Coffee With Scott Adams — Knowledge Archive May 24, 2026
Scott Adams Philosophy Archive
Search ideas
Episodes Episode #2331

Episode 2331 CWSA 12/23/23 A Shift In Consciousness, German Lessons On American Propaganda, More

Episode #2331 Dec 23, 2023 1:29:20 28,781 views

If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.

Opening The Golden Age

Good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams and there's never been a better time in your entire life. If you'd like this experience to go up to levels that you'll never forget in your small human brains can't even comprehend, well al…

View segment →
SimultaneousSip General Commentary

Go take a moment to sip here. If you're waking and baking, continue. Well I'm trying a new microphone setup for YouTube. It appears that the audio on YouTube should be a little worse than normal but clear. Yeah okay good looks like we're good. Here's something I learned just moments ago from an In…

View segment →
MainContent Media & Fake News

how Americans are propagandized by their government. Is that awesome or what? Right, German students learn how Americans are propagandized by their own government. Do you know who doesn't learn that? Americans. So if you want to find out what's happening to Americans you got to ask a German because…

View segment →
NewsReaction General Commentary

not buying into the aliens from another planet but that there is something here. How many of you believe that there's something here that's spiritual in nature? I'm going to go with nope there's nothing here. I'd love to believe there were. You know I like my conspiracy theories. I like them a lot b…

View segment →
MainContent Luck, Skill & Timing

or. Brian Remelli has a post on X telling us that there's a Sumerian tablet. So Sumeria, you all know where the Sumerians were right? Do you know where the Sumerians were? Let's check your general knowledge. That's correct yeah the area which we now call Iraq and you know the larger area there. So…

View segment →
MainContent Two Movie Screen

conquers a city but if you conquer a city you don't stay there and like run the city. Like why would you get rid of all the people and then leave it empty so long that it gets covered with sand like nobody's sweeping for a thousand years? If you were a homeless primitive person and you knew there wa…

View segment →
MainContent Cognitive Reframing

tually a clear picture, if you could trace the light coming into your eyes and then how that's translated into a signal and how that reaches your brain, if you could see that somehow separate from how your brain is processing it you would see it's just this big fuzzy approximate thing. Yeah and that…

View segment →
NewsReaction Politics as Persuasion

ment will always be clear but it's not actually what's there or what your eye is picking up. So yeah reality is kind of weird. The other possibility is that these coincidences are something called a coincidence and they don't mean anything at all and you're not in the simulation and there are no do…

View segment →
MainContent Media & Fake News

ent than both of us. So it could be that the genes you know did their thing and I just became very much like my grandfather. Now here's the interesting thing. I don't know if epigenetics or Lamarckian stuff I don't know if any of that's real. Is it possible that a grandfather could have a life expe…

View segment →
MainContent Persuasion

step so they didn't want to do it just because it's important. I like that. I like the fact that they weren't willing to do it just because it's important because that wasn't the right reason. That's not the reason. The reason should be that the lower court didn't get it right or something and there…

View segment →
MainContent Economics & Finance

ke you're flying blind. So you don't need to change your opinion that it's completely political because I think there's enough obvious evidence for that but if you think you proved it because of this I don't see it. You're going to have to do better. I'm just going to guess what he would say. Here'…

View segment →
NewsReaction Politics as Persuasion

is but against the top players let's say he's playing somebody who has the best backhand in the world. They like oh my God you don't want to hit to their backhand. Do you know what he would do? Hit to their backhand because it was their best shot. Because if he could break it down there was nothing…

View segment →
MainContent Politics as Persuasion

ask you if they compare him to every dictator in the world and it's all they have between now and election day who wins? If it's all they have it's just more cowbell. It's going to sound like people will just be used to it and it'll just look stupid. Yeah so let me give you a good general rule for…

View segment →
NewsReaction Politics as Persuasion

e true to every human in the world. No doubt. So there is no doubt that Donald Trump is a threat to our liberties and even to our democracy. Now what was the part about his policies? I say that's it. Where's the part about when he was president last time which wasn't too long ago he did all of these…

View segment →
MainContent Politics as Persuasion

iticians easy to blackmail? I'm going there's an obvious reason. Do you know why? I mean other than the fact they do bad things but other people do bad things too. I have a feeling that one of the reasons people go into politics is that they're too ugly to get laid otherwise. Am I wrong? Look look a…

View segment →
NewsReaction Politics as Persuasion

ked the question just brainstorm right? I absolutely like that he asked the question. I had no problem with that at all. So when he asked the question what about Nikki Haley as vice president that is not an indication that he likes her on the ticket. To me that's the normal Trump way of doing busine…

View segment →
MainContent Cognitive Reframing

ecause you should ask yourself how will the school kids respond to naming my child Jack Cass? Do you think that will cause any problems? Now I only mentioned that because I grew up with somebody named Jack Cass. Yeah I mean he his born name was Jonathan but everybody called him Jack. So yeah don't d…

View segment →
NewsReaction Media & Fake News

ces. Wait you're saying you're saying that the news the DOJ the FBI all of them he's going after all of them. Do you see the pattern? Those doppelgangers are people who are noticing patterns. It just happens to be a trivial pattern it's not important you know somebody looks like somebody else but th…

View segment →
MainContent Career & Life Strategy

ed 40 murderers. Now as amuse asks what possible reason what's the reason for that? Now I do know that when politicians are leaving office and retiring it's not that unusual to pardon a bunch of people that maybe you think shouldn't be pardoned but murderers 40 murderers. You what it makes me wonder…

View segment →
Closing General Commentary

in California you know gets in the 40s I can make a fire and put some blankets on me I could live right but if you lose your electricity in Wisconsin in February like if the whole state loses its power well good luck with that. So I've always picked tried to pick situations where you have lots of es…

View segment →

Good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams and there's never been a better time in your entire life. If you'd like this experience to go up to levels that you'll never forget in your small human brains can't even comprehend, well all you need for that is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tankard, a goblet, a can or a jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine of the day, the thing that makes everything better. It's called, that's right, it's a simultaneous sip and it happens now.

Go take a moment to sip here. If you're waking and baking, continue.

Well I'm trying a new microphone setup for YouTube. It appears that the audio on YouTube should be a little worse than normal but clear. Yeah okay good looks like we're good.

Here's something I learned just moments ago from an Instagram video apparently and I saw screenshots so I think this is real. The German high school students have lessons on how Americans are propagandized by their government. Is that awesome or what? Right, German students learn how Americans are propagandized by their own government. Do you know who doesn't learn that? Americans. So if you want to find out what's happening to Americans you got to ask a German because they learn it in school. That's a real thing I think. I mean I'll take a fact check on this but there were screenshots and one of the German textbooks according to the screenshot says America has become no longer self-critical and lonely. And my first reaction to that was goddamn you Germans. Why are you calling us not self-critical and lonely? Okay you're right it's true you nailed it but why do you have to say that about us? Damn it stop being accurate.

Tucker Carlson clarified his belief about what the unusual UAPs, some call them UFOs, are all about and he believes that these beings have always been here. So Tucker believes there are real beings, some kind of other civilization that have always been here and that they have a spiritual component. Interesting. So he's not buying into the aliens from another planet but that there is something here. How many of you believe that there's something here that's spiritual in nature? I'm going to go with nope there's nothing here. I'd love to believe there were. You know I like my conspiracy theories. I like them a lot but no.

Now let me reiterate why I don't believe it. I acknowledge there's a mountain of evidence. You've got your whistleblowers, eyewitnesses, you've got people under oath, you've got video, you've got radar, you've got sonar, you've got my God so much, so much. And none of us, good, there are a million things that have that much direct evidence that are not true. You want an example? How about President Trump once called neo-Nazis fine people. Well that must be true. There's tons of evidence. You can look at the video. All the news is reporting it. And then if you want to say well but is it true or is it like a one-off, well then you would look at all the mountain of evidence that suggests that Trump is a racist dictator. It's a mountain of evidence so it must be true. But it isn't true. I mean it seems to be it's not true.

So the most ordinary thing in the world is to have a mountain of evidence for something that isn't true because the evidence has a certain quality to it. It's all kind of sketchy. There's a lot of it but it's all kind of sketchy. Those are the ones you got to watch out for.

Brian Remelli has a post on X telling us that there's a Sumerian tablet. So Sumeria, you all know where the Sumerians were right? Do you know where the Sumerians were? Let's check your general knowledge. That's correct yeah the area which we now call Iraq and you know the larger area there. So the Sumerians were there thousands of years ago and they found this Sumerian tablet from 2000 BCE which apparently shows several math problems being solved including drawings of trapezoids and triangles. It suggests very strongly that the Sumerians understood the Pythagorean theorem long before the Greek philosopher Pythagoras. And Brian ends his post with the amnesia of who we really are.

Now I told you I'd like conspiracy theories. Here's the one I like the best. If we know that there are all these buried civilizations we keep finding like there's one whose name I can't recall, Göbekli Tepe. There's Göbekli Tepe and there's others like I said how many times do I have to say it clearly. Göbekli Tepe. But it's the name of another one of these ancient incredible sites that got dug up. It was completely buried and appears to have signs of civilization beyond what we believed existed at the time of these ruins. So there are lots of hints that there might have been an earlier form of humans that were more advanced and something happened so that we lost, maybe we lost what they knew.

So I got to believe that one because if you look at our ability to reconstruct history whether it's the evolutionary tree which is always changing and evolving or the history of humankind, you know did we all come out of Africa, is it more complicated than that? There are big things about the history of the planet that we revise all the time. I would not be surprised at all if we were once more advanced and it wasn't a straight line from primitive to advanced. I've got a feeling it was kind of a bumpy ride where we got more advanced and then we got wiped out by war and we got more advanced and then we got wiped out by a flood. You know probably something like that. It's my guess.

But I've always been amazed that there are abandoned cities. Why would you ever abandon a city? There's something I fundamentally don't understand about history. It's like a whole city. You built the thing. Now I understand if somebody conquers a city but if you conquer a city you don't stay there and like run the city. Like why would you get rid of all the people and then leave it empty so long that it gets covered with sand like nobody's sweeping for a thousand years? If you were a homeless primitive person and you knew there was a whole abandoned city somewhere wouldn't you move in? I don't know maybe it's food. It might be all about food and resources. Yeah I can understand disease but disease would kill everybody and then let's say it becomes empty but once it's empty are you telling me nobody wants to move back in? There's no other civilization that says hey free city there's nobody in the city let's just take it. Maybe superstition. Maybe they don't want to inhabit dead people's homes.

Mike Cernovich tweeted that he's been seeing more doppelgangers than usual. Doppelganger meaning somebody who looks just like somebody else. He said a friend even sent one of me meaning Cernovich. Could be code reuse as Scott Adams says. If so why now? Of course he's just being provocative and having fun with it. You know don't take it too seriously but how many of you are familiar with a book written decades ago called The Celestine Prophecy? Have you ever heard of that? It was a very influential, it's a fiction it's just a fictional story but a key concept in those books was that when people started noticing coincidences more often the coincidences were a signal for a consciousness shift that human awareness was about to take a leap.

Now I've always been fascinated by that and there's no reason in the world to think that a consciousness shift would be preceded by some kind of bunch of coincidences unless there's an obvious reason for it. You want to hear an obvious reason why you might notice more coincidences right before a perceptual shift? Like a really obvious reason. The coincidences were always there but your awareness improved and you're just noticing something that was right in front of you the whole time but you just didn't see it. So when somebody noticed a doppelganger of Mike Cernovich maybe a year ago they would have walked right past him not even noticed.

So I'm not saying any of this is true. I'm just having fun with it but you could imagine a situation in which the general awareness of the public is increasing and they not only see the big stuff more clearly such as the misinformation architecture of our existence such as the full propagandized news you know that sort of thing. If you're noticing the big stuff that you didn't really quite understand before wouldn't it make sense that you're also maybe noticing other patterns just because your pattern recognizer has gone to another level? And might we see other examples that would suggest that human awareness is reaching a new level?

Do you know anybody who predicted that human awareness was about to take a gigantic change? Yes that would be me in 2016 or 15 I can't remember. I predicted a number of times in public and nobody even commented on it because it was such a strange prediction that Trump would change more than politics. That he would rip a hole in the fabric of reality and change how we saw reality itself. One of my better predictions.

All right but let's take this a little bit further. Why are some other reasons that you might be able to see more coincidences? Well it could be like I said there's a coincidence storm that you apparently notice because your ability to notice things is getting better in general. Or here's another possibility. Maybe it is code reuse and we're a simulation. That we're literally a program and the program is reaching some limits you know physical limits because we keep getting more complicated. More people are born. Every person has a complicated life that has to integrate with every other complicated life. So you could quite easily imagine that even an amazingly powerful computer would reach some kind of limitation of its resources eventually. Doesn't have to but it could.

Now if you were the programmer and you were really good like you're not even an average programmer like you're a programmer from the future or even AI wrote it maybe AI programmed it so it really knew how to take care of every possibility. That's the best programmer right? The best programmer anticipates everything that could go wrong and then programs around it. So one of the things that could go wrong is you'd run out of resources. Then what are you going to do? Slow it down and then we all start moving in slow motion. Would we notice it? I think I'm moving in slow motion suddenly. No that's a bad solution. How about the program starts to reuse code so it doesn't have to make up new code all the time. That would save some resources. So maybe you would say oh hell I'm not going to design a new person I'll just copy some of the people I already have and they're not going to notice. Maybe. So maybe you're just running out of resources in the simulation. I don't think that's true but I like to put on all the fun possibilities.

But here's the thing you have to understand about what you see around you. If you could somehow know in where you're sitting right now as you're watching this your exact environment where you are, if you had some way to know how much of your actual environment that you think you see clearly is actually a clear picture, if you could trace the light coming into your eyes and then how that's translated into a signal and how that reaches your brain, if you could see that somehow separate from how your brain is processing it you would see it's just this big fuzzy approximate thing. Yeah and that would blow your mind. It's a good thing you can't see that. What's really happening is your brain is making you see clarity where it nonexists.

Let me tell you what's probably close to real. All right if I hold this object in my hand and I put all my focus on it there's a reasonably good chance that I'm seeing this very simple clean object in the middle of my field somewhat close to how it actually exists but everything in my peripheral I imagine is also clear but I'm not looking at it at the moment but probably it's all just invented. It's just sort of like this general canvas of invention that your brain is putting in there because your brain can't see everything clearly.

Here's where I learned this first. A tennis player who watches ball hit near a line and then you know there's an argument hey I saw it clearly hitting the line and somebody else says I clearly saw it outside. Which one of them is right? One saw it hit the line and one saw it missed the line. Which one was right? Now you say well how would I know I'm not there you're just making up this example. No there's an answer. There's an actual answer to the question. The answer is neither of them are right. Both of them are seeing an invention of their mind. Neither of them are seeing a ball hit a line. They're not. And the reason we know that is at a certain speed your eyes can't really process it so the ball is coming in faster than your eyes can see it and the moment it hits is actually your hallucination. You don't actually even see the ball hit.

Now I think sometimes you do by coincidence because you're kind of seeing the ball at stages and then your brain is filling in the in-between stuff but the part you're seeing is here then here then here. So if you were lucky at the exact time the ball hit was also a time you were seeing it well maybe you did see it but probably your brain filled in a little movie of where it thinks it landed and you think you saw it with your own eyes but what you saw was your brain inventing a scene for you because it couldn't see it at that speed. Yeah most of what you see is invented by your brain. It's not actually what it looks like but your brain says it's clear.

Now let me give you another example. Let's say I'm a bad programmer and I want to create a simulated world but I don't want to give it a lot of detail because my computers are not strong enough to make everything precise and detailed but I don't want the characters who are in the simulation to know it's not detailed because if they see it pixelated you know then the game is over. They're like hey I'm in a pixelated environment this is obviously a simulation so that's not going to work. So instead I program it like this. Hey little character in the program that I just wrote if you think you're looking at an object right in front of you your brain will see this clearly. That's it. That's the whole program. Your brain will see it clearly even if your eyes don't really have the ability to do that. So your environment will always be clear but it's not actually what's there or what your eye is picking up. So yeah reality is kind of weird.

The other possibility is that these coincidences are something called a coincidence and they don't mean anything at all and you're not in the simulation and there are no doppelgangers and none of it's real. I mean if you're going to bet on it I think I'd bet on it just being a coincidence but it's fun.

Here's another possibility for doppelgangers. This from a reply by Michael Guarin and I think I'll just read it because it's so well expressed. I've never heard this before and Michael says genes like energy are conserved as scale to which I say I don't know what that means but he goes on he says they don't go away but will resurface. There's been some decent evidence that humans have suffered several population bottlenecks which is when the total number of people alive worldwide was quite small which kind of makes sense with my earlier conversation of civilizations coming and going. One such example comes from Rutgers I think in a 2005 or 2006 some kind of study that all pre-1492 Native Americans descend from approximately 100 people that crossed the land bridge. Now that kind of makes sense doesn't it? Like if you assume that Native Americans got through over that little land bridge that was frozen for much of history but at some point they could walk it you wouldn't really guess that a million people came over. I would guess small group you know made it so and maybe a lot of people died on the way etc. But what if it's true that a hundred people came across or that in history there are a number of other times when the total number of people got really small and then that group had to regrow the population.

So as Michael Guarin goes on he said you would expect if the bottleneck was small enough and the total population today large enough that there would be lots of doppelgangers because the way genetics work is you don't always create something that's like a copy of yourself but you can create maybe a couple generations down something that was pretty close to you just by chance. So doppelgangers would not be unusual if they all came from the first group of a hundred but it would be very unusual if your starting group was a million. Does that make sense? So it could be one reason why you see more doppelgangers than you think ought to be normal.

And then I would add to that I said this on my man cave last night. We're going to tie it all together now. Do you know how some people seem like old souls and if you say to me Scott what does that mean what do you mean by an old soul my answer would be I'm not really sure but I feel like I know it when I see it right and I think most of you would say the same thing. I'm not really sure how to define that. I kind of know it when I see it right. There are some children who are just born adults. I happened to be one of them. I was basically born an adult and it feels like they have an old soul but what if they are very similar genetically to some relative from before like in my case my grandfather. I'm told I never met him because he died when I was in the womb but I'm told that I'm sort of the personality spitting image of my grandfather I never met but not so much my father. My father was different than both of us. So it could be that the genes you know did their thing and I just became very much like my grandfather.

Now here's the interesting thing. I don't know if epigenetics or Lamarckian stuff I don't know if any of that's real. Is it possible that a grandfather could have a life experience that modified his genes in a way that I would pick up two generations later? Is that possible? A lot of people say yes but just for fun let's say it is. Just for fun what would happen if my grandfather had a life experience that modified his genes and then I'm born later would I pick up some of the qualities that would be associated with wait for it lived experience. In other words could my genes have picked up experience in a way in like an indirect way that came from another human? If so it would be very much like I had inherited an older soul but I'd done it the honest way through my genes you know nothing magic nothing outside of the physical realm but it would feel exactly like a soul being passed down and I wonder if I would even have some awareness of it because I feel as if I do. I actually feel the length of that connection to my grandfather I've never met but it's probably mental because my mother used to mention it a lot but anyway maybe there's something to genes and souls.

Well let's go to politics. The Supreme Court as you know rejected the request to expedite Jack Smith's the prosecutor's question about whether Trump would be immune because he was a president during some of the accusations. Now the Supreme Court rejected reviewing it which means that now the lower court can do its thing because the request had been hey if we think this is going to get to the Supreme Court anyway can we just skip this middle step because it's a waste of time. So the Supreme Court said nope you are not going to skip the middle step which I kind of understand. The middle step exists for a reason and they did not have a compelling reason to skip the middle step so they didn't want to do it just because it's important. I like that. I like the fact that they weren't willing to do it just because it's important because that wasn't the right reason. That's not the reason. The reason should be that the lower court didn't get it right or something and there was a reason to appeal. That's the reason they should handle it so they stuck to it. I like it. I'm happy with that.

But here's how people are interpreting it. If you turn on any right-leaning news or watch anybody tweeting about it they will say this. That really the reason that Jack Smith wanted to expedite is so that he could put Trump in jail potentially before the election and therefore Trump you know wouldn't have a chance of winning or his chance would be much lower. He could still win from jail but his odds would be much lower. That all worked down. So that's why. How many of you have seen that reporting and therefore say the experts on the right this is pretty much proof that the prosecution is political because it was so important to get it done before the election and the only reason to do that is to stop him politically. So how many of you are on that page that the Supreme Court and Jack Smith's action are really confirming that the legal part was and it was just political? Everybody. So basically 100% of you are on that page.

Has anybody checked out MSNBC? Have you seen what the left says about this? If you haven't seen what the left says about it you're going to need to check it out. Do you know what the left says about it? It's not going to be delayed. No it might hold it up a little bit but it'll still be done before the election. I thought I was like hallucinating because I just happened to I was just flipping through some news channels and I caught a legal expert and the legal expert was very experienced in this field like he was actually a federal Department of Justice lawyer who knew exactly what he was talking about. And when people on the right are like aha you know Trump won because this won't get done before the election a guy who knows exactly what he's talking about said it won't make much difference. Yeah maybe delayed a little bit.

So now check your own propaganda situation. Have you been propagandized by your own side? Did they tell you something about this is going to make a difference? Because I don't see it. I don't see it at all. I don't see anything that happened. I'm going to go further to really make you mad. I don't see anything that suggests it's political. Why did you all see that? What are you seeing that I don't see?

Now let me be clear it could be and it probably is like my intuition my gut my experience and everything I've ever experienced in my whole life all point in the same direction which is everything's political. All 91 indictments all four cases all political. All right so you and I are 100% on the same page that everything's political. However trying to expedite a case if I were the prosecutor I would try to expedite the case for what reason? One would be purely political but what would be the other reason to try to expedite a case? How about every reason in the world. How about the best reason to expedite a case is that that's exactly what our justice system requires. The justice system requires him to try to do the job fast. If he knows it's going to end up in the Supreme Court he'd be incompetent if he didn't at least say well why don't you see if we could just handle this right away. Why would he do all this court preparation for a lower court if it's a complete waste of time? Don't you think he wants to go home for Christmas too? I mean next Christmas. No no.

So here's the thing you're making some assumptions. Here's the assumption you're making that there's one and only one valid reason for asking the Supreme Court to go fast. There's every reason to ask them to do that. Reason number one it's the right thing to do. Speedy trial. Speedy trial is the most basic well it's one of the most basic things in our system. So you're telling me that you're mad that the prosecutor tried to get a speedy trial and skip a step that's completely a waste of time. That's why we pay him. We pay him to make a speedy trial that doesn't waste anybody's time and you're and we're acting like the only way to interpret that is politically. Now keep in mind I do think everything that they're doing is political but you don't see it in that. It's not in that example. Well let me be more clear it could be entirely in that example but the alternative that he's just doing his job exactly the way you'd want him to do his job this is exactly how I want him to do his job. Don't you? How many of you would want him not to have tried to skip the unnecessary step? Would you be happier if he didn't skip the unnecessary step? Why? What's the argument for that?

Wrong. The speed to hurt defense. So some are saying that the reason for the speed would be to hurt the defense but correct me if I'm wrong does not the defense get to argue how much time they need to the court and can that not be modified based on real reasons? Isn't that normal routine that you say how much time you need and reasonable people look at it and say yeah and if something comes up they're like a real real good reason that you know there's some important evidence that just will take another month no matter what wouldn't the judge say all right that's so important we'll change the trial date to make sure we have that. So to me it seems like the defense always has the right to at least request under reasonable standards a change in the trial. Likewise the prosecution does for any variety of reasons right? So you're wrong.

Let me just say this. If you haven't seen how the left is treating this issue I feel like you're flying blind. So you don't need to change your opinion that it's completely political because I think there's enough obvious evidence for that but if you think you proved it because of this I don't see it. You're going to have to do better.

I'm just going to guess what he would say. Here's what I guess. We tried to do speedy trials and not waste money and I tried to skip an unnecessary step that both sides prosecution etc. probably thought were unnecessary.

Did we hit the 34 minute glitch again? I've seen both platforms. There is a 34 minute glitch. What the hell is that? It's a 34 minute glitch but it's on both platforms and the only thing they have in common is my Wi-Fi. Why would my Wi-Fi glitch every day? I feel like there's maybe something comes online that uses the same. I don't think it's throttling. I don't know buffer overrun. I don't know it's a mystery.

All right let's talk about the Rolling Stone has an article about Trump who apparently is telling his close advisor types that he plans to keep saying that the illegal immigrants are poisoning the blood of America. Now of course his opponents are saying that came out of Mein Kampf. You're talking like Hitler. Stop talking like Hitler. To which Trump says I think I'm going to double down on talking like Hitler. No don't do it you sound like Hitler. Now I'm going to triple my talk like Hitler. No no you're so Hitler. Stop it. Okay now I'm going to do nothing but Hitler. No no. I feel like he's just making them crazy because he's literally doubling down on the thing that they think is his biggest vulnerability. Just think about it. He's doubling down on giving them fodder for what they consider his biggest vulnerability. What's up with that? Is he suddenly stupid? Trump is it like just doesn't make any sense? My first reaction was why would you do this this is just making your job harder. All you had to do is just keep your mouth shut and just coast into the job.

Yeah well let me suggest the possibility because I know I'm getting mocked for oh you're doing 4D chess. No he's just being stupid. Maybe maybe. Well it's not how I would have played it so but let's just explore the possibility there's something here that's more strategic than obvious. And this comes from Andre Agassi. So Andre Agassi when he would play against top players he only needed to do this but against the top players let's say he's playing somebody who has the best backhand in the world. They like oh my God you don't want to hit to their backhand. Do you know what he would do? Hit to their backhand because it was their best shot. Because if he could break it down there was nothing left. Because if he takes their best shot by winning more points on their best shot than they win on their best shot their entire architecture of confidence crumbles. So he can beat people in the first few games right. It's like maybe you have to win three out of five sets but he can win in the first three games. All he has to do is go right at their strongest shot until he wins more points than they won on their strongest shot and then they're dead. They're absolutely dead and then the rest of it is just bayoneting the wounded basically.

Now you have to be so good that you can beat their best shot so I mean it's not like so much a strategy as you know he's so good but he could have very easily tried to go to the weak shot which would tell the other person that they have a really good shot because he's really staying away from my forehand. So you don't give him any confidence. You just go right at their best shot you break it down and then they got nothing. They have nothing left after that.

Now what is the Democrats' best shot on Trump? Well clearly they've completely abandoned anything like policy. Just you is he's a dictator and you fill in the blanks. We have some new Democrats who have added some new dictators. So an anti-Trump group is now comparing him in some kind of ad to Mussolini or Orban. Orban is the leader of Hungary right yeah. So they're comparing him to other leaders that they think are totalitarian. Now let me mock this. They actually have to add more dictators. So saying that Trump was like Hitler wasn't getting him any traction so here was their strategy I think. We don't have enough dictators. Okay they're not buying the they're not buying Hitler. What if we add Mussolini? Well now you're talking. Now you're talking that's two dictators. Wow I wasn't too concerned when you compared Trump to one dictator but oh my God now two. Orban three. Three. Oh no oh no three dictators. How about Putin? Oh no it's Putin. Oh four dictators. Oh do you know what this makes me think of when they keep adding dictators? See if this doesn't make you laugh. I'm waiting to see if anybody said it yet in the comments. You're not there yet. Two words. You ready for it? More cowbell.

Yeah what do you think? More cowbell. Do you know why that's funny now? First of all it comes from Saturday Night Live and what was the name of the actor who's got the yeah Christopher Walken in some skit. He's doing some musical skit and he's insisting that there'd be more cowbell. Now cowbell is usually the you know sort of the least respected instrument you except maybe the tambourine you know that when the lead singer like does the tambourine because the lead singer can't play an instrument but beyond the tambourine the probably the cowbell is the least respected of the instrument parts. But I just think of more cowbell every time they add a new dictator and I feel like just saying that it's like well he's like Hitler. Go on. Well he's also like Mussolini. More cowbell. Well he's also like Orban. More cowbell. Well he's also like Putin. More cowbell. Well he's also kind of like Pol Pot. More cowbell. Well he's also like Thanos. More cowbell. So just yell more cowbell every time they add a dictator. It'll be funny.

So here's why Trump might be smarter than you think. He goes for energy and he's breaking down their strongest their strongest stroke. This is their backhand. Well I'll call it their forehand because forehand usually stronger. This is the Democrats' forehand. He's going at their forehand. He's so aggressive which is why people like him. Like he doesn't it would be easy for him to back down from this and say you know we love the immigrants we love them love the immigrants but you know we need to do a little more on the border. That's not really going to make you excited or even believe he's going to do much but if he goes further than he's supposed to go to the point where his opponents are calling him Hitler more cowbell Mussolini more cowbell Orban then he's got him right where he wants him. What are you thinking about when Trump is going too far on the border? What do you think? Thinking about where's your brain go? That it'll get the job done but by making you think that he'll go too far it makes you think well at least he'll get the job done. His persuasion is not exactly how I would do it but like I always say you can't compare him to any other human or animal like Trump is just his own entity. Like comparing him to anything is just a waste of time. He's just his own and I think he's going right at their forehand because he wants to break it down.

Now let me ask you if they compare him to every dictator in the world and it's all they have between now and election day who wins? If it's all they have it's just more cowbell. It's going to sound like people will just be used to it and it'll just look stupid.

Yeah so let me give you a good general rule for persuasion or for spotting a dishonest argument. Here's a good rule. Somebody who has an honest argument in politics or anything else is going to say here are the pros and here are the cons but when you consider all the pros and you consider all the cons on net I'm in favor of this or I'm against it. Now then you've got something to work with. Maybe you debate the facts maybe you debate the priorities but that's an honest argument. Here's all the pros here's all the cons here's what I think about it on net. So if you see that you should engage as an honest debater yourself you know if you want to be a good person because that's an honest person. They're trying even if they disagree with you it looks like they're trying.

Now here's what not an honest debate looks like. Analogies. If all you're getting is scary analogies you know this is like the Great Depression you know this is like Hitler you know this reminds me of you know the destruction of the Roman Empire you know right. If you have analogies without an argument that is a dishonest debate. It's dishonest because they're not trying to win on any kind of logic or priorities or anything they're just trying to scare the shit out of you. So I don't know why nobody else is mentioning this. Why am I the only one to mention that the attacks against Trump have nothing to do with his policies? It's entirely analogies. They're simply taking other people in other situations well you know Hitler in 1939 well you know what it's not 1939 he's not Hitler and almost nothing about that applies but if your brain thinks it does then it can be persuasive.

Now I'm not saying the Democrats are not being persuasive. They are. It's just all they have. They really have to run as far as and hard as they can from policy because Biden didn't deliver and everybody everybody can see for example that the border's a mess and crime in the city and all that.

I'm going to agree with Biden people on one thing. I do think the economy is better than the press or the public maybe is quite realized. Now you say to yourself but you know prices are too high yes and the debt is out of control yes. So if you looked at those two things they actually are a mess but it is we have a strange economy where employment's not so bad and if anything employers are going to be begging for workers. I do think workers' pay has gone up maybe not as much as inflation. It does look like we're getting our supply chains slowly but consistently we're getting our supply chains under control. That's good especially the critical stuff you know not fast enough not nearly fast enough but moving in the right direction. So I'm going to give Biden a B minus on the economy. B minus which is probably better than the public thinks it is because that when you buy the gas and you buy the groceries you know you just vomit in your own mouth. I mean even I do and I'm doing okay. Like when I buy groceries I'm actually shocked. I'm shocked and I can afford it so you it's not affecting my life too much but I was shocked when I had this little pile of groceries and they're like that'll be $200. I'm like what that little that little pile that's $200? I mean it just my mind exploded. Normally I don't even pay attention to honestly you know I hate to say it because it's such a douchebag thing I don't really pay attention to small consumer item prices because you know it doesn't affect my life but it's so high that I'm actually paying attention and I'm actually making decisions that I wouldn't have made before about well maybe I don't need that. So yeah I can see why people think the economy is garbage but it's probably a little bit better than they think. It's just not affecting them personally yet. I am worried about the crushing debt. I don't know how we get out of that.

All right here's Governor Newsom talking about Trump. Let's see if you can find his policy criticisms. Policy criticisms. Here's Governor Newsom. He warned that efforts to prevent former president Trump from getting on the ballot in his state would be political distraction. So he doesn't want to do it but oh that's very big of him isn't it? Like it matters in California. California doesn't matter. Trump's not going to win California so it doesn't matter what they do. So Newsom instead of Newsom saying it doesn't matter what we do because he's not going to win California he just says it's a political distraction which is actually pretty smart because it sounds more like a high ground. You know I'm the adult in the room don't bother with this trivial stuff. He's right about it but then he says this quote there is no doubt. I like that there's no doubt. Oh no there's no doubt. See if you have any doubt about what follows in the rest of the sentence because he told you there's no doubt so what follows must be true to every human in the world. No doubt. So there is no doubt that Donald Trump is a threat to our liberties and even to our democracy. Now what was the part about his policies? I say that's it. Where's the part about when he was president last time which wasn't too long ago he did all of these terrible things and took away your liberties? I don't remember that happening. I feel like that was kind of weird that Trump waited until the second term to take away our liberties. Why doesn't he take away our liberties in the first four years if he's going to take away our liberties?

So you can see now that even Newsom who is sort of the standard of quality for the Democrats he's basically the best they have. I hate to say it he's the best they have and he's not even touching policy. The only way he'll touch policy is to tell you it's like Hitler. So he's you know roughly touching on immigration policy but he doesn't mention it. It's like well Hitler what do you think about Trump's policy about energy and drill baby drill? Well Hitler what do you think about Trump's saying he could you know stop the war in Ukraine? Well Hitler. That's all they have. More cowbell I tell you.

Consistently that you can't understand politics until you understand the players. So wherever I can I'm going to tell you about a player that you'll remember that the next time you see that player you'll know you're not dealing with an honest broker of information right. Have you heard of a publication called The Atlantic? Well The Atlantic is perhaps the very worst of the absurdly political biased anti-Trump deranged but because The Atlantic is an old institution as a publication there are many people as in Democrats who don't know it's not a legitimate publication. I mean it's not even close to legitimate. It's just a purely political instrument. So what did they say? Today they had an article says in the debate over freedom versus control of the global network meaning the internet freedom versus control China was largely correct and the US was wrong. Yes The Atlantic would like you to believe that China is more correct in censoring their internet because the only way the Democrats can win is to prevent Republicans from having free speech. They're kind of saying it directly now.

Now here's the important part. The fact that it's in The Atlantic tells you that it's basically a Democrat op. It's not just a bunch of people who agree with Democrats it's more likely very connected to the Democrat strategy than just you know randomly agrees with them. If the Democrat strategy is to get you feeling a little bit better about Chinese level censorship or the Iranian model where the Ayatollah decides who's on the ballot oh yeah we have democracy here you can vote for anybody you want as long as I've approved them being on the ballot. So that's what they're trying to do with Trump. You can vote for anybody you want but we're going to tell you who can be on the ballot. So yeah so The Atlantic is part of this mass misinformation Democrat machine that's trying to propagandize you or prime you for greater internet control. Do you know why? Because that misinformation that you're getting in other words everything Republicans say according to them that misinformation would lead to what? What would it lead to? Could it lead to losing your liberty and your democracy? Yeah so The Atlantic is one of the ones to keep in your mind that whatever they're saying is an op. It's not news and it's not exactly even an opinion. It's not even the real opinion of the people saying it. It's an op. You should see it that way. It's just pure propaganda.

Well this is disturbing. Congressman Tim Burchett described on a podcast how the blackmail operations work in Congress. Now what is scarier than thinking the worst about something and then finding out it's exactly correct? Now I don't know if Tim Burchett has seen this or he's just like us where he just assumes it's true but he's there. I feel like he saw it. Here's how he describes the system. Now remember he's in the system. He's not like us he's not looking from the outside. He's in the system that he's describing this way. Quote this is how it works. You're visiting you're out of the country you're out of town or you're in a motel or bar in DC and some whatever you're into women or men or whatever comes up and they're very attractive and they're laughing at your jokes and you're buying them a drink and next thing you know you're in the motel room with them naked and the next thing you know you're about to make a key vote and what happens some well-dressed person comes up and whispers in your ear hey man there's tape. Sound on. You were you in a hotel room on whatever with whoever and then you're like oh and said you really ought to be not be voting for this thing. Do you think that's accurate? I mean he could not be a better source. He's right in the middle of this world. Is it literally that obvious? It's like right on the nose. They literally have the what do you call it the sugar trap or something. There's some name for it. What's the name for that when it's a honey pot? Yeah so it's a honey trap. It's a honeypot. That literally there's honeypot and that literally somebody comes up and says we have tapes.

Now I'm sure that has happened in American history and you know numerous times I'm sure but I wonder how universal it is. Does it describe literally everything? Because I think this has been happening since what J. Edgar Hoover that there's been you know like an ongoing blackmail operation.

Well do you know what makes this worse? Why are politicians easy to blackmail? I'm going there's an obvious reason. Do you know why? I mean other than the fact they do bad things but other people do bad things too. I have a feeling that one of the reasons people go into politics is that they're too ugly to get laid otherwise. Am I wrong? Look look at your politicians and then you subtract down some outliers. It's like okay JFK he was good-looking right and apparently had a pretty active sex life but you know he's an outlier. If Mitch McConnell is getting a little on the side do you think it's because he's quite a lover he really knows how to get it done if you know what I mean he's a finisher? Probably not. Now I'm not suggesting he's having any kind of situation like that. I'm just saying that if you were to take a picture of the certainly the men in Congress it's mostly the men I think if you took a picture of the men they're not exactly killing it on Tinder. So I think they're unusually easy to blackmail because you just got to pay somebody to you know close their eyes and do whatever drugs they need to to get the job done. But yeah I think Congress is especially susceptible to this.

So my suggestion is this. You should either only vote for people who can get laid without your help in other words they don't need the job. Well I can still get laid and then maybe maybe less blackmail. Or people who have been so thoroughly vetted that you wouldn't be surprised a bit and the blackmail wouldn't even work if you caught them with their pants down in the middle of a you know the public square. Can you think of anybody like that who would be a politician who has been caught so many times that it wouldn't even mean anything if you caught him again? Yeah and Trump is perfect. I think he's as close to unblackmailable as we've ever had for a leader. He might be he might be the pinnacle of an unblackmailable person and I remind you of this all the time but when he was running for office the first time he said publicly I'm no angel. When he did that I said to myself okay you just told us what the game is. I'm no angel but I'm on your side. That was a pretty good package. I wanted somebody to say I'm no angel so if something comes out later that shows them they're no angel go oh well you didn't lie to me. I guess I should have seen it coming but at the same time he says I'm not going to be an angel but I'm going to be the I'm going to be the one on your side and then he acts exactly like he's on your side closing the border etc. So I can live with that. I can totally live with I'm no angel but I'm going to be the demon on your team. Sounds good to me.

All right there are all these Trump Nikki Haley rumors. CBS is reporting that Trump was asking his allies about the possibility of Nikki Haley for vice president and then Trump supporters got all excited and upset and yada yada yada. Here's my take on that. If there's one thing we've learned about Trump he will ask all the questions that are the right questions to ask and then when he's done asking all the right questions to ask he'll go a little further which I actually love about him. Remember the story about he asked if he could use a nuclear weapon to stop a hurricane? Do you remember that? Now I don't know if he ever asked that question I think he denied it but I love the fact if he did. I love it. Now the answer was no that's crazy and then it didn't come up again but don't you like that he asked the question just brainstorm right? I absolutely like that he asked the question. I had no problem with that at all. So when he asked the question what about Nikki Haley as vice president that is not an indication that he likes her on the ticket. To me that's the normal Trump way of doing business that he doesn't see it because if he saw it he wouldn't be asking am I right? If he felt she was the right choice he wouldn't be asking the question so he's not feeling it and when he asks the question it suggests that he's looking for somebody to make the best argument to see if it changes his mind. That is good. That's good for you. Should always check to see if somebody can change your mind because it's one of the biggest questions right. His VP is one of the biggest questions so he wants to get it right right.

And just like I was going to use that example when he got in trouble for asking about the injecting of the disinfectant the context was light as the disinfectant so he went beyond what you'd expect and asked the extra question well could you use light you know if you could inject the light inside the body would it work and then it got misinterpreted as drinking bleach of course but I wanted him to ask the question. I was happy he asked the question it just got turned out wrong. So yeah ask the question. I don't think there's any chance and as I posted I don't think I could support him if she were vice president.

Let me do a quick poll. Many of you are probably Trump supporters. Should he get the nomination you may maybe you're supporting somebody else but if he got the nomination how many of you would withdraw your support if Nikki Haley were the vice president? All right yeah it looks like people would withdraw support. Now let me ask you this question. Can you even think of another choice for vice president that would make you change your vote? People don't change their vote for the vice president but they would for her. I would. I literally that not hyperbole I that would be a hard no because I would lose confidence in Trump. I would lose confidence in his judgment if he took such an obvious wrong choice.

So Pence was a good choice because we didn't know much about him so you just say well all right whatever if you like him it's okay with me but Haley we know too much about especially in the military industrial complex way. Now I don't know if the accusations against Nikki Haley are you know as solid as they appear to be which is she's a little too close to the military spenders but it could be. I mean it's a huge red flag so it doesn't seem like the right fit for Trump. I'm glad he's asking the question. My personal assumption is zero chance it will happen zero chance but I think he and Haley have had a good history right am I right? I thought they got along when she was in the administration so I don't mind at all they ask the question because asking the question is how he finds out how other people feel about it and that's exactly what he should be doing. He's probably thinking that his own judgment let me put it another way because he worked with her and had a you know reasonably good association I think he's not trusting his own judgment and he wants to get some more objective opinions on it but he'll be fine. There's no way he's going to pick her.

But Nikki Haley does seem to be surging in the New Hampshire polling all the way up to just barely behind Trump who is polling at 33% with two or 29% the rest of the field is way behind. Now that's probably what triggered Trump to start asking the question but does New Hampshire mean anything to anybody? I feel like New Hampshire is the least indicative primary isn't it? It goes first so it can definitely change how we think about it but it shouldn't so I don't know I'm not worried about New Hampshire.

Trump was asked if he would debate a Republican and I guess you who had to ask him that and he gave exactly the right answer exactly the right answer. The right answer is yes if it gets close but it's not there yet because he wants to act strong like of course I would talk to them but he also doesn't want to look like he's wasting his time with the undercard so he gives the exactly the right answer. If somebody comes close yeah that would make sense have a debate. Just what you want to hear. He might not mean it but it's exactly the right answer.

Here's something you didn't see coming. Ron DeSantis had been backed by I guess one of the biggest backers it's the main outside group was a PAC political action committee called Never Back Down. Never back down. Let's get an update on Never back down. Oh they're backing down they're backing down. So they're not going to run ads in Iowa or New Hampshire. They're not going to run ads in Iowa or New Hampshire the first two primaries. I feel like they backed down. Let me give you some hypnotist and humorist advice. When you're picking the name of your group you should say to yourself how can this be mocked. It's exactly the same if you're picking a name for your child. If your last name is Cass don't name your child Jack am I right? Because you should ask yourself how will the school kids respond to naming my child Jack Cass? Do you think that will cause any problems? Now I only mentioned that because I grew up with somebody named Jack Cass. Yeah I mean he his born name was Jonathan but everybody called him Jack. So yeah don't do that. Never call your PAC Never Back Down if you think you might back down.

All right surprise of the day. Wall Street Apes had this post. So you probably heard of the Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan. You all know who he is right? So I think he's accused of being anti-Semitic but he is a well-known powerful longtime leader in the black community for the subset of the black community who likes his messages so he's very controversial. Specifically anti-Semitic is the charge on him. But here's what he said. They're just mind-blowing. Now remember I said that those doppelgangers and those coincidences they might signal a larger shift in consciousness a larger shift in consciousness. Let me read to you what the Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan says about Donald Trump. This is recent. I'll read the whole thing. Quote the nature of this administration is good for us. He was talking about Trump. Maybe this was maybe this is when Trump was not sure on this. He says because of Trump's way he is an anomaly. There's never been no president quite like Mr. Trump. There's something that he's doing. Trump is destroying every enemy that was an enemy of our rise. In this case he's talking about Black Americans. So he's saying that Trump and Black Americans have the same enemies. That sound familiar? Something I've told you. He said who's the enemy of our rise? Is it the Department of Justice where we get none? Is it Congress where you make a law that favors us and then you turn around and destroy it? Is it the media that has destroyed every black leader that stood up for us? Martin Luther King suffered it and then he says Malcolm suffered it. Then he talks about Trump some more. He says he's attacking in the media calls it fake news. We have been the victims of some fake news yes. He's beating up the FBI and then he says go at it baby. Yeah they've been beating the hell out of us ever since J. Edgar Hoover in the counter. I don't know what the counter is.

So does that feel like a shift in consciousness? It does doesn't it? So the shift in consciousness is that the Democrats have been gaslighting them the Black Americans the whole time and that they couldn't tell who their friends were and who their enemies were but when Trump very clearly targeted all the same people that Farrakhan would call his enemies he couldn't miss it anymore. What would you call noticing that Trump had targeted the media the FBI the Department of Justice? Another word for that would be another word for that it's the same things that Black America wanted he targeted and then Trump actually did it. What's another word for that? That's a coincidence isn't it? Kind of a coincidence. So Louis Farrakhan noticed a pattern that maybe he hadn't noticed until recently that wait a minute that's kind of a coincidence. I don't I think the Department of Justice is corrupt and now this Republican guy does too. That's a weird coincidence. Wait we think the FBI is corrupt but you're saying Trump says that too. That's two coincidences. Wait you're saying you're saying that the news the DOJ the FBI all of them he's going after all of them. Do you see the pattern? Those doppelgangers are people who are noticing patterns. It just happens to be a trivial pattern it's not important you know somebody looks like somebody else but that raised consciousness that allows you to see patterns allows you to break out of the brainwashing because it's those patterns that are the key to the door. If you're in your little brainwash bubble there's actually a door and it's got a keyhole and the keyhole are the coincidences. Wait a minute if this is true then how could this other thing be true? Well if it were just one thing maybe you ignore it but wait a minute how but this other thing is true also. How does that make sense with this other thing? And then the coincidences start to form a pattern and then the pattern becomes a key and then the key goes in the lock and you escape your bubble. Farrakhan just found the keyhole. Now I'm not a Farrakhan fan so I'm not fanboying Farrakhan that's not happening. I'm just saying you're seeing an example of somebody who used pattern recognition as an escape and it worked.

Here's another pattern. Tucker Carlson talking about Assange Julian Assange and Julian Assange did a number of journalistic things that other people call him a spy I guess and the journalistic things were very embarrassing for our intel organizations and you the deep state basically and Hillary Clinton and apparently we have reporting that Mike Pompeo was talking about plans to murder Assange to murder him. So now you've got Democrats who want him dead Assange you've got a prominent Republican who was even running for president at one point who wanted him dead reportedly and it seems to me that Assange has embarrassed the deep state which might be a little bit both Republican and Democrat at its base. So the question is why why are so many people wanting to kill him or put him in jail forever when you and I aren't quite sure why it's been a long time. Shouldn't I be able to express the other argument as easily as I can express the you know the freedom? Why do I only know the argument of why he's a journalist and should be freed? Why am I not aware of the counterargument? Is that a coincidence? Don't see it anywhere.

Now I know the general argument that he revealed some stuff that would cause some people to get killed or something and I'd like to see that argument and if that's the case you know that's important but there's something about the lack of transparency and the fact that he's being treated the way he's treated that tells you that this is that everything about this is corrupt and wrong and should be stopped. I don't know what's wrong with it and I don't know what's corrupt but this isn't adding up. Sorry the pattern recognition is too clear. The pattern is if they had the real goods the stuff they could argue with the public was important and you would agree with it they would tell you. Yeah they would tell you. When somebody doesn't have an argument that they're willing to share with you it's because they don't have one. I mean I have trouble believing that there are secrets that are the real reason that we don't know what's going on so I don't trust our government at all on the Assange situation and therefore because citizens although not an American citizen citizens have the presumption of innocence so my presumption about Assange is innocent. And as you know one of the things that the bad guys do if they can't figure out a legal way to take you out is they come up with a fake sex charge. So you know Assange had this fake sex charge hanging over him some rape charge or something and do you know why it went away? Because there was never any evidence for it. It just went away. It just it was fake yeah. So everything that you think is the worst case scenario sort of like the representative Burchett was telling you about the blackmail if you imagine that they wouldn't cause a fake rape charge to take down an enemy you're not living in the real world because yeah they would yeah they would. Matt Gaetz perfect example. Yeah fake fake sex charges are a common way to take somebody down. So my take on Assange is I don't know if he did anything bad I don't know but the lack of transparency is so disgusting that I am firmly on the you better free him or basically put up or shut up right. My assumption is everybody's a dirty murderer who wants him to stay where he is. You're all dirty murderers. I don't trust anybody who wants him in jail if they won't tell you why. I'm open to the argument. I'm open to the argument. I can be persuaded that he should stay in jail but no argument strangely missing. Nope not buying it for a minute. He should be freed and I'm also curious why Trump didn't do it because you know there was pressure on Trump to do it so there's more to the story because the fact that you can't get a Republican or a Democrat to do it and yet we don't know what's going on this thing's all corrupt and dirty.

Well outgoing Louisiana governor Edwards according to the amuse account on X has decided to pardon 40 murderers. What that can't be possible. I know for sure nobody would pardon 40 murderers that'd be crazy right? No it says he pardoned 40 murderers. Now as amuse asks what possible reason what's the reason for that? Now I do know that when politicians are leaving office and retiring it's not that unusual to pardon a bunch of people that maybe you think shouldn't be pardoned but murderers 40 murderers. You what it makes me wonder if they were since it was Louisiana I wonder if they were falsely accused. Do you think it's like 40 black guys who the accusations were too weak and he's just saying you know what I'm not even sure any of these people murdered anybody. It could be yeah. So I think there's more we need to know about that but the question of why you doing it is the right question. I'm going to guess he doesn't think that they were the cases were strong enough and that maybe the relics from a more racist past and maybe it's just time to set it right. I don't know. Could we'll find out.

Well Fetterman continues to be interesting. He thanked President Biden for pardoning certain marijuana offenses and he called the charges weed charges. He said in a statement he said a few Christmases ago as lieutenant governor I push for legal weed and delivering pardons for weed charges. Okay Fetterman stop it just stop it. I don't want to love you. I don't want to love you. You're making me love you. I don't like it stop just cut it out. I love that he wants to pardon the weed people. I love even more that he calls the charges cut it out stop it stop it damn it I love you.

All right Ian Miles Cheong is reporting that a tribunal in the UK has ruled that it is not discrimination for a company to rule out white men from being hired. What what it's not discrimination to discriminate. Interesting take. You'd almost think it's built right into the word there discriminate. Okay but it makes me ask this question and yes I'm serious I need a backup plan. If it becomes you know if America becomes like South Africa like what's my backup plan? Where where can a white man go to be safe and to be treated like a full citizen? Certainly not America but where can I go? Now I'll tell you that tell you where people suggest it. They said Poland Hungary Italy Japan Argentina Iceland Indonesia Bhutan Paraguay Paraguay for the weed UAE but here's the problem yeah so I'm ruling out New Zealand and Australia because they already went woke. Thailand Thailand's on the list of possibilities. Antarctica is looking good not a lot of discrimination there except against penguins or something. Cuba is due for a flip. Switzerland you say not so sure. I think Europe has the Islamicized problem. I think Europe will probably become Islamic eventually and Hungary is too close to Russia for my tastes too close and New Zealand and Australia too woke. Iceland as I told you Iceland had volcanoes and the whole country melted it was all made of ice yeah so Iceland doesn't exist anymore because the volcano melted it so that's out of the question. No not really it's still there. Well Alaska is not a country. Montenegro yeah I don't want to be over in that Europe Eastern Europe area not comfortable with that. You know what you know one of the best answers was Argentina apparently Argentina is both multiethnic and true melting pot. Can anybody confirm that? I've actually heard really good things about Argentina and the people and sort of the social part. Is that true or is that an exaggeration? I had a friend who used to travel there just for the women and apparently he had a really really good time because all you had to do is be an American and walk in the door and suddenly you'd be popular with the ladies that's what he said. Well Argentina might be a mess in terms of their economy and all that but if you had your own money is the culture at least non-discriminatory? Saudi Arabia Philippines that's interesting Philippines yeah. So I don't have plans to move but I think you know it's just sort of my way to be prepared for everything you know my house was built to withstand you know all the common disasters and I built in a place that was free from most of the common disasters and you know if I lost my power I could live right the coldest day in California you know gets in the 40s I can make a fire and put some blankets on me I could live right but if you lose your electricity in Wisconsin in February like if the whole state loses its power well good luck with that. So I've always picked tried to pick situations where you have lots of escape you can get away you can survive you know all that stuff. My house has its own water supply I don't have to depend on the town so and I've got solar but I don't have a battery yet I need to add a battery backup. But likewise I think it is time for white men to at least have a backup plan because I do think America could fall in terms of being safe to live here. It's not there but you know that these things can be right on the edge for a long time before they flip so things could change quickly. It's good to have a backup plan. I heard Costa Rica heard good things about Costa Rica but I think that might be more about the lifestyle than it is about lack of discrimination. Uruguay oh Uruguay not Paraguay yeah Uruguay is the better one than Paraguay right do I have that right? Neverland Joe stale yeah probably not Guyana.

All right ladies and gentlemen that's all I got for you today. Thanks for joining the best live stream ever and YouTube I will talk to you tomorrow. If you're wondering will I be live streaming on Christmas Day what do you think will I be live streaming at the normal time on Christmas Day? Yeah yeah yes I will because I don't take days off so I'll see you on Christmas but also see you tomorrow and have a great day. Thanks YouTube.

good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization it's called coffee with Scott Adams and there's never been a better time in your entire life if you'd like this experience to go up to levels that you'll never forget in your small human brains can't even comprehend well all you need for that is a cuper muger glass a tanker gel ofin a Canen Jugger flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid I like coffee and join me now for the unparal pleasure the dope am Med of the day the thing that makes everything better it's called that's right it's a simultaneous Sip and happens now go take a moment to sa her if you're waking and baking continue well I'm trying a new uh microphone setup for You.

Tube um it appears that uh how how is the audio on You.

Tube should be a little worse than normal but clear yeah okay good looks like we're good um here's something I learned just moments ago from a Instagram video apparently and I saw screenshots so I think this is real the German high school students have lessons on how Americans are propagandized by their government is that awesome or what right German students learn how Americans are propagandized by their own government do you know who doesn't learn that Americans so if you want to find out what's happening to Americans you got to ask a German because they learn it in school that's a real thing I think I mean I'll take a fact check on this but there were screenshots and and uh one of the one of the German textbooks according to the screenshot says America has become uh uh no longer self-critical and we lonely and my first reaction to that was godamn you Germans why are you calling us not self-critical and and lonely okay you're right it's true you nailed it but why do you have to say that about us damn it stop being accurate well Tucker Carlson clarified his uh his belief about what the uh unusual uaps some call them UFOs are all about and he believes that these beings have always been here so Tucker believes there are real beings some kind of other civilization that have always been here and that they have a spiritual component interesting so he's not buying into the aliens from another planet but that there is something here how many of you believe that that there's something here that's spiritual in nature I'm going to go with nope there's nothing here I'd love to believe there were you know I I like my conspiracy theories I like them a lot but no now let me let me reiterate why I don't believe it I acknowledge there's a mountain of evidence you've got your whistleblowers eyewitnesses you got people under oath you got video you've got radar you've got sonar you've got my God so much so much and none of us good there there are a million things that have that much Direct evidence that are not true you want an example how about uh president Trump once called neo-nazis Fine people well that must be true there's tons of evidence you can look at the video all the news is reporting it and then if you want to say well but is it true or is it like a oneoff well then you would look at all the the mountain of evidence that suggests that Trump is a racist dictator it's a mountain of evidence so it must be true but it isn't true I mean seems to be it's not true so the most ordinary thing in the world is to have a mountain of evidence for something that isn't true because the evidence has a certain quality to it it's all kind of sketchy there's a lot of it but it's all kind of sketchy those are the ones you got to watch out for all right um Brian remelli has a post on X telling us that there's a two from there's a surian tablet so suaria you all know where the Sumerians were right do you know where the samarians were let let's check your general knowledge that's correct yeah the area which we now call Iraq and you know the larger area there so the samarians were there a thousands of years ago and they found this Samaran tablet from 2000 BCE which apparently shows a several math problems uh being solved including drawings of trapezoids and triangles uhoh it suggests very strongly that the samarians understood Pythagorean theorem long before the Greek philosopher Pythagoras and and Brian ends his post with the Amnesia of who we really are now I told you I'd like conspiracy theories here's the one I like the best if we know that there are all these buried civilizations we keep finding like there's a one whose name I can't call G cppy there's a what's the one it's called G Gopi something glei and there's Tey yes like I said how many times do I have to say Clearly say it Go Blacky teppy but it's the name of a another one of these ancient uh you know incredible sites that got dug up it was completely buried and appears to have signs signs of civilization beyond what we believed existed at at the time of these ruins so there are lots of hints that there might have been an earlier form of humans that were more advanced and something happened so that we lost maybe we lost what they knew so I got of believe that one because because if you look at our ability to reconstruct history whether it's the you know the evolutionary tree which are always changing and evolving or the history of humankind you know did we all come out of Africa is it more complicated than that the there are big things about the history of the planet that we revise all the time I would not be surprised at all if we were once more more advanced and it wasn't a straight line from primitive to Advanced I've got a feeling it was kind of a a bumpy ride where we got more advanced and that we got wiped out by war and we got more advanced and then we got wiped out by a flood you know probably something like that it's my guess um but I've always been amazed that there are abandoned cities why would you ever abandon a city there there's something I fundamentally don't understand about history it's like a whole city you built the thing now I understand if somebody conquers a city but if you conquer a city you don't you stay there and like run the city like why why would you get rid of all the people and then leave it leave it empty so long that it gets covered with sand like nobody's sweeping for you know a thousand years if you were a homeless primitive person and you knew there was a whole abandoned city somewhere when you move in I don't know maybe it's food it might it might be all about food and resources yeah I I can I can understand disease but disease would kill everybody and then let's say it becomes empty but once it's empty you telling me nobody wants to move back in there's no other civilization that says hey free City there's nobody in the city let's just take it maybe Superstition maybe they don't want to inhabit dead people's homes maybe uh Mike cernovich tweeted that he's been seeing more doppelgangers than you usual doppelganger meaning somebody who looks just like somebody else he said a friend even sent one of me meaning covich uh could be code reuse as Scott Adams says um if so why now of course he's just being provocative and having fun with it you know don't take it too seriously but how many of you are familiar with a book written decades ago called The Celestine prophecies have you ever heard of that it was a very influential it's a fiction it's just a fictional story but the a key Concept in those books was that when people started noticing coincidences more often the coincidences were a signal for a Consciousness shift that human awareness was about to take a leap now I've always been fascinated by that and there's no reason in the world to think that a Consciousness shift would be preed by some kind of bunch of coincidences unless there's an obvious reason for it you you want to hear an obvious reason why you might notice more coincidences right before a perceptual shift like a really obvious reason the coincidences were always there but your awareness improved and you're just noticing something that was right in front of you the whole whole time but you just didn't see it so when somebody noticed a Doppel ganger of Mike cernovich maybe you year ago they would have walked right past him not even noticed so I'm not saying any this is true I'm just having fun with it but you could imagine a situation in which the general awareness of the public is increasing and they not only see the big stuff more clearly such as the misinformation you know architecture of our existence such as the full propagandized news you know that sort of thing if you're noticing the big stuff that you didn't really quite understand before wouldn't it make sense that you're also maybe noticing other patterns just because your pattern recognizer has gone to another level and might we see might we see other examples that would suggest that human awareness is reaching a new level do you know anybody who predicted that human awareness was about to take a gigantic change yes that would be me in 2016 or 15 I can't remember uh I predicted a number of times in public and nobody even commented on it because it was such a strange prediction that Trump would change more than politics that he would rip a hole in the fabric of reality and change how we saw reality itself one of my better predictions all right but uh let's uh let's take this a little bit uh further why why are some other reasons that you might be able to see more coincidences well it could be like I said there's a coincidence storm that you apparently notice because your ability to notice things is getting better in general or here's another possibility maybe it is code reuse and we're a simulation that we're literally a program and the program is reaching some limits you know physical limits because we keep getting more complicated more people are born every person has a complicated life that has to integrate with every other complicated life so you could quite easily imagine that even an amazingly powerful computer would reach some kind of limitation of its resources eventually doesn't have to but it but it could now if you were the programmer and you were like really good like you're not even an average programmer like you're a programmer from the future or even AI wrote it maybe AI programmed it so it really knew how to take care of every possibility that's that's the best programmer right the best programmer anticipates everything that could go wrong and then programs around it so one of of the things that could go wrong is you'd run out of resources then what are you going to do slow it down and then we all start moving in slow motion would we notice it I think I'm moving in slow motion suddenly no that's a bad solution how about the program starts to reuse code so it doesn't have to make up new code all the time that would save some resources so maybe you would say oh hell I'm not going to design a new person I'll just copy some of the people I already have and they're not going to notice maybe so maybe you're just running out of resources in the simulation I don't think that's true but like to put on all the fun possibilities but here's the thing you have to understand about what you see around you if you could somehow know in in where you're sitting right now as you're watching this your exact environment where you are if you had some way to know how much of your actual environment that you think you see clearly is actually a clear picture if you could trace the light coming into your eyes and then how that's translated into a signal and how that reaches your brain if you could see that somehow separate from how your brain is processing it you would see it's just this big fuzzy approximate thing yeah and that would blow your mind it's a good thing you can't see that what's really happening is your brain is making you see Clarity where it non exists let let me tell you what's probably close to real all right if I hold this object in my hand and I and I put all my focus on it there's a reasonably good chance that I'm seeing this very simple clean object in the middle of my field somewhat close to how it actually exists but everything in my peripheral I imagine is also clear but I'm not looking at it at the moment but probably it's all just invented it's just sort of like this General canvas of invention that your brain is putting in there because your brain can't see everything clearly here's where I learned this first a tennis player uh who watches ball hit near a line and then you know there's an argument hey I saw it clearly hitting the line and somebody else says I clearly saw it outside which one of them is right one saw it hit the line and one saw it missed the line which one was right now you say well how would I know I'm not there you're just making up this example no there's an answer There's an actual answer to the question the answer is neither of them are right both of them are seeing an invention of their mind neither of them are seeing a ball hit alive they're not and the we reason we know that is at a certain speed speed your eyes can't really process it so the ball is coming in faster than your eyes can see it and the moment it hits is actually your hallucination you don't actually even see the ball hit now I think sometimes you do by coincidence because you're kind of seeing the ball at stages and then your brain is filling in the in between stuff but the part you're seeing is here then here than here so if you were lucky at the exact time the ball hit was also a time you were seeing it well maybe you did see it but probably your brain filled in a little movie of where it it thinks it landed and you you think you saw it with your own eyes but what you saw was your brain inventing a scene for you because it couldn't see it at that speed yeah most of what you see is invented by your brain it's not actually what it looks like like but your brain says it's clear now let me give you another example let's say I'm a bad programmer and I want to create a simulated world but I don't want to give it a lot of detail because my computers are not strong enough to make everything precise and detailed but I don't want the characters who are in the simulation to know it's not detailed because if they see it pixelated you know then the game is over they're like hey I'm in a pixelated environment this is obviously a simulation so that's not going to work so instead I program it like this hey hey little character in the program that I just wrote If you think you're looking at an object right in front of you your brain will see this clearly that's it that's the whole program your brain will see it clearly even if your eyes don't really have the ability to do that so your your environment will always be be clear but it's not actually what's there or what your what your eye is picking up so yeah reality is kind of weird um the other possibility is that these coincidences are something called a coincidence and they don't mean anything at all and you're not in the simulation and there no doppelgangers and none of it's none of it's real I mean if you're going to bet on it I think I'd bet on it just being a coincidence but it's fun here's another possibility for doppelgangers uh this from a reply by Michael guarin and I think I'll just read it because it's so well expressed i' never heard this before and uh Michael says genes like energy are conserved as scale to which I say uh I don't know what that means but he goes on he says they don't go away but will resurface there's been some decent evidence that humans have suffered several population bottlenecks which is when the total number of people live worldwide was quite small which kind of makes sense with my earlier conversation of civilizations coming and going one such example comes from ruggers I think in a 2005 or six uh some kind of study that all pre 1492 Native Americans descend from approximately 100 people that cross the land bridge now that kind of makes sense doesn't it like if you assume that Native Americans got through over that little land bridge that was frozen for much of history but at some point they could walk it you wouldn't really guess that a million people came over I would guess small group you know made it so and maybe a lot of people died on the way Etc but what if it's true that a hundred people came across um or or that in history there are a number of other times when the total number of people got really small and then that group had to regrow the population so as uh Michael guarin goes on he said uh you would expect if the bottleneck was small enough and the total population today large enough that there would be lots of Doppel gangers because the way genetics work is you don't always create something that's like a copy of yourself but you can create maybe a couple Generations down something that was pretty close to you just by chance so go doppelgangers would not be unusual if they all came from the first group of a 100 but it would be very unusual if your starting group was a million does that make sense so it could be one one reason why you see more doppelgangers than you think ought to be normal um and I and then I would add to that I said this on my man cave last night um we're going to tie it all together now do you know how some people seem like old souls and if you say to me Scott what does that mean what what do you mean by an old soul my answer would be I'm not really sure but I I feel like I know it when I see it right and I think most of you would say the same thing I'm not really sure how to define that I kind of know it when I see it right there some children who are just born adults I happened to be one of them I was basically born an adult and it feels like they have an old soul but what if they are very similar genetically to some relative from before like in my case of Grandfather I'm I'm told I I never met him because he died when I was in the womb but I'm told that I'm sort of the personality spitting image of my grandfather I never met but not so much my father my father was different than both of us so it could be that the genes you know did their thing and I just became very much like my grandfather now here's the interesting thing I don't know if epep is it epigenetics um or laran stuff I don't know if any of that's real is it possible that a grandfather could have a life experience that modified his genes in a way that I would pick up two generations later is that possible a lot of people say yes but just for fun let's say it is just for fun what would happen if my grandfather had a life experience that modified his genes and then I I'm born later would I pick up some of the qualities that would be associated with wait for it lived experience in other words could my genes have picked up experience in a way in a in like an indirect way that came from another human if so it would be very much like I had inherited an older soul but i' done it the honest way through my genes you know nothing magic nothing outside of the Physical Realm but it would feel exactly like a soul being past down and I wonder if I would even have some awareness of it because I feel as if I do I actually feel the length of that connection to my grandfather I've never met but it's probably mental because my mother used to mention it a lot but anyway maybe there's something to genes and souls well let's go to politics the Supreme Court as you know rejected the request to expedite Jack Smith the prosecutor's uh um question about uh whether I think the question is whether Trump would be immune because he was a president during some of the some of the accusations now the Supreme Court rejected reviewing it which means that now the lower court can do its thing because the request had been hey if we think this is going to get to the Supreme Court anyway can we just skip this middle step because it's a waste of time so the Supreme Court said nope you are not going to skip the middle step which I kind of understand the middle step exists for a reason and they did not have a compelling reason that to skip the metal step middle step so they didn't want to do it just because it's important I like that I like the fact that they weren't willing to do it just because it's important because that wasn't the right reason that's not the reason the reason should be that the lower court you know didn't get get it right or something and there was a reason to appeal that's the reason they should handle it so they stuck to it I like it I'm happy with that but here's how people are interpreting it if you turn on any right leaning news or watch anybody tweeting about it they will say this that really the reason that Jack Smith wanted to expedite is so that he could uh put Trump in jail potentially before the election and therefore Trump you know wouldn't have a chance of winning or his chance would be much lower he could still win from jail but his odds would be much lower that that all worked down so that's why you how many of you have seen that reporting and therefore say the experts on the right this this is pretty much proof that the prosecution is political because it was so important to get it done before the election and the only reason to do that is to stop him politically so how many of you are on that page that the Supreme Court and Jack Smith's action are really confirming that the legal part was and it was just political everybody so basically 100% of you are on that page has uh anybody checked out MSNBC have you seen what the left says about this if you haven't seen what the left says about it you're going to need to check it out do you know what the left says about it it's not going to be it's not going to be delayed no it might hold it up a little bit but it'll still be done before the election I I I thought I was like hallucinating because I you I just happened to I was just flipping through some news channels and I caught a legal expert and the Le and the legal expert was very experienced in this field like he was actually a you know a federal department of justice uh lawyer who knew exactly what he was talking about and when people people on the right are like aha you know Trump won because this won't get done before the election a guy who knows exactly what he's talking about said it won't make a much difference yeah may maybe delayed a little bit so now now check check your own propaganda situation Have You Been propagandized by your own side did they tell you some about this is going to make a difference because I don't see it I don't see it at all I don't see anything that happened I'm going to go further to really make you mad I don't see anything that suggest as political why did you all see that what are you saying that I don't see now let me be clear it could be and it probably is like my my intuition my gut my experience and everything I've ever experienced in my whole life all point in the same D same direction which is everything's political all 91 indictments all four cases all political all right so you and I are 100% on the same page that everything's political however trying to expedite a case if if I were the prosecutor I would try to expede the case for what reason what one would be purely political but what would be the other reason to try to expedite a case how about every reason in the world how how about the best reason to expedite a case is that that's exactly what our politicals uh are justice system requires the justice system requires him to try to do to do the job fast if he knows it's going to end up in the Supreme Court he'd be a not to go there first Am I Wrong tell me I'm wrong if you know it's going to go to the Supreme Court he would be a incompetent if he didn't at least see well why don't you see if he could just handle this right away why why would he do all this court preparation for a lower core if it's a complete waste of time don't you think he wants to go home for Christmas too I mean next Christmas no no here so here's the thing you're you're making some assumptions here's the Assumption you're making that there's one and only one valid reason for for asking the Supreme Court to go fast there's every reason to ask them to do that reason number one it's the right thing to do speedy trial speedy trial is the most basic well it's one of the most basic things in our system so you're telling me that you're mad that the prosecutor tried to get a speedy trial and skip a step this completely a waste of time that's why we pay him we pay him to make a speedy trial that doesn't waste anybody's time and you're and we're acting like the only way to interpret that is politically now keep in mind I do think everything that they're doing is political but you don't see it in that it's not in that example well let me be more clear it could be entirely in that example but the alternative that he's just doing his job exactly the way you'd want him to do his job this is exactly how I want him to do his job don't you how many of you would want him not to have tried to skip the unnecessary step would would you be happier if you skip the unnecessary step step why what's the argument for that uh wrong the speed to hurt defense so some are saying that the reason for the speed would be to the defense but but correct me if I'm wrong does not the defense get to argue how much time they need to the court and can that not be modified based on real reasons isn't that normal routine that you you say how much time you need and reasonable people look at it and say yeah and and if something comes up there like a real real real good reason that you know there's some important evidence that just will take another month no matter what wouldn't the judge say all right that's such that's so important we'll change the trial date to make sure we have that so to me it seems like the defense always has the right to at least request under reasonable standards a change in the trial likewise the the prosecution does for any variety of reasons right so you're wrong let me just say this if you haven't seen how the left is treating this issue I feel like you're Flying Blind so you don't need to change your opinion that it's completely political because I think there's enough obvious evidence for that but if you think you proved it because of this I don't see it you're going to have to do better I'm just going to guess what he would say here's what I guess um we Tred to do Speedy trials and not waste money and I tried to skip an unnecessary step that both sides uh prosecution Etc probably thought were unnecessary did we hit the 34 Minute glitch again I'm I've seen both platforms there is 34 minutes what the hell is that it's a 34 Minute glitch but it's on both platforms and the only thing they have in common is my Wi-Fi why would my Wi-Fi glitch every day I feel like there's maybe something comes online that uses the same I don't think it's throttling I don't know buffer overun I don't know it's a mystery all right um let's talk about uh the Rolling Stones has an article about uh Trump who apparently is telling his close advisor types that he plans to keep saying uh that the illegal immigrants are poisoning the blood of America now of course his opponents are saying that came out of mine comp you're talking like Hitler uh stop talking like Hitler to which Trump says I think I'm going to double down on talking like Hitler no don't do it you sound like hiter now I'm going to Triple my talk like Hiller no no you're so Hitler stop it okay now I'm going to do nothing but Hitler no no I I feel like he's just making them crazy because he's literally doubling down on the thing that they think is his biggest um his biggest vulnerability just think about it he's doubling down on giving them fod for what they consider his biggest vulnerability what's up with that is he suddenly stupid Trump is it is it like just doesn't make any sense my first reaction was why would you do this this is just making your job harder all you had to do is just keep your mouth shut and just you know Coast into the job yeah well let me suggest the possibility because I know I know I'm getting mocked for oh you're doing 44 D CHS no he's just being stupid maybe maybe well it's not how I would have played it so but let's just explore the possibility there's something here that's more strategic than obvious uh and this comes from uh Andre uh what was his name famous tennis Andre Agassi so Andre Agassi when he would play against top players he he only needed to do this but against the top players uh let's say he's playing somebody who has the best backand in the world they like oh my God you don't want to hit to their backand do you know what he would do hit to their backand because it was their best shot cuz if he could break it down there was nothing left cuz if he takes s their best shot by you know winning more points on their best shot than they Wi on their best shot their entire uh architecture of confidence crumbles so he can beat people in the first few games right it's like maybe you have to win three out of five sets but he can win in the first three games all he has to do is go right at their strongest shot until he wins more points than they want on their strongest shot and then they're dead they're absolutely dead and then the rest of it is just you know bayonetting the the wounded basically now you have to be so good that you can beat their best shot so I mean it's not like so much a strategy as you know he's so good but he could have very easily you know tried to go to the weak shot which would tell the other person that they have a really good shot because he's really staying away from my forehand so you don't give him any confidence you just go right at their best shot you break it down and then they got nothing they have nothing left after that now what is what is the Democrats best shot on Trump well clearly they've completely abandoned anything like policy just you is he's a he's a dictator and you fill in the blanks we we have some new Democrats who have added some new dictators so an anti-trump group uh is now comparing him in some kind of AD to M musolini or Orban Orban is the leader of uh Hungary no who is Orban Hungary right yeah so they're comparing him to other leaders that they think are totalitarian now um let me mock this they actually have to add more dictators so so saying that Trump was like Hitler wasn't getting him any traction so here was their strategy I think we don't have enough dictators okay they're not buying the they're not buying Hitler what if we add uh musi well now you're talking now you're talking that's two dictators wow I wasn't too concerned when you compared Trump to one dictator but oh my God now two Orban Orban three three oh no oh no three dictators how about Putin oh no it's Putin oh four dictators oh oh do you know what this makes me uh think of when they keep adding dictators see if this doesn't make you laugh I'm I'm waiting to see if anybody said it yet in the comments you're not there yet two words you ready for it more cowbell yeah what do you think more cowbell do you know why that's funny now first of all it's uh comes from Saturday live uh and what was the name of the actor uh who's got the uh yeah Christopher Walkin in some skit he's doing some musical skit and he's insisting that there'd be more cowbell now cowbell is usually the you know sort of the least respected instrument you except maybe the tambourine you know that when the lead singer like does the tambourine because the lead singer can't play an instrument but beyond the tambourine the probably the cowbell is the least respected of the the instrument Parts um but I I just think of more cowbell every time they add a new dictator and I feel like just saying that it's like well he's like Hitler go on well he's also like musolini more cowbell well he's also like Orban more cowbell well he's also like Putin more cowbell well he's also kind of like Paul pot more cowbell well he's also like Thanos more cowbell so just yell more cowbell every time they had a dictator it'll be funny so here's why Trump might be smarter than you think he goes for energy and he goes for um he's breaking down their strongest uh their strongest stroke this is their backand well I'll call it their forehand because forehand usually stronger that this is the democrat's forehand he's going out their forehand he's he's so aggressive which is why people like him like he doesn't it would be easy for him to to back down from this and say you know we love the immigrants we love them love the immigrants but you know we need to do a little more on the border that's not really going to make you excited or even believe he's going to do much but if he goes further than he's supposed to go to the point where his opponents are calling him Hiller more cowbell mus more cowbell or Ben then he's got him right where he wants him what are you thinking about when Trump is going too far on the border what do you think thinking about where's your brain go that that it'll get the job done but by making you think that he'll go too far it makes you think well at least he'll get the job done he his his persuasion is not exactly how I would do it but like I always say you can't compare him to any other human or animal like Trump is is just his own entity like it comparing him to anything is just a waste of time he's just his own and I think he's going right at their forehand because he wants to break it down now let me ask you if they compare him to every dictator in the world and it's all they have between now and election day who wins if it's all they have it's just more cowbell it's going to sound like people will just be used to it and it'll just look stupid yeah so let me give you a good general rule for persuasion or for spotting a dishonest argument here's a good rule somebody who has an honest argument in politics or anything else is going to say here are the pros and here are the cons but when you consider all the pros and you consider all the cons on net I'm in favor of this or I'm against it now then you've got something to work with maybe you debate the the facts maybe you debate the priorities but that's an honest argument here's all the pros here's all the cons here's what I think about it on that so if you see that you should engage as an honest debater yourself you know if you want to be a good person uh because that's an honest person they're they're trying even if they disagree with you it looks like they're trying now here's what not an honest debate looks like analogies if all you're getting is scary analogies you know this is like the Great Depression you know this is like Hitler you know this reminds me of you know the destruction of the Roman Empire you know right if you have analogies without an argument that is a dishonest debate it's dishonest because they're not trying to win on any kind of logic or priorities or anything they're just trying to scare the that of you so I don't know why nobody else is mentioning this why am I the only one to mention that the attacks against Trump have nothing to do with his policies it's entirely analogies they're simply taking other people in other situations well you know Hitler in 1939 well you know what it's not ger it's not 1939 he's not a Hiller and almost nothing about that applies but if your brain thinks it does then it can be persuasive now I'm not saying the Democrats are not being persuasive they are it's just all they have they really have to run as far as and hard as they can from policy because Biden didn't deliver and everybody everybody can see for example that the borders a mess and crime in the city and all that um I'm going to agree with Biden people on one thing I do think the economy is better than the press or the public maybe is quite realized now you say to yourself but but you know prices are too high yes and the debt is out of control yes so if you looked at those two things they actually are a mess but it is we we have a strange economy where employment's not so bad and if anything employers are going to be begging for workers um I do think workers pay has gone up maybe not as much as inflation um it does look like we're getting our um Supply chains slowly but consistently we're getting our supply chains under control that's good especially the the critical stuff you know not fast enough enough not nearly fast enough but moving in the right direction so I'm going to give I'm going to give Biden a uh B minus on the economy B minus which is probably better than the public thinks it is because that when you buy the gas and you buy the groceries you know you just vomit in your own mouth I mean even I do and I'm I'm doing okay like when I when I buy groceries I'm actually shocked I'm shocked and I can afford it so you it's not affecting my life too much but I was shocked when I had this little pile of Gres and they're like that'll be $200 I'm like what that that that little that little pile that's $200 I mean it just my mind exploded normally I don't even pay attention to honestly you know I hate to say it because it's such a douchebag thing I don't really pay attention to small consumer item prices because you know it doesn't affect my life but is so high that I'm actually paying attention and I'm actually making decisions that I wouldn't have made before about well maybe I don't need that so yeah I can see why people think the economy is garbage but it's probably a little bit better than they think it's just not affecting them personally yet uh I am worried about the crushing debt I don't know how we get out of that all right um here's Governor New talking about uh Trump let's see if you can find his policy criticisms policy criticisms here's Governor Nome um he he warned that efforts to prevent former president Trump from getting on the ballot in his state would be political distraction so he doesn't want to do it but oh that's very big of him isn't it like it matters in California California doesn't matter Trump's not going to win California so it doesn't matter what they do so Nome instead of Nome saying it doesn't matter what we do because he's not going to win California he just says it's a political distraction which is actually pretty smart because it sounds more like a high ground you know I'm the adult in the room don't bother with this trivial stuff he's right about it uh but then he says this quote there is no doubt I like that there's no doubt oh no there's no doubt see if you have any doubt about what follows in the rest of the sentence because he told you there's no doubt so what follows must be true to every human in the world no doubt so there is no doubt that Donald Trump is a threat to our liberties and even to our democracy Now what was the part about his policies I say that's it where's the part about when he was president last time which wasn't too long ago he did all of these terrible things and took away your Liberties I don't remember that happening I feel like that was kind of weird that Trump waited until the second term to take away our liberties why doesn't he take away our liberties in the first four years if he's going to take away our liberties so you can see now that even Nome who is sort of the standard of quality for the Democrats he's basically the best they have I hate to say it he's the best they have and he's not even touching policy the only way he'll touch policy is to tell you it's like Hitler so he's you know roughly touching on immigration policy but he doesn't mention it it's like well Hitler what do you think about Trump's po policy about uh energy and drill baby drill well Hiller what do you think about Trump's uh saying he could you know stop the war in Ukraine well Hitler that's all they have more cowbell I tell you consistently that you can't understand uh politics until you understand the players so wherever I can I'm going to tell you about a player that you'll remember that the next time you see the that player you'll know you're not dealing with an honest broker of information right have you heard of a publication called the Atlantic well the Atlantic is perhaps the very worst of the absurdly political biased uh anti-trump deranged but because the Atlantic is an old institution as a publication there are many people as in Democrats who don't know it's not a legitimate publication I mean it's not even close to legitimate it's just a purely political instrument so what did they say um today they had an article says in the debate over Freedom versus control of the global Network meaning the internet Freedom versus control China was largely correct and the US was wrong yes the Atlantic would like you to believe that China is more correct in censoring their internet because the only way the Democrats can win is to prevent Republicans from having free speech they're kind of saying it directly now now here's the important part the fact that it's in the Atlantic tells you that it's U basically a Democrat op it's not just a bunch of people who agree with Democrats it's more likely very connected to the Democrat strategy then just you know randomly agrees with them if the Democrat strategy is to get you feeling a little bit better about Chinese level censorship or the Iranian model where the uh the Ayatollah decides who's on the ballot oh yeah we have democracy here you can vote for anybody you want as long as I've approved them being on the ballot so that's that's what they're trying to do with Trump you can vote for anybody you want but we're going to tell you who can be on the ballot so yeah so the Atlantic is part of this Mass misinformation Democrat machine that's trying to propagandize you or prime you for greater internet control do you know why because that misinformation that you're getting in other words everything Republicans say according to them that Miss information would lead to what what would it lead to could it lead to losing your Liberty and your democracy yeah so that the so the Atlantic is one of the ones to keep in your mind that whatever they're saying is an OP it's not news and it's not exactly even an opinion it's not even the real opinion of the people saying it it's an OP you should see it that way it's just pure propaganda well this is disturbing uh Congressman Tim burette uh described on a podcast how the blackmail operations work in Congress now what is scarier than thinking the worst about something and then finding out is exactly correct now I don't know if Tim berett has seen this or he's just like us where he just assumes it's true but he's he's there I feel like he saw it here's how he describes the system now remember he's in the system he's not like us he's not looking from the outside he's in the system that he's describing this way quote uh this is how it works you're visiting uh you're out of the country you're out of town or you're in a motel or bar in DC and some uh whatever you're into women or men or whatever comes up and they're very attractive and they're laughing at your jokes and you're buying them a Dr things and next thing you know you're in the motel room with them naked and the next thing you know you're about to make a key vote and what happens some well-dressed person comes up and Whispers In Your Ear hey man there's tape sound on you were you in a hotel room on whatever with whoever and then you're like oh and said uh you really you really ought to be not be voting for this thing do you think that's accurate I mean he's he could not be a better Source he's right in the middle of this world is it Act is it literally that obvious it's like right on the nose they literally have the what do you call it the the sugar trap or something there's some name for it what's the name for that when the a honey poot yeah so it's a sugar trap it's a Honeypot um that literally there's hyot and that literally somebody comes up and says we have tapes now I'm sure that has happened in American history and you know numerous times I'm sure but I wonder how Universal it is it does it describe literally everything because I think this has been happening since what J Edgar Hoover that there's been you know like a an ongoing blackmail operation well um do you know what makes this worse what why are politicians easy to Blackmail I'm going there's an obvious reason do you know why I mean other than the fact they do bad things but other people do bad things too um I have a feeling that one of the reasons people go into politics is that they're too ugly to get laid otherwise Am I Wrong look look at your politicians and then you subtract down some outliers it's like okay JFK he was good-look right and apparently had a pretty active sex life but you know he's he's an outlier if if Mitch Mitchell is getting a little on the side do you think it's because he's quite a lover he really knows how to get it done if you know what I mean he's a finisher probably not now I'm not suggesting he's having any kind of situation like that I'm just saying that if you were to take a picture of the certainly the men in Congress it's mostly the men I think if you took a picture of the men they're not exactly killing it on Tinder so I think they're unusually easy to Blackmail because you just got to pay somebody to you know close their eyes and do whatever drugs they need to to get the job done but yeah I think uh Congress is especially s uh they're especially susceptible to this so my suggestion is this you should either uh only vote for people who can get laid without your help in other words they don't need the job well I can still get laid and then maybe maybe less blackmail um or people who have been uh so thoroughly vetted that you wouldn't be surprised a bit and the blackmail wouldn't even work if you caught them with their pants down in the middle of a you know the Public Square can you think of anybody like that who would be who would be a politician who has been caught so many times that it wouldn't even mean anything if you caught him again yeah and Trump is perfect I I think he's as close to unblack a mailable as we've ever had for a leader he might be he might be the Pinnacle of an unblack amable person and I I remind you of this all the time but when he was running for office the first time he said publicly I'm No Angel when he did that I said to myself okay you just told us what what the game is I'm No Angel but I'm on your side that was a pretty good package I wanted somebody to say I'm No Angel so if something comes out later that shows them they're No Angel go oh well you didn't you didn't lie to me I guess I should have seen it coming but at the same time he says I'm not going to be an angel but I'm going to be the I'm going to be the on your side and then he acts exactly like he's on your side closing the Border Etc so I can live with that I I can totally live with I'm No Angel but I'm going to be the the demon on your team sounds good to me all right um there are all these uh Trump Nikki Haley rumors CBS is reporting that Trump was asking his allies about the possibility of Nikki hilly for vice president and then then Trump supporters got all excited and upset and yada yada y here's my take on that if there's one thing we've learned about Trump he will ask all the questions that are the right questions to ask and then when he's done asking all the right questions to ask he'll go a little further which I actually love about him remember the story about he asked if he could use a nuclear weapon to stop a hurricane do you remember that now I don't know if he ever asked that question I think he denied it but I love the fact if he did I love it now the answer was no that's crazy and then it didn't come up again but don't you like that he ask the question just brainstorm right I I absolutely like that he asked the question I had no problem with that at all so when he asked the question what about Nikki hilly as vice president that is not an indication that he likes her on the ticket to me that's the normal Trump way of doing business that he doesn't see it because if he saw it he wouldn't be asking am I right if if he felt she was the right choice he wouldn't be asking the question so he's not feeling it and and when he asks the question it suggests that he's looking for somebody to make the best argument to see if it changes his mind that is good that's good for you should always check to see if somebody can change your mind because it's one of the biggest questions right his his VP is one of the biggest questions so he wants get it right right and and just like I was going to use that example when he got in trouble for asking about the injecting of the disinfectant the the context was light as the disinfectant so he went beyond what you'd expect and asked the extra question well could you use light you know if you could inject the light inside the body would it work and then it got misinterpreted misinterpreted as drinking bleach of course but I wanted him to ask the question I was happy he asked the question it just got turned out wrong so yeah ask the question I don't think there's any chance and um as I posted um I don't think I could support him if she were Vice President let me do a quick poll many of you are probably Trump supporters should he get the nomination you may maybe you're supporting somebody else but if he got the nomination how many of you would withdraw your support if Nikki hilly were the vice president all right yeah it looks like people would withdraw support now let me ask you this question can you even think of another choice for voice vice president that would make you change your vote people don't change their vote for the vice president but they would for her I would I I literally that not hyperbole I I that would be a hard know because I would I would lose confidence in Trump I would lose confidence in his judgment If he if he took such an obvious wrong choice so Pence was a good choice because we didn't know much about him so you just say well all right whatever if you like him he's it's okay with me but Haley we know too much about especially in the military industrial complex way now I don't know if the accusations against Nikki hilly are you know as solid as they appear to be which is she's a little too close to the military Spenders uh but it could be I mean it's a huge red flag so it doesn't seem like the right fit for Trump I'm glad he's asking the question my personal assumption is zero chance it will happen zero chance but I think he and Haley have had a uh a good history right am I right I thought they got along when she was in the administration so I don't mind at all they ask the question because asking the question is how he finds out how other people feel about it and that's exactly what he should be doing he's probably thinking that his own judgment let me put it another way because he worked with her and had a you know reasonably good Association I think he's not trusting his own judgment and he wants to get some more objective opinions on it but he'll be fine there's no way he's going to pick her uh but Nikki hilly does seem to be surging in the New Hampshire polling all the way up to just barely behind Trump who is polling at 33% with two or 29% the rest of the field is way behind now that's probably what triggered Trump to start asking the question but does does New Hampshire mean anything to anybody I feel like New Hampshire is the least indicative um primary isn't it the it goes first so it can definitely change how we think about it but it shouldn't so I don't know I'm not worried about New Hampshire Trump was asked if he would debate a Republican and I guess you who had to ask him that and he gave exactly the right answer exactly the right answer the right answer is yes if it gets close but it's not there yet because he wants act strong like of course I would talk to them but he also doesn't want to look like he's wasting his time with the undercard so he gives the exactly the right answer if if somebody comes close yeah that would make sense have a debate just what you want to hear he might not mean it but it's exactly the right answer um here's something you didn't see coming um Rond de sanus uh had been backed by I guess one of the biggest B backers it's the main outside group uh was a pack polit political action committee uh called Never Back Down Never back down let's get an update on Never back down oh they're backing down they're backing down so uh they're they're not going to run ads in Iowa or New Hampshire they're uh they're not going to run ads in Iowa or New Hampshire the first two primaries I feel like they backed down let me give you some hypnotist and humorist advice when you're picking the name of your group you should say to yourself how can this be mock it's exactly the same if you're picking a name for your child if your last name is Cass don't name your child Jack am I right because you should ask yourself how old the school kids respond to naming my child Jack Cass do you think that will cause any problems now I only mentioned that because I grew up with somebody named Jack Cass yeah I mean he his born name was Jonathan but everybody called him jack so yeah don't do that never call your pack Never back down if you think you might back down all right surprise of the day uh W Street Apes had this post so You' probably heard of uh The Honorable Mr.

Minister Lewis faran you all know who he is right so uh I think he's accused to be of being anti-semitic but he is a uh well-known powerful longtime leader in the black community for the subset of the black community who likes his messages so he's very controversial um specifically anti-semitic is the is the charge on him um but here's what he said there just mind-blowing now remember I said that those doppelgangers and those coinci res es they might associate a larger shift in Consciousness a larger shift in Consciousness let me let me read to you what the honorable Minister Lewis faran says about Donald Trump this is recent I'll read the whole thing um quote uh the nature of this Administration is good for us he was talking about Trump maybe this was uh maybe this is when Trump was not sure the on this um he says because of Trump's way he is an anomaly there's never been no president quite like Mr.

Trump there's something that he's doing Trump is destroying every enemy that was an enemy of our rise in this case he's talking about Black Americans so he's saying that Trump and black Americans have the same enemies that sound familiar something I've told you uh he said who's the enemy of arise is it the Department of Justice where we get none is it Congress where where you make a law that favors us and then you turn around and destroy it is it the media that has destroyed every black leader that stood up for us uh Martin Luther King suffered it and then he says uh Malcolm suffered it uh then he talks about Trump some more he says he's attacking in the media calls it fake news we have been the victims of some fake news yes he's beating up the FBI and then he says go at it baby yeah they've been beating the hell out of us ever since J Hoover in the in the counter I don't know what the counter is so does that feel like a shift in Consciousness it does doesn't it so the shift in Consciousness is that the Democrats have been gaslighting them them the black Americans the whole time and that they couldn't tell who their friends were and who their enemies were but when Trump very clearly targeted all the same people that farakhan would call his enemies he couldn't miss it anymore what what would you call noticing that Trump had targeted the the media the FBI the Department of Justice another word for that would be uh would be another word for that it's the same things that Black America wanted he targeted and then trunk actually did it what's another word for that that's a coincidence isn't it kind of a coincidence so lisis farakhan noticed a pattern that maybe he hadn't noticed until recently that wait a minute that's kind of a coincidence I don't I think the Department of Justice is corrupt and now this Republican guy does too that's a weird coincidence wait we think the FBI is corrupt but you're saying Trump says that too s that's two coincidences wait you're saying you're saying that the news the dog the the FBI all of them he's going after all of them do you see the B pattern those doppelgangers are people who are noticing patterns it just happens to be a trivial pattern it's not important you know somebody looks like somebody else but that that raisin Consciousness that allows you to see patterns allows you to break out of the brainwashing because it's those patterns that are the key to the door if you're in your little brainwash bubble there's actually a door and it's got a keyhole and the keyhole are the coincidences wait a minute if if this is true then how could this other thing be true well if it were just one thing maybe you ignore it but wait a minute how but this other thing is true also how does that make sense with this other thing and then the coincidence start to find form a pattern and then the pattern becomes a key and then the key goes in the lock and you escape your bubble fakon just found the keyhole now I'm not a fakon fan so I'm not fanboying fakon that's not happening I'm just saying you're seeing an example of somebody used pattern recognition as an escape and it worked um here's another pattern tuer Carlson talking about uh Assange Julian Assange and Julian Assange did a number of uh journalistic things that other people call him a spy I guess and the journalistic things were very embarrassing for our Intel organizations and you the Deep State basically and Hillary Clinton and apparently we have reporting that Mike pompe oo was talking about plans to murder Assange to murder him so now you've got Democrats who want him dead Assange you got a prominent Republican who was even running for president at one point who wanted him dead reportedly um and it seems to me that Assange has embarrassed the Deep state which might be a little bit both Republican and Democrat at its space so the question is why why are so many people wanting to kill him or put him in jail forever when you and I aren't quite sure why it's been a long time shouldn't I be able to express the other argument as easily as I can express the you know the freom why do I only know the argument of why he's a journalist and should be freed why am I not aware of the counterargument is that a coincidence don't see it anywhere now now I know the general argument that he revealed some stuff that would cause some people to get killed or something and I'd like to see that argument and if that's the case you know that's important but there there's something about the lack of transparency and the fact that he's being treated the way he's treated that tells you that this is that everything about this is corrupt and wrong and should be stopped I don't know what's wrong with it and I don't know what's corrupt but this isn't adding up sorry the the pattern recognition is too clear the pattern is if they had the real Goods the stuff they could argue with the public was important and you would agree with it they would tell you yeah they would tell you when somebody doesn't have an argument that they're willing to share with you it's because they don't have one I mean I I have a trouble believing that there are secrets that's that are the real reason that we don't know what's going on so I don't trust our government in at all on the Assange situation and therefore because citizens although not in American citizen citizens have the uh presumption of innocence so my presumption about Assange is innocent and as you know one of the things that the bad guys do if they can't figure out a legal way to take you out is they come up with a fake sex charge so you know Assange had this fake sex charge hanging over him some rape charge or something and do you know why it went away because there was never any evidence for it it just went away it just it was fake yeah so everything that you think is the worst case scenario sort of like the representative burette was telling you about the black male if you imagine that they wouldn't cause a fake rape charge to take down an enemy you're not living in the real world CU yeah they would yeah they would yeah Matt Gates perfect example yeah fake fake sex charges are a common way to take somebody down so my take on Assange is I don't know if he did anything bad I don't know but the lack of transparency is so disgusting that I am firmly on the you better free him or basically put up or shut up right my assumption is everybody's a dirty murderer who wants him to stay where he is you're all dirty murderers I I don't trust anybody who wants him in jail if they won't tell you why I'm open to the argument arent I'm open to the argument I can be persuaded that he should stay in jail but no argument strangely missing nope not buying it for a minute he should be freed and and I'm also curious why Trump didn't do it because you know there was pressure on Trump to do it so there's more to the story because the fact that you can't get a Republican or a Democrat to to do it and yet we don't know what's going on a this thing's all corrupt and dirty well outgoing Louisiana governor Edwards uh according to the amuse account on X um has decided to Pardon uh 40 murderers what that that can't be possible I know for sure nobody would pardon 40 murderers that'd be crazy right no it says he pardoned 40 murders now as amuse asks what possible reason what's the reason for that now I do know that when politicians are leaving office in retiring it's not that unusual to Pardon a bunch of people that maybe you think shouldn't be pardoned but murderers 40 murderers you what it makes me wonder uh if they were since it was Louisiana I wonder if they were falsely accused do do you think it's like 40 black guys who who just the accusations were too weak and he's just saying you know what I'm not even sure any of these people murdered anybody it could be yeah so I think there's more we need to know about that uh but the question of why you doing it is the right question I'm I'm going to guess he doesn't think that they were the cases were strong enough and that maybe the relics from a more racist past and maybe it's just time to set it right I don't know could we'll find out well fedman continues to uh be interesting uh he thanked President Biden for uh pardoning certain marijuana offenses and he called the charges weed charges he said in a statement he said a few Christmases ago as lieutenant governor I push for legal weed and uh and delivering pardons for weed charges okay Federman stop it just stop it I don't want to love you I don't want to love you you're making me love you I don't like it stop just cut it out I love that he wants to pardon the the weed people I love even more that he calls the charges cut it out stop it stop it damn it I love you all right um uh Ian miles Chong is reporting that a tribunal in the UK has ruled that is not discrimination for a company to rule out white men from being hired what what it's not discrimination to discriminate interesting take you'd almost think it's built right into the word there discriminate okay um but it makes me ask this question and yes I'm serious I need a backup plan uh if it becomes you know if America becomes like South Africa like what's my backup plan where where can a white man and go to be safe and to be treated like a full citizen certainly not America but where can I go now I'll tell you that tell you where people suggest it they they said Poland Hungary uh Italy Japan Argentina Iceland um Indonesia Bhutan Paraguay Paraguay for the weed UAE but here's the problem yeah so I'm ruling out New Zealand and Australia because they already went woke Thailand Thailand's on the list of possibilities Antarctica is looking good not a lot of discrimination there except against Penguins or something um Cuba is due for a flip Switzerland you say not so sure I I think I think Europe has the uh is islamicized problem I think Europe will probably become Islamic eventually and Hungary is too close to Russia for my tastes too close and New Zealand and Australia too woke uh Iceland as I told you Iceland had volcanoes and the whole country melted it was all made of ice yeah so Iceland doesn't exist anymore because the volcano melted it so that's out of out of the question uh no not really it's still there um well Alaska is not a country you Montenegro yeah I don't want to be over in that Europe Eastern Europe area not comfortable with that you know what you know one of the best answers was was Argentina apparently Argentina is both multiethnic and true Melting Pot can anybody confirm that I've actually heard really good things about Argentina and uh the people and sort of the social part is that true or is that an exaggeration I I had a friend who used to travel there just for the women and apparently he had a really really good time because all you had to do is be an American and walk in the door and suddenly you'd be popular with the ladies that's what he said well Argentina might be a m in terms of their economy and all that but if you had your own money is is the culture at least non-discriminatory Saudi Arabia Philippines that's interesting Philippines yeah so I don't have plans to move but I think you know it's just sort of my way to be prepared for everything you know my house was built to to withstand you know all the common disasters and I built in a place that was you know free from most of the common disasters and you know if if I lost my power I could live right the coldest day in California you know gets in the 40s I can make a fire and put some blankets on me I could live right but if you if you lose your electricity in Wisconsin in February like if the whole State loses its power well good luck with that so I've always picked tried to pick um situations where you have lots of Escape you can get away you can survive you know all that stuff my house has its own water supply I don't have to depend on the town so and I've got a solar but I don't have a battery yet I need to add a battery back up um but likewise I think it is time for white men to at least have a backup plan because I do think America could fall in terms of being safe to live here it's not there but you know that the these things can be right on the edge for a long time before they they flip so things could change quickly it's good to have a backup plan I heard Costa Rica heard good things about Costa Rica but I think that might be more about the lifestyle than it is about lack of discrimination uay oh uay not Paraguay yeah Uruguay is the better one than Paraguay right do I have that right Neverland Joe stale yeah probably not Guyana all right ladies and gentlemen that's all I got for you today thanks for joining the best live stream ever and You.

Tube I will talk to you tomorrow if you're wondering will I be live streaming on Christmas day what do you think will I be live streaming at the normal time on Christmas day yeah yeah yes I will because I don't take days off so I'll see you on Christmas but also see you tomorrow and uh have a great day thanks You.

Tube

good morning everybody and welcome to

the highlight of human

civilization it's called coffee with

Scott Adams and there's never been a

better time in your entire life if you'd

like this experience to go up to levels

that you'll never forget in your small

human brains can't even comprehend well

all you need for that is a cuper muger

glass a tanker gel ofin a Canen Jugger

flask a vessel of any kind fill it with

your favorite liquid I like coffee and

join me now for the unparal pleasure the

dope am Med of the day the thing that

makes everything better it's called

that's right it's a simultaneous Sip and

happens now

go take a moment to sa her if you're

waking and

baking

continue well I'm trying a new uh

microphone setup for

YouTube um it appears that uh how how is

the audio on YouTube

should be a little worse than normal but

clear yeah okay good looks like we're

good um here's something I learned just

moments ago from a Instagram video

apparently and I saw screenshots so I

think this is real the German high

school students have lessons on how

Americans are propagandized by their

government is that awesome or what

right German students learn how

Americans are propagandized by their own

government do you know who doesn't learn

that

Americans so if you want to find out

what's happening to Americans you got to

ask a German because they learn it in

school that's a real thing I think I

mean I'll take a fact check on this but

there were

screenshots and and uh one of the one of

the German textbooks according to the

screenshot says America has become uh uh

no longer

self-critical and we

lonely and my first reaction to that was

godamn you Germans why are you calling

us not self-critical and and

lonely okay you're right it's true you

nailed it but why do you have to say

that about us damn it stop being

accurate well Tucker Carlson clarified

his uh his belief about what the uh

unusual uaps some call them UFOs are all

about and he

believes that these beings have always

been here so Tucker believes there are

real beings some kind of other

civilization that have always been here

and that they have a spiritual

component interesting so he's not buying

into the aliens from another planet but

that there is something

here how many of you believe that that

there's something here that's spiritual

in

nature I'm going to go with

nope there's nothing

here I'd love to believe there were you

know I I like my conspiracy theories I

like them a lot but no

now let me let me

reiterate why I don't believe

it I acknowledge there's a mountain of

evidence you've got your whistleblowers

eyewitnesses you got people under oath

you got video you've got radar you've

got sonar you've got my God so much so

much and none of us

good there there are a million things

that have that much Direct evidence that

are not true you want an

example how about uh president Trump

once called neo-nazis Fine people well

that must be true there's tons of

evidence you can look at the video all

the news is reporting it and then if you

want to say well but is it true or is it

like a oneoff well then you would look

at all the the mountain of evidence that

suggests that Trump is a racist dictator

it's a mountain of evidence so it must

be true but it isn't true I mean seems

to be it's not true so the most ordinary

thing in the world is to have a mountain

of evidence for something that isn't

true because the evidence has a certain

quality to it it's all kind of sketchy

there's a lot of it but it's all kind of

sketchy those are the ones you got to

watch out

for all right um Brian remelli has a

post on

X telling us that there's a two from

there's a surian

tablet so suaria you all know where the

Sumerians were right do you know where

the samarians

were let let's check your general

knowledge that's correct yeah the area

which we now call Iraq and you know the

larger area there so the samarians were

there a thousands of years ago and they

found this Samaran tablet from 2000

BCE which apparently shows a several

math

problems uh being solved including

drawings of trapezoids and triangles

uhoh it suggests very strongly that the

samarians understood Pythagorean

theorem long before the Greek

philosopher

Pythagoras and and Brian ends his post

with the Amnesia of who we really

are now I told you I'd like conspiracy

theories here's the one I like the

best if we know that there are all these

buried civilizations we keep finding

like there's a one whose name I can't

call G cppy there's a what's the one

it's called G

Gopi something glei

and there's

Tey yes like I said how many times do I

have to say Clearly say it Go Blacky

teppy but it's the name of a another one

of these ancient uh you know incredible

sites that got dug up it was completely

buried and appears to have signs signs

of civilization beyond what we believed

existed at at the time of these ruins so

there are lots of

hints that there might have been an

earlier form of humans that were more

advanced and something

happened so that we lost maybe we lost

what they

knew so I got of believe that one

because because if you look at our

ability to reconstruct history whether

it's the you know the evolutionary tree

which are always changing and evolving

or the history of humankind you know did

we all come out of Africa is it more

complicated than that the there are big

things about the history of the planet

that we revise all the time I would not

be surprised at all if we were once more

more

advanced and it wasn't a straight line

from primitive to Advanced I've got a

feeling it was kind of a a bumpy ride

where we got more advanced and that we

got wiped out by war and we got more

advanced and then we got wiped out by a

flood you know probably something like

that it's my guess

um but I've always been amazed that

there are abandoned

cities why would you ever abandon a

city there there's something I

fundamentally don't understand about

history it's like a whole city you built

the thing now I understand if somebody

conquers a city but if you conquer a

city you don't you stay there and like

run the

city like why why would you get rid of

all the people and then leave it leave

it empty so long that it gets covered

with sand like nobody's sweeping for you

know a thousand

years if you were a homeless primitive

person and you knew there was a whole

abandoned city

somewhere when you move

in I don't know maybe it's food it might

it might be all about food and resources

yeah I I can I can understand

disease but disease would kill everybody

and then let's say it becomes empty but

once it's empty you telling me nobody

wants to move back in there's no other

civilization that says hey free City

there's nobody in the city let's just

take it maybe Superstition maybe they

don't want to inhabit dead people's

homes

maybe uh Mike

cernovich tweeted that he's been seeing

more doppelgangers than you usual

doppelganger meaning somebody who looks

just like somebody else he said a friend

even sent one of me meaning covich uh

could be code reuse as Scott Adams

says um if so why now of course he's

just being provocative and having fun

with it you know don't take it too

seriously but how many of you are

familiar with a book written decades ago

called The Celestine prophecies have you

ever heard of that it was a very

influential it's a fiction it's just a

fictional story but the a key Concept in

those books was that when people started

noticing coincidences more often the

coincidences were a signal for a

Consciousness shift that human awareness

was about to take a leap now I've always

been fascinated by that and there's no

reason in the world to think that a

Consciousness shift would be

preed by some kind of bunch of

coincidences

unless there's an obvious reason for

it you you want to hear an obvious

reason why you might notice more

coincidences right before a perceptual

shift like a really obvious

reason the coincidences were always

there but your awareness improved and

you're just noticing something that was

right in front of you the whole whole

time but you just didn't see it so when

somebody noticed a Doppel ganger of Mike

cernovich maybe you year ago they would

have walked right past

him not even

noticed so I'm not saying any this is

true I'm just having fun with it but you

could imagine a situation in which the

general awareness of the public is

increasing and they not only see the big

stuff more clearly such as the

misinformation you know architecture of

our existence such as the full

propagandized news you know that sort of

thing if you're noticing the big stuff

that you didn't really quite understand

before wouldn't it make sense that

you're also maybe noticing other

patterns just because your pattern

recognizer has gone to another

level and might we see might we see

other examples that would

suggest that human awareness is reaching

a new

level do you know anybody who predicted

that human awareness was about to take a

gigantic change yes that would be me in

2016 or 15 I can't remember uh I

predicted a number of times in public

and nobody even commented on it because

it was such a strange prediction that

Trump would change

more than politics

that he would rip a hole in the fabric

of reality and change how we saw reality

itself one of my better

predictions all right but uh let's uh

let's take this a little bit uh

further why why are some other reasons

that you might be able to see more

coincidences well it could be like I

said there's a coincidence storm that

you apparently notice because your

ability to notice things is getting

better in general or here's another

possibility maybe it is code reuse and

we're a simulation that we're literally

a program and the program is reaching

some limits you know physical limits

because we keep getting more complicated

more people are born every person has a

complicated life that has to integrate

with every other complicated life so you

could quite easily imagine that even an

amazingly powerful computer would reach

some kind of limitation of its resources

eventually doesn't have to but it but it

could now if you were the programmer and

you were like really good like you're

not even an average programmer like

you're a programmer from the future or

even AI wrote it maybe AI programmed it

so it really knew how to take care of

every possibility that's that's the best

programmer right the best programmer

anticipates everything that could go

wrong and then programs around it so one

of of the things that could go wrong is

you'd run out of resources then what are

you going to do slow it down and then we

all start moving in slow motion would we

notice it I think I'm moving in slow

motion suddenly no that's a bad

solution how

about the program starts to reuse code

so it doesn't have to make up new code

all the

time that would save some resources so

maybe you would say oh hell I'm not

going to design a new person I'll just

copy some of the people I already have

and they're not going to

notice maybe so maybe you're just

running out of resources in the

simulation I don't think that's true but

like to put on all the fun

possibilities but here's the thing you

have to understand about what you see

around

you if you could somehow know in in

where you're sitting right now as you're

watching this your exact environment

where you are if you had some way to

know

how much of your actual environment that

you think you see clearly is actually a

clear picture if you could trace the

light coming into your eyes and then how

that's translated into a signal and how

that reaches your brain if you could see

that somehow separate from how your

brain is processing it you would see

it's just this big fuzzy approximate

thing yeah and that would blow your mind

it's a good thing you can't see that

what's really happening is your brain is

making you see Clarity where it non

exists let let me tell you what's

probably close to

real all right if I hold this object in

my hand and I and I put all my focus on

it there's a reasonably good chance that

I'm seeing this very simple clean object

in the middle of my field somewhat close

to how it actually exists but everything

in my peripheral I imagine is also clear

but I'm not looking at it at the moment

but probably it's all just invented it's

just sort of like this General canvas of

invention that your brain is putting in

there because your brain can't see

everything clearly here's where I

learned this

first a tennis player uh who watches

ball hit near a line and then you know

there's an argument hey I saw it clearly

hitting the line and somebody else says

I clearly saw it outside which one of

them is right

one saw it hit the line and one saw it

missed the line which one was right now

you say well how would I know I'm not

there you're just making up this example

no there's an answer There's an actual

answer to the

question the answer is neither of them

are right both of them are seeing an

invention of their mind neither of them

are seeing a ball hit

alive they're not and the we reason we

know that is at a certain speed speed

your eyes can't really process it so the

ball is coming in faster than your eyes

can see it and the moment it hits is

actually your

hallucination you don't actually even

see the ball

hit now I think sometimes you do by

coincidence because you're kind of

seeing the ball at stages and then your

brain is filling in the in between stuff

but the part you're seeing is here then

here than here so if you were lucky at

the exact time the ball hit was also a

time you were seeing it well maybe you

did see it but

probably your brain filled in a little

movie of where it it thinks it

landed and you you think you saw it with

your own eyes but what you saw was your

brain inventing a scene for you because

it couldn't see it at that

speed yeah most of what you see is

invented by your brain it's not actually

what it looks like like but your brain

says it's

clear now let me give you another

example let's say I'm a bad programmer

and I want to create a simulated world

but I don't want to give it a lot of

detail because my computers are not

strong enough to make everything precise

and detailed but I don't want the

characters who are in the simulation to

know it's not detailed because if they

see it pixelated you know then the game

is over they're like hey I'm in a

pixelated environment this is obviously

a simulation so that's not going to work

so instead I program it like

this hey hey little character in the

program that I just wrote If you think

you're looking at an object right in

front of you your brain will see this

clearly that's it that's the whole

program your brain will see it clearly

even if your eyes don't really have the

ability to do that so your your

environment will always be be

clear but it's not actually what's there

or what your what your eye is picking

up so yeah reality is kind of weird um

the other possibility is that these

coincidences are something called a

coincidence and they don't mean anything

at all and you're not in the simulation

and there no doppelgangers and none of

it's none of it's real I mean if you're

going to bet on it I think I'd bet on it

just being a coincidence but it's fun

here's another possibility for

doppelgangers uh this from a reply by

Michael

guarin and I think I'll just read it

because it's so well expressed i' never

heard this

before and uh Michael says genes like

energy are conserved as scale to which I

say uh I don't know what that means but

he goes on he says they don't go away

but will

resurface there's been some decent

evidence that humans have suffered

several

population

bottlenecks which is when the total

number of people live worldwide was

quite

small which kind of makes sense with my

earlier conversation of civilizations

coming and going one such example comes

from ruggers I think in a 2005 or six uh

some kind of study that all pre 1492

Native Americans descend from

approximately 100

people that cross the land bridge

now that kind of makes sense doesn't it

like if you assume that Native Americans

got through over that little land bridge

that was frozen for much of history but

at some point they could walk it you

wouldn't really guess that a million

people came

over I would guess small group you know

made it so and maybe a lot of people

died on the way Etc but what if it's

true that a hundred people came

across um or or that in history there

are a number of other times when the

total number of people got really small

and then that group had to regrow the

population so as uh Michael guarin goes

on he said uh you would expect if the

bottleneck was small enough and the

total population today large enough that

there would be lots of Doppel gangers

because the way genetics work is you

don't always create something that's

like a copy of yourself but you can

create maybe a couple Generations down

something that was pretty close to you

just by chance so go doppelgangers would

not be unusual if they all came from the

first group of a 100 but it would be

very unusual if your starting group was

a million does that make sense so it

could be one one reason why you see more

doppelgangers than you think ought to be

normal

um and I and then I would add to that I

said this on my man cave last

night um we're going to tie it all

together

now do you know how some people seem

like old

souls and if you say to me Scott what

does that mean what what do you mean by

an old soul my answer would be I'm not

really sure but I I feel like I know it

when I see it right and I think most of

you would say the same thing I'm not

really sure how to define that I kind of

know it when I see it right there some

children who are just born adults I

happened to be one of them I was

basically born an adult and it feels

like they have an old

soul but what

if they are very similar

genetically to some relative from before

like in my case of Grandfather I'm I'm

told I I never met him because he died

when I was in the womb but I'm told that

I'm sort of the personality spitting

image of my grandfather I never met but

not so much my father my father was

different than both of us so it could be

that the genes you know did their thing

and I just became very much like my

grandfather now here's the interesting

thing I don't know if epep is it

epigenetics um or laran stuff I don't

know if any of that's real is it

possible that a grandfather could have a

life experience that modified his genes

in a way that I would pick up two

generations

later is that

possible a lot of people say yes but

just for fun let's say it is just for

fun what would happen if my grandfather

had a life experience that modified his

genes and then I I'm born

later would I pick up some of the

qualities that would be associated with

wait for it

lived

experience in other words could my genes

have picked up

experience in a way in a in like an

indirect way that came from another

human if so it would be very much like I

had inherited an older soul but i' done

it the honest way through my genes you

know nothing magic nothing outside of

the Physical Realm but it would feel

exactly like a soul being past down and

I wonder if I would even have some

awareness of it because I feel as if I

do I actually

feel the length of that connection to my

grandfather I've never met but it's

probably mental because my mother used

to mention it a lot but anyway maybe

there's something to genes and

souls well let's go to politics the

Supreme Court as you know rejected the

request to expedite Jack Smith the

prosecutor's uh

um question about uh whether I think the

question is whether Trump would be

immune because he was a president during

some of the some of the accusations now

the Supreme Court

rejected reviewing it which means that

now the lower court can do its thing

because the request had been hey if we

think this is going to get to the

Supreme Court anyway can we just skip

this middle step because it's a waste of

time so the Supreme Court said nope you

are not going to skip the middle step

which I kind of understand the middle

step exists for a reason and they did

not have a compelling reason that to

skip the metal step middle step so they

didn't want to do it just because it's

important I like that I like the fact

that they weren't willing to do it just

because it's important because that

wasn't the right reason that's not the

reason the reason should be that the

lower court you know didn't get get it

right or something and there was a

reason to appeal that's the reason they

should handle it so they stuck to it I

like it I'm happy with that but here's

how people are interpreting it if you

turn on any right leaning news or watch

anybody tweeting about it they will say

this that really the reason that Jack

Smith wanted to expedite is so that he

could uh put Trump in jail potentially

before the election and therefore Trump

you know wouldn't have a chance of

winning or his chance would be much

lower he could still win from jail but

his odds would be much lower that that

all worked

down so that's why you how many of you

have seen that reporting and therefore

say the experts on the right this this

is pretty much proof that the

prosecution is political because it was

so important to get it done before the

election and the only reason to do that

is to stop him

politically so how many of you are on

that page that the Supreme Court and

Jack Smith's action are really

confirming that the legal part was

and it was just political

everybody so basically 100% of you are

on that

page has uh anybody checked out

MSNBC have you seen what the left says

about

this if you haven't seen what the left

says about it you're going to need to

check it out do you know what the left

says about

it it's not going to be it's not going

to be

delayed no it might hold it up a little

bit but it'll still be done before the

election I I I thought I was like

hallucinating because I you I just

happened to I was just flipping through

some news channels and I caught a legal

expert and the Le and the legal expert

was very experienced in this field like

he was actually a you know a federal

department of

justice uh lawyer who knew exactly what

he was talking about and when people

people on the right are like aha you

know Trump won because this won't get

done before the

election a guy who knows exactly what

he's talking about said it won't make a

much difference yeah may maybe delayed a

little

bit so now now check check your own

propaganda

situation Have You Been propagandized by

your own side did they tell you some

about this is going to make a

difference because I don't see

it I don't see it at

all I don't see anything that

happened I'm going to go further to

really make you

mad I don't see anything that suggest as

political why did you all see that what

are you saying that I don't

see now let me be clear it could be and

it probably is like my my

intuition my gut my experience and

everything I've ever experienced in my

whole life all point in the same D same

direction which is everything's

political all 91 indictments all four

cases all political all right so you and

I are 100% on the same page that

everything's

political

however trying to expedite a

case if if I were the prosecutor I would

try to expede the case for what reason

what one would be purely political but

what would be the other reason to try to

expedite a

case how about every reason in

the world

how how about the best reason to

expedite a case is that that's exactly

what our politicals uh are justice

system

requires the justice system requires him

to try to do to do the job fast if he

knows it's going to end up in the

Supreme Court he'd be a

not to go there

first Am I Wrong tell me I'm wrong if

you know it's going to go to the Supreme

Court

he would be a incompetent

if he didn't at least see well

why don't you see if he could just

handle this right

away why why would he do all this court

preparation for a lower core if it's a

complete waste of time don't you think

he wants to go home for Christmas too I

mean next

Christmas no no here so here's the thing

you're you're making some

assumptions here's the Assumption you're

making that there's one and only one

valid reason for for asking the Supreme

Court to go

fast there's every reason to ask them to

do that reason number one it's the right

thing to

do speedy trial speedy trial is the most

basic well it's one of the most basic

things in our system so you're telling

me that you're mad that the prosecutor

tried to get a speedy trial and skip a

step this completely a waste of

time that's why we pay him we pay him to

make a speedy trial that doesn't waste

anybody's time and you're and we're

acting like the only way to interpret

that is

politically now keep in mind I do think

everything that they're doing is

political but you don't see it in that

it's not in that

example well let me be more clear it

could be entirely in that example but

the alternative that he's just doing his

job exactly the way you'd want him to do

his job this is exactly how I want him

to do his

job don't you how many of you would want

him not to have tried to skip the

unnecessary step would would you be

happier if you skip the unnecessary step

step why what's the argument for

that uh wrong the speed to hurt defense

so some are saying that the reason for

the speed would be to the

defense but but correct me if I'm wrong

does not the defense get to argue how

much time they need to the court and can

that not be modified based on real

reasons isn't that normal

routine that you you say how much time

you need and reasonable people look at

it and say yeah and and if something

comes up there like a real real real

good reason that you know there's some

important evidence that just will take

another month no matter what wouldn't

the judge say all right that's such

that's so important we'll change the

trial date to make sure we have

that so to me it seems like the defense

always has the right to at least request

under reasonable standards a change in

the

trial likewise the the prosecution does

for any variety of

reasons right so you're

wrong let me just say

this if you haven't seen how the left is

treating this

issue I feel like you're Flying

Blind so you don't need to change your

opinion that it's completely political

because I think there's enough obvious

evidence for that but if you think you

proved it because of this I don't see it

you're going to have to do

better I'm just going to guess what he

would say here's what I

guess um we Tred to do Speedy trials and

not waste money and I tried to skip an

unnecessary step that both sides uh

prosecution Etc probably thought were

unnecessary did we hit the 34 Minute

glitch again I'm I've seen both

platforms there is 34

minutes what the hell is

that it's a 34 Minute

glitch but it's on both platforms and

the only thing they have in common is my

Wi-Fi why would my

Wi-Fi glitch every

day I feel like there's maybe something

comes online that uses the

same I don't think it's throttling I

don't know buffer overun I don't know

it's a mystery all

right

um let's talk about uh the Rolling

Stones has an article about uh Trump who

apparently is telling his close advisor

types that he plans to keep saying uh

that the illegal immigrants are

poisoning the blood of America now of

course his opponents are saying that

came out of mine comp you're talking

like Hitler uh stop talking like Hitler

to which Trump says I think I'm going to

double down on talking like Hitler no

don't do it you sound like hiter now I'm

going to Triple my talk like Hiller no

no you're so Hitler stop it okay now I'm

going to do nothing but Hitler no

no I I feel like he's just making them

crazy because he's literally doubling

down on the thing that they think is his

biggest um his biggest

vulnerability just think about it he's

doubling

down on giving them fod for what they

consider his biggest

vulnerability what's up with

that is he suddenly stupid Trump is it

is it like just doesn't make any

sense my first reaction was why would

you do this this is just making your job

harder all you had to do is just keep

your mouth shut and just you know Coast

into the job

yeah well let me suggest the possibility

because I know I know I'm getting mocked

for oh you're doing 44 D CHS no he's

just being stupid maybe

maybe well it's not how I would have

played it so but let's just explore the

possibility there's something here

that's more strategic than

obvious uh and this comes from uh Andre

uh what was his name famous tennis Andre

Agassi so Andre Agassi when he would

play against top players he he only

needed to do this but against the top

players uh let's say he's playing

somebody who has the best backand in the

world they like oh my God you don't want

to hit to their backand do you know what

he would do hit to their backand because

it was their best shot cuz if he could

break it down there was nothing

left cuz if he takes s their best shot

by you know winning more points on their

best shot than they Wi on their best

shot their entire uh architecture of

confidence crumbles so he can beat

people in the first few

games right it's like maybe you have to

win three out of five sets but he can

win in the first three games all he has

to do is go right at their strongest

shot until he wins more points than they

want on their strongest shot and then

they're dead

they're absolutely dead and then the

rest of it is just you know bayonetting

the the wounded basically now you have

to be so good that you can beat their

best shot so I mean it's not like so

much a strategy as you know he's so good

but he could have very easily you know

tried to go to the weak shot which would

tell the other person that they have a

really good shot because he's really

staying away from my forehand so you

don't give him any confidence you just

go right at their best shot you break it

down and then they got nothing they have

nothing left after that now what is what

is the Democrats best shot on Trump well

clearly they've completely abandoned

anything like policy just you is he's a

he's a dictator and you fill in the

blanks we we have some new Democrats who

have added some new

dictators so an anti-trump group uh is

now comparing him in some kind of AD to

M musolini or

Orban Orban is the leader

of uh Hungary no who is Orban Hungary

right yeah so they're comparing him to

other leaders that they think are

totalitarian

now

um let me mock this they actually have

to add more

dictators so so saying that Trump was

like

Hitler wasn't getting him any traction

so here was their

strategy I think we don't have enough

dictators okay they're not buying the

they're not buying Hitler what if we add

uh

musi well now you're talking now you're

talking that's two dictators

wow I wasn't too concerned when you

compared Trump to one dictator but oh my

God now

two Orban Orban three three oh no oh no

three

dictators how about Putin oh no it's

Putin oh four dictators oh

oh do you know what this makes me uh

think of when they keep adding

dictators see if this doesn't make you

laugh I'm I'm waiting to see if anybody

said it yet in the comments you're not

there

yet two words you ready for

it more

cowbell yeah what do you think more

cowbell do you know why that's funny now

first of all it's uh comes from Saturday

live uh and what was the name of the

actor uh

who's got the uh yeah Christopher Walkin

in some skit he's doing some musical

skit and he's insisting that there'd be

more cowbell now cowbell is usually the

you know sort of the least respected

instrument you except maybe the

tambourine you know that when the lead

singer like does the tambourine because

the lead singer can't play an instrument

but beyond the

tambourine the probably the cowbell is

the least respected of the the

instrument

Parts um but I I just think of more

cowbell every time they add a new

dictator and I feel like just saying

that it's like well he's like Hitler go

on well he's also like musolini more

cowbell well he's also like Orban more

cowbell well he's also like Putin more

cowbell

well he's also kind of like Paul pot

more

cowbell well he's also like Thanos more

cowbell so just yell more cowbell every

time they had a dictator it'll be funny

so here's why Trump might be smarter

than you

think he goes for

energy and he goes

for um he's breaking down their

strongest uh their strongest stroke this

is their backand well I'll call it their

forehand because forehand usually

stronger that this is the democrat's

forehand he's going out their

forehand he's he's so aggressive

which is why people like him like he

doesn't it would be easy for him to to

back down from this and say you know we

love the immigrants we love them love

the immigrants but you know we need to

do a little more on the border that's

not really going to make you excited or

even believe he's going to do

much but if he goes further than he's

supposed to go to the point where his

opponents are calling him Hiller more

cowbell mus more cowbell or

Ben then he's got him right where he

wants him what are you thinking about

when Trump is going too far on the

border what do you think thinking about

where's your brain

go that that it'll get the job

done but by making you think that he'll

go too far it makes you think well at

least he'll get the job

done he his his

persuasion is not exactly how I would do

it but like I always say you can't

compare him to any other human or animal

like Trump is is just his own entity

like it comparing him to anything is

just a waste of time he's just his own

and I think he's going right at their

forehand because he wants to break it

down now let me ask you if they compare

him to every dictator in the world and

it's all they have between now and

election day who

wins if it's all they have it's just

more cowbell it's going to sound like

people will just be used to it and it'll

just look

stupid yeah so let me give you a good

general rule for persuasion or for

spotting a dishonest argument here's a

good rule somebody who has an honest

argument in politics or anything else is

going to say here are the

pros and here are the cons but when you

consider all the pros and you consider

all the cons on net I'm in favor of this

or I'm against it now then you've got

something to work with maybe you debate

the the facts maybe you debate the

priorities but that's an honest argument

here's all the pros here's all the cons

here's what I think about it on that so

if you see that you should engage as an

honest debater yourself you know if you

want to be a good person uh because

that's an honest person they're they're

trying even if they disagree with you it

looks like they're trying

now here's what not an honest debate

looks

like

analogies if all you're getting is scary

analogies you know this is like the

Great Depression you know this is like

Hitler you know this reminds me of you

know the destruction of the Roman Empire

you know right if you have analogies

without an

argument that is a dishonest debate

it's dishonest because they're not

trying to win on any kind of logic or

priorities or anything they're just

trying to scare the that of you so

I don't know why nobody else is

mentioning this why am I the only one to

mention that the attacks against Trump

have nothing to do with his policies

it's entirely analogies they're simply

taking other people in other situations

well you know Hitler in

1939 well you know what it's not ger

it's not

1939 he's not a

Hiller and almost nothing about that

applies but if your brain thinks it does

then it can be persuasive now I'm not

saying the Democrats are not being

persuasive they are it's just all they

have they really have to run as far as

and hard as they can from policy because

Biden didn't

deliver and everybody everybody can see

for example that the borders a mess and

crime in the city and all

that

um I'm going to agree with Biden people

on one

thing I do think the economy is better

than the press or the public maybe is

quite realized now you say to yourself

but but you know prices are too high yes

and the debt is out of control yes so if

you looked at those two things they

actually are a mess but it is we we have

a strange economy where employment's not

so bad and if anything employers are

going to be begging for workers um I do

think workers pay has gone up maybe not

as much as inflation um it does look

like we're getting our um Supply chains

slowly but consistently we're getting

our supply chains under control that's

good especially the the critical stuff

you know not fast enough enough not

nearly fast enough but moving in the

right direction so I'm going to give I'm

going to give Biden a

uh B minus on the economy B minus which

is probably better than the public

thinks it is because that when you buy

the gas and you buy the groceries you

know you just vomit in your own mouth I

mean even I do and I'm I'm doing okay

like when I when I buy groceries I'm

actually shocked I'm shocked and

I can afford it so you it's not

affecting my life too much but I was

shocked when I had this little

pile of Gres and they're like that'll be

$200 I'm like

what that that that little that little

pile that's

$200 I mean it just my mind exploded

normally I don't even pay attention to

honestly you know I hate to say it

because it's such a douchebag thing I

don't really pay attention to small

consumer item prices because you know it

doesn't affect my life but is so high

that I'm actually paying attention and

I'm actually making decisions that I

wouldn't have made before about well

maybe I don't need

that so yeah I can see why people think

the economy is garbage but it's probably

a little bit better than they think it's

just not affecting them personally yet

uh I am worried about the crushing debt

I don't know how we get out of that all

right

um here's Governor New talking about uh

Trump let's see if you can find his

policy

criticisms policy criticisms here's

Governor

Nome um he he warned that efforts to

prevent former president Trump from

getting on the ballot in his state would

be political distraction so he doesn't

want to do it but oh that's very big of

him isn't

it like it matters in California

California doesn't matter Trump's not

going to win California so it doesn't

matter what they do so Nome instead of

Nome saying it doesn't matter what we do

because he's not going to win California

he just says it's a political

distraction which is actually pretty

smart because it sounds more like a high

ground you know I'm the adult in the

room don't bother with this trivial

stuff he's right about it uh but then he

says this quote there is no doubt I like

that there's no doubt oh no there's no

doubt see if you have any doubt about

what follows in the rest of the sentence

because he told you there's no

doubt so what follows must be true to

every human in the world no doubt so

there is no doubt that Donald Trump is a

threat to our liberties and even to our

democracy Now what was the part about

his

policies I say

that's

it where's the part about when he was

president last time which wasn't too

long ago he did all of these terrible

things and took away your

Liberties I don't remember that

happening I feel

like that was kind of weird that Trump

waited until the second term to take

away our liberties why doesn't he take

away our liberties in the first four

years if he's going to take away our

liberties so you can see now that even

Nome who is sort of the standard of

quality for the Democrats he's basically

the best they have I hate to say it he's

the best they have and he's not even

touching policy the only way he'll touch

policy is to tell you it's like Hitler

so he's you know roughly touching on

immigration policy but he doesn't

mention it it's like well

Hitler what do you think about Trump's

po policy about uh energy and drill baby

drill well Hiller

what do you think about Trump's uh

saying he could you know stop the war in

Ukraine well

Hitler that's all they have more

cowbell I tell you consistently that you

can't understand uh politics until you

understand the

players so wherever I can I'm going to

tell you about a player that you'll

remember that the next time you see the

that player you'll know you're not

dealing with an honest broker of

information right have you heard of a

publication called the

Atlantic well the Atlantic is perhaps

the very worst of the absurdly political

biased uh anti-trump deranged

but because the Atlantic is an

old institution as a publication there

are many people as in Democrats

who don't know it's not a legitimate

publication I mean it's not even close

to legitimate it's just a purely

political

instrument so what did they say

um today they had an article says in the

debate over Freedom versus control of

the global Network meaning the internet

Freedom versus control China was largely

correct and the US was

wrong yes the Atlantic would like you to

believe that China is more correct in

censoring their internet because the

only way the Democrats can win is to

prevent Republicans from having free

speech they're kind of saying it

directly now now here's the important

part the fact that it's in the

Atlantic tells you that it's U basically

a Democrat op it's not just a bunch of

people who agree with Democrats it's

more likely

very connected to the Democrat strategy

then just you know randomly agrees with

them if the Democrat strategy is to get

you feeling a little bit better about

Chinese level

censorship or the Iranian model where

the uh the Ayatollah decides who's on

the ballot oh yeah we have democracy

here you can vote for anybody you want

as long as I've approved them being on

the

ballot so that's that's what they're

trying to do with Trump you can vote for

anybody you want but we're going to tell

you who can be on the

ballot so yeah so the Atlantic is part

of this Mass misinformation Democrat

machine that's trying to propagandize

you or prime you for greater internet

control do you know why because that

misinformation that you're getting in

other words everything Republicans say

according to them that Miss information

would lead to what what would it lead to

could it lead to losing your Liberty and

your

democracy yeah so that the so the

Atlantic is one of the ones to keep in

your mind that whatever they're saying

is an OP it's not news and it's not

exactly even an opinion it's not even

the real opinion of the people saying it

it's an OP you should see it that way

it's just pure

propaganda

well this is disturbing uh Congressman

Tim burette uh described on a podcast

how the blackmail operations work in

Congress now what is scarier than

thinking the worst about something and

then finding out is exactly

correct now I don't know if Tim berett

has seen

this or he's just like us where he just

assumes it's true but he's he's there I

feel like he saw it here's how he

describes the system now remember he's

in the system he's not like us he's not

looking from the outside he's in the

system that he's describing this way

quote uh this is how it works you're

visiting uh you're out of the country

you're out of town or you're in a motel

or bar in DC and some uh whatever you're

into women or men or whatever comes up

and they're very attractive and they're

laughing at your jokes and you're buying

them a Dr things and next thing you know

you're in the motel room with them naked

and the next thing you know you're about

to make a key vote and what happens some

well-dressed person comes up and

Whispers In Your Ear hey man there's

tape sound on you were you in a hotel

room on whatever with whoever and then

you're like oh and said uh you really

you really ought to be not be voting for

this

thing do you think that's accurate

I mean he's he could not be a better

Source he's right in the middle of this

world is it Act is it literally that

obvious it's like right on the nose they

literally have the what do you call it

the the sugar trap or something there's

some name for it what's the name for

that when

the a honey poot yeah so it's a sugar

trap it's a Honeypot

um that literally there's

hyot and that literally somebody comes

up and says we have

tapes now I'm sure that has happened in

American

history and you know numerous times I'm

sure but I wonder how Universal it

is it does it describe literally

everything because I think this has been

happening since what J Edgar

Hoover that there's been you know like a

an ongoing blackmail

operation well um do you know what makes

this

worse what why are politicians easy to

Blackmail I'm going there's an obvious

reason do you know why I mean other than

the fact they do bad things but other

people do bad things

too um I have a

feeling that one of the reasons people

go into politics is that they're too

ugly to get laid

otherwise

Am I

Wrong look look at your

politicians and then you subtract down

some outliers it's like okay JFK he was

good-look right and apparently had a

pretty active sex life but you know he's

he's an

outlier if if Mitch Mitchell is getting

a little on the

side do you think it's because he's

quite a lover he really knows how to get

it done if you know what I mean he's a

finisher probably not now I'm not

suggesting he's having any kind of

situation like that I'm just saying that

if you were to take a picture of the

certainly the men in Congress it's

mostly the men I think if you took a

picture of the men they're not exactly

killing it on

Tinder so I think they're unusually easy

to Blackmail because you just got to pay

somebody to you know close their eyes

and do whatever drugs they need to to

get the job done but yeah I think uh

Congress is especially s uh they're

especially susceptible to this so my

suggestion is

this you should either uh only vote for

people who can get laid without your

help in other words they don't need the

job well I can still get laid and then

maybe maybe less

blackmail um or people who have been uh

so thoroughly vetted that you wouldn't

be surprised a bit and the blackmail

wouldn't even work if you caught them

with their pants down in the middle of a

you know the Public

Square can you think of anybody like

that who would be who would be a

politician who has been caught so many

times that it wouldn't even mean

anything if you caught him

again

yeah and Trump is perfect I I think he's

as close to unblack a mailable as we've

ever had for a leader he might be he

might be the Pinnacle of an unblack

amable person and I I remind you of this

all the time but when he was running for

office the first time he said publicly

I'm No

Angel when he did that I said to myself

okay you just told us what what the game

is I'm No Angel but I'm on your

side that was a pretty good package

I wanted somebody to say I'm No Angel so

if something comes out later that shows

them they're No Angel go oh well you

didn't you didn't lie to

me I guess I should have seen it coming

but at the same time he says I'm not

going to be an angel but I'm going to be

the I'm going to be the on your

side and then he acts exactly like he's

on your side closing the Border Etc so I

can live with that I I can totally live

with I'm No Angel but I'm going to be

the the demon on your

team sounds good to

me all right um there are all these uh

Trump Nikki Haley rumors CBS is

reporting that Trump was asking his

allies about the possibility of Nikki

hilly for vice president and then then

Trump supporters got all excited and

upset and yada yada y here's my take on

that if there's one thing we've learned

about Trump he will ask all the

questions that are the right questions

to ask and then when he's done asking

all the right questions to ask he'll go

a little

further which I actually love about him

remember the story about he asked if he

could use a nuclear weapon to stop a

hurricane do you remember that now I

don't know if he ever asked that

question I think he denied it but I love

the fact if he did I love

it now the answer was no that's crazy

and then it didn't come up

again but don't you like that he ask the

question just brainstorm right I I

absolutely like that he asked the

question I had no problem with that at

all so when he asked the question what

about Nikki hilly as vice president that

is not an indication that he likes her

on the ticket to me that's the normal

Trump way of doing business that he

doesn't see it because if he saw it he

wouldn't be asking am I right if if he

felt she was the right choice he

wouldn't be asking the question so he's

not feeling it and and when he asks the

question it

suggests that he's looking for somebody

to make the best argument to see if it

changes his

mind that is good that's good for you

should always check to see if somebody

can change your mind because it's one of

the biggest questions right his his VP

is one of the biggest questions so he

wants get it right right and and just

like I was going to use that example

when he got in trouble for asking about

the injecting of the disinfectant the

the context was light as the

disinfectant so he went beyond what

you'd expect and asked the extra

question well could you use light you

know if you could inject the light

inside the body would it work and then

it got misinterpreted misinterpreted as

drinking bleach of course but I wanted

him to ask the question I was happy he

asked the question it just got turned

out wrong so yeah ask the question I

don't think there's any chance and um as

I posted um I don't think I could

support him if she were Vice President

let me do a quick

poll many of you are probably Trump

supporters should he get the nomination

you may maybe you're supporting somebody

else but if he got the

nomination how many of you would

withdraw your support if Nikki hilly

were the vice

president all right yeah it looks like

people would withdraw support now let me

ask you this question can you even think

of another choice for voice vice

president that would make you change

your

vote people don't change their vote for

the vice

president but they would for her I would

I I literally that not hyperbole I I

that would be a hard know because I

would I would lose confidence in Trump I

would lose confidence in his judgment If

he if he took such an obvious wrong

choice so Pence was a good choice

because we didn't know much about

him so you just say well all right

whatever if you like him he's it's okay

with me but Haley we know too much

about especially in the military

industrial complex way now I don't know

if the accusations against Nikki hilly

are you know as solid as they appear to

be which is she's a little too close to

the military

Spenders uh but it could be I mean it's

a huge red flag so it doesn't seem like

the right fit for Trump I'm glad he's

asking the question my personal

assumption is zero chance it will

happen zero

chance but I think he and Haley have had

a uh a good history right am I right I

thought they got along when she was in

the administration so I don't mind at

all they ask the question because asking

the question is how he finds out how

other people feel about it and that's

exactly what he should be doing he's

probably thinking that his own judgment

let me put it another way because he

worked with her and had a you know

reasonably good

Association I think he's not trusting

his own judgment and he wants to get

some more objective opinions on it but

he'll be fine there's no way he's going

to pick

her uh but Nikki hilly does seem to be

surging in the New Hampshire polling all

the way up to just barely behind Trump

who is polling at 33% with two or 29%

the rest of the field is way behind now

that's probably what

triggered Trump to start asking the

question but does does New Hampshire

mean anything to

anybody I feel like New Hampshire is the

least

indicative um

primary isn't it the it goes first so it

can definitely change how we think about

it but it

shouldn't so I don't know I'm not

worried about New

Hampshire Trump was asked if he would

debate a

Republican and I guess you who had to

ask him that and he gave exactly the

right answer

exactly the right answer the right

answer is yes if it gets close but it's

not there yet because he wants act

strong like of course I would talk to

them but he also doesn't want to look

like he's wasting his time with the

undercard so he gives the exactly the

right answer if if somebody comes close

yeah that would make sense have a

debate just what you want to hear he

might not mean it but it's exactly the

right

answer

um here's something you didn't see

coming um Rond de sanus uh had been

backed by I guess one of the biggest B

backers it's the main outside group uh

was a pack polit political action

committee uh called Never Back Down

Never back down let's get an update on

Never back down oh they're backing down

they're backing down so uh they're

they're not going to run ads in Iowa or

New

Hampshire they're uh they're not going

to run ads in Iowa or New Hampshire the

first two

primaries I feel like they backed

down let me give you some hypnotist and

humorist

advice when you're picking the name of

your

group you should say to yourself how can

this be mock

it's exactly the same if you're picking

a name for your

child if your last name is

Cass don't name your child

Jack am I right because you should ask

yourself how old the school

kids respond to naming my child Jack

Cass do you think that will cause any

problems now I only mentioned that

because I grew up with somebody named

Jack Cass yeah I mean he his born name

was Jonathan but everybody called him

jack so yeah don't do that never call

your pack Never back down if you think

you might back down all right surprise

of the day uh W Street Apes had this

post so You' probably heard of uh The

Honorable Mr Minister Lewis

faran you all know who he is right so uh

I think he's accused to be of being

anti-semitic but he is a uh well-known

powerful longtime leader in the black

community for the subset of the black

community who likes his messages so he's

very

controversial um specifically

anti-semitic is the is the charge on him

um but here's what he

said there just

mind-blowing now remember I said that

those doppelgangers and those coinci res

es they might associate a larger shift

in

Consciousness a larger shift in

Consciousness let me let me read to you

what the honorable Minister Lewis faran

says about Donald Trump this is recent

I'll read the whole

thing um quote uh the nature of this

Administration is good for us he was

talking about Trump maybe this was uh

maybe this is when Trump was not sure

the on this um he says because of

Trump's way he is an anomaly there's

never been no president quite like Mr

Trump there's something that he's doing

Trump is destroying every enemy that was

an enemy of our rise in this case he's

talking about Black Americans so he's

saying that Trump and black Americans

have the same

enemies that sound

familiar something I've told you uh he

said who's the enemy of arise is it the

Department of Justice where we get

none is it Congress where where you make

a law that favors us and then you turn

around and destroy

it is it the media that has destroyed

every black leader that stood up for

us uh Martin Luther King suffered

it and then he says uh Malcolm suffered

it uh then he talks about Trump some

more he says he's attacking in the media

calls it fake news we have been the

victims of some fake news yes he's

beating up the FBI and then he says go

at it baby yeah they've been beating the

hell out of us ever since J Hoover in

the in the counter I don't know what the

counter

is

so does that feel like a shift in

Consciousness it does doesn't

it so the shift in Consciousness is that

the Democrats have been gaslighting them

them the black Americans the whole

time and that they couldn't tell who

their friends were and who their enemies

were but when Trump very clearly

targeted all the same people that

farakhan would call his enemies he

couldn't miss it

anymore what what would you call

noticing that Trump had targeted

the the media the FBI the Department of

Justice another word for that would be

uh would be another word for that it's

the same things that Black America

wanted he targeted and then trunk

actually did it what's another word for

that that's a coincidence isn't it kind

of a

coincidence so lisis farakhan noticed a

pattern that maybe he hadn't noticed

until recently

that wait a minute that's kind of a

coincidence I don't I think the

Department of Justice is corrupt and now

this Republican guy does too that's a

weird

coincidence wait we think the FBI is

corrupt but you're saying Trump says

that too s that's two

coincidences wait you're saying you're

saying that the news the dog the the FBI

all of them he's going after all of

them do you see the B

pattern those doppelgangers are people

who are noticing patterns it just

happens to be a trivial pattern it's not

important you know somebody looks like

somebody else but that that raisin

Consciousness that allows you to see

patterns allows you to break out of the

brainwashing because it's those

patterns that are the key to the door if

you're in your little brainwash bubble

there's actually a door

and it's got a keyhole and the keyhole

are the

coincidences wait a minute if if this is

true then how could this other thing be

true well if it were just one thing

maybe you ignore it but wait a minute

how but this other thing is true

also how does that make sense with this

other

thing and then the coincidence start to

find form a pattern and then the

pattern becomes a key

and then the key goes in the

lock and you escape your

bubble

fakon just found the

keyhole now I'm not a fakon fan so I'm

not fanboying fakon that's not happening

I'm just saying you're seeing an example

of somebody used pattern

recognition as an

escape and it

worked

um here's another

pattern tuer Carlson talking about uh

Assange Julian Assange and Julian

Assange did a number of uh journalistic

things that other people call him a spy

I guess and the journalistic things were

very embarrassing for our Intel

organizations and you the Deep State

basically and Hillary Clinton and

apparently we have reporting that Mike

pompe oo was talking about plans to

murder Assange to murder him so now

you've

got Democrats who want him dead Assange

you got a prominent Republican who was

even running for president at one point

who wanted him dead

reportedly

um and it seems to me

that Assange has embarrassed the Deep

state which might be a little bit both

Republican and Democrat at its

space so the question

is why why are so many people wanting to

kill him or put him in jail forever when

you and I aren't quite sure

why it's been a long

time shouldn't I be able to express the

other argument as easily as I can

express the you know the freom why do I

only know the

argument of why he's a journalist and

should be

freed why am I not aware of the

counterargument is that a coincidence

don't see it

anywhere now now I know the general

argument that he revealed some stuff

that would cause some people to get

killed or something and I'd like to see

that argument and if that's the case you

know that's important

but there there's something about the

lack of transparency

and the fact that he's being treated the

way he's treated that tells you that

this is that everything about this is

corrupt and wrong and should be stopped

I don't know what's wrong with it and I

don't know what's

corrupt but this isn't adding up sorry

the the pattern recognition is too clear

the pattern is if they had the real

Goods the stuff they could argue with

the public was important and you would

agree with it they would tell

you yeah they would tell you when

somebody doesn't have an argument that

they're willing to share with you it's

because they don't have one I mean I I

have a trouble believing that there are

secrets that's that are the real reason

that we don't know what's going on so I

don't trust our government in at all on

the Assange situation and

therefore because citizens although not

in American citizen citizens have the uh

presumption of

innocence so my presumption about

Assange is

innocent and as you know one of the

things that the bad guys do if they

can't figure out a legal way to take you

out is they come up with a fake sex

charge so you know Assange had this fake

sex charge hanging over him some rape

charge or something and do you know why

it went away because there was never any

evidence for it it just went away it

just it was fake yeah so everything that

you think is the worst case scenario

sort of like the representative burette

was telling you about the black

male if you imagine that they wouldn't

cause a fake rape charge to take down an

enemy you're not living in the real

world CU yeah they would yeah they would

yeah Matt Gates perfect example yeah

fake fake sex charges are a common way

to take somebody down so my take on

Assange is I don't know if he did

anything bad I don't know but the lack

of transparency is so

disgusting that I am firmly on the you

better free him or basically put up or

shut up right my assumption is

everybody's a dirty murderer who wants

him to stay where he is you're all dirty

murderers I I don't trust anybody who

wants him in jail if they won't tell you

why I'm open to the argument arent I'm

open to the argument I can be persuaded

that he should stay in jail but no

argument strangely missing nope not

buying it for a minute he should be

freed and and I'm also curious why Trump

didn't do it because you know there was

pressure on Trump to do

it so there's more to the story because

the fact that you can't get a Republican

or a Democrat to to do it and yet we

don't know what's going

on a this thing's all corrupt and dirty

well outgoing Louisiana governor

Edwards uh according to the amuse

account on X um has decided to Pardon uh

40

[Music]

murderers what that that can't be

possible I know for

sure nobody would pardon 40 murderers

that'd be crazy right no it says he

pardoned 40

murders now as amuse

asks what possible

reason what's the reason for

that now I do know that when politicians

are leaving office in retiring it's not

that unusual to Pardon a bunch of people

that maybe you think shouldn't be

pardoned

but

[Music]

murderers 40

murderers you

what it makes me

wonder uh if they were since it was

Louisiana I wonder if they were falsely

accused do do you think it's like 40

black guys who who just the accusations

were too weak and he's just saying you

know what I'm not even sure any of these

people murdered

anybody it could be yeah so I think

there's more we need to know about that

uh but the question of why you doing it

is the right question I'm I'm going to

guess he doesn't think that they were

the cases were strong enough and that

maybe the

relics from a more racist past and maybe

it's just time to set it right I don't

know could we'll find out well fedman

continues to uh be interesting uh he

thanked President Biden for uh pardoning

certain marijuana offenses and he called

the charges weed charges he

said in a statement he said a few

Christmases ago as lieutenant governor I

push for legal weed and uh and

delivering pardons for weed

charges okay Federman stop it just stop

it I don't want to love you I don't want

to love you you're making me love

you I don't like it stop just cut it

out I love that he wants to pardon the

the weed people I love even more that he

calls the charges

cut it out stop it stop

it damn it I love

you all right

um uh Ian miles Chong is reporting that

a tribunal in the UK has ruled that is

not discrimination for a company to rule

out white men from being hired

what what it's not discrimination to

discriminate interesting take you'd

almost think it's built right into the

word there

discriminate okay um but it makes me ask

this question and yes I'm serious I need

a backup

plan uh if it becomes you know if

America becomes like South Africa like

what's my backup plan where where can a

white man and go to be safe and to be

treated like a full citizen certainly

not America but where can I go now I'll

tell you that tell you where people

suggest it they they said Poland Hungary

uh Italy Japan

Argentina

Iceland um

Indonesia Bhutan

Paraguay Paraguay for the

weed UAE but here's the problem yeah so

I'm ruling out New Zealand and Australia

because they already went woke Thailand

Thailand's on the list of possibilities

Antarctica is looking good not a lot of

discrimination there except against

Penguins or something um Cuba is due for

a flip Switzerland you say not so sure I

I think I think

Europe has the uh is islamicized problem

I think Europe will probably become

Islamic eventually and Hungary is too

close to Russia for my

tastes too close and New Zealand and

Australia too

woke uh Iceland as I told you Iceland

had volcanoes and the whole country

melted it was all made of ice yeah so

Iceland doesn't exist anymore because

the volcano melted it so that's out of

out of the question uh no not really

it's still there

um well Alaska is not a

country you Montenegro yeah I don't want

to be over in that Europe Eastern Europe

area not comfortable with that you know

what you know one of the best answers

was was

Argentina apparently

Argentina is both multiethnic and true

Melting

Pot can anybody confirm that I've

actually heard really good things about

Argentina and uh the people and sort of

the social part is that true or is that

an

exaggeration I I had a friend who used

to travel there just for the

women and apparently he had a really

really good time because all you had to

do is be an American and walk in the

door and suddenly you'd be popular with

the ladies that's what he

said well Argentina might be a m in

terms of their economy and all that but

if you had your own

money is is the culture at least

non-discriminatory Saudi Arabia

Philippines that's

interesting

Philippines yeah so I don't have plans

to move but I think you know it's just

sort of my way to be prepared for

everything you know my house was built

to to withstand you know all the common

disasters and I built in a place that

was you know free from most of the

common disasters and you know if if I

lost my power I could

live right the coldest day in California

you know gets in the 40s I can make a

fire and put some blankets on me I could

live right but if you if you lose your

electricity in Wisconsin in February

like if the whole State loses its power

well good luck with that so I've always

picked tried to pick um situations where

you have lots of Escape you can get away

you can survive you know all that stuff

my house has its own water supply I

don't have to depend on the town so and

I've got a solar but I don't have a

battery yet I need to add a battery back

up um but likewise I think it is time

for white men to at least have a backup

plan because I do think America could

fall in terms of being safe to live here

it's not there but you know that the

these things can be right on the edge

for a long time before they they flip so

things could change quickly it's good to

have a backup plan I heard Costa Rica

heard good things about Costa Rica but I

think that might be more about the

lifestyle than it is about lack of

discrimination uay oh uay not Paraguay

yeah Uruguay is

the better one than Paraguay right do I

have that

right

Neverland Joe

stale yeah probably not Guyana all right

ladies and gentlemen that's all I got

for you today thanks for joining the

best live stream ever and YouTube I will

talk to you tomorrow if you're wondering

will I be live streaming on Christmas

day what do you think will I be live

streaming at the normal time on

Christmas

day

yeah yeah yes I will because I don't

take days off so I'll see you on

Christmas but also see you tomorrow and

uh have a great day thanks

YouTube