Coffee With Scott Adams — Knowledge Archive July 10, 2026
Scott Adams Philosophy Archive
Search ideas
Episodes Episode #2525

Episode 2525 CWSA 07/03/24

Episode #2525 Jul 3, 2024 1:27:46 31,147 views

The mentally ill versus Trump. (It's not always about politics.) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.

Opening General Commentary

Hey everybody, come on in here. Good morning everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams. And as you're pouring in here, I know you are, if you'd like to take your experience today, which will be marvelous, up to levels that nobody can even unde…

View segment →
SimultaneousSip General Commentary

, all you need for that is a cup or mug or glass or tankard or chalice or jug or flask or vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dope, of being here the day, the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simu…

View segment →
NewsReaction Media & Fake News

reciate you if I don't say it enough. Well, if you are watching the Dilbert Reborn comic that's only available to subscribers on X or people who subscribe to ScottAdamsLocals.com where they get lots more, Wally is using artificial intelligence for his own healthcare. Doesn't go well. Doesn't go wel…

View segment →
NewsReaction Health & Biohacking

ight have fudged it a little bit to make it sound a little better to the public. What do you think? I don't know. I'm just saying I'd bet against it. I'd bet against it being real. Well, let's play could have asked Scott and saved a bunch of money in science. Turns out there's a new study. Amazingl…

View segment →
MainContent Health & Biohacking

s, I feel like we're in the age of Biden's brain where science can tell us things that we all knew forever and then we're supposed to act surprised. No, we knew Biden was gone, okay? We knew going to the beach is relaxing and we knew that relaxing is good for all those things like high blood pressur…

View segment →
NewsReaction AI & Technology

d guess that that would make you feel better. And obesity, if you have the drug that makes you feel like you're connected and good and everything is fine, do you need to eat as much? Well, you might love to eat, but you're not going to do it for emotional reasons because your emotional reasons will…

View segment →
NewsReaction Politics as Persuasion

ng for it will be a pain. And then the attractive women have already left the industry. I think that's what it looks like. So I think the porn industry is dead actually. There's something you never thought. Did you ever think the porn industry would just die? I think it's already dead. I think that…

View segment →
NewsReaction Media & Fake News

accusing the media of election interference because the way they're covering Biden in the debate. Wow. So they're worried. Just hold this in your head. There's a Biden campaign official who is willing to say publicly that correct news, which is that Biden is infirm, correct news is election interfer…

View segment →
MainContent Politics as Persuasion

have made it to America. I just don't know if that's behind the drop in the crime statistics. So here's a little test for you. If you're going to mock the idiots, just be careful what you're believing because this was a little bit too on the nose for me. I'm not going to buy this one. Could be. I c…

View segment →
NewsReaction Politics as Persuasion

y one is follow the money. So you've got a bunch of, you know, maybe 25-ish Democrats who feel like they'll lose their job and their money. You know, nobody wants to go look for a new job. So they would be the ones who would turn on Biden and suddenly they can see all of his infirmities. But the pe…

View segment →
MainContent Politics as Persuasion

he determinant. Biden's not going to drop out unless he gets a lot worse fast. And he might be so worse that he can't make the decision to drop out because he's not thinking right. So we may be past the point where he is coherent enough to even know he should drop out. So we might be stuck. But her…

View segment →
NewsReaction Politics as Persuasion

thinks is CNN trying to take Biden out of the race. So they think that they biased the debate. They didn't. They think that the CNN people are somehow pro-Trump or at least not anti-Trump enough. I don't see it, but I guess if they're not getting what they want, the MSNBC people, they don't like it…

View segment →
NewsReaction Media & Fake News

help you with the economy. That would be a productive lie. You know, bending the truth, hyperbole, little exaggeration of what he accomplished, maybe even some made-up stuff. And if he got elected he would be very transparent because presidents are, and we would see if he's doing things for us. And…

View segment →
MainContent Media & Fake News

make that bigger. And tell Joe Biden what to do and Dr. Joe Biden and apparently even Hunter telling him what to do. So let me tell you what this show is going to do. We are going to pay all of that the same amount of attention. The same amount of attention will go to that. All right. I'm not sure…

View segment →
MainContent Hypnosis & Influence

ut not, they're not crazy. I don't think so. Let's see. Rachel Maddow had Stormy Daniels on yesterday. Do you think Stormy Daniels is a relevant guest to have on in our current situation? I can't think of anything that would be less useful to the country than to hear a little bit more from Stormy.…

View segment →
MainContent Systems vs Goals

dia lying to them. Imagine finding out for the first time, well you know he's not a felon technically and the odds of him becoming one just went really small. Are you aware of that? They're not going to like it. I saw a funny comment from just a user on X named John Eckel and he wrote this one sent…

View segment →
NewsReaction Media & Fake News

dent does not have dementia? That's about pretty big. I call that pretty big anyway. The fact that they've pivoted to calling the idea that the election was rigged a big lie, why would they do that? Remember we're going to do the hypnotist test again about the choice of words. If you just wanted to…

View segment →
NewsReaction Media & Fake News

at earthers. And she said something along the lines of you never know. You know, sort of allowing that science is so bad that maybe even the Earth is flat. Now I took that as sort of a playful hyperbole, meaning I don't know if she believes that literally. She's just sort of putting it out there to…

View segment →
Tangent AI & Technology

you know what's a wave and what's a particle? How did we think that? Well I think that we are inevitably and probably the easiest, I think this is the easiest prediction I'll ever make, it will become a much bigger thing that we might be a simulation. And the reason is we're going to build a simula…

View segment →
Closing General Commentary

God or some version of that. As soon as you see we can do it, and that's less than a year away if it's not already done, as soon as you see we can do it you'll know you're in one. Other people will be harder to convince but most people will say oh God you got me. Yeah we're a simulation. We have to…

View segment →

Hey everybody, come on in here. Good morning everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams. And as you're pouring in here, I know you are, if you'd like to take your experience today, which will be marvelous, up to levels that nobody can even understand with their tiny human smooth brains, but if you'd like yours to go up to levels that are absolutely July 4th fireworks kind of spectacular, all you need for that is a cup or mug or glass or tankard or chalice or jug or flask or vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dope, of being here the day, the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens now.

Go.

Thank you, Paul. Always appreciate you if I don't say it enough.

Well, if you are watching the Dilbert Reborn comic that's only available to subscribers on X or people who subscribe to ScottAdamsLocals.com where they get lots more, Wally is using artificial intelligence for his own healthcare. Doesn't go well. Doesn't go well anyway.

How many of you knew this historical fact that John Adams, President John Adams, and Thomas Jefferson, they both died on the same day, July 4th, four hours apart? How many of you know that history? You've all been taught that John Adams and Thomas Jefferson died four hours apart. And there was a little story about, I guess when the first one died, when Jefferson died, you know, the other one said, oh, the other one still lives, or something like that.

So does that sound to you like a story that is real? Do you think they really died on the same day? You were told that, weren't you? And history records it. If you researched it, history would agree. Do you think it really happened? It's a little bit on the nose, isn't it? A little bit too on the nose. A little bit too perfect. If you heard a story like this in 2024, would you believe it was real? Giant coincidence.

Let me, you know, since we're watching the Democrats wake up from their long sleep to find out that the news about Biden had always been fake, and we're like, whoa, are you telling me that all the people we trust could be lying to us and it could take years to find out? Yes. Yes. All the people in charge could be lying to you. Four years now.

Let me ask again. Do you think that John Adams and Thomas Jefferson died on the same day? Really? Really? Here's what I think. They probably died around the same day, but don't you think that if it was around the same day there'd be a big pressure to make it sort of the same day? I think being within a few days of the same day would be kind of a coincidence but not nearly as remarkable. But I feel like maybe they might have fudged it a little bit to make it sound a little better to the public. What do you think? I don't know. I'm just saying I'd bet against it. I'd bet against it being real.

Well, let's play could have asked Scott and saved a bunch of money in science. Turns out there's a new study. Amazingly, you won't believe this, but less than two minutes of looking at water outdoors, such as a lake or an ocean, is enough to activate your parasympathetic nervous system and lower your blood pressure and heart rate. Science, let me talk to you for a minute, science. The rest of you, I'm just going to take a moment. I'm going to talk to science directly.

Science, you know there's a reason that people vacation at the beach, right? You know that lakes are a recreational destination. What do you think that was? Is it because going to the lake makes you feel bad? Is it because walking on the beach in the sun with the water lapping up against the beach, is it because people do that because it makes them feel bad? No, no. You could have saved a little bit of time. I've been to the beach. Has anybody ever been on a beach? And did you instantly feel like, oh, this is relaxing? But you didn't know if it was relaxing until this study. Turns out that what you were seeing with your own eyes and feeling with your own feet and every experience you had is exactly what you thought it was.

It's, I feel like we're in the age of Biden's brain where science can tell us things that we all knew forever and then we're supposed to act surprised. No, we knew Biden was gone, okay? We knew going to the beach is relaxing and we knew that relaxing is good for all those things like high blood pressure and such. Yeah, we knew that. Could have asked me. Save a little money.

The University of Cambridge has a hypothesis that has some data behind it that oxytocin could be a possible treatment for obesity and postnatal depression. So let me see if I understand this right. So the drug or the, let's say the chemical, the chemical that you have in your body that sometimes you don't have enough of is the thing that makes you feel like you've got what you need and you don't need anything else. That if you don't have enough of that, you're going to need like something else to make you happy. Well, okay.

You may have heard me talk about this for the last 20 years. I call it my pleasure unit hypothesis, that a human needs a certain minimum amount of pleasure. And if they don't get it, oh, they're going to do something to get it. They'll break a law. They'll do illegal drugs. They'll do risky behavior. They'll have sex without protection. Because humans absolutely need some minimum amount of pleasure or else they'll just end their lives. It's like, what's the point of being here?

So oxytocin certainly seems like it would be an obvious treatment for obesity and postnatal depression because depression is because you don't have enough of the right drugs. So if you give you the right chemicals, it seems like a good guess that that would make you feel better. And obesity, if you have the drug that makes you feel like you're connected and good and everything is fine, do you need to eat as much? Well, you might love to eat, but you're not going to do it for emotional reasons because your emotional reasons will be solved by a chemical.

So I would say that's in the should have asked Scott category. Yes, if oxytocin is something you can actually give to somebody and it will act just like you produced it yourself. Yeah, I could give you another list of things it would cure. Would you like the whole list? It will cure just about everything because it's literally the only thing we organize our life around, is to get more oxytocin. It's like the thing.

All right, Breitbart has a story that says that AI bots and other AI garbage is 42% of overall web traffic. Wow. So EIMI Technologies has a stat. And so apparently the bots are 40%, just AI crawling around and grabbing data. And 65% of those bots are classified as malicious. What? 65% of the AI is already malicious? That's a lot.

Have you noticed, have any of you noticed that YouTube has turned into what they call the faceless channels, where somebody just gives an AI prompt and it creates a whole YouTube video? So apparently now you could just use whichever AIs, I forget, and you could just say, give me a video about the fall of Rome, and then it just makes it. There just won't be any real people in it. It'll be sort of cartoony.

And so people quickly figured out that they could make these and make a fortune. But what it did was it sort of ruined YouTube because now YouTube is just all these faceless things that I could just ask ChatGPT. I don't really need YouTube if it's the same thing that I can just ask ChatGPT and they'll just talk me through it. Because once you take out the people, I don't much need to look at the pictures. It becomes almost an audio product after that.

So in fact that's what I do. I use the ChatGPT app and I just ask it the same things I would have looked for on YouTube. So instead of looking for a pre-made YouTube video, I just say, hey, tell me about this or that, and it gives me basically a YouTube without the video.

But I think that porn is largely going to be a dead industry on the internet because I think AI will replace all the human women. The human women will move to, you know, OnlyFans, the attractive ones, and that will leave unattractive women in porn plus AI. I think the future is that porn will just go away because it'll all be just buried with bad AI stuff and just looking for it will be a pain. And then the attractive women have already left the industry. I think that's what it looks like. So I think the porn industry is dead actually.

There's something you never thought. Did you ever think the porn industry would just die? I think it's already dead. I think that literally it's just overweight ugly people in porn now. It's dead.

All right, so you've been hearing about this Project 2025. The Heritage Foundation puts out this real big document of things that they wish would happen if a conservative comes to power or conservatives come to power. And it involves every major agency and how they would be eliminated or changed. And there's a list of conservatives who are ready to go for different jobs. However, this is called by the Democrats a blueprint for fascism. It's a blueprint for fascism. So I think that's what Jane Fonda says. And it would do things like get rid of the EPA and the Department of Education. You dismantle the government.

Now here's my question. I don't know too much about what the word fascism means, but as Trump once famously said, I don't think you know what it means either. Well, sort of paraphrasing. But is reducing the size of your own government fascism? Is that what that's called when you reduce regulations? In other words, you have less control as a government over the people. So you're returning freedom to the people in the sense of getting rid of burdensome regulations, as they would see it, burdensome. How in the world do you call that fascism? I was pretty sure that was the opposite.

Now, have you seen any situation in which the news or people in it would tell you something that's clearly the opposite of what it is? Joe Biden's sharpest attack, just to pick one. President Trump is colluding with Russia. 51 intelligence people tell you the laptop is Russia disinformation or has all the earmarks of it. Yeah, we're pretty used to the news and the famous people in the news telling us the opposite of what is obvious. And I think that might be new. Would you agree that it used to be that people would say stuff like, well, I've got a secret source that said something, and you say to yourself, well, probably not true, but you know, I don't see anything that would counter it. It's just something that's true or not, and you can't tell, but there's nothing saying it's not true. It's just an unknown.

We've gone from unknowns to things you know for sure are true that the people who should be telling you the truth are telling you you're not seeing. You know, Jake Tapper was apparently saying the same thing, that we're being asked to deny what we see obviously right in front of us. Now he was talking about denying that Biden has a little cognitive difficulties. We all saw it. And yet part of the government and part of the media is trying to tell us that they couldn't see it. Really? Really? No, you could see it.

And now according to Red State, the Biden campaign, there's a Biden campaign official who's accusing the media of election interference because the way they're covering Biden in the debate. Wow. So they're worried. Just hold this in your head. There's a Biden campaign official who is willing to say publicly that correct news, which is that Biden is infirm, correct news is election interference. Accurate news is election interference. Now I could see how it would be, but you would have to have been in a coma for a very long time to think this is the point you want to make in public. So I guess the fake news isn't working for them the way it used to.

All right, here's another shocking fact allegedly according to the Daily Mail. Venezuela had an epic drop in murder. So the murder rate in Venezuela just went through the floor. Not really. It's a 22-year low, down 25% or something. And of course the suggestion there is that the Venezuelan murderers and the repeat criminals have been released from jail and sent to America, or if they weren't in jail they just came to America. And that the reason that the crime is low in Venezuela compared to what it was is because the criminals came to America.

Does that sound true? Does that sound true or does it sound a little bit too on the nose? It's kind of clean, isn't it? It's a very clean story. Well, we're anti-immigration and now Venezuela, their crime rate has gone down. So I guess that means all the criminals came to the United States. Am I right?

Let me be as clear as I can. That might be exactly what's happening. I cannot disprove that claim, nor is it ridiculous on its surface because we know lots of people are coming. If you were a criminal, maybe it's a pretty good way to get a clean start. So it's perfectly possible that that's exactly what's happening.

But have you ever seen any government data from the United States, such as California's job reports that we found out today have been completely fake, such as the major revisions of everything, such as the crime statistics that we report in the United States which are clearly fudged? Why would you trust Venezuela to have accurate crime data of all the things that Venezuela is likely to do right? You think the crime data is in that list? You don't think that maybe the government just wants you to think, the government of Venezuela, you don't think that maybe they just want you to think that they did a good job and crime went down? Do you think that they even have good reporting in Venezuela or do you think it's more likely that somebody stopped reporting? Remember, it's like a failed state. But you think their data is good? It's a failed state with accurate data? Is that what you think? They get a dictator but they get accurate data? And if it's a failed state, there isn't really a big chance that their data is correct. You get that, right? The odds of Venezuela's data being correct is close to zero.

Now, but I have to be specific. That doesn't mean it's not true. It might be true that there's a whole bunch of criminals that used to be there that moved to America. I would assume some have. I mean, you could say with some certainty some number of criminals from Venezuela have made it to America. I just don't know if that's behind the drop in the crime statistics.

So here's a little test for you. If you're going to mock the idiots, just be careful what you're believing because this was a little bit too on the nose for me. I'm not going to buy this one. Could be. I can't debunk it, but no, far more likely the numbers are wrong. All right, or far more likely that it's just there's some kind of natural thing that's happening that just reduced the rate.

Remember the theory that Obama was really the one in control of Biden and that Biden was never independent, it was always Obama behind the scenes? And I entertained that theory as well. But it sort of conflicted with other theories. You know, the other theory that the CIA is in charge or that the defense industrial industry is in charge, but really that's also the CIA. Or I don't know, there's some secret advisor who's really in charge. So we had lots of rumors of who's really in charge.

But I think you can rule out Obama was in charge of Biden because the reporting is that Obama is not too pleased with Biden staying in the race. And if Obama had all that power, Biden would already be out of the race. So the evidence suggests that whatever Obama's influence was, it wasn't as much as Obama wanted because I think he's complained about Biden before as if he doesn't have any control. He complained, and now it looks like he certainly doesn't have control over whether Biden bows out.

Now it could also be that there are no real options. We're just pretending there are options and there aren't. But I feel like you can rule that out now.

I was surprised to see that somebody smart agreed with me, or even more rare, I agreed with somebody smart, because Mike Benz has pointed out that maybe it was always the Biden family that were the ones that were sort of connected to the intelligence community. Maybe the fact that the Bidens were all over Ukraine tells you that the Bidens were the ones closest to the real power. And maybe that's why Obama had to pick Biden as his vice president. It could be that Biden was the CIA's pick to make sure that Obama didn't get too far off the path. Maybe. I mean, just speculating here. Or it could be that the CIA liked both of them. Could be that.

But Benz is suggesting that the Biden family and the CIA might have had a closer connection. And that even now there was an ex-head of the intelligence community who is saying that as long as the head of the CIA is happy with Biden, we're in good shape because he has good advisors. So the idea is that the country is not in trouble because there are real adults running the important stuff like the CIA. And if the head of the CIA is okay with Biden, well then there's not really much of a problem. Except that sort of gives away the game, doesn't it? Could they be more obvious that the CIA is running Biden? I mean, how am I supposed to take that?

How in the world would the CIA think that a degraded, mentally degraded president is a good idea? Under what scenario is that a good idea? The only scenario I could think of is he didn't matter in the first place. It seems pretty obvious that the person who would know who matters, the head of the CIA, if they're okay with this and apparently they are, that really suggests that it's been a while since Biden had much real influence. He might have just been a caretaker for the office, and the office might be just a subsidiary of the CIA. So he's just a figurehead. Could be. That's one hypothesis that does not seem to be ruled out at this point.

All right. Did you know this is another Mike Benz point: that Kamala Harris was on the Senate Intelligence Committee? Do you remember that? Somehow I didn't remember that, but she was on the Senate Intelligence Committee. Guess what the Senate Intelligence Committee does? It oversees the CIA. So in Congress there's a group that oversees the CIA, sort of like a regulator, you might say.

What would you expect to happen of somebody regulating the CIA? Well, on day one, maybe a little bit of regulating. What happens 10 years later? Well, on paper there's only one way it goes. On paper, if you said all right, there's a group of elected officials and it's their job to monitor and sort of be the boss, in a sense, of the CIA. Now you go out 10 years. What happened? You all know what would happen. That the committee that was supposed to be regulating, so to speak, would be captured just like every other regulator. Because if the regulators have less power or money or they're less scary than what they're regulating, over time the one getting regulated will be in charge. It's true with everything we've ever seen.

You know, our medical situation, it looks like the FDA and the other organizations are just owned by the people with the money. So does it seem weird to you that Harris would be on the Senate Intelligence Committee, which one assumes by now should be owned by the CIA, which would make Harris an acceptable CIA candidate if any of this is true? By the way, I'm just in speculative territory here. We have to guess on a lot of stuff because we don't know what the real government is. We actually, we literally don't know what our government is. Is that fair? Is it fair to say that as of today, if I had to describe who's in charge of the government, I literally couldn't do it, not with confidence?

So we're left to speculate who's actually in charge and in what situations is who in charge. So I'm just speculating because I don't know who's in charge. But on paper, if there's any kind of chaos, on paper these spooks should end up in charge because they have the ability, the power, the right skills, they have the right access. On paper they should always end up in charge. There shouldn't be any other possibility.

And by the way, if the CIA was so lame that they couldn't completely control the Senate Intelligence Committee, they couldn't do anything else either. That would be like the easiest thing they'd ever did. You know, they're out there overthrowing countries like crazy. You don't think they could get a lot of control over who the Senate Intelligence Committee picks to be in the committee? Of course they can. Chuck Schumer said so. If you cross the intelligence community, they have a, what did he say, a thousand ways from Sunday to get back at you. Even, you know, even the majority leader or was he minority leader then? Even they say directly that's a very direct statement that they're in charge. If the elected officials are literally afraid of them, and that's what Schumer said. He said that Trump should be afraid of them, which suggests that Schumer himself is afraid of them. That's who's in charge, the person you're afraid of. I mean, that's a pretty clear signal. And I think Kamala Harris is becoming a clear signal as well.

All right. Design is destiny. So if there's somebody regulating the CIA, the CIA will eventually own them. That's guaranteed.

Well, now we have 25 members of the House that are Democrats who are preparing to call for Biden to step down. 25 of them. Well, 25 is not that many. You know, given the total number in Congress, 25 is not a lot, but it's more than one. One has so far. But it's only the ones in competitive races. So the ones who are safe in their reelection, they're just going with the flow because they don't need to do anything. But the ones who are in trouble, you know, the ones who are actually going to lose their jobs are willing to say Biden is not the guy.

Now, have I ever mentioned that sometimes you can predict the future by a little trick that I made up all by myself? You've never heard of it. It's called follow the money. Now of course it's a famous thing. And follow the money. Every time you see it working you should say to yourself, there it goes again. Keeps working. Because if you can't predict the future by following the money, well you shouldn't be doing any predicting because that's the easy one. The easy one is follow the money.

So you've got a bunch of, you know, maybe 25-ish Democrats who feel like they'll lose their job and their money. You know, nobody wants to go look for a new job. So they would be the ones who would turn on Biden and suddenly they can see all of his infirmities. But the people who have no money on the line and have safe jobs, they think he's fine.

So could there be a clearer example that the Democrats are not even trying to represent the public? Oh, big surprise. The ones who are going to lose money if Biden stays in because he'll ruin the whole down-ballot situation, the ones who will lose money are willing to say he'll go. And the ones who won't lose money are willing to just let it go. So there's your honest Democrats for you.

No, but I'm sure it would work the same way with Republicans, by the way. It wouldn't be any different. The Republicans would follow the money because everybody does. The reason it works is that nobody's exempt. You know, if some big part of the country didn't follow the money reliably, then it wouldn't be such an easy way to predict what's going to happen. But they do. Everybody, religious people, non-religious, it doesn't matter. They all follow the money. Sometimes they have excuses. They'll say, follow the money. Oh yeah, yeah, I guess coincidentally those big old noble reasons that I gave you, I guess you're right. I hadn't even noticed, but it is compatible with my own financial benefit, huh? I didn't really even notice it when I was doing my detailed analysis and making my mind up. But you're right. You know, now that you mentioned it, I would make more money with this opinion, huh? Yeah, it's a big coincidence.

Well, according to Colin Rugg and some other people reporting that in the betting markets Harris has already overtaken Joe Biden. So if you were going to place a bet, the odds are that Trump is, I don't know, up close to 60% odds of winning against everybody else. And Harris is now somewhere in that 15% range, barely squeaking out Biden. Some of the betting polls are different, so it's not every poll.

But I'm so mad because the easiest money I ever could have made would be betting that Kamala Harris would be the candidate. But here's why it's a little bit tricky. They're not really giving us a Biden or Kamala Harris option. You think they are because your brain is still in the normal world. In the normal world, if you had the top of the ticket was clearly mentally incapable and everybody could see it, in a normal world you would replace that person with somebody who is at least not mentally deranged. So that would suggest, well, it's definitely Kamala or somebody but not Biden. That's the normal world. You don't live in that world. This is not the normal world.

Let me tell you the most likely outcome. Doesn't mean it'll happen, but here's the most likely outcome. And Biden's rate of his failing health will be the determinant. Biden's not going to drop out unless he gets a lot worse fast. And he might be so worse that he can't make the decision to drop out because he's not thinking right. So we may be past the point where he is coherent enough to even know he should drop out. So we might be stuck.

But here's the thing. Was there really some chance that anybody but Kamala Harris was going to be considered? And the answer is if you've been alive for the last five years and you weren't in a coma, you know that they could not skip over Kamala Harris because she's black and female. And by the way, there's a California politician who says it directly on video. There's no way you're going to skip over the black woman because you're going to lose black women voters and then you're dead. You can't win. So the threat is there. It's direct and it's public. You can't do it. And of course they know they can't do it. They are the DEI party. They can't ignore DEI just because it got inconvenient. That would blow the whole game. So they're stuck with her.

But here's where I think many of you might be wrong, especially the betting markets. I don't think she's going to be officially at the top of the ticket on Election Day. I think they're going to run the Schrodinger's candidate. Now you remember Schrodinger's cat, famous mental experiment where you put a cat in a sealed box and there's some radioactive decay. And if it goes a certain way, and you can't tell because it'd be a randomized process, the cat would be dead because it would release a poison. And if the radioactive decay went a different way, the poison would not be released and when you opened the box the cat would be alive.

So and then the weird physics of it, which you could debate, is that until you see the cat it is neither alive nor dead. It's in a superposition or it's only in a state of potential, potentially alive, potentially dead. And you don't know until you open the box because according to physics things don't solidify until they're observed or measured somehow.

So here's what the Biden-Harris team appears to be doing, and this is my prediction. Biden will still be top of the ticket on Election Day no matter how degraded he is, so long as he can still talk. If he's on machines it might be different. But I think they're going to say, you know what, here's the proposition. Here's my prediction. Democrats will eventually settle on the following message: you're voting for Kamala either way. That's it. That's the message. We're going to run Joe Biden at the top, but we all agree that he's going to step down as soon as he gets elected. So whether Kamala goes to the top place and runs or she stays as vice president and runs, in both cases you're voting for Kamala.

But here's the beauty of it, the psychological beauty. And remember we're in stupid world. So what I tell you next you're going to say, but Scott, that's so illogical. Right, right it is. And it's what they're going to think and do. Something completely illogical and very predictable. And it looks like this. They're going to run the Schrodinger's candidate. They're going to say if you like Biden, vote for Biden. You're going to get Kamala Harris. But if you don't want to vote for Kamala Harris, you don't have to because Biden's right there. Vote for Biden. But suppose you want to not vote for Biden because you could see that would be a disaster. What do you do then? You vote for Kamala Harris by voting for Biden because in both cases you get Kamala Harris.

It's just, well, there's really only one situation. You're going to get Kamala Harris because there's no way that Joe would get elected and continue serving. We all know that, right? So we don't know if it's the day after the election, the day after inauguration, six months in. But nobody thinks that if Biden got elected that you still, the president in six months. Nobody thinks that. It'd be 25th Amendment for sure.

But so there's my prediction. So if I were to go to the betting markets and say Kamala Harris is going to be the candidate, I could be right and lose the bet. You see the problem? Because if they simply run as the same package that they said they were, because all the paperwork is done and they're on the ballots, if they simply just do what they say they're going to do, that's really Kamala Harris running. There's no way around that. No smart person would disagree with that statement that at this point if it's Biden at the top of the ticket, it's a Kamala Harris race.

So here's the thing that you weekend speculators are missing. They don't have to do anything. No change is necessary to get everything they want. They'll leave Biden in for everybody who wants to vote for him, but really it's Kamala. And everybody who wanted Kamala to be at the top of the ticket would say, you know what, I guess it is a little late for that, but we'll just take it the other way. You know, we'll just wait six months, which would be quite reasonable. Just wait six months. So then everybody in the Democratic Party gets everything the stupid way. The stupid way by running the guy with no brain but telling you that you can have it either way. You could have a Biden or you could have a Kamala, which is really just Kamala. But if you like Biden, why don't you vote for Biden? He did a great job. Why don't you reward him? Reward him with a vote for Biden. But don't worry because it's just, it's Schrodinger's candidate. They're really going to run both of them and one is dead and one is alive just like the cat. It's kind of fascinating.

But here's the thing. If you think it's not going to be Kamala either as the second part of the ticket or the top, every path is Kamala. It's all Kamala all the way. It never was anything else or any other possibility. There was never a possibility of Michelle Obama. Never. And she just confirmed that it's not in her soul.

And let me tell you how to read an honest versus a dishonest answer. Here would be a potentially dishonest answer if Michelle Obama said, I have to be honest, I haven't even thought about it. Well that would leave the door open, wouldn't it? All you have to do is think about it. Or how about if she said Joe Biden is the nominee, that is the end of it. Well that would be leaving the door open a little bit, wouldn't it? It would. How about, you know, I don't think I could win. Oh that would be leaving the door open a little bit. How about, you know, I haven't had an interest in politics. No, but you could get interested to save the country.

So there are a thousand ways she could have said that she's not interested that you would say, hmm, the way you said it though, the way you said it makes me think you might be. But she didn't do any of the thousand ways that would leave the door open. She said you have to have it in your soul to run for office. I do not have it in my soul. It's not going to happen. That, ladies and gentlemen, is 100% proof she's not going to run. You do not say it's not in my soul unless you're really, really not going to run. Because you don't want anybody to ask you later, well what about that whole soul thing? You're running but I'm not sure you're into it. She's basically poisoned her own candidacy by saying my soul isn't into it. You can't take that back now.

Biden said he wasn't ready, you know, because he had a death in the family or something. Not ready is saying that you will be ready. She's not saying later I'll have a soul for it. She's saying I don't have the soul for it. And there's no way you get elected once you said you don't have the soul for the job. That is a poison pill that she gave to herself right in front of you. Hey, hey morons, do you see this giant poison pill? It's called it's not in my soul. I'm going to take this right in front of you. Will you please shut up? Stop saying I might be president. Shut up. Watch me eat that. Only it's like what can she do to convince you? No, there was never any chance she would be president or run for it.

All right. What about those Mar-a-Lago boxes? If you're not following lawyer Jeff Clark, for all of the lawfare stuff about Trump you're missing a lot of great takes. But Jeff Clark, look for him and follow him on X. And he says in a post today it's now dawning on the left that the argument I've long been making regarding the Mar-a-Lago documents case is correct. That whatever else is true, Trump declassified the documents. And then he puts an asterisk by course of conduct. In other words, the mere act of saying put these in the boxes and send them to Mar-a-Lago, by any reasonable person's judgment would be a declassification because there was no formal process that he had to follow.

So the fact that he was sloppy with the sort of informal process would be irrelevant because he's the president. So if he acts in every way as though documents are being declassified, and certainly packing them up and sending them outside of the White House and outside of a secure environment would be the clearest possible indication that he doesn't expect them to be classified. Now whether he said it or not, I think you have to give him the benefit of the doubt. And it wouldn't matter what president it was. I'd say the same thing. I think on that gray stuff you got to give them the benefit of it that you just can't run the presidency if every little gray area slows them down.

So Jeff Clark says turns out that now it's been confirmed that Trump has immunity for official acts. That's the Supreme Court case. That taking the documents with him to Mar-a-Lago means no criminal liability can attach because it was an official act. That by his actions he declassified the documents. Seems right to me. Now this by the way was exactly my take from the beginning, that he didn't have to say the words because there was no process, no guaranteed process. There was an informal one, there was a traditional one, but not one that he had to follow.

All right. CNN's getting heat for what the left thinks is CNN trying to take Biden out of the race. So they think that they biased the debate. They didn't. They think that the CNN people are somehow pro-Trump or at least not anti-Trump enough. I don't see it, but I guess if they're not getting what they want, the MSNBC people, they don't like it so they don't like CNN.

All right, let's see what else. So there's a video that's viral of, just so you can visualize it, there's a young black man who's on some kind of a Zoom call with a young black woman. And he's asking her who said the following quotes. And he gives a bunch of quotes that are all Joe Biden quotes. Every one of the quotes is Joe Biden. And the young black woman says, oh that's Trump. Oh that was definitely Trump. And she says Trump for everyone. Now these are the historical comments that Biden has made that sound, some people say, racist. If the shoe were reversed I would probably say he wasn't, but that's what they're saying.

So apparently the actual words of Biden when heard out of context makes a young black woman say, oh that's got to be Trump because that's racist as hell. And when she was told that every one of those comments came from Biden and none of them came from Trump, she was instantly flipped to what the hell is going on here. Now I don't know if she would, that doesn't mean she's pro-Trump, but everything she thought about Biden versus Trump she suddenly realized was wrong. It was fascinating. And I love to see how many times you could reproduce that because I've seen that same thing on street interviews before where you just give the quotes of Biden and everybody thinks it's Trump. And the young people especially, they all think it sounds super racist because they're all woke. And it blows their mind when they find out they're wrong. Blows their mind. It's fun to watch. I'd like to see more of it.

All right. As you know, Biden's new attack on Trump is that Trump is a liar. Now we've all watched Trump and we know that the fact checkers get exhausted when he gives a rally. We know that it's all baked in. But most of us have come to the understanding that he lies like a salesperson. In other words, he's a productive liar. In other words, he's lying for your benefit because we all want to get a deal. You know, if he says my economy was way better last year than you remember, well you could call it a lie or you could say he's trying to get elected because he would be the best one to help you with the economy. That would be a productive lie. You know, bending the truth, hyperbole, little exaggeration of what he accomplished, maybe even some made-up stuff. And if he got elected he would be very transparent because presidents are, and we would see if he's doing things for us. And if it was like the first four years you'd probably like a lot of the stuff he did.

So here's my question. If Biden is saying that Trump is a big old liar and that's why you should not vote for him, I was trying to think, and this is not a rhetorical question, it'll sound like I know the answer, I don't know the answer. But I was trying to think of anything that Biden has said of substance that's true. I couldn't think of anything. Now that doesn't mean that he hasn't said a true thing of importance. I just know I couldn't think of one. I couldn't think of anything. Nothing. Every topic I thought of, the way he talks about it is a lie. So he either has a hoax or he has wrong facts or he's leaving something out or he's just wildly making something up.

I mean, think about the categories. We know all of his personal stories are complete fabrications. We know his complaints about Trump are 100% hoaxes. Every single complaint about Trump is based on a hoax. No exceptions. All of his complaints are based on a weird interpretation of reality or hoax. And then he of course presents his record in a misleading way, which they all do. They all do. So he's lying about his personal anecdotes. He's lying 100% about Trump using hoaxes. He lies about his record. They all do. And he lied about his health, his mental health. What's left?

This is not a rhetorical question because I don't want to be hanging out there if there are examples to disprove me. So I need you to disprove me before somebody who doesn't like me disproves me. Please tell me anything he said of substance, you know, something about the campaign. What has Biden said of substance that was also true? I couldn't think of a single thing. Can you?

Well, he this week, what did he say this week? That he had a cold. And then he said that he was tired from traveling even though he had like a week to get over it. He was still tired from traveling. He said that Trump got dictator powers from the Supreme Court. None of those things are true. 100% of everything he said in the last few days was false. Everything. I think everything he said, probably everything at the debate was a lie or out of context. Am I wrong? Can somebody tell me if there's anything of substance he says at all? At all? Anything that isn't misleading intentionally, out of context or just a flat-out lie? I can't think of a thing. Not a single thing.

So Joy Reid is hilarious. I'm trying something here. I'm seeing if I can share my screen. I may disappear. We'll see what happens. Let's see. Start my screen sharing. This will be interesting to see if I can pull it off. Hey look at that. Technology. It's working. Now that's Joy Reid. Let me see if I can try to make that bigger.

And tell Joe Biden what to do and Dr. Joe Biden and apparently even Hunter telling him what to do. So let me tell you what this show is going to do. We are going to pay all of that the same amount of attention. The same amount of attention will go to that. All right. I'm not sure if I disappeared there or not because I was skipping back and forth.

But watch Joy Reid and see if you get the same vibe I do, which is a mental health crisis. Now I'm not saying that strictly for political reasons because you know I don't like her team. Honestly it comes across as severe mental illness. Even one eye looks like it's not open. Like one of her eyes is like going crazy. Like your brain is not firing right. And the things that she says are so wildly ridiculous that it just looks like mental health.

And then you know a minute later Rachel Maddow will come on and she just screams bad mental health, which she's admitted by the way. She has a long-term mental health problem which is all over her face. And I feel bad for both of them. So if it sounds like I'm just being mean, that's not my intention. I actually have empathy for them. They look like they're having a crisis and they're acting it out in their jobs. Unfortunately it's affecting us.

So when and then Jane Fonda was in some event in which she was talking about Trump and she just seemed bat crazy. I think we've got to stop ignoring the problem is mental health. You tell me that all of the hosts of MSNBC are not seeing therapists. Seriously? Do you think Joy Reid is not seeing a therapist? Do you think Rachel Maddow is not seeing a therapist? Do you think the others are not seeing therapists? I would guess every one of them is. I don't know. I mean I'll be speculating. But they don't just have a different opinion.

Here's the difference. I've watched Jake Tapper forever and often disagreeing with his takes. Have I ever thought he had a mental illness? No, not once. Not once. I don't know exactly what he's thinking. Nobody knows what anybody's thinking. But he doesn't look mentally ill. And if you were to look at Wolf Blitzer or any of the gang, none of them look mentally ill even though I've often greatly disagreed with their takes. They look like they believe them at least in a non-crazy way.

And the bifurcation of the media on the left into CNN, which I would call a normal dissenting voice, meaning that they're not always going to agree with the administration, sometimes they might, versus the ones that just are bat crazy. And I think it's still a male-female thing. I think the women have scared themselves. Well not themselves. I would say that the Democrats have gaslit themselves to the point where the people with the weakest minds among the Democrats believe the gaslighting because they don't get the real news and they're in a panic.

And I think Republicans are safer because they recognize it for what it is, which is some kind of weird brainwashing propaganda thing that seems to affect the people doing it and not the people that it's trying to do it to. Well I mean the Democrats are unified but Republicans don't look at any of this stuff and think it's real. We literally, I watch MSNBC for entertainment because I just can't believe it. It's just weird and wacky.

Now do you think that they have the same view when they watch Fox News? I don't think so. I think they think the Fox News people are lying or evil but not, they're not crazy. I don't think so.

Let's see. Rachel Maddow had Stormy Daniels on yesterday. Do you think Stormy Daniels is a relevant guest to have on in our current situation? I can't think of anything that would be less useful to the country than to hear a little bit more from Stormy. Now what's that? I mean that just again, that just looks like mental illness instead of even somebody doing their job. That doesn't even seem like serving the customers at all.

And what is it that, oh well okay this is what Joy Reid said. We begin tonight with reality which is sinking in. I'm not going to gaslight you. You saw it. I saw it. Everyone who frantically texted me saw it. Now she's talking about Biden's bad performance. So she says I'm not going to gaslight you. Why would she say that? Why would it seem necessary to say I'm not going to gaslight you? I've never said that in my life. Do you know why? Because it's not in my mental model that one of the things I might ever do is gaslight you.

Here's another thing. I've never had to say, hey Bob, don't worry, I'm not going to get a chainsaw and cut you in half. Do you know why? Because we would both know that would not be in the set of possible options. Don't worry, I'm not going to flap my wings and fly away. Nope, not one of the options. The fact that she said I'm not going to do it suggests strongly that she has done it and knew it was an option. So yeah, this is my hypnotist filter. The hypnotist filter says there are no accidents in the choice of words. And indeed choice of words is what hypnosis is. It's knowing that some words are more active than others. That's a simplification but basically is that.

And when I see somebody choose those words which are very unusual choice of words, what is the last time somebody said to you I'm not going to gaslight you when the topic was something you saw with your own eyes? Yeah, we all saw with our own eyes. So I'm not going to tell you you didn't see it with your own eyes. Why is that even a topic unless she knows she does it sometimes? That's my speculation.

And then she says it is straight up fascism if you're to combine a Trump autocracy, a fully Christian nationalist Republican Party in control of both houses in Congress and the current Supreme Court majority. Wow, Katie bar the door and unleash the devil because we would be finished as a democracy. I don't even know where to start with that bunch of crazy. Should I start with we haven't been a democracy ever, we're a republic? That's too obvious. Should I start with presidential autocracy? Yeah, the autocrat is who her president wants to put in jail for lawfare. How do you ignore that? And the other guy said autocrat. So that's the bat crazy woman update.

I would say that what we're seeing is not politics anymore. The whole Biden situation, it's very divorced from what I'd call politics now. It's about Democrats who have poisoned the minds of other Democrats. The real issue here is what Democrats did to themselves to pretend that this is now about Democrats versus Republicans. That's not exactly the top line. I mean that's happening too. But the top line is there's this massive mental illness that was caused by Democrats poisoning their own minds with nonstop hoaxes.

On paper you were going to end up here. Suppose I told you one of the political parties is going to completely forget about even trying to be honest and just do hoaxes all the time. What would you predict would be the outcome of that? Well you would predict that the people who watch hoaxes all day long and then inevitably they find out that they're in a hoax-ocracy, that they get all kinds of mental disabilities from that. That's what happens. But you could have predicted that from the setup. Here we are.

Here's another prediction. You know I always talk about systems being better than goals. And sometimes I say Democrats like goals and Republicans like systems. And that more than any other reason is why I'm a registered Democrat but I prefer Republicans. I prefer them because they're systems-based. Religion is a system. Christianity is a system. Working hard and staying in a job is a system. Going to jail, learning a skill, getting a family, making sure that you get married young, have some kids, that's a system. And they even talk about it that way. You know the family unit is a good system. Having a religion, it's a good system. Then they don't use the word system but they do talk about institutions and things that have worked before. Systems.

What do the Democrats say? Got to make everything diverse. Well how you going to do it? Well we'll just make unqualified people get hired. That's not really a system. That's more like you start with the end point and you just hammer it in. You're missing the whole buildup to it, the useful part.

So I would say that if you had predicted what would happen if the Democrats go hog wild with DEI and then you combine that with a thoroughly fake news industry, where would you end up? If that's all you knew, all you knew is they were going to go big on DEI without a system to get there and that the media would be lying about everything, right here you would be. Right here you would be in a place where the country is doubting reality itself.

All right, we'll get rid of full screen Joy.

All right. So if you want to break the brains of the Democrats completely, try telling them that Trump is not a felon. He's not a convicted felon and it's unlikely he'll ever be one. Do you think any Democrats know that it's true he's not a felon because the judge has not done whatever is the official thing the judge has to do. So it's not official until it's entered into the record. So they've been calling him a convicted felon and he's not.

Now to their credit they were saying it because it was just a matter of some paperwork. Not anymore. It's not a matter of some paperwork now. Now I'd bet against it. I'd bet against it because he's got that ruling that he's got some immunity that may require a redo or a throwing out of the case. But at the very least it would push it till Trump is president and then all bets are off. So it's entirely possible, I would say even likely, that Trump will never be a felon. And that's a reality that the Democrats have been living in, the reality that they successfully lawfared him, they turned him into a felon, and it never happened. It never happened. How are they going to handle that?

Imagine being at this point with what they're finding out about their media lying to them. Imagine finding out for the first time, well you know he's not a felon technically and the odds of him becoming one just went really small. Are you aware of that? They're not going to like it.

I saw a funny comment from just a user on X named John Eckel and he wrote this one sentence that made me laugh. He goes, man journalists are going to be so surprised when they hear about all of Joe's shady business dealings. Do we have another round of this where the Democrats suddenly find out that Joe Biden has some shady connections to money from other countries? Are they going to say, hey, if we get a scoop for you, we think some of Hunter's money from China and Ukraine may have ended up in Joe Biden's pockets. I know, I know, hard to believe.

Well here's the good news. President Biden says grocery costs are too high for families across the country and we have a plan to tackle them. It's good he wasn't specific about the plan. But I do have some behind the curtain, a little special, I guess you could call it breaking news and maybe an exclusive. Really an exclusive. I do know Joe Biden's plan for making your groceries cost less. It's something called Ozempic and you get it in a shot and the shots will be mandatory.

What? Now why are you laughing? No that's a good plan. What, did you miss a whole pandemic? If there's something that can save your health and it's happening like all over the country, the government can make you get a shot now. What would you call obesity? What would kill more people, the pandemic or obesity? Well you know the answer. Obesity will be far more deadly than the pandemic. Now if the pandemic caused them to force you to get shots to go to school and work and travel and stuff, why would they not do the same thing for grocery prices? You could cut your grocery prices in half by eating less. So I think he's going to reduce the demand for groceries by giving mandatory Ozempic shots because why not?

Let me put it in a different way. If the president sat down in front of you and said what was your reasoning for making these COVID shots mandatory, and he would say something like well COVID was a deadly thing and we had to make sure I was protecting the country and if I hadn't people would have died. Now you could argue about the reality of that but that would be their case, their argument for why they made it mandatory for let's say flying and stuff like that was that it was a big health crisis and there was a treatment, the shot, and so the government thought it should make it somewhat mandatory, at least they would pressure you to get it.

How is that different from obesity? Find me any way that that's different. Obesity is more dangerous. There is a shot you can take that has some side effects. It's not risk-free but it's been tested. Why not make 300 million doses and just start giving that stuff to every overweight person in the country? Can you imagine how much better our health would be if we had mandatory Ozempic shots? No I'm not in favor of it in case this gets taken out of context, of course. But tell me what's the difference. See that's the interesting thing. There isn't any. There isn't.

All right. So it looks like MSNBC is going to pivot their hoaxes from Biden is sharp to the January 6 zombie hoax. It's a zombie hoax because as obviously not true as it is, it can't die. And they're going to call it the big lie that the election was rigged. The big lie. What would be a bigger lie than the president does not have dementia? That's about pretty big. I call that pretty big anyway.

The fact that they've pivoted to calling the idea that the election was rigged a big lie, why would they do that? Remember we're going to do the hypnotist test again about the choice of words. If you just wanted to say the election was not rigged, why do you need to brand it? Why don't you just say there's no evidence, it wasn't rigged, it was clean, had a good election. But no, they call it the big lie so it sounds Nazi-like, right? That's what the big lie refers to. It's a Nazi reference. So they're acting like Nazis. Well you could say it's the opposite. Let's not argue with they're Nazis. Rather let's say why would they say that the election rigging is the big lie? Why do they have to brand it? What's the branding telling you? It's telling me that they know it was rigged. That's what it tells me.

To me that's a strong signal that they're completely aware it was fake. Because if they thought it was real they'd say look you idiots show us some evidence or just shut up, elections are fine. You wouldn't go so far as to brand it the big lie unless you're using it to cover up the big lie. You know, remember everything they do is projection. So if they say it's a big lie that the election was fake, they're basically telling you as clearly as possible the election was rigged. You can't get more clear than that. Now again this is the hypnotist filter and it's based on the fact that people choose their words not by coincidence. It's not a coincidence. They're calling it the big lie because it was true. That would be the only reason they would call it that honestly.

Well Scott Galloway is basically saying that Biden is gone and the Democrats are likely to lose. But Galloway is not in favor of Trump because he thinks he's basically unstable and dangerous. So Trump is unstable and dangerous.

Here's a question for Scott Galloway. Having awakened in a world where you found out that everything about Biden's health was made up and fake, and in a world where the main campaign theme of Biden, the main campaign theme was to find people hoaxes, which even Snopes has debunked and he's probably aware of that by now. So the two biggest claims of the administration are known to be hoaxes. There's no question about them. But yet he's still believing that Trump is unstable and dangerous. How do you wake up from two gigantic hoaxes and then think that the same people who told you those two hoaxes are right about this dangerous part? Or do you think that he came to that conclusion on his own and was not influenced by the news? That's rhetorical. We're all influenced by the news. If the news had not covered it as Trump was the problem he wouldn't have that opinion because that's an assigned opinion.

You can tell an assigned opinion from a real one. The assigned ones just agree with the narrative that you see on the TV. Those are assigned opinions. And the way they assign them is they just shade the news and leave out context until you agree with whatever they're selling. But it's kind of amazing because Galloway would be unusually smart and unusually, shall I say, streetwise. You know the common sense kind of good smart stuff. And having broken through several major hoaxes from his own team, he's still clinging to the most ridiculous one. The president that we had for four years and didn't cause any of this, didn't cause any of this. And we're looking at a president who started the Ukraine war basically. I mean to imagine that these are somehow equivalent risks is something you couldn't get on your own. You couldn't just look at the information and come to that conclusion. You would have to be a little bit brainwashed.

All right. My favorite story that doesn't really have any importance but Candace Owens is getting into a little online fight with Konstantin Kisin. Now I don't know what Konstantin's middle name is but I hope to God it doesn't start with the letter K anyway.

So Konstantin Kisin was kind of mocking Candace Owens. Candace Owens did a video in which she's, so I'm going to paraphrase so don't blame her if I paraphrase it wrong. She's got a sense that science has been so unreliable lately that even things that you would have accepted without question are now on the table for example. Exiles were the moon landing, which she's increasingly doubtful about. But also she brought up the flat earthers. And she said something along the lines of you never know. You know, sort of allowing that science is so bad that maybe even the Earth is flat.

Now I took that as sort of a playful hyperbole, meaning I don't know if she believes that literally. She's just sort of putting it out there to make an extreme point that science has not been reliable lately. But Konstantin, who's got some, I think his family's got a sciency background. I think his father was a scientist etc. So he's pro-science as a lot of people are. And he mocks Candace and he says it's true for too long big science has convinced us that the Earth is round against all the evidence. What a relief it is to finally see this spouse theory challenged. Perhaps now our planes, ships and vehicles will at last be able to navigate the planet. I mean the planet. So he's making a joke. Flat Earth and planet, the flat.

So I had to get involved because well sometimes I can just be and sometimes there's no reason. Sometimes it's just for fun. So I weighed in and I said the round earthers are a cocky bunch but not as cocky as we simulation believers who think that none of it is base reality including your belief in shapes. I debunk your belief in shapes.

Now I'm serious but I'm not serious. I'm not serious that I care too much about the debate and trying to insert myself into it was really just for fun. But I think it's kind of cocky to take anything that science says is definitely true and imagine that 200 years from now you'll agree. Take any point in history, any point, then take a dart and throw it at a list of all the things we thought were true according to science and see where the dart landed and then check that thing in 200 years. Do you think it'll still be true? Probably not. We keep revising everything we know and we think we're done like every 50 years we're like finally we got everything figured out. We got the molecules, we got the big bang, we got it all figured out. And then 100 years later we're like how did we ever think it was all about particles and you know what's a wave and what's a particle? How did we think that?

Well I think that we are inevitably and probably the easiest, I think this is the easiest prediction I'll ever make, it will become a much bigger thing that we might be a simulation. And the reason is we're going to build a simulation and there's no way to stop it. We have AI. We know how to build software environments. I would be surprised if it doesn't already exist. You don't think that somewhere there's an AI avatar in the game that is already living his life and is programmed not to know it's an avatar? Of course somewhere. Because AI can do that for you. You just have the AI being the brains of the NPCs in the games and you tell them, you program them, you believe you're real, you are base reality. If anybody questions you, nope, make sure you argue you are base reality. And it would look exactly like us. We wouldn't be able to tell the difference.

Now you're going to say but Scott, you know he could just look around his fake world and he could see the pixels. Can you see your pixels? No. All you have to do is put one line of code in there that says you will see everything clearly even if it's not clear. Your brain will just interpret everything as a clear picture. That's all you need. And it will just tell you what not to think and not to look at so that you don't accidentally discover that you're not real. Easy peasy.

So once we build our own simulations and people are convinced, holy hell I'm watching this little character like I'm God you know because he doesn't know he's being watched. But you're watching the 3D version of somebody living their life and you will observe that they act and talk like regular people in the real world. And if you quiz them they'd say no no no I think I was put here by God or some version of that. As soon as you see we can do it, and that's less than a year away if it's not already done, as soon as you see we can do it you'll know you're in one. Other people will be harder to convince but most people will say oh God you got me. Yeah we're a simulation. We have to be.

All right. So we cocky simulation believers say you just wait. Your time is coming.

All right ladies and gentlemen that's all I got for today. Thanks for joining. I'm going to talk to the beloved local subscribers privately. Thanks for joining on X and YouTube and Rumble and we'll see you tomorrow same time.

hey everybody come on in here good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization it's called coffee with Scott Adams and as you're pouring in here I know you are you know if you'd like to take your experience today which will be marvelous up to levels that nobody can even understand with their tiny human smooth brains but if you'd like yours to go up to levels that are absolutely July 4th fireworks kind of spectacular all you need for that is a cuper Mugger glass of tankered chel a Jugger flask of vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid I like coffee and join me now for the unparallel pleasure the dope of being here the day the thing that makes everything better it's called the simultaneous Sip and happens now go thank you Paul always appreciate you if I don't say it enough well if you are watching the Dilbert reborn comic that's only available to subscribers on X or people who subscribe to Scot ms.

locals.com where they get lots more um Wally is using uh artificial intelligence for his only health care doesn't go well doesn't go well anyway uh how many of you knew this historical fact that John Adams President John Adams and Thomas Jefferson they both died on the same day July 4th four hours apart how many of you know that history you've all been taught that that John Adams and Thomas Jefferson died four hours apart and there was a little story about I guess when the first one died uh when Jefferson died you know the or the other one said oh the other one still lives or something like that so does that sound to you like a story that is real do you think they really died in the same day you were told that weren't you and history records it if you researched it history would agree do you think it really happened it's a little bit on the nose isn't it little bit too on the nose a little bit too perfect if you heard a story like this in 2024 would you believe it was real giant coincidence let let me you know since uh we're watching the Democrats wake up from their long sleep to find out that the news about Biden had always been fake and we're like whoa are you telling me that all the people we trust could be lying to us and and it could take years to find out yes yes all the people in charge could be lying to you four years now let me ask again do you think that John Adams and Thomas Jefferson died on the same day really really here's what I think they probably died around the same day but don't you think that if it was around the same day there'd be a big pressure to you make it sort of the same day I think being within a few days of the same day would be kind of a coincidence but not nearly as remarkable but I feel like maybe they might have fudged it a little bit to make it sound a little better to the public what do you think I don't know I'm just saying I'd bet against it I'd bet against it being real well let's play could have asked Scott and saved a bunch of money in science uh turns out there's a new study amazingly you won't believe this but uh less than two minutes of looking at Water Outdoors such as a lake or an ocean is enough to activate your parasympathetic nervous system and lower your blood pressure and heart rate um science let me talk to you for a minute science the rest of you um just going to take a moment I'm going to talk to science directly um science you know there's a reason that people vacation at the beach right you know that Lakes are a recreational destination what do you think that was is it because going to the lake makes you feel bad is it because walking on the beach in the sun with the water lapping up against the beach is it because people do that because it makes it feel bad no no you could have saved a little bit of time I've been to the beach has anybody ever been on a beach and did you instantly feel like oh this is relaxing but you didn't know if it was relaxing until this study turns out that what you were seeing with your own eyes and feeling with your own feet and every experience you had is exactly what you thought it was it's I feel like we're in the age of Biden's brain where people where science can tell us things that we all knew forever and then we're supposed to act surprised um no we knew Biden was gone okay we knew going to the beach is relaxing and we knew that relaxing is good for all those things like high blood pressure and such yeah we knew that could have asked me save a little money the University of Cambridge uh has a hypothesis that has some data behind it that oxytocin could be a possible treatment for obesity and postnatal depression so let me see if I understand this right so the drug or the let's say the chemical the chemical that you have in your body that sometimes you don't have enough of is the thing that makes you feel like you've got what you need and you don't need anything else that if you don't have enough of that you're going to need like something else to make you happy well okay you may have heard me talk about this for the last 20 years I call it my pleasure unit hypothesis that a human needs a certain minimum amount of pleasure and if they don't get it oh they're going to do something to get it they'll break a law they'll do illegal drugs they'll do risky Behavior they'll have sex without protection because humans absolutely need some minimum amount of pleasure or else they'll just end their life lives it's like what's the point of being here so oxytocin certainly seems like it would be an obvious treatment for obesity and postnatal depression because depression is because you don't have enough of the right drugs so if you give give you the right chemicals it seems like a good guess that that would make you feel better and obesity if you have the drug that makes you feel like you're connected and good and everything is fine do you need to eat as much well you might love to eat but you're not going to do it for emotional reasons because your emotional reasons will be solved by a chemical so I would say that's in the should have asked Scott category yes if oxytocin is something you can actually give to somebody and it will act just like you produced it yourself yeah I I I could give you another list of things it would cure would you like the whole list it will cure just about everything because it's literally the only thing we we organize our life around is to get more oxytocin it's like the thing all right breit bar has a story that says that uh that AI um Bots and other AI garbages 42% of overall web traffic wow um so eimi Technologies has a stat and so apparently the Bots are 40% um just AI crawling around and grabbing data and 65% of those Bots are classified as malicious what 65% of the AI is already malicious that's a lot um have you noticed have any of you noticed that You.

Tube has turned into what they call the faceless channels where somebody just gives an AI prompt and it creates a whole You.

Tube video so apparently now you could just um use whichever AIS I forget and you could just say uh give me a video about the fall of Rome and then it just makes it there just won't any real people in it'll be sort of cartoony and so people quickly figured out that they could make these and make a fortune but what it did was it sort of ruined You.

Tube because now You.

Tube is just all these faceless things that I could just ask chat GPT I don't really need You.

Tube if it's the same thing that I can just ask chat gbt and they'll just talk me through it because once you take out the people I don't much need to look at the pictures it becomes almost an audio product after that so in fact that's what I do I use chat GPT app and I just ask at the same things I would have looked for on You.

Tube so instead of looking for you know a pre-made You.

Tube video I just say hey tell me about this or that and it gives me basically a You.

Tube without the video um but I think that porn is largely going to be a dead industry on the internet because um I think AI will replace all the human women the human women will move to um you know only fans the attractive ones and that will leave unattractive women in porn plus AI I I think the future is that that porn will just go away because it'll it'll all be just buried with bad AI stuff and just looking for it will be a pain and then the attractive women have already left the industry I think that's what it looks like so I think the porn industry is dead actually um there's something you never thought did you ever think the porn industry would just die I think it's already dead I I I think that literally it's just it's just overweight ugly people in porn now it's it's dead all right so you've been hearing about this project 25 the Heritage Foundation puts out this real big document of things that they wish would happen if a conservative comes to power or conservatives come to power and it involves you know every major agency and how they would be eliminated or changed and it there's a list of conservatives who ready to go for different jobs uh however this is called by the Democrats a blueprint for fascism it's a blueprint for fascism so I think that's what Jane Fonda says and it would do things like uh get rid of the EPA and the Department of Education you dismantle the government now here's my question I don't know too much about what the word fascism means but As Trump once famously said I don't think you know what it means either well sort of paraphrasing um but is reducing the size of your own government fascism is that what that's called when you reduce regulations in other words you have less control as a government over the people so you're returning freedom to the people in the sense of getting rid of burdensome regulations as they would see it burdensome how in the world do you call that fascism I was pretty sure that was the opposite now have you seen any situation in which the news or people in it would tell you something that's clearly the opposite of what it is Joe Biden's sharpest attack just to pick one um president Trump is colluding with Russia 51 uh people tell you the laptop is Russia disinformation or has all the earmarks of it yeah we're pretty used to the news and the famous people in the news telling us the opposite of what is obvious and I think that might be new would you agree that it used to be that people would say stuff like well I've got a I got a secret source that said something and you say to yourself well probably not true but you know I don't see anything that would counter it it's just something that's true or not and you can't tell but there's nothing saying it's not true it's just an unknown we've gone from unknowns to things you know for sure are true that the people who should be telling you the truth are telling you you're not seeing you know Jake Tapper was apparently saying the same thing that we're being asked to deny what we see obviously right in front of us now he was talking about denying that Biden has a little cognitive difficulties we all saw it and yet part of the part of the government and part of the um media is trying to tell us that they couldn't see it really really no you could see it and now according to Red State the Biden campaign uh there's a Biden campaign official who's accusing the media of election interference uh because the way they're covering Biden in the debate wow so they're worried just hold this in your head there's a Biden official campaign official who is willing to say publicly that correct news which is that Biden is infirmed correct news is election interference accurate news is is election interference now I could see how it would be but you would have to have been in a coma for a very long time to think this is the point you want to make in public so I guess the fake news isn't working for them the way it used to all right here's another shocking fact allegedly according to the Daily Mail uh Venezuela had an epic drop in Murder so the murder rate in Venezuela just went through the floor not really it's a 22e low down 25% or something um and of course the suggestion there is that the Venezuelan murderers and the repeat criminals have been uh released from jail and sent to America or if they weren't in jail they just came to America and that the reason that the crime is low in Venezuela compared to what it was um is because the criminals came to America does that sound true does that sound true or does it sound a little bit too on the nose it's kind of clean isn't it it's a very clean story well we're anti-immigration and now Venezuela their crime rate is gone down so I guess that means all the criminals came to the United States am I right let me say let me be as clear as I can that might be exactly what's happening I I I cannot disprove that claim nor is it ridiculous on its surface because we know lots of people are coming if you were a criminal maybe it's pretty good way to get a clean start so it's perfectly possible that that's exactly what's happening but have you ever seen any government data from the United States such as California's job reports that we found out today have been completely fake such as the major revisions of everything such as the crime statistics that we report report in the United States which are clearly fudged why would you trust Venezuela to have accurate crime data of all the things that that Venezuela is likely to do right you think the crime data is in that list you don't you don't think that maybe the government just wants you to think the government of Venezuela you don't think that maybe they just want you to think that they did a good job and crime went down do you think that they even have good reporting in Venezuela or do you think it's more likely that somebody stopped reporting remember it's like a failed state but you think their date is good it's a failed state with accurate data is that what you think they get a dictator but they get accurate data and if failed State there isn't really a big chance that their data is correct you get that right the odds of Venezuela's data being correct is close to zero now but I have to be I have to be specific that doesn't mean it's not true it mean it might be true that there's a whole bunch of criminals that used to be there that moved to America I would assume some have I mean that you you could say with some certainty some number of criminals from Venezuela have made it to America I just don't know if that's behind the drop in the crime statistics so here's a little test for you if you're going to mock the idiots just be careful what you're believing because this was a little bit too on the nose for me I'm not going to buy this one could be I I can't debunk it but no no far more likely the numbers are wrong all right or far more likely that it's just there's some kind of natural thing that's happening that just reduced the uh reduce the rate um let's see remember the theory that Obama was really the one in control of Biden and the Biden was never independent it was always a you know Obama was behind the scenes and I I entertained that theory as well um but it sort of conflicted with other theories you know the other theory that the CIA is in charge or that the uh the uh defense industrial you know industry is in charge but really that's also the CIA or uh I don't know there's some secret advisor who's really in charge so we had lots of rumors of who's really in charge but I think you can rule out Obama was in charge of of Biden because the reporting is that Obama is not too pleased with Biden staying in the race and if Obama had all that power Biden would already be out of the race so the evidence suggests that whatever Obama's Obama's influence was it wasn't as much as Obama wanted because I think he's complained about you know Biden before as as if he doesn't have any control he complained and now it looks like he certainly doesn't have control over whether Biden bows out now it could also be that there are no real options we're just pretending there are options and there aren't but I feel like you can rule that out now I was surprised to see that somebody smart agreed with me or or even more rare uh I agreed with somebody smart because Mike Ben has pointed out that maybe it was always the Biden family that the were the ones that were sort of connected to the uh let's say the intelligence community maybe the fact that the bidens were all over Ukraine tells you that the bidens were the ones closest to the real power and maybe that's why Obama had to pick Biden as his vice president it could be that Biden was the the cia's pick to make sure that you know Obama didn't get too far off off of the path maybe I mean just speculating here or it could be that the CIA liked both of them could be that but um so Benz is is suggesting that you know the Biden family in the CIA might have had a closer connection and that even even now um there was a ex head of the intelligence Community who saying that as long as the head of the CIA is happy with Biden we're in good shape because you know he has good advisors so the idea is that the country is not in trouble because there are real adults running the important stuff like the CIA and if the CIA the head is okay with Biden well then there's not really much of a problem except that sort of gives away the game doesn't it could they be more obvious that the CIA is running Biden I mean how am I supposed to take that how in the world would the CIA think that a degraded you know mentally degraded president is a good idea under What scenario is that a good idea the only scenario I could think of is he didn't matter in the first place it seems pretty obvious that the person who would know who matters the head of the CIA if they're okay with this and apparently they are that really suggest that it's been a while since Biden had much real influence he might have just been caretaker for the office and and the office might be just a subsidiary of the CIA so he's just a figurehead could be that's one hypothesis that does not seem to be ruled down at this point all right um did you know this is another Mike Ben's point out that KL Harris was on the Senate intelligence committee do you remember that somehow I didn't remember that but she was on the Senate and intelligence committee guess what the Senate intelligence committee does it oversees the CIA so in Congress there's a group that oversees the CIA sort of like a regulator you might say what would you expect to happen of somebody regulating the CIA well on day one maybe a little bit of regulating what happens 10 years later well on paper there's only one way it goes on paper if you said all right there's a there's a group of elected officials and it's their job to Monitor and sort of be the boss in a sense of the CIA now you go out 10 years what happened you all know what would happen that the the the committee That was supposed to be regulating so to speak would be captured just like every other regulator because if The Regulators have less power or money or they're less scary than what they're regulating over time the one the one getting regulated will be in charge it's true with everything we've ever seen you know our medical situation it looks like the FDA and the other organizations are just owned by the people with the money so does it seem weird to you that Harris would be on the Senate intelligence committee which one assumes by now should be owned by the CIA which would make Harris an acceptable CIA candidate if any of this is true by the way I'm just in speculative territory here we have to guess on a lot of stuff because we don't know what the real government we actually we literally don't know what our government is is that fair is it fair to say that as of today if I had to describe who's in charge of the government I literally couldn't do it not with confidence so we're left to speculate who's actually in charge and in what situations is who in charge so I'm just speculating because I don't know who's in charge but it on paper if if if there's any kind of chaos on paper these Spooks should end up in charge because they have the ability the power the right skills they have the right access on paper they should always end up in charge there shouldn't be any other possibility and by the way if the CIA was so lame that they couldn't uh completely control the Senate intelligence committee they couldn't do anything else either that would be like the easiest thing they'd ever did you know they're out there overthrowing countries like crazy you don't think they could get a lot of control over who the Senate intelligence committee picks to be in the committee of course they can Chuck Schumer said so if you cross the intelligence Community they have a what do you say a thousand ways from Sunday to get back at you even you know even the majority or was he minority leader then um even they say directly that's a very direct statement that they're in charge if if the elected officials are literally afraid of them and that's what Schumer said he said that Trump should be afraid of them which suggests that Schumer himself is afraid of them that's who's in charge the person you're afraid of I mean that's a pretty clear signal and I think KL Harris is becoming a clear signal as well all right design is Destiny so if there's somebody regulating the CIA the CIA will eventually own them that's that's guaranteed well now we have 25 members of the house that are Democrats who are preparing to call for uh Biden to step down 25 of them well 25 is not that many you know given the total number in Congress 25 is not a lot but it's more than one one one has so far um but it's only the ones in competitive races so the ones who are safe in their reelection they're just going with the flow because they don't need to do anything but the uh the ones who are in trouble trouble you know the ones who are actually going to lose their jobs are willing to say Biden is uh not the guy now have I ever mentioned that sometimes you can predict the future by a little trick that I made up all by myself you've never heard of it it's called follow the money now of course it's a famous famous thing and follow the money every time you see it working you should say to yourself there it goes again keeps working because if you can't predict the future by following the money well you shouldn't be doing any predicting because that's the easy one the easy one is follow the money so you've got a bunch of you know maybe 25ish Democrats who feel like they'll lose their job and their money you know nobody wants to go look for a new job so they would be the ones who would turn on Biden and suddenly they can see all of his infirmities but the people who have no money on the line and have safe jobs they they think he's fine so could there be a clearer example that the Democrats are not even trying to represent the public oh big surprise the ones who are going to lose money if Biden stays in because he'll ruin the whole down vote situation the ones who will lose money are willing to say he's he'll go and the ones who won't lose money are willing to just let it go so there's your your honest democrats for you no but I'm sure it would work the same way with Republicans by the way it wouldn't be any different the Republicans would follow the money because everybody does the reason it works is that nobody's exempt you know if some big part of the country didn't follow the money reliably then it wouldn't be such an easy way to to predict what's going to happen but they do everybody religious people non-religious it doesn't matter they all follow the money sometimes they have excuses they'll say follow the money oh yeah yeah I guess coincidentally that uh those big old Noble reasons that I gave you I guess you're right I I hadn't even noticed but it is compatible with my own Financial benefit huh I didn't didn't really even notice it when I was doing my detailed analysis and making my mind up but you're right you know now that you mentioned it I would make more money with this opinion huh yeah it's a big coincidence well according to Colin rug and some other people reporting that in the betting markets uh Harris has already overtaken Joe Biden so if you're were going to place a bet the odds are that Trump is I don't know up close to 60% odds of winning and against everybody else and uh Harris is now you know somewhere in that 15% range barely squeaking out Biden some of the betting polls are different so it's not it's not every poll but uh I'm so mad because the easiest money I ever could have made would be betting that Kell Harris would be the you know the candidate but here's why it's a little bit tricky they're not really giving us a Biden or Kam Harris option you think they are because your brain is still in the normal world in the normal world if you had a the top of the ticket was clearly mentally incapable and everybody could say it in a normal world you would replace that person with somebody who is at least not mentally deranged so that would suggest well it's definitely you know kamla or somebody but you know not to be Biden that's the normal world you don't live in that world this is not the normal World let me tell you the most likely outcome doesn't mean it'll happen but here's the most likely outcome and Biden's uh the rate of his failing health will be the determinant Biden's not going to drop out unless he gets a lot worse fast and he might be so worse that he can't make the decision to drop out because he's not thinking right so we may be past the point where he is coherent enough to even know he should drop out so we might be stuck but here's the thing was there really some chance that anybody but K Harris was going to be considered and the answer is if you've been alive for the last 5 years and you weren't in a coma you know that they could not could not skip over KLA Harris because she's black and female and by the way there's a California uh California politician who says it directly on video there's no way you're going to skip over the black woman because you're going to lose Black Women Voters and then you're dead you can't win so the threat is there it's direct and it's public you can't do it and of course they know they can't do it they are they are the Dei party they can't ignore Dei just because it got inconvenient that would blow the whole whole the game so they're stuck with her but here's where I think many of you might be wrong especially the Betty markets I don't think she's going to be officially at the top of the ticket on Election Day I think they're going to run the Schrodinger's candidate now you remember Schrodinger's cat famous mental experiment where you put a cat in a sealed box and there's some radioactive decay and if it goes a certain way the and you can't tell because it'd be a randomized process the cat would be dead because it would release a poison and if it went if the radioactive decay went a different way the poison would not be released and when you opened the box the cat would be alive so and then the the weird physics of it which you could debate is that until you see the cat it is neither alive nor dead is in a super position or or the it's only in a state of potential potentially alive potentially dead and you don't know until you open the box because according to physics things don't solidify until they're observed or or measured somehow so here's what the uh Biden Harris team appears to be doing and this is my prediction Biden will still be top of the ticket on Election Day no matter how degraded he is so long as he can still talk if he's on machines it might be different but I think they're going to say you know what here's the proposition here's my prediction Democrats will eventually settle on the following message you're voting for kamla either way that's it that's the message we're going to run Joe Biden at the top but we all agree that you know he's going to step down as soon as he gets elected so whether kamla goes to the top place place and runs or she stays as vice president and runs in both cases you're voting for kamla but here's the beauty of it the psychological Beauty and and remember we're in stupid world so what I tell you next you're going to say but Scott that's so illogical right right it is and it's what they're going to think and do something completely illogical and very predictable and it looks like this they're going to run the Schrodinger's candidate they're going to say if you like Biden vote for Biden you're going to get KL Harris but if you don't want to vote for KL Harris you don't have to because Biden's right there vote for Biden but suppose you want to not vote for Biden because you could see that would be a disaster what do you do then you vote for KLA Harris by voting for Biden because in both cases you get KLA Harris it's just well there's really only one situation you're going to get conell Harris because there's no way that Joe would get elected and continue serving we all know that right so we don't know if it's the day after the election the day after inauguration six months in but nobody nobody thinks that if Biden got elected that you still the president in six months nobody thinks that it'd be 25th amendment for sure but so there's my prediction so if I were to go to the Bing markets and say KL Harris is going to be the candidate I could be right and lose the bet you see the problem because if if they simply run as the same package that they said they were because all the paperwork is done and they're on the ballots if they simply just do what they say they're going to do that's really Comm Harris running there's no way around that there no smart person would disagree with that statement that at this point if it's Biden at the top of the ticket it's it's a Comm Harris race so here's the thing that you you uh weekend speculators are missing they don't have to do anything no change is necessary to get everything they want they'll leave Biden in for everybody wants to vote for him but really is kamla and everybody who wanted kamla to be at the top of the ticket would say you know what I guess it is a little late for that but we'll just take it the other way you know we'll just wait 6 months which would be quite reasonable just wait six months so then everybody in the Democratic party gets everything the stupid way the stupid way by running the guy with no brain but telling you that you can have it either way you could have a Biden or you could have a kamla which is really just KLA but if you like Biden why don't you vote for Biden he did a great job why don't you reward him reward him with a vote for Biden but don't worry because it's just couple it's Schrodinger's candidate they're really going to run both of them and one is dead and one is alive just like the cat it's kind of fascinating but here's the thing if you think it's not going to be kamla either as the second part of the ticket or the top every path is kamla it's all CA all the way it never was anything else or any other possibility there was never a possibility of Michelle Obama never and she just confirmed that it's not in her soul and let me tell you how to read um an honest versus an a dishonest answer here would be a a potentially dishonest answer if Michelle Obama said I have to be honest I haven't even thought about it well that would leave the door open wouldn't it all you have to do is think about it or how about if she said Joe Biden is the nominee that is the end of it well that would be leaving the door open a little bit wouldn't it it would how about um you know I don't think I could win oh that would be leaving the door open a little bit how about um you know I I haven't had an interest in politics no but you could you could get interested to save the country so there are a Thousand Ways she could have said that she's not interested that you would say hm the way you said it though the way you said it makes me think you might be but she didn't do any of the thousand ways that would leave the door open she said you have to have it in your soul to run for office I do not have it in my soul it's not going to happen that ladies and gentlemen is 100 per proof she's not going to run you do not say it's not in my soul unless you're really really not going to run because you don't want anybody to ask you later well what about that whole soul thing you're running but I'm not sure you're into it she's basically poisoned her own candidacy by saying my soul isn't into it you can't take that back now Biden said he wasn't ready you know because he had a death in the family or something not ready is saying that you will be ready she's not saying later I'll have a soul for it she's saying I don't have the soul for it and there's no way you get elected once you said you don't have the soul for the job that is a poison pill that she gave to herself right in front of you hey hey morons do you see this giant poison pill it's called it's not my soul I'm going to take this right in front of you will you please shut up stop saying I might be president shut up watch me eat that only it's like what what can she do to convince you no there was never any chance she would be president or run for it all right uh what about those maralago boxes if you're not following uh lawyer Jeff Clark um for all of the law fair stuff about Trump you're missing a lot of great takes but but uh so Jeff Clark look for him and follow him on X and he says in a post today it's now Dawning on the left that the argument I've long been making uh regarding the moral Lago documents case is correct that whatever else is true Trump Declassified the documents and then he puts it in asterisk by course of Conduct in other words the mere Act of saying put these in the boxes and send them to Mar Lago by any reasonable person's judgment would be a declassification because there was no formal process that he had to follow so the fact that he was sloppy with the sort of informal process would be irrelevant because he's the president so if he if he acts in every way as though documents are being disass Declassified and certainly packing them up and sending them outside of the White House and outside of a secure environment would be the clearest possible indication that he doesn't expect them to be CL classified now whether he said it or not I think you have to give him the benefit of a doubt and it wouldn't matter what president it was I'd say the same thing I think on that gray stuff you got to give them the benefit of it that you just can't run the presidency if every little gray area you know slows them down so um so Jeff Clark says turns out that now it's been confirmed that Trump has immunity for official acts that's the Supreme K case uh that taking the documents with him to maralago means no criminal liability can attach because it was an official act that by his actions he Declassified the documents seems right to be now this by the way was um exactly my take from the beginning that he didn't have to say the words because there was no process no guaranteed process there was you know an informal one there was a traditional one but not one that he had to follow all right um CNN's getting heat for what the left left thinks is CNN trying to take Biden out of the race so they think that they they bias the debate they didn't they think that the CNN people are uh somehow Pro Trump or at least not anti-trump enough I don't see it but I I guess if they're not getting what they want the MSNBC people um they don't like it so they don't like CNN all right let's see what else um so there's a there's a video that's viral of uh just so you can visualize it there's a young black man who's on some kind of a zoom call with a young black woman and he's asking her who said the following uh quotes and he gives a bunch of quotes that are all Joe Biden quotes every one of the quotes is Joe Biden and the young black woman says oh that's Trump oh that was definitely Trump and she says Trump for everyone now these are the uh historical comments that Biden has made the sound some people say racist if the if the shoe were reversed I would probably say he wasn't but that's what they're saying so apparently the actual words of Biden when heard out a context makes a young black woman say oh that's got to be Trump because that's racist as hell and when she was told that every one of those comments came from Biden and none of them came from Trump she was instantly flipped to what the hell is going on here now I don't know if she would I don't that doesn't mean she's Pro Trump but everything she thought about Biden versus Trump she suddenly realized was wrong it was fascinating and I love to see how many times you could reproduce that because I've seen that same thing on Street interviews before where you just give the quotes of Biden and everybody thinks it's Trump and they the young people especially they all think it sounds super racist because they're all woke and uh it blows their mind when they find out they're wrong blows their mind it's fun to watch i' like to see more of it all right um as you know Biden's new attack on uh Trump is that Trump is a liar now we've all watched Trump and we know that the fact Checkers get exhausted when he gives a rally we know that it's all baked in but most of us have come to the understanding that he he uh lies like a salesperson in other words he's a productive liar in other words he's lying for your benefit because we all want to get a deal you know if he says my economy was way better last year than you remember well you could call it a lie or you could say he's trying to get elected because he would be the best one to help you with the economy that would be a productive lie you know B bending the truth hyperbole little exaggeration of what he accomplished maybe even some madeup stuff and if he get elected he would be very transparent because presidents are and we would see if he's doing things for us and if it was like the first four years you'd probably like a lot of the stuff he did so um here's my question if Biden is saying that Trump is a big old liar and that's why you should not vote for him I was trying to think and this is not a rhetorical question it'll sound like a it'll sound like I know the answer I don't know the answer but I was trying to think of anything that Biden has said of substance that's true I couldn't think of anything now that doesn't mean that he hasn't said a true thing of importance I just know I couldn't think of one I couldn't think of anything nothing every every topic I thought of the way he talks about it is a lie so he either has a hoax or he has wrong facts or or he's you know leaving something out or he's just wildly making something up I mean the think about the categories uh we know all of his personal stories are complete we know his complaints about Trump are 100% hoaxes every single complaint about Trump is based on a hoax no exceptions all of his complaints are based on a weird interpretation of reality or hoax and and then he you know of course he presents his record in a misleading way which they all do they all do so he he's lying about his personal anecdotes he's lying 100% about Trump using hoaxes he lies about his record they all do and he lied about his health his mental health what's left this is not a rhetorical question because I don't want to be hanging out there if there are examples to disprove me so I need you to disprove me before somebody who doesn't like me disproves me please tell me anything he said of substance you know something about the campaign what has Biden said of substance that was also true I couldn't think of a single thing can you well he this week what did he say this week um that he had a cold and then he then he said that he was tired from traveling even though he had like a week to get get over it he was still tired from traveling uh he said that Trump got dictator powers from the Supreme Court none of those things are true 100% of everything he said in the last few days was false everything I think everything he said probably everything at the debate was a lie or an a context Am I Wrong can can somebody tell me if there's anything of substance he says at all at all anything that isn't misleading intentionally an a context or just a flat out lie I can't think think of a thing not a single thing so Joy Reed is uh hilarious um I'm try something here I'm see if I can share my screen I may disappear we'll see what happens let's see start my screen sharing this will be interesting to see if I can pull it off hey look at that technology it's working now that's Joy Reed uh let me see if I can try to make that bigger and tell Joe Biden what to do and Dr.

Joe Biden and apparently even Hunter telling him what to do so let me tell you what this show is going to do we are going to pay all of that the same amount of attention the same amount of attention will go to that all right I'm not sure if I Disappeared there or not because I was skipping back and forth but watch Joy Reed and see if you get the same Vibe I do which is a a mental health crisis now I'm not saying that strictly for political reasons because you know I don't like her team honestly it comes comes across a severe mental illness even one eye looks like it's not open like one of her eyes is like you know going crazy like like your brain is not firing right and the things that she says are so wildly ridiculous that it just looks like mental health and then you know a minute later um Rachel mad will come on and she just screams bad mental health which she's admitted by the way she has a a long-term mental health problem which is all over her face and I I feel bad for both of them so if it sounds like I'm just being mean that's not my intention I actually have empathy for them they look like they're having a crisis and it's they're acting it out in their jobs unfortunately it's affecting us so when and then uh Jane Fondo was in some event in which he was talking about Trump and she just seemed bash she had crazy I think we've got to stop ignoring the the problem is mental health you tell me that all of the hosts of MMS of MSNBC are not seeing therapists seriously do you think Joy Reid is not seeing a therapist do you think ra Rachel madow is not seeing a therapist do you think the others are not seeing therapists I would guess every one of them is I don't know I mean I'll be speculating but they they they don't don't just have um a different opinion here's the difference I've watched uh Jake Tapper you know forever and often disagreeing with his takes have I ever thought he had a mental illness no not once not once I I don't know you know exactly what he's thinking nobody knows what anybody's thinking but he doesn't look mentally ill and and if you were to look at you know let's say Wolf Blitzer or you know any of the andn gang none of them look mentally ill even though I've often you know greatly disagreed with their takes they look like they believe them um you know at least in a non-crazy way and the bifurcation of the media on the left into CNN which I would call a a normal dissenting voice meaning that they're not always going to agree with the administration sometimes they might uh versus the ones that just are bad crazy and I I think it's still a male female thing I think the women um have scared themselves well not themselves I would say that the Democrats have gaslighted themselves to the point where the people with the weakest Minds among the Democrats believe the gaslighting because they don't get the real news and they're in a panic and I think Republic ANS are safer because they recognize it for what it is which is some kind of weird brainwashing propaganda thing that seems to affect the people doing it and not the people that trying to do it too well I mean the Democrats are unified but Republicans don't look at any of this stuff and think it's real we literally I watch NBC MSNBC for entertainment because I just can't believe it it's just weird and wacky now do you think that they have the same view when they watch Fox News I don't think so I think they think the Fox News people are lying or evil um but not they're not crazy I don't think so let's see uh Rachel madow had Stormy Daniels on yesterday yesterday do you think Stormy Daniels is a relevant guest to have on in our current situation I can't think of anything that would be less useful to the country than to hear a little bit more from stormy now what's that I mean that just again that just looks like mental illness instead of even somebody doing their job that doesn't even seem like serving the customers at all um and what what is it that uh oh well okay this is what Joy Reed said uh we begin tonight with reality which is sinking in I'm not going to gas light you you saw it I saw it everyone who frantically texted me saw it now she's talking about Biden's bad performance so she says I'm not going to Gaslight you why would she say that why why would it seem necessary to say I'm not going to Gaslight you I've never said that in my life do you know why because it's not in my mental model that one of the things I might ever do is Gaslight you here here's another thing I've never had to say hey Bob don't worry I'm not going to get a chainsaw and cut you in half do you know why because we would both know that would not be in the set of possible options don't worry I'm not going to Flap my wings and fly away nope not one of the options the fact that she said I'm not going to do it suggest strongly that she has done it and knew it was an option so yeah this is my hypnotist filter the hypnotist filter says there are no accidents in ch in the choice of words and indeed choice of words is what hypnosis is it's knowing that some words are more active than others that's a simplification but basically is that and when I see somebody choose those words which are very unusual choice of words what is the last sometime somebody said to you I'm not going to gasly you when the topic was something you saw with with your own eyes yeah yeah we all saw with our own eyes so I'm not going to tell you you didn't see it with your own eyes why is that even a topic unless she knows she does it sometimes that's my speculation and then she says it is straight up fascism if you're to combine a trump autocracy a fully Christian nationalist Republican party in control of both houses in Congress and the current Supreme Court majority wow Katie Bar the Door and unleash the devil because we would be finished as a democracy I don't even know where to start with that bunch of crazy should I start with we haven't been a democracy ever we're Republic that's too obvious should I start with uh presidential autocracy yeah the autocrat is who her her president wants to put in jail for law fair how do you ignore that and the other gu said autograph so that's the uh bat crazy woman update um I would say that what we're seeing is not politics anymore the the whole Biden situation it's very divorced from what I'd call politics uh now it's about Democrats who have poisoned the minds of other Democrats the real issue here is what Democrats did to themselves to pretend that this is now about Democrats versus republic Republicans that's not exactly the top line I mean that's happening too but the top line is there's this massive mental illness that was caused by democrats poisoning their own minds with non-stop hoaxes on paper you were going to end up here suppose I told you one of the political parties is going to completely forget about even trying to be honest and just do hoaxes all the time what would you predict would be the outcome of that well you would predict that the people who watch hoaxes all day long and then inevitably they find out that they're in a hoax hoax ocracy that they get all kinds of mental disabilities from that that's what happens but you could have predicted that from the setup here we are here's another prediction you know I always talk about systems being better than goals and sometimes I say Democrats like goals and Republicans like systems and that more than any other reason is why I um I'm a registered Democrat but I prefer Republicans I prefer them because they're systems based religion is a system Christianity is a system working hard and staying in a jail is a system going to jail learning a skill getting a family making sure that you get married young have some kids that's a system and they would they even talk about it that way you know the family unit is a good system uh you know having a religion it's good system then you know they don't use the word system but they do talk about institutions and things that have worked before systems what do the uh Republic what do the Democrats say got to make everything diverse well how you going to do it well we'll just make unqualified people get hired that's not really a system that's more like you start with the end point and you just hammer it in you know you're missing the whole buildup to it the the useful part so I would say that if you if you had predicted what would happen if the Democrats go Hog Wild with Dei and then you combine that with a thoroughly fake news industry where would you end up if that's all you knew all you knew is they were going to go big on Dei without a system to get there and that the media would be lying about everything right here you would be right here you would be in a place where the country is doubting reality itself all right we'll get rid of full screen Joy um all right so if you want to break the brains of the Democrats completely try telling them that Trump is not a felon he's not a convicted felon and it's unlikely he'll ever be one do you think any Democrats know that it's true he's not a felon because the judge has not you know done whatever is the official thing the judge has to do so it's not official until it's entered to the record so they've been calling him a convicted felon and he's not now to their credit there were saying it because it was just a matter of you know some paperwork not anymore it's not a matter of some paperwork now now I'd bet against it I'd bet against it because he's got that ruling that you know he's got some immunity that uh may require redo or a throwing out of the case but at the very least it would push it till Trump is President and then all bets are off so it's entirely possible I would say even likely that Trump will never be a felon and that's a reality that the the Democrats have been living in the reality that they successfully lawed him they turned him into a felon and it never happened it never happened how are they going to handle that imagine being at this point with what they're finding out about their media lying to them imagine finding out for the first time well you know he's not a felon technically and the odds of him becoming one just went really small are you aware of that they're not going to like it uh I saw a funny comment from uh just a user on X named John ecall and uh he wrote this uh one sentence that made me laugh he goes man journalists are going to be so surprised when they hear about all of Joe's Shady business dealings do we have another round of this where the Democrats suddenly find out that Joe Biden has some shady connections to money from other countries are they going to say hey if we get a scoop for you we think some of Hunter's money from China and Ukraine may have ended up in Joe Biden's pockets I know I know hard to believe well here's the good news uh President Biden says grocery costs are too high for families across the country and we have a plan to tackle them it's good he wasn't specific about the plan but I do have some behind the curtain um a little special I guess you could call it breaking news and maybe a an exclusive really an exclusive I do know Joe Biden's plan for making your groceries cost less uh it's something called OIC uh and you get it in a shot and the shots will be mandatory what now why are you laughing no that's a good plan what did you miss a whole pandemic if there's something that can save your health and it's happening like a you know all over the country the government can make you get a shot now what do you what would you call obesity what what would kill more people the pandemic or or obesity well you know the answer obesity will be far more deadly than the pandemic now if the pandemic cause them to force you to get shots you know to go to school and work and travel and stuff why would they do the same thing for um grocery prices right you you could cut your grocery prices in half by eating less so I think he's going to reduce the demand for groceries by giving a mandatory OIC shots because why not let me put it in a different way if the president sat down in front of you and said what was your reasoning for making these uh the covid shots mandatory and he would say something like well Co was a deadly thing and uh we had to make sure I was protecting the country and if I hadn't people would have died now you you could argue about the reality of that but that would be their case their argument for why they made it mandatory for let's say flying and stuff like that was that it was a big Health crisis and there was a treatment the shot and so the government thought it should make it somewhat mandatory at least they would pressure you to get it how is is that different from obesity find me any way that that's different obesity is more dangerous there is a shot you can take that has some side effects it's not it's not risk-free but it's been tested why not uh make uh 300 million Doses and just start giving that stuff to every overweight person in the country can you imagine how much better our health would be if we had mandatory oing shots no I'm not in favor of it in case this gets taken out of comp this will be taken out of context of course but tell me what's the difference see that's the interesting thing there isn't any there isn't all right um so it looks like MSNBC is going to Pivot their hoaxes from Biden is sharp to uh the January 6 zombie hoax o it's a zombie hoax because as obviously not true as it is can't die um and they're going to call it the big lie that the election was rigged the big lie what would be a bigger lie than the president does not have dementia that's about pretty big I call that pretty big anyway the fact that they've P pivoted to um calling the idea that the election was rigged a big lie why would they do that remember we're we're going to do the hypnotist test again about the choice of words if you just wanted to say the election was not rigged why do you need to brand it why don't you just say there's no evidence you it wasn't rigged it was clean had a good election but no they call it the big lie so it sounds nazil likee right that's what the big lie refers to it's a Nazi reference so so they're acting like Nazis uh well you could say it's the opposite let's not argue with they're Nazis uh rather let's say why would they say that the election rigging is the big lie why do they have to Brand it what's The Branding telling you it's telling me that they know it was rigged that's what it tells me to to me that's a strong signal that they're completely aware it was fake because if they thought it was real they'd say look you idiots show us some evidence or just shut up elections are fine you wouldn't go so far as to Brand it the big lie unless you're using it to cover up the big lie you know remember everything they do is projection so if they say it's a big lie that the election was fake they're basically telling you as clearly as possible the election was rigged you can't get more clear than that now again this is the hitis filter and it's based on the fact that people choose their words not by coincidence it's not a coincidence um they're they're calling it the big lie because it was true that would the only reason they would call it that honestly well Scott Scott Galloway is uh basically uh you know saying that Biden is gone and the Democrats are likely to lose but uh Galloway is not in favor of um Trump because he thinks he's a basically uh unstable uh and dangerous so Trump is unstable and dangerous here's a question for Scott Galloway having awakened in a world where you found out that everything about Biden's Health was made up and fake and in a world where the main Campaign theme of Biden the main Campaign theme was to find people hoax which even Snopes has debunked and he's probably aware of that by now so the two biggest claims of the administration are known to be hoaxes there's no question about them but yet he's still believing that Trump is unstable and dangerous how do you wake up from two gigantic hoaxes and then think that the same people who told you those two hoaxes are right about this dangerous part or do you think that he came to that conclusion on his own and was not influenced by the news that's that's rhetorical we're all we're all influenced by the news if the news had not covered it As Trump was the problem he wouldn't have that opinion because that's that's an assigned opinion you can tell an assigned opinion from a real one the assigned ones just agree with the narrative that you see on the TV those are assigned opinions and the way they assign them is they just shade the news and leave out context until you agree with whatever they're selling but it's kind of amazing because Galloway would be unusually smart and unusually shall I say St.

Street.

Wise you know the common sense kind of good smart stuff and having broken through break broken free of several major hoaxes from his own team he's still clinging to the most ridiculous one the president that we had for four years and didn't cause any of this didn't cause any of this and we're looking at a president who started the Ukraine war basically I mean to imagine that these are somehow equivalent risks is something you couldn't get on your own you couldn't just look at the information and come to that conclusion you would have to be a little bit brainwashed all right my favorite uh story that doesn't really have any importance but uh candus Owens is getting into a little online fight with Constantine kissen uh now I don't know what Constantine's middle name is but I hope to God it doesn't start with the letter k anyway um so Constantine kissen um was a kind of mocking Candace Owens Candace Owens did a video in which she's so I'm going to paraphrase so don't blame her if I paraphrase it wrong she's she's got a sense that science has been so unreliable lately that even things that you would have accepted without question are now on the table for example exles were the moon landing which she's in increasingly doubtful about uh but also she brought up the flat earthers and and she said something along the lines of you know you never know you know sort of sort of allowing that science is so bad that maybe even the Earth is flat now I took that as sort of a playful hyperbole meaning I don't know if she believes that literally she's just sort of putting it out there to make an extreme point that science has not been reliable lately um but Constantine who's got some I think his family's got a sciency background I think his father was a scientist Etc so he's pro- science as a lot of people are and he mocks Candace and he says uh it's true for too long big science has convinced us that the Earth Earth is round against all the evidence what a relief it is to finally see this spous Theory challenged perhaps now our planes ships and vehicles will will at last be able to navigate the planet I mean the planet so he's making a joke Flat Earth and Planet the flet um so I had to I had to get involved because well sometimes I can just be an sometimes there's no reason sometimes it's just for fun so I weighed in and I said uh I said the round earthers are a cocky Bunch uh but not as cocky as we simulation believers who think that none of it is base reality includ including your belief in shapes I I debunk your belief in shapes now now I'm serious but I'm not serious I'm not serious that I care too much about the debate and trying to insert myself into it was really just for fun um but I think it's kind of cocky to take anything that science says is definitely true and imagine that 200 years from now you'll agree take any point in history any point then take a dart and throw it at a list of all the things we thought were true according to science sh and see where the dart landed and then check that thing in 200 years do you think it'll still be true probably not we we keep revising everything we know and we think we're done like every 50 years we're like finally we got everything figured out we got the molecules we got the big bang we got it all figured out and then 100 years later we're like how did we ever think it was all about you know particles and you know what's a wave and what's a particle how do we think that well I think that we are inevitably and probably the mo the easiest I think this is the easiest prediction I'll ever make it will become a much bigger thing that we might be a simulation and the reason is we're going to build a simulation and there's no way to stop it we have ai we know how to build software environments I would be surp urised if it doesn't already exist you don't think that somewhere there's an AI Avatar in the game that is already living his life and is programmed not to know it's an avatar of course somewhere because AI can do that for you you you just have the AI being the brains of the NPCs and the games and you tell them you program them you believe you're real you are base reality if anybody questions you nope make sure you argue you are base reality and it would look exactly like us we wouldn't be able to tell the difference now you're going to say but Scott um you know he could just look around his fake world and he could see the pixels can you see your pixels no all you have to do is put one line of code in there that says you will see everything clearly even if it's not clear your brain will just interpret everything everything as a clear picture that's all you need and it will just tell you what not to think and not to look at so that you don't accidentally discover that you're not real easy peasy so once we build our own simulations and people are convinced holy hell I'm watching this little character like I'm God you know because he doesn't know he's being watched but you're watching the 3D version of somebody living their life and you will observe that they act and talk like regular people in the real world and if you quiz them they'd say no no no I think I was put here by God or some version of that as soon as you see we can do it and that's less than a year away if it's not already done as soon as you see we can do it you'll know you're in one other people will be harder to convince but most people will say oh God you got me yeah we're a simulation we have to be all right all right so we cocky simulation Believers say you just wait your time is coming all right ladies and gentlemen that's all I got for today thanks for joining I'm going to talk to the Beloved local subscribers privately um thanks for joining on X and You.

Tube and Rumble and we'll see you tomorrow same time e e e e e e e e e e e e e e

[Music]

hey everybody come on in

here good morning everybody and welcome

to the highlight of human civilization

it's called coffee with Scott Adams and

as you're pouring in here I know you are

you know if you'd like to take your

experience today which will be marvelous

up to levels that nobody can even

understand with their tiny human smooth

brains but if you'd like yours to go up

to levels that are absolutely July 4th

fireworks kind of spectacular all you

need for that is a cuper Mugger glass of

tankered chel a Jugger flask of vessel

of any kind fill it with your favorite

liquid I like coffee and join me now for

the unparallel pleasure the dope of

being here the day the thing that makes

everything better it's called the

simultaneous Sip and happens now

go thank you

Paul always appreciate you if I don't

say it

enough well if you are watching the

Dilbert reborn comic that's only

available to subscribers on X or people

who subscribe to Scot ms. locals.com

where they get lots more

um Wally is using uh artificial

intelligence for his only health

care doesn't go well doesn't go

well anyway uh how many of you knew this

historical fact that John Adams

President John Adams and Thomas

Jefferson they both died on the same day

July 4th four hours

apart how many of you know that history

you've all been taught that that John

Adams and Thomas Jefferson died four

hours apart and there was a little story

about I guess when the first one

died uh when Jefferson died you know the

or the other one said oh the other one

still lives or something like

that so does that sound to you like a

story that is

real do you think they really died in

the same day

you were told that weren't you and

history records it if you researched it

history would agree do you think it

really

happened it's a little bit on the nose

isn't it little bit too on the nose a

little bit too

perfect if you heard a story like this

in 2024 would you believe it was

real giant

coincidence let let me you know since uh

we're watching the Democrats wake up

from their long sleep to find out that

the news about Biden had always been

fake and we're like whoa are you telling

me that all the people we trust could be

lying to us and and it could take years

to find

out yes yes all the people in charge

could be lying to you four

years now let me ask

again do you think that John Adams and

Thomas Jefferson

died on the same

day

really

really here's what I think they probably

died around the same

day but don't you think that if it was

around the same day there'd be a big

pressure to you make it sort of the same

day I think being within a few days of

the same day would be kind of a

coincidence but not nearly as remarkable

but I feel like maybe they might have

fudged it a little bit to make it sound

a little better to the public what do

you think I don't know I'm just saying

I'd bet against it I'd bet against it

being

real well let's play could have asked

Scott and saved a bunch of money in

science uh turns out there's a new study

amazingly you won't believe this but uh

less than two minutes of looking at

Water Outdoors such as a lake or an

ocean is enough to activate your

parasympathetic nervous system and lower

your blood pressure and heart

rate

um science let me talk to you for a

minute science the rest of you um just

going to take a moment I'm going to talk

to science

directly um

science you know there's a reason that

people vacation at the beach right

you know that Lakes are a recreational

destination what do you think that was

is it because going to the lake makes

you feel

bad is it because walking on the beach

in the sun with the water lapping up

against the beach is it because people

do that because it makes it feel bad no

no you could have saved a little bit of

time I've been to the beach has anybody

ever been on a beach

and did you instantly feel like oh this

is

relaxing but you didn't know if it was

relaxing until this study turns out that

what you were seeing with your own eyes

and feeling with your own feet and every

experience you had is exactly what you

thought it was it's I feel like we're in

the age of Biden's

brain where people where science can

tell us things that we all knew

forever and then we're supposed to act

surprised um no we knew Biden was gone

okay we knew going to the beach is

relaxing and we knew that relaxing is

good for all those things like high

blood pressure and such yeah we knew

that could have asked me save a little

money the University of

Cambridge uh has a hypothesis that has

some data behind it that oxytocin could

be a possible treatment for obesity and

postnatal

depression so let me see if I understand

this right so the drug or the let's say

the chemical the chemical that you have

in your body that sometimes you don't

have enough of is the thing that makes

you feel like you've got what you need

and you don't need anything

else that if you don't have enough of

that you're going to need like something

else to make you happy

well okay you may have heard me talk

about this for the last 20 years I call

it my pleasure unit

hypothesis that a human needs a certain

minimum amount of pleasure and if they

don't get it oh they're going to do

something to get it they'll break a law

they'll do illegal drugs they'll do

risky Behavior they'll have sex without

protection because

humans absolutely need some minimum

amount of pleasure or else they'll just

end their life lives it's like what's

the point of being here so oxytocin

certainly seems like it would be an

obvious treatment for obesity and

postnatal depression because depression

is because you don't have enough of the

right drugs so if you give give you the

right chemicals it seems like a good

guess that that would make you feel

better and

obesity if you have the drug that makes

you feel like you're connected and good

and everything is fine do you need to

eat as much

well you might love to eat but you're

not going to do it for emotional reasons

because your emotional reasons will be

solved by a chemical so I would say

that's in the should have asked Scott

category yes if oxytocin is something

you can actually give to somebody and it

will act just like you produced it

yourself yeah I I I could give you

another list of things it would cure

would you like the whole list it will

cure just about everything because it's

literally the only thing we we organize

our life around is to get more oxytocin

it's like the

thing all

right breit bar has a story that says

that uh that AI um Bots and other AI

garbages 42% of overall web

traffic wow um so eimi Technologies has

a

stat and so apparently the Bots are 40%

um just AI crawling around and grabbing

data and 65% of those Bots are

classified as

malicious

what 65% of the AI is already

malicious that's a lot um have you

noticed have any of you noticed that

YouTube has turned into what they call

the faceless channels where somebody

just gives an AI prompt and it creates a

whole YouTube video so apparently now

you could just um use whichever AIS I

forget and you could just say uh give me

a video about the fall of

Rome and then it just makes it there

just won't any real people in it'll be

sort of

cartoony and so people quickly figured

out that they could make these and make

a fortune but what it did was it sort of

ruined

YouTube because now YouTube is just all

these faceless things that I could just

ask chat

GPT I don't really need

YouTube if it's the same thing that I

can just ask chat gbt and they'll just

talk me through it because once you take

out the people I don't much need to look

at the pictures it becomes almost an

audio product after that so in fact

that's what I do I use chat GPT app and

I just ask at the same things I would

have looked for on YouTube so instead of

looking for you know a pre-made YouTube

video I just say hey tell me about this

or that and it gives me basically a

YouTube without the

video um but I think that porn is

largely going to be a dead industry on

the internet because

um I think AI will replace all the human

women the human women will move to um

you know only fans the attractive ones

and that will leave unattractive women

in porn plus

AI I I think the future is that that

porn will just go

away because it'll it'll all be just

buried with bad AI stuff and just

looking for it will be a pain and then

the attractive women have already left

the industry I think that's what it

looks

like so I think the porn industry is

dead actually um there's something you

never thought did you ever think the

porn industry would just

die I think it's already dead I I I

think that

literally it's just it's just overweight

ugly people in porn now it's it's

dead all right so you've been hearing

about this project 25 the Heritage

Foundation puts out this real big

document of things that they wish would

happen if a conservative comes to power

or conservatives come to power and it

involves you know every major agency and

how they would be eliminated or changed

and it there's a list of conservatives

who ready to go for different

jobs uh however this is called by the

Democrats a blueprint for fascism it's a

blueprint for

fascism so I think that's what Jane

Fonda says and it would do things like

uh get rid of the EPA and the Department

of

Education you dismantle the government

now here's my

question I don't know too much about

what the word fascism means but As Trump

once famously said I don't think you

know what it means either well sort of

paraphrasing um but is reducing the size

of your own government

fascism is that what that's called when

you reduce regulations in other words

you have less control as a government

over the people so you're returning

freedom to the people in the sense of

getting rid of burdensome regulations as

they would see it

burdensome how in the world do you call

that

fascism I was pretty sure that was the

opposite now have you seen any situation

in which the news or people in it would

tell you something that's clearly the

opposite of what it

is Joe Biden's sharpest

attack just to pick

one um president Trump is colluding with

Russia

51 uh people tell you the laptop is

Russia disinformation or has all the

earmarks of it yeah we're pretty used to

the news and the famous people in the

news telling us the opposite of what is

obvious and I think that might be

new would you agree that it used to be

that people would say stuff like well

I've got a I got a secret source that

said something and you say to yourself

well probably not true but you know I

don't see anything that would counter it

it's just something that's true or not

and you can't tell but there's nothing

saying it's not true it's just an

unknown we've gone from unknowns to

things you know for sure are true that

the people who should be telling you the

truth are telling you you're not seeing

you know Jake Tapper was apparently

saying the same thing that we're being

asked to deny what we see obviously

right in front of us now he was talking

about denying that Biden has a little

cognitive difficulties we all saw it and

yet part of the part of the government

and part of the um media is trying to

tell us that they couldn't see

it

really

really no you could see

it and now according to Red State the

Biden campaign uh there's a Biden

campaign official who's accusing the

media of election

interference uh because the way they're

covering Biden in the

debate

wow so they're

worried just hold this in your head

there's a Biden

official campaign official who is

willing to say

publicly that correct news which is that

Biden is

infirmed correct news is election

interference accurate news is is

election

interference now I could see how it

would be but you would have to have been

in a coma for a very long time to think

this is the point you want to make in

public so I guess the fake news isn't

working for them the way it used

to all right here's another shocking

fact allegedly according to the Daily

Mail uh Venezuela had an epic drop in

Murder so the murder rate in Venezuela

just went through the floor not really

it's a 22e low down 25% or something um

and of course the suggestion there is

that the Venezuelan murderers and the

repeat criminals have been uh released

from jail and sent to America or if they

weren't in jail they just came to

America and that the reason that the

crime is low in Venezuela compared to

what it was um is because the criminals

came to America

does that sound

true does that sound

true or does it

sound a little bit too on the

nose it's kind of clean isn't it it's a

very clean story well we're

anti-immigration and now Venezuela their

crime rate is gone down so I guess that

means all the criminals came to the

United States am I right let me say let

me be as clear as I can that might be

exactly what's

happening I I I cannot disprove that

claim nor is it ridiculous on its

surface because we know lots of people

are coming if you were a criminal maybe

it's pretty good way to get a clean

start so it's perfectly possible that

that's exactly what's

happening but have you ever seen any

government data from the United

States such as California's job reports

that we found out today have been

completely fake such as the major

revisions of everything such as the

crime statistics that we report report

in the United States which are clearly

fudged why would you trust Venezuela to

have accurate crime

data of all the things that that

Venezuela is likely to do

right you think the crime data is in

that list you don't you don't think that

maybe the government just wants you to

think the government of Venezuela you

don't think that maybe they just want

you to think that they did a good job

and crime went

down do you think that they even have

good reporting in Venezuela or do you

think it's more likely that somebody

stopped

reporting remember it's like a failed

state but you think their date is good

it's a failed state with accurate data

is that what you think they get a

dictator but they get accurate data and

if failed

State there isn't really a big chance

that their data is

correct you get that right the odds of

Venezuela's data being correct is close

to

zero now but I have to be I have to be

specific that doesn't mean it's not

true it mean it might be true that

there's a whole bunch of criminals that

used to be there that moved to America I

would assume some have I mean that you

you could say with some certainty

some number of criminals from Venezuela

have made it to America I just don't

know if that's behind the drop in the

crime statistics so here's a little test

for

you if you're going to mock the idiots

just be careful what you're believing

because this was a little bit too on the

nose for me I'm not going to buy this

one could be I I can't debunk it but no

no far more likely the numbers are wrong

all right or far more likely that it's

just there's some kind of natural thing

that's happening that just reduced the

uh reduce the

rate um let's see remember the theory

that Obama was really the one in control

of Biden and the Biden was never

independent it was always a you know

Obama was behind the scenes and I I

entertained that theory as

well um but it sort of conflicted with

other theories you know the other theory

that the CIA is in charge or that the uh

the uh defense industrial you know

industry is in charge but really that's

also the

CIA or uh I don't know there's some

secret advisor who's really in charge so

we had lots of rumors of who's really in

charge but I think you can rule out

Obama was in charge of of Biden because

the reporting is that Obama is not too

pleased with Biden staying in the race

and if Obama had all that

power Biden would already be out of the

race so the evidence suggests that

whatever Obama's Obama's influence was

it wasn't as much as Obama wanted

because I think he's complained about

you know Biden before as as if he

doesn't have any control he complained

and now it looks like he certainly

doesn't have control over whether Biden

bows out now it could also be that there

are no real options we're just

pretending there are options and there

aren't but I feel like you can rule that

out now I was surprised to see that

somebody smart agreed with

me or or even more rare uh I agreed with

somebody smart because Mike Ben has

pointed out that maybe it was always the

Biden family that the were the ones that

were sort of connected to the uh let's

say the intelligence community

maybe the fact that the bidens were all

over Ukraine tells you that the bidens

were the ones closest to the real power

and maybe that's why Obama had to pick

Biden as his vice president it could be

that Biden was the the cia's pick to

make sure that you know Obama didn't get

too far off off of the path maybe I mean

just speculating here or it could be

that the

CIA liked both of them could be that but

um so Benz is is suggesting that you

know the Biden family in the CIA might

have had a closer connection and that

even even now um there was a ex head of

the intelligence Community who saying

that as long as the head of the CIA is

happy with Biden we're in good shape

because you know he has good

advisors so the idea is that the country

is not in trouble because there are real

adults running the important stuff like

the CIA and if the CIA the head is okay

with

Biden well then there's not really much

of a

problem except that sort of gives away

the game doesn't

it could they be more obvious that the

CIA is running

Biden I mean how am I supposed to take

that how in the world would the CIA

think that a degraded you know mentally

degraded president is a good

idea under What scenario is that a good

idea the only scenario I could think of

is he didn't matter in the first

place it seems pretty obvious that the

person who would know who matters the

head of the CIA if they're okay with

this and apparently they are that really

suggest that it's been a while since

Biden had much real influence he might

have just been caretaker for the office

and and the office might be just a

subsidiary of the

CIA so he's just a figurehead could be

that's one hypothesis that does not seem

to be ruled down at this

point all right um did you know this is

another Mike Ben's point out that KL

Harris was on the Senate intelligence

committee do you remember that somehow I

didn't remember that but she was on the

Senate and intelligence committee guess

what the Senate intelligence committee

does it oversees the

CIA so in Congress there's a group that

oversees the

CIA sort of like a regulator you might

say what would you expect to happen of

somebody regulating the

CIA well on day one maybe a little bit

of

regulating what happens 10 years later

well on paper there's only one way it

goes on paper if you said all right

there's a there's a group of elected

officials and it's their job to Monitor

and sort of be the boss in a sense of

the

CIA now you go out 10 years what

happened you all know what would happen

that the the the committee That was

supposed to be regulating so to speak

would be

captured just like every other

regulator because if The Regulators have

less power or money or they're less

scary than what they're regulating over

time the one the one getting regulated

will be in charge it's true with

everything we've ever seen you know our

medical situation it looks like the FDA

and the other organizations are just

owned by the people with the

money so does it seem weird to

you that Harris would be on the Senate

intelligence committee which one assumes

by now should be owned by the CIA which

would make Harris an acceptable CIA

candidate if any of this is true by the

way I'm just in speculative territory

here we have to guess on a lot of stuff

because we don't know what the real

government we actually we literally

don't know what our government is is

that fair is it fair to say that as of

today if I had to describe who's in

charge of the government I literally

couldn't do it not with confidence so

we're left to speculate who's actually

in charge and in what situations is who

in charge so I'm just speculating

because I don't know who's in charge but

it on

paper if if if there's any kind of chaos

on paper these Spooks should end up in

charge because they have the ability the

power the right skills they have the

right

access on paper they should always end

up in charge there shouldn't be any

other possibility and by the way if the

CIA was so lame that they couldn't uh

completely control the Senate

intelligence

committee they couldn't do anything else

either that would be like the easiest

thing they'd ever did you know they're

out there overthrowing countries like

crazy you don't think they could get a

lot of control over who the Senate

intelligence committee picks to be in

the committee of course they can Chuck

Schumer said so if you cross the

intelligence Community they have a what

do you say a thousand ways from Sunday

to get back at

you even you know even the majority or

was he minority leader then um even they

say directly that's a very direct

statement that they're in charge if if

the elected officials are literally

afraid of them and that's what Schumer

said he said that Trump should be afraid

of them which suggests that Schumer

himself is afraid of them that's who's

in charge the person you're afraid of I

mean that's a pretty clear signal and I

think KL Harris is becoming a clear

signal as

well all right design is Destiny so if

there's somebody regulating the CIA the

CIA will eventually own them that's

that's

guaranteed well now we have 25 members

of the house that are Democrats who are

preparing to call for uh Biden to step

down 25 of them well 25 is not that many

you know given the total number in

Congress 25 is not a lot but it's more

than one one one has so far

um but it's only the ones in competitive

races so the ones who are safe in their

reelection they're just going with the

flow because they don't need to do

anything but the uh the ones who are in

trouble trouble you know the ones who

are actually going to lose their jobs

are willing to say Biden is uh not the

guy now have I ever mentioned that

sometimes you can predict the future by

a little trick that I made up all by

myself you've never heard of it it's

called follow the money now of course

it's a famous famous thing and follow

the money every time you see it working

you should say to yourself there it goes

again

keeps working because if you can't

predict the future by following the

money well you shouldn't be doing any

predicting because that's the easy one

the easy one is follow the money so

you've got a bunch of you know maybe

25ish Democrats who feel like they'll

lose their job and their money you know

nobody wants to go look for a new job

so they would be the ones who would turn

on Biden and suddenly they can see all

of his

infirmities but the people who have no

money on the line and have safe jobs

they they think he's

fine so could there be a clearer example

that the Democrats are not even trying

to represent the public oh big

surprise the ones who are going to lose

money if Biden stays in because he'll

ruin the whole down vote situation the

ones who will lose money are willing to

say he's he'll go and the ones who won't

lose money are willing to just let it

go so there's your your honest democrats

for you no but I'm sure it would work

the same way with Republicans by the way

it wouldn't be any different the

Republicans would follow the money

because everybody does the reason it

works is that nobody's

exempt you know if some big part of the

country didn't follow the money reliably

then it wouldn't be such an easy way to

to predict what's going to happen but

they do everybody religious people

non-religious it doesn't matter they all

follow the money sometimes they have

excuses they'll say follow the money oh

yeah yeah I guess

coincidentally that uh those big old

Noble reasons that I gave you I guess

you're right I I hadn't even noticed but

it is compatible with my own Financial

benefit huh I didn't didn't really even

notice it when I was doing my detailed

analysis and making my mind up but

you're right you know now that you

mentioned it I would make more money

with this opinion huh yeah it's a big

coincidence well according to Colin rug

and some other people reporting that in

the betting markets uh Harris has

already overtaken Joe Biden so if you're

were going to place a bet the odds are

that Trump is I don't know up close to

60% odds of winning and against

everybody else and uh

Harris is now you know somewhere in that

15% range barely squeaking out Biden

some of the betting polls are different

so it's not it's not every

poll but

uh I'm so mad

because the easiest money I ever could

have

made would be betting that Kell Harris

would be the you know the candidate but

here's why it's a little bit tricky

they're not really giving us a Biden or

Kam Harris option you think they are

because your brain is still in the

normal world in the normal world if you

had a the top of the ticket was clearly

mentally incapable and everybody could

say it in a normal world you would

replace that person with somebody who is

at least not mentally

deranged so that would suggest well it's

definitely you know kamla or somebody

but you know not to be Biden that's the

normal world you don't live in that

world this is not the normal World let

me tell you the most likely outcome

doesn't mean it'll happen but here's the

most likely outcome and Biden's uh the

rate of his failing health will be the

determinant Biden's not going to drop

out unless he gets a lot worse fast and

he might be so worse that he can't make

the decision to drop out because he's

not thinking right so we may be past the

point where he is coherent enough to

even know he should drop out so we might

be

stuck but here's the thing was there

really some chance that anybody but K

Harris was going to be considered and

the answer is if you've been alive for

the last 5 years and you weren't in a

coma you know that they could not could

not skip over KLA Harris because she's

black and female and by the way there's

a

California uh California politician who

says it directly on video there's no way

you're going to skip over the black

woman because you're going to lose Black

Women Voters and then you're dead you

can't win so the threat is there it's

direct and it's public you can't do it

and of course they know they can't do it

they are they are the Dei party they

can't ignore Dei just because it got

inconvenient that would blow the whole

whole the game so they're stuck with her

but here's where I think many of you

might be wrong especially the Betty

markets I don't think she's going to be

officially at the top of the ticket on

Election Day I think they're going to

run the Schrodinger's

candidate now you remember Schrodinger's

cat famous mental experiment where you

put a cat in a sealed box and there's

some radioactive decay and if it goes a

certain way the and you can't tell

because it'd be a randomized process the

cat would be dead because it would

release a poison and if it went if the

radioactive decay went a different way

the poison would not be released and

when you opened the box the cat would be

alive so and then the the weird physics

of it which you could debate is that

until you see the cat it is neither

alive nor dead is in a super position or

or the it's only in a state of potential

potentially alive potentially dead and

you don't know until you open the box

because according to physics things

don't solidify until they're observed or

or measured somehow

so here's what the uh Biden Harris team

appears to be doing and this is my

prediction Biden will still be top of

the ticket on Election Day no matter how

degraded he is so long as he can still

talk if he's on machines it might be

different but I think they're going to

say you know what here's the proposition

here's my prediction Democrats will

eventually settle on the following

message you're voting for kamla either

way that's it that's the message we're

going to run Joe Biden at the top but we

all agree that you know he's going to

step down as soon as he gets

elected so whether kamla goes to the top

place place and runs or she stays as

vice president and runs in both cases

you're voting for kamla but here's the

beauty of it the psychological Beauty

and and

remember we're in stupid world so what I

tell you next you're going to say but

Scott that's so illogical right right it

is and it's what they're going to think

and do something completely illogical

and very predictable and it looks like

this they're going to run the

Schrodinger's

candidate they're going to say if you

like Biden vote for

Biden you're going to get KL Harris but

if you don't want to vote for KL Harris

you don't have to because Biden's right

there vote for Biden but suppose you

want to not vote for Biden because you

could see that would be a disaster what

do you do

then you vote for KLA

Harris by voting for Biden

because in both cases you get KLA Harris

it's

just well there's really only one

situation you're going to get conell

Harris because there's no way that Joe

would get elected and continue serving

we all know that right so we don't know

if it's the day after the election the

day after

inauguration six months in but nobody

nobody thinks that if Biden got elected

that you still the president in six

months nobody thinks that it'd be 25th

amendment for sure

but so there's my prediction so if I

were to go to the Bing markets and say

KL Harris is going to be the candidate I

could be right and lose the

bet you see the problem because if if

they simply run as the same package that

they said they were because all the

paperwork is done and they're on the

ballots if they simply just do what they

say they're going to do that's really

Comm Harris running there's no way

around that there no smart person would

disagree with that statement that at

this point if it's Biden at the top of

the ticket it's it's a Comm Harris race

so here's the thing that

you you uh weekend speculators are

missing they don't have to do

anything no change is necessary to get

everything they want they'll leave Biden

in for everybody wants to vote for him

but really is kamla and everybody who

wanted kamla to be at the top of the

ticket would say you know what I guess

it is a little late for that but we'll

just take it the other way you know

we'll just wait 6 months which would be

quite reasonable just wait six months so

then everybody in the Democratic party

gets

everything the stupid way the stupid way

by running the guy with no brain but

telling you that you can have it either

way you could have a Biden or you could

have a kamla which is really just KLA

but if you like Biden why don't you vote

for Biden he did a great job why don't

you reward him reward him with a vote

for Biden but don't worry because it's

just couple it's Schrodinger's candidate

they're really going to run both of them

and one is dead and one is alive just

like the

cat it's kind of fascinating but here's

the thing if you think it's not going to

be kamla either as the second part of

the ticket or the

top every path is

kamla it's all CA all the way it never

was anything else or any other

possibility there was never a

possibility of Michelle Obama never and

she just confirmed that it's not in her

soul and let me tell you how to read um

an honest versus an a dishonest answer

here would be a a potentially dishonest

answer if Michelle Obama said I have to

be honest I haven't even thought about

it well that would leave the door open

wouldn't it all you have to do is think

about it or how about if she said Joe

Biden is the nominee that is the end of

it well that would be leaving the door

open a little bit wouldn't it it would

how

about um you know I don't think I could

win oh that would be leaving the door

open a little bit how about um you know

I I haven't had an interest in

politics no but you could you could get

interested to save the country so there

are a Thousand Ways she could have said

that she's not

interested that you would say hm the way

you said it though the way you said it

makes me think you might

be but she didn't do any of the thousand

ways that would leave the door open she

said you have to have it in your soul to

run for office I do not have it in my

soul it's not going to happen that

ladies and gentlemen is 100 per

proof she's not going to run you do not

say it's not in my soul unless you're

really really not going to run because

you don't want anybody to ask you later

well what about that whole soul thing

you're running but I'm not sure you're

into

it she's basically poisoned her own

candidacy by saying my soul isn't into

it you can't take that back now Biden

said he wasn't ready you know because he

had a death in the family or something

not ready is saying that you will be

ready she's not saying later I'll have a

soul for it she's saying I don't have

the soul for it and there's no way you

get elected once you said you don't have

the soul for the job that is a poison

pill that she gave to herself right in

front of you hey hey morons do you see

this giant poison pill it's called it's

not my soul I'm going to take this right

in front of you will you please shut up

stop saying I might be president shut up

watch me eat that only

it's like what what can she do to

convince you no there was never any

chance she would be president or run for

it all

right uh what about those maralago boxes

if you're not following uh lawyer Jeff

Clark um for all of the law fair stuff

about Trump you're missing a lot of

great takes but but uh so Jeff Clark

look for him and follow him on X and he

says in a post today it's now Dawning on

the left that the argument I've long

been

making uh regarding the moral Lago

documents case is correct that whatever

else is true Trump Declassified the

documents and then he puts it in

asterisk by course of

Conduct in other words the mere Act of

saying put these in the boxes and send

them to Mar Lago by any reasonable

person's judgment would be a

declassification because there was no

formal process that he had to follow so

the fact that he was sloppy with the

sort of informal process would be

irrelevant because he's the president so

if he if he acts in every way as though

documents are being disass Declassified

and certainly packing them up and

sending them outside of the White House

and outside of a secure environment

would be the clearest possible

indication that he doesn't expect them

to be CL classified now whether he said

it or not I think you have to give him

the benefit of a doubt and it wouldn't

matter what president it was I'd say the

same thing I think on that gray stuff

you got to give them the benefit of it

that you just can't run the presidency

if every little gray area you know slows

them

down so um so Jeff Clark says turns out

that now it's been confirmed that Trump

has immunity for official acts that's

the Supreme K case uh that taking the

documents with him to maralago means no

criminal liability can attach because it

was an official act that by his actions

he Declassified the

documents seems right to be now this by

the way was

um exactly my take from the beginning

that he didn't have to say the words

because there was no process no

guaranteed process there was you know an

informal one there was a traditional one

but not one that he had to

follow all right um CNN's getting heat

for what the left left thinks is CNN

trying to take Biden out of the race so

they think that they they bias the

debate they didn't they think that the

CNN people are uh somehow Pro Trump or

at least not anti-trump

enough I don't see it but I I guess if

they're not getting what they want the

MSNBC people um they don't like it so

they don't like

CNN all right let's see what

else

um so there's a there's a

video that's viral of uh just so you can

visualize it there's a young black man

who's on some kind of a zoom call with a

young black woman and he's asking her

who said the following uh quotes

and he gives a bunch of quotes that are

all Joe Biden quotes every one of the

quotes is Joe Biden and the young black

woman says oh that's Trump oh that was

definitely Trump and she says Trump for

everyone now these are the uh historical

comments that Biden has made the sound

some people say

racist if the if the shoe were reversed

I would probably say he wasn't but

that's what they're saying so apparently

the actual words of Biden when heard out

a context makes a young black woman say

oh that's got to be Trump because that's

racist as hell and when she was told

that every one of those comments came

from Biden and none of them came from

Trump she was instantly

flipped to what the hell is going on

here now I don't know if she would I

don't that doesn't mean she's Pro Trump

but everything she thought about Biden

versus Trump she suddenly realized was

wrong it was fascinating and I love to

see how many times you could reproduce

that because I've seen that same thing

on Street interviews before where you

just give the quotes of Biden and

everybody thinks it's Trump and they the

young people especially they all think

it sounds super racist because they're

all woke and uh it blows their mind when

they find out they're wrong blows their

mind it's fun to watch i' like to see

more of

it all right

um as you know Biden's new attack on uh

Trump is that Trump is a

liar now we've all watched Trump and we

know that the fact Checkers get

exhausted when he gives a rally we know

that it's all baked in but most of us

have come to the understanding that he

he uh lies like a salesperson in other

words he's a productive liar in other

words he's lying for your benefit

because we all want to get a deal you

know if he says my economy was way

better last year than you

remember well you could call it a lie or

you could say he's trying to get elected

because he would be the best one to help

you with the economy that would be a

productive lie you know B bending the

truth hyperbole little exaggeration of

what he accomplished maybe even some

madeup

stuff and if he get

elected he would be very transparent

because presidents are and we would see

if he's doing things for us and if it

was like the first four years you'd

probably like a lot of the stuff he

did so um here's my question if Biden is

saying that Trump is a big old liar and

that's why you should not vote for him I

was trying to think and this is not a

rhetorical question it'll sound like a

it'll sound like I know the answer I

don't know the answer but I was trying

to think of anything that Biden has said

of

substance that's true I couldn't think

of anything

now that doesn't mean that he hasn't

said a true thing of importance I just

know I couldn't think of one I couldn't

think of anything nothing every every

topic I thought of the way he talks

about it is a lie so he either has a

hoax or he has wrong facts or or he's

you know leaving something out or he's

just wildly making something up I mean

the think about the categories uh we

know all of his personal stories are

complete we know his complaints

about Trump are 100% hoaxes every single

complaint about Trump is based on a hoax

no

exceptions all of his complaints are

based on a weird interpretation of

reality or

hoax and and then he you know of course

he presents his record in a misleading

way which they all do they all do so he

he's lying about his personal anecdotes

he's lying 100% about Trump using hoaxes

he lies about his record they all do and

he lied about his health his mental

health what's

left this is not a rhetorical question

because I don't want to be hanging out

there if there are examples to disprove

me so I need you to disprove me before

somebody who doesn't like me disproves

me please tell me anything he said of

substance you know something about the

campaign what has Biden said of

substance that was also true I couldn't

think of a single thing can

you well he this week what did he say

this week

um that he had a

cold and then he then he said that he

was tired from traveling even though he

had like a week to get get over it he

was still tired from traveling uh he

said that Trump got dictator powers from

the Supreme Court none of those things

are

true 100% of everything he said in the

last few days was false everything I

think everything he said probably

everything at the debate was a lie or an

a

context Am I Wrong can can somebody tell

me if there's anything of

substance he says at all at all anything

that isn't misleading intentionally an a

context or just a flat out lie I can't

think think of a thing not a single

thing so Joy Reed is uh

hilarious um

I'm try something here I'm see if I can

share my screen I may disappear we'll

see what

happens let's

see start my screen

sharing this will be interesting to see

if I can pull it off

hey look at that technology it's

working now that's Joy

Reed uh let me see if I

can try to make that

bigger and tell Joe Biden what to do and

Dr Joe Biden and apparently even Hunter

telling him what to

do so let me tell you what this show is

going to do we are going to pay all of

that the same amount of attention the

same amount of attention will go to

that all

right I'm not sure if I Disappeared

there or not because I was skipping back

and forth but watch Joy Reed and see if

you get the same Vibe I do which is a a

mental health

crisis now I'm not saying that strictly

for political reasons because you know I

don't like her team honestly it comes

comes across a severe mental illness

even one eye looks like it's not open

like one of her eyes is like you know

going crazy like like your brain is not

firing right and the things that she

says are so wildly ridiculous that it

just looks like mental health and then

you know a minute later um Rachel mad

will come on and she just screams bad

mental health which she's admitted by

the way she has a a long-term mental

health problem which is all over her

face and I I feel bad for both of them

so if it sounds like I'm just being mean

that's not my intention I actually have

empathy for them they look like they're

having a crisis and it's they're acting

it out in their jobs unfortunately it's

affecting us

so when and then uh Jane Fondo was in

some event in which he was talking about

Trump and she just seemed bash she had

crazy I think we've got to stop ignoring

the

the problem is mental health you tell me

that all of the hosts of MMS of MSNBC

are not seeing

therapists seriously do you think Joy

Reid is not seeing a

therapist do you think ra Rachel madow

is not seeing a

therapist do you think the others are

not seeing

therapists I would guess every one of

them is I don't know I mean I'll be

speculating but they they they don't

don't just

have um a different

opinion here's the

difference I've watched uh Jake Tapper

you know forever and often disagreeing

with his takes have I ever thought he

had a mental

illness no not once not once I I don't

know you know exactly what he's thinking

nobody knows what anybody's thinking but

he doesn't look mentally ill and and if

you were to look at you know let's say

Wolf Blitzer or you know any of the andn

gang none of them look mentally

ill even though I've often you know

greatly disagreed with their takes they

look like they believe

them um you know at least in a non-crazy

way and the bifurcation of the media on

the left into CNN which I would call a a

normal dissenting voice meaning that

they're not always going to agree with

the administration

sometimes they might uh versus the ones

that just are bad

crazy and I I think it's still a male

female thing I think the women um have

scared themselves well not themselves I

would say that the Democrats have

gaslighted themselves to the point where

the people with the weakest Minds among

the Democrats believe the gaslighting

because they don't get the real news and

they're in a panic and I think Republic

ANS are safer because they recognize it

for what it is which is some kind of

weird brainwashing propaganda thing that

seems to affect the people doing it and

not the people that trying to do it

too well I mean the Democrats are

unified but Republicans don't look at

any of this stuff and think it's real we

literally I watch NBC

MSNBC for entertainment because I just

can't believe it it's just weird and

wacky now do you think that they have

the same view when they watch Fox News I

don't think so I think they think the

Fox News people are lying or

evil um but not they're not

crazy I don't think

so let's see uh Rachel madow had Stormy

Daniels on

yesterday

yesterday do you think Stormy Daniels is

a relevant guest to have on in our

current situation I can't think of

anything that would be less useful to

the country than to hear a little bit

more from

stormy now what's that I mean that just

again that just looks like mental

illness instead of even somebody doing

their job that doesn't even seem like

serving the customers at

all

um and what what is it that

uh oh well okay this is what Joy Reed

said uh we begin tonight with reality

which is sinking in I'm not going to gas

light you you saw it I saw it everyone

who frantically texted me saw it now

she's talking about Biden's bad

performance so she says I'm not going to

Gaslight

you why would she say

that why why would it seem necessary to

say I'm not going to Gaslight

you I've never said that in my life do

you know why because it's not in my

mental model that one of the things I

might ever do is Gaslight you here

here's another thing I've never had to

say hey Bob don't worry I'm not going to

get a chainsaw and cut you in

half do you know why because we would

both know that would not be in the set

of possible

options don't worry I'm not going to

Flap my wings and fly

away nope not one of the

options the fact that she said I'm not

going to do it suggest strongly that she

has done it and knew it was an option

so yeah this is my hypnotist filter the

hypnotist filter says there are no

accidents in ch in the choice of words

and indeed choice of words is what

hypnosis is it's knowing that some words

are more active than others that's a

simplification but basically is that and

when I see somebody choose those words

which are very unusual choice of words

what is the last sometime somebody said

to you I'm not going to gasly you when

the topic was something you saw with

with your own

eyes yeah yeah we all saw with our own

eyes so I'm not going to tell you you

didn't see it with your own eyes why is

that even a

topic unless she knows she does it

sometimes that's my speculation and then

she

says it is straight up fascism if you're

to combine a trump

autocracy a fully Christian nationalist

Republican party in control of both

houses in Congress and the current

Supreme Court majority wow Katie Bar the

Door and unleash the devil because we

would be finished as a

democracy I don't even know where to

start with that bunch of crazy

should I start with we haven't been a

democracy ever we're Republic that's too

obvious should I start with uh

presidential autocracy yeah the autocrat

is who her her president wants to put in

jail for law fair how do you ignore

that and the other gu said

autograph so that's the uh bat

crazy woman update um I would say that

what we're seeing is not politics

anymore the the whole Biden situation

it's very divorced from what I'd call

politics uh now it's about Democrats who

have poisoned the minds of other

Democrats the real issue here is what

Democrats did to

themselves to pretend that this is now

about Democrats versus republic

Republicans that's not exactly the top

line I mean that's happening too but the

top line is there's this massive mental

illness that was caused by democrats

poisoning their own minds with non-stop

hoaxes on paper you were going to end up

here suppose I told you one of the

political parties is going to completely

forget about even trying to be honest

and just do hoaxes all the

time what would you predict would be the

outcome of that well you would predict

that the people who watch hoaxes all day

long and then inevitably they find out

that they're in a hoax hoax

ocracy that they get all kinds of mental

disabilities from that that's what

happens but you could have predicted

that from the

setup here we are here's another

prediction you know I always talk about

systems being better than goals and

sometimes I say Democrats like goals and

Republicans like systems and that more

than any other reason is why I um I'm a

registered Democrat but I prefer

Republicans I prefer them because

they're systems

based religion is a system Christianity

is a system working hard and staying in

a jail is a system going to jail

learning a skill getting a family making

sure that you get married young have

some kids that's a

system and they would they even talk

about it that way you know the family

unit is a good system uh you know having

a religion it's good system then you

know they don't use the word system but

they do talk about institutions and

things that have worked before systems

what do the uh Republic what do the

Democrats say got to make everything

diverse well how you going to do it well

we'll just make unqualified people get

hired that's not really a system

that's more like you start with the end

point and you just hammer it in you know

you're missing the whole buildup to it

the the useful part

so I would say that if you if you had

predicted what would happen if the

Democrats go Hog Wild with

Dei and then you combine that with a

thoroughly fake news

industry where would you end up if

that's all you knew all you knew is they

were going to go big on Dei without a

system to get there

and that the media would be lying about

everything right here you would be right

here you would be in a place where the

country is doubting reality

itself all right we'll get rid

of full screen

Joy

um all right so if you want to break the

brains of the Democrats

completely try telling them that Trump

is not a felon he's not a convicted

felon and it's unlikely he'll ever be

one do you think any Democrats know that

it's true he's not a felon because the

judge has not you know done whatever is

the official thing the judge has to do

so it's not official until it's entered

to the record so they've been calling

him a convicted felon and he's not now

to their credit there were saying it

because it was just a matter of you know

some

paperwork not

anymore it's not a matter of some

paperwork now now I'd bet against it I'd

bet against it because he's got that

ruling that you know he's got some

immunity that uh may require redo or a

throwing out of the case but at the very

least it would push it till Trump is

President and then all bets are

off

so it's entirely possible I would say

even likely that Trump will never be a

felon and that's a reality that the the

Democrats have been living in the

reality that they successfully lawed him

they turned him into a

felon and it never happened it never

happened how are they going to handle

that imagine being at this point with

what they're finding out about their

media lying to them imagine finding out

for the first time well you know he's

not a felon

technically and the odds of him becoming

one just went really small are you aware

of that they're not going to like

it uh I saw a funny comment from uh just

a user on X named John

ecall and uh he wrote this uh one

sentence that made me laugh he goes man

journalists are going to be so surprised

when they hear about all of Joe's Shady

business

dealings do we have another round of

this where the Democrats suddenly find

out that Joe Biden has some shady

connections to money from other

countries are they going to say hey if

we get a scoop for you we think some of

Hunter's money from China and Ukraine

may have ended up in Joe Biden's pockets

I know I know hard to believe well

here's the good news uh President Biden

says grocery costs are too high for

families across the country and we have

a plan to tackle

them it's good he wasn't specific about

the plan but I do have some behind the

curtain um a little

special I guess you could call it

breaking news and maybe a an exclusive

really an exclusive I do know Joe

Biden's plan for making your groceries

cost

less uh it's something called

OIC uh and you get it in a shot and the

shots will be

mandatory what now why are you

laughing no that's a good plan what did

you miss a whole

pandemic if there's something that can

save your health and it's happening like

a you know all over the country the

government can make you get a shot

now what do you what would you call

obesity what what would kill more people

the pandemic or or

obesity well you know the answer obesity

will be far more deadly than the

pandemic now if the pandemic cause them

to force you to get shots you know to go

to school and work and travel and stuff

why would they do the same thing for um

grocery

prices right you you could cut your

grocery prices in half by eating less so

I think he's going to reduce the demand

for groceries by giving a mandatory OIC

shots because why

not let me put it in a different way if

the president sat down in front of you

and said what was your reasoning for

making these uh the covid shots

mandatory and he would say something

like well Co was a deadly thing and uh

we had to make sure I was protecting the

country and if I hadn't people would

have died now you you could argue about

the reality of that but that would be

their case their argument for why they

made it mandatory for let's say flying

and stuff like that was that it was a

big Health

crisis and there was a treatment the

shot and so the government thought it

should make it somewhat mandatory at

least they would pressure you to get

it how is is that different from

obesity find me any way that that's

different obesity is more dangerous

there is a shot you can take that has

some side effects it's not it's not

risk-free but it's been

tested why not uh make uh 300 million

Doses and just start giving that stuff

to every overweight person in the

country can you imagine how much better

our health would be if we had mandatory

oing shots

no I'm not in favor of it in case this

gets taken out of comp this will be

taken out of context of course but tell

me what's the

difference see that's the interesting

thing there isn't

any there

isn't all

right

um so it looks like MSNBC is going to

Pivot their hoaxes from Biden is sharp

to uh the January 6 zombie hoax o it's a

zombie hoax

because as obviously not true as it is

can't

die um and they're going to call it the

big lie that the election was rigged the

big lie what would be a bigger lie than

the president does not have

dementia that's about pretty big I call

that pretty

big anyway the fact that they've P

pivoted to um calling the idea that the

election was rigged a big lie why would

they do

that remember we're we're going to do

the hypnotist test again about the

choice of

words if you just wanted to say the

election was not

rigged why do you need to brand it why

don't you just say there's no evidence

you it wasn't rigged it was clean had a

good election but

no they call it the big lie so it sounds

nazil likee right

that's what the big lie refers to it's a

Nazi reference so so they're acting like

Nazis uh well you could say it's the

opposite let's not argue with they're

Nazis uh rather let's say why would they

say that the election rigging is the big

lie why do they have to Brand

it what's The Branding telling

you it's telling me that they know it

was

rigged that's what it tells me to to me

that's a strong signal that they're

completely aware it was fake because if

they thought it was real they'd say look

you idiots show us some evidence or just

shut

up elections are fine you wouldn't go so

far as to Brand it the big lie unless

you're using it to cover up the big

lie you know remember everything they do

is projection so if they say it's a big

lie that the election was fake they're

basically telling you as clearly as

possible the election was

rigged you can't get more clear than

that now again this is the hitis filter

and it's based on the fact that people

choose their

words not by

coincidence it's not a

coincidence um they're they're calling

it the big lie

because it was true that would the only

reason they would call it that

honestly well Scott Scott

Galloway is uh

basically uh you know saying that Biden

is gone and the Democrats are likely to

lose but uh Galloway is not in favor of

um Trump because he thinks he's a

basically uh unstable uh and

dangerous so Trump is unstable and

dangerous here's a question for Scott

Galloway having awakened in a world

where you found out

that everything about Biden's Health was

made up and fake and in a world where

the main Campaign theme of Biden the

main Campaign theme was to find people

hoax which even Snopes has debunked and

he's probably aware of that by now so

the two biggest

claims of the administration are known

to be

hoaxes there's no question about them

but yet he's still believing that Trump

is unstable and

dangerous how do you wake up from two

gigantic hoaxes and then think that the

same people who told you those two

hoaxes are right about this dangerous

part or do you think that he came to

that conclusion on his own and was not

influenced by the news that's that's

rhetorical we're all we're all

influenced by the news if the news had

not covered it

As Trump was the problem he wouldn't

have that opinion because that's that's

an assigned opinion you can tell an

assigned opinion from a real one the

assigned ones just agree with the

narrative that you see on the TV those

are assigned opinions and the way they

assign them is they just shade the news

and leave out context until you agree

with whatever they're

selling but it's kind of amazing because

Galloway would be unusually smart and

unusually shall I say St StreetWise you

know the common sense kind of good smart

stuff

and having broken through break broken

free of several major hoaxes from his

own team he's still clinging to the most

ridiculous one the president that we had

for four years and didn't cause any of

this didn't cause any of

this and we're looking at a president

who started the Ukraine war basically I

mean to imagine that these are somehow

equivalent risks is

something you couldn't get on your own

you couldn't just look at the

information and come to that conclusion

you would have to be a little bit

brainwashed all right my favorite uh

story that doesn't really have any

importance but uh candus Owens is

getting into a little online fight with

Constantine

kissen uh now I don't know what

Constantine's middle name is but I hope

to God it doesn't start with the letter

k

anyway um so Constantine

kissen um was a kind of mocking Candace

Owens Candace Owens did a video in which

she's so I'm going to paraphrase so

don't blame her if I paraphrase it wrong

she's she's got a sense that science has

been so unreliable lately that even

things that you would have accepted

without question are now on the table

for example exles were the moon landing

which she's in increasingly doubtful

about uh but also she brought up the

flat

earthers and and she said something

along the lines of you know you never

know you know sort of sort of allowing

that science is so

bad that maybe even the Earth is

flat

now I took that as sort of a playful

hyperbole

meaning I don't know if she believes

that literally she's just sort of

putting it out there to make an extreme

point that science has not been reliable

lately um but Constantine who's got some

I think his family's got a sciency

background I think his father was a

scientist Etc so he's pro- science as a

lot of people are and he mocks Candace

and he says uh it's true for too long

big science has convinced us that the

Earth Earth is round against all the

evidence what a relief it is to finally

see this spous Theory challenged perhaps

now our planes ships and vehicles will

will at last be able to navigate the

planet I mean the planet so he's making

a joke Flat Earth and Planet the

flet um so I had to I had to get

involved because well sometimes I can

just be an

sometimes there's no reason

sometimes it's just for fun

so I weighed in and I said uh I said the

round earthers are a cocky

Bunch uh but not as cocky as we

simulation believers who think that none

of it is base reality includ including

your belief in

shapes I I debunk your belief in

shapes now now I'm serious but I'm not

serious I'm not serious that I care too

much about the

debate and trying to insert myself into

it was really just for fun um but I

think it's kind of cocky to take

anything that science says is definitely

true and imagine that 200 years from now

you'll

agree take any point in history any

point then take a dart and throw it at a

list of all the things we thought were

true according to science sh

and see where the dart landed and then

check that thing in 200 years do you

think it'll still be

true probably not we we keep revising

everything we know and we think we're

done like every 50 years we're like

finally we got everything figured out we

got the molecules we got the big bang we

got it all figured out and then 100

years later we're like how did we ever

think it was all about you know

particles and you know what's a wave and

what's a particle how do we think that

well I think that we are

inevitably and probably the mo the

easiest I think this is the easiest

prediction I'll ever

make it will become a much bigger thing

that we might be a

simulation and the reason is we're going

to build a simulation and there's no way

to stop it we have ai we know how to

build software

environments I would be surp urised if

it doesn't already exist you don't think

that somewhere there's an AI Avatar in

the game that is already living his

life and is programmed not to know it's

an

avatar of course somewhere because AI

can do that for you you you just have

the AI being the brains of the NPCs and

the games and you tell them you program

them you believe you're real you are

base reality if anybody questions you

nope make sure you argue you are base

reality and it would look exactly like

us we wouldn't be able to tell the

difference now you're going to say but

Scott um you know he could just look

around his fake world and he could see

the

pixels can you see your

pixels no all you have to do is put one

line of code in there that says you will

see everything clearly even if it's not

clear your brain will just interpret

everything everything as a clear picture

that's all you need and it will just

tell you what not to think and not to

look at so that you don't accidentally

discover that you're not

real easy peasy so once we build our own

simulations and people are convinced

holy hell I'm watching this little

character like I'm God you know because

he doesn't know he's being watched but

you're watching the 3D version of

somebody living their life and you will

observe that they act and talk like

regular people in the real world and if

you quiz them they'd say no no no I

think I was put here by God or some

version of that as soon as you see we

can do it and that's less than a year

away if it's not already done as soon as

you see we can do it you'll know you're

in

one other people will be harder to

convince but most people will say oh God

you got me yeah we're a simulation we

have to

be all right all right so we cocky

simulation Believers say you just wait

your time is coming all right ladies and

gentlemen that's all I got for today

thanks for joining I'm going to talk to

the Beloved local subscribers privately

um thanks for joining on X and YouTube

and Rumble and we'll see you tomorrow

same

time

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e e