Coffee With Scott Adams — Knowledge Archive May 24, 2026
Scott Adams Philosophy Archive
Search ideas
Episodes Episode #2546 Segments
NewsReaction Media & Fake News

Back to episode — Episode 2546 CWSA 07/25/24

Context —

time. As soon as my body was better, brain on point, everything's fine. So I always think it's a mistake to imagine that your brain and your body are separate creatures. It's just your brain. Your body's part of your brain. If you treat it that way, you're going to get much better results. So do your exercise and your diet and get that right. Well, apparently there's reports that NORAD intercept…

← Previous segment →

estionable. Well there's the O'Keefe Media Group. James O'Keefe is looking into this Democrat funding group called ActBlue. And you're probably surprised at how much money suddenly flowed into Kamala Harris as soon as she became the obvious candidate. Who's going to be the wealthy candidate? And apparently ActBlue is collecting thousands of contributions from like one person. Not one person but there are individuals, multiple individuals who are donating thousands of times and donating tens of thousands of dollars. It's all fake. In other words somehow this organization, according to O'Keefe that would be the allegation, they probably knowingly, I don't know about the knowingly but there seems to be evidence that their money is being laundered. And that would mean it's coming from some large big source and then it gets turned artificially into lots of fake contributions from individuals. So one person could put in a million dollars but then the paperwork would look like it came from a hundred thousand different people who gave ten dollars or whatever. So I don't know if any of that's true. Those are the allegations and O'Keefe Media Group is on it.

Then we've all watched this really just head shaking experience where we all thought that Kamala Harris was the border czar. Do you know why we all thought Kamala Harris was the border czar? It's because the government told us and then every news source told us. Every news source, the left, the right, all of them. And then as soon as she's running for president and the border was a big disaster the news is telling us she was never the border czar. My God you lying Republicans. Why are you calling her a border czar when she was never any kind of a border czar? And then all the memers got the compilation videos together. So my favorite one you've seen by now is the one that shows the news calling her a border czar and then the same news network saying whoever called her a border czar she's never been a border czar. And then it goes to the next network. So it's like CNN then MSNBC. She's the border czar. She's been Kamala Harris. She's the border czar. Clip. She's not a border czar. Who, why are they even saying that? That Republicans just making up stuff now. Why are they saying the border czar? It's unfuckingbelievable to watch it happen live.

So do you think that brainwashing is real? Of course it is. This is just pure brainwashing. If you ever imagined that the news was a legitimate news organization, well this should change your mind pretty quickly. And how many Democrats are aware that this switcheroo is happening? None. None. Maybe Michael Ian Black because he was brave enough to open a channel with the other side of the world. So maybe he's seen it. But I'll bet you 99.99999 percent have never seen that she was definitely, absolutely, no doubt about it called the border czar by all the media that says she's never been the border czar. Hilariously, will this matter? Nope. No. You would think that this would be like a gigantic scandal. You know why it's not a gigantic scandal? Because it's the news. The news doesn't tell you that they are a gigantic scandal. The news just takes you to the next story. So there's nobody to report them as a gigantic scandal because it's about them. Now of course you know Fox News will have its fun and Breitbart will have its fun and a bunch of independent right-wing media will have its fun. But nobody on the left will see it. So it will have no impact on the election whatsoever. They will be completely unaware that this is brainwashing.

Meanwhile there was a site called GovTrack. So it was a nonpartisan platform and they would rank people based on how liberal they are. So in 2019 they had ranked Kamala Harris as the most liberal senator. But that page just disappeared. Huh. Isn't that interesting? It was up there and then it disappeared. Now maybe it disappeared because she's not currently a senator. That's a possibility. So I don't want to assume that I know that what's really going on here. But are you suspicious that something that used to be really bad for her re-election just sort of disappeared? Well I've got questions. I don't know for sure. There wasn't a real reason for it. I don't know that. What am I seeing here? Yeah so if they just deleted it it's definitely, if it was deleted some time ago then maybe there was some reasons that she wasn't a current sitting senator or something like that. But if it just happened, it's hard to imagine there's any reason other than the fact she's running for president.

What about the search engines? Well we got questions about that. Elijah Schaffer was looking into that. Vigilant Fox was reporting on X. And it looks like something fishy is going on. If new audit reveals, I'm not sure what an audit, you know that word might be stretched a little bit, but some experimentation let's say with the Google and YouTube search results. It's really hard to find negative news about candidate Harris. Turns out if you search on YouTube or you search on Google you get a lot of hits. Will they be real? Well it looks like they're gamed. Now we know from Dr. Robert Epstein's research, no relationship to Jeffrey Epstein, that a small change in the Google search results changes the vote. Does this look like a small change in the Google search results? Yes it does. Should according to Dr. Epstein would this change the election outcome? Yes it would. Is this brainwashing? Yes it is. This is brainwashing. Yeah, yeah. Calling it propaganda feels like underplaying it. This is actually just brainwashing.

So let's look at the MSNBC brainwashing channel. MSNBC's Joy Reid is telling black people that they would look real weird in her view if they don't vote for Kamala Harris. Quote, you're going to look real crazy being on the other side of that line particularly as a person of color, Reid said. And she gushed over Biden's dropout address and said this was selfless on a level I think that's important in a way that we talk about George Washington being selfless. Yeah, clinging to the job until it's almost too late to replace them, giving the country no real choice until they have to act against the let's say the traditions and rules of their own party to pick somebody at the last minute and try to slot them in with some hope that they can win an election. It's because Joe Biden was so selfless like George Washington. Do you know what offends me about this? She just compared the president of the United States to a slave owner. That's too far. I don't think Joy Reid should be allowed to slime Biden by calling him a slave owner. I mean by association. If she's reminding you of a slave owner I don't think that's good, is it?

All right well you know I'm being facetious but certainly you can't call MSNBC any kind of a news channel. They're into serious brainwashing. But what about other people? Maria Shriver used to be married to Arnold Schwarzenegger and of course part of the Kennedy family. So she's a big Democrat. She posted on X, it's worth noting how different men with power behave. President Biden had all the power in the world and he gave it up. He passed it on. He is reminding us what strong brave men do. All right is Maria Shriver brainwashed or dumb? I can't tell. Or is she just lying? Brainwashed, dumb or lying. Really can't tell. It's a tough one. I don't think she's stupid because would Arnold marry somebody who was stupid? I don't think so. And there's no evidence that she's stupid. She seems very high functioning capable person. So I'm going to rule out stupid. Let's rule out stupid. She's obviously too smart for that. Is she brainwashed or does she know what she's doing? I don't know. It's hard to know.

Let's do another one. So Representative Burchett, Republican, called Kamala Harris a DEI hire. And so CNN had a guest on to remind us that when you hear DEI you should think the n-word. Is that what DEI means to you? You should think the n-word. DEI isn't about black people. Why does their black guest think that DEI is about black people? That's not about black people. It's about diversity in general of all kinds. Sexual, gender preference, religious, every kind of ethnic group. So it's definitely not a replacement for the n-word. But you know CNN's not a serious news organization during a political election certainly. And it looks like the attack will be to call people who say DEI is a bad system, to call them racists. Now I'm cancelled so I can keep saying it all I want. The rest of you you better be careful because it's going to get, I think it will be soon a firing offense to say somebody is a DEI hire if it's not already. It probably is in corporate America. But I can say it because it's true. You know who else can say it? President Biden. Because when he talked about Kamala he said to me the value of diversity, equality and inclusion, in other words DEI, are literally the core strengths of America. That's why I'm proud to have the most diverse administration in history that taps into the full talents of our country. It starts at the top with the vice president. So there he is saying that she is under the DEI umbrella of hiring. Now Burchett would think she's unqualified. Biden would say she is qualified. But we're looking, we can see for

Context —

ourselves that she's not qualified, right? You don't have to be super partisan to see it. The reason she got zero delegates on her own team is because her own team felt she was unqualified, right? So we shouldn't be having a conversation about whether she's qualified because both teams have kind of come to the same conclusion. Except that they don't like Trump so they're going to act like she is b…

Next segment → →