Coffee With Scott Adams — Knowledge Archive July 10, 2026
Scott Adams Philosophy Archive
Search ideas
Episodes Episode #2362

Episode 2362 CWSA 01/23/24

Episode #2362 Jan 23, 2024 1:09:02 28,937 views

Lots of intrigue, mystery, drama, laughs, and coffee If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.

Opening General Commentary

Wow, if you were on the Locals platform right now you would have heard a great, great story. But if you're not on the Locals platform you can still have a great time because today, yeah

View segment →
SimultaneousSip General Commentary

, today is going to be amazing. Today all you need to take it up to the level that nobody can even understand, all you need is a coffee mug or a glass, a tankard, a stein, a canteen, a jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unp…

View segment →
NewsReaction Media & Fake News

Oh, very good, very good. Above average. I'd give it an A minus, possibly an A. And see how much better you feel. Let's talk about all the news. It'll be a combination of things that are real and stuff that's fake and things that I make up completely. You won't tell the difference really. It's all…

View segment →
NewsReaction Politics as Persuasion

ing to come for your coffee. Well those guys, them, kill them. I want them all rounded up, put in prison. WEF must be stopped. They've gone too far. Too far. Yeah, I don't take this too seriously. Did I tell you that 2024 would be the year that everything sounds funny? Right? Do you remember when t…

View segment →
MainContent AI & Technology

to be happy about it, especially since in Elbonia the national sport is rape. But Alice and Tina the tech writer are not going to be too happy about it. So that's what you're missing if you're not on the Locals platform where you could subscribe or on X where you can see Dilbert as well. On the Loca…

View segment →
MainContent Cognitive Reframing

d. All right so as you know humanoid robots are on the way. You do know that in a year you people like me will have an actual humanoid robot in our house, right? You know that? An actual humanoid AI robot in my house probably by the end of the year because I'd be an early adopter at ridiculous pric…

View segment →
MainContent Politics as Persuasion

that's the major pushback is God-given. Wouldn't you say? Because there's not really a third alternative where they are just sort of natural from nature or something like that. That doesn't make sense. All right but let's say you agree they're God-given. What happens if somebody has a different God…

View segment →
MainContent Media & Fake News

o needs some asylum. She could stay at my house. Now you show me military-aged men who are coming over to rape my women. What do I say? Shut that border. Are you crazy? This is insane. What are you doing? And I will give you political reasons and I'll give you economic reasons then I'll give you saf…

View segment →
Tangent Confirmation Bias

's all part of a big conspiracy. Is that what you think? And why is it that this alleged conspiracy for I don't know hundreds of years that there's never been a whistleblower? Never a whistleblower. Not one. There wasn't a liberal who didn't like what the conservatives were doing or a conservative d…

View segment →
MainContent Cognitive Reframing

of do you think you're good at judging character? You know we all think we are. I judge that his character is good and so therefore his intentions are good but I could be wrong. I could be wrong about anybody. But here's what he said and how I disagreed. He was talking about the Gaza situation in th…

View segment →
NewsReaction Media & Fake News

ou can see the comments so I guess other people could see them but I can't. All right all right well I'll continue anyway. Jordan Peterson points out that on YouTube he accrued only 50,000 views in 14 hours which would be enough views to make the rest of us jealous because it's so many but for him…

View segment →
NewsReaction Politics as Persuasion

the five swing states and that was all of the five swing states. Is that true? There was no other state and it was 100% of the swing states. How did I get to this point without knowing that? Because he perfectly formulates the question. When you put it that way it's obviously fraud. I guess I'd been…

View segment →
MainContent Politics as Persuasion

ome leftists about January 6th whether there was an insurrection and you have to hear him. I wouldn't say it was joking mocking but he's so good at making his points it just makes other people look stupid. So here was the things he was saying to people who believed there was a, I think one of the ma…

View segment →
MainContent Cognitive Reframing

threaten him and say look you are going to talk peace or we will rain hell upon you that you've never seen sort of thing and he'd probably actually believe it was going to happen and he'd probably adjust. All right so California Senate race is funny because it's so pathetic. So the people running t…

View segment →
Closing General Commentary

ank goodness the Canadian border doesn't have that kind of problem right? Because we had I think a couple hundred people or so something 100 or 200 that were actually on the terrorist watch list that came up through the southern border. Can you imagine if we had like that many people on the northern…

View segment →

Wow, if you were on the Locals platform right now you would have heard a great, great story. But if you're not on the Locals platform you can still have a great time because today, yeah, today is going to be amazing. Today all you need to take it up to the level that nobody can even understand, all you need is a coffee mug or a glass, a tankard, a stein, a canteen, a jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine, the day, the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip and it happens now.

Oh, very good, very good. Above average. I'd give it an A minus, possibly an A. And see how much better you feel.

Let's talk about all the news. It'll be a combination of things that are real and stuff that's fake and things that I make up completely. You won't tell the difference really. It's all going to sound the same.

Well, San Diego has had more rain in, I guess, a day than they usually have in a month and it's flooding. And it's flooding so badly in San Diego that SeaWorld is underwater. I'm not making that up. That's actually a real story. SeaWorld is underwater. Now what happens if the whales swim away? Because the whales don't know the difference between the flood water and the water they're swimming around in, right? Can't they, if the water gets high enough, can't the whales just swim away? Can they free Willy? Is Willy free already? And is it just the whales or can all the smaller fish that are out in those tanks? Now I know the whales are not going to swim away but it's funny to imagine, isn't it?

Well, the World Economic Forum. I know a lot of you people are like, oh, the World Economic Forum is trying to destroy the world and take away our rights and put us in slavery. And you know, I think it's a lot of hyperbole, don't you? A lot of hyperbole. I'm not worried about the World Economic Forum like all of you people. No, no, I'm not worried about it at all. See what's in the news. The World Economic Forum thinks that coffee is putting too much CO2 into the atmosphere and maybe they're going to come for your coffee. Well those guys, them, kill them. I want them all rounded up, put in prison. WEF must be stopped. They've gone too far. Too far.

Yeah, I don't take this too seriously. Did I tell you that 2024 would be the year that everything sounds funny? Right? Do you remember when the World Economic Forum said there was too much CO2 in the air? I'm trying to do a Swiss accent or Austrian or whatever the hell it is. The scientists have said there's too much CO2 in the air and so you must drive your combustion engine less. Now I have to admit that while I don't buy into that alarmism it at least sounds a little sciency, a little sciency, kind of serious. But then when they come for my coffee I say I don't feel like you're being serious anymore because you know what? I'm not going to give up my coffee. Yeah, no, coffee. You're not going to take my coffee from my cold dead hands. You can pry it anyway.

If you're not watching the Dilbert comic strip, which means that you're not subscribing either on the X platform where you can subscribe to see it every single day as well as the Dilbert calendar in digital form, then you would not know that this week Dilbert's company is being asked to house migrants in their cubicles. That's not too much to ask. And it looks like they'll be housing three to five Elbonian migrants per cubicle. The women in the office are not going to be happy about it, especially since in Elbonia the national sport is rape. But Alice and Tina the tech writer are not going to be too happy about it. So that's what you're missing if you're not on the Locals platform where you could subscribe or on X where you can see Dilbert as well. On the Locals platform you see also my other comic, Robot Reads News, which is far naughtier than anything you've seen before.

Well the story about who's funding Nikki Haley gets more weird and interesting all the time. So apparently she's definitely been getting money from these never-Trump type people. So let's see who's giving her money. This is by Kyle Becker's reporting on this. The 1630 Fund is managed by the Arabella Advisors. You've got the Hope Fund also managed by the Arabella Advisors. And you've got the Democracy Fund voice founded by eBay co-founder Pierre Omidyar and Reid Hoffman, famous billionaire founder of LinkedIn. And so both the last two billionaires are the biggest, probably the biggest two. I know Reid's probably the biggest number one funder of Democrat stuff. So you've got Democrats and never-Trumpers funding Nikki Haley. What do you think's going on there? I haven't quite put this together yet. Have you? Is it exactly what it looks like? Because what it looks like is they're planning to take Trump out. I mean that's what Vivek says. It's what a lot of people say. But I can't think of any other reason for it. Can you? Or is it a clever way to ruin Nikki Haley in case she gets in? As in, well we could make sure we've destroyed the reputation of somebody if they're going to be a Republican. Could you imagine if Nikki Haley actually became president? She wouldn't have Republican support and she's not going to have Democrat support. So what kind of support would she have? Well what would be the point of having a Nikki Haley president who didn't have Democrat support and didn't have at least half of Republican support? And it would look like she got in because the Democrats wanted her. But what part of that would work in the real world? So it certainly argues against any kind of normal political plan. As in, I think I'll give money to the one I want to get elected. It doesn't feel like anything like that's happening. So if you're not donating to the person you want to get elected, what exactly are you doing?

Now the obvious thing would be, oh they're just trying to hurt Trump. But really I feel like they might know something's going to happen to Trump that we don't know. So yeah, I just worry that they know more than we know. But it certainly looks like they're going to try to put him in jail and it certainly looks like if that doesn't work there might be a plan B. There might be. Well there's going to be, according to End Wokeness on X, there are going to be a couple of remakes of a couple of films. It's going to be a remake of The Wizard of Oz and also It's a Wonderful Life. So we'll have remakes of those but they will be completely non-white perspectives. So it's going to be the all black or people of color LGBTQ Wizard of Oz and It's a Wonderful Life. So what do you think about that? I'm totally okay with it. You know who I think should be the most angry about it? Black moviegoers. If I were a black moviegoer I would say why not make a movie that a black person wrote? Why can't we have our own movie? It feels like too little, doesn't it? You know I think they could be good movies because the basic plots of course are awesome. So I would probably watch both of those remakes. I think they could be awesome. You know and I don't mind. I think there's plenty of space for the black Wizard of Oz. You know it's a big world. It's a free market and I'd watch them. You know as long as they're well made, they've got good actors, you know the story is good. But isn't it insulting? I mean it feels like too little, doesn't it? Like if you're trying to make sure that the nonwhite professionals get their own thing, which is a perfectly good thing to want, I feel like they'd be better served by just having their own thing. You can't tell me that there are no black writers writing good movies. You know you have to go back that far to find a good script. I mean I know it's a classic but anyway. You know maybe the intentions are good.

All right so as you know humanoid robots are on the way. You do know that in a year you people like me will have an actual humanoid robot in our house, right? You know that? An actual humanoid AI robot in my house probably by the end of the year because I'd be an early adopter at ridiculous prices. There's no way I'm going to go a minute without a robot. Okay can we just say this? The minute there's a robot that's like an actual quality robot, I might wait for the Tesla robot but I'm getting a robot. Is there anybody with me? You know I realize it's purely a price thing at this point but if you could afford it you'd get a robot, right? How do you not have a robot? Of course you're getting a robot.

Well I have a prediction for you. Apparently there'll be a number of companies making robots including Tesla. Tesla will have its humanoid robot coming out pretty soon. I have a theory that this will be Elon Musk's biggest profit center, the robots. By the way he said that too. He thinks there'll be lots of robots and it might be a bigger profit than cars. I agree with him. But here's why I think the Tesla robot might be the most successful of the humanoid robots. I think it's the only one you're going to be able to have sex with. Seriously, no joke. He's going to make a fortune because my guess is that Elon will be the only one who has an uncensored robot that will do anything you want it to do in the privacy of your home. Now you say to yourself, Scott I'm not going to have intercourse with a robot. Well maybe you won't but somebody will. You know I laughed myself into a cry last night when I was just walking through my house, you know on the way from one room to another, and I suddenly had this thought. If I had a robot and I was really lonely and I didn't have anybody around and I'm 25 instead of my current age, well I wouldn't have intercourse with my robot because it wouldn't have any components. You know there's nothing to insert into. And of course you know it doesn't, I don't think it'll have a mouth. So but if I'm 25 and I'm really, really horny I'm going to put a wig on that thing and ask for a hand job. Now you can tell me you would never do it. Fine, fine. Let's go with that. You'd never think about it. You'd never do it when you were 25 and you didn't have any options. Oh yeah you would. You wouldn't say to yourself I've got a robot, I've got a flashlight, I've got a robot and I've got a flashlight. What to do, what to do? Oh yeah that robot will be holding the flashlight. You can take a bet on that one. I know it doesn't seem like you would do it. I know. Not you. I don't mean you. But I was just laughing myself to death when I thought there was any chance we wouldn't be trying to have sex with the robots. Oh we will be trying to have sex with the robots. Oh yes that will happen. There's no doubt about it. Maybe not you. I didn't say you. But people. People will.

Speaking of people, well it looks like BMW just signed up to have humanoid robots in its car making facility in Germany I guess. So humanoid robots are on order for real factories and they'll be just walking around like co-workers.

All right so a WEF advisor guy but he's also a famous author named Yuval Noah Harari is getting some attention today because he says some things about human rights are a fiction. That it's just imaginary. That nobody has any human rights because they don't come from anybody. It's just fiction. It's just something we tell ourselves. We have rights. And I saw a lot of people on the internet say my God, my God what could be worse. How many of you disagree with that statement? I thought it was obvious that rights are imaginary. You don't think they are? All right let's say yes or no. Are human rights a fiction meaning that we simply agree that we have the rights? I'm seeing yeses. I'm seeing nos. Some say God-given. So all right. So let's take the God-given perspective and I think that's the major pushback is God-given. Wouldn't you say? Because there's not really a third alternative where they are just sort of natural from nature or something like that. That doesn't make sense. All right but let's say you agree they're God-given. What happens if somebody has a different God or a different belief system? Does your God-given rights require that you have the right view of God and what God wants? And if other people will disagree with you that they have the wrong God. So do human rights depend on having picked the right God? See that's the problem. If it's God-given you have to also sort of press upon your fellow citizens that your God is the right one and then we get in trouble.

Yeah I was surprised that this was controversial because I thought everybody knew that religion was based on belief not fact. Now how do you, I have a question. I'm actually curious about it because I have an impression that I don't know if it's true or not. So I'm not a believer but I wish I were because I observe that it has many benefits in this life and if you're right about the afterlife well that's a pretty big benefit too. So I'm not a believer but I think it's a superior way to live. If I could get there, you know if I had the ability to be a believer I would be because it looks like they're happier and more successful. But how do you reconcile that faith is belief by definition with the fact that in the case of rights you treat it like a fact? So it's either a belief or a fact. How do you integrate the faith is a belief by definition but that sometimes you'll treat it like a fact if you're let's say deciding who has rights and stuff? I just don't know how you do it. I'm not arguing one way or another. I'm not giving you an opinion. I just wondered how you do it. So is the way you do it you say to yourself it's a belief but it's also true? Is that how you reconcile that? It's a belief but it's also true. All right yeah I guess that's what a belief is. All right that was just for my own benefit because I don't know how you do that.

All right so Supreme Court ruled against Texas as you know. Texas wanted to protect its own border from the migrants and the Supreme Court said no the federal government controls your border. You can't protect yourself and they're going to take down your barbed wire and let the migrants flow in. Do you know what's wrong with that? Everything. I think everything is wrong with that.

All right so I've got two opinions. Number one my legal opinion and I know you want to hear my legal opinion because what would be more valuable than a non-lawyer's legal opinion? Well the internet's full of it so why not mine. My guess without knowing anything about the topic too much, my guess is that the justices may have correctly read the law and the Constitution. So I'm not sure that they got the wrong answer. It just doesn't work. That's my take. I'm not sure they got the wrong answer and I'm not sure you want a Supreme Court who makes up rights. I mean the whole point of getting these conservative judges is that they're not going to add something to the Constitution that isn't there. Now the fact that they disagreed makes it kind of questionable. How can you disagree about what's there? It'd be one thing to interpret it differently but it's weird that the conservatives would ever disagree because they should just be looking at it and say well it's either there or it's not and it's either clear or it's not. But they did disagree and Amy Coney Barrett, allegedly a conservative, voted that the feds can dismantle the state's self-defense.

Now of course this raises the question of sexism. Yes because people say wait a minute all we needed was that one female conservative to go with the other conservatives and suddenly it would be the other way. But why is it that the female conservative is the one who wants to keep the border open? And now it gets interesting. You're saying to yourself it's based on blackmail. It's bribery. Oh bet it's not. I doubt that. I kind of doubt it. I think it's simply as it's probably as simple as she thought the rule, the law said something the others didn't. But there is another really interesting layer to this which I've mentioned before and I got away with it so I'm going to do it again. And apparently Jordan Peterson is weighing in on this. I didn't see this from him but somebody talking about him so I hope I got it right. Jordan Peterson talks about something like the return of the repressed. Something about that. The idea is that women may be more open to immigration because the men coming across are more manly than the ones here. In other words that women are operating on a mating instinct to increase the number of manly men because there aren't any in America. So they might argue that it's something about fairness and asylum and stuff like that but that the real base mating instinct is simply that the men coming across are more men than the ones that are here. Yeah are you going to disagree with Dr. Peterson? Has that ever been a good strategy? Of all the times that people disagreed with the scientific speculations of Jordan Peterson did that work out really well for people in the past?

Here's what I think. I'll put my own take on it. Everything is an expression of the mating instinct. Everything, everything, everything humans do is an extension of the mating instinct even if you don't know it. Everything is. Right? The clothes you wear, the fact that I've got a big dick in my face that looks like a microphone. None of these decisions were conscious but we are simply mating creatures. Mating is the thing we have to get right. Everything else is subsidiary to can you make more of yourself because that's survival and in theory we optimized for survival. So why would immigration policy be the one thing in the world that's exempt from the mating instinct? And the answer is it absolutely is not. In fact it might be the purest example of the mating instinct being expressed.

Now of course because there are some dumb people. Are there any dumb people here today? Usually we've got a few that get here. Are there any dumb people? Should I speak to the dumb people for a moment? Would the smart people mind if I just take a moment for the dumb people? Yeah whenever I make generalizations it really doesn't mean every single person. So if I say that women in general might have a different view than men in general that doesn't mean you. It doesn't mean people. You know I mean sort of on a general way, sort of average. So if you say to yourself but Scott I know a guy who doesn't think exactly like that example that's not contributing to the conversation because we're starting from the point of it's not applying to everyone. All right now we can go back to talking to the smart people. Are the dumb people satisfied? Would you like to jump into the comments and you're allowed. I'll give you permission. If you're a dumb person you're trying to keep up you can say in the comments Scott that's crazy because I know somebody who's the exception and that will be really helping. So go ahead and do that. Do you know why you would do that? Do you know why you would try to get attention when your opinion is so bad? Because getting attention is part of the mating instinct. That's right. So you can't help it and that's my point.

All right here's my take. Everything's the mating instinct. Immigration is the purest example. Why do men in general want to stop immigration? Because we don't want the competition. Because we want to have the babes in the United States to ourselves. If you show me a border with hot women coming across I say to yourself, I say to you, you know maybe we're being a little tough on this whole migration situation aren't we? You know they look like they need asylum. Especially the hot one. Do you see the hot one coming across swimming across with the wet t-shirt? I think that one needs some, that's a woman who needs some asylum. She could stay at my house. Now you show me military-aged men who are coming over to rape my women. What do I say? Shut that border. Are you crazy? This is insane. What are you doing? And I will give you political reasons and I'll give you economic reasons then I'll give you safety reasons and I'm lying. It's all a lie. I'm watching a bunch of men come over who are going to the women that I want. That's the whole story. And I'm watching women like Amy Coney Barrett who's got a little heart on for the men coming over. She has justified it based on the Constitution and has no idea that she just sold the whole country for her vagina. That's what I think. That's what it looks like to me.

Now you might say but no it's really about the law. And I say but no if you think anything's about the law ever you're really not operating at a very high level. Yeah you want to know what the levels of awareness are? Let me give you the levels of awareness. Level of awareness number one: you're a child and you learn for the first time that your parents lied about Santa Claus and then you say to yourself huh I think people can sometimes lie. That's level one. Actually level one is you believe everything you know when you're a child. Then you learn wait a minute the Tooth Fairy, Santa Claus, wait a minute. And you realize that sometimes they can lie. Easter Bunny etc. That's going from zero to maybe one. First level of awareness. Then at some point you realize that they lie not just about silly stuff not just about Santa Claus but they actually lie about really important things and then you go to the next level of awareness. And then you find out holy cow a whole bunch of our news stories are fake. Oh my God I didn't know this when I was, I thought the news was mostly real. And then you find out that there are a whole bunch of stories that are shaded and even the facts are hidden and the context has changed and you realize that a whole lot of the news is fake. And then you realize it gets worse. A lot of the data, the science you know and the data that we see is fake. Is that where you are? How many of you are at that level where you know that when you see science and you see news you should not assume it's true because it might be true and it might not be true. That's where most of you are right. Here's where I'm trying to get you. I'm trying to get you to the layer above that. I'm trying to take you up a level. At the level above it you'll know none of it's true. It can't be. You'll know it's none of it's true and that it can't be true. That's where you need to get. None of it's true and it can't be. How do I know that? I used to be in the business of creating data that other people would have to use to make decisions. Was it ever real? Nope. It was my job to support the decisions that had already been made or to support guessing by making it look like the guess had some basis to it or to make the department look good or that sort of thing. No all information is fake because it's all motivated. Whoever is coming up with the information has a story to tell. That's it. Once you learn it's all fake you go to a different level. So if you're still believing some of the news is true, good luck. Good luck.

By the way I always see the Jewish conspiracy people come in every morning. I've got a question for you. If you think there's a global Jewish conspiracy and I won't, I'll just ask you this question. Would you agree that there's such a thing as liberal Jewish people and conservative Jewish people? Of course, of course you know that. So they all got together. So all the liberal Jews and the conservative Jews they all got together and it's all part of a big conspiracy. Is that what you think? And why is it that this alleged conspiracy for I don't know hundreds of years that there's never been a whistleblower? Never a whistleblower. Not one. There wasn't a liberal who didn't like what the conservatives were doing or a conservative didn't like what the liberals were doing like everywhere in the rest of the world all the time forever. Not a single person said you know what I was in the meeting where we plan to do whatever it is you think is being done. No whistleblowers. Really? Not a single whistleblower? And yet there are whistleblowers for everything else. All right that's just to think about.

All right so yes I think the question on the border is largely sexual. I also think that BLM was largely a mating event. The Black Lives Matter stuff. I think that female approval of Black Lives Matter was probably a mating instinct sort of a thing. All right and again doesn't mean every person. Doesn't mean you. Right? That's just for the dumb people.

All right Cenk Uygur who's running for president without knowing he's a naturalized citizen so he can't run for president but I think I love it anyway. I have a kind of weird appreciation for Cenk because I think his heart is in the right place. I think so. I mean you never know but he looks like he actually wants things to be better. So the fact that he has a different idea of how to get there I'm much more forgiving on that because I don't think his intentions are in the wrong place. Right? Yeah we could disagree on what makes sense but and I'm seeing your comments so I understand that you have a different view of it but you know sometimes it's kind of a question of do you think you're good at judging character? You know we all think we are. I judge that his character is good and so therefore his intentions are good but I could be wrong. I could be wrong about anybody. But here's what he said and how I disagreed. He was talking about the Gaza situation in the West Bank and he says the occupation as he calls it is morally wrong and completely indefensible. Saying the Palestinians cannot be trusted to govern themselves is deeply racist. Would you agree that is racist to say that the Palestinians can't be trusted to govern themselves? Which I think the better way to say that is Israel doesn't trust that they would be safe if it happened. Is it racist? What do you think? Well I would say it would be racist if they were expelling from their country the people who were also Palestinian and looked like them and prayed like them and had the same genes. So clearly there are plenty of people living in peace in Israel. So if it were race that would not be the case. So clearly it's a security problem and the way that they're dealing with the security problem is they don't know who are the good guys and who are the bad guys. They can't tell the difference.

So but what if it was racist? Because you could make the argument. I think it's primarily just risk assessment and politics and what they want is mostly the people who don't, you know the people who want to kill them. They'd like to have less contact with them. Seems normal. So here's what I said. I haven't been double-canceled yet so we'll see how this goes. I posted back to that and I said that racism is morally and ethically acceptable for self-defense. Let me say it again because you might think you misheard it. Racism is morally and ethically acceptable for self-defense because the standard for self-defense is whatever you think you need to do. That's it. It's whatever you think you need to do. Doesn't matter why. Now you could break the law by doing whatever you need to do and then the law will take care of you and I agree with the law. The law must be obeyed but if you're talking about ethics and morality that's a separate domain from the law. We'd like them to be compatible but they're not always. So if you have a choice between staying alive in your opinion, not mine but your own opinion, that you have to do something racist to stay alive then you should definitely do it. But to be clear racism in any other domain outside of self-defense is abhorrent. So if you're being racist in your personal life, your business life, who you rent to, who you hire, all of that stuff completely you know I disavow all of that. That would be a bad way to run a country, bad way to be a human being and bad in every sense. But in the very narrow domain of self-defense yeah you can be as racist as you want and people really need to understand that or they'll die.

The classic example is the, was it Jesse Jackson saying he might cross the road if he saw a young black man in a hoodie or something. You know that classic case. Why is Jesse Jackson a racist? Well yes in that exact example he would be by his own definition I think but he would also say you know I hate it but I'd stay alive. I'm paraphrasing of course. So yes if you have any reason to think you'd be in trouble you get to do what you need to do. Totally. Yeah if you were an Israeli citizen and you were walking down the street of old Gaza and you were just looking like a, you know let's say you were obviously an Israeli citizen, Orthodox Jew, and you were just walking down the streets in Gaza before the war would you feel safe or would you feel all racist because you thought that maybe they would hurt you because they're not big fans of yours? Well it would be racist if you felt afraid wouldn't it by definition because you'd say I think I'm afraid because they're Palestinian and they have a certain, no you it would be racist but it would also be smart to stay away from that town. So the trouble is if you get too hung up on whether it's technically racist or not you're missing the larger point that it doesn't matter. Is everybody on the same page there? We could argue about whether it is or whether it's not but it doesn't matter because you're going to do whatever you need to do to stay safe and to keep your family safe and nobody can tell you that's immoral. You could be wrong. You could be wrong. It's still your choice. Yeah it's not ethically or anything.

So when Elon Musk went with Ben Shapiro recently just the other day, visited Auschwitz and I believe he had a quote I saw that said you know having visited Auschwitz he understands why Israel had to act decisively you know in Gaza. Why they couldn't let that stand. And yeah I think that's where everybody gets when you have that clear question about self-defense versus is this a little bit too much DEI. Yeah self-defense wins.

Speaking of which there are I guess black Democrats in Chicago. One of them is a DEI consultant which is interesting and they're calling for controls on immigration. So even the black citizens of America who are DEI employees, their very job is to get rid of racism and they're saying you need to close this border. Now what they don't say is all these brown people coming in which is not what they're worrying about because they're not thinking about brown or anything else. They're just thinking taking our resources. So if they were not black Democrat DEI consultants we'd be calling them racist but because they are we can see them somewhat clearly as just people who are under threat. So are these black people being racist? Absolutely not. Or better yet what's the difference? What's the difference if they think they're threatened? These are my American citizens be they Democrats or DEI consultants. If I rank them in importance they are at the top of importance because they're Americans. They're on my team should be and we would all like to be safe and I would like these people in Chicago be they black or white or Democrat or Republican or DEI consultants which I'm not a big fan of. I want them to be safe and if they think that closing that border makes them safe does it matter if it's racist? No it doesn't matter at all. Yeah racism and self-defense just shouldn't be in the same conversation so just get it out of there. So I agree with the Democrats and the DEI consultant in this case.

Jordan Peterson he's in a lot of news today. He always is since he does more interesting things than you and I do. He's in the news a lot sort of like Elon Musk but anyway. He did a video in which he did an interview with somebody talking about the German protests, the farmers. Now how many of you even know that there's a massive German protest? How many of you know that? Okay so most of the people watching this are pretty well informed. By the way is anybody also on one of the other platforms because their comments have stopped? Okay if anybody has a minute can you look at YouTube or Rumble or X. The comments stop coming through on the studio. I could see all the comments on Locals anyway. If they start again I'll let you know. Live chat studio. Oh are they back? No yeah it looks like they're, I think I'm still live though right? Right am I still live on the other platforms? Oh you can see the comments so I guess other people could see them but I can't. All right all right well I'll continue anyway.

Jordan Peterson points out that on YouTube he accrued only 50,000 views in 14 hours which would be enough views to make the rest of us jealous because it's so many but for him it's nothing. You know normal would be maybe three quarters of a million or something. So according to Dr. Peterson it seems obvious that YouTube is suppressing this content specifically. Why would YouTube be suppressing German farmer protests of an American, not American but Canadian psychologist? Why would they be doing that? Yeah it doesn't matter. They're doing it. There's no doubt they're doing it. So any pretense you thought about free speech in America it's kind of an illusion. Would you agree? We don't really have free speech in a practical sense. We have it in the, not well not even in the technical sense because the government does lean on the platforms to suppress speech. So no we actually don't have free speech do we? And in fact a lot of the people who tried to exercise their free speech are in jail right now. That's another topic.

Let's see how many, here's a little test for you. General knowledge test without looking it up. What is the population of Sweden in rough numbers? Just take a guess. Population of Sweden rough numbers. Go. Three million? Ten million? Fifteen? Thirteen? Oh those pretty good guesses. Yeah I think it's around 10 million. It's about 10 million but your guesses are quite well informed. They were all in the range. I'm impressed.

So how many bomb attacks would you expect? So 10 million would be say the size of New York City right? How big is New York City? 10.7, 8 million depends which part you're measuring I guess. So 8 to 10 million. So roughly Sweden is about the size of New York City. How many bomb attacks in New York City would you consider a crisis in a year? Bomb attacks. One. One right? One would be a lot right? Suppose you had 10 a year. Imagine 10 bomb attacks in one year just in New York City. You wouldn't be able to live there. Yeah how many bomb attacks do you think that there were in Sweden that would include things like hand grenades and you know things that blow up in the past year? 134. 134 things blew up in Sweden. Only 10 million people. Sweden apparently has just fallen to the migrants. Yeah the migrants have basically just ruined Sweden. I don't know if it'll ever be the same. So I think Sweden's just gone. Like what? I don't think I would even travel there at this point. So that's a little warning for you in case you're wondering if our uncontrolled migration has any potential risk. Yeah it does.

Representative Clay Higgins from Louisiana says Biden is staging a civil war by pulling down those barriers in Texas. The ones that Texas put up to try to protect itself from the migrants. And what do you think? Do you think Texas and the federal government will end up coming to blows? I think not because I think Americans just wouldn't do it. Like who would execute that order? Who like seriously who would execute the order? If you're in the National Guard and you're standing there looking at your basically your other American in another uniform who's just doing their job and you're just doing your job are you going to shoot him? I don't think we're anywhere near that. I think the soldiers would just lay down their guns and say look are you crazy? We're not going to shoot these guys. That's crazy. So I don't think it's going to turn into a civil war. I just don't think our minds are anywhere near that and we're hundreds of miles away from that mentally.

So here's a question which I need a fact check on this. I saw a question by Benny Johnson on the X platform. Can you tell me if this is true? So he makes an assumption. I think it might be true so I'm not doubting it. I'm just doubting my own memory. So check my memory right. This is what Benny Johnson says in the post. He says I'm asking honestly without bias or preconditions. When in American election history have all five swing states simultaneously stop counting ballots on election night? Is there any explanation for this other than centrally organized fraud? Now here's my question. I was somewhat unaware that it was only the five swing states and that was all of the five swing states. Is that true? There was no other state and it was 100% of the swing states. How did I get to this point without knowing that? Because he perfectly formulates the question. When you put it that way it's obviously fraud. I guess I'd been resisting. I've been resisting the idea that you could tell it was fraud because they decided to count votes the next day. If that's the only thing I knew I'd say well it's suspicious but I mean in a big bureaucracy some states will do it different than others. But I somehow I was unaware of this context. I knew that some of them were swing states but I didn't know it was all five all at the same time. If it's all five at the same time it's definitely fraud. Are we on the same page? So this is a perfect example of something I say a lot. A lot of the times when you think people are disagreeing they're not. It's just that the fake news got to somebody and it didn't get to somebody else. That's it. So in this case I think I was a victim of fake news or maybe I didn't do my own work because it never occurred to me that it was all five and only the five and at the same time. Somehow those three facts never were in my brain at the same time until Benny Johnson put it in that form.

Yeah Scott is waking up. I block everybody who says that. Yeah I'll let you go this time because I don't know how to block you in real time but everybody that says I'm waking up I block. So don't do it jokingly because you get blocked. All right only because I take it as an insult. All right I know you're kidding. It's okay she was kidding.

All right yeah I think the reasonable belief because the government is guilty until proven innocent. If you're the government you have to prove it was legitimate and the evidence suggests otherwise. Yeah all right.

So Trump said directly and out loud that the reason he's made up his mind to never want to have a central bank digital currency, the so-called CBDC, is that Vivek basically filled him in and told him what the risk was and then Trump said okay I'm on board. Have you ever seen that before? The simple transparency of Trump is like a beauty to behold. Oh I didn't really understand that topic and then Vivek explained it to me so now here's my opinion. That was just beautiful wasn't it? Because you know I don't even know much about the topic so I can't say I have a strong opinion other than eventually we will have a digital currency. There's no question about it. Yeah we're not going to be paying stuff with paper in a hundred years. It's just not going to happen. So I don't know what will happen but there's going to be a digital currency someday. But in the meantime maybe you want to forestall that and I could understand that. I wouldn't oppose you wanting that. But just watching how the sausage was made and then not having a problem with it is just a purifying feeling you know? Don't you always assume that what's happening is some like weird behind the scenes negotiating and somebody got blackmailed and somebody doesn't understand and somebody's taking a bribe and you know it's all that stuff and then sometimes it's just this. Oh Vivek is super smart. He explained it to me so now here's my opinion. And Vivek's really smart. What's better than that right? What is better than that? Nothing. That is government operating perfectly. Full transparency. A poor opinion that was corrected by a better opinion and then he explains what happened and pow it's funny. It's such a small thing. It was just a throwaway thing he said at a rally but there's very few things that have made me feel better about the country than watching exactly how that decision got made. Yes put your smart people in charge of the complicated stuff.

So Trump says a very small chance that DeSantis would be in his cabinet. Not that he wouldn't do a good job but I do love the fact that DeSantis came through this process with so much respect. Don't you love that? Like you don't really think a political process ends with anybody looking good especially if they didn't win but he set a standard that I really appreciated. You know I'll say it again. What he added to the country, DeSantis simply by running and giving us essentially validating Trump as the Republican's genuine choice that's so important. I mean it's a difference between a civil war and not having one. It might be that big a difference. And of course Vivek the same thing. So what Vivek and DeSantis did for the country in our system is just hard to underestimate. It's just huge. So debt of gratitude.

Glenn Greenwald is showing us the way. He had some event where he was debating with some leftists about January 6th whether there was an insurrection and you have to hear him. I wouldn't say it was joking mocking but he's so good at making his points it just makes other people look stupid. So here was the things he was saying to people who believed there was a, I think one of the mainstream was there and somebody else. He noted that Trump didn't resist leaving the building like when his term was over which would be a weird thing to do if you're trying to cling to power. Why would you leave the building? That's the dumbest thing you'd ever do if you were going to do an insurrection. Leave the building? Why? And then he points out he didn't try to activate any military force. Who tries to do an insurrection without trying to get at least some kind of military force on your side? You know even if it's your whatever your personal security or something like I don't even think the record even shows that he talked to his own Secret Service. Imagine trying to be a dictator and not colluding with your own protection, your own Secret Service who are dedicated probably to prevent you from being a dictator. So the guys in the room with guns who would literally shoot you if you actually tried to become a dictator I hope they would wouldn't they? Can somebody give me a fact check? If the Secret Service saw you actually becoming a dictator wouldn't they take care of it? Now you're saying no because they would be so professional. They'd be so professional they would support him even if he went full Hitler and started rounding up and murdering his opponents. They would just do their job because they're professionals. No they wouldn't. Come on no they wouldn't. They would prevent it. So one way you can know for sure that he wasn't planning any kind of real insurrection was that he didn't work it out with anybody in his security detail. There's no evidence of that. That'd be the first thing you do because you can't have the enemy being your protection. It's the very first thing you'd have to do. So yeah and he didn't arrest his opponents which is a basic thing you do if you're a dictator. If Trump wanted to stay in power he would have just had Biden arrested but he had no power to do that. He had no power to or well nobody would have done it.

So watch the people who have been brainwashed into thinking January 6th was an insurrection. It's going to be real fun because if you take the Glenn Greenwald model and I think we should we should mock it and make them explain how that could be an insurrection. Now the best argument I've heard for the insurrection hoax believers is that he had those fake electors. This is what Bill Maher says. And the way that argument goes like this. He had fake electors so therefore that's how he was trying to take over the country. Now anybody who knows the situation would say something like this. Well the documentation shows that they believe they were simply placeholders to maintain the right to pursue the legal challenge. It was just a placeholder thing and they weren't replacement for or fake. They were simply sort of on hold to show that you were putting a stake in the ground that you're challenging it. Now what does Bill Maher say about that? Well he wouldn't let you finish the sentence. He would talk over you. I guarantee you you'll never get to finish that sentence. I saw him doing that to somebody the other day. Now suppose you say what if they were fake? How in the world were fake electors going to take over a country? Was the Supreme Court going to say oh yeah fake electors are fine? Like there's no way to connect the dots that that process could have been a way to take over the country. The only thing it could have been is exactly what they said it was. A bunch of lawyers said you know what we'd have a stronger case if he had some alternate electors and you know otherwise we won't use them. So would they strongarm the real delegates? Probably if it was a real insurrection they would. I don't know if they did. Maybe somebody did. Don't argue with analogies. That's a bad way to go.

All right Russia apparently is ruling out any peace talks in Ukraine and why wouldn't they because apparently the money is going to dry up from America unless something changes and that would guarantee that Russia could have anything they want with Ukraine. Kim.com has a provocative prediction if I have it right. He believes that Victoria Nuland is the real president of Ukraine meaning that America is really in charge and that she's the point person over there. And Kim.com believes that she might be putting together some kind of false flag operation to blow up their own nuclear power plant with the thinking being that if Ukraine blows up their own nuclear power plant that that would force NATO to get involved because it would look like Russia did it and then if NATO gets involved maybe Ukraine can be saved. They already said that it's been ongoing on the news. I don't know if any of that's true. I'm not backing that theory myself but it sounds there. But all I have to say about Ukraine is how could Putin possibly lose at this point? Would it be fair to say we started a fight we didn't need to start? In other words probably it was our own damn fault. We fought too long and killed too many people that didn't need to die and when there was the time that we could have made peace we let it pass. I think Biden did all that. I think he basically gave away Ukraine. Do you know who could save Ukraine? Only Trump while running for president. Because if Putin doesn't control all of Ukraine before let's say Trump or a Republican takes over it might be too late because I think that Trump would threaten him and say look you are going to talk peace or we will rain hell upon you that you've never seen sort of thing and he'd probably actually believe it was going to happen and he'd probably adjust.

All right so California Senate race is funny because it's so pathetic. So the people running to be Senator for California would be Adam Schiff, Katie Porter, Barbara Lee and one Republican Steve Garvey who doesn't have a chance because it's California. The funny part is all of the people are under 25% support. They're all under 25%. They're so odious that nobody wants any of them I think. But what's funny is you have a straight white male allegedly running against a woman and a woman of color. How in the world can California elect the straight white guy when there is a woman and a woman of color in the same party? Can they? Gavin was a special case. If Adam Schiff wins this thing I'm going to think the race is rigged. It just doesn't seem like that's possible.

So New Hampshire votes today. Why does anybody care about New Hampshire? Why does anybody care about that? It's such a funny little weird state and so few people vote. The fact that we give it any credibility at all is sort of hilarious but to me it's like all the news people are trying to milk a bull. It's like all right we know you can only milk cows. Bulls don't have udders. Well all we have is this bull so let's milk it. That's what the news feels like. Okay we all know that New Hampshire shouldn't matter. It shouldn't be important but it's the news so we gotta talk about it. Yeah let's talk about how we can milk that bull. All right it's like squeezing orange juice out of a turd. You just can't do it no matter how hard you squeeze.

So the Democrats using their technique of blaming Republicans for whatever they do are going to blame Trump for his many miscues and talking for having cognitive decline. That's right. The supporters of Joe Biden have decided that a good fruitful attack for their side would be to attack Trump for his mental decline because he sometimes mixes up names. They are so freaking consistent and again I have to apologize to Tucker Carlson for when he said that they always do what they blame you of doing. I didn't think he meant always. It just have like a weird overgeneralization. Well not always. Not every single time. Yep it's every single time no matter how absurd it is they'll do it anyway and this is the one that sort of points it out. Imagine the absurdity of defending Joe Biden on a cognitive level but they're doing it. They're doing it.

And I guess we're worried about the Canadian border. So you heard about there were a few hundred people on the terrorist watch list that got through the southern border. So thank goodness the Canadian border doesn't have that kind of problem right? Because we had I think a couple hundred people or so something 100 or 200 that were actually on the terrorist watch list that came up through the southern border. Can you imagine if we had like that many people on the northern border like a few hundred people on the watch list? Checking the news there were 500 of them. Yeah so actually it turns out that by a magnitude there are more terrorists coming across the northern border. You know what I worry about? I don't worry about the ones that came across the southern border because they might be the dumb terrorists. They wouldn't be able to pull something off. But every terrorist who comes through the northern border I say to myself well there's a terrorist who figured out how to do it right. Now that terrorist I worry about because if you came in through Canada you've got some game. If you came in through the southern border I don't think you thought it through because you know Canada it's right there. Just walk across I guess it works on either border.

All right ladies and gentlemen this episode of Coffee with Scott Adams has been brought to you by the best book ever written. It's called Reframe Your Brain by me and we're in phase two now. Phase one is launching the book. Phase two is a bunch of people bought it and read it especially for Christmas and now the messages are coming in. I had to buy five more. My neighbor got one for me for Christmas and just bought several more for their family. So it is and people are posting that it's changing their lives. So I say this because I'm marketing a book but also it's completely true. You can read the reviews and see it yourself. It's changing lives. Now there are a lot of books that say a lot of fun and interesting things and you say to yourself well that's some good advice in that book but do you do it? So what's different about Reframe Your Brain is that the reframes are literally one sentence each. So if you find a reframe that fits your situation you just have to read one sentence and it will either change the way you think of the situation or not but that's your total investment is a sentence. So that's why people are using it successfully because it's so easy to implement and there's no downside. You just read a sentence it works or it doesn't. So that can change your life.

So ladies and gentlemen that's all we got for now. Thanks for joining on the YouTube, Rumble and X platforms. Sorry your comments got locked up there but I guess you can see your own comments and I will see you tomorrow same place same time.

wow if you were on the locals uh platform right now you would have heard a great great story but if you're not on the locals platform you can still have a great time because today yeah today is going to be amazing today all you need to take it up to the level that nobody can even understand all you need is a cuper Mugger glass a tanker gel sste a canteen Jugger flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid I like coffee and join me now for the unparallel pleasure the dopamine the day the thing that makes everything better it's called the simultaneous zip and it happens now go oh very good very good above average I'd give it a a minus possibly an A and see how much better you feel let's talk about all the news it'll be a combination of things that are real and stuff that's fake and things that I make up completely you won't tell the difference really it's all going to sound the same well San Diego has had more rain in I guess a day than they usually have in a month and it's flooding and it's flooding so badly in San Diego the Sea.

World is underwater I'm not making that up that's actually a real story see world is underwater now what happens if the Whales swim away uh cuz the whales don't know the difference between the flood water and the water they're swimming around in right can't they if the water gets high enough can't the whales just swim away can they free Willie is Willie free already and and is it just the whales or can all the smaller fish that are out in those tanks now I know the whales are not going to they're not going to swim away but it's funny to imagine isn't it well the world economic Forum I know a lot of you a lot of you people are you know like oh the world economic forum is trying to you know destroy the world and take away our rights and put us in slavery and you know I think it's a lot of hyperbole don't you a lot of hyperbole I'm not worried about the world economic Forum like all of all of you people are no no I'm I'm not worried about it at all see what's in the news uh the world economic Forum uh thinks that coffee coffee is uh putting too much CO2 into the atmosphere and maybe uh maybe they're going to come for your coffee well those guys them kill them I want them all rounded up put in prison WF Must Be Stopped they've gone too far too far yeah I don't take this too seriously did I tell you that 2024 would be the year that everything sounds funny right do you remember when the W the world economic Forum said there was too much CO2 in the air I'm trying to do a Swiss accent or Austrian or whatever the hell it is uh the scientist of said there too much CO2 in the air and so you must drive your combustion engine less now I have to admit that while I don't buy into that alarmism it at least sounds a little sciency little sciency kind of serious but then when they come for my coffee I say I don't feel like you're being serious anymore because you know what I'm not going to give up my coffee yeah no coffee you're not going to take my coffee and my cold dead hands you can pry it anyway um if you're not watching the Dilbert comic strip which means that you're not subscribing either on the xplatform where you can subscribe to see it every single day as well as the dboard calendar in digital form then you would not know that this week Dilbert his company is being asked to house migrants in their cubicles that's not too much to ask and the it looks like they'll be housing three to five uh elbonian migrants per cubicle uh the women in the office are not going to be happy about it especially since uh uh in elbonia the national sport is rape but Alice and Tina the tech riter are not going to be too happy about it so that's what you're missing if you're not on the locals platform where you could subscribe or on X where you can see Dilbert as well on the locals platform you see also my other comic robots read news Which is far naughtier than anything you've seen before well the story about who's funding Nikki Haley gets uh more weird and interesting all the time so apparently she's definitely been getting money from these never Trump type people um so let's see who's giving her money there's a the this is by Kyle Becker's reporting on this 1630 fund it's managed by the Arabella advisors you got the hopel fund also managed by the Arabella advisers and you got the Democracy fund voice founded by e.

Bay co-founder Pierre Omar omad I don't know how to pronounce his last name and Reed Hoffman famous billionaire founder of Linked.

In and um so both the last two billionaires are the biggest probably the biggest two I know Reed Reed's probably the biggest number one funer of democrat stuff so you got Democrats and never trumpers funding Nikki hilly what do you think's going on there I haven't quite put this together yet have you it is it is it exactly what it looks like because what it looks like is they're planning to take Trump out I mean that's what V says it's it's what a lot of people say but I can't think of any other reason for it can you or are they try is it a clever way to ruin Nikki Haley in case she gets in as in well we could make sure we've destroyed the reputation of somebody if they're going to be a republican CU could you imagine if Nikki Hy actually became president she wouldn't have Republican support and she's not going to have Democrat support so what kind of support would she have well what would be the point of having a Nikki hilly president who didn't have Democrat support and didn't have at least half of Republican support and it would look like she got in because the Democrats wanted her but what part of that would work in the real world so it certainly argues against any kind of normal political plan as in I think I'll give money to the one I want to get elected it doesn't feel like anything like that's happening so if you're not donating to the person you want to get elected what exactly are you doing now the obvious thing would be oh they're just trying to hurt hurt Trump but really I feel like they might know something's going to happen to Trump that we don't know so yeah I I just worry that they know more than we know but it certainly looks like they're going to try to put him in jail and it certainly looks like if that doesn't work there might be a plan B there might be well there's going to be a according to end wokeness on X there going to be uh a couple of remakes of a couple of films it's going to be a remake of The Wizard of Oz and also uh It's a Wonderful Life so we'll have remakes of those but um they will be completely non-white perspectives so it's going to be uh the all black or people of color lgbtq wizard of O and it's a wonderful life so what do you think about that I'm totally okay with it you know who I think should be the most angry about it black movie goers if I were a black movie goer I would say why not make a movie that a black person wrote why can't we have our own movie like what it it feels like Let It feels like too little doesn't it you know I think it could they could be good movies because the the basic plots of course are awesome so I would probably watch both of those remakes I think they could be awesome you know and I don't mind I think there's plenty of space for the black wizard OAS you know it's a it's a big world it's a free market and uh I'd watch them you know as long as they're wellmade they got good actors you know the story is good but isn't it insulting I mean it feels like too little doesn't it like if you if you're trying to make sure that the uh the nonwhite um professionals get their own thing which is a perfectly good thing to want I feel like they they'd be better better Serve by just having their own thing you you can't tell me that there are no black writers writing good movies you know you have to go back that far to find a good script I mean I know it's a classic but anyway H you know it's a maybe the uh the intentions are good all right so as you know humanoid robots are on the way you do know that in a year you people like me will have an actual humanoid robot in her house right you notice that close an actual humanoid AI robot in my house probably by the end of the year because I I'd be an early adapter at ridiculous prices there there's no way I'm going to go a minute without a robot okay can we just say this the minute there's a robot that's like an actual quality robot I might wait for the Tesla robot but I'm getting a robot is there anybody with me you know I I realize it's purely a price thing at this point but if you could afford it you get a robot right how do you not have a robot of course you're getting a robot well um I have a prediction for you apparently there'll be a number of companies making robots including Tesla Tesla will have its humanoid robot coming out pretty soon uh I have a theory that this will be uh Elon musk's biggest profit the robots by the way he said that too he thinks there'll be lots of robots and it might be a bigger profit than cars I agree with him but here's why I think the Tesla robot might be the most successful of the humanoid humanoid robots I think it's the only one you're going to be able to have sex with seriously no joke he's going to make a fortune because my guess is that Elon will be the only one who has an uncensored robot that will do anything you want it to do in the privacy or your home now you said to yourself Scott I'm not going to have intercourse with a robot well maybe you won't but somebody will you know I uh I laughed myself into a cry last night when I was I was just walking through my house you know on the way from one room to another and I suddenly had this thought if I had a robot and I was really lonely and I didn't have anybody around and I'm 25 instead of my current age well I wouldn't have intercourse with my robot because it wouldn't have any components you know there's no nothing to nothing to insert but into but and of course you know it doesn't I don't think it'll have a mouth so but if I'm 25 and I'm really really horny I'm going to put a wig on that thing and ask for a hand job now you can tell you would never do it fine fine let let's go with that you'd never think about it you'd never do it when you were 25 and you didn't have any options oh yeah you would you wouldn't say to yourself I've got a robot I've got a flashlight I got a robot and I've got a flashlight what to do what to do oh yeah that robot will be holding the flashlight you can take a you can take a bet on that one I know it doesn't seem like you would do it I know not you I don't mean you but I was just laughing myself to death when I thought there was any chance we wouldn't be trying to have sex with the robots oh we will be trying to have sex with the robots oh yes that will happen there's no doubt about it maybe not you I didn't say you but people people will speaking of people uh well it looks like BMW just signed up to uh have humanoid robots in its car making facility in Germany I guess so humanoid robots are on order four real factories and they'll be just walking around like co-workers all right so a wef uh advisor guy but he's also a famous author named Yuval Harari is getting some attention today because he says some things about uh human rights are a fiction uh that it's just imaginary that nobody has any human rights because they don't come from anybody it's just Fiction it's just something we tell ourselves we have rights and I saw a lot of people on the uh internet say my God my God what could be worse how many of you disagree with that statement I thought it was obvious that rights are imaginary you don't think they are all right let let's say yes or no are are human rights a fiction meaning that we simply agree that we have the rights I'm seeing yeses I'm seeing NOS uh some say god-given so all right so let's say let's take the god-given perspective and I think that's the the major push back is god-given wouldn't you say because there's not really a third alternative where they are just sort of natural nature or something like that that doesn't make sense all right but let's say you agree they god-given what happens if somebody has a different God or a different belief system do you does your uh god-given rights require that you have the right view of God and what God wants and if other people will disagree with you that they have the wrong God so do human rights depend on having pick the right God see that's the problem if it's god-given you have to also sort of press upon your fellow citizens that your God is the right one and then we get in trouble yeah I was surpris I was surprised that this was controversial because I thought everybody knew that religion was based on belief not not fact now how do you I have I have a question I'm actually uh curious about um because I have an impression that I don't know if it's it's true or not so I'm not a Believer but I wish I were because I observe that it has many benefits in in this life and if you're right about the afterlife well that's pretty big benefit too so I don't I'm not a Believer but I I think it's a superior way to live if I could get there you know if I had the ability to be a believer I would be because it looks like they're happier and more Su successful but um how do you reconcile that faith is belief by definition with the fact that in the case of Rights you treat it like a fact so it's either a belief or a fact how how do you how do you integrate the faith is a belief by definition but that sometimes you'll treat it like a fact if you're let's say deciding who has rights and stuff I just don't I just don't know how you do it I'm not arguing one way or another I'm not I'm not giving you an opinion I just wondered how you do it so is the way you do it you say to yourself it's a belief but it's also true is that how you reconcile that it's a belief but it's also true all right yeah I guess that's what a belief is all right that was just for my own benefit because I don't know how you do that all right so Supreme Court ruled against Texas as you know uh Texas wanted to protect its own border from the migrants and the Supreme Court said no the federal government controls your border you can't protect yourself and they're going to take down your barb wire and let the migrants flow in do you know what's wrong with that everything I think everything is wrong with that all right so I've got two opinions number one my legal opinion and I know you want to hear my legal opinion because you what would be more valuable than a non- lawyer's legal opinion well the internet's full of so why not mine um my guess without knowing anything about the topic too much my guess is that the justices may have correctly read the law and the Constitution so I'm not sure that they got the wrong answer it just doesn't work that that's my take I'm not sure they got the wrong answer and I'm not sure you want a supreme court who makes up right I mean the whole point of getting these these conservative judges is that they're not going to add something to the Constitution that isn't there now the fact that they disagreed makes it kind of questionable how can you disagree about what's there it'd be one thing to you know interpret it differently but it's weird that the conservatives would ever disagree because they should just be looking at and say well it's either there or it's not and it's either clear or it's not but they did disagree and Amy con Barrett uh allegedly a conservative um voted that the feds can dismantle the state's self-defense now of course uh this raises the question of sexism yes because people say wait a minute all we needed was that one female conservative to go with the other conservatives and suddenly it would be the other way but why is it that the female conservative is the one who wants to keep the Border open and now it gets interesting you're saying to yourself it's based on blackmail it's bribery oh bet is not I I I doubt that I kind of doubt it I think it's simply as it's probably as simple as she thought the rule the law said something the others didn't but there is another really interesting layer to this which I've mentioned before and I got away with it so I'm going to do it again um and apparently uh Jordan Peterson is waiting on this I didn't see this from him but somebody talking about him so I hope I got it right um Jordan Peterson talks about something like the return of the repressed something about that that the idea is that women may be more open to immigration because the men coming across are more manly than the ones here in other words that women are operating on a mating instinct to increase the number of manly men because there aren't any in America so they might argue that it's you know something about fairness and and Asylum and stuff like that but that the real base mating instinct is simply that the men coming across are more men than the ones that are here yeah are you going to disagree with Dr.

Peterson has that ever been a good strategy of all the times that people disagreed with the scientific speculations of Jordan Peterson did that work out really well for people in the past here's what I think I'll put my own take on it everything is an expression of the mating Instinct everything everything everything humans do is an extension of the mating Instinct even if you don't know it everything is right the clothes you wear the the the fact that I've got a a big dick in my face that looks like a microphone none of these decisions were conscious but we are simply mating creatures mating is the thing we have to get right everything else is subsidiary to can you make more of yourself because that's Survival and in theory we optimized for survival so why would immigration policy be the one thing in the world that's exempt from The Mating Instinct and the answer is absolutely is not in fact it might be the purest example of the mating Instinct being expressed now of course because there are some dumb people are there any dumb people here today usually we we' got a few that get here are there any dumb people should I speak to the dumb people for a moment would the smart people mind if I just take a moment for the dumb people yeah whenever I make generalizations it really doesn't mean every single person so if I say that women in general might have a different view than men in general that doesn't mean you doesn't mean people you know mean sort of on a general General way sort of average so if you say to yourself but Scott I know a guy who doesn't think exactly like that example that's not contributing to the conversation because we're starting from the point of it's not applying to everyone all right now we can go back to talking to the smart people are the dumb people satisfied would you like to jump into the comments and you're allowed I'll give you a permission if you're a dumb person you're trying to trying to keep up you you can say in the comments scottt that's crazy because I know somebody who's the exception and that will be really helping so go ahead and do that do you do you know why you would do that do you know why you would try to get attention when your opinion is so bad because getting attention is part of the mating Instinct that's right so you can't help it and that's my point all right here's my take everything's The Mating Instinct immigration is the purest example why do men in general want to stop immigration because we don't want the competition because we want to have the babes in the United States to ourselves if you show me a border with hot women coming across I say to yourself I say to you you know maybe we're being a little tough on this whole migration situation aren't we you know they look like they need Asylum especially the hot one do you see the hot one coming AC swimming across with the wet t-shirt I think that would needs some that's a woman who needs some Asylum she could stay at my house now you show me uh military AED men who are coming over to rape my women what do I say shut that border are you crazy this is insane what are you doing and I will give you political reasons and I'll give you economic reasons then I'll give you safety reasons and I'm lying it's all a lie I'm watching a bunch of men come over who are going to the women that I want to that's the whole story and I'm watching women like Amy Coney Barrett who's got a little heart on for the men coming over she has Justified it based on the Constitution and has no idea that she just the whole country for her vagina that's what I think that's what it looks like to me now you might say but no it's really about the law and I say but no if you think anything's about the law ever you're really not operating at a very high level yeah you want to know what the levels of awareness are let me give you the levels of awareness level of awareness number one you're a child and you learn for the first time that your parents lied about Santa Claus and then you say to yourself huh I think people can sometimes lie that's level one actually level one is you believe everything you know when you're a child then you learn wait a minute the Tooth Fairy Santa Claus wait a minute and you realize that sometimes they can lie Easter Bunny Etc that's that's going from zero to maybe one first level of awareness then at some point you realize that they lie not just about silly stuff not just about Santa Claus but they actually lie about really important things and then you go to the next level of awareness and then you find out holy cow a whole bunch of our news stories are fake oh my God I didn't know this when I was I thought the news was mostly real and then you find out that there are a whole bunch of stories that are shaded and and even the facts are hidden and the context has changed and you realize that whole lot of the news is fake and then you realize it gets worse a lot of the data the science you know and the data that we see is fake is that where you are how many of you are you at that level where you you you know that when you see science and you see news you should not assume it's true because it might be true and it might not be true that's that's where most of you are right here's where I'm trying to get you I'm trying to get you to the layer above that I'm trying to take you up a level at the level above it you'll know none of it's true it can't be you'll know it's none of it's true and that it can't be true that's where you need to get none of it's true and it can't be how do I know that I used to be in the business of creating data that other people would have to use to make decisions was it ever real nope it was my job to support the decisions that had already been made uh or to support guessing by making it look like the guess had some basis to it or to you know make the department look good or that sort of thing no all all information is fake because it's all motivated whoever is coming up with the information has a story to tell that's it once you learn it's all fake you go to a different level so if you're still believing some of the news is true Good Luck Good Luck by the way I always see the uh the Jewish conspiracy people come in every morning I've got a question for you if you think there's a global Jewish conspiracy and I won't I'll just ask you this question would you agree that there's such a thing as uh liberal Jewish people and conservative Jewish people of course of course you know that so they all got together so all the liberal Jews and the conservative Jews they all got together and it's all part of a big conspiracy is that what you think and and why is it that this alleged conspiracy for I don't know hundreds of years uh that there's never been a whistleblower never a whistleblower not one there's there wasn't a liberal who didn't like what the conservatives were doing or a conservative didn't like what the Liberals were doing like everywhere in the rest of the world all the time forever not a single person said you know what I was in the meeting where we plan to do whatever it is you think is being done no whistleblowers really not a single whistleblower and yet there are whistleblowers for everything else all right that's just to think about all right uh so yes I think the uh question on the border is largely sexual I also think that um BLM was largely a mating event the black lives matter stuff I think that female um female approval of uh black lives matter was probably a mating Instinct sort of a thing all right and again doesn't mean every person doesn't mean you right that's just for the dumb people all right uh Jen weager who's running for president without knowing he's a naturalized citizen so he can't run for president but I think I love it anyway I I have a uh a kind of weird appreciation appreciation for Jen because I think his I think his heart is in the right place I think so I mean you never know but he looks like actually wants things to be better so the fact that he has different idea of how to get there uh I'm I'm much more forgiving on that because I don't think his intentions are in the wrong place right yeah we could disagree on what makes sense but and and I'm seeing your comments so I understand that you have a different view of it but you know sometimes it's sometimes it's kind of a question of do you think you're good at judging character you know we all think we are I judge that his character is good and so therefore his intentions are good but I could be wrong I could be wrong about anybody but here's what he said and how I disagreed he was talking about the Gaza situation in the West Bank and he says the occupation as he calls it is morally wrong and completely indefensible saying the Palestinians cannot be trusted to govern themselves is deeply racist would you agree that is racist to say that the Palestinians can't be trusted to govern themselves which I think the better way to say that is Israel doesn't trust that they would be safe if it happened is it racist what do you think well I would say it would be racist if they were expelling from their country the people who were also Palestinian and look like him and prayed like them and had the same jeans so clearly there are plenty of people living in peace in Israel so if it were race that would not be the case so clearly it's a security problem and the way that they're dealing with the security problem is they don't know who are the good guys and who are the bad guys they can't tell the difference so but what if it was what if it was racist because you could make the argument uh I think it's primarily just risk assessment and politics and what they want is mostly the people who don't uh you know the people want to kill them they'd like to have less contact with them seems normal so here's what I said I haven't been Double canel Y so we'll see how this goes I posted back to that and I said that racism is morally and ethically acceptable for self-defense let me say it again because you might think you misheard it racism is morally and ethically acceptable for self-defense because the standard for self-defense is whatever you think you need to do that's it it's whatever you think you need to do doesn't matter why now you could break the law by doing whatever you need to do and then the law will take care of you and I agree with the law the law must be obeyed but if you're talking about ethics and morality that's a separate domain from the law we'd like them to be compatible but they're not always so if you have a choice between Staying Alive in your opinion not mine but your own opinion that you have to do something racist to stay alive then you should definitely do it but to be clear uh racism in any other domain outside of self-defense is abor so if you're being racist in your personal life your business life who you rent to who you hire all of that stuff completely you know I disavow all of that that would be a bad way to run a country bad way to be a human being and bad in every sense but in the very narrow domain of self-defense yeah you can be as racist as you want and and people really need to understand that or they'll die uh the classic the classic example is the was it Jesse Jackson saying might cross the road if he saw a young black man in a hoodie or something you that classic case why is Jesse Jackson a racist well yes in that exact example he would be by his own definition I think but he would also say you know I hate it but I'd stay alive you I'm paraphrasing of course so yes if if you have any reason to think you'd be in trouble you get to do what you need to do totally yeah if you were an Israeli citizen and you were walking down the street of Old Gaza and you were just looking like a you know let's say you were obviously an Israeli citizen Orthodox Jew and you were just walking down the streets in Gaza before the war would you feel safe or would you feel all racist because you thought that maybe they would hurt you because they're not big fans of yours well it would be racist if you felt afraid wouldn't it by definition because you'd say I think I'm afraid because they're Palestinian and they have a certain sense no you it would be racist but it would also be um smart to stay away from that town so the the trouble is if you get too hung up on whether it's technically racist or not you're missing the larger point that it doesn't matter is everybody on the same page there we could argue about whether it is or whether it's not but it doesn't matter because you're going to do whatever you need to do to stay safe and to keep your family safe and nobody can tell you that's immoral you could be wrong you could be wrong it's still your choice yeah it's not ethically or or anything so when Elon Musk uh went with Ben Shapiro recently just the other day uh visited owitz and I believe he had a quote I saw that said you know having visit OS he understands why Israel had to act decisively you know in Gaza why they why they couldn't let that stand and um yeah I I think that's where everybody gets when you have that clear question about uh self-defense versus is this a little bit too much Dei yeah self-defense wins um speaking of which there are uh I guess uh black Democrats in Chicago uh one of them is a Dei consultant which is interesting and they're calling for controls on immigration so even the black citizens of America who are Dei employees their very job is to get rid of racism and they're saying uh you need to close this border now what they don't say is all these brown people coming in which is not what they're worrying about because they're not thinking about brown or anything else they're just thinking taking our resources so if they were not black Democrat Dei Consultants we'd be calling them racist but because they are we can see them somewhat clearly as just people who are under threat so are these black people being racist absolutely not or better yet what's the difference what's the difference if they think they're threatened they these are my American citizens be they Democrats or Dei consultants if I rank them in importance they are they're at the top of importance because they're Americans they're on my team should be and we would all like to be safe and I would like these people in Chicago be they uh black or white or democrat or republican or Dei Consultants which I'm not a big fan of I want them to be safe and if they if they think that closing that border makes them safe does it matter if it's racist no it doesn't matter at all yeah racism and self-defense just shouldn't be in the same conversation so just get it out of there so I agree with the uh Democrats and the Dei consultant in this case Jordan Peterson uh he's in a lot of news today um he always he's since he does more interesting things than you and I do he's in the news lot sort of like Elon Musk but anyway uh he did a video in which he did an interview with uh somebody talking about the German protests the farmers now how many of you even know that there's a massive uh German protest how many of you know that okay so most of the people watching this are pretty well informed by the way is anybody also on one of the other platforms because their comments have stopped okay if anybody has a minute can you look at the uh look at You.

Tube or rumble or x uh the comments stop coming through on the studio I could see all the comments on locals anyway if they start again I'll let you know live chat Studio oh are they back no yeah it looks like they're I think I'm still live though right right am I still live on the other platforms oh you can see the comments so I guess other people could see them but I can't all right all right well I'll continue anyway uh Jordan Peterson points out that on You.

Tube he uh he acrw only 50,000 views in 14 hours which would be enough views to make the rest of us jealous because it's so many but for him it's nothing you know normal would be maybe 3/4 of a million or something so according to to Dr.

Peterson it seems obvious that You.

Tube is suppressing this content specifically why would You.

Tube be suppressing German farmer protests of an American not American but Canadian uh psychologists why would they be doing that yeah it doesn't matter they're doing it there's no doubt they're doing it so any any any pretense you thought about free speech in America it's kind of an illusion would you agree we don't really have free speech in a in a practical sense we have it in the um not well not even in the uh technical sense because the government does lean on the platforms to suppress speech so no we actually don't have free speech do not and in fact a lot of the people who tried to exercise their free speech are in jail right now that's another topic um let's see how many here's a little test for you General Knowledge Test without looking it up what is the population of Sweden in rough numbers just take a guess population of Sweden rough numbers go 3 million 10 million 15 13 oh those pretty good guesses yeah I think it's around 10 million it's about 10 million but your guesses are quite quite well informed they were all in the range I'm I'm impressed um did so how many uh bomb attacks would you expect so 10 million would be say the size of New York City right how big is New York City 10.7 8 million depends which part you're measuring I guess so 8 to 10 million so roughly uh Sweden is about the size of New York City how many bomb attacks in New York City would you consider a crisis in a year bomb attacks one one right one would be a lot right suppose you had 10 a year imagine 10 bomb attacks in one year just in New York City you you wouldn't be able to live there yeah how many bomb attacks do you think that there were in Sweden that would include things like hand grenades and you know things that blow up in the past year 134 four 134 things blew up in Sweden only only 10 million people Sweden apparently has just Fallen to the the the migrants yeah the the migrants have basically just ruined Sweden I don't know if it'll ever be the same so I think Sweden's just gone like what I don't think I would even travel there at this point so that's a little warning for you in case you're wondering if our uncontrolled migration has any potential risk yeah it does uh rep representative clay Higgins from Louisiana um says Biden is staging a Civil War by pulling down those barriers in Texas the ones that are Texas put up to try to protect itself from the migrants and um what do you think do you think Texas and the federal government will end up coming to blows I think not because I think I think Americans just wouldn't do it like who would execute that order who like seriously who would execute the order if you're in the National Guard and you're standing there looking at your you know your basically your other American in another uniform who's just doing their job and you're just doing your job are you going to shoot him I don't think we're anywhere near that I I think the I think the soldiers would just lay down their guns and say look are you crazy we're not going to shoot these guys that's crazy so I don't I don't think it's going to turn into a Civil War I just don't think our minds are anywhere near that and we're we're hundreds of miles away from that mentally so here's a question which I I need a fact check on this I saw a question by Benny Johnson on the xplatform can you tell me if this is true so he makes an assumption I think it might be true so I'm not doubting it I'm just doubting my own memory so check my memory right this is what Benny Johnson says uh in the post he says I'm asking honestly without bias or preconditions when in American election history have all five swing States simultaneous ly stop counting ballots on Election night is there any exp explanation for this other than sensually organized fraud now here's my question I I was somewhat unaware that it was only the five swing States and that was all of the five swing States is that true there was no other state and it was 100% of the Swing States how did I get to this point without knowing that because he he perfectly formulates the question when you put it that way it's obviously fraud I guess I'd been resisting I've been resisting the idea that you could tell it was fraud because they decided to count votes the next day if that's the only thing I knew I'd say well it's suspicious but I mean in a big bureaucracy some states will do it different than others but I somehow somehow I was unaware of this context I knew that some of them were swing States but I didn't know it was all five all at the same time if it's all five at the same time it's definitely fraud are we on the same page so this is this is a perfect example of something I say a lot a lot of the times when you think people are disagreeing they're not it's just that the fake news got to somebody and it didn't get to somebody else that's it so in this case um I think I was a victim of fake news or maybe I didn't do my own work because it never occurred to me that it was all five and only the five and at the same time somehow those three facts never never were in my brain at the same time until Benny Johnson put it in that that form yeah Scott is waking up is uh I I block everybody who says that yeah I I'll let you go this time because I don't know how to block you in real time but um every everybody that says I'm waking up I block so don't do it jokingly because you get blocked all right uh only because I take it as an insult all right I know you're kidding it's okay she was kidding all right um yeah I I think the reasonable exp the the reason reasonable belief because the government is guilty until proven innocent if if you're uh if you're the government you have to prove it was it was legitimate and the evidence suggests otherwise yeah all right um so Trump said uh directly and out loud that the reason he's uh made up his mind or toh never want to have a central bank digital currency the so-call cbdc is that aake basically filled him in and told him what the risk was and then Trump said okay I'm on board have you ever seen that before the the the simple transparency of trump is like like a beauty to behold oh I didn't really understand that topic and then V explained it to me so now here's my opinion that was just beautiful wasn't it because you know I don't even I don't even know much about the topic so I can't say I have a strong opinion other than eventually we will have a digital currency there's no question about it yeah we're not going to be paying stuff with paper in a 100 years it's just not going to happen so I don't know what will happen but there's going to be a digital currency someday but in the meantime maybe you want to forestall that and I could understand that I wouldn't wouldn't oppose you wanting that um but just watching watching how the sausage was made and then not having a problem with it is just a it's just a purifying feeling you know don't you always assume that what's happening is some like weird behind the scenes negotiating and somebody got blackmailed and somebody doesn't understand and somebody's somebody's taking a bribe and you know it's the and all that stuff and then sometimes it's just this oh V is super smart he explained it to me so now here's my opinion and the's really smart what's better than that right what is better than that nothing that that is that is government operating perfectly full transparency a poor opinion that was corrected by a better opinion and then he explains what happened and when pow it's funny it's such a small thing you it was just a throwaway thing he said at a rally but there's there are very few things that have made me feel better about the country than watching exactly how that decision got made yes put your smart people in charge of the complicated stuff so Trump says I mean somebody asked the question um well a lot of people ask do you think that Trump would be able to deal with VI in in terms of Trump's ego and I told you you don't understand Trump he loves smart people and if they're smarter than he is he loves them even more he's very consistent about that and so V was just smarter than him on that topic you know being specific on that topic so he went with a smart guy how much do you love that um so Trump says a very small chance that danus would be in his cabinet um not that there's you know not that he wouldn't do a good job but I do love the fact that D santis came through this process with so much respect don't you love that like you don't really think a political process ends with anybody looking good especially if they didn't win but he he set a standard that I really appreciated you know I'll say it again um what he added to the Country to Santa simply by running and and giving us the essentially validating Trump as the Republicans genuine Choice that's so important I mean it's a difference between a Civil War and not having one it it might be that big a difference and of course v v the same thing so what V and dentus did for the country in our in our system is just hard to underestimate it's just huge so debt of gratitude um Glenn Greenwald is showing us the way he had some event where he was debating with some leftists about january6 whether there was an Insurrection and you have to hear him um I wouldn't say it was joking mocking but he's so good at making his points it just makes other people look stupid so here was the things he was saying to people who believed there was a I think one of the Ken steams was there and somebody else he noted that Trump didn't resist leaving the building like when his term was over which would be a weird thing to do if you're trying to cling to power why would you leave the building that's the dumbest thing you'd ever do if you were going to do an Insurrection leave the building why and and then he points out he didn't try to activate any military force who tries to do an Insurrection without trying to get at least some kind of military force on your side you know even if if it's your you know whatever your personal security or something like I don't even thought I don't think the record even shows that he talked to his own secret service imagine trying to be a dictator and not colluding with your own protection your own secret service who are dedicated probably to prevent you from being a dictator so the so the guys in the room with guns who would literally shoot you if you you know actually tried to become a dictator I hope they would wouldn't they can somebody give me a fact check if the Secret Service saw you actually becoming a dictator wouldn't they take care of it now you're saying no because they would be so professional they'd be so professional they would support him even if he went full Hitler and started rounding up his rounding up and murdering his uh opponents they would just so just do their job because they're professionals no they wouldn't come on no they wouldn't they would prevent them so one way you can know for sure that he wasn't planning any kind of real Insurrection was that that he didn't he didn't work it out with anybody in his security detail there's no evidence of that that'd be the first thing you do because you can't have the Enemy being your protection it's the very first thing you'd have to do so yeah and he didn't arrest his opponents which is a basic thing you do if you're a dictator if if Trump wanted to stay in h power he would have just had uh Biden arrested but he had no power to do that he had no power to or well nobody would have done it so watch the uh the people who have been brainwashed into thinking January 6 was an Insurrection is going to be real fun because if you take the Glenn Greenwald model and I think we should we should mock it and make them explain how that could be an Insurrection now the best argument I've heard for the Insurrection um hoax Believers is that he had those fake electors this is what Bill Mah says and and the way that argument uh goes like this um he had fake electors so therefore that's how he was try trying to take over the country now anybody who knows the situation would say something like this well uh the documentation shows that they believe they were simply placeholders to maintain the right to pursue the you know the legal challenge it was just a placeholder thing and they weren't they weren't replacement for or fake they were simply sort of on hold to show that you were you're putting a stake in the ground that you're challenging it now what does Bill Mah say about that well he wouldn't let you finish the sentence he would talk over you I guarantee you you'll never get to finish that sentence I I saw him doing to that to somebody the other day now suppose you say um what if they were fake how in the world were fake electors going to take over a country was the Supreme Court going to say oh yeah fake electors are fine like there there's no way to connect the dots that that process could have been a way to take over the country the only thing it could have been is exactly what they said it was a bunch of lawyers said you know what we'd have a stronger case if he had some alternate electors and you know otherwise we won't use them so uh would they Strongarm the real delegates probably if it was a real Insurrection they would I don't know if they did maybe somebody did uh don't argue with analogies that's a bad way to go all right Russia apparently is ruling out any peace talks in the Ukraine and why wouldn't they because apparently the money is going to dry up from America unless something changes and that would guarantee that Russia could have anything they want with um Ukraine kim.com has a uh provocative uh prediction if I have it right he believes that Victoria nuland is the real president of uh Ukraine meaning that America is really in charge and that she's the point person over there and uh kim.com believes that she might be putting together a some kind of false flag operation to blow up their own nuclear power plant with the thinking being that if Ukraine blows up their own nuclear power plant that that would force NATO to get involved because it would look like Russia did it and then if NATO gets involved maybe Ukraine can be saved uh they already said that it's been ongoing yeah to on the news I don't know if any of that's true um I'm not I'm not backing that theory myself but it sound there um but all I have to say about Ukraine is how could Putin possibly lose at this point would would it be fair to say we started a fight we didn't need to start in other words proa probably it was our own damn fault we fought too long and killed too many people that didn't need to die and when there was the time that we could have made peace we let it pass I think Biden did all that I think he basically gave away Ukraine do you know who could save Ukraine only Trump while running for president because if Putin doesn't control all of Ukraine before the before let's say Trump or republican takes over um it might be too late because I think that Trump would threaten him and say look you are going to talk peace or we will you know Reign hell upon you that you've never seen sort of thing and he'd probably actually believe it was going to happen and he'd probably adjust yeah all right so California Senate race is funny because it's so pathetic so the people running for the to be Senator uh for California would be uh Adam Schiff Katie Porter barbar Lee and one Republican Steve Garvey who doesn't have a chance because it's California the funny part is uh all of the people are under 25% support they're all under 25% they're so odious that that that nobody wants any of them I think but what's funny is you have a straight white male allegedly running against a woman and a woman of color how in the world can Cal can California elect the straight white guy when there is a woman and a woman of color in the same party can they yeah GA I think Gavin was a special special case if Adam Schiff wins this thing I'm I'm going to think the race is rigged it just doesn't seem like that's possible sou New Hampshire voes today why does anybody care about New Hampshire why does anybody care about that it's such a funny little weird State and so few people vote the the fact that we give it any credibility at all is sort of hilarious but to me it's like uh the all the news people are trying to milk a bowl it's like all right we know you can only milk cows Bulls don't have UTS well all we have is this bull so let's milk it that's what the news feels like okay we all know that New Hampshire shouldn't matter it shouldn't be important but it's the news so we gotta talk about it yeah let's talk about how we can milk that bowl all right it's like squeezing orange juice out of a turd you just can't do it no matter how how hard you squeeze so uh the Democrats using their technique of blaming Republicans for whatever they do are going to blame Trump for his many miscues and talking uh for having cognitive decline that's right the supporters of Joe Biden have decided that a good fruitful attack for their side would be to attack Trump for his mental decline because he sometimes mixes up names they are so freaking consistent and again I have to apologize to Tucker Carlson for when he said that they always do what they blame you of doing I didn't think he meant always it just have like a weird you know overgeneralization well not always not not every single time yep it's every single time no matter how absurd it is they'll do it anyway and this is the one that sort of points It Out imagine the absurdity of Defending Joe Biden on a cognitive level but they're doing it they're doing it and I guess we're worried about the Canadian border so you heard about uh there were a few hundred um people on the terrorist watch list that got through the southern border so so thank goodness the Canadian border doesn't have that kind of problem right cuz we had I think a couple hundred people or so something 100 or 200 that were actually on the terrorist watch list that came up through the southern border can you imagine if we had like that many people on the northern border like a few hundred people on the watch list checking the news uh there were 500 of them uh yeah so uh actually it turns out that uh by a MAG an order of magnitude there are more terrorists coming across the northern border you know what I worry about I don't worry about the ones that came across the southern border because they might be the dumb terrorists they wouldn't be able to pull something off but every terrorist who comes through the northern border I say to myself well there's a terrorist who figured out how to do it right now that terrorist I worry about because if you came in through Canada you've got some game if you came in through the southern border I don't think you thought it through because you know Canada it's right there just walk across I guess it works on either border all right ladies and gentlemen this episode of cfee with Scotts has been brought to you by the best book ever written it's called reframe your brain by me and we're in the phase two now fa phase one is launching the book phase two is a bunch of people bought it and read it especially for Christmas and now the messages are coming in um I had to buy five more um my neighbor uh got one for me for Christmas and just bought severon for their family so it is and people are posting that it's changing their lives so I say this uh because I'm marketing a book but also it's completely true you can read the reviews and see it yourself it's changing lives now there are a lot of books that say a lot of fun and interesting things and you say to yourself well that's some good advice in that book but do you do it so what's different about reframe your brain is that the reframes are literally one sentence each so if you find a reframe that fits your situation you just have to read one sentence and it will either change the way you think of the situation or not but that's your that's your total investment is a sentence so that's why people are using it successfully because it's so easy to implement and there's no downside you just read a sentence it works or it doesn't so that can change your life so ladies and gentlemen that's all we got for now thanks for joining on the You.

Tube Rumble and X platforms sorry your comments got locked up there but I guess you can see your own comments and I will see you tomorrow same place same time

wow if you were on the locals uh

platform right now you would have heard

a great great story but if you're not on

the locals platform you can still have a

great time because today yeah today is

going to be amazing today all you need

to take it up to the level that nobody

can even understand all you need is a

cuper Mugger glass a tanker gel sste a

canteen Jugger flask a vessel of any

kind fill it with your favorite liquid I

like coffee and join me now for the

unparallel pleasure the dopamine the day

the thing that makes everything better

it's called the simultaneous zip and it

happens now

go oh very good very good above average

I'd give it a a minus possibly an

A and see how much better you

feel let's talk about all the news it'll

be a combination of things that are real

and stuff that's fake and things that I

make up completely you won't tell the

difference really it's all going to

sound the same well San Diego has had

more rain in I guess a day than they

usually have in a month and it's

flooding and it's flooding so badly in

San Diego the SeaWorld is

underwater I'm not making that up that's

actually a real story see world is

underwater

now what happens if the Whales swim

away uh cuz the whales don't know the

difference between the flood water and

the water they're swimming around in

right can't they if the water gets high

enough can't the whales just swim

away can they free Willie is Willie free

already and and is it just the whales or

can all the

smaller fish that are out in those

tanks now I know the whales are not

going to they're not going to swim away

but it's funny to imagine isn't

it well the world economic Forum I know

a lot of you a lot of you people are you

know like oh the world economic forum is

trying to you know destroy the world and

take away our rights and put us in

slavery and you know I think it's a lot

of hyperbole don't you a lot of

hyperbole I'm not worried about the

world economic Forum like all of all of

you people are no no I'm I'm not worried

about it at all see what's in the

news uh the world economic Forum uh

thinks that

coffee coffee is uh putting too much CO2

into the atmosphere and maybe uh maybe

they're going to come for your coffee

well those guys them kill them

I want them all rounded up put in prison

WF Must Be Stopped they've gone too far

too far yeah I don't take this too

seriously did I tell you that 2024 would

be the year that everything sounds

funny right do you remember when the W

the world economic Forum said there was

too much CO2 in the air I'm trying to do

a Swiss accent or Austrian or whatever

the hell it is uh the scientist of said

there too much CO2 in the air and so you

must drive your combustion engine

less now I have to admit that while I

don't buy into that

alarmism it at least sounds a little

sciency little sciency kind of

serious but then when they come for my

coffee I say I don't feel like you're

being serious anymore because you know

what I'm not going to give up my coffee

yeah no coffee you're not going to take

my coffee and my cold dead hands you can

pry it

anyway um if you're not watching the

Dilbert comic strip which means that

you're not subscribing either on the

xplatform where you can subscribe to see

it every single day as well as the

dboard calendar in digital form then you

would not know that this week Dilbert

his company is being asked to house

migrants in their

cubicles that's not too much to ask and

the it looks like they'll be housing

three to five uh elbonian migrants per

cubicle uh the women in the office are

not going to be happy about it

especially since uh uh in elbonia the

national sport is rape but Alice and

Tina the tech riter are not going to be

too happy about it so that's what you're

missing if you're not on the locals

platform where you could subscribe or on

X where you can see Dilbert as well on

the locals platform you see also my

other comic robots read news Which is

far naughtier than anything you've seen

before well the story about who's

funding Nikki Haley gets uh more weird

and interesting all the time so

apparently she's definitely been getting

money from these never Trump type people

um so let's see who's giving her money

there's a the this is by Kyle Becker's

reporting on this 1630 fund it's managed

by the Arabella advisors you got the

hopel fund also managed by the Arabella

advisers and you got the Democracy fund

voice founded by eBay co-founder Pierre

Omar omad I don't know how to pronounce

his last name and Reed Hoffman famous

billionaire founder of LinkedIn and um

so both the last two billionaires are

the

biggest probably the biggest two I know

Reed Reed's probably the biggest number

one funer of democrat stuff so you got

Democrats and never trumpers funding

Nikki hilly what do you think's going on

there I haven't quite put this together

yet have

you it is it is it exactly what it looks

like because what it looks like is

they're planning to take Trump out

I mean that's what V says it's it's what

a lot of people say but I can't think of

any other reason for it can

you or are they try is it a clever way

to ruin Nikki

Haley in case she gets

in as in well we could make sure we've

destroyed the reputation of somebody if

they're going to be a

republican CU could you imagine if Nikki

Hy actually became president she

wouldn't have Republican

support and she's not going to have

Democrat support so what kind of support

would she

have well what would be the point of

having a Nikki hilly president who

didn't have Democrat support and didn't

have at least half of Republican support

and it would look like she got in

because the Democrats wanted

her but what part of that would work in

the real

world so it certainly argues against any

kind of normal political plan as in I

think I'll give money to the one I want

to get elected it doesn't feel like

anything like that's

happening so if you're not donating to

the person you want to get elected what

exactly are you doing now the obvious

thing would be oh they're just trying to

hurt hurt Trump but really I feel like

they might

know something's going to happen to

Trump that we don't

know

so yeah I I just worry that they know

more than we know but it certainly looks

like they're going to try to put him in

jail and it certainly looks like if that

doesn't work there might be a plan B

there might be well there's going to be

a according to end wokeness on X there

going to be uh a couple of remakes of a

couple of films it's going to be a

remake of The Wizard of Oz and also uh

It's a Wonderful Life so we'll have

remakes of those but

um they will be completely non-white

perspectives so it's going to be uh the

all black or people of color

lgbtq wizard of O and it's a wonderful

life so what do you think about

that I'm totally okay with

it you know who I think should be the

most angry about

it black movie

goers if I were a black movie goer I

would

say why not make a movie that a black

person

wrote why can't we have our own movie

like

what it it feels

like Let It feels like too little

doesn't it you know I think it could

they could be good movies because the

the basic plots of course are awesome so

I would probably watch both of those

remakes I think they could be awesome

you know and I don't mind I think

there's plenty of space for the black

wizard OAS you know it's a it's a big

world it's a free market and uh I'd

watch them you know as long as they're

wellmade they got good actors you know

the story is good but isn't it insulting

I mean it feels like too little doesn't

it like if you if you're trying to make

sure that the uh the

nonwhite um professionals get their own

thing which is a perfectly good thing to

want I feel like they they'd be better

better Serve by just having their own

thing you you can't tell me that there

are no black writers writing good movies

you know you have to go back that far to

find a good script I mean I know it's a

classic but

anyway H you know it's

a maybe the uh the intentions are good

all right so as you know humanoid robots

are on the

way you do know that in a year you

people like me will have an actual

humanoid robot in her house right you

notice that close an actual

humanoid AI robot in my house probably

by the end of the year because I I'd be

an early adapter at ridiculous

prices there there's no way I'm going to

go a minute without a

robot okay can we just say

this the minute there's a robot that's

like an actual quality robot I might

wait for the Tesla robot but I'm getting

a

robot is there anybody with me you know

I I realize it's purely a price thing at

this point but if you could afford it

you get a robot right how do you not

have a robot of course you're getting a

robot

well um I have a prediction for you

apparently there'll be a number of

companies making robots including Tesla

Tesla will have its humanoid robot

coming out pretty soon uh I have a

theory that this will be uh Elon musk's

biggest profit the robots by the way he

said that too he thinks there'll be lots

of robots and it might be a bigger

profit than cars I agree with him but

here's why I think the Tesla robot might

be the most successful of the humanoid

humanoid

robots I think it's the only one you're

going to be able to have sex

with

seriously no

joke he's going to make a

fortune because my guess is that Elon

will be the only one who has an

uncensored robot that will do anything

you want it to do in the privacy or your

home now you said to yourself Scott I'm

not going to have intercourse with a

robot well maybe you

won't but somebody will

you know I uh I laughed myself into a

cry last night when I was I was just

walking through my house you know on the

way from one room to another and I

suddenly had this

thought if I had a

robot and I was really

lonely and I didn't have anybody

around and I'm 25 instead of my current

age well I wouldn't have intercourse

with my robot because it wouldn't have

any components you know there's no

nothing to nothing to insert but into

but and of course you know it doesn't I

don't think it'll have a mouth

so but if I'm 25 and I'm really really

horny I'm going to put a wig on that

thing and ask for a hand job

now you can tell you would never do

it

fine fine let let's go with that you'd

never think about it you'd never do it

when you were 25 and you didn't have any

options oh yeah you would you wouldn't

say to yourself I've got a

robot I've got a

flashlight I got a robot and I've got a

flashlight what to do what to do oh yeah

that robot will be holding the

flashlight you can take a you can take a

bet on that

one I know it doesn't seem like you

would do it I know not you I don't mean

you but I was just laughing myself to

death when I thought there was any

chance we wouldn't be trying to have sex

with the robots oh we will be trying to

have sex with the robots oh yes that

will happen there's no doubt about

it maybe not you I didn't say you but

people people will speaking of

people uh well it looks like BMW just

signed up to uh have humanoid robots in

its car making facility in Germany I

guess so humanoid robots are on order

four real factories and they'll be just

walking around like

co-workers all right so a wef uh advisor

guy but he's also a famous author named

Yuval Harari is getting some attention

today because he says some things about

uh human rights are a

fiction uh that it's just imaginary that

nobody has any human rights because they

don't come from anybody it's just

Fiction it's just something we tell

ourselves we have rights and I saw a lot

of people on the uh internet say my God

my God what could be worse how many of

you disagree with that

statement I thought it was obvious that

rights are

imaginary you don't think they are all

right let let's say yes or no are are

human rights a fiction meaning that we

simply agree that we have the

rights I'm seeing yeses I'm seeing

NOS uh some say god-given so all right

so let's say let's take the god-given

perspective and I think that's the the

major push back is god-given wouldn't

you say because there's not really a

third alternative where they are just

sort of natural nature or something like

that that doesn't make

sense all right but let's say you agree

they god-given what happens if somebody

has a different God or a different

belief system do you does your uh

god-given

rights require that you have the right

view of God and what God wants and if

other people will disagree with you that

they have the wrong

God so do human rights depend on having

pick the right God see that's the

problem if it's god-given you have to

also sort of press upon your fellow

citizens that your God is the right one

and then we get in

trouble yeah I was surpris I was

surprised that this was

controversial

because I thought everybody knew that

religion was based on belief not not

fact now how do you I have I have a

question I'm actually uh curious

about um because I have an impression

that I don't know if it's it's true or

not so I'm not a Believer but I wish I

were because I observe that it has many

benefits in in this life and if you're

right about the

afterlife well that's pretty big benefit

too so I don't I'm not a Believer but I

I think it's a superior way to live if I

could get there you know if I had the

ability to be a

believer I would be because it looks

like they're happier and more Su

successful

but um how do you reconcile that faith

is

belief by

definition with the fact that in the

case of Rights you treat it like a fact

so it's either a belief or a

fact how how do you how do you

integrate the faith is a belief by

definition but that sometimes you'll

treat it like a fact if you're let's say

deciding who has rights and

stuff I just don't I just don't know how

you do it I'm not arguing one way or

another I'm not I'm not giving you an

opinion I just wondered how you do

it so is the way you do it you say to

yourself it's a belief but it's also

true is that how you reconcile that it's

a belief but it's also

true all right yeah I guess that's what

a belief is all right that was just for

my own benefit because I don't know how

you do that all right so Supreme Court

ruled against Texas as you know uh Texas

wanted to protect its own border from

the migrants and the Supreme Court said

no the federal government controls your

border you can't protect yourself and

they're going to take down your barb

wire and let the migrants flow

in do you know what's wrong with

that

everything I think everything is wrong

with

that all right so I've got two opinions

number one my legal opinion and I know

you want to hear my legal

opinion because you what would be more

valuable than a non- lawyer's legal

opinion well the internet's full of so

why not mine um my guess without knowing

anything about the topic too much my

guess is that the justices may have

correctly read the law and the

Constitution so I'm not sure that they

got the wrong answer it just doesn't

work that that's my take I'm not sure

they got the wrong answer and I'm not

sure you want a supreme court who makes

up right I mean the whole point of

getting these these conservative judges

is that they're not going to add

something to the Constitution that isn't

there now the fact that they

disagreed makes it kind of questionable

how can you disagree about what's there

it'd be one thing to you know interpret

it differently but it's weird that the

conservatives would ever disagree

because they should just be looking at

and say well it's either there or it's

not and it's either clear or it's

not but they did disagree and Amy con

Barrett uh allegedly a

conservative um voted that the feds can

dismantle the state's

self-defense now of course uh this

raises the question of

sexism yes because people say wait a

minute all we needed was that one female

conservative to go with the other

conservatives and suddenly it would be

the other way but why is it that the

female conservative is the one who wants

to keep the Border open and now it gets

interesting you're saying to yourself

it's based on blackmail it's

bribery oh bet is

not I I I doubt that I kind of doubt

it I think it's simply as it's probably

as simple

as she thought the rule the law said

something the others didn't but there is

another really interesting layer to this

which I've mentioned before and I got

away with it so I'm going to do it again

um and apparently uh Jordan Peterson is

waiting on this I didn't see this from

him but somebody talking about him so I

hope I got it right um Jordan Peterson

talks about something like the return of

the

repressed something about that that the

idea is that women may be more open to

immigration because the men coming

across are more manly than the ones here

in other words that women are operating

on a mating instinct to increase the

number of manly men because there aren't

any in America so they might argue that

it's you know something about fairness

and and Asylum and stuff like that but

that the real base mating instinct is

simply that the men coming across are

more men than the ones that are here

yeah are you going to disagree with Dr

Peterson has that ever been a good

strategy of all the times that people

disagreed with the

scientific speculations of Jordan

Peterson did that work out really well

for people in the

past here's what I

think I'll put my own take on it

everything is an expression of the

mating

Instinct everything everything

everything humans do is an extension of

the mating

Instinct even if you don't know it

everything is right the clothes you wear

the the the fact that I've got a a big

dick in my face that looks like a

microphone none of these decisions were

conscious but we are simply mating

creatures mating is the thing we have to

get right everything else is subsidiary

to can you make more of yourself because

that's Survival and in theory we

optimized for

survival so why would immigration policy

be the one thing in the world that's

exempt from The Mating Instinct and the

answer is absolutely is not in fact it

might be the purest example of the

mating Instinct being expressed now of

course because there are some dumb

people are there any dumb people here

today usually we we' got a few that get

here are there any dumb people should I

speak to the dumb people for a moment

would the smart people mind if I just

take a moment for the dumb people yeah

whenever I make

generalizations it really doesn't mean

every single

person so if I say that women in general

might have a different view than men in

general that doesn't mean

you doesn't mean people you know mean

sort of on a general General way sort of

average so if you say to yourself but

Scott I know a guy who doesn't think

exactly like that example that's not

contributing to the conversation because

we're starting from the point of it's

not applying to everyone all right now

we can go back to talking to the smart

people are the dumb people

satisfied would you like to jump into

the comments and you're allowed I'll

give you a permission if you're a dumb

person you're trying to trying to keep

up you you can say in the comments

scottt that's crazy because I know

somebody who's the

exception and that will be really

helping so go ahead and do that do you

do you know why you would do that do you

know why you would try to get attention

when your opinion is so bad because

getting attention is part of the mating

Instinct that's right so you can't help

it and that's my point all right here's

my take everything's The Mating Instinct

immigration is the purest example

why do men in general want to stop

immigration because we don't want the

competition because we want to have the

babes in the United States to ourselves

if you show me a border with hot women

coming across I say to yourself I say to

you you know maybe we're being a little

tough on this whole migration situation

aren't we you know they look like they

need Asylum especially the hot one do

you see the hot one coming AC swimming

across with the wet t-shirt I think that

would needs some that's a woman who

needs some Asylum she could stay at my

house now you show me uh military AED

men who are coming over to rape my women

what do I say shut that border

are you crazy this is insane

what are you doing and I will give you

political reasons and I'll give you

economic reasons then I'll give you

safety reasons

and I'm

lying it's all a lie I'm watching a

bunch of men come over who are going to

the women that I want to

that's the whole story and I'm watching

women like Amy Coney Barrett who's got a

little heart on for the men coming

over she has Justified it based on the

Constitution and has no idea that she

just the whole country for her

vagina that's what I

think that's what it looks like to me

now you might say but no it's really

about the law and I say but no if you

think anything's about the law ever

you're really not operating at a very

high

level yeah you want to know what the

levels of awareness are let me give you

the levels of awareness level of

awareness number one you're a child and

you learn for the first

time that your parents lied about Santa

Claus and then you say to yourself huh I

think people can sometimes lie that's

level one actually level one is you

believe everything you know when you're

a child then you learn wait a minute the

Tooth Fairy Santa Claus wait a minute

and you realize that sometimes they can

lie Easter Bunny Etc that's that's going

from zero to maybe one first level of

awareness then at some point you realize

that they lie not just about silly stuff

not just about Santa Claus but they

actually lie about really important

things and then you go to the next level

of

awareness and then you find out holy

cow a whole bunch of our news stories

are fake oh my God I didn't know this

when I was I thought the news was mostly

real and then you find out that there

are a whole bunch of stories that are

shaded and and even the facts are hidden

and the context has changed and you

realize that whole lot of the news is

fake and then you realize it gets worse

a lot of the data the science you know

and the data that we see is

fake is that where you are how many of

you are you at that level where you you

you know that when you see science and

you see news you should not assume it's

true because it might be true and it

might not be true that's that's where

most of you

are right here's where I'm trying to get

you

I'm trying to get you to the layer above

that I'm trying to take you up a level

at the level above

it you'll know none of it's

true it can't

be you'll know it's none of it's

true and that it can't be

true that's where you need to get none

of it's true and it can't be how do I

know that I used to be in the business

of creating data that other people would

have to use to make decisions was it

ever real

nope it was my job to support the

decisions that had already been

made uh or to support guessing by making

it look like the guess had some basis to

it or to you know make the department

look good or that sort of thing no all

all information is fake because it's all

motivated whoever is coming up with the

information has a story to tell that's

it once you learn it's all

fake you go to a different level so if

you're still believing some of the news

is

true Good

Luck Good Luck by the way I always see

the uh the Jewish conspiracy people come

in every

morning I've got a question for you if

you think there's a global Jewish

conspiracy and I won't I'll just ask you

this

question would you agree that there's

such a thing as uh liberal Jewish people

and conservative Jewish people of course

of course you know that so they all got

together so all the liberal Jews and the

conservative Jews they all got together

and it's all part of a big conspiracy is

that what you think and and why is it

that this alleged conspiracy for I don't

know hundreds of years uh that there's

never been a whistleblower never a

whistleblower not one there's there

wasn't a liberal who didn't like what

the conservatives were doing or a

conservative didn't like what the

Liberals were doing like everywhere in

the rest of the world all the time

forever not a single person said you

know what I was in the meeting where we

plan to do whatever it is you think is

being done no whistleblowers really not

a single whistleblower and yet there are

whistleblowers for everything

else all

right that's just to think about all

right uh so yes I think the uh question

on the border is largely sexual I also

think that um BLM was largely a mating

event the black lives matter stuff I

think that female

um female approval of uh black lives

matter was probably a mating Instinct

sort of a thing all

right and again doesn't mean every

person doesn't mean you right that's

just for the dumb

people all right uh Jen weager who's

running for president without knowing

he's a naturalized citizen so he can't

run for president but I think I love it

anyway I I have a uh a kind of weird

appreciation appreciation for Jen

because I think his I think his heart is

in the right place I think so I mean you

never know but he looks like actually

wants things to be better so the fact

that he has different idea of how to get

there uh I'm I'm much more forgiving on

that because I don't think his

intentions are in the wrong place right

yeah we could disagree on what makes

sense but and and I'm seeing your

comments so I understand that you have a

different view of it but you know

sometimes

it's sometimes it's kind of a question

of do you think you're good at judging

character you know we all think we are I

judge that his character is good and so

therefore his intentions are good but I

could be wrong I could be wrong about

anybody but here's what he said and how

I

disagreed he was talking about the Gaza

situation in the West Bank and he says

the occupation as he calls it is morally

wrong and completely indefensible saying

the Palestinians cannot be trusted to

govern themselves is deeply

racist would you agree that is racist to

say that the Palestinians can't be

trusted to govern themselves which I

think the better way to say that is

Israel doesn't trust that they would be

safe if it happened is it

racist what do you

think well I would say it would be

racist if they were expelling from their

country the people who were

also Palestinian and look like him and

prayed like them and had the same jeans

so clearly there are plenty of people

living in peace in Israel so if it were

race that would not be the case so

clearly it's a security problem and the

way that they're dealing with the

security problem is they don't know who

are the good guys and who are the bad

guys they can't tell the difference

so but what if it was what if it was

racist because you could make the

argument uh I think it's primarily just

risk assessment and politics and what

they want is mostly the people who don't

uh you know the people want to kill them

they'd like to have less contact with

them seems normal so here's what I said

I haven't been Double canel Y so we'll

see how this

goes I posted back to that and I said

that racism is morally and ethically

acceptable for

self-defense let me say it again because

you might think you misheard it

racism is morally and ethically

acceptable for self-defense because the

standard for self-defense is whatever

you think you need to do that's it it's

whatever you think you need to do

doesn't matter

why now you could break the law by doing

whatever you need to do and then the law

will take care of you and I agree with

the law the law must be

obeyed but if you're talking about

ethics and morality that's a separate

domain from the law we'd like them to be

compatible but they're not always so if

you have a choice between Staying Alive

in your opinion not mine but your own

opinion that you have to do something

racist to stay alive then you should

definitely do it but to be clear uh

racism in any other domain outside of

self-defense is abor so if you're being

racist in your personal life your

business life who you rent to who you

hire all of that

stuff completely you know I disavow all

of that that would be a bad way to run a

country bad way to be a human being and

bad in every sense but in the very

narrow domain of self-defense yeah you

can be as racist as you want and and

people really need to understand that or

they'll

die uh the classic the classic example

is the was it Jesse Jackson saying might

cross the road if he saw a young black

man in a hoodie or something you that

classic case why is Jesse Jackson a

racist well yes in that exact example he

would be by his own definition I think

but he would also say you know I hate it

but I'd stay alive you I'm paraphrasing

of course so yes if if you have any

reason to think you'd be in trouble you

get to do what you need to do totally

yeah if you were an Israeli citizen

and you were walking down the street of

Old Gaza and you were just looking like

a you know let's say you were obviously

an Israeli citizen Orthodox Jew and you

were just walking down the streets in

Gaza before the war would you feel safe

or would you feel all racist because you

thought that maybe they would hurt you

because they're not big fans of yours

well it would be racist if you felt

afraid wouldn't it by definition

because you'd say I think I'm afraid

because they're Palestinian and they

have a certain sense no you it would be

racist but it would also be um smart to

stay away from that

town so the the trouble is if you get

too hung up on whether it's technically

racist or not you're missing the larger

point that it doesn't

matter is everybody on the same page

there we could argue about whether it is

or whether it's not but it doesn't

matter because you're going to do

whatever you need to do to stay safe and

to keep your family safe and nobody can

tell you that's immoral you could be

wrong you could be wrong it's still your

choice yeah it's not ethically or or

anything

so when Elon Musk uh went with Ben

Shapiro recently just the other day uh

visited

owitz and I believe he had a quote I saw

that said you know having visit OS he

understands why Israel had to act

decisively you know in Gaza why they why

they couldn't let that stand

and um yeah I I think that's where

everybody gets when you have that clear

question about uh self-defense versus is

this a little bit too much Dei yeah

self-defense

wins um speaking of which there are uh I

guess

uh black Democrats in

Chicago uh one of them is a Dei

consultant which is interesting and

they're calling for controls on

immigration so even the black citizens

of America who are

Dei

employees their very job is to get rid

of racism and they're saying uh you need

to close this border now what they don't

say is all these brown people coming in

which is not what they're worrying about

because they're not thinking about brown

or anything else they're just thinking

taking our resources so if they were not

black Democrat Dei Consultants we'd be

calling them racist but because they are

we can see them somewhat clearly as just

people who are under threat so are these

black people being racist absolutely not

or better yet what's the

difference what's the

difference if they think they're

threatened they these are my American

citizens be they Democrats or Dei

consultants if I rank them in importance

they are they're at the top of

importance because they're

Americans they're on my team should be

and we would all like to be safe and I

would like these people in Chicago be

they uh black or white or democrat or

republican or Dei Consultants which I'm

not a big fan of I want them to be safe

and if they if they think that closing

that border makes them safe does it

matter if it's racist no it doesn't

matter at all yeah racism and

self-defense just shouldn't be in the

same conversation so just get it out of

there so I agree with the uh Democrats

and the Dei consultant in this

case Jordan Peterson uh he's in a lot of

news today um he always he's since he

does more interesting things than you

and I do he's in the news lot sort of

like Elon Musk but anyway uh he did a

video in which he did an interview with

uh somebody talking about the German

protests the farmers now how many of you

even know that there's a massive uh

German

protest how many of you know

that okay so most of the people watching

this are pretty well informed by the way

is anybody also on one of the other

platforms because their comments have

stopped okay if anybody has a minute can

you look at the uh look at YouTube or

rumble or

x uh the comments stop coming through on

the studio I could see all the comments

on

locals anyway if they start again I'll

let you

know live chat

Studio oh are they back no yeah it looks

like they're I think I'm still live

though right right am I still live on

the other

platforms oh you can see the comments so

I guess other people could see them but

I can't all right all right well I'll

continue anyway uh Jordan Peterson

points out that on YouTube he uh he acrw

only 50,000 views in 14 hours which

would be enough views to make the rest

of us jealous because it's so many but

for him it's nothing you know normal

would be maybe 3/4 of a million or

something so according to to Dr Peterson

it seems obvious that YouTube is

suppressing this content specifically

why would YouTube be suppressing German

farmer

protests of an American not American but

Canadian uh psychologists why would they

be doing

that yeah it doesn't matter they're

doing it there's no doubt they're doing

it so any any any pretense you thought

about free speech in America it's kind

of an

illusion would you agree we don't really

have free speech in a in a practical

sense we have it in the um not well not

even in the uh technical sense because

the government does lean on the

platforms to suppress speech so no we

actually don't have free

speech do not and in fact a lot of the

people who tried to exercise their free

speech are in jail right

now that's another topic

um let's see how many here's a little

test for you General Knowledge Test

without looking it up what is the

population of Sweden in rough numbers

just take a guess population of Sweden

rough numbers go 3 million 10 million 15

13 oh those pretty good guesses yeah I

think it's around 10

million it's about 10 million but your

guesses are quite quite well informed

they were all in the range I'm I'm

impressed um

did so how many uh bomb attacks would

you expect so 10 million would be say

the size of New York City right how big

is New York

City 10.7 8 million depends which part

you're measuring I guess so 8 to 10

million so roughly uh Sweden is about

the size of New York

City how many bomb attacks in New York

City would you consider a crisis in a

year

bomb attacks one one right one would be

a lot right suppose you had 10 a year

imagine 10 bomb attacks in one year just

in New York City you you wouldn't be

able to live there yeah how many bomb

attacks do you think that there were in

Sweden that would include things like

hand grenades and you know things that

blow up in the past year 134

four 134 things blew up in Sweden only

only 10 million people Sweden apparently

has just Fallen to the the the migrants

yeah the the migrants have basically

just ruined Sweden I don't know if it'll

ever be the same so I think Sweden's

just gone like what I don't think I

would even travel there at this

point so that's a little warning for you

in case you're wondering if our

uncontrolled migration has any potential

risk yeah it

does uh rep representative clay Higgins

from

Louisiana um says Biden is staging a

Civil War by pulling down those barriers

in Texas the ones that are Texas put up

to try to protect itself from the

migrants

and um what do you think do you think

Texas and the federal government will

end up

coming to

blows I think not because I think I

think Americans just wouldn't do it like

who would execute that

order who like seriously who would

execute the

order if you're in the National Guard

and you're standing there looking at

your you know your basically your other

American in another uniform who's just

doing their job and you're just doing

your job are you going to shoot

him I don't think we're anywhere near

that I I think the I think the soldiers

would just lay down their guns and say

look are you crazy we're not

going to shoot these

guys that's

crazy so I don't I don't think it's

going to turn into a Civil War I just

don't think our minds are anywhere near

that and we're we're hundreds of miles

away from that

mentally so here's a question which I I

need a fact check on this I saw a

question by Benny Johnson on the

xplatform can you tell me if this is

true so he makes an

assumption I think it might be true so

I'm not doubting it I'm just doubting my

own memory so check my memory right this

is what Benny Johnson says uh in the

post he says I'm asking honestly without

bias or

preconditions when in American election

history have all five swing States

simultaneous ly stop counting ballots on

Election night is there any exp

explanation for this other than

sensually organized fraud now here's my

question I I was somewhat

unaware that it was only the five swing

States and that was all of the five

swing States is that true there was no

other state and it was 100% of the Swing

States how did I get to this point

without knowing

that

because he he perfectly formulates the

question when you put it that way it's

obviously

fraud I guess I'd been

resisting I've been resisting the idea

that you could tell it was fraud because

they decided to count votes the next day

if that's the only thing I knew I'd say

well it's

suspicious but I mean in a big

bureaucracy some states will do it

different than others but I somehow

somehow I was unaware of this context I

knew that some of them were swing

States but I didn't know it was all five

all at the same

time if it's all five at the same time

it's definitely

fraud are we on the same

page so this is this is a perfect

example of something I say a lot a lot

of the times when you think people are

disagreeing they're not it's just that

the fake news got to somebody and it

didn't get to somebody else that's it so

in this case um I think I was a victim

of fake news or maybe I didn't do my own

work because it never occurred to me

that it was all five and only the five

and at the same time somehow those three

facts never never were in my brain at

the same time until Benny Johnson put it

in that that

form yeah Scott is waking up is uh I I

block everybody who says that

yeah I I'll let you go this time because

I don't know how to block you in real

time but um every everybody that says

I'm waking up I block so don't do it

jokingly because you get

blocked all right uh only because I take

it as an insult all right I know you're

kidding it's okay she was

kidding all right

um

yeah I I think the reasonable exp the

the reason reasonable belief because the

government is guilty until proven

innocent if if you're uh if you're the

government you have to prove it

was it was legitimate and the evidence

suggests otherwise

yeah all right um so Trump said uh

directly and out loud that the reason

he's uh made up his mind or toh never

want to have a central bank digital

currency the so-call cbdc is that aake

basically filled him in and told him

what the risk was and then Trump said

okay I'm on board have you ever seen

that

before the the the simple transparency

of trump is like like a beauty to behold

oh I didn't really understand that topic

and then V explained it to me so now

here's my

opinion that was just

beautiful wasn't it

because you know I don't even I don't

even know much about the

topic so I can't say I have a strong

opinion other than eventually we will

have a digital currency there's no

question about it yeah we're not going

to be paying stuff with paper in a 100

years it's just not going to happen so I

don't know what will happen but there's

going to be a digital currency someday

but in the meantime maybe you want to

forestall that and I could understand

that I wouldn't wouldn't oppose you

wanting that um but just watching

watching how the sausage was made and

then not having a problem with it is

just a it's just a purifying feeling you

know don't you always assume that what's

happening is some like weird behind the

scenes negotiating and somebody got

blackmailed and somebody doesn't

understand and somebody's somebody's

taking a bribe and you know it's the and

all that

stuff and then sometimes it's just this

oh V is super smart

he explained it to me so now here's my

opinion and the's really

smart what's better than

that right what is better than that

nothing that that is that is government

operating perfectly full

transparency a poor opinion that was

corrected by a better opinion and then

he explains what happened and when

pow it's funny it's such a small

thing you it was just a throwaway thing

he said at a rally but there's there are

very few things that have made me feel

better about the country than watching

exactly how that decision got

made yes put your smart people in charge

of the complicated stuff so Trump says I

mean somebody asked the question um well

a lot of people ask do you think that

Trump would be able to deal with VI

in in terms of Trump's

ego and I told you you don't understand

Trump he loves smart people and if

they're smarter than he is he loves them

even more he's very consistent about

that and so V was just smarter than him

on that topic you know being specific on

that topic so he went with a smart guy

how much do you love

that um so Trump says a very small

chance that danus would be in his

cabinet um not that there's you know not

that he wouldn't do a good job but I do

love the fact that D santis came through

this process with so much

respect don't you love that like you

don't really think a political process

ends with anybody looking good

especially if they didn't win but he he

set a

standard that I really appreciated you

know I'll say it again um what he added

to the Country to Santa simply by

running and and giving us the

essentially validating Trump as the

Republicans genuine Choice that's so

important I mean it's a difference

between a Civil War and not having one

it it might be that big a

difference and of course v v the same

thing so what V and dentus did for the

country in our in our system is just

hard to underestimate it's just huge so

debt of

gratitude um Glenn Greenwald is showing

us the way he had some event where he

was debating with some leftists about

january6 whether there was an

Insurrection and you have to hear him um

I wouldn't say it was joking mocking but

he's so good at making his points it

just makes other people look stupid so

here was the things he was saying to

people who believed there was a I think

one of the Ken steams was there and

somebody

else he noted that Trump didn't resist

leaving the building like when his term

was over which would be a weird thing to

do if you're trying to cling to power

why would you leave the

building that's the dumbest thing you'd

ever do if you were going to do an

Insurrection leave the building why and

and then he points out he didn't try to

activate any military

force who tries to do an Insurrection

without trying to get at least some kind

of military force on your side you know

even if if it's your you know whatever

your personal security or something like

I don't even thought I don't think the

record even shows that he talked to his

own secret

service imagine trying to be a dictator

and not colluding with your own

protection your own secret service who

are dedicated probably to prevent you

from being a

dictator so the so the guys in the room

with

guns who would literally shoot you if

you you know actually tried to become a

dictator I hope they would wouldn't they

can somebody give me a fact check if the

Secret Service saw you actually becoming

a

dictator wouldn't they take care of

it now you're saying no because they

would be so professional they'd be so

professional they would support him even

if he went full Hitler and started

rounding up his rounding up and

murdering his uh opponents they would

just so just do their job because

they're professionals no they

wouldn't come on no they wouldn't they

would prevent

them so one way you can know for sure

that he wasn't planning any kind of real

Insurrection was

that that he didn't he didn't work it

out with anybody in his security detail

there's no evidence of that that'd be

the first thing you do because you can't

have the Enemy being your

protection it's the very first thing

you'd have to do so yeah and he didn't

arrest his opponents which is a basic

thing you do if you're a dictator if if

Trump wanted to stay in h power he would

have just had uh Biden arrested but he

had no power to do that he had no power

to or well nobody would have done

it so watch the uh the people who have

been brainwashed into thinking January 6

was an

Insurrection is going to be real fun

because if you take the Glenn Greenwald

model and I think we should we should

mock it and make them explain how that

could be an Insurrection now the best

argument I've heard for the

Insurrection um hoax

Believers is that he had those fake

electors this is what Bill Mah says and

and the way that argument uh goes like

this um he had fake electors so

therefore that's how he was try trying

to take over the country now anybody who

knows the situation would say something

like this

well uh the documentation shows that

they believe they were simply

placeholders to maintain the right to

pursue the you know the legal challenge

it was just a placeholder thing and they

weren't they weren't replacement for or

fake they were simply sort of on hold to

show that you were you're putting a

stake in the ground that you're

challenging it now what does Bill Mah

say about

that well he wouldn't let you finish the

sentence he would talk over

you I guarantee you you'll never get to

finish that sentence I I saw him doing

to that to somebody the other

day now suppose you say um what if they

were fake

how in the world were fake electors

going to take over a country was the

Supreme Court going to say oh yeah fake

electors are fine like there there's no

way to connect the dots that that

process could have been a way to take

over the country the only thing it could

have been is exactly what they said it

was a bunch of lawyers said you know

what we'd have a stronger case if he had

some alternate electors and you know

otherwise we won't use them

so uh would they Strongarm the real

delegates probably if it was a real

Insurrection they would I don't know if

they did maybe somebody

did uh don't argue with analogies that's

a bad way to

go all right Russia apparently is ruling

out any peace talks in the Ukraine and

why wouldn't they because apparently the

money is going to dry up from America

unless something changes and that would

guarantee that Russia could have

anything they

want with um Ukraine kim.com

has a uh provocative uh prediction if I

have it right he believes that Victoria

nuland is the real president of uh

Ukraine meaning that America is really

in charge and that she's the point

person over there and uh kim.com

believes that she might be putting

together a some kind of false flag

operation to blow up their own nuclear

power

plant with the thinking being that if

Ukraine blows up their own nuclear power

plant that that would force NATO to get

involved because it would look like

Russia did it and then if NATO gets

involved maybe Ukraine can be

saved uh they already said

that it's been ongoing yeah to on the

news I don't know if any of that's true

um I'm not I'm not backing that theory

myself but it sound there um but all I

have to say about Ukraine is how could

Putin possibly lose at this

point would would it be fair to say we

started a fight we didn't need to start

in other words proa probably it was our

own damn fault we fought too long and

killed too many people that didn't need

to die and when there was the time that

we could have made peace we let it

pass I think Biden did all that I think

he basically gave

away Ukraine do you know who could save

Ukraine only Trump while running for

president because if Putin doesn't

control all of Ukraine before the before

let's say Trump or republican takes

over um it might be too late because I

think that Trump would threaten him and

say look you are going to talk peace or

we will you know Reign hell upon you

that you've never seen sort of thing and

he'd probably actually believe it was

going to happen and he'd probably

adjust yeah all right so California

Senate race is funny because it's so

pathetic so the people running for the

to be Senator uh for California would be

uh Adam Schiff Katie Porter barbar Lee

and one Republican Steve Garvey who

doesn't have a chance because it's

California the funny part is uh all of

the people are under 25%

support they're all under 25% they're so

odious that that that nobody wants any

of them I

think but what's funny is you have a

straight white male allegedly running

against a woman and a woman of

color how in the

world can Cal can California elect the

straight white guy when there is a woman

and a woman of color in the same

party can

they yeah GA I think Gavin was a special

special

case if Adam Schiff wins this thing I'm

I'm going to think the race is

rigged it just doesn't seem like that's

possible sou New Hampshire voes today

why does anybody care about New

Hampshire why does anybody care about

that it's such a funny little weird

State and so few people vote the the

fact that we give it any credibility at

all is sort of hilarious but to me it's

like uh the all the news people are

trying to milk a

bowl it's like all right we know you can

only milk cows Bulls don't have

UTS well all we have is this

bull

so let's milk

it that's what the news feels like okay

we all know that New Hampshire shouldn't

matter it shouldn't be

important but it's the news so we gotta

talk about it yeah let's talk about how

we can milk that

bowl all right it's like squeezing

orange juice out of a turd you just

can't do it no matter how how hard you

squeeze

so uh the Democrats using their

technique of blaming Republicans for

whatever they do are going to blame

Trump for his many miscues and talking

uh for having cognitive

decline that's right the supporters of

Joe Biden have decided that a good

fruitful attack for their side would be

to attack Trump for his mental decline

because he sometimes mixes up

names they are so freaking

consistent and again I have to apologize

to Tucker Carlson for when he said that

they always do what they blame you of

doing I didn't think he meant always it

just have like a weird you know

overgeneralization well not always not

not every single

time yep it's every single time no

matter how absurd it is they'll do it

anyway and this is the one that sort of

points It Out imagine the absurdity of

Defending Joe Biden on a cognitive

level but they're doing it they're doing

it and I guess we're worried about the

Canadian border so you heard about uh

there were a few hundred um people on

the terrorist watch list that got

through the southern border so so thank

goodness the Canadian border doesn't

have that kind of problem right cuz we

had I think a couple hundred people or

so something 100 or 200 that were

actually on the terrorist watch list

that came up through the southern border

can you imagine if we had like that many

people on the northern border like a few

hundred people on the watch list

checking the news uh there were 500 of

them uh yeah so uh actually it turns out

that uh by a MAG an order of magnitude

there are more terrorists coming across

the northern

border you know what I worry

about I don't worry about the ones that

came across the southern border because

they might be the dumb terrorists they

wouldn't be able to pull something off

but every terrorist who comes through

the northern border I say to myself well

there's a terrorist who figured out how

to do it right now that terrorist I

worry

about because if you came in through

Canada you've got some game if you came

in through the southern border I don't

think you thought it through because you

know Canada it's right there just walk

across I guess it works on either

border all right ladies and

gentlemen this episode of cfee with

Scotts has been brought to you by the

best book ever written it's called

reframe your brain by me and we're in

the phase two now fa phase one is

launching the book phase two is a bunch

of people bought it and read it

especially for Christmas and now the

messages are coming in um I had to buy

five more um my neighbor uh got one for

me for Christmas and just bought severon

for their family so it is and people are

posting that it's changing their lives

so I say this uh because I'm marketing a

book but also it's completely true you

can read the reviews and see it yourself

it's changing lives now there are a lot

of books that say a lot of fun and

interesting things and you say to

yourself well that's some good advice in

that book but do you do it so what's

different about reframe your brain is

that the reframes are literally one

sentence each so if you find a reframe

that fits your situation you just have

to read one sentence and it will either

change the way you think of the

situation or not but that's your that's

your total investment is a sentence so

that's why people are using it

successfully because it's so easy to

implement and there's no downside you

just read a sentence it works or it

doesn't so that can change your life so

ladies and gentlemen that's all we got

for now thanks for joining on the

YouTube Rumble and X platforms sorry

your comments got locked up there but I

guess you can see your own comments and

I will see you tomorrow same place same

time