e true to every human in the world. No doubt. So there is no doubt that Donald Trump is a threat to our liberties and even to our democracy. Now what was the part about his policies? I say that's it. Where's the part about when he was president last time which wasn't too long ago he did all of these terrible things and took away your liberties? I don't remember that happening. I feel like that was kind of weird that Trump waited until the second term to take away our liberties. Why doesn't he take away our liberties in the first four years if he's going to take away our liberties?

So you can see now that even Newsom who is sort of the standard of quality for the Democrats he's basically the best they have. I hate to say it he's the best they have and he's not even touching policy. The only way he'll touch policy is to tell you it's like Hitler. So he's you know roughly touching on immigration policy but he doesn't mention it. It's like well Hitler what do you think about Trump's policy about energy and drill baby drill? Well Hitler what do you think about Trump's saying he could you know stop the war in Ukraine? Well Hitler. That's all they have. More cowbell I tell you.

Consistently that you can't understand politics until you understand the players. So wherever I can I'm going to tell you about a player that you'll remember that the next time you see that player you'll know you're not dealing with an honest broker of information right. Have you heard of a publication called The Atlantic? Well The Atlantic is perhaps the very worst of the absurdly political biased anti-Trump deranged but because The Atlantic is an old institution as a publication there are many people as in Democrats who don't know it's not a legitimate publication. I mean it's not even close to legitimate. It's just a purely political instrument. So what did they say? Today they had an article says in the debate over freedom versus control of the global network meaning the internet freedom versus control China was largely correct and the US was wrong. Yes The Atlantic would like you to believe that China is more correct in censoring their internet because the only way the Democrats can win is to prevent Republicans from having free speech. They're kind of saying it directly now.

Now here's the important part. The fact that it's in The Atlantic tells you that it's basically a Democrat op. It's not just a bunch of people who agree with Democrats it's more likely very connected to the Democrat strategy than just you know randomly agrees with them. If the Democrat strategy is to get you feeling a little bit better about Chinese level censorship or the Iranian model where the Ayatollah decides who's on the ballot oh yeah we have democracy here you can vote for anybody you want as long as I've approved them being on the ballot. So that's what they're trying to do with Trump. You can vote for anybody you want but we're going to tell you who can be on the ballot. So yeah so The Atlantic is part of this mass misinformation Democrat machine that's trying to propagandize you or prime you for greater internet control. Do you know why? Because that misinformation that you're getting in other words everything Republicans say according to them that misinformation would lead to what? What would it lead to? Could it lead to losing your liberty and your democracy? Yeah so The Atlantic is one of the ones to keep in your mind that whatever they're saying is an op. It's not news and it's not exactly even an opinion. It's not even the real opinion of the people saying it. It's an op. You should see it that way. It's just pure propaganda.

Well this is disturbing. Congressman Tim Burchett described on a podcast how the blackmail operations work in Congress. Now what is scarier than thinking the worst about something and then finding out it's exactly correct? Now I don't know if Tim Burchett has seen this or he's just like us where he just assumes it's true but he's there. I feel like he saw it. Here's how he describes the system. Now remember he's in the system. He's not like us he's not looking from the outside. He's in the system that he's describing this way. Quote this is how it works. You're visiting you're out of the country you're out of town or you're in a motel or bar in DC and some whatever you're into women or men or whatever comes up and they're very attractive and they're laughing at your jokes and you're buying them a drink and next thing you know you're in the motel room with them naked and the next thing you know you're about to make a key vote and what happens some well-dressed person comes up and whispers in your ear hey man there's tape. Sound on. You were you in a hotel room on whatever with whoever and then you're like oh and said you really ought to be not be voting for this thing. Do you think that's accurate? I mean he could not be a better source. He's right in the middle of this world. Is it literally that obvious? It's like right on the nose. They literally have the what do you call it the sugar trap or something. There's some name for it. What's the name for that when it's a honey pot? Yeah so it's a honey trap. It's a honeypot. That literally there's honeypot and that literally somebody comes up and says we have tapes.

Now I'm sure that has happened in American history and you know numerous times I'm sure but I wonder how universal it is. Does it describe literally everything? Because I think this has been happening since what J. Edgar Hoover that there's been you know like an ongoing blackmail operation.

Well do you know what makes this worse? Why are pol