like him. The people on the far left didn't like him. And so there was an election and the one with the most votes was the one on the far right. But their system apparently has some kind of runoff situation.

And what happened was the people on the far left teamed up with I guess Macron's group so that they could pick their own leader. So basically if you had the two lesser loved groups together they would have more power than the one group that's the most powerful. Similar to how Fox News is the biggest news entity in the United States but if you looked at it compared to all the other entities they all lean the other direction so it doesn't matter that Fox is the biggest. It matters that they've got so many that they're still bigger. They can drown out Fox News. So it's one of those situations.

So in other words France managed to create a system that on paper would guarantee the destruction of their country. On paper that you could do this kind of thing which is give the public exactly what they didn't ask for. It's exactly what they didn't ask for is what they got. And the group coming in apparently is pro-immigration so they can have more immigration not less. It was the main thing that activated them to be so excited about an election in the first place and why they voted by very large numbers in favor of the losing group even though they got the most votes. So their system is pretty messed up.

And the current thinking is that they've created a logjam in their own government which will guarantee they'll never be able to do anything good again and the immigration will just destroy them. Now why is France destroying itself? Do you think it's batshit crazy women there too? Because I can't understand men doing it. It's just not a male thing to do. Men don't open their borders unless there's some woman behind him that's agitating for it. Yeah I don't really understand it at all. So France is dead. Or as I like to say, I'd like to make this historical reference: Lafayette, we're over there. All right. How many thought that was funny? Lafayette we're over there. No? Okay, okay.

There's a whole new round of brain dead Biden videos. My favorites where he's mumbling and looking like he's lost. And seriously people, no joke, no joke, no joke. And then he tells some lies and says no joke. And then he brags about his ice cream and his Ray-Bans and he tells his three dimension stories.

Do you remember the story about how when Biden was done with this disastrous debate he met with his supporters right after and he seemed to be talking coherently somewhat to the supporters? And you said to yourself wait a minute, why is he suddenly kind of coherent? Did you recognize the story he told? He was telling one of his pocket stories. One of the stories he just tells all the time. I forget which one but it was one of his standard stories.

And if you're a dementia patient, I'll take a fact check on this, I'm no expert, but don't you have long-term memory? In other words aren't you the most functional when you're telling a story that you've been telling for 50 years? I think so. I think you have trouble with stuff that happened this week but if you've been telling a story for 50 years you can probably go to it. So I think that when he got off stage where everything was unknown, what the question would be, you know it was like a wild west situation. As soon as he got off stage he just, they just probably said, and by the way I don't think it was his idea, I think somebody whispered in his ear, Joe just tell that story three. Just tell story three. Oh yeah story three. That's all I remember. And then he makes up that same story.

So look for him doing, whenever he's talking about something that happened a long time ago, look for him to look coherent even though it's just an old man story. But anytime he has to think on his feet it's going to be a disaster.

Biden's doctor has been called in by Congress. Apparently Biden's doctor had allegedly some involvement in the Biden crime family income. Did you ever wonder how did you get a White House doctor that was not going to out the president for having dementia? How loyal would you have to be that you would violate your oath? I mean clearly he's violating his oath. Wouldn't you agree? Is it safe to say that the White House doctor has clearly violated his oath? I mean he's doing harm. He's doing harm to the country, doing harm to the patient. I mean you couldn't violate your oath any harder than that. Because obviously he knew what the situation was. Obviously he's been lying, right? Obviously. I don't think there's any doubt about it.

So now he's being called in to be questioned because there's some allegation that he received money through the Biden crime family situation which would explain everything if true.

There's a story that I wouldn't say is validated but there's some individual who claims to have access to secret knowledge about what happened on Air Force One. And allegedly there was a medical emergency in which Biden was hallucinating and they had to, I don't know, give him an antipsychotic or something. I would say the odds of that being true are not zero but I wouldn't give it a lot of credibility. It's a kind of story that if you heard it about Trump I would be saying and who's the source? And you'd say well anonymous source. And then I would say exactly. Yeah, an anonymous source says the worst possible thing happened when nobody was looking. That's the story really. It's always the worst thing when nobody's looking.

So if I had to bet on it I'd bet against it being true but maybe only a 60-40 because there's a good chance he's having medical situations we don't know about.

Well Biden says he's good for employment but he did get one black woman fired from her job. Apparently the radio station in Philadelphia in which he did a friendly interview recently and the questions were given to the host to ask him and she actually asked four of the eight questions that they gave her and she got fired. But I don't think that's fair. As a person who's worked in the media I don't think that the host who used the four questions should be fired because isn't that unusual? I don't think it was meant to be a hard-hitting interview. It was meant to be a friendly and those are fine. There's nothing wrong with doing a friendly interview, right? Sean Hannity talks to Trump. You don't see me bitching about that, right? As long as there's also some hard ones. You do all the friendly ones you want. That's not a problem.

So to be fired for doing a friendly interview and then also being honest. Also being honest. She said yeah I got the questions. I picked four of them. She didn't hide anything. Why did she get fired? I think she got fired for being honest. I don't think she got fired for using the questions. What do you think? I think she deserves her job back. I don't think this is an appropriate firing whatsoever. Now it's a business decision so they might have gotten so much heat they just had to do it. But I think this is totally unfair and I think that the host should be rehired and they should apologize because what she did wasn't that far outside of normal behavior. It certainly not a firing offense. And talking, I think she got fired for talking about it. I don't think she got fired for doing it. I think she got fired for talking about it. They said it's for doing it but I don't think that's real. Yeah, no that's unfair. She should be hired back.

Anyway let's see what else we got going on here in this big old day. Have you noticed that the biggest problem in the country is the debt crisis and neither candidate has any idea what to do about it? Should we be worried about that? That we have one obvious existential problem. But here's what I wonder about. I wonder if there's somebody somewhere in the government who has figured out it's not the problem we think it is.

Remember I provocatively said the following. What if you just canceled all the debt? Just cancel it. Just say we're not going to pay. Now I'm not recommending it. This is just a mental process. Who would lose the money? Are there any poor people who have government debt? I doubt it. The last thing you can, if you're poor you're not buying government bonds. So who does? Let's say you're a middle class person who wants to invest. Where do you put your money? Not in government bonds probably. Have it in the stock market or real estate or something like that.

So then you keep going. All right, rich people. Rich people who have more money than they need to employ at the moment might park it in bonds just because it won't go wildly up or down. It's just sort of a safe place to park some money. It's all the parked money. What would happen if you just said all right it's all gone, we're not paying? I'm not recommending it and I'm not predicting it. I'm just working through the how much of a risk are we rea