Back to episode — Episode 2595 CWSA 09/12/24
Context —
day are dying from fentanyl, but that's the cost of having this control, and that's worth it. I feel like that would explain everything, and it would be consistent with all observations. It's consistent with human behavior. It's consistent with incentives, and it's consistent with history. It might not be true, but it's the only thing that fits the observations. Because if you're telling me that…
← Previous segment →ould completely explain a lot of things if nobody told Trump, which is why he's saying things like we'll bomb the cartels, which will never happen. That would explain everything, wouldn't it?
And Mike Benz, you know, is let's say compatible with the idea that we have some cartel-related dealings with the government south of us. The details could be wildly different than what I'm speculating, but it does seem like we may have a cozy relationship in some way that's not completely public.
All right. According to Project Veritas, they're still in operation even though they lost O'Keefe. There's this Department of Justice immigration attorney that says they got him undercover saying that Biden has the authority to end illegal immigration but he doesn't because Democrat mega donors control the border. The Gateway Pundit is reporting that. Does that sound right to you? Now just because it's a DOJ immigration attorney, that doesn't necessarily mean he knows what's happening. He might be talking as just a citizen who's speculating like the rest of us. Because if you asked me what's going on, I'd say well, somebody's controlling that border. I think the DOJ person legitimately believes that the mega donors are controlling the border. But I don't think he understands that the mega donors are in turn owned by whatever that deep entity is that's running things behind the scenes.
So if this DOJ's belief is that let's say Soros is the funder who's keeping the border open, does he go further and say is Soros his own man? Soros is now elder and younger. Are they their own men or are they influenced by somebody? Let me give you the most obvious interpretation: they're not independent. The most obvious, I mean let's be honest. Alex Soros is getting married to Huma Abedin. Does that look organic to you? To me that reminds me of the old kings and queens in Europe. You know, you'd have to marry your German cousin or something to make sure that everybody's not going to sell you out. Keep it in the family. So to me it looks like a keep-it-in-the-family move. And that the Soros money, it's just what it looks like. Do I have any proof? Nah, no. I'm saying that if you're trying to understand the world, the world in which he's just donating because he thinks it's good for the immigrants is kind of absurd. It is good for the immigrants, but it's absurd to imagine that's why they're doing it. The why of it is clearly something that we're not being told. So what would that be? It all comes back to basically the same answers for everything. The people behind the curtain.
All right. Did you know Ryan Setera was reporting on this? That when there's a debate, there's always somebody who hooks it up to a dial test. Now a dial test is where you get what you hope is a mixed group of people in a room, and they literally have a little dial where they're sitting, each of them. And as
Context —
they're watching the debate, if they like what they're hearing, they'll dial it up, and then they'll dial it down if they don't like what they're hearing. So you can see, overlaid when the candidates are talking, you can see the graphs moving. Oh, they like what they're saying right now. Oh, and then they're divided by independents, Democrats, and Republicans. Now you would not be surprised that…
Next segment → →