t if it's something like this? It caught my eye either six percent of the public is sensitive to gluten and almost the same number believe they had vaccine side effects. Do you think it could be as simple as there's some people who have a specific allergy and they did have bad outcomes with the vax? Yeah I don't know. I don't know if the vaccine is something you can have an allergy to because it has to be alive. Doesn't have to be alive to give you an allergic reaction technically. Oh I think it does. It doesn't have to be alive to give you I think there's like a technical definition that requires something to be alive but you could have a bad reaction to something that's not alive so it looks the same.

All right so here's what I'd say. I would say this is super alarming in the same way that the VAERS reports are but if you take it too much beyond that then you'd be into pretty speculative range. All right so I'd be worried about it. Apparently there's another report on one of the vaccinations giving strokes to even older people because we know there's some extra risks with the younger people so one of them might actually have some older people risk but they're looking into that. Drip drip drip.

So I was listening to a Spaces that audio program on Twitter and there was a conversation about the vaccine injury and stuff and Alex Berenson was there and they were talking about the fact that there are more vaccinated people being hospitalized and having bad outcomes than unvaccinated and it was an extended conversation. And while I was listening to it I didn't hear the whole thing I didn't hear anybody bring up the obvious point that whether the vaccines work or don't work at least the way we currently you know the way the doctors currently say they work which is not stopping the spread but rather helping you survive. Whether so here's what they were not saying. How would you interpret the fact that it's mostly the heavily boosted? More boosters you have the more likely you have a bad outcome. What's your interpretation of that? Your interpretation is that the vaccine not only doesn't work it gives you a negative impact right? Because that's not my interpretation. Well that seems to be the way everybody else is interpreting it and I'm trying to figure out is it me?

All right here's my interpretation. What group of people are most likely to get boosted? The people who spend the most time around people in crowds because they would have the most chance of getting infected and the people who are weak and old and have comorbidities. If you took just the group of people who have comorbidities and are around lots of people and compared to them you know forget about vaccinations just compare the people who are weak and around a lot of people to the people who are healthy and not around a lot of people would they have the same amount of outcomes? It should be hugely different right? The old people are dying like crazy. The young people it's just a sniffle r