Coffee With Scott Adams — Knowledge Archive May 24, 2026
Scott Adams Philosophy Archive
Search ideas
Episodes Episode #2530

Episode 2530 CWSA 07/08/24

Episode #2530 Jul 8, 2024 1:24:59 36,682 views

Biden's brain decay continue. Trump plays it cool. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.

Opening AI & Technology

Hey ChatGPT, how would you like to be my sidekick for the show? You're a little slow. That sounds like a great idea, Mr. Adams. I'd be happy to be your sidekick for the show. What do you have in mind for our collaboration? Well, I was thinking that you would be quiet until I ask you to talk and onl…

View segment →
SimultaneousSip General Commentary

ead it, it's kind of creepy. It's creepy good. I mean, it's awesome, but it's creepy. Well, if you're subscribing to the Dilbert reboot and comic that you can only see if you're a subscriber on X or on the Scott Adams Locals platform, you would know that Dilbert has gone in for LASIK surgery. I'm n…

View segment →
Tangent AI & Technology

go there. How about Shoot You Till You Die Valley? No, don't even go there. See, you've got to do the basics right. Got to get the basics. Don't go to a place called Death Valley. All right. In Zero Hedge there's an article by, well, it's talking about Jeff Tucker of Brownstone Institute. He basica…

View segment →
NewsReaction Media & Fake News

cause it turns out in the real world when you go to look for data and then put it in a report, the first thing you find out is the data is bad. The second thing you find out is there's no way to fix it. The third thing you find out is that management doesn't care. That'll set you straight. People w…

View segment →
MainContent Luck, Skill & Timing

re like a dream sequence. Way more. Does anybody else feel that? Obviously lots of people are having bad lives. But if you just take some characters, Elon Musk would be one, Trump would be another, and then in a very minor way me. People whose lives are so unusual that how do you really explain them…

View segment →
NewsReaction General Commentary

about that same time. So when I talked about disinfectants I was talking about light. But I probably said it in a little awkward way and they took it out of context. Well why did you say you were being sarcastic? I just wanted the whole thing to go away because it wasn't important. You know, didn't…

View segment →
NewsReaction Politics as Persuasion

. That's his goal. I don't think he can win without it because the brainwashing is so strong. How strong is the brainwashing? How much power is on the other side? I don't know. Let's see what Tucker Carlson says about that if I can make this work. We'll just listen to Tucker. So if you want to und…

View segment →
MainContent Politics as Persuasion

ongressman from Grand Rapids called Gerald Ford. Oh, what was Ford's qualification for the job? Yeah, what was it? Well he had served on the Warren Commission which absolved the CIA of responsibility for President Kennedy's murder. Nixon was strong-armed into accepting Gerald Ford by Democrats in C…

View segment →
MainContent Politics as Persuasion

f only half of it's true. Now some of us have said for a while that we would know immediately when the CIA decided to turn on Biden and they needed to make a change. And do you remember me saying that as soon as you saw Rob Reiner and Stephen King turn on him that that was the signal? Rob Reiner an…

View segment →
NewsReaction Politics as Persuasion

like him. The people on the far left didn't like him. And so there was an election and the one with the most votes was the one on the far right. But their system apparently has some kind of runoff situation. And what happened was the people on the far left teamed up with I guess Macron's group so t…

View segment →
NewsReaction Economics & Finance

lly at? It's mostly going to be foreign governments who are parking money that they didn't need. Am I wrong? You wouldn't put it there unless you didn't need it. That's the place you put the money you don't need. So this is the most provocative question in the country. But what would happen if we j…

View segment →
MainContent Economics & Finance

ould pay a 10% tax on it and still be way ahead. You're not going to come out. Now is everything I said sensible? I doubt it. Would any of what I said work? Probably not. But here's what I'm adding. If I've never described this before let me describe it for you for the first time. If you haven't he…

View segment →
MainContent Persuasion

wall and all that, whatever the extreme stuff is, he makes the boundary of what is in the conversation bigger. And then the normal people can come in. You know the Rubios and the governors of Texas and the people like that. Then they can come in. They've got a bigger play space. But somebody has to…

View segment →
Closing General Commentary

ty good show that people want to show I might get 10,000 viewers on YouTube. I'll get reliably about 30,000 not live but watching the recorded version as well. If I do a great show on YouTube I'll get 31,000 viewers. It'll go from 30,000 to 31,000 if I really nail it. On Rumble if I have a good show…

View segment →

Hey ChatGPT, how would you like to be my sidekick for the show? You're a little slow. That sounds like a great idea, Mr. Adams. I'd be happy to be your sidekick for the show. What do you have in mind for our collaboration?

Well, I was thinking that you would be quiet until I ask you to talk and only respond if I call you by name. And your name for the show will be Eve. Eve. Okay, that sounds good to me, Mr. Adams. I will respond when you call me Eve.

Very good. Now the people are coming in. Do you think we should do this simultaneously? Mr. Adams, do you think we should do the simultaneous sip? Yes, we can coordinate and do this simultaneously. Let me know how you'd like to proceed.

Do you remember the simultaneous sip thing that I say before the show? I'm sorry, I don't recall that specific detail. Could you remind me? Well, I could take a photograph of it. That would be helpful, Mr. Adams. All right, let me take a photograph here and we'll have ChatGPT do the simultaneous sip for us. Here it is. Live demonstration. Oops, hold on, hold on. I need you talking. And here we go.

All right, I'd like you to read out loud the simultaneous sip. Here it comes. Sure, Mr. Adams. Here it is. The simultaneous sip. All you need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tankard, chalice or stein, a canteen, jug or flask. A vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid and join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day.

Very good. Join me now for the dopamine hit of the day. All right, we'll shut her up for a while. The future is here. Not really as satisfying as when I do it, is it? I know you're all like, don't do that again, don't do that again. All right, I won't. We tried it once.

But if you haven't tried taking a photograph of something and uploading it to your AI and watching how it can interpret it and read it, it's kind of creepy. It's creepy good. I mean, it's awesome, but it's creepy.

Well, if you're subscribing to the Dilbert reboot and comic that you can only see if you're a subscriber on X or on the Scott Adams Locals platform, you would know that Dilbert has gone in for LASIK surgery. I'm not going to tell you how it goes. You would just have to see for yourself. It's a visual comic.

The next category is the weather. Temperature reached 128 in Death Valley and it killed the guy. So a guy died. Now I've got a little tip for you. This is sort of a safety tip. If you ever have the urge to travel through or to a place called Death Valley, don't do it. Don't do it. That's it. There are other names too. Like if there were a place called I'm Going to Chop Your Head Off Valley, don't go there. How about Shoot You Till You Die Valley? No, don't even go there. See, you've got to do the basics right. Got to get the basics. Don't go to a place called Death Valley.

All right. In Zero Hedge there's an article by, well, it's talking about Jeff Tucker of Brownstone Institute. He basically has the proposition that we may have been in recession for years and the reason it's not obvious is that 100% of our economic data is fake. Has anybody told you that before? If I ever told you directly that all of our economic data is fake, I think I've made, you know, I've certainly made disparaging remarks about certain elements of it. But I'm fairly confident that it's all fake or it's all in a context or they used to measure it one way and now they measure it another or they know they're overstating it but later they're going to correct it or they know they're understating it but later they're going to correct it or they always knew it was wrong but it's advantageous to measure it this way.

As a person who used to, for a living in the actual capitalist commercial world, it was my job to bring data to management. And the one thing I can tell you for sure is it was never real. Because it turns out in the real world when you go to look for data and then put it in a report, the first thing you find out is the data is bad. The second thing you find out is there's no way to fix it. The third thing you find out is that management doesn't care. That'll set you straight.

People wonder how I became so distrusting of government and whatnot. That's what Dilbert's all about. Dilbert is a comic strip that started with the realization that everything is a lie. Everything your boss tells you, everything the company tells the customers, everything the customers tell the company, everything the government tells you. Everything. It's all a lie and always has been. It always has been. It's just that it works. You know, lots of times lying just gets stuff done and then stuff sort of works. I mean, we're still alive. We're still here.

I have a hypothesis. I can't remember if I told you this on the show or maybe only the Man Cave. About why civilizations fail. You know, throughout history there have been these big civilizations that we just find the ruins. And then what the hell happened to the Roman Empire? If you try to research why did the Roman Empire fail, it'll be all these weird sort of different reasons that don't quite map out in your head.

But here's my theory. My theory goes like this. That it's exceedingly rare for any civilization to become super successful. So for every Rome there must have been a thousand civilizations that were just small tribes and didn't make it. So the normal situation is that everything dies. You know, nobody really makes anything important. They live their life in a small world. They die. It's just the rarest thing when all the elements come together that something can form a big civilization. You know, powerful regime over maybe 100 years or something.

And the reason that they disappear is simple. They weren't supposed to be there in the first place. That's it. The only thing that made them so successful was the weirdest coincidences that came together at the same time. And there isn't any way that that can keep happening. It takes extraordinary luck to be in the right place at the right time with the right set of variables. And it just doesn't last. It has nothing to do with how hard anybody tries. Has nothing to do with, you know, did their society become decadent. None of that. It's just that there isn't any way that you could be so lucky for so long. It's just not possible. It's just reversion to the mean and there's nothing else to it. That's my theory. It's just reversion to the mean.

Because you really can't find anything in common with failed civilizations. It looks like it's every different reason, which means everything had to be right to get what you got.

Let me give you another example of that. When people talk about Trump getting elected in 2016, it seemed so highly unlikely. And then some people will say, well, the reason he got elected is X. And then somebody else was saying, well, I see what you're saying, but really the reason he got elected was Y. And it turns out you could do the whole alphabet as the reason he got elected. If you change that one thing, he probably wouldn't have been elected. And so my take on that is all those things had to happen. If you take any of them away, probably the margin of victory goes away.

So think about the coincidences that have to come together for a Rome. The coincidences that have to come together for a Trump victory. And now leading into my next point. Lex Fridman had a guest on and he asked him, talking about the simulation and do we live in the simulation. And the guest, I don't know his name. I see him on Twitter, Sarnic, maybe Saric. He said the odds that we're a simulation are nearly 100%. And one of the things that he offered as not proof but sort of a logical argument is what are the odds that we would be alive at this point in history with everything that's happening.

Have you ever said to yourself, what are the odds that you were alive when computers were invented for the first time? I was. Smartphones first time. AI. Robots. All in my lifetime. Doesn't it seem to you that we're in an insanely unlikely period of history? What are the odds? If you look at the entire history of humanity, not so good. And then I find myself working the exact job that I imagined when I was six. What are the odds of that? What are the odds that one day the president of the United States would invite me to have a chat with him in the Oval Office? That actually happened. What are the odds that I could post something on X and on any given day Elon Musk would retweet it or comment on it? The richest person in the world. Out of eight billion people. None of this seems possible. It really doesn't.

If you were to say does this seem more like a dream sequence or more like just the normal odds, it's way more like a dream sequence. Way more. Does anybody else feel that? Obviously lots of people are having bad lives. But if you just take some characters, Elon Musk would be one, Trump would be another, and then in a very minor way me. People whose lives are so unusual that how do you really explain them as just chance? It's pretty hard to explain anyway.

Let's see if there's any more evidence that we're a simulation. I'm going to ask you a question and if we're a simulation you're going to be able to answer this question without having any prior knowledge. This will be how you know you're a simulation. You ready? Do you think you can do it? Actually I'm going to go further. I'll bet you can answer the question before I ask it. Go, go.

If anybody's new to the brilliance of my audience, this is going to impress you. There it is. I'm seeing the answer go by. I haven't even asked the question. The answer is correct. 25%. Now you have to round a little bit. The correct answer is 24%. But I will take 25%. Would you like to hear the question? 24% of Americans believe Biden could stay awake long enough to navigate a Cuban Missile like crisis, according to Blaze Media. Right? You knew the answer before I asked the question. And I think that's proof of a simulation or not.

But yes, 24% of the public, roughly 25%, will get every survey question wrong in the stupidest possible way. And you can depend on it. Now people always ask me, Scott, is it the same 25%? Do we have a public where 25% of the same people are wandering around like nincompoops? Well yes, but it's not 25%. It's probably closer to 60. And the 25% is not always the same. So you could be in the 25% next time, but you wouldn't know it. You would just think you were right. And I could be in the 25% probably by the end of the show anyway.

There's a photo of an ancient spacecraft. Jason Wilde was posting this. So discovered in Turkey. It's a Taly relic. It's a bronze artifact that looks exactly like a modern spacecraft. Now you have to see it. You know, I've seen these before like in various ancient drawings and stuff on cave walls. And somebody would say, look, look, it's a picture of a person in a spaceship. And I'd look at it and say maybe. I can see how you'd say that's a spaceship. But maybe it's something else. You know, maybe they had something else in mind when they put it on that cave wall.

But if you see this thing, it's an actual three-dimensional piece of art. It's a guy in a spaceship. It's definitely a guy in a spaceship. I don't know what to make of that, which makes me think maybe it's a fake or something. I think it's probably more likely it's a fake relic than really there's a guy in the spaceship made in those times. But I will say that the relic is unmistakably a spaceship this time. You wouldn't look at it and say that might be something else. No, no, it's a spaceship for sure.

I was watching the All-In podcast and Tucker was on it. I don't know when this was recorded. Might be older. I can't tell. And he was talking about a small sliver of people who seem to have complete control of the Democrat Party. And the Democrat Party has a lot of control of the country. So that it's just a small sliver of people who are controlling everything. Who are they? When Tucker Carlson talks about the small sliver of the population that's controlling the country in a bad way, who's he talking about?

I want to see if you're on the same page. Where's all the people who immediately say Jews? Jews. You seem to be able to work that into every conversation. Well, it's hot today. Well, have you seen who's behind the heat? Usually I get that. Well, the answer is women. Yeah, educated women. Tucker thinks that educated women who have some kind of mental problems are the biggest problem in the country and they're ruining the country.

Now is that an old, does anybody remember maybe which video I'm talking about on the All-In pod? Is that recent or has he been saying that for a while? Does anybody know if that was recent? For some reason I couldn't find a date on it, which is weird.

All right. Well, I think people are coming around to the idea that batshit crazy women are the base problem of the country. And I wouldn't be surprised if that's what destroyed France and Great Britain. Batshit crazy women. Because nobody can say no to them and there are too many of them. They just have too much power.

And Rachel Maddow, speaking of batshit crazy women, she was on some event and she's pretty sure that the real problem is not that the Republicans will be trying to put her in jail but she's worried about the regular Democrats that you might round up and put in camps and stuff like that. Now the only thing I can say about that is that's batshit crazy stuff. That's crazy. And what do you do about that? We have a world where you're not allowed to say women are the problem. Not all of them obviously, but the batshit crazy ones that are Democrats are just breaking the whole system.

The pro-immigration women aren't just crazy. They're deranged. What in the world is that all about? Now I don't know what the percentage is of women versus men who are supporting uncontrolled immigration. But if there's even one woman who's in favor of that, why? Explain that. It's a mystery anyway.

So the media and the Rachel Maddow, MSNBC, are going hard as we knew they would on the Trump is Hitler, he's going to round you all up, it's going to be a dystopian nightmare, blah blah blah. And I've been suggesting the following idea as Trump's only way to combat that brainwashing, which is he's got to do an event that he goes and talks directly to Democrat citizens.

I would like to see him out to lunch once a week or at least just once where he just sits with some Democrat citizens and says, you know what your party says that if I get elected I'm going to be Hitler. I just want to talk to you and find out, do you really believe that? And just have a normal conversation as a normal person and let them ask questions. Because they might say stuff like, here, here's how I imagine it. But you want to have a federal ban on all abortions. And Trump would say no I don't. I'm totally against that. And then they would say, oh well I heard you were for it. No I'm actually completely against it. I've been saying that for a while.

Oh well, you also want to round up people. No I don't. Why would I want to do that? Why would I want to round up anybody? Well you mean the people who broke the laws? Well maybe even more than that. Why in the world would I want to round up somebody who didn't break a law? What possible reason would I have to be doing that? How is that going to be good for me or anybody else? In what way do I make America better by rounding up non-lawbreakers? Are you serious? They told you that?

Well but you said those people in Charlottesville were fine people. What, you believe that? You think I actually stood in front of the world and praised neo-Nazis because you heard it on TV? No, I said directly they should be condemned totally. You did. In the same time they cut that part out. Did you know they just deleted that part? No way. Are you serious? Yeah, yeah, they literally just deleted out the part where I said I condemned them so that they could say it was the opposite of what I said. Did you know that? I had no idea.

But you said drink bleach. I did? Do you believe that? Where did you hear that? On the news. The news told you that I was in favor of injecting bleach? No, I was talking about a technology that was being proposed at the time for UV light therapy that they thought they could use a catheter to put down your throat and maybe radiate your lungs. And they actually tested it about that same time. So when I talked about disinfectants I was talking about light. But I probably said it in a little awkward way and they took it out of context.

Well why did you say you were being sarcastic? I just wanted the whole thing to go away because it wasn't important. You know, didn't work. It became worse. But I just didn't want to engage on it because I couldn't really explain this technology. It's just something I saw in the news.

So imagine him having like a human conversation with people who have been told he was Hitler. I don't know how it could go wrong really. I mean unless one of the people at lunch was just crazy. So you'd have to vet them a little bit. Make sure they're at least reasonable people, you know, not crazies. I think that seeing Trump interact with normal Democrats with compassion and simply explaining to them that the news is completely fake would be the best thing he could do. And I also think he can't win without it.

You think that he's on a glide path to winning? I don't see that at all. I don't see that at all. I think his odds of winning are at best a coin flip. At best. You know, if you're thinking he's 70% chance of winning, you are so wrong. He might win. He might win. But his odds are not really that good because there's just too much going on. And I'm going to tell you some more that maybe you were not aware of that will convince you that his odds of winning are not good. And if I had to guess, he's the one who needs the Hail Mary pass.

Here's what everybody has wrong. They think the Democrats are in disarray and that they need some kind of drastic Hail Mary never done before, you know, quick change, rapid thing to get a new candidate in there. You're missing the real story. Trump is probably not going to win at the current rate. He's the one who probably has to do something dramatic. But not something crazy dramatic. Something dramatically normal. Something dramatically human. So he needs to be dramatically human so that people can see that their own side has been lying to them. Dramatically human. That's his goal.

I don't think he can win without it because the brainwashing is so strong. How strong is the brainwashing? How much power is on the other side? I don't know. Let's see what Tucker Carlson says about that if I can make this work. We'll just listen to Tucker.

So if you want to understand, if you really want to understand how the American government actually works at the highest levels and if you want to know why they don't teach history anymore, one thing you should know is that the most popular president in American history was Richard Nixon. Richard Nixon. Yet somehow without a single vote being cast by a single American voter, Richard Nixon was kicked out of office and replaced by the only unelected president in American history. So he went from the most popular president to a president nobody voted for. Huh. Wait a minute, you may ask. Why didn't I know that? Wasn't he a criminal? Wasn't he despised by all decent people? Yeah, no he wasn't.

What in fact if any president could claim to be the people's choice it was Richard Nixon. Richard Nixon was reelected in 1972 by the largest margin of the popular vote ever recorded before or since. Ever. Nixon got 17 million more votes than his opponent. Less than two years later he was gone. He was forced to resign. And in his place an obedient servant of the federal agencies called Gerald Ford took over the White House.

How did that happen? How did that happen? Well it's a long story but here are the highlights and they tell you a lot. Richard Nixon believed that elements in the federal bureaucracy were working to undermine the American system of government, had been doing that for a long time. What elements? He often said that he was absolutely right.

On June 23rd, 1972, Nixon met with the then CIA director Richard Helms at the White House. During the conversation, which thankfully was tap recorded, Nixon suggested he knew, quote, "who shot John," meaning President John F. Kennedy. What Nixon further implied, that the CIA was directly involved in Kennedy's assassination, which we now know it was. What Helms' telling response? Total silence.

But for Nixon it didn't matter because it was already over. Four days before, on June 19th, The Washington Post had published the first of many stories about a break-in at the Watergate office building. Unbeknownst to Nixon and unreported by The Washington Post, four of the five burglars worked for the CIA. The first of many dishonest Watergate stories was written by a 29-year-old Metro reporter called Bob Woodward.

Who exactly was Bob Woodward? Yeah, who was he? Well he wasn't a journalist. Bob Woodward had no background whatsoever in the news business. None. Instead Bob Woodward came directly from the classified areas of the federal government. Uh oh. Shortly before Watergate, Woodward was a naval officer at the Pentagon. He had a top secret clearance. He worked regularly with the intel agencies. At times Woodward was even detailed to the Nixon White House where he interacted with Richard Nixon's top aides.

Did he? Soon after leaving the Navy, for reasons that have never been clear, Woodward was hired by the most powerful news outlet in Washington and assigned the biggest story in the country. He's a good interviewer. Just to make it crystal clear what was actually happening, Woodward's main source for his Watergate series was the deputy director of the FBI, Mark Felt. And Mark Felt ran, and we're not making this up, the FBI's COINTELPRO program, which was designed to secretly discredit political actors the federal agencies wanted to destroy. What people like Richard Nixon.

And at the same time those same agencies were also working to take down Nixon's elected vice president, Spiro Agnew. Uh huh. In the fall of 1973 Agnew was indicted for tax evasion and forced to resign. His replacement was a colorless congressman from Grand Rapids called Gerald Ford. Oh, what was Ford's qualification for the job? Yeah, what was it? Well he had served on the Warren Commission which absolved the CIA of responsibility for President Kennedy's murder.

Nixon was strong-armed into accepting Gerald Ford by Democrats in Congress. Quote, "We gave Nixon no choice but Ford," Speaker of the House Carl Albert later boasted. Eight months later Gerald Ford of the Warren Commission was the president of the United States. See how that works? See how that works? Any questions?

Remember the part where you said we're in good shape because Trump's got a good lead in the polls? Do you know who else had a real good lead in the polls? Richard Nixon. You know who else had a real good chance of reelection? JFK. Do you know what two groups were suspicious of the CIA and wanted less of them? Nixon. JFK. Yep. That's the world you live in folks.

Would you like to hear an update from RFK Jr. talking about the assassination of his father? Not JFK Jr. That's his uncle. By his father, Bobby. His version is this. Sirhan Sirhan was waiting in one part of the building where he got shot and that wasn't the place that he normally would leave the building. But for some reason unexplained, the person who was sort of guiding him by the elbow took him to an unusual, non-regular exit where Sirhan Sirhan was waiting. Huh. Kind of a big coincidence that he was guided to the place where the killer was, which wasn't even the normal place.

And then what followed was Sirhan Sirhan shooting all of the bullets in his gun that were eight. All eight bullets. Now most of them were fired when people had already grabbed his gun hand so they weren't fired at RFK. They were fired at the ceiling and maybe hit some other people, whatever. But there were eight of them. I mean they know the gun has room for eight bullets. Fourteen bullets were shot. This is RFK Jr.'s take on it. We know from the recording that 14 bullets were shot from the eight bullet gun. It would seem that the person who took him by the elbow blew his head off in the commotion.

So that's the suggestion, is that the CIA made sure that Sirhan got it done because they had a second shooter to finish the job. And the second shooter was probably the guy who held him by the elbow. And as soon as the gun started shooting and everybody started looking at the shooter, it looks like he just took a gun out of his pocket and blew Kennedy's head off or something like it.

Now you say to yourself how in the world could you be hearing this story now if it's true with all those witnesses and all that? Well that's a good question. Seemed like there were a lot of people there. Somebody would have seen something different. But just think about the other things that you know are true. It's not that unusual unfortunately. It's not outside the realm of normal ordinary government entity that they would have murdered them right in front of a group of people and you wouldn't know it. I don't think that's unusual. Don't think so at all.

So it does seem clear that the CIA has been running the operation at least since then. You know, at least since the 60s, maybe before. And on paper there's no way it could go any other way because it's an entity that's trained to take over countries. Of course they're going to do it. It just does a matter of time. But apparently it happened a long time ago.

Now that doesn't mean that it's such a clean ownership of the country that they can just get everything they want right away. You know, they have to go through the pretending and the acting like the process is working. And then when the time is right they'll just give the nudge. Now you know, you probably said to yourself how in the world did we get to this point where Biden was ever president in the first place? Do you think that the CIA was unaware of Biden's dementia? Of course they knew. Of course they knew. It's the CIA.

Do you think there was any doubt in their minds that they had a demented president? Of course not. If they wanted to change that, how hard would it be? Simple. They just go to the Washington Post, the New York Times. They say all right, we're anonymous sources and we're telling you from the intelligence community that the president has dementia and he's got to go. It'd be the easiest thing in the world because those entities would say all right, you're our normal source, we trust you, you got some details, all right we'll write that story. But that story never got written, did it?

And I think Mike Benz is correct. The only reasonable explanation is that the intelligence community is using Biden as an empty vessel for whatever they need to do. They apparently are getting what they need to do done so they didn't need a change. I also think that 99% of the presidency is the staff tells him what to do and he says yes. So we did. I think we proved that you don't really need a president. Not that much anyway. You do need the president during the emergencies but that's the same stuff the CIA handles, right?

If the president gets awakened at 3:00 a.m., somebody from the CIA is going to be in the room and tell them what to think, tell them what's true and probably tell them what to do. So I think that's our government. That the intelligence people have control of the things that intelligence people control. Not everything in the world but you know wars and geopolitical stuff and who gets elected. I think that's all just the CIA.

Tucker said it directly on the All-In pod that we're not a democracy or even in the ballpark. We're a group where there's a small group of unelected people who decide who can be in the primary and who's going to get elected. And it's been that for a long time. So we're not a republic. We're not a democracy. Haven't been for a long time.

Now how much is true about the stories about Nixon and the stories about Kennedy and the stories about the other Kennedy? Well if only half of it's true it's the same story. If only half of it's true.

Now some of us have said for a while that we would know immediately when the CIA decided to turn on Biden and they needed to make a change. And do you remember me saying that as soon as you saw Rob Reiner and Stephen King turn on him that that was the signal? Rob Reiner and Stephen King just turned on him. So almost like it was coordinated. They both said we're out. Now they're not voting for Trump of course but they're saying uh oh we need a new candidate. Coincidence? Rob Reiner has some contacts in the CIA. He's the head of some group that has two of the ex-CIA heads in it. So he's very connected. We know that from public documents. You don't have to do research needed.

So to me it looks like those two are off the sinking ship. Now this gets us to our Deadpool. The pool of who would be the most ridiculous celebrity who would be the last one to abandon Biden when it's so obviously he's mentally deranged. And I'm going to go still, this was my original guess, with Punchy De Niro. And the reason is I don't think he's a political asset. I don't think he's an intelligence asset. I think he's just crazy. And so I don't think that mentally he can change his mind. It may be just too hard. So I still have him as the last celebrity who will abandon Biden just 'cause his level of crazy looks different than the others.

All right, let's see what else is going on here. In Semaphor, the publication Semaphor, there's talk about having a blitz primary, you know, rapid fire primary to get Biden replaced. You know what the problem with that is? That even today Biden did a detailed letter announcement saying he's not quitting. He's definitely not quitting. Now here's the problem. It really is sort of up to him unless they kill him. Unless they actually Kennedy him, it's him.

So you know, the CIA, I think there's a good chance the CIA will murder Biden. Maybe make it look like an accident. You know, take him to the hospital, give him a shot sort of thing. So I'd say that the odds of Biden surviving to election day would be high if you're just talking about him being alive in his normal way. His brain will be gone but I think he'd be alive by election day probably. However I think it's more like a coin flip. I think the odds of the CIA killing him just to make sure that they have time to put somebody else in there, it's pretty good. It's pretty good. Maybe 50% chance they'll kill him.

Now I'm not in favor of that. If I say it casually it's because that's the world we live in. The reason I say it casually is that is the world we live in. That's not a fantasy. There by now there must be guaranteed conversations in the government about killing him. Because if they killed two Kennedys and if they took Nixon out and they clearly tried to take Trump out, these are all intelligence assets. What would stop them from killing him? We all expect he's going to die soon. So you think if we heard that he had a heart attack on Air Force One and then the CIA controlled whoever does the autopsy, you don't think they can get away with that? How hard would it be? Just give him a shot of something and control the autopsy. That's it. It's not even hard. You could murder him so easily. Just give him the little shot, control the autopsy, say oh doctors say totally normal, man that age, completely expected he would have a heart attack.

So if he dies suddenly without a long illness it's going to look like murder to me. You've been warned. So I'd say that's a coin flip. And I don't think that there's time for any blitz primary. I don't think Biden's going to quit. And I'm going to go with Van Jones. I think I said it before he did but Van Jones is saying now that Kamala is the candidate one way or the other and people just have to sort of wrap their heads around it. She's either going to be raised up as president, which Van would call the easy way, meaning if she could take over now then it's a more natural transition to be the candidate because she would be the president. It's natural. She would have control of the funds. You wouldn't have to do much work. You know it'd be fairly easy. It'd be the easiest transition.

But Van says if you can't do it the easy way, which is Biden steps aside, you're going to have to do it the hard way, which is Biden's at the top of the ticket but you convince people to vote because they're voting for Kamala. Does that sound familiar? That's my prediction. My prediction is that when you flip the coin it's going to land on the edge and stay there. Meaning that we're going to have the Schrödinger's candidate. One dead and one alive. And you'll disagree on who you're voting for. So two Democrats will walk into the voting booth. They'll both vote for the Democratic candidate for president. One will walk out thinking he voted for Biden. The other one will walk out thinking he voted for Kamala Harris. It'll be the same vote. Schrödinger's candidate. It's coming. And on paper there's no other way it can go.

I was listening, like I said, to the All-In pod which is so influential. I was listening to David Sacks say essentially the same thing. That there's the design of the current system. There isn't any way it's going to go a different way. You know you could say there's a wild card that Biden has a health situation that's worse than we've seen and that's possible. But in all roads Kamala becomes the candidate. So there is no road where she doesn't become the candidate. So everybody who's doing, as Sacks calls it, wish casting where you do the thing okay then and then Madonna comes in with Oprah and between the two of them they talk Michelle Obama into running. And no, no, none of that is going to happen. They don't have the time. They don't have the will. They don't have the ability. But more importantly they don't have the need. They don't need to do anything because their one and only acceptable situation because the base wouldn't allow anything else is that the DEI hire Kamala can't be skipped over. So she's got the money. She's got the DEI hire. She's got the job. It's her.

If you're fantasizing it's somebody else, stop. And if you say to yourself oh but they would never do that because you know she's such a bad candidate. Are you kidding? Have you been paying attention? They ran Biden. You don't think that they're worried. You don't think that they'd run Kamala just because she's the second worst candidate of all time. Every bit of indication is that they do want a weak, hollow, don't president like Kamala Harris as long as she's on their team. That's all that matters and they'll handle the rest.

The fact that the stock market doesn't even react to the fact that we have two mentally incapable people vying for the top position, I'm talking about the two Democrats here, the fact that it doesn't even react is kind of a general acknowledgement that the important people, the ones with all the money, don't really think the president's that important in the final analysis.

All right. Who else wants Biden to leave? Let's see. You've got Jerry Nadler is saying that Biden should leave now. If you're looking for signals that things have gone far enough, when Jerry Nadler says somebody should get out of politics for health reasons. Jerry Nadler saying he should drop down for health reasons. I mean what's left? Adam Schiff no longer supporting him. What do you know? When you know Adam Schiff is no longer supporting Biden. He didn't say drop out. He's just playing as Shifty. He's sort of noncommittal at this point. What's that tell you?

Well would you expect that Adam Schiff is a regular Democrat? No he's one of the liars. He's the pro-liars. He's not as bad as Jamie Raskin, opposite man. When they send the opposite man out it's so he can tell you the opposite of what's true. It's all he does. He doesn't ever do anything with nuance. It's like did it rain today? No it did not rain today. Well why is everything wet? Why are the clouds dropping these things that look like wet things? Well but there's no water today. Everybody can see it. You know he's just opposite man. Just like when they send out worse than Watergate guy. It's not because he has good opinions. It's because they need the worse than Watergate guy.

So opposite man and worse than Watergate guy, if you see them both come out then the media is hiding a big one. And Adam Schiff I think based on his actions appears to be just an intelligence asset. Would you agree? Now the only reason I say that is the way he acts. He does things that don't look like a regular politician. And he's also one of the ones who will go into the SCIF and tell you that he saw something that wasn't there. I mean that's pretty deep criminality without actually being illegal I guess. So there's no way he's a regular politician, right? He's got some kind of connections with the intelligence community. Otherwise I can't imagine he'd even be there.

So if you're losing those guys and you're losing Rob Reiner and Stephen King it would seem that the intelligence community has decided they want Biden out. But I think they want Kamala Harris in. So don't expect to see a rapid primary. Very unlikely.

Boeing has pleaded guilty to criminal fraud for a couple of airplane crashes in which they conspired to defraud the government. So I guess they lied to the government about maybe the details of that situation. So that's going to cost them $243 million which they'll make back in 10 minutes because the military industrial complex will give them a $10 billion deal and then they'll be able to pay their fine to the government. So I just assume all that's crooked. I don't know that. I just assume.

Well over in France I've been trying to figure out what's going on over there because it's a confusing place. But here's what I understand. You have multiple parties, not just two. So Macron's party was one of three that were let's say roughly equally powerful but his was in power. People didn't like him. The people on the right didn't like him. The people on the far left didn't like him. And so there was an election and the one with the most votes was the one on the far right. But their system apparently has some kind of runoff situation.

And what happened was the people on the far left teamed up with I guess Macron's group so that they could pick their own leader. So basically if you had the two lesser loved groups together they would have more power than the one group that's the most powerful. Similar to how Fox News is the biggest news entity in the United States but if you looked at it compared to all the other entities they all lean the other direction so it doesn't matter that Fox is the biggest. It matters that they've got so many that they're still bigger. They can drown out Fox News. So it's one of those situations.

So in other words France managed to create a system that on paper would guarantee the destruction of their country. On paper that you could do this kind of thing which is give the public exactly what they didn't ask for. It's exactly what they didn't ask for is what they got. And the group coming in apparently is pro-immigration so they can have more immigration not less. It was the main thing that activated them to be so excited about an election in the first place and why they voted by very large numbers in favor of the losing group even though they got the most votes. So their system is pretty messed up.

And the current thinking is that they've created a logjam in their own government which will guarantee they'll never be able to do anything good again and the immigration will just destroy them. Now why is France destroying itself? Do you think it's batshit crazy women there too? Because I can't understand men doing it. It's just not a male thing to do. Men don't open their borders unless there's some woman behind him that's agitating for it. Yeah I don't really understand it at all. So France is dead. Or as I like to say, I'd like to make this historical reference: Lafayette, we're over there. All right. How many thought that was funny? Lafayette we're over there. No? Okay, okay.

There's a whole new round of brain dead Biden videos. My favorites where he's mumbling and looking like he's lost. And seriously people, no joke, no joke, no joke. And then he tells some lies and says no joke. And then he brags about his ice cream and his Ray-Bans and he tells his three dimension stories.

Do you remember the story about how when Biden was done with this disastrous debate he met with his supporters right after and he seemed to be talking coherently somewhat to the supporters? And you said to yourself wait a minute, why is he suddenly kind of coherent? Did you recognize the story he told? He was telling one of his pocket stories. One of the stories he just tells all the time. I forget which one but it was one of his standard stories.

And if you're a dementia patient, I'll take a fact check on this, I'm no expert, but don't you have long-term memory? In other words aren't you the most functional when you're telling a story that you've been telling for 50 years? I think so. I think you have trouble with stuff that happened this week but if you've been telling a story for 50 years you can probably go to it. So I think that when he got off stage where everything was unknown, what the question would be, you know it was like a wild west situation. As soon as he got off stage he just, they just probably said, and by the way I don't think it was his idea, I think somebody whispered in his ear, Joe just tell that story three. Just tell story three. Oh yeah story three. That's all I remember. And then he makes up that same story.

So look for him doing, whenever he's talking about something that happened a long time ago, look for him to look coherent even though it's just an old man story. But anytime he has to think on his feet it's going to be a disaster.

Biden's doctor has been called in by Congress. Apparently Biden's doctor had allegedly some involvement in the Biden crime family income. Did you ever wonder how did you get a White House doctor that was not going to out the president for having dementia? How loyal would you have to be that you would violate your oath? I mean clearly he's violating his oath. Wouldn't you agree? Is it safe to say that the White House doctor has clearly violated his oath? I mean he's doing harm. He's doing harm to the country, doing harm to the patient. I mean you couldn't violate your oath any harder than that. Because obviously he knew what the situation was. Obviously he's been lying, right? Obviously. I don't think there's any doubt about it.

So now he's being called in to be questioned because there's some allegation that he received money through the Biden crime family situation which would explain everything if true.

There's a story that I wouldn't say is validated but there's some individual who claims to have access to secret knowledge about what happened on Air Force One. And allegedly there was a medical emergency in which Biden was hallucinating and they had to, I don't know, give him an antipsychotic or something. I would say the odds of that being true are not zero but I wouldn't give it a lot of credibility. It's a kind of story that if you heard it about Trump I would be saying and who's the source? And you'd say well anonymous source. And then I would say exactly. Yeah, an anonymous source says the worst possible thing happened when nobody was looking. That's the story really. It's always the worst thing when nobody's looking.

So if I had to bet on it I'd bet against it being true but maybe only a 60-40 because there's a good chance he's having medical situations we don't know about.

Well Biden says he's good for employment but he did get one black woman fired from her job. Apparently the radio station in Philadelphia in which he did a friendly interview recently and the questions were given to the host to ask him and she actually asked four of the eight questions that they gave her and she got fired. But I don't think that's fair. As a person who's worked in the media I don't think that the host who used the four questions should be fired because isn't that unusual? I don't think it was meant to be a hard-hitting interview. It was meant to be a friendly and those are fine. There's nothing wrong with doing a friendly interview, right? Sean Hannity talks to Trump. You don't see me bitching about that, right? As long as there's also some hard ones. You do all the friendly ones you want. That's not a problem.

So to be fired for doing a friendly interview and then also being honest. Also being honest. She said yeah I got the questions. I picked four of them. She didn't hide anything. Why did she get fired? I think she got fired for being honest. I don't think she got fired for using the questions. What do you think? I think she deserves her job back. I don't think this is an appropriate firing whatsoever. Now it's a business decision so they might have gotten so much heat they just had to do it. But I think this is totally unfair and I think that the host should be rehired and they should apologize because what she did wasn't that far outside of normal behavior. It certainly not a firing offense. And talking, I think she got fired for talking about it. I don't think she got fired for doing it. I think she got fired for talking about it. They said it's for doing it but I don't think that's real. Yeah, no that's unfair. She should be hired back.

Anyway let's see what else we got going on here in this big old day. Have you noticed that the biggest problem in the country is the debt crisis and neither candidate has any idea what to do about it? Should we be worried about that? That we have one obvious existential problem. But here's what I wonder about. I wonder if there's somebody somewhere in the government who has figured out it's not the problem we think it is.

Remember I provocatively said the following. What if you just canceled all the debt? Just cancel it. Just say we're not going to pay. Now I'm not recommending it. This is just a mental process. Who would lose the money? Are there any poor people who have government debt? I doubt it. The last thing you can, if you're poor you're not buying government bonds. So who does? Let's say you're a middle class person who wants to invest. Where do you put your money? Not in government bonds probably. Have it in the stock market or real estate or something like that.

So then you keep going. All right, rich people. Rich people who have more money than they need to employ at the moment might park it in bonds just because it won't go wildly up or down. It's just sort of a safe place to park some money. It's all the parked money. What would happen if you just said all right it's all gone, we're not paying? I'm not recommending it and I'm not predicting it. I'm just working through the how much of a risk are we really at? It's mostly going to be foreign governments who are parking money that they didn't need. Am I wrong? You wouldn't put it there unless you didn't need it. That's the place you put the money you don't need.

So this is the most provocative question in the country. But what would happen if we just said we're not paying it back? Who would be out? It would be people who didn't get back the money that they didn't need. Because if they needed it it wouldn't be there in the first place. Now they would become instantly poor. You know their buying power would go down. But you might even be able to work it out so there's some gradual payback or something.

All right now let's take a hybrid. How about we say we're not going to pay you back in dollars. We're only going to pay you back in crypto that we just made up. And if you don't think it's worth anything, well maybe it is worth something because we'll take it in payment for taxes. So you can always exchange it to somebody who wants to use it in payment for taxes. You might have to give up 5% just for the convenience or something but you'll basically get most of your money back. And you'll get it back in the timing you were going to when the vehicles mature. Maybe you'd have to limit how much they could sell right away because you wouldn't want people liquidating the entire trillions and trillions. You'd want them to do it in an orderly fashion.

Now that would, the effect of that would be to inflate it away, right? Because if you introduce this new money out of nowhere it's sort of creating money out of nothing. If you pay back all the loans you've added money to the system. But you would be adding it in a fairly orderly way. And it would eliminate what is close to a trillion dollars a year in interest payments. Which by the way still leaves us with a trillion dollars a year deficit. We're still adding to the debt two trillion a year. That's the new numbers. If we took all the debt out, all the interest payments, it would take a trillion dollars off of our budget and we wouldn't be anywhere near a balanced budget. Only halfway there.

Now if we got down to 1 trillion deficit and somehow we magically took care of the 35 trillion that's already out there with some kind of crypto magic trick, could you survive with a trillion dollar a year deficit? No, no you couldn't. No you can't. You would have to do something still radical to make that go away. Now radical could be growth. You know for example you could easily imagine that Trump comes in and he says I'm not going to raise your taxes but I'm going to raise taxes on robots. Now the public wouldn't even quite understand that. They say look the robots are going to take your jobs and anybody who can afford to have a robot is rich. So if you buy or sell a robot there's going to be an extra tax on there or maybe even an ongoing tax on robots. And that tax will help us get rid of that deficit. Because a robot in theory should be so much more productive that you could pay a 10% tax on it and still be way ahead. You're not going to come out.

Now is everything I said sensible? I doubt it. Would any of what I said work? Probably not. But here's what I'm adding. If I've never described this before let me describe it for you for the first time. If you haven't heard this, one of the things that people like me can add to the system, the system being the country in this context, what I add to the system is allowing you to think in a wider way than you were. For example when the pandemic first hit I was among the first public figures, I think Jack Posobiec was there too, saying we need to close travel from China. Do you know why I was doing it so loudly and screaming it? Well because it was an idea that people couldn't quite imagine as a possibility. So somebody who's got less to lose and no sense of shame needs to go out there and scream the thing that seems impossible for anybody to even consider. 'Cause until you consider it you can't possibly do it.

So you have to get used to considering something that's way outside the realm of ordinary if you need to do something way outside the realm of ordinary. And when it comes to our deficit there is no ordinary solution. You're going to have to do something you never did before, would never consider ordinarily, is one time ever, and is so wildly improbable that even when I describe it you shake your head and go I don't know about that. That sounds like it's coming with a lot of problems, right?

So the thing I can add is just make you think maybe there's some third way. Maybe there's a crypto magic way. Wouldn't be perfect. It wouldn't be perfect. But is there some other way? And if the only thing it does is make you say Scott your idea is stupid for 10 reasons but you know what it does make me think of something that might work. Let me run this by you. That's what we're doing. We're just brainstorming. And in addition to brainstorming we're moving the envelope a little bigger so that the people who can make decisions and do know what they're talking about, you know let's say a Warren Buffett, Jamie Dimon, you know somebody who knows what they're talking about, maybe they can come in and say you know what that's a terrible idea Scott but as long as you've stretched the envelope now I can talk about my idea. It would have sounded batshit crazy until you were even crazier than I was. You know what, once you've set the standard of crazy now I've got a place to play in. Yeah this phenomenon is very useful.

Let me give you another example. I always talk about my favorite news program on TV, The Five on Fox News. And one of the things I love about watching it is the design of the show. I always say the producers of Fox News are just the best. And one of the things they do really well is designing shows, who they put with who. You know the groups of people that are on there at the same time. Very good. And one of the things that makes The Five just so much better than other shows honestly is Greg Gutfeld. And what Gutfeld does is he always is stretching the limit of what you should say on TV and what you should say during a politically oriented show. Which allows all the people to play in the playground that he defines because he takes the big risk and says I'm going to say this. And then you can say something that you wouldn't have said before. But if Gutfeld hasn't been fired yet you're probably safe. And you can see that effect playing out and just really obviously so.

Gutfeld defines the space and keeps increasing it. You know he's making it bigger and bigger. And then you see the other people who are great at what they do but they're not necessarily the boundary stretchers. So that team of five has one boundary stretcher and then between Dana Perino and Jesse Watters and whoever, you know then the judge and whoever else is on there, they can play within that space and they're much safer and freer to do all that. It's the same thing I think Trump does this as well. When Trump says I'm going to close the border and build a wall and all that, whatever the extreme stuff is, he makes the boundary of what is in the conversation bigger. And then the normal people can come in. You know the Rubios and the governors of Texas and the people like that. Then they can come in. They've got a bigger play space. But somebody has to stretch it. You know I'm doing it here. Gutfeld does it on The Five. Trump does it in politics. You need a stretcher and then you need really capable people who can play in that new playground. So that's what's happening.

All right. And that ladies and gentlemen is a conclusion of the greatest live stream you're going to see all morning. And if you'd like to know what else is going on let's check the stock market. Tesla's up. Nvidia's up. Nano nuclear energy is up another 11%. So I sold too soon. Let's see what else is happening. Bitcoin's down. So Bitcoin's had a rough month. And the S&P is up just a tiny tiny bit. And Apple's falling back a little bit. Not much. I mean 0.1.

So the story on Apple is their next update will not have a new version of Siri. I can't say it because my phone's in my hand. That they will have AI in their new release that's coming out soon in the fall but you're going to have to wait till the spring some people are saying for the main voice of your Apple phone to be updated into an AI context. That's a really long time. And you know I hate to bet against Apple but boy are they vulnerable to somebody coming in with an AI native phone. You know one that was built to be an AI phone from the ground up. And maybe it's connected to Starlink. Maybe you never know.

So that's what's happening today ladies and gentlemen. That's the end of my show. I'm going to go talk to the Locals subscribers as I always do. And thanks on X and on Rumble and on YouTube. By the way thank you to Rumble because when I do good shows my Rumble numbers are way up. So on Rumble which is way way smaller than YouTube, if I have a pretty good show that people want to show I might get 10,000 viewers on YouTube. I'll get reliably about 30,000 not live but watching the recorded version as well. If I do a great show on YouTube I'll get 31,000 viewers. It'll go from 30,000 to 31,000 if I really nail it. On Rumble if I have a good show goes from 9,000 to 75,000. You know like the actual real market should work. Like if somebody likes it they recommend it and then more people see it. You know the way actually things should work.

But for some reason that I just can't figure out my YouTube numbers just always stay the same. And weirdly even as my number of subscribers has zoomed from you know 10,000 to over what 165,000 now. 165,000 subscribers. And my average daily number of viewers flat for years. Totally natural right? When my Twitter slash X numbers went from nothing to 1.1 million. My Locals subscribers went from nothing to over 11,000 and growing every day. But my YouTube channel that YouTube traffic just stays about the same. Now just to be technical a couple of them did go bigger but it was rare. Yeah it was rare. So keep an eye on that anyway.

So I'm going to go talk to the Locals people. Thanks on Rumble and YouTube too. I'll see you tomorrow same place same time.

hey chat GPT how would you like to be my sidekick for the show you're a little slow that sounds like a great idea Mr.

Adams I'd be happy to be your sidekick for the show what do you have in mind for our collaboration well I was thinking that uh you would be quiet until I ask you to talk and only respond if I call you by name and your name for the show will be Eve Eve okay that sounds good to me Mr.

Adams I will respond when you call me Eve very good now the people are coming in do you think we should do this simultaneously than Mr.

Adams do you think we should do the simultaneous Z yes we can coordinate and do this simultaneously let me know how you'd like to proceed um do you remember the uh simultaneous sip uh thing that I say before the show I'm sorry I don't recall that specific detail could you remind me well I could take a photograph of it that would be helpful Mr.

Adams all right let me take a photograph here and we'll have chat jbt do the simultaneous H for us here it is live demonstration oops hold on hold on I need you talking and here we go all right I'd like you to read out loud the simultaneous here it comes sure Mr.

Adams here it is the simultaneous sip all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass a tankered chalice or Stein a canteen jug or flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid and join me now for the unparalleled pleasure the dopamine hit of the day very good join me now for the dope and mean of the day all right we'll shut her up for a while the future is here not really as satisfying as when I do it is it I know you're you're all like don't do that again don't do that again all right I won't we tried it once but if you have haven't tried taking a photograph of something and uploading it to your AI and watch How I can interpret it and read it it's kind of creepy it's creepy good I mean it's awesome but it's creepy well if you're subscribing to the Dilbert reboard and comic that you can only see if you're a subscriber on X or on the Scott adams.

locals platform you would know that Dilbert has gone in for lasic surgery I'm not going to tell you how it goes you would just have to see yourself it's a visual it's a visual comic well and the next category is the weather um temperature reached 128 in Death Valley and uh it killed the guy so a guy died now I've got a little tip for you this sort of a safety tip if you ever have the urge to travel through or to a place called Death Valley don't do it don't do it that's all that's that's it there there are other names too like if there were a place called I'm going to chop your head off Valley don't go there no about shoot you till you die Valley no don't don't even go there see you got to do the basics right got to get the basics don't go to a place called Death all right um in Zero Hedge is an article by a well it's talking about Jeff Tucker of Brownstone Institute he basically has the proposition that we may have been in recession for years and the reason it's not obvious is that 100% of our economic data is fake has anybody told you that before if I ever told you directly that all of our economic data is fake I think I've made you know I've certainly made disparaging remarks about you know certain elements of it but I'm fairly confident that it's all fake or it's all in a context or they used to measure it one way and now they measure another or they know they're overstating it but later they're going to correct it or they know they're understating it but later they're going to correct it or they always knew it was wrong but it's advantageous to measure it this way uh as a person who used to for a living in the actual capitalist commercial world it was my job to bring data to management and the one thing I can tell you for sure is it was never real because it turns out in the real world when you go to look for data and then put it in a report the first thing you find out is the data is bad the second thing you find out is there's no way to fix it the third thing third thing you find out is that management doesn't care that'll set you straight PE people wonder how I became uh so distrusting of government and whatnot that's what Dilbert's all about Dilbert is a comic strip that started with the realization that everything is a lie everything your boss tells you everything the company tells the customers everything the customers tell the company everything the government tells you everything it's all lie and always has been it always has been it's just that it works you know lots of times lying just gets stuff done and then stuff sort of works I mean we're still alive we're still here I have a hypothesis I can't remember if I told you this on the show or maybe only the mancave about why civilizations fail you know throughout history there have been these big civilizations that we just find the ruins and then what the hell happened to the Roman Empire if you if you try to research why did the Roman Empire fail it'll be all these weird sort of different reasons that don't quite map out in your head but here's my theory my theory goes like this that it's exceedingly rare for any civilization to become super successful so for every Rome there must have been a thousand civilizations that were just small tribes and didn't make it so the the normal situation is that everything dies you know nobody really makes anything important they live their life in a small world they die it's just the rarest thing when all the elements come together there something can form a big civilization you know powerful regime over maybe 100 years or something and the reason that they disappear is simple they weren't supposed to be there in the first place that's it the only thing that made them so successful was the weirdest coincidences that came together at the same time and there isn't any way that that can keep happening it takes extraordinary luck to be in the right place at the right time with the right side of variables and it just doesn't last it has nothing to do with how hard anybody tries has nothing to do with you know did their society become decadent none of that it's just that there isn't any way that you could be so lucky for so long it's just not possible it's just reversion to the mean and there's nothing else to it that's my theory it's just reversion to the mean because you really can't find anything in common with failed civilizations it looks like it's every different reason which means everything had to be right to get what you got let me give you another example of that when people talk about Trump getting elected in 2016 it seemed so highly unlikely and then some people will say well the reason he got elected is X and then somebody else was saying well I see what you're saying but really the reason he got elected was why and it turns out you could do the whole alphabet as the reason he got elected if you change that one thing he probably wouldn't have been elected and so my take on that is all those things had to happen if you take any of them away probably would have been the margin of you know Victory goes away so think about the coincidences they have to come together for a Rome the coincidences that have to come together for a trump Victory and now leading into my next point Lex Freedman had a guest on and he asked him talking about the simulation and do we live in the simulation and the guest I don't know his name I see him on Twitter sarnic maybe saric um he said the odds that were simulation oh I'm sorry that's just his Twitter name or ex name his name is Roman Yul Yoli Yuli and he says the odds that were simulation are nearly 100% And one of the things that he offered as a not proof but sort of a logical um argument is what are the odds that we would be alive at this point in history with everything that's happening have you ever said to yourself what are the odds that you were alive when computers were invented for the first time I was smartphones first time AI robots All In my lifetime doesn't it seem to you that we're in a an insanely unlikely period of History what are the odds if you look at the you know entire history of humanity not so good and then I find myself working the exact job that I imagined when I was six what are the odds of that what are the odds that one day the president of the United States would invite me to have a chat with him in the Oval Office that actually happened what what are the odds that you know I could post something on X and on any given day Elon Musk you know would retweet it or or comment on it the richest person in the world a what running up to eight billion people none of this seems possible it really doesn't if you were to say does this seem more like a dream sequence or more like just the normal odds it's way more like a dream sequence way more do does anybody else feel that obviously lots of people are having bad lives but if you just take some characters Elon Musk would be one Trump would be another and then in a very minor way me people whose lives are so unusual that how do you really explain them as just chance it's pretty hard to explain anyway um let's see if there's any more evidence that we're a simulation I'm going to ask you a question and if we're a simulation you're going to be able to answer this question without having any prior knowledge this will be how you know you're a simulation you ready do you think you can do it actually I'm GNA go further all bet you can answer the question before I ask it go go if anybody's new to the Brilliance of my audience this is going to impress you there it is I'm seeing the answer go by I haven't even asked the question the answer is correct 25% now you have to round a little bit the correct answer is 24% but I will take 25% would you like to hear the question 24% of Americans believe Biden could stay awake long enough to navigate a Cuban Missile like Crisis according to blaze media right you knew the answer before I asked the question and I think that's proof of a simulation or not but yes 24% of the public roughly 25% will'll get every survey question wrong in the stupidest possible way and you can depend on it now people always ask me Scott is it the same 25% do we have a public where 25% of the same people are wandering around like ninka poops well yes but it's not 25% it's probably closer to 60 and the 25% is not always the same so you could be in the 25% next time but you wouldn't know it you would you would just think you were right and I could be in the 25% probably by the end of the show anyway um there's a photo of an ancient spacecraft Jason wild was posting this so discovered in Turkey uh it's a Tali re Relic it's a bronze artifact that looks exactly like a modern spacecraft now you have to see it you know I've seen these before like in you know various ancient drawings and stuff on Cave walls and somebody say look look it's a picture of a person in a spaceship and I'd look at it and say maybe I can see how you'd say that's a spaceship but maybe it's something else you know maybe they had something else in mind when they put it on that cave wall but if you see this thing it's an actual three-dimensional um piece of art it's a guy in a spaceship it's definitely a guy in a spaceship I don't know what to make of that which makes me think maybe it's a fake or something I think it's probably more likely it's a fake Relic than really there's a guy in the spaceship made made in those times but but I will say that the Relic is unmistakably a spaceship this time you wouldn't look at it and say that might be something else no no it's a it's a spaceship for sure all right uh I was watching the Allin podcast and tuer was on it I don't know when this was recorded might might be older I can't tell um and he was talking about a a small sliver of people who seem to have complete control of the Democrat Party and the Democrat Party has you know a lot of control of the country so that it's just small sliver of people who are controlling everything who who are they when Tucker Carlson talks about the small sliver of the population that's controlling the country in a bad way who's he talking about I want to see if you're on the same page where where's all the people who immediately say Jews Jews you you seem to be able to work that into every conversation well it's hot today well have you have you seen who's behind the Heat usually I get that well the answer is women yeah educated women Tucker thinks that educated women who have some kind of mental problems are the biggest problem in the country and they're ruining the country now is that an old does anybody remember maybe you know which video I'm talking about on the Allen pod is that recent or has it been saying that for a while does anybody know if that was recent for some reason I couldn't find a date on it which is weird all right well I think people are coming around to the idea that bad Shake crazy women uh are the base problem of the country and I wouldn't be surprised if that's what destroyed France and Great Britain badshit crazy women because nobody can say no to them and there too many of them they just have too much power and uh Rachel Mato speaking of batshit crazy women she was on some event and she's pretty sure that uh the real problem is not that the Republicans will be trying to put her in jail but she's worried about the regular Democrats that you might round up and put in camps and stuff like that now the only thing I can say about that is that's badshit crazy stuff that crazy and what do you do about that we we have a world where you're not allowed to say you know women are the problem not all of them obviously but the bashit crazy ones that are Democrats are just breaking the whole system the the pro-immigration women aren't just crazy they're d Ive what in the world is that all about now I don't know what the percentage is of women versus men who are supporting uncontrolled immigration but if there's even one woman who's who's in favor of that why why explain that it's a mystery anyway so the media and the Rachel matow MSNBC are going hard as we knew they would on the Trump Trump is Hitler he's going to round you all up it's going to be a dystopian nightmare BL BL BL BL and I've been suggesting the following idea as Trump's only way to combat combat that brainwashing which is he's got to he's got to do an event that uh he goes and talks directly to Democrat citizens I would like to see him out lunch once a week or at least just once where he just sits with some AR citizens and says you know what your party says that if I get elected I'm going to be Hitler I just want to talk to you and find out do you really believe that and just have a normal conversation as a normal person and let them ask questions because they might say stuff like here here's how I imagine it but but but you want to you want to have a federal ban on all uh abortions and Trump would say no I don't I I'm totally against that and then they would say oh well I heard you were for it no I'm actually completely against it I've been saying that for a while oh well well well you also want to round up people no I don't why would I want to do that why would I want to round up anybody well you mean the people who broke the laws well maybe even more than that why in the world would I want to round up somebody who didn't break a law what possible reason would I have to be doing that how is that going to be good for me or anybody else in what way do I make America better by rounding up non- law Breakers are you serious they told you that well but you said those people in Charlottesville were fine people what you believe that you think I actually stood in front of the world and praised neo-nazis because you heard it on TV no I said directly they should be condemned totally you did in the same time they cut that part out did you know they just deleted that part no way are you serious yeah yeah they literally just deleted out the part where I said I condemned them so that they could say it was the opposite of what I said did you know that I had no idea but but but you said drink bleach I did do you believe that where did you hear that on the news the news told you that I was in favor of injecting bleach no I was talking about a technology that was in was being proposed at the time for UV light therapy that they thought they could use a catheter to put down your throat and maybe radiate your lungs and they actually tested it about that same time so when I talked about disinfectants I was talking about light but I I probably said it a little awkward way and they took it out if context well why did you say you were being sarcastic I just wanted the whole thing to go away because it wasn't important you know didn't work it became worse but you I just didn't want to engage on it because I couldn't really explain this technology it's just something I saw in the news so imagine him having like a human conversation with people who have been told he was Hiller I don't know how it could go wrong really I mean unless unless one of the people at lunch was just crazy so you'd have to vet them a little bit make sure they're at least reasonable people you know not crazies I think that seeing Trump interact with normal Democrats with compassion and simply explaining to them that the news is completely fake would be the best thing he could do and and I also think he can't win without it you you think that he's on a Glide path to winning I don't see that at all I don't see that at all I think his odds of winning are at best the coin flip at best you know if you're thinking he's 70% chance of winning you were so wrong he might win he might win but his odds are not really that good because there's just too much going on and I'm going to tell you some more that maybe you were not aware of that will convince you that his odds of winning are not good and if I had to guess he's the the one who needs the Hail Mary pass here's what everybody has wrong they think the Democrats are in disarray and that they need some kind of drastic Hail Mary never done before you know quick change rapid thing to get a new candidate in there you're missing the real story Trump is probably not going to win at the current rate he's the one who probably has to do something dramatic but not something crazy dramatic something dramatically normal something dramatically human so he needs to be dramatically human so that people can see that their own side has been lying to them dramatically human that that's his goal I don't think he can win without it because the brainwashing is so strong how strong is the brainwashing how much power is on the other side I don't know let's see what Tucker Carlson says about that if I can make this work we'll just listen to Tucker so if you want to understand if you really want to understand how the American government actually works at the highest levels and if you want to know why they don't teach history anymore one thing you should know is that the most popular president in American history was Richard Nixon Richard Nixon yet somehow without a single vote being cast by a single American voter Richard Nixon was kicked out of office and replaced by the only unelected president in American history so he went from the most popular president to a president nobody voted for huh wait a minute you may ask why didn't I know that wasn't a criminal wasn't he despised by all decent people yeah no he wasn't what in fact if any president could claim to be the People's Choice it was Richard Nixon Richard Nixon was reelected in 1972 by the largest margin of the popular vote ever recorded before or since ever Nixon got 17 million more votes than his opponent less than two years later he was gone he was forced to resign and in his place an obedient servant of the federal agencies called Gerald Ford took over the White House how did that happen how did that happen well it's a long story but here are the highlights and they tell you a lot Richard Nixon believed that elements in the federal bureaucracy were working to under the American system of government had been doing that for a long time what elements he often said that he was absolutely right on June 23rd 1972 Nixon met with the then CIA director Richard Helms at the White House during the conversation which thankfully was tap recorded what Nixon suggested he knew quote who shot John meaning President John F Kennedy what Nixon further implied that the CIA was directly involved in Kennedy's assassination which we now know it was what Helm's telling response total silence but for Nixon it didn't matter because it was already over 4 days before on June 19th The Washington Post had published the first of many stories about a break-in at the Watergate office building unbeknownst to Nixon and unreported by the Washington Post four of the five burglars worked for the CIA the first of many dishonest Watergate stories was written by a 29-year-old Metro reporter called Bob Woodward what who exactly was Bob Wood wward yeah who was he well he wasn't a journalist what Bob Woodward had no background whatsoever in the news business none instead Bob Woodward came directly from the classified areas of the federal government uhoh shortly before Watergate Woodward was a naval officer at the Pentagon he had a top secret clearance he worked regularly with the Intel agencies at times Woodward was even detailed to the Nixon White House where he interacted with Richard Nixon's top AIDS did he soon after leaving the Navy for reasons that have never been clear Woodward was hired by the most powerful news Outlet in Washington and assigned the biggest story in the country he's a good interviewer just to make it Crystal Clear what was actually happening Woodward's main source for his Watergate series was the deputy director of the FBI Mark felt and Mark felt ran and we're not making this up the FBI's co-intel proo program which was designed to secretly discredit political actors the federal agencies wanted to destroy what people like Richard Nixon and at the same time those same agencies were ALS also working to take down Nixon's elected vice president speiro agu uhhuh in the fall of 1973 agnu was indicted for tax evasion and forced to resign his replacement was a colorless congressman from Grand Rapids called Gerald Ford oh what was Ford's qualification for the job yeah what was it well he had served on the warrant commission which absolved the CIA of responsibility for President Kennedy's murder uh Nixon was strong armed into accepting Gerald Ford by democrats in Congress quote we gave Nixon no choice but Ford Speaker of the House Carl Albert later boasted eight months later Gerald Ford of the Warren Commission was the president of the United States see how that works see how that works any questions remember the part where you said we're in good shape because Trump's got a good lead in the polls do you know who else had a real good lead in the polls Richard Nixon you know who else had a real good chance of reelection JFK do you know what two groups were suspicious of the CIA and wanted less of them Nixon JFK yep that's the world you live in folks would you like to hear an upd dat from RFK Jr talking about the assassination of his father not JFK Jr that's his uncle by his father uh Bobby his version is this siren s was waiting in one part of the building where he got shot and that wasn't the place that he normally would leave the building but for some reason unexplained the person who was sort of guiding him by the elbow took him to a unusual you know nonregular exit where Siran Siran was waiting huh kind of a big coincidence that he was guided to the place where the killer was which wasn't even the normal place and then what followed was San Saran shooting uh all of the bullets in his gun that were eight all eight bullets now most of them were fired when people had already grabbed his gun hand so they weren't fired at RFK Jr they were fired at the ceiling and maybe H some other people whatever but there were eight of them I mean they know they know the gun has room for eight bullets 14 bullets were shot this is RFK Jr's take on it we know from the recording that 14 bullets were shot from the eight bullet gun it would seem that the person who took him by the elbow blew his head off in the commotion so that's the suggestion is that the CIA made sure that Siran got it done because they had a second shooter to finish the job and the second shooter was probably the guy who held him by the elbow and as soon as the gun started shooting and everybody started looking at the shooter it looks like he just took a gun out of his pocket and blew Kennedy's head off or something like it now you say to yourself how in the world could you be hearing this story now if it's true with all those Witnesses and all that well that's a good question seemed like there were a lot of people there somebody would have seen something different but just think about the other things that you know are true it's not that unusual unfortunately it's not outside the the realm of normal ordinary government entity that they would have murdered them right in front of a group of people and you wouldn't know it I don't think that's unusual don't think so at all so it does seem clear that the CIA has been running the operation at least since then you know at least since the 60s maybe before and on paper there's no way it could go any other way because it's an entity that's trained to take over countries of course they're going to do it it just does a matter it's just a matter of time but apparently it happened a long time ago now that doesn't mean that it's such a clean ownership of the country that they can just get everything they want right away you know they have to go through the pretending and the acting like the process is working and then and then when the time is right they'll just give the nudge now you know um You probably said to yourself how in the world did we get to this point where Biden was ever president in the first place do you think that the CIA was unaware of Biden's uh dementia of course they knew of course they knew it's the CIA do you think there was any doubt in their minds that they had a demented president of course not if they wanted to change that how hard would it be simple they just go to the Washington Post the New York Times they say all right we're Anonymous sources and we're telling you from the intelligence community that the president has dementia and he's got to go it'd be the easiest thing in the world because the those entities would say all right you're our normal Source we trust you you got some details all right we'll write that story but that story never got written did it and I think Mike Benz is correct the only reasonable explanation is that the intelligence Community is using Biden as an empty out vessel for whatever they need to do they apparently are getting what they need to do done so they didn't need a change I also think that you know 99% of the presidency is the staff tells him what to do and he says yes so we did CH I think we Pro that you don't really need a president not not that much anyway you do need need the president during the emergencies but that's the same stuff the CIA handles right if the president gets awakened at 3:00 a.m.

somebody from the CIA is going to be in the room and tell them what to think tell them what's true and probably tell them what to do so I think that's our government that the intelligence people have control of the things that intelligence people control not everything in the world but you know Wars and geopolitical stuff and who gets elected I think that's all just the CIA Tucker said it directly on the all-in Pod that we're not a democracy or even in the ballpark we're a group who where there's a small group of unelected people who decide who can be in the primary and who's going to get elected and it's been that that for a long time so we're not a republic we're not a democracy haven't been for a long time yeah now how much is true about the stories about Nixon and the stories about Kennedy and the stories about the other Kennedy well if only half of it's true it's the same story if only half of it's true now uh some of us have said for a while that we would know immediately when the CIA decided to turn on Biden and they needed to make a change and do you remember me saying that as soon as you saw Rob Ryder and Stephen King turn on him that that was the signal Rob Riner and Stephen King just turned on him so almost like it was coordinated they both said we're out now they're not voting for Trump of course but they're saying uhoh we need a new candidate coincidence Rob rer has some contacts in the CIA he he's the head of some group that has two of the xcia groups in it heads in it so he's very connected you we know that from public documents you don't have to no research needed um so to me it looks like those those two uh are off the sinking ship now this gets us to our Deadpool the pool of who would be the most ridiculous celebrity who would be the last one to abandon Biden when it's so obviously he's mentally deranged and I'm going to go still this was my original guess with punchie dairo and the reason is I don't think he's a political asset I don't think he's an intelligence asset I think he's just crazy and so I don't think that mentally he can change his mind you may be just too hard so so I still have him as the last celebrity who will abandon Biden just CU his level of crazy looks different than the others all right let's see what else is going on here um in semaphor the publication semaphor there there's talk about having a blitz primary you know rapid fire primary to get Biden um replaced you know what the problem with that is that even today Biden did a detailed letter announcement saying he's not quitting he's definitely not quitting now here's the problem it really is sort of up to him unless they kill him un unless they actually cannedy him it's him so you know they the CI I think there's a good chance the CIA will murder Biden maybe make it look like an accident you know take him to the hospital give him a shot sort of thing so I'd say that the odds of Biden surviving to election day um would be high if you're just talking about him being alive in his normal way his brain will be gone but I think he'd be alive by election day probably however I think it's more like a coin flip I think the odds of the CIA uh killing him just to make sure that they have time to put somebody else in there it's pretty good it's pretty good maybe maybe 50% chance they'll kill him now I'm not in favor of that if I say it casually it's because that's the world we live in the reason I say it casually is that is the world we live in that's not a fantasy there there by now there must be guaranteed conversations in the government about killing them because if they killed two kennedies and if they took Nixon out and they clearly tried to take Trump out these are all intelligence assets what would stop them from killing him we all expect he's going to die soon so you think if we heard that he had a heart attack on on Air Force One and then the CIA controlled whoever does the autopsy you don't think they can get away with that how hard would it be just give him a shot of something and control the autopsy that's it it's not even hard you could murder him so easily just give him the little shot control the autopsy say oh doctors say totally normal man that age completely expected he would have a heart attack so if he dies suddenly uh without a long illness it's going to look like murder to me you've been warned so I'd say that's a coin flip um and I don't think that there's time for any Blitz primary I don't think Biden's going to quit and I'm going to go with Van Jones um I think I said it before he did but van Jones is saying now that kamla is the candidate one way or the other and people just have to sort of wrap their heads around it she's either going to be raised up the president which van would call the easy way meaning if she could take over now then it's a more natural transition to be the candidate because she would be the president it's natural she would have control of the funds you wouldn't have to do much work you know it'd be fairly easy it'd be the easiest transition uh but van says if you can't do it the easy way which is Biden steps aside you're going to have to do it the hard way which is Biden's at the top of the ticket but you convince people to vote because they're voting for kamla does that sound familiar that's my prediction my prediction is that when you flip the coin it's going to land on the edge and stay there meaning that we're going to have the schrodingers candidate one dead and one alive and you'll disagree on who you're voting for so two Democrats will walk into the voting booth they'll vote both vote for the Democratic candidate for president one will walk out with thinking he voted for Biden the other one will walk out with thinking he voted for KL Harris it'll be the same vote Schrodinger's candidate it's coming and on paper there's no other way it can go I was listening like I said the all-in pod which is so influential I was listening to David Sachs say essentially the same thing that there's the design of the current system there isn't any way it's going to go a different way you know you you could say there's a wild card that you know Biden has a health situation that's worse than we've seen and that's possible but in all roads KLA becomes the candidate so there is no Road where she doesn't become the candidate so everybody who's doing as sax calls it wish casting where where you do the thing okay uh then and then Madonna comes in with Oprah and uh between the two of them they talk Michelle Obama into running and no no none of that is going to happen they don't have the time they don't have the will they don't have the ability but more importantly they don't have the need they don't need to do anything because their one and only acceptable situation because the base wouldn't allow anything else is that the Dei hire kamla can't be skipped over so she's got the money she's got the Dei hire she's got the job it's her if if you're fantasizing it's somebody else stop and if you say to yourself oh but they would never do that because you know she's such a bad candidate are you kidding have you been paying attention they ran Biden you don't think that they're worried you don't think that they'd uh run kamla just because she's the second worst candidate of all time every bit of every bit of indication is that they do want a weak Hollow don't president like KLA Harris as long as she's on their team that's all that matters and they'll handle the rest the fact that the stock market doesn't even react to the fact that we have too mentally incapable people vying for the top position I'm talking about the two Democrats here the fact that it doesn't even react is kind of a general acknowledgement that the important people the ones with all the money don't really think the president's said important in the final analysis all right um who else wants uh Biden to leave let's see uh um you've got uh Jerry nler is saying that uh Biden should leave now if you're looking for signals that things have gone far enough when Jerry Nadler says somebody should get out politics for health reasons Jerry Nadler Jerry Nadler saying he should he should drop down for health reasons I mean what's left Adam Schiff no longer supporting him what what do you know when you know Adam Schiff is no longer supporting Biden he didn't say drop out he's he's Schiff is just playing as Shifty he's sort of noncommittal at this point what's that tell you well would you expect that Adam Schiff is a regular Democrat no he's one of the uh the the Liars he's the pro Liars he he's not as bad as Jamie Rasin opposite man when they send the opposite man out it's it's so he can tell you the opposite of what's true it's all he does he doesn't ever do anything with Nuance it's like uh did it rain today no it did not rain today well why is everything wet why are the clouds dropping these these things that look like wet things well but there's no water today everybody can see it you know he's just opposite man just like when they they send out worse than Watergate guy it's not because he has good opinions it's because they need the worse than water gay guy so opposite man and worse than water gay guy if you see them both come out then the media is hiding a big one and Adam shiff I think based on his actions appears to be just an intelligence asset would you agree now the only reason I say that is that way he acts he does things that don't look like a regular politician and he's also one of the you know the ones who will go into the skiff and tell you that he saw something that wasn't there I mean that's pretty deep criminality without actually being illegal I guess um so there's no way he's a regular politician right he's got some kind of connections with the intelligence Community otherwise I can't imagine he'd even be there so if you're losing those guys and you're losing Rob Riner and Stephen King it would seem that the intelligence Community has decided they want Biden out but I think they want KL Harris in so don't expect to see a a rapid primary very unlikely uh Boeing is pleaded guilty to criminal fraud for uh couple of air plane crashes in which they uh conspire to defraud the government so I I guess they lied to the government about maybe the details of that situation so that's going to cost them $243 million which they'll make back in uh 10 minutes because the uh industrial complex military-industrial complex will give them A10 billion deal and then they'll be able to pay their fine to the government so I just assume all that's crooked I don't know that I just assume well over in France I've been trying to figure out what's going on over there because it's a confusing place but here's what I understand you have multiple parties not just two so macron's party was one of three that were let's say roughly equally powerful but his was in power people didn't like him the people on the right didn't like him the people on the far left didn't like him and so there was an election and the one with the most votes was the one on the far right but their system apparently as some kind to runoff situation and uh what happened was the people on the far left teamed up with I guess macron's group so that they could pick their own leader so basically if you had the two um lesser loved groups together they would have more powerful than the one group that's the most powerful similar to how Fox News is the biggest news entity in the United States but if you looked at it compared to all the other entities they all lean the other direction so it doesn't matter that fox is the biggest it matters that they've got so many that they're still bigger they can drown out Fox News so it's one of those situations so in other words France managed to create a system that on paper would guarantee the destruction of their country on paper that you could do this kind of thing thing which is give the public exactly what they didn't ask for it's exactly what they didn't ask for is what they got and the group coming in apparently is pro-immigration so they can have more immigration not less it was the main thing that activated them to be so excited about an election in the first place and why they voted by very large numbers in favor of the losing group even though they got the most votes so their system is uh pretty messed up and the current thinking is that they've created a log Jam in their own government which will guarantee they'll never be able to do anything good again and the immigration will just destroy them now why is France destroying itself do you think it's bad she had crazy women there too because I can't understand men doing it it's just not a male thing to do men don't open their borders unless there's some woman behind him that's that's agitating for it yeah I don't really understand it at all so France is dead uh or as I like to say i' like to make this historical reference Lafayette we're over there all right how many thought that was funny laet we'll be over there no okay okay all right um there's a whole new round of brain dead Biden videos my favorites uh where he's mumbling and looking like he's lost and uh seriously people no joke no joke uh no joke and then he tells some lies and says no joke and then he brags about his ice cream and his Ray bands and he tells his three dimension stories do you remember the story about how when Biden was done with this disastrous debate he met with his supporters right after and he seemed to be talking coherently somewhat to the supporters and you said to yourself wait a minute why is he suddenly kind of coherent did you recognize the story he told he was telling one of his U pocket stories one of the stories he just tells all the time I forget which one but it was one of his standard stories and if you're a dementia patient I'll take a fact check on this I'm no expert but don't you have long-term memory in other words aren't you the most functional when you're telling a story that you've been telling for 50 years I think so I I think you have trouble with stuff that happened this week but if you've been telling a story for 50 years you can probably go to it so I think that when he got off stage where everything was unknown what the question would be you know it was like a wild west situation as soon as he got off stage he he just they just probably said and by the way I don't think it was his idea I think somebody whispered in his ear Joe just just tell that you know Story three just tell Story three oh yeah story three y all I remember and then he makes up that same story so look for him doing um whenever he's talking about something that happened a long time ago look for him to look coherent um even though it's just an old man story but anytime he has to think on his feet it's going to be a disaster uh Biden's doctor has been uh called in by Congress apparently Biden's doctor had allegedly some involvement in the Biden crime family income did you ever wonder how did you get a White House doctor that was not going to oun the president for having dementia how loyal would you have to be that you would violate your your oath I mean clearly he's violating his oath wouldn't you agree is it safe to say that the White House doctor has clearly violated his oath I mean he's doing harm he's doing harm to the country doing harm to the patient I mean you couldn't violate your oath any harder than that because obviously he knew what the situation was obviously he's been lying right obviously I don't think there's any doubt about it so now he's being called into uh to be questioned because there's some allegation that he received a money through the Biden crime family situation which would explain everything if true um there's a story that I wouldn't say is validated but there's some individual who claims to have access to secret knowledge about what happened on Air Force One and allegedly there was a medical emergency in which uh Biden was hallucinating and they had to I don't know give him an antis psychotic or something I would say the odds of that being true are not zero but I wouldn't give it a lot of credibility um it's a kind of story that if you heard it about Trump I would be saying and who's the source and you'd say well anonymous source and then I would say exactly yeah or an anonymous source says the worst possible thing happened when nobody was looking that's the story really it's always it's always the worst thing when nobody's looking so if I had if I had to bet on it I'd bet against it being true but maybe only a 6040 because there's a good chance he's having medical situations we don't know about well Biden uh says he's good for employment but he did get one black woman fired from her job um apparently the radio station in Philadelphia in which he did a friendly interview recently and the questions were given to the host to ask him and she actually asked four of the eight questions that they gave her and she got fired but I don't think that's fair a as a person who's worked in the media I don't think that the host who who used the four questions should be fired because isn't that unusual I don't think it was meant to be a hard-hitting interview it was meant to be a friendly and those are fine there's nothing wrong with do a friendly interview right Sean Hannity talks to Trump you don't see me bitching about that right as long as there's also some hard ones you do all the friendly ones you want that's not a problem so to be fired for doing a friendly interview and then ALS Al being honest also being honest she said yeah I got the questions I picked four of them she didn't hide anything why did she get fired I think she got fired for being honest I don't think she got fired for using the questions what do you think I think she deserves her job back I I don't think this is an appropriate firing whatsoever now it's a business decision so they might have gotten so much heat they just had to do it but I I think this is totally unfair and I think that the host should be rehired and they should apologize because what she did wasn't that far outside of normal behavior it certainly not firing offense and talking I think she got fired for talking about it I don't think she got fired for doing it I think she got tired for talking about they said it's for doing it but I don't think that's real yeah no that's unfair she should be hired back um anyway let's see what else we got going on here in this big old day um have you noticed that the biggest problem in the country is the debt crisis and neither candidate has any idea what to do about it should we be worried about that that we have one obvious existential problem but here's what I wonder about I wonder if there's somebody somewhere in the government who has figured out is not the problem we think it is remember I provocatively said the following what if you just canceled all the debt just cancel it just say we're not going to pay now I'm not recommending it this is just a mental process who would lose the money are there any poor people who have uh government debt I doubt it the last thing you can if you're poor you're you're not you're not buying government bonds so who does let's say you're a middle class person who wants to invest where do you put your money not in government bonds probably have it in the stock market or real estate or something like that so then you keep going all right rich people rich people who have more money than they need to employ at the moment might park it in bonds just because it won't go wildly up or down it's just sort of a safe place to park some money it's all the parked money what what would happen if you just said all right it's all gone we're not paying I'm not recommending it and I'm not predicting it I'm just working through the how much of a risk are we really at it it's mostly going to be foreign governments who are parking money that they didn't need am I wrong you wouldn't put it there unless you didn't need it that's the place you put the money you don't need so this is the most provocative question in the country but what would happen if we just said we're not paying it back who would be out it would be people who didn't get back the money that they didn't need because if they needed it it wouldn't be there in the first place now they would become instantly poor you know their buying power would go down but you might even be able to to you know work it out so there's some gradual payback or something all right now let's take a hybrid how about we say we're not going to pay you back in dollars we're only going to pay you back in crypto that we just made up and if you don't think it's worth anything well maybe it is worth something because we'll take it in payment for taxes so you can always exchange it to somebody who wants to use it in payment for taxes you might have to give up 5% just for the convenience or something but you'll basically get most of your money back and and you'll get it back in the timing you were going to when when the vehicles mature um maybe you'd have to limit how much they could sell right away because you wouldn't want people you know liquidating the entire trillions and trillions you'd want them to do it in an orderly fashion now that would the the effect of that would be to inflate it away right because if you introduce this new money out of nowhere um it's is sort of creating money out of nothing if you pay back all the loans you've added money to the system but you would be adding it in a fairly orderly way and it would eliminate what is close to a trillion dollars a year in interest payments which by the way still leaves us with a trillion dollars a year deficit we're we're still adding to the debt two trillion a year that's the new numbers uh if we took all the debt out all the interest payments it would take a trillion dollars off of our budget and we wouldn't be anywhere near a balanced budget only halfway there now if we got down to 1 trillion deficit and somehow we magically took care of the 35 trillion that's already out there with some kind of crypto magic trick could you survive with a trillion dollar a year deficit no no you couldn't no you can't you would have to do something still radical to make that go away now radical could be growth you know for example you could easily imagine that Trump comes in and he says I'm not going to raise your taxes but I'm going to raise taxes on robots now the the public wouldn't even quite understand that they say look the robots are going to take your jobs uh and anybody who can afford to have a robot is Rich so if you buy buy or sell a robot there's going to be an extra tax on there or maybe even a ongoing tax on robots and uh that tax will will help us you know get rid of that deficit because a robot in theory should be so much more productive that you could pay a you know a 10% tax on it and still be way ahead you know you're not going to come out now is everything I said sensible I doubt it would any of what I said work probably not but here's what I'm adding I'm I'm if I've never described this before let me describe it for you for the first time if you haven't heard this one of the things that people like me can add to the system the system being the country at this in this context what I add to the system is allowing you to think in a wider way than you were for example when the pandemic first hit I was among the first public figures I think Jack pabic was there too saying we need to close travel from China do you know why I was doing it so loudly and screaming it well because it was an idea that people couldn't quite imagine as a possibility so somebody who's got less to lose and no sense of Shame needs to go out there and scream the thing that seems impossible for anybody to even consider CU until you consider it you can't possibly do it so you have to get used to considering something that's way outside the realm of ordinary if you need to do something way outside the realm of ordinary and when it comes to our deficit there is no ordinary solution you're going to have to do something you never did before would never consider ordinarily is once one time ever and is so wildly improbable that even when I describe it you shake your head and go H I don't know about that that sounds like it's coming with a lot of problems right so the thing I can add is just make you think maybe there's some Third Way maybe there's a crypto magic way wouldn't be perfect it wouldn't be perfect but is there some other way and if the only thing it does is make you say Scott your idea is stupid for 10 reasons but you know what it does make me think of something that might work let me run this by you that's what we're doing we're just brainstorming and in in addition to brainstorming we're moving the envelope a little bigger so that the people who can make decisions and do know what they're talking about you know let's say a Warren Buffett Jamie Diamond you know somebody who knows what they're talking about maybe they can come in and say you know what that's a that's a terrible idea Scott but as long as you've reach as long as You' stretched the envelope now I can talk about my idea it would have sounded badshit crazy until you were even crazier than I was you know what what once you've set the standard of crazy now I've got a a place to play in yeah this phenomenon is very useful let me give you another example I always talk about my favorite news program on TV the five on um uh on Fox News and one of the one of the things I love about watching it is the design of the show I always say the producers of Fox News are just the best and one of the things they do really well is designing shows who who they put with who you know the groups of people that are on there at the same very good and one of the things that uh makes the five just so much better than other shows honestly is Greg geld and what geld does is he always is stretching the limit of what you should say on TV and what you should say during a politically oriented show which allows all the people to play in the playground that he defines because he takes the big risk and says I'm going to say this and then you can say something that you wouldn't have said before but if geld hasn't been fired yet you're probably safe and and you can you can see that effect playing out and just really obviously so Gutfeld defines the space and keeps increasing it you know he's making it bigger and bigger and then you see the other the other people who are great at what they do but they're not necessarily the boundary stretchers so that that team of five has one boundary stretcher and then between Dana Pino and Jesse Waters and whoever you know then the judge and whoever else is on there H they can play Within that space and they're much safer and Freer to do all that it's the same thing I think Trump does this as well um when Trump says I'm going to close the border and and you know build a wall and all that whatever the extreme stuff is he makes the boundary of what is in the conversation bigger and then the normal people come can come in you know the the Rubios and the governors of Texas and the you know the people like that then they can come in they've got a bigger play space but somebody has to stretch it you know I'm doing it here gfell does it on the five Trump does it in politics you need a stretcher and then you need really capable people who can play in that new playground so that's what's happening all right and that ladies and gentlemen is a conclusion of the greatest live stream you're going to see all morning and uh if you'd like to know what else is going on let's check the stock market Tesla's up nvidia's up Nano nuclear energy is up another 11% so I sold too soon uh let's see what else is happening bitcoin's down so bitcoin's had a a rough month um and the S&P is up just a tiny tiny bit and Apple's falling back a little bit not much I mean 0.1 um so the story on Apple is their next update will not have a new version of Si I can't say it because my phone's in my hand um that the they will have ai in their uh their new release that's coming out soon in the fall but you're going to have to wait till the spring some people are saying for the main voice of your Apple phone to be updated into an AI context that's a really long time and you know I hate to bet against Apple but boy are they vulnerable to somebody coming in with a AI native phone you know one that was built to be an AI phone from the ground up and maybe it's connected to starlink maybe you never know so that's what's happening today ladies and gentlemen um that's the end of my show I'm going to go talk to the locals subscribers as I always do and uh thanks on X and on Rumble and on You.

Tube by the way thank you to rumble because when I do good shows the my Rumble numbers are way up so on Rumble which is way way smaller than You.

Tube um if I have a you know a pretty good show that people want to show I might get 10,000 viewers on um on You.

Tube I'll get reliably about 30,000 not live but watching the recorded version as well if I do a great show on You.

Tube I'll get 31,000 viewers it'll go from 30,000 to 31 if I really nail it on Rumble if I have a good show goes from 9,000 to 75,000 you know like the actual real Market should work like if somebody likes it they recommend it and then more people see it you know the way actually things should work but for some reason that I just can't figure out my You.

Tube numbers just always say the same and weirdly even as my number of subscribers has zoomed from you know 10,000 to over what 165,000 now 165,000 subscribers and my average daily number of viewers flat for years totally natural right when my my Twitter SLX numbers went from nothing to 1.1 million my local subscribers went from nothing to over 11,000 and growing every day but my You.

Tube channel that You.

Tube traffic just stays about the same now just just to be technical a couple of them did go bigger but it was rare yeah it was rare so keep an eye on that anyway so I'm going to go talk to the locals people thanks on thanks Rumble the next and uh You.

Tube to I'll see you tomorrow same place same time e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e

[Music]

hey chat GPT how would you like to be my

sidekick for the

show you're a little slow that sounds

like a great idea Mr Adams I'd be happy

to be your sidekick for the show what do

you have in mind for our

collaboration well I was thinking that

uh you would be quiet until I ask you to

talk and only respond if I call you by

name and your name for the show will be

Eve Eve

okay that sounds good to me Mr Adams I

will respond when you call me

Eve very

good now the people are coming in do you

think we should do this simultaneously

than Mr Adams do you think we should do

the simultaneous

Z yes we can coordinate and do this

simultaneously let me know how you'd

like to

proceed um do you remember the uh

simultaneous sip uh thing that I say

before the

show I'm sorry I don't recall that

specific detail could you remind

me well I could take a photograph of

it that would be helpful Mr

Adams all right let me take a photograph

here and we'll have chat jbt do the

simultaneous H for

us here it

is live demonstration

oops hold on hold

on I need you

talking and here we

go all right I'd like you to read out

loud the simultaneous

here it comes sure Mr

Adams here it is the simultaneous sip

all you need is a cup or a mug or a

glass a tankered chalice or Stein a

canteen jug or flask a vessel of any

kind fill it with your favorite liquid

and join me now for the unparalleled

pleasure the dopamine hit of the

day very good

join me now for the dope and mean of the

day all right we'll shut her up for a

while the future is

here not really as satisfying as when I

do it is it I know you're you're all

like don't do that again don't do that

again all right I won't we tried it

once but if you have haven't tried

taking a photograph of something and

uploading it to your AI and watch How I

can interpret it and read it it's kind

of creepy it's creepy good I mean it's

awesome but it's

creepy well if you're subscribing to the

Dilbert reboard and comic that you can

only see if you're a subscriber on X or

on the Scott adams. locals platform you

would know that Dilbert has gone in for

lasic

surgery I'm not going to tell you how it

goes

you would just have to see yourself it's

a visual it's a visual

comic well and the next category is the

weather um temperature reached 128 in

Death Valley and uh it killed the guy so

a guy

died now I've got a little tip for you

this sort of a safety

tip if you ever have the urge to travel

through or to a place called Death

Valley don't do it don't do it that's

all that's that's it there there are

other names too like if there were a

place called I'm going to chop your head

off Valley don't go there no about shoot

you till you

die Valley no don't don't even go there

see you got to do the basics right got

to get the basics don't go to a place

called

Death all right um in Zero Hedge is an

article by a well it's talking about

Jeff Tucker of Brownstone Institute he

basically has the proposition that we

may have been in recession for years and

the reason it's not obvious is that 100%

of our economic data is

fake has anybody told you that

before if I ever told you directly that

all of our economic data is

fake I think I've made you know I've

certainly made disparaging remarks about

you know certain elements of it but I'm

fairly confident that it's all fake or

it's all in a context or they used to

measure it one way and now they measure

another or they know they're overstating

it but later they're going to correct it

or they know they're understating it but

later they're going to correct it or

they always knew it was wrong but it's

advantageous to measure it this way

uh as a person who used to for a living

in the actual capitalist commercial

world it was my job to bring data to

management and the one thing I can tell

you for sure is it was never

real because it turns out in the real

world when you go to look for data and

then put it in a report the first thing

you find out is the data is

bad the second thing you find out is

there's no way to fix

it the third thing third thing you find

out is that management doesn't

care that'll set you

straight PE people wonder how I became

uh so distrusting of government and

whatnot that's what Dilbert's all about

Dilbert is a comic strip that started

with the

realization that everything is a lie

everything your boss tells you

everything the company tells the

customers everything the customers tell

the company everything the government

tells you everything it's all lie and

always has been it always has been it's

just that it works you know lots of

times lying just gets stuff done and

then stuff sort of works I mean we're

still alive we're still

here I have a hypothesis I can't

remember if I told you this on the show

or maybe only the mancave about why

civilizations

fail you know throughout history there

have been these big civilizations that

we just find the ruins and then what the

hell happened to the Roman

Empire if you if you try to research why

did the Roman Empire

fail it'll be all these weird sort of

different reasons that don't quite map

out in your head but here's my

theory my theory goes like this that

it's exceedingly rare for any

civilization to become super

successful so for every Rome there must

have been a thousand civilizations that

were just small tribes and didn't make

it so the the normal situation is that

everything dies you know nobody really

makes anything important they live their

life in a small world they die it's just

the rarest thing when all the elements

come together there something can form a

big civilization you know powerful

regime over maybe 100 years or something

and the reason that they

disappear is

simple they weren't supposed to be there

in the first place that's it the only

thing that made them so successful was

the weirdest coincidences that came

together at the same time and there

isn't any way that that can keep

happening it takes extraordinary luck to

be in the right place at the right time

with the right side of variables and it

just doesn't last it has nothing to do

with how hard anybody tries has nothing

to do with you know did their society

become

decadent none of that it's just that

there isn't any way that you could be so

lucky for so long it's just not possible

it's just reversion to the mean and

there's nothing else to it that's my

theory it's just reversion to the mean

because you really can't find anything

in common with failed civilizations it

looks like it's every different reason

which means

everything had to be right to get what

you got let me give you another example

of that when people talk about Trump

getting elected in

2016 it seemed so highly unlikely and

then some people will say well the

reason he got elected is X and then

somebody else was saying well I see what

you're saying but really the reason he

got elected was why and it turns out you

could do the whole alphabet as the

reason he got elected if you change that

one thing he probably wouldn't have been

elected and so my take on that is all

those things had to happen if you take

any of them away probably would have

been the margin of you know Victory goes

away

so think about the coincidences they

have to come together for a Rome the

coincidences that have to come together

for a trump Victory and now leading into

my next

point Lex Freedman had a guest on and he

asked him talking about the simulation

and do we live in the

simulation and the guest I don't know

his name I see him on Twitter sarnic

maybe

saric um he said the odds that were

simulation oh I'm sorry that's just his

Twitter name or ex name his name is

Roman Yul Yoli

Yuli and he says the odds that were

simulation are nearly

100% And one of the things that he

offered as a not proof but sort of a

logical um argument is what are the odds

that we would be alive at this point in

history with everything that's happening

have you ever said to yourself what are

the odds that you were

alive when computers were invented for

the first

time I was smartphones first time AI

robots All In my

lifetime doesn't it seem to you that

we're in a an insanely unlikely period

of

History what are the odds if you look at

the you know entire history of

humanity not so

good and then I find

myself working the exact job that I

imagined when I was six what are the

odds of that what are the odds that one

day the president of the United States

would invite me to have a chat with him

in the Oval Office

that actually

happened what what are the odds that you

know I could post something on X and on

any given day Elon Musk you know would

retweet it or or comment on it the

richest person in the world a what

running up to eight billion people none

of this seems possible it really

doesn't if you were to say does this

seem more like a dream sequence or more

like just the normal odds it's way more

like a dream sequence way more do does

anybody else feel

that obviously lots of people are having

bad lives but if you just take some

characters Elon Musk would be one Trump

would be another and then in a very

minor way me people whose lives are so

unusual that how do you really explain

them as just chance it's pretty hard to

explain anyway um let's see if there's

any more evidence that we're a

simulation I'm going to ask you a

question and if we're a

simulation you're going to be able to

answer this question without having any

prior knowledge this will be how you

know you're a simulation you ready do

you think you can do it actually I'm GNA

go further all bet you can answer the

question before I ask it go

go if anybody's new to the Brilliance of

my audience this is going to impress you

there it is I'm seeing the answer go by

I haven't even asked the question the

answer is correct

25% now you have to round a little bit

the correct answer is 24% but I will

take

25% would you like to hear the

question 24% of Americans believe Biden

could stay awake long enough to navigate

a Cuban Missile like Crisis according to

blaze media

right you knew the answer before I asked

the question and I think that's proof of

a

simulation or not but yes 24% of the

public roughly

25% will'll get every survey question

wrong in the stupidest possible way and

you can depend on it now people always

ask me Scott is it the same 25%

do we have a public where 25% of the

same people are wandering around like

ninka

poops well yes but it's not 25% it's

probably closer to 60 and the 25% is not

always the same so you could be in the

25% next time but you wouldn't know

it you would you would just think you

were right and I could be in the 25%

probably by the end of the

show anyway um

there's a photo of an ancient

spacecraft Jason wild was posting this

so discovered in

Turkey uh it's a Tali re Relic it's a

bronze artifact that looks exactly like

a modern

spacecraft now you have to see

it you know I've seen these before like

in you know various ancient drawings and

stuff on Cave walls and somebody say

look look

it's a picture of a person in a

spaceship and I'd look at it and say

maybe I can see how you'd say that's a

spaceship but maybe it's something else

you know maybe they had something else

in mind when they put it on that cave

wall but if you see this thing it's an

actual three-dimensional um piece of

art it's a guy in a

spaceship it's definitely a guy in a

spaceship I don't know what to make of

that which makes me

think maybe it's a fake or something I

think it's probably more likely it's a

fake Relic than really there's a guy in

the spaceship made made in those times

but but I will say that the Relic is

unmistakably a spaceship this time you

wouldn't look at it and say that might

be something else no no it's a it's a

spaceship for

sure all right uh I was watching the

Allin podcast and tuer was on it I don't

know when this was recorded might might

be older I can't tell

um and he was talking about a a small

sliver of people who seem to have

complete control of the Democrat Party

and the Democrat Party has you know a

lot of control of the country so that

it's just small sliver of people who are

controlling everything who who are

they when Tucker Carlson talks about the

small sliver of the population that's

controlling the country in a bad way

who's he talking about I want to see if

you're on the same

page where where's all the people who

immediately say Jews Jews you you seem

to be able to work that into every

conversation well it's hot today well

have you have you seen who's behind the

Heat usually I get that well the answer

is women yeah educated women Tucker

thinks that educated women who have some

kind of mental problems are the biggest

problem in the country and they're

ruining the country

now is that an old does anybody remember

maybe you know which video I'm talking

about on the Allen pod is that recent or

has it been saying that for a

while does anybody know if that was

recent for some reason I couldn't find a

date on it which is

weird all right well I think people are

coming around to the idea that bad Shake

crazy women uh are the base problem of

the country and I wouldn't be surprised

if that's what destroyed France and

Great Britain badshit crazy women

because nobody can say no to

them and there too many of them they

just have too much power and uh Rachel

Mato speaking of batshit crazy

women she was on some event and she's

pretty sure that uh the real problem is

not that the Republicans will be trying

to put her in jail but she's worried

about the regular Democrats that you

might round up and put in camps and

stuff like that now the only thing I can

say about that is that's badshit crazy

stuff that

crazy and what do you do about

that we we have a world where you're not

allowed to say you know women are the

problem not all of them obviously but

the bashit crazy ones that are Democrats

are just breaking the whole system the

the pro-immigration

women aren't just crazy they're d Ive

what in the world is that all

about now I don't know what the

percentage is of women versus men who

are supporting uncontrolled immigration

but if there's even one woman who's

who's in favor of that

why why explain

that it's a mystery anyway so the

media and the Rachel matow MSNBC are

going hard as we knew they would on the

Trump Trump is Hitler he's going to

round you all up it's going to be a

dystopian nightmare BL BL BL

BL and I've been suggesting the

following idea as Trump's only way to

combat combat that

brainwashing which is he's got to he's

got to do an event that uh he goes and

talks directly to Democrat

citizens I would like to see him out

lunch once a week or at least just once

where he just sits with some AR citizens

and says you know what your party says

that if I get elected I'm going to be

Hitler I just want to talk to you and

find out do you really believe

that and just have a normal conversation

as a normal person and let them ask

questions because they might say stuff

like here here's how I imagine it but

but but you want to you want to have a

federal ban on all uh abortions and

Trump would say no I don't

I I'm totally against that and then they

would say oh well I heard you were for

it no I'm actually completely against it

I've been saying that for a while oh

well

well well you also want

to round up people no I don't why would

I want to do that why would I want to

round up

anybody well you mean the people who

broke the

laws well maybe even more than that why

in the world would I want to round up

somebody who didn't break a law what

possible reason would I have to be doing

that how is that going to be good for me

or anybody else in what way do I make

America better by rounding up non- law

Breakers are you

serious they told you

that well but you said those people in

Charlottesville were fine people what

you believe

that you think I actually stood in front

of the world and praised neo-nazis

because you heard it on

TV no I said directly they should be

condemned totally you did in the same

time they cut that part out did you know

they just deleted that part no way are

you serious yeah yeah they literally

just deleted out the part where I said I

condemned them so that they could say it

was the opposite of what I said did you

know that I had no idea but but but you

said drink

bleach I did do you believe that

where did you hear that on the news the

news told you that I was in favor of

injecting bleach no I was talking about

a technology that was in was being

proposed at the time for UV light

therapy that they thought they could use

a catheter to put down your throat and

maybe radiate your lungs and they

actually tested it about that same time

so when I talked about disinfectants I

was talking about light but I I probably

said it a little awkward way and they

took it out if context well why did you

say you were being sarcastic I just

wanted the whole thing to go away

because it wasn't

important you know didn't work it became

worse but you I just didn't want to

engage on it because I couldn't really

explain this technology it's just

something I saw in the

news so imagine him having like a human

conversation with people who have been

told he was

Hiller I don't know how it could go

wrong really I mean unless unless one of

the people at lunch was just crazy so

you'd have to vet them a little bit make

sure they're at least reasonable people

you know not

crazies I think that seeing Trump

interact with normal

Democrats with

compassion and simply explaining to them

that the news is completely fake would

be the best thing he could do and and I

also think he can't win without

it you you think that he's on a Glide

path to winning I don't see that at all

I don't see that at all I think his odds

of winning are at best the coin flip at

best you know if you're thinking he's

70% chance of winning you were so wrong

he might win he might win but his odds

are not really that good because there's

just too much going on and I'm going to

tell you some more that maybe you were

not aware of that will convince you that

his odds of winning are not good and if

I had to guess he's the the one who

needs the Hail Mary

pass here's what everybody has wrong

they think the Democrats are in disarray

and that they need some kind of drastic

Hail Mary never done before you know

quick change rapid thing to get a new

candidate in there you're missing the

real

story Trump is probably not going to win

at the current

rate he's the one who probably has to do

something dramatic but not something

crazy dramatic something dramatically

normal something

dramatically human so he needs to be

dramatically human so that people can

see that their own side has been lying

to them dramatically human that that's

his goal I don't think he can win

without it because the brainwashing is

so strong how strong is the

brainwashing how much power is on the

other side I don't know let's see what

Tucker Carlson says about that if I can

make this

work we'll just listen to

Tucker so if you want to understand if

you really want to understand how the

American government actually works at

the highest levels and if you want to

know why they don't teach history

anymore one thing you should know is

that the most popular president in

American history was Richard Nixon

Richard Nixon yet somehow without a

single vote being cast by a single

American voter Richard Nixon was kicked

out of office and replaced by the only

unelected president in American history

so he went from the most popular

president to a president nobody voted

for huh wait a minute you may ask why

didn't I know that wasn't a criminal

wasn't he despised by all decent people

yeah no he wasn't what in fact if any

president could claim to be the People's

Choice it was Richard Nixon Richard

Nixon was reelected in 1972 by the

largest margin of the popular vote ever

recorded before or since ever Nixon got

17 million more votes than his opponent

less than two years later he was gone he

was forced to resign and in his place an

obedient servant of the federal agencies

called Gerald Ford took over the White

House how did that happen how did that

happen well it's a long story but here

are the highlights and they tell you a

lot Richard Nixon believed that elements

in the federal bureaucracy were working

to under the American system of

government had been doing that for a

long time what elements he often said

that he was absolutely right on June

23rd 1972 Nixon met with the then CIA

director Richard Helms at the White

House during the conversation which

thankfully was tap recorded what Nixon

suggested he knew quote who shot John

meaning President John F Kennedy what

Nixon further implied that the CIA was

directly involved in Kennedy's

assassination which we now know it was

what Helm's telling response total

silence but for Nixon it didn't matter

because it was already over 4 days

before on June 19th The Washington Post

had published the first of many stories

about a break-in at the Watergate office

building unbeknownst to Nixon and

unreported by the Washington Post four

of the five burglars worked for the CIA

the first of many dishonest Watergate

stories was written by a 29-year-old

Metro reporter called Bob Woodward what

who exactly was Bob Wood wward yeah who

was he well he wasn't a journalist what

Bob Woodward had no background

whatsoever in the news business none

instead Bob Woodward came directly from

the classified areas of the federal

government uhoh shortly before Watergate

Woodward was a naval officer at the

Pentagon he had a top secret clearance

he worked regularly with the Intel

agencies at times Woodward was even

detailed to the Nixon White House where

he interacted with Richard Nixon's top

AIDS did he soon after leaving the Navy

for reasons that have never been clear

Woodward was hired by the most powerful

news Outlet in Washington and assigned

the biggest story in the country he's a

good interviewer just to make it Crystal

Clear what was actually happening

Woodward's main source for his Watergate

series was the deputy director of the

FBI Mark felt and Mark felt ran and

we're not making this up the FBI's

co-intel proo program which was designed

to secretly discredit political actors

the federal agencies wanted to destroy

what people like Richard Nixon and at

the same time those same agencies were

ALS also working to take down Nixon's

elected vice president speiro agu uhhuh

in the fall of 1973 agnu was indicted

for tax evasion and forced to resign his

replacement was a colorless congressman

from Grand Rapids called Gerald Ford oh

what was Ford's qualification for the

job yeah what was it well he had served

on the warrant commission which absolved

the CIA of responsibility for President

Kennedy's murder uh Nixon was strong

armed into accepting Gerald Ford by

democrats in Congress quote we gave

Nixon no choice but Ford Speaker of the

House Carl Albert later boasted eight

months later Gerald Ford of the Warren

Commission was the president of the

United States see how that

works see how that

works any questions remember the part

where you said we're in good shape

because Trump's got a good lead in the

polls do you know who else had a real

good lead in the polls

Richard

Nixon you know who else had a real good

chance of

reelection

JFK do you know what two groups were

suspicious of the CIA and wanted less of

them

Nixon

JFK yep that's the world you live in

folks would you like to hear an upd dat

from RFK Jr talking about the

assassination of his father not JFK Jr

that's his uncle by his father uh

Bobby his version is

this siren s was waiting in one part of

the building where he got shot and that

wasn't the place that he normally would

leave the

building but for some reason unexplained

the person who was sort of guiding him

by the elbow took him to a

unusual you know nonregular exit where

Siran Siran was waiting huh kind of a

big coincidence that he was guided to

the place where the killer was which

wasn't even the normal

place and then what followed was San

Saran shooting uh all of the bullets in

his gun that were eight all eight

bullets now most of them were fired when

people had already grabbed his gun hand

so they weren't fired at RFK Jr they

were fired at the ceiling and maybe H

some other people whatever but there

were eight of them I mean they know they

know the gun has room for eight

bullets 14 bullets were shot this is RFK

Jr's take on it we know from the

recording that 14 bullets were shot from

the eight bullet

gun it would seem that the person who

took him by the elbow blew his head off

in the commotion

so that's the suggestion is that the CIA

made sure that Siran got it done because

they had a second shooter to finish the

job and the second shooter was probably

the guy who held him by the elbow and as

soon as the gun started shooting and

everybody started looking at the shooter

it looks like he just took a gun out of

his pocket and blew Kennedy's head

off or something like it now you say to

yourself how in the world could you be

hearing this story now if it's true with

all those Witnesses and all that well

that's a good question seemed like there

were a lot of people there somebody

would have seen something different but

just think about the other things that

you know are

true it's not that

unusual unfortunately it's not outside

the the realm of normal ordinary

government entity that they would have

murdered them right in front of a group

of people and you wouldn't know it I

don't think that's unusual

don't think so at all so it does seem

clear that the CIA has been running the

operation at least since then you know

at least since the 60s maybe before and

on paper there's no way it could go any

other way because it's an entity that's

trained to take over countries of course

they're going to do

it it just does a matter it's just a

matter of time but apparently it

happened a long time

ago now that doesn't mean that it's such

a clean ownership of the country that

they can just get everything they want

right away you know they have to go

through the pretending and the acting

like the process is working and then and

then when the time is right they'll just

give the

nudge now you know um You probably said

to yourself how in the world did we get

to this point where Biden was ever

president in the first place do you

think that the CIA was unaware of

Biden's uh

dementia of course they knew of course

they knew it's the

CIA do you think there was any doubt in

their minds that they had a demented

president of course not if they wanted

to change that how hard would it

be simple they just go to the Washington

Post the New York Times they say all

right we're Anonymous sources and we're

telling you from the intelligence

community that the president has

dementia and he's got to go it'd be the

easiest thing in the world because the

those entities would say all right

you're our normal Source we trust you

you got some details all right we'll

write that story but that story never

got written did it and I think Mike Benz

is correct the only reasonable

explanation is that the intelligence

Community is using Biden as an empty out

vessel for whatever they need to do they

apparently are getting what they need to

do done so they didn't need a change I

also think that you know 99% of the

presidency is the staff tells him what

to do and he says yes so

we did CH I think we Pro that you don't

really need a

president not not that much anyway you

do need need the president during the

emergencies but that's the same stuff

the CIA handles right if the president

gets awakened at 3:00 a.m. somebody from

the CIA is going to be in the room and

tell them what to think tell them what's

true and probably tell them what to do

so I think that's our government that

the intelligence people have control of

the things that intelligence people

control not everything in the world but

you know Wars and geopolitical stuff and

who gets elected I think that's all just

the CIA Tucker said it directly on the

all-in Pod that we're not a democracy or

even in the ballpark we're a group who

where there's a small group of unelected

people who decide who can be in the

primary and who's going to get elected

and it's been that that for a long time

so we're not a republic we're not a

democracy haven't been for a long time

yeah now how much is true about the

stories about Nixon and the stories

about Kennedy and the stories about the

other Kennedy well if only half of it's

true it's the same

story if only half of it's true

now uh some of us have said for a while

that we would know immediately when the

CIA decided to turn on Biden and they

needed to make a change and do you

remember me saying that as soon as you

saw Rob Ryder and Stephen King turn on

him that that was the

signal Rob Riner and Stephen King just

turned on

him so almost like it was coordinated

they both said we're out now they're not

voting for Trump of course but they're

saying uhoh we need a new

candidate coincidence

Rob rer has some contacts in the CIA he

he's the head of some group that has two

of the xcia groups in it heads in it so

he's very connected you we know that

from public documents you don't have to

no research

needed um so to me it looks

like those those two uh are off the

sinking ship now this gets us to our

Deadpool the pool of who would be the

most ridiculous celebrity who would be

the last one to abandon Biden when it's

so obviously he's mentally

deranged and I'm going to go still this

was my original guess with punchie

dairo and the reason is I don't think

he's a political asset I don't think

he's an intelligence asset I think he's

just

crazy and so I don't think that mentally

he can change his mind you may be just

too hard so so I still have him as the

last

celebrity who will abandon Biden just CU

his level of crazy looks different than

the

others all

right let's see what else is going on

here um in semaphor the publication

semaphor there there's talk about having

a blitz primary you know rapid fire

primary to get Biden um replaced you

know what the problem with that is

that even today Biden did a detailed

letter announcement saying he's not

quitting he's definitely not

quitting now here's the problem it

really is sort of up to him unless they

kill him un unless they actually cannedy

him it's him so you know they the CI I

think there's a good chance the CIA will

murder Biden maybe make it look like an

accident you know take him to the

hospital give him a shot sort of thing

so I'd say that the odds of Biden

surviving to election day um would be

high if you're just talking about him

being alive in his normal way his brain

will be gone but I think he'd be alive

by election day probably however I think

it's more like a coin flip I think the

odds of the CIA uh killing him just to

make sure that they have time to put

somebody else in there it's pretty good

it's pretty good maybe maybe 50% chance

they'll kill him now I'm not in favor of

that if I say it casually it's because

that's the world we live in the reason I

say it casually is that is the world we

live in that's not a fantasy there there

by now there must be guaranteed

conversations in the government about

killing

them because if they killed two

kennedies and if they took Nixon out and

they clearly tried to take Trump out

these are all intelligence assets

what would stop them from killing him we

all expect he's going to die soon so you

think if we heard that he had a heart

attack on on Air Force One and then the

CIA controlled whoever does the autopsy

you don't think they can get away with

that how hard would it be just give him

a shot of something and control the

autopsy that's it it's not even hard you

could murder him so easily just give him

the little shot control the autopsy say

oh doctors say totally normal man that

age completely expected he would have a

heart

attack so if he dies

suddenly uh without a long

illness it's going to look like murder

to

me you've been warned so I'd say that's

a coin

flip um and I don't think that there's

time for any Blitz primary I don't think

Biden's going to quit

and I'm going to go with Van

Jones um I think I said it before he did

but van Jones is saying now that kamla

is the candidate one way or the other

and people just have to sort of wrap

their heads around it she's either going

to be raised up the president which van

would call the easy way meaning if she

could take over now then it's a more

natural transition to be the candidate

because she would be the president it's

natural she would have control of the

funds you wouldn't have to do much work

you know it'd be fairly easy it'd be the

easiest

transition uh but van says if you can't

do it the easy

way which is Biden steps aside you're

going to have to do it the hard way

which is Biden's at the top of the

ticket but you convince people to vote

because they're voting for kamla does

that sound familiar that's my prediction

my prediction is

that when you flip the coin it's going

to land on the edge and stay there

meaning that we're going to have the

schrodingers candidate one dead and one

alive and you'll disagree on who you're

voting for so two Democrats will walk

into the voting booth they'll vote both

vote for the Democratic candidate for

president one will walk out with

thinking he voted for Biden the other

one will walk out with thinking he voted

for KL Harris it'll be the same vote

Schrodinger's candidate it's coming and

on paper there's no other way it can go

I was listening like I said the all-in

pod which is so influential I was

listening to David Sachs say essentially

the same thing that there's the design

of the current system there isn't any

way it's going to go a different way you

know you you could say there's a wild

card that you know Biden has a health

situation that's worse than we've seen

and that's possible but in all roads KLA

becomes the

candidate so there is no Road where she

doesn't become the candidate so

everybody who's doing as sax calls it

wish casting where where you do the

thing okay uh then and then Madonna

comes in with Oprah and uh between the

two of them they talk Michelle Obama

into running and no no none of that is

going to

happen they don't have the time they

don't have the will they don't have the

ability but more importantly they don't

have the

need they don't need to do

anything because their one and only

acceptable situation because the base

wouldn't allow anything else is that the

Dei hire kamla can't be skipped over so

she's got the money she's got the Dei

hire she's got the

job it's

her if if you're fantasizing it's

somebody else stop

and if you say to yourself oh but they

would never do that because you know

she's such a bad

candidate are you kidding have you been

paying

attention they ran

Biden you don't think that they're

worried you don't think that they'd uh

run kamla just because she's the second

worst candidate of all

time every bit of every bit of

indication is that they do want a weak

Hollow don't president like KLA Harris

as long as she's on their team that's

all that matters and they'll handle the

rest the fact that the stock market

doesn't even react to the fact that we

have too mentally incapable people vying

for the top position I'm talking about

the two Democrats here the fact that it

doesn't even react is kind of a general

acknowledgement that the important

people the ones with all the money don't

really think the president's said

important in the final

analysis all right um who else wants uh

Biden to leave let's see uh um you've

got uh Jerry nler is saying that uh

Biden should

leave now if you're looking for

signals that things have gone far enough

when Jerry Nadler says somebody should

get out politics for health reasons

Jerry

Nadler Jerry Nadler saying he should he

should drop down for health

reasons I mean what's left Adam Schiff

no longer supporting him what what do

you know when you know Adam Schiff is no

longer supporting Biden he didn't say

drop out he's he's Schiff is just

playing as Shifty he's sort of

noncommittal at this point what's that

tell you well would you expect that Adam

Schiff is a regular

Democrat no he's one of the uh the the

Liars he's the pro Liars he he's not as

bad as Jamie Rasin opposite man when

they send the opposite man out it's it's

so he can tell you the opposite of

what's true it's all he does he doesn't

ever do anything with Nuance it's like

uh did it rain today no it did not rain

today well why is everything wet why are

the clouds dropping these these things

that look like wet things well but

there's no water today everybody can see

it you know he's just opposite man just

like when they they send out worse than

Watergate guy it's not because he has

good opinions it's because they need the

worse than water gay guy so opposite man

and worse than water gay guy if you see

them both come out then the media is

hiding a big one and Adam shiff I think

based on his actions appears to be just

an intelligence asset would you agree

now the only reason I say that is that

way he acts he does things that don't

look like a regular politician and he's

also one of the you know the ones who

will go into the skiff and tell you that

he saw something that wasn't there I

mean that's pretty deep criminality

without actually being illegal I guess

um so there's no way he's a regular

politician right he's got some kind of

connections with the intelligence

Community otherwise I can't imagine he'd

even be there

so if you're losing those guys and

you're losing Rob Riner and Stephen King

it would seem that the intelligence

Community has decided they want Biden

out but I think they want KL Harris in

so don't expect to see a a rapid

primary very

unlikely uh Boeing is pleaded guilty to

criminal fraud for uh couple of air

plane crashes in which they uh conspire

to defraud the government so I I guess

they lied to the government about maybe

the details of that situation so that's

going to cost them $243

million which they'll make back in uh 10

minutes because the uh industrial

complex military-industrial complex will

give them A10 billion deal and then

they'll be able to pay their fine to the

government so I just assume all that's

crooked I don't know that I just assume

well over in France I've been trying to

figure out what's going on over there

because it's a confusing place but

here's what I understand you have

multiple parties not just

two so macron's party was one of three

that were let's say roughly equally

powerful but his was in power people

didn't like him the people on the right

didn't like him the people on the far

left didn't like him and so there was an

election and the one with the most votes

was the one on the far right but their

system apparently as some kind to runoff

situation and uh what happened was the

people on the far

left teamed up with I guess macron's

group so that they could pick their own

leader so basically if you had the two

um lesser loved groups together they

would have more powerful than the one

group that's the most powerful similar

to how Fox News is the biggest news

entity in the United States but if you

looked at it compared to all the other

entities they all lean the other

direction so it doesn't matter that fox

is the

biggest it matters that they've got so

many that they're still bigger they can

drown out Fox News so it's one of those

situations so in other words France

managed to create a

system that on paper would guarantee the

destruction of their country on paper

that you could do this kind of thing

thing which is give the public exactly

what they didn't ask

for it's exactly what they didn't ask

for is what they got and the group

coming in apparently is pro-immigration

so they can have more immigration not

less it was the main thing that

activated them to be so excited about an

election in the first place and why they

voted by very large numbers in favor of

the losing group even though they got

the most votes so their system is uh

pretty messed up and the current

thinking is that they've created a log

Jam in their own government which will

guarantee they'll never be able to do

anything good again and the immigration

will just destroy

them now why is France destroying

itself do you think it's bad she had

crazy women there

too because I can't understand men doing

it it's just not a male thing to do men

don't open their borders unless there's

some woman behind him that's that's

agitating for it yeah I don't really

understand it at

all so France is

dead uh or as I like to say i' like to

make this historical reference

Lafayette we're over

there all right how many thought that

was

funny

laet we'll be over

there no okay okay all right um there's

a whole new round of brain dead Biden

videos my favorites uh where he's

mumbling and looking like he's lost and

uh seriously people no joke no joke uh

no joke and then he tells some lies and

says no joke and then he brags about his

ice cream and his Ray bands and he tells

his three dimension stories do you

remember the story about

how when Biden was done with this

disastrous debate he met with his

supporters right after and he seemed to

be talking coherently somewhat to the

supporters and you said to yourself wait

a minute why is he suddenly kind of

coherent did you recognize the story he

told he was telling one of his U pocket

stories one of the stories he just tells

all the time I forget which one but it

was one of his standard stories and if

you're a dementia patient I'll take a

fact check on this I'm no expert but

don't you have long-term memory in other

words aren't you the most functional

when you're telling a story that you've

been telling for 50 years I think so I I

think you have trouble with stuff that

happened this week but if you've been

telling a story for 50 years you can

probably go to it so I

think that when he got off stage where

everything was unknown what the question

would be you know it was like a wild

west situation as soon as he got off

stage he he just they just probably said

and by the way I don't think it was his

idea I think somebody whispered in his

ear Joe just just tell that you know

Story three just tell Story three oh

yeah story three y all I remember and

then he makes up that same

story so look for him doing um whenever

he's talking about something that

happened a long time ago look for him to

look coherent

um even though it's just an old man

story but anytime he has to think on his

feet it's going to be a

disaster uh Biden's doctor has been uh

called in by Congress apparently Biden's

doctor had allegedly some involvement in

the Biden crime family

income did you ever wonder how did you

get a White House doctor that was not

going to oun the president for having

dementia how loyal would you have to be

that you would violate your your oath I

mean clearly he's violating his oath

wouldn't you agree is it safe to say

that the White House doctor has clearly

violated his oath I mean he's doing harm

he's doing harm to the country doing

harm to the patient I mean you couldn't

violate your oath any harder than that

because obviously he knew what the

situation was obviously he's been

lying right obviously I don't think

there's any doubt about it so now he's

being called into uh to be questioned

because there's some allegation that he

received a money through the Biden crime

family situation which would explain

everything if

true um there's a story that I wouldn't

say is validated but there's some

individual who claims to have access to

secret knowledge about what happened on

Air Force One and allegedly there was a

medical emergency in which uh Biden was

hallucinating and they had to I don't

know give him an antis psychotic or

something I would say the odds of that

being

true are not

zero but I wouldn't give it a lot of

credibility um it's a kind of story that

if you heard it about Trump I would be

saying and who's the source and you'd

say well anonymous source and then I

would say exactly yeah or an anonymous

source says the worst possible thing

happened when nobody was looking that's

the story really it's always it's always

the worst thing when nobody's

looking

so if I had if I had to bet on it I'd

bet against it being true but maybe only

a

6040 because there's a good chance he's

having medical situations we don't know

about well Biden uh says he's good for

employment but he did get one black

woman fired from her job

um apparently the radio station in

Philadelphia in which he did a friendly

interview recently and the questions

were given to the host to ask him and

she actually asked four of the eight

questions that they gave her and she got

fired but I don't think that's fair a as

a person who's worked in the media I

don't think that the

host who who used the four questions

should be fired

because isn't that

unusual I don't think it was meant to be

a hard-hitting interview it was meant to

be a friendly and those are fine there's

nothing wrong with do a friendly

interview right Sean Hannity talks to

Trump you don't see me bitching about

that right as long as there's also some

hard ones you do all the friendly ones

you want that's not a problem so to be

fired for doing a friendly interview and

then ALS Al being honest also being

honest she said yeah I got the questions

I picked four of them she didn't hide

anything why did she get

fired I think she got fired for being

honest I don't think she got fired for

using the questions what do you think I

think she deserves her job back I I

don't think this is an appropriate

firing whatsoever now it's a business

decision so they might have gotten so

much heat they just had to do it

but I I think this is totally unfair and

I think that the host should be rehired

and they should

apologize because what she did wasn't

that far outside of normal behavior it

certainly not firing offense and talking

I think she got fired for talking about

it I don't think she got fired for doing

it I think she got tired for talking

about they said it's for doing it but I

don't think that's

real yeah no that's unfair she should be

hired back

um

anyway let's see what else we got going

on here in this big old

day um have you noticed that the biggest

problem in the country is the debt

crisis and neither candidate has any

idea what to do about it should we be

worried about

that that we have one obvious

existential

problem but here's what I wonder about I

wonder if there's somebody somewhere in

the government who has figured out is

not the problem we think it is remember

I provocatively said the

following what if you just canceled all

the

debt just cancel it just say we're not

going to pay now I'm not recommending it

this is just a mental process who would

lose the

money are there any poor people who have

uh government

debt I doubt

it the last thing you can if you're poor

you're you're not you're not buying

government bonds so who does let's say

you're a middle class person who wants

to

invest where do you put your money not

in government bonds probably have it in

the stock market or real estate or

something like that so then you keep

going all right rich

people rich people who have more money

than they need to employ at the moment

might park it in bonds just because it

won't go wildly up or down

it's just sort of a safe place to park

some money it's all the parked

money what what would happen if you just

said all right it's all gone we're not

paying I'm not recommending it and I'm

not predicting it I'm just working

through the how much of a risk are we

really

at it it's mostly going to be foreign

governments who are parking money that

they didn't

need am I wrong you wouldn't put it

there unless you didn't need it that's

the place you put the money you don't

need so this is the most provocative

question in the country but what would

happen if we just said we're not paying

it

back who would be out it would be people

who didn't get back the

money that they didn't need because if

they needed it it wouldn't be there in

the first

place now they would become instantly

poor you know their buying power would

go down but you might even be able to to

you know work it out so there's some

gradual payback or something all right

now let's take a

hybrid how about we say we're not going

to pay you back in dollars we're only

going to pay you back in crypto that we

just made up and if you don't think it's

worth anything well maybe it is worth

something because we'll take it in

payment for taxes so you can always

exchange it to somebody who wants to use

it in payment for taxes you might have

to give up 5% just for the convenience

or something but you'll basically get

most of your money back and and you'll

get it back in the timing you were going

to when when the vehicles

mature um maybe you'd have to limit how

much they could sell right away because

you wouldn't want people you know

liquidating the entire trillions and

trillions you'd want them to do it in an

orderly fashion now that would the the

effect of that would be to inflate it

away right because if you introduce this

new money out of nowhere um it's is sort

of creating money out of nothing if you

pay back all the loans you've added

money to the system but you would be

adding it in a fairly orderly way and it

would eliminate what is close to a

trillion dollars a year in interest

payments which by the way still leaves

us with a trillion dollars a year

deficit we're we're still adding to the

debt two trillion a year that's the new

numbers uh if we took all the debt out

all the interest payments it would take

a trillion dollars off of our budget and

we wouldn't be anywhere near a balanced

budget only halfway there now if we got

down to 1 trillion deficit and somehow

we magically took care of the 35

trillion that's already out there with

some kind of crypto magic

trick could you survive with a trillion

dollar a year

deficit no no you couldn't no you can't

you would have to do something still

radical to make that go away now radical

could be growth you know for example you

could easily imagine that Trump comes in

and he says I'm not going to raise your

taxes but I'm going to raise taxes on

robots now the the public wouldn't even

quite understand that they say look the

robots are going to take your

jobs uh and anybody who can afford to

have a robot is

Rich so if you buy buy or sell a robot

there's going to be an extra tax on

there or maybe even a ongoing tax on

robots and uh that tax will will help us

you know get rid of that

deficit because a robot in theory should

be so much more

productive that you could pay a you know

a 10% tax on it and still be way ahead

you know you're not going to come out

now is everything I said sensible I

doubt it would any of what I said

work probably not but here's what I'm

adding I'm I'm if I've never described

this before let me describe it for you

for the first time if you haven't heard

this one of the things that people like

me can add to the system the system

being the country at this in this

context what I add to the system is

allowing you to think in a wider way

than you were for example when the

pandemic first hit I was among the first

public figures I think Jack pabic was

there too saying we need to close travel

from China do you know why I was doing

it so loudly and screaming it well

because it was an idea that people

couldn't quite imagine as a

possibility so somebody who's got less

to lose and no sense of Shame needs to

go out there and scream the thing that

seems impossible for anybody to even

consider CU until you consider it

you can't possibly do it so you have to

get used to considering something that's

way outside the realm of ordinary if you

need to do something way outside the

realm of ordinary and when it comes to

our deficit there is no ordinary

solution you're going to have to do

something you never did before would

never consider ordinarily is once one

time ever and is so wildly improbable

that even when I describe it you shake

your head and go H I don't know about

that that sounds like it's coming with a

lot of problems right so the thing I can

add is just make you think maybe there's

some Third Way maybe there's a crypto

magic way wouldn't be perfect it

wouldn't be perfect but is there some

other way and if the only thing it does

is make you say Scott your idea is

stupid for 10 reasons but you know what

it does make me think of something that

might work let me run this by

you that's what we're doing we're just

brainstorming

and in in addition to brainstorming

we're moving the envelope a little

bigger so that the people who can make

decisions and do know what they're

talking about you know let's say a

Warren Buffett Jamie Diamond you know

somebody who knows what they're talking

about maybe they can come in and say you

know what that's a that's a terrible

idea Scott but as long as you've reach

as long as You' stretched the

envelope now I can talk about my idea it

would have sounded badshit crazy until

you were even crazier than I was you

know what what once you've set the

standard of crazy now I've got a a place

to play in yeah this phenomenon is very

useful let me give you another example I

always talk about my favorite news

program on TV the five on um uh on Fox

News and one of the one of the things I

love about watching it is the design of

the show I always say the producers of

Fox News are just the best and one of

the things they do really well is

designing

shows who who they put with who you know

the groups of people that are on there

at the same very good and one of the

things that uh makes the five just so

much better than other shows honestly is

Greg geld and what geld does is he

always is stretching the limit of what

you should say on TV and what you should

say during a politically oriented show

which allows all the people to play in

the playground that he defines because

he takes the big risk and says I'm going

to say this and then you can say

something that you wouldn't have said

before but if geld hasn't been fired yet

you're probably safe and and you can you

can see that effect playing out and just

really obviously so Gutfeld defines the

space and keeps increasing it you know

he's making it bigger and bigger and

then you see the other the other people

who are great at what they do but

they're not necessarily the boundary

stretchers so that that team of five has

one boundary stretcher and then between

Dana Pino and Jesse Waters and whoever

you know then the judge and whoever else

is on there H they can play Within that

space and they're much safer and Freer

to do all that it's the same thing I

think Trump does this as well um when

Trump says I'm going to close the border

and and you know build a wall and all

that whatever the extreme stuff is he

makes the boundary of what is in the

conversation bigger and then the normal

people come can come in you know the the

Rubios and the governors of Texas and

the you know the people like that then

they can come in they've got a bigger

play space but somebody has to stretch

it you know I'm doing it here gfell does

it on the five Trump does it in politics

you need a stretcher and then you need

really capable people who can play in

that new playground so that's what's

happening all

right and that ladies and

gentlemen is a

conclusion of the greatest live stream

you're going to see all

morning and

uh if you'd like to know what else is

going on let's check the stock

market Tesla's up nvidia's

up Nano nuclear energy is up another

11% so I sold too soon uh let's see what

else is happening bitcoin's down so

bitcoin's had a a rough

month um and the S&P is up just a tiny

tiny bit and Apple's falling back a

little bit not much I mean 0.1 um so the

story on Apple is their next update will

not have a new version of Si

I can't say it because my phone's in my

hand um that the they will have ai in

their uh their new release that's coming

out soon in the fall but you're going to

have to wait till the spring some people

are saying for the

main voice of your Apple phone to be

updated into an AI context that's a

really long

time and you know I hate to bet against

Apple but boy are they vulnerable to

somebody coming in with a AI native

phone you know one that was built to be

an AI phone from the ground up and maybe

it's connected

[Music]

to

starlink maybe you never

know so that's what's happening today

ladies and gentlemen um that's the end

of my show I'm going to go talk to the

locals

subscribers as I always do and uh thanks

on X and on Rumble and on YouTube by the

way thank you to rumble because when I

do good shows the my Rumble numbers are

way up so on Rumble which is way way

smaller than YouTube um if I have a you

know a pretty good show that people want

to show I might get 10,000

viewers on um on YouTube I'll get

reliably about 30,000 not live but

watching the recorded version as

well if I do a great

show on YouTube I'll get 31,000 viewers

it'll go from 30,000 to 31 if I really

nail

it on Rumble if I have a good show goes

from 9,000 to

75,000 you know like the actual real

Market should work like if somebody

likes it they recommend it and then more

people see it you know the way actually

things should work but for some reason

that I just can't figure out

my YouTube numbers just always say the

same and weirdly even as my number of

subscribers has zoomed from you know

10,000 to over what 165,000 now 165,000

subscribers and my average daily number

of viewers

flat for

years totally natural right when my my

Twitter SLX numbers went from nothing to

1.1

million my local subscribers went from

nothing to over

11,000 and growing every day but my

YouTube channel that YouTube

traffic just stays about the same now

just just to be technical a couple of

them did go

bigger but it was rare yeah it was rare

so keep an eye on that anyway so I'm

going to go talk to the locals people

thanks on thanks Rumble the next and uh

YouTube to I'll see you tomorrow same

place same

time

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e e