Back to episode — Episode 2291 Scott Adams - CWSA 11/13/23, Reframing The News So You Can Use It
Context —
ent situations and watch how it works. You see what changes and maybe you look for a pattern. I don't know. But I wonder if pattern recognition could get you to understanding the machinery of a cell if you could see enough parts of it working. You know, too complicated for a human but too complicated for AI? I don't know. A quantum computer with AI? I don't know. So just something to think about.…
← Previous segment →employment because that was going to happen naturally. You can't really fault him for the economy not being as good as it was before the pandemic. There are pretty good reasons for that. But in terms of how people react and vote, how in the world can he get elected when more than half of the country thinks he made the economy worse or he didn't make it better? Well yeah, I'd be worried about those. Worried about election integrity.
But related to this and also Rasmussen, if you don't follow the Rasmussen account, they're very active in running down all the various allegations about 2020 and what evidence there is that has not been debunked. And it is a whole different world when you look at their claims, which by the way are always backed with documents, right? Everything Rasmussen has said about the election, they print the document. You know, they point to the paragraph that matters to their point. You can see it yourself. So there are still a bunch of things going on. I'm kind of lost in it. But I'll tell you this. This world of we almost have the Kraken is completely different from the other world. In the other world everything's been debunked and it's just done.
Do you know the story about — I've told this a bunch of times — there's an allegation that there's a locked closet with 150,000 ballots that are fake ballots and that the courts wouldn't open the thing. But it went to a higher court and they said yes, you got to open it up. But the lower court is dawdling. But if they could open up that door, you know, you could see that the ballots were or were not fake. But then I read the Atlanta Constitution. It says oh that's an old claim and they've already looked at all the ballots and the ballots were fine. Those two things can't be the same. They've either looked at all these questionable ballots and found no problem, which is in the newspaper, or the court is doing something that doesn't make any sense, which is trying to look for those same ballots that have already been checked in a room. Is it exac
Context —
tly 150,000 in both cases? But it's two different cases. I don't understand what's going on. I cannot figure out how to combine those two realities even by explaining that one has the wrong information and one has the right information. Like they are just so different worlds right now and I don't know what to make of it. So I'll tell you my general advice for every specific claim. The odds of it…
Next segment → →