Coffee With Scott Adams — Knowledge Archive May 24, 2026
Scott Adams Philosophy Archive
Search ideas

Context —

, an AI. It remembered my encounter and then it made a prediction about me in the context of the world in which it and I existed as individuals and it did it correctly. Now you say to yourself but what about the part where it has feelings and sensations? Well let me ask you if I were to give you an injection say a shot which numbed your entire body in a way that you couldn't even feel the numbnes…

← Previous segment →

ould want to put a brand on it so it could never be forgotten.

If she had simply said we have claims and you know I don't want to give you the details but they're pretty bad would you remember it? It'd be harder to remember. But once she said it's the Kraken and all the news said she says it's a Kraken there's a Kraken coming boy if you don't deliver a Kraken what does it do to you? It destroys your credibility for the rest of time and that's what happened.

So the most powerful ally of President Trump who the machine was trying to take out ends up that she has the weirdest she believes this weirdest Kraken story and then is completely disgraced when it's disproven or not proven.

Now you tell me that Tucker Carlson having secret sources that he won't tell you about who do you think that is? He's got secret sources that he won't tell you about not stuff that's been on TV. He has extra. Now probably whoever he's talking to is not necessarily a CIA agent might be but not necessarily but could it be somebody that's an associate someone who was influenced by or someone that the CIA influenced to believe it's true so by the time they talk to Tucker they're very credible because they believe it's true but maybe got fed to them.

Here's what I believe. I believe somebody's trying to take out Tucker Carlson by making him believe in these spiritual entities or whatever they are that can't be proven and it's just it's basically a way to degrade his power and that he's falling for it. Because one of the things they would know about Tucker in terms of his personality part of his personality he says directly to you he likes conspiracy theories and that he's drawn to them. He says that directly and he said it a number of times.

So he makes no bones about the fact that if the conspiracy theory has a little bit of meat to it he likes to take a big bite out of it right. Now if you were going to take down Tucker Carlson and you were really good at it you know you're an intel group that would be his weakness and he told you what it was. He actually broadcast his own weakness. His own weakness is the propensity to believe something before all the evidence is there if it's like a good little package of a conspiracy theory.

I feel like it's a Kennedy. I feel like Tucker better be careful because I think this is a play on his credibility.

Now here's my argument for why UFOs. Well I'll let you decide if they're real. There are two UFO possibilities. Let me explain them. One is there's something to it. The something to it could include an actual space alien. It could include creatures that are human but have been hiding in the Earth for centuries. It's Atlantis. Could include Atlantis. Could include a spiritual entity you know angels and demons something like that.

Now I'll put those as one package of things and don't think that one of those has an impact on the other credibility of the others. I'm putting them as just the there is something there. Would you agree with I can package them all up as there's something there.

And then alternately to believe there's nothing there what would you have to believe? You have to believe a lot right? You'd have to believe that multiple witnesses who have serious careers are willing to go under oath in front of the whole country to say something that they either know isn't true or they're crazy and they're so crazy that they act not crazy. Isn't it kind of hard to believe that all those people would want to ruin their whole careers? Very hard to believe.

And then you have the sensors from the airplanes etc. that have picked up real objects that don't seem to be moving according to the laws of physics. Now for that to be wrong given there not one sighting it's multiple reports very similar it's on the instruments and they even have video. They have video right? I mean it's grainy it looks like a Tic Tac but it's there. There was another one today they showed that there was an orb apparently allegedly followi

Context —

ng the president's Air Force One just the other day or today or something. So you got video you know massive video you got sensors you got the most credible people some of them are not but you have plenty of credible people with similar stories putting their careers and even suppose risking jail if they lied to Congress. So now what are the odds that given all of that evidence what are the odds…

Next segment → →