Back to episode — Episode 2419 CWSA 03/20/24
Context —
sassination of JFK. So Ron Paul is saying that was the day that we lost the government. Now others say it was earlier or something about the Federal Reserve and bankers and stuff and I don't understand any of that. I'm not discounting it. I just don't understand the topic so I'll dig into that a little bit. But you know there's some theory about the Titanic went down and a bunch of bankers were on…
← Previous segment →you something or already agree with you. Not too hard.
So yes in my lifetime this really happened. That the CIA apparently killed the president in conjunction with somebody else probably and then assigned themselves to look into who killed him. Very much like OJ looking for the real killer. So before OJ said he'd find the real killer in the real world that actually happened. That the CIA was helping to find the real killer. Now I don't have proof that the CIA killed him but I'd say all evidence suggests it. Is that fair? Would you go with that? That I don't have proof but all evidence suggests it. Seems pretty obvious at this point.
Do you know the story, the Zapruder film? You know the film we've all seen. Now there's a subsidiary story that says it was altered. So but beyond that did you know that it took years before anybody saw that video? Are you aware of that? That many years went by between the assassination and then the time we first saw the video. Now don't you think that the person who took the video was aware that he had the video? Do you think he wasn't aware that it was the most valuable? Yeah it was 1977 that the video comes out. That was what, 12 years after the assassination something like that. And anyway I guess I don't have to finish that point. So yeah the fact that the video didn't come out for 12 years is almost dead certain it's fake. Does anybody disagree with that? If you had the most valuable video in the entire world and you sat on it for 12 years that guarantees it was fake because there's no human behavior you've ever seen that would match what allegedly that person did. Sat on the most important story of the whole 100 years basically. And yeah I just thought I don't know if anybody would be interested in this. Come on it's obviously fake. It's quite obviously fake. I never thought that before. Do you know what convinced me? That it took 12 years. I'm not sure I ever heard that before but as soon as I heard that I was like oh obviously fake. They just had to wait until Star Wars came out and they had the right technology to fake it. So that's what it was anyway in case you wondered.
So that's when the Republic was lost at least some people say much earlier but at the very minimum by the time Kennedy was assassinated it was obvious that we don't have a regular Republic. But what did we lose? Free speech I think it was around, we started losing it around 2016. And you know the Twitter files revealed that the government had been leaning on the social media to censor things. So now that's all known right. There's no speculation involved. The government was censoring people like wild for years now. 2020 might have been the zenith but it didn't start then. But yeah the Twitter files told us that free speech went away a while ago and I don't know if it'll ever come back but it's gone. So we don't really have a country that's like a republic. You know we're a little bit closer to the Iran China Russia model than I was ever aware of. And certainly free speech is only if you say things that nobody cares about. So free speech that you can say anything that nobody cares about is opposite of free speech. Everybody gets that right.
So is there anybody here who thinks we have free speech in this country? Does anybody believe we have free speech right now? Because I know somebody's going to say something like but Scott look at the things you're saying right now. No the only reason I can say them is that I've already been siloed into such a little bubble that I'm only talking to the people who already think it's true. I don't talk to anybody who doesn't agree with me. You know I posted something yesterday I forget what it was and it brought in a whole trainload of trolls. You know the ones that all act the same. They just act like trolls. And I swear they had never seen any of my material before. They didn't know who I was, nothing about any of my posts. And they were really mad because they think that if Elon Musk comments on one of my comments which is what brought them in that they have to see stuff and they hated it. It's like if we watch Elon Musk we're going to have to see this guy's comments sometimes. Can't stand it. No we don't have anything like free speech.
All right. So Elon has been on this point about the public doesn't understand what this immigration is really all about. So far the illegal migration has created so many new people in the country that it would represent 13 congressional districts. In other words we would add 13 seats to our government just because of the illegal migration. And the idea is that the Democrats will lavish them with free stuff and make sure that they come in knowing that the Democrats are helping them get this better life. And then of course the political leaders on the left want the extra power that the extra congressional districts gives them. And that would allow them to essentially control the country forever if they just get enough migrants in the places where there was too much political power with Republicans. So they're doing a play. It's basically a Hail Mary play.
So I feel like the immigrant thing is such an aggressive swing for the fences. You know all or nothing play. And it really is all or nothing because if it doesn't work and they don't get the people in fast enough to take control of the government in the way that they want to then it will implode. It'll go the other way. So there's this real close timing thing where you've got two teams that are swinging for the fences. Here's what I mean. If the Democrats do succeed in gaming the system by getting more districts and that's enough for them to take power of the Congress and the presidency then they will just change the rules until nobody can ever compete with them because we've seen the pattern that they like to change the rules to stay in power. So there'd be more gerrymandering and things. And by the way Republicans do similar sketchy things but if the Democrats were in power they would be the ones doing it now.
At the same time interestingly you've got Donald Trump running for president now. What would happen if the Republicans sweep which is very possible. It's very possible th
Context —
at the Republicans will sweep and it would be because of immigration. So immigration is this really aggressive play for the Democrats to take over everything except that in the short run it's such an overreach and it's so alarming to the public it might cause the Republicans to win everything. So we've got this weird all or nothing that's been set up by both teams. And the Democrat Party will eith…
Next segment → →