Episode 2419 CWSA 03/20/24

well welcome to coffee with Scott Adams the highlight of human civilization and the best thing that ever happened to you I always forget to turn down my sound listen to myself if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that even Google's Gemini can't even imagine all you need is a cuper mar glass a tanker chal's d a canteen jug or flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid I like coffee and join me now for the unparallel pleasure the dopamine the other the day the thing that makes everything better it's called the simultaneous sip happens now go ah good delightful I think we're ready now if you're not already subscribing to see the Dilbert cartoon that has continued on it's now called dilber reborn and it's spicier what you would be missing and by the way you can only subscribe on X see my profile and on the locals platform will you get the comic plus another comic called robots re news and a bunch more but what you're missing if you're not subscribing to that is a uh Dei is being extended to the robots in Dilbert's company so Dilbert is running about about two years ahead of the reality probably we two years from having an AI coworker an actual embodied walking talking coworker and uh it's only a matter of time before Dei catches up and discrimination against robots becomes a thing and in the uh comic that you don't get to see today unless you're a subscriber uh the robot is complaining about uh people calling him derogatory names like Skylink hey Skylink anyway so that's what you're missing Nvidia has announced a new GPU new chip do you call it a chip it's more than a chip but it's got 28 billion transistors now I don't even know how to process that my brain can't even hold that how do you make anything with 208 how how could you possibly manufacture anything that had 208 billion physical anythings how's that even possible you I get that it's small but 208 billion transistors uh there's some fun stuff about to happen and it's pretty small too so I guess you can fit in one rack you know the things that practically were an entire data seter not too long ago well here's an interesting thing happening uh bride .

a um took some of my online shows this show and uh tried to use AI to predict what the next show would be so it takes it takes my patterns and characteristics and turned it into a video of me actually doing the show today before I do the show today and so it was taking some logical guesses about what I'd be talking about it was pretty good yeah I mean didn't get exactly the prediction uh but it was sort of amazing that it it could do an imitation to be doing the show and apparently there's a entity party.

that is taking uh all of my materials and building some kind of an engine where you can reproduce me this raises many questions about IP because I have publicly said that if AI wants to copy me that you know I'm giving a a public approval to that but how deep does that go would that include does that automatically give permission to use all of my books I don't know we're we're in weird territory where maybe writing books won't make any sense anymore because they just get stolen by AI uh So speaking of that um you know the book The Fourth turning a lot of you have heard of it I said to myself you know I'd like to know what's in that book but I certainly don't want to read it so I asked chat GPT to summarize it and then I got to ask questions you know I asked more detailed questions well what about this or what's to say about this and what's the prediction and what's the basis for it and in five minutes you could query pretty much all the important stuff in the book now I haven't read the book but a lot of people have been asking me what do you think about that fourth turning book it's predicting the future and it doesn't look good So I listened to at least the summary of it by Chad GPT and I've come to the following conclusion it looks like total to me how many of you think that's real this the most I've ever heard in my life none none of that looks even a little bit convincing but that's just me now some of you are going to say if somebody said this morning but Scott look at these very specific predictions that it got right and I look at the very specific predictions and every one of them you could have done without that book what was it hard to predict there might be a pandemic someday not so hard was was it hard to predict that um our Congress would keep spending until there's an emergency no no I didn't really need to read a book to know that but those are some of the predictions so beware of generic predictions because they're pretty easy to do there's a new study that says using computers can give you erectile dysfunction um and you will be far less likely to produce sperm and be a functioning human so what could cause that huh if the more time you spend looking at your screen the less your penis works could it be porn is better than people now I've been here's something I've been warning about and I didn't have to read that fourth turning book um it is inevitable that because humans don't change that fast we don't evolve very quickly but technology improves very quickly it was inevitable that porn would catch up to and surpass human to human sex now you're saying to yourself Scott that's crazy I clearly prefer human sex I know you do but most people don't even have access to it and if they have access to it it's not very often it's not as often as they want it so uh yeah this makes perfect sense that people are just seeing something that looks like the ideal the ideal thing that turns them on and then as soon as they turn off their computer they turn around and the partner that they could earn you know the partner that's the best they can do may not be really competitive with that thing that was on the screen so when people say uh these men are not producing their erections in sperm like they used to be maybe it's because humans got worse when technology got better I think that's the whole explanation people got worse technology got better all right uh at Cambridge University in Great Britain uh 12% of the undergrads identify as homosexual not too different than it sounds roughly um the average uh but 20 uh almost 30% identifies as bisexual so 30% of Cambridge is bisexual do you think that happened on its own do do do you think people just thought it through and things are changing and you know attitudes are changing and they just said to themselves you know what I think I want to be a little little bisexual well maybe it's some of it is that it's uh you know less ostracized that probably makes a difference you know incentives always matter um but don't you think that this is literally programmed see I want to see the I want to see the study that shows me the Tik Tock users versus the non-tick Tock users and you'd have to see what if people identified as gay or bicep sexual or any part of the lgbtq see if they identified before they started using Tik Tok I think you're going to see a direct link I think you'll see a very direct correlation between using Tik Tock and changing your gender or your sex preference so anyway it's people are going to act like it's a big old surprise when the entire world catches up what one of the things about being a hypnotist is you really can see the future it just takes a while for people to realize what's going on but if you know if you're alert to how how strong persuasion is it's pretty obvious that Tik Tok is changing people's sexual preference but if you're Normie you say well that can't be a thing I can't change my whole you know sexual preference by watching something on a screen yes she can it's not even hard I can rewire almost every one of you if I had enough time I know you don't believe it you're all you're all thinking well not me I mean I'm so you're you're so whatever you are that you can never change nope nope any good hypnotist could change your sexual preference and you would think it was your own idea it would just take some time it just couldn't it couldn't be done in one one setting like you couldn't do it in an hour but you could do it over time yeah pretty reliably and that's what Tik Tok does I think um there's a story about Google's AI this is in the Free Press um so there's a x bunch of X Google employees are basically saying that it's no surprise the Gemini AI that came out of Google was so woke that it was useless basically it was just a huge racist because it was so woke and the people who work there say you know they're not surprised because everything about working there had to be Dei so apparently even if you made a slight patch to the software a small software upgrade to something just make it a little better you had to write an impact statement about how it helped to Dei seriously if you made a software patch you had to State how it was good for Dei or bad I guess so that was real thing so the thing that you have to understand is that this is not fixable there isn't any way to fix the technology because the technology was never broken the technology did exactly what they wanted it to do it's just that when you see it it's so outlandish that you can't believe it but no it was designed to do exactly what it did so I would um I don't I assume other people have made the same prediction but here's a prediction Google may never be in the AI business in the way other companies might be able to because it won't be able to fix it it's not fixable unless they got rid of all the employees and so may maybe that's going to happen someday nope not going to fix that but um the the there's another uh product that might be uh might be deleted too let's see who's I got to find uh so Eric Weinstein was saying so there's a a Google product called engr viewer I've never heard of that before but um I think it used to be called something else maybe but what you could do is you could put in a search term and you could find out when it took off so you know how there's some Search terms that had zero interest until one day now that sudden interest in the in the search term can be really revealing about how the uh the media is hypnotizing and brainwashing the public so if something was never mentioned for decades and then suddenly it's all in the news and it's the only thing you're talking about it could be organic but that would be unusual far more likely it's an it's an OP that uh some somebody is trying to make it a thing and you think it's happening naturally but it's not it's the mainstream media working with sometimes our own intelligence people to make something Trend so here's an interesting um prediction by Eric Weinstein he says prediction Google engram viewer will be shut down one day for public access it is simply too subversive and at first I looked at it and I thought well you're not going to shut it down just cuz the you know the answers are a little inconvenient but the more I thought about it I'm going to back his prediction I think he's right I I think that it reveals when an OP starts and it makes it very obvious that it isn't you know some kind of a you know brainwashing operation you you can just see it in the graph boom everybody's talking about this now so I think he's right which is a hell of a prediction a good prediction all right there's a you probably know there's a mind reading ability of AI that uh it can actually if you put some sensors on your head the right kind of sensors it can look at brain wave patterns and it can tell what you're thinking and draw a picture of it so that's a real thing so you know you can think of a giraffe and the AI through its sensors will will draw giraff because it can tell you're thinking about it now apparently there's some big breakthrough in that I saw this on a Rowan CH young uh Thread about AI who's a good follow for all the AI stuff and researches a stability AI in Princeton they've got this new thing called Mind ey to and it's some big leap in restructuring reconstructing images from brain activity now how much do you want your government not to have that that that's the ultimate thing you don't want anybody to have I can't think of any technology that would be worse for humankind than being able to read your mind that's your last freedom your last freedom is to be able to think your own thoughts privately and have nobody know it that's right on the verge of going away now do you think your your government can't force you to the sensors of course they can do you think they'll use it to solve crime yep soon as it gets good enough they're going to say uh think about where you were Tuesday and it's going to draw a picture of the crime and you'll you'll be like you'll be trying to beat it like a light detector test you be like oh squeeze my sphincter or whatever the trick is to beat the light detector test you'll be like oh think of sex don't think of my crime but yeah if if they can read your mind they're going to be reading your mind there there's no chance that this gets used only for innocent fun oh the government will be reading your mind that's coming well the best story of the day is the uh the theory that uh president macron of France his wife has uh was born a man and uh is still a man and uh I guess Candace Owens is having fun with this and as she says it would be easy to disprove that he married a man who represents as a woman now all you'd have to do is show a picture of her when she's young any time in the first 30 years of her life and apparently nobody can find a picture of macron's wife below the age of 30 now don't you think it would be pretty easy to prove that you were born a woman and you've always been a woman if you were born a woman and you've always been a woman as Candace says just one photograph that's all it takes do do you know anybody who doesn't have any photographs of themselves before the age of 30 now she's not claiming she doesn't have any photographs but it seems like the easiest the easiest rumor to debunk and then just to make it fun there's videos on the internet that you shouldn't trust at all that makes it look like she has a male bulge in some of her pants suits and dresses now I don't trust the Bulge and the pants thing at all uh do do you remember a Curb Your Enthusiasm episode with Larry David where he was wearing a a kind of pair of pants that when he sat down it would sort of pillow up like he was excited and then people would think think he was excited he's like no no it's just the pants the pants just fold this way anyway so I think that's probably what's going on but the fact that they can't produce a picture and then further the the theory goes that uh there there are pictures of macron's wife's brother as a as a young person that matches what she looks like fairly perfectly but that alone does anything cuz they would be siblings but apparently her brother disappeared so the alleged brother I know somehow he disappeared he's just not with us and no explanation so if you told me well I did hear the story the other day when I heard the story the other day I immediately dismissed it as you know just internet fun and couldn't possibly be true but the but the further you dig into it the more fun it gets I I'm going to stop short of saying I believe it but the but the fact that it's so easily disproved but yet not disproved is very entertaining all right so whatever happens with this story I am entertained and by the way why do I care I mean I don't really care what their relationship is it's not my business but it is funny it's very funny all right um so there's a there's a movie called The American Society of magical Negros um that opened up and uh in its first first weekend it only made one million dollars in the entire us or as or as the uh and wokeness account was said it was a box office bloodbath the it's just a totally anti-white movie so it basically is that's what it is it's just an anti-white movie and uh the public decided nope they didn't want to see it now were any of you tempted to see the anti-white movie so I saw something online before I saw this story I saw something online that the reviews were excellent did anybody see that that so the critical reviews were just like really good I think probably before it was released maybe they were saying that so I thought to myself you know this might be because I think it was supposed to be funny or something I thought I might actually watch this movie and then I heard it was just an anti-white movie and I said oh well I'm not going to watch that movie it makes me wonder if this is you know you're always looking for the the the changing points like is this the inflection point well probably not but it's good to know that an anti-white movie didn't make money so that's good de um did you notice I I posted yesterday I asked people when they think the Republic ended in the United States now I when I was born I was under the oppression and most of my childhood and even adulthood that we were a uh some kind of a Democratic federal republic and that we voted for people and then they were in charge and they ran the country well I've I've since become convinced by 100% of all evidence that the Republic ended sometime in the past but I was curious when because clearly whoever is pulling the strings is not are elected officials that's pretty obvious and so I had my own theory was probably about the time that Kennedy was assassinated that that was sort of the obvious point where the intelligence people were running the show if they could just kill the elected leader and get away with it which apparently is what happened apparently I wasn't there but it does look very much like the CIA killed Kennedy and that they got away with it so coincidentally Ron Paul was interviewed by tuck and the same day I was asking about the Republic you know when do you think it ended um Ron Paul said the date I say it was concrete that there was a coup and we lost our government was November 22nd the assassination of JFK so Ron Paul is saying that was the day that we lost the government now others say it was earlier or something about the uh the Federal Reserve and bankers and stuff and I don't understand any of that I'm not discounting it I just don't understand the topic so I'll I'll dig into that a little bit but you know there's some theory about the Titanic went down and a bunch of Bankers were on it and that allowed the FED to be created and that was a a way to rip people off and I don't quite understand how that works but I'll look into it because I know you're going to ask me about it so I will I'll look into it anyway here's something the Ron Paul said about that about the assassination of JFK he said I find it astonishing and Despicable that the director of the CIA at the time Alan Dulles was appointed to the Warren Commission which was tasked with investigating it so then Tucker says so the guy who was responsible for the murder was investigating the murder yes yes and by the way doues wasn't just a member of the Warren Commission he was probably the only one that mattered probably the only one that mattered there were other members but you know if one of them is the head of the CIA the head of the CIA probably picked the other members do you know how uh uh John Brennan does it do you know how he can get 50 people to say the laptop thing is Russian information Uh Russian disinformation he gets to personally pick who he talks to that's how it's done if you're the one who picks the people you can get any answer you want you just pick the people who owe you something or already agree with you not too hard so yes in my lifetime this really happened that the CIA apparently killed the president in conjunction with somebody else probably and and then assigned themselves to look into who killed him very much like OJ looking for the real killer so before OJ said he'd find the real color in the real world that actually happened that the CIA was helping to find the real killer now I don't have proof that the CIA killed him but I'd say all evidence suggests is that fair would you go with that that I don't have proove but all evidence suggests it seems pretty obvious at this point do you know the story the zuder zuder film you know the film we've all seen now there's a there's a subsidiary story that says it was you know it was altered so but beyond that did you know that it took years before anybody saw that video are you aware of that that that many years went by Between the assassination and then the time we first saw the video now don't you think that the person who took the video was aware that he had the video do do you think he wasn't aware that it was the most Val yeah it was 1977 that the video comes out that was what 12 years after the assassination something like that and and uh anyway I guess I don't have to finish that point so yeah the the fact that the video didn't come out for 12 years is almost dead certain it's fake does anybody disagree with that if you had the most valuable video in the entire world and you sat on it for 12 years that guarantees it was fake because there's no there's no human behavior you've ever seen that would match what allegedly that person did sat on the most important story of the whole 100 years basically and yeah I just thought I don't know if anybody be interested in this come on it's obviously fake it's it's quite obviously fake I never thought that before do you know what convinced me that it took 12 years I'm not sure I ever heard that before but as soon as I heard that I was like oh obviously fake they just had to wait until Star Wars came out and they had the right technology to to fake it so that's what it was anyway case you wondered um let's talk about so that's when the Republic was lost at least some people say much earlier but at the very minimum by the time Kennedy was assassinated it was obvious that we don't have a regular Republic but what did we lose free speech I think it was around we started losing it around 2016 and you know the Twitter files revealed that the government had been leaning on the social media to censor things so now that's all known right there's no speculation involved the government was censoring people like wild for years now 2020 might have been the Zenith but it didn't start then um but yeah the Twitter files told us that Free Speech went away a while ago and uh I don't know it'll ever come back but it's gone so we don't really have a country that's like a republic you know we're a little bit closer to the Iran China Russia model than I was ever aware of um and certainly free speech is only if you say things that nobody cares about so free speech that you can say anything that nobody cares about is opposite of free speech everybody gets that right so is there anybody here who thinks we have free speech in this country does anybody believe we have free speech right because I know somebody's going to say something like but Scott look at the things you're saying right now no the only reason I can say them is that I've already been siloed into such a little bubble that I'm only talking to the people who already think it's true I don't talk to anybody who doesn't agree with me you know I posted something yesterday I forget what it was and it brought in a whole uh trainload of trolls you know the ones that all act the same they just act like trolls and uh I swear they had never seen any of my material before they didn't know who I was um nothing about any of my posts and they were really mad because they think that um if Elon Musk comments on one of my comments which is what brought them in um that they they have to see stuff and they hated it it's like ah if we watch Elon Musk we're going to have to see this guy's comments sometimes can't stand it no we don't have anything like free speech all right um so Elon has been on this point about uh the public doesn't understand what this immigration is really all about so far the illegal migration has created so many new people in the country that it would represent 13 congressional districts in other words we would add 13 people to our government just because of the illegal migration and the idea is that the the Democrats will lavish them with free stuff and make sure that they come in knowing that the Democrats are help them get this better life and then of course the political leaders uh on the left want the extra power that the extra congressional districts gives them and that would allow them to essentially control the country forever if they just get enough migrants in the places where there was too much political power with with Republicans so that so they're doing a play to it's basically a a Hail Mary play so I feel like the Immigrant thing is such an aggressive swing the fense you know All or Nothing play and it really is All or nothing because it if it doesn't work and and they don't get the people in fast enough to take control of the government in the way that they want to then it will implode it'll go the other way so there's this real close timing thing where you've got two teams that are swinging for the fence here's what I mean if the Democrats do succeed in in gaming the system by getting more districts and that's enough for them to take power of the Congress and the presidency then they will just change the rules until nobody can ever compete with them because we've seen the pattern that they like to change the rules to stay in power so there'd be more Jerry mandering and things and by the way Republicans do similar you know sketchy things but if the Democrats were in power they would be they would be the ones doing now at the same time interestingly you've got Donald Trump running for president now what would happen if the Republicans sweep which is very possible it's very possible that the Republicans will sweep and it would be because of immigration so immigration is this really aggressive play for the Democrats to take over everything except that in the short run it's such a an overreach and it's so alarming to the public it might cause the Republicans to win everything so we've got this weird All or Nothing that's been set up by both teams and the Democrat Party will either own everything forever after this election or after they get enough you know immigrants to control everything whereas the Republicans will own everything if they get in before that happens so it's literally just like a timing thing of who's going to own the government completely so that's fun to watch um do you think that elon's uh his filter on this is correct that the real play is to get Democratic power forever do you think that's the major incentive well here's what's complicated these things never have one reason and as soon as you tell yourself well there's this one reason everything gets confusing with a lot of people involved there are different people have different reasons so I would say the following reasons certainly apply the people at the top probably are trying to figure out a way to stay there so yes the people at the top are probably doing exactly what Elon Musk is saying they're trying to beef up their Congressional population so they can control everything however why how does that explain how Ordinary People are supporting it like why would Ordinary People support so much migration do you think the ordinary Democrat is saying ah I'm I'm part of the plan I'm I'm helping the migrants come in because I agree with my leadership we can get all power do you think that's what's happening well maybe some maybe some I would suggest that there's a bigger effect U which is the impulse toward self harm I think that the Democrats are driven at least at the voter level uh maybe a third to a half of their entire political party is obsessed with self harm now the self harm grows out of the white guilt I suppose the the guilt that they got too much and it's because of the legacy of slavery and the systemic racism and they got to do something to you know fix it so I think that's why um yeah so I I think self harm is actually driving most of immigration at the voter level and at the senior level it's a plan to have more control will you buy that that the individual voters are not nearly as complicated they're just trying to ease their guilt and they're doing it by self harm which is the way people do it they harm themselves to get of their guilt yeah so if you look at and by the way this idea of self harm being the primary motivating factor of at least a third of the Democrat party is starting to catch on I don't know if you've seen it anywhere else has anybody seen anybody else mention the self harm theme have you seen it yet you might you might see a little more of it because it's so obvious once you hear it you're like oh yeah it's obvious everything they do has that same quality that it's bad for the people doing it I've never seen that before it it's a very specific white guilt thing I don't know if it's a Christian thing or what it is I don't know where it comes from actually anyway there's new climate alarm now as you know the climate topic has two completely different worlds in one world every new piece of information proves that the temperature is not going up and and that the climate alarm is fake the ice is not melting and the oceans are not rising and the people who make those claims will point to data and you'll look at it you'll say h they make a good point and then you'll see something like today's report that the uh the Earth has endured its hot as years since blah blah blah and it's all heating up and everything's hot and we're all going to die so that's coming from the UN now how do they support that well they point to studies and things that are completely opposite from what the people who say nothing's happening are looking at two different worlds which one's right well let me tell you this the people who were telling you that the climate is going to kill you are the same scientists who didn't know if masks would work and they don't know if your child is male or female they don't know anything about nutrition and think most of what they say about physics is completely made up I'm not so sure string theory is quite what they think it is just saying so um scientists have gone from the most credible um members of society to in my opinion the least credible they didn't just go from oh you're not nearly as awesome as before I think science is just a way to launder lies science the way way it's currently organized and reported in in the Press is just a laundering operation for lies you you just find the science that agrees with you and see if you can push it into the Public's Consciousness now that doesn't mean that real science doesn't happen it's just we're not watching it you know the real science is probably you know somebody in a laboratory inventing a thing that makes communication faster or chip faster and we never hear about that all we hear is oh if you want outside you're going to be melted from all the climate and maybe it's true how would I know all I know is that the people telling me this have no credibility whatsoever scientists they have no credibility on climate change and the funniest the funniest response to that I like to use is the same people who think the news is real you know I laugh when I think talking to somebody who still thinks the news is real it's just impossible there's just no Common Ground they they'll just tell you that they saw something in the news and so you're wrong and then you say but you know the news is all made up and then they'll tell you another thing they heard in the news to prove why it's not all made up and I think okay you're not hearing me it's all made up the important stuff right if they say a hurricane is coming it's probably true but if they say so and so did something because of something that's never true that's never true all right so I don't know what's true I don't know which data is true but I'll tell you if scientists are my source to know that uh I should be alarmed about the climate and they also claim that they can measure the temperature of the Earth really really precisely over decades and if not hundreds of years that's so obviously not true like anybody who's lived in the real world you you know you can't measure the temperature of the earth and get a consistent reading there are way too many things to go wrong that you wouldn't know or you wouldn't admit because you don't want anybody to know you did it wrong so no There's no practical way to measure the temperature of the freaking Earth and and you'd have to be very inexperienced or very young to imagine that's even a doable thing now people often say but Scott doesn't that make you a science denier no I'm not talking about any science I'm talking about there's somebody whose job it is to sell a thermometer there's somebody's job it is to put it somewhere and there's somebody's job to read it and somebody's job to like add it up and find out the averages and stuff that's not science that's just a job and the guy who created the Dilbert comic strip I know what people do when they have jobs they cover up their mistakes they they fudge things they they falsify documents they don't mention that it's near an airport you know a million things so it's it's a purely human endeavor to go read these measurements and decide whether the machine is accurate and then you decide oh this one seems an a whack because it's too close to some concrete so maybe I'll change it but I don't have the budget to change it so I'll just write down the number that's the real world oh this this looks wrong to me because it's giving me an anomalous reading but it's not my job to replace thermometers I'm just the reader uh let's my job is just go out there and write down that number and I think to myself all right if I report this it's going to be a whole bunch of paperwork and I'm not really paid for all that extra I'm paid to just write down this number that doesn't look right but I can make my day a lot easier if I just write it down and go to the next one now I'm of course I'm making up an imaginary situation I don't know if anybody's writing down anything but the point is there's a whole human process that has nothing to do with science when you're just measuring the temperature in a thousand different places Peter Navaro is in prison and uh I was watching CNN do a show about it and I asked you this would Peter Naro be in prison if we had a legitimate uh news entity if the news industry were not completely fake would Peter Navaro be in prison that's a not a real question I'm going to give you the answer no there's not a chance you it requires the illegitimate press to give cover to the illegitimate Department of Justice so you've got something that very clearly and unambiguously inappropri for the Department of Justice if you don't believe me you should believe Ellen dtz who will tell you that you know a lot a lot of the stuff against Trump is just crazy town the lawfare by the way dtz is the one who invented the word lawfare did you know that Ellen dtz he invented that word lawfare and uh he certainly sees it happening to Trump but whatever is happening to Naro is just an extension of the law fair against Trump and I believe that there is no way that Navaro would be in jail if both the left and the right leaning media called what do you think if both the left and the right said this is illegitimate he would not be in jail because I don't think that the system can survive doing things that both the left and the right say well this is obviously wrong it requires at least the L left because they control most of the media to bless it which they did and they blessed it imagine being part of the media that allowed him to go to jail knowing that that wouldn't have happened except for your actions it would only take one entity let's say CNN or MSNBC it would only take one of them to say okay this is too far this is too far we we can't be putting Peter Navaro in jail for you know what he did it would only take one so every person who's uh on CNN and MSNBC you lying you're putting a man in jail for no good reason and how do you feel about that when you go home seriously how do you feel about that when you go home do you say to yourself oh it's not me it's not me cuz I'm just one person no it's you it's you if if you're on the air on a news entity and you let Peter Navaro go to jail right in front of you when you know it's and you're not say anything about it you're putting him in jail that's on you so go sleep with that um New York Times Steve MCU was posting about this the New York Times in what you can only imagine is once again the ridiculous merging with the uh with reality uh they did a the New York Times did a story extolling the virtues of the deep State when we hear deep State instead of recoiling we should rally because it's the Deep State that's protecting you from uh Trump that that's actually in the news the New York times is telling you that the Deep state is really important and valuable because it can you know protect you from people like Trump how in the world I mean how how do you not be embarrassed working for that company anyway on another topic uh um this is changing quickly but if you're not caught up at First Texas was going to start arresting people and deporting them and then the said no you can't do that you know the states can't Deport people and then I guess on an appeal it was reversed and then before I started the show the reversal was reversed am I up to speed yet so at the moment I believe and that could change in five minutes apparently Texas cannot Deport people back to Mexico is that true can give me an update on that or there's another hearing today oh maybe there's just a hearing today anyway so it's up in the air a little bit but here's my plan um as you know um Central South America they're sending uh a lot of criminals up here and some say they're emptying their jails which would be a smart play on their on their half behalf and my plan is to wait until uh all of the criminals from Central and South America and Mexico have been shipped into the United States and then wait for it I'm going to move to Central America it's going to be like a paradise down there all the criminals are going to be in the United States I'm just going to go down there and like hey how's the crime right here and the locals will say crime we haven't any had any crime since 19 20 or 2024 we haven't seen a s s not a single criminal act in two years and I'll be like yeah coming at you all right that's my plan um so did you know that uh Newsmax was reporting this that Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg she had a ruling when she was alive back in 2019 and apparently she was one of the people who laid down how the eighth amendment of our constitution prohibited an excessive fine so there was a case that got to the Supreme Court and somebody some just some individual was find way more than what the crime would suggest would make sense and so you've got this situation where the uh is it the eth amendment yeah the Eighth Amendment uh guarantees the right against unusual punishments you know cruel and unusual but also against excessive fines were you aware that the Constitution of the United States has in direct language that you can't give somebody excessive fines and and poor Trump poor Trump is trying to pay over 400 uh you know million dollars for a victimless crime that is as everybody explained who's in the industry business as usual business as usual and he's got to pay $454 million now by anybody's estimation that is an excessive fine do you think you could find any normal human being who would think that's anything but a ridiculous fine no and and the fact that he's being forced to maybe sell assets um in in a short time period when his assets are mostly physical so he'd have to lose I mean he might lose another 200 million by selling things out of fire sale price because he has to now who in the world thinks that that's any kind of Justice nobody now I assume the Supreme Court will reverse it or and apparently they can even take action when the states are involved in um violating the eth amendment so you don't have to worry about the thing that it's a a state action the Supreme Court can jump in if you're violating the eth amendment and clearly they are obviously there there's no doubt about that right it's just right in front of you it could not be more obvious that they're abusing the the Constitution and uh can we agree that none of those fines would have happened if Trump were not running for president is it fair to say he would not have been prosecuted except running for president now the fact that Leticia James said she was going to go after him but didn't know what she was going after him for and then they searched until they found something how is that not illegal there's no law against that there's no law against saying I'm going after somebody and then going and looking for a crime and then finding a victimless crime and taking his whole business away from him maybe putting him in jail how in the world is that not illegal so I'm going to make a prediction that uh karma is g to be quite a for Leticia James here's what I think's going to happen I think that there'll be enough enemies of hers that they will put enormous resources into looking into any Crim she may have committed and that they will do to her what she did to Trump and God I hope so because you need mutually assured destruction uh when you watch somebody destroying somebody because they're white that's really what it is if if Trump were not if Trump were black none of this would be happening he's being destroyed primarily for being white and Republican I guess and I think that the perfect response would be in a perfectly legal way not anything illegal that people should start turning over every Rock and talking to everybody she's ever worked with until they find a crime do do you think you couldn't find a crime with pretty much anybody if you look hard enough of course you can you'd find like a processed crime or some exaggeration you could call a lie yeah you could find something so my prediction is that a year from now there's a good chance that Trump will be president and Leticia James will be in prison unless she's appealing it but I think they're G the odds of her never have well let me put it this way we've all seen how she acts in public right we we've seen her dance with Glee about the mounting problems for Trump we saw him T we saw her Target him for purely political and personal reasons and then follow up on it and Destroy somebody that you know many of you would like to be president we trying now given what she's done in public that you can observe with your own eyes is there any question in your mind that she's a criminal in other ways I've never seen anybody who acts like she acts the parts we can see who didn't also have a criminal background I've never seen that that honest people don't act anything like the way she's acting so you're if you tell me oh no there was just this one time when she decided to ignore the Constitution and the laws of our country and you know spit on everything that's good no no there's a really high she's got a whole bunch of crimes in her past and you just have to look for them and I would imagine that a tremendous amount of money has already been allocated to pay people to look for it and if the Republicans are not doing that i''d be pretty disappointed but they probably are all right um and uh yeah and as DT warns if Trump is kept from running or maybe he loses because of lawfare um that will not be deemed a credible outcome certainly I would not say that was a fair election if if the lawfare takes them out all right Democrats uh as I've often said what passes as a disagreement is often Democrats not knowing how anything works have you noticed that it looks like it's a disagreement like some philosophical thing but it's not it's just Democrats literally don't have the background and experience in many cases to understand how anything Works Republicans tend to be uh business people who succeeded in business and maybe became a senator later you know they ran some kind of a serious Enterprise and then maybe ran for office but there are a lot of Democrats who never had any kind of business experience let me give you some real world examples I saw a uh user an X Michael Harriet who is explaining um why Dei well here's what he says he says uh well here's the thing while most people think Dei policies have something to do with increasing minorities most Dei policies focus on recruiting and retention and he says instead of lowering your standards you can increase diversity by inviting more diverse students to apply now that's somebody who does it looks like somebody has no experience in the real world that's like stupid isn't it how does he not understand that the problem is there's not enough Supply it's true that any one company can improve their diversity if they do better than the other companies at attracting you know a higher percentage of Supply but it's not true that they can all do it there's too low of Supply the only way you can fix the number of adults you know being a enough to have a diverse workplace the only way to fix that is to fix it at childhood you're going to have to fix the pipeline you're going to have to get them really early like first grade kindergarten and train them so that eventually there's enough people to do every job diversely but how how could you possibly be an adult and not understand that the problem is a supply problem and not a how you do it problem there's no way to do it to create the supply once you're an adult you got to start with 30 years earlier or forget it so we should um and so I looked at uh Michael's um profile and he's a writer and some kind of a race profiteer kind of guy he does some kind of race grip Ry stuff uh everything about race is grifty so I don't know his details but are you surprised that somebody who's a writer and obsessed with race related things can't do even counting and knowing how supply and demand Works no it's very ordinary very ordinary okay here's another one uh apparently the law in New York and some other places maybe California too uh allows a gang member to uh buy a firearm an illegal migrant can buy a firearm legally these are the Democrat laws so they can come in uh they'll actually be helped to bring in uh and then they can find an empty rental property or even your own house and just move into it when you're on vacation and it would be illegal for you to move them out you have to let them stay and if they they stay for a certain amount of time it becomes their property so so basically MS13 knows they can just find an empty house and move in and it's theirs they get to keep it that's real I'm not making that up MS13 can come here illegally but it's we've made it legal to be here illegally they can go to the store and buy a a firearm or they can possess one and they can move into your house while you're on vacation and keep it that's our current laws is there anybody here who didn't know that because this is new it's not every state but I'm sure California and New York the squatter has the rights not the owner now do you think that people who understand how anything Works were be these rules no of course not nobody who had any business experience or experience with the real world would allow that to happen because it's pretty obvious what's going to happen obviously MS13 is going to take over every house they can get why wouldn't they it's free houses California and New York are giving away free houses to MS13 members and I'm not even making that up that's like a a real thing now they don't say it that way it's just that they've created laws that guarantee it now this is my second example where there's something wrong with not just the philosophy of Democrats they seem inable or unable to Think Through really basic stuff how incentives work how any system is designed really basic you want another example I'll give you a two from Ted Lou he's uh one of the California Congress people and there's a video of him it's not a new one but not too long ago a couple years ago he was on MSNBC and he was telling the viewers that the best way to combat fake news is for people to watch MSNBC because they report real news all the time he actually said real news all the time I didn't I didn't even add the all the time part those were his exact words he looked at the camera and said without any any tinge of sarcasm that the way to combat fake news is for people to watch MSNBC because they report real news all the time now you might say to yourself Scott that might be the dumbest thing I've ever heard an elected official say do you think he's unaware do you think he's unaware that MSNBC is all fake because he might be that would be even be more frightening it it would be one thing to imagine you know he's just lying and he wants a job there someday so he's just buttering him up I mean that's not terrible you know it's bad to lie but it's not the worst thing but the worst thing would be if he actually thought it was true what if he thinks it's true have you ever considered that what if the Democrats believe what they're saying because I always assume they don't believe it because it's so weird and stupid stupid how can you possibly believe it it's just something you say to win but he might actually believe that you want another one here's another Ted Lou he said uh that on a post he said Trump claims he is a billionaire but he can't pay 464 million judgment that means he is lying how do I know math wow wow do you know who had to school him in public that Donald Trump is not to blame uh for not having the cash Mark Cuban who couldn't even stand watching his own teammate you know somebody who would be anti-trump he he couldn't stand watching the stupidity coming from his own side so he had to do an extended thread to explain how in an atmosphere of low interest rates somebody like Trump would put all of their cash into assets because the assets could grow but cash isn't worth much in zero interest rate times so Mark cubin had to explain the difference between cash and assets to somebody we elected to make laws so Ted Ted Lou thinks MSNBC tells the truth all the time and he doesn't understand how money works like really basic stuff so yeah uh I contend that the Democratic party can be explained by not understanding how business Works in general so they they get everything wrong in terms of incentives every time and also being um obsessed with self harm so between self harm and not understanding business you get the Democrats at least a third of them I'd say well there's some new uh evidence that happiness is changing for some countries American Germany fell out of the top 20 happiest countries huh I wonder when that happened kind of a sudden drop in the last several years do you think that wokeness might be part of it of course it is of course it is yeah wokeness makes you unhappy why because it's the act of focusing on yourself and how the external world is victimizing you do you know what makes a person unhappy Focus ing on yourself and believing that the external world is after you and the reason you can't succeed is because something somebody else is doing it's all that discrimination yeah so wokeness by its design will make you unhappy that's not all it will do it will also destroy your whole country but in the short term it'll make you unhappy because it shifts your mindset to oh I'd be doing better if it were for all these white supremacists and stuff so of course that's the problem meanwhile Helsinki Finland is looking good um Israel well their numbers were before the October 7th thing so I'm not sure that'll tell you anything uh meanwhile in a separate um survey by Walla Hub they looked at the 10 happiest cities in America so this is a survey so you know it's scientific it must be completely true so here are the cities that they found the happiest in America I'll just read them quickly Scot Arizona Columbia Maryland Pearl City Hawaii San Francisco California halulu Hawaii Irvine California Madison Wisconsin San Jose California Overland Park Kansas and Fremont California so we've got out of the top 10 San Francisco Irvine San Jose and Fremont four of the top 10 are California ities do you know why well first of all I doubt the question about San Francisco I'm not sure that that's accurate but um it's the weather it's the weather the the weather just really really makes a difference if you have a choice go where the weather's good so these are just four places in California where the weather's real good Los Angeles isn't on the list I'm surprised San Francisco's on there anyway um do you remember Christine blazzy Ford blazzy Ford she's the one who said that uh justice Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her or something and Molly Hemingway uh posts 20 things that would strongly suggest she lied about the whole thing now I don't have to go through the whole list but just know that there are 20 really strong indications that they never met and she made up the whole thing but somehow that story has emerged again there's a lawyer who is just sued in Great Britain for saying that only women can have periods so they got some pretty bad hate speech rules over there that would be considered hate speech to say that only women can have periods um I call them vagina having people people so that's how I get away they're just vagina having people all right um rasmuson is reporting some uh poll results on voters that suggest the Republicans are going to gain seats in the upcoming election so here's the details from raspon all right so if the elections for congress were held today 47% would vote for Republican candidates while 41 would vote for Democrat so that's is a Sixpoint spread it's been higher it's been as high as uh nine recently in January but um two years ago in March 22 Republicans had an 11-point lead um around now but in the final polling before election day Republicans had a five-point lead and that five-point lead compare that to today's Sixpoint lead um got them a net gain of nine seats so and they captured house so net gain now the the immigrants coming in who are going to boost the number of uh congressional seats that won't kick in until after the next census I guess so it's a a long-term play but uh do you think this will hold do you think that this indication does tell you that Republicans will do well well there's going to be so much that happens between now and then yeah that that lead will evaporate between now and then all right if you're not watching the ongoing story about the Dominion machines and there is allegations from a sheriff in Michigan that he's seen documentation to suggest that serbians accessed the machines the voting machines while votes were being counted that's quite an allegation so the allegation which I'm not saying is true I'm just reporting the allegation is that the Sheriff says there were at least two serbians Nationals who were accessing the machines in real time while they were watching while the votes were being counted now the access they had presumably would give them the ability to change things doesn't mean they did uh Dominion's comment on this is that it is flatly false flatly false didn't happen now here's what we're waiting for flatly false is is sort of lacky in details here's what a real denial would sound like that is flatly false followed by the reason and the reason would sound like I'll just make this one up but it would sound like something like this uh you're looking at records that are from the wrong day I'm not saying that's true I'm just saying that's the sort of thing you'd expect or they'd say uh yes the serbians work for us they were contractors they did have access but we walled off their thing and we can check the records to see if they did anything so it was it was fine don't worry about it now I didn't hear that and maybe that will come later but what you expect for a real denial is some some acknowledgment that the evidence exists but your version of it is that it's not saying what you think it's saying when there's a flat denial that doesn't acknowledge that the people making the alleg or looking at a piece of paper with writing on it that it exists to not mention what the real story is about whatever it is they're looking at is sort of a dog that's not barking really loudly so keep an eye on this one I remind you that uh 95 to 100% of every Claim about the 2020 election is highly likely to be wrong even if the election was rigged but any specific claim and this would be a specific claim uh is unlikely to be true however this one is getting a little bit more attention than most of them and there does seem to be a document and there are some questions doesn't mean that anything happened that was illegal or that it was rigged it just means that if you ever thought our system was auditable do you feel stupid now is there anybody here who ever believed we could audit our election system and find out if it was proper who whoever believe that here again I think Democrats believe it if they have not worked and lived in the real world now I have worked and lived in the real world and a lot of the times it was my job to fund and put together you know technology packages complicated things often make uh I would often be collecting data from different sources to do an analysis if you've done that kind of business you know what any complicated environment looks like so the election system is a complicated environment I don't need to have direct evidence or direct experience with that domain to make the following claim there's no way you can audit that thing it's just like my my state about you can't measure the temperature of the earth you know correctly and over time and show the change you can't do those things in the real world in the real world you can't you can't increase diversity without discriminating because there just aren't enough candidates not in the real world and 100% of people with real world experience know that you know some might lie because you know their team is lying but we all know it everybody who has lived in the real world knows that you can't keep those measuring devices accurate over time the maintenance problems the concrete problems the the fact that they measure the high and the lows instead of you know just the average there all kinds of problems plus the number of places that aren't measured the fact that heat can go hide in different places in the planet for a while and then you know move around and you don't have measurements everywhere so you can't capture that and then they tell us that the election is a no nobody who's ever spent a minute in the real world could look at anything that complicated with so many different players involved and you just ask yourself Scott can you track your own vote to make sure it got to his destination was and was counted no that's all you need to know that's the end of the story if I can't if I can't track my own vote no it's not auditable who would ever think that who would think that you could check every part of a automated system and that nobody could get in there and you know put a little bug in there or a worm or something and and that the company producing it has every right to keep their software proprietary so do you do you think there's somebody who's just an independent Observer who has access to uh dominions software like to actually look at the SCE code I don't know I would think that they would keep that to themselves in the real world in the real world they're not going to let anybody see it which means you don't know what it's doing right in the real world if you design a system and it's not giving you what you want year after year after year same problems if you don't change it or talk loudly about your desire to change it then it's not the problem is that you designed it to do what it's doing right design shows you intention over time you know on day one something might do not do what you hoped it would do but over time if we keep having these results that the public isn't completely trusting and they're not getting the results quickly and there's a lot of you know credibility questions if you don't fix that it's because you want it not to be fixed so again if you have any real world experience and you and look at the difference of opinions from the people with real world experience versus those who don't and it's a waste of time to have an argument with somebody who doesn't have real world business experience if I get a in a conversation with somebody has no real world business experience they're going to say of course we can improve diversity everywhere at the same time no you can't that's stupid no nobody with experience thinks that uh and uh that you can audit the elections nobody with any technical experience believes that show me anybody who who's ever written a functional piece of code and you tell me that they'll honestly think you can audit the entire election system nobody not a single person with experience people with experience who think you can measure the planet Earth none these are really clean examp examples of things that are lies we know those are not doable things all right ladies and gentlemen this brings me to the conclusion of the best live stream you're going to see today do you want some optimism to close down who wants some optimism all right here's some everything's trending in the right direction except debt but I think we'll figure that out too everything's trending in the right direction so they're terrible problems which um in real time are being reframed and the big difference between this year and prior years is the growth of the Independent Media so Independent Media you know the Glenn greenwalls the Matt taies the Michael shellenberger and people like me we get to say what the mainstream corporate media can say and it really is making a difference now you're you're already seeing the power of the internet dads and I I'll say internet moms as well have you seen it have you seen any situation where the the let's say the uh responsible people who know how things work have put a a damper on things yeah that whole uh um blood bath thing the bloodbath thing was turned into a joke by the independent by people like me We turned it into a joke and it it completely disabled the Democrats because every time they said it we would laugh at them and make fun of it and create and get content and the more they said it the more we laughed and the funnier it was and they finally just sort of slunk away because I don't think they're talking about it today are they and it got crazier when they brought in their smartest people all right we really screwed up in this makes some kind of weird lawyerly argument where the bloodbath thing starts to make sense again so then they started to say well okay granted he wasn't talking about it like that it was just about the car business but that's what he does so it really must be seen in the context of our other hoaxes so we hoaxed you about the fine people we hoaxed you about whipping immigrants if you believe that well obviously and so once it got to the point where they were using their other hoaxes to prop up the new hoax and all the independent people could see it and we talked about it and we thought it was funny it kind of made it go away so there's going to be more of that things are very different this time and I think we're going to be watching for any in the election um in my opinion there's no chance that they won't attempt to rig the election that's my view I I see no chance none at all that the Democrats will just play fair um I think they'll try to rig it in legal means you if they can change some rules in ways that help but definitely in illegal means too because uh that's the world we're in I can't believe for a minute they would allow uh Trump to become president if they could stop it because they've all been convinced he's like the second coming of Hitler so of course they're going to try to stop him of course but I think that between the Independent Media which makes a big difference uh X and Elon which makes a big difference in our free speech I do think that the corrective forces are lining up uh I think that it's starting to look to me like Trump will get through all of his lawfare now I'm not sure I would have said that two months ago but the way things are shaping up that even if he can't pay his fine to Leticia James I shouldn't admit this but I'm going to there's part of me the hopes he can't pay the fine is anybody having that same feeling because I feel this needs to be pushed to the breaking point I want to see Trump say I can't pay it we're going to review it and you can't make me pay pay it before it's appealed you're going to have to put me in jail now I think what they try to do is close his businesses in other words I think that Leticia and her goons would show up with you know police tape like tape up the his building and say we own it now imagine that do you think they have the gusts to do that do you think that New Yorkers would allow them to take over the building right in front of them well a lot of them would but a lot of them wouldn't a lot of them wouldn't so there's part of me that says let's push this but I don't want to risk Trump actually being in jail you know because they could very easily Peter Navaro him too but I don't feel like nibbling around the edges on this is working it's just going to cost them a billion dollars I think he needs to go right at it and just say you know what every person in the whole country can see what's happening he should stand in front of his building on the on the deadline and say here I am here I am but do it in front of everybody now I can't recommend that Trump do that because he'd probably end up in jail and that's not cool but there's but there's part of me that fantasizes he just pushes it Until It Breaks you know you know you know if you have that loose tooth you've ever lost a tooth when you're a kid and you can't stop pushing it with your tongue because it's loose and you just you at some point even though it hurts you just want to rip that thing out that's how I'm feeling let's just pull that mole around and see what happens anyway um I'm going to talk to the people on locals after I say goodbye to the rest of you on this platform they get the special after show because they're so special and uh thanks for joining on X and locals and You.

Tube and uh Rumble too see you tomorrow same time same place

[Music]

well welcome to coffee with Scott Adams

the highlight of human civilization and

the best thing that ever happened to

you I always forget to turn down my

sound listen to myself if you'd like to

take this experience up to levels that

even Google's Gemini can't even imagine

all you need is a cuper mar glass a

tanker chal's d a canteen jug or flask a

vessel of any kind fill it with your

favorite liquid I like coffee and join

me now for the unparallel pleasure the

dopamine the other the day the thing

that makes everything better it's called

the simultaneous sip happens now

go ah good

delightful I think we're ready now if

you're not already

subscribing to see the Dilbert cartoon

that has continued on it's now called

dilber reborn and it's spicier what you

would be

missing and by the way you can only

subscribe on X see my profile and on the

locals platform will you get the comic

plus another comic called robots re news

and a bunch more but what you're missing

if you're not subscribing to that is a

uh Dei is being extended to the robots

in Dilbert's company so Dilbert is

running about

about two years ahead of the

reality probably we two years from

having an AI coworker an actual embodied

walking talking

coworker and uh it's only a matter of

time before Dei catches up and

discrimination against robots becomes a

thing and in the uh comic that you don't

get to see today unless you're a

subscriber uh the robot is complaining

about uh

people calling him derogatory names like

Skylink hey

Skylink anyway so that's what you're

missing Nvidia has announced a new GPU

new chip do you call it a chip it's more

than a chip but it's got 28 billion

transistors now I don't even know how to

process that my brain can't even hold

that how do you make anything with 208

how how could you possibly manufacture

anything that had 208 billion physical

anythings how's that even

possible you I get that it's small but

208 billion

transistors uh there's some fun stuff

about to happen and it's pretty small

too so I guess you can fit in one

rack you know the things that

practically were an entire data seter

not too long

ago well here's an interesting thing

happening uh bride . a um took some of

my online shows this show and uh tried

to use AI to predict what the next show

would

be so it takes it takes my patterns and

characteristics and turned it into a

video of me actually doing the show

today before I do the show today and so

it was taking some logical guesses about

what I'd be talking about it was pretty

good yeah I mean didn't get exactly the

prediction uh but it was sort of amazing

that it it could do an imitation to be

doing the show and apparently there's a

entity

party. that is taking uh all of my

materials and building some kind of an

engine where you can reproduce me this

raises many questions about

IP because I have publicly said that if

AI wants to copy me that you know I'm

giving a a public approval to that but

how deep does that go would that include

does that automatically give permission

to use all of my

books I don't know we're we're in weird

territory where maybe writing books

won't make any sense anymore because

they just get stolen by

AI uh So speaking of

that um you know the book The Fourth

turning a lot of you have heard of it I

said to myself you know I'd like to know

what's in that book but I certainly

don't want to read it so I asked chat

GPT to summarize it and then I got to

ask questions you know I asked more

detailed questions well what about this

or what's to say about this and what's

the prediction and what's the basis for

it and in five minutes you could query

pretty much all the important stuff in

the book now I haven't read the book but

a lot of people have been asking me what

do you think about that fourth turning

book it's predicting the future and it

doesn't look good

So I listened to at least the summary of

it by Chad GPT and I've come to the

following

conclusion it looks like total

to me how many of you think that's

real this the most I've ever

heard in my life none none of that looks

even a little bit

convincing but that's just me now some

of you are going to say if somebody said

this morning but Scott look at these

very specific predictions that it got

right and I look at the very specific

predictions and every one of them you

could have done without that

book what was it hard to predict there

might be a pandemic

someday not so hard was was it hard to

predict that um our Congress would keep

spending until there's an

emergency no no I didn't really need to

read a book to know that but those are

some of the predictions so beware of

generic predictions because they're

pretty easy to

do

there's a new study that says using

computers can give you erectile

dysfunction um and you will be far less

likely to produce sperm and be a

functioning

human so what could cause that huh if

the more time you spend looking at your

screen the less your penis

works could it be porn is better than

people now I've been here's something

I've been warning about and I didn't

have to read that fourth turning book um

it is

inevitable that because humans don't

change that fast we don't evolve very

quickly but technology improves very

quickly it was inevitable that porn

would catch up to and

surpass human to human sex now you're

saying to yourself Scott that's crazy I

clearly prefer human sex I know you do

but most people don't even have access

to it and if they have access to it it's

not very often it's not as often as they

want it

so uh yeah this makes perfect sense that

people are just seeing something that

looks like the ideal the ideal thing

that turns them on and then as soon as

they turn off their computer they turn

around and the partner that they could

earn you know the partner that's the

best they can

do may not be really competitive with

that thing that was on the screen so

when people say uh these men are not

producing their erections in sperm like

they used to be maybe it's

because humans got worse when technology

got

better I think that's the whole

explanation people got worse technology

got

better all right uh at Cambridge

University in Great Britain uh 12% of

the undergrads identify as homosexual

not too different than it sounds roughly

um the average uh but 20 uh almost 30%

identifies as

bisexual so 30% of Cambridge is

bisexual do you think that happened on

its

own do do do you think people just

thought it through and things are

changing and you know attitudes are

changing and they just said to

themselves you know what I think I want

to be a little little bisexual

well maybe it's some of it is that it's

uh you know less ostracized that

probably makes a difference you know

incentives always

matter um but don't you think that this

is literally

programmed see I want to see the I want

to see the study that shows me the Tik

Tock users versus the non-tick Tock

users and you'd have to see what if

people identified as gay or bicep sexual

or any part of the lgbtq see if they

identified before they started using Tik

Tok I think you're going to see a direct

link I think you'll see a very direct

correlation between using Tik Tock and

changing your gender or your sex

preference so anyway it's people are

going to act like it's a big old

surprise when the entire world catches

up what one of the things about being a

hypnotist is you really can see the

future it just takes a while for people

to realize what's going on but if you

know if you're alert to how how strong

persuasion is it's pretty obvious that

Tik Tok is changing people's sexual

preference but if you're Normie you say

well that can't be a thing I can't

change my whole you know sexual

preference by watching something on a

screen yes she can it's not even hard I

can rewire almost every one of you if I

had enough

time I know you don't believe it you're

all you're all thinking well not me I

mean I'm so you're you're so whatever

you are that you can never change

nope nope any good hypnotist could

change your sexual preference and you

would think it was your own idea it

would just take some time it just

couldn't it couldn't be done in one one

setting like you couldn't do it in an

hour but you could do it over time yeah

pretty reliably and that's what Tik Tok

does I

think um there's a story about Google's

AI this is in the Free Press um so

there's a x bunch of X Google employees

are basically saying that it's no

surprise the Gemini AI that came out of

Google was so woke that it was useless

basically it was just a huge racist

because it was so

woke and the people who work there say

you know they're not surprised because

everything about working there had to be

Dei so apparently even if you made a

slight patch to the software a small

software upgrade to something just make

it a little better you had to write an

impact statement about how it helped to

Dei

seriously if you made a software patch

you had to State how it was good for Dei

or bad I guess so that was real thing so

the thing that you have to understand is

that this is not

fixable there isn't any way to fix the

technology because the technology was

never

broken the technology did exactly what

they wanted it to

do it's just that when you see it it's

so

outlandish that you can't believe it but

no it was designed to do exactly what it

did so I would um I don't I assume other

people have made the same prediction but

here's a

prediction Google may never be in the AI

business in the way other companies

might be able to because it won't be

able to fix it it's not fixable unless

they got rid of all the

employees and so may maybe that's going

to happen

someday nope not going to fix

that but

um the the there's another uh product

that might be uh might be deleted too

let's see who's I got to find uh so Eric

Weinstein was saying so there's a a

Google product called engr

viewer I've never heard of that before

but um I think it used to be called

something else maybe but what you could

do is you could put in a search term and

you could find out when it took off so

you know how there's some Search terms

that had zero interest until one

day now that sudden interest in the in

the search term can be really revealing

about how the uh the media is

hypnotizing and brainwashing the public

so if something was never mentioned for

decades and then suddenly it's all in

the news and it's the only thing you're

talking about it could be

organic but that would be unusual far

more likely it's an it's an OP that uh

some somebody is trying to make it a

thing and you think it's happening

naturally but it's not it's the

mainstream media working with sometimes

our own intelligence people to make

something Trend so here's an interesting

um prediction by Eric Weinstein he says

prediction Google engram viewer will be

shut down one day for public access it

is simply too

subversive and at first I looked at it

and I thought well you're not going to

shut it down just cuz the you know the

answers are a little inconvenient but

the more I thought about it I'm going to

back his

prediction I think he's right I I think

that it reveals when an OP starts and it

makes it very obvious that it isn't you

know some kind of a you know

brainwashing operation you you can just

see it in the graph boom everybody's

talking about this

now so I think he's right which is a

hell of a prediction

a good prediction all right there's a

you probably know there's a mind reading

ability of AI that uh it can actually if

you put some sensors on your head the

right kind of sensors it can look at

brain wave patterns and it can tell what

you're thinking and draw a picture of

it so that's a real thing so you know

you can think of a giraffe and the AI

through its sensors will will draw

giraff because it can tell you're

thinking about it now apparently there's

some big breakthrough in that I saw this

on a Rowan CH young uh Thread about AI

who's a good follow for all the AI

stuff and researches a stability AI in

Princeton they've got this new thing

called Mind ey to and it's some big leap

in restructuring reconstructing images

from brain

activity now how much do you want your

government not to have

that that that's the ultimate thing you

don't want anybody to have I can't think

of any technology that would be worse

for humankind than being able to read

your mind that's your last

freedom your last freedom is to be able

to think your own thoughts privately and

have nobody know it that's right on the

verge of going away now do you think

your your government can't force you to

the sensors of course they can do you

think they'll use it to solve

crime

yep soon as it gets good enough they're

going to say uh think about where you

were Tuesday and it's going to draw a

picture of the

crime and you'll you'll be like you'll

be trying to beat it like a light

detector test you be like oh squeeze my

sphincter or whatever the trick is to

beat the light detector test you'll be

like oh think of sex don't think of my

crime but yeah if if they can read your

mind they're going to be reading your

mind there there's no chance that this

gets used only for innocent fun oh the

government will be reading your mind

that's

coming well the best story of the day is

the uh the theory that uh president

macron of France his wife has uh was

born a man and uh is still a

man and uh I guess Candace Owens is

having fun with this and as she says it

would be easy to disprove that he

married a man who represents as a woman

now all you'd have to do is show a

picture of her when she's

young any time in the first 30 years of

her

life and apparently nobody can find a

picture of macron's wife below the age

of

30 now don't you think it would be

pretty easy to prove that you were born

a woman and you've always been a woman

if you were born a woman and you've

always been a

woman as Candace says just one

photograph that's all it takes do do you

know anybody who doesn't have any

photographs of themselves before the age

of

30 now she's not claiming she doesn't

have any photographs but it seems like

the

easiest the easiest rumor to debunk and

then just to make it fun there's videos

on the internet that you shouldn't trust

at all that makes it look like she has a

male bulge in some of her pants suits

and

dresses now I don't trust the Bulge and

the

pants thing at all uh do do you remember

a Curb Your Enthusiasm episode with

Larry

David where he was wearing a a kind of

pair of pants that when he sat down it

would sort of pillow up like he was

excited and then people would think

think he was excited he's like no no

it's just the pants the pants just fold

this way anyway so I think that's

probably what's going on but the fact

that they can't produce a picture and

then further the the theory

goes that uh there there are pictures of

macron's wife's brother as a as a young

person that matches what she looks like

fairly perfectly but that alone does

anything cuz they would be

siblings but apparently her brother

[Laughter]

disappeared so the alleged

brother I know somehow he disappeared

he's just not with

us and no

explanation

so if you told me well I did hear the

story the other day when I heard the

story the other day I immediately

dismissed it as you know just internet

fun and couldn't possibly be true but

the but the further you dig into

it the more fun it gets I I'm going to

stop short of saying I believe

it but the but the fact that it's so

easily

disproved but yet not disproved is very

entertaining all right so whatever

happens with this story I am entertained

and by the way why do I care I mean I

don't really care

what their relationship is it's not my

business but it is funny it's very funny

all

right

um so there's a there's a movie called

The American Society of magical

Negros um that opened up and uh in its

first first weekend it only made one

million dollars in the entire

us or as or as the uh and wokeness

account was said it was a box office

bloodbath the it's just a totally

anti-white movie so it basically is

that's what it is it's just an

anti-white movie and uh the public

decided nope they didn't want to see it

now were any of you tempted to see the

anti-white

movie so I saw something online before I

saw this story I saw something online

that the reviews were

excellent did anybody see that that so

the critical reviews were just like

really good I think probably before it

was released maybe they were saying that

so I thought to myself you know this

might be because I think it was supposed

to be funny or something I thought I

might actually watch this movie and then

I heard it was just an anti-white movie

and I said oh well I'm not going to

watch that movie it makes me wonder if

this is you know you're always looking

for the the the changing points like is

this the inflection point well probably

not but it's good to know that an

anti-white movie didn't make money so

that's

good de um did you notice I I posted

yesterday I asked people when they think

the Republic ended in the United States

now I when I was born I was under the

oppression and most of my childhood and

even adulthood that we were a uh some

kind of a

Democratic federal

republic and that we voted for people

and then they were in charge and they

ran the country well I've I've since

become convinced by 100% of all evidence

that the Republic ended sometime in the

past but I was curious when because

clearly whoever is pulling the strings

is not are elected officials that's

pretty obvious and so I had my own

theory was probably about the time that

Kennedy was

assassinated that that was sort of the

obvious point where the intelligence

people were running the show if they

could just kill the elected leader and

get away with it which apparently is

what happened apparently I wasn't there

but it does look very much like the CIA

killed Kennedy and that they got away

with

it so coincidentally Ron Paul was

interviewed by tuck

and the same day I was asking about the

Republic you know when do you think it

ended

um Ron Paul said the date I say it was

concrete that there was a coup and we

lost our government was November 22nd

the assassination of

JFK so Ron Paul is saying that was the

day that we lost the government now

others say it was earlier or something

about the uh the Federal Reserve and

bankers and stuff and I don't understand

any of that I'm not discounting it I

just don't understand the topic so I'll

I'll dig into that a little bit but you

know there's some theory about the

Titanic went down and a bunch of Bankers

were on it and that allowed the FED to

be created and that was a a way to rip

people off and I don't quite understand

how that works but I'll look into it

because I know you're going to ask me

about it so I will I'll look into it

anyway here's something the Ron Paul

said about that about the assassination

of

JFK he said I find it astonishing and

Despicable that the director of the CIA

at the time Alan Dulles was appointed to

the Warren Commission which was tasked

with investigating it so then Tucker

says so the guy who was responsible for

the murder was investigating the

murder

yes yes and by the way doues wasn't just

a member

of the Warren Commission he was probably

the only one that

mattered probably the only one that

mattered there were other members but

you know if one of them is the head of

the CIA the head of the CIA probably

picked the other

members do you know how uh uh John

Brennan does it do you know how he can

get 50 people to say the laptop thing is

Russian information Uh Russian

disinformation he gets to personally

pick who he talks to

that's how it's done if you're the one

who picks the people you can get any

answer you want you just pick the people

who owe you something or already agree

with you not too hard so yes in my

lifetime this really happened that the

CIA apparently killed the president in

conjunction with somebody else probably

and and then assigned themselves to look

into who killed him very much like OJ

looking for the real killer

so before OJ said he'd find the real

color in the real world that actually

happened that the CIA was helping to

find the real

killer now I don't have proof that the

CIA killed him but I'd say all evidence

suggests is that

fair would you go with that that I don't

have proove but all evidence suggests it

seems pretty obvious at this

point do you know the story the zuder

zuder film you know the film we've all

seen now there's a there's a subsidiary

story that says it was you know it was

altered so but beyond that did you know

that it took years before anybody saw

that

video are you aware of that that that

many years went by Between the

assassination and then the time we first

saw the

video now don't you think that the

person who took the video

was aware that he had the

video do do you think he wasn't aware

that it was the most Val yeah it was

1977 that the video comes out that was

what 12 years after the assassination

something like that

and and uh

anyway I guess I don't have to finish

that

point so yeah the the fact that the

video didn't come out for 12

years is

almost dead certain it's

fake does anybody disagree with that if

you had the most valuable video in the

entire

world and you sat on it for 12

years that guarantees it was fake

because there's no there's no human

behavior you've ever seen that would

match what allegedly that person did sat

on the most important story of the whole

100 years basically and yeah I just

thought I don't know if anybody be

interested in this come on it's

obviously

fake it's it's quite obviously fake I

never thought that before do you know

what convinced me that it took 12 years

I'm not sure I ever heard that before

but as soon as I heard that I was like

oh obviously fake they just had to wait

until Star Wars came out and they had

the right technology to to fake it so

that's what it was

anyway case you

wondered

um let's talk about so that's when the

Republic was lost at least some people

say much earlier but at the very

minimum by the time Kennedy was

assassinated it was obvious that we

don't have a regular

Republic but what did we lose free

speech I think it was

around we started losing it around

2016

and you know the Twitter files revealed

that the government had been leaning on

the social media to censor things so now

that's all known right there's no

speculation involved the government was

censoring people like wild for years now

2020 might have been the Zenith but it

didn't start

then um but yeah the Twitter files told

us that Free Speech went away a while

ago and uh I don't know it'll ever come

back but it's gone so we don't really

have a country that's like a republic

you know we're a little bit closer to

the Iran China Russia model than I was

ever aware

of um and certainly free speech is only

if you say things that nobody cares

about so free speech that you can say

anything that nobody cares about is

opposite of free speech everybody gets

that right so is there anybody here who

thinks we have free speech in this

country

does anybody believe we have free

speech right because I know somebody's

going to say something like but Scott

look at the things you're saying right

now no the only reason I can say them is

that I've already been siloed into such

a little bubble that I'm only talking to

the people who already think it's true I

don't talk to anybody who doesn't agree

with

me you know I posted something yesterday

I forget what it was and it brought in a

whole uh trainload of trolls you know

the ones that all act the same they just

act like trolls and uh I swear they had

never seen any of my material before

they didn't know who I was um nothing

about any of my posts and they were

really mad because they think that um if

Elon Musk comments on one of my comments

which is what brought them in um that

they they have to see stuff and they

hated it it's like ah if we watch Elon

Musk we're going to have to see this

guy's comments sometimes can't stand it

no we don't have anything like free

speech all right um so Elon has been on

this point about uh the public doesn't

understand what this immigration is

really all about so far the illegal

migration has created so many new people

in the country that it would represent

13 congressional districts in other

words we would add 13 people to our

government just because of the illegal

migration and the idea is that the the

Democrats will lavish them with free

stuff and make sure that they come in

knowing that the Democrats are help them

get this better

life and then of course the political

leaders uh on the left want the extra

power that the extra congressional

districts gives them and that would

allow them to essentially control the

country forever if they just get enough

migrants in the places where there was

too much political power with with

Republicans so that so they're doing a

play to it's basically a a Hail Mary

play so I feel like the Immigrant thing

is such an aggressive swing the fense

you know All or Nothing play and it

really is All or nothing because it if

it doesn't work and and they don't get

the people in fast enough to take

control of the government in the way

that they want to then it will implode

it'll go the other way so there's this

real close timing thing where you've got

two teams that are swinging for the

fence here's what I mean if the

Democrats do succeed in in gaming the

system by getting more districts and

that's enough for them to take power of

the Congress and the

presidency then they will just change

the rules until nobody can ever compete

with them because we've seen the pattern

that they like to change the rules to

stay in power so there'd be more Jerry

mandering and things and by the way

Republicans do similar you know sketchy

things but if the Democrats were in

power they would be they would be the

ones

doing now at the same time

interestingly you've got Donald Trump

running for

president now what would happen if the

Republicans

sweep which is very

possible it's very possible that the

Republicans will

sweep and it would be because of

immigration so immigration is this

really aggressive play for the Democrats

to take over everything except that in

the short run it's such a an overreach

and it's so alarming to the public it

might cause the Republicans to win

everything so we've got this weird All

or Nothing that's been set up by both

teams and the Democrat Party will either

own everything forever after this

election or after they get enough you

know immigrants to control everything

whereas the Republicans will own

everything if they get in before that

happens

so it's literally just like a timing

thing of who's going to own the

government

completely so that's fun to

watch um do you think that

elon's uh his filter on this is correct

that the real play is to get Democratic

power

forever do you think that's the major

incentive well here's what's complicated

these things never have one reason and

as soon as you tell yourself well

there's this one reason everything gets

confusing with a lot of people involved

there are different people have

different reasons so I would say the

following reasons certainly apply the

people at the top probably are trying to

figure out a way to stay there so yes

the people at the top are probably doing

exactly what Elon Musk is saying they're

trying to beef up their Congressional

population so they can control

everything however why how does that

explain how Ordinary People are

supporting it like why would Ordinary

People support so much migration do you

think the ordinary Democrat is saying ah

I'm I'm part of the plan I'm I'm helping

the migrants come in

because I agree with my leadership we

can get all power do you think that's

what's happening well maybe

some maybe some I would suggest that

there's a bigger effect U which is the

impulse toward self harm I think that

the Democrats are

driven at least at the voter

level uh maybe a third to a half of

their entire political party is obsessed

with self harm now the self harm grows

out of the white guilt I suppose the the

guilt that they got too much and it's

because of the legacy of slavery and the

systemic racism and they got to do

something to you know fix

it so I think that's why um

yeah so I I think self harm is actually

driving most of immigration at the voter

level and at the senior level it's a

plan to have more

control will you buy that that the

individual voters are not nearly as

complicated they're just trying to ease

their guilt and they're doing it by self

harm which is the way people do it they

harm themselves to get of their

guilt yeah so if you look at and by the

way this idea of self harm being the

primary motivating factor of at least a

third of the Democrat party is starting

to catch on I don't know if you've seen

it anywhere else has anybody seen

anybody else mention the self harm theme

have you seen it

yet you might you might see a little

more of it because it's so obvious once

you hear it you're like oh yeah it's

obvious everything they do has that same

quality that it's bad for the people

doing it I've never seen that before it

it's a very specific white guilt thing I

don't know if it's a Christian thing or

what it is I don't know where it comes

from

actually anyway there's new climate

alarm now as you know the climate topic

has two completely different worlds in

one world every new piece of information

proves that the temperature is not going

up and and that the climate alarm is

fake the ice is not melting and the

oceans are not

rising and the people who make those

claims will point to data and you'll

look at it you'll say

h they make a good point and then you'll

see something like today's report that

the uh the Earth has endured its hot as

years since blah blah blah and it's all

heating up and everything's hot and

we're all going to die so that's coming

from the UN now how do they support that

well they point to studies and things

that are completely opposite from what

the people who say nothing's happening

are looking

at two different worlds which one's

right well let me tell you this the

people who were telling you that the

climate is going to kill you are the

same scientists who didn't know if masks

would work and they don't know if your

child is male or

female they don't know anything about

nutrition and think most of what they

say about physics is completely made up

I'm not so sure string theory is quite

what they think it is just

saying so um scientists have gone from

the most credible um members of society

to in my opinion the least

credible they didn't just go from oh

you're not nearly as awesome as before I

think science is just a way to launder

lies science the way way it's currently

organized and reported in in the Press

is just a laundering operation for lies

you you just find the science that

agrees with you and see if you can push

it into the Public's Consciousness now

that doesn't mean that real science

doesn't happen it's just we're not

watching it you know the real science is

probably you know somebody in a

laboratory inventing a thing that makes

communication faster or chip faster and

we never hear about that all we hear is

oh if you want outside you're going to

be melted from all the climate and maybe

it's true how would I know all I know is

that the people telling me this have no

credibility

whatsoever scientists they have no

credibility on climate

change and the funniest the funniest

response to that I like to

use is the same people who think the

news is real you know I laugh when I

think talking to somebody who still

thinks the news is real

it's just

impossible there's just no Common Ground

they they'll just tell you that they saw

something in the news and so you're

wrong and then you say but you know the

news is all made up and then they'll

tell you another thing they heard in the

news to prove why it's not all made up

and I think okay you're not hearing me

it's all made up the important stuff

right if they say a hurricane is coming

it's probably true but if they say so

and so did something because of

something that's never true

that's never

true all right so I don't know what's

true I don't know which data is true but

I'll tell you if scientists are my

source to know that uh I should be

alarmed about the climate and they also

claim that they can measure the

temperature of the Earth really really

precisely over decades and if not

hundreds of years that's so obviously

not

true like anybody who's lived in the

real

world you you know you can't measure the

temperature of the earth and get a

consistent

reading there are way too many things to

go wrong that you wouldn't know or you

wouldn't admit because you don't want

anybody to know you did it wrong so no

There's no practical way to measure the

temperature of the freaking Earth and

and you'd have to be very

inexperienced or very young to imagine

that's even a doable thing now people

often say but Scott doesn't that make

you a science denier no I'm not talking

about any science I'm talking about

there's somebody whose job it is to sell

a thermometer there's somebody's job it

is to put it somewhere and there's

somebody's job to read it and somebody's

job to like add it up and find out the

averages and stuff that's not

science that's just a job and the guy

who created the Dilbert comic strip I

know what people do when they have

jobs they cover up their mistakes they

they fudge things they they falsify

documents they don't mention that it's

near an

airport you know a million things so

it's it's a purely human endeavor to go

read these measurements and decide

whether the machine is accurate and then

you decide oh this one seems an a whack

because it's too close to some concrete

so maybe I'll change it but I don't have

the budget to change it so I'll just

write down the

number that's the real world oh this

this looks wrong to me because it's

giving me an anomalous

reading but it's not my job to replace

thermometers I'm just the reader uh

let's my job is just go out there and

write down that number and I think to

myself all right if I report

this it's going to be a whole bunch of

paperwork and I'm not really paid for

all that extra I'm paid to just write

down this

number that doesn't look

right but I can make my day a lot easier

if I just write it down and go to the

next one now I'm of course I'm making up

an imaginary situation I don't know if

anybody's writing down anything but the

point is there's a whole human process

that has nothing to do with science when

you're just measuring the temperature in

a thousand different

places Peter Navaro is in

prison and uh I was watching CNN do a

show about it and I asked you this would

Peter Naro be in prison if we had a

legitimate uh

news entity if the news industry were

not completely fake would Peter Navaro

be in prison that's a not a real

question I'm going to give you the

answer no there's not a chance you it

requires the illegitimate press to give

cover to the illegitimate Department of

Justice so you've got something that

very clearly and

unambiguously inappropri for the

Department of Justice if you don't

believe me you should believe Ellen dtz

who will tell you that you know a lot a

lot of the stuff against Trump is just

crazy

town the lawfare by the way dtz is the

one who invented the word

lawfare did you know that Ellen dtz he

invented that word

lawfare and uh he certainly sees it

happening to Trump but whatever is

happening to Naro is just an extension

of the law fair against Trump and I

believe that there is no way that Navaro

would be in jail if both the left and

the right leaning media called

what do you

think if both the left and the right

said this is

illegitimate he would not be in jail

because I don't think that the system

can survive doing things that both the

left and the right say well this is

obviously wrong it requires at least the

L left because they control most of the

media to bless it which they did and

they blessed it imagine being part of

the

media that allowed him to go to jail

knowing that that wouldn't have happened

except for your

actions it would only take one entity

let's say CNN or MSNBC it would only

take one of them to say okay this is too

far this is too far we we can't be

putting Peter Navaro in jail for you

know what he did it would only take one

so every person who's uh on CNN and

MSNBC you lying

you're putting a man in

jail for no good reason and how do you

feel about that when you go

home seriously how do you feel

about that when you go home do you say

to yourself oh it's not me it's not me

cuz I'm just one person no it's you it's

you if if you're on the air on a news

entity and you let Peter Navaro go to

jail right in front of you when you know

it's and you're not say

anything about it you're putting

him in

jail that's on you so go sleep with

that um New York

Times Steve MCU was posting about

this the New York Times in what you can

only imagine

is once again the ridiculous merging

with the uh with reality uh they did a

the New York Times did a story extolling

the virtues of the deep State when we

hear deep State instead of recoiling we

should

rally because it's the Deep State that's

protecting you from uh

Trump that that's actually in the

news the New York times is telling you

that the Deep

state is really important and valuable

because it can you know protect you from

people like

Trump how in the

world I mean how how do you not be

embarrassed working for that

company anyway on another topic uh um

this is changing quickly but if you're

not caught up at First Texas was going

to start arresting people and deporting

them and then the said no you can't do

that you know the states can't Deport

people and then I guess on an appeal it

was

reversed and then before I started the

show the reversal was

reversed am I up to speed yet so at the

moment I believe and that could change

in five minutes apparently Texas cannot

Deport people back to Mexico is that

true can give me an update on that

or there's another hearing today oh

maybe there's just a hearing today

anyway so it's up in the air a little

bit but here's my plan um as you know um

Central South

America they're sending uh a lot of

criminals up here and some say they're

emptying their jails which would be a

smart play on their on their half behalf

and my plan is to wait until uh all of

the criminals from Central and South

America and Mexico have been shipped

into the United States and then wait for

it I'm going to move to Central

America it's going to be like a paradise

down there all the criminals are going

to be in the United States I'm just

going to go down there and like hey

how's the crime right here and the

locals will say crime we haven't any had

any crime since 19 20 or

2024 we haven't seen a s s not a single

criminal act in two years and I'll be

like yeah

coming at

you all right that's my plan

um so did you know that uh Newsmax was

reporting this that Supreme Court

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg she had a

ruling when she was alive back in

2019 and apparently she was one of the

people who laid down how the eighth

amendment of our constitution prohibited

an excessive fine so there was a case

that got to the Supreme Court and

somebody some just some individual was

find way more than what the crime would

suggest would make sense and so you've

got this situation where the uh is it

the eth amendment yeah the Eighth

Amendment uh guarantees the right

against unusual punishments you know

cruel and unusual but also against

excessive

fines were you aware that the

Constitution of the United States has in

direct language

that you can't give somebody excessive

fines and and poor Trump poor Trump is

trying to pay over

400 uh you know million dollars for a

victimless crime that is as everybody

explained who's in the industry business

as

usual business as

usual and he's got to pay

$454 million now by anybody's

estimation that is an excessive fine do

you think you could find any normal

human being who would think that's

anything but a ridiculous fine no and

and the fact that he's being forced to

maybe sell

assets um in in a short time period when

his assets are mostly physical so he'd

have to lose I mean he might lose

another 200 million by selling things

out of fire sale price because he has

to now who in the world thinks that

that's any kind of Justice nobody now I

assume the Supreme Court will reverse it

or and apparently they can even take

action when the states are involved in

um violating the eth amendment so you

don't have to worry about the thing that

it's a a state action the Supreme Court

can jump in if you're violating the eth

amendment and clearly they are

obviously there there's no doubt about

that right it's just right in front of

you it could not be more obvious that

they're abusing the the

Constitution and

uh can we agree that none of those fines

would have happened if Trump were not

running for president is it fair to say

he would not have been prosecuted except

running for

president now the fact that Leticia

James said she was going to go after him

but didn't know what she was going after

him for

and then they searched until they found

something how is that not

illegal there's no law against that

there's no law against saying I'm going

after somebody and then going and

looking for a crime and then finding a

victimless crime and taking his whole

business away from

him maybe putting him in jail how in the

world is that not

illegal so I'm going to make a

prediction that uh karma is g to

be quite a for Leticia James

here's what I think's going to

happen I think that there'll be enough

enemies of hers that they will put

enormous resources into looking into any

Crim she may have

committed and that they will do to her

what she did to Trump and God I hope so

because you need mutually assured

destruction uh when you watch somebody

destroying somebody because they're

white that's really what it is if if

Trump were not if Trump were black none

of this would be happening he's being

destroyed primarily for being white and

Republican I

guess and I think that the perfect

response would be in a perfectly legal

way not anything

illegal that people should start turning

over every Rock and talking to everybody

she's ever worked with until they find a

crime do do you think you couldn't find

a crime with pretty much anybody if you

look hard enough of course you can you'd

find like a processed crime or some

exaggeration you could call a lie yeah

you could find something so my

prediction is that a year from now

there's a good chance that Trump will be

president and Leticia James will be in

prison unless she's appealing it but I

think they're G the odds of her never

have well let me put it this

way we've all seen how she acts in

public right we we've seen her dance

with

Glee about the mounting problems for

Trump we saw him T we saw her Target him

for purely political and personal

reasons and then follow up on it and

Destroy somebody that you know many of

you would like to be president we

trying now given what she's done in

public that you can observe with your

own eyes is there any question in your

mind that she's a

criminal in other ways

I've never seen anybody who acts like

she acts the parts we can see who didn't

also have a criminal background I've

never seen that that honest people don't

act anything like the way she's acting

so you're if you tell me oh no there was

just this one time when she decided to

ignore the Constitution and the laws of

our country and you know spit on

everything that's good no no there's a

really high she's got a whole bunch of

crimes in her past and you just have to

look for them and I would imagine that a

tremendous amount of money has already

been

allocated to pay people to look for it

and if the Republicans are not doing

that i''d be pretty

disappointed but they probably are all

right

um and uh yeah and as DT

warns if Trump is kept from running or

maybe he loses because of

lawfare um that will not be deemed a

credible

outcome certainly I would not say that

was a fair election if if the lawfare

takes them

out all right Democrats uh as I've often

said what passes as a disagreement is

often Democrats not knowing how anything

works

have you noticed that it looks like it's

a disagreement like some philosophical

thing but it's not it's just Democrats

literally don't have the background and

experience in many cases to understand

how anything Works Republicans tend to

be uh business people who succeeded in

business and maybe became a senator

later you know they ran some kind of a

serious Enterprise and then maybe ran

for office but there are a lot of

Democrats who never had any kind of

business experience let me give you some

real world

examples I saw a uh user an X Michael

Harriet who is explaining um why Dei

well here's what he says he says uh well

here's the thing while most people think

Dei policies have something to do with

increasing minorities most Dei policies

focus on recruiting and retention and he

says instead of lowering your standards

you can increase diversity by inviting

more diverse students to

apply now that's somebody who does it

looks like somebody has no experience in

the real world that's like stupid isn't

it how does he not understand that the

problem is there's not enough

Supply it's true that any one company

can improve their diversity if they do

better than the other companies at

attracting you know a higher percentage

of Supply but it's not true that they

can all do it there's too low of Supply

the only way you can fix the number of

adults you know being a enough to have a

diverse workplace the only way to fix

that is to fix it at childhood you're

going to have to fix the pipeline you're

going to have to get them really early

like first grade kindergarten and train

them so that eventually there's enough

people to do every job

diversely but how how could you possibly

be an adult

and not understand that the problem is a

supply problem and not a how you do it

problem there's no way to do it to

create the supply once you're an adult

you got to start with 30 years earlier

or forget

it so we should um and so I looked at uh

Michael's um profile and he's a writer

and some kind of a race profiteer kind

of guy he does some kind of race grip Ry

stuff uh everything about race is grifty

so I don't know his details but are you

surprised that somebody who's a writer

and obsessed with race related things

can't do even counting and knowing how

supply and demand Works no it's very

ordinary very

ordinary okay here's another

one uh apparently the law in New York

and some other places maybe California

too uh allows a gang member

to uh buy a firearm an illegal migrant

can buy a firearm

legally these are the Democrat laws so

they can come in uh they'll actually be

helped to bring in uh and then they can

find an empty rental property or even

your own house and just move into it

when you're on vacation and it would be

illegal for you to move them

out you have to let them stay and if

they they stay for a certain amount of

time it becomes their

property so so basically MS13 knows they

can just find an empty house and move in

and it's theirs they get to keep

it that's real I'm not making that up

MS13 can come here illegally but it's

we've made it legal to be here illegally

they can go to the store and buy a a

firearm or they can possess one and they

can move into your house while you're on

vacation and keep

it that's our current

laws is there anybody here who didn't

know that because this is

new it's not every state but I'm sure

California and New York the squatter has

the rights not the

owner now do you think that people who

understand how anything Works were be

these rules no of course not nobody who

had any business experience or

experience with the real world would

allow that to happen because it's pretty

obvious what's going to happen obviously

MS13 is going to take over every house

they can get why wouldn't they it's free

houses California and New York are

giving away free houses to MS13 members

and I'm not even making that up that's

like a a real thing

now they don't say it that way it's just

that they've created laws that guarantee

it now this is my second example where

there's something wrong with not just

the philosophy of

Democrats they seem inable or unable to

Think Through really basic stuff how

incentives work how any system is

designed really basic you want another

example I'll give you a two from Ted Lou

he's uh one of the California Congress

people and there's a video of him it's

not a new one but not too long ago a

couple years ago he was on

MSNBC and he was telling the viewers

that the best way to combat fake news is

for people to watch

MSNBC because they report real news all

the

time he actually said real news all the

time I didn't I didn't even add the all

the time

part those were his exact words

he looked at the

camera and said without any any tinge of

sarcasm that the way to combat fake news

is for people to watch MSNBC because

they report real news all the

time now you might say to yourself Scott

that might be the dumbest thing I've

ever heard an elected official

say do you think he's

unaware do you think he's unaware that

MSNBC is all

fake because he might be

that would be even be more frightening

it it would be one thing to imagine you

know he's just lying and he wants a job

there someday so he's just buttering him

up I mean that's not terrible you know

it's bad to lie but it's not the worst

thing but the worst thing would be if he

actually thought it was true what if he

thinks it's

true have you ever considered that what

if the Democrats believe what they're

saying because I always assume they

don't believe it because it's so weird

and stupid stupid how can you possibly

believe it it's just something you say

to win but he might actually believe

that you want another

one here's another Ted

Lou he said uh that on a post he said

Trump claims he is a billionaire but he

can't pay 464 million judgment that

means he is lying how do I know

math wow wow

do you know who had to school him in

public that Donald Trump is not to blame

uh for not having the cash Mark

Cuban who couldn't even stand watching

his own teammate you know somebody who

would be anti-trump he he couldn't stand

watching the stupidity coming from his

own side so he had to do an extended

thread to explain how in an atmosphere

of low interest rates somebody like

Trump would put all of their cash into

assets

because the assets could grow but cash

isn't worth much in zero interest rate

times so Mark cubin had to explain the

difference between cash and assets to

somebody we elected to make

laws so Ted Ted Lou thinks MSNBC tells

the truth all the

time and he doesn't understand how money

works like really basic

stuff so yeah uh I contend that the

Democratic party can be explained by not

understanding how business Works in

general so they they get everything

wrong in terms of incentives every time

and also being um obsessed with self

harm so between self harm and not

understanding business you get the

Democrats at least a third of them I'd

say well there's some new uh evidence

that happiness is changing for some

countries American Germany fell out of

the top 20 happiest

countries huh I wonder when that

happened kind of a sudden drop in the

last several

years do you think that wokeness might

be part of it of course it is of course

it is yeah wokeness makes you

unhappy why because it's the act of

focusing on yourself and how the

external world is victimizing you do you

know what makes a person unhappy Focus

ing on yourself and believing that the

external world is after you and the

reason you can't succeed is because

something somebody else is doing it's

all that

discrimination yeah so wokeness by its

design will make you

unhappy that's not all it will do it

will also destroy your whole country but

in the short term it'll make you unhappy

because it shifts your mindset to oh I'd

be doing better if it were for all these

white supremacists and

stuff so of course that's the problem

meanwhile Helsinki Finland is looking

good um Israel well their numbers were

before the October 7th thing so I'm not

sure that'll tell you

anything uh meanwhile in a separate um

survey by Walla Hub they looked at the

10 happiest cities in

America so this is a survey so you know

it's scientific it must be completely

true

so here are the cities that they found

the happiest in America I'll just read

them quickly Scot Arizona Columbia

Maryland Pearl City Hawaii San Francisco

California halulu Hawaii Irvine

California Madison Wisconsin San Jose

California Overland Park Kansas and

Fremont California so we've got out of

the top 10 San Francisco Irvine San Jose

and Fremont four of the top 10 are

California

ities do you know

why well first of all I doubt the

question about San Francisco I'm not

sure that that's accurate but um it's

the

weather it's the weather the the weather

just really really makes a difference if

you have a choice go where the weather's

good so these are just four places in

California where the weather's real good

Los Angeles isn't on the

list I'm surprised San Francisco's on

there

anyway um do you remember Christine

blazzy Ford blazzy Ford she's the one

who said that uh justice Kavanaugh

sexually assaulted her or something and

Molly Hemingway uh posts 20 things that

would strongly suggest she lied about

the whole thing now I don't have to go

through the whole list but just know

that there are 20 really strong

indications that they never met and she

made up the whole

thing but

somehow that story has emerged

again there's a lawyer who is just sued

in Great Britain for saying that only

women can have

periods so they got some pretty bad hate

speech rules over there that would be

considered hate speech to say that only

women can have

periods um I call them vagina having

people

people so that's how I get away they're

just vagina having

people all right

um rasmuson is reporting some uh poll

results on voters that suggest the

Republicans are going to gain seats in

the upcoming election so here's the

details from raspon all right so if the

elections for congress were held today

47% would vote for Republican candidates

while 41 would vote for Democrat so

that's is a Sixpoint spread it's been

higher it's been as high as uh nine

recently in January but um two years ago

in March 22 Republicans had an 11-point

lead um around now but in the final

polling before election day Republicans

had a five-point lead and that

five-point lead compare that to today's

Sixpoint lead um got them a net gain of

nine

seats so and they captured house so net

gain now the the immigrants coming in

who are going to boost the number of uh

congressional seats that won't kick in

until after the next census I guess so

it's a a long-term

play but uh do you think this will hold

do you think that this indication does

tell you that Republicans will do well

well there's going to be so much that

happens between now and then yeah that

that lead will evaporate between now and

then

all right if you're not watching the

ongoing story about the Dominion

machines and there is allegations from a

sheriff in Michigan that he's seen

documentation to suggest that serbians

accessed the machines the voting

machines while votes were being

counted that's quite an allegation so

the

allegation which I'm not saying is true

I'm just reporting the allegation is

that the Sheriff says there were at

least two serbians Nationals who were

accessing the machines in real time

while they were

watching while the votes were being

counted now the access they had

presumably would give them the ability

to change things doesn't mean they did

uh Dominion's comment on this is that it

is flatly

false flatly false didn't happen now

here's what we're waiting for flatly

false is is sort of lacky in

details here's what a real denial would

sound like that is flatly false followed

by the reason and the reason would sound

like I'll just make this one up but it

would sound like something like this uh

you're looking at records that are from

the wrong

day I'm not saying that's true I'm just

saying that's the sort of thing you'd

expect or they'd say uh yes the serbians

work for us they were contractors they

did have access but we walled off their

thing and we can check the records to

see if they did anything so it was it

was fine don't worry about it now I

didn't hear that and maybe that will

come later but what you expect for a

real denial is some some acknowledgment

that the evidence

exists but your version of it is that

it's not saying what you think it's

saying when there's a flat denial that

doesn't acknowledge that the people

making the alleg or looking at a piece

of paper with writing on it that it

exists to not mention what the real

story is about whatever it is they're

looking

at is sort of a dog that's not barking

really loudly so keep an eye on this one

I remind you that uh 95 to 100% of every

Claim about the 2020 election is highly

likely to be

wrong even if the election was rigged

but any specific claim and this would be

a specific

claim uh is unlikely to be true however

this one is getting a little bit more

attention than most of them and there

does seem to be a

document and there are some questions

doesn't mean that anything happened that

was illegal or that it was

rigged it just means that if you ever

thought our system was

auditable do you feel stupid now is

there anybody here who ever believed we

could audit our election system and find

out if it was

proper who whoever believe

that here

again I think Democrats believe it if

they have not worked and lived in the

real world now I have worked and lived

in the real world and a lot of the times

it was my job to fund and put together

you know technology packages complicated

things often make uh I would often be

collecting data from different sources

to do an analysis if you've done that

kind of

business you know what any complicated

environment looks

like so the election system is a

complicated

environment I don't need to have direct

evidence or direct experience with that

domain to make the following claim

there's no way you can audit that

thing it's just like my my state about

you can't measure the temperature of the

earth you know correctly and over time

and show the change you can't do those

things in the real

world in the real world you can't you

can't increase diversity without

discriminating because there just aren't

enough candidates not in the real world

and 100% of people with real world

experience know that you know some might

lie because you know their team is lying

but we all know

it everybody who has lived in the real

world knows that you can't keep those

measuring devices accurate over time the

maintenance problems the concrete

problems the the fact that they measure

the high and the lows instead of you

know just the average there all kinds of

problems plus the number of places that

aren't measured the fact that heat can

go hide in different places in the

planet for a while and then you know

move around and you don't have

measurements everywhere so you can't

capture

that and then they tell us that the

election is a

no nobody who's ever spent a minute in

the real world could look at anything

that complicated with so many different

players involved and you just ask

yourself Scott can you track your own

vote to make sure it got to his

destination was and was counted no

that's all you need to know that's the

end of the story if I can't if I can't

track my own vote no it's not

auditable who would ever think that who

would think that you could check every

part of a automated system and that

nobody could get in there and you know

put a little bug in there or a worm or

something and and that the company

producing it has every right to keep

their software

proprietary so do you do you think

there's somebody who's just an

independent Observer who has access to

uh dominions

software like to actually look at the

SCE

code I don't know I would think that

they would keep that to themselves in

the real world in the real world they're

not going to let anybody see it which

means you don't know what it's

doing right in the real world if you

design a

system and it's not giving you what you

want year after year after year same

problems if you don't change it or talk

loudly about your desire to change it

then it's not the problem is that you

designed it to do what it's doing right

design shows you intention over time you

know on day one something might do not

do what you hoped it would do but over

time if we keep having these results

that the public isn't completely

trusting and they're not getting the

results quickly and there's a lot of you

know credibility questions if you don't

fix

that it's because you want it not to be

fixed so

again if you have any real world

experience and you and look at the

difference of opinions from the people

with real world experience versus those

who don't and it's a waste of time to

have an argument with somebody who

doesn't have real world business

experience if I get a in a conversation

with somebody has no real world business

experience they're going to say of

course we can improve diversity

everywhere at the same time no you can't

that's

stupid no nobody with experience thinks

that uh and uh that you can audit the

elections nobody with any technical

experience believes that show me anybody

who who's ever written a functional

piece of code and you tell me that

they'll honestly think you can audit the

entire election system nobody not a

single person with

experience people with experience who

think you can measure the planet Earth

none these are really clean examp

examples of things that are lies we know

those are not doable things all right

ladies and

gentlemen this brings me to the

conclusion of the best live stream

you're going to see today do you want

some optimism to close down who wants

some

optimism all right here's some

everything's trending in the right

direction except debt but I think we'll

figure that out too everything's

trending in the right direction so

they're terrible

problems which um in real time are being

reframed and the big difference between

this year and prior years is the growth

of the Independent

Media

so Independent Media you know the Glenn

greenwalls the Matt taies the Michael

shellenberger and people like me we get

to say what the mainstream corporate

media can say and it really is making a

difference

now you're you're already seeing the

power of the internet dads and I I'll

say internet moms as well have you seen

it have you seen any situation where the

the let's say the uh responsible people

who know how things work have put a a

damper on things yeah that whole uh um

blood bath thing the bloodbath thing was

turned into a

joke by the independent

by people like me We turned it into a

joke and it it completely disabled the

Democrats because every time they said

it we would laugh at them and make fun

of it and create and get content and the

more they said it the more we laughed

and the funnier it was and they finally

just sort of slunk away because I don't

think they're talking about it today are

they and it got crazier when they

brought in their smartest people all

right we really screwed up in this makes

some kind of weird lawyerly argument

where the bloodbath thing starts to make

sense again so then they started to say

well okay granted he wasn't talking

about it like that it was just about the

car business but that's what he does so

it really must be seen in the context of

our other

hoaxes so we hoaxed you about the fine

people we hoaxed you about whipping

immigrants if you believe that well

obviously and so once it got to the

point where they were using their other

hoaxes to prop up the new hoax and all

the independent people could see it and

we talked about it and we thought it was

funny it kind of made it go away so

there's going to be more of that things

are very different this time and I think

we're going to be watching for any

in the election um in my opinion

there's no chance that they won't

attempt to rig the election

that's my view I I see no chance none at

all that the Democrats will just play

fair um I think they'll try to rig it in

legal means you if they can change some

rules in ways that help but definitely

in illegal means too because uh that's

the world we're

in I can't believe for a minute they

would allow uh Trump to become president

if they could stop it because they've

all been convinced he's like the second

coming of Hitler so of course they're

going to try to stop

him of course but I think that between

the Independent Media which makes a big

difference uh X and Elon which makes a

big difference in our free speech I do

think that the corrective forces are

lining

up uh I think that it's starting to look

to me like Trump

will get through all of his

lawfare now I'm not sure I would have

said that two months ago

but the way things are shaping up that

even if he can't pay his fine to Leticia

James I shouldn't admit this but I'm

going

to there's part of me the hopes he can't

pay the

fine is anybody having that same

feeling because I feel this needs to be

pushed to the breaking

point I want to see Trump say I can't

pay it we're going to review it and you

can't make me pay pay it before it's

appealed you're going to have to put me

in jail now I think what they try to do

is close his businesses in other words I

think that Leticia and her goons would

show up with you know police tape like

tape up the his building and say we own

it now imagine

that do you think they have the gusts to

do that do you think that New Yorkers

would allow them to take over the

building right in front of them well a

lot of them would

but a lot of them

wouldn't a lot of them wouldn't so

there's part of me that says let's push

this but I don't want to risk Trump

actually being in jail you know because

they could very easily Peter Navaro him

too

but I don't feel like nibbling around

the edges on this is

working it's just going to cost them a

billion dollars I think he needs to go

right at it and just say you know what

every person in the whole

country can see what's happening he

should stand in front of his building on

the on the deadline and say here I

am here I am but do it in front of

everybody now I can't recommend that

Trump do that because he'd probably end

up in jail and that's not cool but

there's but there's part of me that

fantasizes he just pushes it Until It

Breaks you know you know you know if you

have that loose tooth you've ever lost a

tooth when you're a kid

and you can't stop pushing it with your

tongue because it's

loose and you just you at some point

even though it hurts you just want to

rip that thing

out that's how I'm feeling let's just

pull that mole around and see what

happens anyway um I'm going to talk to

the people on locals after I say goodbye

to the rest of you on this platform they

get the special after show because

they're so special and uh thanks for

joining on X and locals and YouTube and

uh Rumble too see you tomorrow same time

same

place