Episode 2402 CWSA 03/03/24

good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that could only be described as Galactic well then all you need is a cup or mug or glass a tankered sheler Stein a canteen Jer flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid I like coffee and join me now for the unparallel pleasure of the dopamine the end of the day the thing that makes everything better it's called The Sim thing you said but happens now go oh H surprisingly good how often does a surprise turn out to be better than you thought have you ever noticed that that you don't often get surprised with something that's better than you thought it's about a 3:1 ratio oh that's a surprise 3: one I don't know why all right here's something I don't think I've said too often maybe never uh if you don't subscribe to the Dilbert comic which you can now only get by subscription on the xplatform or on locals at Scott adams.

locals where you get lots of other stuff as well um you would miss today's um today's Sunday comic and I'm just going to tell you two things about it in the first panel Dilbert tells his boss he wants to transition that's the first thing I'm going to tell you about it second thing I'm going to tell you about it is it might be the funniest thing I've ever written it might be now you can judge for yourself but it might be the funniest thing I've ever written so look at the comments if you don't believe me the they're saying it right now I saw a post on X saying the CNN was considering canning Anderson Cooper and Chris Wallace is that true can I get a fact check on that since what do they tell you who they're considering firing that doesn't sound true to me does it like who who has that conversation you know we're we're really thinking hard about getting of our top host I don't know I'm got to put a big question mark next to that one yeah I'm going to say I don't believe it yet if you want to see something that's really funny I just po uh I just uh reposted it it's a uh compilation of Morning Joe talking about Trump in 2016 when they liked them and then it's a quick cut to 2024 when they don't like him oh you have to see it I don't think there's anything that's ever been on TV that's as entertaining as watching moring Joe being normal and nice and then flipping uh watching him in you know deep TDS I can't even explain it you just have to see it yourself all right um SNL was mocking Joe Biden for his lack of vigor the funniest the funniest line was uh one of the characters said he had a grandpa monkey grip grandpa monkey grip he and he can jump over walls and he's so v he's so much full of vigor so what does it tell you when CNL SNL I just combined CNN and SNL but what does it tell you when SNL is openly mocking one of the candidates and happens to be a Democrat they're very done with him I feel like they're very done with him yeah and at least SNL has the self-awareness to know even if they prefer him as president you know they know physically and mentally he's kind of gone so that's I I give them credit for being honest about that because they didn't have to be you know we're in this weird world where if they just ignored that one president can barely function they could have gotten away with it it probably wouldn't have made any difference to their numbers but they played it straight and I appreciate that there's a video of Sergey Bren one of the founders of Google talking about the uh new problems they have with her racist um AI that shows everybody looking black no matter what they were and Sergey said uh yeah we messed up on uh image generation and he thought that the reason that maybe they messed up was wait for it not enough testing not enough testing now ah you know I'm no entrepreneur who created the biggest company most impressive company I don't know if it's the biggest but most impressive company in the world um but Sergey I don't think it was a testing problem I think it tested just the way they built it that's why they rolled it out that's why I think and you know what else it's not an image problem it's the whole damn thing it's not an image problem you want to find out if it's an image problem or if it's just broken try to Google this uh crime by demographic do it just Google crime by demographic group do you know what comes up uh lots of stories about how black people are the biggest victims of crime so is that because they didn't test it enough because you know some people when they do that search sometimes they're looking for who's the biggest victims a crime so that's totally appropriate but other times they're trying to figure out who's committing the crimes such as you know are migrants doing more crimes are immigrants doing more crimes is there any difference you know that that we can identify and I'm not saying there's a reason for it because that gets into a racist territory but certainly you should understand it and and the demographic um nature of it is part of understanding it even if you know the reasons that you give to the underlying problem should be you know probably deeper than the ones we give it yeah no there's the Google is completely broken and has nothing to do with testing you know the way I interpret that is if we tested it better we could have gotten away with it and what I mean by gotten away with it is making it anti-white it was just a little bit too anti-white so they didn't get away with it that's really all there was if they made it subtle like the the search results I just mentioned if you weren't looking for that search result you wouldn't know that it's completely illegitimate basically um you wouldn't know that but if you do any kind of searching on anything that's a little bit interesting you immediately find out the whole thing is broken it doesn't give you anything like anything like interesting whatever you're looking for it doesn't trust you anyway no it's not a problem with testing but it does suggest that maybe they don't don't know how to fix it there might be no way to fix it you know some have suggested they have to fire 80% of their staff and that's not going to happen so now it looks unfixable interestingly enough now here's a real question is it possible that AI could ever replace Google as a search engine because doesn't AI just sort of use Google I mean you still need the basic search engine and AI just sits on top of it right so I don't think that AI can replace it um and does anybody have any you know data that's not that's not corrupted that way I don't know so I don't know I I suppose that uh Google will continue being the brain of the world now you're completely aware that if Google decides that the President should be X or Y they they get to decide right in our current system whoever Google decides to make president they just they could just change the algorithm and make him president did you know that now it might not work in this specific case because Biden is just you know disintegrating in front of us that's that might be the special case but if the election was supposed to be close then Google decides or mailin ballots decide the only thing that doesn't decide for sure is the voters I think the only purpose for voting is to create the illusion that it was close so that whatever the bad guys do to rig it it won't be so obvious it was rigged so I think the only purpose of voting at the moment is to hide the rigging would you agree well let's see what Tucker says um Wall Street Apes had this post so Tucker was talking about the CIA controlling election and I'm just going to read his whole four paragraph thing and I want to see if this matches where you are all right is this where you are in understanding your world so Tucker says the fact that CIA is playing uh is playing in domestic politics and actually has for a long time is shocking you can't have that the reason I'm so mad is I really believe in the idea of representative government acknowledging its imperfections but like I should have have some say I live here I'm a citizen the the fact that they would be tampering with American democracy is so outrageous to me and I don't know why is only Glenn Greenwald mad about it now that's what I say why why do I read every day Glenn Greenwall making claims about you know the elections and not the elections but just the government being a sort of an intelligence asset basically and nobody really fact checks them have you noticed that nobody fact checks them because it's true there's nothing to fact check and he can do it all day long and we just act like it's just somebody talking instead of the most important thing happening in the world yeah the Glen who I'll talk about the octopus in a second uh then he says uh uh blah blah blah about Glenn greenwald's claims about the CIA Tucker says I mean it's confirmed it's not like a fever dream that's what I keep saying we know it's true and he goes it's real they played it in the last election domestically and I guess it shows how dumb I am because they've been doing that for many years the guy who took out uh mosad day lived on my street uh I'm one of the results CIA officer what I don't know what that means so I mean again I grew up around this stuff but I never really thought I never I never reached the obvious conclusion which is that wait for it here comes the obvious conclusion and see if this sounds familiar to you the obvious conclusion which is that if the US government subverts democracy in other countries in the name of democracy it will over time subvert democracy in my country why wouldn't it does that sound familiar that's why I've been for a while now if you create an entity who become really good at overthrowing countries and they do it 80 times in a row successfully I don't know how many in a row but 80 times successfully they're going to overthrow your country because they can and they will come up with a justification because they can they came up with justifications for all the other countries you know they don't do it without some kind of cover story so all they is a cover story that's the easiest thing in the world oh the other one's a dictator better overthrow the country save democracy yeah so um I remember do do you remember when you first realized that we didn't live in a in a republic and maybe we hadn't for a long time how how many of you remember like the moment you said oh this was never even real in my lifetime I don't know if it was ever real maybe when I was when I was two maybe maybe during Eisenhower maybe I don't know but I don't feel that I live in anything like a republic or a you know Democratic Republic how many of you feel like you're living in a republic like it's it's actually the will of the people and you know it's imperfect but it's basically good yeah now I wonder if any Republicans feel they're living in a republic anymore I don't know yeah it it's it's weird that that could change well I watched uh started watching I haven't finished yet the uh Netflix series a new series called The Octopus murders and I can't I can't entirely summarize it for you because it's so complicated there are a lot of names involved but that's part of the story The Octopus is all the names involved so the basic idea is that there was some guy that they think was CIA connected who was doing all these Ops around the world and one of them was he sort of took over an Indian reservation and then he used it for illegal selling illegal drugs and gambling uh to make some illegal money and then started inviting in the US uh I guess some arms dealers that were working with the CIA so they could do illegal arms stuff to get I don't know they were going to give the arms to the contas or something so they used the Indian Reservation because it's not America per se to do illegal things that you couldn't do or you wouldn't want to get caught if he did somewhere else what's that sound like that's Ukraine it's just creating a place where the CIA can operate with impunity to do all the dirty stuff they need to do and it's not in the United States and so they're alleged that there are many murders that um are associated with the CIA and they're they're a murderous bunch of drug dealing people but here are the things which if this stuff is true of course who knows I believe there was there was a suggestion that they wanted to use the Indian reservation for a bioweapons lab did I hear that right I was sort of half falling asleep that so they're going to use does this sound familiar it's basically the Ukraine play and then you can see that they've already tested it so it must be common operation to find the most Lawless Place partner with the most dangerous people sell drugs to make dirty money that you can use for whatever you're doing it's all there so basically everything you assumed about the CIA everything you ever assumed about Ukraine it's all their modeled as not just I'm not going to say that they practice there to do it in Ukraine what I'm saying is it must be part of the the toolbox of the trade to do exactly what Ukraine is so it doesn't surprise you at all yeah it's all there all right so uh when when you see that the uh cartels seem to have freedom to bring drugs into this country and you say to yourself I'm sure we could have done more to stop it it's because we're not stopping it you know I don't believe that the border patrol is working with the CIA to Lad drugs in the country that's not happening there there's no evidence that I think the border patrol is trying to stop it and wondering why they don't have the right tools and why nobody's helping him that's that's cuz somebody's probably making money on it so you got that uh another story the University of Florida um terminated all of its Dei people and now that's going to be illegal it is illegal in Florida to teach Dei in their schools now that's still leaves the corporations so it's not like a gigantic win but but at least she got it out of the corporations that's or you got out the schools now here's my question imagine if you had taken up a job a cubical job to be a Dei professional and then you hear that Florida decided that you you the person in that job is too dangerous to even be allowed to operate in the state state schools cu that's what happened they didn't say let's get rid of Dei because it's not giving us benefit for the money they didn't say that they said it's dangerous that it makes things worse imagine that's your job your job as Dei and you just just found out one of our biggest states had a vote and decided is just really bad for the state we got to get ad made it illegal how many other things are illegal that basically are talking and teaching you know Dei is a lot of talking and teaching it's kind of amazing and I was trying to think what other jobs are illegal in some states but not others and I thought it too so you couldn't be an abortion doctor where abortions illegal right abortionist uh you couldn't have a weed dispensary couldn't have a weed dispensary is there anything else yeah not that they have anything in common but um just imagine being in a job that was some major State thought about it hard and said you're bad for the world or we're going to make you illegal in our state oh prostitution there's another one yeah anyway so here's my question could Trump ban Dei in the country by executive order could you ban Dei nationally in in corporations not just government entities but corporations could you ban it by executive order now my understanding of executive orders is very thin but what I think it means usually is there has to be some existing laws on the books or it would have to be you know right within his job description somehow I guess um he can only interpret existing things is that right an executive order is not a new law it's a new way of interpreting some existing law right so is there any existing law that would allow somebody to do an EO EO executive order that would ban it nationally well would be oh a health emergency there we go civil rights civil rights I would think civil rights would be sufficient but I might have a better one coming up I'll make you wait for it um well I won't make you wait for it maybe I'll just skip right to it um I asked Google so you have to question it whether uh you could sue somebody for brainwashing is it illegal to brainwash somebody that's kind of interesting because where where's the dividing line between just influencing and brainwashing well I would say is this if you're influencing somebody you know just to vote for your candidate we accept that that's good if you influence somebody to buy your product we're okay with that we don't call that brainwashing but suppose you influence somebody to do something that's clearly damaging to them personally what would that be called well I would call that brainwashing and I would think that that would be illegal so if you're brainwashing somebody else for your own benefit and there was no benefit to the brainwash person I would think that you're doing something illegal so I looked it up and uh let's see um it did say that there if you inflict emotional abuse on people yeah emotional abuse could be the the the trigger for the brainwashing being illegal if you just brainwash somebody but they were happy about it you're fine if you just brain but if you brainwash them and they're in great mental distress because of it yeah that's that feels like you actually attack them it's basically assault and here's what I'd like to see I'd love to see uh maybe Republicans uh sue the DNC the Democrats and Sue the Biden Administration for brainwashing black Americans into thinking they are victims now here here's the argument the argument is that we we know very well that if you tell somebody they're a victim they'll have a less good life would you agree I I think 100% of social science would agree that if you tell somebody they're a victim you know in the normal course of things I'm not talking about somebody who's literally a slave you could tell them they're a victim maybe that's better than not but in the normal course of you know people just living and thriving in in our society if you took one group of them and you brainwash them into believing they were the victims you would be doing tremendous damage to them personally psychologically economically socially you you could actually decrease their ability to reproduce literally because you know let's say it you know causes them to have some separation from the people that they think are oppressing them and maybe some of them would have married some of those people in another the world so you you can actually reduce their ability to reproduce their ability to you know Thrive the ability to have a good job now the whole point of Dei is if you complain enough something good will happen and that would be maybe the defense maybe that would be the defense hey something good will happen if we complain enough but I'd like to see the science I think the science would show you that the conservatives who are black in this country generally are happier I I'll bet you could find that in a poll there's your science do a poll of conservative black Americans versus your know liberal black Americans who do you think would be happier probably the ones who think they can take their own fate into their own hands the Republicans and make something out of themselves even if there are difficulties even if there is discrimination that they can still Thrive but if you thought you couldn't Thrive because of all the Discrimination you would be at a great psychological economic disadvantage and now I don't have any uh illusion that somebody could win such a case but it would be the greatest reframe of all time the greatest reframe of all time would be suing democrats for brainwashing black Americans into the worst situation they could be in because of the brainwashing all right and it has the odd political quality of being true but the the reframing of it would be amazing you you could lose and win right you you could lose the court case but you would win by simply making it a thing that people have to talk about that there there is a difference between persuading and brainwashing right you know the difference when you see it TDs is a result of brainwashing TDS did not happen on its own that is your media brainwashing now there might also be you know a CIA or other intelligence agency involvement I don't know if you could make that case but you wouldn't need to all right there's if you haven't seen Trump mocking fonny Willis in his in his latest uh rally it's uh it's worth seeing he's pretty darn funny about it he does he he does say emotion I'll paraphrase but he was talking about uh the boyfriend Wade uh he so Trump said he was hired without you know experience the right kind of experience in the law for the job he got from his girlfriend but Trump says he had experience of something else and then Trump does his hand motion of like of the sexual head motion something no presidential candidate has ever done in the in the history of presidential candidates nobody ever stood in front of a crowd and did a and did a humping each other hand motion like how do you not love that like no matter what you'll think of is politics how do you not love that anyway uh he was very funny about that all right uh Senator Chris Murphy from Connecticut says the crime surge for migrants is 100% made up it's a right-wing invention he says violent crime is way down and let me tell you he's using all capital letters for way and down so it's a big difference because if he didn't use the capitals I would have read that this way violent crime is way down you wouldn't be impressed by that no but the way he's written with the capitals the way I read his violent crime is weigh down and that's different makes you feel completely different he says the drop in urban murders this year was the largest in the nation's history and that the data shows that migrants commit crimes at lower rates than the people who were real already here at lower rates is that true well it turns out you can prove anything with data that data has no value it really doesn't is it's just blah blah blah my data can can he make his case with data do you think that do you think that Chris Murphy if he just had an argument with data could he make his case yes yes the data is completely on his side but is that therefore his narrative is correct no because I'm pretty sure that one extra death is a little bit too much so his argument about the rate I think is actually true historically but you know what's not true that migration today looks like historical migration you can't use the old data to tell me what the new migrants are going to do now it might be the same but the data won't tell you that because the data is about a certain kind of migration from a certain set of countries and those people really really just wanted to work and they didn't want to get deported they didn't come here for crime and they actually I believe have a lower crime rate than population General I think I can use a fact check on that but I think historically people really want to stay off of law enforcement's radar and just work so they actually did have a lower crime rate um yeah so that could be true but it could also be true that you know any extra deaths or too much that's just a different different way of looking at the same data now are we bringing in um the same kind of IM migrants or immigrants that we used to it looks like no there there is certainly a suggestion that the Venezuelan criminals got in of jail and ran up here you know the very thing that Trump said might happen actually happened it looks like now if they're entering the jails I would imagine that there would be some locations where the crime goes up maybe so be careful of uh be careful of all the um assumptions about data you can prove anything you want with the data but I I do want to give the uh the immigrants who are already here um a little bit of respect if you don't mind I about a little bit of respect for the immigrants who are here and just want to work and just want to be Americans I'm seeing some of you saying no no respect really no respect for somebody who loves their God and their family and they're in a bad situation and they're willing to do what they need to make it right and even though it's illegal to come here what they want is to just make a good legal life and contribute to the country you don't respect that because they broke a law to do it interesting I would I would argue that you've been deeply brainwashed for that opinion that that's not a that's not a natural opinion that's a that's a brainwashed opinion I I hate to tell my own you know we're we're all brainwashed by the way including me we're all brainwashed maybe in slightly different ways but if you can't find it in yourself to respect someone who came from another country wanted to be American wanted to work wanted to obey all the laws after coming in illegal illegally perhaps you can't you can't find a way to respect that really you don't have to like it by the way it's it's a different argument if you think we should close the border that's separate I'm just saying that if you're just looking at the people the human beings they're human beings just trying to get along now I'm I'm for very strong borders and very tough vetting so we're only letting in people who can help us all right but that's a separate conversation you you can still you can still respect the people right you're you're tough graders you're very tough graders yeah I don't know well so part of it is I put myself in their situation and I say to myself if I were in some country and I knew that if I took a risk I could get here and I could you know make make something to myself and I just want to follow the law there's just this one law I'm going to violate to get here would I feel bad about myself I don't think I would I think I would respect my choice if it worked out and my second generation was completely legal and had a good life and went to school so are are the is there anybody here who would think it would be more respectable to stay in your native country and starve versus breaking a law to try to get to a new place how many of you think it's more respectable to stay there and let your family starve I don't know I think you can consider that we're all brainwashed by the way that's that's a really good mental experiment don't assume it's the other people the other people are definitely brainwashed no doubt about that but if your level of awareness is only the other people are getting brainwashed I I'm here to help you up to the next level right I'm here to help I'm not from the government I'm here I'm actually here to help I would actually like you to understand when it happens to you if you only see it when it's happening to somebody else that's you know that's grade school that's easy I'm trying to take you up to at least junior college level where you can see it's happening to you as well if you can't see it happening to you you're really going to be lost you have to know it's happening to you it's very very important all right um I know it's uncomfortable to have that thought in your head uh Biden saying the border is insecure because of trump let's just talk about uh sort of the theme I was getting to that the level of gaslighting during the election season is so of the chart and I I don't know I don't know if it's worse than ever it feels like it is but maybe we think that all the time I don't know so how how much of a Gaslight is it to say that Trump's the reason that the border is open I that's just insane it's insane and the story that theyve sold to I don't know at least half of their own people is that if that b if that Bill had passed the Border would be closed how how little would you have to know about this situation to think that that's true you would have to know almost nothing about the situation to to buy that and the fact that Biden says it and you know it's the standard line now really does suggest that they know how dumb their voters are they're really playing their voters for idiots right because there's lots you could say that would be not exactly what Trump says there's a whole bunch of things you could say which is Trump honestly says this we honestly say this we think our thing is better they can't do that all they can do is make up the most absurd lie that Trump's responsible for it now I do believe that Trump said it would be better for my election results if he don't pass the Bill do you believe that part do you believe that Trump ever did say you know it'd be better off if we don't pass it I believe he said that but not the way they're interpreting it it doesn't make sense to do a bad Bill if it's also politically bad that's what I heard the Bill's bad but passing it would be twice as bad it's two bad things the bill itself and then the politics of passing it if they could claim it worked or that it's going to work any day now so yeah uh I think Trump is completely it's completely normal thing to say this would be bad to pass this politically but it's also just a bad bill which we we observe all right because it didn't really address the core problems um here's the funniest thing I I really don't think that Democrats understand that uh that replacement theory that they keep complaining about you know um a lot of people on the right keep saying hey they're trying to replace us they're going to try to replace us and they're usually thinking uh I guess white Republicans or something they're trying to replace us well you know how the future is impossible to predict Ain that anything yeah we just most things are just unpredictable here's what I think might be happening the migrants might be replacing us but only the the Democrats I think the migrants are replacing the Democrats and because what are how many of the migrants have blue hair has anybody seen the have you seen the thousands and thousands of migrants I look for the blue-haired ones and I also I'm wondering how many of them are trans have you seen the numbers are are you saying that no trans people are coming across the border I feel like that group should be carved down for special protection no trans no blue hair no trans and uh are they rejecting religion the people coming in or are they embracing it just the gas probably most of them at least from Central Latin America are certainly religious nature do they like families yes do they expect and want to work hard to succeed yes yeah you I don't think I don't think we've quite grasped uh the degree to which we've refreshed the country and we don't know it now again let me say I'm completely against open immigration we got to close the freaking border and vet people but within the vetting I'm very much uh a musk perspective we probably need 50 million migrants just to survive not a preference it might be requirement an actual existential requirement that we need 50 million now I know you don't like it and I'm not crazy about it myself unless they're vetted if we vet them 50 million is going to be really really good for the country if we get the you know best people from other countries Etc but I don't think we can do that with Dei I think as long as Dei is in place you're not going to get the best people coming to this country you it's definitely going to be a little bit of a gating factor I would think um all right so just keep an eye on it and if I were the Republicans here's what I would do I would create a do might use AI that would give a very maybe three or four point explanation of what a Democrat is and what a republican is and I would hand it out to every migrant I could find now the news would pick it up and they'd say look what these damn white supremacists are doing they're they're giving out these little leaflets to everybody and it's telling you what's the difference between a Republican and a Democrat oh oh and then they would talk about it and then the other migrants would hear about it in the news I don't know if they're watching a lot of news but let's say and it would just become a frame because right now we're we're allowing the Democrats you know all of us collectively we're allowing the Democrats to frame it as of course there are Democrats and I do think that that might be persuading people coming in that they must be Democrats if the only thing they hear is Democrats saying hey we're the ones who let you in be a Democrat I'd probably sign up if I didn't know anything else except the Democrats want me here and the Republicans are complaining I'd be a Democrat if it's all I knew and I I'd probably sign a paper if they put it in front of me Etc um yeah and the right the NGS are probably saying bad things about Republicans even before before they get here so suppose somebody gets here and you hand them a document says if you're a republican you like God and families and you no abortion what whatever you think would get the the migrant you know people on your side but because you're the ones who decide how to frame the other side yeah you know you just frame them in the worst possible way and uh and probably that's enough I mean it it it would certainly change the equation in terms of how enthusiastic were the Democrats about bringing a new voters if I I think you could get at least half of them to register Republican with a little bit of work yeah and then you use AI to translate it into as many languages as you need so if you keep the differences between Democrat and Republican to let's say four items uh one will allow the government to transition your child to another gender without telling you just simple stuff right um and if there's only let's say four bullet points on each one you could on one document you could translate it into you know 80% of the the languages they use just use AI wouldn't take you but a moment um Jonathan turle is talking about these so-called enhanced sentences so some of the the January 6 people got enhanced meaning longer sentences because there was an argument there was something about it that made it extra bad even within the field of crime that they were alleged to have committed but I didn't know this that did you know that uh in a TV interview at some point wasn't recently but Justice official uh Michael Sherwin he said quote our office wanted to ensure that there was shock and awe meaning that the sentences were extra stiff shock and awe um there was sh it worked because we saw through the media post that people were afraid to come back to DC because they're like if we go there we're going to get charged we wanted to take out those individuals that essentially were thumbing their noses at the public for what they did does any of that sound like justice no no that's not even close I can't even believe he said this out loud can you believe somebody said that in public that we charged them you know to make an example of them basically well that should be enough reason to let them all out yeah yeah have you have you asked yourself what that day would look like imagine a trump Victory imagine he signs the you know the the whatever document to free them all and imagine you actually watch the video of all of them leaving jail just just hold that in your mind you just see them all just streaming out of jail yeah that if I wouldn't care about anything else in this election but that that's the one thing you got to get right or I don't care about anything else don't even want to live here if they stay in jail I don't even want to live in this country you got to get that right then we'll talk about taxes and you know immigration Wars and stuff very important but not as important as this not as important as freeing those political prisoners that's my number one that's my number one and and if you told me um Trump is a a rapist and he continues to rape people every day I'd still support him because of just that one thing there's nothing you could tell me about Trump you know whether it's true or not true that would make me not be willing to free those prisoners if he's the only one willing to do it if nobody else is willing to do it he's your man and I don't care what else you say is he a felon do you think I care do you think do you think I care if he gets convicted no I care that he lets the January 6 people out of jail do you think I care that he didn't do enough about fenadol I do care but it wouldn't make any difference in my vote because nobody else is doing anything either and I think it's obvious that we want that to happen we meaning whoever actually runs the country has decided that they're that that's an acceptable expense of lives yeah no there's nothing you can tell me about Trump that would make any difference to my support of him as long as the January 6 is are in jail nothing else matters in fact if I were running for president I wouldn't even say anything else I just say you know what you know what I will do for president you've already seen it I'm going to let these guys out in jail now that would probably only work for the Republicans right so it probably wouldn't let him get elected you the Democrats would say ah you insurrectionist but yeah if you're if you on the political right and you put anything above that issue I don't know how you do it but what what is a higher issue than people who have your opinion being put in jail that's basically what's happening there's nothing higher than that nothing all right um you know you thought that Fortran was an old computer language from the 70s does anybody remember Fortran well now there's a new name for it and wokeness is telling us about a family that has four children and they're all TR all four all four kids are trans yeah uh let's see let's calculate the odds odds having one trans kid one in 3,000 according to end wokeness uh the odds of having four all four it's not just four but it's all four 100% it's uh let's see do the math 3,000 to the fourth power that'd be one 187 billion so there's this video of the very proud parents oh my God are they proud that they reverse the genders of all of their children all four of them and they're beaming with pride and they made a video because they're so proud they'd like you to share in their Glory yeah and that's legal now let's show this story to the uh the migrants and say hey if you vote Democrat you can have this too we can reverse the genders of all of your children and here's the good part we don't even have to check in with you we can do it while they're at school literally all right um over 73% of registered voters think Biden is too old including 56% of Democrats and it's a new poll but it's in line with other polls and I love the fact that the Democrats are still pretending there's nothing wrong we're getting closer and closer to that Monty Python skit aren't we that parro is dead no it's not now why isn't that more of a meme all right I challenge you I want you to find the Monty Python dead parrot sketch and I want you to use AI to replace the parrot's head with Joe Biden's head can do that for me it's all I ask today just use Ai and do that skit but it's got to be Biden's head as the little parrot who's dead well he's dead no he's not now uh I here's a thing that I I think Trump has figured out which is things are so absurd that mockery is the only right answer like defending yourself would be just stupid you should just mock how insanely stupid it is and how they're playing you for stupid because they're really playing you for stupid seriously playing you for stupid all right uh there's a New York Times Sienna poll that I think it was Molly Hemingway was or somebody was I think it was Molly was pointing out that uh in the past has been a little skewed Pro Biden so you'd expect their poll to show Biden in the best possible light if they were acting the way they've acted before but instead they're showing Trump would beat Biden 48 to 43 which is pretty healthy margin because at one point you know I think they had the same poll you know in Prior prior election 2020 uh they had a uh they had Biden up by 14 now of course the final vote was nothing like that but at the final vote they still had him up by nine they had him up by nine on Election Day all right so you know that they're seemingly we don't know because we can't read minds but seemingly they just seem to be a political pole that is in the bag for Biden but even they have given up it looks like a 19point swing since that you know the biggest biggest sport they ever showed for Biden 19p Point swing so how do you explain that he's still there yeah isn't it super obvious that he can't win under normal circumstances now here's what's really fun if it's true as Tucker says that the elections are all fake and they've been maybe fake for a long time and that the CIA or whoever it is can uh control them any way they want you know for in a variety of ways they can change laws about you know the mailing votes they can they can get Google to be more biased you there probably A Million Ways they can do things uh and maybe even directly with the vote but we don't have any proof of that um a lot of strong suspicions and an inability to check by the way if there's ever question and the and you're not allowed to check you just assume that the election is rigged so my understanding is that there's now a still a room full of ballots that some people said were fake that the judge simply just doesn't rule on it to rule whether they can open the door and look at them now in my opinion there were there's no way there's still a bunch of evidence in a room that hasn't been removed I don't think there's any chance that that room has something in it but the fact that they won't unlock it that's I would consider that proof that the election is rigged would you what what do you consider proof you know you got your scientific proof but that doesn't really apply you've got your legal courtroom proof but it's not being handled by the court the courts ignoring it if the cor had ruled and opened that door in Georgia I guess is and then we looked you know maybe there's something there maybe there isn't but then we would say well at least the court is doing its Court thing but if the court refuses to let you look just yeah your working assumption should be oh that's proof if they won't let you check that's proof and I think that should be the standard so likewise on January 6 the fact there was so much resistance to Simply taking a little time to make sure that's not scientific proof it's not legal proof but on a working basis for a citizen trying to understand what's true that's proof yeah if your government won't show you something about an election that's proof it was rigged I I I think that's a reasonable definition in the realm of Elections as to what proof actually means what the word mean because remember a scientific proof and a legal proof they're not the same we use the word proof different a a math proof is not the same as a science proof and a legal proof is not the same as a math proof or a science proof three different proofs I believe there is also a political proof a political proof is we're not going to show you even though it's right here it's right behind behind this door but we're not going to open it for you and we're not going to give you a reason why we won't show you that's a political proof anybody disagree refusing to show you something that can be shown to you because it's not proprietary that's a proof so if you say it's been proved and you say this is how I is how I Define it whenever there's a lack of transparency from the government have I ever said this before citizens are innocent until proven guilty you don't want to change that but governments are not citizens they're entities The Entity is always guilty until they prove they're not because all entities will be corrupt if you can't check everybody knows that if there's any entity that you can't check what's going on and there's money involved or power of course are corrupt it's only transparency it's only transparency that protects you there's nothing else not a single other thing but transparency we don't have it for the election and so it was rigged you don't have to wonder about it that and and by the way I believe that that standard of what I'm calling proof you know here I'm defining my own terms I believe it's as rigorous as at least the scientific proof is certainly as rigorous as a political proof I would I will not go so far as to say it's as rigorous as a math proof right that's hard to beat but certainly science and the courts are a little bit subjective even if they try not to be so yeah you can you can be a little bit subjective and still make it a proof there's a standard for that all right and of course mailin ballots is pretty much proof of rigging if if if there's a a a push for mailin ballots that doesn't seem to fit the situation like like the need for it is not demonstrated that that's proof of fraud in my in my opinion all right uh the same poll I think it was that shows Trump winning Hispanics well there's a poll in the real world the United States in 20124 that has Trump handily ahead 46 to 40 with Hispanic voters now actually yeah with voters it's not even just Hispanics it's voters is that possible let let me make a prediction I'm going to make the most radical prediction but I'm not going to I'm not going to predict it as a certainty for the first time ever and only because of the special situation with Biden falling apart and the Border being open under that weird special situation Trump could win the black vote outright I'm not going to predict that as in like a certainty but it it is on the table now at the moment it's not close at the moment it's not close and and by the way he doesn't have any chance of winning black women so let me modify that I believe that Trump could win black men outright he doesn't have a chance with black women you're forgetting the election is already decided but let's say in the polling right let's just say in the polling I I think you're right that the actual election is uh almost certainly certain to be rigged because I think they always have been um but I I think the polling on Election Day could show that he's winning with black men I feel he's one story away you know one good narrative away he's not there he doesn't have a narrative that could make that happen but you know what he does have what's he had what what does he have this time that he never had before yeah this time he's got a vake this time he's got a vake and it's really sort of a messaging challenge right so he's got the best messaging person of all time and you know we we laugh about the sneakers um the sneakers is not nothing it's not nothing yeah it's funny that you was so on the nose it sounds like you know trying too hard or something but somehow he pulled it off he actually pulled it off and here's what I think you're missing when Trump introduces sneakers the Democrats say ah he's pandering is he or is he showing he understands a segment of the world in a way that the Democrats missed I think it shows an understanding of Black America yeah on a level that we haven't seen and I don't mean you know I like sneakers they like sneakers not that simple I I think there's a deeper thing with the the status of Footwear you know I've heard other people say um if you can't afford to have a mansion you know you could have a little status in your Footwear or your your your bag you know so it's something like that yeah and the Hillary with the H sauce was just that felt like pandering but there's something about Trump and the golden snakers and the fact that they were huge success that I'm not even sure I understand but I feel like that's there's something deeper than pandering that's going on there that feels like feels like understanding some d dnamic that maybe I don't understand likewise when Trump says that his his legal problems could help him with black voters and then the Democrats say you racist are you saying that black people are defined by the legal system and of course it's nothing like that it's just do you believe the system is rigged against you if you feel like the system is just obviously right in everybody's face rigged against you you're going to have a little bit of feeling of solidarity with somebody who's also feeling the system rigged against them can you think of an example like that yeah you just saw one I just gave you one I just told you that my top political thing is freeing the January 6 people do you think I would have been there do you think I would have been there beaten up a cop destroying property nope nope no am I am I relating to the January 6 people because hey I'm an insurrectionist and they're insurrectionist nope am I relating to them because it's obvious that they were targeted for being white mostly yes that's how I relate to them I relate to them as someone who's been targeted unfairly by the system and I relate to that now let's say let's change all their uh ethnicities it's mostly mostly white people in January 6 jail suppose they were all black how would I feel about it then would I would I be able to relate I'd be like ah different problem than my situation nope same same if if thousands of black let's say Republicans had been locked up it's still my number one topic because I would still relate to it I would still relate to it the the color of their skin honestly I don't think I thought once in until today I don't think I thought once about the fact that the January Sixers were mostly white they're not all white they're not all white but mostly it just wasn't you know that wasn't the point of compar the point of comparison is living in a country where that can happen I don't want it to happen to them I don't want it to happen to anybody black ever and I don't want it to happen to me so that's that's my point of you know if um you know if if it ever came down to like a a physical Revolution I want on my side the people who think like me I don't need on my side the people look like me I want them to think like me right then you're on my team you know when things get dangerous all right um so here's another thing we could mock so the bid Administration is uh limiting the natural gas production I guess in this country but not so much the drilling of the oil which is interesting I don't know how they explain it but the idea is that uh you know Natural Gas um you know you could find some substitutes say the green people but then the Lesser green people say gas is cleaner than whatever else you're using at the moment so why wouldn't you use the cleaner alternative well it turns out that that analysis is not very straightforward because when you're looking at substitutions you can never know exactly who substitutes what for what so it's not entirely clear that limiting natural gas even helps you for CO2 because limiting that people might substitute something worse but they also might substitute something better and it might be different in a different country right so somebody might try harder to do solar um but somebody else might just say well I better burn coal because I don't have time to build me a solar plant so economists can't really sort this one out um I think it's an easy one I think you sell you sell the uh natural gas until you got a better idea to me it seems straightforward but I would take it from let's say a pure manager perspective you know if you knew at the moment it was better than the Alternatives I'd probably do it and try to figure out something later um but here's my question since you cannot use math and economics to support limiting natural gas because it's a questionable proposition economically and even CO2 wise would you say that the Biden Administration is following the science their their entire thing is follow the science so don't you think that they owe us a an analysis perhaps a model for climate change they like to use models they should produce a model they should here we are cutting the cutting the natural gas and here you can see how this follows through to reducing you know this line on co2 if that's their argument and their whole deal is you got to be compatible with science why don't we hold them to their own standard and make them compatible with science well it's because they've been gaslighting and they've never been compatible with science because you know what is not a science models everybody who thinks that a a projection model is science has really been brainwashed it's closer to the opposite yeah um do do you think that I could create a model or here's a challenge for you would you bet a million dollars against my claim that I can create a model that will predict the GDP of America in 10 years so that's my claim I can create a prediction model that'll hit the GDP of America 10 years from now on this on the same dat who would bet against me it's easy do you want me to tell you how I could do it easily and I know you're thinking hey nobody can predict the future like that I I could create a model that I would bet a million dollars will be right do you know how I do it I would create a thousand models every one of them would be you know off by a tenth of a percentage point and then I would give you all thousand models and I'd say in 10 years I'm going to tell you which one of those was right and then I'm going to claim that I created a model that predicted it and you know what it would be true because that would be the model you had it for 10 years I'm pointing to it it's the exact number that is the you know reality there you go now you're saying but Scott that's not like climate change models no it is that's how they do it you didn't know how they do it they have hundreds of models and they do something called hind casting which is making sure that it would have worked if it had existed in the past up to today do you know how they do that they make so many models the some of them by coincidence will be in the range of what is reality and then they tell you and here's the big scam that therefore it can predict the future nope think about my thousand models about the GDP one of them was right can it predict the fure future no it wasn't right because it was right it was right because there were a thousand of them and one was was going to be pretty close I threw away everything that wasn't you know within that range of something it could have been how many of you did not know that you can make the models do anything including match the past it has no predictive value none yeah some of you do it but if you don't if you don't do this for a living or you don't listen to somebody like me who did it for a living which is projecting the future as funny as that is um you would never know you if you're an ordinary person you don't know that a metaanalysis is usually fake you don't know that a observational study shouldn't be trusted at all you wouldn't know that peer reviewed means coin flip doesn't mean anything it's just a coin flip yeah yes no about 50% so anyway um here's another funny thing that axios is treating the weather the way they treat Trump they're treating the weather they're reporting on the weather the same way as Trump so you know how they're uh the the left leing people are covering Trump what they're not not saying is that his policies from his first term were bad have you noticed that wh which of his first term policies are they railing against oh we don't want to do that again none there's not even a single policy that they oppose which of his new proposed policies are they saying are a bad idea uh I can't think of any well you know but abortion is settled it's going to the states that's not even a trump issue in my opinion you know you could federalize it but nobody's going to do it I don't think it's going to get federalized so instead what did they do about Trump well first of all they're trying to Gaslight you that he's the one with dementia I love that one right yeah he's the one with dementia do you have any names uh I forget when I'm just doing my podcast here how many times have you heard me try to remember like the name of the Speaker of the House or something like really easy names and I'll be like what what's that name and then you'll say it in the comments I'll go oh yeah a I'll just like forget names it's very common when you're talking about politics do you do you know how many names that Trump has had to remember in his life the people he's met is is like an insane number of people to not hundreds it's thousands it it's way over hundreds probably the PE the number of people he would need to remember would be I don't know 8 to 10,000 or something just crazy numbers but here's what axio says about the the weather February's extreme weather event uh did some bad things what do they call Trump extreme Mega because there's nothing wrong with the mega so you call it extreme what was wrong with the weather well apparently the cold weather doesn't really match the whole global warming thing you know even though I know climate change could be Extremes in either direction but it doesn't f fit the narrative so well so they just say it's extreme they're actually insulting the weather the same way they're insulting Trump because they don't have a better thing to say extreme if they start saying that the weather is chaotic or possibly white supremacist I guess that's where we're heading that weather have you noticed that the snow always white yeah yeah the snow is too white and too extreme yep they only have one set of things to say and I have a prediction my prediction is if it rains hard on Election Day X year will report it as a coup all right that's my joke of the day they'll reported as a coup because they can't tell the difference between the weather and Trump because they're both extreme all right uh I have a challenge and a question for you um so our debt is approaching 35 trillion we're adding a trillion every 100 days or so and how do we survive that I don't know because the problem's been around long enough where people would at least be mentioning potential Solutions because I've never seen one and here's my challenge I want to see Jamie Diamond or Bill Amman and I pick them because they're credible I would call them reasonably Centrist but Democrat I think they're both Democrat but reasonably Centrist and experts at finance and I want them to explain to the rest of us how in any scenario we're not doomed in any scenario because I'm not aware of one I honestly can't think of anyway we're not doomed so have you ever heard have you ever seen Jamie Diamond say look there is a way out you'd have to let's say cut government 20% you'd have to get GDP up to six you know which would be crazy at the same time you'd have to you know you'd have to manage inflation so maybe you'd want more than usual but that cuts into your debt a little bit so if you do these three things you might be able to you know reduce the rate of growth enough that we can survive don't you want to see that how about Warren Buffett can Warren Buffett explain to the the public oh yeah there is a way out it would be very very hard but if we do the hard things we can actually do it I don't think there's a hard path I believe there's none I believe there's none and the smartest people even the ones who are in the same team you know in theory as the administration even they can't tell you any kind of scenario in which we survive which makes me wonder if there is a secret plan do you think there's a secret plan because I'm trying to think of what would be big enough to pay off our natural debt well how about if we put Russia out of the energy business and then we took their market share you got really quiet didn't you what if the Ukraine war is the only way we can pay off our debt in other words there's no way that the normal growth of the economy will pay it off but but if we just owned energy we just owned it you know you couldn't even buy energy unless you're buying it from us you know maybe other people too but you definitely have to get it from us too there just isn't enough if we owned Russia and we owned their gas station we could probably pay off the debt with GDP growth you know we would be robbing Russia to do it I mean literally we'd be robbing them but you need a lot of money and actually I'm not even sure if Russia has enough would that even be enough if Russia stopped spending money on itself and just gave it all to us I don't think it's enough right how about the growth of the robot economy will we go to a super cycle in which um the robot growth is so big it's bigger than cars bigger than computer computer is bigger than the internet maybe might but would that be enough to get us under debt I don't know again can Elon Musk explain to us in the best case scenario if we mine an asteroid and robots are big and AI is big is that enough I think not probably not and I wonder that the real play is that the government knows that money is going to go away I wonder if the real play is that the people who really know what's going on think that our money will just go away and they'll just be crypto or something else or we don't need money or the government gives us a coupon or something I know but uh certainly like the know the answer that all right uh Gaza is a mess um and the US is helping out we dropped 66 bundles air dropped uh of 38,000 meals we dropped into Gaza on the beach there 38,000 meals there are over a million people starving and they probably need more than one meal a day to be healthy is this just are we just trying to make it look like we're doing something I mean I'm glad we're doing something but and then I also don't understand why would you give them food in Gaza how does that even make sense is isn't the entire thing that Israel is trying to accomplish is to drain out all the citizens so they can kill whatever's left and then someday people can go back shouldn't you put 100% of the food just under the city limits and say fre food you just have to come here to get it and then do what they need to when everybody's out the city so I don't know war is terrible there's yeah everybody's bad that's that's my everybody's bad I'll just keep it at that well the number that the uh Hamas puts out for the death toll is at 30,000 we should not believe numbers like that because it's coming from a sketchy Source but but I remind you that all numbers come from sketchy sources all of them and we do come to believe some even if they're not true um so I think this 30,000 number as non-credible as it is is going to enter our Consciousness as the narrative and they're pushing hard and I think they can push it hard enough to enter it as the narrative at 30,000 if it becomes a narrative again not the truth truth but simply what people imagine is the truth um that that will completely destroy the uh I know reputation of Israel for generations and I think the rest of the world will call it genocide what do you think now again I'm not giving you my opinion uh I'm saying that under this situation that that number of people in that short at a time on that size of a population for these conditions you know this situation I believe that most of the world the majority will come to see this death toll as the real one even if it isn't and because that they will come to see it as a genocide I don't think there's anything that worse that could happen for Israel's reputation so I'm not sure how they navigate it um I'm just pointing out that they most important asset which is the Goodwill of other countries um is largely gone and makes you wonder how that's going to work out now again that's not my opinion you know I'm not I'm not criticizing Israel because my take on it is you could criticize them all day long but they're going to do what they're going to do and you don't have to love it but you're not going to stop it all right um that ladies and gentlemen is my fantastic Funday Sunday show and uh whoa ran long I didn't even know that thanks for joining on the xplatform and on Rumble and on the racist You.

Tube channel uh I'll see you again tomorrow thanks for joining

[Music]

good morning everybody and welcome to

the highlight of human

civilization if you'd like to take this

experience up to levels that could only

be described as

Galactic well then all you need is a cup

or mug or glass a tankered sheler Stein

a canteen Jer flask a vessel of any kind

fill it with your favorite liquid I like

coffee and join me now for the

unparallel pleasure of the dopamine the

end of the day the thing that makes

everything better it's called The Sim

thing you said but happens now

go oh H surprisingly

good how often does a surprise turn out

to be better than you thought have you

ever noticed

that that you don't often get surprised

with something that's better than you

thought

it's about a 3:1 ratio oh that's a

surprise 3: one I don't know why all

right here's something I don't think

I've said too often maybe never uh if

you don't subscribe to the Dilbert comic

which you can now only get by

subscription on the

xplatform or on locals at Scott adams.

locals where you get lots of other stuff

as well um you would miss today's um

today's Sunday

comic and I'm just going to tell you two

things about

it in the first panel Dilbert tells his

boss he wants to

transition that's the first thing I'm

going to tell you about it second thing

I'm going to tell you about it is it

might be the funniest thing I've ever

written it might be now you can judge

for yourself but it might be the

funniest thing I've ever written so look

at the comments if you don't believe me

the they're saying it right

now I saw a post on X saying the CNN was

considering canning Anderson Cooper and

Chris

Wallace is that true can I get a fact

check on that since what do they tell

you who they're considering firing that

doesn't sound true to me does

it like who who has that conversation

you

know we're we're really thinking hard

about getting of our top host I don't

know I'm got to put a big question mark

next to that one

yeah I'm going to say I don't believe it

yet if you want to see something that's

really funny I just po uh I just uh

reposted it it's a uh compilation of

Morning Joe talking about Trump in 2016

when they liked them and then it's a

quick cut to 2024 when they don't like

him oh you have to see it I don't think

there's anything that's ever been on TV

that's as entertaining as watching

moring Joe being normal and nice and

then flipping uh watching him in you

know deep

TDS I can't even explain it you just

have to see it yourself all right um SNL

was mocking Joe Biden for his lack of

vigor the

funniest the funniest line was

uh one of the characters said he had a

grandpa monkey

grip grandpa monkey

grip he and he can jump over walls and

he's so v he's so much full of

vigor so what does it tell you when CNL

SNL I just combined CNN and SNL but what

does it tell you when SNL is openly

mocking one of the candidates and

happens to be a

Democrat they're very done with him I

feel like they're very done with him

yeah and at least SNL has the

self-awareness to know even if they

prefer him as president you know they

know physically and mentally he's kind

of gone so that's I I give them credit

for being honest about that because they

didn't have to be you know we're in this

weird world where if they just

ignored that one president can barely

function they could have gotten away

with it it probably wouldn't have made

any difference to their numbers but they

played it straight and I appreciate

that there's a video of Sergey Bren one

of the founders of Google talking about

the uh new problems they have with her

racist um AI that shows everybody

looking black no matter what they were

and Sergey said uh yeah we messed up on

uh image

generation and he thought that the

reason that maybe they messed up was

wait for

it not enough

testing not enough

testing

now ah you know I'm no entrepreneur who

created the biggest company most

impressive company I don't know if it's

the biggest but most impressive company

in the world um

but

Sergey I don't think it was a testing

problem I think it tested just the way

they built it that's why they rolled it

out that's why I think and you know what

else it's not an image problem it's the

whole damn thing it's not an image

problem you want to find out if it's an

image problem or if it's just

broken try to Google

this uh crime by

demographic

do it just Google crime by demographic

group do you know what comes

up uh lots of stories about how black

people are the biggest victims of

crime so is that because they didn't

test it enough because you know some

people when they do that search

sometimes they're looking for who's the

biggest victims a crime so that's

totally

appropriate but other times they're

trying to figure out who's committing

the crimes

such as you know are migrants doing more

crimes are immigrants doing more crimes

is there any difference you know that

that we can identify and I'm not saying

there's a reason for it because that

gets into a racist territory but

certainly you should understand it and

and the demographic um nature of it is

part of understanding it even if you

know the reasons that you give to the

underlying

problem should be you know probably

deeper than the ones we give it

yeah no there's the Google is completely

broken and has nothing to do with

testing you know the way I interpret

that is if we tested it better we could

have gotten away with it and what I mean

by gotten away with it is making it

anti-white it was just a little bit too

anti-white so they didn't get away with

it that's really all there was if they

made it subtle like the the search

results I just mentioned if you weren't

looking for that search result you

wouldn't know that it's

completely illegitimate

basically um you wouldn't know

that but if you do any kind of searching

on anything that's a little bit

interesting you immediately find out the

whole thing is broken it doesn't give

you anything like anything like

interesting whatever you're looking for

it doesn't trust

you anyway no it's not a problem with

testing but it does suggest that maybe

they don't don't know how to fix it

there might be no way to fix it you know

some have suggested they have to fire

80% of their

staff and that's not going to happen so

now it looks unfixable interestingly

enough now here's a real

question is it possible that

AI could ever

replace Google as a search engine

because doesn't AI just sort of use

Google I mean you still need the basic

search engine and AI just sits on top of

it right so I don't think that AI can

replace

it um and does anybody have any you know

data that's not that's not corrupted

that way I don't know so I don't know I

I suppose that uh Google will continue

being the brain of the world now you're

completely aware that if Google decides

that the President should be X or Y they

they get to decide

right in our current system whoever

Google decides to make president they

just they could just change the

algorithm and make him president did you

know that now it might not work in this

specific case because Biden is just you

know disintegrating in front of us

that's that might be the special case

but if the election was supposed to be

close then Google

decides or mailin ballots decide the

only thing that doesn't decide for sure

is the

voters I think the only purpose for

voting is to create the illusion that it

was close so that whatever the bad guys

do to rig it it won't be so obvious it

was rigged so I think the only purpose

of voting at the moment is to hide the

rigging would you

agree well let's see what Tucker says um

Wall Street Apes had this post so Tucker

was talking about the CIA controlling

election and I'm just going to read his

whole four paragraph thing and I want to

see if this matches where you

are all right is this where you are in

understanding your world so Tucker says

the fact that CIA is playing uh is

playing in domestic politics and

actually has for a long time is shocking

you can't have that the reason I'm so

mad is I really believe in the idea of

representative government acknowledging

its imperfections but like I should have

have some say I live here I'm a citizen

the the fact that they would be

tampering with American democracy is so

outrageous to me and I don't know why is

only Glenn Greenwald mad about it now

that's what I say why why do I read

every

day Glenn Greenwall making claims about

you know the elections and not the

elections but just the government being

a sort of an intelligence asset

basically and nobody really fact checks

them have you noticed that nobody fact

checks them because it's

true there's nothing to fact check and

he can do it all day long and we just

act like it's just somebody

talking instead of the most important

thing happening in the world yeah the

Glen

who I'll talk about the octopus in a

second uh then he says uh uh blah blah

blah about Glenn greenwald's claims

about the CIA Tucker says I mean it's

confirmed it's not like a fever dream

that's what I keep saying we know it's

true and he goes it's real they played

it in the last election domestically and

I guess it shows how dumb I am because

they've been doing that for many years

the guy who took out uh mosad day lived

on my

street uh I'm one of the results CIA

officer what I don't know what that

means so I mean again I grew up around

this stuff but I never really thought I

never I never reached the obvious

conclusion which is that wait for it

here comes the obvious conclusion and

see if this sounds familiar to you the

obvious

conclusion which is that if the US

government subverts democracy in other

countries in the name of democracy it

will over time subvert democracy in my

country why wouldn't

it does that sound

familiar that's why I've been for a

while now if you create an entity who

become really good at overthrowing

countries and they do it 80 times in a

row successfully I don't know how many

in a row but 80 times

successfully they're going to overthrow

your country because they can and they

will come up with a

justification because they can they came

up with justifications for all the other

countries you know they don't do it

without some kind of cover story so all

they is a cover story that's the easiest

thing in the world oh the other one's a

dictator better overthrow the country

save

democracy yeah so um I

remember do do you remember when you

first realized that we didn't live in a

in a republic and maybe we hadn't for a

long time how how many of you remember

like the moment you said

oh this was never even

real in my lifetime I don't know if it

was ever real maybe when I was when I

was two maybe maybe during

Eisenhower maybe I don't

know but I don't feel that I live in

anything like a republic or a you know

Democratic Republic how many of you feel

like you're living in a republic like

it's it's actually the will of the

people and you know it's imperfect but

it's basically good yeah now I wonder if

any Republicans feel they're living in a

republic

anymore I don't

know yeah it it's it's weird that that

could change well I watched uh started

watching I haven't finished yet the uh

Netflix series a new series called The

Octopus murders and I can't I can't

entirely summarize it for you because

it's so complicated there are a lot of

names involved but that's part of the

story The Octopus is all the names

involved

so the basic idea is that there was some

guy that they think was CIA connected

who was doing all these Ops around the

world and one of them was he sort of

took over an Indian

reservation and then he used it for

illegal selling illegal drugs and

gambling uh to make some illegal money

and then started inviting in the US uh I

guess some arms

dealers that were working with the CIA

so they could do illegal arms stuff to

get I don't know they were going to give

the arms to the contas or something so

they used the Indian Reservation because

it's not America per se to do illegal

things that you couldn't do or you

wouldn't want to get caught if he did

somewhere else what's that sound

like that's

Ukraine it's just creating a place where

the CIA can operate with impunity to do

all the dirty stuff they need to do and

it's not in the United

States and so they're alleged that there

are many murders that um are associated

with the CIA and they're they're a

murderous bunch of drug dealing people

but here are the things which if this

stuff is true of course who knows I

believe there was there was a suggestion

that they wanted to use the Indian

reservation for a bioweapons

lab did I hear that right I was sort of

half falling asleep that so they're

going to use does this sound familiar

it's basically the Ukraine play and then

you can see that they've already tested

it so it must be common operation to

find the most Lawless

Place partner with the most dangerous

people sell

drugs to make dirty money that you can

use for whatever you're

doing it's all there so basically

everything you assumed about the CIA

everything you ever assumed about

Ukraine it's all their modeled as not

just I'm not going to say that they

practice there to do it in Ukraine what

I'm saying is it must be part of the the

toolbox of the trade to do exactly what

Ukraine is so it doesn't surprise you at

all yeah it's all

there all right so uh when when you see

that the uh cartels seem to have freedom

to bring drugs into this country and you

say to yourself I'm sure we could have

done more to stop it it's because we're

not stopping it you know I don't believe

that the border

patrol is working with the CIA to Lad

drugs in the country that's not

happening there there's no evidence that

I think the border patrol is trying to

stop it and wondering why they don't

have the right tools and why nobody's

helping him that's that's cuz somebody's

probably making money on

it

so you got that uh another story the

University of Florida um terminated all

of its Dei

people and now that's going to be

illegal it is illegal in Florida to

teach Dei in their schools now that's

still leaves the

corporations so it's not like a gigantic

win but but at least she got it out of

the corporations that's or you got out

the

schools now here's my

question imagine if you had taken up a

job a cubical job to be a Dei

professional and then you hear that

Florida decided that you you the person

in that job is too dangerous to even be

allowed to operate in the state state

schools cu that's what happened they

didn't say let's get rid of Dei because

it's not giving us benefit for the money

they didn't say that they said it's

dangerous that it makes things

worse imagine that's your

job your job as Dei and you just just

found out one of our biggest

states had a vote and decided is just

really bad for the state we got to get

ad made it

illegal how many other things are

illegal that basically are talking and

teaching you know Dei is a lot of

talking and

teaching it's kind of amazing and I was

trying to think what other jobs are

illegal in some states but not

others and I thought it too so you

couldn't be an abortion doctor where

abortions

illegal right abortionist uh you

couldn't have a weed

dispensary couldn't have a weed

dispensary

is there anything

else yeah not that they have anything in

common but um just imagine being in a

job that was some major State thought

about it hard and said you're bad for

the world or we're going to make you

illegal in our state oh prostitution

there's another one

yeah anyway so here's my question could

Trump ban Dei in the country by

executive

order could you ban

Dei

nationally in in corporations not just

government entities but

corporations could you ban it by

executive order now my understanding of

executive orders is very

thin but what I think it means usually

is there has to be some existing laws on

the

books or it would have to be you know

right within his job description somehow

I guess um he can only interpret

existing things is that right an

executive order is not a new law it's a

new way of interpreting some existing

law right so is there any existing law

that would allow somebody to do an EO EO

executive order that would ban it

nationally well would be oh a health

emergency there we go civil rights civil

rights

I would think civil rights would be

sufficient but I might have a better one

coming

up I'll make you wait for

it um well I won't make you wait for

it maybe I'll just skip right to

it

um I asked Google so you have to

question it whether uh you could sue

somebody

for

brainwashing is it illegal to brainwash

somebody that's kind of interesting

because where where's the dividing line

between just influencing and

brainwashing well I would say is this if

you're influencing somebody you know

just to vote for your candidate we

accept that that's good if you influence

somebody to buy your product we're okay

with that we don't call that

brainwashing but suppose you influence

somebody to do something that's clearly

damaging to them

personally what would that be called

well I would call that brainwashing and

I would think that that would be illegal

so if you're brainwashing somebody else

for your own benefit and there was no

benefit to the brainwash

person I would think that you're doing

something illegal so I looked it up and

uh let's see um it did say that there if

you inflict emotional abuse on people

yeah emotional

abuse could be the the the trigger for

the brainwashing being illegal if you

just brainwash somebody but they were

happy about it you're fine if you just

brain but if you brainwash them and

they're in great mental distress because

of it yeah that's that feels like you

actually attack them it's basically

assault and here's what I'd like to

see I'd love to see uh maybe Republicans

uh sue the DNC the Democrats and Sue the

Biden

Administration for brainwashing black

Americans into thinking they are

victims now here here's the

argument the argument is that we we know

very well that if you tell somebody

they're a victim they'll have a less

good life would you agree I I think 100%

of social science would agree that if

you tell somebody they're a victim you

know in the normal course of things I'm

not talking about somebody who's

literally a slave you could tell them

they're a victim maybe that's better

than not but in the normal course of you

know people just living and thriving in

in our society if you took one group of

them and you brainwash them into

believing they were the victims you

would be doing tremendous damage to

them personally

psychologically

economically socially you you could

actually decrease their ability to

reproduce literally because you know

let's say it you know causes them to

have some separation from the people

that they think are oppressing them and

maybe some of them would have married

some of those people in another the

world so you you can actually reduce

their ability to

reproduce their ability to you know

Thrive the ability to have a good job

now the whole point of Dei is if you

complain enough something good will

happen and that would be maybe the

defense maybe that would be the defense

hey something good will happen if we

complain enough but I'd like to see the

science I think the science would show

you that the conservatives who are black

in this country generally are

happier I I'll bet you could find that

in a poll there's your science do a poll

of conservative black Americans versus

your know liberal black Americans who do

you think would be

happier probably the ones who think they

can take their own fate into their own

hands the Republicans and make something

out of themselves even if there are

difficulties even if there is

discrimination that they can still

Thrive but if you thought you couldn't

Thrive because of all the Discrimination

you would be at a great psychological

economic disadvantage and now I don't

have any uh illusion that somebody could

win such a case but it would be the

greatest reframe of all

time the greatest reframe of all time

would be suing democrats for

brainwashing black

Americans into the worst situation they

could be in because of the

brainwashing all right and it has the

odd political quality of being true but

the the reframing of it would be amazing

you you could lose and win right you you

could lose the court case but you would

win by simply making it a thing that

people have to talk about that there

there is a difference between

persuading and

brainwashing right you know the

difference when you see it TDs is a

result of

brainwashing TDS did not happen on its

own that is your media brainwashing now

there might also be you know a CIA or

other intelligence agency involvement I

don't know if you could make that case

but you wouldn't need

to all right there's if you haven't seen

Trump mocking fonny Willis in his in his

latest uh rally

it's uh it's worth seeing he's pretty

darn funny about it he does he he does

say emotion I'll paraphrase but he was

talking about uh the boyfriend Wade uh

he so Trump said he was hired without

you know

experience the right kind of experience

in the law for the job he got from his

girlfriend but Trump says he had

experience of something else and then

Trump does his hand motion of like of

the sexual head

motion something no presidential

candidate has ever

done in the in the history of

presidential candidates nobody ever

stood in front of a crowd and did a and

did a humping each other hand motion

like how do you not love that like no

matter what you'll think of is politics

how do you not love

that anyway uh

he was very funny about that all right

uh Senator Chris Murphy from Connecticut

says the crime surge for migrants is

100% made up it's a right-wing invention

he says violent crime is way down and

let me tell you he's using all capital

letters for way and down so it's a big

difference because if he didn't use the

capitals I would have read that this way

violent crime is way down you wouldn't

be impressed by that no but the way he's

written with the capitals the way I read

his violent crime is weigh

down and that's different makes you feel

completely

different he says the drop in urban

murders this year was the largest in the

nation's history and that the data shows

that migrants commit crimes at lower

rates than the people who were real

already here at lower

rates is that true

well it turns out you can prove anything

with

data that data has no value it really

doesn't is it's just blah blah blah my

data can can he make his case with

data do you think that do you think that

Chris Murphy if he just had an argument

with data could he make his case yes yes

the data is completely on his

side but is that therefore his narrative

is

correct

no because I'm pretty sure that one

extra death is a little bit too much so

his argument about the rate I think is

actually true

historically but you know what's not

true that migration today looks like

historical

migration you can't use the old data to

tell me what the new migrants are going

to do

now it might be the same but the data

won't tell you that because the data is

about a certain kind of migration from a

certain set of countries and those

people really really just wanted to work

and they didn't want to get

deported they didn't come here for

crime and they actually I believe have a

lower crime rate than population General

I

think I can use a fact check on that but

I think historically

people really want to stay off of law

enforcement's radar and just work so

they actually did have a lower crime

rate

um yeah so that could be true but it

could also be true that you know any

extra deaths or too much that's just a

different different way of looking at

the same

data now are we bringing in um the same

kind of IM migrants or immigrants that

we used to it looks like no there there

is certainly a suggestion that the

Venezuelan criminals got in of jail and

ran up here you know the very thing that

Trump said might happen actually

happened it looks like now if they're

entering the jails I would imagine that

there would be some locations where the

crime goes up maybe so be careful of

uh be careful of all the um assumptions

about data you can prove anything you

want with the data but I I do want to

give the uh the immigrants who are

already here um a little bit of

respect if you don't mind I about a

little bit of respect for the immigrants

who are here and just want to work and

just want to be

Americans I'm seeing some of you saying

no no respect

really no respect for somebody who loves

their God and their family and they're

in a bad situation and they're willing

to do what they need to make it right

and even though it's illegal to come

here what they want is to just make a

good legal life and contribute to the

country you don't respect

that because they broke a law to do

it interesting I would I would argue

that you've been deeply brainwashed for

that

opinion that that's not a that's not a

natural

opinion that's a that's a brainwashed

opinion I I hate to tell my own you know

we're we're all brainwashed by the way

including me we're all brainwashed maybe

in slightly different

ways but if you can't find it in

yourself to respect someone who came

from another country wanted to be

American wanted to work wanted to obey

all the laws after coming in illegal

illegally perhaps you can't you can't

find a way to respect that

really you don't have to like it by the

way it's it's a different argument if

you think we should close the border

that's separate I'm just saying that if

you're just looking at the people the

human beings they're human beings just

trying to get along now I'm I'm for very

strong borders and very tough vetting so

we're only letting in people who can

help us all right but that's a separate

conversation you you can still you can

still respect the

people right you're you're tough

graders you're very tough

graders yeah I don't know well so part

of it is I put myself in their

situation and I say to myself if I were

in some country and I knew that if I

took a risk I could get here and I could

you know make make something to myself

and I just want to follow the law

there's just this one law I'm going to

violate to get

here would I feel bad about

myself I don't think I would I think I

would respect my choice if it worked out

and my second generation was completely

legal and had a good life and went to

school so are are the is there anybody

here who would think it would be more

respectable to stay in your native

country and

starve versus breaking a law to try to

get to a new place how many of you think

it's more respectable to stay there and

let your family

starve I don't know I think you can

consider that we're all

brainwashed by the way that's that's a

really good mental

experiment don't assume it's the other

people the other people are definitely

brainwashed no doubt about that but if

your level of awareness is only the

other people are getting

brainwashed I I'm here to help you up to

the next level right I'm here to help

I'm not from the government I'm here I'm

actually here to help I would actually

like you to understand when it happens

to you if you only see it when it's

happening to somebody else that's you

know that's grade school that's easy I'm

trying to take you up to at least junior

college level where you can see it's

happening to you as well if you can't

see it happening to you you're really

going to be lost you have to know it's

happening to you it's very very

important all right um I know it's

uncomfortable to have that thought in

your

head uh Biden saying the border is

insecure because of

trump let's just talk about uh sort of

the theme I was getting

to that the level of gaslighting during

the election season is so of the chart

and I I don't

know I don't know if it's worse than

ever it feels like it is but maybe we

think that all the time I don't know so

how how much of a Gaslight is it to say

that Trump's the reason that the border

is

open I that's just

insane it's insane and the story that

theyve sold to I don't know at least

half of their own people is that if that

b if that Bill had passed the Border

would be closed

how how little would you have to know

about this situation to think that

that's

true you would have to know almost

nothing about the situation to to buy

that and the fact that Biden says it and

you know it's the standard line now

really does suggest that they know how

dumb their voters

are they're really playing their voters

for idiots right because there's lots

you could say that would be not exactly

what Trump says there's a whole bunch of

things you could say which is Trump

honestly says this we honestly say this

we think our thing is better they can't

do that all they can do is make up the

most absurd lie that Trump's responsible

for it now I do

believe that Trump said it would be

better for my election results if he

don't pass the Bill do you believe that

part do you believe that Trump ever did

say you know it'd be better off if we

don't pass it I believe he said that but

not the way they're interpreting it it

doesn't make sense to do a bad Bill if

it's also politically bad that's what I

heard the Bill's

bad but passing it would be twice as bad

it's two bad things the bill itself and

then the politics of passing it if they

could claim it worked or that it's going

to work any day

now so yeah uh I think Trump is

completely it's completely normal thing

to say this would be bad to pass this

politically but it's also just a bad

bill which we we

observe all right because it didn't

really address the core

problems

um here's the funniest

thing I I really don't think that

Democrats understand that uh that

replacement theory that they keep

complaining about you know um a lot of

people on the right keep saying hey

they're trying to replace us they're

going to try to replace us and they're

usually thinking uh I guess white

Republicans or something they're trying

to replace

us well you know how the future is

impossible to predict Ain that anything

yeah we just most things are just

unpredictable here's what I think might

be

happening the migrants might be

replacing us but only the the

Democrats I think the migrants are

replacing the

Democrats

and because what are how many of the

migrants have blue hair has anybody seen

the have you seen the thousands and

thousands of

migrants I look for the blue-haired

ones and I also I'm wondering how many

of them are

trans have you seen the numbers are are

you saying that no trans people are

coming across the border I feel like

that group should be carved down for

special

protection no trans no blue hair no

trans and uh are they rejecting religion

the people coming in or are they

embracing

it just the gas probably most of them at

least from Central Latin America are

certainly religious nature do they like

families yes

do they expect and want to work hard to

succeed

yes yeah you I don't think I don't think

we've quite

grasped uh the degree to which we've

refreshed the country and we don't know

it now again let me say I'm completely

against open

immigration we got to close the freaking

border and vet people but within the

vetting I'm very much uh a musk

perspective we probably need 50 million

migrants just to

survive not a

preference it might be requirement an

actual existential requirement that we

need 50

million now I know you don't like it and

I'm not crazy about it myself unless

they're

vetted if we vet them 50 million is

going to be really really good for the

country if we get the you know best

people from other countries Etc but I

don't think we can do that with Dei I

think as long as Dei is in place you're

not going to get the best people coming

to this country you it's definitely

going to be a little bit of a gating

factor I would

think

um all right so just keep an eye on it

and if I were the Republicans here's

what I would do I would create a do

might use AI that would give a very

maybe three or four point explanation of

what a Democrat is and what a republican

is and I would hand it out to every

migrant I could find now the news would

pick it up and they'd say look what

these damn white supremacists are doing

they're they're giving out these little

leaflets to everybody and it's telling

you what's the difference between a

Republican and a Democrat oh oh and then

they would talk about

it and then the other migrants would

hear about it in the news I don't know

if they're watching a lot of news but

let's say and it would just become a

frame because right now we're we're

allowing the Democrats you know all of

us collectively we're allowing the

Democrats to frame it as of course there

are Democrats and I do think that that

might be persuading people coming in

that they must be Democrats

if the only thing they hear is Democrats

saying hey we're the ones who let you in

be a

Democrat I'd probably sign up if I

didn't know anything else except the

Democrats want me here and the

Republicans are complaining I'd be a

Democrat if it's all I knew and I I'd

probably sign a paper if they put it in

front of me

Etc um yeah and the right the NGS are

probably saying bad things about

Republicans even before before they get

here so suppose somebody gets

here and you hand them a document says

if you're a republican you like God and

families and you no abortion what

whatever you think would get the the

migrant you know people on your

side but because you're the ones who

decide how to frame the other

side yeah you know you just frame them

in the worst possible way and

uh and probably that's enough I mean it

it it would certainly change the

equation in terms of how

enthusiastic were the Democrats about

bringing a new voters if I I think you

could get at least half of them to

register Republican with a little bit of

work yeah and then you use AI to

translate it into as many languages as

you need so if you keep the differences

between Democrat and Republican to let's

say four

items uh one will allow the government

to transition your child to another

gender without telling you just simple

stuff right um and if there's only let's

say four bullet points on each one you

could on one

document you could translate it into you

know 80% of the the languages they

use just use AI wouldn't take you but a

moment um Jonathan turle is talking

about these so-called enhanced sentences

so some of the the January 6 people got

enhanced meaning longer sentences

because there was an argument there was

something about it that made it extra

bad even within the field of crime that

they were alleged to have

committed but I didn't know this that

did you know that uh in a TV interview

at some point wasn't recently but

Justice official uh Michael Sherwin he

said quote our office wanted to ensure

that there was shock and awe meaning

that the sentences were extra stiff

shock and

awe um there was sh it worked because we

saw through the media post that people

were afraid to come back to DC because

they're like if we go there we're going

to get

charged we wanted to take out those

individuals that essentially were

thumbing their noses at the public for

what they

did does any of that sound like

justice

no no that's not even close I can't even

believe he said this out loud can you

believe somebody said that in public

that we charged them you know to make an

example of them

basically well that should be enough

reason to let them all out yeah yeah

have you have you asked yourself what

that day would look

like imagine a trump

Victory imagine he signs the you know

the the whatever document to free them

all and imagine you actually watch the

video of all of them leaving

jail just just hold that in your

mind you just see them all just

streaming out of

jail yeah that if I wouldn't care about

anything else in this election but

that that's the one thing you got to get

right or I don't care about anything

else don't even want to live here if

they stay in jail I don't even want to

live in this country you got to get that

right then we'll talk about taxes and

you know

immigration Wars and stuff very

important but not as important as

this not as important as freeing those

political prisoners that's my number

one that's my number one and and if you

told me um Trump is a a rapist and he

continues to rape people every day I'd

still support him because of just that

one thing there's nothing you could tell

me about

Trump you know whether it's true or not

true that would make me not be willing

to free those prisoners if he's the only

one willing to do

it if nobody else is willing to do it

he's your man and I don't care what else

you say is he a

felon do you think I care do you think

do you think I care if he gets convicted

no I care that he lets the January 6

people out of jail do you think I care

that he didn't do enough about

fenadol I do care but it wouldn't make

any difference in my vote because nobody

else is doing anything either and I

think it's obvious that we want that to

happen we meaning whoever actually runs

the country has decided that they're

that that's an acceptable expense of

lives yeah no there's nothing you can

tell me about

Trump that would make any difference to

my support of him as long as the January

6 is are in jail nothing else matters in

fact if I were running for president I

wouldn't even say anything else I just

say you know what you know what I will

do for president you've already seen it

I'm going to let these guys out in jail

now that would probably only work for

the Republicans right so it probably

wouldn't let him get elected you the

Democrats would say ah you

insurrectionist but yeah if you're if

you on the political right and you put

anything above that

issue I don't know how you do it but

what what is a higher issue than people

who have your opinion being put in

jail that's basically what's happening

there's nothing higher than that

nothing

all right

um you know you thought that Fortran was

an old computer language from the 70s

does anybody remember

Fortran well now there's a new name for

it and wokeness is telling us about a

family that has four children and

they're all TR all four all four kids

are trans

yeah uh let's see let's calculate the

odds odds having one trans kid one in

3,000 according to end

wokeness uh the odds of having four all

four it's not just four but it's all

four 100% it's uh let's see do the math

3,000 to the fourth power that'd be one

187

billion so there's this video of the

very proud parents oh my God are they

proud that they reverse the genders of

all of their

children all four of

them and they're beaming with pride and

they made a video because they're so

proud they'd like you to share in their

Glory

yeah and that's

legal now let's show this story to the

uh the migrants and say

hey if you vote Democrat you can have

this too we can reverse the genders of

all of your children and here's the good

part we don't even have to check in with

you we can do it while they're at

school

literally all right um over 73% of

registered voters think Biden is too old

including 56% of

Democrats and it's a new poll but it's

in line with other polls

and I love the fact that the Democrats

are still pretending there's nothing

wrong we're getting closer and closer to

that Monty Python skit aren't

we that parro is

dead no it's

not now why isn't that more of a

meme all right I challenge you I want

you to find the Monty Python dead parrot

sketch and I want you to use AI to

replace the parrot's head with Joe

Biden's head can do that for me it's all

I ask today just use Ai and do that skit

but it's got to be Biden's head as the

little parrot who's dead well he's dead

no he's

not

now uh I here's a thing that I I think

Trump has figured out which is things

are so absurd that mockery is the only

right answer like defending yourself

would be just stupid

you should just mock how insanely stupid

it is and how they're playing you for

stupid because they're really playing

you for stupid seriously playing you for

stupid all right uh there's a New York

Times Sienna

poll that I think it was Molly Hemingway

was or somebody was I think it was Molly

was pointing out that uh in the past has

been a little skewed Pro

Biden so you'd expect their poll to show

Biden in the best possible

light if they were acting the way

they've acted

before but instead they're showing Trump

would beat Biden 48 to

43 which is pretty healthy margin

because at one point you know I think

they had the same poll you know in Prior

prior election 2020 uh they had a uh

they had Biden up by

14 now of course the final vote was

nothing like that but at the final vote

they still had him up by

nine they had him up by nine on Election

Day all right so you know that they're

seemingly we don't know because we can't

read minds but seemingly they just seem

to be a political pole that is in the

bag for Biden but even they have given

up it looks like a 19point swing since

that you know the biggest biggest sport

they ever showed for Biden 19p Point

swing

so how do you

explain that he's still

there yeah isn't it super obvious that

he can't win under normal

circumstances now here's what's really

fun if it's true as Tucker says that the

elections are all fake and they've been

maybe fake for a long time and that the

CIA or whoever it is can uh control them

any way they want you know for in a

variety of ways they can change laws

about you know the mailing votes they

can they can get Google to be more

biased you there probably A Million Ways

they can do things uh and maybe even

directly with the vote but we don't have

any proof of that um a lot of strong

suspicions and an inability to check by

the way if there's ever

question and the and you're not allowed

to

check you just assume that the election

is rigged so my understanding is that

there's now a still a room full of

ballots that some people said were fake

that the judge simply just doesn't rule

on it to rule whether they can open the

door and look at them now in my opinion

there were there's no way there's still

a bunch of evidence in a room that

hasn't been removed I don't think

there's any chance that that room has

something in it but the fact that they

won't unlock it that's I would consider

that proof that the election is rigged

would

you what what do you consider

proof you know you got your scientific

proof but that doesn't really apply

you've got your legal courtroom proof

but it's not being handled by the court

the courts ignoring it if the cor had

ruled and opened that door in Georgia I

guess is and then we looked you know

maybe there's something there maybe

there isn't but then we would say well

at least the court is doing its Court

thing but if the court refuses to let

you

look just yeah your working assumption

should be oh that's

proof if they won't let you

check that's proof and I think that

should be the

standard so likewise on January 6 the

fact there was so much resistance to

Simply taking a little time to make

sure that's not scientific proof it's

not legal proof but on a working basis

for a citizen trying to understand

what's true that's proof yeah if your

government won't show you something

about an election that's proof it was

rigged I I I think that's a reasonable

definition in the realm of Elections as

to what proof actually means what the

word mean because remember a scientific

proof and a legal proof they're not the

same we use the word

proof different a a math proof is not

the same as a science

proof and a legal proof is not the same

as a math proof or a science proof three

different proofs I believe there is also

a political

proof a political proof is we're not

going to show you even though it's right

here it's right behind behind this door

but we're not going to open it for you

and we're not going to give you a reason

why we won't show

you that's a political

proof anybody

disagree refusing to show you something

that can be shown to you because it's

not

proprietary that's a proof so if you say

it's been proved and you say this is how

I is how I Define it whenever there's a

lack of

transparency from the government

have I ever said this

before citizens are innocent until

proven guilty you don't want to change

that but governments are not citizens

they're entities The Entity is always

guilty until they prove they're not

because all entities will be corrupt if

you can't check everybody knows that if

there's any entity that you can't check

what's going on and there's money

involved or

power of course are

corrupt it's only

transparency it's only

transparency that protects you there's

nothing else not a single other thing

but

transparency we don't have it for the

election and so it was rigged you don't

have to wonder about it that and and by

the way I believe that that standard of

what I'm calling proof you know here I'm

defining my own terms I believe it's as

rigorous as at least the scientific

proof is certainly as

rigorous as a political proof I would I

will not go so far as to say it's as

rigorous as a math proof right that's

hard to beat but certainly science and

the courts are a little bit subjective

even if they try not to be

so yeah you can you can be a little bit

subjective and still make it a proof

there's a standard for that

all right and of course mailin ballots

is pretty much proof of rigging if if if

there's a a a push for mailin ballots

that doesn't seem to fit the situation

like like the need for it is not

demonstrated that that's proof of fraud

in my in my

opinion all right uh the same poll I

think it was that shows Trump winning

Hispanics well

there's a

poll in the real world the United States

in

20124 that has

Trump handily

ahead 46 to

40 with Hispanic

voters now actually yeah with voters

it's not even just Hispanics it's voters

is that

possible let let me make a

prediction I'm going to make the most

radical prediction but I'm not going to

I'm not going to predict it as a

certainty for the first time ever and

only because of the special situation

with Biden falling apart and the Border

being open under that weird special

situation

Trump could win the black vote

outright I'm not going to predict that

as in like a

certainty but it it is on the table now

at the moment it's not close at the

moment it's not close and and by the way

he doesn't have any chance of winning

black women so let me modify that I

believe that Trump could win black men

outright

he doesn't have a chance with black

women you're forgetting the election is

already

decided but let's say in the

polling right let's just say in the

polling I I think you're right that the

actual election is uh almost certainly

certain to be

rigged because I think they always have

been

um but I I think the polling on Election

Day could show that he's winning with

black

men I feel he's one story

away you know one good narrative away

he's not there he doesn't have a

narrative that could make that happen

but you know what he does

have what's he had what what does he

have this time that he never had

before

yeah this time

he's got a

vake this time he's got a

vake and it's really sort of a messaging

challenge right so he's got the

best messaging person of all

time and you know we we laugh about the

sneakers um the sneakers is not nothing

it's not

nothing yeah it's funny that you was so

on the nose it sounds like you know

trying too hard or something but somehow

he pulled it off he actually pulled it

off and here's what I think you're

missing when Trump introduces sneakers

the Democrats say ah he's

pandering is he or is he showing he

understands a segment of the world in a

way that the Democrats

missed I think it shows an

understanding of Black

America yeah on a level that we haven't

seen and I don't mean you know I like

sneakers they like sneakers not that

simple I I think there's a deeper thing

with the the status of

Footwear you know I've heard other

people say um if you can't afford to

have a mansion you know you could have a

little status in your Footwear or your

your your bag you know so it's something

like

that yeah and the Hillary with the H

sauce was just that felt like pandering

but there's something about Trump and

the golden

snakers and the fact that they were huge

success that I'm not even sure I

understand but I feel like that's

there's something deeper than pandering

that's going on there that feels

like feels like understanding some d

dnamic that maybe I don't

understand likewise when Trump says that

his his legal problems could help him

with black voters and then the Democrats

say you racist are you saying that black

people are defined by the legal system

and of course it's nothing like that

it's just do you believe the system is

rigged against

you if you feel like the system is just

obviously right in everybody's face

rigged against you you're going to have

a little bit of feeling of solidarity

with somebody who's also feeling the

system rigged against them can you think

of an example like

that yeah you just saw one I just gave

you one I just told you that my

top political thing is freeing the

January 6

people do you think I would have been

there do you think I would have been

there beaten up a cop destroying

property nope nope no am I am I relating

to the January 6 people because hey I'm

an insurrectionist and they're

insurrectionist

nope am I relating to them because it's

obvious that they were targeted for

being white

mostly yes that's how I relate to them I

relate to them as someone who's been

targeted unfairly by the

system and I relate to that now let's

say let's change all their uh

ethnicities it's mostly mostly white

people in January 6 jail suppose they

were all black how would I feel about it

then would I would I be able to relate

I'd be like ah different problem than my

situation nope same same if if thousands

of black let's say Republicans

had been locked up it's still my number

one

topic because I would still relate to it

I would still relate to it the the color

of their

skin honestly I don't think I thought

once in until today I don't think I

thought once about the fact that the

January Sixers were mostly white they're

not all white they're not all white but

mostly it just wasn't you know that

wasn't the point of compar

the point of comparison is living in a

country where that can happen I don't

want it to happen to them I don't want

it to happen to anybody black ever and I

don't want it to happen to me so that's

that's my point of you know if um you

know if if it ever came down to like a a

physical

Revolution I want on my side the people

who think like

me I don't need on my side the people

look like me I want them to think like

me right then you're on my team you know

when things get

dangerous all

right

um so here's another thing we could mock

so the bid Administration is uh limiting

the natural gas production I guess in

this country but not so much the

drilling of the oil which is interesting

I don't know how they explain it but the

idea is that uh you know Natural Gas

um you know you could find some

substitutes say the green people but

then the Lesser green people say gas is

cleaner than whatever else you're using

at the moment so why wouldn't you use

the cleaner alternative well it turns

out that that analysis is not very

straightforward because when you're

looking at substitutions you can never

know exactly who substitutes what for

what so it's not entirely clear

that limiting natural gas even helps you

for

CO2 because limiting that people might

substitute something worse but they also

might substitute something better and it

might be different in a different

country right so somebody might try

harder to do solar um but somebody else

might just say well I better burn coal

because I don't have time to build me a

solar plant so economists can't really

sort this one out

um I think it's an easy

one I think you sell you sell the uh

natural gas until you got a better

idea to me it seems straightforward but

I would take it from let's say a pure

manager

perspective you know if you knew at the

moment it was better than the

Alternatives I'd probably do it and try

to figure out something

later um but here's my question since

you cannot use math and economics to

support limiting natural gas because

it's a questionable proposition

economically and even CO2 wise would you

say that the Biden Administration is

following the

science their their entire thing is

follow the

science so don't you think that they owe

us a an

analysis perhaps a model for climate

change they like to use models they

should produce a model they should here

we are cutting the cutting the natural

gas and here you can see how this

follows through to reducing you know

this line on

co2 if that's their argument and their

whole deal is you got to be compatible

with science why don't we hold them to

their own standard and make them

compatible with

science well it's because they've been

gaslighting and they've never been

compatible with science because you know

what is not a science

models everybody who thinks that a a

projection model is science has really

been

brainwashed it's closer to the opposite

yeah um do do you think that I could

create a model or here's a challenge for

you would you bet a million

dollars against my claim that I can

create a model that will predict the GDP

of America in 10

years so that's my claim I can create a

prediction model that'll hit the GDP of

America 10 years from now on this on the

same

dat who would bet against

me it's easy do you want me to tell you

how I could do it easily and I know

you're thinking hey nobody can predict

the future like that I I could create a

model that I would bet a million dollars

will be right do you know how I do it I

would create a thousand

models every one of them would be you

know off by a tenth of a percentage

point and then I would give you all

thousand models and I'd say in 10 years

I'm going to tell you which one of those

was

right and then I'm going to claim that I

created a model that predicted it and

you know what it would be

true because that would be the model you

had it for 10 years I'm pointing to it

it's the exact number that is the you

know

reality there you go now you're saying

but Scott that's not like climate change

models no it is that's how they do it

you didn't know how they do it they have

hundreds of models and they do something

called hind casting which is making sure

that it would have worked if it had

existed in the past up to today do you

know how they do that they make so many

models the some of them by coincidence

will be in the range of what is reality

and then they tell you and here's the

big scam that therefore it can predict

the

future nope think about my thousand

models about the GDP one of them was

right can it predict the fure

future no it wasn't right because it was

right it was right because there were a

thousand of them and one was was going

to be pretty close I threw away

everything that wasn't you know within

that range of something it could have

been how many of you did not

know that you can make the models do

anything including match the past it has

no predictive value none yeah some of

you do it but if you don't if you don't

do this for a living or you don't listen

to somebody like me who did it for a

living which is projecting the future as

funny as that is um you would never know

you if you're an ordinary person you

don't know that a metaanalysis is

usually fake you don't know that a

observational study shouldn't be trusted

at all you wouldn't know that peer

reviewed means coin flip doesn't mean

anything

it's just a coin flip yeah yes no about

50% so anyway um here's another funny

thing that axios is treating the weather

the way they treat

Trump they're treating the weather

they're reporting on the weather the

same way as

Trump so you know how they're uh the the

left leing people are covering

Trump what they're not not saying is

that his policies from his first term

were bad have you noticed that wh which

of his first term policies are they

railing against oh we don't want to do

that again none there's not even a

single policy that they oppose which of

his new proposed policies are they

saying are a bad

idea uh I can't think of

any well you know but abortion is

settled it's going to the states that's

not even a trump issue in my opinion you

know you could federalize it but

nobody's going to do it I don't think

it's going to get

federalized so instead what did they do

about Trump well first of all they're

trying to Gaslight you that he's the one

with dementia I love that

one right yeah he's the one with

dementia do you have any names uh I

forget when I'm just doing my podcast

here how many times have you heard me

try to remember like the name of the

Speaker of the House or something like

really easy names and I'll be like what

what's that name and then you'll say it

in the comments I'll go oh yeah a I'll

just like forget names it's very common

when you're talking about politics do

you do you know how many names that

Trump has had to remember in his life

the people he's

met is is like an insane number of

people to not hundreds it's

thousands it it's way over hundreds

probably the PE the number of people he

would need to remember would be I don't

know 8 to 10,000 or something just crazy

numbers but here's what axio says about

the the weather February's extreme

weather event uh did some bad things

what do they call Trump extreme

Mega because there's nothing wrong with

the mega so you call it

extreme what was wrong with the

weather well apparently the cold weather

doesn't really match the whole global

warming thing you know even though I

know climate change could be Extremes in

either direction but it doesn't f fit

the narrative so well so they just say

it's

extreme they're actually insulting the

weather the same way they're insulting

Trump because they don't have a better

thing to

say

extreme if they start saying that the

weather is

chaotic or possibly white

supremacist I guess that's where we're

heading that weather have you noticed

that the

snow always

white yeah yeah the snow is too white

and too

extreme yep they only have one set of

things to

say and I have a prediction my

prediction is if it rains hard on

Election Day X year will report it as a

coup all

right that's my joke of the day they'll

reported as a coup because they can't

tell the difference between the weather

and Trump because they're both

extreme all right

uh I have a challenge and a question for

you um so our debt is approaching 35

trillion we're adding a trillion every

100 days or

so and

how do we survive

that I don't

know because the problem's been around

long enough where people would at least

be mentioning potential

Solutions because I've never seen

one and here's my

challenge I want to see Jamie

Diamond or Bill Amman and I pick them

because they're

credible I would call them reasonably

Centrist but Democrat I think they're

both Democrat but reasonably Centrist

and experts at

finance and I want them to explain to

the rest of us how in any scenario we're

not

doomed in any scenario because I'm not

aware of one I honestly can't think of

anyway we're not

doomed so have you ever heard have you

ever seen Jamie Diamond say look there

is a way out you'd have to let's say cut

government 20% you'd have to get GDP up

to six you know which would be crazy at

the same time you'd have to you know

you'd have to manage inflation so maybe

you'd want more than usual but that cuts

into your debt a little bit so if you do

these three things you might be able to

you know reduce the rate of growth

enough that we can

survive don't you want to see

that how about Warren

Buffett can Warren Buffett explain to

the the public oh yeah there is a way

out it would be very very hard but if we

do the hard things we can actually do it

I don't think there's a hard

path I believe there's

none I believe there's none and the

smartest people even the ones who are in

the same team you know in theory as the

administration even they can't tell you

any kind of scenario in which we

survive which makes me wonder if there

is a secret

plan do you think there's a secret

plan because I'm trying to think of what

would be big enough to pay off our

natural

debt well

how

about if we put Russia out of the energy

business and then we took their market

share you got really quiet didn't

you what if the Ukraine

war is the only way we can pay off our

debt in other words there's no way that

the normal growth of the economy will

pay it off but but if we just owned

energy we just owned it you know you

couldn't even buy energy unless you're

buying it from us you know maybe other

people too but you definitely have to

get it from us too there just isn't

enough if we owned

Russia and we owned their gas

station we could probably pay off the

debt with GDP growth you know we would

be robbing Russia to do it I mean

literally we'd be robbing them

but you need a lot of money and actually

I'm not even sure if Russia has

enough would that even be

enough if Russia stopped spending money

on itself and just gave it all to us I

don't think it's

enough

right how about the growth of the robot

economy will we go to a super cycle in

which um the robot growth is so big it's

bigger than cars bigger than computer

computer is bigger than the internet

maybe

might but would that be enough to get us

under debt I don't know again can Elon

Musk explain to us in the best case

scenario if we mine an asteroid and

robots are big and AI is big is that

enough I think not probably

not and I wonder that the real play is

that the government knows that money is

going to go

away I wonder if the real play is that

the people who really know what's going

on think that our money will just go

away and they'll just be crypto or

something else or we don't need money or

the government gives us a coupon or

something I know but uh certainly like

the know the answer that all right uh

Gaza is a mess um

and the US is helping out we dropped 66

bundles air dropped uh of 38,000

meals we dropped into Gaza on the beach

there 38,000

meals there are over a million people

starving and they probably need more

than one meal a day to be

healthy is this just are we just trying

to make it look like we're doing

something I mean I'm glad we're doing

something

but and then I also don't understand why

would you give them food in Gaza how

does that even make sense is isn't the

entire thing that Israel is trying to

accomplish is to drain out all the

citizens so they can kill whatever's

left and then someday people can go

back shouldn't you put 100% of the food

just under the city limits and say fre

food you just have to come here to get

it and then do what they need to when

everybody's out the city

so I don't know war is terrible there's

yeah everybody's bad that's that's my

everybody's bad I'll just keep it at

that well the number that the uh Hamas

puts out for the death toll is at 30,000

we should not believe numbers like that

because it's coming from a sketchy

Source but but I remind you that all

numbers come from sketchy sources all of

them and we do come to believe some even

if they're not

true um so I think this 30,000 number as

non-credible as it is is going to enter

our Consciousness as the narrative and

they're pushing hard and I think they

can push it hard enough to enter it as

the narrative at 30,000 if it becomes a

narrative again not the truth truth but

simply what people imagine is the

truth

um that that will completely destroy the

uh I know reputation of Israel for

generations

and I think the rest of the world will

call it genocide what do you think now

again I'm not giving you my

opinion uh I'm saying that under this

situation that that number of people in

that short at a time on that size of a

population for these conditions you know

this situation I believe that most of

the world the majority will come to see

this death toll as the real one even if

it isn't and because that they will come

to see it as a

genocide I don't think there's anything

that worse that could happen for

Israel's reputation so I'm not sure how

they navigate

it um I'm just pointing out that they

most important asset which is the

Goodwill of other countries um is

largely gone and makes you wonder how

that's going to work

out now again that's not my opinion you

know I'm not I'm not criticizing Israel

because my take on it is you could

criticize them all day long but they're

going to do what they're going to do and

you don't have to love it but you're not

going to stop

it all right

um that ladies and

gentlemen is my fantastic Funday Sunday

show and uh whoa ran long I didn't even

know that thanks for joining on the

xplatform and on Rumble and on the

racist YouTube channel uh I'll see you

again tomorrow thanks for

joining