p state instead of recoiling we should rally because it's the deep state that's protecting you from Trump. That's actually in the news. The New York Times is telling you that the deep state is really important and valuable because it can protect you from people like Trump. How in the world, I mean how do you not be embarrassed working for that company?

Anyway on another topic this is changing quickly but if you're not caught up. At first Texas was going to start arresting people and deporting them and then they said no you can't do that. You know the states can't deport people. And then I guess on an appeal it was reversed and then before I started the show the reversal was reversed. Am I up to speed yet? So at the moment I believe and that could change in five minutes apparently Texas cannot deport people back to Mexico. Is that true? Can you give me an update on that? Or there's another hearing today. Oh maybe there's just a hearing today. Anyway so it's up in the air a little bit but here's my plan.

As you know Central and South America they're sending a lot of criminals up here and some say they're emptying their jails which would be a smart play on their behalf. And my plan is to wait until all of the criminals from Central and South America and Mexico have been shipped into the United States and then wait for it. I'm going to move to Central America. It's going to be like a paradise down there. All the criminals are going to be in the United States. I'm just going to go down there and like hey how's the crime right here? And the locals will say crime? We haven't had any crime since 2024. We haven't seen a single criminal act in two years. And I'll be like yeah coming at you. All right that's my plan.

So did you know that Newsmax was reporting this. That Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg she had a ruling when she was alive back in 2019 and apparently she was one of the people who laid down how the Eighth Amendment of our Constitution prohibited an excessive fine. So there was a case that got to the Supreme Court and somebody some individual was fined way more than what the crime would suggest would make sense. And so you've got this situation where the Eighth Amendment guarantees the right against unusual punishments you know cruel and unusual but also against excessive fines. Were you aware that the Constitution of the United States has in direct language that you can't give somebody excessive fines?

And poor Trump. Poor Trump is trying to pay over 400 million dollars for a victimless crime that is as everybody explained who's in the industry business as usual. Business as usual. And he's got to pay $454 million. Now by anybody's estimation that is an excessive fine. Do you think you could find any normal human being who would think that's anything but a ridiculous fine? No. And the fact that he's being forced to maybe sell assets in a short time period when his assets are mostly physical so he'd have to lose I mean he might lose another 200 million by selling things at a fire sale price because he has to. Now who in the world thinks that that's any kind of justice? Nobody.

Now I assume the Supreme Court will reverse it or and apparently they can even take action when the states are involved in violating the Eighth Amendment. So you don't have to worry about the thing that it's a state action. The Supreme Court can jump in if you're violating the Eighth Amendment and clearly they are. Obviously there's no doubt about that right. It's just right in front of you. It could not be more obvious that they're abusing the Constitution. And can we agree that none of those fines would have happened if Trump were not running for president? Is it fair to say he would not have been prosecuted except for running for pre