have made it to America. I just don't know if that's behind the drop in the crime statistics.

So here's a little test for you. If you're going to mock the idiots, just be careful what you're believing because this was a little bit too on the nose for me. I'm not going to buy this one. Could be. I can't debunk it, but no, far more likely the numbers are wrong. All right, or far more likely that it's just there's some kind of natural thing that's happening that just reduced the rate.

Remember the theory that Obama was really the one in control of Biden and that Biden was never independent, it was always Obama behind the scenes? And I entertained that theory as well. But it sort of conflicted with other theories. You know, the other theory that the CIA is in charge or that the defense industrial industry is in charge, but really that's also the CIA. Or I don't know, there's some secret advisor who's really in charge. So we had lots of rumors of who's really in charge.

But I think you can rule out Obama was in charge of Biden because the reporting is that Obama is not too pleased with Biden staying in the race. And if Obama had all that power, Biden would already be out of the race. So the evidence suggests that whatever Obama's influence was, it wasn't as much as Obama wanted because I think he's complained about Biden before as if he doesn't have any control. He complained, and now it looks like he certainly doesn't have control over whether Biden bows out.

Now it could also be that there are no real options. We're just pretending there are options and there aren't. But I feel like you can rule that out now.

I was surprised to see that somebody smart agreed with me, or even more rare, I agreed with somebody smart, because Mike Benz has pointed out that maybe it was always the Biden family that were the ones that were sort of connected to the intelligence community. Maybe the fact that the Bidens were all over Ukraine tells you that the Bidens were the ones closest to the real power. And maybe that's why Obama had to pick Biden as his vice president. It could be that Biden was the CIA's pick to make sure that Obama didn't get too far off the path. Maybe. I mean, just speculating here. Or it could be that the CIA liked both of them. Could be that.

But Benz is suggesting that the Biden family and the CIA might have had a closer connection. And that even now there was an ex-head of the intelligence community who is saying that as long as the head of the CIA is happy with Biden, we're in good shape because he has good advisors. So the idea is that the country is not in trouble because there are real adults running the important stuff like the CIA. And if the head of the CIA is okay with Biden, well then there's not really much of a problem. Except that sort of gives away the game, doesn't it? Could they be more obvious that the CIA is running Biden? I mean, how am I supposed to take that?

How in the world would the CIA think that a degraded, mentally degraded president is a good idea? Under what scenario is that a good idea? The only scenario I could think of is he didn't matter in the first place. It seems pretty obvious that the person who would know who matters, the head of the CIA, if they're okay with this and apparently they are, that really suggests that it's been a while since Biden had much real influence. He might have just been a caretaker for the office, and the office might be just a subsidiary of the CIA. So he's just a figurehead. Could be. That's one hypothesis that does not seem to be ruled out at this point.

All right. Did you know this is another Mike Benz point: that Kamala Harris was on the Senate Intelligence Committee? Do you remember that? Somehow I didn't remember that, but she was on the Senate Intelligence Committee. Guess what the Senate Intelligence Committee does? It oversees the CIA. So in Congress there's a group that oversees the CIA, sort of like a regulator, you might say.

What would you expect to happen of somebody regulating the CIA? Well, on day one, maybe a little bit of regulating. What happens 10 years later? Well, on paper there's only one way it goes. On paper, if you said all right, there's a group of elected officials and it's their job to monitor and sort of be the boss, in a sense, of the CIA. Now you go out 10 years. What happened? You all know what would happen. That the committee that was supposed to be regulating, so to speak, would be captured just like every other regulator. Because if the regulators have less power or money or they're less scary than what they're regulating, over time the one getting regulated will be in charge. It's true with everything we've ever seen.

You know, our medical situation, it looks like the FDA and the other organizations are just owned by the people with the money. So does it seem weird to you that Harris would be on the Senate Intelligence Committee, which one assumes by now should be owned by the CIA, which would make Harris an acceptable CIA candidate if any of this is true? By the way, I'm just in speculative territory here. We have to guess on a lot of stuff because we don't know what the real government is. We actually, we literally don't know what our government is. Is that fair? Is it fair to say that as of today, if I had to describe who's in charge of the government, I literally couldn't do it, not with confidence?

So we're left to speculate who's actually in charge and in what situations is who in charge. So I'm just speculating because I don't know who's in charge. But on paper, if there's any kind of chaos, on paper these spooks should end up in charge because they have the ability, the power, the right skills, they have the right access. On paper they should always end up in charge. There shouldn't be any other possibility.

And by the way, if the CIA was so lame that they couldn't completely control the Senate Intelligence Committee, they couldn't do anything else either. That would be like the easiest thing they'd ever did. You know, they're out there overthrowing countries like crazy. You don't think they could get a lot of control over who the Senate Intelligence Committee picks to be in the committee? Of course they can. Chuck Schumer said so. If you cross the intelligence community, they have a, what did he say, a thousand ways from Sunday to get back at you. Even, you know, even the majority leader or was he minority leader then? Even they say directly that's a very direct statement that they're in charge. If the elected officials are literally afraid of them, and that's what Schumer said. He said that Trump should be afraid of them, which suggests that Schumer himself is afraid of them. That's who's in charge, the person you're afraid of. I mean, that's a pretty clear signal. And I think Kamala Harris is becoming a clear signal as well.

All right. Design is destiny. So if there's somebody regulating the CIA, the CIA will eventually own them. That's guaranteed.

Well, now we have 25 members of the House that are Democrats who are preparing to call for Biden to step down. 25 of them. Well, 25 is not that many. You know, given the total number in Congress, 25 is not a lot, but it's more than one. One has so far. But it's only the ones in competitive races. So the ones who are safe in their reelection, they're just going with the flow because they don't need to do anything. But the ones who are in trouble, you know, the ones who are actually going to lose their jobs are willing to say Biden is not the guy.

Now, have I ever mentioned that sometimes you can predict the future by a little trick that I made up all by myself? You've never heard of it. It's called follow the money. Now of course it's a famous thing. And follow the money. Every time you see it working you should say to yourself, there it goes again. Keeps working. Because if you can't predict the future by following the money, well you shouldn't be doing any predicting because that's the easy one. The eas