ssia.

If you look at the pattern, you'd have to say it's most likely untrue, wouldn't you? So far everything our intelligence agencies have told us about Russia was an intentional lie, right? So Russia collusion was an intentional lie by intelligence people, current and retired. The Russia laptop was a lie. And the Russian influence, the level of influence they had in cyber stuff, was a lie. Now that's three lies that involve Russia. They have our own intelligence backing. What is the only information we have that Russia hacked anything? Our intelligence people said so. That's it. There's no other information. So the least credible entity in the United States, which is our own intelligence agencies, when blaming Russia.

And here's another thing that you can say on livestream that I wouldn't bother to say on Twitter. Most of the intelligence people are probably just good people doing their job and they're patriots and we love them, right? But if I said it on Twitter it looks like I'm blaming all intelligence people for everything. It looks like a few members of leadership are bad apples and they were behind all of these things. So it's a very small percentage of the intelligence people. See the difference? If I say the same thing on Twitter without the context, then I become a different personality. I'm a conspiracy theorist and I'm blaming, you know, I hate the United States and nothing like that's happening.

All right. So yeah, I don't believe anything about Russian hacking of American anything, really.

Did you see that idiot Robert Barnes, I forget if I mentioned this, he tweeted or he wrote in his blog that I personally, the creator of the Dilbert comic strip, am too gullible and believing institutional data. Does that sound like a good analysis? I'm literally the world's most famous doubter of institutional information. If you were to take all eight billion people on the planet Earth and rank them by how prominently they've doubted institutional information, I believe I'd be number one out of eight billion people. Now Robert Barnes imagined that I was believing and I was highly gullible and I would believe institutional information when really I should have been believing rogues. I don't know. He's kind of ridiculous. Now it looks like he's having some kind of a meltdown, doesn't it? Is anybody watching Robert Barnes' reaction to this? It looks like a meltdown because the things he's saying about me are actually, they border on insane. Yeah.

And the clot birds, you can tell the clot birds, they're weighing in now on YouTube. The clot birds are all confused why I got vaccinated. Right, that's confusing because you don't know the context. If the clot birds followed me on a livestream more religiously than they are right now, they would know that I made the same decision as Dr. Robert Malone, one of the most prominent critics of the vaccination policies. I say the same thing he did. It at the same time and for the same reason. I think he waited until we saw what adverse reactions were right away. That's not all of them. There could be, but if you've gone six months your odds are much better. And then so he could go on vacation with my ex-wife. So he could fly internationally. That's why I did it. That's why a lot of people did it.

So if you didn't know that context and you were on Twitter, you say Clod Adams, you must be in favor of the vaccination. If you watch me on livestream, you know that the reason I waited six months when I could have gotten it right away, I was qualified early on because of my age and comorbidities, but I waited as long as I could until the