Coffee With Scott Adams — Knowledge Archive August 24, 2026
Scott Adams Philosophy Archive
Search ideas

Context —

ous. Now you know that superfluous means completely unnecessary, right? Everybody got that? That the mandate would have no effect basically. Have no effect if so many vaccinated people are getting infected. How many people think that's a good conclusion? There's somebody here who still thinks I like mandates. How could you be so misinformed? I've only said it every single time I've been on livestr…

← Previous segment →

ings are agreed by science, right? I can't, I mean I haven't tested it myself but science is very clear, assuming they're right, very clear that it takes your risk of death down to trivial and your risk of spreading it is much less. I see James say wrong. So there are people who will be on. Yeah, false. I'm saying. Here's my challenge to you. I'm saying that my audience is split on this. My understanding is that it's really really clear. Like super clear. Way way clear. Like multiples clear. Like the clearest thing you could ever know. The vaccinations reduce your risk and the amount that you spread. Somebody's saying marginal. I'm saying that's completely wrong. That it's not marginal. It's more like seven to one, eleven to one, two hundred to one. I think I read it's like 200 times more likely you'll spread it if you're not vaccinated. 200 times. I don't know if that's right but say it's 11 times or 10 times. Whatever it is it's not close, right? So the rat race says lol. Shark. The

Context —

shark by telling you something you didn't know because most of you are actually confused by the fact that lots of people get infected while vaccinated and therefore the vaccinations don't have a purpose. That is so wrong according to science. Now if science is wrong, well I guess we all got fooled. But you do know that they're unanimous, right? It is unanimous. Let me say it again. I'm pretty sure…

Next segment → →