but I don't see anything wrong with it. The people involved all seem credible, at least the ones who are named. There are some whistleblowers who are not named. So that's always a red flag, the unnamed whistleblowers. But let me just read what she says is reality. Okay? And pay attention to all this because it's just mind-blowing, but I don't know if it's real. So after I'm done, I'll ask you and then in the comments, you tell me. Does that sound real?

All right. So Emerald Robinson on X. Number one, a few weeks before the 2024 election, Senator Mullen and former Senator David Perdue finally arranged a meeting between Trump adviser Susie Wiles and the one man who could explain exactly how America's election systems are rigged. Who do you think the one man is? Who is the one man who actually would be able to know if the elections are rigged? Well, the meeting took place at Mar-a-Lago. Susie Wiles had publicly said that the election fraud was not real and that people who thought so were crazy. That was a popular line of thought at the time. After the briefing, she didn't know what to think because it sounds pretty credible. And then she asked for a piece of cake. She ate it slowly, which I love the writing. That isn't that great writing? It goes from talking about whether the election was rigged and she had her mind changed and she had a piece of cake. She ate it slowly. That's just good writing.

Then she made the decision Trump's team should be briefed too. All right. So the idea that the elections were rigged had not been getting through to Susie Wiles. She had been presumably not taking that message to anybody because she wasn't convinced. Now she was convinced or at least convinced enough that she thought they needed to hear it. That doesn't mean it's true, but that she apparently couldn't see a problem with it.

Number three, in the end, the man, we don't know who the man is yet, but the man who by her telling is the one person who could figure out if the elections were rigged. In the end, the man stayed at Mar-a-Lago for three days to brief everyone. There was only one man who Wiles trusted to confirm it all: Elon Musk. A call was made. The man found himself in a room with Musk. So this is a man, the man is not Musk, but he was put in a room with Musk because Musk would be good at figuring out if this was true or a bunch of BS. Musk declined to sit through a full briefing and he said, "Just give me your data." That sounds very much like Elon Musk, doesn't it? He wouldn't sit through the briefing, but he definitely wanted to see the data. So Elon Musk read the AI summary. So I guess he used AI to summarize a bunch of data that they gave him. So he read the AI summary of the technical data and then he picked up his phone and made a call. Quote, "We have a problem. It's true." Th