lot of foreshadowing. You would have seen something like a listening tour, right? You know it would be Michelle Obama saying you know our country is very divided. I'm going to go on a listening tour just to see what people think. You know maybe that'll help. And then I would say yeah maybe she's preparing. Or you would hear somebody say yeah we saw a meeting of all these advisers and they met with her. Then I would say well we don't know what she will say but they're pushing for it. There is no evidence whatsoever that Michelle Obama is going to be a candidate. So I'm going to go hard now.

Let's see your opinions. Give me your opinions. How many of you are yes or no on Michelle Obama running for president on this election cycle? Yeah she has no reason to. Right? Yep. Yep. All right. So we can disagree on that but you know I guess I really do have the Karl Rove opinion that it seems so preposterous that I can't even talk about it. Like I feel it's like a waste of energy to even talk about it because it's so imaginary. However now that I've put myself all in the line and if I'm wrong about this I'd be amazed. I would say my level of certainty about her not running is it's the highest for any prediction I've ever made. It's the highest level of certainty for what that's worth. Yeah this is not a coin flip for me. For me this is 99.9 percent likely she's not running.

All right. Meanwhile after the border bill got shot down because it was a complete garbage and our government seems to not be working at all, there's a new Senate bill that got voted 67 to 32 in favor of advancing it. So it's not passed. They're just advancing it. A 95 billion dollar foreign package for Ukraine, Israel, Gaza and Taiwan. Seriously? We're going to give money to four countries that are not the United States in the middle of an invasion? How does that make sense? How does that make sense? And apparently Republicans also voted for it. Not big numbers but quite a few. I don't trust any Republican who voted for this. I would have to assume something else is going on with them. So I looked at the list. As a citizen I feel like I needed to know the names on the list that voted for it. I don't do that. I do not do that usually. You'll hear like you know one dissident or something. Oh Romney didn't vote for it. But this time I actually spent time trying to memorize all the names on the list, the Republicans, because I feel like I need to know that whoever voted for this is not on my team. I don't know what team they're on but you need to know their names. So learn their names for good reason.

And Taiwan, what the hell are we doing for Taiwan? Are you telling me Taiwan doesn't have enough money? I thought Taiwan was doing okay. They've run out of money? They need our money? That makes no sense.

All right. How many of you listened to the audio? It was fascinating of the Supreme Court slapping around the state of Colorado who wants to take Trump off the ballot because they say he was involved in an insurrection which would disqualify him according to the 14th Amendment they say. But the Supreme Court seemed to have the opinion that him not participating in the insurrection, which didn't actually happen in reality, you know might not be enough to get him in trouble here. So I feel like, if you listen to the judges asking the questions of the Colorado people, I finally got some of my faith back in the United States. And especially when I was hearing the liberal justices just hammering on these Colorado lawyers and they were just purely on the Constitution. So here's what I thought I might hear because I haven't listened to a lot of Supreme Court conversations but we know that the rulings often come down pretty close to party lines. You know the liberals go one way and the others go another way. So I thought I was going to hear a bunch of bias. I thought that when the liberal justices were talking they would ask questions that would suggest you know they wanted to go one way if they could make it happen. Nothing like that happened.

So Justice, you're going to have to help me with the name, Ketanji Jackson or I'll just say Justice Jackson. I tuned in when she was talking and I didn't know much about her but boy do I have more respect for her after listening to her talking to the lawyers. I thought she was really sharp, on target, completely compatible with the Constitution, seemed to be right where I wanted it to be. So I'll tell you again, I've said this a number of times, the only thing protecting the United States from collapse is that the Supreme Court still has some credibility. And I thought that it was improved yesterday. I thought the Supreme Court looked a little bit better yesterday and that made me feel good. Now we don't have the ruling yet, right? When is the ruling coming? Ruling will come soon. So we think it'll allow Trump to stay on the ballot.

And then Trump says in his statement about it he says every one of these cases you see comes out of the White House. It comes out of Biden. It's election interference and it's really sad. You know normally I would say you know don't call everything election interference you know because you could spread that to everything but I think he's right. It does seem to me that there is a White House coordinated lawfare approach which doesn't seem related to actual laws. It does seem like the intention is purely to keep Trump off the ballot which I would consider election interference at this level. So if it was a little bit, let's say it was one lawsuit or let's say it was one court case and let's say it was pretty solid I wouldn't call that election interference. But if you have this full court press, every possible legal thing you can do and you can be pretty confident that it's coordinated by the White House, to me that looks full on. I mean it's not just election interference, it's organized election interference. So this is the very crime that they're accusing Trump of,