Back to episode — Episode 2525 CWSA 07/03/24
Context —
dent does not have dementia? That's about pretty big. I call that pretty big anyway. The fact that they've pivoted to calling the idea that the election was rigged a big lie, why would they do that? Remember we're going to do the hypnotist test again about the choice of words. If you just wanted to say the election was not rigged, why do you need to brand it? Why don't you just say there's no evi…
← Previous segment →at earthers. And she said something along the lines of you never know. You know, sort of allowing that science is so bad that maybe even the Earth is flat.
Now I took that as sort of a playful hyperbole, meaning I don't know if she believes that literally. She's just sort of putting it out there to make an extreme point that science has not been reliable lately. But Konstantin, who's got some, I think his family's got a sciency background. I think his father was a scientist etc. So he's pro-science as a lot of people are. And he mocks Candace and he says it's true for too long big science has convinced us that the Earth is round against all the evidence. What a relief it is to finally see this spouse theory challenged. Perhaps now our planes, ships and vehicles will at last be able to navigate the planet. I mean the planet. So he's making a joke. Flat Earth and planet, the flat.
So I had to get involved because well sometimes I can just be and sometimes there's no reason. Sometimes it's just for fun. So I weighed in and I said the round earthers are a cocky bunch but not as cocky as we simulation believers who think that none of it is base reality including your belief in shapes. I debunk your belief in shapes.
Now I'm serious but I'm not serious. I'm not serious that I care too much about the debate and trying to insert myself into it was really just for fun. But I think it's kind of cocky to take anything that science says is definitely true and imagine that 200 years from now you'll agree. Take any point in history, any point, then take a dart and throw it at a list of all the things we thought were true according to science and see where the dart landed and then check that thing in 200 years. Do you think it'll still be true? Probably not. We keep revising everything we know and we think we're done like every 50 years we're like finally we got everything figured out. We got the molecules, we got the big bang, we got it all figured out. And then 100 years later we're like how did we ever think it was all about particles and
Context —
you know what's a wave and what's a particle? How did we think that? Well I think that we are inevitably and probably the easiest, I think this is the easiest prediction I'll ever make, it will become a much bigger thing that we might be a simulation. And the reason is we're going to build a simulation and there's no way to stop it. We have AI. We know how to build software environments. I would…
Next segment → →