Back to episode — Episode 2297 Scott Adams - CWSA 11/19/23, Extra Tasty News Today, Find Out Why
Context —
done when they talk about his past. Am I right? Now does this sound familiar? Is there any historical precedent for one candidate talking about the past and that completely losing the election? Yes. This is exactly Bob Dole versus Clinton. Bill Clinton. When Clinton and Gore were running against Bob Dole, Bob Dole was a lovable older gentleman who went through World War II. And Bob Dole said he w…
← Previous segment →edia Matters. And allegedly they have some screenshots to suggest that Media Matters made up the story and that they did not have examples of bad content put next to advertising. And that the examples they found were so trivial compared to the total traffic on X that if you look at the data it actually proves that X is better than the rest in getting rid of that stuff. In other words it's not just not doing it, it's doing an amazing job of not doing it. It's the complete opposite of what Media Matters reported.
Now if that's true, and these are all allegations at this point, but if it's true that Media Matters faked the screenshots, and there does seem to be some credible looking allegation that that's what happened, and that they misled the public and these companies that stopped advertising, now they brag, the head of Media Matters brags that they get companies to stop advertising and that they get people fired and kicked out of their jobs. It's the worst entity in the world. I mean it's basically Satan's spawn. Now who would be funding somebody that was this clearly evil? George Soros. Yeah, it turns out George Soros. So when Musk says he's going to sue everyone involved in Media Matters, including who's funding him, did Musk just throw down against Soros? Because I think he did. I think he did.
And do you remember that interview you saw with Soros in which he explained why his money goes to entities like this? No, you've never seen any media put Alex Soros, who is now in charge, ask him to defend any of his decisions with his money. And I don't think we're going to get away with that. I think you're going to see Trump and maybe Vivek Ramaswamy point this out in public. It's like hey, how come you keep interviewing me? Where's your interview with Alex Soros? Why do you keep just interviewing one side? There are two sides. Why don't you make him defend what he's doing right now? I don't think that the people protecting Soros are going to turn on him, but it's an angle of attack that is so available. You just have to say hey, why are you protecting him? Why are you protecting the person who's behind all the bad that's happening? I'm not saying he's evil. I'm saying it's very obvious that you're not even letting him talk in public. And he's the biggest player in America right now and nobody interviews him. You know his name. You know where he lives. And he does do public things. He's not a recluse. But nobody's ever put him on record. Say what? Why are you doing these things? Why are you supporting open borders and prosecutors who allow crime and supporting Media Matters which is just a hit piece entity and has no benefit to the country? What about all these cars? Just basically Democrat support
Context —
ers. Yep. I think that's getting interesting. And whatever Musk does to Media Matters and probably Soros by extension is going to get really interesting. It's going to get really interesting. All right. So according to Musk, who agreed with a post that said this, there were 50 impressions on X served against the content in the article. In other words bad stuff that was on X paired with somebody's…
Next segment → →