there are plenty of people mad about plenty of things but it doesn't rise to the level of political speech. When they talk politically they say we want to wipe out Israel and kill all the Jews. Hamas do. Not the Palestinians per se.

So it seems to me that the point of view that all Israel, all Jews must be removed from Israel and from the river to the sea, I don't think Israel would be any safer if they were just the nicest people in the world in every possible way from water rights to travel to security. I don't think it would make any difference. Do you? It would definitely make a difference for the non-military population for how they feel about the whole thing but it wouldn't affect Hamas. Hamas doesn't even have a list of demands. Have you ever seen a list of demands? You know stop strip searching our women and whatever else is on it. You know water rights and travel. And I haven't even seen it. If the leaders of the Palestinians wanted the public to be looking at the real treatment of how Israel treats the West Bank and Gaza etc., if that was the issue it would be at the top of the issue. Every day you'd see the dude saying well what do you expect? Israel does this and this and this to them so it's a natural outcome. I don't think anybody's thinking that way. I think you've got people who are trained to want to destroy all Jews and that's the beginning and the end of the conversation.

So now but should Israel treat all the Palestinians in the best possible way? Probably. But what is the argument for why they wouldn't? What do you suppose would be Israel's counterargument to the Palestinians saying hey we're treated terribly here? I think the answer would be the only reason we do any of this stuff is because of the security threat. We wouldn't need to search your sister if somebody's sister were not coming in here trying to kill us, right? So I think the response would be if you can make the security threat go away then we could fix a lot of these things that you're complaining about in daily life. I assume that would be the argument.

Now I'm not taking a side. If it felt like I'm taking a side I'm not because I don't really know the more daily life problems and which way the security concerns go. That's a little more complicated than I could wrap my head around. I'm just telling you that that should be a question too. If the question is how would you feel if you were abused this long you got to ask why are they abusing you? Is it strictly for security or is it economic, religious? Is there something else going on? I'd like to know that.

And then the next question is what other options did the Palestinians have? Was their only option to suffer and then support Hamas? Because in my view of things the Palestinians have had enough international public support for enough years that they should have very clearly succinctly stated their maybe top five demands and what they needed and I think they would have got them. The trouble is that one of their top five demands and maybe number one is okay number one kill all the Jews and remove their corpses from Israel. Like so here's the problem. I don't think that the Palestinians or anybody in power could have ever put