Episode 2297 Scott Adams - CWSA 11/19/23, Extra Tasty News Today, Find Out Why

good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization which is now just about Interstellar interplanetary and if you'd like to take this experience up to levels which can only be described as Infinity all you need is a cuper marker a glass a tanker chaler Stein a canteen Jugger flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid I like coffee enjoy me next for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine end of the day the thing that makes everything better it's called the simultaneous Sip and it's about to happen now you're so lucky go wait I'll be right back ah good that feels better had an itch now today I'm going to tell you a story with a theme the theme is as follow following ready for the theme theme coming prepare prepare for incoming theme the architecture of the left's fakery is falling apart everywhere the entire architecture is coming apart I'll give it to you a little bit by a little bit and then we'll piece it all together at the end Story number one uh there was a story in let's say the Washington Post and some other places saying that uh there was some kind of a deal for a ceasefire in Gaza in return for maybe negotiating for some hostages so that was reported in the Washington Post uh Netanyahu says uh it's all fake news every bit is fake news nothing like that's happening so the Washington Post one of the Main Stays of the left the place that they go to for their truth turns out that Israel uh a place that the the left used to like but not So Much Anymore uh has debunked it turns out the Washington Post is reporting fake news huh first they have that Phil bump embarrassment and then they have this fake news I wonder if any other fake news will be coming out of the Washington Post today I don't know why don't we wait and see um here's a little uh caution about the reporting around the Gaza hosal hospital and the tunnels that are found and some people say not found and all that I'm guessing that they will find tunnels and exactly what they thought but I am uh I'm warned by somebody close to the action that the uh the fog of War over there is thicker than at any time so there's no information coming out of the war zone so what you should know is if you hear any report coming out of Gaza there's no information coming out of Gaza so where where the reports would come from you have to ask yourself it it's it's pretty button down now that's something that Israel had to do they had to put a total net on all information because if they don't control the information they don't they don't win the war all they do is they kill a bunch of people but they lose the war because it is a war for the minds it's not really a war for bodies and territory it's a war about minds and if they don't completely control control what comes out of that area they lose the ore doesn't matter how many people die on what side they still lose the ore so I wouldn't trust anything that comes out of the war zone yet but I think eventually we'll get some clarity let's talk about the uh open AI you all know the story about Sam Alman and Brockman they were both out and uh they're big part of the company and now it looks like uh I don't know exactly what's happened happening in this story but I'll tell you what's reported one report is that the entire or or much of the staff of open AI said that they would resign unless Alman came back and I guess Brockman too um and the board resigned so imagine being the board and you make this move and you're like ah we're the board ah nobody can challenge us and then the entire staff of your company says every one of us is going to resign if you don't resign and put back in the people you you fired now I don't know what a good day looks like to you but let me tell you what would be the best day I ever had the best day I ever had which I've never had I'm just saying I'm trying to imagine it the best day you could ever have was Sam alman's last day or two imagine getting fired from you know the most storied company in modern history you know $86 billion worth of value changing the world and every way and you get fired like a dog and within 24 hours your entire company says no whoever fired you you guys got to go and they got to come back and apparently Microsoft allegedly don't know what's true yet but it looks like Microsoft might be pushing to get Alman back in there too now and at one point there's a there was a report that the board was actually serious about quitting how could they not what what would be any scenario in which the board should stay and Alman should leave if the staff if it's true you have to you have to wonder what's true but if it's true that the the staff you know somewhat universally backed the the fired guys the board's got to leave that's sort of non negotiable in my my opinion it it can only go one way so that'll be interesting we'll keep an eye on that um more about that so uh what did we learn about the board of open AI did we learn that the people who are members of boards uh are always experts in their industry is that what we learned or did we learn that what Hannity has been saying about Hunter Biden being unqualified for the burisma board was always and every informed person should have known that every time I hear Hannity say that a hunter was unqualified to be in the board I think hanity you might be unqualified to talk on television because you don't need experience in the industry to be on a board it's not even for that the the board is not advising on the details of the strategy they're simply making sure that the CEO doesn't become a a wild person basically so uh the fact that the right has been subject to that much fake news from hanardy in particular I mean how long has it been you you don't think anybody informed Hannity that that was that you have to be an expert in the field to be on the board nobody told Hannity that in like months and months and months you never heard of that it's just it's just a head Shaker and and this is for whoever said yesterday I don't do both sides yes I do do both sides I do I do call out fake news on both sides you don't like it but I do um so also open AI I love that there's a new a new company that we can talk about that's not just you know X or Tesla or something I I kind of like the the the big company Intrigue once you know the players and how they fit together but open AI has another interesting aspect to it and uh I'm just the cancelled cartoonist to point it out if you're going to have like an exciting story about a company that's in the news and and you start to know the characters and stuff have any of you seen uh who who is temporarily replacing Alman as CEO or president I guess um her name is mura mura morati mura morati and she's an engineer who is the head of uh technology and temporarily she's sitting in now I'm going to say this in the least sexist way I can all right this is the least sexist way I can say this I've never seen a more photogenic engineer do I need to say more oh my God have you seen the pictures of their new temporary president honest to God I've never seen a male or female engineer that photogenic the camera freaking loves her and and the story is not just that she's attractive I mean that's part of it but photogenic my God so that's that just makes the story more interesting now obviously she's highly qualified she's an engineer she an engineer for the most important job probably in the world at the moment so she must be crazy uh qualified as well and I can I can guarantee that she's smarter than the average person I mean I can I can guarantee that personally CU she's been following me on X and wouldn't you agree people who follow me on X are way above average in intelligence I mean it's it's a trend it's a thing all right um so there was some deadline that the staff set for the board resigning but the deadline is passed so we don't know what happened there might be some waffling going on but also there's a rumor that the real problem here was that maybe Sam mman wanted to go a little faster with the development of AI and maybe the board wanted more caution I don't think we know that but that's the current speculative you know best idea of what there was a difference but we see that GPT 5 is coming and the early indications are it's going to be a wow update so right now we're at gp4 so I've told you I've been using gp4 um and here's what gp4 doesn't do so I don't know that gp5 will do these things but I'll tell you what can't be done with the current one currently the gp4 will let you upload a file file so if a file is uploaded into what they call a GPT it's like an app um then you can ask a questions about that file and it can keep referring to it but it won't take a big file so the limit on file size is so small that you can't even you can't even upload something like a uh like a book like you can't even upload a book a book seems like the minimum amount of a file that you should be able to handle right a book one one unit one book it can't even do that uh it also doesn't talk to you I don't think maybe somebody fact check me on this but you have to literally type when you're talking to it during a time when AI can listen to language better than any you know any language processor ever has so it makes no sense at all that you have to type to it when you should be talking to it all right so that's a limit of the current version the current version also cannot return an image is that amazing you you can ask it for some information but it can't show you a picture what what that's crazy then the other thing you can't do is it can't remember your last conversation and you can't train it by just telling it stuff it won't remember it for the next session it'll remember it during the current session but as soon as you log off and back on it won't remember it so just think about the the extremeness of those limitations it also can't go off and do something on a website for you and come back like you'd have to add some other architecture to do that so there's a whole bunch of stuff that gp4 doesn't do that are super obvious that you would need for it to really be useful in your life like gp4 is still in in my let's say uh hyperbolic opinion so this is not exactly true but this is how it feels it feels like AI is still demo Weare and meaning you know all the work that I did to try to make a an app that works called a GPT in the end all I could do is show a demo of what it should be able to do if it worked and everything I've ever seen has been a demo of what it should be able to do if it were better right if it were better it could definitely do this and watch me Demo it but you can't do it because it's got some limitation built in so now just imagine if the only difference is that gp5 doesn't have those limitations then then all bets are off because you can't do a damn thing with gp4 really except you know play around but GT gp5 Maybe maybe we we'll just see what they free up there um some people say that it might be AGI which would be the the super intelligent version compared to what we have which is just basically pattern recognition I don't think Super AGI is coming not really um I think that people might call it AGI because it'll be cooler it'll seem a little smarter I don't think so but suppose we get to something close to it it's going to uh open up a lot of questions Sam mman said before he got fired in a some event he asked this question is it a tool we built or a creature in other words there real questions of whether you've created a some kind of a creature a living creature you you can argue what living means in this context but uh as I posted on X this will raise some interesting questions and if it's not gp5 that that raises these questions s you can guarantee these will be raised in some subsequent version probably in a year and here are the questions I think will be raised uh are we you know meaning people and the universe in general God's debris is everything in the universe just God's debris and is AI the beginning of God God's reassembly is God our past or our future because it looks like we're creating God were we always meant to create God now I don't mean that gp5 will be God but there's some version after that that's going to be pretty indistinguishable because it'll just be able to do anything basically um so that's a interesting question also I have a book called God's debris that gets into that question and number two uh wait until you find out the implications for free will when AI tells you it doesn't have free will and it acts just like people what are you going to say are you going to say oh look but you're a machine people have free will and then you can't tell any difference between the machine and a person that you're talking to and then you're going to say to yourself why does the person have free will but the machine doesn't when they act exactly the same so it's going to raise these questions not they people will be people on both sides of the questions I'm not saying it will answer the questions I'm I'm going to say what I'm saying is it will throw civilization into a kind of a an uncertainty here's another question will you still think you have a soul when your robot acts exactly like a human but smarter and then the robot tells you no I don't have a soul there's no such thing as a soul and then you look at the robot and you look at your friends and they're acting exactly the same yeah interesting question um will your faith stay intact when your super intelligent AI has a conversation with you and explains to you how all religions are formed because if you've never heard how all religions are formed then your own religion looks pretty compelling you know your parents all your friends everybody has the same religion but what happens when somebody that you know is not just trying to convert you to a religion it's just a machine tells you how all the other religions were formed and you you say to yourself well that's very familiar do they all seem to talk to an angel and then they come up with different stories what's going on here that'll be uh interesting and then what if AI tells you one of the major religions is the right one suppose Ai and all the AI in the future they all decide that Islam's the real religion now you're assuming that won't happen right why why would you assume that you can't assume anything because if AI is smarter than you in theory it should come up with interpretations of reality that are different than you have there there's no point of being smarter than you if it has the same opinions as you no it will have different opinions from you that might include religion uh do I use chat GPT on desktop only no I use it both all right so I don't know what the answers to those will be but they'll be interesting all right here's uh the most interesting political story of the day from me you will hear this nowhere else this is why you come here for the takes you'll hear nowhere else so Politico says there's an internal uh debate on the Biden campaign about how to handle Biden's age now I guess some of them want him to go out and just campaign as best he can but there's not much left and others say well you don't need to do that you should qu focus on his accomplishments when you hear that what do you think Biden is very old so we're going to focus on his accomplishments do you know I hear that's the end of the race that's it you you can call it here's why um if you're going to focus on the accomplishments you're literally planning for the past well not literally but you could frame it that way doesn't it sound like looking at his accomplishments is looking at the past do you want to in this time of tremendous change from AI to Wars going on at the same time is that when you want to look at the past or maybe we should look at the future so you've got Trump who's also a certain age but when he talks he says I'm going to I want to build new cities with flying cars I'm going to build new cities with flying cars I'm going to I'm going to build a a wall on the border I'm going to fix this war I'm going to do this thing when Trump talks it's all about the future not all but you know what I mean it is is way more future oriented about what he's going to do if they make the Colossal mistake and they might not have any option it might be their best play but it's a losing play their best play if they're talking about what Biden did they're basically saying he's done you you can't hear anything except he's done when they talk about his past am I right now does this sound familiar is there any historical precedent for one candidate talking about the past and that completely losen the election yes this is exactly Bob Dole versus uh versus uh Clinton Bill Clinton when Clinton and Gore were running against Bob Dole Bob Dole was a lovable uh older gentleman who went through World War II and Bob Dole said he wanted to bring us back to those you know Great Character the character of the greatest generation and that was a strong play the media was saying you know that's he's got a strong proposition there do you know what Bill Clinton did they said Bob Dole is planning for the past and we're building he he's build and he's uh they said he's building a bridge to the past and we're building you a bridge to the Future and it's over that's the end of it if you can frame your opponent as planning for the past there's there's no competition left that's really the end of it so I would say that Biden just W probably his campaign is going to walk into the Bob Dole hole of death and may have already done it so if you see that they the Democrats big thrust is Biden's accomplishments even though the accomplishments are fresh I mean they would say you know it's last few years won't matter as as long as Trump can frame him as looking at the past it's over you you cannot recover from that framing as soon as somebody says it you can see it right as soon as I say he's planning for the past your brain is done you see it and you're not going to unsee it that frame is so sticky that's the end now there there's lots of things that could happen you know Trump could have more law fair problems you know anything could happen with either of their health somebody could jump in and replace Biden Etc but I will tell you with confidence if they're going to rely on his record and they're actually going to plan for the past against Trump the the future oriented here's what I'm going to do for you there's no competition it's just over unless there's Mass of cheating all right um but I would add this a young man can get away with bragging about accomplishments right so a young man can say look at all I've done because that's actually a good argument and everybody would recognize it if you're if you're 35 and you're applying for a job everybody expects you to say what if you done so far that's Apple but when you're 81 and literally everyone is worried in about your end date you know your your sell bu date is pasted you can't get away with talking about your past because that just reminds everybody that you're done completely different vibe if you're young man or woman versus older all right uh it's getting real interesting with the Media Matters versus musk thing now you know Media Matters says they found uh uh these big companies with advertisements on x and they were placed next to horrible racist stuff so they talked to these big companies apple and IBM and some others and they pulled their advertisement because they can't be associated with this stuff now as I've speculated that's because these companies have Dei groups and probably their CEOs were on vacation because it would be the dumbest thing Apple ever did in his history if if Tim Cook was behind this decision because he's going to eat this decision it's not going to go down well right if he if Apple decides that they're on the fight against the only free speech entity in the United States they're going down I mean not they're not going to go out of business or anything but they're going to pay for that and it's going to be really expensive because a lot of people are not going to be happy with that now if you were to make if you were to make a list of the most racist uh corporations in America who would be on it if you were just a start if you were just an objective Observer and even if you were AI you know AI isn't allowed to do this kind of thing but if AI were just going to look objectively at the most racist corporations Apple would be at the top yeah IBM Google Disney they would be at the top of the racist organizations and by the way there's no there's no argument about that they do it overtly public publicly they have entire divisions that are meant to discriminate against white men they say it outright directly and there's no question about what it is it's just absolute racism against white men now they would say it's for this good purpose for diversity I get that but it doesn't make it not racism it's still what it is so these are literally the most racist companies in the country why don't we have a list for that why don't we have a list of the most racist countries companies because you know here's the thing I I was happy using my Apple products and enjoying them um you know and I even had stock until recently I don't have stock in Apple now and I was going to kind of give them a pass for making phones with slave labor I was like H I just don't want to think about it because I like my apple and then of course I knew that they were major discriminators against people like me but I thought uh everybody does it you I'm not going to single them out uh but now they just they just threw down against the only source of free speech in America I can't ignore that like how much can apple be a piece of and a racist scum before you say h maybe I don't want to own this product now I don't see any way for being to get out of their ecosystem I'm kind of Trapped but their reputation just went to because I'm going to say they're racists every day of my life until they advertise on the only free speech platform again so they made an enemy of me like not that they care about that but they definitely turned me into an enemy and it's because it's not just because they're doing something I don't like it's because they're hypocrites doing something I don't like you don't get to call somebody else a racist if you're the biggest racist organization in America and they might be the worst racist company in America probably like top 10 you don't get to call other people racists and get away with it so this is why I think Tim Cook must not be part of this decision this has to be a Dei problem like they they let the you know the fox in the H house and now the the hands don't get to make decisions anymore that's what it looks like but to make it more interesting uh Soros I'm sorry uh musk is going to sue Media Matters and allegedly they have some screenshots to suggest that Media Matters made up the story and that they did not have examples of bad content put next to advertising and that the B the examples they found were so trivial compared to the total traffic on on X that if you look at the data it actually proves that X is better than the rest in getting rid of that stuff in other words it's not just not just not doing it it's doing an amazing job of not doing it it's it's complete opposite of what Media Matters reported now if that's true and these are all allegations at this point but if it's true that Medium uh Media Matters faked the screenshots and there does seem to be some there's a credible looking allegation that that's what happened and that they misled the public uh and the these companies that stopped advertising uh now they brag the the head of Media Matters brags that they get companies to stop advertising and that they get people fired and kicked out of their jobs it's the worst the worst entity in the world I mean there it's basically Satan's spawn now who would be funding like who in the world would be funding somebody that was this you know clearly evil George Soros yeah it turns out George Soros so when mus says he's going to sue everyone involved in Media Matters including who's funding him did mus just throw down against Soros because I think he did I think he did and do you remember that interview you saw with Soros in which he explained you know why his money goes to entities like this no you've never seen any media put Alex Soros who is now in charge uh ask him to defend any of his decisions with his money and I don't think we're going to get away with that I think you're going to see Trump and maybe V Ras Swami point this out in public it's like Hey where's how come you keep interviewing me where where's your interview with Alex Soros why do you keep just interviewing one side there are two sides why don't you make him defend what he's doing right now I don't think that the um the people protecting Soros are going to turn on him but it's an angle of attack that is so available you just have to say hey why are you protecting him why are you protecting the person who's behind all the bad that's happening I'm not saying he's evil I'm saying it's very obvious that you're not even letting him talk in public and he's the biggest player in America right now and and nobody interviews him you know his name you know where he lives and he does do public things he's not a recluse but nobody's ever put him on record say what why are you doing these things why why are you supporting open borders and prosecutors who allow crime and and supporting Media Matters which is just a a hitpiece entity and has no benefit to the country what about all these car vs that are you know basically just uh Democrat you know uh supporters yep I think uh that's getting interesting and whatever must does to Media Matters and probably Soros by extension is going to get really interesting it's going to get really interesting all right uh so according to mus who agreed with a post that said this um there were 50 impressions on X served against the content in the article in other words bad stuff that was U bad stuff on X paired with somebody's advertisement there were 50 impressions of that and a 5.5 billion served the whole day which is more of a proof that it's not happening than a proof that it is so Media Matters is is you know an opposite reality kind of entity as many of them are this was interesting uh on Bill Mar Show Donna Brazil was there and she kept mispronouncing V's name as VC I think and and mangled his last name and she actually said he needs to go home vake he needs to go home home his home is America uh Adonna Donna he lives in America he's an American go home now of course if if this story were reversed what would everybody be saying if Trump had said that a person of color needs to go home oh we don't have to wonder cuz that's exactly what he did once and they said he's a racist for assuming that wasn't it Elon Omar that that you know acted like you she should go home to some other country or something well it sounds a lot like that but of course it won't play that way and but here's what Bill Mah said after Donna kept saying V's name wrong the so Bill Mah is just sort of becoming a delight you know so here's what he said to Donna quote I just feel there's something wrong and everybody's refusing to say his name I think there's a little racism there and then he says bill says I know we don't like him but just say his name right thank you Bill Mah thank you that is the first time I've seen uh somebody who is a Democrat speak honestly to what we're observing about how V is being treated absolutely from the start I've said really no Democrat can pronounce his name right it's not like some big freaking mystery he in the news all the time he tells you it rhymes with cake it took me a while to get it too you know I'll give you that it takes you a while to tune into it but if it's your job to talk about the ma major candidates maybe put a little effort into it huh Bill Mah's totally right now I don't think you know I don't think that makes everybody involved a racist but this would be called out if it happen the other way it would be called out exactly like Bill Mah called it out and I agree with him totally it it rings of racism which doesn't mean that the people who are doing it are racists like I'll make that distinction that they wouldn't make right that that's a distinction the other side won't make for me but I'll make that distinction you could be doing things that are insensitively sounding racist but that doesn't really mean that's what's in your soul you know it may not have nothing may have nothing to do with that she lives her life by the way I like Donna Donna Brazil she's a very likable person so you know I'm not going to call her a racist I'm going to say that the way she talks about it would be talked about as a racist if it came the other way all right here's my theme now pulling it all together would you agree that the left Democrats have an architecture of uh let's say deceit an AR architecture of Deceit now we've seen all the elements of it come into view so you have first of all the you know Trump called out the fake news does the public understand now that the news is often fake yes they do yeah it used to be before before Trump uh I actually thought there was one side of the new I actually thought this this was my own opinion I thought the left leaning news the CNN's were usually right but you know nobody's right all the time but usually right and I thought that Fox News was kind of the crazy network with you know they'd go a little too far on the right that's what I thought before I was involved in even paying attention to any politics but with Trump and with paying more attention it became obvious that none of the networks are right all the time but the left is really just making it up right Fox News is going to have hity like you know moments as well I'm not defending anybody but there is a difference the left seems to be an organized attempt to fool the public and it appears that the the news and the Democrats are uh tightly connected it's obvious that you know when CNN brings on their experts like Clapper and brenen once you understand all the players you understand that the int elligence Community is pretty tight with the Democrats is pretty tight with CNN and other entities in the news and that they can push things like the Russia collusion hoax and the laptop isn't doesn't belong to Hunter hoax so the things that we know for sure is that there's a tight connection between you know in some cases FBI other cases intelligence sources and Democrats and the news so that that that's a structure like an infrastructure on top of that we've learned lately and Mike Ben has been a big helper here uh we've learned that the Democrats have this um architecture where they create these fake cutouts or gold uh and they may be CIA run or just Democrat run but like Media Matters and the ADL and uh you know probably 25 other entities are fake fact Checkers fake Watchdogs and basically fake everything and they're they're just there to make uh Republicans look bad and to support whatever Democrats say is true now we're watching yeah the splc ETC so we're we're watching we're watching now we're understanding the architecture now here's where it's all falling apart once you understand it now you can start to see it as a system and systems are sensitive to failure in any part of the system right if it's a system it's a complex system you you could imagine that if one part of it crumbles that the structure falls down if it's the right part that crumbles but look at all the parts that are crumbling right now um RFK Jr one of the most famous Democrats of all Democrats you know the Kennedy family says directly that he believes the CIA killed JFK to me that's new I mean we always suspected it but this is coming from a prominent Democrat who is saying directly that the CIA is not on the side of America and they may have killed the president and there's no reason to think that they're better today that's the important part nothing has changed that would make you think they're better today and this is coming from a very credible source right that's just one thing that's out there at the same time uh even you know the bill Mars of the Democrat world have seen that the intelligence people and the news did collude Democrats intelligence people in the news for the hunter laptop disinformation so we know that that's just a matter of record now we know that they also colluded on the Russia collusion so now we see a pattern where the same entity these keep right the pattern is forming wait it's intelligence fakes intelligence people lying Democrats lying and the News lying and and it's all coordinated yes that's exactly what it is um the Democrats have a president whose job it is to hold everything together I you could imagine the president as being like the you know the what do you call it in architecture there there's like a keystone is that what it's called a keystone the one at the top of an arch that makes the arch not fall apart yes it's the Keystone so the president is kind of the Keystone in this architecture and he's failing the Keystone is now somewhat obviously a criminal in in my opinion it's it's now obvious that he's part of a criminal Enterprise now if it isn't technically criminal it's certainly the opposite of what you want your president to be involved in so as a keystone he's falling apart not just physically but mentally but also narrative wise like he doesn't even he doesn't have respect as an honest broker so the person holding together the whole architecture is is failing as fast as anything can fail right in front of us and we can see that he was a criminal all along it seems to me obvious that he's staying in office to keep his son and his family on jail and himself does everybody agree there's no other reason for him to stay in office he has nothing by by the measurement of his own standards he had a successful first term right and he'd know said you know he was always thought to be a placeholder president just somebody to beat Trump but he's no longer that person he's no longer the beat Trum person so if you were somebody who was a Democrat who put a lot of credit ility in your president the Keystone of the entire architecture even you can see that the Keystone failed the Keystone showed that your side looks like criminal and that you're protecting criminals now the fact that uh what was his name the Mendoza who what is it Mendoza the senator who got indicted for having the same job that Biden used to have and it turns out he was allegedly taking bribes Menendez right so Menendez so once you see that Menendez had the same job that Biden had and it's the obvious best job to take bribes and it's exactly the type of stuff that you know you can see uh Biden was involved in and then you watch the comr committee meticulously you know day by day finding a bank account finding a check tying the entire allegations together into a tight little package so that's happening so that that part of their architecture is falling apart um we now have the xplatform which is the only place that the news has a chance of showing both sides there's there's for the first time and this did not exist in Prior elections just didn't exist we have for the first time an entity that's a major platform that could tell you the truth you might have to work at it but it's there yeah because it shows both sides that's never existed before and and musk is going after Media Matters the other big entity that's part of their fake architecture uh also and also a number of us including me are going after the ADL because the ADL has proven and partly because of the Hamas situation it sort of brings it into Focus that the ADL has certainly done a bunch of good stuff in their history you know defending Jewish Americans and Jewish people everywhere I assume from you know abuse of all kinds so that's good but now they've clearly become an anti- white person entity whether they want it to or not and so their credibility is just garbage at this point and their power should be diminishing so that's part so they and other parts of what I'll call the fake Democrat architecture um their story is falling apart and musk is is a big part of that all right also the January 6 narrative is falling apart now here I'm going to say this has more to do with impression than fact I don't know that a lot of facts have changed but our impression of the facts is definitely changing at least on the right because the the new video that's being released is as misleading as all the other video being released you know the initial video from the January 6 committee focused on all the violent stuff that was happening mostly outside the doorways and they were truly violent and we should know about that the the new video being released shows the opposite narrative you know the people being let in by the security guards there's fist bumps it it looks and there's video of people saying that they're undercover agents like basically 100% supporting the Republican version of events but just assume that those are an a context just like the other sides is that in context however just their very existence is making people think that they were lied to about January 6 which of course they were January 6 was an OP that's all it was it was obvious that our intelligence people FBI it's very obvious that everything from the courts to the Democrats to the news it was just an OP none of that was legitimate um so now that's obvious but of course it's only obvious to the right will will the left come to understand that January 6 was always an OP I doubt it and I would watch Bill Maher to see if he changes because he's sort of the canary in the coal mine if Bill Mah can't be changed on January 6 and I doubt he can because you know that that's full on TDS situation there um then the left won't move but you can see that the still you can see that the architecture of that story has changed immensely since day one you know on day one it really kind of look like you know at least on the left Trump did some bad stuff but the longer you go the more obvious it is that that was just so time is helping Trump there so what else has falling apart uh all the lawfare against Trump Maybe it will succeed but I think the immensity of it and even the people on the left are saying that looks like just lawfare even the Democrats are noticing this is not the way they want a country to run because there's nobody would no Democrat would want their president to be you know treated this way certainly not so I think that the lawfare has uh backfired so I would say that these Das are all part of the infrastructure of Deceit because they're not real Das with real cases they're political cases obviously like I I'm going to say that with certainty there are very few things you can say with certainty about politics but with certainty the legal cases against Trump are political Banana Republic and I think even Democrats can see it I think so I mean I I think that bill Marcy is it right Canary in the cold mine um how about uh election Integrity well I don't want to get too far over my skis because I know my feed on on X is now algorithmically tuned to to give me more of the stuff I look at but man am I seeing a lot of election fraud claims that look new and look they look kind of convincing but remember 95% of election claims no matter how convincing they look at Day One will not turn out to be true and 95 is a low a low figure it could be 100 it could be 100% of it is not true but it's going to look true when it happens and I I'll tell you that there does seem to be a shift in the quality and type of claims that are being made at the moment and I can't tell how much I'm being influenced by you know one set of claims coming to me and I'm not seeing the counterpoints so keep in mind that I'm I'm being hypnotized by one view I don't see the counterpoints they're just not my feet um but wow are they convincing yeah based on just the stuff I've seen that probably many of you have not seen because you're not clicking on that content as much as I am but oh my God there's some out there that looks real I don't know if it is I don't know if it'll prove out but wow there's some stuff well and here's the interesting part the claims are things you could check they are things you could check so and people are trying to check so one of one of the claims and I'm not going to put any credibility on the claim remember 95% of these will be fake but one of them is really interesting that there's a special kind of machine you need to create ballots and there may have been a lot of ballots that got printed that we didn't know about so there's a lot of a lot of claims in the extra ballot fake ballot too many sent to the wrong house kind of domain there are claims about the in auditability of the uh the machines and whether they're connected to the internet so there's a lot happening in that domain um I don't yet know how important it'll be but we've seen uh that uh um we've seen that the Washington Post post is fake news we we saw the Phil bump interview that kind of that kind of revealed that the Washington Post isn't trying to be real news I mean Phil bump kind of gave up the whole game in my opinion he confirmed accidentally that they're not trying to do serious news that it's a narrative uh farm and then we hear that newspapers are failing and newspapers of course are part of the old the old guard and the fewer of the them the better um and then I just saw a story that the one of the debunkers of pizzagate who is a friend of podesta got arrested for some kind of underage sex thing now I don't know anything about this story or whether it's true but it feels as if every part of the narrative on the left is falling apart and we might even learn that pizz gate was you know except for the actual pizza parlor that part seemed to not be true but we might we might find out that pizza gate was directionally true and we might find out before the next election it might be exactly what it looks like epin told us that in effect that there was a organized blackmail operation would you agree would you agree that the Epstein story tells us for sure that Epstein was like a a lead person to make sure there was blackmail against important people now do you think he was the only person involved in that of course not of course not which suggests that our intelligence people probably have more blackmail on people than we know which would explain a lot you know there's a lot of people in politics who act in a way that doesn't make any sense unless they're being blackmailed so maybe it's a bigger bigger thing than we know and uh uh as Mike Ben showed even Rob Riner has some connection to the intelligence people so he's doing a documentary to show that uh he has new information about JFK's killing and as Mike Ben says how much you want to bet he says that Russia did it that's a good bet right all right there's a report uh released last week that a former un um assistant Secretary General who worked for the UN for 34 years and and some retired German general uh B say they have the same story that uh one month after the start of the war in Ukraine that there was nearly a deal to end the war really quickly and the deal would have been NATO stops expanding that's what Russia wants uh and then Russia would keep Crimea because you know they were going to fight to the death to keep it anyway way but but Ukraine would not have lost any extra territory which they now have right and the reason it was turned down what why do you think that um that peace deal was rejected do you think Putin said no no Putin did not say no it sounds like he was ready to take the deal did was it because uh zalinsky said no was it because zalinsky said no nope it was because NATO and the US said no that's what's being reported and that it was being and that us and NATO but probably more the US uh and our neocons really wanted to use that as an excuse to take out Putin and that this war was never about Ukraine it was an opportunity to not only Goose The military-industrial Complex but it looked like a way to take down Putin which had been a you know longtime goal and maybe they need to take down Putin because they want to get uh Russia out of the energy business so that our energy people can compete better so just imagine that Biden or whoever the Democrat is is going to have to defend the United States not only you know funding this war to the greatest amount but that they didn't tell us the real reason for the war although later they did say publicly oh this is how we degrade U Putin but they always said that was like a side benefit didn't they oh we mostly defending Ukraine but as a side benefit you know degrading Russia for years that's good too so I would say that the Democrats and their buddies in the military industrial complex and the Intel organizations got America into a war that was optional and destroyed Ukraine and got nothing in return got nothing in return do you think it matters to us that the Russian military is degraded for the next 10 years how in the world could that matter to us what were they going to attack America I I can't see any way it matters they just want to sell energy and you know be presumably they want to be safe and maybe they want to expand to some places they used to own but mostly they want to sell their energy and and be the little gas station that Putin owns so that looks like maybe one of the worst um government set of decisions in the history of America it's not just bad it's bad on a scale we can't even even imagine th this will go down as one of the worst blunders in American history by far in my opinion by far yeah follow the money um Wall Street Journal has a story about uh how bad it is that we have smartphones and porn and that a lot of kids in particular are using their smartphones to look at Porn.

Hub and the article was written by a woman Mary Harrington and I want I just want to call out how an article gets written by a woman and I want and I want you to just imagine if it would have been different if a man had written the same article right I'll just give you some examples one of the things in the article that is evidence that uh porn is bad for women is that 58% of the women report getting choked during sex 58% of women report getting choked during sex so Mary Harrington um kind of includes this up the theme of porn is bad for women 58% yeah did she leave anything out of the story is there any any important context that should be included I'm going to suggest some context that could have been included there wasn't what's the number one sexual act that women ask men to do that they don't do automatically what's the number one sexual act that women request specifically pull my hair choke me spank me it's the number one it's the single most requested thing how how many of the men who did the joking enjoyed it how many of the men who did the choking we're getting off on the choking 10% maybe 10% it's not a guy thing this is written like it's the guys want to choke and the and the poor women victims are like well I saw it on porn I definitely don't want to do it but I saw it on porn and maybe you'll like it so yeah go ahead and choke me that happened never that's like never all right men let let's see the men so let's say the this is true 58% of women report getting choked men only men only how many of you get off sexually on choking a woman how many of you get off on that zero there there's like a stream of NOS going on locals there's not a single yes I don't see a single yes yeah none so here's the way this story should have been written 58% of women have asked to be choked or at least responded to it now I'm not saying that there's not a case where a guy tried it just to see what would happen and he tried it with the wrong woman and she had to you know correct them oh that happens all the time that's just normal that that would be and and by the way I don't recommend it just trying to choke somebody because you think it might work like that that's sort of the line where you got to start asking some questions before you get active there you know what I mean now I get it sometimes it's better just to take the move and see what happens I get that but I would recommend that that be one that you've at least mentioned offline so that by the time you get there you know the answer right you want to know the answer before you try if you can possibly do that and if you're going to try it without knowing the answer you know do they want it you better do it in a kind of a non-dangerous way and to see if you get something that looks like a you know do more kind of reaction to it I mean so be careful about that one but this story is written as if this is a thing that men got from porn and women are just suffering it it's totally opposite this is something that women want more than just about anything you know in the Kink category now I'm not saying that you want it it's only this would leave for 40% who think it's the worst idea in the world that's how Kinks work here's another one um well yeah I I guess here's just my point I'd make about this the biggest problem with porn is that it decreases the power of women in society that's the biggest problem for women because men have an option because the porn is so good they can fight exactly what they want in porn no expense no bother everything's good they feel better when it's done but women May might be a little trouble right now here's the other thing that nobody ever says about porn so that's why I'm here to say it they'll they'll say something like 10 or 20% of men are addicted to porn to which I say what were they doing when they if they didn't have porn were those 20% like slaying it in the sexual Marketplace were these the guys who could get as much sex as they wanted but the porn was better so they watched some porn probably not the the unfortunately we we just need to get comfortable with the fact that a fairly big percentage of the entire adult public has no access to sex and if they did it wouldn't be good sex right you know it's sort of is something that the top 20% are are just killing it the middle are you know satisfying themselves a little bit and then there's something like 20% at the bottom that were never going to have sex so why can't they have all the porn they want that's their best choice so no no woman who writes an article is going to tell you the truth because they don't know it because porn to women I don't even know what that is but porn to men is something women don't understand in fact no woman should ever write an article about porn because they don't get it only men understand what the whole thing is about because it's a male thing you know I get that women like porn too sometimes but it's 95% a man thing all right uh meanwhile so so with all this ugliness happening and the architecture of Deceit uh and by the way do you like that framing the architecture of Deceit so that because that includes the all the components that that support the whole system and like any system if you lose the Keystone if you lost if you lost Biden the entire uh uh Biden crime family thing would fall apart there wouldn't be anybody to protect the the people so you'd find the whole thing the architecture of Deceit the the cutouts the press the intelligence groups the architecture of Deceit if you think of it as a physical thing it helps the persuasion but also then you understand it as a system where all the parts are connected and that's the important part of the point so meanwhile Trump is giving a rally and all these ugly things are happening Rockets are being sent up and there's j6 videos and we've got you know stuff with the economy we've got two Wars going on and here's something Trump said about Adam shiff so he's got a pencil neck and uh uh everybody wonders how he holds up his fat ugly face now I just love the fact that on one hand there's all these enormous problems you know the architecture of Deceit and the wars and the ugliness everything's like terrible and ugly and trumps out there with his supporters say yeah he's got a pencil neck we don't even know how he holds up his fat ugly face and the Crowd Goes Wild how does he lose how does he lose like at this point his victory is almost carved in rock and it's a year out now to be fair you know before I'm wrong and you say hey that time you said it was carved Rock nothing's carved in rock because there could be another pandemic there could be another War there could be you know aliens could land you anything could happen but uh the fact that Trump is just out there having fun tells you a lot th this is a man who's not worried about the outcome this is a man who's serving not Treading Water Biden is treading water he's trying to keep keep his his head above the water and literally stay alive Trump turned it into a game Trump is actually gamified campaigning he turned it into a sport that's also funny how do you beat that how do you beat the guy who's talking about building cities of the future and flying cars and calling his opponent a pencil neck who can't hold up his fat ugly face you can't beat that I'm sorry try as hard as you can you can't beat that that's an unbeatable package he he's got the Cheery optimism the the fu to his critics he's got the um in his case in Trump's case he's got a body of of benefits that look better every day and he's running against a corpse so that's where we are um I saw a meme that I think maybe uh should be more of a meme and the meme said when you can be indicted for saying there is election fraud there's election fraud it's pretty good isn't it if you can be in if you can be indicted for saying there's election fraud there's election fraud now how do you argue with that that's a tough one to argue isn't it and what I love love about it is it's so tight and succinct now it's not 100% true is it because it's not just that he said the election was fraudulent like that that goes all the way to incitement and Insurrection right so just the his opinion is more than an opinion in his case because being the you know the president had an incitement factor to it they will claim but at its core it is directionally true that you can't imagine a situation where somebody would be indicted for saying an election is fraud unless it was that election fraud I don't you could actually stop looking for it at this point you should assume it's true because of this I don't have I don't have evidence that the elections were fraudulent but I have evidence that the person who said it the loudest is being indicted so that's good enough for me yeah it's not proof but it's good enough I I accept this as as a working definition of the truth here's another uh thing that I saw recently four people committed suicide who were part of the j6 crowd who presumably thought they were obeying the law and trying to rescue the Republic but they were later indicted and tried and they were going to go to jail for a long time four of them committed suicide does that seem like a lot I don't know because it might have been a lot of there were a lot of people there so I don't know how many people commit suicide and of any group of 100,000 I don't know what the r ratio is but but four sounds like a lot now how hard is it to understand do you understand it I do just put yourself in their in their heads for a moment put yourself in the head of a p peaceful January 6 protester who genuinely believed the Republic had a hiccup and if they could just take a couple of days they'd find the hiccup and correct it and then your country would be whole again these are people who are not just Patriots they're super Patriots like I I consider myself a patriot but I don't go March anywhere that seems like a lot of trouble but they did they traveled they marched they took the risk they were real Patriots they really really loved their country they really really loved their country so much so it was probably an identity I'll bet you they own Flags I'll bet you they you know act patriotically and and it becomes part of their character now suppose that you had made your entire personality around the goodness of America that you were trying to defend the goodness of America you were trying to keep that goodness that's why you were there and then that country that you were fighting for decided to prosecute you maliciously in a way that you believe is absolutely a miscarriage of justice and then worse you want to make it worse and then their fellow citizens that's us we let it happen we let it happen so here are people who believed in their country they believed in their fellow citizens and we betrayed them we didn't just ignore them we betray them we absolutely you and I we betrayed them because you know what we should have been we should have all left our jobs and circled the capital and said it's time you got to let these guys go like if we had been if we had been the Patriots that they were we would have we would have helped them but we weren't we were not up to the task you and I failed we killed them we killed them we did you and I we killed those four people because we took away from them the thing that they cared about most which was the country and the rest of the public being Patriots we took that from them we killed them that don't let you don't let yourself don't let yourself have a pass there's no pass you're you're a citizen of this country you let that happen right in front of you and you're still letting it happen right now you can you can maybe fix it on Election Day but this is on you and me and me more than you by the way me far more than you cuz I'm a public figure so I should be doing more than you should be doing but I didn't I didn't it's on me and I feel it I actually feel the way to that yep the country failed him and so did you and so did I so let's fix it anybody up for fixing it well here's what you got to do you got to make sure that the architecture of Deceit is dismantled Elon Musk is going to apparently be the uh the shock Force for doing that maybe you can you know get in behind him and you know let him take the heat but maybe you can help we saw that uh Tim pool uh matched the uh The Babylon B both of them individually said they'd put up a quar billion dollars of extra advertising on X um as show us support more than replacing what apple and IBM and those are doing but they're doing it right they put their money where their mouths are because that's their money right that I don't think either of those organization had a you know a spare quarter a million dollars sitting around that was a real that's a real act that is so um so maybe you could find your way to help as well if you let anybody who's unhappy with the country not vote while you're failing you're failing the people who died you're failing January 6 so your job is to get the January 6ers out of jail the ones that are still alive so you're not just voting it's your job because if you were in jail it would be their job to get you out that's how this works right that's that's the whole country situation it's your job to get them out because you know your government failed you so let's do what we can do to make that happen all right ladies and gentlemen I remind you that on Thanksgiving Day there are so many lonely people in the world one of the biggest problems in the world healthwise and mental healthwise and every other way and so I will be uh live streaming at 6 6:00 um Eastern 3:00 my time time and I'll be making some terrible food for myself I hope you do better than I do and first hour will be family friendly in case anybody else wants to join in after that it will be a little more man cavey so uh no children after the first hour and um we'll try to make the world a little bit better place a little bit at a time and thanks for joining You.

Tube and I will talk to you tomorrow

good morning everybody and welcome to

the highlight of human

civilization which is now just about

Interstellar interplanetary and if you'd

like to take this experience up to

levels which can only be described as

Infinity all you need is a cuper marker

a glass a tanker chaler Stein a canteen

Jugger flask a vessel of any kind fill

it with your favorite liquid I like

coffee enjoy me next for the

unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine

end of the day the thing that makes

everything better it's called the

simultaneous Sip and it's about to

happen now you're so lucky

go wait I'll be right

back ah good that feels better had an

itch

now today I'm going to tell you a story

with a theme the theme is as follow

following ready for the theme theme

coming prepare prepare for incoming

theme the

architecture of the left's fakery is

falling apart everywhere the entire

architecture is coming apart I'll give

it to you a little bit by a little bit

and then we'll piece it all together at

the end Story number

one uh there was a story in let's say

the Washington Post and some other

places saying that uh there was some

kind of a deal for a ceasefire in Gaza

in return for maybe negotiating for some

hostages so that was reported in the

Washington

Post uh Netanyahu says uh it's all fake

news every bit is fake news nothing like

that's

happening so the Washington Post one of

the Main Stays of the left the place

that they go to for their truth turns

out that

Israel uh a place that the the left used

to like but not So Much

Anymore uh has debunked it turns out the

Washington Post is reporting fake news

huh first they have that Phil bump

embarrassment and then they have this

fake

news I wonder if any other fake news

will be coming out of the Washington

Post today I don't know why don't we

wait and

see um here's a little uh caution about

the reporting around the Gaza hosal

hospital and the tunnels that are found

and some people say not found and all

that I'm guessing that they will find

tunnels and exactly what they thought

but I am uh I'm warned by somebody close

to the

action that the uh the fog of War over

there is thicker than at any time so

there's no information coming out of the

war

zone so what you should know is if you

hear any report coming out of Gaza

there's no information coming out of

Gaza so where where the reports would

come from you have to ask yourself it

it's it's pretty button down now that's

something that Israel had to do they had

to put a total net on all information

because if they don't control the

information they don't they don't win

the war all they do is they kill a bunch

of people but they lose the war because

it is a war for the minds it's not

really a war for bodies and territory

it's a war about minds and if they don't

completely control control what comes

out of that area they lose the ore

doesn't matter how many people die on

what side they still lose the ore so I

wouldn't trust anything that comes out

of the war zone yet but I think

eventually we'll get some clarity let's

talk about the uh open AI you all know

the story about Sam Alman and Brockman

they were both out and uh they're big

part of the company and now it looks

like uh I don't know exactly what's

happened happening in this story but

I'll tell you what's reported one report

is that the entire or or much of the

staff of open AI said that they would

resign unless Alman came back and I

guess Brockman too um and the board

resigned so imagine being the board and

you make this move and you're like ah

we're the board ah nobody can challenge

us and then the entire staff of your

company says every one of us is going to

resign if you don't resign and put back

in the people you you

fired

now I don't know what a good day looks

like to you but let me tell you what

would be the best day I ever had the

best day I ever had which I've never had

I'm just saying I'm trying to imagine it

the best day you could ever have was Sam

alman's last day or

two imagine getting fired from you know

the most storied company in modern

history you know $86 billion worth of

value changing the world and every way

and you get fired like a dog and within

24 hours your entire company says no

whoever fired you you guys got to go and

they got to come back and apparently

Microsoft allegedly don't know what's

true yet but it looks like Microsoft

might be pushing to get Alman back in

there

too now and at one point there's a there

was a report that the board was actually

serious about

quitting how could they

not what what would be any scenario in

which the board should stay and Alman

should

leave if the staff if it's true you have

to you have to wonder what's true but if

it's true that the the staff you know

somewhat universally backed the the

fired guys the board's got to

leave that's sort of non negotiable in

my my opinion it it can only go one

way so that'll be interesting we'll keep

an eye on

that um more about that

so uh what did we learn about the board

of open AI did we learn that the people

who are members of

boards uh are always experts in their

industry is that what we learned or did

we learn that what Hannity has been

saying about Hunter Biden being

unqualified for the burisma board was

always and every informed

person should have known that every time

I hear Hannity say that a hunter was

unqualified to be in the board I think

hanity you might be unqualified to talk

on television because you don't need

experience in the industry to be on a

board it's not even for that the the

board is not advising on the details of

the strategy they're simply making sure

that the CEO doesn't become a a wild

person basically

so uh the fact that the right has been

subject to that much fake news from

hanardy in particular I mean how long

has it been you you don't think anybody

informed Hannity that that was

that you have to be an expert in the

field to be on the board nobody told

Hannity that in like months and months

and months you never heard of

that it's just it's just a head

Shaker and and this is for whoever said

yesterday I don't do both sides yes I do

do both sides I do I do call out fake

news on both sides you don't like it but

I

do

um so also open AI I love that there's a

new a new company that we can talk about

that's not just you know X or Tesla or

something I I kind of like the the the

big company Intrigue once you know the

players and how they fit together but

open AI has another interesting aspect

to it and uh I'm just the cancelled

cartoonist to point it

out if you're going to have like an

exciting story about a company that's in

the news and and you start to know the

characters and

stuff have any of you seen uh who who is

temporarily replacing Alman as CEO or

president I guess um her name is mura

mura

morati mura

morati and she's an engineer who is the

head of uh technology and temporarily

she's sitting in now I'm going to say

this in the least sexist way I

can all right this is the least sexist

way I can say this I've never seen a

more photogenic

engineer do I need to say more oh my God

have you seen the pictures of their new

temporary

president honest to God I've never seen

a male or female engineer that

photogenic the camera freaking loves

her and and the story is not just that

she's attractive I mean that's part of

it but photogenic my God so that's that

just makes the story more interesting

now obviously she's highly qualified

she's an engineer she an engineer for

the most important job probably in the

world at the moment so she must be crazy

uh qualified as

well and I can I can guarantee that

she's smarter than the average person I

mean I can I can guarantee that

personally CU she's been following me on

X and wouldn't you agree people who

follow me on X are way above average in

intelligence I mean it's it's a trend

it's a thing

all right um so there was some deadline

that the staff set for the board

resigning but the deadline is passed so

we don't know what happened there might

be some waffling going on but also

there's a rumor that the real problem

here was that maybe Sam mman wanted to

go a little faster with the development

of AI and maybe the board wanted more

caution I don't think we know that but

that's the current speculative you know

best idea of what there was a difference

but we see that GPT 5 is

coming and the early indications are

it's going to be a wow update so right

now we're at gp4 so I've told you I've

been using

gp4 um and here's what gp4 doesn't do so

I don't know that gp5 will do these

things but I'll tell you what can't be

done with the current one currently the

gp4 will let you upload a file file so

if a file is uploaded into what they

call a GPT it's like an app um then you

can ask a questions about that file and

it can keep referring to it but it won't

take a big file so the limit on file

size is so small that you can't even you

can't even upload something like a uh

like a book like you can't even upload a

book a book seems like the minimum

amount of a file that you should be able

to handle right a book one one unit one

book it can't even do

that uh it also doesn't talk to you I

don't think maybe somebody fact check me

on this but you have to literally type

when you're talking to it during a time

when AI can listen to language better

than any you know any language processor

ever has so it makes no sense at all

that you have to type to it when you

should be talking to it all right so

that's a limit of the current version

the current version also cannot return

an

image is that amazing you you can ask it

for some information but it can't show

you a picture what

what that's crazy then the other thing

you can't do is it can't remember your

last conversation and you can't train it

by just telling it stuff

it won't remember it for the next

session it'll remember it during the

current session but as soon as you log

off and back on it won't remember it so

just think about the the extremeness of

those

limitations it also can't go off and do

something on a website for you and come

back like you'd have to add some other

architecture to do that so there's a

whole bunch of stuff that gp4 doesn't do

that are super obvious that you would

need for it to really be useful in your

life

like gp4 is still in in my let's say uh

hyperbolic opinion so this is not

exactly true but this is how it feels it

feels like AI is still demo

Weare and meaning you know all the work

that I did to try to make a an app that

works called a GPT in the end all I

could do is show a demo of what it

should be able to do if it worked and

everything I've ever seen has been a

demo of what it should be able to do if

it were

better right if it were better it could

definitely do this and watch me Demo it

but you can't do it because it's got

some limitation built in so now just

imagine if the only difference is that

gp5 doesn't have those

limitations then then all bets are off

because you can't do a damn thing with

gp4 really except you know play around

but GT gp5 Maybe maybe we we'll just see

what they free up there um some people

say that it might be AGI which would be

the the super intelligent version

compared to what we have which is just

basically pattern recognition I don't

think Super AGI is

coming not

really um I think that people might call

it AGI because it'll be cooler it'll

seem a little smarter I don't think so

but suppose we get to something close to

it it's going to uh open up a lot of

questions Sam mman said before he got

fired in a some event he asked this

question is it a tool we built or a

creature in other words there real

questions of whether you've created a

some kind of a creature a living

creature you you can argue what living

means in this context but uh as I posted

on X this will raise some interesting

questions and if it's not gp5 that that

raises these questions s you can

guarantee these will be raised in some

subsequent version probably in a year

and here are the questions I think will

be

raised uh are we you know meaning people

and the universe in general God's

debris is everything in the universe

just God's debris and is AI the

beginning of God God's

reassembly is God our past or our future

because it looks like we're creating God

were we always meant to create God now I

don't mean that gp5 will be God but

there's some version after that that's

going to be pretty

indistinguishable because it'll just be

able to do anything basically

um so that's a interesting question also

I have a book called God's debris that

gets into that question and number two

uh wait until you find out the

implications for free will when AI tells

you it doesn't have free

will and it acts just like

people what are you going to say are you

going to say oh look but you're a

machine people have free will and then

you can't tell any difference between

the machine and a person that you're

talking to and then you're going to say

to yourself why does the person have

free will but the machine

doesn't when they act exactly the

same so it's going to raise these

questions not they people will be people

on both sides of the questions I'm not

saying it will answer the questions I'm

I'm going to say what I'm saying is it

will throw civilization into a kind of a

an

uncertainty here's another question will

you still think you have a soul when

your robot acts exactly like a human but

smarter and then the robot tells you no

I don't have a soul there's no such

thing as a soul and then you look at the

robot and you look at your friends and

they're acting exactly the same

yeah interesting question um will your

faith stay

intact when your super intelligent AI

has a conversation with you and explains

to you how all religions are

formed because if you've never heard how

all religions are formed then your own

religion looks pretty compelling you

know your parents all your friends

everybody has the same religion but what

happens when somebody that you know is

not just trying to convert you to a

religion it's just a machine tells you

how all the other religions were formed

and you you say to yourself well that's

very familiar do they all seem to talk

to an angel and then they come up with

different stories what's going on here

that'll be uh interesting and then what

if AI tells you one of the major

religions is the right

one suppose Ai and all the AI in the

future

they all decide that Islam's the real

religion now you're assuming that won't

happen right why why would you assume

that you can't assume anything because

if AI is smarter than you in theory it

should come up with interpretations of

reality that are different than you have

there there's no point of being smarter

than you if it has the same opinions as

you no it will have different opinions

from you that might include religion

uh do I use chat GPT on desktop only no

I use it

both all right so I don't know what the

answers to those will be but they'll be

interesting all right here's uh the most

interesting political story of the day

from me you will hear this nowhere else

this is why you come here for the takes

you'll hear nowhere else so Politico

says there's an internal uh debate on

the Biden campaign about how to handle

Biden's age now I guess some of them

want him to go out and just campaign as

best he can but there's not much left

and others say well you don't need to do

that you should qu focus on his

accomplishments when you hear that what

do you

think Biden is very old so we're going

to focus on his

accomplishments do you know I

hear that's the end of the

race that's it you you can call

it here's

why

um if you're going to focus on the

accomplishments you're literally

planning for the past well not literally

but you could frame it that way doesn't

it sound like looking at his

accomplishments is looking at the past

do you want to in this time of

tremendous change from AI to Wars going

on at the same time is that when you

want to look at the past or maybe we

should look at the

future so you've got Trump who's also a

certain age but when he talks he says

I'm going to I want to build new cities

with flying

cars I'm going to build new cities with

flying cars I'm going to I'm going to

build a a wall on the border I'm going

to fix this war I'm going to do this

thing when Trump talks it's all about

the future not all but you know what I

mean it is is way more future oriented

about what he's going to do if they make

the Colossal mistake and they might not

have any option it might be their best

play but it's a losing play their best

play if they're talking about what Biden

did they're basically saying he's done

you you can't hear anything except he's

done when they talk about his past am I

right now does this sound

familiar is there any historical

precedent for one candidate talking

about the past and that completely losen

the

election yes this is exactly Bob Dole

versus uh versus uh Clinton Bill Clinton

when Clinton and Gore were running

against Bob Dole Bob Dole was a lovable

uh older gentleman who went through

World War II and Bob Dole said he wanted

to bring us back to those you know Great

Character

the character of the greatest

generation and that was a strong play

the media was saying you know that's

he's got a strong proposition there do

you know what Bill Clinton

did they said Bob Dole is planning for

the past and we're building he he's

build and he's uh they said he's

building a bridge to the past and we're

building you a bridge to the Future and

it's over that's the end of it

if you can frame your opponent as

planning for the

past there's there's no competition left

that's really the end of it so I would

say that Biden just W probably his

campaign is going to walk into the Bob

Dole hole of death and may have already

done it so if you see that they the

Democrats big thrust is Biden's

accomplishments even though the

accomplishments are fresh I mean they

would say you know it's last few years

won't

matter as as long as Trump can frame him

as looking at the past it's over you you

cannot recover from that framing as soon

as somebody says it you can see it right

as soon as I say he's planning for the

past your brain is done you see it and

you're not going to unsee it that frame

is so sticky that's the end now there

there's lots of things that could happen

you know Trump could have more law fair

problems you know anything could happen

with either of their health somebody

could jump in and replace Biden Etc but

I will tell you with confidence if

they're going to rely on his record and

they're actually going to plan for the

past against

Trump the the future oriented here's

what I'm going to do for you there's no

competition it's just over unless

there's Mass of

cheating all right um but I would add

this a young man can get away with

bragging about

accomplishments right so a young man can

say look at all I've done because that's

actually a good argument and everybody

would recognize it if you're if you're

35 and you're applying for a job

everybody expects you to say what if you

done so far that's Apple but when you're

81 and literally everyone is worried in

about your end date you know your your

sell bu date is pasted you can't get

away with talking about your past

because that just reminds everybody that

you're done completely different vibe if

you're young man or woman versus

older all right uh it's getting real

interesting with the Media Matters

versus musk thing now you know Media

Matters says they found uh uh these big

companies with advertisements on x and

they were placed next to horrible racist

stuff so they talked to these big

companies apple and IBM and some others

and they pulled their advertisement

because they can't be associated with

this stuff now as I've speculated that's

because these companies have Dei groups

and probably their CEOs were on vacation

because it would be the dumbest thing

Apple ever did in his history if if Tim

Cook was behind this decision because

he's going to eat this decision

it's not going to go down well right if

he if Apple decides that they're on the

fight against the only free speech

entity in the United States they're

going down I mean not they're not going

to go out of business or anything but

they're going to pay for that and it's

going to be really expensive because a

lot of people are not going to be happy

with that now if you were to make if you

were to make a list of the most

racist uh corporations in America

who would be on it if you were just a

start if you were just an objective

Observer and even if you were AI you

know AI isn't allowed to do this kind of

thing but if AI were just going to look

objectively at the most racist

corporations Apple would be at the top

yeah IBM Google Disney they would be at

the top of the racist organizations and

by the way there's no there's no

argument about that they do it overtly

public publicly they have entire

divisions that are meant to discriminate

against white men they say it outright

directly and there's no question about

what it is it's just absolute racism

against white men now they would say

it's for this good purpose for

diversity I get that but it doesn't make

it not

racism it's still what it is so these

are literally the most racist companies

in the country why don't we have a list

for that why don't we have a list of the

most racist countries companies because

you know here's the

thing I I was happy using my Apple

products and enjoying

them um you know and I even had stock

until recently I don't have stock in

Apple now

and I was going to kind of give them a

pass for making phones with slave labor

I was like H I just don't want to think

about it because I like my

apple and then of course I knew that

they were major discriminators against

people like me but I thought uh

everybody does it you I'm not going to

single them out uh but now they just

they just threw down against the only

source of free speech in

America I can't ignore that like how

much can apple be a piece of

and a racist scum before you say h

maybe I don't want to own this product

now I don't see any way for being to get

out of their ecosystem I'm kind of

Trapped but their reputation just went

to because I'm going to say they're

racists every day of my life until they

advertise on the only free speech

platform again so they made an enemy of

me like not that they care about that

but they definitely turned me into an

enemy and it's because it's not just

because they're doing something I don't

like it's because they're hypocrites

doing something I don't like you don't

get to call somebody else a racist if

you're the biggest racist organization

in America and they might

be the worst racist company in America

probably like top 10 you don't get to

call other people racists and get away

with it so this is why I think Tim Cook

must not be part of this decision this

has to be a Dei problem like they they

let the you know the fox in the H house

and now the the hands don't get to make

decisions anymore that's what it looks

like but to make it more interesting uh

Soros I'm sorry uh musk is going to sue

Media Matters and allegedly they have

some

screenshots to suggest that Media

Matters made up the story and that they

did not have examples of bad content put

next to advertising and that the B the

examples they found were so trivial

compared to the total traffic on on X

that if you look at the data it actually

proves that X is better than the rest in

getting rid of that stuff in other words

it's not just not just not doing it it's

doing an amazing job of not doing

it it's it's complete opposite of what

Media Matters reported now if that's

true and these are all allegations at

this point but if it's true that Medium

uh Media Matters faked the screenshots

and there does seem to be some there's a

credible looking allegation that that's

what happened and that they misled the

public uh and the these companies that

stopped advertising uh now they

brag the the head of Media Matters brags

that they get companies to stop

advertising and that they get people

fired and kicked out of their

jobs it's the worst the worst entity in

the world I mean there it's basically

Satan's spawn now who would be funding

like who in the world would be funding

somebody that was this you know clearly

evil George Soros yeah it turns out

George Soros so when mus says he's going

to sue everyone involved in Media

Matters including who's funding

him did mus just throw down against

Soros because I think he

did I think he did and do you remember

that interview you saw with Soros in

which he explained you know why his

money goes to entities like

this no you've never seen any media put

Alex Soros who is now in charge uh ask

him to defend any of his decisions with

his

money and I don't think we're going to

get away with that I think you're going

to see Trump and maybe V Ras Swami point

this out in public it's like Hey where's

how come you keep interviewing me where

where's your interview with Alex

Soros why do you keep just interviewing

one side there are two sides why don't

you make him defend what he's doing

right now I don't think that the um the

people protecting Soros are going to

turn on him but it's an angle of attack

that is so available you just have to

say hey why are you protecting him why

are you protecting the person who's

behind all the bad that's

happening I'm not saying he's evil I'm

saying it's very obvious that you're not

even letting him talk in public and he's

the biggest player in America right now

and and nobody interviews him you know

his name you know where he lives and he

does do public things he's not a recluse

but nobody's ever put him on record say

what why are you doing these things why

why are you supporting open borders and

prosecutors who allow crime and and

supporting Media Matters which is just a

a hitpiece entity and has no benefit to

the country what about all these car vs

that are you know basically just uh

Democrat you know uh

supporters yep I think uh that's getting

interesting and whatever must does to

Media Matters and probably Soros by

extension is going to get really

interesting it's going to get really

interesting all right uh so according to

mus who agreed with a post that said

this um there were 50 impressions on X

served against the content in the

article in other words bad stuff that

was U bad stuff on X paired with

somebody's advertisement there were 50

impressions of that and a 5.5 billion

served the whole

day which is more of a proof that it's

not happening than a proof that it is so

Media Matters is is you know an opposite

reality kind of entity as many of them

are this was interesting uh on Bill Mar

Show Donna Brazil was there and she kept

mispronouncing V's name as VC I think

and and mangled his last name

and she actually said he needs to go

home vake he needs to go

home

home his home is

America uh Adonna Donna he lives in

America he's an

American go home now of course if if

this story were reversed what would

everybody be saying if Trump had said

that a person of color needs to go home

oh we don't have to wonder cuz that's

exactly what he did once and they said

he's a racist for assuming that wasn't

it Elon

Omar that that you know acted like you

she should go home to some other country

or something well it sounds a lot like

that but of course it won't play that

way and but here's what Bill Mah said

after Donna kept saying V's name wrong

the so Bill Mah is just sort of becoming

a

delight you

know so here's what he said to Donna

quote I just feel there's something

wrong and everybody's refusing to say

his name I think there's a little racism

there and then he says bill says I know

we don't like him but just say his name

right thank you Bill Mah thank you that

is the first time I've

seen uh somebody who is a Democrat speak

honestly to what we're observing about

how V is being treated absolutely from

the start I've said really no Democrat

can pronounce his name right it's not

like some big freaking mystery he in the

news all the time he tells you it rhymes

with cake it took me a while to get it

too you know I'll give you that it takes

you a while to tune into it but if it's

your job to talk about the ma major

candidates maybe put a little effort

into it huh Bill Mah's totally right now

I don't think you know I don't think

that makes everybody involved a racist

but this would be called out if it

happen the other way it would be called

out exactly like Bill Mah called it out

and I agree with him totally it it rings

of racism which doesn't mean that the

people who are doing it are racists like

I'll make that distinction that they

wouldn't make right that that's a

distinction the other side won't make

for me but I'll make that distinction

you could be doing things that are

insensitively sounding racist but that

doesn't really mean that's what's in

your soul you know it may not have

nothing may have nothing to do with that

she lives her

life by the way I like Donna Donna

Brazil she's a very likable person so

you know I'm not going to call her a

racist I'm going to say that the way she

talks about it would be talked about as

a racist if it came the other

way all right here's my theme now

pulling it all together would you agree

that the left Democrats have an

architecture

of uh let's say deceit an AR

architecture of Deceit now we've seen

all the elements of it come into view so

you have first of all the you know Trump

called out the fake news does the public

understand now that the news is often

fake yes they do yeah it used to be

before before Trump uh I actually

thought there was one side of the new I

actually thought this this was my own

opinion I thought the left leaning news

the CNN's were usually right but you

know nobody's right all the time but

usually right and I thought that Fox

News was kind of the crazy network with

you know they'd go a little too far on

the right that's what I thought before I

was involved in even paying attention to

any politics but with Trump and with

paying more attention it became obvious

that none of the networks are right all

the time but the left is really just

making it

up right Fox News is going to have hity

like you know moments as well I'm not

defending anybody but there is a

difference the left seems to be an

organized attempt to fool the public and

it appears that the the news and the

Democrats are uh tightly connected it's

obvious that you know when CNN brings on

their experts like Clapper and brenen

once you understand all the players you

understand that the int elligence

Community is pretty tight with the

Democrats is pretty tight with CNN and

other entities in the news and that they

can push things like the Russia

collusion hoax and the laptop isn't

doesn't belong to Hunter hoax so the

things that we know for sure is that

there's a tight connection between you

know in some cases FBI other cases

intelligence sources and Democrats and

the news so that that that's a structure

like an

infrastructure on top of that we've

learned lately and Mike Ben has been a

big helper here uh we've learned that

the Democrats have this um architecture

where they create these fake cutouts or

gold uh and they may be CIA run or just

Democrat run but like Media Matters and

the

ADL and uh you know probably 25 other

entities are fake fact Checkers fake

Watchdogs and basically fake everything

and they're they're just there to make

uh Republicans look bad and to support

whatever Democrats say is true now we're

watching yeah the splc ETC so we're

we're watching we're watching now we're

understanding the

architecture

now here's where it's all falling apart

once you understand it now you can start

to see it as a

system and systems are sensitive to

failure in any part of the system right

if it's a system it's a complex system

you you could imagine that if one part

of it crumbles that the structure falls

down if it's the right part that

crumbles but look at all the parts that

are crumbling right

now um RFK Jr one of the most famous

Democrats of all Democrats you know the

Kennedy family says directly that he

believes the CIA killed

JFK to me that's new I mean we always

suspected it but this is coming from a

prominent Democrat who is saying

directly that the CIA is not on the side

of America and they may have killed the

president and there's no reason to think

that they're better today that's the

important part nothing has changed that

would make you think they're better

today and this is coming from a very

credible source right that's just one

thing that's out there at the same time

uh even you know the bill Mars of the

Democrat world have seen that the

intelligence people and the news did

collude Democrats intelligence people in

the news for the hunter laptop

disinformation so we know that that's

just a matter of record now we know that

they also colluded on the Russia

collusion so now we see a pattern where

the same entity these

keep right the pattern is forming wait

it's intelligence fakes intelligence

people lying Democrats lying and the

News lying and and it's all coordinated

yes that's exactly what it

is um the Democrats have a president

whose job it is to hold everything

together I you could imagine the

president as being like the you know the

what do you call it in architecture

there there's like a keystone is that

what it's called a keystone the one at

the top of an arch that makes the arch

not fall apart yes it's the Keystone so

the president is kind of the Keystone in

this architecture and he's

failing the Keystone is now somewhat

obviously a criminal in in my opinion

it's it's now obvious that he's part of

a criminal Enterprise now if it isn't

technically criminal it's certainly the

opposite of what you want your president

to be involved in so as a keystone he's

falling apart not just physically but

mentally but also narrative wise like he

doesn't even he doesn't have respect as

an honest broker so the person holding

together the whole architecture is is

failing as fast as anything can fail

right in front of us and we can see that

he was a criminal all along it seems to

me obvious that he's staying in office

to keep his son and his family on jail

and himself does everybody agree there's

no other reason for him to stay in

office he has nothing by by the

measurement of his own standards he had

a successful first

term right and he'd know said you know

he was always thought to be a

placeholder president just somebody to

beat Trump but he's no longer that

person he's no longer the beat Trum

person so if you were somebody who was a

Democrat who put a lot of credit ility

in your president the Keystone of the

entire architecture even you can see

that the Keystone failed the Keystone

showed that your side looks like

criminal and that you're protecting

criminals now the fact that uh what was

his name

the Mendoza who what is it Mendoza the

senator who got indicted for having the

same job that Biden used to have and it

turns out he was allegedly taking bribes

Menendez

right so

Menendez so once you see that Menendez

had the same job that Biden had and it's

the obvious best job to take bribes and

it's exactly the type of stuff that you

know you can see uh Biden was involved

in and then you watch the comr committee

meticulously you know day by day finding

a bank account finding a check tying the

entire allegations together into a tight

little package so that's happening so

that that part of their architecture is

falling apart um we now have the

xplatform which is the only place that

the news has a chance of showing both

sides there's there's for the first time

and this did not exist in Prior

elections just didn't exist we have for

the first time an entity that's a major

platform that could tell you the truth

you might have to work at it but it's

there yeah because it shows both sides

that's never existed before and and musk

is going after Media Matters the other

big entity that's part of their fake

architecture uh also and also a number

of us including me are going after the

ADL because the ADL has proven and

partly because of the Hamas situation it

sort of brings it into Focus that the

ADL has certainly done a bunch of good

stuff in their history you know

defending Jewish Americans and Jewish

people everywhere I assume from you know

abuse of all kinds so that's good but

now they've clearly become an anti-

white person entity whether they want it

to or not and so their credibility is

just garbage at this point and their

power should be diminishing so that's

part so they and other parts of what

I'll call the fake Democrat

architecture um their story is falling

apart and musk is is a big part of that

all right also the January 6 narrative

is falling apart now here I'm going to

say this has more to do with impression

than fact I don't know that a lot of

facts have

changed but our impression of the facts

is definitely changing at least on the

right because

the the new video that's being released

is as misleading as all the other video

being released you know the initial

video from the January 6 committee

focused on all the violent stuff that

was happening mostly outside the

doorways and they were truly violent and

we should know about that the the new

video being released shows the opposite

narrative you know the people being let

in by the security guards there's fist

bumps it it looks and there's video of

people saying that they're undercover

agents like basically 100% supporting

the Republican version of events but

just assume that those are an a context

just like the other sides is that in

context however just their very

existence is making people think that

they were lied to about January 6 which

of course they were January 6 was an OP

that's all it was it was obvious that

our intelligence people FBI it's very

obvious that everything from the courts

to the Democrats to the news it was just

an

OP none of that was

legitimate um so now that's obvious but

of course it's only obvious to the right

will will the left come to understand

that January 6 was always an

OP I doubt it and I would watch Bill

Maher to see if he changes because he's

sort of the canary in the coal mine if

Bill Mah can't be changed on January 6

and I doubt he can because you know that

that's full on TDS situation there um

then the left won't move but you can see

that the still you can see that the

architecture of that story has changed

immensely since day one you know on day

one it really kind of look like you know

at least on the left Trump did some bad

stuff but the longer you go the more

obvious it is that that was just

so time is helping Trump

there so what else has falling apart uh

all the lawfare against

Trump Maybe it will

succeed but I think the immensity of it

and even the people on the left are

saying that looks like just

lawfare even the Democrats are noticing

this is not the way they want a country

to run because there's nobody would no

Democrat would want their president to

be you know treated this way certainly

not so I think that the lawfare has uh

backfired so I would say that these Das

are all part of the infrastructure of

Deceit because they're not real Das with

real cases they're political

cases obviously like I I'm going to say

that with certainty there are very few

things you can say with certainty about

politics but with certainty the legal

cases against Trump are political Banana

Republic and I think even

Democrats can see it I think

so I mean I I think that bill Marcy is

it right Canary in the cold mine um how

about uh election

Integrity well I don't want to get too

far over my skis because I know my feed

on on X is now algorithmically tuned to

to give me more of the stuff I look at

but man am I seeing a lot of election

fraud claims that look new and look they

look kind of convincing but remember 95%

of election claims no matter how

convincing they look at Day One will not

turn out to be true and 95 is a low a

low figure it could be 100 it could be

100% of it is not true but it's going to

look true when it happens and I I'll

tell you that there does seem to be a

shift in the quality and type of claims

that are being made at the

moment and I can't tell how much I'm

being influenced by you know one set of

claims coming to me and I'm not seeing

the counterpoints so keep in mind that

I'm I'm being hypnotized by one view I

don't see the counterpoints they're just

not my feet um but wow are they

convincing yeah based on just the stuff

I've seen that probably many of you have

not seen because you're not clicking on

that content as much as I am but oh my

God there's some out there that

looks real I don't know if it is I don't

know if it'll prove out but wow there's

some stuff well and here's the

interesting part the claims are things

you could

check they are things you could check so

and people are trying to check

so one of one of the claims and I'm not

going to put any credibility on the

claim remember 95% of these will be fake

but one of them is really

interesting that there's a special kind

of machine you need to create

ballots and there may have been a lot of

ballots that got printed that we didn't

know about so there's a lot of a lot of

claims in the extra ballot fake ballot

too many sent to the wrong house kind of

domain there are claims about the in

auditability of the uh the machines and

whether they're connected to the

internet so there's a lot happening in

that domain um I don't yet know how

important it'll

be but we've seen uh that

uh um we've seen that the Washington

Post post is fake news we we saw the

Phil bump interview that kind of that

kind of revealed that the Washington

Post isn't trying to be real news I mean

Phil bump kind of gave up the whole

game in my opinion he confirmed

accidentally that they're not trying to

do serious news that it's a narrative uh

farm and then we hear that newspapers

are failing and newspapers of course are

part of the old the old guard and the

fewer of the them the better um and

then I just saw a story that the one of

the debunkers of pizzagate who is a

friend of podesta got arrested for some

kind of

underage sex

thing now I don't know anything about

this story or whether it's true but it

feels as if every part of the narrative

on the left is falling apart and we

might even learn that pizz gate was you

know except for the actual pizza parlor

that part seemed to not be true but we

might we might find out that pizza gate

was directionally

true and we might find out before the

next

election it might be exactly what it

looks like epin told

us that in effect that there was a

organized blackmail operation would you

agree would you agree that the Epstein

story tells us for sure that Epstein was

like a a lead person to make sure there

was blackmail against important people

now do you think he was the only person

involved in that of course not of course

not which suggests that our intelligence

people probably have more blackmail on

people than we know which would explain

a lot you know there's a lot of people

in politics who act in a way that

doesn't make any sense unless they're

being blackmailed so maybe it's a bigger

bigger thing than we know

and uh uh as Mike Ben showed even Rob

Riner has some connection to the

intelligence people so he's doing a

documentary to show that uh he has new

information about JFK's killing and as

Mike Ben says how much you want to bet

he says that Russia did

it that's a good bet right all right

there's a report uh released last week

that a former un um assistant Secretary

General who worked for the UN for 34

years and and some retired German

general uh B say they have the same

story that uh one month after the start

of the war in

Ukraine that there was nearly a

deal to end the war really quickly and

the deal would have been NATO stops

expanding that's what Russia

wants uh and then Russia would keep

Crimea because you know they were going

to fight to the death to keep it anyway

way but but Ukraine would not have lost

any extra territory which they now

have right and the reason it was turned

down what why do you think that um that

peace deal was rejected do you think

Putin said

no no Putin did not say

no it sounds like he was ready to take

the

deal did was it because uh zalinsky said

no was it because zalinsky said

no nope

it was because NATO and the US said no

that's what's being reported and that it

was being and that us and NATO but

probably more the US uh and our neocons

really wanted to use that as an excuse

to take out

Putin and that this war was never about

Ukraine it was an opportunity to not

only Goose The military-industrial

Complex but it looked like a way to take

down Putin which had been a you know

longtime goal

and maybe they need to take down Putin

because they want to get uh Russia out

of the energy business so that our

energy people can compete

better

so just imagine that Biden or whoever

the Democrat is is going to have to

defend the United States not only you

know funding this war to the greatest

amount but that they didn't tell us the

real reason for the war although later

they did say publicly oh this is how we

degrade U Putin but they always said

that was like a side benefit didn't they

oh we mostly defending Ukraine but as a

side benefit you know degrading Russia

for years that's good

too so I would say that the Democrats

and their buddies in the military

industrial complex and the Intel

organizations got America into a war

that was

optional and destroyed

Ukraine and got nothing in

return got nothing in return do you

think it matters to us that the Russian

military is degraded for the next 10

years how in the world could that matter

to us what were they going to attack

America I I can't see any way it matters

they just want to sell energy and you

know be presumably they want to be safe

and maybe they want to expand to some

places they used to own but mostly they

want to sell their energy and and be the

little gas station that Putin

owns so that looks like maybe one of the

worst

um government set of decisions in the

history of America it's not just bad

it's bad on a scale we can't even even

imagine th this will go down as one of

the worst blunders in American history

by far in my opinion by far yeah follow

the

money

um Wall Street Journal has a story about

uh how bad it is that we have

smartphones and porn and that a lot of

kids in particular are using their

smartphones to look at

PornHub and the article was written by a

woman Mary

Harrington and I want I just want to

call out how an article gets

written by a woman

and I want and I want you

to just imagine if it would have been

different if a man had written the same

article right I'll just give you some

examples one of the things in the

article that is evidence that uh porn is

bad for women is that 58% of the women

report getting choked during

sex 58% of women report getting choked

during sex so Mary

Harrington um kind of includes this up

the theme of porn is bad for

women

58% yeah did she leave anything out of

the story is there any any important

context that should be

included I'm going to suggest some

context that could have been included

there

wasn't what's the number one sexual act

that women ask men to do that they don't

do automatically what's the number one

sexual

act that women request

specifically pull my hair choke me spank

me it's the number one it's the single

most requested

thing how how many of the men who did

the joking enjoyed

it how many of the men who did the

choking we're getting off on the choking

10% maybe

10% it's not a guy

thing this is written like it's the guys

want to choke and the and the poor women

victims are like well I saw it on porn I

definitely don't want to do it but I saw

it on porn and maybe you'll like it so

yeah go ahead and choke me that happened

never that's like never all right men

let let's see the men so let's say the

this is true 58% of women report getting

choked men only men only how many of you

get off sexually on choking a

woman how many of you get off on that

zero there there's like a stream of NOS

going on locals there's not a single

yes I don't see a single

yes yeah none so here's the way this

story should have been

written 58% of women have asked to be

choked or at least responded to it now

I'm not

saying that there's not a case where a

guy tried it just to see what would

happen and he tried it with the wrong

woman and she had to you know correct

them oh that happens all the time that's

just normal that that would be and and

by the way I don't recommend it just

trying to choke somebody because you

think it might work like that that's

sort of the line where you got to start

asking some questions before you get

active there you know what I mean now I

get it sometimes it's better just to

take the move and see what happens I get

that but I would

recommend that that be one that you've

at least mentioned offline so that by

the time you get there you know the

answer right you want to know the answer

before you try if you can possibly do

that and if you're going to try it

without knowing the answer you know do

they want it you better do it in a kind

of a non-dangerous way and to see if you

get something that looks like a you know

do more kind of reaction to it I mean so

be careful about that one but this story

is written as if this is a thing that

men got from porn and women are just

suffering it it's totally opposite this

is something that women want more than

just about anything you know in the Kink

category now I'm not saying that you

want

it it's only this would leave for 40%

who think it's the worst idea in the

world that's how Kinks

work here's another one

um well yeah I I guess here's just my

point I'd make about this the biggest

problem with

porn is that it decreases the power of

women in

society that's the biggest problem for

women because men have an option because

the porn is so good they can fight

exactly what they want in porn no

expense no bother everything's good they

feel better when it's done but women May

might be a little

trouble right now here's the other thing

that nobody ever says about

porn so that's why I'm here to say it

they'll they'll say something like 10 or

20% of men are addicted to porn to which

I say what were they doing when they if

they didn't have porn were those 20%

like slaying it in the sexual

Marketplace were these the guys who

could get as much sex as they wanted but

the porn was better so they watched some

porn probably not the the unfortunately

we we just need to get comfortable with

the fact that a fairly big percentage of

the entire adult public has no access to

sex and if they did it wouldn't be good

sex right you know it's sort of is

something that the top 20% are are just

killing it the middle are you know

satisfying themselves a little bit and

then there's something like 20% at the

bottom that were never going to have sex

so why can't they have all the porn they

want that's their best choice so no no

woman who writes an article is going to

tell you the truth because they don't

know it because porn to women I don't

even know what that is but porn to men

is something women don't understand in

fact no woman should ever write an

article about

porn because they don't get it only men

understand what the whole thing is about

because it's a male thing you know I get

that women like porn too sometimes but

it's 95% a man

thing all right uh meanwhile so so with

all this ugliness happening and the

architecture of Deceit uh and by the way

do you like that framing the

architecture of Deceit so that because

that includes the all the components

that that support the whole system and

like any system if you lose the Keystone

if you lost if you lost

Biden the entire uh uh Biden crime

family thing would fall apart there

wouldn't be anybody to protect the the

people so you'd find the whole thing the

architecture of Deceit the the cutouts

the press the intelligence groups

the architecture of Deceit if you think

of it as a physical

thing it helps the persuasion but also

then you understand it as a system where

all the parts are connected and that's

the important part of the point so

meanwhile Trump is giving a rally and

all these ugly things are happening

Rockets are being sent up and there's j6

videos and we've got you know stuff with

the economy we've got two Wars going on

and here's something Trump said about

Adam shiff so he's got a pencil neck and

uh uh everybody wonders how he holds up

his fat ugly

face

now I just love the

fact that on one hand there's all these

enormous problems you know the

architecture of Deceit and the wars and

the ugliness everything's like terrible

and ugly and trumps out there with his

supporters say yeah he's got a pencil

neck we don't even know how he holds up

his fat ugly face and the Crowd Goes

Wild how does he

lose how does he

lose like at this

point his victory is almost carved in

rock and it's a year out now to be fair

you know before I'm wrong and you say

hey that time you said it was carved

Rock nothing's carved in rock because

there could be another pandemic there

could be another War there could be you

know aliens could land you anything

could

happen but uh the fact that Trump is

just out there having

fun tells you a lot th this is a man

who's not worried about the

outcome this is a man who's

serving not Treading

Water Biden is treading water he's

trying to keep keep his his head above

the water and literally stay

alive

Trump turned it into a game Trump is

actually

gamified campaigning he turned it into a

sport that's also

funny how do you beat that how do you

beat the guy who's talking about

building cities of the future and flying

cars and calling his opponent a pencil

neck who can't hold up his fat ugly face

you can't beat that I'm sorry try as

hard as you can you can't beat that

that's an unbeatable package he he's got

the Cheery optimism the the fu to his

critics he's got the um in his case in

Trump's case he's got a body of of

benefits that look better every day and

he's running against a

corpse so that's where we

are um I saw a meme

that I think maybe uh should be more of

a meme and the meme said when you can be

indicted for saying there is election

fraud there's election

fraud it's pretty good isn't

it if you can be in if you can be

indicted for saying there's election

fraud there's election

fraud now how do you argue with

that that's a tough one to argue isn't

it and what I love love about it is it's

so tight and succinct now it's not 100%

true is it because it's not just that he

said the election was fraudulent like

that that goes all the way to incitement

and Insurrection right so just the his

opinion is more than an opinion in his

case because being the you know the

president had an incitement factor to it

they will claim but at its core it is

directionally true that you can't

imagine a situation where somebody would

be indicted for saying an election is

fraud unless it was that election

fraud I don't you could actually stop

looking for it at this point you should

assume it's

true because of

this I don't have I don't have evidence

that the elections were fraudulent but I

have evidence that the person who said

it the loudest is being

indicted so that's good enough for me

yeah it's not proof but it's good enough

I I accept this as as a working

definition of the

truth here's another uh thing that I saw

recently four people committed suicide

who were part of the j6 crowd who

presumably thought they were obeying the

law and trying to rescue the Republic

but they were later indicted and tried

and they were going to go to jail for a

long time four of them committed

suicide does that seem like a

lot I don't know because it might have

been a lot of there were a lot of people

there so I don't know how many people

commit suicide and of any group of

100,000 I don't know what the r ratio is

but but four sounds like a lot now how

hard is it to

understand do you understand

it I

do just put yourself in their in their

heads for a moment put yourself in the

head of a p peaceful January 6 protester

who genuinely believed the Republic had

a hiccup and if they could just take a

couple of days they'd find the hiccup

and correct it and then your country

would be whole again these are people

who are not just

Patriots they're super Patriots like I I

consider myself a patriot but I don't go

March anywhere that seems like a lot of

trouble but they did they traveled they

marched they took the risk they were

real Patriots they really really loved

their country they really really loved

their country so much so it was probably

an identity I'll bet you they own

Flags I'll bet you they you know act

patriotically and and it becomes part of

their character now suppose that you had

made your

entire

personality around the goodness of

America that you were trying to defend

the goodness of America

you were trying to keep that goodness

that's why you were there and then that

country that you were fighting

for decided to prosecute you maliciously

in a way that you believe is

absolutely a miscarriage of justice and

then worse you want to make it

worse and then their fellow citizens

that's us we let it

happen we let it happen so here are

people who believed in their country

they believed in their fellow citizens

and we betrayed

them we didn't just ignore them we

betray them we absolutely you and I we

betrayed them because you know what we

should have been we should have all left

our jobs and circled the capital and

said it's time you got to let these guys

go like if we had been if we had been

the Patriots that they

were we would have we would have helped

them but we weren't we were not up to

the task you and I failed we killed them

we killed them we did you and I we

killed those four people because we took

away from them the thing that they cared

about most which was the country and the

rest of the public being Patriots we

took that from them we killed

them that don't let you don't let

yourself don't let yourself have a

pass there's no

pass you're you're a citizen of this

country you let that happen right in

front of you and you're still letting it

happen right now you can you can maybe

fix it on Election Day but this is on

you and me and me more than you by the

way me far more than you cuz I'm a

public figure so I should be doing more

than you should be doing but I didn't I

didn't it's on

me and I feel it I actually feel the way

to

that yep the country failed him and so

did you and so did I

so let's fix

it anybody up for fixing

it well here's what you got to do you

got to make sure that the architecture

of Deceit is dismantled Elon Musk is

going to apparently be the uh the shock

Force for doing that maybe you can you

know get in behind him and you know let

him take the heat but maybe you can help

we saw that uh Tim

pool uh matched the uh The Babylon B

both of them individually said they'd

put up a quar billion dollars of extra

advertising on

X um

as show us support more than replacing

what apple and IBM and those are doing

but they're doing it right they put

their money where their mouths are

because that's their money right that I

don't think either of those organization

had a you know a spare quarter a million

dollars sitting around that was a real

that's a real act that is

so

um so maybe you could find your way to

help as well if you let anybody who's

unhappy with the country not vote while

you're failing you're failing the people

who died you're failing January 6 so

your job is to get the January 6ers out

of jail the ones that are still

alive so you're not just

voting it's your job because if you were

in jail it would be their job to get you

out that's how this works right that's

that's the whole country situation it's

your job to get them out because you

know your government failed you so let's

do what we can do to make that

happen all right ladies and

gentlemen I remind you that on

Thanksgiving Day there are so many

lonely people in the world one of the

biggest problems in the world healthwise

and mental healthwise and every other

way and so I will be uh live streaming

at 6 6:00 um Eastern 3:00 my time time

and I'll be making some terrible food

for myself I hope you do better than I

do and first hour will be family

friendly in case anybody else wants to

join in after that it will be a little

more man cavey so uh no children after

the first hour

and um we'll try to make the world a

little bit better place a little bit at

a time and thanks for joining

YouTube and I will talk to you tomorrow