Episode 2454 CWSA 04/24/24
All the bad behaviors and hoaxes of the government revealed. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.
Good morning everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams. I'm pretty sure you've never had a better time. Today I'm going to attempt to get through the entire show with no cursing whatsoever. I know maybe I didn't do so well yeste
View segment →rday, if you know what I mean, but today, no cursing. And if you'd like to take your experience up to that level of godliness — there's nothing else you could call it — all you need for that is a coffee mug, glass, a tankard, chalice, a canteen, jug or flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your…
View segment →Go. Well ladies and gentlemen, if you were a subscriber to the Dilbert Reborn comic on the X platform, or you were a member of the Locals community, you would know that Tina the tech writer is being replaced by AI. But in the ultimate insult, the ultimate employee insult, Tina will be asked to trai…
View segment →'t know, several years now, probably at least once a day I've said to myself, you know what, I should sit down and I should dedicate a whole bunch of my time to writing up what the drinking bleach hoax was, how it was executed, and really do a good job on it. So yesterday I fell asleep working durin…
View segment →rain knows how to sort out this stuff. But I'll let you know if I write it anyway. I did have an earlier draft of it so I might be able to put it back together. Thomas Massie tells us that the House Sergeant at Arms wants to fine him $500 maybe a day per day for having a post on X that shows a vide…
View segment →ator on world events, has introduced a new word into our vocabulary: the retardosphere. All right I'm just going to read you what he said because it's kind of funny the way he puts it. So Constantine Kisin says the woke left-wing sphere was created by sensible people on the left being silent when th…
View segment →ere that you know what the truth is and the other people got it wrong. How's that sit with you? Let's talk about evolutionary biology that science got right. Now if science got it right wouldn't that be really unique in science to be right? We know that 50% of the studies can't be reproduced. I'm p…
View segment →ion was no longer believed by most scientists. Now of course the people who believe that they knew jumped all over me and said what are you talking about, natural selection is believed by almost all scientists. To which I said I probably should have said survival of the fittest because if you're not…
View segment →inst their identity. Like if you think you're an honest person you don't rob a bank. It's pretty much a direct effect. If you think you're an academic you're probably more likely to go to school. Whatever you think you are you're likely to do that thing. So this is a really really good persuasion te…
View segment →r even stand for it. I don't believe I would even stand for the Pledge of Allegiance at this point because I think it's absurd. I think the country is so far from any image of America that was the kind that you hold in your mind as the good one, the one you wanted to support. We're so far from that.…
View segment →ch but it's hard to feel that it's purely a policy thing and not something much much worse. Anyway so we'll keep an eye on that. I don't know if that'll become the summer riots but I suspect it will. I just think it might backfire. It might be the summer riots that they wish they hadn't instigated.…
View segment →ever imagine. Put yourself in their position. You're a single woman and you've been told and you believed it that an actual Hitler was coming into office to take away your democracy and I don't know turn you into baby makers or something. Yeah that would of course that would make you mentally ill. W…
View segment →your identity. Now if that sounded like a criticism it shouldn't be. You should take it as a mind-opening moment because as I've told you before even though I identify you know as far left of some of your opinions I prefer you as humans. So my audience are the people I would want to be around if I w…
View segment →k this is a total fake. I don't think TikTok's going to disappear. One of two things is going to happen. They've got a year to fight it in court and they'll either win in court and it will stay just the way it is or it will be divested to an American company purely for the purpose of our own CIA hav…
View segment →d to me. And the thing that makes me most suspicious is that it went from having no support to suddenly everybody loved it and it got put into a bill that you couldn't resist or at least Congress couldn't resist. That to me that just looks like our intelligence people decided it was time to make a p…
View segment →people in similarly specious ways and what I've said is that I don't support Israel because the ADL is my enemy. And then I also say because I know how people respond that I say yes I know they don't report to Israel. Yes I know the ADL does not report to Israel but that's not my problem. Now how ma…
View segment →n we be the better version of a constitutional citizenship. Nothing like that's happening over in the Middle East. In the Middle East there are two incompatible systems that can never be compatible and there's only going to be a winner and a loser and at the moment Israel has the upper hand. To have…
View segment →Good morning everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams. I'm pretty sure you've never had a better time. Today I'm going to attempt to get through the entire show with no cursing whatsoever. I know maybe I didn't do so well yesterday, if you know what I mean, but today, no cursing. And if you'd like to take your experience up to that level of godliness — there's nothing else you could call it — all you need for that is a coffee mug, glass, a tankard, chalice, a canteen, jug or flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. Enjoy with me now the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens now.
Go.
Well ladies and gentlemen, if you were a subscriber to the Dilbert Reborn comic on the X platform, or you were a member of the Locals community, you would know that Tina the tech writer is being replaced by AI. But in the ultimate insult, the ultimate employee insult, Tina will be asked to train her AI replacement. Yeah, it's probably one of the number one suggestions I get from people when I ask for Dilbert ideas. You know, hey, is anything bothering you at your workplace? The one I get more than any other one — well actually the one I get the most is people leaving smelly things in microwaves, but I can't write comics about smells. It just kind of doesn't work. And they talk about stealing food from the refrigerator because those are like the simplest, dumbest comic ideas. But the other one is people being fired or replaced and being asked to train their replacement.
Now imagine if you had to train AI as your replacement. Is that better or is that worse? I don't know. We'll explore that in the Dilbert comic.
Well I got to tell you about something that happened to me in the simulation yesterday. For about, I don't know, several years now, probably at least once a day I've said to myself, you know what, I should sit down and I should dedicate a whole bunch of my time to writing up what the drinking bleach hoax was, how it was executed, and really do a good job on it. So yesterday I fell asleep working during the afternoon, which is not uncommon. I woke up next to my laptop, as I often do in my man cave, and I really don't sleep enough. I think that's probably the bottom line there. And I felt all inspired suddenly and I said, darn it, I'm going to write this up. So I put three hours of the most inspired, best writing of my life and I wrote up the whole bleach drinking hoax. And if I'm being honest about my own work, it's just some of the best work I've ever done in my life. After years of thinking about it every day and thinking I've got to do this for the world and it could change the course of history. And when I was done I looked at it and I said, damn, this thing is going to be super viral. Like everybody's going to read this. It's going to uncover the entire technique of creating hoaxes, tell people how they fell for it, show them very clearly that it was a hoax. And it was going to be one of the three tentpole hoaxes. And when I was done and I hit publish, there was a technical bug that ate it and it's gone forever.
So sometimes the simulation has its own plan, apparently. Do you get a preview? No, it's gone forever. It's literally gone. Just a technical problem. And I don't know if I can do it again. So here will be the interesting part. I tend to think that things like this have some kind of a weird purpose to them because I can't think of the last time I lost a document. Do you remember the last time you lost a document after you'd finished it? It's almost something that doesn't happen in the modern technological world. Very rare. But it's definitely gone. And I thought to myself there must be some reason I'm not allowed to do this now. I don't see any specific mechanism to make that happen, but it's really a weird coincidence that the most important thing I've written in years, by far the most consequential thing that would actually have put a big dent in the whole world, disappeared. I just don't know how to explain that. It's just such a weird coincidence.
So here's what we'll watch for. Does it mean that I was meant to rewrite it better? What do you think? Is the universe telling me it wasn't good enough and I have to do it better because it's that important? Or is the universe telling me don't do it? Or is it nothing but a coincidence? I don't know. I don't think the human brain knows how to sort out this stuff. But I'll let you know if I write it anyway. I did have an earlier draft of it so I might be able to put it back together.
Thomas Massie tells us that the House Sergeant at Arms wants to fine him $500 maybe a day per day for having a post on X that shows a video of the House and a number of the members waving Ukrainian flags during the vote about the Ukrainian funding. Now do you think that the House Sergeant at Arms has the authority to fine him because of something he posted on X? Well apparently there's some kind of rule that says you can't have a video of the proceedings inside. And if it was his own video and he took it and then he posted it that probably would be a violation. On the other hand it does seem like absolutely legitimate news and I would be very happy to see it. So of course I reposted it to make sure that more people saw it. And I'd like to make an offer to Thomas Massie that if it turns out that he's going to pay $500 a day I will pay for one of those days. So I'll pledge $500. If he gets fined I'll pay $500 to his campaign or something. So I'll try to make sure that the blow is softened. And if anybody else wants to commit to paying for a day you can pay for your free speech because free speech costs $500 a day.
California, my state, has so much solar power it turns out that during the day there's more solar power than there is demand for it. Now we still have overall an energy problem because it's not balanced. But so many people in California took the government rebates and everything and put solar on their house that when we get that afternoon baking sun we're actually creating more energy than we're using. That's kind of amazing isn't it? I mean it's bad and good at the same time. So 25% of our electricity is now from solar. You know this is one of those things that kind of it's too slow and then it happens fast. You know there are a lot of things like that. It's like god it's slow it's slow it's slow and then it's fast. So maybe we'll have a lot of solar here really fast.
Did you hear Biden's latest gaffe, if it's a gaffe at all? He was saying in his speech about Trump but he talked about himself accidentally. He said how many times does he have to prove weak, can't be trusted. How many times does Trump have to prove that Biden's administration can't be trusted? Well I don't know how many times will it take. He still has half of the country on his side so apparently it's not enough. Well I don't know if we should make anything of that other than Biden's brain is toast and everybody knows it.
Constantine Kisin, who you know from Trigonometry, very fun and smart commentator on world events, has introduced a new word into our vocabulary: the retardosphere. All right I'm just going to read you what he said because it's kind of funny the way he puts it. So Constantine Kisin says the woke left-wing sphere was created by sensible people on the left being silent when they should have said something. The right-wing sphere is being formed in exactly the same way. And he says stop sending me DMs about how much you agree with me about the woke right. Strap on a pair and say something. So that's a little bit different than the point he's going to make next. Unless you want to be on the side that thinks evolution is quote just a theory, i.e. doesn't understand what a theory is in science, sees America as the bad guy in every war and wants to stop women voting. So that would be his description of the right-wing retardosphere: people who think evolution is just a theory meaning in their view of it is not real, and sees America as the bad guy in every war and wants to stop women from voting. And then Constantine says I am not right-wing but the last thing I want is for the left and right to go full retard at the same time. And then he says truth is king, in all caps.
Well may I take a moment to defend the retardosphere? Would you like that? Are there any members of the sphere here? Is there anybody here who would identify with not fully accepting evolution, seeing America as the bad guy in at least the recent wars, and thinks that women should stop voting? Is anybody in that category here? Any one of those? All right a lot of people are saying yes.
All right here's my take on it and I think Constantine is pretty far off on his frame for this. I like his general thinking. You know his general thinking is I don't want to be associated with crazy people. That's good. Or irrational people. So I like the basic thrust of it but here's what I think he might be missing because as he says he's not right-wing so there's some things that if you spend more time in that sphere you get a little nuance on these things. So I'm going to give a little nuance that may not be obvious to the casual traveler.
Okay number one, the part about evolution being just a theory. Yes it is embarrassing when somebody says they don't believe in evolution because it's quote just a theory. If I can educate you on one thing it's that people who understand science will think you're an idiot if you say something's not proven because it's just a theory. Because in the scientific realm theory means it is proven. Hypothesis means it's not proven. Theory means there's so much evidence for it you might as well just call it a fact. But because science doesn't like to commit itself knowing that sometimes even a fact or something they thought was absolutely true can sometimes be overturned, so they do keep it a little bit weak just because you never know what a fact is for sure. But it is not true that theory means they're not quite sure about it. They're very very sure about it and that's what the word theory means in their domain. So get that part right. Just know that in common language theory means unproven but in scientific language it means very very much proven. Does everybody know that now? Again it doesn't mean they're right. I'm just telling you what the words mean in their domains. You know we'll talk about who's right separately. Okay so get that right because you will sound like a bad debater if you get that word usage wrong. That's a real red flag for somebody who's going to mock you for not understanding science.
However it is a very common misunderstanding and I don't think that anybody disbelieves the theory of evolution because the word theory is used. Would you agree with that? There's nobody who disbelieves it simply because they use the word theory. So for Constantine to point that out as something he wants to mock I don't really think that's something anybody actually believes. I think they disbelieve evolution for a reason that I'll talk about. Could be a right reason, could be a bad reason. I'm not saying it's a good or bad reason but I'm saying it has nothing to do with the word. So if you think that anybody has this belief because they didn't know how to use this word correctly in the domain of science that's a complete misdirection. It's just really they're using the word wrong. Has nothing to do with their actual opinion of the topic. It's just the word. So I would say that that's not a fair statement.
But I think the larger point, if I could read between the lines — I'm not a mind reader but I think what he means is more the general idea that evolution is proven according to science and that if you say you're not buying it you're being sort of anti-science in a way. So that seems to be Constantine's point. But I would like to offer the following counterpoints.
Number one, when Tucker Carlson, who really got this whole conversation going, when Tucker Carlson says he doesn't believe in evolution because he believes that God made us, do you think that Tucker regards that as a scientific fact that God made us? I think what maybe Constantine is missing is that this is what I'd call a lifestyle belief. A lifestyle belief. It's not in the domain of what's true or false. It's a choice based on faith. The reason there's a word faith is because it's very distinct from I looked at the facts and science guided me. So to me when I see Tucker say that he has a belief that God made us, to me that's a lifestyle choice to have that worldview. I don't think that's the same as not thinking evolution is real. To me those are different concepts. So I think you have to understand that some people make a choice to accept an entire let's say philosophy because following the philosophy has worldly benefits. Meaning it helps you today and maybe helps you go to heaven if you think that's part of the plan. So when I look at Christians, let's say the Tucker types who believe that God created the earth, I say to myself well I don't know if you've got the mechanism right but I'm not so lacking in humility that I think I know the answer. So I think there's a little lack of humility when you say I know the answer of how we all got here and you got it wrong. So that bothers me a little bit. But I think you have to understand that religious faith is not trying to compete with science. It's more like if I buy this entire package I can see that it works while I'm alive. It might even work after I'm dead if I go to heaven. So it's really just a choice about what works and I don't think you should fact check it. I'm not going to fact check the Muslims. Right? I mean I used to think that was something I could do. It's like huh I'm not so sure that Muhammad went to heaven on a flying horse. Don't bother. It's not a scientific discussion. It is a lifestyle choice to accept a worldview which has a certain set of advantages right here on Earth. So I feel that that has to be said.
Then there's a question: is America the bad guy in every war? Well I think the word every is a little bit hyperbole but I do believe that America is the bad guy in recent wars. Is there anything wrong with that opinion? It does seem to me that our recent wars are driven by energy and the military industrial complex and stuff like that. You know the Atlantic Council, whatever. I don't think we have any kind of a democracy where we're going to save the world for freedom. We don't care about anybody else's freedom. We could give a — oh I almost did it. I'm not going to curse. We don't care about the freedom in other countries. We will work with their dictator just fine. Do you think we have a problem with the kingship of the royal family in Jordan? No, the royal family in Jordan are awesome and we seem to like them and get along just fine. No we don't need them to be a democracy as long as they're on our team. Well that's fine. So no I do think that America is the bad guy but I'll give a little bit of nuance on that as well. I'm not sure being the bad guy is the worst thing it could be. It could be that being a good guy is the worst thing you can do because being a good guy makes you weak and probably get destroyed by somebody who's more of a bad guy. I feel like in the real world when you get outside of the philosophical the baddest player tends to be in charge and you're probably better off being on the same team roughly speaking as the baddest player in the game. So I think America is usually the baddest of the bad but being on the team of the bad guys when they're winning it might be your best bet for survival. So I think you can be on the bad team and also say it's good for you. So I think that's fair to say. But no America is not always the good guy and everything we say about why we do what we do is all BS. Would you agree? The reasons we give like oh we're going to save your democracy, oh we got to make sure those dominoes don't fall, all the communists are going to come and get you, none of that's real. That's completely made up. It's always about money and energy and military and you know and all that. But as I say again keeping our economy strong by raping other countries seems to be a good business model and it does keep us safer. So it's a complicated world.
And how about this one: the sphere wants to stop women from voting. How serious do you think that is? Now I see that a lot. It's like a common thing. But it has a lot to do with the Democrats being largely a party of women and a lot of the batshit crazy things seem to be driven by women. But I don't think anybody's serious about that. I mean not when I say not anybody. There are a few people who act like they're serious about it. I don't think so. I don't think they're super serious about it. So I think Constantine may, you know as he says he's not right-wing, so he may see these things as a little more serious than they are. A little more serious. But more to the point if when you say truth is king in all capitals there's sort of a suggestion there that you know what the truth is and the other people got it wrong. How's that sit with you?
Let's talk about evolutionary biology that science got right. Now if science got it right wouldn't that be really unique in science to be right? We know that 50% of the studies can't be reproduced. I'm pretty sure that climate change is completely BS if you look at the models. I'm pretty sure that the field of psychology is probably more BS than that. I'm pretty sure that string theory is not going to pan out. I don't think physicists can really explain any of the things that they're talking about but the math works you know and sometimes the experiment will prove they were right but I don't think they know what's going on. I don't think they can explain the double slit experiment without using words that just sound crazy. So you know chemistry is probably pretty solid because you can run the experiment and see if it works and engineering is solid. So we're real good at — well not we but people, some people — we're good at making rockets that can maybe go tomorrow someday but that's engineering right? Science is as close to completely broken as anything has ever been. So it feels almost an out-of-date opinion to say that truth is king and believe the science. We just came out of a pandemic believing the science sounds like the dumb view at this point. And so I'd like to suggest that the people who are saying that they know which science is correct because science is good and they've got all these facts, I'd like to suggest that I'm not sure that's the smartest take in 2024. In 2024 I think everything that can't be proven in an experiment on a table like chemistry is probably BS. There's a far greater chance it's not true.
Now I got dragged into this evolution thing because I said the following. I said that the survival of the fittest — or I'm sorry survival, what do they call it, natural selection — I said in a post that natural selection was no longer believed by most scientists. Now of course the people who believe that they knew jumped all over me and said what are you talking about, natural selection is believed by almost all scientists. To which I said I probably should have said survival of the fittest because if you're not aware of this one of the most famous evolutionary biologists, Stephen Jay Gould, he was famous for having shown that survival of the fittest in its most narrow sense wasn't a good explanation of what was happening. In other words it wasn't just that you competed better so you survived but there were a whole bunch of things that could cause you to survive that were not directly related to how fit you were as a competitor. Sometimes it was just luck. Sometimes you just happened to be where there weren't any competitors so you weren't like especially fit to compete. You just didn't need to compete. Now other people say Scott Scott Scott you're using compete too narrowly. If there's a limit to resources you're at the very least competing for the limited resources and if the resources are not limited at the moment if your population keeps growing eventually you hit a limit and then you will be competing for resources. But there are these other elements like luck that could be part of it as well.
Now here's what I say and see if this blows your brain up. What does natural selection mean if it means all of those things that are part of the natural process? So what's it mean? It doesn't mean anything. So the mechanism to describe evolution is that hey it looks like things changed. These things are part of nature so it's natural selection. So nature selected what the outcome was. How could that not be the case? What would be the alternative to nature causing it to be the way it is? And to me that's such a broad explanation that it doesn't mean anything. All it is is an observation that here we are. Do you get that? Natural selection doesn't mean anything because it means everything. If it applies to everything in nature it had to happen just the way it did to get us to just where we are. It's not really talking about anything. And so here I note that the change was from you know this narrow definition of fitness to some wider definition of a number of variables involved. In my opinion that's a complete change in going from a specific mechanism to just saying I don't know, just look at nature.
Now I know what you're going to say, what the scientists will say. Scott Scott Scott I feel so bad for you when you talk about science because you don't know what's going on and you just don't understand all the sciencey things. But I do have a long track record of calling BS on fields in which I don't know anything about them and my track record is really good. Like really really good at calling BS. This to me looks kind of like BS. Now I'm not doubting that things change over time unless we're in a simulation but I do think that if you talk about people being dumb for evolution you kind of have to mention that the simulation is about a billion times more likely than evolution. And if the simulation is true then evolution is just another illusion within the simulation so it's not true. It's just an illusion and probably that the history gets created on demand as opposed to the other way around.
Anyway so Constantine, who's one of the more valuable I think public figures and thinkers, everybody has a blind spot and I think if you're not in an in-group you almost always have a blind spot for the nuance of the reasoning. So there I'm defending the sphere.
All right so the Gateway Pundit giving us more details on this Judge Cannon and the unredacted documents from Jack Smith in his investigation into the Mar-a-Lago boxes. So apparently according to the Gateway Pundit some of the things that were redacted but now we can see revealed that Biden's White House had direct ties to the Mar-a-Lago raid. The Biden regime was also directly tied to Jack Smith's investigation despite claims to the contrary from Merrick Garland. And the redactions also covered up that the National Archives had several conversations with the Biden White House. So the whole question was Trump keeps saying that the Biden administration is orchestrating all the lawfare and everybody oh no what are you talking about I've seen no evidence of that whatsoever. Yes you've seen no evidence of it because it was redacted and now we've seen it. Apparently there's lots of evidence that the Biden White House is directly connected to all these lawfare situations. So it's exactly what it looks like. It's lawfare. It's completely illegal, immoral, illegitimate and probably there's nothing will happen about it because the people in charge are the bad guys and if the bad guys are also the ones in charge nothing's going to happen. Nothing's going to happen about that. Probably one of the biggest crimes of the century is the lawfare against Trump and the January 6 committee. Probably the biggest RICO conspiracy that I've ever seen will be — I don't think it'll be punished at all. Not at all.
All right here's a persuasion expert, Jonah Berger, and he was on some show recently teaching people this following persuasion trick. And he used the example of five-year-olds. You were trying to give five-year-olds to help clean up the house or clean up their space or something. And the technique using a Stanford University study — well this it was a Stanford University study about five-year-olds. If you say to them can you help clean you'll get a lower cooperation than if you word it this way. Instead of can you help clean you say can you be a helper and clean up. If you say can you be a helper you're giving somebody the option of accepting an identity. When people accept an identity then they act on the identity. It's automatic. If you ask them to do something they compare it to their identity and if it's not in their identity they don't do it. So this is a technique which I've also talked about but I call it the Jesus persuasion. Jesus persuasion is telling you that you could be a better person. So it's encouraging you to adopt an identity as a more moral and virtuous person than you were before you heard your lord talk to you. So it's very appealing to say to somebody hey how would you like to upgrade your identity from peasant who has nothing going for you to believer who has a higher moral standard and is going to heaven. And you think I wouldn't mind being one of those. And then once you become one all of the activities that go with it just come automatically.
All right now do you understand why I register as a different party from what I usually advocate? Does that make sense now? Do you understand why I'm not a joiner? I don't join groups because as soon as you join a group and identify in a real way — you know I register as a Democrat but I don't mean it so it's not my identity. So I try to avoid having an identity because the moment you have an identity it causes all actions to conform and that's what team play does. So if you say to somebody you're a Democrat they're going to start acting like one even if they were not inclined to before. Identity creates activity. So you've got to change somebody's identity if you want them to change their behavior. Almost nothing else works because people don't act against their identity. Like if you think you're an honest person you don't rob a bank. It's pretty much a direct effect. If you think you're an academic you're probably more likely to go to school. Whatever you think you are you're likely to do that thing. So this is a really really good persuasion technique.
Now let's apply it. Let's say you're a Republican and you want Republicans to vote. Do you say make sure you vote? No no no because make sure you vote is telling you what to do. It's not an identity. Now compare that to this: be one of the people who saves America. Help us save America. Vote. Oh now you get a little identity. Do you want to be a savior? Do you want to be like the Boston Tea Party? Do you want to be a patriot? You know patriot's a word that not everybody's comfortable with but it's an identity. Now the identity that I have most accepted in the past is patriot because I think wow you know I just want to be on the side of the people who are on the side of the country. But lately when given that half of the country canceled me I was asked recently somebody was giving me a hard time on some point and they said but because I said something about Israel and they said but you wouldn't say that you don't support America just because America does some bad things with you. To which I said huh America canceled me. Half of it. So no I don't support America. America canceled me. The current system which I call America ganged up on me, identified me, discriminated against me and has been discriminating against me in employment for over 30 years. I've lost four different careers for being a white guy. So why would I support that? I do not support America. That's my current brand new opinion and I think I was largely hypnotized that I ever did.
Here's what I support. I support you citizens who did not cancel me. Period. Because you're actually good people and I like good people and I like most of the things that you like and I identify with you. I'm definitely one of you and I'm completely on your team. But America was lost decades ago. So to say that I support America would say that I'm in some kind of a brainwashed gooner situation in which I'm like oh wave my flag. Nope. Unfortunately I've been far too blackpilled to say I support the brainwashing collection of things which our masters have given to us. I support the citizens and there are a number of things I support like freedom of speech for example and Second Amendment for example. So I definitely support those things and there's a whole bunch of stuff in the Constitution that I think is terrific. So I'm pro-Constitution but do I support the government? No. The government is my enemy and I mean that literally. The government is my enemy. I mean the government has decided I'm their enemy and has weaponized its own resources against me personally. Personally yeah I've experienced it in a personal way. So no I'm not going to be on the side of my enemy because my enemy is literally trying to destroy me. My government is trying to put me out of business and they tried really hard. They just couldn't try harder than they did without an overreach so they did it the clever way they can through their minions. So now don't ask me to salute the flag or even stand for it. I don't believe I would even stand for the Pledge of Allegiance at this point because I think it's absurd. I think the country is so far from any image of America that was the kind that you hold in your mind as the good one, the one you wanted to support. We're so far from that. I mean the Biden administration is just a criminal enterprise. The CIA has been running the show since probably the 50s or 60s. We're nothing like a democratic republic. Nothing like that. And we are being robbed every day so that richer people can sell weapons to people basically. So no I don't support any of that.
All right fake protest season is coming as you all know. We all expect the big summer of fake protests and what we don't know yet is if the pro-Palestinian protesters who some would call pro-Hamas we don't know if that's going to be the summer protest or if there might be some new one but I suspect it will. But there is a wrinkle. Don't you expect that the summer protests are always going to be sort of pro-Democrat anti-Republican? That's the ones you expect right? Because you think oh George Soros is funding people. He's sort of closer to the Democrats so it's going to be sort of a Democrat-friendly protesting summer riot group like BLM or you know in its own way Antifa. So does that apply to these groups? Well I looked a little bit, did some Googling, and apparently some of the organizers of these recent protests are funded by the Soros organization. So apparently Soros is funding things. Now you'd normally think this would work out well for Democrats relative to Republicans but it turns out that the protesters surrounded Senate leader Chuck Schumer's home in Brooklyn and he's Jewish. Imagine being Senator Schumer, a Jewish American, and you look out the window and a whole bunch of people with Hamas colors and Palestinian flags and stuff are demonstrating against you and it's not too long after October 7th. How do you think Chuck Schumer feels about that?
Now let me tell you I'm not politically — I don't often agree with Chuck Schumer so politically I'm not on his side but I don't want to see anybody in my country surrounded suspiciously because they're Jewish. I don't think it's just because he's the speaker of the house. It feels like they're getting a twofer there and I'm not really comfortable with that. So I wonder will the Democrats and Soros and the people who generally are favorable to that point of view, are they going to say we went too far and we unleashed a force that's going to eat us alive? Because this force is going to eat alive the Democrats somehow. For some reason Republicans are getting a pass I guess because of an in-power at least in the presidency. So Trump is getting a hell of a free pass. I don't know how long that's going to last. I think it has everything to do with him being out of power. So let's keep an eye on this. They're asking Schumer to stop arming Israel and earlier in the day Schumer thanked Speaker Mike Johnson for passing the Ukraine Israel funding bill.
All right so here's my question. Mike Johnson is not Jewish as far as I know. Schumer is. They were both involved in passing the legislation but the Jewish guy is surrounded. Is that a coincidence? It does feel like they're going for the twofer doesn't it? So it's hard to be comfortable with that as just free speech. I mean I guess it is free speech but it's hard to feel that it's purely a policy thing and not something much much worse. Anyway so we'll keep an eye on that. I don't know if that'll become the summer riots but I suspect it will. I just think it might backfire. It might be the summer riots that they wish they hadn't instigated. And I remind you that there's no such thing as spontaneous organic protests. That's really not a thing. The only way these protests happen is if organizations that are already founded and they've got some members and they get funding from somebody like Soros or some other source and then they've got money to do something and they've got members and then they got something to do. But it's not like there's people just were sitting around watching the news and then they thought oh I think I'll go out and protest in the streets and get arrested. No it's mostly organized stuff.
Persitz had an opinion piece in I think it was the Wall Street Journal and he was talking about Biden's recent gaffe where he sort of both-sides the Israel Palestinian Hamas situation and in so doing he became sort of an example of the fine people hoax himself. In other words it looked like he was creating some kind of a moral equivalency between Israel and the terrorists who attacked Israel. Now you could argue whether that's a correct take or not but here's what I'd like to say. Dershowitz did debunk the fine people hoax but he did it in such a poor way that I have to criticize him. I don't know if I've ever criticized Dershowitz before in terms of his opinions because I often call him out as one of the best intellectuals in public and willing to say the difficult things even if it doesn't agree with his team. So generally I see him as at the highest level of intellectual credibility and so I very much appreciate that. Here's what he said. I'll give you his quote so you're not listening to me say it. He said quote you had some very bad people in that group but you also had some people that were very fine people on both sides Mr. Trump said. Now this is according to Dershowitz he later explained meaning Trump that he meant both sides of the debate over whether to remove a Confederate monument and that the anti-Semitic chanters were very bad people he had in mind. He should have been clearer from the start. That's where he lost me. He should have been clearer from the start. No Alan Dershowitz you're letting your team get away with this too easily. This was not a case of a hoax created by Trump not being clear. At the very same time that he said the fine people thing he said a few things and then within I think 60 seconds he said and I'm not talking about the neo-Nazis they should be condemned totally. Now that is the clearest statement anybody ever made about anything and for Alan Dershowitz to say he should have been clearer from the start is giving a total pass to the bad guys on his team. The bad guys who turned it into propaganda. He should have said this was never a thing. He was very clear that he wasn't talking about them and the bad guys, his team, turned it into a hoax that changed the nature of America and has almost destroyed it. Now that's a fair assessment anyway. And then he went on to say Biden had this week his own moment of unclarity. Well I think it is fair to say that Biden was unclear which also is not a full condemnation of what he said because I think that there's a little bit of piling on because of the piling on at Charlottesville. But I think Biden was unclear but Trump was not unclear and I don't think you should draw an equivalent between them. Alan Dershowitz who I have much respect for intellectually I think you just got this completely wrong.
I saw a post and some data from I think the account and Wes that the number of — here's a demographic breakdown of men and women Democrat versus Republican. So the Democrats in married men they have 39% are married men so less than half are married men. Married women 42% so less than half or fewer than half which is correct. Fewer than half or less than half. Is there any pedantic people? Is it less than half or fewer than half or both? It might be one of those cases where both works because sometimes only one is the proper way but we don't often call that out anyway. So whichever it is then unmarried men 45% again less than half. So the only demographic that Democrats have the majority in of the married and unmarried men and women stuff is 68% of the single women are Democrats. 68% of single women are Democrats.
Now without being unkind and referring to scientific data single women and liberal single women in particular are known to be especially batshit crazy. Meaning literally they seek the therapy the most. They're literally the most miserable, depressed, mentally ill group. And I don't know how much longer we can go without calling it out for what it is because we're pretending we have a political difference. It's not a political difference when one of you has a mental illness. And I think I've called it out enough that you can see it when you see the Democrat women on TV. Not all of them. There are plenty of them that don't fall into this category but don't you notice that they look mentally ill? Can't you tell just by looking at them? And again I'm not saying all Democrats or anything like that but there's a ton of women who are Democrats who when they talk you look at their eyes and their expression and all you see is mental illness. And to continue ignoring the obvious that we have a mental illness problem that is pretending to be a political philosophy I think is not helping us at all. So we should call it out for what it is. You know Constantine calls it the sphere but I think that's giving it too much credit. If you call it the sphere you're sort of acting like you were born that way but I think that TDS has literally made people crazy which means it's not necessarily their own fault. So I have some sympathy for the mentally ill Democrats because I do think that they were propagandized so hard by their own team that Trump is Hitler. That the idea that there's something like an equal number of Americans who want Hitler according to their view of the world that's got to be the most distressing, depressing, saddest, alarming thing I could ever imagine. Put yourself in their position. You're a single woman and you've been told and you believed it that an actual Hitler was coming into office to take away your democracy and I don't know turn you into baby makers or something. Yeah that would of course that would make you mentally ill. Why wouldn't it? So I'm not sure there's anybody to blame except the propaganda people on the Democrat side have destroyed the mental health of their own team. The Republicans were able to withstand the propaganda. Do you know why? Can you tell me why the propaganda that the Democrats completely mentally disturbed their own people, why did it have little to no effect on Republicans? Tell me you know the answer. Why did it have little or no effect on Republicans? No not because Republicans have more men although they do. It's not that. Critical thinking? No they get both sides? No. News? Better news? No. They knew it was fake? No. Guns? No. BS detector? No. Media? Okay I must be the worst teacher in the history of teachers. I literally just gave you an entire lesson on why this is happening. Republicans have an identity so their identity is completely protective against Democrat propaganda. Democrat propaganda doesn't work with somebody who identifies as not a Democrat. If you identify as Republican their propaganda just bounces off you. You don't need better news and better sources. You don't need to see both sides. You don't need better critical thinking. But I think it's humorous that you gave yourself all those pats on the back.
All right if you could take a moment just take a moment to think about the comments. You were watching the comments at the same time you were all patting yourself on the back for your advantages. Well it's probably because we have better critical thinking. Yeah that's probably because we see the news on both sides. Maybe it's because we're not mentally ill. Maybe it's because men are smarter than women and women are emotional and there are more men in Republicans. Did you see how you just immediately ran to compliment yourselves and do you know what you complimented yourselves on? Fill in the blanks. What did you compliment yourself on? Your identity. Yeah you basically gave me answers that went to your identity. So your identity is you see both sides, you're logical, you're not driven by emotional spirits, you see things as they really are. That's your identity. That's not thinking. That's not reasoning. That's not facts and data. That was your identity. This might be the best lesson I've ever given because I didn't realize that you would all fall into this trap. I didn't plan it this way but is anybody having a moment? You're seeing this right? You're seeing it in real time that the persuasion rule that identity is everything and do something differently never works for anybody. You just watched. You solidified around your identity with no regard to the facts. With no regard to the facts. But you just complimented yourself at how awesome you are in your identity. Now if that sounded like a criticism it shouldn't be. You should take it as a mind-opening moment because as I've told you before even though I identify you know as far left of some of your opinions I prefer you as humans. So my audience are the people I would want to be around if I were ever in trouble. I would want you guys to show up first. You know what I mean? You know if my car is on fire and I'm trapped in it I want all of you to be the first ones on the scene. You get that right? Because you're the ones who would pull me out at great personal risk. That's who I want on my team. I don't need to agree with you on your religious beliefs. Nope. I just need to know that if I'm in a burning car you're the car that's going to stop and for that same reason I will stop for you. So that's important. So I'm very bonded in terms of that dynamic but I try not to give myself an identity beyond the fact that there's some character things and some policy things that we're totally in agreement on.
All right the anti-Trump legal commentators according to the Daily Caller. There's a group of the worst people in the world according to me who have a weekly Zoom meeting to talk about how they can present the case against Trump in the most persuasive way. So here are the people who are meeting on Zoom weekly to make sure they're all on the same page about going after Trump. So you've got Norman Eisen he's a CNN legal analyst. You've got Bill Kristol MSNBC legal analyst. Andrew Weissmann lawyer. Jeffrey Toobin. Jeffrey Toobin on the Zoom call. It's a Zoom call. Jeffrey Toobin on it. You're probably wondering are you just going to let that go Scott that there's a Zoom call with a bunch of lawyers who are anti-Trump and one of them's Jeffrey Toobin? Am I just going to let that go? Also has Lawrence Tribe, former Nixon White House counsel although he's super Democrat at the moment. John Dean he's a Lincoln Project co-founder. George Conway we all know George Conway and Harry Litman. And then for some reason Washington Post opinion writer Jennifer Rubin is in these meetings. So it seems to me that another way to report this story would be that there's a group of people who meet weekly on Zoom to masturbate over Trump's legal issues. I think it's being led by Toobin and if they're not jerk buddies I don't know who is. So I'm going to refer to them anytime I see any of these lawyers as the jerk buddies. They're just getting on Zoom and gooning over oh I think he's going down now. Oh tell me more about what Jack Smith said. Oh redact me baby redact it. That's how I see it. Redact me hard.
Is that true somebody just said they're all Jewish? Is that true? George Conway, John Dean? No I don't think they're all Jewish but the fact that there were a lot of lawyers who are also Jewish is not the biggest surprise in the world. No I don't think they're all Jewish.
So the TikTok. So they're calling it a ban but it's not. So the TikTok bill apparently is going to make it to the president's desk and he's going to sign it. Now I think this is a total fake. I don't think TikTok's going to disappear. One of two things is going to happen. They've got a year to fight it in court and they'll either win in court and it will stay just the way it is or it will be divested to an American company purely for the purpose of our own CIA having a back door to it so that instead of China having all our private information and being able to control us and brainwash us our own country will be able to have all of our personal information and usage and who we're connected to and also brainwash us. I'm not entirely sure that's an upgrade. Now I of course have been one of the most vocal proponents of banning TikTok but only if you're really going to ban it. If all you're doing is putting the CIA in charge of it it's just you're just changing the warden. You didn't let anybody out of jail. I want people to get out of jail. I'm not looking for a different warden. That's buying me nothing. So I think that the public has been duped into thinking something has happened and your Congress is finally acting and you know there's things and processes and I don't think anything is happening. It's either going to go right back to the way it was because of some court case or it's going to be worse because our CIA will be in charge of it. I don't know. Doesn't look good to me. And the thing that makes me most suspicious is that it went from having no support to suddenly everybody loved it and it got put into a bill that you couldn't resist or at least Congress couldn't resist. That to me that just looks like our intelligence people decided it was time to make a play and they just made a play to own the thing. And remember where Constantine said hey I don't think you can say America is the bad guy in every war. I think America just stole one of China's biggest companies or at least the American business part of it. I don't think China should have been in control obviously but I don't think we're the good guys.
All right according to the Gateway Pundit the headlines are sort of missing this story that Stormy Daniels owes Trump $300,000 plus interest for her false claims she made against him. So Stormy Daniels is actually paying Trump for false claims made against him. The courts have ruled. At the same time Trump's in court for what an accounting thing that nobody can even understand why it's illegal. Literally the experts are I don't even know why this is illegal. I don't even understand it.
Elon Musk was commenting on a graph that I think was going around that showed that around 2014 I wonder what was happening about then the words racism and racist and race were used in newspapers up 361 to 700% starting around 2014. As Elon Musk says this graph illustrates the woke mind virus taking over legacy media. Same happened with online media and the education system then it spread to other countries. And here's what I say. I don't think there's any force that will make wokeness go away and I think our impression that it's being beaten back is because if you read a lot of right-leaning Republican kind of news sources they're always trumpeting the anecdotal story of this university or this Texas place got rid of DEI and stuff like that. But I think it's growing faster than it's being reduced. That's my sense of it. We just see the stories where it's being reduced. We don't see all the times that somebody added their DEI staff. So I don't think it's correcting itself at all. But there is a force that could correct it and it might be forming up. It hasn't kicked off yet. So there was a court case recently I think it was the Supreme Court that said that white people could sue for discrimination in employment. Now we haven't seen a big wave of that but given that Stephen Miller has that America First fund which seems to be designed exactly for this sort of thing which is to push individual cases that have a larger political dimension to them and what I'd love to see is the funding for that backing a bunch of anti-white discrimination cases because if it becomes impossible to be in business and discriminate against white people because it's just too expensive the trial lawyers and the insurance companies just eat you up that could change things. I don't think anything changes until it's expensive. So here where I might disagree with Elon Musk that people will just sort of see the — I'm not sure what mechanism he thinks would reverse it so I won't read his mind but the only mechanism that reverses anything is money. Nothing else really makes a difference. It's just money. And even when it looks like it's not money it's money. Right because if somebody's let's say defending the reputation right that's kind of money really. So as soon as it gets too expensive to discriminate against white people which has never been the case it's always been easy and it would be easier to discriminate against white people than it would be to explain why you don't have enough diversity. So as soon as it becomes more expensive to screw white people there'll be less of it. But we're not there yet.
All right I said again provocatively and I'm going to tell you this story only because the persuasion element of it because you've heard it before. As you know the ADL came after me and the head of the ADL accused me of being a Holocaust denier in public. Now I don't have to defend myself from that because you should be wise enough to know that's not a thing. I'm obviously not a Holocaust denier. Now they said that in public about me. Now the ADL is going after a number of other people in similarly specious ways and what I've said is that I don't support Israel because the ADL is my enemy. And then I also say because I know how people respond that I say yes I know they don't report to Israel. Yes I know the ADL does not report to Israel but that's not my problem. Now how many of you think that what I say doesn't make sense in the comments? Does it not make sense when I say I don't support Israel because the ADL who is not funded by Israel that came after me? So does that make sense? Now remember I said that Israel doesn't own the ADL they don't control them but that's not my problem. Yeah no my problem is that a substantial entity that has offices in Israel and they say that their mission is — this is from the ADL's own words — the ADL works to support a secure Jewish and democratic state of Israel living in peace and security and for decades they've worked to secure Israel a democratic state, promote a strong and constructive US-Israel relationship. So to me that's the ADL working for Israel. Now if you say but Israel doesn't control them then I say let me introduce you to the real world. May I? If Israel kicked their ass out of Israel and said you're embarrassing us so badly that you can't have an office in Israel you're just making us look like idiots do you think the ADL could survive that? If Israel said hey just for the record we want to say this once the ADL does not represent us. They're a disreputable organization and we disavow them. Do you think the ADL could survive that? Well the management couldn't. The ADL probably could but the management couldn't. They'd have to change management. So when I say I don't support the nation of Israel because the ADL went after me does that sound crazy? It's not my problem that they don't directly pay the ADL. It's true but that's not my problem. Here's the thing. If somebody on your team who is so on your team that they've got an office in your country and their entire mission one of the top line mission statements is to make sure that that other country is doing fine they're working for the same team. And if somebody on your team is trying to destroy me which they are the ADL tried very hard then no I do not back Israel and don't ask me to. All right so I don't care if Israel fixes it but just don't ask me to help.
Now you might say to yourself Scott how much were you backing Israel before which is a good question. Do you think that there's anything I do or have done that has any impact on Israel in any meaningful way? In the comments give me your opinion. Do you think that it means anything or is it just you know talking on Twitter or X? Well here's what I think. It would depend if you thought I had some influence on the region or if you thought I was authoring the simulation it might matter. But at the moment I think that the ADL is destroying the reputation of Israel and that's not my fault. All right as long as the ADL and Israel are joined at the hip I don't support the nation of Israel. Now I'm not supporting their destruction and I'm not supporting the enemies of Israel and I wasn't donating before but I definitely don't think the United States should give them any money. Now one of the arguments I heard is that David Boaz makes this argument that if we didn't fund Israel with the requirement that they buy our weapons then Israel would create its own weapons manufacturing because of course they would need weapons and then we wouldn't have as much influence over them because they would be independently making their own weapons instead of relying on us. To which I say there's a pretty big advantage on relying on us for weapons. The biggest one is it's not easy to bomb our one factory. If Israel had some weapons making factories there would probably be two or three that if you took them out of operation they would be completely out of weapons but the United States probably is harder to get to. Meaning that if the weapons are here and we ship them to Israel it's probably a safer weapons situation. So it's a complicated situation but I don't favor any American money going to Israel as long as they have a better debt situation than we do as long as the ADL is after me. So I think Israel has to live with the bad reputation of the ADL at a time when they're getting a lot of pressure from the outside world. I do think Israel is giving up their Holocaust chip. It will never be the same after this and that doesn't mean it's the wrong choice from their perspective.
So let me give you my real opinion of the whole Hamas Gaza Israel situation. I think anybody who's picking the moral winning side is probably in some kind of a losing conversation because we first of all we don't have any influence. At least I don't. I have no influence over that. So my take is it's like gravity. My take on the region is that whoever's in charge is going to be the warden and whoever is not in charge is going to be in jail. If you were to reverse the situation the Israelis would feel like they're in jail even if it's not true and it would look like the wardens were the Palestinians. Currently it looks like Israel has the most power and whether it's an accurate statement of what's happening or not the Palestinians feel like they're in jail and the Israelis are the warden. If that's not going to change and it's not then what you're watching is just a power dynamic playing out. So to have an opinion on it feels to me like I'm holding a rock in my hand and I let go of the rock. Should I have an opinion about whether the rock will fall to Earth? I could have an opinion but it would be absurd. The only thing that makes sense is just to watch it. Just observe it because you know it's going to go and now it's gravity and has nothing to do with your opinion. So when I watch things in the Middle East I think oh I think I should add my opinion to this for what? It's just gravity. Whoever is the strongest entity is going to — it's going to feel like the weaker entity is being abused even if it's not true. And the reason is that the systems are incompatible and they can never be compatible. There is no way that those groups the Islamic population and the Jewish population are going to find a way to live together in peace with two countries next to each other. To imagine that could happen seems so disconnected from reality that these are people who by their central belief system can't possibly get along in the way that you imagine people of the same belief system could. I think we make the mistake of thinking well it can't be that different from a red and a blue state and yet we find ways to live together next to each other. No it's not like that at all. It's not even slightly like that. The American system we can disagree with each other but we know we're under the same system right? The Constitution in theory is the umbrella under which we're all arguing. So we're all trying to be the better versions of adhering to the Constitution. You maybe sometimes you want to tweak it but you're still talking about how can we be the better version of a constitutional citizenship. Nothing like that's happening over in the Middle East. In the Middle East there are two incompatible systems that can never be compatible and there's only going to be a winner and a loser and at the moment Israel has the upper hand. To have an opinion on that would be like having an opinion on gravity. It's just what it is. It's just what it is. Now the opinion I can have is not to associate my own brand or reputation with it because again I don't have anything to do with it. So if I embraced it then I'm giving something away for free for nothing. I would be giving away my reputational value what little it has for nothing. It wouldn't make them more successful or less but it would make me a victim of whatever abuse I got for having an opinion on it. So I don't support Israel but I don't support their enemies. I love the Jewish people. You know my personal relationships have always been amazing with Jewish citizens as well as Israeli citizens. Probably one of my favorite demographic groups. I say that just because some of you are anti-Semitic and it'll make you mad but yeah but historically everything from dating to my best friends I've been very heavily weighted toward the Jewish population because I like smart people. Is that okay? I like smart people and there are a real lot of educated Jewish people and it's fun to talk to smart people.
All right that ladies and gentlemen is what I had for you today. I don't know if the Rumble studio is going to let me talk privately to the Locals people but I'm going to give it a try. I've refreshed my browser situation so it might work this time. Let's give it a try. Thanks for joining on Rumble and X and YouTube. Let's see if this works. All right local supporters only. Maybe nope looks like everybody's still here. Hey everybody. I'm sure they'll get that bug fixed. That feature had worked every day until a few days ago. All right no you don't have the drinking bleach article. That's the first draft but thank you thank you for asking about it. All right that's all for now. I'm going to end and I'll talk to the Locals people later in the man cave. All right just start an after show stream now. You'll hate it if I start another stream. All right that's it for today. I'll see you all in the morning and the Locals people I'll see you in the man cave tonight. Bye for now. Let's see if this really closes.
good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization it's called coffee with Scott Adams I'm pretty sure you've never had a better time today I'm going to attempt to get through the entire show with no cursing whatsoever I know maybe I didn't do so well yesterday if you know what I mean but today no cursing and if you'd like to take your experience up to that level of godliness there's nothing else you could call it all you need for that is a coverer mug glass a tanker chel s a canteen Jugger flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid I like coffee enjoy me now for the unparallel pleasure the dopamine here the day thing that makes everything better it's called the simultaneous siping happens now go well ladies and gentlemen if you were a subscriber to the Dilbert reborn comic on the xplatform or you were a member of the locals Community Scott adam.
locals you would know that Tina the tech writer is being replaced by AI but in the ultimate insult the ultimate employee insult Tina will be asked to train her AI replacement yeah it's probably one of the number one suggestions I get from people when they when I ask for Dilbert ideas you know hey is anything bothering you at your workplace the the one I get more than any other one well actually the one I get the most is people uh leaving smelly things in microwaves but I can't write comics about smells it just kind of doesn't work and and they talk about Ste in food from the refrigerator because those are like the simplest dumbest comic ideas but the other one is people being fired or replaced and being asked to train their replacement now imagine if you had to train AI as your replacement is that better or is that worse I don't know we'll explore that in the dber comic well I got to tell you about something that happened to me in the simulation yesterday for about I don't know several years now probably at least once a day I've said to myself you know what I should sit down and I should dedicate a whole bunch of my time to writing up what the uh the drinking bleach hoax was how it was executed and really do a good job on it so yesterday um I fell asleep working during the afternoon which is not uncommon I woke up next to my laptop as I often do in my man cave and uh I really don't sleep enough I think that's probably the bottom line there and I felt all inspired suddenly and I said darn it I'm going to write this up and so I I I put three hours of the most inspired best writing of my life and I wrote up the whole bleach drinking hoax and if I'm being honest about my own work it's just some of the best work I've ever done my life and after years of thinking about it every day and thinking I've got to do this for the world and it could change it could change the really the course of history and when I was done I looked at it and I said damn this thing is going to be super viral like everybody's going to read this it's going to uncover the entire technique of creating hoaxes tell people how they fell for it show them very clearly that it was a hoax and it was going to be one of the three 10 pole hoaxes and when I was done and I hit uh publish there was a technical bug that ate it and it's gone forever so sometimes the simulation has its own plan apparently do you get a preview no it's gone forever it's literally gone just a technical problem and I don't know if I can do it again so here will be the interesting part I tend to think that things like this have some kind of a weird purpose to them because I can't think of the last time I lost a document do you remember the last time you lost a document after you'd finished it it's almost something that doesn't happen in the modern you know technological World very rare but it's definitely gone and I thought to myself there must be some reason I'm not allowed to do this now I you know obviously I don't see any specific mechanism to to make that happen but it's really a weird coincidence that the most important thing I've written in years by far you know the the most consequential thing that would actually had put a big you know dent in the whole world disappeared I just don't know how to explain that it's just such a weird coincidence so here's what here's what we'll watch for does it mean that I was meant to rewrite it better what do you think is The Universe telling me it wasn't good enough and I have to do it better because it's that important or is The Universe telling me don't do it or is it nothing but a coincidence I don't know I don't think the human brain knows how to sort out this stuff but I'll let you know if I write it anyway I do I did have an earlier draft of it so I might be able to put it back together uh Thomas Massie tells us that the house Sergeant at Arms wants to find him $500 maybe a day per day for having a post on X that shows a video of the house and all the and a number of the members waving Ukrainian Flags during the vote about the Ukrainian funding now do you think that the uh house Sergeant at Arms has the authority to find him because of something he posted on X well apparently that there's some kind of rule that says you can't have a video of you know the proceedings inside and if it was his own video and he took it and then he posted it that probably would be a violation on the other hand it does seem like absolutely legitimate news and I would be very happy to see it so of course I reposted it to make sure that more people saw it and I'd like to make an offer to Thomas Massie that uh if it turns out that he's going to pay $500 a day I will I will pay for one of those days so I'll pledge $500 if it gets fined I I'll pay $500 to you know either to his camp campaign or something so I I'll try to make sure that he's uh the blow is softened right and if anybody else wants to commit to paying for a day um you can pay for your free speech because Free Speech costs uh let's see free speech costs $500 a day for free speech yeah well California my state has so much solar power it turns out that uh during the day um there's more solar power than there is demand for it now we still have overall there's an energy problem because it's not balanced but so many people in California took the government government rebates and everything and put solar on their house that when we get that afternoon baking sun we're actually creating more energy than we're using that's kind of amazing isn't it I mean it's bad and good at the same time so 25% of our electricity is now from solar you know this is one of those things that kind of it's too slow and then it happens fast you know there are a lot of things like that it's like God it's slow it's slow it's slow um and then it's fast so maybe we'll have a lot of solar here really fast did you hear Biden's latest Gaff if it's a gaff at all he was saying in his speech about Trump but he talked about himself accidentally he said how many times does he have to prove weak can't be trusted how many times does Trump have to have to prove that Biden's Administration can't be trusted well I don't know how many times will it take he still has half of the country on his side so apparently it's not enough well I don't know if we should make anything of that other than Biden's brain is toast and everybody knows it Constantine kissen who you know from trigonometry um very fun and smart commentator on world events has introduced a new word into our vocabulary the retardo sphere the retarda sphere all right I'm just going to read you what he said because it's kind of funny the way he puts it so Constantine kissen says the onx the leftwing sphere was created by sensible people on the left being silent when they should have said something the right-wing spere is being formed in exactly the same way and he says stop sending me DMS about how much you agree with me about the woke right strap on a pair and say something so that that's a little bit different than the point he's going to make next unless you want to be on the side that thinks evolution is quote just a theory I.E doesn't understand what a theory is in science sees America as the bad guy in every war and wants to stop women voting so that that would be his description of the right-wing retardo spere would be people who think evolution is just a theory uh meaning in in their uh view of it is not real and sees America as a bad guy in every war and wants to stop women from voting and then Constantine says I am I am not right-wing but the last thing I want is for the left and right to go full at the same time and then he says truth is King in all caps well may I uh take a moment to defend the retardo spere would you like that are there any members of the sphere here who who would uh is there anybody here who would identify with not fully accepting Evolution seeing America as the bad guy in at least the recent Wars and thinks that women should stop voting is anybody in that category here any one of those all right A lot of people are saying yes all right here's my take on it and I think Constantine is is pretty far off on his frame for this uh I like his General thinking you know his General thinking is I don't want to be associated with crazy people that's good or irrational people so I like the basic thrust of it but here's what I think he might be missing because as he says he's not rightwing so there's some things that if you spend more time in that sphere you get a little Nuance on these things so I'm going to give a little Nuance that may may not be obvious to the Casual traveler okay number one the part about Evolution being just a theory yes it is embarrassing when somebody says they don't believe in evolution because it's quote just a theory if I can educate you on one thing it's that people who understand science will think you're a if you say something's not proven because it's just a theory because in the scientific realm Theory means it is proven hypothesis means it's not proven Theory means there's so much evidence for it you might as well just call it a fact but because science doesn't like to commit itself knowing that sometimes even a fact or something they thought was absolutely true can sometimes be overturned so they do keep it a little bit weak just because you never know what a fact is for sure um but it is not true that theory means they're not quite sure about it they're very very sure about it and that's what the word theory means in their domain so get that part right just know that in common language Theory means unproven but in scientific language it means very very much proven does everybody know that now again it doesn't mean they're right I'm just telling you what the words mean in their domains you know we'll talk about who's right separately okay so get that right because you will sound like a bad debater if you get that that word usage wrong that's a real red flag for somebody who's who's going to mock you for not understanding science however it is a very common um it's a common misunderstanding and I think I I don't think that anybody disbelieves the theory of evolution because the word theory is used would you agree with that there's nobody who disbelieves it simply because they use the word theory so for Constantine to point that out as something he wants to mock I don't really think that's something anybody actually believes I think they disbelieve Evolution for a reason that I'll talk about could be a right reason could be a bad reason I'm not saying it's a good or bad reason but I'm saying it has nothing to do with the word so if you think that anybody has this belief because they didn't know how to use this word correctly in the domain of science that's a complete misdirection it's just really they're using the word wrong has nothing to do with their actual opinion of the the topic it's just the word so I would say that that's not a fair statement but I think the larger point if I could read between the lines I'm not a mind reader but I think what he means is more the general idea that Revolution is proven according to science and that if you say you're not buying it you're being sort of anti-science in a way that so that seems to be Constantine's point but I would like to offer the following counterpoints number one when tuer Carlson who really got this whole conversation going when tuer Carlson says doesn't believe in evolution Because he believes that God made us do you think that Tucker regards that as a scientific fact that God made us I think what maybe Constantine is missing is that this is what i' call a lifestyle belief a lifestyle belief it's not in the domain of what's true or false it's a choice based on faith the the reason there's a word faith is because it's very distinct from I looked at the facts and Science guided me so to me when I see Tucker say that uh he has a belief that God made it to me that's a lifestyle choice to have that worldview I don't think that's the same as not thinking evolution is real to me those are different concepts so I think you have to understand that some people make a choice to accept an entire let's say philosophy because following the philosophy has worldly benefits meaning it helps you today and maybe helps you go to heaven if you think that's part of the plan so when I look at Christians let's say the the Tucker types who believe that God created the earth I say to myself well I don't know if you've got the mechanism right but I'm not so I'm not so I don't lack so much humility that I think I know the answer so I think there's a little lack of humility when you say I know the answer of how we all got here and you got it wrong so that bothers me a little bit but I think you have to understand that religious faith is not trying to compete with science it's more like if I buy this entire package I can see that it works While I'm Alive it might even work after I'm dead if I go to heaven so it's really just a a choice about what works and I don't think you should fact check it I'm not going to fact check the Muslims right I mean I used to think that was something I could do it's like huh I'm not so sure that Muhammad went to heaven on a flying horse don't bother it's not a scientific discussion it is a lifestyle choice to accept a worldview which has a certain set of advantages right here on Earth so um I feel that that has to be said then there's a question uh is America the bad guy in every war well I think the word every is you know a little bit hyperbole but I do believe the that America is the bad guy in recent Wars is that is there anything wrong with that opinion it does seem to me that our recent Wars are driven by energy and the military industrial complex and stuff like that you know the Atlantic Council whatever I don't think we have any kind of a democracy where we're going to save the save the world for Freedom we don't care about anybody else's Freedom we could give a oh I almost did it I'm not going to curse we don't care about the freedom in other countries we will work with their dictator just fine yeah do you think we have a problem with the uh the kingship of uh the royal family in Jordan no no the royal family in Jordan are awesome and we seem to like him and get along just fine no we don't need them to be a democracy as long as are on our team well that's fine so no I do think that America is the bad guy but I'll give a little bit of nuance on that as well I'm not sure being the bad guy is the worst thing it could be it could be that being a good guy is the worst thing you can do CU being a good guy makes you weak and probably get destroyed by somebody who's more of a bad guy I I feel like in the real world when you get outside of the you know the philos philosophical that the the baddest player tends to be in charge and you're probably better off being on the same team roughly speaking as the baddest player in the game so I think America is usually the baddest of the bad but being on the team of the bad guys when they're winning it might be your best bet for survival so I think you can be on the bad team and also say it's good for you so I think I think that's fair to say but no America is not always the good guy and everything we say about why we do what we do is all Bs would you agree the reasons we give like oh we're going to save your democracy oh we got to make sure those dominoes don't fall all the Communists are going to come and get you none of that's real that's completely made up it's always about money and energy and Military and you know and all that but as I say again keeping our economy Strong by raping other countries seems to be a good business model and it does keep us safer so it's a complicated world and how about this one uh uh the and the sphere uh wants to stop women from voting how serious do you think that is now I see that a lot it's like a a common thing but has a lot to do with the Democrats you know being largely a party of women and a lot of the Bas crazy things are seem to be driven by women but I don't think anybody's serious about that I mean not when I say not anybody there are a few people who act like they're serious about it I don't think so yeah I I don't think they're super serious about it so I think Constantine may you know as he says he's not rightwing so he may see these things as a little more serious than they are little more serious but more to the point if when you say truth is King in all capitals there's sort of a suggestion there that you know what the truth is and the other people got it wrong how's that sit with you let let me let's talk about evolutionary biology that uh science got right now if got it right wouldn't that be really unique in science to be right we know that 50% of the studies can't be reproduced um I'm pretty sure that climate change is completely BS if you look at the models I'm pretty sure that the field of psychology is probably more BS than that I'm pretty sure the string theory is not going to pan out I don't think physicists can really explain any of the things that they're talking about but the math works you know and sometimes the experiment will will prove they were right but I don't think they know what's going on I don't I don't think they can explain the double slit experiment without using words that just sound crazy so you know uh chemistry is probably pretty solid because you can you know run the experiment and see if it works and Engineering is solid so we're real good at well not we but people some people were're not are good at making rockets that can maybe go tomorrow someday but that's engineering right science is as close to completely broken as anything has ever been so it feels almost an outof dat opinion to say that truth is King and believe the science we just came out of a pandemic believing the science sounds like the dumb view at this point and so I'd like to suggest that the people are saying that they know which science is correct because science is good and they've got all these facts I'd like to suggest that I'm not sure that's the smartest take in 2024 in 2024 I think everything that can't be proven in an experiment on a table like chemistry is probably BS it's there's a far greater chance is not true now I got dragged into this Evolution thing because I said the following I said that uh the survival of the fitness or I'm sorry survival what do they call it natural selection I said in a post that natural selection was no longer believed by most uh scientists now of course the people who believe that they knew scientists jumped all over me and said what are you talking about natural selection is believed by almost all scientists to which I said I probably should have said uh survival the fittest because if you're not aware of this one of the most famous evolutionary biologist types Stephen J Gould um he was famous for having shown that survival of the fittest in its most narrow sense wasn't a good explanation of what was happening in other words it wasn't just that you competed better so you survived but there were a whole bunch of things that could cause you to survive that were not directly related to how fit you were as a competitor sometimes it was just luck sometimes you just happened to be where there weren't any competitors so you weren't like especially fit to compete you just didn't need to compete now other people say Scott Scott Scott you using compete to narrowly if if there's a limit to resources you're at the very least competing for the limited resources and if the resources are not limited at the moment if your population keeps growing eventually you hit a limit and then you will be competing for resources but there are these other these other elements like luck that could be part of it as well now here's what I say and see if this blows your brain up what does natural selection mean if it means all of those things that are part of the natural process so what's it mean it doesn't mean anything so the me the mechanism to describe evolution is that hey it looks like things changed these things are part of nature so it's natural selection so nature selected what the outcome was how could that not be the case what would be the alternative to Nature causing it to be the way it is and to me that's such a broad explanation that it doesn't mean anything uh all it is is an observation that here we are do do you get that natural natural selection doesn't mean anything because it means everything if it applies to everything in nature had to happen just the way it did to get us to just where we are it's not really talking about anything and and so here I note that the change was from you know this narrow definition of fitness to some wider definition of you know VAR number of variables involved in my opinion that's a complete change in going from a specific mechanism to just saying I don't know just look nature now I know what you're going to say when what the scientists will say Scott Scott Scott I feel so bad for you when you talk about science because you don't know what's going on and you just don't understand all the sciencey things but I do have a long track record of calling BS on fields in which I don't know anything about them and my track record is really good like really really good at calling BS this to me looks kind of like BS now I'm not doubting that things change over time unless we're as simulation but I do think that if you talk about uh people being dumb for in uh Evolution you kind of have to mention that the simulation is about a billion times more likely than Evolution and if the simulation is true then evolution is just another illusion within the simulation so it's not true it's just an illusion and probably that the history gets created on demand as opposed to the other way around anyway so Constantine who's uh one of the uh more valuable I think public figures and thinkers um everybody has a blind spot and I think if you're not in an in group you almost always have a blind spot for you know the Nuance of the reasoning so there I'm discovered I'm a defending the sphere um all right so the Gateway pundit giving us more details on this judge Cannon and the unredacted documents from Jack Smith in his investigation into the moral Lago um boxes so apparently according to the Gateway pundit some of the things that were redacted but now we can see uh is that uh revealed that Biden's White House had Direct ties to the maral Lago raid the Biden regime was also directly tied to Jack Smith's investigation despite claims to the contrary from meric Garland the uh uh Mir Garland and and uh the redactions also covered up that uh the National Archives had had several conversations with the Biden white house so the whole question was Trump keeps saying that Biden is you know the Biden Administration is orchestrating all the lawfare and everybody oh no what are you talking about I've seen no evidence of that whatsoever yes you've seen no evidence of it because it was redacted and now we've seen it apparently there's lots of evidence that the uh that the Biden White House is directly connected to all these lawfare situations so it's exactly what it looks like it's a lawfare it's completely illegal immoral illegitimate and probably there's nothing will happen about it because the people in charge are the bad guys and if the bad guys are also the ones in charge nothing's going to happen nothing's going to happen about that probably one of the biggest uh Crimes of the century is the lawfare against Trump uh and the January 6 committee probably the biggest uh Rico conspiracy that I've ever seen will be not I don't think it'll be punished at all not at all all right um all right here's a persuasion expert Jonah berer and he was on some Show recently uh teaching people this following persuasion trick and he he used the example of a five-year-olds you were trying to give five-year-olds to help clean up clean up the house or clean up their space or something and the technique um using a Stanford University study well this it was a Stanford University study about 5-year-olds if you say to them uh can you help help clean you'll get a lower um cooperation than if you word it this way instead of can you help clean you say can you be a helper and clean up if you say can you be a helper you're giving somebody the option of accepting an identity when people accept an identity then they act on the identity it's automatic if you if you ask them to do something they compare it to their identity and if it's not in their identity they don't do it so this is a technique which I've also talked about but I call it the uh the Jesus persuasion Jesus persuasion is telling you that you could be a better person so it's encouraging you to adopt an identity as a more moral and virtuous person than you were before you heard the you know before you heard your lord talk to you so it's very appealing to say to somebody hey how would you like to upgrade your identity from you know peasant who has nothing going for you to believer who has a higher moral standard and is going to happen and you think I wouldn't mind being one of those and then once you become one all of the all the activities that go with it just come automatically all right now do you understand why I uh register as a different party from what I usually Advocate does that make sense now does do you understand why I'm not a joiner I don't join groups because as soon as you join a group and identify in a real way you know I I register as a Democrat but I don't mean it so it's not my identity so I try to avoid having an identity because the moment you have an identity it causes all actions to conform and that's what team play does so if you say to somebody you're a Democrat they're going to start acting like one even if they were not inclined to before identity creates activity so you gota you got to change somebody's identity if you want them to change their behavior almost nothing else works because people don't act against their identity like if you think you're an honest person you don't rob a bank right it it it's pretty much a direct a direct effect if you think you're an academic you're probably more likely to go to school right what whatever you think you are you're likely to do that thing so this is a really really good persuasion uh technique now let's apply it let's say you're a Republican and you want Republicans to vote do you say make sure you vote no no no cuz make sure you vote is telling you what to do it's not no identity now compare that to this be one of the people who saves America help us save America vote oh now you get a little identity do you want to be a savior do you want to do you want to be like the Boston Tea Party do you want to be a patriot you know P Patriots a word that not everybody's comfortable with but it's an identity now the identity that I uh have most accepted in the past is Patriot because I think wow you know I I just want to be on the side of the people who are on the side of the country but lately when given that half of the country canceled me I I was asked recently um somebody was giving me a hard time um on some point and they said but oh because I said something about Israel and they said but you wouldn't say you're uh that you don't support America just because America does some bad things with you to which I said huh America canel me half of it so no I don't support America America canceled me the current system which I call America ganged up on me identified me discriminated against me and has been discriminating against me in employment for over 30 years I've lost four different careers for being a white guy so why would I support that I do not support America that's my current brand new opinion and I think I was you know largely hypnotized that I ever did here's what I support you I support you citizens who did not cancel me period because you're actually good people and I like good people and I like most of the things that you like and I identify with you I'm definitely one of you and I'm completely on your team but America was lost decades ago so to say that I support America would say that I'm in some kind of a brainwashed you know gooner situation in which I'm like Oh waave my flag nope unfortunately I've been far too blackpilled to say I support the brainwashing collection of things which our masters have given to us I support the citizens and there are a number of things I support like freedom of speech for example and second amendment for example so I definitely support those things and there's a whole bunch of stuff in the Constitution that I think is terrific so I'm I'm Pro Constitution but do I support the government no the government is my enemy and I mean that literally the government is my enemy I mean the government has decided I'm their enemy and has weaponized its own resources against me personally personally yeah I've experienced it in a personal way so no I'm not going to be on the side of my enemy because my enemy is literally trying to destroy me my government is trying to put me out of business and they tried really hard they just couldn't try harder than they did without you know an overreach so they did it the clever way they can through their you know minions so now don't ask me to salute the flag or even stand for it I I don't I don't believe I would even stand for this the Pledge of Allegiance at this point because I think it's absurd I I think the country is so far from any image of America that was the kind that you hold in your mind as the good one the one you wanted to support we're so far from that I mean the Biden Administration is just a criminal Enterprise the CIA has been running the show since probably the 50s or 60s we're nothing like a Democratic Republic nothing like that and we are being robbed every day so that richer people can sell weapons to people basically so no I don't support any of that all right fake protest season is coming as you all know we all expect the big summer of fake protests and what we don't know yet is if the prop palis inan protesters who some would call pramas um we don't know if that's going to be the summer protest or if there might be some new one but I suspect it will but there is a wrinkle don't you expect that the summer protests are always going to be sort of pro-democrat anti-republican that's the ones you expect right because you think oh George Soros is funding people he's sort of closer to the Democrats so it's going to be sort of a Democrat friendly protesting summer Riot group like BML or you know in its own way antifa so does that apply to these groups well I looked a little bit did some Googling and apparently some of the organizers of these recent protests are funded by the Soros organization so apparently Soros is funding things now you'd normally think this would work out well for Democrats relative to Republicans but it turns out that the protester surrounded Senate leader Chuck Schumer's home in Brooklyn and he's Jewish imagine being Senator Schumer a Jewish American and you look out the window and a whole bunch of people with Hamas colors and Palestinian flags and stuff are demonstrating against you and and uh it's not too far not too long after October 7th how do you think how do you think Chuck Schumer feels about that now let me tell you I'm not politically I don't often well a few times I have I don't often agree with Chuck Schumer so politically I'm not in his side but I don't want to see anybody in my country surrounded suspiciously because they're Jewish I don't think it's just because he's the speaker of the house that feel it feels like they're getting a twofer there and I'm not really comfortable with that so I wonder will the Democrats and Soros and the people who generally are favorable to that point of view are they going to say we went too far and we unleashed a force that's going to eat Us Alive because this force is going to eat alive the Democrats somehow for some reason Republicans are getting pass I guess because ranana power at least in the presidency so Trump is getting a hell of a free pass I don't know how long that's going to last I think it has everything to do with him being out of power so let's uh let's keep an eye on this uh they're asking Schumer to stop arming Israel and uh earlier in the day Schumer asked thanked speaker Mike Johnson for passing the Ukraine Israel funding Bill all right so here's my question Mike Johnson is not Jewish as far as I know um Schumer is they were both involved in passing the legislation but the Jewish guy is surrounded is that a coincidence it does feel like they're going for the twofer doesn't it so it's a it's hard to be comfortable with that as just free speech I mean I guess it is Free Speech but it's hard to feel that it's you know purely a policy thing and not something much much worse anyway so we'll keep an eye on that I don't know if that'll become the summer riots um but I suspect it will I just think it might backfire it might be the summer riots that they wish they hadn't instigated and I remind you that there's no such thing as spontaneous organic protests that's really not a thing the only way these protests happen is if organizations that are already founded and they've got some members and they get funding from somebody like Soros or some other source and then they've got money to do something and they've got members and then they got something to do but it's not like there's people just were sitting around watching the news and then they thought oh I think I'll go out and protest in the streets and get arrested now it's mostly organized stuff um persitz had a uh opinion piece in I think it was the Wall Street Journal and uh he was talking about Biden's recent Gaff where he sort of both-sided the Israel Palestinian Hamas situation and in so doing he he became sort of an example of the fine people hoax himself in other words it looked like he was creating some kind of a moral equivalency between Israel and the terrorists who attacked Israel now you could argue whether that's a correct take or not but here's what I'd like to say uh dtz did debunk the fine people hoax um but he did it in such a poor way that I have to criticize him I don't know if I've ever criticized dtz before in terms of his opinions because I often call him out as one of the best you know uh intellectuals in public and willing to say the difficult things even if it doesn't agree with his team so generally I see him as you know at the highest level of intellectual credibility and so so I very much appreciate that he here's what he said I'll give you his quote so you're not you're not listening to me say he said quote you had some very U oh he's talking about Trump's quote on Charlottesville so he's quoting Trump you had some very bad people in that group but you also had some people that were very fine people on both sides Mr.
Trump said now this is according to dtz he later explained meaning Trump that he meant both sides of the debate over whether to remove a Confederate monument and that the anti-semitic chanters were very bad people he had in mind he should have been clearer from the start that's where he lost me he should have been clearer from the start no alen dtz you're letting your team get a your team of the Democrats you're letting them get away with this too easily this was not a case of a hoax was created by Trump not being clear at the very same time that he said the fine people thing he said a few things and then within I think 60 seconds he said and I'm not talking about the neo-nazis they should be condemned totally now that is the clearest statement anybody ever made about anything and for El dtz to say he should have been clearer from the start is G a total pass to the bad guys on his team on his team the bad guys who turned it into propaganda he should have said this was never a thing he was very clear that he wasn't talking about him and the bad guys his team turned it into a hoax that changed the nature of America and has almost destroyed it now that's a fair assessment anyway um and then he went on to say Biden had this week his own moment of unclarity well I think it is fair to say that Biden was unclear which also is not a full condemnation of what he said because I I think that there's a little bit of piling on because of the piling on at Charlesville but uh I think Biden was unclear but Trump was not unclear and I don't think you should draw an equivalent between them alen dtz who I have much respect for intellectually I think you just got this completely wrong uh there's uh saw a post and some data from was it n Wess I think the account and Wess um that the number of here's a demographic breakdown of men and women uh Democrat versus Republican so uh the Democrats in married men they have 39 % are married are married men so less than half are married men married women 42% so less than half or fewer than half which is correct fewer than half or less than half is there any pedantic people is it less than half or fewer than half or both it might be one of those cases where both works because sometimes only one is the proper way but we don't often call that out anyway so whichever it is then unmarried men 45% again less than half so the only demographic that Democrats have the majority in of the married and unmarried men and women stuff is 68% of the single women are Democrats 68% of single women are Democrats now without being unkind and referring to Scientific data single women and liberal single women in particular are known to be especially batshit crazy meaning literally they seek the therapy the most they're literally the most miserable uh um depressed mentally ill group and I don't know how much longer we can go without calling it out for what it is because we're pretending we have a political difference it's not a political difference when one of you has a mental illness and I think I've called it down enough that you can see it when you see the the women the Democrat women on TV not all of them there are plenty of them that don't fall into this category but don't you notice that they look mentally ill can't you tell just by looking at them and again I'm not saying all Democrats or anything like that but there's a ton of women who are Democrats who when they talk you look at their eyes and their expression and all you see is mental illness and to continue ignoring the obvious that we have a mental illness problem that is pretending to be a political philosophy um I think is not helping us at all so we should call it out for what it is you know uh Constantine calls it uh um what do you call it the uh sphere but I think that's giving it too much credit if you call it the sphere you're you're sort of acting like you were born that way but I think that TDS has literally made people crazy which means it's not necessarily their own fault so I have some sympathy for the mentally ill Democrats because I do think that they were propagandized so hard by their own team that Trump is Hiller that the idea that there's you know something like an equal number of Americans who want Hitler according to their view of the world that's got to be the most distressing depressing saddest alarming thing I could ever imagine put yourself in their position you're you're a single woman and you've been told and you believed it that an actual Hitler was coming into office to take away your democracy and I don't know turn you into baby makers or something yeah that would be of course that would make you mentally ill why wouldn't it so I'm not sure there's anybody to blame except the the propaganda people on the Democrat side have destroyed the mental health of their own team the Republicans were able to withstand the propaganda do you know why can you tell me why the propaganda that the Democrats completely mentally Disturbed their own people why did it have little to no effect on Republicans tell me you know the answer why did it have little or no effect on Republicans no not because Republicans have more men although they do it's not that critical thinking no they get both sides no news better news no they knew was fake no guns no BS detector no media okay I must be the worst teacher in the history of teachers I literally just gave you an entire lesson on why this is happening Republicans have an identity so their identity is completely uh protective against Democrat propaganda Democrat propaganda doesn't work with somebody who identifies as not a Democrat if you if you identify as Republican their propaganda just bounces off you you don't need better news and better sources you don't need to see both sides you don't need better critical thinking but I think it's humorous that you gave yourself all those paths on the back all right I if you could take a moment just take a moment to think about the the comments you were watching the comments at the same time you were all patting yourself on the back for your advantages well it's probably because we have better critical thinking yeah it's that's probably because we see the news on both sides maybe it's because we're not mentally ill maybe it's because men are smarter than women and women are emotional and they're more men and Republicans did you see how you just you just immediately ran to compliment yourselves and do you know what you complimented yourselves on fill in the blanks what did you compliment yourself on your identity yeah you basically gave me answers that went to your identity so your identity is you see both sides you're logical you're not you're not driven by emotional Spirits you know you see things as they real that's your identity that's not thinking that's not reasoning that's not facts and data that was your identity this might be the best lesson I've ever given because I didn't realize that you would all fall into this trap I didn't plan it this way but but is anybody having a moment you're seeing this right you're seeing it in real time that the persuasion the persuasion rule that identity is everything and do something differently never works for anybody you you just watched you you solidify around your identity with no regard to the facts with no regard to the facts but you just complemented yourself at how awesome you are in your identity now uh if that sounded like a criticism it shouldn't be you should take it as a like a mind openening moment because as I've told you before um even though identify you know often as far left of some of your opinions I prefer you as humans so my audience are the people I would want to be around if I were ever in trouble I would want you guys to show up first you know what I mean you know if my car is on fire and I'm trapped in it I want all of you to be the first ones on the scene you get that right because you're the ones who would pull me out at Great personal risk that's who I want on my team I don't need to agree with you on your religious beliefs nope I just need to know that if I'm in a burning car you're the car that's going to stop and for that same reason I will stop for you so that's important so I'm very bonded in terms of you know that that Dynamic but I I try not to give myself an identity beyond the fact that there's some character there's some character things and some policy things that we're totally in agreement on all right um the anti-trump legal commentators according to the Daily Caller there's a group of the worst people in the world according to me who have a weekly Zoom meeting to talk about how they can you know present the case against Trump in the most persuasive way so here's the here are the people who are meeting on Zoom weekly to you know make sure they're all on the same page about going after Trump so you've got uh let's see Norman Eisen he's a CNN legal analyst you've got Bill Crystal MSNBC legal analyst Andrew Weissman lawyer Jeffrey tubin Jeffrey tubin on the zoom call it's a zoom call Jeffrey tubin on it you're probably wondering are you just going to let that go Scott that there's a zoom call with a bunch of lawyers who are anti-trump and one of them's Jeffrey tubin am I just going to let that go also has Lawrence tribe former Nixon White House counsel uh um although he's you know super Democrat at the moment um John Dean he's a Lincoln project co-founder George Conway we all know George Conway and Harry Litman and then for some reason Washington Post opinion writer Jennifer Rubin is in these meetings so it seems to me that another way to report this story would be that there's a group of people who meet weekly on Zoom to masturbate over Trump's legal issues I think it's being led by tubin and uh if they're not jerk buddies I don't know who is so I'm going to refer to them anytime I see any of these lawyers as the jerk buddies they're just getting on zoom and gooning over oh I think he's going down now oh oh tell me more about what Jack Smith said oh redact me baby redact it that's how I see it redact me hard um is that true somebody just said they're all Jewish is that true George Conway John Dean no I don't think I don't think they're all Jewish but the fact that there were a lot of lawyers who are also Jewish is not not the biggest surprise in the world no I don't think they're all Jewish um so the Tik Tock so they're calling it a ban but it's not uh so the Tik Tock Bill apparently get is going to make it to the president's desk and he's going to sign it now I think this is a total fake I don't think Tik tok's going to disappear one of two things is going to happen they've got a year to fight it in court and they'll either win in court and it will stay just the way it is or um it will be divested to an American company purely for the purpose of our own CIA having a back door to it so that instead of China having all our private information and being able to control us and brainwash us our own country will be able to have all of our personal information and usage and who we're connected to and also uh brainwashes I'm not entirely sure that's an upgrade now I I of course have been one of the most uh um vocal proponents of banning Tik Tok but only if you're really going to ban it if all you're doing is putting the CIA in charge of it it's just you're just changing the warden you didn't let anybody out of jail I want I want people to get out of jail I'm not looking for a different reward that that's buying me nothing so I think that the the public has been duped into thinking something has happened and and your Congress is finally acting and you know there's things and processes and I don't think anything is happening it's either going to go right back to the way it was because of some you know court case or it's going to be worse because our CIA will be in charge of it I don't know doesn't look good to me um and the thing that the thing that makes me most suspicious is that it went from having no support to suddenly everybody loved it and it got you know put into a bill that you couldn't resist or at least Congress couldn't resist that to me that just looks like our intelligence people decided it was time to make a play and they just made a play to own the thing and remember where Constantine said hey I don't think you can say America is the bad guy in every war I think the I think America just stole one of China's biggest companies or at least the American Business part of it I don't know you know I don't think China should have been in control obviously but I don't think we're the good guys all right um according to the Gateway pundit the headlines are sort of missing this story that stormmy Daniels owes Trump 300,000 plus interest for her false claims she made against him so storby Daniels is actually paying Trump for false claims made against them the courts have ruled at the same time Trump's in court for uh what an accounting thing that nobody can even understand why it's illegal literally the experts are I don't even know why this is illegal I I don't even understand it so of course that's anyway um Elon Musk was commenting on a graph that I think uh was going around that showed that U around 205 is I wonder what was happening about then the words racism and racist and race were used in newspapers uh up 361 to 700% starting around 2014 is actually so as Elon mus says this graph illustrates the woke mind virus taking over Legacy Media uh same happened with online media and the education system than is spread to other countries and here's what I say I don't think there's any force that will make wokeness go away and I I think our uh our impression that it's being beaten back is because if you read a lot of right leaning Republican kind of news sources they're always you know trumpeting the anecdotal story of this University or this Texas place got rid of uh Dei and stuff like that but I think it's growing faster than it's being reduced that's my sense of it we just see the stories where it's being reduced we don't see all the times that somebody added their di you know added the DI staff so I don't think it's correcting itself at all um but there is a force that could correct it and it might be forming up it hasn't kicked off yet so there was a court case recently I think it was the Supreme Court that said that uh white people could sue for discrimination in employment now we haven't seen a big wave of that but given that uh Steven Miller has that America First fund which seems to be designed exactly for this sort of thing which is to push individual cases that have a you know larger political Dimension to them and what I'd love to see is the funding for that backing a bunch of uh anti-white discrimination cases because if it becomes impossible to be in business and discriminate against white people because it's just too expensive the trial lawyers and the insurance companies just eat you up that could change things I don't think anything changes until it's expensive so here where I might disagree with Elon Musk that uh that people will just sort of see the I'm not sure what mechanism he thinks would reverse it so I won't I won't read his mind but the only mechanism that reverses anything is money nothing else really makes a difference it's just money and even when it looks like is not money it's money right because if somebody's let's say defending the reputation right that's kind of money really so as soon as it gets too expensive to discriminate against white people which has never been the case it's always been easy and it would be easier to discriminate against white people than it would be to explain why you don't have enough diversity so as soon as it becomes more expensive to screw white people there'll be less of it but we're not there yet all right um I I said again provocatively and I'm going to tell you this story only because the persuasion element of it because you you've heard it before uh as you know the ADL came after me and the head of the ADL accused me of being a Holocaust denier in public now I don't have to defend myself from that because you should be wise enough to know that's not a thing I'm obviously not a holocaust Den now they said that in public about me now the ADL is going after a number of other people in similarly specious ways and what I've said is that I don't support Israel uh because the ADL is my enemy and then I also say because I know how people respond that I say yes I know they don't report to Israel yes I know the ADL does not report to Israel but that's not my problem now how many of you think that what I say doesn't make sense in the comments does it not make sense when I say I don't support Israel because the ADL who is not who is not funded by Israel that came after me soes that makes sense now remember I said that um Israel doesn't own the ADL they don't control them but that's not my problem yeah no my problem is that uh a substantial entity that has offices in Israel and they say that their uh mission is this is from the adl's own words the ADL Works to support a secure Jewish and Democratic state of Israel living in peace and security and for decades they've worked to secure Israel and Democratic State promote a strong and constructive us Israel relationship so to me that's the ADL working for Israel now if you say but Israel doesn't control them then I say let me introduce you to the real world may I if Israel kicked their ass out of Israel and said you're embarrassing us so badly that you can't have an office Israel you're just making us look like idiots do you think the ADL could survive that if Israel said hey just for the record we want to say this once the ADL does not represent us they see they're a disreputable organization and we disavow them do you think the ADL could survive that well the management couldn't the ADL probably could but the management couldn't they'd have to change management so when I say I don't support the nation of Israel because the ADL went after me does that sound crazy it's not my problem that they don't directly pay the ADL it's true but that's not my problem here's the thing if somebody on your team who is so on your team that they've got an office in your country and their entire mission one of the the Topline mission statements is to make sure that that other country is doing fine they're working for the same team and if somebody on your team is trying to destroy me which they are the ADL tried very hard then no I do not back Israel and don't ask me to all right so I don't care if Israel fixes it but just don't ask me to help now you might say to yourself um Scott how much were you backing Israel before which is a good question do you think that there's anything I do or have done that has any impact on Israel in any meaningful way in the comments give me your give me your opinion do you think that it means anything or is it just you know talking on Twitter or X well here's what I think it would depend if you thought I had some uh influence on the region or if you thought I was authoring the simulation it might matter um but at the moment I think that the ADL is destroying the reputation of Israel and uh that's not my fault all right as long as the ADL and Israel are joined at the hip um I don't support the nation of Israel now I'm not I'm not supporting their destruction and I'm not supporting the the enemies of Israel and I'm not you know I wasn't donating before but I definitely don't think the United States should give them any money now one of the arguments I heard is that uh David boxing hor makes this argument that if uh we didn't fund Israel with the requirement that they buy our weapons then Israel would create its own weapons manufacturing because of course they would need weapons and then we wouldn't have as much influence over them because they would be independently making their own weapons instead of relying on us to which I say there's a pretty big advantage on relying on us for weapons the biggest one is it it's not easy to bomb our one Factory if Israel had some weapons making factories there would probably be two or three that if you took them man of operation they would be completely out of weapons but the United States probably is harder to get to meaning that if the weapons are here and we ship them to Israel it's probably a safer weapons you know situation so it's a complicated situation but I don't I don't favor uh any American money going to Israel as long as they have a better debt situation than we do as long as the ADL is after me so I think Israel has to live with the bad reputation of the ADL at a time when they're getting a lot of um a lot of pressure from the outside world I do think Israel is giving up their Holocaust chip um it will never be the same after this and that doesn't mean it's the wrong choice from their perspective so let me give you the the uh my real opinion of the whole Hamas Gaza Israel situation I think anybody who's picking the moral Winning Side is probably in some kind of a losing conversation because we first of all we don't have any influence at least I don't I I have no influence over that so my take is it's like gravity my my take on the region is that whoever's in charge is going to be the warden and whoever is not in charge is going to be in jail if you were to reverse the situation the Israelis would feel like they're in jail even if it's not true and it would look like the wardens were the Palestinians currently it looks like Israel has the most power and whether it's an accurate statement of what's happening or not the the Palestinians feel like they're in jail and the Israelis are the warden if that's not going to change and it's not then what you're then what you're watching is is just a a power Dynamic playing out so to have an opinion on it feels to me like I'm holding a rock in my hand and I let go of the rock should I have an opinion about whether the rock will fall to Earth I could have an opinion but it would be absurd the only thing that makes sense is just to watch it just observe it because you know it's going to go and now it's gravity and has nothing to do with your opinion so when I watch things in the Middle East I think oh I think I should add my opinion to this for what it's just gravity whoever is the strongest entity is going to it's going to feel like the weaker entity is being abused even if it's not true and the reason is that the systems are incompatible and they can never be compatible there is no way that those those groups the Islamic population and the Jewish population are going to find a way to live together in peace with two two countries next to each other to imagine that could happen seems so disconnected from reality that these are people who by their their Central belief system can't possibly get along in the way that you imagine people of the same belief system could I I think we make the mistake of thinking Well it can't be that different from a red and the blue State and yet we find ways to live together next to each other no it's not like that at all it's not even slightly like that the American system we can disagree with each other but we know we're under the same system right the constitution in theory is the umbrella under which we're all arguing so we're all trying to be the better versions of adhering to the Constitution you maybe sometimes you want to tweak it but you're still talking talking about how can we be the better version of a constitutional you know citizenship nothing like that's happening over in the Middle East in the Middle East there are two incompatible systems that can never be compatible and there's only going to be a winner and a loser and at the moment Israel has the upper hand to have an opinion on that would be like having an opinion on gravity it's just what it is it's it's just what it is now the opinion I can have is not to associate my own brand or reputation with it because again I don't have anything to do with it so if I if I embraced it then I'm giving something away for free for nothing I I would be giving away my reputational value what little it has for nothing it wouldn't make them more successful or less but it would make me a victim of whatever you know abuse I got for having an opinion on it so I don't support Israel but I don't support their enemies I love the Jewish people you know my personal relationships have always been amazing with Jewish citizens as well as Israeli citizens um probably one of my favor favorite demographic groups I say that just because some of you are anti-semitic and it'll make you mad but yeah but historically um everything from dating to my best friends I I've been very heavily weighted toward the Jewish population because I like smart people is that okay I like smart people and uh they're real lot of educated Jewish people and it's fun to talk to smart people all right um that ladies and gentlemen is what I had for you to today I don't know if uh the rumble studio is going to let me talk privately to the locals people but I'm going to give it a try um I've refreshed my browser situation so it might work this time let's give it a try thanks for joining on Rumble and x and You.
Tube let's see if this works all right local supporters only maybe uh nope looks like everybody's still here hey everybody um I'm sure they'll get that bug fix that that that feature had work every day until a few days ago all right uh no you don't have the drinking bleach article that's the first draft but thank you thank you for asking about it all right that's all for now um I'm going to end and uh I'll talk to the uh locals people later in the man cave all right uh just start an after show stream now you'll hate it if I start another stream all right that's it for today I'll see you all in the morning and the locals people I'll see you in the man cave tonight bye for now let's see if this really closes e e e e e e e
good morning everybody and welcome to
the highlight of human civilization it's
called coffee with Scott Adams I'm
pretty sure you've never had a better
time today I'm going to attempt to get
through the entire show with no cursing
whatsoever I know maybe I didn't do so
well yesterday if you know what I mean
but today no cursing
and if you'd like to take your
experience up to that level of
godliness there's nothing else you could
call it all you need for that is a
coverer mug glass a tanker chel s a
canteen Jugger flask a vessel of any
kind fill it with your favorite liquid I
like coffee enjoy me now for the
unparallel pleasure the dopamine here
the day thing that makes everything
better it's called the simultaneous
siping happens now go
well ladies and
gentlemen if you were a subscriber to
the Dilbert reborn comic on the
xplatform or you were a member of the
locals Community Scott adam. locals you
would know that Tina the tech writer is
being replaced by AI but in the ultimate
insult the ultimate employee
insult Tina will be asked to train her
AI replacement
yeah it's probably one of the number one
suggestions I get from people when they
when I ask for Dilbert ideas you know
hey is anything bothering you at your
workplace the the one I get more than
any other one well actually the one I
get the
most is people uh leaving smelly things
in microwaves but I can't write comics
about smells it just kind of doesn't
work
and and they talk about Ste in food from
the refrigerator because those are like
the simplest dumbest comic ideas but the
other one is people being fired or
replaced and being asked to train their
replacement now imagine if you had to
train AI as your replacement is that
better or is that worse I don't know
we'll explore that in the dber comic
well I got to tell you about something
that happened to me in the simulation
yesterday for about
I don't know several years
now probably at least once a day I've
said to myself you know what I should
sit down and I should dedicate a whole
bunch of my time to writing up what the
uh the drinking bleach hoax was how it
was executed and really do a good job on
it so yesterday um I fell asleep working
during the afternoon which is not
uncommon I woke up next to my laptop as
I often do in my man cave
and uh I really don't sleep enough I
think that's probably the bottom line
there and I felt all inspired suddenly
and I said darn it I'm going to write
this up and so I I I put three hours of
the most inspired best writing of my
life and I wrote up the whole bleach
drinking hoax and if I'm being honest
about my own work it's just some of the
best work I've ever done my
life and after years of thinking about
it every day and thinking I've got to do
this for the world and it could change
it could change the really the course of
history and when I was done I looked at
it and I said
damn this thing is going to be super
viral like everybody's going to read
this it's going to uncover the entire
technique of creating hoaxes tell people
how they fell for it show them very
clearly that it was a hoax and it was
going to be one of the three 10 pole
hoaxes and when I was done and I hit uh
publish there was a technical bug that
ate it and it's gone
forever
so sometimes the simulation has its own
plan
apparently do you get a preview no it's
gone forever it's literally gone just a
technical problem and
I don't know if I can do it
again so here will be the interesting
part I tend to think that things like
this have some kind of a weird purpose
to them because I can't think of the
last time I lost a
document do you remember the last time
you lost a document after you'd finished
it it's almost something that doesn't
happen in the modern you know
technological World very rare but it's
definitely gone and I thought to myself
there must be some reason I'm not
allowed to do
this now I you know obviously I don't
see any specific mechanism to to make
that happen but it's really a weird
coincidence that the most important
thing I've written in years by far you
know the the most consequential thing
that would actually had put a big you
know dent in the whole
world
disappeared I just don't know how to
explain that it's just such a weird
coincidence so here's what here's what
we'll watch
for does it mean that I was meant to
rewrite
it
better what do you
think is The Universe telling me it
wasn't good enough and I have to do it
better because it's that important or is
The Universe telling me don't do
it or is it nothing but a coincidence I
don't know I don't think the human brain
knows how to sort out this stuff but
I'll let you know if I write
it
anyway I do I did have an earlier draft
of it so I might be able to put it back
together uh Thomas Massie tells us that
the house Sergeant at Arms wants to find
him $500 maybe a day per day for having
a post on X that shows a video of the
house and all the and a number of the
members waving Ukrainian Flags during
the vote about the Ukrainian
funding now do you think that the uh
house Sergeant at Arms has the authority
to find him because of something he
posted on
X well apparently that there's some kind
of rule that says you can't have a video
of you know the proceedings
inside and if it was his own video and
he took it and then he posted it that
probably would be a violation
on the other hand it does seem like
absolutely legitimate
news and I would be very happy to see it
so of course I reposted it to make sure
that more people saw it and I'd like to
make an offer to Thomas Massie that uh
if it turns out that he's going to pay
$500 a day I will I will pay for one of
those days so I'll pledge $500 if it
gets
fined I I'll pay $500 to you know either
to his camp campaign or something so I
I'll try to make sure that he's uh the
blow is softened right and if anybody
else wants to commit to paying for a day
um you can pay for your free speech
because Free Speech costs uh let's see
free speech costs $500 a day for free
speech
yeah well California my state has so
much solar power it turns out that uh
during the
day um there's more solar power than
there is demand for it now we still have
overall there's an energy problem
because it's not balanced but so many
people in California took the government
government rebates and everything and
put solar on their house that when we
get that afternoon baking sun we're
actually creating more energy than we're
using that's kind of amazing isn't it I
mean it's bad and good at the same time
so 25% of our electricity is now from
solar you know this is one of those
things that kind of it's too slow and
then it happens fast you know there are
a lot of things like that it's like God
it's slow it's slow it's
slow um and then it's fast so maybe
we'll have a lot of solar here really
fast did you hear Biden's latest Gaff if
it's a gaff at
all he was saying in his speech about
Trump but he talked about himself
accidentally he said how many times does
he have to prove weak can't be
trusted how many times does Trump have
to have to prove that Biden's
Administration can't be trusted well I
don't know how many times will it take
he still has half of the country on his
side so apparently it's not
enough well I don't know if we should
make anything of that other than Biden's
brain is toast and everybody knows
it Constantine kissen who you know from
trigonometry um very fun and smart
commentator on world events has
introduced a new word into our
vocabulary the retardo
sphere the retarda sphere all right I'm
just going to read you what he said
because it's kind of funny the way he
puts
it so Constantine kissen says the onx
the leftwing sphere was created
by sensible people on the left being
silent when they should have said
something the right-wing spere
is being formed in exactly the same way
and he says stop sending me DMS about
how much you agree with me about the
woke right strap on a pair and say
something so that that's a little bit
different than the point he's going to
make next unless you want to be on the
side that thinks evolution is quote just
a theory I.E doesn't understand what a
theory is in science sees America as the
bad guy in every war and wants to stop
women voting so that that would be his
description of the right-wing retardo
spere would be people who think
evolution is just a theory uh meaning in
in their uh view of it is not real and
sees America as a bad guy in every war
and wants to stop women from
voting and then Constantine says I am I
am not right-wing but the last thing I
want is for the left and right to go
full at the same time and then he
says truth is King in all caps
well may I uh take a moment to defend
the retardo
spere would you like that are there any
members of the sphere here who
who would uh is there anybody here who
would identify with not fully accepting
Evolution seeing America as the bad guy
in at least the recent Wars and thinks
that women should stop
voting is anybody in that category here
any one of
those all right A lot of people are
saying yes all right here's my take on
it and I think Constantine is is pretty
far off on his frame for
this uh I like his General
thinking you know his General thinking
is I don't want to be associated with
crazy
people that's good or irrational people
so I like the basic thrust of it but
here's what I think he might be missing
because as he says he's not rightwing so
there's some things that if you spend
more time in that sphere you get a
little Nuance on these things so I'm
going to give a little Nuance that may
may not be obvious to the Casual
traveler okay number one the part about
Evolution being just a theory yes it is
embarrassing when somebody says they
don't believe in evolution because it's
quote just a theory if I can educate you
on one thing it's that people who
understand science will think you're a
if you say something's not proven
because it's just a theory because in
the scientific realm Theory means it is
proven hypothesis means it's not proven
Theory means there's so much evidence
for it you might as well just call it a
fact but because science doesn't like to
commit itself knowing that sometimes
even a fact or something they thought
was absolutely true can sometimes be
overturned
so they do keep it a little bit weak
just because you never know what a fact
is for
sure um but it is not true that theory
means they're not quite sure about it
they're very very sure about it and
that's what the word theory means in
their domain so get that part right just
know that in common language Theory
means unproven but in scientific
language it means very very much proven
does everybody know that
now again it doesn't mean they're right
I'm just telling you what the words mean
in their domains you know we'll talk
about who's right separately okay so get
that right because you will sound like a
bad debater if you get that that word
usage wrong that's a real red flag for
somebody who's who's going to mock you
for not understanding science however it
is a very common um it's a common
misunderstanding and I think I I don't
think that anybody disbelieves the
theory of evolution because the word
theory is used would you agree with that
there's nobody who disbelieves it simply
because they use the word theory so for
Constantine to point that out as
something he wants to
mock I don't really think that's
something anybody actually believes I
think they disbelieve Evolution for a
reason that I'll talk about could be a
right reason could be a bad reason I'm
not saying it's a good or bad reason but
I'm saying it has nothing to do with the
word so if you think that anybody has
this belief because they didn't know how
to use this word correctly in the domain
of science that's a complete
misdirection it's just really they're
using the word wrong has nothing to do
with their actual opinion of the the
topic it's just the word so I would say
that that's not a fair statement but I
think the larger point if I could read
between the lines I'm not a mind reader
but I think what he means is more the
general idea that Revolution is proven
according to
science and that if you say you're not
buying it you're being sort of
anti-science in a way that so
that seems to be Constantine's point but
I would like to offer the
following
counterpoints number one when tuer
Carlson who really got this whole
conversation going when tuer Carlson
says doesn't believe in evolution
Because he believes that God made us do
you think that Tucker regards that as a
scientific fact that God made
us I think what maybe Constantine is
missing is that this is what i' call a
lifestyle
belief a lifestyle belief it's not in
the domain of what's true or false it's
a choice based on
faith the the reason there's a word
faith is because it's very distinct from
I looked at the facts and Science guided
me so to me when I see Tucker say that
uh he has a belief that God made it to
me that's a lifestyle choice to have
that
worldview I don't think that's the same
as not thinking evolution is real to me
those are different concepts so I think
you have to understand that some people
make a choice to accept an entire let's
say philosophy because following the
philosophy has worldly benefits meaning
it helps you today and maybe helps you
go to heaven if you think that's part of
the
plan so when I look at Christians let's
say the the Tucker types who believe
that God created the earth I say to
myself well I don't know if you've got
the mechanism right but I'm not so I'm
not so I don't lack so much humility
that I think I know the answer so I
think there's a little lack of humility
when you say I know the answer of how we
all got here and you got it wrong so
that bothers me a little
bit but I think you have to understand
that religious faith is not trying to
compete with science it's more like if I
buy this entire package I can see that
it works While I'm Alive it might even
work after I'm dead if I go to heaven so
it's really just a a choice about what
works and I don't think you should fact
check
it I'm not going to fact check the
Muslims right I mean I used to think
that was something I could do it's like
huh I'm not so sure that Muhammad went
to heaven on a flying
horse don't bother it's not a scientific
discussion it is a lifestyle choice to
accept a worldview which has a certain
set of advantages right here on
Earth so um I feel that that has to be
said then there's a question uh is
America the bad guy in every war well I
think the word every is you know a
little bit hyperbole but I do believe
the that America is the bad guy in
recent Wars is
that is there anything wrong with that
opinion it does seem to me that our
recent Wars are driven by
energy and the military industrial
complex and stuff like that you know the
Atlantic Council whatever I don't think
we have any kind of a democracy where
we're going to save the save the world
for Freedom we don't care about anybody
else's
Freedom we could give a oh I almost did
it I'm not going to curse we don't care
about the freedom in other countries we
will work with their dictator just fine
yeah do you think we have a problem with
the uh the kingship of uh the royal
family in Jordan no no the royal family
in Jordan are awesome
and we seem to like him and get along
just fine no we don't need them to be a
democracy as long as are on our team
well that's fine so no I do think that
America is the bad guy but I'll give a
little bit of nuance on that as
well I'm not sure being the bad guy is
the worst thing it could
be it could be that being a good guy is
the worst thing you can do CU being a
good guy makes you weak and probably get
destroyed by somebody who's more of a
bad guy I I feel like in the real world
when you get outside of the you know the
philos
philosophical that the the baddest
player tends to be in charge and you're
probably better off being on the same
team roughly speaking as the baddest
player in the game so I think America is
usually the baddest of the bad but being
on the team of the bad guys when they're
winning it might be your best bet for
survival so I think you can be on the
bad team and also say it's good for
you so I think I think that's fair to
say but no America is not always the
good guy and everything we say about why
we do what we do is all
Bs would you agree the reasons we give
like oh we're going to save your
democracy oh we got to make sure those
dominoes don't fall all the Communists
are going to come and get you none of
that's real that's completely made up
it's always about money and energy and
Military and you know and all that but
as I say again keeping our economy
Strong by raping other countries seems
to be a good business model and it does
keep us safer so it's a complicated
world and how about this one uh uh the
and the sphere uh wants to stop
women from
voting how serious do you think that is
now I see that a lot it's like a a
common thing but has a lot to do with
the Democrats you know being largely a
party of women and a lot of the Bas
crazy things are seem to be driven by
women but I don't think anybody's
serious about
that I mean not when I say not anybody
there are a few people who act like
they're serious about it I don't think
so yeah I I don't think they're super
serious about it so I think Constantine
may you know as he says he's not
rightwing
so he may see these things as a little
more serious than they are little more
serious but more to the
point if when you say truth is King in
all capitals there's sort of a
suggestion there that you know what the
truth is and the other people got it
wrong how's that sit with
you let let me let's talk about
evolutionary biology that uh science got
right now if got it
right wouldn't that be really unique in
science to be right we know that 50% of
the studies can't be
reproduced um I'm pretty sure that
climate change is completely BS if you
look at the
models I'm pretty sure that the field of
psychology is probably more BS than
that I'm pretty sure the string theory
is not going to pan
out I don't think physicists can really
explain any of the things that they're
talking about but the math works you
know and sometimes the experiment will
will prove they were right but I don't
think they know what's going on I don't
I don't think they can explain the
double slit experiment without using
words that just sound
crazy so you know uh chemistry is
probably pretty solid because you can
you know run the experiment and see if
it works and Engineering is solid so
we're real good at well not we but
people some people were're not
are good at making rockets that can
maybe go tomorrow someday but that's
engineering right
science is as close to completely broken
as anything has ever been so it feels
almost an outof dat opinion to say that
truth is King and believe the science we
just came out of a pandemic believing
the science sounds like the dumb view at
this point and so I'd like to suggest
that the people are saying that they
know which science is correct because
science is good and they've got all
these facts I'd like to suggest that I'm
not sure that's the smartest take in
2024 in 2024 I think everything that
can't be proven in an experiment on a
table like
chemistry is probably
BS it's there's a far greater chance is
not true now I got dragged into this
Evolution thing because I said the
following I said that uh
the survival of the fitness or I'm sorry
survival what do they call it natural
selection I said in a post that natural
selection was no longer believed by most
uh
scientists now of course the people who
believe that they knew scientists jumped
all over me and said what are you
talking about natural selection is
believed by almost all
scientists to which I said I probably
should have said uh survival the fittest
because if you're not aware of this one
of the most famous evolutionary
biologist types Stephen J
Gould um he was famous for having shown
that survival of the fittest in its most
narrow sense wasn't a good explanation
of what was happening in other words it
wasn't just that you competed better so
you survived but there were a whole
bunch of things that could cause you to
survive that were not directly related
to how fit you were as a
competitor sometimes it was just
luck sometimes you just happened to be
where there weren't any competitors so
you weren't like especially fit to
compete you just didn't need to compete
now other people say Scott Scott Scott
you using compete to
narrowly if if there's a limit to
resources you're at the very least
competing for the limited resources and
if the resources are not limited at the
moment if your population keeps growing
eventually you hit a limit and then you
will be competing for
resources but there are these other
these other elements like luck that
could be part of it as
well now here's what I
say and see if this blows your brain
up what does natural selection mean if
it means all of those things that are
part of the natural
process so what's it
mean it doesn't mean anything
so the me the mechanism to describe
evolution is that hey it looks like
things
changed these things are part of nature
so it's natural
selection so nature selected what the
outcome was how could that not be the
case what would be the alternative to
Nature causing it to be the way it
is and to me that's such a broad
explanation that it doesn't mean
anything uh all it is is an observation
that here we
are do do you get
that natural natural selection doesn't
mean anything because it means
everything if it applies to everything
in nature had to happen just the way it
did to get us to just where we
are it's not really talking about
anything
and and so here I note that the change
was from you know this narrow definition
of fitness to some wider definition of
you know VAR number of variables
involved in my opinion that's a complete
change in going from a specific
mechanism to just saying I don't know
just look
nature now I know what you're going to
say when what the scientists will say
Scott Scott
Scott I feel so bad for you when you
talk about science because you don't
know what's going on and you just don't
understand all the sciencey things
but I do have a long track record of
calling BS on fields in which I don't
know anything about them and my track
record is really good like really really
good at calling
BS this to me looks kind of like BS now
I'm not doubting that things change over
time unless we're as simulation but I do
think that if you talk about uh people
being dumb for in uh Evolution you kind
of have to mention that the simulation
is about a billion times more likely
than Evolution and if the simulation is
true then evolution is just another
illusion within the simulation so it's
not true it's just an illusion and
probably that the history gets created
on demand as opposed to the other way
around anyway so Constantine who's uh
one of the uh more
valuable I think public figures and
thinkers um everybody has a blind spot
and I think if you're not in an in group
you almost always have a blind spot for
you know the Nuance of the
reasoning so there I'm discovered I'm a
defending the sphere
um all right so the Gateway pundit
giving us more details on this judge
Cannon and the unredacted documents from
Jack Smith in his investigation into the
moral Lago um
boxes so apparently according to the
Gateway pundit some of the things that
were redacted but now we can
see uh is that uh revealed that Biden's
White House had Direct ties to the maral
Lago raid the Biden regime was also
directly tied to Jack Smith's
investigation despite claims to the
contrary from meric Garland the uh uh
Mir Garland
and and uh the redactions also covered
up that uh the National Archives had had
several conversations with the Biden
white
house so the whole question was Trump
keeps saying that Biden is you know the
Biden Administration is orchestrating
all the lawfare and everybody oh no what
are you talking about I've seen no
evidence of that whatsoever yes you've
seen no evidence of it because it was
redacted and now we've seen it
apparently there's lots of evidence that
the uh that the Biden White House is
directly connected to all these lawfare
situations so it's exactly what it looks
like it's a lawfare it's completely
illegal immoral
illegitimate and probably there's
nothing will happen about it because the
people in charge are the bad guys and if
the bad guys are also the ones in charge
nothing's going to happen nothing's
going to happen about that probably one
of the biggest uh Crimes of the century
is the lawfare against Trump uh and the
January 6 committee probably the biggest
uh Rico conspiracy that I've ever seen
will be not I don't think it'll be
punished at all not at
all all
right
um all right here's a persuasion
expert Jonah berer and he was on some
Show recently uh teaching people this
following persuasion
trick and he he used the example of a
five-year-olds you were trying to give
five-year-olds to help clean up clean up
the house or clean up their space or
something and the technique um using a
Stanford University study well this it
was a Stanford University study about
5-year-olds if you say to them uh can
you help help
clean you'll get a lower um cooperation
than if you word it this way instead of
can you help clean you say can you be a
helper and clean up if you say can you
be a helper you're giving somebody the
option of accepting an identity when
people accept an identity then they act
on the identity it's automatic if you if
you ask them to do something they
compare it to their identity and if it's
not in their identity they don't do
it so this is a technique which I've
also talked about but I call it the uh
the Jesus
persuasion Jesus persuasion is telling
you that you could be a better
person so it's encouraging you to adopt
an
identity as a more moral and virtuous
person than you were before you heard
the you know before you heard your lord
talk to you so it's very appealing to
say to somebody hey how would you like
to upgrade your identity from you know
peasant who has nothing going for you to
believer who has a higher moral standard
and is going to happen and you think I
wouldn't mind being one of those and
then once you become one all of the all
the activities that go with it just come
automatically all right now do you
understand why I uh register as a
different party from what I usually
Advocate does that make sense now does
do you understand why I'm not a joiner I
don't join groups because as soon as you
join a group and identify in a real way
you know I I register as a Democrat but
I don't mean it so it's not my
identity so I try to avoid having an
identity because the moment you have an
identity it causes all actions to
conform and that's what team play does
so if you say to somebody you're a
Democrat they're going to start acting
like one even if they were not inclined
to before identity creates
activity so you gota you got to change
somebody's identity if you want them to
change their behavior almost nothing
else works because people don't act
against their identity like if you think
you're an honest person you don't rob a
bank right it it it's pretty much a
direct a direct effect if you think
you're an academic you're probably more
likely to go to school right what
whatever you think you are you're likely
to do that thing so this is a really
really good
persuasion uh
technique now let's apply
it let's say you're a Republican and you
want Republicans to vote do you say make
sure you
vote no no no cuz make sure you
vote is telling you what to do it's not
no identity now compare that to
this be one of the people who saves
America help us save America
vote oh now you get a little identity do
you want to be a savior do you want to
do you want to be like the Boston Tea
Party do you want to be a patriot you
know P Patriots a word that not
everybody's comfortable with but it's an
identity now the identity that I uh have
most accepted in the past is
Patriot because I think wow you know I I
just want to be on the side of the
people who are on the side of the
country but lately when given that half
of the country canceled me I I was asked
recently um somebody was giving me a
hard time um on some point and they said
but oh because I said something about
Israel and they said but you wouldn't
say you're uh that you don't support
America just because America does some
bad things with you to which I said huh
America canel
me half of it so no I don't support
America America canceled me the current
system which I call America ganged up on
me identified me discriminated against
me and has been discriminating against
me in employment for over 30 years I've
lost four different careers for being a
white guy so why would I support that I
do not support America that's my current
brand new opinion and I think I was you
know largely hypnotized that I ever did
here's what I
support you I support you citizens who
did not cancel me
period because you're actually good
people and I like good people and I like
most of the things that you like and I
identify with you I'm definitely one of
you and I'm completely on your team but
America was lost decades ago so to say
that I support America would say that
I'm in some kind of a
brainwashed you know gooner situation in
which I'm like Oh waave my flag nope
unfortunately I've been far too
blackpilled to say I support the
brainwashing collection of things which
our masters have given to us I support
the citizens and there are a number of
things I support like freedom of speech
for example and second amendment for
example so I definitely support those
things and there's a whole bunch of
stuff in the Constitution that I think
is terrific so I'm I'm Pro
Constitution but do I support the
government no the government is my enemy
and I mean that literally the government
is my enemy I mean the government has
decided I'm their enemy and has
weaponized its own resources against me
personally personally yeah I've
experienced it in a personal way so no
I'm not going to be on the side of my
enemy because my enemy is literally
trying to destroy me my government is
trying to put me out of business and
they tried really hard they just
couldn't try harder than they did
without you know an overreach
so they did it the clever way they can
through their you know
minions so now don't ask me to salute
the flag or even stand for it I I don't
I don't believe I would even stand for
this the Pledge of Allegiance at this
point because I think it's absurd I I
think the country is so far from any
image of America that was the kind that
you hold in your mind as the good one
the one you wanted to support we're so
far from that I mean the Biden
Administration is just a criminal
Enterprise the CIA has been running the
show since probably the 50s or 60s we're
nothing like a Democratic Republic
nothing like that and we are being
robbed every day so that richer people
can sell weapons to people basically so
no I don't support any of
that all right fake protest season is
coming as you all know we all expect the
big summer of fake
protests and what we don't know yet is
if the prop palis inan protesters who
some would call
pramas um we don't know if that's going
to be the summer protest or if there
might be some new one but I suspect it
will but there is a
wrinkle don't you expect that the summer
protests are always going to be sort of
pro-democrat anti-republican
that's the ones you expect right because
you think oh George Soros is funding
people he's sort of closer to the
Democrats so it's going to be sort of a
Democrat friendly protesting summer Riot
group like BML or you know in its own
way
antifa so does that apply to these
groups well I looked a little bit did
some Googling and apparently some of the
organizers of these recent protests are
funded by the Soros
organization so apparently Soros is
funding things now you'd normally think
this would work out well for Democrats
relative to Republicans but it turns out
that the protester surrounded Senate
leader Chuck Schumer's home in
Brooklyn and he's
Jewish imagine being Senator
Schumer a Jewish American and you look
out the window and a whole bunch of
people with Hamas colors and Palestinian
flags and stuff are demonstrating
against you and and uh it's not too far
not too long after October
7th how do you think how do you think
Chuck Schumer feels about that now let
me tell you I'm not politically I don't
often well a few times I have I don't
often agree with Chuck Schumer so
politically I'm not in his side
but I don't want to see anybody in my
country surrounded suspiciously because
they're
Jewish I don't think it's just because
he's the speaker of the house that feel
it feels like they're getting a twofer
there and I'm not really comfortable
with that so I wonder will the Democrats
and Soros and the people who generally
are favorable to that point of view are
they going to say we went too far and we
unleashed a force that's going to eat Us
Alive because this force is going to eat
alive the
Democrats somehow for some reason
Republicans are getting pass I guess
because ranana
power at least in the
presidency so Trump is getting a hell of
a free pass I don't know how long that's
going to last I think it has everything
to do with him being out of
power so let's uh let's keep an eye on
this uh they're asking Schumer to stop
arming
Israel and uh earlier in the day Schumer
asked thanked speaker Mike Johnson for
passing the Ukraine Israel funding Bill
all right so here's my question Mike
Johnson is not Jewish as far as I
know um Schumer is they were both
involved in passing the legislation but
the Jewish guy is
surrounded is that a
coincidence it does feel like they're
going for the
twofer doesn't it so it's a it's hard to
be comfortable with that as just free
speech I mean I guess it is Free Speech
but it's hard to feel that it's you know
purely a policy thing and not something
much much
worse
anyway so we'll keep an eye on that I
don't know if that'll become the summer
riots um but I suspect it will I just
think it might backfire it might be the
summer riots that they wish they hadn't
instigated and I remind you that there's
no such thing as spontaneous organic
protests that's really not a thing the
only way these protests happen is if
organizations that are already
founded and they've got some members and
they get funding from somebody like
Soros or some other source and then
they've got money to do something and
they've got
members and then they got something to
do but it's not like there's people just
were sitting around watching the news
and then they thought oh I think I'll go
out and protest in the streets and get
arrested now it's mostly organized
stuff um persitz had a uh opinion piece
in I think it was the Wall Street
Journal and uh he was talking about
Biden's recent Gaff where he sort of
both-sided the Israel Palestinian Hamas
situation and in so doing he he became
sort of an example of the fine people
hoax himself in other words it looked
like he was creating some kind of a
moral equivalency between Israel and the
terrorists who attacked Israel now you
could argue whether that's a correct
take or not but here's what I'd like to
say uh dtz did debunk the fine people
hoax um but he did it in such a poor way
that I have to criticize him I don't
know if I've ever criticized dtz before
in terms of his opinions because I often
call him out as one of the best you know
uh intellectuals in public and willing
to say the difficult things even if it
doesn't agree with his team so generally
I see him as you know at the highest
level of intellectual
credibility and so so I very much
appreciate that he here's what he said
I'll give you his quote so you're not
you're not listening to me say he said
quote you had some very U oh he's
talking about Trump's quote on
Charlottesville so he's quoting Trump
you had some very bad people in that
group but you also had some people that
were very fine people on both sides Mr
Trump said now this is according to dtz
he later explained meaning Trump that he
meant both sides of the debate over
whether to remove a Confederate monument
and that the anti-semitic chanters were
very bad people he had in mind he should
have been clearer from the start that's
where he lost me he should have been
clearer from the start no alen dtz
you're letting your team get a your team
of the Democrats you're letting them get
away with this too
easily this was not a case of a hoax was
created by Trump not being clear at the
very same time that he said the fine
people thing he said a few things and
then within I think 60 seconds he said
and I'm not talking about the
neo-nazis they should be condemned
totally now that is the clearest
statement anybody ever made about
anything and for El dtz to say he should
have been clearer from the start is G a
total pass to the bad guys on his team
on his team the bad guys who turned it
into propaganda he should have said this
was never a thing he was very clear that
he wasn't talking about him and the bad
guys his team turned it into a hoax that
changed the nature of America and has
almost destroyed it now that's a fair
assessment
anyway um and then he went on to say
Biden had this week his own moment of
unclarity well I think it is fair to say
that Biden was
unclear which also is not a full
condemnation of what he said because I I
think that there's a little bit of
piling on because of the piling on at
Charlesville but uh I think Biden was
unclear but Trump was not unclear and I
don't think you should draw an
equivalent between them alen dtz who I
have much respect for intellectually I
think you just got this completely
wrong uh there's uh saw a post and some
data from was it n Wess I think the
account and Wess um that the number of
here's a demographic breakdown of men
and women uh Democrat versus
Republican so uh the Democrats in
married men they have 39 % are married
are married men so less than half are
married men married women 42% so less
than half or fewer than half which is
correct fewer than half or less than
half is there any pedantic
people is it less than half or fewer
than
half or both it might be one of those
cases where both works because sometimes
only one is the proper way but we don't
often call that out anyway so whichever
it is then unmarried men 45% again less
than half so the only demographic that
Democrats have the majority in of the
married and unmarried men and women
stuff is
68% of the single women are Democrats
68% of single women are Democrats now
without being unkind and referring to
Scientific data single women and liberal
single women in particular are known to
be especially batshit crazy meaning
literally they seek the therapy the most
they're literally the most
miserable
uh um
depressed mentally ill group and I don't
know how much longer we can go without
calling it out for what it is because
we're pretending we have a political
difference it's not a political
difference when one of you has a mental
illness and I think I've called it down
enough that you can see it when you see
the the women the Democrat women on TV
not all of them there are plenty of them
that don't fall into this category but
don't you notice that they look mentally
ill can't you tell just by looking at
them and again I'm not saying all
Democrats or anything like that but
there's a ton of women who are Democrats
who when they talk you look at their
eyes and their expression and all you
see is mental illness and to continue
ignoring the
obvious that we have a mental illness
problem that is pretending to be a
political
philosophy um I think is not helping us
at all so we should call it out for what
it is you know uh Constantine calls it
uh um what do you call it the uh
sphere but I think that's
giving it too much credit if you call it
the sphere you're you're sort
of acting like you were born that way
but I think that TDS has literally made
people
crazy which means it's not necessarily
their own fault so I have some sympathy
for the mentally ill Democrats because I
do think that they were propagandized so
hard by their own team that Trump is
Hiller that the idea that there's you
know something like an equal number of
Americans who want Hitler according to
their view of the world that's got to be
the most distressing depressing saddest
alarming thing I could ever imagine put
yourself in their
position you're you're a single woman
and you've been told and you believed it
that an actual Hitler was coming into
office to take away your democracy and I
don't know turn you into baby makers or
something yeah that would be of course
that would make you mentally ill why
wouldn't it so I'm not sure there's
anybody to blame except the the
propaganda people on the Democrat side
have destroyed the mental health of
their own team the Republicans were able
to withstand the propaganda do you know
why can you tell me why the
propaganda that the Democrats completely
mentally Disturbed their own people why
did it have little to no effect on
Republicans tell me you know the answer
why did it have little or no effect on
Republicans no not because Republicans
have more men although they do it's not
that critical thinking
no they get both sides
no news better news no they knew was
fake no guns no BS detector no media
okay
I must be the worst teacher in the
history of teachers I literally just
gave you an entire lesson on why this is
happening Republicans have an
identity so their identity is completely
uh protective against Democrat
propaganda Democrat propaganda doesn't
work with somebody who identifies as not
a Democrat if you if you identify as
Republican their propaganda just bounces
off you you don't need better news and
better sources you don't need to see
both sides you don't need better
critical thinking but I think it's
humorous that you gave yourself all
those paths on the back all right I if
you could take a moment just take a
moment to think about the the comments
you were watching the comments at the
same time you were all patting yourself
on the back for your advantages well
it's probably because we have better
critical
thinking yeah
it's that's probably because we see the
news on both sides maybe it's because
we're not mentally ill maybe it's
because men are smarter than women and
women are emotional and they're more men
and Republicans did you see how you just
you just immediately ran to compliment
yourselves and do you know what you
complimented yourselves
on fill in the blanks what did you
compliment yourself
on your
identity yeah
you basically gave me answers that went
to your identity so your identity is you
see both sides you're logical you're not
you're not driven by emotional Spirits
you know you see things as they real
that's your identity that's not
thinking that's not reasoning that's not
facts and data that was your
identity this might be the best lesson
I've ever given because I didn't realize
that you would all fall into this trap I
didn't plan it this way but but is
anybody having a moment you're seeing
this right you're seeing it in real time
that the persuasion the persuasion rule
that identity is everything and do
something differently never works for
anybody you you just watched you you
solidify around your identity with no
regard to the facts with no regard to
the facts but you just complemented
yourself at how awesome you are in your
identity now uh if that sounded like a
criticism it shouldn't be you should
take it as a like a mind openening
moment because as I've told you before
um even though identify you know often
as far left of some of your opinions I
prefer you as
humans so my audience are the people I
would want to be around if I were ever
in
trouble I would want you guys to show up
first
you know what I mean you know if my car
is on
fire and I'm trapped in it I want all of
you to be the first ones on the scene
you get that right because you're the
ones who would pull me out at Great
personal risk that's who I want on my
team I don't need to agree with you on
your religious beliefs nope I just need
to know that if I'm in a burning car
you're the car that's going to stop
and for that same reason I will stop for
you so that's important so I'm very
bonded in terms of you know that that
Dynamic but I I try not to give myself
an identity beyond the fact that there's
some
character there's some character things
and some policy things that we're
totally in agreement
on all right um the anti-trump legal
commentators according to the Daily
Caller there's a group of the worst
people in the world according to me who
have a weekly Zoom meeting to talk about
how they can you know present the case
against Trump in the most persuasive way
so here's the here are the people who
are meeting on Zoom weekly to you know
make sure they're all on the same page
about going after Trump so you've got uh
let's see Norman Eisen he's a CNN legal
analyst you've got Bill Crystal MSNBC
legal analyst Andrew Weissman lawyer
Jeffrey
tubin Jeffrey tubin on the zoom
call it's a zoom call Jeffrey tubin on
it you're probably
wondering are you just going to let that
go Scott that there's a zoom
call with a bunch of lawyers who are
anti-trump and one of them's Jeffrey
tubin
am I just going to let that
go also has Lawrence tribe former Nixon
White House counsel uh um although he's
you know super Democrat at the moment um
John Dean he's a Lincoln project
co-founder George
Conway we all know George Conway and
Harry
Litman and then for some reason
Washington Post opinion writer Jennifer
Rubin is in these
meetings
so it seems to me that another way to
report this story would be that there's
a group of people who meet weekly on
Zoom to masturbate over Trump's legal
issues I think it's being led by tubin
and uh if they're not jerk buddies I
don't know who is so I'm going to refer
to them anytime I see any of these
lawyers as the jerk buddies they're just
getting on zoom and gooning over oh I
think he's going down now oh
oh tell me more about what Jack Smith
said oh redact me baby redact
it that's how I see it redact me
hard um is that
true somebody just said they're all
Jewish is that
true George
Conway John Dean
no I don't think I don't think they're
all
Jewish but the fact that there were a
lot of lawyers who are also Jewish is
not not the biggest surprise in the
world no I don't think they're all
Jewish
um so the Tik
Tock so they're calling it a ban but
it's not uh so the Tik Tock Bill
apparently get is going to make it to
the president's desk and he's going to
sign it now I think this is a total fake
I don't think Tik tok's going to
disappear one of two things is going to
happen they've got a year to fight it in
court and they'll either win in court
and it will stay just the way it is
or um it will be divested to an American
company purely for the purpose of our
own CIA having a back door to it so that
instead of China having all our private
information and being able to control us
and brainwash us our own country will be
able to have all of our personal
information and usage and who we're
connected to and also uh
brainwashes I'm not entirely sure that's
an
upgrade now I I of course have been one
of the most uh um vocal proponents of
banning Tik Tok but only if you're
really going to ban it if all you're
doing is putting the CIA in charge of it
it's just you're just changing the
warden
you didn't let anybody out of
jail I want I want people to get out of
jail I'm not looking
for a different
reward that that's buying me nothing so
I think that the the public has been
duped into thinking something has
happened and and your Congress is
finally acting and you know there's
things and processes and I don't think
anything is happening it's either going
to go right back to the way it was
because of some you know court case or
it's going to be worse because our CIA
will be in charge of
it I don't
know doesn't look good to me
um and the thing that the thing that
makes me most suspicious is that it went
from having no support to suddenly
everybody loved
it and it got you know put into a bill
that you couldn't resist or at least
Congress couldn't resist
that to me that just looks like our
intelligence people decided it was time
to make a play and they just made a play
to own the
thing and remember where Constantine
said hey I don't think you can say
America is the bad guy in every
war I think the I think America just
stole one of China's biggest
companies or at least the American
Business part of it I don't know you
know I don't think China should have
been in control obviously but I don't
think we're the good
guys all right um according to the
Gateway pundit the headlines are sort of
missing this story that stormmy Daniels
owes Trump 300,000 plus interest for her
false claims she made against him so
storby Daniels is actually paying Trump
for false claims made against them the
courts have ruled at the same time
Trump's in court for
uh what an accounting thing that nobody
can even understand why it's
illegal literally the experts are I
don't even know why this is illegal I I
don't even understand
it so of course
that's
anyway
um Elon Musk was commenting on a graph
that I think uh was going around that
showed that U around 205
is I wonder what was happening about
then the words racism and racist and
race were used in
newspapers uh up 361 to
700% starting around 2014 is
actually
so as Elon mus says this graph
illustrates the woke mind virus taking
over Legacy
Media uh same happened with online media
and the education system than is spread
to other
countries and here's what I say I don't
think there's any
force that will make wokeness go away
and I I think our uh our impression that
it's being beaten back is because if you
read a lot of right leaning Republican
kind of news sources they're always you
know trumpeting the anecdotal story of
this University or this Texas place got
rid of uh Dei and stuff like that
but I think it's growing faster than
it's being reduced that's my sense of it
we just see the stories where it's being
reduced we don't see all the times that
somebody added their di you know added
the DI
staff so I don't think it's correcting
itself at
all um but there is a force that could
correct it and it might be forming up it
hasn't kicked off yet so there was a
court case recently I think it was the
Supreme Court that said that
uh white people could sue for
discrimination in employment now we
haven't seen a big wave of that but
given that uh Steven Miller has that
America First fund which seems to be
designed exactly for this sort of thing
which is to push individual cases that
have a you know larger political
Dimension to them and what I'd love to
see is the funding for that backing a
bunch of uh anti-white discrimination
cases
because if it becomes impossible to be
in business and discriminate against
white people because it's just too
expensive the trial lawyers and the
insurance companies just eat you up that
could change things I don't think
anything changes until it's
expensive so here where I might disagree
with Elon Musk that uh that people will
just sort of see the I'm not sure what
mechanism he thinks would reverse it so
I won't I won't read his mind but the
only mechanism that reverses anything is
money nothing else really makes a
difference it's just money and even when
it looks like is not money it's money
right because if somebody's let's say
defending the
reputation right that's kind of money
really so as soon as it gets too
expensive to discriminate against white
people which has never been the case
it's always been easy and it would be
easier to discriminate against white
people than it would be to explain why
you don't have enough
diversity so as soon as it becomes more
expensive to screw white people there'll
be less of it but we're not there
yet all right um I I said again
provocatively and I'm going to tell you
this story only because the persuasion
element of it because you you've heard
it before uh as you know the
ADL came after me and the head of the
ADL accused me of being a Holocaust
denier in public now I don't have to
defend myself from that because you
should be wise enough to know that's not
a
thing I'm obviously not a holocaust Den
now they said that in public about me
now the ADL is going after a number of
other people in similarly specious ways
and what I've said is that I don't
support Israel uh because the ADL is my
enemy and then I also say because I know
how people respond that I say yes I know
they don't report to Israel yes I know
the ADL does not report to
Israel but that's not my
problem now how many of you think that
what I say doesn't make sense in the
comments does it not make sense when I
say I don't support Israel because the
ADL who is not who is not funded by
Israel that came after me soes that
makes
sense now remember I said that um Israel
doesn't own the ADL they don't control
them but that's not my
problem yeah no my problem is that uh a
substantial entity that has offices in
Israel and they say that their uh
mission is this is from the adl's own
words the ADL Works to support a secure
Jewish and Democratic state of Israel
living in peace and
security and for decades they've worked
to secure Israel and Democratic State
promote a strong and constructive us
Israel relationship so to me that's the
ADL working for
Israel now if you say but Israel doesn't
control them then I say let me introduce
you to the real world may I if Israel
kicked their ass out of Israel and said
you're embarrassing us so badly that you
can't have an office Israel you're just
making us look like
idiots do you think the ADL could
survive that if Israel said hey just for
the record we want to say this once the
ADL does not represent us they see
they're a disreputable organization and
we disavow them do you think the ADL
could survive that well the management
couldn't the ADL probably could but the
management couldn't they'd have to
change management so when I say I don't
support the nation of Israel because the
ADL went after me does that sound
crazy it's not my
problem that they don't directly pay the
ADL it's true but that's not my problem
here's the thing if somebody on your
team who is so on your team that they've
got an office in your country and their
entire mission one of the the Topline
mission statements is to make sure that
that other country is doing
fine they're working for the same team
and if somebody on your team is trying
to destroy me which they are the ADL
tried very hard then no I do not back
Israel and don't ask me to all right so
I don't care if Israel fixes it but just
don't ask me to help now you might say
to yourself um Scott how much were you
backing Israel before which is a good
question do you think that there's
anything I do or have done that has any
impact on Israel in any meaningful way
in the
comments give me your give me your
opinion do you think that it means
anything or is it just you know talking
on Twitter or
X well here's what I
think it would depend if you thought I
had some uh influence on the region or
if you thought I was authoring the
simulation it might matter um but at the
moment I think that the ADL is
destroying the reputation of Israel and
uh that's not my fault all right as long
as the ADL and Israel are joined at the
hip um I don't support the nation of
Israel now I'm not I'm not supporting
their destruction and I'm not supporting
the the enemies of
Israel and I'm not you know I wasn't
donating before but I definitely don't
think the United States should give them
any
money now one of the arguments I heard
is that uh David boxing hor makes this
argument that if uh we didn't fund
Israel with the requirement that they
buy our weapons then Israel would create
its own weapons manufacturing because of
course they would need weapons and then
we wouldn't have as much influence over
them because they would be independently
making their own weapons instead of
relying on
us to which I say there's a pretty big
advantage on relying on us for weapons
the biggest one is it it's not easy to
bomb our one
Factory if Israel had some weapons
making
factories there would probably be two or
three that if you took them man of
operation they would be completely out
of weapons but the United States
probably is harder to get to meaning
that if the weapons are here and we ship
them to Israel it's probably a safer
weapons you know situation so it's a
complicated situation but I don't I
don't favor uh any American money going
to Israel as long as they have a better
debt situation than we do as long as the
ADL is after me so I think Israel has to
live with the bad reputation of the ADL
at a time when they're getting a lot of
um a lot of pressure from the outside
world I do think Israel is giving up
their Holocaust chip um it will never be
the same after this and that doesn't
mean it's the wrong choice from their
perspective so let me give you the
the uh my real opinion of the whole
Hamas Gaza Israel
situation I think anybody who's picking
the moral Winning
Side is probably in some kind of a
losing
conversation because we first of all we
don't have any influence at least I
don't I I have no influence over that so
my take is it's like gravity my my take
on the region is that whoever's in
charge is going to be the warden and
whoever is not in charge is going to be
in jail if you were to reverse the
situation the Israelis would feel like
they're in jail even if it's not true
and it would look like the wardens were
the Palestinians currently it looks like
Israel has the most power and whether
it's an accurate statement of what's
happening or not the the Palestinians
feel like they're in jail and the
Israelis are the warden if that's not
going to change and it's not then what
you're then what you're watching is is
just a a power Dynamic playing
out so to have an opinion on it feels to
me like I'm holding a rock in my hand
and I let go of the
rock should I have an opinion about
whether the rock will fall to Earth I
could have an opinion but it would be
absurd the only thing that makes sense
is just to watch it just observe it
because you know it's going to go and
now it's gravity and has nothing to do
with your opinion so when I watch things
in the Middle East I think oh I think I
should add my opinion to this for what
it's just gravity whoever is the
strongest entity is going
to it's going to feel like the weaker
entity is being abused even if it's not
true and the reason is that the systems
are incompatible and they can never be
compatible there is no way that those
those groups the Islamic population and
the Jewish population are going to find
a way to live together in peace with two
two countries next to each other to
imagine that could happen seems so
disconnected from
reality that these are people who by
their their Central belief system can't
possibly get along in the way that you
imagine people of the same belief system
could I I think we make the mistake of
thinking Well it can't be that different
from a red and the blue State and yet we
find ways to live together next to each
other no it's not like that at all it's
not even slightly like that the American
system we can disagree with each other
but we know we're under the same
system right the
constitution in theory is the umbrella
under which we're all arguing so we're
all trying to be the better versions of
adhering to the Constitution you maybe
sometimes you want to tweak it but
you're still talking talking about how
can we be the better version of a
constitutional you know
citizenship nothing like that's
happening over in the Middle East in the
Middle East there are two incompatible
systems that can never be
compatible and there's only going to be
a winner and a loser and at the moment
Israel has the upper
hand to have an opinion on that would be
like having an opinion on gravity it's
just what it is it's it's just what it
is now the opinion I can have is not to
associate my own brand or reputation
with it because again I don't have
anything to do with it so if I if I
embraced it then I'm giving something
away for free for
nothing I I would be giving away my
reputational value what little it has
for nothing it wouldn't make them more
successful or less but it would make me
a victim of whatever you know abuse I
got for having an opinion on it so I
don't support Israel but I don't support
their
enemies I love the Jewish people you
know my personal relationships have
always been amazing with Jewish
citizens as well as Israeli citizens um
probably one of my favor favorite
demographic groups I say that just
because some of you are anti-semitic and
it'll make you mad but yeah but
historically
um everything from dating to my best
friends I I've been very heavily
weighted toward the Jewish population
because I like smart
people is that
okay I like smart people and uh they're
real lot of educated Jewish people and
it's fun to talk to smart
people all right
um that ladies and gentlemen is what I
had for you to today I don't know if uh
the rumble studio is going to let me
talk privately to the locals people but
I'm going to give it a try um I've
refreshed my browser situation so it
might work this time let's give it a try
thanks for joining on Rumble and x and
YouTube let's see if this
works all right local supporters only
maybe uh nope
looks like everybody's still here hey
everybody um I'm sure they'll get that
bug fix that that that feature had work
every day until a few days
ago all right uh no you don't have the
drinking bleach article that's the first
draft but thank you thank you for asking
about it all right that's all for now um
I'm going to end and uh I'll talk to the
uh locals people later in the man
cave all
right uh just start an after show stream
now you'll hate it if I start another
stream all right that's it for today
I'll see you all in the morning and the
locals people I'll see you in the man
cave tonight bye for
now let's see if this really
closes
e
e
e
e
e
e e