e case is just such a glaring obvious confirmation that the legal system isn't even trying. This is not even trying. Come on people. So I think even Democrats can start to notice. When you leave her on the case I think they noticed.

I also love that the Democrats keep trotting Biden out and telling us that he's perfectly fine. Now that's funny. It's become completely Monty Python-esque. Yeah. So I mean we're about three months away from Biden literally being a piece of driftwood. That's like he won't be able to talk or move and they're going to point to him and say he looks fine to me. And you'll say but he can't even talk or move. And then they'll say he looks good to me. What are you, some MAGA kind of crazy person? Perfectly fine. No he can't speak. He's wetting his pants right now. No he's not. And besides Trump does twice as bad things. No but okay. Now I think he's dead. He's not breathing. He's breathing. He's breathing fine. He breathes twice as much as any of us. We can't even keep up with his breathing. I swear that's rigor mortis. I'm seeing rigor mortis set in right in front of me. We checked his pulse. He is very, very dead. He's dead. Are you kidding me? Have you seen Trump lately? Oh my God. Everything with you MAGA people is about Biden Biden Biden but look at your guy. Look at your guy. He forgot a name once. I know he forgot some names sometimes. We all do that. But he's literally dead. He's literally in rigor mortis. We can smell him now. His bowels have emptied. You're crazy you MAGA people. He is more capable than anybody on the staff. In fact we just can't keep up with him now.

I enjoy that show. If you're going to go full Monty Python I'm down for that. Let's do more of that. Yep. Let's pretend everything that is ridiculous is true.

All right, here's my favorite fake story of the day. There's a fake story that I think it's in the New York Post that Don Lemon demanded from Elon a Cybertruck and or to be on the X platform and some kind of arrangement. They report that Don Lemon demanded a Cybertruck, $5 million signing bonus, $8 million salary, a $15 million marketing budget, private jet flights, pay for his massages in Vegas, executive assistance and equity in X. Oh and also control over news policy on X.

Now do you know what the source for that is? For a story like that you'd want a pretty solid source, wouldn't you? You know what the source is? The New York Post has learned. So are you happy with that source? The New York Post has learned. No, none of this is true. None of this is true. How many of you believe this story? Did any of you believe this? They say a document that they haven't showed you. Well the agent said that 100% of it is false.

Let me give you a tip about liars. Liars don't talk that way, right? The agent knows the truth because the agent would be negotiating. If the agent had said don't believe everything you read I would say oh must be a lot of that's true. If the agent had said there's only one source for that I would have said oh. But you didn't say it's false. If they had said it was a first draft I would have said oh so it's a little bit true. There are a million things that the agent could have said where I would have said hmm I'm not sure that's quite the denial it needs to be. But here's what a real denial looks like. It's 100% false. Every part of it. That's a good denial. If I could ever teach you to deny, deny 100% of it. Otherwise it's a little bit true, right?

So between the fact that the source is Don Lemon has a lot of enemies, the claim itself is on its face ridiculous, that didn't happen, and the agent says it's 100% false, I'm backing Don Lemon on this story 100%. I could be wrong. Yeah I could be wrong because we're doing a little mind reading here. But everything about this story says fake. But we want to believe it, don't we? Don't you want to believe it? Come on you ought to believe it. That's why it's so good if it's a prank. Which it looks like it's a really good one. A good prank. The key to a good prank is not just that they fooled you. That's not a prank. Fooling you is not a prank. A good prank is when they fool you in the thing that you were ready to believe. You were already primed to believe it. Do you see how perfect this is as a prank? You were primed to believe that Don Lemon is crazy and asking for stuff that's ridiculous. Now he might have asked for a lot. That's how negotiations work. But no, none of this sounds real to me.

All right, there's another report that there's some kind of nervous system problems have become the biggest health problem, even bigger than heart disease. So there's something we don't know that's suddenly affecting nervous systems. Something. There's something that happened a few years ago that apparently is having a huge impact on the population in general. Something. And it's causing strokes and migraines and dementia. And those problems have surged past heart disease to become the leading cause of illness. Not death but illness. So that's bad.

Now all of you of course are ahead of me and you're saying well what has changed recently? Well that pandemic and those vaccinations. So many of you have automatically gone to the belief that the vaccinations is the problem. And I ask you this question. Have you ever seen a study that compared the baseline health of vaccinated people who never got COVID — vaccinated people to unvaccinated people? Have you ever seen that? Well why haven't you seen that?

Now what you're going to say is but Scott here's the thing that shows that the vaccinated got more COVID. Okay fine. But what about the excess deaths? Does it seem unusual to you that the single most important question — as far as I know there's no study to it, never seen one. The obvious thing to study is people who have never been vaccinated compared to the past and see if the never vaccinated have a higher baseline of deaths.

Now are you blown away by the fact that you're not aware of any study of that? Do you know what they study instead? They'll do who got COVID, was vaccinated or unvaccinated. They'll also show you the baseline compared to now which includes the vaccinated and the unvaccinated. You really need to separate that out.

Now how many of you are having a moment here where you're saying wait a minute that is the most obvious thing to do. Look at unvaccinated people who never got COVID because the COVID itself could be part of the long-term problems. You don't know. Unvaccinated, never got COVID. Give me their baseline. If their baseline is flat and there's no excess mortality, well it's the shots. Am I right? Like what else would it be? It's the shots if that if it's the only group that didn't see a difference in their baseline mortality. And nobody studied that. Just hold that in your mind that you're not aware of any study of the only thing that would tell you the answer. Why is that? Can't get funded probably I'm guessing. Or nobody wants to know.

All right but until you have that study that would be very useful as opposed to the other studies that I consider muddy or terrible, I would say that we also have to look at the food supply. I have a hypothesis without facts but my hypothesis is this. When the pandemic hit it caused a lot of people to start using substitutes to get done what they needed to do. They had to find different suppliers for this or that. Do you think there's any chance that farmers changed out the chemistry that they're using for their products because it was a shortage? In other words did they have to use a different fertilizer during the pandemic and maybe kept doing it? Did they have to use a different weed killer or more of it because of the pandemic? Was there anything that changed in the chemistry of our food supply because of the pandemic? And the answer is who studied that? I've never heard anybody look into it. But we should. We should certainly isolate for the shot by looking at unvaccinated which we