Coffee With Scott Adams — Knowledge Archive October 9, 2026
Scott Adams Philosophy Archive
Search ideas
Episodes › Episode #2219

Episode 2219 Scott Adams - If I Told You What's On My Whiteboards Today You Wouldn't Get To See Them

Episode #2219 Sep 2, 2023 1:03:21 34,679 views

If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.

Opening General Commentary

Good morning everybody, and welcome to another highlight of human civilization. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams. If I could get my cables out of your camera, we'd all be happy, wouldn't we? There we go. Look at that. Problem solved. Yay! Now, how would you like to take this experience up to lev…

View segment →
SimultaneousSip Energy & Mood Management

vilization, but you'll be the judge of that. But before we get there, let's take our energy up to the stratosphere. And all you need is a cup or mug or glass or a thermos, a canteen, jug, flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparall…

View segment →
NewsReaction Health & Biohacking

ouble whiteboards. It's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens now. Go. That's so good. Yeah, I've got three cameras here that I'm trying to coordinate, but I think we can make this all work. Well, let's talk about the news before I change the world with my double whiteboards. Let's see. Num…

View segment →
NewsReaction Politics as Persuasion

it and nuts, perfectly healthy all day long. If I eat anything that comes out of a package, I've got inflammation, I'm tired. It's a completely different experience. If I could eat twice as much food, I wouldn't really want to eat twice as much fruit and nuts, just as one example. I wouldn't want to…

View segment →
MainContent Cognitive Reframing

illion more men than they have women. 32 million extra men who don't have an option of having their own exclusive woman and a family. Now that was, of course, because of China's one-child policy for so many years, which is now a three-child policy because we're running out of people. 32 million is t…

View segment →
NewsReaction Media & Fake News

are a couple things that I have going on right now that might change the world. Don't know. One of them is my book *Reframe Your Brain*. It's not written just to have a good time on an airplane. It's written because once you understand this material, you'll be able to literally change how you think…

View segment →
NewsReaction Politics as Persuasion

right. Well, on X the phrase ADL is trending. And I said to myself, what's all that about? So there are a lot of people who are calling the ADL — what does the A stand for? What's the A in ADL stand for? Anti-Defamation League. The Anti-Defamation League, which Republicans have caught on — I think t…

View segment →
NewsReaction Media & Fake News

ink that the Democrats know that this is happening? If you're a Democrat, don't you think that people broke the law and then the law caught up with them and hey, that's how it's supposed to work? Do you believe they have any idea what's going on? I don't. I don't think they have any idea. How could…

View segment →
NewsReaction Media & Fake News

tually ended up backing him when he's been conclusively debunked as a liar on several of his stories. Like there's no doubt about it. It's not even opinion. It's just the legal system itself showed that he was a liar or that his information was wrong. Not necessarily he was lying because that's mind…

View segment →
Tangent General Commentary

een just massive incompetence? Well here's the fun part. Oh, one more. Dan Bongino is not happy with NBC News because Dan Bongino was amplifying Tucker Carlson's concern that what we're seeing in the news suggests that there's some interest by bad people to assassinate Trump. That everything we've…

View segment →
Whiteboard Media & Fake News

xperience. He was Secret Service, right? He used to be Secret Service. So he knows what protecting a president or anybody looks like. So he was apparently putting some layers onto that idea, layers of credibility that we should literally think about Trump's physical safety more. And there was an NBC…

View segment →
MainContent Politics as Persuasion

actually changing the world while they run. And maybe Trump did a little of that too but I've never seen so much actual real world change at least the way we think about things. Then I have from RFK Junior, Vivek, and Larry Elder. I like to put him in the mix too with his family message. Very, very…

View segment →
Closing General Commentary

ight? You didn't understand that. Why did those other people keep saying that they agreed with Biden that that guy should go? But now you understand their play is always the same. They'll always get fake entities to support their narrative and then say hey it's not us. I mean if it were just me, sur…

View segment →

Good morning everybody, and welcome to another highlight of human civilization. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams. If I could get my cables out of your camera, we'd all be happy, wouldn't we? There we go. Look at that. Problem solved. Yay!

Now, how would you like to take this experience up to levels that nobody ever even dreamed of being possible? I've got two whiteboards back there that are going to change civilization. Possibly. It might actually change civilization, but you'll be the judge of that.

But before we get there, let's take our energy up to the stratosphere. And all you need is a cup or mug or glass or a thermos, a canteen, jug, flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better, including double whiteboards. It's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens now.

Go. That's so good.

Yeah, I've got three cameras here that I'm trying to coordinate, but I think we can make this all work.

Well, let's talk about the news before I change the world with my double whiteboards. Let's see. Number one, there's some new obesity research that suggests that we know which part of the brain is regulating your energy and your eating, I guess. And with a small tweak there, some people say you could eat as much as you want without getting obese. Does that sound like good news? You can eat as much as you want? Maybe. I mean, it's not a thing yet, so it's premature. But there's some possibility you could eat as much as you want and not get overweight. Pretty good, huh?

I can't think of a worse idea, because our food is poison. You know, our processed foods are just... the more you eat, the unhealthier you're going to get. Do you know what makes me feel the best, which is one of the reasons I've lost the 10 pounds recently? I've started tracking when I feel good and when I don't. And it's perfectly clear that the thing that makes me feel bad for the rest of the day is food. Just food.

Now, it does matter what I eat. If I just eat fresh fruit and nuts, I feel fine. Fresh fruit and nuts, perfectly healthy all day long. If I eat anything that comes out of a package, I've got inflammation, I'm tired. It's a completely different experience. If I could eat twice as much food, I wouldn't really want to eat twice as much fruit and nuts, just as one example. I wouldn't want to. But you can imagine a lot of people who like to eat processed foods and stuff. They would eat twice as much processed foods. Do you think they're going to feel better?

I feel like obesity is the only thing that stops you from overeating. I think, I don't want to get obese, so I'll eat a little less. I don't know. Feels like it could be good news. That's really bad news. You never know.

Well, China has a problem of too many men. They have 32 million more men than they have women. 32 million extra men who don't have an option of having their own exclusive woman and a family. Now that was, of course, because of China's one-child policy for so many years, which is now a three-child policy because we're running out of people. 32 million is the entire population of Afghanistan. The entire population of Afghanistan is the same as the number of extra men in China.

Historically, what have countries done when they had too many men? War. Yeah, unfortunately we're built to kind of occasionally cut down on the number of extra men. So I wouldn't be surprised if China ends up with an enormous army of proportions that nobody can even understand, because otherwise what are you going to do with them all? Are they going to start having two men for one wife? Maybe. Actually that might actually happen. That might actually become a thing. All right, maybe that would solve some other problems too. You know, if both the men were okay with it, two men with one wife would probably be a pretty good arrangement for some people. All right, so let's watch for that.

Today might be a short presentation but the most important one you've ever seen. I'm trying to build it up so you can't wait, because it actually might be.

Let me tell you one of my secrets for happiness. I've talked about this in at least one or two of my books. I like to have at least one thing going on in my life that could change the world. Now, what are the odds that any one person can change the world in any important way? Well, on one hand you say it's a very low chance that you could change the world. But if you look at how the world has ever changed, it's almost always one person. One person is usually the only way the world changes. They're first. They're not the only one, but there's always somebody who goes first. So one person can change the world.

So here are a couple things that I have going on right now that might change the world. Don't know. One of them is my book *Reframe Your Brain*. It's not written just to have a good time on an airplane. It's written because once you understand this material, you'll be able to literally change how you think on demand in a wide variety of domains. Now if you could change how you think, you would change how you act. And you could easily imagine that it would help people see the world clearer in a more useful way and could change the world.

Now if it became a number one bestseller, it would absolutely change the world. There's no doubt about it. Because in the nonfiction world, let's take a book like *The Seven Habits of Highly Successful People*. It just sat on the bestseller list for decades. That totally changed how people acted, right? They read that book and they said, "Oh, this is a bunch of good tips. I better keep my skills sharp and stuff like that." So if you can be a number one book, you actually do change the world in the nonfiction domain. So there's some chance. Doesn't mean it'll happen, but I like my odds.

But what I have on the whiteboard is another one. I'm going to show you something on the whiteboard after a few more stories that could change the world. Actually literally. What are the odds? I don't know. Not 100%, but it's not 10%. It's probably a greater than 10% chance it will change everything. So that's what I think you should wait for.

All right. The X platform, which I'm phasing out of saying Twitter at the same time. Is everybody ready? If I said "meanwhile on X," you would all know what I mean at this point, right? So is it time to start phasing out that you used to call Twitter? You ready? Everybody ready for that? I think we're ready. Let's call it. Let's call it. Today's the day. Stop dead-naming X. Stop dead-naming it. No more dead-naming.

All right. Well, on X the phrase ADL is trending. And I said to myself, what's all that about? So there are a lot of people who are calling the ADL — what does the A stand for? What's the A in ADL stand for? Anti-Defamation League. The Anti-Defamation League, which Republicans have caught on — I think they caught on a while ago — that it's basically a Democrat group and a way to attack Republicans and call them racists.

So the ADL, I'm sure they had noble intentions when they started, and I'm sure there are plenty of members of it who still have noble intentions. But in terms of the leadership, my observation and my opinion is it's just a racist Democrat organization now. So it looks like they get all the money from Democrats and then they use it to label Democrats' enemies as a bunch of racists. And then they say, "Hey, don't listen to me. Listen to the people I funded to call you a racist." Because if it was just me, it's just an opinion. But it's not just an opinion. It's coming from the people I paid to say my opinion. That's completely different. You get it? It's not my opinion. I'm just referring to the people I paid to tell you my opinion. Can you not get the difference?

All right, so that's what's going on with the ADL. When I got canceled, the ADL came after me and called me a Holocaust denier. Does that sound like me? Does that sound like they did their homework and they came up with a good take to help the world be a better place by calling me a Holocaust denier? Was that useful? That came from the head of the organization. It didn't come from some rank-and-file. The actual leader of the organization in public called me a Holocaust denier. Now, do you think that has anything to do with anything factual? Of course not. Of course not. No, they're just a racist Democrat organization whose job it is to defame people they don't like.

Now, do they also do some good stuff? Probably. Probably. That's why they get to stay in their little cover position, because they also do some good stuff. I assume. I mean, I haven't seen any, but I just assume they do some good stuff.

All right. Do you remember, oh it was 2020 or so, that I got absolutely destroyed on a platform that we call X but it used to be called something else. I'm not even going to dead-name it, and now you know that. But I tweeted that if Joe Biden got elected, the Republicans would be hunted. Oh man, did I get attacked for that. People still tweet around — no, they posted around. People still posted around to try to mock me for how wrong I was in 2020.

Are you feeling I was wrong? Do you feel that the Republicans were not at all hunted? Well, let's talk about Dominic Pezzola, a Proud Boys member who smashed a window during the January 6th stuff and got 10 years in prison for breaking a window. Joe Biggs got 15 years in prison for nothing violent. Somebody saying 17 for nothing violent.

Well, if you say to yourself, "Hey, you do the crime, you do the time, right? You do the crime, you do the time. That's just how our system works." Does it really? Has it worked with Black Lives Matter and Antifa when they were burning down the place? Is it how it worked when Trump got elected in 2016 and all of these same people — well, the groups anyway, not the people, but the same groups — attacked the capital and 50 Secret Service people were injured? Was that 50 people were injured? Lots of property damage, fires.

Yeah, so we do have a country in which we can say, I think without any argument at this point, that Republicans are hunted and that the system is trying to exterminate at least the Republican Party if not the people. So you hear some people saying, "Oh, you know, it's going to get so bad that you could be jailed for your opinion for being a Republican." Well, that's happening now. That's actually happening. People are being jailed for their opinion now. The fake reason is that they broke a window or that they were part of — those are fake reasons.

Now, do you think that the Democrats know that this is happening? If you're a Democrat, don't you think that people broke the law and then the law caught up with them and hey, that's how it's supposed to work? Do you believe they have any idea what's going on? I don't. I don't think they have any idea. How could they? The only place they would tell them are the media sources that their own side says if you even look at those sources, there's something wrong with you. You can't even look at them. You wouldn't even want it in your browser history, you know what I mean? Yeah, so they have no way to know.

So I'm going to call this my best prediction ever: that Republicans were hunted and are being hunted. How many of you would say that that's an accurate claim of success? That I accurately claimed that the way things would unfold is the Republicans would be identified and hunted. Now, I don't mean every Republican. I mean that they only have to hunt and abuse and jail enough so that the rest of you will shut the fuck up.

Do you feel that you've modified your free speech to not get caught up in the January 6 illegitimate prosecution sort of thing? Yeah, I would. So there have been a few times this week when I thought to myself of saying something online that would get close to sounding like I was organizing something. And then I thought, oh crap, if it sounds like I promoted something or organized any kind of response to what we're seeing, then I would be thrown in jail perhaps for inciting violence or maybe banned from platforms or something. So I feel that my free speech is at least on that topic completely gone.

But as I often say, you don't have to worry about some parts of the country until they're quiet. Now I plan to never be quiet, but my free speech is being eroded a little bit at a time because I don't want to go to jail. I didn't mind getting canceled, as you all noticed. Honestly, I didn't mind that at all. I didn't mind being canceled because I feel that's part of the system. People can act any way they want. It's a free world. But now I actually fear going to jail. Like actually literally. That's not a hyperbole. I spent a good time yesterday thinking about everything I do and everybody I've talked to and everything I've ever said to wonder if I could go to jail. Not because I broke any laws but because somebody could say I did. So I actually spent some of my time trying to figure out how not to go to jail for an illegitimate prosecution in America. That's a real thing. Spent my time doing that.

How many of you saw the greatest show that has ever been on the internet, in my opinion? And it featured Philip Bump, allegedly a writer for The Washington Post, being grilled. Oh my God, it was amazing. By, in a podcast, the owner of the Comedy Cellar, Noam Dworman. And I need a fact check on Noam. Is he an attorney who now owns the Comedy Cellar? Why was he so good at his questioning? Was he a trained attorney or is he just super smart? Like he really had the goods.

Does everybody know? If you know how about something not anti-Semitic? Maybe that would be better, right? Yeah, don't make the ADL be right. Don't let them be right. Calm down. Jesus Christ.

But is he an attorney? All right, well whether or not he's an attorney or he went to law school, he had the best game I've seen of any podcaster. That's a pretty big claim but I'll say it again. He had the best game I've ever seen of a podcaster in the political domain. He absolutely eviscerated Philip Bump, who most of us who were close followers of the news know he's not a real news guy. He's a regime cover-up guy, or at least allegedly. So allegedly he's one of the go-to top 10 Democrats when they need a designated liar. Somebody to cover up one of their ops.

So he's one of the ones who helped cover up the Russia collusion op, the laptop is Russian disinformation op. He lied about the upside-down Bible story. You heard that hoax. So he's sort of a hoax supporter kind of a guy. Now nobody thinks he's a real writer if they follow, if they pay attention. When I got canceled, he was one of the main guys who came after me in public to dunk on me for getting canceled. So you can imagine my glee in watching his entire career being dissected while he was still alive. It was like a human autopsy.

All right, so I'm not going to play you a clip because anything you see out of context like a little part of it would never give you a sense of what happened. It was a live murder. He was destroyed. And mostly he did it to himself.

Now some of you are going to say — I'll just give you a sense of it. Can I give you a five-second impression of Philip Bump answering any good question? And there were just lots of good questions. Just ordinary good questions. But here's him answering any good question: "Well, if you're not going to listen to all the counter-information I had... it's a setup. It's a setup. Well this, I should just walk right out if you're not going to listen to anything I say." And then Noam would say, "Well, you know, what are you trying to say? What's the answer to the question?" "Well, how many times do I have to tell you? Do you read my articles? Do you read my articles? If you haven't read my articles, this looks like just some kind of a setup."

I now made that all up, but imagine that was his reaction from the start of the interview. That was his first reaction. Imagine what he was like in an hour and 15 minutes. He got poked so hard in the first five seconds that he completely flipped out. Like his body language was just like he couldn't even sit in the chair. He was sitting in the chair like this. Like he was just completely wrecked. And at some point he realized — he stayed. Yeah, by the way there's some fake news that he walked out. You know, so the political right is not without their fake news. So the way I saw it reported is that he walked out, and nothing like that happened. In fact it was the opposite. He stayed way beyond the time he had committed to stay. So I'm going to defend him on that. He did not walk out. He walked out when really he was winding down and it was time to leave. But he did flip out.

Now a number of people said to me, "Ah, that's cognitive dissonance. The way he's acting, it's a tell for realizing something that he didn't think was true before." But I'm here to tell you I've seen a lot of cognitive dissonance. It's one of the things I talk about the most. That didn't look like cognitive dissonance to me. I didn't see any cognitive dissonance. I saw somebody who knew he was a liar and knew that his job is to cover for the regime hoaxes. And he was going to get caught because he ran into a buzzsaw that he didn't know was a buzzsaw. He probably thought he was talking to some Comedy Cellar guy who would have all the understanding of a comedian, you know what I mean? He probably thought that because the guy owned a comedy shop he was probably more of an artist who got lucky in business or something. And that this would be an easy one and he would just say everything he wants to say and the guy wouldn't know what the good questions were or what was wrong with his answer. Oh no, that's not what happened.

Again, I can't say enough about Noam Dworman. I've never seen a more capable or competent political interview. I mean he's a star. He's a freaking star. And he never lost his cool even while Bump was flipping out, which made it even all the more interesting to watch. So I would not say that was cognitive dissonance. It was not cognitive dissonance. That was somebody who got caught.

And so here's the best part of it. After all of that he made a reference to why you should believe him because he's the expert on the Hunter Biden laptop. So you should believe everything he says. But also that he has the credibility of a big institution that backs him. He actually said that. He said that you can believe him because The Washington Post backs him. The Washington Post.

Now let me ask you this. How many Democrats would know that that's a laugh line? Like how many actual Democrat voters know that saying that The Washington Post backs you is really literally hilarious? Probably not many. But I'll bet a lot of Republicans know it. The Washington Post reportedly and allegedly gets their direction from the CIA. Reportedly. And it seems obvious that some of the writers are more on the page of wherever their direction is coming from than others.

Okay, so The Washington Post actually ended up backing him when he's been conclusively debunked as a liar on several of his stories. Like there's no doubt about it. It's not even opinion. It's just the legal system itself showed that he was a liar or that his information was wrong. Not necessarily he was lying because that's mind reading, but that his stories were factually incorrect. And The Washington Post, instead of saying well he may have gotten some facts wrong but we back him, they didn't do that. They just said they back him as if his incorrect reporting is what they were backing.

So to me this was fascinating. It was extra fascinating because it showed you the gears of the machine. If you did not know that the opinion pieces, the opinion writers especially for something like The Washington Post, are not like regular reporters, that there's a whole different mechanism going on, if you didn't know that you got to see it for the first time. Because if you wondered, "Hey, I wonder if he thinks he's telling the truth. Maybe he believes what he's saying." You could tell for sure he doesn't believe what he's saying. That became really clear. I'm not a mind reader but after an hour and a quarter of him treading water and trying to divert from things, it was pretty obvious he knew. Yeah, it was pretty obvious he's a propaganda guy and not a genuine opinion guy. Well that's my opinion about him.

Let's talk about some more hoaxes. So here's one I didn't know at the time but apparently it's been revealed that there was some big massive hoax up in Canada about alleged mass graves of indigenous children. So the idea was that at some point in Canada's history — and I don't know what era they're talking about — but that a bunch of indigenous people, their children were killed in a mass grave. This of course turned out to be completely false. But in the period between when it was widely reported as true and the time it took them to dig up all the places where they said it was to find out there was nothing there, during that time 83 churches were burned down or vandalized in Canada in response.

Now, do you think that nobody who was pressing the story knew it was false? Because remember when they looked for evidence there was none. There was not even one body. It was just dirt. So do you think that there was anybody who reported, "People are saying this but there is zero evidence"? Do you think the news said there's absolutely no evidence of it so don't assume this is true but you know it's in the news so we're telling you about it? Somehow the Canadian news convinced people this was real without any evidence. Without any evidence. Because it didn't happen so there couldn't be evidence, right? I mean not physical evidence. And the physical evidence would be the most obvious thing you'd ask for because it's literally about a mass grave.

So if the story is about — I think it was multiple mass graves, right? If the story is about a mass grave on your own territory, how long does it take to see if there's a picture of some bones? How did it go that long? You have to assume that this was an op of some kind because it doesn't look like a natural news story or even a natural rumor that got in the news. It looks like an op. It looks like somebody wanted to get rid of some churches. Now I don't know that that was the case. It might have been just massive incompetence. Could it have been just massive incompetence?

Well here's the fun part. Oh, one more. Dan Bongino is not happy with NBC News because Dan Bongino was amplifying Tucker Carlson's concern that what we're seeing in the news suggests that there's some interest by bad people to assassinate Trump. That everything we've seen leading up to it is creating an impression that there might be even something more extreme if they can't take him out through legal means. So Dan Bongino apparently — so he has obviously career experience. He was Secret Service, right? He used to be Secret Service. So he knows what protecting a president or anybody looks like. So he was apparently putting some layers onto that idea, layers of credibility that we should literally think about Trump's physical safety more. And there was an NBC News that mocked him and threw him in the same category with Alex Jones as a disgraced conspiracy theorist. That's what they called Alex Jones: disgraced. That's what they call me too. That's what I call myself. I like to call myself disgraced cartoonist.

So the story is if you were a Democrat and you looked at the story you'd say, "Huh, Dan Bongino is claiming something without evidence and then NBC News doing their job as a news organization called him out for being a conspiracy theorist like all those other conspiracy theorists and you should watch out for those guys." So that's what you think if you were a Democrat. If you're a Republican you probably have seen the smart people say that NBC is essentially a CIA tool and that that's the reporting. So NBC News is considered, with The Washington Post I guess, two of the primary ways the CIA does propaganda in this country, which is completely legal. The CIA is completely legal to run propaganda through our own news entities. It's not ethical but it's legal.

So now that you know that NBC News is considered an owned news organ by the CIA, who do you think you'd worry about assassinating Trump from within the country? Are you worried that the FBI would do it? Are you worried that a judge would do it? Some judge? Are you worried that a regular police officer would do it? Now if you're worried about it at all you're probably thinking about our own CIA because you have some questions about Kennedy's assassination, right? You have some questions.

Now I don't know if the CIA was involved with the JFK assassination. I only know it looks exactly like it. And I think RFK Jr., who certainly has looked into it, believes there's a connection. So now does it make sense? Dan Bongino, who's an expert in this field, used to — his job — says he sees the environment creating what looks like an elevated risk. Is that unreasonable? He's an expert. He's showing his work. Everything he tells you he can back up with this happened, this happened, and together I'm feeling an elevated risk. Now that's not a certainty. It's a risk. And that risk would absolutely be from the CIA if it's real at all. And if the CIA wanted to cover it up, who would they send? NBC News.

So if you happen to know the landscape of the actual real news situation, it looks like the CIA is covering for themselves.

If you're a Republican and you — did you miss me? I wonder if it was the topic. If I said masks are really good for you do you think it would have glitched? Just asking. Does anybody think that if I said hey everybody get your boosters, get your boosters, do you think we would have a technical problem? I don't know. Maybe. Hard to say. But you know I haven't started yet. Let's see if we can make a YouTube glitch again. Anybody want to see if I can make it glitch again? I'm just getting started. All right, let's see if we can make the deep state show its hand. Now it could be a coincidence. Coincidences do happen.

All right, we're going to clip this next part. So the clip is going to start right after I put my hand down. Are you ready? All right. I'd like to describe to you with my double whiteboards how I see the landscape of the country in the news, etc. I'm going to take it from two perspectives. Number one, what is the situation for Republicans? Situation for Republicans as I see it. Yeah, I'll move that in your way. Looks like this.

As you know, not everybody has good information and sometimes we all believe things that aren't true, including me. On the Republican side this is how I see the landscape. Sometimes there are rumors that are started at grassroots level and these rumors could come from anywhere. These are just three examples. Could be from Reddit or somewhere on X. It's a bunch of BS. And sometimes that BS trickles up to leadership and famous people. And so you'll get some Republicans who will believe some of it and they'll get Republican voters to believe it. And then the Democrats will criticize them for being wrong about something that's wrong.

Right now this looks about it. Does that kind of capture the Republican side of things? I'm trying to get it out of my own way here. See, would you say that largely captures what happens? No, I'm not saying that everything Republicans believe is wrong. Nothing like that. I'm saying that when they're wrong — because everybody's wrong, right? — but when they're wrong it usually looks like this. It bubbles up from some rumors. Some politicians pick up on it. Republicans say, "Oh, other people are saying it too." And next thing you know there's some BS and then the Democrats pounce and they fact-check you and they make you look stupid and then they say all Republicans are dumb because some of them believe this stuff. So that's basically the landscape.

All right, but what does the landscape look like on the other side? Does it look like this? Not as much. No, it looks a little different. It's way more complicated but it looks sort of like this. This would be the Democrat news landscape, if I can get out of my own way. All right, so I think most of you can see it now.

So you've got the CIA and the FBI and various Democrat operatives who feed their media. These are just some of the names we know are the illegitimate media. So these are the ones who are being influenced by Democrat leadership and various entities that they have some control over. So the media is fake news. But Democrats are not. They're completely unaware. They think that there's — the Democrats believe that both sides have their own fake news and that's really the whole story. "Oh we had a little fake news, sure, but you had a little fake news. Most of the news is true." Nothing like that is happening. No.

In the political world, nothing. The news about hurricanes is probably real but political news is coming from influencers. The media is completely corrupt and the right-wing media is only looked at by people on the right. So the left is completely unaware that there's any counter-narrative. They never see them. So they take their fake news and they get support from the other fake entities which they support. "Oh the ADL says you're bad too. Oh the media said you're bad but these other people, they agree." These are all funded by Democrats so they're funded to look like legitimate organizations but really they're just Democrat organizations to attack the other side.

What about the fact-checkers? Also funded mostly by Democrats. Also fake. So once you've got all of these other organizations from the media to these funded Democrat organizations, you've got a real big ball of fake news. That's why there are over 20 hoaxes on my hoax list that the Democrats all believe are real. At least 20 major hoaxes that went through this machine.

The outcome of this is that the Democrats are brainwashed. Literally. That is not to say that Republicans have only the truth. Nothing like that's happening. Republicans are also wrong about things quite often. But it is bubbling up from the bottom. It's not coming from the top. From the Democrats it's all top stuff. And so their poor voters don't have any idea what's going on. They think that this is some kind of a legitimate process and they don't have any way to find out it's not. They don't have a mechanism to know that it's not real because the only thing that's telling them it's not real are people like me. And they've already told you I'm a disgraced cartoonist and the ADL told you that I'm a Holocaust denier. That's what the ADL said. The leader of the ADL. I'm not just saying that somebody sent a tweet. The actual leader of the ADL labeled me a Holocaust denier.

Now I don't have to defend that. You know I'm not a Holocaust denier. But it shows you how the machine works, right? When you saw the Philip Bump interview in which he got completely demolished for being a fake news guy, you could see all of this finally being exposed. It was obvious he wasn't a genuine writer with real opinions. You could tell that it came from somewhere and he was supporting some kind of a machine.

All right, so that's what happens to the Democrat voters. Democrat voters get brainwashed and the Republican voters get shadow-banned so they can't fight back. I would be very surprised if this gets big traffic on YouTube, if you know what I mean. Watch the traffic it gets let's say on the X platform and compare that to the baseline and then watch what happens on YouTube and compare that to my baseline. Do you think they're going to be the same? Very little chance of that. Because most of the platforms, the media platforms — which I accidentally erased. This would say social media. They're going to make sure that the other side that has been brainwashed by the system, they're going to make sure they don't see me. Only the people who already agree with me are going to see me. And of course there's prosecutions going on so the Department of Justice is making sure that if you have an opinion such as the one I just expressed that they're coming after you.

So here's what is really, really interesting about this week. The entire gears of the machine are now obvious. You can see the entire Hunter Biden money-making scheme. It's all laid out. You can see every part of it now. The Philip Bumps of the world, the illegitimate people, are going to say "but, but, but you haven't made the case that there's a direct payment from Hunter Biden for any favors that went to Joe Biden." But we know he paid his expenses and that's the way it works. We know that there's not going to be a piece of paper. We know what influence buying and selling looks like. It's all laid out. But Democrats don't know it. Don't know it.

Here's what would change everything. I don't know if it'll happen but if you want some optimism, all it would take is to draw this diagram into a better form and then every time there's a story that could be better understood by this landscape you print it with a story and then you highlight the parts that have been activated. For example, some people say — I don't know if this is true but some say the FBI is more influencing The New York Times whereas the CIA is more influencing The Washington Post. I don't know if that's true but wouldn't it be interesting to see a story in the news where you could light up these parts and show which ones were involved? So once you could show the landscape and how different it is on the Republican side, you could possibly for the first time release some of the Democrats who in my opinion are just victims.

I have to say that in 2016 when I started talking about politics in public and you know it would be a big fight between one side versus the other side and to me it just felt like oh we just have different opinions. Different opinions, that's all. And we're fighting it out. That's the way it's supposed to work. But once I learned the entire landscape and I realized that their opinions are assigned to them and then they're solidified by this entire constellation of let's say people who are just slapping some paint on the turd, if you know what I mean. Once you understand the whole landscape you understand that they're not legitimate actors in a legitimate process. They're actually victims. And so I've started treating my Democrat brainwashed critics with sympathy and I just say I'm sorry they did this to you. Because that's my actual feeling. I don't feel like they're attacking me because they had some independent, well-articulated thought and they've decided that attacking me will help them in some way. Attacking me isn't going to help anybody.

I actually don't have any incentives other than to try to make things a little better before I leave this weird little ball they call the earth. I don't need your money, you know. And obviously I'm not doing it for reputation because I've been the most disgraced and maligned person in the United States probably this year who wasn't named Trump. So I'm only doing it because my payoff is if I make something better then I feel good about myself. That's it. So that makes me kind of dangerous.

Anyway, once you understand the model and if we have a way to communicate it. So here's the key point. It's not good enough that I explained it to you. That doesn't help anybody. It would only be good if this could be operationalized, turned into a sort of a standard way of explaining things so that whenever Democrats come in and they're victims, they've been brainwashed, you could show them something.

Now the ideal form — I'll just brainstorm a little bit — an ideal form would be some kind of a graphic that's maybe not exactly this but something in that nature where you could click on any part of it to validate that it belongs on here. In other words you could click on one of these groups and you could say here's a news story that shows you why they're not legitimate. Here's a news story that shows they get all their funding from Democrats, right? So if you could do that. You know, here's the fact that Philip Bump is ever involved in the story. If you knew the landscape as soon as you saw his name you say ah, it's a Philip Bump situation. As soon as you turned on the news and you saw any one of these designated liars — you know, Schiff, Swalwell, you can make the list yourself. There's some people that the news calls in because they know it's not true but they need people who are willing to say literally anything in order to get somebody on TV who will support the narrative.

And that, ladies and gentlemen, concludes my double whiteboard explanation of how everything works.

Now having now completed that presentation, I try to make a beginning and end because I'm going to clip it. So would you let's double back to my first claim. All right, my claim before I started this was I'd like to have at least one thing brewing in my life that could change the world. That could change the world. If Democrats learned what happened to them — and we're almost there. We're almost to the point where you could actually present them with the full machinery of what put them in the situation they're in. Now some of them have been also educated by the education system. I should have put the education system up here. College. But college has turned into one of the brainwashing operations. So that probably belongs up there as well. But if you didn't know that college is a brainwashing operation — maybe not intentionally, it just sort of evolved that way — you wouldn't really know why you even have opinions.

People actually don't know why they have opinions. They think that they thought of them themselves. That's not how anything works. People don't come up with their own opinions. They're assigned. And they're assigned based on what you have access to on your own. Right? If you had access to your own information maybe it'd be hard to assign it but we don't. I can tell you, you tell me who you voted for and I'll tell you what information you have access to. And you just won't even let yourself look at the other stuff. So that's how our opinions are assigned. The fact that we don't have a way out. We don't look at other stuff.

Now this group, again I will compliment you because I think it's warranted. The people who watch this kind of content are not like any of the people I talked about, right? This group is far more likely to identify BS on their own side than other people. And identifying it on your own side is the hard part. Identifying BS on the other side, well that's children's play. That's children's play. Everybody can tell the other side is lying. The hard part is knowing when your side is lying. Right? Because they have the inside track on influencing you. So watch out for your own side. They're the dangerous ones.

And let me say it a different way. If Republicans were not believing a whole bunch of things in addition to things that are true, the Democrats could not suppress them. It's only because there's so many Republicans who do believe that they could be completely discounted by the other side. So is there anything that's happening right now that would change that situation where Republicans seem to be believing in a lot of — what would change that and what would his name be? Yeah, you're ahead of me. Vivek is not just really good at what he does like Trump. He's changing the narrative. Everybody who saw Vivek talk about climate change just went up a level in their ability to explain their side. Am I right?

If you were copying Trump and saying it snowed yesterday so climate change is a hoax, you look like an idiot. I'm sorry. You might even be right but you would look like an idiot if you repeated what Trump said about climate change. Which I'm not saying Trump's wrong about anything. I'm saying that the way he expresses it is in the least scientific terms you could ever have. When he talks about windmills he jokingly says you know if the wind stops blowing you can't watch TV and the crowd loves it. Don't repeat that. No, that's just something Trump says. Don't repeat that.

But when you watch Vivek talk, every argument he uses is really close to perfect because he just has the skill. So if you copied Vivek's arguments for anything the Democrats would be unarmed. Because their whole game is making you look like a chimpanzee for believing the most ridiculous. And Vivek doesn't buy that. He doesn't buy into that. He actually uses arguments that can be checked. He uses things we all understand and he doesn't support anything he can't defend with a strong argument. But that's not the case for most Republicans. Republicans have consistently over time had points of view that they didn't defend even in a halfway rational way really. But he does. So he can basically fix your weakest part of the Republican Party by at least showing you what a good argument looks like. And you just follow his arguments and you will be fine and the entire party will be fine.

This is why I say that the candidates who are running this time, it's a whole different thing. They're actually changing the world while they run. And maybe Trump did a little of that too but I've never seen so much actual real world change at least the way we think about things. Then I have from RFK Junior, Vivek, and Larry Elder. I like to put him in the mix too with his family message. Very, very positive stuff. So that's the positive part.

So ladies and gentlemen, I believe I have talked about all the news. Oh, so here's some more of understanding the big picture. Does it make sense to you that leadership are half-captors? How could you possibly explain Biden-Harris? I throw in with the mentally incompetent. So there's something wrong with Harris's brain. Would you agree there's something wrong with her brain? It looks to me like substance abuse but I can't say that with certainty. She doesn't look like the same person who she used to be and she does act and look completely incompetent. So it looks like drugs. But if it's organic she needs to get some help because she's clearly not functioning like an adult, right? So I mean that's just my point of view. So I'm not a mind reader but when you look at even McConnell, you know it's not even just the Democrats. There's something going on with the — we've lost the brains of the leaders. Went away and nothing really changed. That tells you there's somebody behind the screen. Because if there were nobody behind the screen the people who are just regular Democrats would say, "Whoa, we better put a better candidate forward." Yeah, so there's some kind of influence or operation that's going on that's beyond just trying to conserve the majority. There's something deeply wrong here.

All right. Amazingly YouTube did not glitch as far as I can tell. Did I miss any news stories that you desperately wish I had talked about? Federman? Obama? Well some say that the power behind the screen is Obama or Clinton but I would say that they may be the same as the intelligence groups. So when I talk about the CIA and maybe some parts of the FBI — and again you're not talking about every person in those groups. You know it's always people within the group. You can kind of see the whole landscape at this point. Yeah, so Obama might be mixed up with that crowd. Some say Obama CIA. Well if you look at — I think Biden said there were five current or former heads of the CIA who signed the laptop disinformation letter. Five former or current members of the CIA. Is there anything else you need to know? Yeah. And they backed completely the Democrat narrative. They did not back the country. It's clear that that was not for the good of the country. That was for the good of the Democrats.

So were they independently acting in a way that they thought was just good for Democrats and they were Democrats and that was the end of the story? Do you think that's the case or do you think there might have been some power that organized all of those people? Hard to say but I got my suspicions.

And I guess Jimmy Buffett passed away at 76. He was by the way one of my role models for business. When I started doing the comic he was killing it and he was selling out in all his concerts despite not being more of a name brand rock star kind of guy. And the way he did it was he was really good at marketing. He was super good at marketing. So he was my role model for marketing. He had a strong — I guess he had a mailing list and had sort of almost a cult following. Yeah, they ate a lot of cheeseburgers. That's all we know about him.

So here's another sign that your news is not real news. You ready for this? How many times have you heard that the Ukrainian prosecutor was really going after Burisma? No, he was really not doing his job and that there were international groups that wanted him removed. So you've heard that like crazy, right? Has anybody asked this question? And I thought Philip Bump was going to get this question but Philip Bump makes the same argument. It wasn't just Joe Biden who wanted that guy fired, the Ukrainian prosecutor. It wasn't just him. Yeah, Viktor Shokin. It wasn't just Biden. It was these international communities. And then he throws his hands away. It goes, here's the question for him: which entity, media, has interviewed one of those people? And which one of them could say no to the United States? Which of the people who wanted Shokin gone individually could say no to the United States and feel it wouldn't have an impact on their career? Any? No.

The answer is this is one of these. So remember I showed you how this is done. So you have bad people who plant a story and then once the story is planted you have various fake organizations back the story and then everybody can say hey you don't have to believe me, look at these organizations. Right? Do you recognize the play? All of those organizations they mention that also wanted Shokin gone are just their own surrogates. And somehow both the left-leaning media and the right-leaning media has never looked into that. Just think about that. Nobody's ever looked into it. Have any of those individuals who agreed that Shokin — first time you're hearing this? Yeah. Nobody's asked, can we put one of those people who agree with you, Joe Biden, who also thought he should go, can we talk to one of them? And could we learn a little bit more about their background and how they get their funding and what they think their career looks like and maybe even what president they backed? Were they Trump supporters? No, they were in other countries, right?

Now the fact that no journalist looked into those other entities shows you that the fix is really deep. I mean it must include the right-leaning media because how would the right-leaning media ignore that? It's the easiest thing just to check to find if the other people who agree are honest players.

Now when I told you that when you see the landscape it allows you to take all of their ops and map it to the parts and then you instantly understand it. See you didn't understand, right? You didn't understand that. Why did those other people keep saying that they agreed with Biden that that guy should go? But now you understand their play is always the same. They'll always get fake entities to support their narrative and then say hey it's not us. I mean if it were just me, sure I'm a Democrat so you can't believe me, but look at those entities that I funded or control. You saw how China seemed to control the WHO during the pandemic. Same play. Same play. Don't believe us. Hey, I know you don't believe us in China but look at the organization that I control. So if you're not going to believe me certainly you could believe the organization I totally dominate and control.

Yeah, once you see it it's everywhere because it's the same play. All they do is they come up, they change the names and the players and then they just put it back on the framework and it works. And Republicans don't have this kind of system. They just have people who have ideas. Some of them are wrong. That's it. People have ideas and some of them are wrong. It's the whole story for the Republicans.

So that, ladies and gentlemen, concludes the best livestream you've ever seen in your life. And when I tell you that there's some chance that it will change the world, I think you can see what I'm talking about. Thanks for joining. YouTube, I'm sorry you got glitched there but I think you got to see the good parts. And I will talk to you tomorrow.

good morning everybody and welcome to another highlight of human civilization it's called coffee with Scott Adams if I could get my cables out of your camera we'd all be happy wouldn't we there we go look at that problem solved D yay now how would you like to take this experience up to levels that nobody ever even dreamed of being possible I've got two white boards back there that are going to change civilization possibly it might actually change civilization but you'll be the judge of that but before we get there let's take our energy up to the stratosphere and all you need is a cuper muger glass attack your chelse dine a canteen jug Su flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid I like coffee and join me now for the unparallel pleasure the dopamine hit of the day the thing that makes everything better including double whiteboards it's called the simultaneous Sip and it happens now go that's so good yeah I've got I've got three cameras here that I'm trying to coordinate but I think we can make this all work well let's talk about the news before I change the world with my double whiteboard and uh let's see number one there's uh some new obesity research that uh suggests that we know which part of the brain is regulating your energy and you're eating I guess and with a small tweak there some people say you could eat as much as you want without getting obese does that sound like good news you can eat as much as you want maybe I mean it's not a thing yet so it's premature but there's some possibility you could eat as much as you want and not get overweight pretty good huh I can't think of a worse idea because our food is poison you know our process foods are just the more you eat the unhealthier you're going to get do you know what makes me feel the best which is one of the reasons I've lost the 10 lbs recently i' I've started tracking you know when I feel good and when I don't and it's perfectly clear that the thing that makes me feel bad for the rest of the day is food just food now it doesn't matter you know it does matter what I eat you know if I just eat uh you know fresh fruit and nuts I feel fine fresh fruit fruit and nuts perfectly healthy all day long if I eat anything that comes out of a package um I got inflammation I'm tired you know it's a completely different experience if I could eat twice as much food I wouldn't really want to eat twice as much fruit and nuts just as one example I wouldn't want but you can imagine a lot of people who like to eat processed foods and stuff they would eat twice as much processed foods do you think they're going to feel better I feel like obesity is the only thing that stops you from overeating I think I don't want to get obese so I'll eat a little less I don't know feels like it could be good news that's really bad news you never know well China has a problem of too many men they have 32 million more men than they have women 32 million extra men who don't have an option of having their own you know exclusive woman and a family now that was of course because of China's one child policy for so many years which is now a three-child policy uh because we're running out of people 32 million is the the entire population of Afghanistan the entire population of Afghanistan is the same as the number of extra in China historically what have countries done when they had too many men War yeah unfortunately we're built to um kind of occasionally cut down on the number of extra men uh so I wouldn't be surprised if China ends up with an enormous Army of proportions that nobody can even and you know understand cuz otherwise what are you going to do with them all are they going to start having two men for one wife maybe actually that might actually happen that might actually become a thing all right maybe that would solve some other problems too you know if both the men were okay with it two men with one wife would probably be pretty good ex it would probably be a pretty good arrangement for some people all right so let's watch for that um today today might be a short presentation but the most important one you've ever seen I'm trying to build it up so you can't wait because it actually might be let me tell you one of my secrets for happiness I've talked about this in at least one or two of my books I like to have at least one thing going on in my life that could change the world now what are the odds that any one person can change the world in you know any important way well on one hand you say well it's very low chance that you could change the world but if you look at how the world has ever changed it's almost always one person one person is usually the only way the world changes they're first they're not the only one but they there's always somebody who goes first you know there's a so one person can change the world so here are a couple things that I have going on right now that might change the world don't know one of them is my book reframe your brain it's not written just to have a good time on an airplane it's written because it once you understand this material you'll be able to literally change how you think on demand in know wide variety of domains now if you could change how you think you would change how you would you would act and you know you could easily imagine that it would help people you know see the world clearer in a more useful way and could change the world now if it became a number one bestseller it would absolutely change the world there's no doubt about it because in the non in the non fiction World Let's Take A Book Like The Seven Habits of Highly Successful People you know just sat on the bestseller list for decades that totally changed how people acted right they read that book and they said oh this is a bunch of good tips I'll better keep my skills sharp and stuff like that so if you can be a number one book you actually do change the world in the non-fiction in the non-fiction domain so there's some chance doesn't mean it'll happen but I like my odds but what I have in the Whiteboard is another one I'm going to show you something on the Whiteboard after a few more stories that could change the world actually literally what are the odds I don't know you know not 100% but it's not 10% it's probably a greater than 10% chance it will change everything so that's that's what I that's what I think you should wait for all right uh the xplatform which I'm phasing out of saying Twitter at the same time is everybody ready if I said meanwhile on X you would all know what I mean at this point right so is it time to start phasing out the that you used to call Twitter you ready everybody ready for that I think I think we're ready let's call it let's call it today's the day stop dead naming X stop dead naming it no no dead naming all right well on X the uh the phrase ADL is trending and I said to to myself what's all all that about so there are a lot of people who are calling the uh ADL what does the A stand for what's the A and ADL stand for anti- defamation League the Anti-Defamation League um which Republicans have caught on I think they caught on a while ago that it's a basically a a Democrat 8 group and and a way to attack Republicans and way and call the braces so the ADL is I'm sure they had Noble you know Noble uh intentions when they started and I'm sure there are plenty of members of it who still have Noble intentions but in terms of the leadership my observation and my opinion is it's just a racist Democrat organization now so it looks like they get all the money from Democrats and then they use it to label Democrats enemies as a bunch of racists and then they say hey don't listen to me listen to the people I funded to call you a racist because if it was just me I mean if it's just me it's just an opinion but it's not just an opinion it's coming from the people I paid to say my opinion that's completely different you get it it's not my opinion I'm just referring to the people I paid to tell you my opinion can you not get the difference all right so that's what's going on with the ADL that when when I got cancelled the ADL came after me and called me a holocaust denier does that sound like me does that sound like they did their homework and they came up with a good take to help the world be a better place by calling me a holocaust denier was was that useful that came from the head of the organization it didn't come from like a you know some rank inv the actual leader of the organization in public called me a holocaust denier now do you think that has anything to do with anything factual of course not of course not no they're just a racist Democrat organization uh whose job it is to you know defame people they don't like now do they also do some good stuff probably probably that that's why they get to stay in their little cover position CU they also do some good stuff I assume I mean I haven't seen any but I just assume they do some good stuff all right um do you remember oh it was 2020 or so that I got absolutely destroyed on a platform that we call X but it used to be called something else I'm not even going to dead name and now you know that but uh I tweeted that if uh Joe Biden got elected the Republicans would be hunted oh man did I get attacked for that oh people people still tweeted around no no they posted around people still posted around to try to mock me for how wrong I was in 2020 are you feeling I was wrong do you feel that the Republicans were not at all haunted well let's talk about the uh Dominique Piza uh he proud boy member who smashed a window during the January 6th stuff and got 10 years in prison for breaking a window 10 years in prison for breaking a window Joe bigs got 15 years in prison for nothing violent 17 s somebody saying 17 for nothing violent well if you say to yourself hey you do you do the crime you do the time right you do the crime you do the time that's just how our system works does it does it really is that have it worked with black lives matter and antifa when they were burning down the place is it is it how it worked when Trump got um elected in 2016 and all of these same people well the groups anyway not the people but the same groups attacked uh the capital and 50 50 secret service people were injured was that 50 people were injured lots of property damage fires yeah so we do have a country in which we can say um I think without any argument at this point that uh Republicans are hunted and that the system is trying to exterminate at least the Republican party if not the people so you you hear some people saying oh you know it's going to get so bad that you could be jailed for your opinion for being a republican well that's happening now that's that's actually happening people are being jailed for their opinion now the the fake reason is that they broke a window or that they were part of those are fake reasons now do you think that the Democrats know that this is happening if you're a Democrat don't you think that people broke the law and then the law caught up with them and hey that's how it's supposed to work do you believe they have any idea what's going on I don't I don't think they have any idea how could they the only place they would tell them are the media sources that their own side says if you even look at those sources there's something wrong with you you can't even look at them you wouldn't even want it in your browser history you know what I mean yeah so they have no way to know um so I'm going to call this my best prediction ever that Republicans were haunted and are being haunted how many of you would say that that's a accurate claim of success that I accurately claimed that the way things were added is the Republicans would be identified and hunted now I don't mean every Republican I mean that they only have to hunt and abuse and jail enough so that the rest of you will shut the up do do you feel that you've uh you've uh let's say modified your free speech to not get caught up in the January 6 you know illegitimate prosecution sort of thing yeah uh I would so there have been a few times this week when I thought to myself of saying something something online that would get close to sounding like I was organizing something and then I thought oh crap if it sounds like I promoted something or organized any kind of response to what we're seeing then I would be thrown in jail perhaps to be someone inciting violence or maybe banned from platforms or something so I feel that my free speech is at least on that topic is completely G but as I often say you don't have to worry about some parts of the country until they're quiet now I plan to never be quiet but my free speech is being eroded a little bit you know at a time because I don't want to go to jail you know I didn't mind getting cancelled as you all noticed honestly that I didn't mind that at all I didn't mind being canceled cuz I feel that's part of the system yeah people can act any way they want it's a free free world but now I actually fear going to jail like actually literally that that's not a hyperbole I spent a good time yesterday thinking about everything I do and everybody I've talked to and everything I've ever said to wonder if I could go to jail not because I broke any laws but because somebody could say I did so I actually spent some of my time trying to figure out how not to go to jail for an illegitimate prosecution in America that's a real thing spend my time doing that yeah um how many of you saw the greatest show that has ever been on the internet in my opinion and it featured Phil bump uh allegedly a writer of The Washington Post uh being grilled oh my God it was it was Amazing by in a podcast by the owner of the comedy seller gnome dworman and I need a fact check on gnome uh is he an attorney who now owns the comedy Center why why was he so good at his questioning was he is he a trained attorney or is he just super smart like he really he really had the goods does everybody know if you know how about something not anti-semitic maybe that would be better right yeah don't make the ADL be right don't don't don't let them be right right calm down Jesus Christ um wow um but is he an attorney all right well whether or not he's an attorney or he went to law school he he had the best game I've seen of any podcaster that's a pretty big claim but I'll say it again he had the best game I've ever seen of a podcaster in the political domain he absolutely eviscerated Phil bump who most of us who were you know close followers of the news you know he's not a real news guy he's a regime coverup guy or at least allegedly allegedly so allegedly he's one of the go-to top 10 Democrats when they need a designated liar somebody to cover up one of their Ops so he's one of the ones who helped cover up the uh Russia collusion op the laptop is a Russian disinformation op uh he lied about the upside down Bible story you heard that hoax so he's sort of a hoax supporter kind of a guy now nobody thinks he's a real real writer if they follow if they pay attention when I got got canceled he was one of the main guys who came after me in public to dunk on me for getting cancelled so you can imagine my glee in watching his entire career being dissected while he was still alive it was like a human autopsy all right so I'm not going to play you a a clip because anything you see out of context like a little part of it would never would never give you a sense of what happened it was It was a live murder he was destroyed and mostly he did it to himself now some of you are going to say I I'll just give you a sense of it can I can I give you let's say a 5c uh 5-second impression of Phil bump answering any good question and there were just like lots of good questions just ordinary good questions but here's him answering any good question well if you're not going to listen to all the counter information I had I it's a setup it's a setup well this I should just walk right out if you're not going to listen to anything I say and then gome would say well you know what are you trying to say you know what's the answer to the question well how many times do I have to tell you do you read my articles do you read my articles if you haven't read my articles this looks like just some kind of a setup you know I now I made that all up but imagine imagine that was his reaction from this start of the interview that was his first reaction imagine what he was like in an hour and 15 minutes he got poked so hard in the first 5 Seconds that he completely flipped out like his body language was just like he couldn't even sit in the chair right he was like sitting in the chair like this like he was just completely wrecked and at some point he realized he he stayed yeah by the way there's some fake news that he walked out uh you know so the the right is not the political right is not without their fake news so the way I saw it reported is that he walked out and nothing like that happened in fact it was the opposite he he stayed Way Beyond the time he had committed to stay so I'm going to defend him on that he did not walk out he walked out when really he was winding down and it was time to leave but he did flip out now a number of people said to me Ah that's cognitive dissonance the way he's acting it's I a tell for realizing you know something that that he didn't think was true before but I'm here to tell you I've seen a lot of cognitive dissonances one of the things I talk about the most that didn't look like cognitive dissonance to me I didn't see any cognitive dissonance I saw somebody who knew he was a liar and knew that his job is to cover for the regime hoaxes and he was going to get caught cuz he ran into a buz saw that he didn't know was a buz saw he probably thought he was talking to some comedy seller guy who would have all the understanding of a comedian you know what I mean he probably thought that because the guy owned a comedy shop he was probably more of an artist who got lucky in business or something and that and that this would be like a you know an easy one and he would just say everything he wants to say and the the guy wouldn't know what the good questions were or what was wrong with his answer oh no that's not what happened again I can't say enough about gnome Dorman I've never seen a more capable or competent political interview I mean he's a star he's a freaking star and he never lost his cool even while bump was flipping out which made it even all the more interesting to watch so um I would not say that was cognitive distance it was not cognitive distance that that was somebody who got caught and uh so here's the best part of it uh after all of that he made a reference to why you should believe him because he's the expert on the on the huntter laptop shoes you should believe everything he says but also that he uh he has The credibility of a big institution that backs him he actually said that he said that you can believe him because the Washington Post backs him the Washington Post now let me ask you this how many Democrats would know that that's a a laugh line like how many actual Democrat voters know that saying that the Washington Post backs you is really literally hilarious probably not many yeah but I'll bet a lot of Republicans know it yeah the Washington Post reportedly and allegedly gets their direction from the CIA reportedly and it seems obvious that some of the writers are more on more on the page of wherever their direction is coming from than others okay so the Washington Post actually ended up backing him uh when he's been conclusively debunked as a liar on several of his stories like there's no doubt about it it's not it's not even opinion it's just it's just the the legal system itself showed that he was a liar or that his information was wrong not not necessarily he was lying because that's mind reading but that his stories were factually Incorrect and the Washington Post instead of instead of saying well he may have gotten some facts wrong but we back him they didn't do that they just said they back him as if his incorrect reporting is what they were backing so um to me this was fascinating um it was extra fascinating because it showed you the gears of the machine if you did not know that the opinion pieces the opinion writers especially for something like the Washington Post are not not like regular reporters that there's old different mechanism going on if you didn't know that you got to see it for the first time because if you wondered hey I wonder if he thinks he's telling the truth maybe he believes what he's saying you could tell for sure he doesn't believe what he's saying that became really clear I'm not a mind reader but after an hour and a quarter of him you know treading water and trying to you know divert from things he said it was pretty obvious he knew yeah it pretty obvious he's a propaganda guy and not a not a not a genuine opinion guy well that's my opinion about him let's talk about some more hoaxes so here's one I didn't know at the time but apparently it's been revealed that there was some big massive hoax up in Canada about alleged Mass Graves of indigenous children so the I guess the idea was that some point in Canada's history and I don't know what uh what era they're talking about but that bunch of indigenous people their children were killed in a mass this of course turned out to be completely false but in the between the period that it was widely reported as true and the time it took them to dig up all the places where they said it was to find out there was nothing there during that time 83 churches were burned down or vandalized in Canada in response now do you think that um that nobody who was press in the story knew it was false CU remember when they looked for evidence there was none there was not even one body it was just dirt so do you think that there was anybody who reported people are saying this but there is zero evidence do you think the news said there's absolutely no evidence of it so don't assume this is true but you know it's in the news so we're telling you about somehow the Canadian news convinced people this was real without any evidence without any evidence because it didn't happen so there couldn't be evidence right I mean not physical evidence and the physical evidence would be the most obvious thing you'd ask for because it's literally about a mass grave so if the story is about I think it was multiple Mass graves right if the story is about a mass grave on your own territory how how long does it take to see if there's a picture of some bones how did it go that long you have to assume that this was an OP of some kind because it doesn't look like a natural news story or even a natural rumor that got in the hand it looks like an OP it looks like somebody wanted to get rid of some Churches now I don't know that that was the case it might have been just massive incompetence right could it it could have been just massive incompetence well here's the fun part oh one more Dan banino is not happy with NBC News uh because Dan banino is was amplifying uh Tucker Carlson's let's say what would you say his concern that what we're seeing in the news suggests that uh there's some interest by bad people to assassinate Trump that everything we've seen leading up to it is is creating a uh impression that there might be even something more extreme if they can't take him out through legal means um so Dan banino apparently so he has obviously career experience uh he was Secret Service right he used to be secret service so he knows what protecting a president or anybody looks like so he was he was apparently um putting some layers onto that idea uh layers of credibility that we should literally think about Trump's physical safety more and there was an NBC news that mocked him and um threw him in the same category with Alex Jones as a disgraced conspiracy theory that's what they called Al Alex Jones disgraced that's what they call me too that's what I call myself I like to call myself disgraced cartoonist um so the story is if you were if you were a Democrat and you looked at the story you'd say huh Dan banino is claiming something without evidence and then NBC News doing their job as a news organization called him out for being a conspiracy theorist that's like all those other conspiracy theorists and you should watch out for those guys so that's why you think if you were a Democrat if you're a republican you probably have seen uh the smart people say that NBC is essentially a CIA tool and that the that's the reporting so NBC News is consider the primary you know with the Washington Post I guess two of the primary ways the CIA does propaganda in this country which is completely legal the CIA is completely legal to run propaganda through our our own news entities it's not ethical but it's legal um so now that you know that now that you know that the the NBC News is considered a uh an owned organ news organ by the CIA who do you think you'd worry about assassinating Trump from within the country are you worried that the FBI would do it are you worried that a judge would do it some judge are you worried that a regular police officer would do it now if you're worried about it at all you're probably thinking about our own CIA because you have some questions about Kennedy's assassination right you have some questions now I don't know if if the CIA was involved with the JFK assassination I only know it looks exactly like it and I think RFK Jr who certainly has looked into it believes there's a connection so now now does it make sense Dan banino who's an expert in this field used to his job says he sees the environment uh creating what looks like an elevated risk is that unreasonable he's an expert he's showing his work everything he tells you he can back up with you know this happened this happened and together I'm feeling an elevated risk now that's not a certainty it's a risk right and that risk would absolutely be from the CIA if it's real at all and if the CIA wanted to cover it up who would they send NBC news so if you happen to know the the landscape of the actual uh real news situation it looks like the CIA is covering for themselves if you're a Republican and you reconnects hey did you miss me I wonder if it was the topic if I said masks are really good for you do you think it would have glitched just asking does anybody think that if I if I said hey everybody get your boosters get your boosters do you think we would have a technical problem I don't know maybe hard to say but you know I haven't started yet let's see if we can make a You.

Tube glitch again anybody want to see if I can make it glitch again I'm just getting started all right let's see if we can make uh the the Deep stage show its hand now it could be it could be a coincidence it could be a coincidence coincidences do happen all right we're going to clip this next part so the clip is going to start right after I put my hand down are you ready all right I'd like to describe to you with my double whiteboards how I see the landscape of the country in the news Etc I'm going to take it from two perspectives number one what is the situation for Republicans situation for Republicans as I see it yeah I'll move that in your way looks like this as you know not everybody has good information and sometimes we all believe things that aren't true including me on the Republican side this is how I see the landscape sometimes there are rumors that are started uh at Grassroots level and these rumors could come from anywhere these are just three examples could be forner Reddit or somewhere in X it's a bunch of BS and sometimes that BS trickles up to leadership and famous people and so you'll you'll get some Republicans who will believe some of it and they'll get Republican voters to believe it and then uh the Democrats will criticize them for being U wrong about something that's wrong right now this looks about it does that kind of capture the Republican side of things I'm trying to get it out of my own way here see would you say that largely captures what happens no I'm not saying that everything Republicans believe is wrong that's nothing like that I'm saying that when they're wrong CU everybody's wrong right but when they're wrong it usually looks like this it bubbles up from some rumors some politicians pick up on it Republicans say oh other people are saying it too and next thing you know there's some BS and then the Democrats pounce and they fact check you and they make you look stupid and then they say all Republicans are dumb because some of them believe this stuff so that's basically the landscape all right but what does the landscape look like on the other side does it look like this not as much no looks a little different it's way more complicated but it looks sort of like this this would be the Democrat news um landscape if I can get out of my own way all right so I think most of you can see it now so you've got the CIA and the FBI and various Democrat operatives who feed their media these are just some of the names we know are the illegitimate media so these are the ones who are being influenced by Democrat leadership and uh various entities that they have some control over so the media is fake news but Democrats are not they're completely unaware they they think that there's the Democrats believe that both sides have their own fake news and that's really the whole story oh we had a little fake news sure but you had a little fake news most of the news is true nothing like that is happening no in the political world nothing you know the news about hurricanes is probably real but political news is uh coming from influencers the media is completely corrupt and the right-wing media only is only looked at by people on the right so the left is completely unaware that there's any counternarrative they never see them so they take their fake news and they get support from you know the other fake entities which they support oh the ADL says you're bad too oh the media said you're bad but these other people they agree these are all funded by democrats so they're funded to look like legitimate organizations but really they're just um they're just Democrat organizations to attack the other side what about the fact Checkers also funded mostly by democrats also fake um so once you've got all of these other organizations from the media to these funded Democrat organizations you you've got a real big ball of fake news that's why there are over 20 hoaxes on my hoax list that the Dem rats all believe are real at least 20 major hoaxes that went through this machine the outcome of this is that the Democrats are brainwashed literally that is not to say that Republicans have only the truth nothing like that's happening Republicans are also wrong about things quite often but it is bubbling up from the the bottom it's not coming from the top uh from the Democrats it's all top stuff and so the their poor voters don't have any idea what's going on they think they think that this is some kind of a legitimate process and they don't have any way to find out it's not they don't have a mechanism to know that it's not real cuz the only thing that's telling them is not real are people like me and they've already they've already told you I'm a disgraced cartoonist and the ADL told you that I'm a holocaust denier that's what the ADL said the the leader of the ADL I'm not just saying that somebody sent a tweet the actual leader of the ADL labeled me a holocaust Den now I don't have to defend that you know I'm not a holocaust denier but it shows you how the machine works right when you saw the Phil bump uh interview in which he got completely demolished for being a fake news guy you could see all of this finally being exposed it was obvious he wasn't a genuine writer with real opinions you could tell that it came from some somewhere and he was supporting some kind of a some kind of a machine all right so that's what happens to the Democrat voters Democrat voters get brainwashed and the Republican voters get Shadow banned so they can't uh fight back um I would be very surprised if this gets big traffic on You.

Tube if you know what I mean what watch the traffic it gets let's say on the xplatform and compare that to the Baseline and then watch what happen on You.

Tube and compare that to my Baseline do you think they're going to be the same very little chance of that because the most of the platforms uh the media platforms which I accidentally erased this is this would say social media uh they're they're going to make sure that you that the other side that has been brainwashed by the system they're going to make sure they don't see me only the people who already agree with me are going to see me and of course there's prosecutions going on so the department of justice is making sure that if you have an opinion such as the one I just expressed that they're coming after you so here's what is really really interesting about this week the entire Gears of the machine are now obvious you can see the entire Hunter Biden money-making scheme right it's all laid out you can see every part of it now the Phil bumps of the world the illegitimate people are going to say but but but you haven't made the case that there's a direct payment from Hunter Biden for any favors that went to Joe Biden but we know he paid his expenses and that's the way it works we know that there doesn't that you know there's not going to be a piece of paper we know that what influence buying and selling looks like it's all laid out but Democrats don't know it don't know it here's what would change everything I don't know it'll happen but if you want some optimism all it would take is to draw this diagram into a better form and then every time there's a story that could be better understood by this landscape you print it with a story and then you highlight the parts that have been activated for example some people say I don't know if this is true but some say the FBI is more influencing the New York Times whereas the CIA is more influencing the Washington post I don't know if that's true but wouldn't it be interesting to see a story in the news where you could light up these parts and show which ones were involved so you could once you could show the landscape and how different it is on the Republican side you could possibly for the first time uh release some of the Democrats who in my opinion are just victims I have to say that in 2016 when I started talking about politic itics in public and you know it would' be a big fight between one side versus the other side and to me it just felt like oh we just have different opinions different opinions that's all and we're fighting it out that's the way it's supposed to work but once I learned the entire landscape and I realized that their opinions are assigned to them and then they're solidified by this entire this entire uh constellation of um let's say people who are just slapping some paint on the turd if you know what I mean you know that once you understand the whole landscape you understand that they're not legitimate actors in a legitimate process they're actually victims and so I've started treating my democ Democrat brainwashed critics with uh sympathy and I just say I'm sorry they did this to you because that's my actual feeling I don't feel like they're attacking me because they had some independent well Arch thought and and they've decided that attacking me will help them in some way attacking me isn't going to help anybody I actually don't have any any incentives other than to try to make things a little better before I leave this weird little ball they call the earth I don't need your money you know and and obviously I'm not doing it for reputation because I've been the most you know disgraced and malign person in the United States probably this year who who wasn't named Trump um so I'm only doing it because my payoff is if I make something better then I feel good about myself that's it so that makes me kind of dangerous anyway once you understand the model and if you have a if we have a way to communicate it so here here's the key point it's not good enough that I explained it to you that doesn't help anybody it would only be good if this could be oper operationalized turned into a sort of a standard way of explaining things so that whenever Democrats come in and they're they're victims they've been brainwashed you could show them something now the ideal form I'll just brainwash I'll brainstorm a little bit an ideal form would be some kind of a graphic that's maybe not exactly this but something in that nature where you could click on any part of it to validate that it belongs on here in other words you could click on one of these groups and you could say here's a news story that shows you why they're not legitimate here's a new story that shows they get all their funding from Democrats right so if you could do that you know here's the the fact that Phil bump is ever involved in the story if you knew the landscape as soon as you saw his name you say ah it's a Phil bump situation as as soon as you turned on the news and you saw any one of these designated Liars you know shiff swall well uh you know you can make the list yourself there's some people that the news calls in because they know it's not true but they need people who are willing to say literally anything in order to get somebody on TV who will support the narrative and that ladies and gentlemen concludes my double white for whiteboard explanation of how everything works now uh having now completed that presentation I try to make a beginning and end because I'm going to clip it do would you let's double back to my first claim all right my claim before I started this was i' like to have at least one thing brewing in my life that could change the world that could change the world world if if Democrats learned what happened to them and we're all almost there we're almost to the point where you could actually present them with the full uh the full Machinery of what put them in the situation they're in now some of them have been also educated by the educa you know I should have put the education system up here College but college has turned into you know one of the brainwashing operations um so that probably belongs up there as well but if you didn't know that college is a brainwashing operation maybe not intentionally it just sort of evolved that way um you wouldn't really know why you even have opinions people actually don't know why they have opinions they think that they thought of them themselves that that's not how anything Works people don't come up with their own opinions they're assigned and they're assigned based on what you have access to on your own right if you had access to your own information maybe it' be hard to assign it but we don't I I can tell you you know you you tell me who you voted for and I'll tell you what information you have access to and you just won't even let yourself look at the other stuff so that's that's how we that's how our opinions are assigned the fact that we don't have a way out we don't we don't look at other stuff now this group again I I will compliment you cuz I think it's warranted the people who watch this kind of content are not like any of the people I talked about right you this group is far more likely to identify BS on their own side than other people and identifying it on your own side is a hard part identifying BS on the other side well that's children's play that's children's play everybody can tell the other side side is lying the hard part is knowing when your side is lying right cuz they have the inside they have the inside track on influencing you so watch out for your own side they're The Dangerous Ones and and and let me say it a different way if if Republicans were not believing a whole bunch of in addition to things that are true the Democrats could not suppress them it's only because there's so many Republicans who do believe that they could be completely discounted by the other side so is there anything that's happening right now that would change that situation where Republicans seem to be believing in a lot of what what would change that and what would his name be yeah you're ahead of me v v is not just really good at what he does like Trump he's changing the narrative everybody who saw V talk about climate change just went up a level in their ability to explain their side am I right if you were copying Trump and saying it snowed yesterday so climate change is a hoax you look like a idiot I'm sorry you might even be right but you would look like a idiot if you repeated what Trump said about climate change which I'm not saying Trump's wrong about anything I'm saying that the way he expresses it is in the least scientific terms you could ever have when he talks about windmills he jokingly says you know if the wind stops blowing you can't watch TV and the crowd loves it don't repeat that no no that's just something Trump says don't repeat that so but when when you watch V talk every argument he uses is it's like really close to perfect because he just has the skill so if you copied V's Arguments for anything the Democrats would be unarmed because their whole game is making you look like a chimpanzee for believing the most ridiculous and V doesn't buy that he doesn't buy into that he actually uses arguments that can be checked he uses things we all understand and he doesn't he doesn't give you he's he doesn't support anything he can't defend with a strong argument but that's not the case for most Republicans Republicans have consistently over time had points of view that they didn't defend even in a halfway rational way really but he does so he can basically fix your weakest part of the Republican Party by at least showing you what a good argument looks like and you just follow his arguments and you will be fine and the entire party will be fine this is why I say that the candidates who are running this time it's a whole different thing they're they're actually changing the world while they run and you know maybe maybe Trump did a little of that too but I've never seen so much actual real world change at least the way we think about things um then I have from RFK Junior V and Larry Elder I like to put him in the in the mix too with his you know family message very very positive stuff so that's the positive part so ladies and gentlemen I believe I have talked about all the news oh so here's here here's some more of understanding U the big picture does it make sense to you that uh leadership are half cavers how could you possibly explain Biden Harris I throw with the mentally incompetence so there's something wrong with Harris's brain would you agree there's something wrong with her brain I it looks it looks to me like substance abuse but I can't say that with certainty she doesn't look like the same person who she used to be and she does feel she does act and look completely incompetent so it looks like drugs but if it's organic she needs to get some help because she's clearly not functioning like an adult right so I mean that's just my point of view so I I'm not a brain not a mind reader but when you look at even even Mc.

Connel you know it's not even just the Democrats there's something going on with the we we've lost the brains of the leaders went away and nothing really changed that that tells you there's somebody there's somebody behind the screen CU if there were nobody behind the screen the people who are just regular Democrats would say who we better put a better candidate forward yeah so there there's some kind of influence or operation that's going on that's beyond just trying to conserve the majority there's something deeply wrong here all right amazingly You.

Tube did not glitch as far as I can tell did I miss any uh news stories that you desperately wish wish I had talked about fedin um Obama well some say that the power behind the screen is Obama uh or Clinton but I would say that they may be the same as the uh intelligence groups so when I talk about the CIA and maybe some parts of the FBI and again you're not talking about every person in those groups you know it's always it's always people within the group um you can kind of see the whole landscape at this point yeah so Obama might be mixed up with that crowd some say some say OB CIA well if you look at I think Biden said um there were five current or former heads of the CIA who signed the laptop disinformation letter five former or current members of the CIA is there anything else you need to know yeah and they backed completely the Democrat narrative they did not back the country it's clear that that was not for the good of the country that was for the good of the Democrats so were they independently acting in a way that they thought was just good for Democrats and they were Democrats and that was the end of the story do you think that's the case or do you think there might have been some power that organized all of those people hard to say but I got my suspicions yeah um and I guess Jimmy Buffett passed away at 76 he was by the way one of my uh role models for business when I when I started uh doing the comic uh he was killing it and he was selling out in all his concerts despite not being more of a name brand you know rock star kind of guy and the way he did it was he he was really good at marketing he was super good at marketing so he was my role model for marketing he had a strong uh I guess he had a mailing list and had sort of almost a cult following yeah yeah they ate a lot of cheeseburgers that's all we know about him so uh here's another sign that your news is not real news you ready for this how many times have you heard that the Ukrainian uh prosecutor was really going after barisma no he was that he was really not doing his job and that there were International groups that wanted him removed so you've heard that like crazy right has anybody asked this question and I I thought I thought uh Phil bump was going to get this question but Phil bump makes the same argument it wasn't just Joe Biden who wanted that guy fired the Ukrainian prosecutor it wasn't just him yeah Victor shoken it wasn't just Biden it was these International communities and then the throws his hands away it goes here's the question for him which entity media has interviewed one of those people and which one of them could say no to the United States which of the people who wanted choke and gone individually could say no to the United States and feel it wouldn't have an impact on their career any no the answer is this is one of these so remember I showed you how this is done so so you have you know bad people who plant a story and then once the story is planted you have various fake organizations back the story and then everybody can say hey you don't have to believe me look at these organizations right do you recognize the play all of those organizations they mention that also wanted shok and gone are just their own surrogates and somehow both the left media and the right leing media and the right leing media has never looked into that just think about that nobody's ever looked into it have any have any of those individuals who agreed the shoken right Marcel first time you're hearing this yeah nobody's asked can we put one of those people who agree with you Joe Biden who also thought he should go can we talk to one of them and could we learn a little bit more about their background and how they get their funding and what and what they think their career looks like and and maybe even what president they backed were they Trump supporters now they were in other countries right now who right now the fact the fact that no no uh journalist looked into those other entities shows you that the fix is really deep I mean it must it must include the right leaning media because how would the right leaning media ignore that it's the easiest thing just check to find it if the other people who agree are honest players now when I told you that when you see the landscape it allows you to take all of their Ops and map it to the parts and then you instantly understand it see you didn't understand right you didn't understand that why did those other people keep saying that they agreed with Biden that that guy should go but now you understand their play is always the same they'll always get fake entities to support their narrative and then say hey it's not us I mean if it were just me I mean sure I'm I'm a Democrat so you can't believe me but but look at those entities that I funded or control you you saw how China seemed to control the who during the pandemic same play Same play don't believe us hey hey uh I know you don't believe us in China but but look at the organization that I control so if you're not going to believe me certainly you could believe the organization I totally Dominate and control yeah once you see it it's everywhere because it's the same play all they do is they come up they change the names and the players and then they just put it back on the framework and it works and repu Republicans don't have this kind of system they just have people who have ideas some of them are wrong that's it people have ideas and some of them are wrong it's the whole story for the Republicans so that ladies and gentlemen concludes the best live stream you've ever seen in your life and when I tell you that there's some chance that it will change the world I think you can see what I'm talking about thanks for joining You.

Tube I'm sorry you got glitched there but I think you you got to see the good parts and I will talk to you tomorrow

[Music]

good morning everybody and welcome to

another highlight of human civilization

it's called coffee with Scott Adams if I

could get my cables out of your camera

we'd all be happy wouldn't we there we

go look at that problem solved D yay now

how would you like to take this

experience up to levels that nobody ever

even dreamed of being possible I've got

two white boards back there that are

going to change

civilization possibly it might actually

change civilization but you'll be the

judge of that but before we get there

let's take our energy up to the

stratosphere and all you need is a cuper

muger glass attack your chelse dine a

canteen jug Su flask a vessel of any

kind fill it with your favorite liquid I

like coffee and join me now for the

unparallel pleasure the dopamine hit of

the day the thing that makes everything

better including double

whiteboards it's called the simultaneous

Sip and it happens now

go that's so

good

yeah I've got I've got three cameras

here that I'm trying

to coordinate but I think we can make

this all

work well let's talk about the news

before I change the world with my double

whiteboard and uh let's see number one

there's uh some new obesity

research that uh suggests that we know

which part of the brain is regulating

your energy and you're eating I guess

and with a small tweak there some people

say you could eat as much as you want

without getting

obese does that sound like good news you

can eat as much as you want maybe I mean

it's not a thing yet so it's premature

but there's some possibility you could

eat as much as you want and not get

overweight pretty good

huh I can't think of a worse

idea because our food is poison you know

our process foods are just the more you

eat the unhealthier you're going to get

do you know what makes me feel the best

which is one of the reasons I've lost

the 10 lbs

recently i' I've started tracking you

know when I feel good and when I don't

and it's perfectly clear that the thing

that makes me feel bad for the rest of

the day is food just

food now it doesn't matter you know it

does matter what I eat you know if I

just eat uh you know fresh fruit and

nuts I feel fine fresh fruit fruit and

nuts perfectly healthy all day long if I

eat anything that comes out of a

package um I got inflammation I'm tired

you know it's a completely different

experience if I could eat twice as much

food I wouldn't really want to eat twice

as much fruit and nuts just as one

example I wouldn't want

but you can imagine a lot of people who

like to eat processed foods and stuff

they would eat twice as much processed

foods do you think they're going to feel

better I feel like obesity is the only

thing that stops you from overeating I

think I don't want to get obese so I'll

eat a little less I don't know feels

like it could be good news that's really

bad news you never

know well China has a problem of too

many men they have 32 million more men

than they have

women 32 million extra

men who don't have an option of having

their own you know exclusive woman and a

family now that was of course because of

China's one child policy for so many

years which is now a three-child policy

uh because we're running out of people

32 million is the the entire population

of

Afghanistan the entire population of

Afghanistan is the same as the number of

extra

in

China historically what have countries

done when they had too many

men War yeah unfortunately we're built

to um kind of

occasionally cut down on the number of

extra

men uh so I wouldn't be surprised if

China ends up with an enormous Army of

proportions that nobody can even and you

know understand cuz otherwise what are

you going to do with them all are they

going to start having two men for one

wife maybe actually that might actually

happen that might actually become a

thing all right maybe that would solve

some other problems

too you know if both the men were okay

with it two men with one wife would

probably be pretty good ex it would

probably be a pretty good arrangement

for some people

all right so let's watch for that um

today today might be a short

presentation but the most important one

you've ever

seen I'm trying to build it up so you

can't wait because it actually might be

let me tell you one of my secrets for

happiness I've talked about this in at

least one or two of my books I like to

have at least one thing going on in my

life that could change the world now

what are the odds that any one person

can change the world in you know any

important way well on one hand you say

well it's very low chance that you could

change the world but if you look at how

the world has ever changed it's almost

always one

person one person is usually the only

way the world changes they're first

they're not the only one but they

there's always somebody who goes first

you know there's a so one person can

change the world so here are a couple

things that I have going on right now

that might change the world don't know

one of them

is my book reframe your brain it's not

written just to have a good time on an

airplane it's written because it once

you understand this material you'll be

able to literally change how you

think on demand in know wide variety of

domains now if you could change how you

think you would change how you would you

would act and you know you could easily

imagine that it would help people you

know see the world clearer in a more

useful way and could change the world

now if it became a number one bestseller

it would absolutely change the world

there's no doubt about it because in the

non in the non fiction World Let's Take

A Book Like The Seven Habits of Highly

Successful People you know just sat on

the bestseller list for decades that

totally changed how people

acted right they read that book and they

said oh this is a bunch of good tips

I'll better keep my skills sharp and

stuff like

that so if you can be a number one book

you actually do change the world in the

non-fiction in the non-fiction domain so

there's some chance doesn't mean it'll

happen but I like my odds but what I

have in the Whiteboard is another one

I'm going to show you something on the

Whiteboard after a few more stories that

could change the world actually

literally what are the odds I don't know

you know not

100% but it's not 10% it's probably a

greater than 10% chance it will change

everything so that's that's what I

that's what I think you should wait for

all right

uh the

xplatform which I'm phasing out of

saying Twitter at the same time is

everybody ready if I said meanwhile on X

you would all know what I mean at this

point right

so is it time to start phasing out the

that you used to call

Twitter you ready everybody ready for

that I think I think we're ready let's

call it let's call it today's the day

stop dead naming X stop dead naming

it no no dead naming all

right well on X the uh the phrase ADL is

trending and I said to to myself what's

all all that about so there are a lot of

people who are calling the uh

ADL what does the A stand

for what's the A and ADL stand for anti-

defamation League the Anti-Defamation

League um which Republicans have caught

on I think they caught on a while ago

that it's a basically a a Democrat 8

group and and a way to attack

Republicans and way and call the braces

so the ADL is I'm sure they had Noble

you know Noble uh intentions when they

started and I'm sure there are plenty of

members of it who still have Noble

intentions but in terms of the

leadership my observation and my opinion

is it's just a racist Democrat

organization now so it looks like they

get all the money from Democrats and

then they use it to label Democrats

enemies as a bunch of racists and then

they say hey don't listen to me listen

to the people I funded to call you a

racist because if it was just me I mean

if it's just me it's just an opinion but

it's not just an opinion it's coming

from the people I paid to say my opinion

that's completely different you get it

it's not my opinion I'm just referring

to the people I paid to tell you my

opinion can you not get the difference

all right so that's what's going on with

the ADL

that when when I got cancelled the ADL

came after me and called me a holocaust

denier does that sound like

me does that sound like they did their

homework and they came up with a good

take to help the world be a better place

by calling me a holocaust

denier was was that useful that came

from the head of the organization it

didn't come from like a you know some

rank inv the actual leader of the

organization in public called me a

holocaust denier now do you think that

has anything to do with anything factual

of course not of course not no they're

just a racist Democrat

organization uh whose job it is to you

know defame people they don't like now

do they also do some good stuff probably

probably that that's why they get to

stay in their little cover position CU

they also do some good stuff I assume I

mean I haven't seen any but I just

assume they do some good

stuff all right um do you remember oh it

was 2020 or so that I got absolutely

destroyed on a platform that we call

X but it used to be called something

else I'm not even going to dead name and

now you know that but uh I tweeted that

if uh Joe Biden got elected the

Republicans would be

hunted oh man did I get attacked for

that oh people people still tweeted

around no no they posted around people

still posted around to try to mock me

for how wrong I was in

2020 are you feeling I was

wrong do you feel that the Republicans

were not at all

haunted well let's talk about the uh

Dominique Piza

uh he proud boy member who smashed a

window during the January 6th stuff and

got 10 years in

prison for breaking a

window 10 years in

prison for breaking a

window Joe bigs got 15 years in

prison for nothing violent

17 s somebody saying 17 for nothing

violent well if you say to yourself hey

you do you do the crime you do the time

right you do the crime you do the time

that's just how our system works does it

does it really is that have it worked

with black lives matter and antifa when

they were burning down the place is it

is it how it worked when Trump got um

elected in 2016 and all of these same

people well the groups anyway not the

people but the same groups attacked uh

the capital and 50 50 secret service

people were injured was that 50 people

were injured lots of property damage

fires

yeah so we do have a country in which we

can say um I think without any argument

at this point that uh Republicans are

hunted and that the system is trying to

exterminate at least the Republican

party if not the

people so you you hear some people

saying oh you know it's going to get so

bad that you could be jailed for your

opinion for being a republican well

that's happening now that's that's

actually happening people are being

jailed for their opinion now the the

fake reason is that they broke a

window or that they were part of those

are fake reasons now

do you think that the Democrats know

that this is happening if you're a

Democrat don't you think that people

broke the law and then the law caught up

with them and hey that's how it's

supposed to

work do you believe they have any idea

what's going on I don't I don't think

they have any

idea how could

they the only place they would tell them

are the media sources that their own

side says if you even look at those

sources there's something wrong with you

you can't even look at them

you wouldn't even want it in your

browser history you know what I mean

yeah so they have no way to know um so

I'm going to call this my best

prediction ever that Republicans were

haunted and are being haunted how many

of you would say that that's a accurate

claim of success that I accurately

claimed that the way things were added

is the Republicans would be identified

and hunted now I don't mean every

Republican I mean that they only have to

hunt and abuse and jail enough so that

the rest of you will shut the

up do do you feel that you've uh you've

uh let's say modified your free speech

to not get caught up in the January 6

you know illegitimate prosecution sort

of thing yeah uh I would so there have

been a few times this week when I

thought to myself of saying something

something

online that would get close to sounding

like I was organizing

something and then I thought oh crap if

it sounds like I promoted something or

organized any kind of response to what

we're seeing then I would be thrown in

jail perhaps to be someone inciting

violence or maybe banned from platforms

or something so I feel that my free

speech is at least on that topic is

completely

G but as I often say you don't have to

worry about some parts of the country

until they're

quiet now I plan to never be quiet but

my free speech is being eroded a little

bit you know at a time because I don't

want to go to

jail you know I didn't mind getting

cancelled as you all

noticed honestly that I didn't mind that

at all I didn't mind being canceled cuz

I feel that's part of the system yeah

people can act any way they want it's a

free free world but now I actually fear

going to jail like actually literally

that that's not a hyperbole I spent a

good time yesterday thinking about

everything I do and everybody I've

talked to and everything I've ever said

to wonder if I could go to jail not

because I broke any laws but because

somebody could say I

did so I actually spent some of my time

trying to figure out how not to go to

jail for an illegitimate prosecution in

America that's a real thing spend my

time doing that yeah

um how many of you saw the greatest show

that has ever been on the internet in my

opinion and it featured Phil bump uh

allegedly a writer of The Washington

Post uh being grilled oh my God it was

it was Amazing by in a podcast by the

owner of the comedy seller gnome dworman

and I need a fact check on

gnome uh is he an attorney who now owns

the comedy Center why why was he so good

at his questioning was he is he a

trained attorney or is he just super

smart like he really he really had the

goods does everybody know if you

know how about something not

anti-semitic maybe that would be better

right yeah don't make the ADL be

right don't don't don't let them be

right right calm down Jesus Christ

um wow um but is he an

attorney all right well whether or not

he's an attorney or he went to law

school he he had the best game I've seen

of any podcaster that's a pretty big

claim but I'll say it again he had the

best game I've ever seen of a podcaster

in the political domain he absolutely

eviscerated Phil bump who most of us who

were you know close followers of the

news you know he's not a real news guy

he's a regime coverup guy or at least

allegedly

allegedly so allegedly he's one of the

go-to top 10 Democrats when they need a

designated liar somebody to cover up one

of their Ops so he's one of the ones who

helped cover up the uh Russia collusion

op the laptop is a Russian

disinformation op uh he lied about the

upside down Bible story you heard that

hoax so he's sort of a hoax supporter

kind of a guy now nobody thinks he's a

real real writer if they follow if they

pay attention when I got got canceled he

was one of the main guys who came after

me in public to dunk on me for getting

cancelled so you can imagine my glee in

watching his entire career being

dissected while he was still alive it

was like a human

autopsy all right so I'm not going to

play you a a clip because anything you

see out of context like a little part of

it would never would never give you a

sense of what happened it was It was a

live

murder he was

destroyed and mostly he did it to

himself now some of you are going to say

I I'll just give you a sense of it can I

can I give you let's say a

5c uh 5-second impression of Phil bump

answering any good question and there

were just like lots of good questions

just ordinary good questions but here's

him answering any good question well if

you're not going to listen to all the

counter information I had I it's a setup

it's a setup well this I should just

walk right out if you're not going to

listen to anything I say and then gome

would say well you know what are you

trying to say you know what's the answer

to the question well how many times do I

have to tell you do you read my articles

do you read my articles if you haven't

read my articles this looks like just

some kind of a setup you know I now I

made that all

up but imagine imagine that was his

reaction from this start of the

interview that was his first

reaction imagine what he was like in an

hour and 15

minutes he got poked so hard in the

first 5 Seconds that he completely

flipped out like his body language was

just like he couldn't even sit in the

chair right he was like sitting in the

chair like this like he was just

completely

wrecked and at some point he

realized he he stayed

yeah by the way there's some fake news

that he walked

out uh you know so the the right is

not the political right is not without

their fake news so the way I saw it

reported is that he walked out and

nothing like that happened in fact it

was the opposite he he stayed Way Beyond

the time he had committed to stay so I'm

going to defend him on that he did not

walk out he walked out when really he

was winding down and it was time to

leave but he did flip out now a number

of people said to me Ah that's cognitive

dissonance the way he's acting it's I a

tell for realizing you know something

that that he didn't think was true

before but I'm here to tell you I've

seen a lot of cognitive dissonances one

of the things I talk about the most that

didn't look like cognitive dissonance to

me I didn't see any cognitive dissonance

I saw somebody who knew he was a liar

and knew that his job is to cover for

the regime hoaxes and he was going to

get caught cuz he ran into a buz saw

that he didn't know was a buz saw he

probably thought he was talking to some

comedy seller guy who would have all the

understanding of a comedian you know

what I

mean he probably thought that because

the guy owned a comedy shop he was

probably more of an artist who got lucky

in business or something and that and

that this would be like a you know an

easy one and he would just say

everything he wants to say and the the

guy wouldn't know what the good

questions were or what was wrong with

his answer oh no that's not what

happened again I can't say enough about

gnome Dorman I've never seen a more

capable or

competent political interview I mean

he's a star he's a freaking star and he

never lost his cool even while bump was

flipping out which made it even all the

more interesting to watch so

um I would not say that was cognitive

distance it was not cognitive distance

that that was somebody who got caught

and uh so here's the best part of it uh

after all of that he made a reference to

why you should believe him because he's

the expert on the on the huntter laptop

shoes you should believe everything he

says but also that he uh he has The

credibility of a big institution that

backs

him he actually said that

he said that you can believe him because

the Washington Post backs him the

Washington Post now let me ask you this

how many Democrats would know that

that's a a laugh

line like how many actual Democrat

voters know that saying that the

Washington Post backs you is really

literally

hilarious probably not many yeah but

I'll bet a lot of Republicans know it

yeah the Washington Post reportedly and

allegedly

gets their direction from the

CIA

reportedly and it seems obvious that

some of the writers are more on more on

the page of wherever their direction is

coming from than others okay so the

Washington Post actually ended up

backing him uh when he's been

conclusively debunked as a liar on

several of his stories like there's no

doubt about it it's not it's not even

opinion it's just it's just the the

legal system itself showed that he was a

liar or that his information was wrong

not not necessarily he was lying because

that's mind reading but that his stories

were factually Incorrect and the

Washington Post instead of instead of

saying well he may have gotten some

facts wrong but we back him they didn't

do that they just said they back him as

if his incorrect reporting is what they

were

backing so um to me this was

fascinating um it was extra fascinating

because it showed you the gears of the

machine if you did not know that the

opinion pieces the opinion writers

especially for something like the

Washington Post are not not like regular

reporters that there's old different

mechanism going on if you didn't know

that you got to see it for the first

time because if you wondered hey I

wonder if he thinks he's telling the

truth maybe he believes what he's saying

you could tell for sure he doesn't

believe what he's

saying that became really clear I'm not

a mind reader but after an hour and a

quarter of him you know treading water

and trying to you know divert from

things he said it was pretty obvious he

knew yeah it pretty obvious he's a

propaganda guy and not a not a not a

genuine opinion guy well that's my

opinion about him let's talk about some

more hoaxes so here's one I didn't know

at the time but apparently it's been

revealed that there was some big massive

hoax up in Canada about alleged Mass

Graves of indigenous

children so the I guess the idea was

that some point in Canada's history and

I don't know what uh what era they're

talking about but that bunch of

indigenous people their children were

killed in a mass

this of course turned out to be

completely

false but in the between the period that

it was widely reported as true and the

time it took them to dig up all the

places where they said it was to find

out there was nothing there during that

time 83 churches were burned down or

vandalized in Canada in

response

now do you

think that um

that nobody who was press in the story

knew it was

false CU remember when they looked for

evidence there was none there was not

even one body it was just

dirt so do you think that there was

anybody who reported people are saying

this but there is zero

evidence do you think the news said

there's absolutely no evidence of it so

don't assume this is true but you know

it's in the news so we're telling you

about

somehow the Canadian news convinced

people this was real without any

evidence without any evidence because it

didn't happen so there couldn't be

evidence right I mean not physical

evidence and the physical evidence would

be the most obvious thing you'd ask for

because it's literally about a mass

grave so if the story is about I think

it was multiple Mass graves right if the

story is about a mass grave on your own

territory how how long does it take to

see if there's a picture of some

bones how did it go that long you have

to assume that this was an OP of some

kind because it doesn't look like a

natural news story or even a natural

rumor that got in the hand it looks like

an OP it looks like somebody wanted to

get rid of some

Churches now I don't know that that was

the case it might have been just massive

incompetence right could it it could

have been just massive

incompetence

well here's the fun

part oh one more Dan

banino is not happy with NBC

News uh because Dan banino is was

amplifying uh Tucker

Carlson's let's say what would you say

his concern that what we're seeing in

the news

suggests that uh there's some interest

by bad people to assassinate Trump

that everything we've seen leading up to

it is is creating a uh

impression that there might be even

something more extreme if they can't

take him out through legal

means

um so Dan banino apparently so he has

obviously career

experience uh he was Secret Service

right he used to be secret service so he

knows what protecting a president or

anybody looks like so he was he was

apparently um putting some layers onto

that idea uh layers of credibility that

we should literally think about Trump's

physical safety

more and there was an NBC news that

mocked him

and um threw him in the same category

with Alex Jones as a disgraced

conspiracy theory that's what they

called Al Alex Jones

disgraced that's what they call me too

that's what I call myself I like to call

myself disgraced

cartoonist

um so the story is if you were if you

were a Democrat and you looked at the

story you'd say huh Dan banino is

claiming something without evidence and

then NBC News doing their job as a news

organization called him out for being a

conspiracy theorist that's like all

those other conspiracy theorists and you

should watch out for those guys so

that's why you think if you were a

Democrat if you're a republican you

probably have seen uh the smart people

say that NBC is essentially a CIA

tool and that the that's the reporting

so NBC News is consider the primary you

know with the Washington Post I guess

two of the primary ways the CIA does

propaganda in this country which is

completely legal the CIA is completely

legal to run propaganda through our our

own news entities it's not ethical but

it's

legal

um so now that you know that now that

you know that the the NBC News is

considered a uh an owned organ news

organ by the

CIA who do you think you'd worry about

assassinating Trump from within the

country are you worried that the FBI

would do

it are you worried that a judge would do

it some judge are you worried that a

regular police officer would do

it now if you're worried about it at all

you're probably thinking about our own

CIA because you have some questions

about Kennedy's assassination right you

have some questions now I don't know if

if the CIA was involved with the JFK

assassination I only know it looks

exactly like

it and I think RFK Jr who certainly has

looked into it believes there's a

connection

so now now does it make sense Dan banino

who's an expert in this

field used to his job says he sees the

environment uh creating what looks like

an elevated risk is that unreasonable

he's an expert he's showing his work

everything he tells you he can back up

with you know this happened this

happened and together I'm feeling an

elevated risk now that's not a certainty

it's a risk right and that risk would

absolutely be from the CIA if it's real

at

all and if the CIA wanted to cover it up

who would they send NBC

news so if you happen to know the the

landscape of the actual uh real news

situation it looks like the CIA is

covering for themselves if you're a

Republican and you

reconnects hey

did you miss

me I wonder if it was the

topic if I said masks are really good

for you do you think it would have

glitched just asking does anybody think

that if I if I said hey everybody get

your boosters get your boosters do you

think we would have a technical

problem I don't know maybe hard to

say but you know I haven't started

yet let's see if we can make a YouTube

glitch again anybody want to see if I

can make it glitch

again I'm just getting started all right

let's see if we can make uh the the Deep

stage show its hand now it could be it

could be a coincidence it could be a

coincidence coincidences do happen all

right we're going to clip this next part

so the clip is going to start right

after I put my hand down are you

ready

all right I'd like to describe to you

with my double whiteboards how I see the

landscape of the country in the news Etc

I'm going to take it from two

perspectives number one what is the

situation for

Republicans situation for Republicans as

I see it yeah I'll move that in your

way looks like this as you know not

everybody has good information and

sometimes we all believe things that

aren't true including me on the

Republican side this is how I see the

landscape sometimes there are rumors

that are

started uh at Grassroots level and these

rumors could come from anywhere these

are just three examples could be forner

Reddit or somewhere in X it's a bunch of

BS and sometimes that BS trickles up to

leadership and famous people and so

you'll you'll get some Republicans who

will believe some of it and they'll get

Republican voters to believe it and then

uh the Democrats will criticize them for

being U wrong about something that's

wrong right now this looks about it does

that kind of capture the Republican side

of things I'm trying to get it out of my

own way

here

see would you say that largely captures

what happens no I'm not saying that

everything Republicans believe is wrong

that's nothing like that I'm saying that

when they're wrong CU everybody's wrong

right but when they're wrong it usually

looks like this it bubbles up from some

rumors some politicians pick up on it

Republicans say oh other people are

saying it too and next thing you know

there's some BS and then the Democrats

pounce and they fact check you and they

make you look stupid and then they say

all Republicans are dumb because some of

them believe this stuff so that's

basically the landscape all right but

what does the landscape look like on the

other side does it look like

this not as much no looks a little

different it's way more

complicated but it looks sort of like

this this would be the Democrat news

um

landscape if I can get out of my own way

all right so I think most of you can see

it

now so you've got the CIA and the FBI

and various Democrat operatives who feed

their media these are just some of the

names we know are the illegitimate media

so these are the ones who are being

influenced by Democrat leadership and uh

various entities that they have some

control over so the media is fake news

but Democrats are not they're completely

unaware they they think that there's the

Democrats believe that both sides have

their own fake news and that's really

the whole story oh we had a little fake

news sure but you had a little fake news

most of the news is true nothing like

that is happening no in the political

world nothing you know the news about

hurricanes is probably real but

political news is uh coming from

influencers the media is completely

corrupt and the right-wing media only is

only looked at by people on the right so

the left is completely unaware that

there's any counternarrative they never

see them so they take their fake news

and they get support from you know the

other fake entities which they support

oh the ADL says you're bad too oh the

media said you're bad but these other

people they agree these are all funded

by democrats so they're funded to look

like legitimate organizations but really

they're just um they're just Democrat

organizations to attack the other side

what about the fact Checkers also funded

mostly by democrats also fake um so once

you've got all of these other

organizations from the media to these

funded Democrat organizations you you've

got a real big ball of fake news that's

why there are over 20 hoaxes on my hoax

list that the Dem rats all believe are

real at least 20 major hoaxes that went

through this

machine the outcome of this is that the

Democrats are brainwashed literally that

is not to say that Republicans have only

the truth nothing like that's happening

Republicans are also wrong about things

quite often but it is bubbling up from

the the bottom it's not coming from the

top uh from the Democrats it's all top

stuff and so the their poor voters don't

have any idea what's going on they think

they think that this is some kind of a

legitimate process and they don't have

any way to find out it's not they don't

have a mechanism to know that it's not

real cuz the only thing that's telling

them is not real are people like me and

they've already they've already told you

I'm a disgraced cartoonist and the ADL

told you that I'm a holocaust

denier that's what the ADL said the the

leader of the ADL I'm not just saying

that somebody sent a tweet the actual

leader of the ADL labeled me a holocaust

Den now I don't have to defend that you

know I'm not a holocaust denier but it

shows you how the machine works right

when you saw the Phil bump uh interview

in which he got completely demolished

for being a fake news guy you could see

all of this finally being exposed it was

obvious he wasn't a genuine writer with

real opinions you could tell that it

came from some somewhere and he was

supporting some kind of a some kind of a

machine all right so that's what happens

to the Democrat voters Democrat voters

get brainwashed and the Republican

voters get Shadow banned so they can't

uh fight back um I would be very

surprised if this gets big traffic on

YouTube if you know what I

mean what watch the traffic it gets

let's say on the

xplatform and compare that to the

Baseline and then watch what happen on

YouTube and compare that to my Baseline

do you think they're going to be the

same very little chance of that because

the most of the platforms uh the media

platforms which I accidentally erased

this is this would say social media uh

they're they're going to make sure that

you that the other side that has been

brainwashed by the system they're going

to make sure they don't see

me only the people who already agree

with me are going to see me and of

course there's prosecutions going on so

the department of justice is making sure

that if you have an opinion such as the

one I just expressed that they're coming

after

you so here's what is really really

interesting about this

week the entire Gears of the machine are

now obvious you can see the entire

Hunter Biden money-making scheme right

it's all laid out you can see every part

of it now the Phil bumps of the world

the illegitimate people are going to say

but but but you haven't made the case

that there's a direct payment from

Hunter Biden for any favors that went to

Joe Biden but we know he paid his

expenses and that's the way it works we

know that there doesn't that you know

there's not going to be a piece of paper

we know that what influence buying and

selling looks like it's all laid out but

Democrats don't know it don't know it

here's what would change everything I

don't know it'll happen but if you want

some optimism all it would take is to

draw this diagram into a better form and

then every time there's a story that

could be better understood by this

landscape you print it with a story and

then you highlight the parts that have

been activated for example some people

say I don't know if this is true but

some say the FBI is more influencing the

New York Times whereas the CIA is more

influencing the Washington

post I don't know if that's true but

wouldn't it be interesting to see a

story in the news where you could light

up these parts and show which ones were

involved so you could once you could

show the landscape and how different it

is on the Republican side you could

possibly for the first time uh release

some of the Democrats who in my opinion

are just victims I have to say that in

2016 when I started talking about

politic itics in public and you know it

would' be a big fight between one side

versus the other side and to me it just

felt like oh we just have different

opinions different opinions that's all

and we're fighting it out that's the way

it's supposed to work but once I learned

the entire landscape and I realized that

their opinions are assigned to them and

then they're solidified by this entire

this entire uh constellation of um let's

say people who are just slapping some

paint on the turd if you know what I

mean you know that once you understand

the whole landscape you understand that

they're not legitimate actors in a

legitimate process they're actually

victims and so I've started treating my

democ Democrat brainwashed critics with

uh sympathy and I just say I'm sorry

they did this to you because that's my

actual feeling I don't feel like they're

attacking me because they had some

independent well Arch thought and and

they've decided that attacking me will

help them in some way attacking me isn't

going to help anybody I actually don't

have any any incentives other than to

try to make things a little better

before I leave this weird little ball

they call the

earth I don't need your money you

know and and obviously I'm not doing it

for reputation because I've been the

most you know disgraced and malign

person in the United States probably

this year who who wasn't named Trump um

so I'm only doing it because my payoff

is if I make something better then I

feel good about

myself that's it so that makes me kind

of

dangerous anyway once you understand the

model and if you have a if we have a way

to communicate it so here here's the key

point it's not good enough that I

explained it to you that doesn't help

anybody it would only be good if this

could be oper

operationalized turned into a sort of a

standard way of explaining things so

that whenever Democrats come in and

they're they're victims they've been

brainwashed you could show them

something now the ideal form I'll just

brainwash I'll brainstorm a little bit

an ideal form would be some kind of a

graphic that's maybe not exactly this

but something in that nature where you

could click on any part of it to

validate that it belongs on here in

other words you could click on one of

these groups and you could say here's a

news story that shows you why they're

not legitimate here's a new story that

shows they get all their funding from

Democrats right so if you could do that

you know here's the the fact that Phil

bump is ever involved in the

story if you knew the landscape as soon

as you saw his name you say ah it's a

Phil bump situation as as soon as you

turned on the news and you saw any one

of these designated Liars you know shiff

swall well uh you know you can make the

list yourself there's some people that

the news calls in because they know it's

not true but they need people who are

willing to say literally anything in

order to get somebody on TV who will

support the narrative and that ladies

and gentlemen concludes my double white

for whiteboard

explanation of how everything works

now uh having now completed that

presentation I try to make a beginning

and end because I'm going to clip

it do would you let's double back to my

first claim all right my claim before I

started this was i' like to have at

least one thing brewing in my life that

could change the

world that could change the world

world if if Democrats learned what

happened to them and we're all almost

there we're almost to the point where

you could actually present them with the

full

uh the full Machinery of what put them

in the situation they're

in now some of them have been also

educated by the educa you know I should

have put the education system up here

College but college has turned into you

know one of the brainwashing

operations um so that probably belongs

up there as well but if you didn't know

that college is a brainwashing operation

maybe not intentionally it just sort of

evolved that way um you wouldn't really

know why you even have

opinions people actually don't know why

they have

opinions they think that they thought of

them

themselves that that's not how anything

Works people don't come up with their

own opinions they're assigned and

they're assigned based on what you have

access to on your own right if you had

access to your own

information maybe it' be hard to assign

it but we don't I I can tell you you

know you you tell me who you voted for

and I'll tell you what information you

have access to and you just won't even

let yourself look at the other stuff so

that's that's how we that's how our

opinions are

assigned the fact that we don't have a

way out we don't we don't look at other

stuff now this group again I I will

compliment you cuz I think it's

warranted the people who watch this kind

of content are not like any of the

people I talked about right you this

group is far more likely to identify BS

on their own side than other people and

identifying it on your own side is a

hard part identifying BS on the other

side well that's children's play that's

children's play everybody can tell the

other side side is lying the hard part

is knowing when your side is

lying right cuz they have the inside

they have the inside track on

influencing you so watch out for your

own side they're The Dangerous

Ones and and and let me say it a

different way if if Republicans were not

believing a whole bunch of

in addition to things that are

true the Democrats could not suppress

them it's only because there's so many

Republicans who do believe that

they could be completely discounted

by the other side so is there anything

that's happening right

now that would change that

situation where Republicans seem to be

believing in a lot of

what what would change

that and what would his name be yeah

you're ahead of me v v is not just

really good at what he does

like Trump he's changing the

narrative everybody who saw V talk about

climate change just went up a level in

their ability to explain their side am I

right if you were copying Trump and

saying it snowed yesterday so climate

change is a hoax you look like a

idiot I'm sorry you might even be right

but you would look like a idiot

if you repeated what Trump said about

climate change which I'm not saying

Trump's wrong about anything I'm saying

that the way he expresses it is in the

least scientific terms you could ever

have when he talks about

windmills he jokingly says you know if

the wind stops blowing you can't watch

TV and the crowd loves it don't repeat

that no no that's just something Trump

says don't repeat

that so but when when you watch V talk

every argument he uses is it's like

really close to perfect because he just

has the skill so if you copied V's

Arguments for

anything the Democrats would be

unarmed because their whole game is

making you look like a chimpanzee for

believing the most ridiculous

and V doesn't buy that he

doesn't buy into that he actually uses

arguments that can be checked he uses

things we all understand and he doesn't

he doesn't give you he's he

doesn't support anything he can't defend

with a strong argument but that's not

the case for most Republicans

Republicans have consistently over time

had points of view that they didn't

defend even in a halfway rational way

really but he does so he can basically

fix your weakest part of the Republican

Party by at least showing you what a

good argument looks like and you just

follow his arguments and you will be

fine and the entire party will be fine

this is why I say that the candidates

who are running this time it's a whole

different thing they're they're actually

changing the world while they

run and you know maybe maybe Trump did a

little of that too but I've never seen

so much actual real world change at

least the way we think about things um

then I have from RFK Junior V and Larry

Elder I like to put him in the in the

mix too with his you know family

message very very positive

stuff so that's the positive part so

ladies and gentlemen I believe I have

talked about all the

news oh so here's here here's some more

of understanding U the big

picture does it make sense to you that

uh leadership are half

cavers how could you possibly explain

Biden

Harris I throw with the mentally

incompetence so there's something wrong

with Harris's brain would you agree

there's something wrong with her brain I

it looks it looks to me like substance

abuse but I can't say that with

certainty she doesn't look like the same

person who she used to be and she does

feel she does act and look completely

incompetent so it looks like

drugs but if it's organic she needs to

get some help because she's clearly not

functioning like an

adult right so I mean that's just my

point of view so I I'm not a brain not a

mind

reader but when you look at even even

McConnel you know it's not even just the

Democrats there's something going

on with the

we we've lost the brains of the leaders

went away and nothing really changed

that that tells you there's somebody

there's somebody behind the

screen CU if there were nobody behind

the screen the people who are just

regular Democrats would say who we

better put a better candidate

forward yeah so there there's some kind

of influence or operation that's going

on that's beyond just trying to conserve

the majority there's something deeply

wrong

here all

right amazingly YouTube did not glitch

as far as I can

tell did I miss any uh news stories that

you desperately wish wish I had talked

about

fedin um Obama well some say that the

power behind the screen is

Obama uh or Clinton but I would say that

they may be the same as the uh

intelligence groups so when I talk about

the CIA and maybe some parts of the FBI

and again you're not talking about every

person in those groups you know it's

always it's always people within the

group

um you can kind of see the whole

landscape at this

point yeah so Obama might be mixed up

with that crowd some

say some say OB

CIA well if you look at I think Biden

said um there were five current or

former heads of the CIA who signed the

laptop disinformation letter five former

or current members of the

CIA is there anything else you need to

know yeah and they backed completely the

Democrat narrative they did not back the

country it's clear that that was not for

the good of the country that was for the

good of the Democrats so were they

independently acting in a way that they

thought was just good for Democrats and

they were Democrats and that was the end

of the

story do you think that's the case or do

you think there might have been some

power that organized all of those

people hard to

say but I got my

suspicions

yeah

um and I guess

Jimmy Buffett passed away at

76 he was by the way one of my uh role

models for business when I when I

started uh doing the comic uh he was

killing it and he was selling out in all

his concerts despite not being more of a

name brand you know rock star kind of

guy and the way he did it was he he was

really good at

marketing he was super good at marketing

so he was my role model for marketing he

had a strong uh I guess he had a mailing

list and had sort of almost a cult

following yeah yeah they ate a lot of

cheeseburgers that's all we know about

him so uh here's another sign that your

news is not real news you ready for this

how many times have you heard that the

Ukrainian uh

prosecutor was really going after

barisma no he was that he was really not

doing his job and that there were

International groups that wanted him

removed so you've heard that like crazy

right has anybody asked this question

and I I thought I thought uh Phil bump

was going to get this question but Phil

bump makes the same argument it wasn't

just Joe Biden who wanted that guy fired

the Ukrainian prosecutor it wasn't just

him yeah Victor shoken it wasn't just

Biden it was these International

communities and then the throws his

hands away it goes here's the question

for him which entity media has

interviewed one of those people and

which one of them could say no to the

United

States which of the people who wanted

choke and gone individually could say no

to the United States and feel it

wouldn't have an impact on their

career any no the answer is this is one

of these so remember I showed you how

this is

done

so so you have you know bad people who

plant a

story and then once the story is planted

you have various fake organizations back

the story and then everybody can say hey

you don't have to believe me look at

these

organizations right do you recognize the

play all of those organizations they

mention that also wanted shok and gone

are just their own

surrogates and somehow both the left

media and the right leing media and the

right leing media has never looked into

that just think about

that nobody's ever looked into it have

any have any of those individuals who

agreed the shoken right Marcel first

time you're hearing this yeah nobody's

asked can we put one of those people who

agree with you Joe Biden who also

thought he should go can we talk to one

of them and could we learn a little bit

more about their background and how they

get their funding and what and what they

think their career looks like and and

maybe even what president they

backed were they Trump supporters now

they were in other

countries right now

who right now the fact the fact that no

no uh journalist looked into those other

entities shows you that the fix is

really deep I mean it must it must

include the right leaning media because

how would the right leaning media ignore

that it's the easiest thing just check

to find it if the other people who agree

are honest

players

now when I told you that when you see

the landscape it allows you to take all

of their Ops and map it to the parts and

then you instantly understand it see you

didn't understand right you didn't

understand that why did those other

people keep saying that they agreed with

Biden that that guy should go but now

you understand their play is always the

same they'll always get fake entities to

support their narrative and then say hey

it's not us I mean if it were just me I

mean sure I'm I'm a Democrat so you

can't believe me but but look at those

entities that I funded or

control you you saw how China seemed to

control the who during the

pandemic same play Same play don't

believe us hey hey uh I know you don't

believe us in China but but look at the

organization that I control so if you're

not going to believe me certainly you

could believe the organization I totally

Dominate and

control yeah once you see it it's

everywhere because it's the same play

all they do is they come up they change

the names and the players and then they

just put it back on the framework and it

works and repu Republicans don't have

this kind of system they just have

people who have ideas some of them are

wrong that's it people have ideas and

some of them are wrong it's the whole

story for the

Republicans

so that ladies and gentlemen concludes

the best live stream you've ever seen in

your life and when I tell you that

there's some

chance that it will change the

world I think you can see what I'm

talking about thanks for joining YouTube

I'm sorry you got glitched there but I

think you you got to see the good parts

and I will talk to you tomorrow