Episode 2434 CWSA 04/04/24

how about that how how about that is that better well if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that do not require my incompetence to hit the wrong buttons like this morning all you need for that is a cuper muger glass of tanker cheler Stein a canteen jug or flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid I like coffee and join me now for the unparallel pleasure of the dope mean h of the day the thing that makes everything better it's called the simultaneous Sip and it happens now go so good so so good all right I'm going to make sure I can see your comments here looking good no I'm wrong technical problem which I will fix right now what an adventure oh my goodness this wouldn't be easy one though fixed well we got all kinds of news today it's amazing did you know that uh Home Depot will sell you a whole house 540 square fet pre prefab for $444,000 so now you can buy a whole house from Home Depot a whole house from Amazon um okay just checking let do we have a sound can anybody hear me let it's not entirely clear that I'm actually live anybody any sound at all is there any kind of a show happening I can't tell yeah okay looks like it looks like we have sound all right well let's just keep on going here just like there's no problem at all uh there's new a uh new AI that can take your script and turn it into a full movie just from the script how cool is that you can just take your movie script and it just becomes a movie now I have certainly a lot of questions whether that really does that I'm going to predict it's really demo whereare you know something that looks like it could work and you wish it would work but doesn't quite work like everything else in AI it almost does something well I think that's what's going to happen uh but what's different is that the pitch for funding at the Y combinator demo day was done with using AI so the founder pitched it using an AI version of herself or one of the founders I think that's kind of cool can robot read your mind well there's one called emo now and it will smile back at you if you smile and it might change really how you interact with machines imagine a robot that knew the correct context to smile back I mean just hold that in your mind that you smile at your robot and it smiles back that's a Game.

Changer that that's the point where you lose the ability to know it's not real or that it's not conscious it when you're robot starts smiling at you there's almost nothing you'll be able to do to think that it's not conscious I don't think it will be but boy isn't going to seem conscious when it Smiles at you but apparently this one the one that smiles can also read your face and try to get an idea what your what your attitude is so now they have ai that'll listen to your words for your emotional state but this one will look at your face and your body language so yes the robots are getting into our emotional space and that's going to be a problem you may have seen this story it's not too new but there was a New Jersey postal worker who had been just throwing away the mail which by the way is not that uncommon sometimes it's just easier to go home and throw the mail away than it is to deliver it all over town that's a lot of work so sometimes ma you'll hear the story about a male person who just would take the mail home and dump it in the you know his living room or something well but this one has an extra element to it there were 99 election ballots in this uh two 2,000 pieces of mail now there's no indication that the male person had any political motive or that throwing the mail had away had anything to do with ballots but well here's my question how did they detect that he threw the mail away was it because somebody knew about their ballot missing is that what happened let's see let me see if I can figure out how to go private on this cuz I'm still I'm still getting people getting trolls telling me there's no sound and I don't think that they're real people I think they're trolls they're trolls right sound is fine yeah I'm not going to ask again all right um so the question is would does our election system detect if a male person throws the mail away how in the world did they know that uh any male was missing in the first place now I didn't see that in the story but the but here's where I would sound the alarm here's what I expected to see in the story there were 99 ballots that were thrown away and uh 10 of those 99 people complained because they knew their ballot didn't reach its destination so when they tracked it down they could easily figure out which postal person it was because of where the the ballot Dropbox was do you think that happened do you think that the election process picked up that ballots were thrown away because if it didn't pick it up then what we did is we outsourced our election security to the post office the post office because I can't think of a more secure environment than the post office but looks like that's what we did well vigilantism is is breaking out right on schedule there are three stories in the news just today of people taking matters into their own hands surprise surprise people feel there's no law and so men men are starting to take the law into their own hands um one example is Walter Isaacson who used to be the CEO of CNN I guess and he was at some event and some protest to some non-binary protester was disturbing it so Walter Isaacson who was 72 years old decided to personally escort that person out which allegedly turned into some shoving but he was removed so alter isacon just dragged some Bastard out of the room and shoved him out of the room now he's in trouble you know the obviously the protesters is going to file charges for assault but you know it's like some scratches on his arm or something um there's a New York City man who was in the news today for catching a porch pirate his his stuff kept getting stolen so he put a fake package out there and waited for the porch pirate and then went out with his baseball bat and uh called the authorities and got him arrested so Walter Isaacson getting physical with a protester New York City man setting his own trap and using physical force violent then there's a story of a Arizona State um attorney was grilling a woman because her husband um had fired at what what was supposed to be a warning shot because there were a bunch of migrants illegally crossing his land so he sends out the uh sends out a uh he does a warning shot and apparently with the warning shot his somebody so now there's some legal difficulty now I don't know if it was really a warning shot makes you wonder if it was really a warning shot but uh there's three examples in the news just today of men deciding they had enough do you think it's a trend do you think you will see more stories of men deciding they've had enough yes you will yes she will there's no way this is going to stop there's going to be a whole bunch more men just figuring it out on their own cuz what choice do you have what choice you don't have a choice it's either let it happen or fix it and you're going to go to jail if you try to fix it well Apple uh you know Apple was going to try to do a car but then they gave up on the car and uh now there's talk in Bloomberg that they're going to make a robot personal robot doesn't that make more sense don't you think Apple should make a personal robot and not so much a car I think getting into the car business would probably have been a mistake so they probably made the right choice to get out of it but an apple robot that's working with your other Apple devices absolutely I I want an apple robot just to be my remote control I just want to tell my robot what to turn on and off it's like hey uh robot can you turn on Netflix find something for me um however I CAU you that this report is in Bloomberg and Bloomberg is not a credible source of news how do I know that well I know that because Bloomberg wants to a story about me so I can say authoritatively that it's not a real source of news now the rest of you have to guess but I've been there yeah I I know they make up at least they did about me so I wouldn't trust anything they say but it might be true well we've got the caedon coming it's like Armageddon with cicas what's the other name for a cicada is it like a locust is a cicada like Locust or is that like a completely different bug does anybody know cicada I don't know I just don't like them but apparently they're every 17 years they emerge and I guess there's two types and by coincidence their their their very long gestation period or hibernation or whatever the hell they do um they lined up so we're can to have two cicada invasions at the same time how many cicas are we talking about trillions trillions I remember when nothing was trillions do you remember that when when nothing was trillions yeah there was no trillionaire we weren't we didn't have a trillion dollar budget deficit now everything's a trillion like even the bugs are a trillion now come on how many people died in Gaza a trillion everything's a trillion not really a trillion I made that part up in case you didn't know didn't come from Bloomberg News well just the news that's a news entity called just the news um reports there's a structural racism class that's mandatory for the UCLA Medical School well you definitely don't want your doctor not to have a mandatory racism class but what what sorts of things do they learn H let's see uh during the lecture the mandatory UCLA Medical School class on structural racism the guest speaker uh led the students in uh some kind of nonsecular prayer to Mama Earth and then got them to chant free free Palestine uh denigrated medicine as white science oh my God and apparently some of them were you know refusing to go along so there were some there were some resistance to it but you know I almost want to go back to the corporate world just so I can experience this you know as the cartoonist not as a regular person just so I can mock it that'd be fun well the daily wire launches a new courtroom reality show starring starring their one of their on air hosts Matt Walsh who to the best of my understanding uh is is not a judge but I saw the clips for it and I gotta say it looks like a winner it looks like a just like a dead winner because all it is is Matt Walsh mocking idiots but in a courtroom setting where they have to listen to him and he's got a he's got a little a little Hammer to bang now whoever came up with this idea the very idea of it is so absurd because he's not a judge but he's very judgy like like his whole job his whole job basically is you know writing and talking in a judgmental way about things so to have him uh wearing his little robe and banging his gavel and mocking idiots on camera I'm I'm down for it I'm down for it haven't seen the show but I feel like I can recommend it you know at least give it a chance all right uh California's governor Newsome introduced this new plan I guess this is going to happen in California that every baby born in California is going to get a college save account at Birth worth up to $1,500 what do you think of that idea giving kids $1,500 at Birth and you just let it sit there and as an investment I guess and build up steam I don't know almost every other topic almost every other topic I can say oh you know that's good or that's bad this one's a little unclear because I'd have to see the math I would have to see the math there there's something very appealing about it and he they didn't invent this idea and and the idea goes like this if you give a kid $1,500 today it might you know grow in value and by the time they're ready to go to college you don't need to give them the loan they can't pay back that would actually be a good investment might even encourage people to get more education than they would have otherwise so there there's a whole bunch that got some weird tickle on my nose um it might be a good idea I can't decide you know if you look in the short run it's just giving people money but in the long run could it be so good that we're all happy to happened I know I but well it if it's invested it will it will grow faster than inflation if you do it right I don't know I'm open-minded on that one that might not be a gigantic mistake which would be quite a difference from everything else California does by the way is anybody experiencing a blizzard today any blizzards nice day here in California I'll be taking a nice walk with my te just in my t-shirt might be shorts weather I'm not sure but um that's why I live in California if you say why do you live in California with all these many many management problems this is why this is why I I wanted to live somewhere where I Wouldn't Die just because I went Outdoors that's not a good enough reason how' you die well I made the mistake of going Outdoors nope won't kill me right away here uh The Daily Mail has a report that says Uh there's a new study a landmark 50 year study about trans kids are you surprised to learn that almost all the trans kids grow out of being trans by the time they're adults it's just a phase so I don't know it said most I don't know if that's 51% or 91% but most go through a phase so if you knew that most whatever most means at least 50% um it's a phase how in the world is it legal to transition kids how in how in any sane world is that legal when it's a 5050 bet yeah at best it's probably less than 5050 it's just amazing and how many of you are surprised is anybody surprised that it's a phase that many kids go through and grow out of course not because you can kids of absolutely anything kids will believe whatever and if their if their body chemistry is not caught up to their you know sex you could totally see why they would think they're the other thing yeah how hard is it to imagine a let's say a tomboyish girl who's just going through a phase thinking it's not a phase that would be pretty normal yeah same with h you know some little boy boy wants to wear a dress cuz he thinks it's funny and then likes it a little bit probably just a phase yeah so maybe we should stop mutilating children uh because it might be good for one of them well Charlamagne the god who's uh hosting on The Daily Show um he said among other things the truth about Dei is that although it's well-intentioned it's mostly garbage and then he played a Montage of conservatives mocking Dei by changing the letters you know to mean something besides diversity equity and inclusion one of the clips he played was uh uh Greg geld saying uh uh di is didn't earn it now I didn't make that one up I stole it from somebody on the internet whose name I didn't manage to write down at the time but uh that one's just a killer yeah well when you see didn't earn it that really should straighten out your thinking because the the issue is that people will think that not that it's not not that it's going to be true for every person it's just that that's what people will think it's just automatic of course you're going to think that but um although Charlemagne did say that di allowed racist to be openly racist the examples he gave were things like people saying oh must have been a de Dei hire that caused that bar at the bridge is it racist to speculate that the barge might have been a Dei situation is that racist give me the ruling racist or not racist what do you say um it sounds a little uh a little sus to me so that's why I Didn't Do It um since there was no evidence that there was any Dei or even any racial element to the accident whatsoever I think it's a mistake to try to sell your Dei philosophy based on an accident right I think it's a it's it's a persuasion mistake to over apply the Dei thinking to say oh well I think I'll win an extra point by saying this accident might have been Dei this it's just not it's not a good look it's not good for the world it's not good for your argument it's a little racist do you agree or no I mean I you know me so I'm I'm primed to not see things as racist but that looks it's too far A little too far so that's my take I would agree with charlam on both points that Dei is well-intentioned but mostly garbage exactly and but the garbage is you know the all the BS corporate part you know good idea ruined why getting a lot of comments on that well it is funny okay I I'll give you that blaming the barge on Dei it's a little funny because it's a what the thing that makes something funny is an oversimplification that's just automatically funny so if you say oh the bar is a Dei hire that is a humorous exaggeration over simplification with no evidence to support it which is why it's funny it's funny because it kind of doesn't fit that's what makes it funny if it was just what happened well then it wouldn't be a joke it would be description of what happened so yeah it's because it's a little bit too far well it's just too far let's not say a little bit however my uh my take on this is that the has broken on Dei if Charlamagne the god um being a prominent voice can say in public you know with lots of thinking about it in advance that Dei is mostly garbage and that it's probably having a backfire effect I think the dam just broke that means that other people can say it too he he's making it safe so he's taking the arrow in the back on this and I think he's uh doing a public service so good for you I'd say good work not only that but I thought he Charlemagne is growing into the job the the first clip I saw of him doing The Daily Show my my first impression honestly was you know I'm glad he got a chance but he can't really deliver the joke you know I felt he was falling short on the delivery but I don't know how many shows he's done now but I watched this clip and I would say yeah he grew into it he actually grew into it yeah he actually solved he he went into a new situation which by the way is my highest compliment my highest compliment is he went into a new situation which could have been super embarrassing did it stop him no no he just did it anyway was his first day out a huge win nope nope it was a little bit embarrassing honestly but did he feel the embarrassment I don't know all I know is he kept at it and then they got good at it so that's my that's that's A+ there's nothing you can say about that but A+ good job I like to see good work I like to call it out when people do good jobs that's a good job well China apparently hacked into Microsoft's mail and got into the accounts of some top Us official officials and people are saying that Microsoft the critics are saying that Microsoft has a a culture of not taking security as seriously as they should but you know that's something critics say who knows how seriously anybody's thinking but um here's something that was a quote from that story uh while no organization is immune to Cyber attack from well-resourced adversaries no organization there's no organization that's immune from Cyber attack huh no organization wow well that's not entirely true is it that no organization is safe from hackers well let me give you an example of of a organization that's completely safe all 50 states election systems all of them pristine boy do they take security seriously there not at a place like Microsoft no the Microsoft smartest people in the entire World um on security and Technology they they what you know those clowns they're not even taking it seriously but luckily luckily people and this is what protects the Republic every single person involved in our elections and especially the election security unlike Microsoft you a bunch of clowns just walking around the the Microsoft people yeah have I ever done an impression of Microsoft people just walking around they're like this really just idiots complete idiots I know I know what you're going to say you're going to say Scott they recruit the smartest people in the world and the best people in their in their field that's true but then you find out they're all lacks about this internet security and what can I conclude because it's not like you can't do it it's not like it's not easy how do I know Internet Security is easy 50 elections people listen to me all 50 election systems pristine unhackable completely secured and yet and yet Microsoft can't figure it out come on Microsoft thank goodness our elections are some weak can trust well Biden Administration has canceled their plans to refill the emergency oil reserves turns out the uh prices are too high so because the prices are too high we'll just not be ready for a war H I wonder if there are any risks of hiring the wrong president what did the other president do oh he filled the reserves when oil prices were really low and oil prices were low because he was such a pro- energy president you know in a way that all worked out didn't it being pro- energy drives down the prices you say hey prices are low let's fill that Reserve make sure nobody attacks us because we look all prepared but Biden went the other way uh destroy the energy industry make the price is high use up all the cheap gas so that we'll be vulnerable if we're attacked okay but uh at least that's the only bad thing Biden's doing can we agree on that at least no other mistakes Flawless pristine I say again pristin well here's another story about Biden he's trying to overthrow the government of an ally uh Israel okay that's not ideal but there's a the reporting is that um the United States is uh encouraging these fake protests so it looks like the the people are against Netanyahu uh they're going to extort ministers in the Israeli government the rich ones telling them they'll clamp down on their businesses internationally if they don't get rid of Netanyahu and America is building a port in Gaza allegedly to deliver aid but probably to take military control of Gaza away from Israel some say now is this reporting true I don't know sounds true because the way our intelligence people work is they always have to have a fake protest when they want to overthrow a government do you remember black lives matter and antifa that was our intelligence people creating fake protests now we know they're fake because they stopped as soon as Biden was President duh and it's the same technique they used in you know 80 other countries they overthrew so as soon as you see there's a bunch of fake protests that means America's Tred to overthrow your country that that's basically a really good sign that they're trying to overthrow your country so some of the reporting here I can't confirm and some of it is an interpretation and a little bit of mind reading but does it look to you like Biden wants to get rid of Netanyahu I say yes if I had to bet on it it looks like it's exactly what it looks like yeah that they're trying to get rid of Netanyahu so not not only is Biden um trying to get rid of his competition both Trump and RFK Jr in different ways using law fair not giving security to RFK Jr keeping him off the ballot um he's the most undemocratic president certainly in American history I don't think you nobody's Come Close RFK junr just says straight out that Biden's the biggest threat to Freedom because he actually he he's done massive First Amendment violations meaning the government work with private entities to censor and the things they censored were the truth it's bad enough that you censor but they censored really vital important truths like really really important to your health the co for example so yes Biden's overthrowing other countries are allies so so he's quite the anti-democracy guy here's a question that uh I had in my mind and I said to myself well I can get an answer to this question by using uh Google and searching and what watch how easy this is to get the right answer I'm going to ask you for the answer first and then I'll check Google and make sure that your answer is correct okay here's the question are seed oils good for your health bad for your health or no difference seed oils good for your health bad for your health or no difference in the comments well if you're on the internet you'll see all the smart people say seed oils are maybe the worst thing you could have in your body right so olive oil is still good avocado oil is still good because they're not based on the seeds are based on the the fruit I guess so so a lot of you are saying bad the seed now I didn't know one way or the other but I've seen a lot of smart people say it's bad based on science so I went to Google and I said our seed oils bad what do you think it told me no they're fine they're fine so what's true do you think that big food has any control over uh Google because I looked at the sources and the Harvard th Chan School of Public Health says uh the whole seed oil thing is BS and there's no real risk from it at all it's fine that's Harvard Harvard School of Public Health says no real risk is Harvard a credible Source no are you kidding me no Harvard's not a credible source for anything I don't know if they ever were but we certainly don't think they are now it's basically the Bloomberg of colleges so I don't know so as of this morning I don't even have a best guess I do not have a best guess my I mean it's easy to keep away from them uh well actually it's not easy because it's in dressings so I try to avoid any kind of dressing from a restaurant or door Dash so I don't I don't use their dressings usually and I guess there was a reason for that so I don't know I don't know if the seed oils are bad I just know the sources can't be trusted um I saw Mike sovich talking about uh the government keeps talking about solar flares disrupting things and he thinks they might be priming you so that election day might be hey solar flare you know wa we got all the mailin ballots cuz they were mailed in before but the the same day voting with our machines oh can't do it I guess there'll be long delays in all those Republican precincts because ah the solar flare got us well yes it's we can't we can't explain it didn't that happen in Maricopa Maricopa their machines all like mysteriously stopped working on Election Day and now we got solar flares well well I will not go as far as CNO is in saying that it's part of a plan but I do like his pattern recognition so his pattern recognition picked up this pattern he could be right yeah I I don't have a intuition about this in particular but yeah I would be amazed if they don't have massive technical problems on Election Day because the technical problems on Election Day will always work against Republicans so of course they're going to have technical problems why wouldn't they a technical problem is the easiest thing to fake what could be easier to fake than a technical Problem by far the easiest Yeah by far the easiest so yeah I would expect some technical problem whether they blame it on solar flares or not all right um Sage Steel is a journalist and she's telling us that when she did a ESPN interview for Biden that she was she was given the questions word for word and told she couldn't ask follow-up questions so on ABC ESPN yeah I think they own ESPN right their journalist now keep in mind this is a professional journalist the journalist was given by management the questions to ask and told that she can't ask follow-up questions so in other words if she asks a question and Biden just lies to her face she has to say next question and just let it lay and that was her specific direction from her bosses yeah in case you're wondering if things are as rigged as you think oh yeah they're totally rigged all right Trump is uh still thinking about how to uh clarify his abortion situation I'm going to make a suggestion for the very best thing he could do are you ready the single hardest persuasion challenge of all time I'm going to tell you what Trump and maybe Trump alone maybe nobody else could get away with this but there is an out he does have a way to to um to say what he believes at the same time it softens the problem for Republicans all right listen to this carefully and this is one that you've never heard anybody use before I may have mentioned it but you've never heard a politician say this this is what I'd say if I were president the president of the United States should only favor life in every situation no exceptions American Life American Life the American president should always favor life and should never make decisions in those gray areas when it comes to Americans living or dying but there are going to be cases where tough choices have to be made you don't want the president to make those choices you want your president to be commander-in-chief if somebody attacks you right if somebody attacks us I say president whoever you are doesn't matter who it is you have all the power you need do what you have to do now in that case I want the president to make all the decisions you know the immediate ones you you know obviously with Consulting with experts and Generals but that's a case where you really want your president to take all the power because it's just the way you're going to stay alive but if it's domestic and it's a b America the President should never be on the side of anything that even even in the most ambiguous case could reduce life in the United States but somebody has to make those decisions who should it be well because it's life and death you want that decision to be driven as close as possible to the people directly involved ideally you know the doctor and and the uh patient but if you can't get it all the way down to the doctor and the patient the state is a lot closer and so the one thing I can get right as your president is I can take it out of my hands if you want to know my personal opinion then you add your personal opinion my personal opinion is you know I think this or that but I do not want in any way to be part of the decision of life and death in your personal very private moments if the state wants to do it that's between the state and its citizens but absolutely the president of the United States should never ever be against life even if it's an ambiguous case now could he get away with that yeah he could everybody would hate it but it would be hated equally just right the Republicans who are you know ban abortion are going to say ah we hoped you would do a National Abortion bill you know Banning it and Trump would say you don't want me in that business and then the the Democrats would say but you should be in favor of abortion and then he would say you don't want me in that business you want everybody else there's there should be only one exception of the person who should say I'll take a pass just the president he's the only one who should take a pass could Trump sell that yes better than every other option now I I don't think he'll do this by the way I think what he'll do is some version of um you know the states the states need to decide but if it's up to me I would have several exceptions and I would treat it as sort of a negotiated Middle Ground so that's probably what he's going to do is that good enough I don't think it's going to gain him any votes the best he can do is reduce how many votes he loses and that would reduce probably give him a little boost you know because it wouldn't be a hard commitment but um yeah there's no right answer let's do a trump lawfare update uh we've got a judge who's uh doing some mind reading um let's see the judge has rejected Trump's bid to delay the hush money that stormmy Daniels hush money criminal trial until the Supreme Court rules on presidential immunity so in other words there's H the possibility that the president would have all kinds of immunity and if that were the case then this and other things would be um you know irrelevant they would just go away or would they be delayed until after he's president no he that would go away because he did it under the cover of presidency but uh the judge merchin decided that he would not wait to find out if the whole case would just go away because he was president and he had he had that immunity um and the reason he says that he's not going to wait for that decision is he goes the timing of the de defense filing quote raises real questions about the sincerity and actual purpose of the motion what why does the sincerity of the request change the law is that a thing I'm sure it is a thing but it doesn't sound right to me shouldn't the law just be the law now I get that you know if you kill somebody in self-defense your intentions are different than if you just murdered them so yeah what you're thinking matters but if you are if you're lawyers and you're doing everything you can for your client and the law allows you to do this where does sincerity come into it how much more sincere do you have to be to think maybe this whole thing should go away and and we should at least find out if he has immunity that's the most sincere thing I could even imagine all right I'm I'm Trump's lawyer and I know that there could be this future thing that's going to happen anyway and it's going to decide whether this case makes any difference at all how am I not sincere when I ask you to wait for that decision how in the world is that not sincere it's strategically correct it's legally correct it's logical it's exactly what they should be doing for their client and they didn't make up any of it it's real stuff like there really is an immunity decision and it's not very far away how does a judge look into their minds and see that they're insincere when every indication is that they are there's not a single indication that there's anything but good lawyering with a strong argument I don't see anything I don't see anything else except a strong argument oh no I'm looking into their brain I'm seeing a lack of sincerity in the world is this allowed anyway uh and but part of it is they missed some deadlines to do it earlier but again I say it's either legal to do it now or it's not legal the fact that they missed an earlier deadline how's that relevant how's that relevant it should be just it's legal or it's not legal and if it's legal they're just doing good Laing lawyering maybe they didn't in the past but that would be not a reason to penalize them now well how about this uh box gate trial the maralago secret boxes um I guess Jack Smith is going after the judge and threatening the judge with you know professional repercussions um as well as you know the Biden people are going after any lawyer who ever worked for Trump so this seems to be more more the uh non-democratic process using lawfare yeah so when you see it all as a group of actions the there never has been a president more against the Constitution than Biden can we say that for sure there's no president who's ever been more anti-constitution because he's completely taken out the first amendment by by workaround you know using these Nos and Soros funded things and fake fact Checkers and you know the social media pressure and everything so the first amendment's gone he's he's chipping away at the Second Amendment doing the best he can and now they're using a lawfare weaponizing the justice system trying to keep people off the B the ballot we've never seen anything like this this is not even in the domain of anything we've ever seen before unless unless there's some you know old presidential story I don't know about I've never seen anything like this this is so right in your face um we're just going to get rid of this whole Constitution thing and of course Dei is all just racist so um so that's happening Politico um has a uh an article from somebody named Rory Daniels who is a Democrat donor we're told by people who don't like his story and he says that uh he's some kind of China expert I I say laughingly cuz he he says that um China prefers Trump all right so a Democrat who actually funds Democrats writes in Politico that in his opinion China really wants Trump do you think that's real that China wants Trump that seems ridiculous this seems ridiculous anyway but people will believe anything did you know that uh there's a a new development apparently we can now predict prime numbers which is the thing that the experts thought could never be done when I say predict them I mean predict the next one that we'll discover you know which could be you know 20 digits long or you know some gigantic number but allegedly it was supposed to be impossible to predict but now there's um some mathematicians who think they can and have so they've they've actually tried it out made a prediction I think it worked so there some researchers in the Hong Kong and North Carolina I don't know what good that is but I I put that in the category of everything you thought was true is not true if you just if you just picked anything that you thought was true and wait 20 years it's probably not you could almost throw a dart at any guaranteed true thing how about the Big Bang throw a dart at that do you think the Big Bang is proven out no it's kind of largely been debunked the most basic thing I ever learned in science how about Evolution now that's pretty guaranteed right there's there's just so much proof for evolution well unless we're a simulation and unless you believe physics and you believe the uh the the double sled experiment do you believe Schrodinger's cat do you believe that there's such thing as you know the cat is both living and dead in the Box let me say it a different way the cat is not both alive and dead in the Box do you all know the Sher cat example you put the cat in a box that nobody can see anything that's happening inside but there's a randomized poison so you don't know if the poison has been randomly activated or not so for you on the outside of the box you don't know if the cat is alive or dead physics suggests that both States exist until observed that when you open the box that cat will be either alive or dead but here's the fun part that means you're creating history in the present that means your observation creates the past because if the cat was not guaranteed alive or not guaranteed dead until you open the box the moment you see the dead cat the history of the cat dying appears at the same time the history didn't exist until the cat was seen dead do you get that we have proof that we create history on the Fly and we've had it for a long time we just don't interpret it that way instead we interpreted that the cat was both alive and dead no that's absurd that's an absurdity but if we're a simulation and all indications in my opinion are that we are then it would act like a video game that you don't see the forest until your character goes into the forest and then it creates it because it needs a forest so you create the past you don't you don't just observe it it was there anyway so what was that all about I don't even know why I was going down that path but I'm sure I connected to something important in today's news Well moving on um Rasmus and poll says in a three-way match between Biden Trump and RFK Jr that 44% would go for Trump and 38 for Biden and 10% for Kennedy so every poll seems to suggest that Trump has a um insurmountable lead especially in the swing States most of them all but one or some say all of them he's ahead and it's a pretty big lead well as you know uh Biden raised $26 million in his big celebrity bash recently and it was a record everybody said it's historic nobody could ever beat that number he's the best fundraiser of all oh okay well looks like Trump's going to raise 43 million at a Palm Beach fundraiser this weekend they project so 43 million would be the new record record by aot let's see what other records has Trump set let's see he made more money as president than any president ever because he got cancelled and created true social and it went public he's got quite a few records there never started a war never started a war that's pretty good record all right Wall Street Journal is reporting that uh men are leaving the Democrat party and droves especially black and Latino young voters apparently every group is having a little um a little bit of second thought about Biden but men in particular are especially leaving so the Wall Street Journal poll found that Biden was drawing only 37% of men in the seven swing States uh now that was on a ballot with only him and Trump so without RFK Jr but um and that found about the same Nationwide and that is way weaker than uh Biden had 46% of men in 2020 so he's gone from 46 down to 37% of men as mostly minority men because the white guys had already left the ones with testosterone had already left so do any of you remember when I first started saying that Democrats were the party of women has anybody been with me long enough you remember the first time I said that I think it was during Hillary's run against Trump if I recall and you could see then that Hillary was turning into the party of women but now it's a thing the the men are abandoning it they see it's a party of women uh I'm going to take some credit for being the first person to notice that that it was going that way I'm sure other people noticed it but they're you know I nobody made as much noise about it as I did well here's the thing if the Democrats are the party of women liberal women and we know their rate of mental illness I would put it as 70% I think 70% of liberal women have mental illness around 50% have diagnosed or have sought treatment so if 50% are sought treatment at least 70% are suffer uing now how many of them are only suffering from TDS and didn't seek treatment it might be 90% have Bonafide observable mental problems so if the men are leaving at this rate it completely turns over the Democrat Party to people who are not figuratively crazy not using hyperbole it literally is a filtering process left all the crazy people in one place now is that predictable that if you get enough crazy people there'll be a point where everything breaks and the people who don't want to be around crazy people just get the hell out of there that's what's happening the men are realizing that they're they're with crazy people actually crazy and the men are saying what the hell is going on get me out of here I want to go where like my work makes a difference and if I succeed I get to keep my money you know not crazy things yeah get the foa so why is it that so many liberal women are crazy well part of it's the news making them crazy in TDS and you know maybe it's the phones and all this but I've got another I have another hypothesis as you know I like to do some work at Starbucks quite often because it's a great environment to bring your laptop and get a little extra work done while you have some delicious coffee but I also am sitting the air wall and watching everybody else's orders if a man comes in there's a pretty good chance that man's getting a cup of coffee if a woman comes in what is she ordering sugar she's ordering sugar yeah I wonder if sugar can make you crazy oh here's a St high levels of glucose triglycerides linked to psychiatric disorders new study says so Starbucks which in my opinion is a liquid candy store let me say that again Starbucks for men is a place to get coffee for women it's a liquid candy store they're going for the sugar if you stand there and watch who walks in what they pick up and what they walk out with it's sugar now I'm I'm on a low sugar diet because my blood you even at my weight and you know eating a pretty clean diet even I am a little bit high in sugar so there's literally one item in all of Starbucks I'm willing to eat that doesn't have wheat in it because I want to stay away from that there's only one item just the egg bites basically so so we have a Starbucks on every Corner we have uh the liberal women walking in there and picking up their sugar going crazy listening to the news and playing with their phones not being able to get a date because the whole dating situation and their meaning of life has been destroyed and then they go into politics and they vote this is not a sustainable situation not sustainable so we we just have to be a little bit more honest about what's going on Democrats are a party of women women are eating too much sugar and they're going crazy not just because of the sugar I mean it's also the the phones the situation the old family dating situation complexity of Life Etc now I have a second theory that I'm going to break out if something were driving all of civilization crazy whatever it is you know you you can pick your favorite thing it's the news it's their phones it's something whatever it is where would you see it first where where would a like if there was a ray gun that made people crazy where would you see it first I think you'd see it in children because they have the weakest Minds uh and you'd see them going trans and non-binary like crazy do we see that yes yes you see children having major psychological problems changing their genders trying anything literally trying anything to try to you know solve what's happening so you'd see it in children and and definitely children are going nuts secondly you would see it in women before men why well do I even need to explain that are can we finally get past the point where I have to treat men and women like they're the same is there anybody listening who needs me to do oh there's some reason that they're exactly the same no you don't need that right are haven't we outgrown that yeah I I'm pretty sure that women are let's say closer to their emotional let's say their emotional life is richer than men is that the best way to say do women have a richer emotional life than men because that takes the takes the Judgment out of it right because I think you'd all agree with that that women have a richer emotional life if you have a ritual emotional life and I find out about it and I'm a hypnotist do you know how easy it is to manipulate somebody with that rich emotional life super easy easier than somebody who's analytical that's for sure you can also fool fool very smart analytical people but that's a little different different kind of process yeah so if we're if we're being subjected to some kind of anide force or forces that are driving people crazy every observation is supporting that because the humans are falling in the exact order that they would be susceptible to outside manipulation of their psychological well-being it's all there it's right in front of you um let's see is there any other evidence of that well Joe Rogan was talking to Coleman Hughes and Coleman Hughes had been on The View recently and had a good little interaction with them and it caused Joe Rogan to characterize the view as the people on The View as quote rabies infested Hen House rabies infested Hen House what would be another word for that b crazy liberal woman yeah so people are willing to say it out loud now they're going to use their own language but people are saying it out loud the when you watch The View you really don't get the feeling you're seeing a difference of opinion you think you're seeing mental illness only that's all I say I I know what a difference of opinion looks like you know who has a difference of opinion John Stewart John Stewart now he's got you know maybe a little TDS like everybody but he's not insane he's not mentally incompetent he's he doesn't have rabies he he just has different information different priorities you know little team play but he's not crazy right Bill Mah You can disagree with him all day long but he doesn't seem crazy you know he has a little TDS but otherwise fairly normal psychologically as far as we can tell but there's definitely a difference when you look at the view they actually seem mentally unwell and if we can't call out mental health and we have to keep treating it like it's a difference of opinion that's not going to work very well yeah we we need to treat mental health as a mental problem you know if you want to respect the people involved you treat them like as a medical problem well the bird flew maybe coming at us I don't know somebody had sex with a cow and a bird at the same time and ate a hamburger I don't know the details I may have made that up but somehow the CDC is worrying that this bird flu can spread among our dairy cattle but uh Thomas Massie picking up the pattern quickly um says the bureaucrats and corporations will probably use this to advance an agenda against raw milk independent farmers and backyard chickens let me give you some advice never get a backyard chicken never never get a backyard chicken because you know what happens if you have a backyard chicken sooner or later one way or another you're going to end up with a backyard rooster do you know what happens when you have a backyard rooster well you don't sleep too well and your neighbors are going to call the authorities and then what do you do with your rooster do you kill it well that's not legal no because it's a pet you can't kill your pet and they're protected you cannot kill a male you know a rooster so well at least you can give it away right you can find like somebody wants to take it nope there are zero places that will take a rooster can't give it away can't sell it can't lose it can't kill it but you might have to move so if you get a rooster you're going to have to sell your house your your neighbors will make you move don't get a chicken it's going to lead to a rooster you're going to have to move and none of that's a joke by the way and it's guaranteed that that that chain of events that's guaranteed chicken rooster gotta leave your house don't do it best advice I'll ever give you because I've seen it I I'm speaking from Direct close experience all right uh Tucker is talking to uh Marjorie Taylor green and she's not too keen on speaker Johnson and him trying to get money to Ukraine and there was you know the speculation that speaker Johnson is being blackmailed by somebody does he act like somebody who's being blackmailed if you're just observing and you see that the top Republican is just gung-ho about Ukraine support and you notice that um he replaced Mitch Mc.

Connell who's going to remain as a senator and Mitch Mc.

Connell said his number one goal as he remains a senator is funding Ukraine so the ex speaker of the house was in favor of it the new speaker of the house is in favor of it but Republicans by majority are not in favor it now is that true the Republicans by a majority are not in favor in the house is that true right now I think that's true so why would the leaders be doing something that their base does not favor by a majority I'll need a fact check on that I think it's not a majority and the only reason I can think of is that the uh our intelligence people um threaten them so I think they're coerced I think Mc.

Connell um either has some financial gain or he's being blackmailed and I think that speaker Johnson is probably just being blackmailed I think he's being blackmailed I think we have a blackmail accuracy that our entire government is some basically collection of blackmailed people that the intelligence people can control they they prer black mailable people because that's how they control them so that's what it looks like I don't have any proof of that but I would say observationally they look like uh captives they they act like prisoners basically if you act like a prisoner long enough I'm going to think you're a prisoner and these guys are acting like prisoners they don't act like these are their opinions at all and I think uh Mitch MCC Mc.

Connell calls it an isolationist movement to give up on Ukraine is it is it an isolationist movement or is it just a bad idea an isolationist and of course uh CNN and MSNBC have been telling us forever that Ukraine is winning which is apparently absurd and so why would the leaders of the Republican party of all things want to support all this money for war when they know it's not going to make a difference what's going on the only thing I can assume is it's exactly what it looks like the industrial military complex can make a lot of money out of that 60 billion and they want their cut and they have blackmail or bribery or something on the leaders now if you've got a republican like MTG questioning whether the leader of her own group is being being blackmailed he has to step down it doesn't matter if you can prove it if you're acting in a way that your own base can't tell if you've been blackmailed or you're under duress and you can't explain why you're acting the way you're acting you know without obvious I feel like that loss of confidence should be enough to get you out of the job you know the appearance of being blackmailed seems like that should be enough you know to take somebody out of that kind of a job anyway the French are making noise about maybe sending troops on the ground to Ukraine so the Russian uh the Russia Russia called the French defense minister to say it will create problems for France itself I don't want to say what kind of problems but France you might have some problems that's ominous so what do you think are the French going to break the seal and then it will be easier for America to add some troops because at that point well it's just a NATO action and we're part of NATO and we got to Pro protect our French allies so of course we're sending some advisers just a few advisers no they we're just going to do train them to use the weapons well while they're there they shot a few things well as long as we're over there and everybody knows we're over there and shooting we might as well send some more people over there and pretty soon the military-industrial complex is making even more money than before um more people are speaking out about Israel's treatment of Gaza uh I will remind you that my opinion of what Israel is doing there is irrelevant as is yours because they're going to do what they're going to do now there are a lot of cases where your opinion actually could make a difference I think in American politics you if you press hard enough enough and complain hard enough and enough people pick up the same complaint it probably makes a difference but this is a really special case it's it's a onever situation you hope it's onever and uh Israel's just going to do what they're going to do and I think they're going to burn their International reputation but they've decided it's worth the cost and I don't know that they're wrong from a purely let's say you know National interest point of view are they wrong to to burn their Holocaust Goodwill if you ironically if you can call it that but it's they're they're torching it the the whole Holocaust thing is is gone I think it's gone already imagine this conversation Israeli says blah blah blah Holocaust now where does the conversation go after that every time for the rest of Eternity um um Gaza right G Gaza now erases the Holocaust as an asset their greatest asset it's gone but is it a good investment I'm going to say again that in 200 years if Israel essentially controls Gaza and pacified it and maybe made it economically successful it's going to look like they made the right decisions in the war at the moment it never looks like a good decision does it like nothing looks smart when you're the bullets are flying everybody looks dumb in that situation you're like really you couldn't find any way to prevent somebody from shooting at you for a year there was nothing you could do to make that not happen you know so we just automatically think if the bullets are flying probably both sides are being a little up right a little bit like every Situation's different but you just automatically have that bias so anyway Paul Graham had an interesting comment about a situation that I don't know if it's true at all because you know everything out of the war zone is is fake but he he says that uh there's some um evidence from some military person who says it's true that uh the Israelis preferred to wait for the Hamas uh highlevel person to come home uh then they would take out the whole home with the family and the wife and that they preferred doing it that way I guess because they knew where it was then you know they didn't have to wonder if they were getting them now that might have been one person and it's the fog of War i' I'd be surprised if that's the official policy I wouldn't be surprised if somebody's Commander told them to do it I'd be a little surprised if it was coming from the top but it's War do I think that it is moral or ethical to kill the entire family when you're just going after the Hamas leader who is married to them well it's war and I don't believe in making moral and ethical judgments during a war because it's all bad like making some little uh you know ranking of oh this is a little bit worse than this other thing and no it's just all bad like everything is just bad both sides just all the time all bad but um certainly self defense is is the motivating factor here for Israel so I'm going to ask I'm going to ask the question a different way and this this is just to make you expand your thinking about it all right so analogies are never the same as the situation so I'm going to give you an analogy just to expand your thinking but analogies are not arguments so so I don't win the argument with this I might expand your thinking imagine there was a situation where somebody kidnapped a child um did surgery on him and put a bomb inside their torso sewed him up and then said all right kid your your parents are here and maybe the real goal is to you know blow up wherever the parents work so here get out of the car and run toward your parents now let's say that our intelligence people had learned in advance that the kid had a bomb in it and as soon as he went through the doorway the building would blow up and the kid would be dead would it be ethical and moral to shoot the child before he reached the door murder the innocent child to avoid the further death ethical moral well I'm gonna take a page n of uh Dana Pino's book she she she split the baby on TV yesterday in a way that I thought was clever totally immoral which is you know separate from the question of whether you need to do it you know the the the question of morality you you can allow yourself a luxury belief so a luxury belief is one you don't have to operate on it's like somebody else's problem oh yeah killing people totally immoral I'm totally against it which I can say because nobody slaughtered my people on October 7th pretty easy for me to say Wars immoral but if you slaughtered my people I might feel a little differently about that so we want to be good people in public so if anybody asks you what do you think about you know the situation you should say oh it's terrible it's a terrible situation and it's all immoral and unethical and I'm not going to change my vote it's all immoral and unethical well that's just sort of a Dodge but I do like that it's a nod toward you know maybe an ideal that we should strive for that we should try to be good people but in the real world you got to make decisions and if your terrorist is commuting and commuting back to the house do you call that self-defense if you take out the whole house well I say it's not worth talking about because I don't think this is unusual in war to me the looks sort of ordinary terrible but kind of ordinary meaning that probably every war has this same degree of things you wish didn't happen and in the special case where the children have been weaponized um it makes the self-defense argument stronger right so here here's another one same argument let's say there's a home Invader at your home and it's is somebody bigger than you I'll just use me I'll use myself there's a home Invader and they're definitely bigger than me and but I get lucky we get in a scuffle and the home Invader trips over the rug and I jump on top of him and I you managed to be able to hold them down now uh and let's say the home invader's knife came free and I'm now on sitting on the back of the home Invader and I've got my knife in my hand but there's some subdued so I can't legally kill them right you all agree I can't kill them because they're subdued and now the person who's subdued says all right you're in trouble now if you don't kill me and you let me get up I'm going to kill you and you know you only got lucky the first time because it's somebody bigger than you and you know if you let them up and you don't have your phone with you so you can't call out you can't call out to anybody if you let them up they're going to kill you is it self-defense if you finish them off I actually don't know the answer to that if you finish them off because it's the only way you can stay alive is that self-defense and I think the law would say it's not self-defense I think they would call it murder do you know what I would call it necessary I would call it necessary in my also be murder but that doesn't change it being necessary so yes I would stab them to death and then I would call the police in that order every time so if you say to me there's a house full of people who are going to grow up to be terrorists if you kill their dad do I have a legal ethical right to kill them too no I don't I don't don't it's not moral and it's not ethical it might be necessary it might be necessary but it's not moral it's not ethical so war is about the uh what is necessary it is not about moral or ethical we just wish it we wish it were it isn't all right um and then CNN had some analysts who said that the is Israeli military has told them to basically just shoot every man of fighting age do you think that's true do you think that the official rules of engagement are to shoot everybody of military age I don't know you know it could be one one Commander maybe could be more than that could be this person's lying no no it's on CNN so it could just be a lie but is it necessary to shoot every man of fighting age I don't know I don't know um I know that if you didn't a lot more of you would die that I know there would be more Israeli soldiers would die if they didn't so does that make it appropriate because it's self-defense they're killing him just in case is that self-defense I don't know I actually don't know um but I'm not going to defend Israel I'm just going to say in a war this is exactly what happens there are no good guys in Wars there are no good guys in Wars there's just what's necessary and then there are people who are on your side and that's about it so if Israel is doing what is necessary and they're still our allies then that's my conclusion it's necessary they're allies if he ask me is it moral and ethical no nope isas moral and ethical nah is the Biden Administration nah no are the people who want it to stop moral and ethical they might be they might also be stupid so I I can separate those things pretty easily all right ladies and gentlemen that's all I've got for you today in this amazing show that you wait you spent much too much time on I'm going to say goodbye to X and You.

Tube and Rumble is spend a little extra time just with the local subscribers because they're special they get extra thanks for joining see you in the morning tomorrow e e e e e

how about that how how about that is

that

better well if you'd like to take this

experience up to levels that do not

require my incompetence to hit the wrong

buttons like this morning all you need

for that is a cuper muger glass of

tanker cheler Stein a canteen jug or

flask a vessel of any kind fill it with

your favorite liquid I like coffee and

join me now for the unparallel pleasure

of the dope mean h of the day the thing

that makes everything better it's called

the simultaneous Sip and it happens now

go so

good so so good all right I'm going to

make sure I can see

your comments

here looking

good no I'm

wrong technical problem which I will fix

right

now what an

adventure oh my

goodness this wouldn't be easy one

though fixed

well we got all kinds of news today it's

amazing did you know that uh Home Depot

will sell you a whole house 540 square

fet pre prefab for

$444,000 so now you can buy a whole

house from Home Depot a whole house from

Amazon um okay just checking let

do we have a

sound can anybody hear

me let it's not entirely clear that I'm

actually

live

anybody any sound at all is there any

kind of a show

happening I can't tell yeah okay looks

like it looks like we have

sound all right well let's just keep on

going here just like there's no problem

at all uh there's new a uh new AI that

can take your script and turn it into a

full movie just from the

script how cool is that you can just

take your movie script and it just

becomes a

movie now I have certainly a lot of

questions whether that really does that

I'm going to predict it's really demo

whereare you know something that

looks like it could work and you wish it

would work but doesn't quite work like

everything else in AI it almost does

something well I think that's what's

going to happen uh but what's different

is that the pitch for funding at the Y

combinator demo day was done with using

AI so the founder pitched it using an AI

version of herself or one of the

founders I think that's kind of cool can

robot read your

mind well there's one called emo now and

it will smile back at you if you

smile and it might change really how you

interact with machines imagine a

robot that knew the correct context to

smile

back I mean just hold that in your mind

that you smile at your robot and it

smiles back that's a

GameChanger that that's the point where

you lose the ability to know it's not

real or that it's not conscious it when

you're robot starts smiling at you

there's almost nothing you'll be able to

do to think that it's not conscious I

don't think it will be but boy isn't

going to seem conscious when it Smiles

at you but apparently this one the one

that

smiles can also read your face and try

to get an idea what your what your

attitude is so now they have ai that'll

listen to your words for your emotional

state but this one will look at your

face and your body language so yes the

robots are getting into our emotional

space and that's going to be a problem

you may have seen this story it's not

too new but there was a New Jersey

postal worker who had been just throwing

away the mail which by the way is not

that

uncommon sometimes it's just easier to

go home and throw the mail away than it

is to deliver it all over town that's a

lot of work so sometimes ma you'll hear

the story about a male person who just

would take the mail home and dump it in

the you know his living room or

something well but this one has an extra

element to it there were 99 election

ballots in this uh two 2,000 pieces of

mail now there's no indication that the

male person had any political motive or

that throwing the mail had away had

anything to do with

ballots but well here's my

question how did they detect that he

threw the mail

away was it because somebody knew about

their ballot

missing is that what

happened let's see let me see if I can

figure out how to go private on

this cuz I'm still I'm still getting

people getting trolls telling me there's

no

sound and I don't think that they're

real people I think they're

trolls they're trolls right sound is

fine yeah I'm not going to ask

again all right um so the question is

would does our election system detect if

a male person throws the mail

away how in the world did they know that

uh any male was missing in the first

place now I didn't see that in the story

but the but here's where I would sound

the alarm here's what I expected to see

in the story there were 99 ballots that

were thrown

away and uh 10 of those 99 people

complained because they knew their

ballot didn't reach its

destination so when they tracked it down

they could easily figure out which

postal person it was because of where

the the ballot Dropbox

was do you think that happened do you

think that the election process

picked up that ballots were thrown

away because if it didn't pick it

up then what we did is we outsourced our

election

security to the post

office the post

office because I can't think of a more

secure environment than the post

office but looks like that's what we

did well vigilantism is is breaking out

right on schedule there are three

stories in the news just

today of people taking matters into

their own hands

surprise surprise people feel there's no

law and so men men are starting to take

the law into their own

hands um one example is Walter Isaacson

who used to be the CEO of CNN I guess

and he was at some event and some

protest to some non-binary protester was

disturbing it so Walter Isaacson who was

72 years old decided to personally

escort that person out which allegedly

turned into some

shoving but he was

removed so alter isacon just dragged

some Bastard out of the room and shoved

him out of the room now he's in trouble

you know the obviously the protesters is

going to file charges for assault but

you know it's like some scratches on his

arm or something

um there's a New York City man who was

in the news today for catching a porch

pirate his his stuff kept getting stolen

so he put a fake package out there and

waited for the porch pirate and then

went out with his baseball bat and uh

called the authorities and got him

arrested so Walter Isaacson getting

physical with a protester New York City

man setting his own trap and using

physical force violent

then there's a story of a Arizona State

um attorney was grilling a woman because

her

husband um had fired at what what was

supposed to be a warning shot because

there were a bunch of migrants illegally

crossing his

land so he sends out the

uh sends out a uh he does a warning shot

and apparently with the warning shot his

somebody so now there's some legal

difficulty now I don't know if it was

really a warning shot makes you wonder

if it was really a warning shot but uh

there's three examples in the news just

today of men deciding they had enough do

you think it's a trend do you think you

will see more stories of men deciding

they've had enough yes you

will yes she will there's no way this is

going to stop there's going to be a

whole bunch more men just figuring it

out on their own cuz what choice do you

have what choice you don't have a choice

it's either let it happen or fix it and

you're going to go to jail if you try to

fix it well Apple uh you know Apple was

going to try to do a car but then they

gave up on the

car and uh now there's talk in Bloomberg

that they're going to make a robot

personal robot doesn't that make more

sense don't you think Apple should make

a personal robot and not so much a

car I think getting into the car

business would probably have been a

mistake so they probably made the right

choice to get out of it but an apple

robot that's working with your other

Apple

devices absolutely I I want an apple

robot just to be my remote

control I just want to tell my robot

what to turn on and off it's like hey uh

robot can you turn on Netflix find

something for

me um however I CAU you that this report

is in Bloomberg and Bloomberg is not a

credible source of news how do I know

that well I know that because Bloomberg

wants to a story about me so I can say

authoritatively that it's not a real

source of

news now the rest of you have to guess

but I've been there yeah I I know they

make up at least they did about me

so I wouldn't trust anything they say

but it might be

true well we've got the caedon coming

it's like Armageddon with

cicas what's the other name for a cicada

is it like a

locust is a cicada like Locust or is

that like a completely different bug

does anybody know cicada I don't know I

just don't like them but apparently

they're every 17 years they emerge and I

guess there's two types and by

coincidence their their their very long

gestation period or hibernation or

whatever the hell they do um they lined

up so we're can to have two

cicada invasions at the same time how

many cicas are we talking

about

trillions

trillions I remember when nothing was

trillions do you remember that when when

nothing was

trillions yeah there was no trillionaire

we weren't we didn't have a trillion

dollar budget deficit now everything's a

trillion like even the bugs are a

trillion now come

on how many people died in Gaza a

trillion everything's a

trillion not really a trillion I made

that part up in case you didn't know

didn't come from Bloomberg

News well just the news that's a news

entity called just the news

um reports there's a structural racism

class that's mandatory for the UCLA

Medical School well you definitely don't

want your doctor not to have a mandatory

racism class but what what sorts of

things do they learn H let's see uh

during the lecture the mandatory UCLA

Medical School class on structural

racism the guest speaker uh led the

students in uh some kind of nonsecular

prayer to Mama

Earth and then got them to chant free

free

Palestine uh denigrated medicine as

white

science oh my

God and apparently some of them were you

know refusing to go along so there were

some there were some resistance to it

but you know I almost want to go back to

the corporate world just so I can

experience this you know as the

cartoonist not as a regular person just

so I can mock

it that'd be

fun well the daily wire launches a new

courtroom reality show starring starring

their one of their on air hosts Matt

Walsh who to the best of my

understanding uh

is is not a judge but I saw the clips

for it and I gotta

say it looks like a

winner it looks like a just like a dead

winner because all it is is Matt Walsh

mocking idiots but in a courtroom

setting where they have to listen to him

and he's got a he's got a little a

little Hammer to

bang now whoever came up with this idea

the very idea of it is so absurd because

he's not a

judge but he's very judgy like like his

whole job his whole job basically is you

know writing and talking in a judgmental

way about things so to have him uh

wearing his little robe and banging his

gavel and mocking idiots on camera I'm

I'm down for it I'm down for it haven't

seen the show but I feel like I can

recommend it you know at least give it a

chance all right uh California's

governor Newsome introduced this new

plan I guess this is going to happen in

California that every baby born in

California is going to get a college

save account at Birth worth up to

$1,500 what do you think of that

idea giving kids $1,500 at Birth and you

just let it sit there and as an

investment I guess and build up

steam I don't know almost every other

topic almost every other topic I can say

oh you know that's good or that's bad

this one's a little unclear because I'd

have to see the

math I would have to see the math there

there's something very appealing about

it and he they didn't invent this idea

and and the idea goes like this if you

give a kid $1,500 today it might you

know grow in value and by the time

they're ready to go to college you don't

need to give them the loan they can't

pay

back that would actually be a good

investment might even encourage people

to get more education than they would

have otherwise so there there's a whole

bunch that got some weird tickle on my

nose

um it might be a good

idea I can't decide you know if you look

in the short run it's just giving people

money but in the long

run could it be so good that we're all

happy to happened I know I but well it

if it's invested it will it will grow

faster than inflation if you do it

right I don't know I'm open-minded on

that one that might not be a gigantic

mistake which would be quite a

difference from everything else

California does by the way is anybody

experiencing a blizzard

today any

blizzards nice day here in

California I'll be taking a nice walk

with my te just in my t-shirt might be

shorts weather I'm not sure but um

that's why I live in California if you

say why do you live in California with

all these many many management problems

this is why this is why I I wanted to

live somewhere where I Wouldn't Die just

because I went

Outdoors that's not a good enough reason

how' you die well I made the mistake of

going Outdoors nope won't kill me right

away

here uh The Daily

Mail has a report that says Uh there's a

new study a landmark 50 year study about

trans

kids are you surprised to learn that

almost all the trans kids grow out of

being trans by the time they're adults

it's just a

phase

so I don't know it said most I don't

know if that's 51% or 91% but most go

through a phase so if you knew that most

whatever most means at least

50%

um it's a

phase how in the world is it legal to

transition

kids how in how in any sane world is

that

legal when it's a 5050 bet yeah at best

it's probably less than

5050 it's just amazing and how many of

you are surprised is anybody surprised

that it's a phase that many kids go

through and grow out of course not

because you can

kids of absolutely anything kids will

believe whatever and if their if their

body chemistry is not caught up to their

you know

sex you could totally see why they would

think they're the other thing yeah how

hard is it to imagine a let's say a

tomboyish girl who's just going through

a phase thinking it's not a phase that

would be pretty normal yeah same with h

you know some little boy boy wants to

wear a dress cuz he thinks it's funny

and then likes it a little bit probably

just a phase yeah so maybe we should

stop mutilating

children uh because it might be good for

one of

them well Charlamagne the god who's uh

hosting on The Daily

Show um he said among other things the

truth about Dei is that although it's

well-intentioned it's mostly

garbage and then he played a Montage of

conservatives mocking Dei by changing

the letters you know to mean something

besides diversity equity and inclusion

one of the clips he played was uh uh

Greg geld saying uh uh di is didn't earn

it now I didn't make that one up I stole

it from somebody on the internet whose

name I didn't manage to write down at

the time but uh that one's just a

killer yeah well when you see didn't

earn it that really should straighten

out your thinking because the the issue

is that people will think that not that

it's not not that it's going to be true

for every person it's just that that's

what people will think it's just

automatic of course you're going to

think that but um although Charlemagne

did say that di allowed racist to be

openly racist the examples he gave were

things like people saying oh must have

been a de Dei hire that caused that bar

at the

bridge is it

racist to speculate that the barge might

have been a Dei situation is that racist

give me the ruling racist or not

racist what do you

say um it sounds a little uh a little

sus to me so that's why I Didn't Do It

um since there was no evidence that

there was any Dei or even any racial

element to the accident whatsoever I

think it's a mistake to try to sell your

Dei philosophy based on an

accident right I think it's a it's it's

a persuasion mistake to over apply the

Dei thinking to say oh well I think I'll

win an extra point by saying this

accident might have been

Dei this it's just not it's not a good

look it's not good for the world it's

not good for your argument

it's a little

racist do you agree or

no I mean I you know me so I'm I'm

primed to not see things as racist but

that looks it's too far A little too far

so that's my take I would agree with

charlam on both points that Dei is

well-intentioned but mostly garbage

exactly and but the garbage is you know

the all the BS corporate part you know

good idea ruined

why getting a lot of comments on

that well it is funny okay I I'll give

you that blaming the barge on

Dei it's a little

funny because it's a what the thing that

makes something funny is an

oversimplification that's just

automatically funny so if you say oh the

bar is a Dei hire that is a humorous

exaggeration over simplification with no

evidence to support it which is why it's

funny it's funny because it kind of

doesn't fit that's what makes it funny

if it was just what happened well then

it wouldn't be a joke it would be

description of what happened so yeah

it's because it's a little bit too far

well it's just too far let's not say a

little

bit however my uh my take on this is

that the has broken on Dei if

Charlamagne the god um being a prominent

voice can say in

public you know with lots of thinking

about it in advance that Dei is mostly

garbage and that it's probably having a

backfire

effect I think the dam just broke that

means that other people can say it

too he he's making it safe so he's

taking the arrow in the back on this and

I think he's uh doing a public

service so good for you I'd say good

work not only that but I thought he

Charlemagne is growing into the job the

the first clip I saw of him doing The

Daily

Show my my first impression honestly

was you know I'm glad he got a chance

but he can't really deliver the joke you

know I felt he was falling short on the

delivery

but I don't know how many shows he's

done now but I watched this clip and I

would say yeah he grew into it he

actually grew into it yeah he actually

solved he he went into a new situation

which by the way is my highest

compliment my highest compliment is he

went into a new situation which could

have been super embarrassing did it stop

him no no he just did it anyway was his

first day out a huge win nope nope

it was a little bit embarrassing

honestly but did he feel the

embarrassment I don't know all I know is

he kept at it and then they got good at

it so that's my that's that's A+ there's

nothing you can say about that but A+

good job I like to see good work I like

to call it out when people do good jobs

that's a good

job well China apparently hacked into

Microsoft's mail and got into the

accounts of some top Us official

officials and people are saying that

Microsoft the critics are saying that

Microsoft has a a culture of not taking

security as seriously as they should but

you know that's something critics say

who knows how seriously anybody's

thinking but um here's something that

was a quote from that story uh while no

organization is immune to Cyber attack

from well-resourced

adversaries no

organization there's no organization

that's immune from Cyber attack

huh no

organization

wow well that's not entirely true is it

that no organization is safe from

hackers well let me give you an example

of of a

organization that's completely

safe all 50 states election

systems all of them pristine

boy do they take security seriously

there not at a place like

Microsoft no the Microsoft smartest

people in the entire

World um on security and Technology they

they what you know those clowns they're

not even taking it seriously but luckily

luckily people and this is what protects

the

Republic every single person involved in

our elections

and especially the election security

unlike Microsoft you a bunch of

clowns just walking around the the

Microsoft people yeah have I ever done

an impression of Microsoft people just

walking around they're like

this really just idiots complete

idiots I know I know what you're going

to say you're going to say Scott they

recruit the smartest people in the world

and the best people in their in their

field that's true but then you find out

they're all lacks about this internet

security and what can I conclude because

it's not like you can't do it it's not

like it's not easy how do I know

Internet Security is

easy 50 elections people listen to me

all 50 election systems pristine

unhackable completely secured and yet

and yet Microsoft can't figure it

out come on

Microsoft thank goodness our elections

are some weak can

trust well Biden Administration has

canceled their plans to refill the

emergency oil

reserves turns out the uh prices are too

high so because the prices are too high

we'll just

not be ready for a

war H I wonder if there are any risks of

hiring the wrong

president what did the other president

do oh he filled the reserves when oil

prices were really low and oil prices

were low because he was such a pro-

energy

president you know in a way that all

worked out didn't it

being pro- energy drives down the prices

you say hey prices are low let's fill

that Reserve make sure nobody attacks us

because we look all prepared but Biden

went the other

way uh destroy the energy industry make

the price is high use up all the cheap

gas so that we'll be vulnerable if we're

attacked

okay but uh at least that's the only bad

thing Biden's doing can we agree on that

at least no other mistakes Flawless

pristine I say again

pristin well here's another story about

Biden he's trying to overthrow the

government of an ally uh

Israel okay that's not ideal but there's

a the reporting is that um the United

States is uh encouraging these fake

protests so it looks like the the people

are against Netanyahu

uh they're going to extort ministers in

the Israeli government the rich ones

telling them they'll clamp down on their

businesses internationally if they don't

get rid of Netanyahu and America is

building a port in Gaza allegedly to

deliver aid but probably to take

military control of Gaza away from

Israel some say now is this reporting

true I don't

know sounds true because the way our

intelligence people work is they always

have to have a fake protest when they

want to overthrow a

government do you remember black lives

matter and

antifa that was our intelligence people

creating fake protests now we know

they're fake because they stopped as

soon as Biden was President duh and it's

the same technique they used in you know

80 other countries they overthrew so as

soon as you see there's a bunch of fake

protests that means America's Tred to

overthrow your

country that that's basically a really

good sign that they're trying to

overthrow your

country so some of the reporting here I

can't confirm and some of it is an

interpretation and a little bit of mind

reading but does it look to you like

Biden wants to get rid of

Netanyahu I say yes if I had to bet on

it it looks like it's exactly what it

looks like yeah that they're trying to

get rid of Netanyahu so not not only is

Biden um trying to get rid of his

competition both Trump and RFK Jr in

different ways using law fair not giving

security to RFK Jr keeping him off the

ballot um he's the most

undemocratic president certainly in

American history I don't think you

nobody's Come Close RFK junr just says

straight out that Biden's the biggest

threat to Freedom because he actually he

he's done massive First Amendment

violations meaning the government work

with private entities to censor and the

things they censored were the

truth it's bad enough that you censor

but they censored really vital important

truths like really really important to

your health the co for

example so yes Biden's overthrowing

other countries are

allies so so he's quite the

anti-democracy

guy here's a question that uh I had in

my mind and I said to myself well I can

get an answer to this question by using

uh Google and

searching and what watch how easy this

is to get the right answer I'm going to

ask you for the answer first and then

I'll check Google and make sure that

your answer is correct okay here's the

question are seed oils good for your

health bad for your health or no

difference seed oils good for your

health bad for your health or no

difference in the

comments well if you're on the

internet you'll see all the smart people

say seed oils are maybe the worst thing

you could have in your

body right so olive oil is still good

avocado oil is still good because

they're not based on the seeds are based

on the the fruit I guess so so a lot of

you are saying bad the seed now I didn't

know one way or the other but I've seen

a lot of smart people say it's bad based

on science so I went to Google and I

said our seed oils bad what do you think

it told me no they're fine they're

fine so what's

true do you think that big food has any

control over uh

Google because I looked at the sources

and the Harvard th Chan School of Public

Health says uh the whole seed oil thing

is BS and there's no real risk from it

at all it's fine that's Harvard Harvard

School of Public Health says no real

risk is Harvard a credible

Source no are you kidding me no

Harvard's not a credible source for

anything I don't know if they ever were

but we certainly don't think they are

now it's basically the Bloomberg of

colleges so I don't know so as of this

morning I don't even have a best

guess I do not have a best

guess my I mean it's easy to keep away

from them uh well actually it's not easy

because it's in

dressings so I try to avoid any kind of

dressing from a restaurant or door Dash

so I don't I don't use their dressings

usually and I guess there was a reason

for that so I don't know I don't know if

the seed oils are bad I just know the

sources can't be

trusted um I saw Mike sovich talking

about uh the government keeps talking

about solar flares disrupting things and

he thinks they might be priming you so

that election day might be hey solar

flare you know wa we got all the mailin

ballots cuz they were mailed in before

but the the same day voting with our

machines oh can't do it I guess there'll

be long delays in all those Republican

precincts because ah the solar flare got

us well yes it's we can't we can't

explain

it didn't that happen in Maricopa

Maricopa their machines all like

mysteriously stopped working on Election

Day and now we got solar

flares well well I will not go as far as

CNO is in saying that it's part of a

plan but I do like his pattern

recognition so his pattern recognition

picked up this pattern he could be right

yeah I I don't have a intuition about

this in particular but yeah I would be

amazed if they don't have massive

technical problems on Election Day

because the technical problems on

Election Day will always work against

Republicans so of course they're going

to have technical problems why wouldn't

they a technical problem is the easiest

thing to fake what could be easier to

fake than a technical

Problem by far the easiest Yeah by far

the easiest so yeah I would expect some

technical problem whether they blame it

on solar flares or

not all right um Sage Steel is a

journalist and she's telling us that

when she did a ESPN interview for Biden

that she was she was given the questions

word for word and told she couldn't ask

follow-up

questions so on

ABC

ESPN yeah I think they own ESPN right

their

journalist now keep in mind this is a

professional

journalist the journalist was given by

management the questions to ask and told

that she can't ask follow-up questions

so in other words if she asks a question

and Biden just lies to her face she has

to

say next

question and just let it lay and that

was her specific

direction from her

bosses yeah in case you're wondering if

things are as rigged as you think oh

yeah they're totally

rigged all right Trump is uh still

thinking about how to uh clarify his

abortion situation I'm going to make a

suggestion for the very best thing he

could do are you

ready the single

hardest persuasion challenge of all

time I'm going to tell you what Trump

and maybe Trump alone maybe nobody else

could get away with this but there is an

out he does have a way to

to um to say what he believes at the

same time it softens the problem for

Republicans all right listen to this

carefully and this is one that you've

never heard anybody use before I may

have mentioned it but you've never heard

a politician say

this this is what I'd say if I were

president the president of the United

States should only favor

life in every

situation no exceptions American Life

American

Life the American president should

always favor life and should never make

decisions in those gray areas when it

comes to Americans living or

dying but there are going to be cases

where tough choices have to be made you

don't want the president to make those

choices you want your president to be

commander-in-chief if somebody attacks

you right if somebody attacks us I say

president whoever you are doesn't matter

who it is you have all the power you

need do what you have to do now in that

case I want the president to make all

the decisions you know the immediate

ones you you know obviously with

Consulting with experts and Generals but

that's a case where you really want your

president to take all the power because

it's just the way you're going to stay

alive but if it's domestic

and it's a b

America the President should never be on

the side of anything that

even even in the most ambiguous case

could reduce life in the United States

but somebody has to make those decisions

who should it

be well because it's life and death you

want that decision to be driven as close

as possible to the people directly

involved ideally you know the doctor and

and the uh patient but if you can't get

it all the way down to the doctor and

the patient the state is a lot

closer and so the one thing I can get

right as your president is I can take it

out of my hands if you want to know my

personal opinion then you add your

personal opinion my personal opinion is

you know I think this or that but I do

not want in any way to be part of the

decision of life and death in your

personal very private moments if the

state wants to do it that's between the

state and its citizens but absolutely

the president of the United States

should never ever be against life even

if it's an ambiguous

case now could he get away with

that yeah he

could everybody would hate it but it

would be hated

equally just right

the Republicans who are you know ban

abortion are going to say ah we hoped

you would do a National Abortion bill

you know Banning it and Trump would say

you don't want me in that business and

then the the Democrats would say but you

should be in favor of abortion and then

he would say you don't want me in that

business you want everybody else there's

there should be only one exception of

the person who should say I'll take a

pass just the president he's the only

one who should take a

pass could Trump sell

that yes better than every other

option now I I don't think he'll do this

by the way I think what he'll do is some

version of um you know the states the

states need to decide but if it's up to

me I would have several exceptions and I

would treat it as sort of a negotiated

Middle Ground so that's probably what

he's going to do is that good

enough I don't think it's going to gain

him any votes the best he can do is

reduce how many votes he

loses and that would

reduce probably give him a little boost

you know because it wouldn't be a hard

commitment but um yeah there's no right

answer let's do a trump lawfare

update uh we've got a judge who's uh

doing some mind reading

um let's see the judge has rejected

Trump's bid to delay the hush money that

stormmy Daniels hush money criminal

trial until the Supreme Court rules on

presidential immunity so in other words

there's H the possibility that the

president would have all kinds of

immunity and if that were the case then

this and other things would be um you

know irrelevant they would just go

away or would they be delayed until

after he's president no he that would go

away because he did it under the cover

of presidency but uh the judge merchin

decided that he would not wait to find

out if the whole case would just go away

because he was president and he had he

had that

immunity um and the reason he says that

he's not going to wait for that decision

is he goes the timing of the de defense

filing quote raises real questions about

the sincerity and actual purpose of the

motion

what why does the sincerity of the

request change the

law is that a

thing I'm sure it is a thing but it

doesn't sound right to me shouldn't the

law just be the

law now I get that you know if you kill

somebody in self-defense your intentions

are different than if you just murdered

them so yeah what you're thinking

matters but if you are if you're lawyers

and you're doing everything you can for

your client and the law allows you to do

this where does sincerity come into

it how much more sincere do you have to

be to think maybe this whole thing

should go away and and we should at

least find out if he has

immunity that's the most sincere thing I

could even imagine all right I'm I'm

Trump's lawyer and I know that there

could be this future thing that's going

to happen anyway and it's going to

decide whether this case makes any

difference at all how am I not sincere

when I ask you to wait for that

decision how in the world is that not

sincere it's strategically

correct it's legally

correct it's

logical it's exactly what they should be

doing for their

client and they didn't make up any of it

it's real stuff like there really is an

immunity decision and it's not very far

away how does a judge look into their

minds and see that they're insincere

when every indication is that they

are there's not a single indication that

there's anything but good lawyering with

a strong argument I don't see anything I

don't see anything else except a strong

argument oh no I'm looking into their

brain I'm seeing a lack of

sincerity in the world is this allowed

anyway uh and but part of it is they

missed some deadlines to do it earlier

but again I say it's either legal to do

it now or it's not

legal the fact that they missed an

earlier

deadline how's that

relevant how's that

relevant it should be just it's legal or

it's not legal and if it's legal they're

just doing good Laing lawyering maybe

they didn't in the past but that would

be not a reason to penalize them now

well how about this uh box gate trial

the maralago secret

boxes um I guess Jack Smith is going

after the judge and threatening the

judge with you know professional

repercussions

um as well as you know the Biden people

are going after any lawyer who ever

worked for Trump so this seems to be

more more the uh non-democratic process

using

lawfare yeah so when you see it all as a

group of actions the there never has

been a president more against the

Constitution than Biden can we say that

for sure there's no president who's ever

been more

anti-constitution because he's

completely taken out the first amendment

by by workaround you know using these

Nos and Soros funded things and fake

fact Checkers and you know the social

media pressure and everything so the

first amendment's gone he's he's

chipping away at the Second Amendment

doing the best he can and now they're

using a lawfare weaponizing the justice

system trying to keep people off the B

the ballot we've never seen anything

like this this is not even in the domain

of anything we've ever seen before

unless unless there's some you know old

presidential story I don't know about

I've never seen anything like this this

is so right in your face um we're just

going to get rid of this whole

Constitution

thing and of course Dei is all just

racist

so um so that's happening

Politico um has a uh an article from

somebody named Rory Daniels who is a

Democrat donor we're told by people who

don't like his story and he says that uh

he's some kind of China

expert I I say laughingly cuz he he says

that um China prefers

Trump all right so a Democrat who

actually funds Democrats writes in

Politico that in his opinion China

really wants Trump do you think that's

real that China wants

Trump that seems ridiculous

this seems

ridiculous anyway but people will

believe anything did you know that uh

there's a a new development apparently

we can now predict prime

numbers which is the thing that the

experts thought could never be done when

I say predict them I mean predict the

next one that we'll discover you know

which could be you know 20 digits long

or you know some gigantic number but

allegedly it was supposed to be

impossible to predict but now there's um

some mathematicians who think they can

and have so they've they've actually

tried it out made a prediction I think

it

worked so there some researchers in the

Hong Kong and North

Carolina I don't know what good that is

but I I put that in the category of

everything you thought was true is not

true if you just if you just picked

anything that you thought was true and

wait 20 years

it's probably not you could almost throw

a dart at any guaranteed true thing how

about the Big

Bang throw a dart at that do you think

the Big Bang is proven out no it's kind

of largely been debunked the most basic

thing I ever learned in science how

about Evolution now that's pretty

guaranteed right there's there's just so

much proof for evolution well unless

we're a simulation and unless you

believe physics and you believe the

uh the the double sled experiment do you

believe Schrodinger's

cat do you believe that there's such

thing as you know the cat is both living

and dead in the Box let me say it a

different way the cat is not both alive

and dead in the

Box do you all know the Sher cat example

you put the cat in a box that nobody can

see anything that's happening inside but

there's a randomized poison so you don't

know if the poison has been randomly

activated or not so for you on the

outside of the box you don't know if the

cat is alive or dead physics suggests

that both States exist until

observed that when you open the box that

cat will be either alive or

dead but here's the fun

part that means you're creating history

in the present that means your

observation creates the past because if

the cat was not guaranteed alive or not

guaranteed dead until you open the box

the moment you see the dead cat the

history of the cat dying appears at the

same time the history didn't

exist until the cat was seen dead do you

get that we have proof that we create

history on the Fly and we've had it for

a long time we just don't interpret it

that way instead we interpreted that the

cat was both alive and dead no that's

absurd

that's an

absurdity but if we're a simulation and

all indications in my opinion are that

we are then it would act like a video

game that you don't see the forest until

your character goes into the forest and

then it creates it because it needs a

forest so you create the

past you don't you don't just observe it

it was there

anyway so what was that all

about

I don't even know why I was going down

that path but I'm sure I connected to

something important in today's

news Well moving on

um Rasmus and poll says in a three-way

match between Biden Trump and RFK Jr

that 44% would go for Trump and 38 for

Biden and 10% for Kennedy so every poll

seems to suggest that Trump has a um

insurmountable lead especially in the

swing States most of them all but one or

some say all of them he's ahead and it's

a pretty big

lead well as you know uh Biden raised

$26 million in his big celebrity bash

recently and it was a record everybody

said it's historic nobody could ever

beat that number he's the best

fundraiser of all oh okay well looks

like Trump's going to raise 43 million

at a Palm Beach fundraiser this weekend

they project so 43 million would be the

new record record by

aot let's see what other records has

Trump

set let's see he made more money as

president than any president ever

because he got cancelled and created

true social and it went

public he's got quite a few records

there never started a

war never started a war that's pretty

good record all right Wall Street

Journal is reporting that uh men are

leaving the Democrat party and droves

especially black and Latino young

voters apparently every group is having

a little um a little bit of second

thought about Biden but men in

particular are especially leaving so the

Wall Street Journal poll found that

Biden was drawing only 37% of men in the

seven swing

States uh now that was on a ballot with

only him and Trump so without RFK Jr but

um and that found about the same

Nationwide

and that is way weaker than

uh Biden had 46% of men in 2020 so he's

gone from 46 down to 37% of men as

mostly minority men because the white

guys had already left the ones with

testosterone had already left

so do any of you remember when I first

started saying that Democrats were the

party of

women has anybody been with me long

enough you remember the first time I

said

that I think it was during Hillary's run

against

Trump if I

recall and you could see then that

Hillary was turning into the party of

women but now it's a thing the the men

are abandoning it they see it's a party

of women uh I'm going to take some

credit for being the first person to

notice that that it was going that way

I'm sure other people noticed it but

they're you know I nobody made as much

noise about it as I did well here's the

thing if the Democrats are the party of

women liberal women and we know their

rate of mental illness I would put it as

70% I think 70% of liberal women have

mental illness around 50% have diagnosed

or have sought

treatment so if 50% are sought

treatment at least 70% are suffer uing

now how many of them are only suffering

from TDS and didn't seek

treatment it might be

90% have

Bonafide observable mental

problems so if the men are leaving at

this rate it completely turns over the

Democrat Party to people who are not

figuratively

crazy not using

hyperbole it literally is a filtering

process left all the crazy people in one

place now is that

predictable that if you get enough crazy

people there'll be a point where

everything breaks and the people who

don't want to be around crazy people

just get the hell out of there that's

what's happening the men are realizing

that they're they're with crazy people

actually crazy and the men are saying

what the hell is going on get me out of

here I want to go where like my work

makes a difference and if I succeed I

get to keep my money you know not crazy

things yeah get the

foa so why is it that so many liberal

women are crazy well part of it's the

news making them crazy in TDS and you

know maybe it's the phones and all this

but I've got another I have another

hypothesis as you know I like to do some

work at Starbucks quite often because

it's a great environment to bring your

laptop and get a little extra work done

while you have some delicious coffee but

I also am sitting the air wall and

watching everybody else's

orders if a man comes in there's a

pretty good chance that man's getting a

cup of

coffee if a woman comes in what is she

ordering sugar she's ordering

sugar yeah I wonder if

sugar can make you crazy oh here's a St

high levels of glucose triglycerides

linked to psychiatric disorders new

study

says

so Starbucks which in my opinion is a

liquid candy store let me say that again

Starbucks for men is a place to get

coffee for women it's a liquid candy

store they're going for the

sugar if you stand there and watch who

walks in what they pick up and what they

walk out with it's

sugar now I'm I'm on a low sugar diet

because my blood you even at my weight

and you know eating a pretty clean diet

even I am a little bit high in sugar so

there's literally one item in all of

Starbucks I'm willing to eat that

doesn't have wheat in it because I want

to stay away from that there's only one

item just the egg bites basically

so so we have a Starbucks on every

Corner we have uh the liberal women

walking in there and picking up their

sugar going crazy listening to the news

and playing with their phones not being

able to get a date because the whole

dating situation and their meaning of

life has been

destroyed and then they go into politics

and they

vote this is not a sustainable

situation not sustainable

so we we just have to be a little bit

more honest about what's going on

Democrats are a party of women women are

eating too much sugar and they're going

crazy not just because of the sugar I

mean it's also the the phones the

situation the old family dating

situation complexity of Life

Etc now I have a second theory that I'm

going to break

out if something were driving all of

civilization

crazy whatever it is you know you you

can pick your favorite thing it's the

news it's their phones it's something

whatever it is where would you see it

first where where would a like if there

was a ray gun that made people crazy

where would you see it

first I think you'd see it in

children because they have the weakest

Minds uh and you'd see them going trans

and non-binary like crazy do we see that

yes

yes you see children having major

psychological problems changing their

genders trying anything literally trying

anything to try to you know solve what's

happening so you'd see it in children

and and definitely children are going

nuts secondly you would see it in women

before

men

why well do I even need to explain

that are can we finally get past the

point where I have to treat men and

women like they're the

same is there anybody listening who

needs me to do oh there's some reason

that they're exactly the same no you

don't need that right are haven't we

outgrown that yeah I I'm pretty sure

that women are let's say closer to their

emotional let's say their emotional life

is richer than men is that the best way

to say do women have a richer emotional

life than men

because that takes the takes the

Judgment out of it right because I think

you'd all agree with that that women

have a richer emotional life if you have

a ritual emotional life and I find out

about it and I'm a

hypnotist do you know how easy it is to

manipulate somebody with that rich

emotional life super easy easier than

somebody who's analytical that's for

sure you can also fool fool very smart

analytical people but that's a little

different different kind of

process yeah so if we're if we're being

subjected to some kind of anide force or

forces that are driving people crazy

every observation is supporting that

because the humans are falling in the

exact order that they would be

susceptible to outside manipulation of

their psychological

well-being it's all there it's right in

front of

you um let's see is there any other

evidence of that well Joe Rogan was

talking to Coleman Hughes and Coleman

Hughes had been on The View recently and

had a good little interaction with

them and it caused Joe Rogan to

characterize the view as the people on

The View as quote rabies infested Hen

House rabies infested Hen

House what would be another word for

that b crazy liberal woman yeah

so people are willing to say it out loud

now they're going to use their own

language but people are saying it out

loud the when you watch The View you

really don't get the feeling you're

seeing a difference of opinion you think

you're seeing mental

illness only that's all I say I I know

what a difference of opinion looks like

you know who has a difference of opinion

John

Stewart John Stewart now he's got you

know maybe a little TDS like everybody

but he's not insane he's not mentally

incompetent he's he doesn't have rabies

he he just has different information

different priorities you know little

team play but he's not

crazy right Bill Mah You can disagree

with him all day long but he doesn't

seem crazy you know he has a little TDS

but otherwise fairly normal

psychologically as far as we can tell

but there's definitely a difference when

you look at the view they actually

seem mentally unwell and if we can't

call out mental health and we have to

keep treating it like it's a difference

of opinion that's not going to work very

well yeah we we need to treat mental

health as a mental

problem you know if you want to respect

the people involved you treat them like

as a medical

problem well the bird flew maybe coming

at us I don't know somebody had sex with

a cow and a bird at the same time and

ate a hamburger I don't know the details

I may have made that up but somehow the

CDC is worrying that this bird flu can

spread among our dairy cattle but uh

Thomas Massie picking up the pattern

quickly um says the bureaucrats and

corporations will probably use this to

advance an agenda against raw milk

independent farmers and backyard

chickens let me give you some

advice never get a backyard

chicken never never get a backyard

chicken because you know what happens if

you have a backyard

chicken sooner or later one way or

another you're going to end up with a

backyard rooster do you know what

happens when you have a backyard rooster

well you don't sleep too well and your

neighbors are going to call the

authorities and then what do you do with

your rooster do you kill it well that's

not legal no because it's a pet you

can't kill your pet and they're

protected you cannot kill a male you

know a

rooster so well at least you can give it

away right you can find like somebody

wants to take

it nope there are zero places that will

take a rooster

can't give it away can't sell it can't

lose it can't kill

it but you might have to

move so if you get a rooster you're

going to have to sell your house your

your neighbors will make you

move don't get a chicken it's going to

lead to a rooster you're going to have

to move and none of that's a joke by the

way and it's

guaranteed that that that chain of

events that's guaranteed chicken rooster

gotta leave your house don't do it best

advice I'll ever give

you because I've seen it I I'm speaking

from Direct close

experience all right uh Tucker is

talking to uh Marjorie Taylor green and

she's not too keen on speaker Johnson

and him trying to get money to

Ukraine

and there was you know the speculation

that speaker Johnson is being

blackmailed by somebody

does he act like somebody who's being

blackmailed if you're just

observing and you see that the top

Republican is just gung-ho about Ukraine

support and you notice that

um he replaced Mitch McConnell who's

going to remain as a senator and Mitch

McConnell said his number one goal as he

remains a senator is funding

Ukraine so the ex speaker of the house

was in favor of it the new speaker of

the house is in favor of it but

Republicans by majority are not in favor

it now is that true the Republicans by a

majority are not in favor in the house

is that true right now I think that's

true so why would the

leaders be doing something that their

base does not favor by a

majority I'll need a fact check on that

I think it's not a

majority and the only reason I can think

of is that the uh our intelligence

people

um threaten them so I think they're

coerced I think McConnell um either has

some financial gain or he's being

blackmailed and I think that speaker

Johnson is probably just being

blackmailed I think he's being

blackmailed I think we have a blackmail

accuracy that our entire government is

some basically collection of blackmailed

people that the intelligence people can

control they they prer black mailable

people because that's how they control

them so that's what it looks like I

don't have any proof of that but I would

say observationally they look like uh

captives they they act like prisoners

basically if you act like a prisoner

long enough I'm going to think you're a

prisoner and these guys are acting like

prisoners they don't act like these are

their opinions at

all and I think uh Mitch MCC McConnell

calls it an isolationist movement to

give up on Ukraine is it is it an

isolationist movement or is it just a

bad

idea an

isolationist and of course uh CNN and

MSNBC have been telling us forever that

Ukraine is winning which is apparently

absurd and so why would the leaders of

the Republican party of all things want

to support all this money for

war

when they know it's not going to make a

difference what's going on the only

thing I can assume is it's exactly what

it looks like the industrial military

complex can make a lot of money out of

that 60 billion and they want their cut

and they have blackmail or bribery or

something on the leaders now if you've

got a republican like

MTG questioning whether the leader of

her own group is being being

blackmailed he has to step

down it doesn't matter if you can prove

it if you're acting in a way that your

own base can't tell if you've been

blackmailed or you're under

duress and you can't explain why you're

acting the way you're acting you know

without obvious I feel like

that loss of confidence should be enough

to get you out of the job you know the

appearance of being

blackmailed seems like that should be

enough you know to take somebody out of

that kind of a job anyway the French are

making noise about maybe sending troops

on the ground to

Ukraine so the Russian uh the Russia

Russia called the French defense

minister to say it will create problems

for France

itself I don't want to say what kind of

problems but France you might have some

problems that's ominous

so what do you think are the French

going to break the seal and then it will

be easier for America to add some troops

because at that point well it's just a

NATO action and we're part of NATO and

we got to Pro protect our French allies

so of course we're sending some advisers

just a few advisers no they we're just

going to do train them to use the

weapons well while they're there they

shot a few things well as long as we're

over there and everybody knows we're

over there and shooting we might as well

send some more people over there and

pretty soon the military-industrial

complex is making even more money than

before um more people are speaking out

about Israel's treatment of Gaza uh I

will remind you that my opinion of what

Israel is doing there is

irrelevant as is yours because they're

going to do what they're going to do now

there are a lot of cases where your

opinion actually could make a difference

I think in American politics you if you

press hard enough enough and complain

hard enough and enough people pick up

the same

complaint it probably makes a difference

but this is a really special case it's

it's a onever

situation you hope it's onever and uh

Israel's just going to do what they're

going to do and I think they're going to

burn their International

reputation but they've decided it's

worth the cost and I don't know that

they're wrong from a purely let's say

you know National interest point of view

are they wrong to to burn their

Holocaust Goodwill if you ironically if

you can call it that but it's they're

they're torching it the the whole

Holocaust thing is is gone I think it's

gone already imagine this

conversation Israeli says blah blah blah

Holocaust now where does the

conversation go after that every time

for the rest of Eternity um um

Gaza right G Gaza now erases the

Holocaust as an asset their greatest

asset it's gone but is it a good

investment I'm going to say again that

in 200 years if Israel essentially

controls Gaza and pacified it and maybe

made it economically successful it's

going to look like they made the right

decisions in the war at the moment it

never looks like a good decision does it

like nothing looks smart when you're the

bullets are flying everybody looks dumb

in that situation you're like really you

couldn't find any way to prevent

somebody from shooting at you for a year

there was nothing you could do to make

that not happen you know so we just

automatically think if the bullets are

flying probably both sides are being a

little up right a little bit like

every Situation's different but you just

automatically have that bias

so anyway Paul Graham had an interesting

comment about a situation that I don't

know if it's true at all because you

know everything out of the war zone is

is

fake but he he says that uh there's

some um evidence from some military

person who says it's true that uh the

Israelis preferred to wait for the Hamas

uh highlevel person to come home uh then

they would take out the whole home with

the family and the wife and that they

preferred doing it that

way I guess because they knew where it

was then you know they didn't have to

wonder if they were getting them now

that might have been one person and it's

the fog of

War i' I'd be surprised if that's the

official policy I wouldn't be surprised

if somebody's Commander told them to do

it I'd be a little surprised if it was

coming from the top but it's War do I

think that it is moral or ethical to

kill the entire family when you're just

going after the Hamas leader who is

married to them well it's war and I

don't believe in making moral and

ethical judgments during a war because

it's all bad like making some little uh

you know ranking of oh this is a little

bit worse than this other thing and no

it's just all bad like everything is

just bad both sides just all the time

all bad but um certainly self defense is

is the motivating factor here for

Israel so I'm going to ask I'm going to

ask the question a different

way and this this is just to make you

expand your thinking about it all right

so analogies are never the same as the

situation so I'm going to give you an

analogy just to expand your thinking but

analogies are not arguments so so I

don't win the argument with this I might

expand your thinking imagine there was a

situation where somebody kidnapped a

child um did surgery on him and put a

bomb inside their torso sewed him up and

then said all right kid your your

parents are here and maybe the real goal

is to you know blow up wherever the

parents work so here get out of the car

and run toward your parents now let's

say that our intelligence people had

learned in advance that the kid had a

bomb in it and as soon as he went

through the doorway the building would

blow up and the kid would be dead

would it be ethical and moral to shoot

the child before he reached the

door murder the innocent child to avoid

the further death ethical

moral well I'm gonna take a page n of uh

Dana Pino's

book she she she split the baby on TV

yesterday in a way that I thought was

clever totally

immoral which is you know separate from

the question of whether you need to do

it you know the the the question of

morality you you can allow yourself a

luxury belief so a luxury belief is one

you don't have to operate on it's like

somebody else's problem oh yeah killing

people totally immoral I'm totally

against it which I can say because

nobody slaughtered my people on October

7th pretty easy for me to say Wars

immoral but if you slaughtered my people

I might feel a little differently about

that so we want to be good people in

public so if anybody asks you what do

you think about you know the situation

you should say oh it's terrible it's a

terrible situation and it's all immoral

and unethical and I'm not going to

change my vote it's all immoral and

unethical well that's just sort of a

Dodge but I do like that it's a nod

toward you know maybe

an ideal that we should strive for that

we should try to be good

people but in the real world you got to

make decisions and if your terrorist is

commuting and commuting back to the

house do you call that self-defense if

you take out the whole

house

well I say it's not worth talking about

because I don't think this is unusual in

war to me the looks sort of ordinary

terrible but kind of ordinary meaning

that probably every war has this same

degree of things you wish didn't

happen and in the special case where the

children have been

weaponized

um it makes the self-defense argument

stronger right so here here's another

one same argument let's say there's a

home Invader at your home and it's is

somebody bigger than you I'll just use

me I'll use myself there's a home

Invader and they're definitely bigger

than me and but I get lucky we get in a

scuffle and the home Invader trips over

the rug and I jump on top of him and I

you managed to be able to hold them down

now uh and let's say the home invader's

knife came free and I'm now on sitting

on the back of the home Invader and I've

got my knife in my hand but there's some

subdued so I can't legally kill them

right you all agree I can't kill them

because they're

subdued and now the person who's subdued

says all right you're in trouble now if

you don't kill me and you let me get up

I'm going to kill you and you know you

only got lucky the first time because

it's somebody bigger than you and you

know if you let them up and you don't

have your phone with you so you can't

call out you can't call out to anybody

if you let them up they're going to kill

you is it self-defense if you finish

them

off I actually don't know the answer to

that if you finish them off because it's

the only way you can stay

alive is that self-defense and I think

the law would say it's not

self-defense I think they would call it

murder do you know what I would call

it

necessary I would call it necessary in

my also be

murder but that doesn't change it being

necessary so yes I would stab them to

death and then I would call the police

in that

order every time so if you say to me

there's a house full of people who are

going to grow up to be terrorists if you

kill their

dad do I have a legal ethical right to

kill them

too no I

don't I don't don't it's not moral and

it's not ethical it might be

necessary it might be necessary but it's

not moral it's not

ethical so war is about the uh what is

necessary it is not about moral or

ethical we just wish it we wish it were

it

isn't all right

um and then CNN had some analysts who

said that the is Israeli military has

told them to basically just shoot every

man of fighting

age do you think that's true do you

think that the official rules of

engagement are to shoot everybody of

military

age I don't

know you know it could be one one

Commander maybe could be more than that

could be this person's lying no no it's

on CNN so it could just be a

lie but is it necessary to shoot every

man of fighting age I don't

know I don't

know um I know that if you didn't a lot

more of you would

die that I know there would be more

Israeli soldiers would die if they

didn't so does that make it appropriate

because it's

self-defense they're killing him just in

case is that

self-defense I don't know I actually

don't know um but I'm not going to

defend Israel I'm just going to say in a

war this is exactly what

happens there are no good guys in

Wars there are no good guys in Wars

there's just what's necessary and then

there are people who are on your side

and that's about it so if Israel is

doing what is necessary and they're

still our allies then that's my

conclusion it's necessary they're allies

if he ask me is it moral and ethical

no nope isas moral and ethical nah is

the Biden Administration nah no are the

people who want it to stop moral and

ethical they might be they might also be

stupid so I I can separate those things

pretty easily all right ladies and

gentlemen that's all I've got for you

today in this amazing show that you wait

you spent much too much time on I'm

going to say goodbye to X and YouTube

and Rumble is spend a little extra time

just with the local

subscribers because they're special they

get extra thanks for joining see you in

the morning

tomorrow

e

e

e

e

e