ome leftists about January 6th whether there was an insurrection and you have to hear him. I wouldn't say it was joking mocking but he's so good at making his points it just makes other people look stupid. So here was the things he was saying to people who believed there was a, I think one of the mainstream was there and somebody else. He noted that Trump didn't resist leaving the building like when his term was over which would be a weird thing to do if you're trying to cling to power. Why would you leave the building? That's the dumbest thing you'd ever do if you were going to do an insurrection. Leave the building? Why? And then he points out he didn't try to activate any military force. Who tries to do an insurrection without trying to get at least some kind of military force on your side? You know even if it's your whatever your personal security or something like I don't even think the record even shows that he talked to his own Secret Service. Imagine trying to be a dictator and not colluding with your own protection, your own Secret Service who are dedicated probably to prevent you from being a dictator. So the guys in the room with guns who would literally shoot you if you actually tried to become a dictator I hope they would wouldn't they? Can somebody give me a fact check? If the Secret Service saw you actually becoming a dictator wouldn't they take care of it? Now you're saying no because they would be so professional. They'd be so professional they would support him even if he went full Hitler and started rounding up and murdering his opponents. They would just do their job because they're professionals. No they wouldn't. Come on no they wouldn't. They would prevent it. So one way you can know for sure that he wasn't planning any kind of real insurrection was that he didn't work it out with anybody in his security detail. There's no evidence of that. That'd be the first thing you do because you can't have the enemy being your protection. It's the very first thing you'd have to do. So yeah and he didn't arrest his opponents which is a basic thing you do if you're a dictator. If Trump wanted to stay in power he would have just had Biden arrested but he had no power to do that. He had no power to or well nobody would have done it.

So watch the people who have been brainwashed into thinking January 6th was an insurrection. It's going to be real fun because if you take the Glenn Greenwald model and I think we should we should mock it and make them explain how that could be an insurrection. Now the best argument I've heard for the insurrection hoax believers is that he had those fake electors. This is what Bill Maher says. And the way that argument goes like this. He had fake electors so therefore that's how he was trying to take over the country. Now anybody who knows the situation would say something like this. Well the documentation shows that they believe they were simply placeholders to maintain the right to pursue the legal challenge. It was just a placeholder thing and they weren't replacement for or fake. They were simply sort of on hold to show that you were putting a stake in the ground that you're challenging it. Now what does Bill Maher say about that? Well he wouldn't let you finish the sentence. He would talk over you. I guarantee you you'll never get to finish that sentence. I saw him doing that to somebody the other day. Now suppose you say what if they were fake? How in the world were fake electors going to take over a country? Was the Supreme Court going to say oh yeah fake electors are fine? Like there's no way to connect the dots that that process could have been a way to take over the country. The only thing it could have been is exactly what they said it was. A bunch of lawyers said you know what we'd have a stronger case if he had some alternate electors and you know otherwise we won't use them. So would they strongarm the real delegates? Probably if it was a real insurrection they would. I don't know if they did. Maybe somebody did. Don't argue with analogies. That's a bad way to go.

All right Russia apparently is ruling out any peace talks in Ukraine and why wouldn't they because apparently the money is going to dry up from America unless something changes and that would guarantee that Russia could have anything they want with Ukraine. Kim.com has a provocative prediction if I have it right. He believes that Victoria Nuland is the real president of Ukraine meaning that America is really in charge and that she's the point person over there. And Kim.com believes that she might be putting together some kind of false flag operation to blow up their own nuclear power plant with the thinking being that if Ukraine blows up their own nuclear power plant that that would force NATO to get involved because it would look like Russia did it and then if NATO gets involved maybe Ukraine can be saved. They already said that it's been ongoing on the news. I don't know if any of that's true. I'm not backing that theory myself but it sounds there. But all I have to say about Ukraine is how could Putin possibly lose at this point? Would it be fair to say we started a fight we didn't need to start? In other words probably it was our own damn fault. We fought too long and killed too many people that didn't need to die and when there was the time that we could have made peace we let it pass. I think Biden did all that. I think he basically gave away Ukraine. Do you know who could save Ukraine? Only Trump while running for president. Because if Putin doesn't control all of Ukraine before let's say Trump or a Republican takes over it might be too late because I think that Trump would