Coffee With Scott Adams — Knowledge Archive October 9, 2026
Scott Adams Philosophy Archive
Search ideas

Context —

xperience. He was Secret Service, right? He used to be Secret Service. So he knows what protecting a president or anybody looks like. So he was apparently putting some layers onto that idea, layers of credibility that we should literally think about Trump's physical safety more. And there was an NBC News that mocked him and threw him in the same category with Alex Jones as a disgraced conspiracy t…

← Previous segment →

actually changing the world while they run. And maybe Trump did a little of that too but I've never seen so much actual real world change at least the way we think about things. Then I have from RFK Junior, Vivek, and Larry Elder. I like to put him in the mix too with his family message. Very, very positive stuff. So that's the positive part.

So ladies and gentlemen, I believe I have talked about all the news. Oh, so here's some more of understanding the big picture. Does it make sense to you that leadership are half-captors? How could you possibly explain Biden-Harris? I throw in with the mentally incompetent. So there's something wrong with Harris's brain. Would you agree there's something wrong with her brain? It looks to me like substance abuse but I can't say that with certainty. She doesn't look like the same person who she used to be and she does act and look completely incompetent. So it looks like drugs. But if it's organic she needs to get some help because she's clearly not functioning like an adult, right? So I mean that's just my point of view. So I'm not a mind reader but when you look at even McConnell, you know it's not even just the Democrats. There's something going on with the — we've lost the brains of the leaders. Went away and nothing really changed. That tells you there's somebody behind the screen. Because if there were nobody behind the screen the people who are just regular Democrats would say, "Whoa, we better put a better candidate forward." Yeah, so there's some kind of influence or operation that's going on that's beyond just trying to conserve the majority. There's something deeply wrong here.

All right. Amazingly YouTube did not glitch as far as I can tell. Did I miss any news stories that you desperately wish I had talked about? Federman? Obama? Well some say that the power behind the screen is Obama or Clinton but I would say that they may be the same as the intelligence groups. So when I talk about the CIA and maybe some parts of the FBI — and again you're not talking about every person in those groups. You know it's always people within the group. You can kind of see the whole landscape at this point. Yeah, so Obama might be mixed up with that crowd. Some say Obama CIA. Well if you look at — I think Biden said there were five current or former heads of the CIA who signed the laptop disinformation letter. Five former or current members of the CIA. Is there anything else you need to know? Yeah. And they backed completely the Democrat narrative. They did not back the country. It's clear that that was not for the good of the country. That was for the good of the Democrats.

So were they independently acting in a way that they thought was just good for Democrats and they were Democrats and that was the end of the story? Do you think that's the case or do you think there might have been some power that organized all of those people? Hard to say but I got my suspicions.

And I guess Jimmy Buffett passed away at 76. He was by the way one of my role models for business. When I started doing the comic he was killing it and he was selling out in all his concerts despite not being more of a name brand rock star kind of guy. And the way he did it was he was really good at marketing. He was super good at marketing. So he was my role model for marketing. He had a strong — I guess he had a mailing list and had sort of almost a cult following. Yeah, they ate a lot of cheeseburgers. That's all we know about him.

So here's another sign that your news is not real news. You ready for this? How many times have you heard that the Ukrainian prosecutor was really going after Burisma? No, he was really not doing his job and that there were international groups that wanted him removed. So you've heard that like crazy, right? Has anybody asked this question? And I thought Philip Bump was going to get this question but Philip Bump makes the same argument. It wasn't just Joe Biden who wanted that guy fired, the Ukrainian prosecutor. It wasn't just him. Yeah, Viktor Shokin. It wasn't just Biden. It was these international communities. And then he throws his hands away. It goes, here's the question for him: which entity, media, has interviewed one of those people? And which one of them could say no to the United States? Which of the people who wanted Shokin gone individually could say no to the United States and feel it wouldn't have an impact on their career? Any? No.

The answer is this is one of these. So remember I showed you how this is done. So you have bad people who plant a story and then once the story is planted you have various fake organizations back the story and then everybody can say hey you don't have to believe me, look at these organizations. Right? Do you recognize the play? All of those organizations they mention that also wanted Shokin gone are just their own surrogates. And somehow both the left-leaning media and the right-leaning media has never looked into that. Just think about that. Nobody's ever looked into it. Have any of those individuals who agreed that Shokin — first time you're hearing this? Yeah. Nobody's asked, can we put one of those people who agree with you, Joe Biden, who also thought he should go, can we talk to one of them? And could we learn a little bit more about their background and how they get their funding and what they think their career looks like and maybe even what president they backed? Were they Trump supporters? No, they were in other countries, right?

Now the fact that no journalist looked into those other entities shows you that the fix is really deep. I mean it must include the right-leaning media because how would the right-leaning media ignore that? It's the easiest thing just to check to find if the other people who agree are honest players.

Now when I told you that when you see the landscape it allows you to take all of their ops and map it to the parts and then you instantly understand it. See you didn't understand, r

Context —

ight? You didn't understand that. Why did those other people keep saying that they agreed with Biden that that guy should go? But now you understand their play is always the same. They'll always get fake entities to support their narrative and then say hey it's not us. I mean if it were just me, sure I'm a Democrat so you can't believe me, but look at those entities that I funded or control. You s…

Next segment → →