ourselves that she's not qualified, right? You don't have to be super partisan to see it. The reason she got zero delegates on her own team is because her own team felt she was unqualified, right? So we shouldn't be having a conversation about whether she's qualified because both teams have kind of come to the same conclusion. Except that they don't like Trump so they're going to act like she is because even unqualified is better than Trump they would say. But we're certainly in agreement that she's not the best choice for the job. And DEI is of course the reason. Of course it's the reason.

Now of course there's a big push on Trump's going to steal your democracy. And I'm disappointed in Republicans for not already having a list of ways that the Democrats and Kamala Harris plan to steal your democracy. What is wrong with you people? You people Republicans in charge of Trump's campaign. This is obviously missing. You need a tight list. Maybe 10 things would be good. 10 things that everybody agrees is happening that are clearly taking away your freedom. Because they're just simply saying that Trump is going to steal your democracy and you look at their examples and they're just batshit crazy. I said this before. One of their ways that he's trying to steal your democracy is by keeping guns legal as the Constitution would suggest. Because if you're less safe you have less freedom and guns make you less safe she would argue. That's an actual argument for how they're taking your freedom and your democracy. Now that's pretty crazy stuff. But let's see if you could make a better argument the other way. Is there anything that they're doing? Well we know that Kamala Harris has said she's interested in potentially limiting the eating of red meat for the climate I guess. So you have cows farting up the air. So is that freedom? Telling you that you can't eat the most basic food in the human diet for a hundred thousand years that as far as we know is completely healthy. So which one's freedom? Now she would probably define it as say well if we get rid of the cows you'll have the freedom to be free from climate change which doesn't appear to be real if you look at their own climate predictions and projections and compare it to what they've predicted and projected. There seems to be no reality to it.

Then the Democrats would like to limit what car you can buy so you can only buy an electric car. Trump says he's not a big fan of the electric car but so you should definitely be able to buy an electric car. It's great for some people but you should have the option to buy the more. Which one's taking your democracy? The one that says you can buy the vehicle you want or the one that says you can't? It's kind of easy.

What do you think? Open borders. Are open borders helping your democracy in the United States? It looks like that's the opposite. The open borders appear to be designed for the specific purpose of thwarting democracy. Stacking people in areas that will give you more representation, more electoral votes. Bring in people who may be part of a fraudulent campaign for the election. We don't know yet but it looks like that's the only reason to bring them in. So it looks like you're rigging an election to me. That looks like stealing your democracy.

How about dividing us by identity? Did dividing the country by identity and continually pushing the us versus them within the public, is that making you freer? More democracy? Well it's free speech but you know both sides at that sort of. I don't think that's making me freer. There are entire places that it feels like it would be dangerous to go if you wore your MAGA hat. How many of you have ever avoided a place because the country was just too hot now and you knew that if they identified you as a let's say a Trump supporter you'd be in trouble? Probably all of you. So you can't even travel to places and wear what you want. You can't even wear the shirt that you want in the United States. You cannot wear a pro-Trump shirt without getting your ass kicked. That's the freedom that they've given you. And that certainly never existed before.

How about DEI? Is DEI an example of freedom and democracy? It literally says white men can't get jobs. Now I know that if you're the one Democrat watching this you're saying Scott you fool it's not about preference for a race it's about giving everybody an equal chance. No you idiots. In the real world if you make that a priority then less qualified people will of course be hired so that you don't violate the diversity rules. Of course you'll hire less qualified people. Now that doesn't mean everybody's less qualified. It means you're going to pick a less qualified one if you can't find one that's qualified. But of course there are plenty people qualified but not enough, not nearly enough for all the demand. So as long as you've got that supply and demand imbalance you will hire in unqualified people like Ka