a study that says you might be able to slow your biological aging by eating less. How many times have you heard this story? I feel like this is the millionth study that showed us. Maybe for the last 30 years, 40 years, haven't we been hearing the same study just repeated every year for 40 years? I'm not alone in that, right?

But here's what's left out, and why I consider this fake science. Fake science. It's because the thing that they say they're measuring is that you eat fewer calories. So they have a control group that eats what they want, I guess, and another group that has limited calories. And then they measure their biomarkers and they find out that the people who ate less food have better biomarkers.

Now there's an obvious point to this, which is obesity is not good for you. But if you're doing a short-term study it seems weird that you'd see a big difference in the short term. But here's what's left out. I'm pretty sure that our food supply is largely poison. Meaning that the more food you eat, it's not just more calories. It's more poison. It's more additives. It's more pesticides. It's more everything.

So they did a test to see if eating fewer calories made you healthier. But they never tested to see if eating less poison makes you healthier. Don't you think if you were eating at McDonald's and you just did less of it, it's not just the calories that you got less of? You got less of all the stuff you didn't want in your body. Of course it makes you healthier. Of course it does.

So that's weird science. And there's not even a mention of the fact that the food itself might be bad for you.

All right, here's more of fake science. I guess the Biden administration is trying to come up with a new climate forecast model that would take into account what they wa