be a mix. But I think it's all bad for kids.

Are you aware that Representative Dan Crenshaw and also Michael Waltz, both Republicans, issued a joint resolution authorizing Biden to use military force to combat the cartels pumping fentanyl and other stuff into the country? So that's all good.

Now remember, my current political stand is that I'm going to back for president whoever has the best fentanyl policy. So far that's Trump because Trump also says use the military against the cartels. Crenshaw is saying something similar, but as far as we know he's not running for president.

How did I get this far with my microphone not on? Is that better? I'm sorry.

So if Crenshaw runs for president, then I will have a dilemma because then I would have to choose between Trump and Crenshaw. Now I know what you're going to say. Some of you are going to say, no, not Crenshaw. I dislike him for my five reasons. Don't care. Do not care. Yeah, don't even tell me what you don't like about him. Warmonger? Sure, whatever. Don't care. If he would have the best policy on fentanyl — and so far it would just be a tie, you know. So far Trump still has the advantage. But hypothetically, and I'm doing this just to warn you, right, because I don't want you to have any shock, I will abandon Trump in a hot flash. I will abandon him so fast if somebody has a better idea on fentanyl. Only fentanyl. One issue. It's all I care about. Everything else, you know, deep state's going to do what deep state does.

But congratulations to Crenshaw for having his priorities straight. He said one thing that was — or I don't know if he said this, but the news reported that Crenshaw said this. Now this can't possibly be true and I want you to maybe help me here. Did the news just report it wrong or did he misstate this or is this actually true? I'll just read wh