Back to episode — Episode 2415 CWSA 03/16/24
Context —
a problem and it would be as easy as lining it out with a pencil to get rid of the problematic part. Because if you just make it about TikTok you've got wide agreement. If you throw in that Trojan horse part you don't. So why won't they take it out? There's only one reason that's in there. It's either intentionally to kill the bill — in other words it's a poison pill — or if it got approved it wou…
← Previous segment →who talked about banning it was Donald Trump or Josh Hawley. Do you know what the real answer is? The real answer is me in December of 2020. So that's when I started talking about it and continued talking about it since then. So if you can find a source before December of 2020 then I'll say oh I guess somebody got there first. But if you can't find that source — and it's really hard to find it by the way. It took a team of people and thank you Owen for finally finding that to confirm.
So here's what's happening. I'm not telling you this so I can get your credit, although that's cool too. I like credit. I do like to be recognized for getting something right. We all do. So that's not nothing. But there's a bigger point to this. You're watching history being rewritten wrong in your lifetime. Think about the nature of this story. This story is being told completely wrong and those of you who lived through it are completely aware of it. And it's being recorded as a complete fake history while you're alive and while you're watching it in real time.
And do you know I've noticed this with other searches I did this morning that very clearly showed that these search engines have become useless. So there are probably other examples and you could come up with them in which you're watching in real time as the history of the world is completely fake and it's going into the history books. It's not like the first time. There's a lot of them, right? And I posted this on yesterday. Do you remember it used to be a generally accepted statement that winners write history? You all believe that's true, right? The winners get to write history because if there's a big war or you take over the country or something you get to write your own history. Somewhere along the line that stopped. We now have a situation where only losers write history. Like actually the biggest losers in society are reporters and the history teachers who believe that the reporters were true. So we actually have a complete reversal. We have a situation where the losers are writing history and it's no more true than when the winners write it. When the winners write history it's fake. But when the losers write it it's just fake a different way. But still all fake. So all of our history is fake. That's confirmed. I saw that Elon boosted my message that history is fake anyway.
Fani Willis. So there's a result there. I guess the judge said after all the testimony about Fani hiring her boyfriend Wade to prosecute Trump that that was too much of an appearance of conflict of interest. And so either she had to get off the case, said the judge, or the boyfriend had to be fired. So the boyfriend quit so they didn't have to go through the indignity of being fired. But we assume he had to be fired. So quitting just saved him some ego. But anyway, I'm very happy about this result. Now it's bad for Trump obviously. But I love the fact that we don't have to guess if the legal system is rigged. Leaving her on th
Context —
e case is just such a glaring obvious confirmation that the legal system isn't even trying. This is not even trying. Come on people. So I think even Democrats can start to notice. When you leave her on the case I think they noticed. I also love that the Democrats keep trotting Biden out and telling us that he's perfectly fine. Now that's funny. It's become completely Monty Python-esque. Yeah. So…
Next segment → →