nt to do in terms of reducing aircraft contribution to CO2. So they're trying to figure out how to model just what would be different if they get a greener type of jet fuel.

So here's something that's embedded in the story that if you didn't notice it you wouldn't know that it debunked all models. Within the story saying how they're going to create a model is a paragraph that debunks all models. They don't call it out that way. You just have to notice it.

All right, here's that paragraph. It says the rumor has it that those involved with the modeling process can't find common ground regarding the actual impact of corn usage in the synthesis. Some believe that it should be weighted with a higher penalty since carbon generation occurs during the harvesting phase. The ethanol industry wants to see its carbon impact as low as possible in order to blah blah blah.

All right, did you catch it? Yeah, in that was the debunking of all climate models. How many of you saw it?

All right, here's what you should say. The climate models are completely dependent on the assumptions. The model is not even important. The assumptions they make about how important it is to, let's say just using their example, to consider or not consider the time of the season when you're picking the corn or something like that. So you could simply make an assumption that would completely change the outcome.

Now