dent does not have dementia? That's about pretty big. I call that pretty big anyway.

The fact that they've pivoted to calling the idea that the election was rigged a big lie, why would they do that? Remember we're going to do the hypnotist test again about the choice of words. If you just wanted to say the election was not rigged, why do you need to brand it? Why don't you just say there's no evidence, it wasn't rigged, it was clean, had a good election. But no, they call it the big lie so it sounds Nazi-like, right? That's what the big lie refers to. It's a Nazi reference. So they're acting like Nazis. Well you could say it's the opposite. Let's not argue with they're Nazis. Rather let's say why would they say that the election rigging is the big lie? Why do they have to brand it? What's the branding telling you? It's telling me that they know it was rigged. That's what it tells me.

To me that's a strong signal that they're completely aware it was fake. Because if they thought it was real they'd say look you idiots show us some evidence or just shut up, elections are fine. You wouldn't go so far as to brand it the big lie unless you're using it to cover up the big lie. You know, remember everything they do is projection. So if they say it's a big lie that the election was fake, they're basically telling you as clearly as possible the election was rigged. You can't get more clear than that. Now again this is the hypnotist filter and it's based on the fact that people choose their words not by coincidence. It's not a coincidence. They're calling it the big lie because it was true. That would be the only reason they would call it that honestly.

Well Scott Galloway is basically saying that Biden is gone and the Democrats are likely to lose. But Galloway is not in favor of Trump because he thinks he's basically unstable and dangerous. So Trump is unstable and dangerous.

Here's a question for Scott Galloway. Having awakened in a world where you found out that everything about Biden's health was made up and fake, and in a world where the main campaign theme of Biden, the main campaign theme was to find people hoaxes, which even Snopes has debunked and he's probably aware of that by now. So the two biggest claims of the administration are known to be hoaxes. There's no question about them. But yet he's still believing that Trump is unstable and dangerous. How do you wake up from two gigantic hoaxes and then think that the same people who told you those two hoaxes are right about this dangerous part? Or do you think that he came to that conclusion on his own and was not influenced by the news? That's rhetorical. We're all influenced by the news. If the news had not covered it as Trump was the problem he wouldn't have that opinion because that's an assigned opinion.

You can tell an assigned opinion from a real one. The assigned ones just agree with the narrative that you see on the TV. Those are assigned opinions. And the way they assign them is they just shade the news and leave out context until you agree with whatever they're selling. But it's kind of amazing because Galloway would be unusually smart and unusually, shall I say, streetwise. You know the common sense kind of good smart stuff. And having broken through several major hoaxes from his own team, he's still clinging to the most ridiculous one. The president that we had for four years and didn't cause any of this, didn't cause any of this. And we're looking at a president who started the Ukraine war basically. I mean to imagine that these are somehow equivalent risks is something you couldn't get on your own. You couldn't just look at the information and come to that conclusion. You would have to be a little bit brainwashed.

All right. My favorite story that doesn't really have any importance but Candace Owens is getting into a little online fight with Konstantin Kisin. Now I don't know what Konstantin's middle name is but I hope to God it doesn't start with the letter K anyway.

So Konstantin Kisin was kind of mocking Candace Owens. Candace Owens did a video in which she's, so I'm going to paraphrase so don't blame her if I paraphrase it wrong. She's got a sense that science has been so unreliable lately that even things that you would have accepted without question are now on the table for example. Exiles were the moon landing, which she's increasingly doubtful about. But also she brought up the fl