Back to episode — Part 1 of 2 - Episode 2408 CWSA 03/09/24
Context —
nt to do in terms of reducing aircraft contribution to CO2. So they're trying to figure out how to model just what would be different if they get a greener type of jet fuel. So here's something that's embedded in the story that if you didn't notice it you wouldn't know that it debunked all models. Within the story saying how they're going to create a model is a paragraph that debunks all models.…
← Previous segment →is this a special case? Is this the one time somebody built a projection model in which the assumptions really drove the output? No, it's the only way it can be. There's no other way it can be. In the real world the assumptions that the study people put into it determines the output. That's the opposite of science. It's the opposite. You can't be more opposite than the people sitting in a room debating what assumption should be in your model. That's the least scientific thing anybody ever did ever.
But we still have this little fiction like the models can predict the future. Nope. Never have, never will.
There's a company that I still have a subscription to called iStock, where you get st
Context —
ock photos that you could use with a license approval. And every now and then I'll use one of those for my posting on social media. So I wanted to look for a picture of a dumb person. You know, would be a good picture for it. So I went there and I searched within iStock, and this is a Getty company, they own it. And I looked for... Do you think there were any issues with the diversity, the way th…
Next segment → →