Back to episode — Episode 2309 Scott Adams - CWSA 12/01/23 The News Has A Pattern Lately. I'll Tell You What It Means
Context —
o the government they are guilty until proven innocent. I would say at this point the weight of evidence suggests that we have a blackmail-based government and maybe other countries as well. Would you say that's a fair assessment of our current government? That it is a blackmail. Fundamentally that's the operating system of the government, is blackmail. Now it only makes sense because I've told yo…
← Previous segment →r Carlson for his VP? I'm going to put the odds of that at zero. Yeah, everybody on Locals is saying no, zero. Because it would bring him more heat, not less. Tucker has his own set of historic huge group of critics. You don't bring that into your campaign. And Ben Carson is a ridiculous idea. Honestly, yeah there's no way he's going to pick Ben Carson. If he picks Ben Carson that's like giving up. I mean Ben Carson is like taxidermy more than politics. I mean I need signs of life. When somebody said that he was considering Ben Carson I literally said to myself, is he still alive? I thought he passed away. But then compare that to Vivek or DeSantis in the unlikely case. Yeah, there are tons of people who would be better than Tucker. Tucker would be awesome and fun but it wouldn't get Trump elected.
All right. Ken Paxton, AG of Texas, is suing Pfizer for misrepresenting COVID-19 vaccine efficacy and conspiring to censor the public discourse. Now the beauty of this is not that it'll necessarily win on anything but that it will cause discovery. So at least the legal system will cause Pfizer to tell us everything they know as much as possible. So that could get interesting.
Now I saw a doctor say the other day that it is now well understood—I guess that's debatable—that the vaccine did not work enough to make it worthwhile for any group except one group with comorbidities. Does that match your opinion? Would you say that there's still one population of people who are over a certain age and maybe had a comorbidity that they still believe maybe it was better, it was more good than bad? Maybe there's bad as well. But is it true that the consensus is that everybody was worse off on average except for this group of special people above a certain age and with comorbidities? So I'm seeing lots of yeses, seeing lots of yeses but also some nos.
All right, so I guess you could argue what the consensus is. But my understanding is that the data still supports the idea that there was this specific group of people who benefited on average. Isn't it a
Context —
mazing that we would disagree on this? I don't know what's true by the way. I don't know what's true. I do know that doctors say that there was one group that probably came out ahead. Now the reason I ask is because I'm in that group. But I don't know if it's true. Maybe we'll find out if it's true from this lawsuit. But maybe. And I just point out that most of the people who mock me because I got…
Next segment → →