Episode 2005 Scott Adams - Pretending To Care About Kids, Bill Maher & CNN, China Can't Make Chips
Find my "extra" content on Locals: https://ScottAdams.Locals.com Content: ----------- - Bill Maher to slightly join CNN - Kids getting dumber because of smartphones? - Dan Crenshaw's strong anti-fentanyl stance - China's state managed manufacturing system - Excess COVID deaths or psychogenic death? - MSNBC Yasmin Vossoughian's Myocarditis ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.
Everybody, welcome to the highlight of civilization, the best thing that's ever happened to you by far. And let's all take this experience up to levels where other people will be jealous. Yeah, the reason to feel good is to make other people feel bad
View segment →. Don't lose sight of that. And if you want to make them feel really bad, all you need is a copper mug or a glass or a tankard, chalice, a canteen, yoga flask — the vessel of the Medica — and fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the thing…
View segment →of the day, the thing that makes everything better. Everything. It's called the simultaneous sip. Congratulations, you made it on time. I see some people just got here at the nick of time, and your day will be perfect today. Then what a day you're gonna have. In fact, I'm going to give you a little…
View segment →good stuff as more important than the bad stuff that day. So it might be just a psychological phenomenon. Or we live in a simulation and that's how you steer it by your intentions, because all evidence does suggest that's the case. One day. That's all I'm asking. Just one day every now and then, rem…
View segment →Well, at the same time that the price of eggs is going through the roof because of avian flu, there was some big egg production facility that burned down. Does that sound like a coincidence? That at the same time the eggs are in great demand and high priced, that a major egg facility would burn down…
View segment →n make you feel good before you go to bed. Anyway, keep an eye on that. I do have a feeling about it which is just one of those that feels like, you know how people always think in analogies. So if something reminds you of someth
View segment →ing else, you irrationally think that the thing it reminded you of is telling you something about the thing. It probably isn't. That's just two things that remind you of each other. But here's what it reminds me of. When I used to own restaurants locally, when I saw a restaurant start to serve brun…
View segment →, am I right? I mean, there's some politicians on board, but it's mostly that grew up from the bottom up. That wasn't the top-down thing. All of the top-down stuff is anti-children. I don't know. Is that a coincidence that it's all anti-children? All of it? Because it is. It's all anti-children. I…
View segment →you make any breakthroughs in artificial intelligence today? I didn't. I really didn't do anything. So it almost doesn't matter how smart I am. I just have to be able to take care of myself and that's it. The one percent of smart people who have always been with us are still doing what they always…
View segment →be a mix. But I think it's all bad for kids. Are you aware that Representative Dan Crenshaw and also Michael Waltz, both Republicans, issued a joint resolution authorizing Biden to use military force to combat the cartels pumping fentanyl and other stuff into the country? So that's all good. Now r…
View segment →at the news said. Crenshaw, the architect of the bill, last Congress told Fox News Digital that the cartels quote are responsible for about 360,000 homicides this year in Mexico. That couldn't possibly be true, is it? 360,000 murders in one year in Mexico? No, that's not plausible. That is not plau…
View segment →ology. Did we say this about Japan when I was young? Didn't we say, oh, the Japanese, there's something about their culture. They'll never want to take a chance, so therefore they'll never build any technology because they don't want to. There's something about their culture. Well, Japan is doing o…
View segment →es into some corruption black box. So the opportunity for corruption among the Chinese system is that a lot of the money is going to get siphoned off for projects that were not good ideas but somebody had the clout to get it funded from the government. So China's system is based on who you are, how…
View segment →cused of doing, is this the one that people care the least about? Have you ever met even one person who said, oh, I thought he'd be a good president but once I found out he used campaign money for campaign purposes to make the Stormy Daniels thing go away, I don't know if I could support somebody wh…
View segment →that's likely to run out. Now I don't think my publisher knows that yet, but I'm almost positive this will be the biggest book I've ever written and I think the biggest book in the world, not counting religious books. That's what I think. That's based on just looking at it myself and I look at it. I…
View segment →Everybody, welcome to the highlight of civilization, the best thing that's ever happened to you by far. And let's all take this experience up to levels where other people will be jealous. Yeah, the reason to feel good is to make other people feel bad. Don't lose sight of that.
And if you want to make them feel really bad, all you need is a copper mug or a glass or a tankard, chalice, a canteen, yoga flask — the vessel of the Medica — and fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the thing that will be the end of the day, the thing that makes everything better. Everything. It's called the simultaneous sip.
Congratulations, you made it on time. I see some people just got here at the nick of time, and your day will be perfect today. Then what a day you're gonna have. In fact, I'm going to give you a little technique to try today. So I've tried this and it works every time I do it, and it's kind of freaky because it's not obvious why it would work.
It goes like this: Today is the day something good is going to happen. Just tell yourself that all day long and watch what happens. Just say, I think I feel like some good luck's coming. Today's the day. It's gonna be a good day. Wow, today's gonna be a good day. Some good stuff coming.
Now it might be that you talk yourself into seeing the good stuff as more important than the bad stuff that day. So it might be just a psychological phenomenon. Or we live in a simulation and that's how you steer it by your intentions, because all evidence does suggest that's the case. One day. That's all I'm asking. Just one day every now and then, remind yourself something good is going to happen today. I can feel it. It's coming. See what happens. You'll be amazed.
Well, at the same time that the price of eggs is going through the roof because of avian flu, there was some big egg production facility that burned down. Does that sound like a coincidence? That at the same time the eggs are in great demand and high priced, that a major egg facility would burn down? Now I believe this is a case of, well, it's obvious who did it. Do I have to say it? It's obvious. No, it was the egg white supremacists. The egg white supremacists. That's who I think did it. Yes, it did kick off many bad puns. I won't repeat them all. Just that one. Do the rest among yourselves.
The big news entertainment-wise is that Bill Maher is going to slightly be on CNN. Oh, he's not moving his show to CNN. He's just sort of slightly, tangentially, a little bit, sometimes, kind of flirting with the idea of a little bit of content on CNN. So on Friday nights, the extra part of his show that's on HBO, Real Time, the extra part after the end of the show where they sit around and keep talking, the extra part will be on CNN late at night on Fridays.
Because usually his show is only once a week. Now, is this a reaction to Gutfeld? Are they testing the waters? Will CNN test Bill Maher for a little bit at that time and then say to themselves, we should be running this kind of content at this time all the time, because people want to see funny news, not like hard news before they go to bed? So I think that's one of Gutfeld's magic tricks, that he can make you feel good before you go to bed.
Anyway, keep an eye on that. I do have a feeling about it which is just one of those that feels like, you know how people always think in analogies. So if something reminds you of something else, you irrationally think that the thing it reminded you of is telling you something about the thing. It probably isn't. That's just two things that remind you of each other.
But here's what it reminds me of. When I used to own restaurants locally, when I saw a restaurant start to serve brunch when normally they were just a lunch and dinner place, as soon as they would offer brunch you knew they were going out of business. Do you know why? Because brunch is a terrible business. It's like a last-ditch thing to do. Like if you've given up on making money the normal way, you try to do brunch. It never works. It's like the ultimate thing that never works.
Nobody ever goes to the lunch and dinner place for brunch. Do you know why? Because they're used to it as the lunch and dinner place. They can't really — it doesn't really ever become a breakfast place. The only places that do it are breakfast places. If a place is a breakfast place, people go to breakfast there. Otherwise their minds just can't wrap around it.
So when I see CNN trying to scoop up the leftovers from Bill Maher on HBO, that looks to me a lot like brunch, if you know what I mean. Sort of a Hail Mary, desperation, try-anything kind of thing. But if I want to look at it as a more aggressive approach, I would say they're testing out their audience to see if they can maybe compete for his full show. What do you think?
I don't know if he'd want to do it every night though. I don't think he wants to do a nightly show. But maybe he would. Maybe he would. You never know.
My music teacher — well, I won't say it. I'll just say a music teacher. I shouldn't have said that and now I can't do the story because I didn't want to identify it. Skipping that story. Going right to the next one.
So does it seem to you that kids are getting dumber because of smartphones? How many would say that the children, the youth, are getting dumber because of smartphones? A lot of people say yes, somewhat reflexively. Now what do you think you would find — don't do this yet, but what do you think you would find if you were to go to Google and Google "are smartphones making children dumber"? What do you think you'd find as the top result from Google, who I believe would like everybody to use a smartphone?
Do you think that Google would say, oh, here's the research showing these smartphones, which were a big part of it, are bad for you? What do you think? Well, the top result, or one of the top results, or actually the top curated results — so if you go to Google and you look for something that other people have looked for a lot, Google will help you by curating a quick hit that's like all you need to know. You can look deeper, but it's basically the answer to the question. But it's curated, meaning it's not just a natural way that you search and the good stuff comes up first. Somebody at Google decided that the first thing you should see when you click on it is this: The arguments that smartphones are making us dumber don't hold up. Explain, some PhD cognitive scientist, blah blah. And that's the opposite: that smartphones are making us smarter.
What do you think about that? Do you think smartphones make you dumber or make you smarter? Well, maybe there's a trick to it. Maybe there's a trick. Here's the trick. If I say to you, are smartphones making you smarter, who is "you"? See, it seems obvious, right? You is you, and then your phone is separate. Your phone is there and this is you.
But this answer that smartphones are making you smarter treats you like a cyborg. You're part phone and part person. And if you look at the person as part phone, connected to the internet and part person, we're way smarter. What do you think of that? So it might be true that the organic part of our cyborg being is getting some less abilities. Yeah, it might be decreasing as memorization ability. But at the same time we're no longer just an organic entity. We're a cyborg. We're part machine, part human. And the machine part is awesome. You know, it more than makes up for what we're losing in cognitive abilities.
So do you buy that? And do you buy that it's a total coincidence that Google, a company that would really like you to look at a screen a lot, that a big company like that wants you to know that you're just getting better and stronger and smarter because you're part computer and part person? And how could that be bad?
Now there are lots of studies that would suggest the opposite. So other studies that don't look at you as a cyborg and see you just as your organic part, there's lots of indications that we're getting more distracted and shorter retention spans, that kind of stuff.
Can we tie a few things together here? So I did an unscientific Twitter poll and I asked people what will destroy the lives of more children. And the choices were pandemic policies — so that would include everything from vaccinations to masks to shutdowns to Zoom class, all that. So the pandemic policies, or smartphones and social media being called out as a big part of that, or COVID-19 itself, you know, the actual virus.
So the number of people who thought that the most people of these choices that COVID-19 would destroy the lives of more children was 2%. Two percent thought COVID was the thing that would destroy the most children. Coming in second was all of the pandemic policies put together, 25%. Twenty-five percent. That's about a quarter of the people. Interesting.
The other people said 73% said it was the smartphones and social media. I don't want to make too much of the 25%, but what do you think? Seventy-three percent think the smartphone was worse than everything in the pandemic. Seventy-three percent think it was worse than the COVID itself and worse than the response to the COVID, from vaccinations to masks to Zoom school.
So that's how many people think smartphones are like a serious danger to children. Do you see a big movement to ban smartphones for children? I don't. There's none, is there? I tweeted it the other day and I got a lot of support, but there's nothing in the government that's going to ban smartphones now because the big tech companies have too much control. That's never going to happen.
Can we stop pretending we care about children? Could we just stop lying about it? Because I feel like it's bad enough that we're putting children in these situations. That's bad enough. But we're also lying about it while we're doing it. Obviously we don't care about children. In fact, I will go further. I believe wars, general wars, the kind where you're shooting and killing, wars are about sacrificing young people to protect old people, aren't they? You put the young people on the front line, cannon fodder, to protect the old people and the retirements. We've never cared about young people. It's just never been.
And in fact, if you go back for most of civilization, children were just an asset that could maybe make you some money or protect you from your enemies. But basically it wasn't all about the kids. The kids were just like the animals. You know, they're just part of the system. So I find it distasteful that we even pretend that we care about children when it's so obvious we don't.
So obvious. Do you know why parents give up on phones when they should be tough? Why do parents give up and say, all right, you can have your phone but not after 9 p.m. Okay, you can have your phone after 9 p.m. Why do most parents do that? Because it's too hard to take it away. It's just too hard. And the kid is less trouble when they're on their phone. They're not making trouble in the back seat of the car. It's sort of like television. You know, people use television as a babysitter because it works. It works really well. And the phones are just that.
So I think we're destroying our children. Seventy-three percent of you know it completely. And at least the pandemic policies are mopping up whatever you haven't destroyed with smartphones. But do you see any indication — so look at the state of our public schools. Look at our public schools. Just all of it. Just all of it. Look at smartphones and then look at how we treated kids during the pandemic and you tell me that we care about children. Seriously, tell me we care about children.
Now I do think that every parent does. I believe that. I believe every parent cares about their children, and a lot. No different than it never has been. But as an entity, a group, as a country, you can't tell us we care about children. Come on. Yeah, there's fentanyl. Fentanyl is just an obvious one. Stop saying we care about the young. We don't. If we wouldn't do any — you know, homeschooling is growing, but homeschooling is a growth from individual parents, am I right? I mean, there's some politicians on board, but it's mostly that grew up from the bottom up. That wasn't the top-down thing.
All of the top-down stuff is anti-children. I don't know. Is that a coincidence that it's all anti-children? All of it? Because it is. It's all anti-children. I don't know how that ever evolved to be like complete anti-children. But maybe we've always been this way. Yeah, maybe it's just a little more obvious because of the pandemic. But maybe we've always just not cared about children. We just pretend that we feel otherwise because we do care about our own.
So I think we're conflating how much we care about our own kids with how much we care about your kids, you know what I mean? Because that feels like your problem.
A few other things. If you keep looking at the Google searches, you'll see all kinds of science of both sides. So I'm saying it's hurting our attention spans and some saying it isn't. But let me tell you my favorite pushback from this. It's all right, so I'm an old man, old man shouting at the sky, right? So I'm clearly a boomer. I'm clearly in that demographic who says, you know, get a haircut you kids, stop listening to that Elvis Presley and that rock and roll. It's gonna hurt your minds.
So after I make this whole tweet thing about the safety of children, a Twitter username, Steve Stevens — I won't say anything about the creativity of his parents who named him Steve Stevens, but I'll just say that his comment was hilarious. So after talking about how smartphones are hurting the children, he tweets, "You left out pinball and pool halls." Okay, you win. You win. Good. Can we just let Steve Stevens have the win? Stevens for the win. Total win. Yes.
Steve Stevens, who has been around long enough to know that there's never been a time when we didn't say the children are dumb this time, and we've been wrong every time. We always say the children are dumb. Always. Since I was a kid, all that rock and roll was going to destroy our minds and nothing like that ever happened, right?
So this was just such a good comment. You left out pinball and pool halls because they're gonna rot those children's minds.
Here's what I think is true. The truth is that the only smart people who matter are the top one percent, and they're probably no different than they ever were. In fact, there might be more of them. Did you invent any microchips today? I didn't. I didn't. Did you make any breakthroughs in artificial intelligence today? I didn't. I really didn't do anything. So it almost doesn't matter how smart I am. I just have to be able to take care of myself and that's it.
The one percent of smart people who have always been with us are still doing what they always do. They invent the future and then we live in it. So it doesn't matter if the average person can memorize a poem. Somebody else said the other thing the kids can't do today — ever since the invention of writing, they haven't been able to memorize ten thousand word poems. I thought to myself that is so perfect. Because you know when the invention of writing came along, somebody probably said, all right, look, with all of this writing, kids are no longer going to be able to memorize 10,000 word poems like they can easily. So let's get rid of the writing, Gramps.
Yeah, Rush Limbaugh said ten percent carry the rest. It's way less than 10 percent if you're talking about the people who've invented the future, right? You know, Elon Musk isn't in the 10 percent. He's in the one percent.
So my argument will be this. I believe the smartphones have made us different and they've made some people smarter in some ways, but it also probably changed their attention span. Did that hurt us? It depends. It might hurt some people in some weird ways. What I imagine is that the average person can scroll through a screen way faster than the ancients could have. I feel like they optimized for insane amounts of information.
So what does a kid optimize for in the boring past? In the boring past we were optimized to survive boredom. That's all I remember of my youth: pain and boredom. That's it. Pain and boredom. That was my entire youth. I was either in pain or I was bored. I only had two reactions. So it was horrible.
Now kids are full of so much stimulation. Do you think that a kid today is more or less able to handle complexity? I don't know. I mean, I'm just throwing out some suggestions. They might be more. It's possible less. It's possible less. But I think more. I think more because they handle complexity every day with their interfaces and social everything. But they may be giving up some interpersonal skills. They might be giving up some concentration. But do they need it?
What would be more important? Let me ask you this. Which skill would be more important in 2023? The ability to really focus deeply on a single subject for a long time, or the ability to quickly skim all kinds of useful information quickly using your smartphone? I know I see people learning like crazy because they have phones. Don't you know somebody who Googles everything? You're in the conversation, like one minute into it they're Googling just to fact check you or to add a thing or to find out a new thing.
You know that didn't exist before. There's no way smartphones aren't making us a lot smarter in some ways while at the same time taking something away. So I think we could confirm that we're changing. I don't know if it's bad yet. Might be a mix. But I think it's all bad for kids.
Are you aware that Representative Dan Crenshaw and also Michael Waltz, both Republicans, issued a joint resolution authorizing Biden to use military force to combat the cartels pumping fentanyl and other stuff into the country? So that's all good.
Now remember, my current political stand is that I'm going to back for president whoever has the best fentanyl policy. So far that's Trump because Trump also says use the military against the cartels. Crenshaw is saying something similar, but as far as we know he's not running for president.
How did I get this far with my microphone not on? Is that better? I'm sorry.
So if Crenshaw runs for president, then I will have a dilemma because then I would have to choose between Trump and Crenshaw. Now I know what you're going to say. Some of you are going to say, no, not Crenshaw. I dislike him for my five reasons. Don't care. Do not care. Yeah, don't even tell me what you don't like about him. Warmonger? Sure, whatever. Don't care. If he would have the best policy on fentanyl — and so far it would just be a tie, you know. So far Trump still has the advantage. But hypothetically, and I'm doing this just to warn you, right, because I don't want you to have any shock, I will abandon Trump in a hot flash. I will abandon him so fast if somebody has a better idea on fentanyl. Only fentanyl. One issue. It's all I care about. Everything else, you know, deep state's going to do what deep state does.
But congratulations to Crenshaw for having his priorities straight. He said one thing that was — or I don't know if he said this, but the news reported that Crenshaw said this. Now this can't possibly be true and I want you to maybe help me here. Did the news just report it wrong or did he misstate this or is this actually true? I'll just read what the news said.
Crenshaw, the architect of the bill, last Congress told Fox News Digital that the cartels quote are responsible for about 360,000 homicides this year in Mexico. That couldn't possibly be true, is it? 360,000 murders in one year in Mexico? No, that's not plausible. That is not plausible. I'm sorry. 36,000 might be. Would you accept 36,000? 36,000 is a lot. That would be a lot of murder. But 360,000? No.
So can we do a fact check on that? Because my belief is that — oh, 370 per day. What's wrong with a little hyperbole? Well, that's a lot of hyperbole. Yeah, that's a lot of hyperbole. Because if it were really 360,000 murders in a year, the Mexican government would be begging us to send in the military, wouldn't they? Am I wrong about that? If it were really 360,000 a year just in Mexico in one year, they would be begging us for the military. That can't possibly be true.
Would you believe 25,000? I would, yeah. I would believe 36,000. I mean, I wouldn't know if it's true, but it's within the credible range. So that's weird.
Let's talk about China. Wall Street Journal has an opinion piece. I'm trying to decide if it's racist. Every time I hear that China can't develop technology, you know, because they have something about their system, they can't develop technology. Did we say this about Japan when I was young? Didn't we say, oh, the Japanese, there's something about their culture. They'll never want to take a chance, so therefore they'll never build any technology because they don't want to. There's something about their culture.
Well, Japan is doing okay. Seems like they fixed that. Now we're doing the same thing about China, that there's something about their system or something about, I don't know, the culture that makes them not be able to make microchips. On the surface, doesn't that just sound like a racist sort of thing that we're looking for support for? Like we're looking for confirmation bias. But it feels like it starts with racism, doesn't it? Am I wrong about that? Am I too woke? Is that too woke? Because that might be me. Or maybe I'm just so primed for it that — well, I'll give you the argument, right?
So I'm going to give you the argument. I suspect I just feel like it may have started in the wrong place and then they work backwards to the argument. But we'll give them the benefit of the doubt. Okay, and here's the argument. Now this first part is a pretty good argument. In the U.S. system, funding for big companies usually starts with small companies and it's private. You know, venture capitalists and angels and stuff. And so there are tons of people in the market and they're watching their money pretty closely. If a venture capitalist gives you a million dollars, they're going to attend your meetings, right? They're going to make sure you spent their million dollars right.
So we have a system in which the funding for tech is monitored and managed by the people who gave them the funding. So the funders are very close to the process, literally in the room, same room. In China it's a state-managed process. So the state decides which industries they're going to be promoting. They decided they would do chips. It's a good idea. So then at the top of the government they release a gazillion dollars — I think it was going to be like a trillion dollars or something eventually, just huge amounts of money. And then who does it go to? Who does it go to? Well, it doesn't go to anybody who's not part of the Communist Party.
Did you know that if you're not in the Communist Party you don't get any of the money? So right there they basically taken out part of what works in the United States. Because in the United States you just have to be good at what you're doing. Over there you have to also be in the Communist Party. It's one inefficiency, right? They're missing anybody who's not. But I don't know what percentage are not, frankly. So maybe it's not as big a deal as I think.
Secondly, the higher your rank as a technology person, the higher you rank in the Communist Party, the more funding you're going to get. So that it's based not on the quality of the project but on the status of the person who asked for the money. Again, there's no way in the world that doesn't hurt their system. Now, but you could argue it's the same here. It just looks different, right? You could argue that if Elon Musk starts another company and if he were to ask for investments, which he typically doesn't, people would say, oh, okay, we'll definitely give you money. So it could be that the important people always get the most money anyway, you know, however you slice it. But I think our system works better there.
But here's the big part. So if the Chinese government at the top releases a billion dollars for something, it first goes to the biggest communist who wants the money. And then after that it just goes into some corruption black box. So the opportunity for corruption among the Chinese system is that a lot of the money is going to get siphoned off for projects that were not good ideas but somebody had the clout to get it funded from the government.
So China's system is based on who you are, how much corruption you're involved in, and looking good to the Communist Party. Our system is almost entirely, brutally based on performance. And I have to admit if their system did not adjust to this problem, I don't see how they could. I don't see how they could build anything.
And I think there was another reason given which was it was mostly corruption. Here's the part that really raised my red flag. So this is an opinion piece. I won't even tell you who the opinion is from, but it's in the Wall Street Journal. Let's see: Dreams and passions are impractical and expensive and even silly. So he's talking about the typical Chinese culture that dreams and passions are impractical and expensive and even silly and they must be discarded. And he says if China can't cultivate free thinkers, you know, it's always going to be a follower.
Do you think China can't cultivate free thinkers? Or does that just sound super racist to you? Because it sounds super racist to me. Because you know who else can't cultivate free thinkers who make a difference? The United States. Because 98% of us are not contributing anything that our free thought made a difference to. I didn't invent any chips. Did you?
I know I feel like the top one percent of Chinese effective scientists and technical people probably just like everybody else. So I don't know. I'm not buying this whole cultural thing. There's definitely something going on that they're not keeping up, but I think it has more to do with the funding, probably the funding more than anything.
All right, Rachel Maddow, who I watched just for humor purposes, watching her face contort when she's trying to sell you some anti-Trump stuff. Now first of all, watching Rachel Maddow do anti-Trump content feels like 70 years ago. It doesn't feel current anymore, does it? It just feels really kind of old, kind of stale. But she's working. She's really making a big deal about the fact that Trump is now going to be prosecuted for giving money to Stormy Daniels to not talk, but it was campaign financing money.
Now of all the things that Trump is accused of doing, is this the one that people care the least about? Have you ever met even one person who said, oh, I thought he'd be a good president but once I found out he used campaign money for campaign purposes to make the Stormy Daniels thing go away, I don't know if I could support somebody who used campaign funds to benefit his campaign. I don't. I can't support that. Is there even one person who cares about that story? Seriously.
Now I get that your Rob Reiner types are hoping that this is what takes Trump out. But do you think Rob Reiner cares about the story? Does he care that Stormy Daniels got some money that came from donations that actually did — well, if it worked it would have helped Trump get elected. I've never seen the story with less meat on it than this.
Now I'm not saying he won't be prosecuted, but is it going to keep him from being president? Wouldn't it just be a fine? Correct me if I'm wrong. The worst he's talking about is paying a fine, which is somewhat typical. Obama paid one, I think. Has not Obama paid a fine for the same thing? Campaign lapses. It's just the most — if I could tell you one fact that would convince you Trump is going to be your next president, here would be that one fact. You didn't know anything else. It's the only thing you know. It's 2023 and MSNBC is running Rachel Maddow, a major segment talking about the problems with Trump and that payment to Stormy Daniels seven years ago. That's what they have. That is the best they have right now.
What would stop him from being president? See, I think you have to now talk in terms of what could possibly stop him, because I think we're asking the wrong question. You know, who's going to run against him? What could possibly stop him at this point? I don't see anything. I mean, he's been proven basically right on everything important and all they have left are things that nobody cared about in the first place. That's what it looks like to me.
And I don't think DeSantis will run, but I could be wrong. We'll see.
Biden is going to cancel the COVID emergency, whatever laws. So that would mean that nobody would be required by the federal government to mask or get vaccinated. How about that? Do you know why Biden says he's going to cancel it on May 11th? Because Republicans introduced legislation to cancel it sooner. And as Thomas Massie points out, Republicans are already getting results because the news is quite clear that Biden would not have announced this except that he had to counter the Republicans wanting to get rid of the restrictions. And the public very much wants the restrictions to go away.
So it was something that was free money for Republicans. So remember I always look for as a sign of competence: Can you at least pick up the free money? It's just right there on the table. Why are your hands not going toward it? Why are you walking away from the free money? Well, there is Trump again. Trump picked up the free money. Like it's such a reliable indicator. If you can't do the easy stuff, we're not going to trust you to do the hard stuff. But if the money's just laying there on the table, just pick it up.
Thomas Massie saw money laying on the table. It's obvious that the public wants the restrictions lifted. It's obvious that scientifically, health-wise, it's the right time to do it. So they say, Republicans, the smart ones, there's this money on the table. Why don't we just pick it up? And so they picked it up and it made Biden scramble to keep up with them. Now that's what I want to see. I want to see Republicans see free money on the table and then walk over and pick it up and just keep doing that. You don't even have to do anything magical or special. You don't need any character. You don't need any charisma. Just pick up the free money. That's all we're asking. Not that much. Just the free stuff.
I love the fact that we think we live in some kind of objective reality where we've figured out what's true and what's that. And then I mentioned how Sweden did during the COVID epidemic and I triggered yesterday. I triggered a Twitter graph war where everybody was putting up their graph to show that Sweden was either doing poorly or doing great.
And do you know how I can tell which Twitter graphs are the credible ones and which ones are garbage? Do you know? There's a way to know, right? If it's on Twitter it's garbage. Also if it's not on Twitter it's garbage. If it's based on data it's garbage. If it comes from somebody you don't know it's garbage. If their source of it is not shown in the graph, and quite often that's the case on Twitter, that's garbage. So basically we got to this point and we can't even tell if Sweden did a good job or a bad job.
Now I know you think you all know, but when you see the level of fighting on Twitter, the people disagreeing whether it was a good job or a bad job, we don't know. We really don't. It's actually kind of confusing. So the fact that they're younger and thinner and they supplement with vitamin D, I think is most of the story.
But I will go back to my best, probably the best prediction I've ever made at the beginning of the pandemic, that at the end of the pandemic we wouldn't know who managed it well. And everybody who disagreed, oh, we're gonna tell some people are doing it right, some people not. Nope. Can't tell. The narrow place where you can tell is whether people protected the nursing homes, right? So in the case of DeSantis, yes, that was good work. That's one item that you can identify and say okay, compared to New York, the leadership made a difference. Like that's — there's no doubt about that one. But on the country level, on the country level, hard to say. Still don't know.
I know some of you think you might know. Have you ever heard of — oh, then also the excess deaths are still a mystery. Now some of you think all the excess deaths or most of them are vaccine injury related. But the excess deaths seem to be in every demographic and they also seem to be across countries. So the excess deaths are not an American thing. It's everywhere. And I think that they're doing different kinds of vaccines and all kinds of different policies, but still the excess deaths are high wherever we can count them. Well, in the Western countries anyway.
So I will put out one possibility: psychogenic death. How many of you ever heard that term? Psychogenic death. It means basically you lose the will to live and you just die. And I have a hypothesis that when I grew up, no matter how bad things were at the moment, I had in my mind a path to happiness. And that path was you get a good job, you get married, you have a family. American dream. The American dream was very clearly — it was just you could feel it. Like everybody was moving toward it, it seemed like. And no matter how bad things were, you had a future. You had hope, right?
Now compare that to our LGBTQ trans culture. And by the way, I'm a big supporter of the LGBTQ trans community, but we can talk about them honestly, right? And I would say that the American dream had to disappear to make room for this other kind of wokeness. And again, I'm not criticizing it. I'm just describing it. That if you say, well, you know, this, you got to get married and you've got to have a family and go to church on Sunday thing, that doesn't work for everybody. So now it's a free-for-all.
And people are saying that there are more single people than ever, more people alone, people using their phones. Tinder made it impossible to date unless you're a nine or above, right? So basically if you were a kid — and I've heard actually young people say this — there's no future. Now of course there is. There is a future. But it's not cleanly packaged and supplied to children as their hope. Oh yeah, you're having a bad day today. I get it. But look at this American dream. You just get on this American dream path. Everything you're doing today, studying hard, staying in school, you're on the right path, kid. You're doing it right. And here's your happiness in the future. Here's your meaning.
And now if you're a kid you don't see any of that, do you? Who's selling the American dream? Conservatives, homeschoolers, right? Homeschoolers. So my theory is if you tested the psychological well-being of homeschoolers, you would find they have something like hope for the future because the homeschooling community is likely to be more likely to say follow this path and you'll have a good life.
I think public school says you're all being discriminated against. Systemic discrimination is going to hold you back forever. It looks like the police have tried to kill you because you're brown and you better get on the streets and complain because complaining is the thing to do. Complaining will make things better. And it does sometimes. It does. But that message would leave me feeling hopeless if I were a child. I would just say, well, if I don't get married, why am I doing anything? Right? The marriage is more about having children in this case. But what's my future?
Let's say I'm 12-year-old Scott today. I make money for what? For what? For my entertainment? You know, even at 12 I knew I would get bored entertaining myself all day. Oh, I'm going to make money so I can party on the weekends and that's it. Like that's — yeah, oh I can have short encounters with women and that would be a lot of fun. But that's it. That's what I have to look forward to, is brief encounters with women who are having brief encounters with lots of other people. And that's what I'm going to live for.
I'm surprised there isn't higher excess deaths because there's a whole bunch of people who just figured out there's no reason to live. That's why we taught the kids. We taught the kids there's no reason to live. I think we did. So I don't know if that's any of it, but I'd throw that in the mix. It's probably some small part of it.
Here's the most useful thing to know if you're a consumer of news: which news outlets are controlled by the CIA. If you don't know that, you really can't watch the news. You're going to be all confused. Let me give you an example. MSNBC, who people who are smarter than me say is clearly and has always been, as is NBC, captured entities by our intelligence agencies. Right now you might doubt that. You might say, Scott, Scott, that's a little bit of hyperbole. Yeah, they may have leaned on the networks in some ways on some issues, but in general they're independent.
And then there's this story. I'm going to tell you this story and then you tell me if this is independent news. This is pointed out on Twitter by UnHoodwinked, a good follow for you. You should follow UnHoodwinked. There was a nine-minute segment. That's a lot of time on television. Nine minutes on a TV news show is forever. That's a lot of time. He refers to it as the CIA-run MSNBC. All right, that's his characterization. And she's talking about her COVID and how she was diagnosed with pericarditis and myocarditis.
So for nine minutes she talked about how COVID had probably given her pericarditis and myocarditis. For nine minutes. And never mentions her vaccination status. Let me just say that again. An MSNBC host talked for nine minutes about her own quite scary myocarditis — and she was a young woman, right, too young to be having heart problems — for nine minutes, never once mentioned her vaccination status. Is there anything else you need to know about this story? Right? Do you wonder if this is independent reporting?
Do you think she may have mentioned, well, I don't know. Do you think in her first draft — I assume somebody sees her first draft — don't you think her first draft was, well, I don't know what the cause is. You know, I did get vaccinated but I also got COVID and now I have myocarditis. It's hard to know if it's a vaccination or the COVID, but I'm just letting you know my experience so that you can recognize it too. Don't you think the first draft might have said something like that?
Now you could not be more obvious in what you're trying to hide. The story — but suppose you didn't know that MSNBC and NBC are strongly suggested to be Democrat-slash-CIA run. If you didn't know that, you think that was the story? You think that was something like an objective representation of something that's happening? And it wasn't. Not even close to objective.
Now I'm not saying the vaccination caused a problem. I'm not saying that at all. I'm saying if you don't mention it as a possibility, it's just amazing that anybody can watch that network with that kind of situation. All right. The host was a Yasmin Vossoughian, I think. That's all I had to say.
And that, ladies and gentlemen — I feel like there was one other thing I was going to say. Is there a topic I missed? You can blanket blame COVID? Well, indirectly, sure. I'll tell you about that later.
Somebody says Scott is looking for a way out from Trump. It's so transparent. Correct. It's transparent because it's true and it's obvious and I'm telling you right up front. I don't want a president who's over a certain age. Trump in my case, in my personal view, is aged out of the job. So somebody's showing the great insight here and says I think Scott secretly is looking for a way to not support Trump. No, it's not a secret. I'm doing that right in front of you.
If anybody comes up with a better fentanyl plan and they're also — they can walk and talk and they're not 100 years old, I'm going to look at that pretty seriously. Get a look at that really seriously. So don't be surprised. I'm saying it as directly as I can. Fentanyl policy is all I care about. I will drop Trump like a hot rock the minute a legitimate candidate has a better take. And it doesn't even have to be military. I mean, I could imagine somebody coming up with a better take that wasn't attacking Mexico. I just haven't heard it.
Those who bailed out Sam Bankman-Fried, their names can be released. That's interesting. I don't think that'll tell us much.
Any place to pre-order? I'm not sure when you can pre-order my book. It'll be called *Reframe Your Brain*. I think Amazon has a holding place for it, but I don't know if you can order yet. Do they have pre-orders already? They probably don't put it there unless there's a pre-order option. Oh, you ordered it? Okay, I guess I'm selling a book I haven't made yet. So that's pretty good. I mean, I've finished writing it. *Coup a Claude* Adams story. It's a good movie. Why would you pre-order? To make sure you don't run out. This is a book that's likely to run out. Now I don't think my publisher knows that yet, but I'm almost positive this will be the biggest book I've ever written and I think the biggest book in the world, not counting religious books. That's what I think. That's based on just looking at it myself and I look at it. I think everybody's gonna buy this.
Because one of the things I've done is I've dealt with the attention span problem by reducing everything to one sentence. You could kind of skim the argument and see the one sentence and know if the reframe was going to work for you or not. So I think it's got everything. It's got stuff that would change everybody's life a lot.
No, Dean is asking if I'm being humble. I know how to judge my own work, meaning that I've produced things I knew wouldn't be good and wouldn't sell and I knew it immediately. But my biggest book, which was *The Dilbert Principle*, so that's the one that sold the most, I also told my publisher when my publisher said it might go gold, which is selling 100,000 copies, which is great. If you sell a hundred thousand copies of a book you're definitely going to get another book deal. I mean, publisher loves that. That's solidly successful.
And when my publisher told me that, I said, gold, huh, 100,000. I said, I think this is going to sell a million. Very few books sell a million. Very few. I mean well under one percent of new books sell over a million. And I remember the look on his face. It was like, well, you know, it's very unusual. He explained to me that anything sells a million and a hundred thousand is really, really strong. So if you could sell that, which hasn't happened, but if you did that would be really strong. And I said to him, I think it's going to be a million. Last I checked it was 1.5. 1.5 million.
So this is the only time I've had that same feeling, but this feeling's stronger. A lot stronger. Like a lot. Now this will be a good test to my intuition because I actually think it'll be the best-selling book at least the country, not in the world but in the United States. I think it will be the best-selling book of all time. Now you haven't seen it so there's no way you can judge that claim. But you wouldn't believe the feedback I'm getting, you know, just from some of the reframes. The number of people who have changed their life with one reframe already without even the book existing yet is a lot. It's a lot. And it's going to surprise you.
Lance says it sounds boring. Sounds boring. Well, maybe it's not for you, Lance. Have I seen Dad's book? No. So this is a funny thing that happened to me yesterday. Maybe I'll save this one for Locals. All right, I'll just say the story for Locals. This is not for you, sorry YouTube. I'm gonna go talk to Locals privately. And thanks for joining. I think this was the best livestream you've ever seen in your whole life. Bye for now.
everybody and welcome to the highlight of civilization best thing that's ever happened to you by far and let's all take this experience up to levels where other people will be jealous yeah the reason to feel good is to make other people feel bad don't lose sight of that and if you want to make them feel really bad all you need is a copper mug or a glass of tanker Charles aside the Kim team yoga flaska The Vessel of Medica and fill it with your favorite liquid I like coffee and join me now for the unparalleled pleasure the dope will be the end of the day the thing that makes everything better everything it's called the simultaneous congratulations you made it on time I see some people just got here at the nick of time and your day will be perfect today then what a day you're gonna have in fact I'm going to give you a little uh technique to try today so I've tried this and it works every time I do it and it's kind of freaky because it's not obvious why it would work it goes like this today is the day something good is going to happen just tell yourself that all day long and Watch What Happens just say I think I feel like some good Luck's coming today's day it's gonna be a good day wow today's gonna be a good day some good stuff coming now it might be that you talk yourself into seeing the good stuff as more important than the bad stuff that day so it might be just a psychological phenomenon a war or we live in a simulation and that's how you steer it by your intentions because all all evidence does suggest that's the case one day that's all I'm asking just one day every now and then remind yourself something good is going to happen today I can feel it it's coming see what happens you'll be amazed well at the same time that the price of eggs is going through the roof because of avian flu there was some big egg production facility that burned down does that sound like a coincidence that the same time the eggs are in great demand and the high priced that have major egg facility would burn down now I believe this is a case of well it's obvious who did it do I have to say it it's obvious no it was the egg white supremacists the egg white supremacists that's the way I think he did it yes it did kick off uh many bad puns I won't repeat them all just that one don't work among yourselves and do the rest of the puns well the big news entertainment wise is that Bill Maher is going to slightly be on CNN oh he's not moving his show to see him then he's just sort of slightly tangentially a little bit sometimes kind of flirting with the idea of a little bit of content on CNN so on Friday nights the extra part of his show that's on HBO real time uh the extra part after the end of the show where they sit around and keep talking the extra part will be on CNN late at night on Fridays because usually goes on is only once a week now is this a reaction to Gutfeld are they testing the waters will CNN test Bill Maher for a little bit at that time and then say to themselves we should be running this kind of content at this time all the time because people want to see funny news not like hard news before they go to bed so I think that's one of one of Garfield's magic is that uh you know he can make you feel good before you go to bed uh anyway keep an eye on that uh I do have a feeling about it which is just one of those that feels alike you know how people always think in analogies so if something reminds you of something else you irrationally think that the thing it reminded you of is telling you something about the thing it probably isn't that's just two things that remind you of each other but here's what it reminds me of when I used to own restaurants locally uh when I saw a restaurant start to serve brunch when normally they were just a lunch at dinner place as soon as they would offer brunch you knew they were going out of business do you know how it's because brunch is a terrible business it's like a it's like a last last ditch thing to do like if you've given up on making money the normal way you try to do brunch it never works it's like the ultimate thing that never works nobody ever goes to the lunch and dinner place for brunch do you know why because they're used to it as the lunch and dinner place they can't really it doesn't really ever become a breakfast place the only places to do are breakfast places if a place is a breakfast place people go to breakfast there otherwise their minds just can't wrap around it so when I see uh CNN trying to scoop up the the leftovers from Bill Marshall on HBO that looks to me a lot like brunch if you know what I mean sort of a Hail Mary desperation try anything kind of thing but if I want to look at it as a more aggressive approach I would say they're testing out their audience to see if they can maybe compete for his full show what do you think I don't know if you'd want to do it every night though I don't think he wants to do a nightly show but maybe he would maybe you would you never know um my my music teacher well I won't say I'll just say a music teacher I shouldn't have said that and now I can't do the story because I didn't want to identify it skipping that story going right to the next one um so does it seem to you that uh kids are getting Dumber because of smartphones how many would say that the children the youth are getting Dumber because of smartphones a lot of people say yes somewhat reflexively now what do you think you would find don't do this yet but what do you think you would find if you were to go to Google and Google are smartphones making uh children Dumber what do you think you'd find as the top result from Google who I believe would like everybody to use a smartphone do you think that Google would say oh here's the research show these smartphones which were a big part of are bad for you what do you think well the top result or one of the top results or actually the top curated results so if you go to Google and you you look for something that other people have looked for a lot Google will help you by curating a quick hit that's like all you need to know you can look deeper but it's basically the answer to the question but it's curated meaning it's not just a natural way that you search and the good stuff comes up first somebody at Google decided that the first thing you should say when you click on it um is this the arguments that are making us that smartphones are making us Dumber don't hold up explain some PhD cognitive scientist blah blah and that's the opposite the smartphones are making us smarter what do you think about that do you think smartphones make you you dumber or making you smarter well maybe there's a trick to it maybe there's a trick here's the trick if I say to you are smartphones making you smarter who is you see it seems obvious right you is you and then your phone is separate your phone is there and this is you but this answer that smartphones are making you smarter treats you like a cyborg Your Part phone and part person and if you could if you look at the person as part of phone connected to the internet and per person we're a way smarter what do you think of that so it might be true that the organic part of our cyborg being is getting some less abilities yeah it might might be decreasing as memorization ability but at the same time we're no longer just an organic entity we're a cyborg we're part machine part human and the the machine part is is awesome you know it more than makes up for what we're losing in cognitive abilities so do you buy that and you buy that it's a total coincidence that Google a company that would really like you to look at a screen a lot that a big company like that wants you to know that you're just getting better and stronger and smarter because you're part computer and part person and how could that be bad now there are lots of studies that would suggest the opposite so other studies that don't look at you as a cyborg and see you just as your organic part they there's lots of indications that we're getting more distracted and shorter retention spans that kind of stuff uh can we treat well and let me tie a few things together here so I did a unscientific Twitter poll and I asked people uh what will describe destroy the lives of more children and the choices were pandemic policies so that would include everything from vaccinations to masks to shutdowns to zoom class all that so the pandemic policies or smartphones and social media being you know called out as a big part of that or a covid-19 itself you know the actual virus so the number of people who thought that uh the most people of these choices that uh that covid-19 would destroy the lives more children was two percent two percent thought covert was the thing that would destroy the most children coming in second was all of the pandemic policies put together 25 percent 25 percent 25 25.
25.
that's about a quarter that's about a quarter of the people interesting the other people said uh 73 said there was the smartphones in social media I don't want to make too much of the 25 but um and what do you think 73 think the smartphone was worse than everything in the pandemic 73 percent think it was worse than the coven itself and worse than the response to the covet from vaccinations to Mass to zoom School so that's how many people think smartphones are like a serious danger to children do you see a big movement to ban to ban smartphones for children I don't there's none is there I tweeted it the other day and I got a lot of support but there's nothing in the government that's going to ban smartphones now because the big tech companies have too much control that's never going to happen can we can we stop her pretending we care about children could we just stop lying about it because I feel like it's bad enough that we're putting children in these situations that's bad enough but we're also lying about it while we're doing it obviously we don't care about children in fact I will go further I believe Wars General Wars the kind of where you're shooting and killing Wars are about sacrificing young people to protect old people aren't they you put the old the young people on the front line cannon fodder to protect the old people and the retirements we've never cared about young people it's just never been and in fact if you go back for most of civilization children were just an asset that could maybe make use of money or protect you from your enemies but basically it wasn't all about the kids the kids were just like the animals the you know they're just part of the system so I find it distasteful that we even pretend that we care about children when it's so obviously we don't so obvious do you know why do you know why parents give up on phones when they should be tough why why do children why do parents give up and say all right you can have your phone but not after 9 pm okay you could have your phone after 9 pm why do most parents do that because it's too hard to take it away it's just too hard and then and the kid is less trouble when they're on their phone they're not making trouble in the back seat of the car it's sort of like television you know you people use television as a babysitter well because it works it works really well and the phones with just that so I think I think we're destroying our children 73 percent of you know it completely and at least the pandemic policies are you know mopping up whatever you haven't destroyed with smartphones but do you see any indication so so look at the state of our Public Schools look at our Public Schools just all of it just all of it look at smartphones and then look at how we treated kids during the pandemic and you tell me that we care about children seriously tell me we care about children now I do think that every parent does I believe that I believe every parent cares about their children and a lot right no difference than it never has been but as a as an entity a group as a country you can't tell us we care about children come on yeah there's fentanyl fentanyl is just an obvious one stop saying we care about the young we don't if we wouldn't do any you know homeschooling is growing but homeschooling is a growth from Individual parents am I right I mean there's some politicians on board but it's mostly that grew up from the bottom up that that wasn't the top down thing all of the top-down stuff is anti-children I I don't know is that a coincidence that it's all anti-children all of it because it is it's all anti-children I don't know how that ever evolved to be like complete anti-jilden but maybe we've always been this way yeah maybe it's just a little more obvious because of the pandemic but maybe we've always just not cared about children we just pretend that we feel otherwise because we do care about our own so I think we're conflating how much we care about our own kids with how much we care about your kids you know what I mean because that feels like your problem all right um a few other things if you keep looking at the Google searches you'll see all kinds of Science of both sides so I'm saying it's hurting our attention spans and some saying it isn't it uh but let me tell you my favorite uh pushback from this it's all right so I'm uh old man old man shouting at the sky right so I'm clearly a boomer I'm clearly in that demographic who says you know get a haircut you kids stop listening to that Elvis Presley and that rock and roll it's gonna hurt your minds so after I make this this whole tweet thing about the safety of children uh a Twitter username Steve Stevens I won't say anything about the creativity of his parents who named him Steve Stevens but I'll just say that his comment was hilarious So after talking about his smartphones hurting the children he tweets you left out pinball and pool halls okay you win uh you win good can we just let Steve Stevens have the win Stevens for the win total win yes Steve Stevens who has been around long enough to know that there's never been a time when we didn't say the children are dumb this time and we've been wrong every time we always say the children are dumb always since I was a kid all that rock and roll was going to destroy our minds and nothing like that ever happened right so this this was just such a good comment you left out pinball and pool halls because they're gonna rot those children's Minds here's what I think is true the truth is that the only smart people who matter are the top one percent and they're probably no different than they ever were in fact there might be more of them did you invent any microchips today I I didn't I didn't did you uh make any breakthroughs in artificial intelligence today I didn't I really didn't do anything so it almost doesn't matter how smart I am I just have to be able to take care of myself and and that's it the one percent of smart people who have always been with us are still doing what they always do they invent the future and then we live in it so it doesn't matter if the average person can memorize a poem so somebody else said uh the other thing the kids can't do today ever since the invention of writing they haven't been able to been able to memorize ten thousand word poems I thought to myself that is so perfect because you know when the invention of writing came along somebody probably said all right look with all of this writing uh kids are no longer going to be able to memorize 10 000 word poems like they can easily so let's get rid of the writing Gramps yeah Rush Limbaugh said ten percent carry the rest it's way less than 10 percent if you're talking about the the people who've invented the future right you know Elon Musk isn't in the 10 percent he's in the one percent so uh my argument will be this I believe the smartphones have made us different and then it made some people smarter in some ways but it also probably changed their attention span did that hurt us it depends it might hurt some people in some weird ways what uh what I imagine is that the average person can scroll through a screen way faster than the Ancients could have I feel like they optimized for insane amounts of information so what what does a kid optimize for in the boring past in the boring past we were optimized to survive boredom that's all I remember of my youth pain and boredom that's it pain and boredom that was my entire youth I was either in pain or I was bored I only had two reactions so it was horrible now kids are full of you know so much stimulation do you think that a kid today is more or less able to handle complexity I don't know I mean I'm just throwing out some suggestions they might be more it's possible less it's possible less but I think more I think more because I handle complexity every day with their interfaces and social everything but they may be giving up some interpersonal skills they might be giving up some um concentration but do they need it what would be more important let me ask you this which skill would be more important than 2023 are really an ability to really focus deeply on a single subject for a long time or the ability to quickly skim all kinds of useful information quickly using your smartphone I know I see people learning like crazy because they have phones don't you know somebody who googles everything you're in the conversation like one minute into it they're Googling just to fact check you or to add a thing or to find out a new thing you know that didn't exist before there's no way smartphones aren't making us a lot smarter in some ways while at the same time taking something away so I think we could confirm that we're changing I don't know if it's bad yet might be a might be a mix but I think it's all bad for kids on that are you aware that uh representative Dan Crenshaw um and also Michael Waltz both Republicans issued a joint resolution authorizing Biden to use military force to combat the cartels pumping Fentanyl and other stuff into the country so that's all good now remember my my current political stand is that I'm going to back for a president Whoever has the best fentanyl policy so far that's Trump because Trump also says use the military against the cartels uh Crenshaw is saying something similar but as far as we know he's not running for president how did I get this far with my microphone not on is that better I'm sorry all right um so here's so if credential runs for president then I will have a dilemma because then I would have to choose between Trump and Crenshaw now I know what you're going to say some are you going to say no not Crenshaw I dislike him for my five reasons don't care do not care yeah don't don't even tell me what you don't like about them warmonger sure whatever don't care if you if you would have the best policy on Fentanyl and so far it would just be a tie you know so far Trump still has the advantage but hypothetically and I'm doing this just to warn you right because I don't want you to have any shock I will I will abandon Trump in a hot flash I will abandon him so fast if somebody has a better idea on Sentinel only fentanyl one issue it's all I care about everything else you know deep State's going to do what deep state does but uh congratulations to Crenshaw for having his priorities straight he said one thing that was or I don't know if he said this but the news reported that Crenshaw said this now this can't possibly be true and I want to want you to maybe help me here did the news just report it wrong or did he misstate this or is this actually true I'll just read what the news said um Crenshaw the architect of the bill last Congress told Fox News digital that the cartels quote are responsible for about 360 000 homicides this year in Mexico that couldn't possibly be true is it 360 000 murderers murders one year in Mexico no that's not plausible that is not plausible I'm sorry 36 000 might be would you accept thirty six thousand 36 000 is a lot that would be a lot of murder but 360 000 no um so can we do a fact check on that because my belief is that uh oh 370 per day what's wrong with a little hyperbole well that's a lot of hyperbole yeah that's a lot of hyperbole because if it were really 360 000 murders in a year The Mexican government would be begging us to send it in the military wouldn't they am I am I wrong about that if it were really 360 000 a year just in Mexico in one year they would be begging us for the military that can't possibly be true would you believe 25 000 I would yeah I would believe 36 000.
I mean I wouldn't know it's true but it's within the credible range so that's weird let's talk about China Wall Street Journal has an opinion piece I'm trying to decide if it's racist every time I hear that China can't develop technology you know because they have something about their system they can't develop technology did we say this about Japan when I was young didn't we say oh the Japanese there's something about their culture they'll they'll never want to take a chance so therefore they'll never build any technology because they don't want to there's something about their culture well Japan is doing okay seems like they're they they fixed that now we're now we're doing the same thing about China that there's something about this system or something about I don't know the culture that makes them not be able to make microchips on the surface doesn't that just sound like a racist sort of thing that we're looking for support for like we're looking for confirmation bias but it feels like it starts with racism doesn't it am I wrong about that am I too woke is that too woke because that might be me or maybe I'm just so primed for it that well I'll give you the argument right so I'm going to give you the argument I suspect I just feel like it may have started in the wrong place and then they work backwards to the argument but we'll give them the benefit of a doubt okay and here's the argument now this first part is a pretty good argument in the U.S system uh funding for big companies usually starts with small companies and it's private you know Venture capitalists and angels and stuff and so there are tons of people in the market and they're watching their money pretty closely if a venture capitalist gives you a million dollars they're going to attend your meetings right they're going to make sure you spent their million dollars right so we have a system in which the funding for Tech is is monitored and managed by the people who gave them the funding so so the the funders are very close to the process literally in the room same room in China it's a state managed process so the state decides which Industries they're going to be promoting they decided they would do chips it's a good idea so then at the top of the government they release a gazillion dollars I think it was going to be like a trillion dollars or something eventually just huge amounts of money and then who does it go to who does it go to well it doesn't go to anybody who's not part of the Communist party did you know that if you're not in the Communist Party you don't get any of the money so right there they basically taken out part of what works in the United States because in the United States you just have to be good at what you're doing over there you have to also be in the Communist Party it says one inefficiency right they're missing anybody who's not but I don't know what percentage are not frankly so maybe it's not as big a deal as I think secondly the higher your rank as a technology person the higher you rank in the Communist Party the more funding you're going to get so that it's based not on the quality of the project but on the status of the person who asked for the money again there's no way in the world that doesn't hurt their system now but you could argue it's the same here it just looks different right you could argue that if Elon Musk starts a you know another company and if you were to ask for Investments which he typically doesn't uh people would say oh okay we'll definitely give you money so it could be that the important people always get the most money anyway you know however however you slice it but I think our system works better there but here's the big part so if the Chinese government at the top releases a billion dollars for something it first goes to the you know biggest communist who wants the money and then after that it just goes into some corruption Black Box so the opportunity for corruption among the Chinese system is that a lot of the money is going to get siphoned off for projects that were not good ideas but somebody had the clout to get it funded from the government so China's system is based on uh Who You Are how much corruption you're involved in and looking good to the Communist party our system is almost entirely brutally based on performance and I have to admit if their system did not adjust to this problem I don't see how they could I don't see how they could build anything um and I think there was another another reason given which was uh it was mostly corruption um here's the part that really raised my red flag so this is an opinion piece I won't even tell you who are the opinion is from but it's in the Wall Street Journal um let's see dreams and passions are impractical and expensive and even silly so he's talking about the typical Chinese culture that dreams and passions and impractical and are impractical and expensive and even silly and they must be discarded and he says if China can't cultivate free thinkers you know it's always going to be a follower do you think China can't cultivate fruit the free thinkers or does that just sound super racist to you because it sounds super racist to me because you know who else can't cultivate free thinkers who make a difference United States because 98 of us are not contributing anything that our free thought made a difference to I didn't invent any chips did you I know I feel like the top one percent of Chinese effective you know scientists and Technical people probably just like everybody else so I don't know I'm not buying this whole cultural thing there's definitely something going on that they're not keeping up but I think has more to do with the funding probably the funding more than anything all right Rachel Maddow who I watched just for humor purposes watching her face contort when she's trying to sell you some anti-trump stuff now first of all watching Rachel Maddow do anti-trump content feels like 70 years ago it doesn't feel current anymore does it just feels really kind of old kind of stale but she's working she's uh really making a big deal about the fact that uh Trump um is now going to be prosecuted for uh giving money to Stormy Daniels to not talk but it was campaign financing money now of all the things that Trump is accused of doing is this the one that people care the least about have you ever met even one person who said oh ah I thought he'd be a good president but once I found a used campaign money for campaign purposes to you know make the Stormy Daniels thing go away I don't know if I could support somebody who used campaign funds to benefit his campaign I I don't I can't support that is there even one person who cares about that story seriously now I got that you know your Rob Riders are hoping that this is what takes Trump out but do you think Rob Rider cares about the story does he care that Stormy Daniels got some some money that came from uh donations that actually did well if it worked it would have helped Trump get elected I've never seen the story with less meat on it than this now I'm not saying he won't be prosecuted but is it going to keep him from being president wouldn't it just be a fine correct me if I'm wrong the worst he's talking about is paying a fine which is somewhat typical Obama's paid one I think has not Obama paid a fine for the same thing campaign you know lapses it's just the most if if I could if I could tell you one fact that would convince you Trump is going to be your next president here would be that one fact you didn't know anything else it's the only thing you know it's 20 23.
and MSNBC is running Rachel Maddow a major segment talking about the problems with Trump and that payment to Stormy Daniels seven years ago that's what they have that is the best they have right now what would stop him from being president see I think you have to now talk talk in terms of what could possibly stop him because I think we're asking the wrong question you know who's going to run what could possibly stop him at this point I don't say anything I mean he's been proven basically right on everything important and all they have left are things that nobody cared about in the first place that's what it looks like to me and I don't think De.
Santis will run but I I could be wrong we'll see um so Biden is going to cancel the covid emergency whatever laws so that would mean that nobody would be required by the federal government to mask or get vaccinated how about that do you know why Biden says he's going to cancel it on May 11th because Republicans uh introduced legislation to cancel it sooner and as Thomas Massey points out Republicans are already getting results because the news the news is quite clear that Biden would not have announced this except that he he had to counter the Republicans wanting to get rid of the restrictions and the public very much wants the restrictions to go away so it was something that was free money for republicans so remember I always look for as a sign of competence can you at least pick up the free money it's just right there on the table why are your hands not going toward it why are you walking away from the free money well there is Trump again Trump picked up the free money like it's such a it's such a reliable indicator if he can't do the easy stuff we're not going to trust you to do the hard stuff but if the money's just laying there on the table just pick it up Thomas Massey saw money lag on the table it's obvious that the public wants the restrictions lifted it's obvious that scientifically health-wise it's the right time to do it so they say Republicans do the Smart Ones there's this money on the table why don't we just pick it up and so they picked it up and it made it made Biden scramble to keep up with them now that's what I want to see I want to see Republicans see free money on the table and then walk over and pick it up and just keep doing that you don't even have to do anything magical or special you don't need any character you don't need any charisma just pick up the free money that's all we're not asking that much just the free stuff um I love the fact that we think we live in some kind of objective reality where we figured out what's true and what's that and then I mentioned how Sweden did during the covid epidemic and I I triggered yesterday I triggered a Twitter graph or where everybody was putting up their graph to show that Sweden was either doing poorly or doing great and do you know how I can tell which Twitter graphs are the credible ones and which ones are garbage do you know there's a way to know right if it's on Twitter it's garbage also if it's not on Twitter it's garbage if it's based on data it's garbage if it comes from somebody you don't know it's garbage if their source of it is not shown in the graph and quite often that's the case on Twitter that's garbage so basically we got to this point and we can't even tell if Sweden did a good job or a bad job now I know you think you all know but when you see when you see the level of fighting on Twitter the people disagreeing whether it was a good job or a bad job we don't know we really don't it's actually kind of confusing so the fact that they're younger and uh thinner and they supplement with vitamin D I think is most of the story but but I will go back to my best probably the best prediction I've ever made at the beginning of the pandemic that at the end of the pandemic we wouldn't know who managed it well and everybody who are that disagreed oh we're gonna tell some people are doing it right some people not nope can't tell the narrow place where you can tell is whether People Protected the nursing homes right so in the case of De.
Santis yes that was good work that that's one item that you can identify and say okay compared to New York yeah the leadership made a difference like that's there's no doubt about that one but on the country level on the country level hard to say still don't know I know some of you think you might know have you ever heard of uh oh then also the excess deaths are still a mystery now some of you think all the excess deaths or most of them are vaccine injury related but the excess deaths seemed to be in every demographic and they also seem to be across countries so the excess deaths are not an American thing it's everywhere and I think that they're doing different kinds of vaccines and you know all kinds of different policies but still the excess deaths are high wherever we can count them well in the Western countries anyway so I will put out one possibility psychogenic death how many of you ever heard that term psychogenic death it means basically you lose the will to live and you just die and I have a hypothesis that when I grew up no matter how thing how bad things were at the moment I had in my mind a path to happiness and that path was you get a good job you get married you have a family American Dream the American dream was very clearly it was it was just you could feel it like it everybody was moving toward it it seemed like and no matter how bad things were you have a future you had hope right now compare that to our lgbtq trans culture and by the way I'm you know big supporter of the lgbtq trans community but we can talk about them honestly right and I would say that the American dream had to disappear to make room for this other kind of wokeness and again I'm not criticizing it I'm just describing it that if you say well you know this you got to get married and you've got to have a family and go to church on Sunday thing that doesn't work for everybody so now it's a free-for-all and people are saying that there are more single people than ever more more people alone people using their phones Tinder made it impossible to date unless you're a nine or above right so basically if if you were a kid and I've heard actually young people say this there's no future now of course there is there is a future but it's not it's not cleanly packaged and supplied to children as their hope oh yeah you're having a bad day today I get it but look at this you know American Dream you just get on this American Dream path everything you're doing today studying hard staying in a jail you're on the right path kid you're doing it right and here's your happiness in the future here's your meaning and now if you're a kid you don't see any of that do you who's selling the American dream conservatives homeschoolers right homeschoolers so my theory is if you tested the psychological well-being of homeschoolers you would find they have something like hope for the future because the homeschooling Community is likely to be more likely to say follow this path and you'll have a good life I think Public School says you're all being discriminated against systemic discrimination is going to hold you back forever it looks like the police have tried to kill you because you're Brown and you better get on the streets and complain because complaining is the thing to do complaining will make things better and it does sometimes it does but that message would leave me feeling hopeless if I were a child I would just say well if I don't get married why am I doing anything right the marriage is more about having children in this case but what what's my future let's say I'm 12 year old Scott today I make money for what for what for my entertainment you know even at 12 I knew I would get bored entertaining myself all day oh I'm going to make money so I can party on the weekends and that's it like that's yeah oh I can have I can have short encounters with women and that would be a lot of fun but but that's it that's what I have to look forward to is Brief Encounters with women who are having Brief Encounters with lots of other people and that's what I'm going to live for I'm surprised there isn't a higher excess deaths because there's a whole bunch of people who just figured out there's no reason to live that's why we taught the kids we taught the kids there's no reason to live I think we did so I don't know if if that's any of it but I'd throw that in the mix it's probably some some small part of it um here's a most useful thing to know if you're a consumer of news which news outlets are controlled by the CIA if you don't know that you really can't watch the news you're going to be all confused let me give you an example MSNBC who people who are smarter than smarter than me say is clearly and has always been as is NBC uh captured entities by our intelligence agencies right now you might doubt that you might say Scott Scott that's a little a little bit of hyperbole yeah they may have they may have leaned on the networks in some ways on some issues but in general you know they're independent and then there's this story I'm going to tell you this story and then you tell me if this is Independent News this is pointed out on Twitter by unhoodwinked a good follow for you you should follow on Hoodwinked uh there was a nine nine minute segment that's a lot of time on television nine minutes on a TV news show is forever that's a lot of time um he refers to it as the CIA run and snbc all right that's his characterization and she's talking about her coved and how she was diagnosed with pericarditis and myocarditis so for nine minutes she talked about how covet had probably given her pericitis and myocarditis for nine minutes and never mentions her vaccination status let me just say that again and MSNBC host talked for nine minutes about her own quite scary myocarditis and she was a young woman right too young to be having heart problems for nine minutes never once mentioned her vaccination status is there anything else you need to know about this story right do you wonder if this is independent reporting do you think do you think she may have mentioned well I don't you know do you think in her first draft I assume somebody sees her first draft don't you think her first draft was well I don't know what the cause is you know I did get vaccinated but I also covet and now I have myocarditis it's hard to know if it's a vaccination or the or the covid but I'm just letting you know my experience so that you can recognize it too don't you think the first draft might have said something like that now you could not be more obvious and you're trying to hide the story but suppose you didn't know that MSNBC and NBC are you know strongly suggested to be Democrat slash CIA run if he didn't know that you think that was the story you think that was something like a an objective representation of something that's happening and it wasn't not even close to objective now I'm not saying the vaccination caused a problem I'm not saying that at all I'm saying if you don't mention it as a possibility it's just amazing that anybody can watch that network with with that kind of situation all right uh the host was a Yasmin vasugin foreign I think that's all I had to say and that ladies and gentlemen um I feel like there was one other thing I was going to say is there a topic I missed you can blanket blame covet well indirectly sure I'll tell you about that later all right um somebody says Scott is looking for a way out from Trump it's so transparent correct it's transparent because it's true and it's obvious and I'm telling you right up front I don't want a president who's over a certain age Trump in my case in my in my personal View is aged out of the job so somebody somebody's showing the great Insight here and says I think Scott secretly is looking for a way to not support Trump no it's not a secret I'm doing that right in front of you if anybody comes up with a better fentanyl plan and they're also they can walk and talk and they're not 100 years old I'm going to look at that pretty seriously get a look at that really seriously so don't be surprised I'm saying it as directly as I can fentanyl policy is all I care about I will drop a trumpet like a hot rock the minute a legitimate candidate has a better take and it doesn't even have to be military I mean I could imagine somebody coming up with a better take that wasn't attacking Mexico I just haven't heard it uh those who bailed out Sam bankman their names can be released that's interesting I don't think that'll tell us much uh any place to pre-order I'm not sure when you can pre-order my book it'll be called reframe your brain I think I think Amazon has a a holding place for it but I don't know if you can order yet do they have pre-orders already they probably don't put it there unless there's a pre-order option oh you ordered to okay I guess I'm selling a book I haven't made yet so that's pretty good I mean I've I finished writing it cope a Claude Adams story it's a good movie why would you pre-order to make sure you don't run out this is a book that's likely to run out now I don't think my publisher knows that yet but uh I'm almost positive this will be the biggest book I've ever written and I think the biggest book in the world not counting religious books that's what I think that's based on just looking at it myself and I look at it I think I think everybody's gonna buy this because one of the things I've done is I dealt with the um attention span problem by reducing reducing everything to one sentence you could kind of you know skim the argument and see the one sentence and you know if the reframe was going to work for you or not so I think it's got everything it's got stuff that would change everybody's life a lot no you Dean is asking if I'm being humble I know how to I know how to judge my own work meaning that I've produced things I knew wouldn't be good and wouldn't sell and I knew it immediately but my biggest book which was the Delbert principle so that's what the one that sold the most I also told my publisher when my Publishers said it might go gold which is selling 100 000 copies which is great if you sell a hundred thousand copies of a book you're definitely going to get another book deal I mean publisher loves that that's solidly successful and when my publisher told me that I said gold huh 100 000.
I said uh I think this is going to sell a million very few books sell a million very few I mean well under one percent of new books sell over a million and I remember the look on his face it was like well you know it's very unusual he explained to me that anything sells a million and a hundred thousand is really really strong so if you could sell that which hasn't happened but if you did that would be really strong and I said to him I think it's going to be a million last I checked it was 1.5 1.5 million so this is the only time I've had that same feeling but this feeling's stronger a lot stronger like a lot now this will be a good test to my intuition because I actually think it'll be the best-selling book at least the country not in the world but in the United States I think it will be the best-selling book of all time now you haven't seen it so there's no way you can judge that claim but you wouldn't believe that the feedback I'm getting you know just from some of the reframes the number of people who have changed their life with one reframe already without even the book existing yet is a lot it's a lot and it's going to surprise you Lance says it sounds boring sounds boring well maybe it's not for you Lance have I seen dad's book no so so this is a funny thing that happened to me yesterday uh maybe I'll save this one for locals all right I'll just say the story for locals this is not for you sorry You.
Tube um I'm gonna go talk to locals privately and thanks for joining I think this was the best live stream you've ever seen in your whole life bye for now
everybody and welcome to the highlight
of civilization
best thing that's ever happened to you
by far
and let's all take this experience up to
levels where other people will be
jealous yeah the reason to feel good is
to make other people feel bad don't lose
sight of that and if you want to make
them feel really bad all you need is
a copper mug or a glass of tanker
Charles aside the Kim team yoga flaska
The Vessel of Medica and fill it with
your favorite liquid
I like coffee
and join me now for the unparalleled
pleasure the dope will be the end of the
day the thing that makes everything
better
everything
it's called the simultaneous
congratulations you made it on time I
see some people just got here at the
nick of time
and your day will be perfect today
then what a day you're gonna have in
fact I'm going to give you a little uh
technique to try today
so I've tried this and it works every
time I do it and it's kind of freaky
because it's not obvious why it would
work
it goes like this
today is the day something good is going
to happen
just tell yourself that all day long and
Watch What Happens
just say I think I feel like some good
Luck's coming today's day
it's gonna be a good day wow today's
gonna be a good day some good stuff
coming
now it might be that you talk yourself
into seeing the good stuff
as more important than the bad stuff
that day so it might be just a
psychological phenomenon a war
or we live in a simulation
and that's how you steer it by your
intentions because all all evidence does
suggest that's the case
one day that's all I'm asking just one
day every now and then remind yourself
something good is going to happen today
I can feel it it's coming
see what happens you'll be amazed
well at the same time that the price of
eggs is going through the roof because
of avian flu there was some big egg
production facility that burned down
does that sound like a coincidence that
the same time the eggs are in great
demand and the high priced that have
major egg facility would burn down
now I believe this is a case of
well it's obvious who did it
do I have to say it it's obvious
no it was the egg white supremacists the
egg white supremacists
that's the way I think he did it yes it
did kick off uh many bad puns
I won't repeat them all
just that one
don't work among yourselves and do the
rest of the puns
well the big news entertainment wise is
that Bill Maher is going to slightly be
on CNN
oh he's not moving his show to see him
then
he's just sort of slightly tangentially
a little bit sometimes
kind of flirting with the idea of a
little bit of content on CNN so on
Friday nights the extra part of his show
that's on HBO real time
uh the extra part after the end of the
show where they sit around and keep
talking
the extra part will be on CNN late at
night
on Fridays because usually goes on is
only once a week
now is this a reaction to Gutfeld
are they testing the waters
will CNN test Bill Maher for a little
bit at that time and then say to
themselves
we should be running this kind of
content at this time all the time
because people want to see funny news
not like hard news before they go to bed
so I think that's one of one of
Garfield's magic is that uh you know he
can make you feel good before you go to
bed
uh anyway
keep an eye on that uh I do have a
feeling about it which is just one of
those that feels alike you know how
people always think in analogies
so if something reminds you of something
else you irrationally think that the
thing it reminded you of is telling you
something about the thing it probably
isn't that's just two things that remind
you of each other but here's what it
reminds me of
when I used to own restaurants locally
uh when I saw a restaurant
start to serve brunch when normally they
were just a lunch at dinner place as
soon as they would offer brunch you knew
they were going out of business
do you know how
it's because brunch is a terrible
business it's like a it's like a last
last ditch thing to do like if you've
given up on making money the normal way
you try to do brunch
it never works it's like the ultimate
thing that never works nobody ever goes
to the lunch and dinner place for brunch
do you know why because they're used to
it as the lunch and dinner place they
can't really it doesn't really ever
become a breakfast place the only places
to do are breakfast places
if a place is a breakfast place people
go to breakfast there
otherwise their minds just can't wrap
around it
so when I see uh CNN trying to scoop up
the the leftovers from Bill Marshall on
HBO that looks to me a lot like brunch
if you know what I mean
sort of a Hail Mary desperation try
anything
kind of thing
but if I want to look at it as a more
aggressive approach
I would say they're testing out their
audience
to see if they can maybe compete for his
full show
what do you think
I don't know if you'd want to do it
every night though I don't think he
wants to do a nightly show but maybe he
would maybe you would you never know
um
my my music teacher well I won't say
I'll just say a music teacher
I shouldn't have said that
and now I can't do the story
because I didn't want to identify it
skipping that story going right to the
next one
um
so does it seem to you that uh
kids are getting Dumber because of
smartphones
how many would say that the children the
youth are getting Dumber because of
smartphones
a lot of people say yes somewhat
reflexively now what do you think you
would find
don't do this yet but what do you think
you would find if you were to go to
and Google are smartphones making
uh children Dumber
what do you think you'd find as the top
result
from Google
who I believe would like everybody to
use a smartphone
do you think that Google would say oh
here's the research show these
smartphones which were a big part of
are bad for you
what do you think
well the top result or one of the top
results or actually the top curated
results
so if you go to Google and you you look
for something that other people have
looked for a lot
Google will help you by curating a quick
hit
that's like all you need to know you can
look deeper but it's basically the
answer to the question but it's curated
meaning it's not just a natural way that
you search and the good stuff comes up
first
somebody at Google
decided that the first thing you should
say
when you click on it
um
is this
the arguments that are making us that
smartphones are making us Dumber don't
hold up
explain some PhD cognitive scientist
blah blah and
that's the opposite the smartphones are
making us smarter
what do you think about that
do you think smartphones make you you
dumber
or making you smarter
well maybe there's a trick to it
maybe there's a trick
here's the trick
if I say to you are smartphones making
you smarter who is you
see it seems obvious right you is you
and then your phone is separate
your phone is there and this is you
but this answer that smartphones are
making you smarter
treats you
like a cyborg
Your Part phone and part person
and if you could if you look at the
person as part of phone connected to the
internet and per person we're a way
smarter
what do you think of that
so it might be true that the organic
part of our cyborg being
is getting some less abilities
yeah it might might be decreasing as
memorization ability but at the same
time we're no longer just an organic
entity
we're a cyborg
we're part machine part human
and the the machine part is is awesome
you know it more than makes up for what
we're losing in cognitive abilities so
do you buy that
and you buy that it's a total
coincidence that Google a company that
would really like you to look at a
screen a lot that a big company like
that
wants you to know that you're just
getting better and stronger and smarter
because you're part computer and part
person
and how could that be bad
now there are lots of studies
that would suggest the opposite
so other studies that don't look at you
as a cyborg and see you just as your
organic part they there's lots of
indications that we're getting more
distracted and shorter retention spans
that kind of stuff
uh can we treat
well and let me tie a few things
together here so I did a unscientific
Twitter poll
and I asked people uh what will describe
destroy the lives of more children
and the choices were pandemic policies
so that would include everything from
vaccinations to
masks to shutdowns to zoom class all
that so the pandemic policies or
smartphones and social media being you
know called out as a big part of that or
a covid-19 itself
you know the actual virus
so the number of people who thought that
uh the most people of these choices that
uh that covid-19 would destroy the lives
more children was two percent
two percent thought covert was the thing
that would destroy the most children
coming in second was all of the pandemic
policies
put together
25 percent
25 percent
25 25.
25.
that's about a quarter
that's about a quarter of the people
interesting the other people said uh 73
said there was the smartphones in social
media
I don't want to make too much of the 25
but
um
and
what do you think 73 think the
smartphone was worse than everything in
the pandemic
73 percent think it was worse than the
coven itself and worse than the response
to the covet from vaccinations to Mass
to zoom School
so that's how many people think
smartphones are like a serious danger to
children
do you see a big movement to ban to ban
smartphones for children
I don't
there's none is there
I tweeted it the other day and I got a
lot of support but there's nothing in
the government that's going to ban
smartphones now because the big tech
companies have too much control that's
never going to happen can we can we stop
her pretending we care about children
could we just stop lying about it
because I feel like
it's bad enough
that we're putting children in these
situations that's bad enough
but we're also lying about it while
we're doing it
obviously we don't care about children
in fact I will go further
I believe Wars General Wars the kind of
where you're shooting and killing Wars
are about sacrificing young people to
protect old people aren't they
you put the old the young people on the
front line cannon fodder to protect the
old people and the retirements
we've never cared about young people
it's just never been and in fact if you
go back for most of civilization
children were just an asset that could
maybe make use of money or protect you
from your enemies but basically
it wasn't all about the kids the kids
were just like the animals the you know
they're just part of the system
so
I find it distasteful that we even
pretend that we care about children when
it's so obviously we don't so obvious
do you know why do you know why parents
give up on phones when they should be
tough
why why do children why do parents give
up and say all right you can have your
phone but not after 9 pm
okay you could have your phone after 9
pm
why do most parents do that
because it's too hard to take it away
it's just too hard and then and the kid
is less trouble when they're on their
phone
they're not making trouble in the back
seat of the car it's sort of like
television you know you people use
television as a babysitter well because
it works it works really well and the
phones with just that so I think I think
we're destroying our children
73 percent of you know it completely and
at least the pandemic policies are you
know mopping up whatever you haven't
destroyed with smartphones
but do you see any indication
so so look at the state of our Public
Schools
look at our Public Schools just all of
it just all of it look at smartphones
and then look at how we treated kids
during the pandemic and you tell me that
we care about children
seriously
tell me we care about children
now I do think that every parent does
I believe that I believe every parent
cares about their children and a lot
right no difference than it never has
been
but as a as an entity a group as a
country
you can't tell us we care about children
come on
yeah there's fentanyl fentanyl is just
an obvious one stop saying we care about
the young we don't if we wouldn't do any
you know homeschooling is growing
but homeschooling is a growth from
Individual parents
am I right I mean there's some
politicians on board but it's mostly
that grew up from the bottom up that
that wasn't the top down thing all of
the top-down stuff is anti-children
I I don't know is that a coincidence
that it's all anti-children all of it
because it is it's all anti-children
I don't know how that ever evolved to be
like complete
anti-jilden but maybe we've always been
this way
yeah maybe it's just a little more
obvious because of the pandemic but
maybe we've always just not cared about
children
we just pretend that we feel otherwise
because we do care about our own
so I think we're conflating how much we
care about our own kids
with how much we care about your kids
you know what I mean because that feels
like your problem
all right
um
a few other things
if you keep looking at the Google
searches you'll see all kinds of Science
of both sides so I'm saying it's hurting
our attention spans and some saying it
isn't it uh but let me tell you my
favorite uh pushback
from this it's all right so I'm uh old
man
old man shouting at the sky right so I'm
clearly a boomer
I'm clearly in that demographic who says
you know get a haircut you kids stop
listening to that Elvis Presley and that
rock and roll it's gonna hurt your minds
so after I make this this whole tweet
thing about the safety of children uh a
Twitter username Steve Stevens
I won't say anything about the
creativity of his parents who named him
Steve Stevens but I'll just say that his
comment was hilarious So after talking
about his smartphones hurting the
children he tweets you left out pinball
and pool halls
okay you win
[Laughter]
uh you win
good can we just let Steve Stevens have
the win
Stevens for the win
total win
yes Steve Stevens who has been around
long enough to know that there's never
been a time when we didn't say the
children are dumb this time
and we've been wrong every time
we always say the children are dumb
always since I was a kid all that rock
and roll was going to destroy our minds
and nothing like that ever happened
right so this this was just such a good
comment you left out pinball and pool
halls because they're gonna rot those
children's Minds
here's what I think is true
the truth is
that the only smart people who matter
are the top one percent
and they're probably no different than
they ever were in fact there might be
more of them
did you invent any microchips today
I I didn't I didn't
did you uh make any breakthroughs in
artificial intelligence today
I didn't
I really didn't
do anything
so it almost doesn't matter how smart I
am I just have to be able to take care
of myself and
and that's it
the one percent of smart people who have
always been with us are still doing what
they always do they invent the future
and then we live in it so it doesn't
matter if the average person can
memorize a poem so somebody else said uh
the other thing the kids can't do today
ever since the invention of writing
they haven't been able to been able to
memorize ten thousand word poems
I thought to myself that is so perfect
because you know when the invention of
writing came along somebody probably
said all right look with all of this
writing
uh kids are no longer going to be able
to memorize 10 000 word poems like they
can easily so
let's get rid of the writing
Gramps
yeah Rush Limbaugh said ten percent
carry the rest it's way less than 10
percent
if you're talking about the the people
who've invented the future right you
know Elon Musk isn't in the 10 percent
he's in the one percent
so
uh my argument will be this I believe
the smartphones have made us different
and then it made some people smarter in
some ways but it also probably changed
their attention span
did that hurt us
it depends it might hurt some people in
some weird ways
what uh what I imagine is that the
average person can scroll through a
screen way faster than the Ancients
could have I feel like they optimized
for insane amounts of information
so what what does a kid optimize for in
the boring past in the boring past we
were optimized to survive boredom
that's all I remember of my youth
pain and boredom
that's it
pain and boredom that was my entire
youth I was either in pain or I was
bored I only had two reactions
so it was horrible
now kids are full of you know so much
stimulation do you think that a kid
today is more or less able to handle
complexity
I don't know
I mean I'm just throwing out some
suggestions they might be more it's
possible less it's possible less but I
think more
I think more because I handle complexity
every day with their interfaces and
social everything
but they may be giving up some
interpersonal skills they might be
giving up some
um concentration
but do they need it
what would be more important
let me ask you this which skill would be
more important than 2023 are really an
ability to really focus deeply on a
single subject for a long time
or the ability to quickly skim all kinds
of useful information quickly using your
smartphone
I know I see people learning like crazy
because they have phones don't you know
somebody who googles everything
you're in the conversation like one
minute into it they're Googling just to
fact check you or to add a thing or to
find out a new thing you know that
didn't exist before
there's no way smartphones aren't making
us a lot smarter in some ways
while at the same time taking something
away
so I think we could confirm that we're
changing
I don't know if it's bad yet
might be a might be a mix
but I think it's all bad for kids
on that
are you aware that uh representative Dan
Crenshaw
um
and also Michael Waltz both Republicans
issued a joint resolution authorizing
Biden to use military force to combat
the cartels pumping Fentanyl and other
stuff into the country
so
that's all good now remember my my
current political stand
is that I'm going to back for a
president Whoever has the best
fentanyl policy
so far that's Trump
because Trump also says use the military
against the cartels
uh Crenshaw is saying something similar
but as far as we know he's not running
for president
how did I get this far with my
microphone not on
is that better
I'm sorry all right
um
so here's so if credential runs for
president then I will have a dilemma
because then I would have to choose
between Trump and Crenshaw now I know
what you're going to say some are you
going to say no not Crenshaw I dislike
him for my five reasons don't care
do not care
yeah don't don't even tell me what you
don't like about them
warmonger sure whatever don't care if
you if you would have the best policy on
Fentanyl and so far it would just be a
tie
you know so far Trump still has the
advantage but hypothetically and I'm
doing this just to warn you right
because I don't want you to have any
shock I will I will abandon Trump in a
hot flash
I will abandon him so fast if somebody
has a better idea on Sentinel only
fentanyl one issue it's all I care about
everything else you know deep State's
going to do what deep state does
but uh congratulations to Crenshaw for
having his priorities straight he said
one thing that was or I don't know if he
said this but the news reported that
Crenshaw said this now this can't
possibly be true
and I want to want you to maybe help me
here did the news just report it wrong
or did he misstate this
or is this actually true
I'll just read what the news said
um Crenshaw the architect of the bill
last Congress told Fox News digital that
the cartels quote are responsible for
about 360
000 homicides this year in Mexico
that couldn't possibly be true
is it
360
000 murderers murders
one year
in Mexico
no that's not plausible
that is not plausible I'm sorry
36 000 might be
would you accept thirty six thousand
36 000 is a lot
that would be a lot of murder
but 360
000 no
um
so can we do a fact check on that
because my belief is that
uh oh
370 per day
what's wrong with a little hyperbole
well that's a lot of hyperbole
yeah that's a lot of hyperbole
because if it were really 360
000 murders in a year
The Mexican government would be begging
us to send it in the military wouldn't
they
am I am I wrong about that if it were
really 360
000 a year just in Mexico in one year
they would be begging us for the
military that can't possibly be true
would you believe 25 000 I would yeah I
would believe 36 000.
I mean I wouldn't know it's true but
it's within the credible range
so that's weird
let's talk about China Wall Street
Journal has an opinion piece I'm trying
to decide if it's racist
every time I hear that China
can't develop technology
you know because they have something
about their system they can't develop
technology
did we say this about Japan
when I was young didn't we say oh the
Japanese there's something about their
culture they'll they'll never want to
take a chance
so therefore they'll never build any
technology because they don't want to
there's something about their culture
well Japan is doing okay
seems like they're they they fixed that
now we're now we're doing the same thing
about China
that there's something about this system
or something about I don't know the
culture
that makes them not be able to make
microchips
on the surface doesn't that just sound
like a racist sort of thing that we're
looking for support for like we're
looking for confirmation bias but it
feels like it starts with racism doesn't
it am I wrong about that
am I too woke
is that too woke
because that might be me or maybe I'm
just so primed for it that well I'll
give you the argument right
so I'm going to give you the argument I
suspect I just feel like it may have
started in the wrong place and then they
work backwards to the argument but we'll
give them the benefit of a doubt okay
and here's the argument now this first
part is a pretty good argument
in the U.S system uh funding for big
companies
usually starts with small companies and
it's private you know Venture
capitalists and angels and stuff and so
there are tons of people in the market
and they're watching their money pretty
closely if a venture capitalist gives
you a million dollars
they're going to attend your meetings
right they're going to make sure you
spent their million dollars right
so we have a system in which the funding
for Tech
is is monitored and managed by the
people who gave them the funding
so so the the funders are very close to
the process literally in the room same
room
in China
it's a state managed process so the
state decides which Industries they're
going to be promoting they decided they
would do chips
it's a good idea so then at the top of
the government they release a gazillion
dollars I think it was going to be like
a trillion dollars or something
eventually just huge amounts of money
and then who does it go to
who does it go to
well it doesn't go to anybody who's not
part of the Communist party did you know
that if you're not in the Communist
Party you don't get any of the money
so right there
they basically taken out part of what
works in the United States because in
the United States you just have to be
good at what you're doing
over there you have to also be in the
Communist Party it says one inefficiency
right they're missing anybody who's not
but I don't know what percentage are not
frankly so maybe it's not as big a deal
as I think
secondly
the higher your rank
as a technology person the higher you
rank in the Communist Party the more
funding you're going to get
so that it's based not on the quality of
the project
but on the status of the person who
asked for the money
again there's no way in the world that
doesn't hurt their system
now but you could argue it's the same
here it just looks different right you
could argue that if Elon Musk starts a
you know another company
and if you were to ask for Investments
which he typically doesn't
uh people would say oh okay we'll
definitely give you money so it could be
that the important people always get the
most money anyway
you know however however you slice it
but I think our system works better
there but here's the big part
so if the Chinese government at the top
releases a billion dollars for something
it first goes to the you know biggest
communist who wants the money
and then after that it just goes into
some corruption Black Box
so
the opportunity for corruption
among the Chinese system is that a lot
of the money is going to get siphoned
off for projects that were not good
ideas
but somebody had the clout to get it
funded from the government
so China's system is based on uh Who You
Are
how much corruption you're involved in
and looking good
to the Communist party our system is
almost entirely brutally based on
performance
and I have to admit if their system did
not adjust to this problem I don't see
how they could I don't see how they
could build anything
um and I think there was another another
reason given
which was uh
it was mostly corruption
um here's the part that really raised my
red flag so this is an opinion piece I
won't even tell you who are the opinion
is from but it's in the Wall Street
Journal
um
let's see
dreams and passions are impractical and
expensive and even silly so he's talking
about the typical Chinese culture
that dreams and passions and impractical
and are impractical and expensive and
even silly and they must be discarded
and he says if China can't cultivate
free thinkers
you know it's always going to be a
follower
do you think China can't cultivate fruit
the free thinkers or does that just
sound super racist to you
because it sounds super racist to me
because you know who else can't
cultivate free thinkers who make a
difference
United States
because 98 of us are not contributing
anything that our free thought made a
difference to I didn't invent any chips
did you
I know I feel like the top one percent
of Chinese effective
you know scientists and Technical people
probably just like everybody else
so I don't know I'm not buying this
whole
cultural thing there's definitely
something going on that they're not
keeping up but I think has more to do
with the funding probably the funding
more than anything
all right
Rachel Maddow
who I watched just for humor purposes
watching her face contort
when she's trying to sell you some
anti-trump stuff
now first of all watching Rachel Maddow
do anti-trump content
feels like
70 years ago
it doesn't feel current anymore does it
just feels really kind of old kind of
stale
but she's working she's uh really making
a big deal about the fact that uh Trump
um is now going to be prosecuted
for uh giving money to Stormy Daniels to
not talk but it was campaign financing
money
now of all the things that Trump is
accused of doing
is this the one that people care the
least about
have you ever met even one person who
said oh
ah I thought he'd be a good president
but once I found a used campaign money
for campaign purposes
to you know make the Stormy Daniels
thing go away
I don't know if I could support somebody
who used campaign funds to benefit his
campaign
I I don't I can't support that
is there even one person who cares about
that story seriously
now I got that you know your Rob Riders
are hoping that this is what takes Trump
out but do you think Rob Rider cares
about the story
does he care that Stormy Daniels got
some some money that came from uh
donations
that actually did well if it worked it
would have helped Trump get elected I've
never seen the story with less meat on
it than this now I'm not saying he won't
be prosecuted but is it going to keep
him from being president
wouldn't it just be a fine
correct me if I'm wrong the worst he's
talking about is paying a fine
which is somewhat typical Obama's paid
one I think has not Obama paid a fine
for the same thing campaign you know
lapses
it's just the most
if if I could if I could tell you one
fact
that would convince you Trump is going
to be your next president
here would be that one fact you didn't
know anything else it's the only thing
you know it's 20 23.
and MSNBC is running Rachel Maddow a
major segment
talking about the problems with Trump
and that payment to Stormy Daniels seven
years ago
that's what they have
that is the best they have right now
what would stop him from being president
see I think you have to now talk talk in
terms of what could possibly stop him
because I think we're asking the wrong
question you know who's going to run
what could possibly stop him at this
point I don't say anything
I mean he's been proven basically right
on everything important
and all they have left are things that
nobody cared about in the first place
that's what it looks like to me and I
don't think DeSantis will run but I I
could be wrong we'll see
um
so Biden is going to cancel the covid
emergency
whatever laws so that would mean that
nobody would be required by the federal
government
to mask or get vaccinated
how about that
do you know why Biden says he's going to
cancel it on May 11th
because Republicans uh introduced
legislation to cancel it sooner
and as Thomas Massey points out
Republicans are already getting results
because the news the news is quite clear
that Biden would not have announced this
except that he he had to counter the
Republicans wanting to get rid of the
restrictions and the public very much
wants the restrictions to go away
so it was something that was free money
for republicans
so remember I always look for as a sign
of competence can you at least pick up
the free money
it's just right there on the table
why are your hands not going toward it
why are you walking away from the free
money well there is Trump again Trump
picked up the free money
like it's such a it's such a reliable
indicator if he can't do the easy stuff
we're not going to trust you to do the
hard stuff but if the money's just
laying there on the table just pick it
up
Thomas Massey saw money lag on the table
it's obvious that the public wants the
restrictions lifted it's obvious that
scientifically health-wise it's the
right time to do it
so they say Republicans do the Smart
Ones
there's this money on the table why
don't we just pick it up and so they
picked it up and it made it made Biden
scramble to keep up with them
now that's what I want to see I want to
see Republicans see free money on the
table and then walk over and pick it up
and just keep doing that
you don't even have to do anything
magical or special you don't need any
character you don't need any charisma
just pick up the free money
that's all
we're not asking that much just the free
stuff
um
I love the fact
that we think we live in some kind of
objective reality where we figured out
what's true and what's that
and then I mentioned
how Sweden did during the covid epidemic
and I I triggered yesterday I triggered
a Twitter graph or where everybody was
putting up their graph to show that
Sweden was either doing poorly
or doing great
and do you know how I can tell which
Twitter graphs are the credible ones
and which ones are garbage do you know
there's a way to know right
if it's on Twitter it's garbage
also if it's not on Twitter it's garbage
if it's based on data
it's garbage
if it comes from somebody you don't know
it's garbage if their source of it is
not shown in the graph and quite often
that's the case on Twitter that's
garbage
so basically we got to this point and we
can't even tell
if Sweden did a good job or a bad job
now I know you think you all know
but when you see when you see the level
of fighting on Twitter the people
disagreeing whether it was a good job or
a bad job we don't know we really don't
it's actually kind of confusing
so the fact that they're younger and uh
thinner and they supplement with vitamin
D I think is most of the story
but but
I will go back to my best
probably the best
prediction I've ever made at the
beginning of the pandemic that at the
end of the pandemic we wouldn't know who
managed it well
and everybody who are that disagreed oh
we're gonna tell
some people are doing it right some
people not nope can't tell the narrow
place where you can tell is whether
People Protected the nursing homes
right so in the case of DeSantis yes
that was good work that that's one item
that you can identify and say okay
compared to New York yeah the leadership
made a difference like that's there's no
doubt about that one but on the country
level
on the country level
hard to say still don't know
I know some of you think you might know
have you ever heard of uh oh then also
the excess deaths are still
a mystery now some of you think all the
excess deaths or most of them are
vaccine injury related
but the excess deaths seemed to be in
every demographic and they also seem to
be across countries
so the excess deaths are not an American
thing it's everywhere and I think that
they're doing different kinds of
vaccines and you know all kinds of
different policies but still the excess
deaths are high wherever we can count
them well in the Western countries
anyway
so I will put out one possibility
psychogenic death
how many of you ever heard that term
psychogenic death
it means basically you lose the will to
live
and you just die
and I have a hypothesis
that when I grew up no matter how thing
how bad things were at the moment
I had in my mind a path to happiness
and that path was you get a good job
you get married you have a family
American Dream the American dream was
very clearly
it was
it was just you could feel it
like it everybody was moving toward it
it seemed like
and no matter how bad things were you
have a future you had hope right
now compare that to our lgbtq
trans
culture
and by the way I'm you know big
supporter of the lgbtq trans community
but we can talk about them honestly
right and I would say that the American
dream
had to disappear
to make room for
this other kind of wokeness and again
I'm not criticizing it I'm just
describing it
that if you say well you know this you
got to get married and you've got to
have a family and go to church on Sunday
thing that doesn't work for everybody
so now it's a free-for-all
and people are saying that there are
more single people than ever more more
people alone people using their phones
Tinder made it impossible to date unless
you're a nine or above right so
basically if if you were a kid and I've
heard actually young people say this
there's no future
now of course there is
there is a future
but it's not it's not cleanly packaged
and supplied to children as their hope
oh yeah you're having a bad day today I
get it but look at this you know
American Dream you just get on this
American Dream path everything you're
doing today studying hard staying in a
jail you're on the right path kid you're
doing it right and here's your happiness
in the future here's your meaning and
now if you're a kid you don't see any of
that do you who's selling the American
dream
conservatives
homeschoolers right homeschoolers
so my theory is if you tested the
psychological well-being of
homeschoolers you would find they have
something like hope
for the future
because the homeschooling Community is
likely to be more likely to say follow
this path and you'll have a good life
I think Public School says you're all
being discriminated against systemic
discrimination is going to hold you back
forever it looks like the police have
tried to kill you because you're Brown
and you better get on the streets and
complain because complaining is the
thing to do
complaining will make things better and
it does sometimes it does
but that message would leave me feeling
hopeless if I were a child
I would just say well
if I don't get married
why am I doing anything
right the marriage is more about having
children in this case but
what what's my future let's say I'm 12
year old Scott today
I make money
for what for what
for my entertainment
you know even at 12 I knew I would get
bored entertaining myself all day oh I'm
going to make money so I can party on
the weekends
and that's it like that's yeah oh I can
have I can have short encounters with
women and that would be a lot of fun
but
but that's it
that's what I have to look forward to is
Brief Encounters with women who are
having Brief Encounters with lots of
other people
and that's what I'm going to live for
I'm surprised there isn't a higher
excess deaths because there's a whole
bunch of people who just figured out
there's no reason to live
that's why we taught the kids we taught
the kids there's no reason to live
I think we did
so I don't know if if that's any of it
but I'd throw that in the mix it's
probably some some small part of it
um here's a most useful thing to know if
you're a consumer of news
which news outlets are controlled by the
CIA
if you don't know that
you really can't watch the news you're
going to be all confused let me give you
an example
MSNBC
who people who are smarter than smarter
than me say is clearly and has always
been as is NBC uh captured entities by
our intelligence agencies
right now you might doubt that you might
say Scott Scott that's a little a little
bit of hyperbole yeah they may have they
may have leaned on the networks in some
ways on some issues but in general you
know they're independent
and then there's this story
I'm going to tell you this story and
then you tell me if this is Independent
News
this is pointed out on Twitter by
unhoodwinked a good follow for you you
should follow on Hoodwinked
uh there was a nine nine minute segment
that's a lot of time on television
nine minutes on a TV news show is
forever that's a lot of time
um
he refers to it as the CIA run and snbc
all right that's his characterization
and she's talking about her coved and
how she was diagnosed with pericarditis
and myocarditis
so for nine minutes she talked about how
covet had probably given her pericitis
and myocarditis for nine minutes
and never mentions her vaccination
status
let me just say that again
and MSNBC host
talked for nine minutes about her own
quite scary
myocarditis and she was a young woman
right too young to be having heart
problems
for nine minutes
never once mentioned
her vaccination status
is there anything else you need to know
about this story
right do you wonder
if this is independent reporting
do you think do you think she may have
mentioned well I don't you know do you
think in her first draft I assume
somebody sees her first draft don't you
think her first draft was well I don't
know what the cause is you know I did
get vaccinated
but I also covet and now I have
myocarditis it's hard to know if it's a
vaccination or the or the covid but I'm
just letting you know my experience so
that you can recognize it too
don't you think the first draft might
have said something like that
now you could not be more obvious and
you're trying to hide the story
but suppose you didn't know
that MSNBC and NBC are
you know
strongly suggested to be Democrat slash
CIA run
if he didn't know that you think that
was the story
you think that was something like a an
objective representation of something
that's happening and it wasn't not even
close to objective now I'm not saying
the vaccination caused a problem
I'm not saying that at all I'm saying if
you don't mention it as a possibility
it's just amazing that anybody can watch
that network with with that kind of
situation
all right uh the host was a Yasmin
vasugin
foreign
I think that's all I had to say
and that ladies and gentlemen
um I feel like there was one other thing
I was going to say
is there a topic I missed
you can blanket blame covet well
indirectly sure
I'll tell you about that later
all right
um
somebody says Scott is looking for a way
out from Trump it's so transparent
correct
it's transparent because it's true and
it's obvious and I'm telling you right
up front
I don't want a president who's over a
certain age
Trump in my case in my in my personal
View
is aged out of the job
so somebody somebody's showing the great
Insight here and says I think Scott
secretly is looking for a way to not
support Trump no it's not a secret
I'm doing that right in front of you
if anybody comes up with a better
fentanyl plan and they're also they can
walk and talk and they're not 100 years
old I'm going to look at that pretty
seriously
get a look at that really seriously
so don't be surprised I'm saying it as
directly as I can
fentanyl policy is all I care about
I will drop a trumpet like a hot rock
the minute a legitimate candidate has a
better take
and it doesn't even have to be military
I mean I could imagine somebody coming
up with a better take that wasn't
attacking Mexico I just haven't heard it
uh those who bailed out Sam bankman
their names can be released that's
interesting I don't think that'll tell
us much
uh
any place to pre-order I'm not sure when
you can pre-order my book it'll be
called
reframe your brain I think I think
Amazon has a a holding place for it but
I don't know if you can order yet
do they have pre-orders already
they probably don't put it there unless
there's a pre-order option
oh you ordered to okay I guess I'm
selling a book I haven't made yet so
that's pretty good I mean I've I
finished writing it
cope a Claude Adams story it's a good
movie
why would you pre-order to make sure you
don't run out
this is a book that's likely to run out
now I don't think my publisher knows
that yet but uh
I'm almost positive this will be the
biggest book I've ever written and I
think the biggest book in the world
not counting religious books
that's what I think that's based on just
looking at it myself and I look at it I
think
I think everybody's gonna buy this
because one of the things I've done is I
dealt with the
um attention span problem
by reducing reducing everything to one
sentence
you could kind of you know skim the
argument and see the one sentence and
you know if the reframe was going to
work for you or not so I think it's got
everything
it's got stuff that would change
everybody's life
a lot
no you Dean is asking if I'm being
humble
I know how to I know how to judge my own
work
meaning that I've produced things I knew
wouldn't be good and wouldn't sell and I
knew it immediately but my biggest book
which was the Delbert principle so
that's what the one that sold the most I
also told my publisher
when my Publishers said it might go gold
which is selling 100 000 copies which is
great if you sell a hundred thousand
copies of a book you're definitely going
to get another book deal I mean
publisher loves that that's solidly
successful and when my publisher told me
that I said gold huh 100 000. I said uh
I think this is going to sell a million
very few books sell a million
very few I mean well under one percent
of new books sell over a million
and I remember the look on his face it
was like
well
you know it's very unusual he explained
to me that anything sells a million and
a hundred thousand is really really
strong so if you could sell that which
hasn't happened but if you did
that would be really strong
and I said to him I think it's going to
be a million
last I checked it was 1.5 1.5 million
so this is the only time I've had that
same feeling
but this feeling's stronger a lot
stronger like a lot now this will be a
good test to my intuition
because I actually think it'll be the
best-selling book
at least the country not in the world
but in the United States
I think it will be the best-selling book
of all time
now you haven't seen it so there's no
way you can judge that claim
but
you wouldn't believe that the feedback
I'm getting you know just from some of
the reframes the number of people who
have changed their life with one reframe
already without even the book existing
yet is a lot
it's a lot and it's going to surprise
you
Lance says it sounds boring
sounds boring
well maybe it's not for you Lance
have I seen dad's book no
so so this is a funny thing that
happened to me yesterday
uh
maybe I'll save this one for locals all
right I'll just say the story for locals
this is not for you sorry YouTube
um I'm gonna go talk to locals privately
and thanks for joining I think this was
the best live stream you've ever seen in
your whole life bye for now