Coffee With Scott Adams — Knowledge Archive July 10, 2026
Scott Adams Philosophy Archive
Search ideas
Episodes Episode #2434 Segments
Tangent Two Movie Screen

Back to episode — Episode 2434 CWSA 04/04/24

Context —

that good enough? I don't think it's going to gain him any votes. The best he can do is reduce how many votes he loses. And that would probably give him a little boost, you know, because it wouldn't be a hard commitment. But yeah, there's no right answer. Let's do a Trump lawfare update. We've got a judge who's doing some mind reading. Let's see. The judge has rejected Trump's bid to delay the hu…

← Previous segment →

Physics suggests that both states exist until observed. That when you open the box that cat will be either alive or dead. But here's the fun part. That means you're creating history in the present. That means your observation creates the past. Because if the cat was not guaranteed alive or not guaranteed dead until you open the box, the moment you see the dead cat, the history of the cat dying appears at the same time. The history didn't exist until the cat was seen dead. Do you get that? We have proof that we create history on the fly and we've had it for a long time. We just don't interpret it that way. Instead we interpreted that the cat was both alive and dead. No, that's absurd. That's an absurdity. But if we're a simulation, and all indications in my opinion are that we are, then it would act like a video game that you don't see the forest until your character goes into the forest and then it creates it because it needs a forest. So you create the past. You don't just observe it. It was there anyway.

So what was that all about? I don't even know why I was going down that path but I'm sure I connected to something important in today's news.

Well moving on. Rasmussen poll says in a three-way match between Biden, Trump and RFK Jr. that 44% would go for Trump and 38% for Biden and 10% for Kennedy. So every poll seems to suggest that Trump has an insurmountable lead, especially in the swing states. Most of them, all but one or some say all of them, he's ahead and it's a pretty big lead.

Well as you know Biden raised $26 million in his big celebrity bash recently and it was a record. Everybody said it's historic. Nobody could ever beat that number. He's the best fundraiser of all. Oh okay. Well looks like Trump's going to raise $43 million at a Palm Beach fundraiser this weekend, they project. So $43 million would be the new record. Record by a lot. Let's see what other records has Trump set. Let's see. He made more money as president than any president ever because he got canceled and created Truth Social and it went public. He's got quite a few records there. Never started a war. Never started a war. That's a pretty good record.

All right. Wall Street Journal is reporting that men are leaving the Democrat party in droves, especially Black and Latino young voters apparently. Every group is having a little bit of second thought about Biden, but men in particular are especially leaving. So the Wall Street Journal poll found that Biden was drawing only 37% of men in the seven swing states. Now that was on a ballot with only him and Trump, so without RFK Jr. But and that found about the same nationwide. And that is way weaker than Biden had 46% of men in 2020. So he's gone from 46 down to 37% of men, as mostly minority men because the white guys had already left. The ones with testosterone had already left.

So do any of you remember when I first started saying that Democrats were the party of women? Has anybody been with me long enough? You remember the first time I said that? I think it was during Hillary's run against Trump if I recall. And you could see then that Hillary was turning into the party of women. But now it's a thing. The men are abandoning it. They see it's a party of women.

I'm going to take some credit for being the first person to notice that it was going that way. I'm sure other people noticed it but nobody made as much noise about it as I did.

Well here's the thing. If the Democrats are the party of women, liberal women, and we know their rate of mental illness, I would put it as 70%. I think 70% of liberal women have mental illness. Around 50% have diagnosed or have sought treatment. So if 50% have sought treatment, at least 70% are suffering. Now how many of them are only suffering from TDS and didn't seek treatment? It might be 90% have bonafide observable mental problems. So if the men are leaving at this rate it completely turns over the Democrat Party to people who are not figuratively crazy, not using hyperbole. It literally is a filtering process left all the crazy people in one place.

Now is that predictable? That if you get enough crazy people there'll be a point where everything breaks and the people who don't want to be around crazy people just get the hell out of there? That's what's happening. The men are realizing that they're with crazy people, actually crazy. And the men are saying what the hell is going on? Get me out of here. I want to go where my work makes a difference and if I succeed I get to keep my money. You know, not crazy things. Yeah, get the fuck out.

So why is it that so many liberal women are crazy? Well part of it's the news making them crazy in TDS and maybe it's the phones and all this. But I've got another hypothesis. As you know I like to do some work at Starbucks quite often because it's a great environment to bring your laptop and get a little extra work done while you have some delicious coffee. But I also am sitting there and watching everybody else's orders. If a m

Context —

an comes in there's a pretty good chance that man's getting a cup of coffee. If a woman comes in, what is she ordering? Sugar. She's ordering sugar. Yeah. I wonder if sugar can make you crazy. Oh here's a study. High levels of glucose, triglycerides linked to psychiatric disorders, new study says. So Starbucks, which in my opinion is a liquid candy store, let me say that again. Starbucks for men…

Next segment → →