at, which I guess was still floating, and tried to salvage the drugs that had not been blown up.

Now, if you climb back in the boat, and the boat is still afloat and it still has, I don't know, half of its drugs there, why wouldn't they be allowed to shoot again? That pretty much would be a continuation of what it was that got them missiled in the first place. So if the first missile made sense, the second missile made sense because they had not finished the job. So ABC News is very much supporting the administration's point of view without saying they're doing that, but factually it would support their version that the job wasn't finished. All they did was finish the job, which I think would be completely allowed. I'm no JAG or military guy, but it seems to me that's all you need to know. If a full boat was a problem then half a boat was a problem too. So we'll see.

And then I saw that Senator Mark Warner was on one of the shows, Morning Joe I guess, and he said that in many ways the uniformed military may help save us from this president. What? Seriously, a sitting senator is saying in public that the military might be how we save ourselves from this president. Does he not know that sounds like an insurrectionist or a sedition or a coup or something terribly inappropriate? If you're even suggesting in America that you need the military to control your president instead of our current situation where you have a military leader of the military, you have a civilian leader of the military. Does he really not know how that sounds? Because to me it sounds like the worst thing you could ever say in public if you're a sitting senator. I mean, seriously, name one thing that would be worse than that. He could say something racist, but then that would just be his problem, right? He could say something that's not true, but that would be business as usual for a senator. What could he say that would be worse than suggesting you might need the military to take out the president or somehow control the president? I can't think of anything that would be worse than that. That is the dumbest, most dangerous thing you'll ever hear a senator say. Unfreakingbelievable, but it happened.

And then I'd like to tell you this story. You know, this one right here that my printer has completely hidden from me. I'll bet it was a good story, but we'll have to go without that today.

Meanwhile, Rasmussen reports, who you should follow on X, they've been following the whole election integrity thing and especially the Venezuelan Smartmatic connection. Now, because I don't want to be sued, there's nothing I'm going to say next about this story that I know to be true. These are allegations from other people. And apparently we have some Venezuelan general is in a US jail and the general he was a three-star general in Venezuela and he was among other things he was the director of military intelligence right so that's pretty serious job Venezuelan three-star general director of military intelligence and he wrote a letter to Trump saying that the Smartmatic system can be altered and this is a fact. He said this technology was later exported abroad according to the United States. So he says that quote I do not claim that every election is stolen but I state with certainty that elections can be rigged with the software that would be the Smartmatic software and has been used to do so.

Now, why would he be doing that? Now you can't really trust it, right? You know, you're not going to trust the jailed Venezuelan general. If there were a type of person to not trust, I would say, well, put at the top of the list a jailed director of military intelligence from Venezuela. So I'm going to say his credibility is as low as you could possibly get. However, and I'm assuming that he's trying to angle for maybe a pardon or something that I can't imagine why else he'd be doing it. But that doesn't mean it's true. It does mean he was in a position to know if it's true. So I think you could say for certain that he knows whether that's true, what he's saying. And it seems like our FBI or somebody should be talking to him and hooking him up to some lie detector and maybe see if they can catch him in some kind of inconsistency or something. But I'd sure like to know if there's anything to it, wouldn't you?

Does it feel to you that the election stuff, especially the voting machine stuff, does it feel to you a lot like climate change used to where you knew there was something wrong, but the entire world seemed to act like there wasn't something wrong and you just felt like you were in some kind of weird not real situation because I would say to myself, you know, this climate change stuff. How do you not see that this is maybe not every part of it, but isn't it super obvious? And yet most of the people would be on the side of a thing that looked to me like super obviously fake.

Now, I don't have any specific knowledge that our elections were rigged, but I do have this thought, which is a very powerful one. What