Episode 2306 Scott Adams - CWSA 11/28/23 Wokeness Jumps The Shark, Hunter Rejects Clothed Hearing
If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.
Good morning everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams. There's never been a better time in your life, and if you'd like to take it up to levels that people can't
View segment →even understand, well all you need for that is a cup or a mug, a glass, a tankard, a stein, a can, a jug, a flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. Join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine. The end of the day, the thing that makes everything be…
View segment →participated for your excellent sipping talents. Well, I have a theme for today's show, and the theme is: Is it my imagination or has wokeness totally jumped the shark? Now if you don't recognize that American TV reference, jumping the shark is a reference originally to a TV show. They had a ridicu…
View segment →ink it would, right? So everything about this topic is literally the fodder for a humorous movie. Or you read it, you go, okay that's kind of funny. We'll get to some more of those. But let's talk about some other news. Thanks to Owen for all these little scientific tidbits that I see on X. So the…
View segment →bly place a large bet against it because it's a little bit too good. You know when you hear that cancer has been cured by something that sounds too good to be true, it's probably too good to be true, probably not true. So this one's probably in the too-good-to-be-true category. And it was only, I th…
View segment →es? Do you think watching continuous content showing people cheating on their spouses and every manner of bad behavior, I feel like it's not exactly a good message. And then it makes me wonder, huh. So TikTok got to the younger kids, and China owns it, knows at least could control it if they want to…
View segment →ups are special purpose groups or whatever, so they would say no it's not about anti-Jewish, it's more about who's in. So it's not about who's out. It's about having a club for ourselves. But the effect of it might be to just be purely racist. So to me I think it's funny that the most liberal colle…
View segment →rect me if I'm wrong but the limit for something like Meta to transmit realistic looking images like you're in a 3D world, the limit is the transmission, right? It's not the computer and it's not the limit of the software. Am I right about that? It's just a transmission limit. Well let me explain t…
View segment →er side can recreate me without a full picture of me being transmitted. For example, if the receiving side already had a full model of me and then I took my hand and I went like this, it could use AI on its end to say well I know what that would look like. If his head looks like this here and he mo…
View segment →amazing how useful he is in pushing energy toward one point of view. Because certainly it would be good if everybody started thinking oh wokeness is the funny stuff. Like it's just a joke. And Musk is saying it directly. Yeah it's basically a joke. So that helps. Thank you for alerting me to that.…
View segment →a successful model that was really making money and people liked it I would probably sign up just to see it. I would do that. I mean literally I would do that without the sexual interest. I would see how good it is. Now I did the same thing with the app that gives you a digital girlfriend. Like I di…
View segment →think you could rule out that anybody in person is saying you know Alex maybe that thing you're looking at is not the whole story or have you considered this? I don't think it happens because it doesn't happen to me and if it doesn't happen to me why would it happen to him? So because I think my sit…
View segment →ne of the greatest things I've ever seen invention wise. As an invention it's just one of the greatest things. All right. Let's talk about the Musk trip to Israel now that we've got a little time to digest it. You know Elon Musk had been accused of being an anti-Semite for something he said that wa…
View segment →a note. That is as perfect as you can do this kind of stuff. I've never seen anybody do it that well actually. That's the best I've ever seen. And I would like to compliment Israel and Netanyahu's staff because they were as wise as Musk was in knowing how to do this for optimum mutual benefit. But…
View segment →there are plenty of people mad about plenty of things but it doesn't rise to the level of political speech. When they talk politically they say we want to wipe out Israel and kill all the Jews. Hamas do. Not the Palestinians per se. So it seems to me that the point of view that all Israel, all Jews…
View segment →together a list of if you just do these five things we can live in peace. We're just asking you stop abusing us in these five ways. Nobody's ever done that. Here's why I think they don't do it. If a Palestinian leader put together a list of five things that you needed to do in order to have peace a…
View segment →ll number. So I think Trump might have a good lawyer in that mix there. There's something about this I like so much. So much. Well speaking of Biden and inflation. So Biden's trying to argue that corporations raised their prices because their own costs were high but then when the inflation went dow…
View segment →Good morning everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams. There's never been a better time in your life, and if you'd like to take it up to levels that people can't even understand, well all you need for that is a cup or a mug, a glass, a tankard, a stein, a can, a jug, a flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. Join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine. The end of the day, the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens now. Go.
Savor it. Savor it. Good. That was some good sipping. I'd like to compliment all of you who participated for your excellent sipping talents.
Well, I have a theme for today's show, and the theme is: Is it my imagination or has wokeness totally jumped the shark? Now if you don't recognize that American TV reference, jumping the shark is a reference originally to a TV show. They had a ridiculous plot. Happy Days was the name of the TV show, where one of the characters would be water skiing. Fonzie was the character. And he would jump off some kind of a ramp water skiing, and he would jump over a shark.
Now since the show was usually on the stage in the set, you know, just doing funny things, it became a huge, huge hit. But after a while the good writers move on. So I don't know if you know this. This is why all good TV shows eventually fail. Let's see if you know this. The reason a great TV show fails, pretty much all of them, is that if you get a job as a writer for a top number one show, you're going to get a nice paycheck. So of course the best writers would try to work at the best shows. But once you've worked at the best show for a year, you can get a much bigger paycheck somewhere else. So it's basically a way to siphon the good writers through the good show but almost immediately to a higher paying job for some new show that needs somebody who's got that experience and credibility.
So the nature of the model is that any good show should attract good writers, but over time they're going to be moving out too fast and it should be self-destructive. Anyway, that's just on the side. But it seems to me that the jump the shark thing means that a formerly good thing went too far. It just became too ridiculous to even work anymore. That's what jumping the shark means.
So you tell me if we've reached that point. In my opinion, now keeping in mind I see a certain amount of right-leaning media stuff on the internet, so I probably see more of that than anything else. But in my experience at least 90% of all the stories in the wokeness domain, from racism to trans to everything else, 90% of the news stories are treated as jokes. True or not. In the beginning of the wokeness trend there would be two sides to every story, but both sides would treat it seriously, right? So the woke people would say, hey, we have this serious issue. And then if you thought that was too far or something you'd say, hey, what are you doing to our society? Or you seem to be ruining something that was good about what worked before. But it was basically two serious conversations.
But as the wokeness became more extreme, it became harder and harder to hold your frame that any of this was serious, because it no longer looked like serious people. It looked like the slippery slope. Things went too far and it just jumped the shark.
Let me give you some examples. Apparently the Daily Wire just finished a movie that's a comedy that's going to make fun of trans athletes. Yeah, the ones born male and doing sports as a woman. Now, did you see that coming? I did not see that coming. I didn't know they were working on it, but apparently it looks like it's done now.
When was the last time you saw any comedy seriously? When was the last time you went to see a comedy at a movie theater? I don't even remember. Honestly, this is not a joke. I actually don't remember. I think it's been years. Five years perhaps. I think at least five years since I thought there was a movie in a theater that was worth going to a theater for. And it's not just because I like to watch everything at home. It's like I haven't even been tempted. But this will be interesting. I'll probably watch it, the Daily Wire's movie. I don't know what the name of it is, but you'll hear a lot about it.
So that's my evidence number one that wokeness has now completely turned into joke content. It's far more likely to be a joke than to be a serious conversation.
Let me see. You texted me early in the morning. My college just texted me to ask me to give them money. How do you think that's going to go? No, I'm not going to give money to a college. Do you know I'm not going to give money to a college? Now this is my undergraduate college, a Hartwick College, and I don't really even know what they're up to, but I guarantee they're racist as hell. I don't even have to check. I don't even need to check. Am I right? Would you agree that a liberal arts college in upstate New York, would you agree that I don't need to check to see if they've gone too far? I don't need to check. No, they're asking me for money. Do you know how I treat that? Literally as a joke. Am I right? Yeah.
As I'm talking about how wokeness has become a joke, when my alma mater Hartwick College contacts me in the middle of my statements to ask for money, I just think, well that's funny. As if I would give them money. As if there's not the slightest chance of that.
All right. In other news, to back up this claim that wokeness has jumped the shark, I don't know if this is true but I saw on the internet a claim without a good source that said that there's a study that says if your business gets labeled racist on Yelp, a year later your business will be up. Apparently the claim, and I'm not positive this is true but it sounds true because it kind of works in my head so I'm kind of biased toward thinking it's true, but I don't know for sure. That makes sense to me because I think the people who read a story about a business being racist don't really care because it's like one incident and maybe they just want their coffee so they don't care. But I could definitely see people who think that wokeness has gone too far to say, all right, I'm going to support that business. I hadn't even thought about them before but I think I'll go there twice this week. I can see that.
And when you read the story that, again if it's true, I can't guarantee this is true, but if it's true that Yelp labeling somebody a racist company increases their business, isn't that kind of funny? Am I wrong? Like when you hear that story you're like, that's kind of funny. No matter what you think about the base situation, it's just funny that it doesn't work out the way you'd think it would, right? So everything about this topic is literally the fodder for a humorous movie. Or you read it, you go, okay that's kind of funny.
We'll get to some more of those. But let's talk about some other news. Thanks to Owen for all these little scientific tidbits that I see on X.
So there's an alcohol addiction drug. Perhaps it's too soon to know, but in the course of testing something for something, some people at the University of Oklahoma and Oklahoma State University, they found that something called semaglutide turns out they were testing it for something else but as a side effect the people taking it dramatically reduced their alcohol consumption, which wasn't the subject of the test. And now they say, hey, maybe we should do a big test on this and see if it works.
Imagine that. I don't think it'll work. If I had to bet I would probably place a large bet against it because it's a little bit too good. You know when you hear that cancer has been cured by something that sounds too good to be true, it's probably too good to be true, probably not true. So this one's probably in the too-good-to-be-true category. And it was only, I think there were only six people that they looked at. So six people is by no means telling you that it works or that it's safe. But if all six people dramatically reduced their alcohol intake, I wouldn't ignore it. It's not proof, but I wouldn't ignore six out of six.
All right. There's a new Chinese app, just what we need, a new app that's getting tons of downloads. And apparently what it does is it creates these little dramas that run for like a minute, but there are lots of them so they form a body of work after a while. And they're really cheesy and they're like little soap operas with bad actors overacting in a soap opera way. But apparently middle-aged women just love this thing. So it's got millions of downloads. It's called ReelShort. Real as in two E's. ReelShort. And just so you know it's coming.
Now my question is this. These little soap operas, they have one thing in common. To make it a dramatic soap opera you have to have people really dysfunctional. You know, people are cheating and that baby doesn't belong to you and all that stuff. Do you think all of that works against, let's say, traditional families? Do you think watching continuous content showing people cheating on their spouses and every manner of bad behavior, I feel like it's not exactly a good message. And then it makes me wonder, huh. So TikTok got to the younger kids, and China owns it, knows at least could control it if they want to. So that would give China the user interface to control the minds of our young people. Now they have a similarly addictive app that's aimed directly at older women. Older as in the mid-range. Is that a coincidence? Or is that part of a plan to weave their content around the brains of Americans so that they can tweak it as they need to?
You know, Elon Musk does the best job of calling out the fact that our big problem is underpopulation. Do you think that this app will cause people to want to form families and have children? Or is it going to make it look like just a landmine if you even get in a relationship? I feel if you watch enough content where people have bad relationships that's going to have an impact on you. So I would be worried about a second front in China's ability to control our minds. That's real.
Well, going back to my category of wokeness jumping the shark, turns out that Jewish students are suing my other alma mater. Is it alma mater or alma mater? Right, alma mater. Okay, my alma mater Berkeley. So months ago I disavowed Berkeley for being a racist college. So I didn't want to have anything to do with them. And if I knew where my diploma was I'd set it on fire because I feel embarrassed to be associated with Berkeley. Literally embarrassed.
And now Jewish groups are suing Berkeley for what they claim is just an out-of-control anti-Jewish policy. I guess there are some groups that don't allow Jewish people to join. What? There are some student groups that forbid Jewish people from joining them. I mean just hold that in your head for a second. Anyway, now obviously these groups are special purpose groups or whatever, so they would say no it's not about anti-Jewish, it's more about who's in. So it's not about who's out. It's about having a club for ourselves. But the effect of it might be to just be purely racist.
So to me I think it's funny that the most liberal college in the world is being sued by its Jewish students for being racist. Isn't that funny? To me that's funny. It's like all good things go to eventually because good intentions always turn into horrible things.
Anyway, here's an irony of the simulation. If we live in a simulation, clearly it was made by people with a sense of humor who keep yanking away the dollar bill we find on the sidewalk. It's like oh there's a dollar on the sidewalk and you lean over to pull it and there's a string on it and they yank it away.
Here's another one. As you know, semiconductors are beginning to reach a limit to how much more you can do with silicon and the common materials. But there are new materials that are being considered. So it turns out there is one material that is really, really good for microcomputers, semiconductors, and it's diamond. Seriously. The one thing we need that would be better than the thing we're using: diamond. Could you be any more inconvenient? Like what could be worse? I literally can't think of anything that would be worse than finding out the only way we'll be able to keep up with China is with diamonds. So well, you know, maybe we can lab grow them I suppose. Some version of them. Yeah. Anyway it's just ironic that the most expensive thing in the world, it's probably not, but well maybe it is. Are diamonds the most expensive by weight? Is that a true statement? They're not the most expensive by weight anymore. What would be most expensive by weight? Rubies? Emeralds? Not gold. Definitely not gold. Saffron? Uranium? Oh maybe uranium. Yeah maybe.
All right. According to Unusual Whales account on X, China has launched the fastest internet: 1.2 terabits per second. It can transmit 150 movies that are 4K movies in one second. 150 movies that are 4K, you know the real dense ones, in one second. That's pretty awesome.
Now that does certainly open up a question whether there's a strategic benefit to that. Is that something that we need to catch up with right away? Because I wonder if you had this internet speed and you attached it to one of these hedge funds that tries to do automated trading, you know when they find small errors. And the whole secret of the hedge fund, they literally put their data center physically as close as possible to whatever they're interacting with to trade because that distance would give them a millionth of a microsecond advantage over everybody else so they can front-run trades. But what if you got this 1.2 terabit thing? I don't know. Does that give them some advantage? I don't know. I think not because it would have to be 1.2 terabit all the way. So it might not help them if you're in a different country. I don't know. But that's fun.
I think that has more to do with virtual reality. Correct me if I'm wrong but the limit for something like Meta to transmit realistic looking images like you're in a 3D world, the limit is the transmission, right? It's not the computer and it's not the limit of the software. Am I right about that? It's just a transmission limit.
Well let me explain to you how the transmission limit could be gamed. You ready? Let's say you want to transmit, I think they're already doing this by the way, but it's a fun technical fact. Suppose you wanted to send my image in 4K, a full 3D looking image to appear on your computer at a distance and not have any lag. There's a way to do that. If you were to send a refreshed screen of every position I'm in, your internet would choke, especially if there are other characters in the scene. But if you take one really good image of me and then you only transmit the changes, the other side can recreate me without a full picture of me being transmitted.
For example, if the receiving side already had a full model of me and then I took my hand and I went like this, it could use AI on its end to say well I know what that would look like. If his head looks like this here and he moves up here it's still going to look like the hand. I'll just recreate it as if it had been transmitted. But the only thing being transmitted is the coordinate changes. You know where your fingers are. So it'd be like the end of my fingertip. It knows that it was here but now it's here so it just fills in the rest.
So we already have a technology that can get around a lot of speed limitations.
Scott, look at what Elon said on your tweet. Uh oh. Did Elon just say something on a tweet of mine? All right we're going to stop and look at that because I'll be far too curious. What should I look up? Look up Elon and then look at his comments. All right let's see what he replied. It's probably a reply, right? Is a reply. You could have just told me what he said. Oh my woke tweet. All right I'll look at my woke tweet. All right find me. All right let's see what he said about wokeness jumping the shark.
Oh yeah. So five minutes ago Elon Musk. So here was my tweet. So it's basically the theme of the show. I posted that it feels like wokeness has totally jumped the shark. 90% of the stories in that domain are being treated as jokes. And then I said balance will be restored. And Elon replied, "Indeed. Woke is a laughing stock at this point."
Have you noticed how useful Elon Musk is in moving the needle on everything? It's hard to find any category that's interesting that he isn't the most important voice in it. Because if Scott says wokeness has jumped the shark, maybe it makes some content for my show, maybe you repost it. But if Musk says it, by tonight it could be a headline. Like I wouldn't be surprised if Fox News covers this as a story because he's said it. They wouldn't cover it if I said it. It's amazing how useful he is in pushing energy toward one point of view. Because certainly it would be good if everybody started thinking oh wokeness is the funny stuff. Like it's just a joke. And Musk is saying it directly. Yeah it's basically a joke. So that helps. Thank you for alerting me to that.
Anyway, Hunter's agreed to testify and allow it to be a public hearing. And so his lawyers have said on the 13th of December he'll be in a closed door deposition. Now you probably ask yourself why would Hunter want it to be public? Like wouldn't you think that everything about that he would want to be low key? So there are two possibilities. One possibility is that his defense or whatever he plans to say is so strong that it would be better to put that out there than to have people wonder what happened. That might be. But I have another theory.
I think that Hunter was high and his lawyer called him and they had a bad connection. And the lawyer said, Hunter, the committee is asking about a closed door, closed door. You want to be closed door, closed meeting or an unclosed meeting? And Hunter thought he said clothed. And so Hunter said well no I don't want clothes. I don't want to wear any clothes. Have you seen his selfies? It's funny. If you've seen the selfies he doesn't like clothes when he's with a group of people. You put several people in a room with Hunter, the first thing he does is take off his clothes, right? I mean Marjorie Taylor Greene's going to be in the room. The guy's going to start stripping. He's going to be, Lauren Boebert, wow, right? He's just going to start shedding those clothes. So I think it was just a misunderstanding between closed and clothed. I think that's all it was. That's just a guess. It's just a guess.
Well Biden is apparently going to use or talking about using the Defense Production Act to make sure that our pharma products get made in the US, which is a big problem because it's hard for us. First of all it's hard for the United States to do manufacturing apparently. But it would take a long time to bring everything back and then we'd still be dependent on maybe the base materials. Even if we manufactured here we still have to get our base materials from a potentially unfriendly country. So he's going to use the Defense Production Act which gives the president extra powers and money to force things to happen quickly.
I'm going to surprise you on this one. I'm 100% behind this. Anybody disagree? I'm 100% behind it. And I think Trump would have done it. I think Vivek Ramaswamy might have done it. I don't know. But this feels right to me. 100%. And for those of you who wonder would I ever say anything good about a Democrat or Biden if they did something that clearly made sense? Yes. This clearly makes sense in my opinion. Now the execution could be botched because it's a government. But yeah I back this 100%. This should not even be about politics.
Well there's a story I saw in a Joe Pompliano post about Sports Illustrated. Apparently Sports Illustrated bought or created these AI generated headshots so it looked like real human beings were writing articles that in fact were written by AI. But Sports Illustrated was trying to pass them off with a fake picture as if a human had done it. Now when they got called out about it they just deleted the content.
But here's the interesting part of the story. Two parts that are interesting. Number one it's kind of interesting that they tried to get away with it because imagine how much money they could save if they ran opinion pieces by robots and people thought they were human and they're like oh okay good opinion. But here's what I think. They had to get rid of it immediately upon realizing it was fake even though they could have said you caught us so we're going to label these as AI but we're still going to keep the pictures and we think it's fun to do AI opinions. That's if people had liked the AI opinions.
I believe this is more of what I'm going to call the Adams rule of AI art. If you're the first one to say it you get to name it after yourself. That's how it works. The Adams law of AI art. And it goes like this. AI generated art, which would include writing and include opinion, that's art, will not be interesting to humans if they know it's AI generated. And I've said this before but just summarizing, I believe our appreciation of art has a little bit to do with the quality of the art but a lot to do with what you assume about the talent of the person who created it. Meaning that the art and the artist are the same. Your triggering of what makes you say whoa look at that art is not the art. That's not what triggers you. So art by itself is just dead. It just sits there no matter how well it's done. No matter how well it's done it's just dead and it sits there until your brain says how did a human make that? Wow a human made that. And what you're reacting to is the artist. You're reacting to the talent of the artist which is an extension of your mating instinct because we're attracted to talent because that's a tell for somebody with good genes. Any kind of talent. And art is the way you express your talent.
So the Adams rule of AI art states that as soon as the audience knows it's AI they will lose interest via the mating instinct being taken out of the conversation. You think I'm wrong? Do you think I'm wrong?
Here's my summary of that argument. You ready? Here's the summary. If AI had created the Mona Lisa and you knew it was AI, the Mona Lisa's total value would be a nickel. Nobody would buy the Mona Lisa. Everything about the Mona Lisa is about the artist, right? It's all about the artist. How about a Van Gogh? Who would buy a Van Gogh if they thought it had been randomly generated by AI? The thing that makes Van Gogh so interesting is probably because he had mental problems. But when you look at it you say how did that come out of a human mind? Like what extra is going on in there? In this case it wasn't an advantage maybe. Yeah all right.
And then imagine modern art. You know we all laugh about the modern art. It's like it'll be a big white canvas and a pickle or a soup can and you'll say that's not art. I don't love looking at that. That's just you put something in the middle. Now and yet people pay a lot of money for it. But imagine that AI made that art. Imagine if AI did the soup cans that Andy Warhol did. How many AI generated soup cans would you buy? How about zero? Yeah zero. Because there's no artist involved. So just watch for that. And I believe it will be in every form of art from opinion writing, visual art, musical, every form. I think it will be the same.
Now when I said this online another user of the X platform asked me the following question which is a pretty good question. Says well if you believe that it's all about the mating instinct and that people aren't going to be attracted to AI, Scott, how do you explain that there are AI models within the, what's it called, OnlyFans? Did you see how I pretended I didn't know what it was called? What's it called? It's like OnlyFans or something. Yeah never heard of it. So actually I don't use it believe it or not. But so how could it be true the Adams rule of AI art if in fact people are making money with AI generated porn? Is that a good question?
Here was my response. Porn is not art. Porn is not exactly art. And here's what I mean. Yeah and you're going to say to yourself but Scott it is. It is a form of art. Here's where the art happens. The art happens in your head. Losing connection here. Do you think YouTube's sending me like a warning shot or something? Might be a warning shot like don't talk about this topic. Oh because kids are watching or something. Maybe it's because kids could watch. Is that why? Or did Locals glitch too? When Locals glitches I can't see it on my end because it was continuous so maybe it was the internet.
All right but my point was that the art happens in your imagination, right? Because there's actually not much art involved in watching two people do the same thing that you watched two other people do the day before and two other people the day before. It's kind of the same. You know half dozen things they're doing. It's not exactly art but in your head it is. So the art's in your head.
But I would also argue that it's there's a good chance that the AI generated porn may disappear. I think there's a novelty effect. If I were in the AI business like a techie and I heard that OnlyFans had a successful model that was really making money and people liked it I would probably sign up just to see it. I would do that. I mean literally I would do that without the sexual interest. I would see how good it is. Now I did the same thing with the app that gives you a digital girlfriend. Like I didn't think I was going to have a digital girlfriend for the rest of my life but I really wanted to experience it because I want to feel like what does the future look like with this AI stuff. So some of it novelty.
All right. GPT-4 AI for radiology is as good as doctors now. So if you're looking at a radiology imaging of some internal part of your body, apparently the AI can find the pattern, meaning it can find the fault in the image, whatever is wrong with you, as well as a doctor.
Now what happens when you fast forward one year and it becomes common knowledge that the AI is better than a human doctor? And let's say the AI says it looks like you have a tumor but the experienced doctor looks at the same image and says I don't think so. I don't think that is a tumor so I wouldn't operate because the operation is dangerous. But the AI is saying yeah yeah that's a tumor which would indicate you got to operate immediately. So what's the doctor going to do?
Here's what I worry about. I worry that the doctor will have to agree with the AI because to do otherwise would be risking a lawsuit. So the doctor is going to say I don't think you should operate but if the AI says you should and it turns out I'm wrong you're going to die and then your family's lawyer is going to say the AI told you to operate and you also know the AI is better than humans. Why did you override the AI when the AI is the superior diagnostic tool? You see what I'm saying?
I think the doctor just becomes like the dog that guards the machine. You know the old joke about there's an airplane that's so advanced in flying itself that you only need two people to fly it. You need a pilot and you need a dog. And the job of the dog is to make sure the pilot doesn't touch anything. That's the joke. So it's going to be like that. The doctors are going to have to agree with AI or just get sued. And then why do you need a doctor? Pretty soon doctoring becomes either just pure research or something. I don't know. It's going to be interesting.
Well here's an update on Alex Soros. I already talked about this but there's a community note added to make it more fun. So Alex Soros as you know has taken over for his dad George Soros in the Soros funds and giving out the charity money etc. And you also know that he gets a lot of heat, the Soroses do, for funding the campaigns for progressive DAs who like not to prosecute a lot of lesser crimes. And it's making the cities look unlivable because of the unprosecuted crimes.
But Alex Soros defending himself he posted where are murder rates actually higher? And he says not in progressive cities. And he linked to an article that said that conservative rural areas have increasing murder rates and inner cities that might be run by Democrats maybe not as much. So he compared the conservative rural places to the Democrat run cities and said hey it's not much worse than the city so why are you bothering me?
Now as I reposted him with a quote I pointed out that the only reason you would compare a rural place to a city is if you're trying to hide the impact of your policies. Does that sound fair? Because it's such an obvious wrong comparison. The only reason you would do an obviously wrong comparison is if you're trying to hide something or you're trying to make something look true that's not true. I guess that would be the other way.
All right. And then I went on to explain that you should compare cities to cities, Democrat run to Republican run, and you should compare rural to rural to the extent that there are any liberal run rural areas. There must be somewhere.
Now I thought that was just obvious and it also made me wonder is the situation with Alex Soros that he knows there's a problem and he was intentionally using a misleading comparison to cover over the problem? Because I can't read his head. I can't read his mind so I don't know. But the other possibility is he really didn't know. And I think that's the stronger possibility.
Well let me develop this. How often do you see super leftist stuff on the X platform? I feel like I'm completely shut out from it. The only time I see left-leaning content is when somebody's mocking it on the right. And I didn't turn off any knobs so I didn't see Democrats. Like I want to see the Democrats but the algorithm has locked me out.
Now how about in person? Do I see a lot of left-leaning people in person who would maybe correct me if I had some wrong opinions because I'd only seen one side of the issue? I actually don't. I don't have any conversations with people who disagree with me in person. I'm sure there are people who disagree with me but I don't have any conversations about it. My daily life would be people who don't care about politics at all. Let me say that again. I don't spend time with people who care about politics at all.
You should see me trying to talk about my day. Hey how was your day? Whole bunch of things you don't care about. And I'm done. That's my whole day. Bunch of stuff that none of you care about who I know well enough to see in person. I think I have one or two friends who engage in that content and otherwise nobody cares.
So here's my point. Imagine you're Alex Soros. How many staunch Republicans do you encounter in person and have meaningful conversations with? I'm guessing zero. Would you argue with that? I'm guessing exactly zero. So I think you could rule out that anybody in person is saying you know Alex maybe that thing you're looking at is not the whole story or have you considered this? I don't think it happens because it doesn't happen to me and if it doesn't happen to me why would it happen to him? So because I think my situation is normal. You just get closed off in your little bubble and people don't want to make trouble too, right? People don't want to. Since Alex Soros is rich probably his friends who maybe even do disagree with him a little bit, maybe they don't mention it because they kind of like having a rich friend. That's a thing. So I don't think he hears any dissenting opinions in person.
Now do you think he sees them in the media? How often is he reading Breitbart? Zero. How often does he spend time on Fox News? Zero. I'm guessing zero, right? How often does he follow me on social media? He doesn't. I follow him. He doesn't follow me. So my best guess is he's actually has no exposure whatsoever to a countering argument that he would find stronger than his own opinion. And there are counter arguments that are stronger than his own opinion. A lot stronger.
But here's the beauty of the story is that now he posted this thing. He might have noticed that my account countered him because I have a million followers. Remember I told you if I had a million followers I could run the world. This is what I'm talking about. Because the only way I could break through that bubble is if my account is big enough that somebody's going to either mention it to him or he's going to notice it on his own because it's a big account. You need about a million people to break through the bubble on the other side. And then only sometimes. Like you have to do your best work to get in there in any way.
But on top of that the community notes said, so it was added to the Soros post. So community note says on X the five cities with the highest murder rate and their mayors are and it goes St. Louis, Baltimore, New Orleans, Detroit, Cleveland and they're all Democrats. So the top five murder cities are all Democrats.
Now the other thing I criticized Alex's post was that murder isn't really the big question. Murder is the worst crime but it's not the big question when we're talking about the liberal DAs. Because unless I'm wrong about this, can you give me a fact check on this? Democrats don't like murder do they? I think they're opposed to murderers. So I don't think there's a giant difference between Democrats and Republicans when it comes to whether a murderer should be in jail. Am I wrong about that? Aren't they pretty close when it comes to murder? Because nobody's disagreeing like well maybe that murderer should get bail. I don't think so. But all of the other crimes, the property crimes and the lesser violence, those are the ones that really would show if you're looking for what's the impact of a progressive DA.
So when Alex looks at murder rates he's first of all looking in the wrong box. That's not where the problem would be probably. I would look there too but I'm not looking to expect the problem there. So it's a diversion. And if he can get you to think that murder rate is a key metric then he wins because it's not the key metric. It's the one you should ignore the most actually perhaps.
So now that they got a community note and I think Elon Musk actually weighed in on this because the community note and he said those who can't handle reality will leave this platform due to community notes. But the public will increasingly come to realize this is still Musk that X is the best source of truth causing our user numbers to rise as they abandon less accurate sources of information. True. True. Yeah and X is rising in traffic so it's working.
So now there are three things that happened with Alex's, four things actually with Alex's post which are all productive in my opinion. Number one a high account with a lot of traffic in mine countered him in a way which if I may be humble was really succinct and on point. So he could have noticed that. Maybe not but he could have. Number two the community notes makes it a bigger story so the odds that he got fact checked by community notes raises again the odds that he saw it. Number three Elon Musk weighed in in favor of the community notes obviously. So I think everybody notices when Elon Musk comments on their work. Would you agree? How do you not notice if Elon Musk comments on your note on X? So that probably takes it to the next level of he'll probably see it. So that's three things that are working in the right direction.
The fourth thing and again with all modesty if I did a good job of showing that that was the wrong comparison then it also educated a million people to if they see it again say oh that's the wrong comparison. And that's really valuable because that means that Alex Soros might hear it from different places at different times and the more you hear the same thing the more true it becomes, right? So that's the update on that.
The publication called Deadspin which apparently is just a bunch of racists, they said that the NFL needs to speak out against the Kansas City Chiefs fan in blackface and Native headdress. Oh my God. So there was a young boy who was wearing blackface and a Native headdress and she'd be called out for that blackface. Oh except it was only blackface on one side. The other side was painted red because it was the color of the team. Black and red had nothing to do with blackface. So do you know who called them out? Community notes. Community notes for the win. Call them out.
I'm starting to think that community notes, it's in an nascent form so it should get better over time, it's one of the greatest inventions in modern history. It's simple. It's a simple little model and the model is that people of all types, left and right leaning, have to agree on the note or it can't go forward. So community notes doesn't have the option of being biased because the other people will say nope nope too biased and that's it. It just doesn't go anywhere if one side says that's biased. But if one side says somebody's talking about the murder rate in these cities and the side that wants to make the opposite point says we're just going to say what the murder rate is, do you disagree that the data we're using is correct? And then the left says oh that is on point and the data is correct. What are we going to do? We don't love it. We don't love it but we're honest brokers and what you're saying is on point and it is honest. That's huge. The fact that that works at all is just amazing. It's really one of the greatest things I've ever seen invention wise. As an invention it's just one of the greatest things.
All right. Let's talk about the Musk trip to Israel now that we've got a little time to digest it. You know Elon Musk had been accused of being an anti-Semite for something he said that was obviously taken out of context. Advertisers left because of the protest. So partly to address that obviously but also partly because he's very interested in the world and peace and keeping things together on this planet he decided to go over to Israel. And he spent the day with Netanyahu. He toured the kibbutz where much of the violence happened on October 7th. He watched the video compilation from the GoPro cameras of the terrorists with horrors that I would never watch. That I can't even imagine having that in my head.
One of the family members of a kidnapped person offered him the dog tags of the kidnapped person who's not yet released. Elon said he would wear the dog tags until the family member was released. Oh my God he's good at this. Oh my God he's good at this.
But here here's the kill shot to the whole thing. So the trip itself was in my opinion pitch perfect. He hit every note right. Every note. Here's the things he got right. 100% backing Israel to kill Hamas because they have a preference for killing civilians. And he says if somebody wants to kill civilians the only way to deal with them is kill them. Perfect. Perfect.
Then he says he's willing to help rebuild Gaza. Oh my God. Now I don't know what that help would look like but if you were a Gaza resident and you hope to ever go back and you found out that the most capable person who designs anything, he's the best product person in the world right now, the best product designer for any design if it's a product is Elon Musk. And if the product is a new city, just imagine. I mean can you imagine what he could do with a whole city if he starts from scratch? Putting in self-driving cars and Tesla solar panels and he's probably got some good idea for desalination. I mean it could be crazy. It could be just crazy how good it is when he's done.
So we don't know what kind of help he's going to give but to say he's going to help allows him to be on both sides because he needs to be on both sides. When I say both sides I mean he needs to be on the side of life for both sides. Not guilty life but he's on the side of innocent life and that's the right place to be. So he gave something for Israel. He showed them the respect and the consideration and really he literally damaged himself permanently to make the point. I will never watch that video of the actual massacre because I do not want that in my head. I know what that would do to me. I would be permanently damaged. That's brain damage, right? He actually signed up for intentional brain damage to show the degree of support he has for this. He will never forget those videos. They will be there like a virus or a disease in his brain for the rest of his life. The rest of his life he'll be damaged by that and he did that voluntarily. Amazing really.
So and then he also talked about the de-radicalization of Gaza and he talked about the importance of controlling the school system so that the education doesn't produce more terrorists. Is there any note that he missed? He didn't miss a note. That is as perfect as you can do this kind of stuff. I've never seen anybody do it that well actually. That's the best I've ever seen.
And I would like to compliment Israel and Netanyahu's staff because they were as wise as Musk was in knowing how to do this for optimum mutual benefit.
But here's the punchline or the kill shot to add all. I don't know if you know this name. Dov Hikind used to be in politics in New York state but he's well known as a defender of Jews, defender of Israel, one of the stronger more public voices about who's an anti-Semite and who's not. And he did a video. He didn't just do a post with words. He did a whole video in which he said I've devoted over 50 years to fighting Jew hatred. I can smell an anti-Semite a mile away. And let's be completely clear on this. Elon Musk is no anti-Semite.
Now I am going to give him a little bit of Dov because he had to add this. He's made some mistakes in his judgment. You know I do that too. Like if I'm supporting somebody that I don't support every single thing they've ever done. You know I'll do that. Well you know he's made some mistakes. But here's the better way to do it. The better way to do it is to say I haven't agreed with him on everything. It's kind of a dick move to say he's made some mistakes in the same breath that you're supporting him. It's just a dick move. So Dov has got a great reputation, does good work so I respect him and his work. So this would just be advice not criticism. I wouldn't word it that way. If your overall point is supportive don't say he's made some mistakes. Say I would have done it differently. It's the same thing but it's just not a dick way to say it.
All right. I would like to call your attention to an account which fascinates me because I'm surprised he's still alive. All right the account is called Martyr Made. It's two words. If you just search for that on X. So Martyr and the word Made. Here's why it's interesting. So this account is doing a pretty aggressive effort of trying to do what I'll call, I'll put this in quotes, both siding the issue. Both siding the issue with Gaza and the Palestinians and Israel.
Now he's not both siding October 7th, right? He's completely against the violence of October 7th. He's not pro-Hamas. Not pro-Hamas. Let me say that three times. He's not pro-Hamas. Not not not. Okay. But he is trying to create a complete picture so that we better understand what everybody's thinking and that part is of value. But it is really dangerous territory because you so easily could get lumped in with supporting Hamas and then your life is destroyed. So I respect him for the risk that he's taking in the service of making sure that we have a more complete understanding of things.
However watch me. Watch me not say he made some mistakes because right I'm going to model my own opinion. I would say there are a few things that I would have handled differently. See isn't that better? Like you keep your respect to the person but you can still say there are a few things I would have handled differently.
So on one of his posts today he was talking about, well I'll just read his post. So he said this and I'll tell you what I had a problem with. He said where did people get this idea that half a century of brutal military occupation, he's talking about Israel and the Palestinians, could possibly result in anything but burning hatred of the occupiers, his word, by the occupied? How would you feel about foreign soldiers strip searching your sister or killing your little nephew? Of course those are anecdotes and things now.
So here was my response. Number one good question. That's a good question. How would you feel? Perfectly good question. But it's not the only question. So where I would have handled it differently is this is a totally good question but it's incomplete and in its incompleteness it maybe is misleading.
So here are the questions I asked. A related question is whether Israel would be under the same level of danger from Hamas no matter what they did. Don't you think that Hamas's assumption is that Israel would be under less risk if they only treated the Palestinians the way the Palestinians wanted to be treated? That's a good question too. Because my assumption is that Israel would be under exactly the same risk because I never hear the Palestinians say you strip searched my sister. I've never heard that. I mean I'm sure that there are plenty of people mad about plenty of things but it doesn't rise to the level of political speech. When they talk politically they say we want to wipe out Israel and kill all the Jews. Hamas do. Not the Palestinians per se.
So it seems to me that the point of view that all Israel, all Jews must be removed from Israel and from the river to the sea, I don't think Israel would be any safer if they were just the nicest people in the world in every possible way from water rights to travel to security. I don't think it would make any difference. Do you? It would definitely make a difference for the non-military population for how they feel about the whole thing but it wouldn't affect Hamas. Hamas doesn't even have a list of demands. Have you ever seen a list of demands? You know stop strip searching our women and whatever else is on it. You know water rights and travel. And I haven't even seen it. If the leaders of the Palestinians wanted the public to be looking at the real treatment of how Israel treats the West Bank and Gaza etc., if that was the issue it would be at the top of the issue. Every day you'd see the dude saying well what do you expect? Israel does this and this and this to them so it's a natural outcome. I don't think anybody's thinking that way. I think you've got people who are trained to want to destroy all Jews and that's the beginning and the end of the conversation.
So now but should Israel treat all the Palestinians in the best possible way? Probably. But what is the argument for why they wouldn't? What do you suppose would be Israel's counterargument to the Palestinians saying hey we're treated terribly here? I think the answer would be the only reason we do any of this stuff is because of the security threat. We wouldn't need to search your sister if somebody's sister were not coming in here trying to kill us, right? So I think the response would be if you can make the security threat go away then we could fix a lot of these things that you're complaining about in daily life. I assume that would be the argument.
Now I'm not taking a side. If it felt like I'm taking a side I'm not because I don't really know the more daily life problems and which way the security concerns go. That's a little more complicated than I could wrap my head around. I'm just telling you that that should be a question too. If the question is how would you feel if you were abused this long you got to ask why are they abusing you? Is it strictly for security or is it economic, religious? Is there something else going on? I'd like to know that.
And then the next question is what other options did the Palestinians have? Was their only option to suffer and then support Hamas? Because in my view of things the Palestinians have had enough international public support for enough years that they should have very clearly succinctly stated their maybe top five demands and what they needed and I think they would have got them. The trouble is that one of their top five demands and maybe number one is okay number one kill all the Jews and remove their corpses from Israel. Like so here's the problem. I don't think that the Palestinians or anybody in power could have ever put together a list of if you just do these five things we can live in peace. We're just asking you stop abusing us in these five ways. Nobody's ever done that.
Here's why I think they don't do it. If a Palestinian leader put together a list of five things that you needed to do in order to have peace and none of those five things said get all Jews out of Israel the leader of the Palestinians would be executed by his own people. He would be dead for putting together a list that would give them peace without their primary objective of getting control of Israel. So in my opinion the Palestinians' clear strategy of not asking for the other stuff and making that like the entire package of claims seems to be a preference. Maybe it's not a conscious preference but in terms of the whole it operates as a preference. And the preference is if we can't get this one thing which is all the Jews out of Israel if we can't get that we don't even need to talk about four through five. It's like we need that first. That's the opening bid. There's nothing to talk about under those conditions.
Under those conditions Israel has a free pass. I hate to say it. I don't mean on a moral or ethical basis but they have a free pass because their situation would not get worse if they were nicer or would not get better if they were nicer. So that kind of limits their options as well.
Anyway I don't have a hard opinion about what should happen over there. What I have is an observation that there aren't any good guys that are organized enough to deal with them. So Israel always says we would negotiate peace if you told us who to negotiate with. Have you heard that before? Who are we going to talk to? There's nobody to talk to. How do you do a peace deal when you literally can't even get a meeting with anybody who's in charge who would even be a little bit interested in it? So that's a good point too.
Anyway so Mike Benz continues to be a national treasure here as he's helping us understand how much influence the security state, the intelligence agencies, have on our daily life because you don't realize how much control they have over various entities and groups and the media etc. And so Mike Benz on the X platform is always calling that out.
Now he points out that Business Insider, a publication which seems to be very opinionated about some political stuff, was bought a few years ago by what Mike calls a major CIA media conduit. So some I think a German entity or something but the publishing company that bought it apparently is well understood as a CIA cutout. And we're not guessing. And apparently we know there's this thing called the Integrity Initiative. This is also from Mike Benz. Something called the Integrity Initiative was this big umbrella group that would be the sort of mothership for all these different cutouts that look like they're independent people but they're really just sent by the mothership. So a lot of the people from one go to the other. There's a lot of cross-pollination of the people.
Now if you didn't know that you would read Business Insider and you'd say hey there's news. But if you know it you know that the only news that would be in Business Insider if I'll just say if this CIA influence is still working through the buyer all the way down to the stories, don't know. But if that's the case then you'd have to read their coverage with one eyebrow up. It's like I don't know. Maybe yes maybe no. So don't believe anything about that.
There is an interesting story about the Trump lawyers. I saw one opinion that well I'll tell you what that was. His lawyers have asked for all information regarding government informants on January 6. So you think to yourself aha Trump's defense is going to be that there were so many feds that they were the reason for the violence. Aha that's what you say right? But apparently the lawyers are explaining in their request for this information they're saying it's not because he thought the feds instigated the problem but rather, wait for it, because it would indicate whether the feds did enough to prevent it. In other words they're going to argue there weren't enough agents there.
Now here's what I think. This is just my speculation. I think this is just the cleverest way to find out how many agents were there. Because if you said tell us how many agents are there couldn't the government say we can't tell you that and then that's the end of it? But suppose they say we're trying to prove that they didn't have enough there. Would that put a different kind of pressure on them to say we did a good job because we had enough people there? This might be way more clever than you think it is.
But it was described by one observer as basically giving up on the idea that there were so many feds there that the feds caused the problem. Like he's giving up on that. I don't see that. I don't think they're giving up on that at all. I think if they have the number of agents, if it's a low, here's what I think. If they get a number which is iffy, if they get a number and it's like a low number then they can claim well that's the problem. You knew there was going to be a problem. Why did you have so few people there? How is that my fault that everybody knew this was coming because they did. Everybody knew the protest was coming and you understaffed. So you understaffed but I got impeached because you understaffed. Is that what you're telling me? So that would be one argument.
Now suppose against all odds they give a number it's like a crazy big number. Suppose they come out there like 80 or 100 undercover people. If you heard there were 100 of them and I'm just making up that number no reason to believe it, wouldn't you say to yourself well they must have caused it? Yeah because 100 could have stopped it. That's what your brain would say. That's not necessarily true but your brain would say man if they had 100 people they could have stopped it but they must have been there to start it right? So your brain would play tricks on you if it's a big number and it would play a different trick on you if it's a small number. So I think Trump might have a good lawyer in that mix there. There's something about this I like so much. So much.
Well speaking of Biden and inflation. So Biden's trying to argue that corporations raised their prices because their own costs were high but then when the inflation went down according to Biden but not too many other people the corporations didn't lower the prices. So you know what the problem is? It's those corporations. No it's not how much money he printed. It's not how much he borrowed. No no no it's those evil corporations. That's all he has. Imagine having nothing else to run on but that. Yeah inflation's high but I blame the corporations because you know what the free market stopped working. That's right. The free market has stopped working. That's what he's arguing. Because if a company raised its prices and then its cost of production went down but it didn't lower its price it's competing against somebody unless there's collusion or monopoly activity that could be. Too anyway.
Trump is finding a way to lose it looks like. Trump is going to take a crack at getting rid of Obamacare. That is such a losing strategy. My God how many times have I told you that? Nobody's even brought up Medicare I'm sorry. Nobody brought up health care. Health care was the biggest thing and it just stopped being an issue. When was the last time you heard anybody complain about Obamacare? A year? I haven't even heard the name in two years probably.
Well so here's what I think. I said this in the beginning and I'm going to double down on it. I think Obama was a genius about Obamacare. And in public Obama said that Obamacare was basically a mess but once it got in the system it would be too hard to remove it and so the government would be forced to keep tweaking and improving it until it had something that worked. Because remember health care was like this huge unsolvable problem. Nobody could figure out how to create a good health care system that would also be supported by people. There wasn't any way to do it. If he had the best idea in the world the other side would have said no and there just wasn't any way to make a good one.
So instead of making a good one he actually in public said directly so we're going to give you a bad one and we're going to stick it with the country and when they're too hooked on it they'll have to fix it. And that's actually happening I think. I think there have been enough tweaks that people just stopped complaining about it or they adjusted to the cost, got used to it, started worrying about other things.
But here's my point. I'm not going to make an argument that Obamacare is good. If you heard that that's not what I'm saying. Let me say it again. I'm not making an argument that Obamacare is good. My argument is it's no longer a political question. But if Trump says I'm going to get rid of it it's just going to turn into the worst political thing of all time. You should just ignore it. If people, if nobody's complaining about it at least in the media and social media I don't see anybody complaining. If they're not complaining move on to something they are complaining about that you can fix. That to me would be like the abortion question. It would be another way to lose on principle. On principle he might say this has to be fixed. I know people aren't complaining but on principle there's some things wrong with it we need to fix. But that's how you lose an election on principle. So you have to make that decision. You have to make the Vegas decision to just say I'm trying to win this time so I'm going to let TikTok survive until I win.
All right. And that ladies and gentlemen concludes my prepared remarks for what will no doubt be the best live stream you've ever seen in your life. Probably will go down in history as the greatest thing that ever happened.
All right. Yeah hit that subscribe button. Hit the like button you YouTubers. You know what I realize I don't do? It's so dumb. Yeah you're going to laugh at how dumb this is. After I do the live stream you know this will become posted as a recorded video on YouTube. I never remember to retweet it. The most obvious thing you should do. Like I create this content and it just sits there and I don't even promote it. I think I might start doing that today. Anyway hit the subscription button if you like it and thanks for joining. You are wonderful.
You can persuade him to talk to you in an interview online. I don't know. We'll try. Bye for now.
good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization it's called coffee with Scott Adams there's never been a better time in your life and if you'd like to take it up to levels that people can't even understand well all you need for that is a cuper and mugger a glass of tanker cheler Stein a kinen Jugger flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid I like coffee join me now for the unparallel pleasure of the dopa Bean the end of the day the thing that makes everything better it's called the simultaneous Sip and happens now go savor it savor it good that was some good sipping I'd like to compliment all of you who participated for your excellent sipping talents well I have a theme for today's show and the theme is is it my imagination or has wokeness totally jumped the shark now if you don't recognize that American TV reference Jumping the Shark is a reference to a originally a reference to a TV show they had a ridiculous plot Happy Days was the name of the TV show where one of the characters would be water skiing foni was the character and he would jump off a some kind of a ramp water skiing and he would jump over a shark now since the show was usually on the stage in the set you know just doing funny things became you know huge huge hit but after a while the good writers move on so I don't know if you know this this is why all good TV shows eventually fail uh let's see if you know this the reason a great TV show fails pretty much all of them is that if you get a job as a writer for a top number one show you're going to get a nice paycheck so of course the the best writers would try to work at the best shows but once you've worked at the best show for a year you can get a much bigger paycheck somewhere else so it's basically a way to you know siphon The Good the good writers through the good show but almost immediately to a higher pay paying job for some new show that you know needs somebody who's got that experience and credibility so the the nature of the model is that any good show should attract good writers but over time they're going to be moving out too fast and it should be self-destructive anyway that's just on the side but it seems to me that uh and so the the jump the shark thing means that a formally good thing went too far it it just became too ridiculous to even work anymore that's what Jumping the Shark means so you tell me if we've reached that point in my opinion now keeping in mind I see a certain amount of uh right leaning uh Media stuff on the internet so I probably see more of that than anything else but in my experience at least 90% of all the stories in the wokeness domain from racism to trans to everything else 90% of the news stories are treated as jokes true true or not in the beginning of the wokeness trend there would be two sides to every story but both sides would treat it seriously right so the woke people would say hey we have this serious issue and then if you thought that was you know too far or something you'd say hey what are you doing to our society or you know you seem to be ruining the you know something that was good about what worked before but it was basically two serious conversations but as the wokeness became more extreme it became harder and harder to hold your frame that any of this was serious because it no longer looked like serious people it looked like you know the slippery slope just things went too too far and it just jumped the shark let me give you some examples apparently the daily wire uh just finished a movie that's a comedy that's going to make fun of trans athletes yeah the ones born male and and uh doing sports as a woman now did you see that coming I did not see that coming I I didn't know they were working on it but apparently it's looks like it's done now when was the last time you saw any comedy seriously when was the last time you went to see a comedy at a movie theater I don't even remember uh honestly this is not a joke I actually don't remember I think it's been years five years perhaps I think at least five years since I thought there was a movie in a theater that was worth going to a theater for and it's not just because I like to watch everything at home it's like I haven't even been tempted but uh this will be interesting I'll probably watch it the daily wires movie I don't know what the name of it is but you'll hear a lot about it so that's my evidence number one that wokeness has now completely turned into a a joke content is far more likely to be a joke than to be a serious conversation let me see you text me early in the morning my uh my college just texted me to ask me to uh give them money how do you think that's going to go no I'm not going to give money to a college do you know I I'm not going to give money to a college now this is my undergraduate college a heart Weck college and I don't really even know what they're up to but I guarantee they they're racist as hell I don't even have to check I don't even need to check am I right would you agree that a uh a liberal arts college in Upstate New York would you agree that I don't need to check to see if they've gone too far I don't need to check no they're asking me for money do you know how I treat that literally as a joke am I right yeah as I'm talking about how wokeness has become a joke when my Elma Mo Harwick College contacts me in the middle of my in the middle of my statements to ask for money I just think well that's funny a as if I would give them money as if there's not there's not the slightest chance of that all right uh in other news to back up this claim that wokeness has jumped the um I don't know if this is true but I saw on the internet a claim without a good source that said that there's a study that says if your business gets labeled racist on Yelp A year later your business will be up apparently the the claim and I'm not positive this is true but it sounds true because it kind of works in my head so I'm kind of I'm kind of biased where thinking is true but I don't know for sure that makes sense to me because I I think the people who read a story about a business being racist don't really care because it's like one one incident and you know maybe they just want their coffee so they're not they don't care but I could definitely see people who think that wokeness has gone too far to say all right I'm going to support that business I had I hadn't even thought about them before but I think I'll go there twice this week I can see that and and when you read the story that uh and again if is true I can't guarantee this is true but if it's true that uh that Yelp labeling somebody a racist company increases their business isn't that kind of funny am I wrong like when you hear that story you like that's kind of funny like what no matter what you think about the the base situation it's just funny that it doesn't work out out the way you'd think it would right so everything about this topic is literally the fod for a humorous movie or you read it you go okay that's kind of funny um we'll get to some more of those but uh let's talk about some other news uh thanks to uh Owen for all these little scientific uh tidbits that I see on X um so there's an alcohol addiction drug parade apps now it's too soon to know but in the course of testing something for something some people at the University of Oklahoma and Oklahoma State University they uh found that something called semaglutide semaglutide turns out they were testing it for something else but as a side effect the people taking it dramatically reduced their alcohol consumption which wasn't the subject of the test and now they say hey maybe we should do a big test on this and see if it works imagine that I don't I don't think it'll work if I had the bat I would probably I would place a large bat against it cuz it's it's a little bit too good you know when you hear when you hear that you know cancer has been cured by something that sounds too good to be true it's probably too good to be true probably not true so this one's probably in the too good to be true category and it was only I think there were only six people that they looked at so six people is by no means telling you that it works or that it's safe but if all six people dramatically reduce their alcohol intake I wouldn't ignore it it's not proof but I wouldn't ignore six out of six all right uh there's a new Chinese app just what we need a new app that's uh getting tons of downloads and apparently what does is it creates these little dramas that run for like a minute but but there are lots of them so they they form a body of work after a while and and they're really cheesy and they're like little soap operas with Bad actors overacting in a soap opera way but apparently middle-aged women just love this thing so it's it's got millions of downloads it's called Uh real short real as in two EAS e e real short and just so you know it's coming now my question is this these little soap operas they have one thing in common to make it a dramatic soap opera you have to have people really dysfunctional you know people are cheating and you know that that baby doesn't belong to you and you know all that stuff do you think all of that works against let's say traditional families do do you think watching uh continuous content showing people cheating on their spouses and you know every manner of bad behavior I I feel like it's not exactly a good message and then it makes me wonder huh so Tik Tock got to the younger the younger kids and China owns you know at least could control it if they want to so that would give China the user interface to control the minds of our young people now they have a similarly addictive app that's aim directly at older women older as in you know the mid-range is that a coincidence or is that part of a plan to to weave their content around the brains of Americans so that they can tweak it as they need to you know Elon Musk does the best job of calling out the fact that our big problem is uh underpopulation do you think that this app will cause people to want to form families and have children or is it going to make is it going to make it look like just a you know a landmine if you even get in a relationship I feel if you watch enough content where people have bad relationships that's going to have a have an impact on you so I would be worried about second uh front in China's ability to control our minds that's real well going back to my category of uh wokeness Jumping the Shark turns out that Jewish students are suing my other Elma Mater is it Elma Mater or Elma moer modder right Elma m m okay my Elma m Berkeley so uh months ago I disavowed Berkeley for being a racist college so I didn't want to have anything to do with them and if I knew where my diploma was i' set it on fire because uh I feel embarrassed to be associated with Berkeley literally literally embarrassed and uh now Jewish groups are suing Berkeley for what they claim is you know just an contr control anti-jewish um policy I guess there are some groups that don't allow Jewish people to join what what there's some student groups that forbid Jewish people from joining them I I mean just hold that in your head for a second anyway now obviously these groups are you know special purpose groups or whatever so they would say no it's not about anti-jewish it's more about who's in so it's not about who's out you know it's about having a club for ourselves but the effect of it might be to uh just be purely racist so uh to me I think it's funny that the most liberal college in the world is being sued by its Jewish students for being racist isn't that funny to me that's funny it It's like you know uh all good things go to eventually because good intentions always turn into horrible things um anyway here's a here's a irony of the simulation if we live in a simulation clearly was made by people with a sense of humor who keep you yanking away the the dollar bill we find on the sidewalk it's like oh there's a dollar on the sidewalk and you you lean over to pullet and there's a string on it and Y it away here's another one uh as you know semiconductors are beginning to reach a limit to how much more you can do with silicon and and the common materials but there are new materials that are being considered so it turns out there is one material that is really really good for um for microcomputers semiconductors uh for semiconductors and it's a it's a diamond it's diamond seriously seriously the the one thing we need that would be you know the thing that's better than the thing we're using Diamond could you be any more inconvenient like what could be worse I literally can't think of anything that would be worse than finding out the only way we'll be able to keep up with with China is with diamonds so uh well you know maybe we can lab grow them I suppose some version of them yeah anyway it's just ironic that the the most expensive thing in the world it's probably not but well maybe it is are diamonds the most expensive by weight is that a true statement they're not the most expensive by weight anymore what would be most expensive by weight rubies Emerald not gold definitely not gold saffron uranium oh maybe uranium yeah maybe all right according to unusual Wales account on X China has launched the fastest internet 1.2 terabits per second it can transmit 150 movies that are 4K movies in one second 150 movies that are 4K you know the real dense ones in 1 second that's pretty awesome now that does uh certainly open up a question whether there's a Strategic Benefit to that is is that something that we need to catch up with right away because I I wonder I wonder if you had this internet speed and you attached it to one of these hedge funds that tries to do automated trading you know when they find small errors and the whole secret of the hedge fund they literally put their uh I think this is still true the the hedge fund would literally put their data center physically as close as possible to whatever they're interacting with you know to trade because that distance would give them you know a millionth of a microsc advantage over everybody else so they can front run trades but what if you got this 1.2 terabit thing you know I don't know does that give them some Advantage I don't know uh I I think not because it would have to be 1 Point ter 1.2 terabit all the way so might not help him if you're in a different country I don't know but uh that's fun I think that has more to do with uh virtual reality uh correct me if I'm wrong but the limit for something like meta to transmit you know realistic looking images like you're in a 3D World the limit is the transmission right it's not the computer and it's not the limit of the software am I right about that it's just a transmission limit well let me explain to you how the transmission limit could be gamed you ready let's say you want to transmit I think they're already doing this by the way but it's it's a fun technical fact suppose you wanted to uh send my image in 4k a full 3d looking image to appear on your computer at a distance and not have any lag there's a way to do that if you were to send a refreshed screen of every position I'm in you know your internet would choke especially if there are other characters in the scene but if you take one really good image of me and then you only transmit the changes the other side can recreate me without a full picture of me being transmitted for example if if the receiving side already had a full model of me and then I took my hand and I went like this uh it could use AI on its end to say well I I know what that would look like if his head looks like this here and he moves up here it's still G to look like the hand I'll just recreate it as if it had been transmitted but the only thing being transmitted is the coordinate changes you know where where your fingers are so it'd be like the end of my fingertip it knows that it was here but now it's here so it just fills in fills in the rest so uh we we already have a technology that can get around um a lot of speed limitations Scott look at what Elon said on your Tweet uhoh did did Elon just say something on a tweet of mine all right we're going to stop and look at that cuz because I'll be far too curious what should I look up look up Elon and then look at his comments all right let's see what he replied it's probably a reply right is a reply you could have just told me what he said oh my woke tweet all right I'll look at my woke tweet all right find me all right let's see what he said uh about wokeness jumping shark oh yeah so five minutes ago Elon Musk so here was my tweet so it's basically the theme of the show I I uh posted that it feels like wokeness has totally jumped the shark 90% of the stories in that domain are being treated as jokes and then I said balance will be restored and Elon replied indeed woke is a laughing stock at this point H have you noticed how useful Elon Musk is in um moving the needle on everything it it's it's hard to find any cat category that's interesting that he isn't the most important voice in it because you know if if Scott says you know wokeness is jump the shark you know maybe it makes some content for my show maybe maybe you repost it but if musk says it by tonight it could be a headline right like I wouldn't be surprised if you know Fox News covers this as a story because he's said it you know they wouldn't cover it if I said it it it's amazing how useful he is in in pushing energy toward one point of view because certainly it would be good if everybody started thinking oh wokeness is the funny stuff like it's just a joke and musk is saying it directly yeah it's basically a joke so that helps thank you for alerting me to that anyway um Hunters uh agreed to testify um and allow it to be a public hearing and so his lawyers have said on um on the 13th of December he'll he'll be in a closed door deposition now you probably ask yourself why would hunter wanted to be public like wouldn't you think that everything about that he would want to be you know lowkey so that well there are two possibilities one possibility is that his defense or whatever he plans to say is so strong that it would be better to put that out there than to have people wonder what happened that might be but I have another theory I think that uh Hunter was high and his lawyer called him and and they had a bad connection and the lawyer said uh Hunter the committee is asking about a closed door closed door you want to be closed door closed meeting or an unclosed meeting and Hunter thought he said closed and so Hunter said well no I don't I don't want clothes I don't want to wear any clothes have you seen his selfies it's funni if you've seen the Selfies he doesn't like clothes when he's with a group of people you put several people in a in a room with Hunter the first thing he does is take off his clothes right I mean margerie Taylor Green's going to be in the room the guy's going to start stripping he's going to be Lauren BT wow right he's just going to start shedding those clothes so I think it was just a misunderstanding between closed and clothed I think that's all that's all it was that's just a guess it's just a guess well um Biden is apparently going to use or talking about using the defense production act to make sure that our Pharma products get made in the US which is a big problem uh because we it's hard for us first of all it's hard for the United States to do manufacturing apparently but it would take a long time to bring everything back and then we'd still be dependent on you know maybe the base materials even if we manufactured here we still have to get our base materials from a potentially unfriendly country so he's going to use the defense production act which gives the president extra powers and money to you know Force things to happen quickly um I'm going to surprise you on this one I'm 100% behind this anybody disagree I'm 100% behind it and I think Trump would have done it I think V ramaswami might have done it I don't know but this feels like me to me this feels right 100% And you know for th for those of you who Wonder would I ever say anything good about a Democrat or Biden if they did something that you know clearly made sense yes this clearly makes sense in my opinion now the execution could be botched you know because it's a government but yeah I back this 100% this should not even be about politics um well there's a story I saw in a Joe Pompano post um about Sports Illustrated apparently Sports Illustrated bought or created these AI generated head shots so it looked like uh real human beings were writing articles that in fact were written by AI but Sports illustrat was trying to pass them off you know with a fake picture as if a human had done it now when they got called down about it they just deleted the content um but here's the interesting part of the story two parts that are interesting number one it's kind of interesting that they tried to get away with it because imagine how much money they could save if they ran opinion Pieces by robots and people thought they were human and they're like oh okay good opinion but here's what I think they had to get rid of it immediately upon realizing it was fake even though they could have said you know you caught us uh so we're going to label these as AI but we're still going to keep the pictures and you know we think it's fun to do AI opinions that's if people had liked the AI opinions I believe this is more of what um I'm going to call the Adams rule of AI art if if you're the first one to say you get to name it after yourself that's how it works the Adams law of AI art and it goes like this AI generated art which would include writing and include opinion that's art uh will not be interesting to humans if they know it's AI generated and I've said this before but just summarizing uh I believe our appreciation of art has a little bit to do with the quality of the art but a lot to do with what you assume about the talent of the person who created it meaning that the art and the artist are the same you're you're you're triggering of what makes you say whoa look at that art is not the art that's not what triggers you so art by itself is just dead it just sits there no matter how well it's done no matter how well it's done it's just dead and it sits there until your brain says how did a human make that wow a human made that and what you're reacting to is the artist you're reacting to the talent of the artist which which is an extension of your mating Instinct because we're we're attracted to talent because that's a tell for somebody with good genes any kind of talent and art is the way you express your talent so the Adams rule of AI art states that as soon as the audience knows it's AI AI they will lose interest via the mating Instinct being you know taken out of the taken out of the conversation you think I'm wrong do you think I'm wrong here's my summary of that argument you ready here's the summary if AI had created the Mona Lisa and you knew it was AI the Mona Lisa's total value would be a nickel nobody would buy the mon Lisa everything about the mo Lisa is about the artist right it's all about the artist how about a van go who would buy a vanau if they thought it had been randomly generated by AI the thing that makes vanau so interesting is probably because he had mental problems but when you look at it you say how like how did that come out of a human mind like what what extra is going on in there in this case it wasn't an advantage maybe yeah all right um and then imagine Modern Art you know we all laugh about the modern art it's like it'll be a big white canvas and a like a pickle or a soup can and you'll say that's not art you know I don't love looking at that that's just you put something in the middle now and yet people pay a lot of money for it but imagine that AI made that art imagine if AI did The Soup cans that anti waral did how how many AI generated Soup cans would you buy how about zero yeah zero because there's no artist involved so just watch for that and I believe it will be in every form of art from opinion writing visual art musical every form I think it will be the same now uh when I said this online a uh another user of the xplatform asked me the following question which is a pretty good question says well if if you believe that it's all about the meing Instinct and that people aren't going to be attracted to AI Scott how do you explain that there are AI uh models within the um what's it called uh only fans did you see how I pretended I didn't know what it was called what what's it called it's like only fans or something yeah never heard of it so actually I don't use it believe it or not but um so how could it be true the Adams rule of AI art if in fact people are making money with AI generated porn is that a good question question here was my response por is not art por is not exactly art and and here's what I mean yeah and you're going to say to yourself but Scott it is it is a form of Art here's where the art happens the art happens in your head losing connection here do you think You.
Tube's sending me like a warning shot or something might be a warning shot like don't talk about this topic oh cuz kids are watching or something maybe it's because kids could watch is that why or did locals oh locals glitch too what when locals glitches I can't see it on my end because it was continuous so maybe it was the internet all right but my point was that the art happens in your imagination right because there's actually not much are involved in watching two people do the same thing that you watch two other people do the day before and two other people the day before it's kind of the same you know half dozen things they're doing it's not exactly art but um in your head it is so the Arts in your head but I would also argue that it's there's a good chance that the AI generated porn may disappear I think there's a novelty effect if if I were in the um AI business like a tacky and I and I heard that there was uh you know only fans had a successful model that was really making money and people liked it I would probably sign up just to see it I would do that I mean literally I would do that without the sexual interest I would see how good it is now I did the same thing with the app that gives you a digital girlfriend like I didn't think I was going to have a digital girlfriend for the rest of my life but I really want to experience it because I want to feel like you know what does the future look like with this AI stuff so some of it novelty all right gp4 AI for radiology is as good as doctors now so uh if you're looking at a radiology Imaging you know of some internal part of your body um apparently the AI can find the pattern meaning it can find the fault in the image whatever is wrong with you as well as a doctor now now what happens when you fast forward one year and it becomes common knowledge that the AI is better than a human doctor and let's say the AI says it looks like you have a tumor but the experienced doctor looks at the same image and says I don't think so I don't think that is a tumor so I wouldn't operate because you know the operation is dangerous but the AI is saying yeah yeah that's a tumor which which would indicate you know you got to operate immediately so what's the doctor going to do uh here's what I worry about I worry that the doctor will have to agree with the AI because to do otherwise would be risking a lawsuit so the doctor is going to say I don't think you should operate but if the AI says you should and it turns out I'm wrong you're going to die and then your lawyer your family's lawyer is going to say the the AI told you to operate and you also know the AI is better than humans why did you override the AI when the AI is the superior diagnostic tool you see what I'm saying I think the doctor just becomes like the dog that uh you know guards the machine you you you know the old joke about um what is it the there's an airplane that's so advanced in flying itself that there only you know you only need two people to fly it you need a pilot and you need a dog and the the job of the dog is to make sure the pilot doesn't touch anything that's the joke so it's going to be like that the doctors are going to have to agree with AI or just get suit and then why do you need a doctor pretty soon doctoring becomes either just pure research or something I don't know it's going to be interesting well here's an update on Alex Soros uh I already talked about this but there's a community no added to make it more fun so Alex Soros as you know is has taken over for his dad George Soros in the in the Soros funds and giving out the charity money Etc and you also know that um he gets a lot of heat the Soros is do for funding uh the the campaigns for Progressive Das who like not prosecute a lot of uh lesser crimes and it's making the cities look unlivable because of the unprosecuted crimes but Alex Soros uh defending himself he posted uh uh where are murder rates actually higher and he says not in Progressive cities and he linked to an article that said that um conservative um rural areas have you know increasing murder rates and um inner cities that might be run by democrats you know maybe not as much so he compared the conservative rural places to the Democrat run cities and said hey it's not much worse than the city so why are you you know why are you bothering me now as I as I uh reposted him with a quote um I pointed out that the only reason you would compare a rural place to a city is if you're trying to hide the impact of your policies does that sound fair because it's such an obvious wrong comparison the only reason you would do an obviously wrong comparison is if you're trying to hide something or or you're trying to make something look true that's not true I guess that would be the other way all right and then and then I went on to explain that you should compare cities the cities you know Democrat run to Republican run and you you should compare rural to rural to the extent that they're you know any liberal run rural areas uh there must be somewhere now I thought that was just obvious and it and it also made me wonder is the situation with Alex Soros that he knows there's a problem and he was intentionally using a misleading comparison to cover over the problem cuz I can't read his head I can't read his mind so I don't know but the other possibility is he really didn't know and and I think that's the stronger possibility well let let me let me develop this how often do you see uh super leftist stuff on the xplatform I feel like I'm completely shut out from it the only time I see left leaving content is when somebody's mocking it on the right and I didn't I didn't turn off any you know I didn't turn any knobs so I didn't see uh Democrats like I want to see the Democrats but but the algorithm has locked me out now how about in person do I see a lot of left leaning people in person who would maybe correct me if I had some wrong opinions because I'd only seen one side of the issue I actually don't I don't have any conversations with people who disagree with me in person I'm sure I'm sure there are people who disagree with me but I don't have any conversations about it you know my daily life would be people who don't care about politics at all let me say that again I don't spend time with people who care about politics at all you should see me trying to talk about my day hey how was your day um whole bunch of things you don't care about and I'm done that's my whole day bunch of stuff that none of you care about who you know I know well enough to see in person I think I have one or two friends you know who engage in that content and otherwise nobody cares so here's my point imagine you're Alex Soros how many staunch Republicans do you encounter in person and have meaningful conversations with I'm guessing zero would you argue with that I'm guessing exactly zero so I think you could rule out that anybody in person is saying you know Alex maybe that thing you're looking at is not the whole story or have you consider this I don't think it happens because it doesn't happen to me and if it doesn't happen to me why would it happen to him so I I because I think my situation is normal you know you just you just get closed off in your little bubble and people don't want to make trouble too right people don't want to since Alex sorus is Rich probably his friends who maybe even do disagree with them a little bit maybe they don't mention it because they kind of like having a rich friend that's a thing so I don't think he hears any consenting opin desent no any disagreeing opinions in person now do you think he sees them in the media how often is he reading Breitbart zero how often does he spend time on Fox News zero I'm guessing zero right how often does he follow me on social media he doesn't I follow him he doesn't follow me so my best guess is he's actually has no exposure whatsoever to a countering argument that he would find stronger than his own opinion and there are op there are C arguments that are stronger than his own opinion a lot stronger so um but here's the uh the beauty of the story is that now he he posted this thing he he might have noticed that my account um countered him because I have a million followers remember I told you if I had a million followers I could run the world this is what I'm talking about because the only way I could break through that bubble is if my account is big enough that somebody's going to either mention it to him or he's going to notice it on his own because it's a big account you need about a million people to break through the bubble on the other side and and then only sometimes like you have to do your best work to like get in there in any way but on top of that um the community notes said so it was added to the Soros uh post so Community note says on X the five cities with the highest murder rate and their Mayors are and it goes you know St.
Louis Baltimore New Orleans Detroit Cleveland and they're all Democrats so the top five murder cities are all Democrats now the other thing I criticized Alex's uh post was that murder isn't really the big question murder is the worst crime but it's not the big question when we're talking about the um liberal Das cuz unless I'm wrong about this can you give me a fact check on this Democrats don't like murder do they I I think they're opposed to murderers so I don't think there's a giant difference between Democrats and Republicans when it comes to whether a murderer should be in jail am I wrong about that AR aren't they pretty close when it comes to murder CU nobody's disagreeing like well maybe that murderer should get bail I don't think so but all of the other crimes the property crimes and the the Lesser violence those are the ones that really would show if you're looking for what's the impact of a progressive da so when Alex looks at murder rates he's first of all looking in the wrong box that's not where the problem would be probably you know I would look there too but I'm not looking to expect the problem there so it's a version and if he can get you to think that murder rate is a key metric then he wins cuz it's not the key metric it's the one you should ignore the most actually perhaps so now that they got a community note and uh I think uh oh and El Elon Musk actually weighed in on this because the community note and he said those who can't handle reality will leave this platform uh due to community notes but the public will increasingly come to realize this is still musk uh that X is the best source of Truth causing our user numbers to Rises the abandoned less accurate sources of information true true yeah and X is rising in traffic so it's working so so now there are three things that happened with Alex's um four things actually with Alex's post which are all productive in my opinion number one a a high high account you know with a lot of traffic in mine countered him in a way which if I may be humble was really succinct and on point so he could have noticed that maybe not but he could have number two um the community notes makes it a bigger story so the odds that he got fact checked by Community notes raises again the odds that he sought number three um Elon Musk weighed in in favor of the community notes obviously so I think everybody notices when Elon Musk comments on their work would you agree how do you not notice if Elon Musk comments on your note on X so that probably takes it to the next level of he'll probably see it so that's three things that are working in the right direction the fourth thing and again with all modesty if I did a good job of showing that that was the wrong comparison then it also educated a million people to if they see it again say oh that's the wrong comparison and that's really valuable because that means that that Alex Soros might hear it from different places at different times and the more you hear the same thing the more true it becomes right so that's uh that's the update on that um the uh publication called Dead spin which apparently is just a bunch of racists um they said that uh the NFL needs to speak out against the one writer said uh the NFL needs to speak out against the Kansas City Chiefs fan and black face and Native headdress oh my God so there was a young boy who who was wearing black face and a native you know a native uh head headgear and she' be called out for that that black face oh except it was only black face on one side the other side was painted red because it was the color of the team black and red had nothing to do with blackface so do you know who called them out Community notes Community notes for the win call them out I'm starting to think that Community notes uh it's you know it's in a nent form so it should get better over time it's one of the greatest inventions in modern history is simple it's a simple little model and the model is if you didn't know the model is that people of all types left and right leaning have to agree on the note or it can't go forward so Community notes doesn't have the option of being biased because the other people will say nope nope too biased and that's it it it just doesn't go anywhere if one side says that biased but if one side says somebody's talking about the murder rate in these cities and the side that wants to you know make the opposite Point says we're just going to say what the murder rate is do you disagree that the data we're using is correct and then the left says oh that is on point and the data is correct what are we going to do we we don't love it we don't love it but we're honest Brokers and what you're saying is on point and it is honest that's huge that the fact that that works at all is just amazing it's really one of the the greatest things I've ever seen in invention wise as an invention is just one of the greatest things all right um let's talk about the musk trip to Israel now that we've got a little time to digest it you know Elan musk had been accused of being an anti-semite for something he said that was obviously taken out of context advertisers left because of the protest so partly partly to address that obviously but also partly because he's very interested in the world and peace and you know keeping things together on this planet he decided to go over to Israel and he spent the day with Netanyahu he toured the kabut where much of the violence happened on October 7th he watched the uh the video compilation from the Go.
Pro cameras of the terrorists you know with Horrors that I would never watch that I can't even imagine having that in my head um one of the uh family members of a kidnapped person uh offered him the dog tags of the kidnapped person who's not yet released Elon said he would wear the dog tags until the family member was released oh my God he's good at this oh my God he's good at this um and but here here's the the kill shot to the whole thing so the the trip itself was in my opinion Pitch Perfect he hit every note right every note here here's the things he got right 100% backing Israel to kill Hamas because they have a preference for killing civilians and he says if if somebody wants to kill civilians the only way to deal with them is kill him perfect perfect then he says he's is willing to help rebuild uh Gaza oh my God now I don't know what that help would look like but if you were a Gaza resident and you hope to ever go back and you found out that the most capable person who designs anything he's the best product person in the world right now the best product designer for any design if it's a product is Elon Musk and if the product is a new city just imagine I mean can you imagine what he could do with a whole city if he starts from scratch you know putting in self-driving cars and you know uh Tesla solar panels and he's probably got some good idea for desalinization I mean it could be crazy it could be just crazy how good it is when he's done so we don't know what kind of help he's going to give but to say he's going to help um allows him to be on both sides because he needs to be on both sides when I say both sides I mean he needs to be on the side of life for both sides not guilty life but he's on the side of innocent life and that's the right place to be so he gave something for Israel you know he showed them he showed them the the respect and the consideration and and really he literally damaged himself permanently to make the point I will never watch that video of the actual Massacre because I do not want that in my head I know what that would do to me I would be permanently damaged that's brain damage right he actually signed up for intentional brain damage to show the degree of support he has for this he will never forget those videos they they will they will be there like a like a virus or a or a disease in his brain for the rest of his life the rest of his life he'll be damaged by that and he did that voluntarily amazing really so and then he also talked about the U the densification of Gaza and he talked about how the importance of controlling the school system so that the education doesn't produce more terrorists is there any note that he missed he didn't miss a note that that is as perfect as you can do this kind of stuff I've never seen anybody do it that well actually that's the best I've ever seen and I would like to uh compliment Israel and netanyahu's staff because they were as wise as musk was in knowing how to do this for you know Optimum Mutual benefit uh but here's the here's the uh punchline or the kill shot to ad all I don't know if you know this name Dove uh hiken uh used to be in politics in New York state but uh he's he's well known as a defender of Jews defender of Israel you know one of one of the stronger more public voices about who's an anti-semite and who's not and he did a video he didn't just do a post with words he did a whole video in which he said I've devoted over 50 years to fighting Jew hatred I can smell an anti-semite a mile away and let's be completely clear on this Elon Musk is no anti-semite now I am going to give him a little bit of uh Dove because he had to add this he's made some mistakes in his judgment you know I do that too like if I'm supporting somebody that I don't support every single thing they've ever done you know I'll do that well you know he's made some mistakes but here's the better way to do it the better way to do it is to say I haven't agreed with him on everything it's kind of a dick move to say he's made some mistakes in the same breath that you're supporting him it's just a dick move so Dove is you know got a great reputation does good work so I respect him and his work so this would just be advice not criticism I wouldn't word it that way if your if your overall point is supportive don't say he's made some mistakes say I would have done it differently it's the same thing but it's just not a dick way to say it all right I would like to call your attention to an account which fascinates me because I'm surprised he's still alive all right the account is called martyr made it's two words if you just search for that on X so Marr and the word made um m a d and um here's why it's interesting so this account is doing a pretty aggressive effort of trying to do what I'll call I'll put this in quotes uh both siding the issue both siding the issue issue with Gaza and the Palestinians and Israel now he's not bull sightings October 7th right he's completely against the violence of October 7th he's not pramas not pramas let me say that three times he's not pramas not not not okay but he is trying to to create a complete picture so that we better understand what everybody's thinking and that part is is a value but it is really dangerous territory because you so easily could get lumped in with the supporting Hamas and then you know your life is destroyed so I respect him for the risk that he's taking in the service of making sure that we have a more complete understanding of things however watch me watch me not say he made some mistakes because right I'm I'm going to model my own opinion I would say there are a few things that that I would have handled differently see isn't that better like you keep your respect to the person but you can still say there are a few things I would handled differently so on one of his posts today um he was talking about well I'll just read his post so he said this and I'll tell you what I I had a problem with he said where did people get this idea that half a century of brutal military occupation he's talking about Israel and the Palestinians could possibly result in anything but burning hatred of the occupiers his word by the occupied how would you feel about foreign soldiers strip searching your sister or killing your little nephew of course those are anecdotals and things now so here was my response number one good question that's a good question how would you feel perfectly good question but it's not the only questions so where I would have handled it differently is this is a totally good question but it's incomplete and in its incompleteness it maybe is misleading so here are the questions I asked a related question is whether Israel would be under the same level of danger from Hamas no matter what they did don't you think that murder Ma's assumption is that Israel would be under less risk if they only treated the Palestinians the way the Palestinians wanted to be treated that's a good question too CU my assumption is that Israel would be under exactly the same risk because the I I never hear the Palestinians say you strip searched my sister I've never heard that I mean I'm sure that there you know plenty of people mad about plenty of things but it doesn't rise to the level of political speech when they talk politically they say we want to wipe out Israel and kill all the Jews Hamas do not the Palestinians per se so it seems to me that the point of view that um all Israel all Jews must be removed from Israel and from The River To The Sea I don't think Israel would be any safer if they were just the nicest people the world in every possible way from water rights to travel to security I don't think it would make any difference do you it would definitely make a difference for the non-military population for how they feel about the whole thing but it wouldn't affect Hamas Hamas doesn't even have a list of Demands have you ever seen a list of Demands you know stop strip searching our women and whatever else is on it you know water rights and travel and I haven't even seen it if if the leaders of the Palestinians wanted the public to be looking at you know the the real treatment of how Israel treats you know the the West Bank in Gaza Etc if they if that was the issue it would be at the top of the issue yeah every day you'd say every day you'd see the DU saying well what do you expect you know Israel does this and this and this to them so it's a natural outcome I don't think anybody's thinking that way I think you got people who are trained to want to destroy all Jews and that's the beginning and the end of the conversation so now but should Israel treat all the Palestinians in the best possible way probably but what is the argument for why they wouldn't what what do you suppose would be Israel's counterargument to the Palestinians say hey we're treated terribly here I think the answer would be the only reason we do any of this stuff is because of the security threat we wouldn't need to search your sister if somebody's sister were not coming in here from trying to kill us right so I think the response would be if you can make the security system go away then we could fix a lot of these things that you're complaining about in daily life I assume that would be the argument now I'm not taking aide if it if it felt like I'm taking aside I'm not CU I don't really know you know the the more daily life problems and and which way the security concerns go that's a little more complicated than I could wrap my head around I'm just telling you that that should be a question too if the question is how would you feel if you were abused this long you got to ask why are they abusing you is it strictly for security or is it economic religious is there something else going on i' i' like to know that and then the next question is what other options did the Palestinians have was their only option to suffer and then support Hamas because in my view of things um the Palestinians have had enough International public support for enough years that they should have very clearly you know succinctly stated their maybe top five demands and what they needed and I think they would have got them the trouble is that one of their top five demands and maybe number one is okay number one kill all the Jews and remove remove their corpses from Israel like so here's the problem I don't think that the Palestinians or anybody in power could have ever put together a list of if you just do these five things we can live in peace you we're just asking you stop abusing Us in these five ways nobody's ever done that here's why I think they don't do it if a Palestinian leader put together a list of five things that you needed to do in order to have peace and none of those five things said uh get all Jews out of Israel the leader of the Palestinians would be executed by his own people he would be dead for putting together a list that would give them peace without their primary objective of getting control of Israel so in my opinion the Palestinians uh clear clear strategy of not asking for the other stuff and and making that like a the entire package of claims seems to be a preference you know maybe it's not a conscious preference but in terms of the whole it operates as a preference and the preference is if we can't get this one thing which is all the Jews out of Israel if we can't get that we don't even need to talk about 4 through five it's like you know we need that first that's the opening bid there's nothing to talk about under those conditions under those conditions Israel has a free pass I hate to say it you know I don't mean on a Moral Moral or ethical basis but they have a free pass cuz their situation would not get worse if they were nicer or would not get better if they were nicer so that kind of limits their options as well anyway I don't have a uh a hard opinion about what should happen over there what I have is an observation that there aren't any good guys that are organized enough to deal with them so Israel always says we would negotiate peace if he told us who to negotiate with have you heard that before who who are we going to talk to there's nobody to talk to how do you do a peace deal when you literally can't even get a meeting with anybody who's in charge who would even be a little bit interested in it so that's a good point too anyway so um Mike Ben continues to be a national treasur here as he's helping us expl he's helping us understand how much influence the security State you know the intelligence agencies have have on our daily life because you don't realize how much control they have over various entities and groups and the media Etc and so Mike Ben on the xplatform is always calling that out now he points out that Business Insider a publication which seems to be very opinionated about some political stuff um was bought a few years ago by what Mike calls a major CIA media conduit so uh some I think a German entity or something but the publishing company that bought it apparently is well understood as a CIA cutout and we're not guessing and and apparently we know there's this thing called uh what's it called the Integrity initiative this is also from Mike Benz something called the Integrity initiative was this big umbrella group that would be the sort of U Mothership for all these different uh cutouts that look like they're independent people but they're really you know they're just sent by the mothership so a lot of the people from One go to the other you know there's a lot of cross-pollination of the people now if you didn't know that you would read Business Insider and you'd say hey there's news but if you know it you know that the only news that would be in Business Insider if I'll just say F this CIA influence is still working through the buyer all the way down to the stories don't know but if that's the case then you'd have to read their coverage with one eyebrow up it's like I don't know maybe maybe yes maybe no so don't believe anything about that there interesting story about the Trump lawyers I saw one opinion that well I'll tell you what that was his lawyers have asked for uh all information regarding government informance on January 6 so you think to yourself aha Trump's defense is going to be that there were so many Feds that they were the reason for the violence aha that's what you say right but apparently the lawyers are explaining in their uh request for this information they're saying it's uh not because he thought the feds instigated the problem but rather wait for for it because it would indicate whether the feds did enough to prevent it in other words in other words they're going to argue there weren't enough agents there now here's what I think this is just my speculation I think this is just the cleverest way to find out how many agents were there because if you said tell us how many agents are there couldn't the government say we can't tell you that and then that's the end of it but suppose they say we're trying to prove that they didn't have enough there would that put a different kind of pressure on them to um to say we did a good job because we had enough people there th this might be way more clever than you think it is uh but it was described by one Observer as as uh basically giving up on the idea that there were so many feds there that the feds caused the problem like he's giving up on that I don't see that I don't think they're giving up on that at all I think if they have the number of Agents if if it's a low here's what I think if they get a number which is iffy if they get a number and it's like a low number then they can claim well that's the problem you knew there was going to be a problem why did you have so few people there how is that my fault that everybody knew this was coming cuz they did everybody knew the protest coming and and you underst staffed so you understaffed but I got impeached because you understaffed is that is that what you're telling me so that would be one argument now suppose Against All Odds they give a number it's like a crazy big number suppose they come out there like 80 or 100 undercover of people if you heard there were 100 of them and I'm just making up that number no reason to believe it wouldn't you say to yourself well they must have caused it yeah because 100 could have stopped it you know that's what your brain would say that's not necessarily true but your brain would say man if they had 100 people they could have stopped it but they must have been there to start it right so your brain would play tricks on you if it's a big number and it would play a different trick on you if it's a l a small number so I think Trump might have a good lawyer in the in that mix there there's something about this I like so much so much well speaking of Biden and inflation so Biden's trying to argue that corporations raised their prices because their own their own costs were high but then when the inflation went down according to Biden but not too many other people the corporations didn't lower the prices so you know what the problem is it's those corporations no it's not how much money he printed it's not how much he borrowed no no no it's those evil corporations that's all he has imagine having nothing else to run on but that yeah inflation's high but I blame the corporations because you know what the free market stopped working that's right the free market has stopped working that's what he's arguing because if if a company raised its prices and then its cost of production went down but it didn't lower its price it's competing against somebody you know unless there's collusion or Monopoly activity that could be too anyway uh Trump is finding a way to lose it looks like uh Trump is going to take a crack at getting rid of Obamacare that is such a losing strategy my God how many times have I told you that nobody's even brought up Medicare I'm sorry nobody brought up health care healthc care became was the biggest thing and it just stopped being an issue when was the last time you heard anybody complain about Obamacare a year I haven't even heard the name in two years probably well so here's what I think uh I said this in the beginning and I'm going to double down on it I think Obama was a genius about Obamacare and in public Obama said that Obamacare was basically a mess but once it got in the system it would be too hard to remove it and so the government would be forced to keep tweaking and improving it until he had something that worked because remember Healthcare was like this huge unsolvable problem no nobody could figure out how to create a good health care system that would also be supported by people there wasn't any way to do it if he had the best idea in the world the other side would have said no and there just wasn't any way to make a good one so instead of making a good one he actually in public said directly so we're going to give you a bad one and we're going to stick it with the country and when they're too hooked on it they'll have to fix it and that's actually happening I think I I think that I think there have been enough tweaks um I think there probably been enough tweaks that people just stopped complaining about it or they adjusted to the cost got used to it started worrying about other things but here's my point uh I'm not going to make an argument that Obamacare is good if you heard that that's not what I'm saying let me say it again I'm not making an argument that Obamacare is good my argument is it's no longer a political question but if Trump says I'm going to get rid of it it's just going to turn into the worst political thing of all time you should just ignore it if people if nobody's complaining about it at least you know in the media and social media I don't see anybody complaining if they're not complaining move on to something they are complaining about that you can fix that to me to me this would be like the um the abortion question it would be another way to lose un principle on principle he might say you know this has to be fixed I know people aren't complaining but on principle there's some things wrong with it we need to fix but that's how you lose an election on principle so you have to make that decision you have to make the v v the vake decision to just say I'm trying to win this time you know so I'm going to let Tik Tok survive until I win all right um and that ladies and gentlemen concludes my prepared remarks for what will no doubt be the best live stream you've ever seen in your life probably probably will go down in history as the greatest thing that ever happened all right um yeah hit that subscribe button hit the like button you You.
Tubers you know what I realize I don't do it's so dumb yeah you're going to laugh at how dumb this is uh after after I do the uh live stream you know this this will become posted as a as a recorded video on You.
Tube I never remember to retweet it the the most obvious thing you should do like I create this content and it just sits there and I don't even promote it I think I might start doing that today anyway hit the subscription button if you like it and uh thanks for joining you are wonderful um you can persuade him to talk to you in an interview online I don't know we'll try bye for
good morning everybody and welcome to
the highlight of human civilization it's
called coffee with Scott Adams there's
never been a better time in your life
and if you'd like to take it up to
levels that people can't even understand
well all you need for that is a cuper
and mugger a glass of tanker cheler
Stein a kinen Jugger flask a vessel of
any kind fill it with your favorite
liquid I like coffee join me now for the
unparallel pleasure of the dopa Bean the
end of the day the thing that makes
everything better it's called the
simultaneous Sip and happens now
go savor it savor
it good that was some good sipping I'd
like to compliment all of you who
participated for your excellent sipping
talents well I have a theme for today's
show and the theme
is is it my
imagination or has wokeness totally
jumped the
shark now if you don't recognize that
American TV reference Jumping the Shark
is a reference to a originally a
reference to a TV show they had a
ridiculous plot Happy Days was the name
of the TV show where one of the
characters would be water skiing foni
was the character and he would jump off
a some kind of a ramp water skiing and
he would jump over a
shark now since the show was usually on
the stage in the set you know just doing
funny things became you know huge huge
hit but after a while the good writers
move on so I don't know if you know this
this is why all good TV shows eventually
fail
uh let's see if you know this the reason
a great TV show
fails pretty much all of them is that if
you get a job as a writer for a top
number one show you're going to get a
nice paycheck so of course the the best
writers would try to work at the best
shows but once you've worked at the best
show for a year you can get a much
bigger paycheck somewhere else so it's
basically a way to you know siphon The
Good the good writers through the good
show but almost immediately to a higher
pay paying job for some new show that
you know needs somebody who's got that
experience and
credibility so the the nature of the
model is that any good show should
attract good writers but over time
they're going to be moving out too fast
and it should be self-destructive anyway
that's just on the
side but it seems to me that uh and so
the the jump the shark thing means that
a formally good thing went too far it it
just became too ridiculous to even work
anymore that's what Jumping the Shark
means so you tell me if we've reached
that point in my opinion now keeping in
mind I see a certain amount of uh right
leaning uh Media stuff on the internet
so I probably see more of that than
anything else but in my experience at
least
90% of all the stories in the wokeness
domain from racism to trans to
everything else 90% of the news stories
are treated as
jokes true true or
not in the beginning of the wokeness
trend there would be two sides to every
story but both sides would treat it
seriously right so the woke people would
say hey we have this serious issue and
then if you thought that was you know
too far or something you'd say hey what
are you doing to our society or you know
you seem to be ruining the you know
something that was good about what
worked before but it was basically two
serious
conversations but as the wokeness became
more
extreme it became harder and harder to
hold your frame that any of this was
serious because it no longer looked like
serious people it looked like you know
the slippery slope just things went too
too far and it just jumped the shark let
me give you some examples apparently the
daily
wire uh just finished a movie that's a
comedy that's going to make fun of trans
athletes yeah the ones born male and and
uh doing sports as a
woman now did you see that coming I did
not see that coming I I didn't know they
were working on it but apparently it's
looks like it's done
now when was the last time you saw any
comedy seriously when was the last time
you went to see a comedy at a movie
theater I don't even remember uh
honestly this is not a joke I actually
don't
remember I think it's been
years five years perhaps I think at
least five years since I thought there
was a movie in a theater that was worth
going to a theater for and it's not just
because I like to watch everything at
home it's like I haven't even been
tempted but uh this will be interesting
I'll probably watch it the daily wires
movie I don't know what the name of it
is but you'll hear a lot about it so
that's my evidence number one that
wokeness has now completely turned into
a a joke
content is far more likely to be a joke
than to be a serious
conversation let me see you text me
early in the morning
my uh my college just texted me to ask
me to uh give them
money how do you think that's going to
go no I'm not going to give money to a
college do you know I I'm not going to
give money to a college now this is my
undergraduate college a heart Weck
college and I don't really even know
what they're up to but I guarantee they
they're racist as hell I don't even have
to
check I don't even need to check am I
right would you agree that a uh a
liberal arts college in Upstate New York
would you agree that I don't need to
check to see if they've gone too far I
don't need to check no they're asking me
for money do you know how I treat
that literally as a
joke am I right yeah as I'm talking
about how wokeness has become a joke
when my Elma Mo Harwick College contacts
me in the middle of my in the middle of
my statements to ask for money I just
think well that's funny a as if I would
give them
money as if there's not there's not the
slightest chance of
that all right uh in other news to back
up this claim that wokeness has jumped
the
um I don't know if this is true but I
saw on the internet a claim without a
good source that said that there's a
study that says if your business gets
labeled racist on Yelp A year later your
business will be
up
apparently the the claim and I'm not
positive this is true but it sounds true
because it kind of works in my head so
I'm kind of I'm kind of biased where
thinking is true but I don't know for
sure
that makes sense to me because I I think
the people who read a story about a
business being
racist don't really care because it's
like one one incident and you know maybe
they just want their coffee so they're
not they don't care but I could
definitely see people who think that
wokeness has gone too far to say all
right I'm going to support that business
I had I hadn't even thought about them
before but I think I'll go there twice
this week I can see that
and and when you read the story that uh
and again if is true I can't guarantee
this is true but if it's true that uh
that Yelp labeling somebody a racist
company increases their
business isn't that kind of
funny am I wrong like when you hear that
story you like that's kind of
funny like what no matter what you think
about the the base situation it's just
funny that it doesn't work out out the
way you'd think it would right so
everything about this topic is literally
the fod for a humorous movie or you read
it you go okay that's kind of
funny um we'll get to some more of those
but uh let's talk about some other
news uh thanks to uh Owen for all these
little scientific uh tidbits that I see
on X um so there's an alcohol addiction
drug parade apps now it's too soon to
know but in the course of testing
something for something some people at
the University of Oklahoma and Oklahoma
State University they uh found that
something called
semaglutide
semaglutide turns out they were testing
it for something else but as a side
effect the people taking it dramatically
reduced their alcohol consumption which
wasn't the subject of the test and now
they say hey maybe we should do a big
test on this and see if it works imagine
that I don't I don't think it'll work if
I had the bat I would probably I would
place a large bat against it cuz it's
it's a little bit too good you know when
you hear when you hear that you know
cancer has been cured by something that
sounds too good to be true it's probably
too good to be true probably not true so
this one's probably in the too good to
be true category and it was only I think
there were only six people that they
looked at so six people is by no means
telling you that it works or that it's
safe but if all six people dramatically
reduce their alcohol intake I wouldn't
ignore
it it's not proof but I wouldn't ignore
six out of
six all right uh there's a new Chinese
app just what we need a new app that's
uh getting tons of downloads and
apparently what does is it creates these
little
dramas that run for like a
minute but but there are lots of them so
they they form a body of work after a
while and and they're really cheesy and
they're like little soap operas with Bad
actors overacting in a soap opera way
but apparently middle-aged women just
love this thing so it's it's got
millions of downloads it's called Uh
real
short real as in two EAS e e real
short and just so you know it's coming
now my question is
this these little soap
operas they have one thing in common to
make it a dramatic soap opera you have
to have people really dysfunctional you
know people are cheating and you know
that that baby doesn't belong to you and
you know all that stuff do you think all
of that works against let's say
traditional
families do do you think watching uh
continuous content showing people
cheating on their spouses and you know
every manner of bad
behavior I I feel like it's not exactly
a good message and then it makes me
wonder
huh so Tik Tock got to the younger the
younger kids and China owns you know at
least could control it if they want to
so that would give China the user
interface to control the minds of our
young
people now they have a similarly
addictive app that's aim directly at
older women older as in you know the
mid-range is that a
coincidence or is that part of a plan to
to weave their content around the brains
of Americans so that they can tweak it
as they need
to you know Elon Musk does the best job
of calling out the fact that our big
problem is uh
underpopulation do you think that this
app will cause people to want to form
families and have children or is it
going to make is it going to make it
look like just a you know a landmine if
you even get in a
relationship I feel if you watch enough
content where people have bad
relationships that's going to have a
have an impact on you so I would be
worried about second uh front in China's
ability to control our
minds that's
real well going back to my category of
uh wokeness Jumping the Shark turns out
that Jewish students are suing my other
Elma Mater is it Elma Mater or Elma
moer modder
right Elma
m m okay my Elma m
Berkeley so uh months ago I disavowed
Berkeley for being a racist college so I
didn't want to have anything to do with
them and if I knew where my diploma was
i' set it on fire because uh I feel
embarrassed to be associated with
Berkeley literally literally
embarrassed and uh now Jewish groups are
suing Berkeley for what they claim is
you know just an contr control
anti-jewish
um policy
I guess there are some groups that don't
allow Jewish people to
join
what what there's some student groups
that forbid Jewish people from joining
them I I mean just hold that in your
head for a
second anyway now obviously these groups
are you know special purpose groups or
whatever so they would say no it's not
about anti-jewish it's more about who's
in so it's not about who's out you know
it's about having a club for
ourselves but the effect of it might be
to uh just be purely racist so uh to me
I think it's funny that the most liberal
college in the world is being sued by
its Jewish students for being
racist isn't that funny to me that's
funny it It's like you know uh all good
things go to eventually because
good intentions always turn into
horrible
things um
anyway here's a here's a irony of the
simulation if we live in a simulation
clearly was made by people with a sense
of humor who
keep you yanking away the the dollar
bill we find on the sidewalk it's like
oh there's a dollar on the sidewalk and
you you lean over to pullet and there's
a string on it and Y it away here's
another one uh as you know
semiconductors are beginning to reach a
limit to how much more you can do with
silicon and and the common materials but
there are new materials that are being
considered so it turns out there is one
material that is really really good for
um for microcomputers semiconductors uh
for semiconductors and it's
a it's a
diamond it's diamond
seriously
seriously the the one thing we need that
would be you know the thing that's
better than the thing we're using
Diamond could you
be any more
inconvenient like what could be
worse I literally can't think of
anything that would be worse than
finding out the only way we'll be able
to keep up with with China is with
diamonds so uh well you know maybe we
can lab grow them I suppose some version
of
them yeah anyway it's just ironic that
the the most expensive thing in the
world it's probably not but well maybe
it is are diamonds the most expensive by
weight is that a true statement they're
not the most expensive by weight anymore
what would be most expensive by weight
rubies Emerald not gold definitely not
gold saffron uranium oh maybe uranium
yeah
maybe all right according to unusual
Wales account on X China has launched
the fastest internet 1.2 terabits per
second it can transmit 150 movies that
are 4K
movies in one
second 150 movies that are 4K you know
the real dense
ones in 1
second that's pretty
awesome now that does uh certainly open
up a question whether there's a
Strategic Benefit to
that is is that something that we need
to catch up with right away because I I
wonder I wonder if you had this internet
speed and you attached it to one of
these hedge funds that tries to do
automated trading you know when they
find small errors and the whole secret
of the hedge fund they literally put
their uh I think this is still true the
the hedge fund would literally put their
data center physically as close as
possible to whatever they're interacting
with you know to trade because that
distance would give them you know a
millionth of a microsc advantage over
everybody else so they can front run
trades
but what if you got this 1.2 terabit
thing you know I don't know does that
give them some Advantage I don't know uh
I I think not because it would have to
be 1 Point ter 1.2 terabit all the way
so might not help him if you're in a
different country I don't
know but uh that's fun I think that has
more to do with uh virtual
reality uh correct me if I'm wrong but
the limit for something like meta to
transmit you know realistic looking
images like you're in a 3D World the
limit is the transmission right it's not
the
computer and it's not the limit of the
software am I right about that it's just
a transmission
limit well let me explain to you how the
transmission limit could be gamed you
ready let's say you want to transmit I
think they're already doing this by the
way but it's it's a fun technical fact
suppose you wanted to uh send my image
in 4k a full 3d looking image to appear
on your computer at a distance and not
have any
lag there's a way to do that if you were
to send a refreshed screen of every
position I'm in you know your internet
would choke especially if there are
other characters in the scene but if you
take one really good image of me and
then you only transmit the
changes the other side can recreate me
without a full picture of me being
transmitted for example if if the
receiving side already had a full model
of me and then I took my hand and I went
like this uh it could use AI on its end
to say well I I know what that would
look like if his head looks like this
here and he moves up here it's still G
to look like the hand
I'll just recreate it as if it had been
transmitted but the only thing being
transmitted is the coordinate changes
you know where where your fingers are so
it'd be like the end of my fingertip it
knows that it was here but now it's here
so it just fills in fills in the rest so
uh we we already have a
technology that can get around um a lot
of speed
limitations Scott look at what Elon said
on your Tweet
uhoh did did Elon just say something on
a tweet of
mine all right we're going to stop and
look at that cuz because I'll be far too
curious what should I look up look up
Elon and then look at his
comments all right let's see what he
replied it's probably a reply right is a
reply you could have just told me what
he said oh my woke
tweet all right I'll look at my woke
tweet all right find
me all right let's see what he
said uh about wokeness jumping
shark oh yeah so five minutes ago Elon
Musk so here was my tweet so it's
basically the theme of the show I I uh
posted that it feels like wokeness has
totally jumped the shark 90% of the
stories in that domain are being treated
as jokes and then I said balance will be
restored and Elon replied indeed woke is
a laughing stock at this
point H have you
noticed how useful Elon Musk is in um
moving the needle on everything it it's
it's hard to find any cat category
that's interesting that he isn't the
most important voice in
it because you know if if Scott says you
know wokeness is jump the shark you know
maybe it makes some content for my show
maybe maybe you repost it but if musk
says
it by tonight it could be a
headline right like I wouldn't be
surprised if you know Fox News covers
this as a story because he's said it you
know they wouldn't cover it if I said it
it it's amazing how useful he is in in
pushing energy toward one point of view
because certainly it would be good if
everybody started thinking oh wokeness
is the funny stuff like it's just a joke
and musk is saying it directly yeah it's
basically a joke so that helps thank you
for alerting me to
that anyway
um Hunters uh agreed to
testify um and allow it to be a public
hearing and so his lawyers have said on
um on the 13th of December he'll he'll
be in a closed door deposition now you
probably ask yourself why would hunter
wanted to be
public like wouldn't you think that
everything about that he would want to
be you know lowkey so
that well there are two possibilities
one possibility is that his defense or
whatever he plans to say is so strong
that it would be better to put that out
there than to have people wonder what
happened that might be but I have
another
theory I think that uh Hunter was high
and his lawyer called him and and they
had a bad connection and the lawyer said
uh Hunter the committee is asking about
a closed door closed door you want to be
closed door closed meeting or an
unclosed
meeting and Hunter thought he said
closed and so Hunter said well no I
don't I don't want
clothes I don't want to wear any clothes
have you seen his selfies it's funni if
you've seen the Selfies he doesn't like
clothes when he's with a group of people
you put several people in a in a room
with Hunter the first thing he does is
take off his clothes right
I
mean margerie Taylor Green's going to be
in the room the guy's going to start
stripping he's going to be Lauren BT wow
right he's just going to start shedding
those clothes so I think it was just a
misunderstanding between
closed and
clothed I think that's all that's all it
was that's just a guess it's just a
guess well um Biden is apparently going
to use or talking about using the
defense production act to make sure that
our Pharma products get made in the US
which is a big problem uh because we
it's hard for us first of all it's hard
for the United States to do
manufacturing apparently but it would
take a long time to bring everything
back and then we'd still be dependent on
you know maybe the base materials even
if we manufactured here we still have to
get our base materials from a
potentially unfriendly country so he's
going to use the defense production act
which gives the president extra powers
and money to you know Force things to
happen quickly um I'm going to surprise
you on this one I'm 100% behind
this anybody
disagree I'm 100% behind it
and I think Trump would have done it I
think V ramaswami might have done it I
don't
know but this feels like me to me this
feels
right
100% And you know for th for those of
you who Wonder would I ever say anything
good about a Democrat or Biden if they
did something that you know clearly made
sense yes this clearly makes sense in my
opinion now the execution could be
botched you know because it's a
government but yeah I back this 100%
this should not even be about politics
um well there's a story I saw in a Joe
Pompano
post um about Sports Illustrated
apparently Sports Illustrated bought or
created these AI generated head shots so
it looked like uh real human beings were
writing articles that in fact were
written by AI but Sports illustrat was
trying to pass them off you know with a
fake picture as if a human had done it
now when they got called down about it
they just deleted the
content
um but here's the interesting part of
the story two parts that are interesting
number one it's kind of interesting that
they tried to get away with it because
imagine how much money they could save
if they ran opinion Pieces by robots and
people thought they were human and
they're like oh okay good
opinion but here's what I think they had
to get rid of it immediately upon
realizing it was fake even though they
could have said you know you caught us
uh so we're going to label these as AI
but we're still going to keep the
pictures and you know we think it's fun
to do AI
opinions that's if people had liked the
AI
opinions I believe this is more of what
um I'm going to call the Adams rule of
AI
art if if you're the first one to say
you get to name it after yourself that's
how it works the Adams law of AI art and
it goes like this AI generated art which
would include writing and include
opinion that's art uh will not be
interesting to humans if they know it's
AI generated and I've said this before
but just summarizing uh I believe our
appreciation of art has a little bit to
do with the quality of the art but a lot
to do with what you assume about the
talent of the person who created it
meaning that the art and the artist are
the same you're you're you're triggering
of what makes you say whoa look at that
art is not the art that's not what
triggers you so art by itself is just
dead it just sits there no matter how
well it's done no matter how well it's
done it's just dead and it sits there
until your
brain says how did a human make that
wow a human made that and what you're
reacting to is the artist you're
reacting to the talent of the artist
which which is an extension of your
mating Instinct because we're we're
attracted to talent because that's a
tell for somebody with good genes any
kind of talent and art is the way you
express your talent so the Adams rule of
AI art states that as soon as the
audience knows it's AI AI they will lose
interest via the mating Instinct being
you know taken out of the taken out of
the
conversation you think I'm
wrong do you think I'm
wrong here's my summary of that argument
you ready here's the summary if AI had
created the Mona
Lisa and you knew it was
AI the Mona Lisa's total value
would be a
nickel nobody would buy the mon
Lisa everything about the mo Lisa is
about the
artist right it's all about the artist
how about a van
go who would buy a vanau if they thought
it had been randomly generated by
AI the thing that makes vanau so
interesting is probably because he had
mental problems but when you look at it
you say how like how did that come out
of a human mind like what what extra is
going on in there in this case it wasn't
an advantage
maybe yeah all right um and then imagine
Modern Art you know we all laugh about
the modern art it's like it'll be a big
white canvas and a like a pickle or a
soup can and you'll say that's not art
you know I don't love looking at that
that's just you put something in the
middle now
and yet people pay a lot of money for it
but imagine that AI made that art
imagine if AI did The Soup cans that
anti waral did how how many AI generated
Soup cans would you buy how about zero
yeah zero because there's no artist
involved so just watch for that and I
believe it will be in every form of art
from opinion writing visual art musical
every form I think it will be the same
now uh when I said this online a uh
another user of the xplatform asked me
the following question which is a pretty
good
question says well if if you believe
that it's all about the meing Instinct
and that people aren't going to be
attracted to
AI Scott how do you
explain that there are AI uh models
within the um what's it called uh only
fans did you see how I pretended I
didn't know what it was called what
what's it called it's like only fans or
something
yeah never heard of it so actually I
don't use it believe it or
not but um so how could it be true the
Adams rule of AI art if in fact people
are making money with AI generated
porn is that a good question
question here was my
response por is not
art por is not exactly
art and and here's what I mean yeah and
you're going to say to yourself but
Scott it is it is a form of Art here's
where the art happens the art happens in
your head losing connection
here do you think YouTube's sending me
like a warning shot or
something might be a warning shot like
don't talk about this topic oh cuz kids
are watching or something maybe it's
because kids could watch is that why or
did locals oh locals glitch too what
when locals glitches I can't see it on
my end because it was
continuous so maybe it was the internet
all right but my point was that the art
happens in your
imagination right because there's
actually not much
are involved in watching two people do
the same thing that you watch two other
people do the day before and two other
people the day before it's kind of the
same you know half dozen things they're
doing it's not exactly
art but um in your head it is so the
Arts in your head but I would also argue
that it's there's a good chance that the
AI
generated porn may
disappear I think there's a novelty
effect if if I were in the um AI
business like a tacky and I and I heard
that there was uh you know only fans had
a successful model that was really
making money and people liked it I would
probably sign up just to see
it I would do that I mean literally I
would do that without the sexual
interest I would see how good it is now
I did the same thing with the app that
gives you a digital
girlfriend like I didn't think I was
going to have a digital girlfriend for
the rest of my life but I really want to
experience it because I want to feel
like you know what does the future look
like with this AI stuff so some of it
novelty all right
gp4 AI for radiology is as good as
doctors
now so uh if you're looking at a
radiology Imaging you know of some
internal part of your body um apparently
the AI can find the pattern meaning it
can find the fault in the image whatever
is wrong with you as well as a doctor
now now what
happens when you fast forward one year
and it becomes common knowledge that the
AI is better than a human doctor and
let's say the AI says it looks like you
have a tumor but the experienced doctor
looks at the same image and says I don't
think so I don't think that is a tumor
so I wouldn't operate because you know
the operation is dangerous but the AI is
saying yeah yeah that's a tumor which
which would indicate you know you got to
operate immediately so what's the doctor
going to
do uh here's what I worry about I worry
that the doctor will have to agree with
the AI because to do otherwise would be
risking a lawsuit so the doctor is going
to say I don't think you should operate
but if the AI says you should and it
turns out I'm wrong you're going to die
and then your lawyer your family's
lawyer is going to say the the AI told
you to operate and you also know the AI
is better than humans why did you
override the AI when the AI is the
superior diagnostic
tool you see what I'm saying I think the
doctor just becomes like the dog that uh
you know guards the
machine you you you know the old joke
about um what is it the there's an
airplane that's so advanced in flying
itself
that there only you know you only need
two people to fly it you need a pilot
and you need a
dog and the the job of the dog is to
make sure the pilot doesn't touch
anything that's the joke so it's going
to be like that the doctors are going to
have to agree with AI or just get suit
and then why do you need a doctor pretty
soon doctoring becomes either just pure
research or something I don't know it's
going to be
interesting well here's an update on
Alex Soros uh I already talked about
this but there's a community no added to
make it more fun so Alex Soros as you
know is has taken over for his dad
George Soros in the in the Soros funds
and giving out the charity money Etc and
you also know that um he gets a lot of
heat the Soros is do for funding uh the
the campaigns for Progressive Das who
like not prosecute a lot of uh lesser
crimes and it's making the cities look
unlivable because of the unprosecuted
crimes but Alex Soros uh defending
himself he posted uh uh where are murder
rates actually higher and he says not in
Progressive cities and he linked to an
article that said that um
conservative um rural
areas have you know increasing murder
rates and um inner cities that might be
run by democrats you know maybe not as
much so he compared the conservative
rural places to the Democrat run cities
and said hey it's not much worse than
the city so why are you you know why are
you bothering
me now as I as I uh reposted him with a
quote um I pointed out that the only
reason you would compare a rural place
to a city is if you're trying to hide
the impact of your policies does that
sound fair because it's such an obvious
wrong
comparison the only reason you would do
an obviously wrong comparison is if
you're trying to hide something or or
you're trying to make something look
true that's not true I guess that would
be the other
way all right and then and then I went
on to explain that you should compare
cities the cities you know Democrat run
to Republican run and you you should
compare rural to rural to the extent
that they're you know any liberal run
rural areas uh there must be
somewhere now I thought that was just
obvious and it and it also made me
wonder is the situation with Alex Soros
that he knows there's a problem and he
was intentionally using a misleading
comparison to cover over the
problem cuz I can't read his head I
can't read his mind so I don't know but
the other possibility is he really
didn't
know and and I think that's the stronger
possibility well let let me let me
develop
this how often do you
see uh super leftist stuff on the
xplatform I feel like I'm completely
shut out from it the only time I see
left leaving content is when somebody's
mocking it on the right and I didn't I
didn't turn off any you know I didn't
turn any knobs so I didn't see uh
Democrats like I want to see the
Democrats but but the algorithm has
locked me out now how about in person do
I see a lot of left leaning people in
person who would maybe correct me if I
had some wrong opinions because I'd only
seen one side of the issue I actually
don't I don't have any conversations
with people who disagree with me in
person I'm sure I'm sure there are
people who disagree with me but I don't
have any conversations about it you know
my daily life would be people who don't
care about politics at all let me say
that again I don't spend time with
people who care about politics at
all you should see me trying to talk
about my day hey how was your day
um whole bunch of things you don't care
about and I'm done that's my whole day
bunch of stuff that none of you care
about who you know I know well enough to
see in
person I think I have one or two friends
you know who engage in that content and
otherwise nobody cares so here's my
point imagine you're Alex
Soros how many staunch Republicans do
you encounter in person and have
meaningful conversations with I'm
guessing zero
would you argue with that I'm guessing
exactly zero so I think you could rule
out that anybody in person is saying you
know Alex maybe that thing you're
looking at is not the whole story or
have you consider this I don't think it
happens because it doesn't happen to
me and if it doesn't happen to me why
would it happen to him so I I because I
think my situation is normal you know
you just you just get closed off in your
little bubble and people don't want to
make trouble too
right people don't want to since Alex
sorus is Rich probably his friends who
maybe even do disagree with them a
little bit maybe they don't mention it
because they kind of like having a rich
friend that's a thing so I don't think
he hears any consenting opin desent no
any disagreeing opinions in person now
do you think he sees them in the
media how often is he reading
Breitbart zero how often does he spend
time on Fox
News
zero I'm guessing zero right how often
does he follow me on social media he
doesn't I follow him he doesn't follow
me so my best guess is he's actually has
no exposure whatsoever to a countering
argument that he would find stronger
than his own opinion and there are op
there are C arguments that are stronger
than his own
opinion a lot
stronger so um but here's the uh the
beauty of the story is that now he he
posted this thing he he might have
noticed that my account um countered
him because I have a million followers
remember I told you if I had a million
followers I could run the
world this is what I'm talking
about because the only way I could break
through that bubble is if my account is
big enough that somebody's going to
either mention it to him or he's going
to notice it on his own because it's a
big
account you need about a million people
to break through the bubble on the other
side and and then only sometimes like
you have to do your best work to like
get in there in any way but on top of
that um the community notes said so it
was added to the Soros uh post so
Community note says on X the five cities
with the highest murder rate and their
Mayors are and it goes you know St Louis
Baltimore New Orleans Detroit Cleveland
and they're all Democrats so the top
five murder cities are all
Democrats now the other thing I
criticized Alex's uh post was that
murder isn't really the big
question murder is the worst crime but
it's not the big question when we're
talking about the um liberal Das cuz
unless I'm wrong about this can you give
me a fact check on this Democrats don't
like murder do they I I think they're
opposed to murderers so I don't think
there's a giant difference between
Democrats and Republicans when it comes
to whether a murderer should be in jail
am I wrong about
that AR aren't they pretty close when it
comes to
murder CU nobody's disagreeing like well
maybe that murderer should get
bail I don't think so but all of the
other crimes the property crimes and the
the Lesser violence those are the ones
that really would show if you're looking
for what's the impact of a progressive
da so when Alex looks at murder rates
he's first of all looking in the wrong
box that's not where the problem would
be probably you know I would look there
too but I'm not looking to expect the
problem there so it's a version and if
he can get you to think that murder rate
is a key metric then he wins cuz it's
not the key metric it's the one you
should ignore the most
actually perhaps so now that they got a
community note and uh I think uh oh and
El Elon Musk actually weighed in on this
because the community note and he said
those who can't handle reality will
leave this platform uh due to community
notes
but the public will increasingly come to
realize this is still musk uh that X is
the best source of Truth causing our
user numbers to Rises the abandoned less
accurate sources of
information true true yeah and X is
rising in traffic so it's working
so so now there are three things that
happened with Alex's um four things
actually with Alex's post which are all
productive in my opinion
number one a a high high account you
know with a lot of traffic in mine
countered him in a way which if I may be
humble was really succinct and on
point so he could have noticed that
maybe not but he could have number
two um the community notes makes it a
bigger story so the odds that he got
fact checked by Community notes raises
again the odds that he
sought number
three um Elon Musk weighed in in favor
of the community notes obviously so I
think everybody notices when Elon Musk
comments on their work would you agree
how do you not notice if Elon Musk
comments on your note on X so that
probably takes it to the next level of
he'll probably see it so that's three
things that are working in the right
direction the fourth thing and again
with all
modesty if I did a good job of showing
that that was the wrong
comparison then it also educated a
million
people to if they see it again say oh
that's the wrong
comparison and that's really valuable
because that means that that Alex Soros
might hear it from different places at
different times and the more you hear
the same thing the more true it
becomes right
so that's uh that's the update on
that
um the uh publication called Dead spin
which apparently is just a bunch of
racists um they said that uh the NFL
needs to speak out against the one
writer said uh the NFL needs to speak
out against the Kansas City Chiefs fan
and black face and Native headdress oh
my God so there was a young boy who who
was wearing black face and a native you
know a native uh head
headgear and she' be called out for that
that black face oh except it was only
black face on one side the other side
was painted red because it was the color
of the team black and
red had nothing to do with
blackface so do you know who called them
out Community notes Community notes for
the win call them
out I'm starting to think that Community
notes uh it's you know it's in a nent
form so it should get better over time
it's one of the greatest
inventions in modern
history is simple it's a simple little
model and the model is if you didn't
know the model is that people of all
types left and right leaning have to
agree on the note or it can't go
forward so Community notes doesn't have
the option of being biased because the
other people will say nope nope too
biased and that's it it it just doesn't
go anywhere if one side says that biased
but if one side says somebody's talking
about the murder rate in these
cities and the side that wants to you
know make the opposite Point says we're
just going to say what the murder rate
is do you disagree that the data we're
using is correct and then the left says
oh that is on point and the data is
correct what are we going to do we we
don't love it we don't love it but we're
honest Brokers and what you're saying is
on point and it is honest that's
huge that the fact that that works at
all
is just amazing it's really one of the
the greatest things I've ever seen in
invention wise as an invention is just
one of the greatest
things all right um let's talk about the
musk trip to Israel now that we've got a
little time to digest it you know Elan
musk had been accused of being an
anti-semite for something he said that
was obviously taken out of context
advertisers left because of the protest
so partly partly to address that
obviously but also partly because he's
very interested in the world and peace
and you know keeping things together on
this planet he decided to go over to
Israel and he spent the day with
Netanyahu he toured the kabut where much
of the violence happened on October 7th
he watched the uh the video compilation
from the GoPro cameras of the terrorists
you know with Horrors that I would never
watch that I can't even imagine having
that in my head um one of the uh family
members of a kidnapped person uh offered
him the dog tags of the kidnapped person
who's not yet released Elon said he
would wear the dog tags until the family
member was
released oh my God he's good at
this oh my God he's good at
this um
and but here here's the the kill shot to
the whole thing so the the trip itself
was in my opinion Pitch
Perfect he hit every note right every
note here here's the things he got right
100% backing Israel to kill Hamas
because they have a preference for
killing civilians and he says if if
somebody wants to kill civilians the
only way to deal with them is kill
him perfect perfect then he says he's is
willing to help rebuild uh
Gaza oh my God now I don't know what
that help would look like but if you
were a Gaza resident and you hope to
ever go back and you found out that the
most capable person who designs anything
he's the best product person in the
world right now the best product
designer for any design if it's a
product is Elon Musk and if the product
is a new city just
imagine I mean can you imagine what he
could do with a whole city if he starts
from scratch you know putting in
self-driving cars and you know uh Tesla
solar panels and he's probably got some
good idea for
desalinization I mean it could be crazy
it could be just crazy how good it is
when he's
done so we don't know what kind of help
he's going to give but to say he's going
to help um allows him to be on both
sides because he needs to be on both
sides when I say both sides I mean he
needs to be on the side of
life for both sides not guilty life but
he's on the side of innocent life and
that's the right place to be so he gave
something for Israel you know he showed
them he showed them the the respect and
the consideration and and really he
literally damaged himself permanently to
make the
point I will never watch that video of
the actual Massacre because I do not
want that in my head I know what that
would do to me I would be permanently
damaged that's brain damage right he
actually signed up for intentional brain
damage to show the degree of support he
has for this he will never forget those
videos they they will they will be there
like a like a virus or a or a disease in
his brain for the rest of his life the
rest of his life he'll be damaged by
that and he did that
voluntarily amazing really so and then
he also talked about the U the
densification of Gaza and he talked
about how the importance of controlling
the school system so that the education
doesn't produce more
terrorists is there any note that he
missed he didn't miss a
note that that is as
perfect as you can do this kind of stuff
I've never seen anybody do it that well
actually that's the best I've ever
seen and I would like to uh compliment
Israel and
netanyahu's staff because they were as
wise as musk was in knowing how to do
this for you know Optimum Mutual
benefit uh but here's the here's the uh
punchline or the kill shot to ad all I
don't know if you know this name Dove uh
hiken uh used to be in politics in New
York state but uh he's he's well known
as a defender of Jews defender of Israel
you know one of one of the stronger more
public voices about who's an anti-semite
and who's not
and he did a video he didn't just do a
post with words he did a whole video in
which he said I've devoted over 50 years
to fighting Jew hatred I can smell an
anti-semite a mile away and let's be
completely clear on this Elon Musk is no
anti-semite now I am going to give him a
little bit of
uh Dove because he had to add this
he's made some mistakes in his
judgment
you know I do that too like if I'm
supporting somebody that I don't support
every single thing they've ever done you
know I'll do that well you know he's
made some
mistakes but here's the better way to do
it the better way to do it is to say I
haven't agreed with him on
everything it's kind of a dick move to
say he's made some mistakes in the same
breath that you're supporting him it's
just a dick move so Dove is you know got
a great reputation does good work so I
respect him and his work so this would
just be advice not criticism I wouldn't
word it that way if your if your overall
point is supportive don't say he's made
some mistakes say I would have done it
differently it's the same thing but it's
just not a dick way to say
it all right I would like to call your
attention to an account which fascinates
me because I'm surprised he's still
alive
all right the account is called martyr
made it's two words if you just search
for that on X so Marr and the word made
um m a d
and
um here's why it's
interesting so this account is doing a
pretty aggressive effort of trying to do
what I'll call I'll put this in
quotes uh both siding the issue both
siding the issue issue with Gaza and the
Palestinians and Israel now he's not
bull sightings October 7th right he's
completely against the violence of
October 7th he's not pramas not pramas
let me say that three times he's not
pramas not not not okay but he is trying
to to create a complete picture so that
we better understand what everybody's
thinking and that part is is a value but
it is really dangerous territory because
you so easily could get lumped in with
the supporting Hamas and then you know
your life is destroyed so I respect him
for the risk that he's taking in the
service of making sure that we have a
more complete understanding of things
however watch me watch me not say he
made some mistakes because right I'm I'm
going to model my own opinion I would
say there are a few things that that I
would have handled differently see isn't
that
better like you keep your respect to the
person but you can still say there are a
few things I would handled differently
so on one of his posts
today um he was talking about well I'll
just read his post so he said this and
I'll tell you what I I had a problem
with he said where did people get this
idea that half a century of brutal
military occupation he's talking about
Israel and the Palestinians could
possibly result in anything but burning
hatred of the occupiers his word by the
occupied how would you feel about
foreign soldiers strip searching your
sister or killing your little nephew of
course those are anecdotals and things
now so here was my response number one
good
question that's a good question how
would you
feel perfectly good question but it's
not the only questions so where I would
have handled it differently is this is a
totally good question but it's
incomplete and in its
incompleteness it maybe is
misleading so here are the questions I
asked a related question is whether
Israel would be under the same level of
danger from
Hamas no matter what they
did don't you think that murder Ma's
assumption is that Israel would be under
less
risk if they only treated the
Palestinians the way the Palestinians
wanted to be
treated that's a good question too CU my
assumption is that Israel would be under
exactly the same risk
because the I I never hear the
Palestinians say you strip searched my
sister I've never heard that I mean I'm
sure that there you know plenty of
people mad about plenty of things but it
doesn't rise to the level of political
speech when they talk politically they
say we want to wipe out Israel and kill
all the Jews Hamas do not the
Palestinians per
se so it seems to me that the point of
view that um all Israel all Jews must be
removed from Israel and from The River
To The Sea I don't think Israel would be
any
safer if they were just the nicest
people the world in every possible way
from water rights to travel to security
I don't think it would make any
difference do
you it would definitely make a
difference for the non-military
population for how they feel about the
whole thing but it wouldn't affect Hamas
Hamas doesn't even have a list of
Demands have you ever seen a list of
Demands you know stop strip searching
our women and whatever else is on it you
know water rights and travel and I
haven't even seen it if if the leaders
of the Palestinians wanted the public to
be looking at you know the the real
treatment of how Israel treats you know
the the West Bank in Gaza Etc if they if
that was the
issue it would be at the top of the
issue yeah every day you'd say every day
you'd see the DU saying well what do you
expect you know Israel does this and
this and this to them so it's a natural
outcome I don't think anybody's thinking
that way I think you got people who are
trained to want to destroy all
Jews and that's the beginning and the
end of the
conversation so
now but should Israel treat all the
Palestinians in the best possible
way probably but what is the argument
for why they
wouldn't what what do you suppose would
be Israel's counterargument to the
Palestinians say hey we're treated
terribly
here I think the answer would be the
only reason we do any of this stuff is
because of the security threat we
wouldn't need to search your sister if
somebody's sister were not coming in
here from trying to kill us right so I
think the response would be if you can
make the security system go away then we
could fix a lot of these things that
you're complaining about in daily life I
assume that would be the argument now
I'm not taking aide
if it if it felt like I'm taking aside
I'm not CU I don't really know you know
the the more daily life problems and and
which way the security concerns go
that's a little more complicated than I
could wrap my head around I'm just
telling you that that should be a
question too if the question is how
would you feel if you were abused this
long you got to ask why are they abusing
you is it strictly for security or is it
economic religious is there something
else going on i' i' like to know that
and then the next question
is what other options did the
Palestinians
have was their only option to suffer and
then support
Hamas because in my view of things um
the Palestinians have had enough
International public support for enough
years that they should have very clearly
you know succinctly stated their maybe
top five demands and what they needed
and I think they would have got
them the trouble is that one of their
top five demands and maybe number one is
okay number one kill all the Jews and
remove remove their corpses from
Israel like so here's the problem I
don't think that the Palestinians or
anybody in power could have ever put
together a list of if you just do these
five things we can live in peace you
we're just asking you stop abusing Us in
these five ways
nobody's ever done
that here's why I think they don't do it
if a Palestinian leader put together a
list of five things that you needed to
do in order to have peace and none of
those five things said uh get all Jews
out of
Israel the leader of the Palestinians
would be executed by his own
people he would be dead for putting
together a list that would give them
peace without their primary objective of
getting control of
Israel so in my opinion the Palestinians
uh clear clear strategy of not asking
for the other stuff and and making that
like a the entire package of claims
seems to be a
preference you know maybe it's not a
conscious preference
but in terms of the whole it operates as
a preference and the preference is if we
can't get this one thing which is all
the Jews out of Israel if we can't get
that we don't even need to talk about 4
through five it's like you know we need
that first that's the opening bid
there's nothing to talk about under
those conditions under those conditions
Israel has a free pass I hate to say it
you know I don't mean on a Moral Moral
or ethical basis but they have a free
pass cuz their situation would not get
worse
if they were nicer or would not get
better if they were nicer so that kind
of limits their options as
well anyway I don't have a uh a hard
opinion about what should happen over
there what I have is an
observation that there aren't any good
guys that are organized enough to deal
with them so Israel always says we would
negotiate peace if he told us who to
negotiate with have you heard that
before who who are we going to talk
to there's nobody to talk to how do you
do a peace deal when you literally can't
even get a meeting with anybody who's in
charge who would even be a little bit
interested in it so that's a good point
too anyway so um Mike Ben continues to
be a national treasur here as he's
helping us expl he's helping us
understand how much influence the
security State you know the intelligence
agencies have have on our daily life
because you don't realize how much
control they have over various entities
and groups and the media Etc and so Mike
Ben on the xplatform is always calling
that out now he points out that Business
Insider a publication which seems to be
very opinionated about some political
stuff um was bought a few years ago by
what Mike calls a major CIA media
conduit so uh some I think a German
entity or something but the publishing
company that bought it apparently is
well understood as a CIA cutout and
we're not
guessing and and apparently we know
there's this thing
called uh what's it called the Integrity
initiative this is also from Mike
Benz something called the Integrity
initiative was this big
umbrella group that would be the sort of
U
Mothership for all these different uh
cutouts that look like they're
independent people but they're really
you know they're just sent by the
mothership so a lot of the people from
One go to the other you know there's a
lot of cross-pollination of the people
now if you didn't know
that you would read Business Insider and
you'd say hey there's
news but if you know it you know that
the only news that would be in Business
Insider if I'll just say F this CIA
influence is still working through the
buyer all the way down to the stories
don't know but if that's the case then
you'd have to read their coverage with
one eyebrow up it's like I don't know
maybe maybe yes maybe
no so don't believe anything about that
there interesting story about the Trump
lawyers I saw one opinion that well I'll
tell you what that was his lawyers have
asked for uh all information regarding
government informance on January
6 so you think to yourself
aha Trump's defense is going to be that
there were so many Feds that they were
the reason for the violence aha that's
what you say right but apparently the
lawyers are explaining in their uh
request for this information they're
saying it's uh not because he thought
the feds instigated the problem but
rather wait for for it because it would
indicate whether the feds did enough to
prevent it in other words in other words
they're going to argue there weren't
enough agents
there now here's what I think this is
just my
speculation I think this is just the
cleverest way to find out how many
agents were there because if you said
tell us how many agents are there
couldn't the government say we can't
tell you
that and then that's the end of it but
suppose they say we're trying to prove
that they didn't have enough there would
that put a different kind of pressure on
them to um to say we did a good job
because we had enough people
there th this might be way more clever
than you think it
is uh but it was described by one
Observer as as uh basically giving up on
the idea that there were so many feds
there that the feds caused the problem
like he's giving up on that I don't see
that I don't think they're giving up on
that at all I think if they have the
number of Agents if if it's a low here's
what I think if they get a number which
is iffy if they get a number and it's
like a low number then they can claim
well that's the problem you knew there
was going to be a problem why did you
have so few people there how is that my
fault that everybody knew this was
coming cuz they did everybody knew the
protest coming and and you underst
staffed so you
understaffed but I got impeached because
you understaffed is that is that what
you're telling me so that would be one
argument now suppose Against All Odds
they give a number it's like a crazy big
number suppose they come out there like
80 or 100 undercover of people if you
heard there were 100 of them and I'm
just making up that number no reason to
believe it wouldn't you say to yourself
well they must have caused it yeah
because 100 could have stopped it you
know that's what your brain would say
that's not necessarily true but your
brain would say man if they had 100
people they could have stopped it but
they must have been there to start
it right so your brain would play tricks
on you if it's a big number and it would
play a different trick on you if it's a
l a small number
so I think Trump might have a good
lawyer in the in that mix there there's
something about this I like so much so
much well speaking of Biden and
inflation so Biden's trying to argue
that corporations raised their prices
because their own their own costs were
high but then when the inflation went
down according to Biden but not too many
other people the corporations didn't
lower the prices so you know what the
problem is it's those
corporations no it's not how much money
he printed it's not how much he borrowed
no no no it's those evil
corporations that's all he
has imagine having nothing else to run
on but that yeah inflation's high but I
blame the
corporations because you know what the
free market stopped
working that's right the free market has
stopped working that's what he's
arguing
because if if a company raised its
prices and then its cost of production
went down but it didn't lower its price
it's competing against
somebody you know unless there's
collusion or Monopoly activity that
could be
too anyway uh Trump is finding a way to
lose it looks like uh Trump is going to
take a crack at getting rid of
Obamacare that is such a losing
strategy my God how many times have I
told you that nobody's even brought up
Medicare I'm sorry nobody brought up
health care healthc care became was the
biggest thing and it just stopped being
an
issue when was the last time you heard
anybody complain about
Obamacare a year I haven't even heard
the name in two years
probably well so here's what I think
uh I said this in the beginning and I'm
going to double down on it I think Obama
was a genius about
Obamacare and in public Obama said that
Obamacare was basically a
mess but once it got in the system it
would be too hard to remove it and so
the government would be forced to keep
tweaking and improving it until he had
something that worked because remember
Healthcare was like this huge unsolvable
problem no nobody could figure out how
to create a good health care system that
would also be supported by
people there wasn't any way to do it if
he had the best idea in the world the
other side would have said no and there
just wasn't any way to make a good one
so instead of making a good one he
actually in public said directly so
we're going to give you a bad one and
we're going to stick it with the country
and when they're too hooked on it
they'll have to fix it
and that's actually happening I think I
I think that I think there have been
enough
tweaks um I think there probably been
enough tweaks that people just stopped
complaining about it or they adjusted to
the cost got used to it started worrying
about other things but here's my point
uh I'm not going to make an argument
that Obamacare is good if you heard that
that's not what I'm saying let me say it
again I'm not making an argument that
Obamacare is good
my argument is it's no longer a
political question but if Trump says I'm
going to get rid of it it's just going
to turn into the worst political thing
of all time you should just ignore it if
people if nobody's complaining about it
at least you know in the media and
social media I don't see anybody
complaining if they're not complaining
move on to something they are
complaining about that you can fix that
to me to me this would be like the um
the abortion
question it would be another way to lose
un principle on principle he might say
you know this has to be fixed I know
people aren't complaining but on
principle there's some things wrong with
it we need to fix but that's how you
lose an election on
principle so you have to make that
decision you have to make the
v v the vake
decision to just say I'm trying to win
this time you know so I'm going to let
Tik Tok survive until I
win all
right
um and that ladies and
gentlemen concludes my prepared remarks
for what will no doubt be the best live
stream you've ever seen in your life
probably probably will go down in
history as the greatest thing that ever
happened all right um yeah hit that
subscribe button hit the like
button you YouTubers you know what I
realize I don't do it's so
dumb yeah you're going to laugh at how
dumb this
is uh after after I do the uh live
stream you know this this will become
posted as a as a recorded video on
YouTube I never remember to retweet
it the the most obvious thing you should
do like I create this content and it
just sits there and I don't even promote
it I think I might start doing that
today anyway hit the subscription button
if you like it and uh thanks for joining
you are
wonderful um you can persuade him to
talk to you in an interview online I
don't know we'll
try bye for