Coffee With Scott Adams — Knowledge Archive July 10, 2026
Scott Adams Philosophy Archive
Search ideas
Episodes Episode #22 Segments
MainContent Politics as Persuasion

Back to episode — Episode 22 - Trump’s Personal Attorney’s Office Raided

Context —

And I'll say again as clearly as possible, if the president doesn't do some firing because of this, I'm going to be real disappointed. And when you ask me what do I think of the ramifications, what about the fallout from the firing, what about all the bad things, the marches in the street, what about the protests, what about the violence that would certainly happen? Probably there would be protest…

← Previous segment →

We are still waiting for people who actually know what they're talking about to weigh in. And that usually means somebody like Dershowitz. I cannot wait to hear Alan Dershowitz talk about this because I don't know what Dershowitz is gonna say. And this might be the first time that he and I disagree. I don't know that but it might be. Because I suspect that Dershowitz would speak in terms of the law and what's the best legal strategy, that sort of thing. But I'm not really talking on that level. I no longer care about the law. Sorry. I no longer care about the law. That's not what this is about anymore. This is not about the law. This is about something completely different.

Context —

What if he does not fire anyone? Well, you know, I'm not even sure this will hurt him for re-election because if these guys really dig into this Stormy stuff and they use the stuff they found from this person, the lawyer, to get at him, I'm gonna register to vote, man. That's how I agree. I would be. Do you know how many people like you get to vote if I register? It would be a lot. And this is one…

Next segment → →