Back to episode — Episode 2454 CWSA 04/24/24
Context —
r even stand for it. I don't believe I would even stand for the Pledge of Allegiance at this point because I think it's absurd. I think the country is so far from any image of America that was the kind that you hold in your mind as the good one, the one you wanted to support. We're so far from that. I mean the Biden administration is just a criminal enterprise. The CIA has been running the show si…
← Previous segment →ch but it's hard to feel that it's purely a policy thing and not something much much worse. Anyway so we'll keep an eye on that. I don't know if that'll become the summer riots but I suspect it will. I just think it might backfire. It might be the summer riots that they wish they hadn't instigated. And I remind you that there's no such thing as spontaneous organic protests. That's really not a thing. The only way these protests happen is if organizations that are already founded and they've got some members and they get funding from somebody like Soros or some other source and then they've got money to do something and they've got members and then they got something to do. But it's not like there's people just were sitting around watching the news and then they thought oh I think I'll go out and protest in the streets and get arrested. No it's mostly organized stuff.
Persitz had an opinion piece in I think it was the Wall Street Journal and he was talking about Biden's recent gaffe where he sort of both-sides the Israel Palestinian Hamas situation and in so doing he became sort of an example of the fine people hoax himself. In other words it looked like he was creating some kind of a moral equivalency between Israel and the terrorists who attacked Israel. Now you could argue whether that's a correct take or not but here's what I'd like to say. Dershowitz did debunk the fine people hoax but he did it in such a poor way that I have to criticize him. I don't know if I've ever criticized Dershowitz before in terms of his opinions because I often call him out as one of the best intellectuals in public and willing to say the difficult things even if it doesn't agree with his team. So generally I see him as at the highest level of intellectual credibility and so I very much appreciate that. Here's what he said. I'll give you his quote so you're not listening to me say it. He said quote you had some very bad people in that group but you also had some people that were very fine people on both sides Mr. Trump said. Now this is according to Dershowitz he later explained meaning Trump that he meant both sides of the debate over whether to remove a Confederate monument and that the anti-Semitic chanters were very bad people he had in mind. He should have been clearer from the start. That's where he lost me. He should have been clearer from the start. No Alan Dershowitz you're letting your team get away with this too easily. This was not a case of a hoax created by Trump not being clear. At the very same time that he said the fine people thing he said a few things and then within I think 60 seconds he said and I'm not talking about the neo-Nazis they should be condemned totally. Now that is the clearest statement anybody ever made about anything and for Alan Dershowitz to say he should have been clearer from the start is giving a total pass to the bad guys on his team. The bad guys who turned it into propaganda. He should have said this was never a thing. He was very clear that he wasn't talking about them and the bad guys, his team, turned it into a hoax that changed the nature of America and has almost destroyed it. Now that's a fair assessment anyway. And then he went on to say Biden had this week his own moment of unclarity. Well I think it is fair to say that Biden was unclear which also is not a full condemnation of what he said because I think that there's a little bit of piling on because of the piling on at Charlottesville. But I think Biden was unclear but Trump was not unclear and I don't think you should draw an equivalent between them. Alan Dershowitz who I have much respect for intellectually I think you just got this completely wrong.
I saw a post and some data from I think the account and Wes that the number of — here's a demographic breakdown of men and women Democrat versus Republican. So the Democrats in married men they have 39% are married men so less than half are married men. Married women 42% so less than half or fewer than half which is correct. Fewer than half or less than half. Is there any pedantic people? Is it less than half or fewer than half or both? It might be one of those cases where both works because sometimes only one is the proper way but we don't often call that out anyway. So whichever it is then unmarried men 45% again less than half. So the only demographic that Democrats have the majority in of the married and unmarried men and women stuff is 68% of the single women are Democrats. 68% of single women are Democrats.
Now without being unkind and referring to scientific data single women and liberal single women in particular are known to be especially batshit crazy. Meaning literally they seek the therapy the most. They're literally the most miserable, depressed, mentally ill group. And I don't know how much longer we can go without calling it out for what it is because we're pretending we have a political difference. It's not a political difference when one of you has a mental illness. And I think I've called it out enough that you can see it when you see the Democrat women on TV. Not all of them. There are plenty of them that don't fall into this category but don't you notice that they look mentally ill? Can't you tell just by looking at them? And again I'm not saying all Democrats or anything like that but there's a ton of women who are Democrats who when they talk you look at their eyes and their expression and all you see is mental illness. And to continue ignoring the obvious that we have a mental illness problem that is pretending to be a political philosophy I think is not helping us at all. So we should call it out for what it is. You know Constantine calls it the sphere but I think that's giving it too much credit. If you call it the sphere you're sort of acting like you were born that way but I think that TDS has literally made people crazy which means it's not necessarily their own fault. So I have some sympathy for the mentally ill Democrats because I do think that they were propagandized so hard by their own team that Trump is Hitler. That the idea that there's something like an equal number of Americans who want Hitler according to their view of the world that's got to be the most distressing, depressing, saddest, alarming thing I could
Context —
ever imagine. Put yourself in their position. You're a single woman and you've been told and you believed it that an actual Hitler was coming into office to take away your democracy and I don't know turn you into baby makers or something. Yeah that would of course that would make you mentally ill. Why wouldn't it? So I'm not sure there's anybody to blame except the propaganda people on the Democra…
Next segment → →