there's a reason for it because that gets into racist territory. But certainly you should understand it. And the demographic nature of it is part of understanding it even if the reasons that you give to the underlying problem should be deeper than the ones we give.

Yeah, no, Google is completely broken and it has nothing to do with testing. You know the way I interpret that is if we tested it better we could have gotten away with it. And what I mean by gotten away with it is making it anti-white. It was just a little bit too anti-white so they didn't get away with it. That's really all there was. If they made it subtle like the search results I just mentioned, if you weren't looking for that search result you wouldn't know that it's completely illegitimate basically. You wouldn't know that. But if you do any kind of searching on anything that's a little bit interesting you immediately find out the whole thing is broken. It doesn't give you anything interesting. Whatever you're looking for, it doesn't trust you anyway. No, it's not a problem with testing. But it does suggest that maybe they don't know how to fix it. There might be no way to fix it. You know some have suggested they have to fire 80% of their staff and that's not going to happen. So now it looks unfixable.

Interestingly enough, now here's a real question. Is it possible that AI could ever replace Google as a search engine? Because doesn't AI just sort of use Google? I mean you still need the basic search engine and AI just sits on top of it, right? So I don't think that AI can replace it. And does anybody have any data that's not corrupted that way? I don't know. So I don't know. I suppose that Google will continue being the brain of the world.

Now you're completely aware that if Google decides that the president should be X or Y, they get to decide, right? In our current system, whoever Google decides to make president, they could just change the algorithm and make him president. Did you know that? Now it might not work in this specific case because Biden is just disintegrating in front of us. That might be the special case. But if the election was supposed to be close then Google decides or mail-in ballots decide. The only thing that doesn't decide for sure is the voters. I think the only purpose for voting is to create the illusion that it was close so that whatever the bad guys do to rig it, it won't be so obvious it was rigged. So I think the only purpose of voting at the moment is to hide the rigging. Would you agree?

Well, let's see what Tucker says. Wall Street Apes had this post. So Tucker was talking about the CIA controlling elections and I'm just going to read his whole four paragraph thing and I want to see if this matches where you are. All right, is this where you are in understanding your world?

So Tucker says the fact that the CIA is playing in domestic politics and actually has for a long time is shocking. You can't have that. The reason I'm so mad is I really believe in the idea of representative government, acknowledging its imperfections, but like I should have some say. I live here. I'm a citizen. The fact that they would be tampering with American democracy is so outrageous to me. And I don't know why is only Glenn Greenwald mad about it? Now that's what I say. Why do I read every day Glenn Greenwald making claims about the elections and not the elections but just the government being a sort of an intelligence asset basically? And nobody really fact checks them. Have you noticed that? Nobody fact checks them because it's true. There's nothing to fact check. And he can do it all day long and we just act like it's just somebody talking instea