Back to episode — Episode 2419 CWSA 03/20/24
Context —
n had to explain the difference between cash and assets to somebody we elected to make laws. So Ted Lieu thinks MSNBC tells the truth all the time and he doesn't understand how money works like really basic stuff. So yeah I contend that the Democratic party can be explained by not understanding how business works in general. So they get everything wrong in terms of incentives every time and also…
← Previous segment →ns. Doesn't mean that anything happened that was illegal or that it was rigged. It just means that if you ever thought our system was auditable do you feel stupid now? Is there anybody here who ever believed we could audit our election system and find out if it was proper? Whoever believed that here again I think Democrats believe it if they have not worked and lived in the real world.
Now I have worked and lived in the real world and a lot of the times it was my job to fund and put together technology packages, complicated things. Often I would often be collecting data from different sources to do an analysis. If you've done that kind of business you know what any complicated environment looks like. So the election system is a complicated environment. I don't need to have direct evidence or direct experience with that domain to make the following claim. There's no way you can audit that thing. It's just like my statement about you can't measure the temperature of the earth correctly and over time and show the change. You can't do those things in the real world. In the real world you can't increase diversity without discriminating because there just aren't enough candidates. Not in the real world. And 100% of people with real world experience know that. You know some might lie because their team is lying but we all know it. Everybody who has lived in the real world knows that you can't keep those measuring devices accurate over time. The maintenance problems, the concrete problems, the fact that they measure the highs and the lows instead of just the average. There are all kinds of problems. Plus the number of places that aren't measured. The fact that heat can go hide in different places in the planet for a while and then move around and you don't have measurements everywhere so you can't capture that.
And then they tell us that the election is, nobody who's ever spent a minute in the real world could look at anything that complicated with so many different players involved and you just ask yourself Scott can you track your own vote to make sure it got to its destination and was counted? No. That's all you need to know. That's the end of the story. If I can't track my own vote no it's not auditable. Who would ever think that? Who would think that you could check every part of an automated system and that nobody could get in there and put a little bug in there or a worm or something and that the company producing it has every right to keep their
Context —
software proprietary. So do you think there's somebody who's just an independent observer who has access to Dominion's software like to actually look at the source code? I don't know. I would think that they would keep that to themselves. In the real world they're not going to let anybody see it which means you don't know what it's doing right. In the real world if you design a system and it's no…
Next segment → →