ews.

Speaking of DEI, the California Globe, Katie Grimes is writing that Governor Newsom, I didn't know about this, but apparently did you know that California had an equity task force that had recommendations on how to take land away from white farmers and distribute it to non-white farmers in California? You probably thought I said South Africa, right? In California recently, this is recent, the governor was behind a task force that was trying to figure out how to take the farms away from white people and make it more equitably distributed.

Now do I think that it would be great if farms were equitably available to everybody? Yeah, that'd be great. I have no problem with that. However, if you already have a situation where a bunch of white farmers own farms, you don't want to get there by taking it from them or forcing them to be unable to buy farms and then just saying the only people can have a farm from now on until everything's equal are either Native Americans or some other disadvantaged group. How is that going to turn out? How much do you think the efficiency of the farms is going to decrease if you artificially say we're going to take the experienced farmers and we're going to block them from owning farms or decrease their impact on the farms? But we take these inexperienced farmers, not for any it's not their fault that they're inexperienced, but we're going to move the farms to people who didn't have as much experience.

Again, it wouldn't matter if we were talking about only Albanians. If you take the farms from the Albanians who know how to farm and you give it to the Albanians who don't have the same experience to farm, what is going to happen to the price of food? It only goes one way. You know, nobody doubts how that's going to turn out. And that's happening in my actual state in the current day. So there's no way that that is anything but going to drive up food prices.

And I guess the report from this group recommends the development of local ordinances to restrict citizens from purchasing land unless they're part of certain minority groups. In the United States, in the United States, you would be blocked from buying land based on your ethnicity in 2025. It's unfucking believable.

All right. Well, here's an update on the voting machines. I've told you before that one of my favorite sources for following up on the allegations of voting irregularities is the Rasmussen Reports on X. And I don't have a sense of what kind of allegations about the voting machines are true and what ones are not true. But the allegations themselves are really interesting. And here again, you can decide how much of this is fact and how much of this is just allegation. I do not make any claims of fact because I don't want to get sued.

But here's what the Rasmussen Report has summarized and updated us. You may have heard of all these individually, but when you see them all in the big list, it's kind of impactful.

All right. So on X Rasmussen Report writes that Smartmatic that would be the software people were federally indicted in October. So indicted doesn't mean guilty, but they were indicted. Then Dominion, that would be the hardware company, was quote sold in September under secret terms. I wonder what that's about. And the election systems currently in use have reportedly been newly examined by feds and are apparently full of illegal Chinese sourced components. So again, that doesn't mean that the machines are rigged, but you have to wonder why they have Chinese components in them that might make that possible.

So remember, these are allegations. I don't know what's true. And allegedly, according to Rasmussen Reports, Tulsi Gabbard is being prevented from publishing her completed official report about the voting machines. I don't know why she would be prevented or who would prevent it. The former secret Dominion/Huawei data center in Belgrade. Do you remember that part of the story? So the allegation is that somehow the rigging of the machines was executed by going through some kind of Belgrade server system that somehow rigged the election. But now the key engineers hold on and that secret data center in Belgrade that officially and emphatically did not exist. I guess at one point the government said it doesn't even exist. Turns out it did exist and it was allegedly disabled by US government employees. I don't know what they were employees of. Were they employees of some intelligence agency? I don't know. But US government employees disabled it just prior to the 2024 election and it has now been dismantled.

So I've heard the claim that that's the only reason that Trump won is that these government employees disabled the mechanism for the cheating. Again, I don't know that that's a fact. It's an allegation and apparently the engineers that were allegedly involved in that are joined by this former Venezuelan intelligence person who is now in jail. Okay, that makes him suspicious but and that they're collectively they're cooperating with federal authorities. So that would suggest that the feds are on the trail of finding out if or if not those machines were being rigged.

Again this is Rasmussen Reports their summary says after rejecting over two dozen traitors our three-letter agencies are now supposedly helping find bad election actors but they remain unreliable because their own direct criminal involvement. So what that's saying is that there is in fact some effort to get to the bottom of this but there are too many people who are in charge of getting to the bottom of it who are at the bottom of it. So they would slow down things so that their own bad behavior does not get caught. And even so some of the bad people have been weeded out there are so many of them that they may still be holding up the investigation.

True. I don't know. Official state and court adduced evidence of election fraud has been compiled now for every one of the 2020 battleground states, but cowardice and corruption within the American judiciary has completely paralyzed justice. So again, the allegation is that the evidence of a rigged election are there, but that the people whose job it is to make something of it are either afraid or unable to do something with it. I don't know.

The Department of Justice has been forced to sue multiple states to require their compliance with federal election laws. That part is true, but again we don't know if their lack of compliance is evidence of rigging or it's just more of the Democrat plus Republican fighting stuff.

There's a weirdness about the Tina Peters case in Colorado. And then there's an armada that's setting off of Venezuela. So could it be true that one of the things that Trump wants from Venezuela is a full accounting of their alleged role in rigging our systems? What if Maduro said, wait, wait, don't attack. I've got an offer. I'll tell you everything I know about rigging of your systems. If in fact there was any rigging I'll tell you everything we know if you don't attack my country. What would Trump do? What does Trump want more than proof positive that the 2020 election was rigged? Probably nothing. It's hard to — well, I'm exaggerating, but it would certainly be something he'd want a lot. Would he want it enough to assemble an armada? Maybe, maybe because I got to tell you, it's pretty important to me. I would say it's critically important to me to get to the bottom of whether our elections were rigged.

And do you remember how easy it was for me to penetrate the truth? Let me say it again. With no knowledge whatsoever about any of these specific allegations, I have be