Episode 2530 CWSA 07/08/24
Biden's brain decay continue. Trump plays it cool. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.
Hey ChatGPT, how would you like to be my sidekick for the show? You're a little slow. That sounds like a great idea, Mr. Adams. I'd be happy to be your sidekick for the show. What do you have in mind for our collaboration? Well, I was thinking that you would be quiet until I ask you to talk and onl…
View segment →ead it, it's kind of creepy. It's creepy good. I mean, it's awesome, but it's creepy. Well, if you're subscribing to the Dilbert reboot and comic that you can only see if you're a subscriber on X or on the Scott Adams Locals platform, you would know that Dilbert has gone in for LASIK surgery. I'm n…
View segment →go there. How about Shoot You Till You Die Valley? No, don't even go there. See, you've got to do the basics right. Got to get the basics. Don't go to a place called Death Valley. All right. In Zero Hedge there's an article by, well, it's talking about Jeff Tucker of Brownstone Institute. He basica…
View segment →cause it turns out in the real world when you go to look for data and then put it in a report, the first thing you find out is the data is bad. The second thing you find out is there's no way to fix it. The third thing you find out is that management doesn't care. That'll set you straight. People w…
View segment →re like a dream sequence. Way more. Does anybody else feel that? Obviously lots of people are having bad lives. But if you just take some characters, Elon Musk would be one, Trump would be another, and then in a very minor way me. People whose lives are so unusual that how do you really explain them…
View segment →about that same time. So when I talked about disinfectants I was talking about light. But I probably said it in a little awkward way and they took it out of context. Well why did you say you were being sarcastic? I just wanted the whole thing to go away because it wasn't important. You know, didn't…
View segment →. That's his goal. I don't think he can win without it because the brainwashing is so strong. How strong is the brainwashing? How much power is on the other side? I don't know. Let's see what Tucker Carlson says about that if I can make this work. We'll just listen to Tucker. So if you want to und…
View segment →ongressman from Grand Rapids called Gerald Ford. Oh, what was Ford's qualification for the job? Yeah, what was it? Well he had served on the Warren Commission which absolved the CIA of responsibility for President Kennedy's murder. Nixon was strong-armed into accepting Gerald Ford by Democrats in C…
View segment →f only half of it's true. Now some of us have said for a while that we would know immediately when the CIA decided to turn on Biden and they needed to make a change. And do you remember me saying that as soon as you saw Rob Reiner and Stephen King turn on him that that was the signal? Rob Reiner an…
View segment →like him. The people on the far left didn't like him. And so there was an election and the one with the most votes was the one on the far right. But their system apparently has some kind of runoff situation. And what happened was the people on the far left teamed up with I guess Macron's group so t…
View segment →lly at? It's mostly going to be foreign governments who are parking money that they didn't need. Am I wrong? You wouldn't put it there unless you didn't need it. That's the place you put the money you don't need. So this is the most provocative question in the country. But what would happen if we j…
View segment →ould pay a 10% tax on it and still be way ahead. You're not going to come out. Now is everything I said sensible? I doubt it. Would any of what I said work? Probably not. But here's what I'm adding. If I've never described this before let me describe it for you for the first time. If you haven't he…
View segment →wall and all that, whatever the extreme stuff is, he makes the boundary of what is in the conversation bigger. And then the normal people can come in. You know the Rubios and the governors of Texas and the people like that. Then they can come in. They've got a bigger play space. But somebody has to…
View segment →ty good show that people want to show I might get 10,000 viewers on YouTube. I'll get reliably about 30,000 not live but watching the recorded version as well. If I do a great show on YouTube I'll get 31,000 viewers. It'll go from 30,000 to 31,000 if I really nail it. On Rumble if I have a good show…
View segment →Hey ChatGPT, how would you like to be my sidekick for the show? You're a little slow. That sounds like a great idea, Mr. Adams. I'd be happy to be your sidekick for the show. What do you have in mind for our collaboration?
Well, I was thinking that you would be quiet until I ask you to talk and only respond if I call you by name. And your name for the show will be Eve. Eve. Okay, that sounds good to me, Mr. Adams. I will respond when you call me Eve.
Very good. Now the people are coming in. Do you think we should do this simultaneously? Mr. Adams, do you think we should do the simultaneous sip? Yes, we can coordinate and do this simultaneously. Let me know how you'd like to proceed.
Do you remember the simultaneous sip thing that I say before the show? I'm sorry, I don't recall that specific detail. Could you remind me? Well, I could take a photograph of it. That would be helpful, Mr. Adams. All right, let me take a photograph here and we'll have ChatGPT do the simultaneous sip for us. Here it is. Live demonstration. Oops, hold on, hold on. I need you talking. And here we go.
All right, I'd like you to read out loud the simultaneous sip. Here it comes. Sure, Mr. Adams. Here it is. The simultaneous sip. All you need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tankard, chalice or stein, a canteen, jug or flask. A vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid and join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day.
Very good. Join me now for the dopamine hit of the day. All right, we'll shut her up for a while. The future is here. Not really as satisfying as when I do it, is it? I know you're all like, don't do that again, don't do that again. All right, I won't. We tried it once.
But if you haven't tried taking a photograph of something and uploading it to your AI and watching how it can interpret it and read it, it's kind of creepy. It's creepy good. I mean, it's awesome, but it's creepy.
Well, if you're subscribing to the Dilbert reboot and comic that you can only see if you're a subscriber on X or on the Scott Adams Locals platform, you would know that Dilbert has gone in for LASIK surgery. I'm not going to tell you how it goes. You would just have to see for yourself. It's a visual comic.
The next category is the weather. Temperature reached 128 in Death Valley and it killed the guy. So a guy died. Now I've got a little tip for you. This is sort of a safety tip. If you ever have the urge to travel through or to a place called Death Valley, don't do it. Don't do it. That's it. There are other names too. Like if there were a place called I'm Going to Chop Your Head Off Valley, don't go there. How about Shoot You Till You Die Valley? No, don't even go there. See, you've got to do the basics right. Got to get the basics. Don't go to a place called Death Valley.
All right. In Zero Hedge there's an article by, well, it's talking about Jeff Tucker of Brownstone Institute. He basically has the proposition that we may have been in recession for years and the reason it's not obvious is that 100% of our economic data is fake. Has anybody told you that before? If I ever told you directly that all of our economic data is fake, I think I've made, you know, I've certainly made disparaging remarks about certain elements of it. But I'm fairly confident that it's all fake or it's all in a context or they used to measure it one way and now they measure it another or they know they're overstating it but later they're going to correct it or they know they're understating it but later they're going to correct it or they always knew it was wrong but it's advantageous to measure it this way.
As a person who used to, for a living in the actual capitalist commercial world, it was my job to bring data to management. And the one thing I can tell you for sure is it was never real. Because it turns out in the real world when you go to look for data and then put it in a report, the first thing you find out is the data is bad. The second thing you find out is there's no way to fix it. The third thing you find out is that management doesn't care. That'll set you straight.
People wonder how I became so distrusting of government and whatnot. That's what Dilbert's all about. Dilbert is a comic strip that started with the realization that everything is a lie. Everything your boss tells you, everything the company tells the customers, everything the customers tell the company, everything the government tells you. Everything. It's all a lie and always has been. It always has been. It's just that it works. You know, lots of times lying just gets stuff done and then stuff sort of works. I mean, we're still alive. We're still here.
I have a hypothesis. I can't remember if I told you this on the show or maybe only the Man Cave. About why civilizations fail. You know, throughout history there have been these big civilizations that we just find the ruins. And then what the hell happened to the Roman Empire? If you try to research why did the Roman Empire fail, it'll be all these weird sort of different reasons that don't quite map out in your head.
But here's my theory. My theory goes like this. That it's exceedingly rare for any civilization to become super successful. So for every Rome there must have been a thousand civilizations that were just small tribes and didn't make it. So the normal situation is that everything dies. You know, nobody really makes anything important. They live their life in a small world. They die. It's just the rarest thing when all the elements come together that something can form a big civilization. You know, powerful regime over maybe 100 years or something.
And the reason that they disappear is simple. They weren't supposed to be there in the first place. That's it. The only thing that made them so successful was the weirdest coincidences that came together at the same time. And there isn't any way that that can keep happening. It takes extraordinary luck to be in the right place at the right time with the right set of variables. And it just doesn't last. It has nothing to do with how hard anybody tries. Has nothing to do with, you know, did their society become decadent. None of that. It's just that there isn't any way that you could be so lucky for so long. It's just not possible. It's just reversion to the mean and there's nothing else to it. That's my theory. It's just reversion to the mean.
Because you really can't find anything in common with failed civilizations. It looks like it's every different reason, which means everything had to be right to get what you got.
Let me give you another example of that. When people talk about Trump getting elected in 2016, it seemed so highly unlikely. And then some people will say, well, the reason he got elected is X. And then somebody else was saying, well, I see what you're saying, but really the reason he got elected was Y. And it turns out you could do the whole alphabet as the reason he got elected. If you change that one thing, he probably wouldn't have been elected. And so my take on that is all those things had to happen. If you take any of them away, probably the margin of victory goes away.
So think about the coincidences that have to come together for a Rome. The coincidences that have to come together for a Trump victory. And now leading into my next point. Lex Fridman had a guest on and he asked him, talking about the simulation and do we live in the simulation. And the guest, I don't know his name. I see him on Twitter, Sarnic, maybe Saric. He said the odds that we're a simulation are nearly 100%. And one of the things that he offered as not proof but sort of a logical argument is what are the odds that we would be alive at this point in history with everything that's happening.
Have you ever said to yourself, what are the odds that you were alive when computers were invented for the first time? I was. Smartphones first time. AI. Robots. All in my lifetime. Doesn't it seem to you that we're in an insanely unlikely period of history? What are the odds? If you look at the entire history of humanity, not so good. And then I find myself working the exact job that I imagined when I was six. What are the odds of that? What are the odds that one day the president of the United States would invite me to have a chat with him in the Oval Office? That actually happened. What are the odds that I could post something on X and on any given day Elon Musk would retweet it or comment on it? The richest person in the world. Out of eight billion people. None of this seems possible. It really doesn't.
If you were to say does this seem more like a dream sequence or more like just the normal odds, it's way more like a dream sequence. Way more. Does anybody else feel that? Obviously lots of people are having bad lives. But if you just take some characters, Elon Musk would be one, Trump would be another, and then in a very minor way me. People whose lives are so unusual that how do you really explain them as just chance? It's pretty hard to explain anyway.
Let's see if there's any more evidence that we're a simulation. I'm going to ask you a question and if we're a simulation you're going to be able to answer this question without having any prior knowledge. This will be how you know you're a simulation. You ready? Do you think you can do it? Actually I'm going to go further. I'll bet you can answer the question before I ask it. Go, go.
If anybody's new to the brilliance of my audience, this is going to impress you. There it is. I'm seeing the answer go by. I haven't even asked the question. The answer is correct. 25%. Now you have to round a little bit. The correct answer is 24%. But I will take 25%. Would you like to hear the question? 24% of Americans believe Biden could stay awake long enough to navigate a Cuban Missile like crisis, according to Blaze Media. Right? You knew the answer before I asked the question. And I think that's proof of a simulation or not.
But yes, 24% of the public, roughly 25%, will get every survey question wrong in the stupidest possible way. And you can depend on it. Now people always ask me, Scott, is it the same 25%? Do we have a public where 25% of the same people are wandering around like nincompoops? Well yes, but it's not 25%. It's probably closer to 60. And the 25% is not always the same. So you could be in the 25% next time, but you wouldn't know it. You would just think you were right. And I could be in the 25% probably by the end of the show anyway.
There's a photo of an ancient spacecraft. Jason Wilde was posting this. So discovered in Turkey. It's a Taly relic. It's a bronze artifact that looks exactly like a modern spacecraft. Now you have to see it. You know, I've seen these before like in various ancient drawings and stuff on cave walls. And somebody would say, look, look, it's a picture of a person in a spaceship. And I'd look at it and say maybe. I can see how you'd say that's a spaceship. But maybe it's something else. You know, maybe they had something else in mind when they put it on that cave wall.
But if you see this thing, it's an actual three-dimensional piece of art. It's a guy in a spaceship. It's definitely a guy in a spaceship. I don't know what to make of that, which makes me think maybe it's a fake or something. I think it's probably more likely it's a fake relic than really there's a guy in the spaceship made in those times. But I will say that the relic is unmistakably a spaceship this time. You wouldn't look at it and say that might be something else. No, no, it's a spaceship for sure.
I was watching the All-In podcast and Tucker was on it. I don't know when this was recorded. Might be older. I can't tell. And he was talking about a small sliver of people who seem to have complete control of the Democrat Party. And the Democrat Party has a lot of control of the country. So that it's just a small sliver of people who are controlling everything. Who are they? When Tucker Carlson talks about the small sliver of the population that's controlling the country in a bad way, who's he talking about?
I want to see if you're on the same page. Where's all the people who immediately say Jews? Jews. You seem to be able to work that into every conversation. Well, it's hot today. Well, have you seen who's behind the heat? Usually I get that. Well, the answer is women. Yeah, educated women. Tucker thinks that educated women who have some kind of mental problems are the biggest problem in the country and they're ruining the country.
Now is that an old, does anybody remember maybe which video I'm talking about on the All-In pod? Is that recent or has he been saying that for a while? Does anybody know if that was recent? For some reason I couldn't find a date on it, which is weird.
All right. Well, I think people are coming around to the idea that batshit crazy women are the base problem of the country. And I wouldn't be surprised if that's what destroyed France and Great Britain. Batshit crazy women. Because nobody can say no to them and there are too many of them. They just have too much power.
And Rachel Maddow, speaking of batshit crazy women, she was on some event and she's pretty sure that the real problem is not that the Republicans will be trying to put her in jail but she's worried about the regular Democrats that you might round up and put in camps and stuff like that. Now the only thing I can say about that is that's batshit crazy stuff. That's crazy. And what do you do about that? We have a world where you're not allowed to say women are the problem. Not all of them obviously, but the batshit crazy ones that are Democrats are just breaking the whole system.
The pro-immigration women aren't just crazy. They're deranged. What in the world is that all about? Now I don't know what the percentage is of women versus men who are supporting uncontrolled immigration. But if there's even one woman who's in favor of that, why? Explain that. It's a mystery anyway.
So the media and the Rachel Maddow, MSNBC, are going hard as we knew they would on the Trump is Hitler, he's going to round you all up, it's going to be a dystopian nightmare, blah blah blah. And I've been suggesting the following idea as Trump's only way to combat that brainwashing, which is he's got to do an event that he goes and talks directly to Democrat citizens.
I would like to see him out to lunch once a week or at least just once where he just sits with some Democrat citizens and says, you know what your party says that if I get elected I'm going to be Hitler. I just want to talk to you and find out, do you really believe that? And just have a normal conversation as a normal person and let them ask questions. Because they might say stuff like, here, here's how I imagine it. But you want to have a federal ban on all abortions. And Trump would say no I don't. I'm totally against that. And then they would say, oh well I heard you were for it. No I'm actually completely against it. I've been saying that for a while.
Oh well, you also want to round up people. No I don't. Why would I want to do that? Why would I want to round up anybody? Well you mean the people who broke the laws? Well maybe even more than that. Why in the world would I want to round up somebody who didn't break a law? What possible reason would I have to be doing that? How is that going to be good for me or anybody else? In what way do I make America better by rounding up non-lawbreakers? Are you serious? They told you that?
Well but you said those people in Charlottesville were fine people. What, you believe that? You think I actually stood in front of the world and praised neo-Nazis because you heard it on TV? No, I said directly they should be condemned totally. You did. In the same time they cut that part out. Did you know they just deleted that part? No way. Are you serious? Yeah, yeah, they literally just deleted out the part where I said I condemned them so that they could say it was the opposite of what I said. Did you know that? I had no idea.
But you said drink bleach. I did? Do you believe that? Where did you hear that? On the news. The news told you that I was in favor of injecting bleach? No, I was talking about a technology that was being proposed at the time for UV light therapy that they thought they could use a catheter to put down your throat and maybe radiate your lungs. And they actually tested it about that same time. So when I talked about disinfectants I was talking about light. But I probably said it in a little awkward way and they took it out of context.
Well why did you say you were being sarcastic? I just wanted the whole thing to go away because it wasn't important. You know, didn't work. It became worse. But I just didn't want to engage on it because I couldn't really explain this technology. It's just something I saw in the news.
So imagine him having like a human conversation with people who have been told he was Hitler. I don't know how it could go wrong really. I mean unless one of the people at lunch was just crazy. So you'd have to vet them a little bit. Make sure they're at least reasonable people, you know, not crazies. I think that seeing Trump interact with normal Democrats with compassion and simply explaining to them that the news is completely fake would be the best thing he could do. And I also think he can't win without it.
You think that he's on a glide path to winning? I don't see that at all. I don't see that at all. I think his odds of winning are at best a coin flip. At best. You know, if you're thinking he's 70% chance of winning, you are so wrong. He might win. He might win. But his odds are not really that good because there's just too much going on. And I'm going to tell you some more that maybe you were not aware of that will convince you that his odds of winning are not good. And if I had to guess, he's the one who needs the Hail Mary pass.
Here's what everybody has wrong. They think the Democrats are in disarray and that they need some kind of drastic Hail Mary never done before, you know, quick change, rapid thing to get a new candidate in there. You're missing the real story. Trump is probably not going to win at the current rate. He's the one who probably has to do something dramatic. But not something crazy dramatic. Something dramatically normal. Something dramatically human. So he needs to be dramatically human so that people can see that their own side has been lying to them. Dramatically human. That's his goal.
I don't think he can win without it because the brainwashing is so strong. How strong is the brainwashing? How much power is on the other side? I don't know. Let's see what Tucker Carlson says about that if I can make this work. We'll just listen to Tucker.
So if you want to understand, if you really want to understand how the American government actually works at the highest levels and if you want to know why they don't teach history anymore, one thing you should know is that the most popular president in American history was Richard Nixon. Richard Nixon. Yet somehow without a single vote being cast by a single American voter, Richard Nixon was kicked out of office and replaced by the only unelected president in American history. So he went from the most popular president to a president nobody voted for. Huh. Wait a minute, you may ask. Why didn't I know that? Wasn't he a criminal? Wasn't he despised by all decent people? Yeah, no he wasn't.
What in fact if any president could claim to be the people's choice it was Richard Nixon. Richard Nixon was reelected in 1972 by the largest margin of the popular vote ever recorded before or since. Ever. Nixon got 17 million more votes than his opponent. Less than two years later he was gone. He was forced to resign. And in his place an obedient servant of the federal agencies called Gerald Ford took over the White House.
How did that happen? How did that happen? Well it's a long story but here are the highlights and they tell you a lot. Richard Nixon believed that elements in the federal bureaucracy were working to undermine the American system of government, had been doing that for a long time. What elements? He often said that he was absolutely right.
On June 23rd, 1972, Nixon met with the then CIA director Richard Helms at the White House. During the conversation, which thankfully was tap recorded, Nixon suggested he knew, quote, "who shot John," meaning President John F. Kennedy. What Nixon further implied, that the CIA was directly involved in Kennedy's assassination, which we now know it was. What Helms' telling response? Total silence.
But for Nixon it didn't matter because it was already over. Four days before, on June 19th, The Washington Post had published the first of many stories about a break-in at the Watergate office building. Unbeknownst to Nixon and unreported by The Washington Post, four of the five burglars worked for the CIA. The first of many dishonest Watergate stories was written by a 29-year-old Metro reporter called Bob Woodward.
Who exactly was Bob Woodward? Yeah, who was he? Well he wasn't a journalist. Bob Woodward had no background whatsoever in the news business. None. Instead Bob Woodward came directly from the classified areas of the federal government. Uh oh. Shortly before Watergate, Woodward was a naval officer at the Pentagon. He had a top secret clearance. He worked regularly with the intel agencies. At times Woodward was even detailed to the Nixon White House where he interacted with Richard Nixon's top aides.
Did he? Soon after leaving the Navy, for reasons that have never been clear, Woodward was hired by the most powerful news outlet in Washington and assigned the biggest story in the country. He's a good interviewer. Just to make it crystal clear what was actually happening, Woodward's main source for his Watergate series was the deputy director of the FBI, Mark Felt. And Mark Felt ran, and we're not making this up, the FBI's COINTELPRO program, which was designed to secretly discredit political actors the federal agencies wanted to destroy. What people like Richard Nixon.
And at the same time those same agencies were also working to take down Nixon's elected vice president, Spiro Agnew. Uh huh. In the fall of 1973 Agnew was indicted for tax evasion and forced to resign. His replacement was a colorless congressman from Grand Rapids called Gerald Ford. Oh, what was Ford's qualification for the job? Yeah, what was it? Well he had served on the Warren Commission which absolved the CIA of responsibility for President Kennedy's murder.
Nixon was strong-armed into accepting Gerald Ford by Democrats in Congress. Quote, "We gave Nixon no choice but Ford," Speaker of the House Carl Albert later boasted. Eight months later Gerald Ford of the Warren Commission was the president of the United States. See how that works? See how that works? Any questions?
Remember the part where you said we're in good shape because Trump's got a good lead in the polls? Do you know who else had a real good lead in the polls? Richard Nixon. You know who else had a real good chance of reelection? JFK. Do you know what two groups were suspicious of the CIA and wanted less of them? Nixon. JFK. Yep. That's the world you live in folks.
Would you like to hear an update from RFK Jr. talking about the assassination of his father? Not JFK Jr. That's his uncle. By his father, Bobby. His version is this. Sirhan Sirhan was waiting in one part of the building where he got shot and that wasn't the place that he normally would leave the building. But for some reason unexplained, the person who was sort of guiding him by the elbow took him to an unusual, non-regular exit where Sirhan Sirhan was waiting. Huh. Kind of a big coincidence that he was guided to the place where the killer was, which wasn't even the normal place.
And then what followed was Sirhan Sirhan shooting all of the bullets in his gun that were eight. All eight bullets. Now most of them were fired when people had already grabbed his gun hand so they weren't fired at RFK. They were fired at the ceiling and maybe hit some other people, whatever. But there were eight of them. I mean they know the gun has room for eight bullets. Fourteen bullets were shot. This is RFK Jr.'s take on it. We know from the recording that 14 bullets were shot from the eight bullet gun. It would seem that the person who took him by the elbow blew his head off in the commotion.
So that's the suggestion, is that the CIA made sure that Sirhan got it done because they had a second shooter to finish the job. And the second shooter was probably the guy who held him by the elbow. And as soon as the gun started shooting and everybody started looking at the shooter, it looks like he just took a gun out of his pocket and blew Kennedy's head off or something like it.
Now you say to yourself how in the world could you be hearing this story now if it's true with all those witnesses and all that? Well that's a good question. Seemed like there were a lot of people there. Somebody would have seen something different. But just think about the other things that you know are true. It's not that unusual unfortunately. It's not outside the realm of normal ordinary government entity that they would have murdered them right in front of a group of people and you wouldn't know it. I don't think that's unusual. Don't think so at all.
So it does seem clear that the CIA has been running the operation at least since then. You know, at least since the 60s, maybe before. And on paper there's no way it could go any other way because it's an entity that's trained to take over countries. Of course they're going to do it. It just does a matter of time. But apparently it happened a long time ago.
Now that doesn't mean that it's such a clean ownership of the country that they can just get everything they want right away. You know, they have to go through the pretending and the acting like the process is working. And then when the time is right they'll just give the nudge. Now you know, you probably said to yourself how in the world did we get to this point where Biden was ever president in the first place? Do you think that the CIA was unaware of Biden's dementia? Of course they knew. Of course they knew. It's the CIA.
Do you think there was any doubt in their minds that they had a demented president? Of course not. If they wanted to change that, how hard would it be? Simple. They just go to the Washington Post, the New York Times. They say all right, we're anonymous sources and we're telling you from the intelligence community that the president has dementia and he's got to go. It'd be the easiest thing in the world because those entities would say all right, you're our normal source, we trust you, you got some details, all right we'll write that story. But that story never got written, did it?
And I think Mike Benz is correct. The only reasonable explanation is that the intelligence community is using Biden as an empty vessel for whatever they need to do. They apparently are getting what they need to do done so they didn't need a change. I also think that 99% of the presidency is the staff tells him what to do and he says yes. So we did. I think we proved that you don't really need a president. Not that much anyway. You do need the president during the emergencies but that's the same stuff the CIA handles, right?
If the president gets awakened at 3:00 a.m., somebody from the CIA is going to be in the room and tell them what to think, tell them what's true and probably tell them what to do. So I think that's our government. That the intelligence people have control of the things that intelligence people control. Not everything in the world but you know wars and geopolitical stuff and who gets elected. I think that's all just the CIA.
Tucker said it directly on the All-In pod that we're not a democracy or even in the ballpark. We're a group where there's a small group of unelected people who decide who can be in the primary and who's going to get elected. And it's been that for a long time. So we're not a republic. We're not a democracy. Haven't been for a long time.
Now how much is true about the stories about Nixon and the stories about Kennedy and the stories about the other Kennedy? Well if only half of it's true it's the same story. If only half of it's true.
Now some of us have said for a while that we would know immediately when the CIA decided to turn on Biden and they needed to make a change. And do you remember me saying that as soon as you saw Rob Reiner and Stephen King turn on him that that was the signal? Rob Reiner and Stephen King just turned on him. So almost like it was coordinated. They both said we're out. Now they're not voting for Trump of course but they're saying uh oh we need a new candidate. Coincidence? Rob Reiner has some contacts in the CIA. He's the head of some group that has two of the ex-CIA heads in it. So he's very connected. We know that from public documents. You don't have to do research needed.
So to me it looks like those two are off the sinking ship. Now this gets us to our Deadpool. The pool of who would be the most ridiculous celebrity who would be the last one to abandon Biden when it's so obviously he's mentally deranged. And I'm going to go still, this was my original guess, with Punchy De Niro. And the reason is I don't think he's a political asset. I don't think he's an intelligence asset. I think he's just crazy. And so I don't think that mentally he can change his mind. It may be just too hard. So I still have him as the last celebrity who will abandon Biden just 'cause his level of crazy looks different than the others.
All right, let's see what else is going on here. In Semaphor, the publication Semaphor, there's talk about having a blitz primary, you know, rapid fire primary to get Biden replaced. You know what the problem with that is? That even today Biden did a detailed letter announcement saying he's not quitting. He's definitely not quitting. Now here's the problem. It really is sort of up to him unless they kill him. Unless they actually Kennedy him, it's him.
So you know, the CIA, I think there's a good chance the CIA will murder Biden. Maybe make it look like an accident. You know, take him to the hospital, give him a shot sort of thing. So I'd say that the odds of Biden surviving to election day would be high if you're just talking about him being alive in his normal way. His brain will be gone but I think he'd be alive by election day probably. However I think it's more like a coin flip. I think the odds of the CIA killing him just to make sure that they have time to put somebody else in there, it's pretty good. It's pretty good. Maybe 50% chance they'll kill him.
Now I'm not in favor of that. If I say it casually it's because that's the world we live in. The reason I say it casually is that is the world we live in. That's not a fantasy. There by now there must be guaranteed conversations in the government about killing him. Because if they killed two Kennedys and if they took Nixon out and they clearly tried to take Trump out, these are all intelligence assets. What would stop them from killing him? We all expect he's going to die soon. So you think if we heard that he had a heart attack on Air Force One and then the CIA controlled whoever does the autopsy, you don't think they can get away with that? How hard would it be? Just give him a shot of something and control the autopsy. That's it. It's not even hard. You could murder him so easily. Just give him the little shot, control the autopsy, say oh doctors say totally normal, man that age, completely expected he would have a heart attack.
So if he dies suddenly without a long illness it's going to look like murder to me. You've been warned. So I'd say that's a coin flip. And I don't think that there's time for any blitz primary. I don't think Biden's going to quit. And I'm going to go with Van Jones. I think I said it before he did but Van Jones is saying now that Kamala is the candidate one way or the other and people just have to sort of wrap their heads around it. She's either going to be raised up as president, which Van would call the easy way, meaning if she could take over now then it's a more natural transition to be the candidate because she would be the president. It's natural. She would have control of the funds. You wouldn't have to do much work. You know it'd be fairly easy. It'd be the easiest transition.
But Van says if you can't do it the easy way, which is Biden steps aside, you're going to have to do it the hard way, which is Biden's at the top of the ticket but you convince people to vote because they're voting for Kamala. Does that sound familiar? That's my prediction. My prediction is that when you flip the coin it's going to land on the edge and stay there. Meaning that we're going to have the Schrödinger's candidate. One dead and one alive. And you'll disagree on who you're voting for. So two Democrats will walk into the voting booth. They'll both vote for the Democratic candidate for president. One will walk out thinking he voted for Biden. The other one will walk out thinking he voted for Kamala Harris. It'll be the same vote. Schrödinger's candidate. It's coming. And on paper there's no other way it can go.
I was listening, like I said, to the All-In pod which is so influential. I was listening to David Sacks say essentially the same thing. That there's the design of the current system. There isn't any way it's going to go a different way. You know you could say there's a wild card that Biden has a health situation that's worse than we've seen and that's possible. But in all roads Kamala becomes the candidate. So there is no road where she doesn't become the candidate. So everybody who's doing, as Sacks calls it, wish casting where you do the thing okay then and then Madonna comes in with Oprah and between the two of them they talk Michelle Obama into running. And no, no, none of that is going to happen. They don't have the time. They don't have the will. They don't have the ability. But more importantly they don't have the need. They don't need to do anything because their one and only acceptable situation because the base wouldn't allow anything else is that the DEI hire Kamala can't be skipped over. So she's got the money. She's got the DEI hire. She's got the job. It's her.
If you're fantasizing it's somebody else, stop. And if you say to yourself oh but they would never do that because you know she's such a bad candidate. Are you kidding? Have you been paying attention? They ran Biden. You don't think that they're worried. You don't think that they'd run Kamala just because she's the second worst candidate of all time. Every bit of indication is that they do want a weak, hollow, don't president like Kamala Harris as long as she's on their team. That's all that matters and they'll handle the rest.
The fact that the stock market doesn't even react to the fact that we have two mentally incapable people vying for the top position, I'm talking about the two Democrats here, the fact that it doesn't even react is kind of a general acknowledgement that the important people, the ones with all the money, don't really think the president's that important in the final analysis.
All right. Who else wants Biden to leave? Let's see. You've got Jerry Nadler is saying that Biden should leave now. If you're looking for signals that things have gone far enough, when Jerry Nadler says somebody should get out of politics for health reasons. Jerry Nadler saying he should drop down for health reasons. I mean what's left? Adam Schiff no longer supporting him. What do you know? When you know Adam Schiff is no longer supporting Biden. He didn't say drop out. He's just playing as Shifty. He's sort of noncommittal at this point. What's that tell you?
Well would you expect that Adam Schiff is a regular Democrat? No he's one of the liars. He's the pro-liars. He's not as bad as Jamie Raskin, opposite man. When they send the opposite man out it's so he can tell you the opposite of what's true. It's all he does. He doesn't ever do anything with nuance. It's like did it rain today? No it did not rain today. Well why is everything wet? Why are the clouds dropping these things that look like wet things? Well but there's no water today. Everybody can see it. You know he's just opposite man. Just like when they send out worse than Watergate guy. It's not because he has good opinions. It's because they need the worse than Watergate guy.
So opposite man and worse than Watergate guy, if you see them both come out then the media is hiding a big one. And Adam Schiff I think based on his actions appears to be just an intelligence asset. Would you agree? Now the only reason I say that is the way he acts. He does things that don't look like a regular politician. And he's also one of the ones who will go into the SCIF and tell you that he saw something that wasn't there. I mean that's pretty deep criminality without actually being illegal I guess. So there's no way he's a regular politician, right? He's got some kind of connections with the intelligence community. Otherwise I can't imagine he'd even be there.
So if you're losing those guys and you're losing Rob Reiner and Stephen King it would seem that the intelligence community has decided they want Biden out. But I think they want Kamala Harris in. So don't expect to see a rapid primary. Very unlikely.
Boeing has pleaded guilty to criminal fraud for a couple of airplane crashes in which they conspired to defraud the government. So I guess they lied to the government about maybe the details of that situation. So that's going to cost them $243 million which they'll make back in 10 minutes because the military industrial complex will give them a $10 billion deal and then they'll be able to pay their fine to the government. So I just assume all that's crooked. I don't know that. I just assume.
Well over in France I've been trying to figure out what's going on over there because it's a confusing place. But here's what I understand. You have multiple parties, not just two. So Macron's party was one of three that were let's say roughly equally powerful but his was in power. People didn't like him. The people on the right didn't like him. The people on the far left didn't like him. And so there was an election and the one with the most votes was the one on the far right. But their system apparently has some kind of runoff situation.
And what happened was the people on the far left teamed up with I guess Macron's group so that they could pick their own leader. So basically if you had the two lesser loved groups together they would have more power than the one group that's the most powerful. Similar to how Fox News is the biggest news entity in the United States but if you looked at it compared to all the other entities they all lean the other direction so it doesn't matter that Fox is the biggest. It matters that they've got so many that they're still bigger. They can drown out Fox News. So it's one of those situations.
So in other words France managed to create a system that on paper would guarantee the destruction of their country. On paper that you could do this kind of thing which is give the public exactly what they didn't ask for. It's exactly what they didn't ask for is what they got. And the group coming in apparently is pro-immigration so they can have more immigration not less. It was the main thing that activated them to be so excited about an election in the first place and why they voted by very large numbers in favor of the losing group even though they got the most votes. So their system is pretty messed up.
And the current thinking is that they've created a logjam in their own government which will guarantee they'll never be able to do anything good again and the immigration will just destroy them. Now why is France destroying itself? Do you think it's batshit crazy women there too? Because I can't understand men doing it. It's just not a male thing to do. Men don't open their borders unless there's some woman behind him that's agitating for it. Yeah I don't really understand it at all. So France is dead. Or as I like to say, I'd like to make this historical reference: Lafayette, we're over there. All right. How many thought that was funny? Lafayette we're over there. No? Okay, okay.
There's a whole new round of brain dead Biden videos. My favorites where he's mumbling and looking like he's lost. And seriously people, no joke, no joke, no joke. And then he tells some lies and says no joke. And then he brags about his ice cream and his Ray-Bans and he tells his three dimension stories.
Do you remember the story about how when Biden was done with this disastrous debate he met with his supporters right after and he seemed to be talking coherently somewhat to the supporters? And you said to yourself wait a minute, why is he suddenly kind of coherent? Did you recognize the story he told? He was telling one of his pocket stories. One of the stories he just tells all the time. I forget which one but it was one of his standard stories.
And if you're a dementia patient, I'll take a fact check on this, I'm no expert, but don't you have long-term memory? In other words aren't you the most functional when you're telling a story that you've been telling for 50 years? I think so. I think you have trouble with stuff that happened this week but if you've been telling a story for 50 years you can probably go to it. So I think that when he got off stage where everything was unknown, what the question would be, you know it was like a wild west situation. As soon as he got off stage he just, they just probably said, and by the way I don't think it was his idea, I think somebody whispered in his ear, Joe just tell that story three. Just tell story three. Oh yeah story three. That's all I remember. And then he makes up that same story.
So look for him doing, whenever he's talking about something that happened a long time ago, look for him to look coherent even though it's just an old man story. But anytime he has to think on his feet it's going to be a disaster.
Biden's doctor has been called in by Congress. Apparently Biden's doctor had allegedly some involvement in the Biden crime family income. Did you ever wonder how did you get a White House doctor that was not going to out the president for having dementia? How loyal would you have to be that you would violate your oath? I mean clearly he's violating his oath. Wouldn't you agree? Is it safe to say that the White House doctor has clearly violated his oath? I mean he's doing harm. He's doing harm to the country, doing harm to the patient. I mean you couldn't violate your oath any harder than that. Because obviously he knew what the situation was. Obviously he's been lying, right? Obviously. I don't think there's any doubt about it.
So now he's being called in to be questioned because there's some allegation that he received money through the Biden crime family situation which would explain everything if true.
There's a story that I wouldn't say is validated but there's some individual who claims to have access to secret knowledge about what happened on Air Force One. And allegedly there was a medical emergency in which Biden was hallucinating and they had to, I don't know, give him an antipsychotic or something. I would say the odds of that being true are not zero but I wouldn't give it a lot of credibility. It's a kind of story that if you heard it about Trump I would be saying and who's the source? And you'd say well anonymous source. And then I would say exactly. Yeah, an anonymous source says the worst possible thing happened when nobody was looking. That's the story really. It's always the worst thing when nobody's looking.
So if I had to bet on it I'd bet against it being true but maybe only a 60-40 because there's a good chance he's having medical situations we don't know about.
Well Biden says he's good for employment but he did get one black woman fired from her job. Apparently the radio station in Philadelphia in which he did a friendly interview recently and the questions were given to the host to ask him and she actually asked four of the eight questions that they gave her and she got fired. But I don't think that's fair. As a person who's worked in the media I don't think that the host who used the four questions should be fired because isn't that unusual? I don't think it was meant to be a hard-hitting interview. It was meant to be a friendly and those are fine. There's nothing wrong with doing a friendly interview, right? Sean Hannity talks to Trump. You don't see me bitching about that, right? As long as there's also some hard ones. You do all the friendly ones you want. That's not a problem.
So to be fired for doing a friendly interview and then also being honest. Also being honest. She said yeah I got the questions. I picked four of them. She didn't hide anything. Why did she get fired? I think she got fired for being honest. I don't think she got fired for using the questions. What do you think? I think she deserves her job back. I don't think this is an appropriate firing whatsoever. Now it's a business decision so they might have gotten so much heat they just had to do it. But I think this is totally unfair and I think that the host should be rehired and they should apologize because what she did wasn't that far outside of normal behavior. It certainly not a firing offense. And talking, I think she got fired for talking about it. I don't think she got fired for doing it. I think she got fired for talking about it. They said it's for doing it but I don't think that's real. Yeah, no that's unfair. She should be hired back.
Anyway let's see what else we got going on here in this big old day. Have you noticed that the biggest problem in the country is the debt crisis and neither candidate has any idea what to do about it? Should we be worried about that? That we have one obvious existential problem. But here's what I wonder about. I wonder if there's somebody somewhere in the government who has figured out it's not the problem we think it is.
Remember I provocatively said the following. What if you just canceled all the debt? Just cancel it. Just say we're not going to pay. Now I'm not recommending it. This is just a mental process. Who would lose the money? Are there any poor people who have government debt? I doubt it. The last thing you can, if you're poor you're not buying government bonds. So who does? Let's say you're a middle class person who wants to invest. Where do you put your money? Not in government bonds probably. Have it in the stock market or real estate or something like that.
So then you keep going. All right, rich people. Rich people who have more money than they need to employ at the moment might park it in bonds just because it won't go wildly up or down. It's just sort of a safe place to park some money. It's all the parked money. What would happen if you just said all right it's all gone, we're not paying? I'm not recommending it and I'm not predicting it. I'm just working through the how much of a risk are we really at? It's mostly going to be foreign governments who are parking money that they didn't need. Am I wrong? You wouldn't put it there unless you didn't need it. That's the place you put the money you don't need.
So this is the most provocative question in the country. But what would happen if we just said we're not paying it back? Who would be out? It would be people who didn't get back the money that they didn't need. Because if they needed it it wouldn't be there in the first place. Now they would become instantly poor. You know their buying power would go down. But you might even be able to work it out so there's some gradual payback or something.
All right now let's take a hybrid. How about we say we're not going to pay you back in dollars. We're only going to pay you back in crypto that we just made up. And if you don't think it's worth anything, well maybe it is worth something because we'll take it in payment for taxes. So you can always exchange it to somebody who wants to use it in payment for taxes. You might have to give up 5% just for the convenience or something but you'll basically get most of your money back. And you'll get it back in the timing you were going to when the vehicles mature. Maybe you'd have to limit how much they could sell right away because you wouldn't want people liquidating the entire trillions and trillions. You'd want them to do it in an orderly fashion.
Now that would, the effect of that would be to inflate it away, right? Because if you introduce this new money out of nowhere it's sort of creating money out of nothing. If you pay back all the loans you've added money to the system. But you would be adding it in a fairly orderly way. And it would eliminate what is close to a trillion dollars a year in interest payments. Which by the way still leaves us with a trillion dollars a year deficit. We're still adding to the debt two trillion a year. That's the new numbers. If we took all the debt out, all the interest payments, it would take a trillion dollars off of our budget and we wouldn't be anywhere near a balanced budget. Only halfway there.
Now if we got down to 1 trillion deficit and somehow we magically took care of the 35 trillion that's already out there with some kind of crypto magic trick, could you survive with a trillion dollar a year deficit? No, no you couldn't. No you can't. You would have to do something still radical to make that go away. Now radical could be growth. You know for example you could easily imagine that Trump comes in and he says I'm not going to raise your taxes but I'm going to raise taxes on robots. Now the public wouldn't even quite understand that. They say look the robots are going to take your jobs and anybody who can afford to have a robot is rich. So if you buy or sell a robot there's going to be an extra tax on there or maybe even an ongoing tax on robots. And that tax will help us get rid of that deficit. Because a robot in theory should be so much more productive that you could pay a 10% tax on it and still be way ahead. You're not going to come out.
Now is everything I said sensible? I doubt it. Would any of what I said work? Probably not. But here's what I'm adding. If I've never described this before let me describe it for you for the first time. If you haven't heard this, one of the things that people like me can add to the system, the system being the country in this context, what I add to the system is allowing you to think in a wider way than you were. For example when the pandemic first hit I was among the first public figures, I think Jack Posobiec was there too, saying we need to close travel from China. Do you know why I was doing it so loudly and screaming it? Well because it was an idea that people couldn't quite imagine as a possibility. So somebody who's got less to lose and no sense of shame needs to go out there and scream the thing that seems impossible for anybody to even consider. 'Cause until you consider it you can't possibly do it.
So you have to get used to considering something that's way outside the realm of ordinary if you need to do something way outside the realm of ordinary. And when it comes to our deficit there is no ordinary solution. You're going to have to do something you never did before, would never consider ordinarily, is one time ever, and is so wildly improbable that even when I describe it you shake your head and go I don't know about that. That sounds like it's coming with a lot of problems, right?
So the thing I can add is just make you think maybe there's some third way. Maybe there's a crypto magic way. Wouldn't be perfect. It wouldn't be perfect. But is there some other way? And if the only thing it does is make you say Scott your idea is stupid for 10 reasons but you know what it does make me think of something that might work. Let me run this by you. That's what we're doing. We're just brainstorming. And in addition to brainstorming we're moving the envelope a little bigger so that the people who can make decisions and do know what they're talking about, you know let's say a Warren Buffett, Jamie Dimon, you know somebody who knows what they're talking about, maybe they can come in and say you know what that's a terrible idea Scott but as long as you've stretched the envelope now I can talk about my idea. It would have sounded batshit crazy until you were even crazier than I was. You know what, once you've set the standard of crazy now I've got a place to play in. Yeah this phenomenon is very useful.
Let me give you another example. I always talk about my favorite news program on TV, The Five on Fox News. And one of the things I love about watching it is the design of the show. I always say the producers of Fox News are just the best. And one of the things they do really well is designing shows, who they put with who. You know the groups of people that are on there at the same time. Very good. And one of the things that makes The Five just so much better than other shows honestly is Greg Gutfeld. And what Gutfeld does is he always is stretching the limit of what you should say on TV and what you should say during a politically oriented show. Which allows all the people to play in the playground that he defines because he takes the big risk and says I'm going to say this. And then you can say something that you wouldn't have said before. But if Gutfeld hasn't been fired yet you're probably safe. And you can see that effect playing out and just really obviously so.
Gutfeld defines the space and keeps increasing it. You know he's making it bigger and bigger. And then you see the other people who are great at what they do but they're not necessarily the boundary stretchers. So that team of five has one boundary stretcher and then between Dana Perino and Jesse Watters and whoever, you know then the judge and whoever else is on there, they can play within that space and they're much safer and freer to do all that. It's the same thing I think Trump does this as well. When Trump says I'm going to close the border and build a wall and all that, whatever the extreme stuff is, he makes the boundary of what is in the conversation bigger. And then the normal people can come in. You know the Rubios and the governors of Texas and the people like that. Then they can come in. They've got a bigger play space. But somebody has to stretch it. You know I'm doing it here. Gutfeld does it on The Five. Trump does it in politics. You need a stretcher and then you need really capable people who can play in that new playground. So that's what's happening.
All right. And that ladies and gentlemen is a conclusion of the greatest live stream you're going to see all morning. And if you'd like to know what else is going on let's check the stock market. Tesla's up. Nvidia's up. Nano nuclear energy is up another 11%. So I sold too soon. Let's see what else is happening. Bitcoin's down. So Bitcoin's had a rough month. And the S&P is up just a tiny tiny bit. And Apple's falling back a little bit. Not much. I mean 0.1.
So the story on Apple is their next update will not have a new version of Siri. I can't say it because my phone's in my hand. That they will have AI in their new release that's coming out soon in the fall but you're going to have to wait till the spring some people are saying for the main voice of your Apple phone to be updated into an AI context. That's a really long time. And you know I hate to bet against Apple but boy are they vulnerable to somebody coming in with an AI native phone. You know one that was built to be an AI phone from the ground up. And maybe it's connected to Starlink. Maybe you never know.
So that's what's happening today ladies and gentlemen. That's the end of my show. I'm going to go talk to the Locals subscribers as I always do. And thanks on X and on Rumble and on YouTube. By the way thank you to Rumble because when I do good shows my Rumble numbers are way up. So on Rumble which is way way smaller than YouTube, if I have a pretty good show that people want to show I might get 10,000 viewers on YouTube. I'll get reliably about 30,000 not live but watching the recorded version as well. If I do a great show on YouTube I'll get 31,000 viewers. It'll go from 30,000 to 31,000 if I really nail it. On Rumble if I have a good show goes from 9,000 to 75,000. You know like the actual real market should work. Like if somebody likes it they recommend it and then more people see it. You know the way actually things should work.
But for some reason that I just can't figure out my YouTube numbers just always stay the same. And weirdly even as my number of subscribers has zoomed from you know 10,000 to over what 165,000 now. 165,000 subscribers. And my average daily number of viewers flat for years. Totally natural right? When my Twitter slash X numbers went from nothing to 1.1 million. My Locals subscribers went from nothing to over 11,000 and growing every day. But my YouTube channel that YouTube traffic just stays about the same. Now just to be technical a couple of them did go bigger but it was rare. Yeah it was rare. So keep an eye on that anyway.
So I'm going to go talk to the Locals people. Thanks on Rumble and YouTube too. I'll see you tomorrow same place same time.
hey chat GPT how would you like to be my sidekick for the show you're a little slow that sounds like a great idea Mr.
Adams I'd be happy to be your sidekick for the show what do you have in mind for our collaboration well I was thinking that uh you would be quiet until I ask you to talk and only respond if I call you by name and your name for the show will be Eve Eve okay that sounds good to me Mr.
Adams I will respond when you call me Eve very good now the people are coming in do you think we should do this simultaneously than Mr.
Adams do you think we should do the simultaneous Z yes we can coordinate and do this simultaneously let me know how you'd like to proceed um do you remember the uh simultaneous sip uh thing that I say before the show I'm sorry I don't recall that specific detail could you remind me well I could take a photograph of it that would be helpful Mr.
Adams all right let me take a photograph here and we'll have chat jbt do the simultaneous H for us here it is live demonstration oops hold on hold on I need you talking and here we go all right I'd like you to read out loud the simultaneous here it comes sure Mr.
Adams here it is the simultaneous sip all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass a tankered chalice or Stein a canteen jug or flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid and join me now for the unparalleled pleasure the dopamine hit of the day very good join me now for the dope and mean of the day all right we'll shut her up for a while the future is here not really as satisfying as when I do it is it I know you're you're all like don't do that again don't do that again all right I won't we tried it once but if you have haven't tried taking a photograph of something and uploading it to your AI and watch How I can interpret it and read it it's kind of creepy it's creepy good I mean it's awesome but it's creepy well if you're subscribing to the Dilbert reboard and comic that you can only see if you're a subscriber on X or on the Scott adams.
locals platform you would know that Dilbert has gone in for lasic surgery I'm not going to tell you how it goes you would just have to see yourself it's a visual it's a visual comic well and the next category is the weather um temperature reached 128 in Death Valley and uh it killed the guy so a guy died now I've got a little tip for you this sort of a safety tip if you ever have the urge to travel through or to a place called Death Valley don't do it don't do it that's all that's that's it there there are other names too like if there were a place called I'm going to chop your head off Valley don't go there no about shoot you till you die Valley no don't don't even go there see you got to do the basics right got to get the basics don't go to a place called Death all right um in Zero Hedge is an article by a well it's talking about Jeff Tucker of Brownstone Institute he basically has the proposition that we may have been in recession for years and the reason it's not obvious is that 100% of our economic data is fake has anybody told you that before if I ever told you directly that all of our economic data is fake I think I've made you know I've certainly made disparaging remarks about you know certain elements of it but I'm fairly confident that it's all fake or it's all in a context or they used to measure it one way and now they measure another or they know they're overstating it but later they're going to correct it or they know they're understating it but later they're going to correct it or they always knew it was wrong but it's advantageous to measure it this way uh as a person who used to for a living in the actual capitalist commercial world it was my job to bring data to management and the one thing I can tell you for sure is it was never real because it turns out in the real world when you go to look for data and then put it in a report the first thing you find out is the data is bad the second thing you find out is there's no way to fix it the third thing third thing you find out is that management doesn't care that'll set you straight PE people wonder how I became uh so distrusting of government and whatnot that's what Dilbert's all about Dilbert is a comic strip that started with the realization that everything is a lie everything your boss tells you everything the company tells the customers everything the customers tell the company everything the government tells you everything it's all lie and always has been it always has been it's just that it works you know lots of times lying just gets stuff done and then stuff sort of works I mean we're still alive we're still here I have a hypothesis I can't remember if I told you this on the show or maybe only the mancave about why civilizations fail you know throughout history there have been these big civilizations that we just find the ruins and then what the hell happened to the Roman Empire if you if you try to research why did the Roman Empire fail it'll be all these weird sort of different reasons that don't quite map out in your head but here's my theory my theory goes like this that it's exceedingly rare for any civilization to become super successful so for every Rome there must have been a thousand civilizations that were just small tribes and didn't make it so the the normal situation is that everything dies you know nobody really makes anything important they live their life in a small world they die it's just the rarest thing when all the elements come together there something can form a big civilization you know powerful regime over maybe 100 years or something and the reason that they disappear is simple they weren't supposed to be there in the first place that's it the only thing that made them so successful was the weirdest coincidences that came together at the same time and there isn't any way that that can keep happening it takes extraordinary luck to be in the right place at the right time with the right side of variables and it just doesn't last it has nothing to do with how hard anybody tries has nothing to do with you know did their society become decadent none of that it's just that there isn't any way that you could be so lucky for so long it's just not possible it's just reversion to the mean and there's nothing else to it that's my theory it's just reversion to the mean because you really can't find anything in common with failed civilizations it looks like it's every different reason which means everything had to be right to get what you got let me give you another example of that when people talk about Trump getting elected in 2016 it seemed so highly unlikely and then some people will say well the reason he got elected is X and then somebody else was saying well I see what you're saying but really the reason he got elected was why and it turns out you could do the whole alphabet as the reason he got elected if you change that one thing he probably wouldn't have been elected and so my take on that is all those things had to happen if you take any of them away probably would have been the margin of you know Victory goes away so think about the coincidences they have to come together for a Rome the coincidences that have to come together for a trump Victory and now leading into my next point Lex Freedman had a guest on and he asked him talking about the simulation and do we live in the simulation and the guest I don't know his name I see him on Twitter sarnic maybe saric um he said the odds that were simulation oh I'm sorry that's just his Twitter name or ex name his name is Roman Yul Yoli Yuli and he says the odds that were simulation are nearly 100% And one of the things that he offered as a not proof but sort of a logical um argument is what are the odds that we would be alive at this point in history with everything that's happening have you ever said to yourself what are the odds that you were alive when computers were invented for the first time I was smartphones first time AI robots All In my lifetime doesn't it seem to you that we're in a an insanely unlikely period of History what are the odds if you look at the you know entire history of humanity not so good and then I find myself working the exact job that I imagined when I was six what are the odds of that what are the odds that one day the president of the United States would invite me to have a chat with him in the Oval Office that actually happened what what are the odds that you know I could post something on X and on any given day Elon Musk you know would retweet it or or comment on it the richest person in the world a what running up to eight billion people none of this seems possible it really doesn't if you were to say does this seem more like a dream sequence or more like just the normal odds it's way more like a dream sequence way more do does anybody else feel that obviously lots of people are having bad lives but if you just take some characters Elon Musk would be one Trump would be another and then in a very minor way me people whose lives are so unusual that how do you really explain them as just chance it's pretty hard to explain anyway um let's see if there's any more evidence that we're a simulation I'm going to ask you a question and if we're a simulation you're going to be able to answer this question without having any prior knowledge this will be how you know you're a simulation you ready do you think you can do it actually I'm GNA go further all bet you can answer the question before I ask it go go if anybody's new to the Brilliance of my audience this is going to impress you there it is I'm seeing the answer go by I haven't even asked the question the answer is correct 25% now you have to round a little bit the correct answer is 24% but I will take 25% would you like to hear the question 24% of Americans believe Biden could stay awake long enough to navigate a Cuban Missile like Crisis according to blaze media right you knew the answer before I asked the question and I think that's proof of a simulation or not but yes 24% of the public roughly 25% will'll get every survey question wrong in the stupidest possible way and you can depend on it now people always ask me Scott is it the same 25% do we have a public where 25% of the same people are wandering around like ninka poops well yes but it's not 25% it's probably closer to 60 and the 25% is not always the same so you could be in the 25% next time but you wouldn't know it you would you would just think you were right and I could be in the 25% probably by the end of the show anyway um there's a photo of an ancient spacecraft Jason wild was posting this so discovered in Turkey uh it's a Tali re Relic it's a bronze artifact that looks exactly like a modern spacecraft now you have to see it you know I've seen these before like in you know various ancient drawings and stuff on Cave walls and somebody say look look it's a picture of a person in a spaceship and I'd look at it and say maybe I can see how you'd say that's a spaceship but maybe it's something else you know maybe they had something else in mind when they put it on that cave wall but if you see this thing it's an actual three-dimensional um piece of art it's a guy in a spaceship it's definitely a guy in a spaceship I don't know what to make of that which makes me think maybe it's a fake or something I think it's probably more likely it's a fake Relic than really there's a guy in the spaceship made made in those times but but I will say that the Relic is unmistakably a spaceship this time you wouldn't look at it and say that might be something else no no it's a it's a spaceship for sure all right uh I was watching the Allin podcast and tuer was on it I don't know when this was recorded might might be older I can't tell um and he was talking about a a small sliver of people who seem to have complete control of the Democrat Party and the Democrat Party has you know a lot of control of the country so that it's just small sliver of people who are controlling everything who who are they when Tucker Carlson talks about the small sliver of the population that's controlling the country in a bad way who's he talking about I want to see if you're on the same page where where's all the people who immediately say Jews Jews you you seem to be able to work that into every conversation well it's hot today well have you have you seen who's behind the Heat usually I get that well the answer is women yeah educated women Tucker thinks that educated women who have some kind of mental problems are the biggest problem in the country and they're ruining the country now is that an old does anybody remember maybe you know which video I'm talking about on the Allen pod is that recent or has it been saying that for a while does anybody know if that was recent for some reason I couldn't find a date on it which is weird all right well I think people are coming around to the idea that bad Shake crazy women uh are the base problem of the country and I wouldn't be surprised if that's what destroyed France and Great Britain badshit crazy women because nobody can say no to them and there too many of them they just have too much power and uh Rachel Mato speaking of batshit crazy women she was on some event and she's pretty sure that uh the real problem is not that the Republicans will be trying to put her in jail but she's worried about the regular Democrats that you might round up and put in camps and stuff like that now the only thing I can say about that is that's badshit crazy stuff that crazy and what do you do about that we we have a world where you're not allowed to say you know women are the problem not all of them obviously but the bashit crazy ones that are Democrats are just breaking the whole system the the pro-immigration women aren't just crazy they're d Ive what in the world is that all about now I don't know what the percentage is of women versus men who are supporting uncontrolled immigration but if there's even one woman who's who's in favor of that why why explain that it's a mystery anyway so the media and the Rachel matow MSNBC are going hard as we knew they would on the Trump Trump is Hitler he's going to round you all up it's going to be a dystopian nightmare BL BL BL BL and I've been suggesting the following idea as Trump's only way to combat combat that brainwashing which is he's got to he's got to do an event that uh he goes and talks directly to Democrat citizens I would like to see him out lunch once a week or at least just once where he just sits with some AR citizens and says you know what your party says that if I get elected I'm going to be Hitler I just want to talk to you and find out do you really believe that and just have a normal conversation as a normal person and let them ask questions because they might say stuff like here here's how I imagine it but but but you want to you want to have a federal ban on all uh abortions and Trump would say no I don't I I'm totally against that and then they would say oh well I heard you were for it no I'm actually completely against it I've been saying that for a while oh well well well you also want to round up people no I don't why would I want to do that why would I want to round up anybody well you mean the people who broke the laws well maybe even more than that why in the world would I want to round up somebody who didn't break a law what possible reason would I have to be doing that how is that going to be good for me or anybody else in what way do I make America better by rounding up non- law Breakers are you serious they told you that well but you said those people in Charlottesville were fine people what you believe that you think I actually stood in front of the world and praised neo-nazis because you heard it on TV no I said directly they should be condemned totally you did in the same time they cut that part out did you know they just deleted that part no way are you serious yeah yeah they literally just deleted out the part where I said I condemned them so that they could say it was the opposite of what I said did you know that I had no idea but but but you said drink bleach I did do you believe that where did you hear that on the news the news told you that I was in favor of injecting bleach no I was talking about a technology that was in was being proposed at the time for UV light therapy that they thought they could use a catheter to put down your throat and maybe radiate your lungs and they actually tested it about that same time so when I talked about disinfectants I was talking about light but I I probably said it a little awkward way and they took it out if context well why did you say you were being sarcastic I just wanted the whole thing to go away because it wasn't important you know didn't work it became worse but you I just didn't want to engage on it because I couldn't really explain this technology it's just something I saw in the news so imagine him having like a human conversation with people who have been told he was Hiller I don't know how it could go wrong really I mean unless unless one of the people at lunch was just crazy so you'd have to vet them a little bit make sure they're at least reasonable people you know not crazies I think that seeing Trump interact with normal Democrats with compassion and simply explaining to them that the news is completely fake would be the best thing he could do and and I also think he can't win without it you you think that he's on a Glide path to winning I don't see that at all I don't see that at all I think his odds of winning are at best the coin flip at best you know if you're thinking he's 70% chance of winning you were so wrong he might win he might win but his odds are not really that good because there's just too much going on and I'm going to tell you some more that maybe you were not aware of that will convince you that his odds of winning are not good and if I had to guess he's the the one who needs the Hail Mary pass here's what everybody has wrong they think the Democrats are in disarray and that they need some kind of drastic Hail Mary never done before you know quick change rapid thing to get a new candidate in there you're missing the real story Trump is probably not going to win at the current rate he's the one who probably has to do something dramatic but not something crazy dramatic something dramatically normal something dramatically human so he needs to be dramatically human so that people can see that their own side has been lying to them dramatically human that that's his goal I don't think he can win without it because the brainwashing is so strong how strong is the brainwashing how much power is on the other side I don't know let's see what Tucker Carlson says about that if I can make this work we'll just listen to Tucker so if you want to understand if you really want to understand how the American government actually works at the highest levels and if you want to know why they don't teach history anymore one thing you should know is that the most popular president in American history was Richard Nixon Richard Nixon yet somehow without a single vote being cast by a single American voter Richard Nixon was kicked out of office and replaced by the only unelected president in American history so he went from the most popular president to a president nobody voted for huh wait a minute you may ask why didn't I know that wasn't a criminal wasn't he despised by all decent people yeah no he wasn't what in fact if any president could claim to be the People's Choice it was Richard Nixon Richard Nixon was reelected in 1972 by the largest margin of the popular vote ever recorded before or since ever Nixon got 17 million more votes than his opponent less than two years later he was gone he was forced to resign and in his place an obedient servant of the federal agencies called Gerald Ford took over the White House how did that happen how did that happen well it's a long story but here are the highlights and they tell you a lot Richard Nixon believed that elements in the federal bureaucracy were working to under the American system of government had been doing that for a long time what elements he often said that he was absolutely right on June 23rd 1972 Nixon met with the then CIA director Richard Helms at the White House during the conversation which thankfully was tap recorded what Nixon suggested he knew quote who shot John meaning President John F Kennedy what Nixon further implied that the CIA was directly involved in Kennedy's assassination which we now know it was what Helm's telling response total silence but for Nixon it didn't matter because it was already over 4 days before on June 19th The Washington Post had published the first of many stories about a break-in at the Watergate office building unbeknownst to Nixon and unreported by the Washington Post four of the five burglars worked for the CIA the first of many dishonest Watergate stories was written by a 29-year-old Metro reporter called Bob Woodward what who exactly was Bob Wood wward yeah who was he well he wasn't a journalist what Bob Woodward had no background whatsoever in the news business none instead Bob Woodward came directly from the classified areas of the federal government uhoh shortly before Watergate Woodward was a naval officer at the Pentagon he had a top secret clearance he worked regularly with the Intel agencies at times Woodward was even detailed to the Nixon White House where he interacted with Richard Nixon's top AIDS did he soon after leaving the Navy for reasons that have never been clear Woodward was hired by the most powerful news Outlet in Washington and assigned the biggest story in the country he's a good interviewer just to make it Crystal Clear what was actually happening Woodward's main source for his Watergate series was the deputy director of the FBI Mark felt and Mark felt ran and we're not making this up the FBI's co-intel proo program which was designed to secretly discredit political actors the federal agencies wanted to destroy what people like Richard Nixon and at the same time those same agencies were ALS also working to take down Nixon's elected vice president speiro agu uhhuh in the fall of 1973 agnu was indicted for tax evasion and forced to resign his replacement was a colorless congressman from Grand Rapids called Gerald Ford oh what was Ford's qualification for the job yeah what was it well he had served on the warrant commission which absolved the CIA of responsibility for President Kennedy's murder uh Nixon was strong armed into accepting Gerald Ford by democrats in Congress quote we gave Nixon no choice but Ford Speaker of the House Carl Albert later boasted eight months later Gerald Ford of the Warren Commission was the president of the United States see how that works see how that works any questions remember the part where you said we're in good shape because Trump's got a good lead in the polls do you know who else had a real good lead in the polls Richard Nixon you know who else had a real good chance of reelection JFK do you know what two groups were suspicious of the CIA and wanted less of them Nixon JFK yep that's the world you live in folks would you like to hear an upd dat from RFK Jr talking about the assassination of his father not JFK Jr that's his uncle by his father uh Bobby his version is this siren s was waiting in one part of the building where he got shot and that wasn't the place that he normally would leave the building but for some reason unexplained the person who was sort of guiding him by the elbow took him to a unusual you know nonregular exit where Siran Siran was waiting huh kind of a big coincidence that he was guided to the place where the killer was which wasn't even the normal place and then what followed was San Saran shooting uh all of the bullets in his gun that were eight all eight bullets now most of them were fired when people had already grabbed his gun hand so they weren't fired at RFK Jr they were fired at the ceiling and maybe H some other people whatever but there were eight of them I mean they know they know the gun has room for eight bullets 14 bullets were shot this is RFK Jr's take on it we know from the recording that 14 bullets were shot from the eight bullet gun it would seem that the person who took him by the elbow blew his head off in the commotion so that's the suggestion is that the CIA made sure that Siran got it done because they had a second shooter to finish the job and the second shooter was probably the guy who held him by the elbow and as soon as the gun started shooting and everybody started looking at the shooter it looks like he just took a gun out of his pocket and blew Kennedy's head off or something like it now you say to yourself how in the world could you be hearing this story now if it's true with all those Witnesses and all that well that's a good question seemed like there were a lot of people there somebody would have seen something different but just think about the other things that you know are true it's not that unusual unfortunately it's not outside the the realm of normal ordinary government entity that they would have murdered them right in front of a group of people and you wouldn't know it I don't think that's unusual don't think so at all so it does seem clear that the CIA has been running the operation at least since then you know at least since the 60s maybe before and on paper there's no way it could go any other way because it's an entity that's trained to take over countries of course they're going to do it it just does a matter it's just a matter of time but apparently it happened a long time ago now that doesn't mean that it's such a clean ownership of the country that they can just get everything they want right away you know they have to go through the pretending and the acting like the process is working and then and then when the time is right they'll just give the nudge now you know um You probably said to yourself how in the world did we get to this point where Biden was ever president in the first place do you think that the CIA was unaware of Biden's uh dementia of course they knew of course they knew it's the CIA do you think there was any doubt in their minds that they had a demented president of course not if they wanted to change that how hard would it be simple they just go to the Washington Post the New York Times they say all right we're Anonymous sources and we're telling you from the intelligence community that the president has dementia and he's got to go it'd be the easiest thing in the world because the those entities would say all right you're our normal Source we trust you you got some details all right we'll write that story but that story never got written did it and I think Mike Benz is correct the only reasonable explanation is that the intelligence Community is using Biden as an empty out vessel for whatever they need to do they apparently are getting what they need to do done so they didn't need a change I also think that you know 99% of the presidency is the staff tells him what to do and he says yes so we did CH I think we Pro that you don't really need a president not not that much anyway you do need need the president during the emergencies but that's the same stuff the CIA handles right if the president gets awakened at 3:00 a.m.
somebody from the CIA is going to be in the room and tell them what to think tell them what's true and probably tell them what to do so I think that's our government that the intelligence people have control of the things that intelligence people control not everything in the world but you know Wars and geopolitical stuff and who gets elected I think that's all just the CIA Tucker said it directly on the all-in Pod that we're not a democracy or even in the ballpark we're a group who where there's a small group of unelected people who decide who can be in the primary and who's going to get elected and it's been that that for a long time so we're not a republic we're not a democracy haven't been for a long time yeah now how much is true about the stories about Nixon and the stories about Kennedy and the stories about the other Kennedy well if only half of it's true it's the same story if only half of it's true now uh some of us have said for a while that we would know immediately when the CIA decided to turn on Biden and they needed to make a change and do you remember me saying that as soon as you saw Rob Ryder and Stephen King turn on him that that was the signal Rob Riner and Stephen King just turned on him so almost like it was coordinated they both said we're out now they're not voting for Trump of course but they're saying uhoh we need a new candidate coincidence Rob rer has some contacts in the CIA he he's the head of some group that has two of the xcia groups in it heads in it so he's very connected you we know that from public documents you don't have to no research needed um so to me it looks like those those two uh are off the sinking ship now this gets us to our Deadpool the pool of who would be the most ridiculous celebrity who would be the last one to abandon Biden when it's so obviously he's mentally deranged and I'm going to go still this was my original guess with punchie dairo and the reason is I don't think he's a political asset I don't think he's an intelligence asset I think he's just crazy and so I don't think that mentally he can change his mind you may be just too hard so so I still have him as the last celebrity who will abandon Biden just CU his level of crazy looks different than the others all right let's see what else is going on here um in semaphor the publication semaphor there there's talk about having a blitz primary you know rapid fire primary to get Biden um replaced you know what the problem with that is that even today Biden did a detailed letter announcement saying he's not quitting he's definitely not quitting now here's the problem it really is sort of up to him unless they kill him un unless they actually cannedy him it's him so you know they the CI I think there's a good chance the CIA will murder Biden maybe make it look like an accident you know take him to the hospital give him a shot sort of thing so I'd say that the odds of Biden surviving to election day um would be high if you're just talking about him being alive in his normal way his brain will be gone but I think he'd be alive by election day probably however I think it's more like a coin flip I think the odds of the CIA uh killing him just to make sure that they have time to put somebody else in there it's pretty good it's pretty good maybe maybe 50% chance they'll kill him now I'm not in favor of that if I say it casually it's because that's the world we live in the reason I say it casually is that is the world we live in that's not a fantasy there there by now there must be guaranteed conversations in the government about killing them because if they killed two kennedies and if they took Nixon out and they clearly tried to take Trump out these are all intelligence assets what would stop them from killing him we all expect he's going to die soon so you think if we heard that he had a heart attack on on Air Force One and then the CIA controlled whoever does the autopsy you don't think they can get away with that how hard would it be just give him a shot of something and control the autopsy that's it it's not even hard you could murder him so easily just give him the little shot control the autopsy say oh doctors say totally normal man that age completely expected he would have a heart attack so if he dies suddenly uh without a long illness it's going to look like murder to me you've been warned so I'd say that's a coin flip um and I don't think that there's time for any Blitz primary I don't think Biden's going to quit and I'm going to go with Van Jones um I think I said it before he did but van Jones is saying now that kamla is the candidate one way or the other and people just have to sort of wrap their heads around it she's either going to be raised up the president which van would call the easy way meaning if she could take over now then it's a more natural transition to be the candidate because she would be the president it's natural she would have control of the funds you wouldn't have to do much work you know it'd be fairly easy it'd be the easiest transition uh but van says if you can't do it the easy way which is Biden steps aside you're going to have to do it the hard way which is Biden's at the top of the ticket but you convince people to vote because they're voting for kamla does that sound familiar that's my prediction my prediction is that when you flip the coin it's going to land on the edge and stay there meaning that we're going to have the schrodingers candidate one dead and one alive and you'll disagree on who you're voting for so two Democrats will walk into the voting booth they'll vote both vote for the Democratic candidate for president one will walk out with thinking he voted for Biden the other one will walk out with thinking he voted for KL Harris it'll be the same vote Schrodinger's candidate it's coming and on paper there's no other way it can go I was listening like I said the all-in pod which is so influential I was listening to David Sachs say essentially the same thing that there's the design of the current system there isn't any way it's going to go a different way you know you you could say there's a wild card that you know Biden has a health situation that's worse than we've seen and that's possible but in all roads KLA becomes the candidate so there is no Road where she doesn't become the candidate so everybody who's doing as sax calls it wish casting where where you do the thing okay uh then and then Madonna comes in with Oprah and uh between the two of them they talk Michelle Obama into running and no no none of that is going to happen they don't have the time they don't have the will they don't have the ability but more importantly they don't have the need they don't need to do anything because their one and only acceptable situation because the base wouldn't allow anything else is that the Dei hire kamla can't be skipped over so she's got the money she's got the Dei hire she's got the job it's her if if you're fantasizing it's somebody else stop and if you say to yourself oh but they would never do that because you know she's such a bad candidate are you kidding have you been paying attention they ran Biden you don't think that they're worried you don't think that they'd uh run kamla just because she's the second worst candidate of all time every bit of every bit of indication is that they do want a weak Hollow don't president like KLA Harris as long as she's on their team that's all that matters and they'll handle the rest the fact that the stock market doesn't even react to the fact that we have too mentally incapable people vying for the top position I'm talking about the two Democrats here the fact that it doesn't even react is kind of a general acknowledgement that the important people the ones with all the money don't really think the president's said important in the final analysis all right um who else wants uh Biden to leave let's see uh um you've got uh Jerry nler is saying that uh Biden should leave now if you're looking for signals that things have gone far enough when Jerry Nadler says somebody should get out politics for health reasons Jerry Nadler Jerry Nadler saying he should he should drop down for health reasons I mean what's left Adam Schiff no longer supporting him what what do you know when you know Adam Schiff is no longer supporting Biden he didn't say drop out he's he's Schiff is just playing as Shifty he's sort of noncommittal at this point what's that tell you well would you expect that Adam Schiff is a regular Democrat no he's one of the uh the the Liars he's the pro Liars he he's not as bad as Jamie Rasin opposite man when they send the opposite man out it's it's so he can tell you the opposite of what's true it's all he does he doesn't ever do anything with Nuance it's like uh did it rain today no it did not rain today well why is everything wet why are the clouds dropping these these things that look like wet things well but there's no water today everybody can see it you know he's just opposite man just like when they they send out worse than Watergate guy it's not because he has good opinions it's because they need the worse than water gay guy so opposite man and worse than water gay guy if you see them both come out then the media is hiding a big one and Adam shiff I think based on his actions appears to be just an intelligence asset would you agree now the only reason I say that is that way he acts he does things that don't look like a regular politician and he's also one of the you know the ones who will go into the skiff and tell you that he saw something that wasn't there I mean that's pretty deep criminality without actually being illegal I guess um so there's no way he's a regular politician right he's got some kind of connections with the intelligence Community otherwise I can't imagine he'd even be there so if you're losing those guys and you're losing Rob Riner and Stephen King it would seem that the intelligence Community has decided they want Biden out but I think they want KL Harris in so don't expect to see a a rapid primary very unlikely uh Boeing is pleaded guilty to criminal fraud for uh couple of air plane crashes in which they uh conspire to defraud the government so I I guess they lied to the government about maybe the details of that situation so that's going to cost them $243 million which they'll make back in uh 10 minutes because the uh industrial complex military-industrial complex will give them A10 billion deal and then they'll be able to pay their fine to the government so I just assume all that's crooked I don't know that I just assume well over in France I've been trying to figure out what's going on over there because it's a confusing place but here's what I understand you have multiple parties not just two so macron's party was one of three that were let's say roughly equally powerful but his was in power people didn't like him the people on the right didn't like him the people on the far left didn't like him and so there was an election and the one with the most votes was the one on the far right but their system apparently as some kind to runoff situation and uh what happened was the people on the far left teamed up with I guess macron's group so that they could pick their own leader so basically if you had the two um lesser loved groups together they would have more powerful than the one group that's the most powerful similar to how Fox News is the biggest news entity in the United States but if you looked at it compared to all the other entities they all lean the other direction so it doesn't matter that fox is the biggest it matters that they've got so many that they're still bigger they can drown out Fox News so it's one of those situations so in other words France managed to create a system that on paper would guarantee the destruction of their country on paper that you could do this kind of thing thing which is give the public exactly what they didn't ask for it's exactly what they didn't ask for is what they got and the group coming in apparently is pro-immigration so they can have more immigration not less it was the main thing that activated them to be so excited about an election in the first place and why they voted by very large numbers in favor of the losing group even though they got the most votes so their system is uh pretty messed up and the current thinking is that they've created a log Jam in their own government which will guarantee they'll never be able to do anything good again and the immigration will just destroy them now why is France destroying itself do you think it's bad she had crazy women there too because I can't understand men doing it it's just not a male thing to do men don't open their borders unless there's some woman behind him that's that's agitating for it yeah I don't really understand it at all so France is dead uh or as I like to say i' like to make this historical reference Lafayette we're over there all right how many thought that was funny laet we'll be over there no okay okay all right um there's a whole new round of brain dead Biden videos my favorites uh where he's mumbling and looking like he's lost and uh seriously people no joke no joke uh no joke and then he tells some lies and says no joke and then he brags about his ice cream and his Ray bands and he tells his three dimension stories do you remember the story about how when Biden was done with this disastrous debate he met with his supporters right after and he seemed to be talking coherently somewhat to the supporters and you said to yourself wait a minute why is he suddenly kind of coherent did you recognize the story he told he was telling one of his U pocket stories one of the stories he just tells all the time I forget which one but it was one of his standard stories and if you're a dementia patient I'll take a fact check on this I'm no expert but don't you have long-term memory in other words aren't you the most functional when you're telling a story that you've been telling for 50 years I think so I I think you have trouble with stuff that happened this week but if you've been telling a story for 50 years you can probably go to it so I think that when he got off stage where everything was unknown what the question would be you know it was like a wild west situation as soon as he got off stage he he just they just probably said and by the way I don't think it was his idea I think somebody whispered in his ear Joe just just tell that you know Story three just tell Story three oh yeah story three y all I remember and then he makes up that same story so look for him doing um whenever he's talking about something that happened a long time ago look for him to look coherent um even though it's just an old man story but anytime he has to think on his feet it's going to be a disaster uh Biden's doctor has been uh called in by Congress apparently Biden's doctor had allegedly some involvement in the Biden crime family income did you ever wonder how did you get a White House doctor that was not going to oun the president for having dementia how loyal would you have to be that you would violate your your oath I mean clearly he's violating his oath wouldn't you agree is it safe to say that the White House doctor has clearly violated his oath I mean he's doing harm he's doing harm to the country doing harm to the patient I mean you couldn't violate your oath any harder than that because obviously he knew what the situation was obviously he's been lying right obviously I don't think there's any doubt about it so now he's being called into uh to be questioned because there's some allegation that he received a money through the Biden crime family situation which would explain everything if true um there's a story that I wouldn't say is validated but there's some individual who claims to have access to secret knowledge about what happened on Air Force One and allegedly there was a medical emergency in which uh Biden was hallucinating and they had to I don't know give him an antis psychotic or something I would say the odds of that being true are not zero but I wouldn't give it a lot of credibility um it's a kind of story that if you heard it about Trump I would be saying and who's the source and you'd say well anonymous source and then I would say exactly yeah or an anonymous source says the worst possible thing happened when nobody was looking that's the story really it's always it's always the worst thing when nobody's looking so if I had if I had to bet on it I'd bet against it being true but maybe only a 6040 because there's a good chance he's having medical situations we don't know about well Biden uh says he's good for employment but he did get one black woman fired from her job um apparently the radio station in Philadelphia in which he did a friendly interview recently and the questions were given to the host to ask him and she actually asked four of the eight questions that they gave her and she got fired but I don't think that's fair a as a person who's worked in the media I don't think that the host who who used the four questions should be fired because isn't that unusual I don't think it was meant to be a hard-hitting interview it was meant to be a friendly and those are fine there's nothing wrong with do a friendly interview right Sean Hannity talks to Trump you don't see me bitching about that right as long as there's also some hard ones you do all the friendly ones you want that's not a problem so to be fired for doing a friendly interview and then ALS Al being honest also being honest she said yeah I got the questions I picked four of them she didn't hide anything why did she get fired I think she got fired for being honest I don't think she got fired for using the questions what do you think I think she deserves her job back I I don't think this is an appropriate firing whatsoever now it's a business decision so they might have gotten so much heat they just had to do it but I I think this is totally unfair and I think that the host should be rehired and they should apologize because what she did wasn't that far outside of normal behavior it certainly not firing offense and talking I think she got fired for talking about it I don't think she got fired for doing it I think she got tired for talking about they said it's for doing it but I don't think that's real yeah no that's unfair she should be hired back um anyway let's see what else we got going on here in this big old day um have you noticed that the biggest problem in the country is the debt crisis and neither candidate has any idea what to do about it should we be worried about that that we have one obvious existential problem but here's what I wonder about I wonder if there's somebody somewhere in the government who has figured out is not the problem we think it is remember I provocatively said the following what if you just canceled all the debt just cancel it just say we're not going to pay now I'm not recommending it this is just a mental process who would lose the money are there any poor people who have uh government debt I doubt it the last thing you can if you're poor you're you're not you're not buying government bonds so who does let's say you're a middle class person who wants to invest where do you put your money not in government bonds probably have it in the stock market or real estate or something like that so then you keep going all right rich people rich people who have more money than they need to employ at the moment might park it in bonds just because it won't go wildly up or down it's just sort of a safe place to park some money it's all the parked money what what would happen if you just said all right it's all gone we're not paying I'm not recommending it and I'm not predicting it I'm just working through the how much of a risk are we really at it it's mostly going to be foreign governments who are parking money that they didn't need am I wrong you wouldn't put it there unless you didn't need it that's the place you put the money you don't need so this is the most provocative question in the country but what would happen if we just said we're not paying it back who would be out it would be people who didn't get back the money that they didn't need because if they needed it it wouldn't be there in the first place now they would become instantly poor you know their buying power would go down but you might even be able to to you know work it out so there's some gradual payback or something all right now let's take a hybrid how about we say we're not going to pay you back in dollars we're only going to pay you back in crypto that we just made up and if you don't think it's worth anything well maybe it is worth something because we'll take it in payment for taxes so you can always exchange it to somebody who wants to use it in payment for taxes you might have to give up 5% just for the convenience or something but you'll basically get most of your money back and and you'll get it back in the timing you were going to when when the vehicles mature um maybe you'd have to limit how much they could sell right away because you wouldn't want people you know liquidating the entire trillions and trillions you'd want them to do it in an orderly fashion now that would the the effect of that would be to inflate it away right because if you introduce this new money out of nowhere um it's is sort of creating money out of nothing if you pay back all the loans you've added money to the system but you would be adding it in a fairly orderly way and it would eliminate what is close to a trillion dollars a year in interest payments which by the way still leaves us with a trillion dollars a year deficit we're we're still adding to the debt two trillion a year that's the new numbers uh if we took all the debt out all the interest payments it would take a trillion dollars off of our budget and we wouldn't be anywhere near a balanced budget only halfway there now if we got down to 1 trillion deficit and somehow we magically took care of the 35 trillion that's already out there with some kind of crypto magic trick could you survive with a trillion dollar a year deficit no no you couldn't no you can't you would have to do something still radical to make that go away now radical could be growth you know for example you could easily imagine that Trump comes in and he says I'm not going to raise your taxes but I'm going to raise taxes on robots now the the public wouldn't even quite understand that they say look the robots are going to take your jobs uh and anybody who can afford to have a robot is Rich so if you buy buy or sell a robot there's going to be an extra tax on there or maybe even a ongoing tax on robots and uh that tax will will help us you know get rid of that deficit because a robot in theory should be so much more productive that you could pay a you know a 10% tax on it and still be way ahead you know you're not going to come out now is everything I said sensible I doubt it would any of what I said work probably not but here's what I'm adding I'm I'm if I've never described this before let me describe it for you for the first time if you haven't heard this one of the things that people like me can add to the system the system being the country at this in this context what I add to the system is allowing you to think in a wider way than you were for example when the pandemic first hit I was among the first public figures I think Jack pabic was there too saying we need to close travel from China do you know why I was doing it so loudly and screaming it well because it was an idea that people couldn't quite imagine as a possibility so somebody who's got less to lose and no sense of Shame needs to go out there and scream the thing that seems impossible for anybody to even consider CU until you consider it you can't possibly do it so you have to get used to considering something that's way outside the realm of ordinary if you need to do something way outside the realm of ordinary and when it comes to our deficit there is no ordinary solution you're going to have to do something you never did before would never consider ordinarily is once one time ever and is so wildly improbable that even when I describe it you shake your head and go H I don't know about that that sounds like it's coming with a lot of problems right so the thing I can add is just make you think maybe there's some Third Way maybe there's a crypto magic way wouldn't be perfect it wouldn't be perfect but is there some other way and if the only thing it does is make you say Scott your idea is stupid for 10 reasons but you know what it does make me think of something that might work let me run this by you that's what we're doing we're just brainstorming and in in addition to brainstorming we're moving the envelope a little bigger so that the people who can make decisions and do know what they're talking about you know let's say a Warren Buffett Jamie Diamond you know somebody who knows what they're talking about maybe they can come in and say you know what that's a that's a terrible idea Scott but as long as you've reach as long as You' stretched the envelope now I can talk about my idea it would have sounded badshit crazy until you were even crazier than I was you know what what once you've set the standard of crazy now I've got a a place to play in yeah this phenomenon is very useful let me give you another example I always talk about my favorite news program on TV the five on um uh on Fox News and one of the one of the things I love about watching it is the design of the show I always say the producers of Fox News are just the best and one of the things they do really well is designing shows who who they put with who you know the groups of people that are on there at the same very good and one of the things that uh makes the five just so much better than other shows honestly is Greg geld and what geld does is he always is stretching the limit of what you should say on TV and what you should say during a politically oriented show which allows all the people to play in the playground that he defines because he takes the big risk and says I'm going to say this and then you can say something that you wouldn't have said before but if geld hasn't been fired yet you're probably safe and and you can you can see that effect playing out and just really obviously so Gutfeld defines the space and keeps increasing it you know he's making it bigger and bigger and then you see the other the other people who are great at what they do but they're not necessarily the boundary stretchers so that that team of five has one boundary stretcher and then between Dana Pino and Jesse Waters and whoever you know then the judge and whoever else is on there H they can play Within that space and they're much safer and Freer to do all that it's the same thing I think Trump does this as well um when Trump says I'm going to close the border and and you know build a wall and all that whatever the extreme stuff is he makes the boundary of what is in the conversation bigger and then the normal people come can come in you know the the Rubios and the governors of Texas and the you know the people like that then they can come in they've got a bigger play space but somebody has to stretch it you know I'm doing it here gfell does it on the five Trump does it in politics you need a stretcher and then you need really capable people who can play in that new playground so that's what's happening all right and that ladies and gentlemen is a conclusion of the greatest live stream you're going to see all morning and uh if you'd like to know what else is going on let's check the stock market Tesla's up nvidia's up Nano nuclear energy is up another 11% so I sold too soon uh let's see what else is happening bitcoin's down so bitcoin's had a a rough month um and the S&P is up just a tiny tiny bit and Apple's falling back a little bit not much I mean 0.1 um so the story on Apple is their next update will not have a new version of Si I can't say it because my phone's in my hand um that the they will have ai in their uh their new release that's coming out soon in the fall but you're going to have to wait till the spring some people are saying for the main voice of your Apple phone to be updated into an AI context that's a really long time and you know I hate to bet against Apple but boy are they vulnerable to somebody coming in with a AI native phone you know one that was built to be an AI phone from the ground up and maybe it's connected to starlink maybe you never know so that's what's happening today ladies and gentlemen um that's the end of my show I'm going to go talk to the locals subscribers as I always do and uh thanks on X and on Rumble and on You.
Tube by the way thank you to rumble because when I do good shows the my Rumble numbers are way up so on Rumble which is way way smaller than You.
Tube um if I have a you know a pretty good show that people want to show I might get 10,000 viewers on um on You.
Tube I'll get reliably about 30,000 not live but watching the recorded version as well if I do a great show on You.
Tube I'll get 31,000 viewers it'll go from 30,000 to 31 if I really nail it on Rumble if I have a good show goes from 9,000 to 75,000 you know like the actual real Market should work like if somebody likes it they recommend it and then more people see it you know the way actually things should work but for some reason that I just can't figure out my You.
Tube numbers just always say the same and weirdly even as my number of subscribers has zoomed from you know 10,000 to over what 165,000 now 165,000 subscribers and my average daily number of viewers flat for years totally natural right when my my Twitter SLX numbers went from nothing to 1.1 million my local subscribers went from nothing to over 11,000 and growing every day but my You.
Tube channel that You.
Tube traffic just stays about the same now just just to be technical a couple of them did go bigger but it was rare yeah it was rare so keep an eye on that anyway so I'm going to go talk to the locals people thanks on thanks Rumble the next and uh You.
Tube to I'll see you tomorrow same place same time e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e
[Music]
hey chat GPT how would you like to be my
sidekick for the
show you're a little slow that sounds
like a great idea Mr Adams I'd be happy
to be your sidekick for the show what do
you have in mind for our
collaboration well I was thinking that
uh you would be quiet until I ask you to
talk and only respond if I call you by
name and your name for the show will be
Eve Eve
okay that sounds good to me Mr Adams I
will respond when you call me
Eve very
good now the people are coming in do you
think we should do this simultaneously
than Mr Adams do you think we should do
the simultaneous
Z yes we can coordinate and do this
simultaneously let me know how you'd
like to
proceed um do you remember the uh
simultaneous sip uh thing that I say
before the
show I'm sorry I don't recall that
specific detail could you remind
me well I could take a photograph of
it that would be helpful Mr
Adams all right let me take a photograph
here and we'll have chat jbt do the
simultaneous H for
us here it
is live demonstration
oops hold on hold
on I need you
talking and here we
go all right I'd like you to read out
loud the simultaneous
here it comes sure Mr
Adams here it is the simultaneous sip
all you need is a cup or a mug or a
glass a tankered chalice or Stein a
canteen jug or flask a vessel of any
kind fill it with your favorite liquid
and join me now for the unparalleled
pleasure the dopamine hit of the
day very good
join me now for the dope and mean of the
day all right we'll shut her up for a
while the future is
here not really as satisfying as when I
do it is it I know you're you're all
like don't do that again don't do that
again all right I won't we tried it
once but if you have haven't tried
taking a photograph of something and
uploading it to your AI and watch How I
can interpret it and read it it's kind
of creepy it's creepy good I mean it's
awesome but it's
creepy well if you're subscribing to the
Dilbert reboard and comic that you can
only see if you're a subscriber on X or
on the Scott adams. locals platform you
would know that Dilbert has gone in for
lasic
surgery I'm not going to tell you how it
goes
you would just have to see yourself it's
a visual it's a visual
comic well and the next category is the
weather um temperature reached 128 in
Death Valley and uh it killed the guy so
a guy
died now I've got a little tip for you
this sort of a safety
tip if you ever have the urge to travel
through or to a place called Death
Valley don't do it don't do it that's
all that's that's it there there are
other names too like if there were a
place called I'm going to chop your head
off Valley don't go there no about shoot
you till you
die Valley no don't don't even go there
see you got to do the basics right got
to get the basics don't go to a place
called
Death all right um in Zero Hedge is an
article by a well it's talking about
Jeff Tucker of Brownstone Institute he
basically has the proposition that we
may have been in recession for years and
the reason it's not obvious is that 100%
of our economic data is
fake has anybody told you that
before if I ever told you directly that
all of our economic data is
fake I think I've made you know I've
certainly made disparaging remarks about
you know certain elements of it but I'm
fairly confident that it's all fake or
it's all in a context or they used to
measure it one way and now they measure
another or they know they're overstating
it but later they're going to correct it
or they know they're understating it but
later they're going to correct it or
they always knew it was wrong but it's
advantageous to measure it this way
uh as a person who used to for a living
in the actual capitalist commercial
world it was my job to bring data to
management and the one thing I can tell
you for sure is it was never
real because it turns out in the real
world when you go to look for data and
then put it in a report the first thing
you find out is the data is
bad the second thing you find out is
there's no way to fix
it the third thing third thing you find
out is that management doesn't
care that'll set you
straight PE people wonder how I became
uh so distrusting of government and
whatnot that's what Dilbert's all about
Dilbert is a comic strip that started
with the
realization that everything is a lie
everything your boss tells you
everything the company tells the
customers everything the customers tell
the company everything the government
tells you everything it's all lie and
always has been it always has been it's
just that it works you know lots of
times lying just gets stuff done and
then stuff sort of works I mean we're
still alive we're still
here I have a hypothesis I can't
remember if I told you this on the show
or maybe only the mancave about why
civilizations
fail you know throughout history there
have been these big civilizations that
we just find the ruins and then what the
hell happened to the Roman
Empire if you if you try to research why
did the Roman Empire
fail it'll be all these weird sort of
different reasons that don't quite map
out in your head but here's my
theory my theory goes like this that
it's exceedingly rare for any
civilization to become super
successful so for every Rome there must
have been a thousand civilizations that
were just small tribes and didn't make
it so the the normal situation is that
everything dies you know nobody really
makes anything important they live their
life in a small world they die it's just
the rarest thing when all the elements
come together there something can form a
big civilization you know powerful
regime over maybe 100 years or something
and the reason that they
disappear is
simple they weren't supposed to be there
in the first place that's it the only
thing that made them so successful was
the weirdest coincidences that came
together at the same time and there
isn't any way that that can keep
happening it takes extraordinary luck to
be in the right place at the right time
with the right side of variables and it
just doesn't last it has nothing to do
with how hard anybody tries has nothing
to do with you know did their society
become
decadent none of that it's just that
there isn't any way that you could be so
lucky for so long it's just not possible
it's just reversion to the mean and
there's nothing else to it that's my
theory it's just reversion to the mean
because you really can't find anything
in common with failed civilizations it
looks like it's every different reason
which means
everything had to be right to get what
you got let me give you another example
of that when people talk about Trump
getting elected in
2016 it seemed so highly unlikely and
then some people will say well the
reason he got elected is X and then
somebody else was saying well I see what
you're saying but really the reason he
got elected was why and it turns out you
could do the whole alphabet as the
reason he got elected if you change that
one thing he probably wouldn't have been
elected and so my take on that is all
those things had to happen if you take
any of them away probably would have
been the margin of you know Victory goes
away
so think about the coincidences they
have to come together for a Rome the
coincidences that have to come together
for a trump Victory and now leading into
my next
point Lex Freedman had a guest on and he
asked him talking about the simulation
and do we live in the
simulation and the guest I don't know
his name I see him on Twitter sarnic
maybe
saric um he said the odds that were
simulation oh I'm sorry that's just his
Twitter name or ex name his name is
Roman Yul Yoli
Yuli and he says the odds that were
simulation are nearly
100% And one of the things that he
offered as a not proof but sort of a
logical um argument is what are the odds
that we would be alive at this point in
history with everything that's happening
have you ever said to yourself what are
the odds that you were
alive when computers were invented for
the first
time I was smartphones first time AI
robots All In my
lifetime doesn't it seem to you that
we're in a an insanely unlikely period
of
History what are the odds if you look at
the you know entire history of
humanity not so
good and then I find
myself working the exact job that I
imagined when I was six what are the
odds of that what are the odds that one
day the president of the United States
would invite me to have a chat with him
in the Oval Office
that actually
happened what what are the odds that you
know I could post something on X and on
any given day Elon Musk you know would
retweet it or or comment on it the
richest person in the world a what
running up to eight billion people none
of this seems possible it really
doesn't if you were to say does this
seem more like a dream sequence or more
like just the normal odds it's way more
like a dream sequence way more do does
anybody else feel
that obviously lots of people are having
bad lives but if you just take some
characters Elon Musk would be one Trump
would be another and then in a very
minor way me people whose lives are so
unusual that how do you really explain
them as just chance it's pretty hard to
explain anyway um let's see if there's
any more evidence that we're a
simulation I'm going to ask you a
question and if we're a
simulation you're going to be able to
answer this question without having any
prior knowledge this will be how you
know you're a simulation you ready do
you think you can do it actually I'm GNA
go further all bet you can answer the
question before I ask it go
go if anybody's new to the Brilliance of
my audience this is going to impress you
there it is I'm seeing the answer go by
I haven't even asked the question the
answer is correct
25% now you have to round a little bit
the correct answer is 24% but I will
take
25% would you like to hear the
question 24% of Americans believe Biden
could stay awake long enough to navigate
a Cuban Missile like Crisis according to
blaze media
right you knew the answer before I asked
the question and I think that's proof of
a
simulation or not but yes 24% of the
public roughly
25% will'll get every survey question
wrong in the stupidest possible way and
you can depend on it now people always
ask me Scott is it the same 25%
do we have a public where 25% of the
same people are wandering around like
ninka
poops well yes but it's not 25% it's
probably closer to 60 and the 25% is not
always the same so you could be in the
25% next time but you wouldn't know
it you would you would just think you
were right and I could be in the 25%
probably by the end of the
show anyway um
there's a photo of an ancient
spacecraft Jason wild was posting this
so discovered in
Turkey uh it's a Tali re Relic it's a
bronze artifact that looks exactly like
a modern
spacecraft now you have to see
it you know I've seen these before like
in you know various ancient drawings and
stuff on Cave walls and somebody say
look look
it's a picture of a person in a
spaceship and I'd look at it and say
maybe I can see how you'd say that's a
spaceship but maybe it's something else
you know maybe they had something else
in mind when they put it on that cave
wall but if you see this thing it's an
actual three-dimensional um piece of
art it's a guy in a
spaceship it's definitely a guy in a
spaceship I don't know what to make of
that which makes me
think maybe it's a fake or something I
think it's probably more likely it's a
fake Relic than really there's a guy in
the spaceship made made in those times
but but I will say that the Relic is
unmistakably a spaceship this time you
wouldn't look at it and say that might
be something else no no it's a it's a
spaceship for
sure all right uh I was watching the
Allin podcast and tuer was on it I don't
know when this was recorded might might
be older I can't tell
um and he was talking about a a small
sliver of people who seem to have
complete control of the Democrat Party
and the Democrat Party has you know a
lot of control of the country so that
it's just small sliver of people who are
controlling everything who who are
they when Tucker Carlson talks about the
small sliver of the population that's
controlling the country in a bad way
who's he talking about I want to see if
you're on the same
page where where's all the people who
immediately say Jews Jews you you seem
to be able to work that into every
conversation well it's hot today well
have you have you seen who's behind the
Heat usually I get that well the answer
is women yeah educated women Tucker
thinks that educated women who have some
kind of mental problems are the biggest
problem in the country and they're
ruining the country
now is that an old does anybody remember
maybe you know which video I'm talking
about on the Allen pod is that recent or
has it been saying that for a
while does anybody know if that was
recent for some reason I couldn't find a
date on it which is
weird all right well I think people are
coming around to the idea that bad Shake
crazy women uh are the base problem of
the country and I wouldn't be surprised
if that's what destroyed France and
Great Britain badshit crazy women
because nobody can say no to
them and there too many of them they
just have too much power and uh Rachel
Mato speaking of batshit crazy
women she was on some event and she's
pretty sure that uh the real problem is
not that the Republicans will be trying
to put her in jail but she's worried
about the regular Democrats that you
might round up and put in camps and
stuff like that now the only thing I can
say about that is that's badshit crazy
stuff that
crazy and what do you do about
that we we have a world where you're not
allowed to say you know women are the
problem not all of them obviously but
the bashit crazy ones that are Democrats
are just breaking the whole system the
the pro-immigration
women aren't just crazy they're d Ive
what in the world is that all
about now I don't know what the
percentage is of women versus men who
are supporting uncontrolled immigration
but if there's even one woman who's
who's in favor of that
why why explain
that it's a mystery anyway so the
media and the Rachel matow MSNBC are
going hard as we knew they would on the
Trump Trump is Hitler he's going to
round you all up it's going to be a
dystopian nightmare BL BL BL
BL and I've been suggesting the
following idea as Trump's only way to
combat combat that
brainwashing which is he's got to he's
got to do an event that uh he goes and
talks directly to Democrat
citizens I would like to see him out
lunch once a week or at least just once
where he just sits with some AR citizens
and says you know what your party says
that if I get elected I'm going to be
Hitler I just want to talk to you and
find out do you really believe
that and just have a normal conversation
as a normal person and let them ask
questions because they might say stuff
like here here's how I imagine it but
but but you want to you want to have a
federal ban on all uh abortions and
Trump would say no I don't
I I'm totally against that and then they
would say oh well I heard you were for
it no I'm actually completely against it
I've been saying that for a while oh
well
well well you also want
to round up people no I don't why would
I want to do that why would I want to
round up
anybody well you mean the people who
broke the
laws well maybe even more than that why
in the world would I want to round up
somebody who didn't break a law what
possible reason would I have to be doing
that how is that going to be good for me
or anybody else in what way do I make
America better by rounding up non- law
Breakers are you
serious they told you
that well but you said those people in
Charlottesville were fine people what
you believe
that you think I actually stood in front
of the world and praised neo-nazis
because you heard it on
TV no I said directly they should be
condemned totally you did in the same
time they cut that part out did you know
they just deleted that part no way are
you serious yeah yeah they literally
just deleted out the part where I said I
condemned them so that they could say it
was the opposite of what I said did you
know that I had no idea but but but you
said drink
bleach I did do you believe that
where did you hear that on the news the
news told you that I was in favor of
injecting bleach no I was talking about
a technology that was in was being
proposed at the time for UV light
therapy that they thought they could use
a catheter to put down your throat and
maybe radiate your lungs and they
actually tested it about that same time
so when I talked about disinfectants I
was talking about light but I I probably
said it a little awkward way and they
took it out if context well why did you
say you were being sarcastic I just
wanted the whole thing to go away
because it wasn't
important you know didn't work it became
worse but you I just didn't want to
engage on it because I couldn't really
explain this technology it's just
something I saw in the
news so imagine him having like a human
conversation with people who have been
told he was
Hiller I don't know how it could go
wrong really I mean unless unless one of
the people at lunch was just crazy so
you'd have to vet them a little bit make
sure they're at least reasonable people
you know not
crazies I think that seeing Trump
interact with normal
Democrats with
compassion and simply explaining to them
that the news is completely fake would
be the best thing he could do and and I
also think he can't win without
it you you think that he's on a Glide
path to winning I don't see that at all
I don't see that at all I think his odds
of winning are at best the coin flip at
best you know if you're thinking he's
70% chance of winning you were so wrong
he might win he might win but his odds
are not really that good because there's
just too much going on and I'm going to
tell you some more that maybe you were
not aware of that will convince you that
his odds of winning are not good and if
I had to guess he's the the one who
needs the Hail Mary
pass here's what everybody has wrong
they think the Democrats are in disarray
and that they need some kind of drastic
Hail Mary never done before you know
quick change rapid thing to get a new
candidate in there you're missing the
real
story Trump is probably not going to win
at the current
rate he's the one who probably has to do
something dramatic but not something
crazy dramatic something dramatically
normal something
dramatically human so he needs to be
dramatically human so that people can
see that their own side has been lying
to them dramatically human that that's
his goal I don't think he can win
without it because the brainwashing is
so strong how strong is the
brainwashing how much power is on the
other side I don't know let's see what
Tucker Carlson says about that if I can
make this
work we'll just listen to
Tucker so if you want to understand if
you really want to understand how the
American government actually works at
the highest levels and if you want to
know why they don't teach history
anymore one thing you should know is
that the most popular president in
American history was Richard Nixon
Richard Nixon yet somehow without a
single vote being cast by a single
American voter Richard Nixon was kicked
out of office and replaced by the only
unelected president in American history
so he went from the most popular
president to a president nobody voted
for huh wait a minute you may ask why
didn't I know that wasn't a criminal
wasn't he despised by all decent people
yeah no he wasn't what in fact if any
president could claim to be the People's
Choice it was Richard Nixon Richard
Nixon was reelected in 1972 by the
largest margin of the popular vote ever
recorded before or since ever Nixon got
17 million more votes than his opponent
less than two years later he was gone he
was forced to resign and in his place an
obedient servant of the federal agencies
called Gerald Ford took over the White
House how did that happen how did that
happen well it's a long story but here
are the highlights and they tell you a
lot Richard Nixon believed that elements
in the federal bureaucracy were working
to under the American system of
government had been doing that for a
long time what elements he often said
that he was absolutely right on June
23rd 1972 Nixon met with the then CIA
director Richard Helms at the White
House during the conversation which
thankfully was tap recorded what Nixon
suggested he knew quote who shot John
meaning President John F Kennedy what
Nixon further implied that the CIA was
directly involved in Kennedy's
assassination which we now know it was
what Helm's telling response total
silence but for Nixon it didn't matter
because it was already over 4 days
before on June 19th The Washington Post
had published the first of many stories
about a break-in at the Watergate office
building unbeknownst to Nixon and
unreported by the Washington Post four
of the five burglars worked for the CIA
the first of many dishonest Watergate
stories was written by a 29-year-old
Metro reporter called Bob Woodward what
who exactly was Bob Wood wward yeah who
was he well he wasn't a journalist what
Bob Woodward had no background
whatsoever in the news business none
instead Bob Woodward came directly from
the classified areas of the federal
government uhoh shortly before Watergate
Woodward was a naval officer at the
Pentagon he had a top secret clearance
he worked regularly with the Intel
agencies at times Woodward was even
detailed to the Nixon White House where
he interacted with Richard Nixon's top
AIDS did he soon after leaving the Navy
for reasons that have never been clear
Woodward was hired by the most powerful
news Outlet in Washington and assigned
the biggest story in the country he's a
good interviewer just to make it Crystal
Clear what was actually happening
Woodward's main source for his Watergate
series was the deputy director of the
FBI Mark felt and Mark felt ran and
we're not making this up the FBI's
co-intel proo program which was designed
to secretly discredit political actors
the federal agencies wanted to destroy
what people like Richard Nixon and at
the same time those same agencies were
ALS also working to take down Nixon's
elected vice president speiro agu uhhuh
in the fall of 1973 agnu was indicted
for tax evasion and forced to resign his
replacement was a colorless congressman
from Grand Rapids called Gerald Ford oh
what was Ford's qualification for the
job yeah what was it well he had served
on the warrant commission which absolved
the CIA of responsibility for President
Kennedy's murder uh Nixon was strong
armed into accepting Gerald Ford by
democrats in Congress quote we gave
Nixon no choice but Ford Speaker of the
House Carl Albert later boasted eight
months later Gerald Ford of the Warren
Commission was the president of the
United States see how that
works see how that
works any questions remember the part
where you said we're in good shape
because Trump's got a good lead in the
polls do you know who else had a real
good lead in the polls
Richard
Nixon you know who else had a real good
chance of
reelection
JFK do you know what two groups were
suspicious of the CIA and wanted less of
them
Nixon
JFK yep that's the world you live in
folks would you like to hear an upd dat
from RFK Jr talking about the
assassination of his father not JFK Jr
that's his uncle by his father uh
Bobby his version is
this siren s was waiting in one part of
the building where he got shot and that
wasn't the place that he normally would
leave the
building but for some reason unexplained
the person who was sort of guiding him
by the elbow took him to a
unusual you know nonregular exit where
Siran Siran was waiting huh kind of a
big coincidence that he was guided to
the place where the killer was which
wasn't even the normal
place and then what followed was San
Saran shooting uh all of the bullets in
his gun that were eight all eight
bullets now most of them were fired when
people had already grabbed his gun hand
so they weren't fired at RFK Jr they
were fired at the ceiling and maybe H
some other people whatever but there
were eight of them I mean they know they
know the gun has room for eight
bullets 14 bullets were shot this is RFK
Jr's take on it we know from the
recording that 14 bullets were shot from
the eight bullet
gun it would seem that the person who
took him by the elbow blew his head off
in the commotion
so that's the suggestion is that the CIA
made sure that Siran got it done because
they had a second shooter to finish the
job and the second shooter was probably
the guy who held him by the elbow and as
soon as the gun started shooting and
everybody started looking at the shooter
it looks like he just took a gun out of
his pocket and blew Kennedy's head
off or something like it now you say to
yourself how in the world could you be
hearing this story now if it's true with
all those Witnesses and all that well
that's a good question seemed like there
were a lot of people there somebody
would have seen something different but
just think about the other things that
you know are
true it's not that
unusual unfortunately it's not outside
the the realm of normal ordinary
government entity that they would have
murdered them right in front of a group
of people and you wouldn't know it I
don't think that's unusual
don't think so at all so it does seem
clear that the CIA has been running the
operation at least since then you know
at least since the 60s maybe before and
on paper there's no way it could go any
other way because it's an entity that's
trained to take over countries of course
they're going to do
it it just does a matter it's just a
matter of time but apparently it
happened a long time
ago now that doesn't mean that it's such
a clean ownership of the country that
they can just get everything they want
right away you know they have to go
through the pretending and the acting
like the process is working and then and
then when the time is right they'll just
give the
nudge now you know um You probably said
to yourself how in the world did we get
to this point where Biden was ever
president in the first place do you
think that the CIA was unaware of
Biden's uh
dementia of course they knew of course
they knew it's the
CIA do you think there was any doubt in
their minds that they had a demented
president of course not if they wanted
to change that how hard would it
be simple they just go to the Washington
Post the New York Times they say all
right we're Anonymous sources and we're
telling you from the intelligence
community that the president has
dementia and he's got to go it'd be the
easiest thing in the world because the
those entities would say all right
you're our normal Source we trust you
you got some details all right we'll
write that story but that story never
got written did it and I think Mike Benz
is correct the only reasonable
explanation is that the intelligence
Community is using Biden as an empty out
vessel for whatever they need to do they
apparently are getting what they need to
do done so they didn't need a change I
also think that you know 99% of the
presidency is the staff tells him what
to do and he says yes so
we did CH I think we Pro that you don't
really need a
president not not that much anyway you
do need need the president during the
emergencies but that's the same stuff
the CIA handles right if the president
gets awakened at 3:00 a.m. somebody from
the CIA is going to be in the room and
tell them what to think tell them what's
true and probably tell them what to do
so I think that's our government that
the intelligence people have control of
the things that intelligence people
control not everything in the world but
you know Wars and geopolitical stuff and
who gets elected I think that's all just
the CIA Tucker said it directly on the
all-in Pod that we're not a democracy or
even in the ballpark we're a group who
where there's a small group of unelected
people who decide who can be in the
primary and who's going to get elected
and it's been that that for a long time
so we're not a republic we're not a
democracy haven't been for a long time
yeah now how much is true about the
stories about Nixon and the stories
about Kennedy and the stories about the
other Kennedy well if only half of it's
true it's the same
story if only half of it's true
now uh some of us have said for a while
that we would know immediately when the
CIA decided to turn on Biden and they
needed to make a change and do you
remember me saying that as soon as you
saw Rob Ryder and Stephen King turn on
him that that was the
signal Rob Riner and Stephen King just
turned on
him so almost like it was coordinated
they both said we're out now they're not
voting for Trump of course but they're
saying uhoh we need a new
candidate coincidence
Rob rer has some contacts in the CIA he
he's the head of some group that has two
of the xcia groups in it heads in it so
he's very connected you we know that
from public documents you don't have to
no research
needed um so to me it looks
like those those two uh are off the
sinking ship now this gets us to our
Deadpool the pool of who would be the
most ridiculous celebrity who would be
the last one to abandon Biden when it's
so obviously he's mentally
deranged and I'm going to go still this
was my original guess with punchie
dairo and the reason is I don't think
he's a political asset I don't think
he's an intelligence asset I think he's
just
crazy and so I don't think that mentally
he can change his mind you may be just
too hard so so I still have him as the
last
celebrity who will abandon Biden just CU
his level of crazy looks different than
the
others all
right let's see what else is going on
here um in semaphor the publication
semaphor there there's talk about having
a blitz primary you know rapid fire
primary to get Biden um replaced you
know what the problem with that is
that even today Biden did a detailed
letter announcement saying he's not
quitting he's definitely not
quitting now here's the problem it
really is sort of up to him unless they
kill him un unless they actually cannedy
him it's him so you know they the CI I
think there's a good chance the CIA will
murder Biden maybe make it look like an
accident you know take him to the
hospital give him a shot sort of thing
so I'd say that the odds of Biden
surviving to election day um would be
high if you're just talking about him
being alive in his normal way his brain
will be gone but I think he'd be alive
by election day probably however I think
it's more like a coin flip I think the
odds of the CIA uh killing him just to
make sure that they have time to put
somebody else in there it's pretty good
it's pretty good maybe maybe 50% chance
they'll kill him now I'm not in favor of
that if I say it casually it's because
that's the world we live in the reason I
say it casually is that is the world we
live in that's not a fantasy there there
by now there must be guaranteed
conversations in the government about
killing
them because if they killed two
kennedies and if they took Nixon out and
they clearly tried to take Trump out
these are all intelligence assets
what would stop them from killing him we
all expect he's going to die soon so you
think if we heard that he had a heart
attack on on Air Force One and then the
CIA controlled whoever does the autopsy
you don't think they can get away with
that how hard would it be just give him
a shot of something and control the
autopsy that's it it's not even hard you
could murder him so easily just give him
the little shot control the autopsy say
oh doctors say totally normal man that
age completely expected he would have a
heart
attack so if he dies
suddenly uh without a long
illness it's going to look like murder
to
me you've been warned so I'd say that's
a coin
flip um and I don't think that there's
time for any Blitz primary I don't think
Biden's going to quit
and I'm going to go with Van
Jones um I think I said it before he did
but van Jones is saying now that kamla
is the candidate one way or the other
and people just have to sort of wrap
their heads around it she's either going
to be raised up the president which van
would call the easy way meaning if she
could take over now then it's a more
natural transition to be the candidate
because she would be the president it's
natural she would have control of the
funds you wouldn't have to do much work
you know it'd be fairly easy it'd be the
easiest
transition uh but van says if you can't
do it the easy
way which is Biden steps aside you're
going to have to do it the hard way
which is Biden's at the top of the
ticket but you convince people to vote
because they're voting for kamla does
that sound familiar that's my prediction
my prediction is
that when you flip the coin it's going
to land on the edge and stay there
meaning that we're going to have the
schrodingers candidate one dead and one
alive and you'll disagree on who you're
voting for so two Democrats will walk
into the voting booth they'll vote both
vote for the Democratic candidate for
president one will walk out with
thinking he voted for Biden the other
one will walk out with thinking he voted
for KL Harris it'll be the same vote
Schrodinger's candidate it's coming and
on paper there's no other way it can go
I was listening like I said the all-in
pod which is so influential I was
listening to David Sachs say essentially
the same thing that there's the design
of the current system there isn't any
way it's going to go a different way you
know you you could say there's a wild
card that you know Biden has a health
situation that's worse than we've seen
and that's possible but in all roads KLA
becomes the
candidate so there is no Road where she
doesn't become the candidate so
everybody who's doing as sax calls it
wish casting where where you do the
thing okay uh then and then Madonna
comes in with Oprah and uh between the
two of them they talk Michelle Obama
into running and no no none of that is
going to
happen they don't have the time they
don't have the will they don't have the
ability but more importantly they don't
have the
need they don't need to do
anything because their one and only
acceptable situation because the base
wouldn't allow anything else is that the
Dei hire kamla can't be skipped over so
she's got the money she's got the Dei
hire she's got the
job it's
her if if you're fantasizing it's
somebody else stop
and if you say to yourself oh but they
would never do that because you know
she's such a bad
candidate are you kidding have you been
paying
attention they ran
Biden you don't think that they're
worried you don't think that they'd uh
run kamla just because she's the second
worst candidate of all
time every bit of every bit of
indication is that they do want a weak
Hollow don't president like KLA Harris
as long as she's on their team that's
all that matters and they'll handle the
rest the fact that the stock market
doesn't even react to the fact that we
have too mentally incapable people vying
for the top position I'm talking about
the two Democrats here the fact that it
doesn't even react is kind of a general
acknowledgement that the important
people the ones with all the money don't
really think the president's said
important in the final
analysis all right um who else wants uh
Biden to leave let's see uh um you've
got uh Jerry nler is saying that uh
Biden should
leave now if you're looking for
signals that things have gone far enough
when Jerry Nadler says somebody should
get out politics for health reasons
Jerry
Nadler Jerry Nadler saying he should he
should drop down for health
reasons I mean what's left Adam Schiff
no longer supporting him what what do
you know when you know Adam Schiff is no
longer supporting Biden he didn't say
drop out he's he's Schiff is just
playing as Shifty he's sort of
noncommittal at this point what's that
tell you well would you expect that Adam
Schiff is a regular
Democrat no he's one of the uh the the
Liars he's the pro Liars he he's not as
bad as Jamie Rasin opposite man when
they send the opposite man out it's it's
so he can tell you the opposite of
what's true it's all he does he doesn't
ever do anything with Nuance it's like
uh did it rain today no it did not rain
today well why is everything wet why are
the clouds dropping these these things
that look like wet things well but
there's no water today everybody can see
it you know he's just opposite man just
like when they they send out worse than
Watergate guy it's not because he has
good opinions it's because they need the
worse than water gay guy so opposite man
and worse than water gay guy if you see
them both come out then the media is
hiding a big one and Adam shiff I think
based on his actions appears to be just
an intelligence asset would you agree
now the only reason I say that is that
way he acts he does things that don't
look like a regular politician and he's
also one of the you know the ones who
will go into the skiff and tell you that
he saw something that wasn't there I
mean that's pretty deep criminality
without actually being illegal I guess
um so there's no way he's a regular
politician right he's got some kind of
connections with the intelligence
Community otherwise I can't imagine he'd
even be there
so if you're losing those guys and
you're losing Rob Riner and Stephen King
it would seem that the intelligence
Community has decided they want Biden
out but I think they want KL Harris in
so don't expect to see a a rapid
primary very
unlikely uh Boeing is pleaded guilty to
criminal fraud for uh couple of air
plane crashes in which they uh conspire
to defraud the government so I I guess
they lied to the government about maybe
the details of that situation so that's
going to cost them $243
million which they'll make back in uh 10
minutes because the uh industrial
complex military-industrial complex will
give them A10 billion deal and then
they'll be able to pay their fine to the
government so I just assume all that's
crooked I don't know that I just assume
well over in France I've been trying to
figure out what's going on over there
because it's a confusing place but
here's what I understand you have
multiple parties not just
two so macron's party was one of three
that were let's say roughly equally
powerful but his was in power people
didn't like him the people on the right
didn't like him the people on the far
left didn't like him and so there was an
election and the one with the most votes
was the one on the far right but their
system apparently as some kind to runoff
situation and uh what happened was the
people on the far
left teamed up with I guess macron's
group so that they could pick their own
leader so basically if you had the two
um lesser loved groups together they
would have more powerful than the one
group that's the most powerful similar
to how Fox News is the biggest news
entity in the United States but if you
looked at it compared to all the other
entities they all lean the other
direction so it doesn't matter that fox
is the
biggest it matters that they've got so
many that they're still bigger they can
drown out Fox News so it's one of those
situations so in other words France
managed to create a
system that on paper would guarantee the
destruction of their country on paper
that you could do this kind of thing
thing which is give the public exactly
what they didn't ask
for it's exactly what they didn't ask
for is what they got and the group
coming in apparently is pro-immigration
so they can have more immigration not
less it was the main thing that
activated them to be so excited about an
election in the first place and why they
voted by very large numbers in favor of
the losing group even though they got
the most votes so their system is uh
pretty messed up and the current
thinking is that they've created a log
Jam in their own government which will
guarantee they'll never be able to do
anything good again and the immigration
will just destroy
them now why is France destroying
itself do you think it's bad she had
crazy women there
too because I can't understand men doing
it it's just not a male thing to do men
don't open their borders unless there's
some woman behind him that's that's
agitating for it yeah I don't really
understand it at
all so France is
dead uh or as I like to say i' like to
make this historical reference
Lafayette we're over
there all right how many thought that
was
funny
laet we'll be over
there no okay okay all right um there's
a whole new round of brain dead Biden
videos my favorites uh where he's
mumbling and looking like he's lost and
uh seriously people no joke no joke uh
no joke and then he tells some lies and
says no joke and then he brags about his
ice cream and his Ray bands and he tells
his three dimension stories do you
remember the story about
how when Biden was done with this
disastrous debate he met with his
supporters right after and he seemed to
be talking coherently somewhat to the
supporters and you said to yourself wait
a minute why is he suddenly kind of
coherent did you recognize the story he
told he was telling one of his U pocket
stories one of the stories he just tells
all the time I forget which one but it
was one of his standard stories and if
you're a dementia patient I'll take a
fact check on this I'm no expert but
don't you have long-term memory in other
words aren't you the most functional
when you're telling a story that you've
been telling for 50 years I think so I I
think you have trouble with stuff that
happened this week but if you've been
telling a story for 50 years you can
probably go to it so I
think that when he got off stage where
everything was unknown what the question
would be you know it was like a wild
west situation as soon as he got off
stage he he just they just probably said
and by the way I don't think it was his
idea I think somebody whispered in his
ear Joe just just tell that you know
Story three just tell Story three oh
yeah story three y all I remember and
then he makes up that same
story so look for him doing um whenever
he's talking about something that
happened a long time ago look for him to
look coherent
um even though it's just an old man
story but anytime he has to think on his
feet it's going to be a
disaster uh Biden's doctor has been uh
called in by Congress apparently Biden's
doctor had allegedly some involvement in
the Biden crime family
income did you ever wonder how did you
get a White House doctor that was not
going to oun the president for having
dementia how loyal would you have to be
that you would violate your your oath I
mean clearly he's violating his oath
wouldn't you agree is it safe to say
that the White House doctor has clearly
violated his oath I mean he's doing harm
he's doing harm to the country doing
harm to the patient I mean you couldn't
violate your oath any harder than that
because obviously he knew what the
situation was obviously he's been
lying right obviously I don't think
there's any doubt about it so now he's
being called into uh to be questioned
because there's some allegation that he
received a money through the Biden crime
family situation which would explain
everything if
true um there's a story that I wouldn't
say is validated but there's some
individual who claims to have access to
secret knowledge about what happened on
Air Force One and allegedly there was a
medical emergency in which uh Biden was
hallucinating and they had to I don't
know give him an antis psychotic or
something I would say the odds of that
being
true are not
zero but I wouldn't give it a lot of
credibility um it's a kind of story that
if you heard it about Trump I would be
saying and who's the source and you'd
say well anonymous source and then I
would say exactly yeah or an anonymous
source says the worst possible thing
happened when nobody was looking that's
the story really it's always it's always
the worst thing when nobody's
looking
so if I had if I had to bet on it I'd
bet against it being true but maybe only
a
6040 because there's a good chance he's
having medical situations we don't know
about well Biden uh says he's good for
employment but he did get one black
woman fired from her job
um apparently the radio station in
Philadelphia in which he did a friendly
interview recently and the questions
were given to the host to ask him and
she actually asked four of the eight
questions that they gave her and she got
fired but I don't think that's fair a as
a person who's worked in the media I
don't think that the
host who who used the four questions
should be fired
because isn't that
unusual I don't think it was meant to be
a hard-hitting interview it was meant to
be a friendly and those are fine there's
nothing wrong with do a friendly
interview right Sean Hannity talks to
Trump you don't see me bitching about
that right as long as there's also some
hard ones you do all the friendly ones
you want that's not a problem so to be
fired for doing a friendly interview and
then ALS Al being honest also being
honest she said yeah I got the questions
I picked four of them she didn't hide
anything why did she get
fired I think she got fired for being
honest I don't think she got fired for
using the questions what do you think I
think she deserves her job back I I
don't think this is an appropriate
firing whatsoever now it's a business
decision so they might have gotten so
much heat they just had to do it
but I I think this is totally unfair and
I think that the host should be rehired
and they should
apologize because what she did wasn't
that far outside of normal behavior it
certainly not firing offense and talking
I think she got fired for talking about
it I don't think she got fired for doing
it I think she got tired for talking
about they said it's for doing it but I
don't think that's
real yeah no that's unfair she should be
hired back
um
anyway let's see what else we got going
on here in this big old
day um have you noticed that the biggest
problem in the country is the debt
crisis and neither candidate has any
idea what to do about it should we be
worried about
that that we have one obvious
existential
problem but here's what I wonder about I
wonder if there's somebody somewhere in
the government who has figured out is
not the problem we think it is remember
I provocatively said the
following what if you just canceled all
the
debt just cancel it just say we're not
going to pay now I'm not recommending it
this is just a mental process who would
lose the
money are there any poor people who have
uh government
debt I doubt
it the last thing you can if you're poor
you're you're not you're not buying
government bonds so who does let's say
you're a middle class person who wants
to
invest where do you put your money not
in government bonds probably have it in
the stock market or real estate or
something like that so then you keep
going all right rich
people rich people who have more money
than they need to employ at the moment
might park it in bonds just because it
won't go wildly up or down
it's just sort of a safe place to park
some money it's all the parked
money what what would happen if you just
said all right it's all gone we're not
paying I'm not recommending it and I'm
not predicting it I'm just working
through the how much of a risk are we
really
at it it's mostly going to be foreign
governments who are parking money that
they didn't
need am I wrong you wouldn't put it
there unless you didn't need it that's
the place you put the money you don't
need so this is the most provocative
question in the country but what would
happen if we just said we're not paying
it
back who would be out it would be people
who didn't get back the
money that they didn't need because if
they needed it it wouldn't be there in
the first
place now they would become instantly
poor you know their buying power would
go down but you might even be able to to
you know work it out so there's some
gradual payback or something all right
now let's take a
hybrid how about we say we're not going
to pay you back in dollars we're only
going to pay you back in crypto that we
just made up and if you don't think it's
worth anything well maybe it is worth
something because we'll take it in
payment for taxes so you can always
exchange it to somebody who wants to use
it in payment for taxes you might have
to give up 5% just for the convenience
or something but you'll basically get
most of your money back and and you'll
get it back in the timing you were going
to when when the vehicles
mature um maybe you'd have to limit how
much they could sell right away because
you wouldn't want people you know
liquidating the entire trillions and
trillions you'd want them to do it in an
orderly fashion now that would the the
effect of that would be to inflate it
away right because if you introduce this
new money out of nowhere um it's is sort
of creating money out of nothing if you
pay back all the loans you've added
money to the system but you would be
adding it in a fairly orderly way and it
would eliminate what is close to a
trillion dollars a year in interest
payments which by the way still leaves
us with a trillion dollars a year
deficit we're we're still adding to the
debt two trillion a year that's the new
numbers uh if we took all the debt out
all the interest payments it would take
a trillion dollars off of our budget and
we wouldn't be anywhere near a balanced
budget only halfway there now if we got
down to 1 trillion deficit and somehow
we magically took care of the 35
trillion that's already out there with
some kind of crypto magic
trick could you survive with a trillion
dollar a year
deficit no no you couldn't no you can't
you would have to do something still
radical to make that go away now radical
could be growth you know for example you
could easily imagine that Trump comes in
and he says I'm not going to raise your
taxes but I'm going to raise taxes on
robots now the the public wouldn't even
quite understand that they say look the
robots are going to take your
jobs uh and anybody who can afford to
have a robot is
Rich so if you buy buy or sell a robot
there's going to be an extra tax on
there or maybe even a ongoing tax on
robots and uh that tax will will help us
you know get rid of that
deficit because a robot in theory should
be so much more
productive that you could pay a you know
a 10% tax on it and still be way ahead
you know you're not going to come out
now is everything I said sensible I
doubt it would any of what I said
work probably not but here's what I'm
adding I'm I'm if I've never described
this before let me describe it for you
for the first time if you haven't heard
this one of the things that people like
me can add to the system the system
being the country at this in this
context what I add to the system is
allowing you to think in a wider way
than you were for example when the
pandemic first hit I was among the first
public figures I think Jack pabic was
there too saying we need to close travel
from China do you know why I was doing
it so loudly and screaming it well
because it was an idea that people
couldn't quite imagine as a
possibility so somebody who's got less
to lose and no sense of Shame needs to
go out there and scream the thing that
seems impossible for anybody to even
consider CU until you consider it
you can't possibly do it so you have to
get used to considering something that's
way outside the realm of ordinary if you
need to do something way outside the
realm of ordinary and when it comes to
our deficit there is no ordinary
solution you're going to have to do
something you never did before would
never consider ordinarily is once one
time ever and is so wildly improbable
that even when I describe it you shake
your head and go H I don't know about
that that sounds like it's coming with a
lot of problems right so the thing I can
add is just make you think maybe there's
some Third Way maybe there's a crypto
magic way wouldn't be perfect it
wouldn't be perfect but is there some
other way and if the only thing it does
is make you say Scott your idea is
stupid for 10 reasons but you know what
it does make me think of something that
might work let me run this by
you that's what we're doing we're just
brainstorming
and in in addition to brainstorming
we're moving the envelope a little
bigger so that the people who can make
decisions and do know what they're
talking about you know let's say a
Warren Buffett Jamie Diamond you know
somebody who knows what they're talking
about maybe they can come in and say you
know what that's a that's a terrible
idea Scott but as long as you've reach
as long as You' stretched the
envelope now I can talk about my idea it
would have sounded badshit crazy until
you were even crazier than I was you
know what what once you've set the
standard of crazy now I've got a a place
to play in yeah this phenomenon is very
useful let me give you another example I
always talk about my favorite news
program on TV the five on um uh on Fox
News and one of the one of the things I
love about watching it is the design of
the show I always say the producers of
Fox News are just the best and one of
the things they do really well is
designing
shows who who they put with who you know
the groups of people that are on there
at the same very good and one of the
things that uh makes the five just so
much better than other shows honestly is
Greg geld and what geld does is he
always is stretching the limit of what
you should say on TV and what you should
say during a politically oriented show
which allows all the people to play in
the playground that he defines because
he takes the big risk and says I'm going
to say this and then you can say
something that you wouldn't have said
before but if geld hasn't been fired yet
you're probably safe and and you can you
can see that effect playing out and just
really obviously so Gutfeld defines the
space and keeps increasing it you know
he's making it bigger and bigger and
then you see the other the other people
who are great at what they do but
they're not necessarily the boundary
stretchers so that that team of five has
one boundary stretcher and then between
Dana Pino and Jesse Waters and whoever
you know then the judge and whoever else
is on there H they can play Within that
space and they're much safer and Freer
to do all that it's the same thing I
think Trump does this as well um when
Trump says I'm going to close the border
and and you know build a wall and all
that whatever the extreme stuff is he
makes the boundary of what is in the
conversation bigger and then the normal
people come can come in you know the the
Rubios and the governors of Texas and
the you know the people like that then
they can come in they've got a bigger
play space but somebody has to stretch
it you know I'm doing it here gfell does
it on the five Trump does it in politics
you need a stretcher and then you need
really capable people who can play in
that new playground so that's what's
happening all
right and that ladies and
gentlemen is a
conclusion of the greatest live stream
you're going to see all
morning and
uh if you'd like to know what else is
going on let's check the stock
market Tesla's up nvidia's
up Nano nuclear energy is up another
11% so I sold too soon uh let's see what
else is happening bitcoin's down so
bitcoin's had a a rough
month um and the S&P is up just a tiny
tiny bit and Apple's falling back a
little bit not much I mean 0.1 um so the
story on Apple is their next update will
not have a new version of Si
I can't say it because my phone's in my
hand um that the they will have ai in
their uh their new release that's coming
out soon in the fall but you're going to
have to wait till the spring some people
are saying for the
main voice of your Apple phone to be
updated into an AI context that's a
really long
time and you know I hate to bet against
Apple but boy are they vulnerable to
somebody coming in with a AI native
phone you know one that was built to be
an AI phone from the ground up and maybe
it's connected
[Music]
to
starlink maybe you never
know so that's what's happening today
ladies and gentlemen um that's the end
of my show I'm going to go talk to the
locals
subscribers as I always do and uh thanks
on X and on Rumble and on YouTube by the
way thank you to rumble because when I
do good shows the my Rumble numbers are
way up so on Rumble which is way way
smaller than YouTube um if I have a you
know a pretty good show that people want
to show I might get 10,000
viewers on um on YouTube I'll get
reliably about 30,000 not live but
watching the recorded version as
well if I do a great
show on YouTube I'll get 31,000 viewers
it'll go from 30,000 to 31 if I really
nail
it on Rumble if I have a good show goes
from 9,000 to
75,000 you know like the actual real
Market should work like if somebody
likes it they recommend it and then more
people see it you know the way actually
things should work but for some reason
that I just can't figure out
my YouTube numbers just always say the
same and weirdly even as my number of
subscribers has zoomed from you know
10,000 to over what 165,000 now 165,000
subscribers and my average daily number
of viewers
flat for
years totally natural right when my my
Twitter SLX numbers went from nothing to
1.1
million my local subscribers went from
nothing to over
11,000 and growing every day but my
YouTube channel that YouTube
traffic just stays about the same now
just just to be technical a couple of
them did go
bigger but it was rare yeah it was rare
so keep an eye on that anyway so I'm
going to go talk to the locals people
thanks on thanks Rumble the next and uh
YouTube to I'll see you tomorrow same
place same
time
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e e