Coffee With Scott Adams — Knowledge Archive October 9, 2026
Scott Adams Philosophy Archive
Search ideas

Context —

nough to close that gap. So you might hear this phrase, the margin of litigation. Is he close enough that a legal challenge could make a difference? Don't you think you would find some pleasure if you're a Trump supporter and it turns out Biden is the winner? Would you find some pleasure in watching the Squad tear him apart? Because he's going to get, I mean he'll just get ripped down to the bon…

← Previous segment →

it wasn't fraud if it turns out that the basic facts being alleged are true? Let's say it's true that 128,000 votes appeared suddenly and a hundred percent of them were Biden and that's the story. If that was the final story and we never got any deeper explanation, would you accept this election as valid?

I don't know. To me it would depend a little bit about whether that one change would change the result. If it would, well if it would you've got some real questions there.

Somebody says please don't have a defeatist attitude about this. Wel

Context —

l it's not defeatist. I would say that the odds of a challenge that's got some meat to it is pretty good. I don't know if that wins the day but there's a pretty good chance the president has a case. And if he could find a way to get that case to the Supreme Court, does he have an advantage because of his conservative judges? Maybe so. Somebody says kudos on keeping going today. Well let me ask yo…

Next segment → →