Coffee With Scott Adams — Knowledge Archive May 24, 2026
Scott Adams Philosophy Archive
Search ideas
Episodes Episode #2595

Episode 2595 CWSA 09/12/24

Episode #2595 Sep 12, 2024 1:00:09 32,632 views

An earlier and shorter show today only ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.

Opening General Commentary

Yeah, I'm early. I'm early. I'll tell you about that in a minute. Well, we don't know how many people are going to join us in this new earlier shorter version of the show, but eleven of us so far. You're the ones I call the high achievers. Get in here, will you? Let's figure out how this day is goin…

View segment →
SimultaneousSip General Commentary

s sip habit in you. I feel like I have to deliver every single day. So here I am. And if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that nobody can even understand, well, all you need for that is a cup or mug or glass, a tankard, a chalice, a canteen, a jug or flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill…

View segment →
MainContent Cognitive Reframing

goodness. Well, I've got the swaddling blanket of comfort on me today because it seems to me that the country is in a weird mental state. And what you need is, well, me. You need me. You need me to snap you out of this bad mental state. It looks like there's doom coming from every direction and the…

View segment →
NewsReaction Career & Life Strategy

announced that they're going to put a limit on junior investment bankers' hours. So if you're a junior investment banker at JP Morgan, they will no longer let you work more than eighty hours per week, no matter how much you want to. What? Who works eighty hours a week unless it's their own company?…

View segment →
NewsReaction Politics as Persuasion

But even I don't work eighty hours a week. Eighty hours a week. Do you have any idea what that would do to you? I mean, there's a report of somebody dying from overwork, and in Japan you hear about it all the time. But there's no good reason to make somebody work eighty hours a week. There's no way…

View segment →
NewsReaction Persuasion

of a more racist organization, like just overtly racist, than MSNBC? Actually I can't think of one. I actually can't think of any. Well, that's weird. It seems like there'd be some competition for the top spot, but there really isn't. Yeah, MSNBC is so blatantly racist that they're going after Laura…

View segment →
MainContent Media & Fake News

what's happening. So the Democrats are like, all right, you've got Laura Loomer, ha ha. And then we say, oh yeah, you've got Dick Cheney, ha ha. And then the Democrats say, well, you've got that terrible person Scott Adams. And then I say, oh yeah, you've got Adam Kinzinger. And then they say, we've…

View segment →
NewsReaction Politics as Persuasion

the evidence that there was something real happening. And maybe there's something real happening, but the odds of it being a secret sonic weapon were really not very high. Now, could I be wrong and someday they'll find a secret sonic weapon? Sure, because unlike the news, I do not declare that some…

View segment →
NewsReaction Health & Biohacking

ed to." You know what I mean? We used to have an outdoor cat. It didn't come home. We don't know why, but there are mountain lions and all kinds of dangerous things out there, and outdoor cats disappear a lot. And sometimes they'll be gone for days and come back. Now if you had heard that the immigr…

View segment →
MainContent Politics as Persuasion

oking at or whether it's been edited, whether it's AI. You can't tell. But my best guess is that there's a little bit to it, but the rest might be a mass hysteria. Because then people say, but my cat's missing for two hours. They got my cat. And then they complain about the cat and you hear about i…

View segment →
NewsReaction Politics as Persuasion

day are dying from fentanyl, but that's the cost of having this control, and that's worth it. I feel like that would explain everything, and it would be consistent with all observations. It's consistent with human behavior. It's consistent with incentives, and it's consistent with history. It might…

View segment →
MainContent Decision Making

ould completely explain a lot of things if nobody told Trump, which is why he's saying things like we'll bomb the cartels, which will never happen. That would explain everything, wouldn't it? And Mike Benz, you know, is let's say compatible with the idea that we have some cartel-related dealings wi…

View segment →
MainContent Persuasion

they're watching the debate, if they like what they're hearing, they'll dial it up, and then they'll dial it down if they don't like what they're hearing. So you can see, overlaid when the candidates are talking, you can see the graphs moving. Oh, they like what they're saying right now. Oh, and the…

View segment →
NewsReaction Hypnosis & Influence

right now feels to me like an expression of my mating instinct. I'm literally showing off. That's what I'm doing. Like right now. I mean I do it for other reasons too, but the other reasons are my conscious reasons. My conscious reasons are oh, I enjoy this topic and it's easy and I like dealing wit…

View segment →
MainContent Media & Fake News

at nobody can be okay with that. At least half the country, they can't be okay with it. So the IVF thing could be a surprising home run that nobody saw coming just because it's one of the few things that taps into your most basic instinct, which we act on all day long but we're not aware of it. So…

View segment →
MainContent Politics as Persuasion

not really an argument on the other side that you know there was no way to vote without mail-in ballots. So mail-in ballots are a signal of an intention to cheat. What about the use of voting machines which we've been told are totally secure? Well, have you heard of the Secure It Act? So that's a p…

View segment →
MainContent Systems vs Goals

say Pennsylvania mail-in ballot. I posted the link to the Pennsylvania mail-in ballot because winning Pennsylvania might be the whole game. A lot of people say so. If you wanted to just drill in on the one lever that might move the whole thing, besides IVF which could be surprisingly effective, you…

View segment →
NewsReaction Politics as Persuasion

is she talking from beyond the grave? She's seventy-eight. But she's a cat lady. She's adopted kids but didn't have her own kids. But she does have a cat. And she said in her message, quote, "Trump hates women, immigrants, and people of color." How do all the batshit crazy women come to that opinion…

View segment →
Closing General Commentary

ntlemen, this is my show for the day. I'm not going to talk to the locals people privately today because I got to run. But have a great day, and I will get back to you maybe tonight in the man cave for the locals people, but I'm not sure yet. And I will talk to you soon. Thanks for joining. And I'll…

View segment →

Yeah, I'm early. I'm early. I'll tell you about that in a minute. Well, we don't know how many people are going to join us in this new earlier shorter version of the show, but eleven of us so far. You're the ones I call the high achievers. Get in here, will you? Let's figure out how this day is going to go. We're going to have some fun.

All right, I've got a little scheduling overlap today, so I'm doing the show earlier and shorter. But I didn't want to miss out. I didn't want you to wake up and say, "Where's my simultaneous sip?" Which for many of you might be recorded, but I hope you figure it out and come here and make it all work. Because I take some responsibility for having developed a simultaneous sip habit in you. I feel like I have to deliver every single day. So here I am.

And if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that nobody can even understand, well, all you need for that is a cup or mug or glass, a tankard, a chalice, a canteen, a jug or flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. Join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine of the day. The thing that makes everything better is called the simultaneous sip, and it happens now.

Go.

When I say I needed that. Oh my goodness.

Well, I've got the swaddling blanket of comfort on me today because it seems to me that the country is in a weird mental state. And what you need is, well, me. You need me. You need me to snap you out of this bad mental state. It looks like there's doom coming from every direction and the elections look iffy. Yeah, we'll fix all that. I've got an idea to fix all of it actually. Really. So although today's story will be short, you're about to see the best idea ever. Just wait for that.

Well, JP Morgan announced that they're going to put a limit on junior investment bankers' hours. So if you're a junior investment banker at JP Morgan, they will no longer let you work more than eighty hours per week, no matter how much you want to. What? Who works eighty hours a week unless it's their own company? Well, you can make millions as an investment banker if you do everything right, but it looks like there's a lot of competition for those jobs.

And so the question I ask myself is, if I can see a timesheet for that entire eighty hours, how much of that time are you like just really kicking out the work? Because you know, recently I got some attention for having a good work ethic because I like to show up every day and I'm not big on vacations. I like to work every day. But even I don't work eighty hours a week. Eighty hours a week. Do you have any idea what that would do to you? I mean, there's a report of somebody dying from overwork, and in Japan you hear about it all the time. But there's no good reason to make somebody work eighty hours a week. There's no way that that extra ten hours or twenty hours at the end is your good time. You would have to have all kinds of breaks, and I don't know, you're going to have to have an affair with your co-workers to make that all work. So a pretty broken system.

Meanwhile, MSNBC has decided to spend some considerable time telling its audience what a terrible person Laura Loomer is. Now Laura Loomer is, if you've not heard that name, she's associated with the right, and she's, I guess I would say, an independent researcher journalist. And she's broken some good scoops, so she's got some serious credibility in terms of scoops. But she's also controversial, and it's not my job to defend anything that anybody else said. So you should hear this first. I'm not defending anything that anybody else said. But do I need to? Why would that be my job? No, I'm on a pirate ship. All right, I signed up to be on a pirate ship. If they let another pirate on the pirate ship, you know what I'm not going to do? I'd like to examine your past statements for acceptability. No, I'm going to take whatever weapons that pirate has because we need to get a mission done, and I don't give a rat's ass what anybody ever said to offend you.

Do I agree with everything ever said by RFK Jr.? I doubt it. I mean, I can't think of a specific example, but I doubt it. Do I think he shouldn't be on the pirate ship? No, I think he should be very much on the pirate ship. I want to be on the same ship as him. So Laura Loomer is very effective, and they wouldn't be talking about her unless she had made a big dent in the universe. And if you're a pirate who can make a big dent in the universe and you want Trump to win because I think it's vital to the survival of the United States, and that's the kind of pirate I don't mind associating with.

But it's kind of funny because we've entered this weird political mode where we're trying to take people down by who they associate with. And then it's kind of a contest. It's like MSNBC say, all right, all right, we're going to say that Trump is associating with this horrible racist. They would say Laura Loomer. And of course that's weird because MSNBC is the most famously corrupt and racist organization in the public knowledge. That would be an interesting question. Could you think of a more racist organization, like just overtly racist, than MSNBC? Actually I can't think of one. I actually can't think of any. Well, that's weird. It seems like there'd be some competition for the top spot, but there really isn't. Yeah, MSNBC is so blatantly racist that they're going after Laura Loomer now.

Again, I'm not defending Laura Loomer. I know you're going to say the ADL. I thought of the ADL, but they're so special purpose that they seem like a different kind of animal. Yeah, the ADL is not my favorite organization. They defamed me in public because racist. Yeah, you're right. The ADL might be competitive because they went after me because they're racists, I assume. I mean, they made a racist claim about me anyway.

So here's what's happening. So the Democrats are like, all right, you've got Laura Loomer, ha ha. And then we say, oh yeah, you've got Dick Cheney, ha ha. And then the Democrats say, well, you've got that terrible person Scott Adams. And then I say, oh yeah, you've got Adam Kinzinger. And then they say, we've got that terrible person, fill in the blank. I feel like there are enough terrible people according to other people that we could do this all day long.

All right, now here's the funniest story of the day. As I told you, that every meme about Trump is funny, and I don't know how it expands all generations. Whatever it is that's funny about Trump as a personality or a character or a meme or whatever, it works for every generation. And on TikTok today, this is real by the way. This sounds like I'm making it up, but it's real. There's a viral trend going on where the TikTokers, young ones like older teens, are dancing to Trump saying at the debate, "They're eating our dogs. They're eating our pets." And they've turned that into an autotune sort of a line that they dance with. So you can hear Trump's voice: "They're eating our dogs. They're eating our pets." And you see the people dancing: "They're eating our dogs. They're eating our pets." And it's freaking hilarious.

And where does that come from? Like where in the world of all the things that a TikToker could dance to, they pick that? And it works. It works. It's hilarious. And I watched several of them this morning, and I thought, oh, I'm glad I saw those. Those are pretty good. So that never gets old.

Anyway, are they eating our pets? Well, let me tell you how the news determines whether something is true. Would you like to see an example of me doing some investigative journalism? Watch. There's nothing behind that closed door. How do I know? Well, I don't see anything behind it. Well, but that's because the door is closed. So how could you see something behind the door if the door is closed? Well, there's no reports whatsoever of anything from behind the door. I know, but you wouldn't necessarily hear about it unless you talk to the right people, as in opening the door. But there's no indication there's anything behind the door. I know, but you can't know what's behind the door unless you open the door and look. I don't know. You sound like a conspiracy theorist because you're always thinking there's something behind the door when we've proven there's not. No, you didn't prove it. You didn't prove it. You simply stated it without checking. That's the opposite of proving. Proving would be doing something actively. Not doing something is called not proving it.

So yeah, we know that no dogs or cats are being eaten because some of the news people ask the government. They ask the government. Now I would like to put out at least an alternative hypothesis to the eating of the pets. There may have been somebody who tried to kill a goose at the park. I think that's likely. I mean, if you needed food and you're used to killing ducks and geese where you grew up and you saw a goose and it looked like it was free, I could see that happening. The cats and dogs part, especially the cats, seems like it's at least a little bit likely to be a mass hysteria. I know, I know, I'm a broken record. Mass hysterias everywhere. So it could be that I'm just filtered that way, so I see mass hysterias because my brain is kind of tuned to look for them. That's how I knew that there would be no information about a secret sonic weapon at the embassies, because that was really a classic mass hysteria, even with all the evidence that there was something real happening. And maybe there's something real happening, but the odds of it being a secret sonic weapon were really not very high.

Now, could I be wrong and someday they'll find a secret sonic weapon? Sure, because unlike the news, I do not declare that something doesn't exist simply because I haven't seen it. What I did predict is that they wouldn't find it. It would never be confirmed. So think of it as a prediction, not a fact. So far the prediction is holding.

Now let me ask you this. If you went to my neighborhood, my current neighborhood, and you surveyed all of the people here and you said, "Do you have an outdoor cat?" Some of them would say yes. An alarming number of them would say, "We used to." You know what I mean? We used to have an outdoor cat. It didn't come home. We don't know why, but there are mountain lions and all kinds of dangerous things out there, and outdoor cats disappear a lot. And sometimes they'll be gone for days and come back. Now if you had heard that the immigrants in your town were eating cats and then your cat disappeared, what would you tell people? "Uh oh, I think they got my cat. They may have eaten my cat."

Now that's how a mass hysteria starts. Because if you have a natural situation where cats disappear pretty much all the time, I mean outdoor cats, they don't last a long time where I live. So you could imagine that people would start hearing stories of other people losing their cats and presuming it was the immigrants, etc. So here's my best guess of what's really happening. My best guess is that there are a few legitimate claims of an immigrant eating an animal. Might have been a goose. Might even be one example or two where somebody ate an animal like a pet. Maybe. I wouldn't rule it out because I haven't seen it. And you're going to say to me, but Scott, we've seen the videos and the phone calls and stuff. Well, I don't trust anything anymore. I don't trust any videos. You don't know where they came from or what you're really looking at or whether it's been edited, whether it's AI. You can't tell.

But my best guess is that there's a little bit to it, but the rest might be a mass hysteria. Because then people say, but my cat's missing for two hours. They got my cat. And then they complain about the cat and you hear about it, but they don't tell you later the cat came home in two hours. I think it might be that. But again, I'm speculating. So unlike the news, I can't tell you what is a fact without investigating.

All right. In Aurora, the town of Aurora, ten members of that Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua have been arrested. Fox News says they're associated with that alleged building takeover. So the question of whether a building has been taken over or not is still a little bit contentious. I think Aurora is saying no, but there are gang members, and they put out a statement saying that the gangs are not taking over Aurora and they've got things under control. Well, maybe.

According to the Express, there's a big breakthrough in prosthetic hands. So a mechanical hand for somebody who's lost a hand, they figured out how to make it controlled by the brain. So they actually showed a video of somebody with a mechanical hand whose brain was controlling the fingers and the grip. And Daniel, a thirty-four-year-old from Italy, he tested it because he'd lost a hand. And he said, quote, "It feels like I'm moving my own hand." Oh my God. Really? Really? Could that be true? Because the hard part would be the part where you feel like it's your own hand. I don't know how they did that. I mean, I suppose it could be just a psychological phenomenon as much as a physical one. I don't know.

But what if this is true? And by the way, this is a little too good to be true. It falls into the category of maybe the demo worked, but you know, maybe it's not so easy to just slap these on people and say there you go, you got a new hand. But it does raise some questions. If you can get a prosthetic hand that feels just like you're moving your own hand, makes me wonder what other options are available. I'm going to sip a coffee while you fill in the joke. Not even saying the obvious. I'm just letting you fill in your own joke at home. See, it's a prosthetic hand that feels just like your own. But if I were at home and I were writing this joke, I'd say something like this: I wonder if I can get a female hand that doesn't sound like it feels like it's my own. All right, I had to say it.

All right, what else do we got going on? Fentanyl is killing two hundred people a day in the United States and costing 1.5 trillion per year, according to the Times of India. And their headline is "How China is destroying US families with deadly drug fentanyl." Well, yes, it's true that China seems to be the source of the precursors, and they do seem to pretend that they're going to do something about it while clearly not doing anything about it or anything that matters. And then they send that to the cartels in Mexico, and the cartels process it and ship it across the border and kill two hundred people a day in the United States. That would be about one every eight minutes. One every eight minutes.

So we've been on for thirty-three minutes or let's say I've been on for three deaths. So we could change the way we keep time in the United States by having eight-minute increments. That's one fentanyl overdose death. So we're three fentanyl ODs into the show. Oh, hold on, hold on. Four. Somebody else just died. Every eight minutes. Every eight minutes somebody's dropping dead from fentanyl. In another eight minutes I might remind you there's another one.

Now here's my current working hypothesis on this. There's no way this could have persisted this long the way it is unless some dark part of the United States government is in on the plot. And we do have at least the suggestion that the countries that are south of our border, our country wants to control their governments in any way that we can because that would have a legitimate value to the country. Making sure it doesn't become an enemy-controlled country, making sure we have access to resources, all that stuff. So we probably can't control a country that's owned by the cartels unless we're working with the cartels. So it seems to me that cartels probably control most of the governments. And therefore if we work with the cartels and let them earn, they will let us have our little geopolitical control. Because the last thing the cartels want is foreign control. The last thing the cartels want is China or Russia, for example, to get real active in their country.

So to me it seems obvious that the US government, at least some portion of it, the security state part of it, probably gives the talk to only Republican leaders, not everybody, because it'd be too sensitive. But I'm sure if you're the Speaker of the House, for example, there's somebody in that dark part of the government who says, look, here's the deal. If we stop the cartels from earning, we're not going to be able to work with them, and we're going to lose control of entire Central and South America, and the entire country could be in trouble. So I know it's terrible, terrible, terrible that two hundred people a day are dying from fentanyl, but that's the cost of having this control, and that's worth it.

I feel like that would explain everything, and it would be consistent with all observations. It's consistent with human behavior. It's consistent with incentives, and it's consistent with history. It might not be true, but it's the only thing that fits the observations. Because if you're telling me that the United States really, really wants to fight this fentanyl and the border is kind of porous, that's no. Sorry. If we're not physically attacking the source of the fentanyl, which we're not going to do by the way, even if Trump wins, there won't be any bombing of the cartels. I think there's no chance of it because I think the people doing the bombing will say no. They'll say you can order us, but we're literally not going to go. Why? Because there's a dark part of the government that has a lot of control over things who would say maybe don't.

I do believe that it's possible Trump does not get the talk. And the reason is if Trump got the talk, he might tell you all. All right, here's the deal. I'm just going to be honest with you. We can't attack them because we're working with the cartels. You know, that would be the nightmare scenario for any alleged deep state hypothetical group that's really controlling things behind the curtain. So and we've seen, you know, that the generals, etc., suggest that Trump should not be told the full truth that the intelligence people know. So it would completely explain a lot of things if nobody told Trump, which is why he's saying things like we'll bomb the cartels, which will never happen. That would explain everything, wouldn't it?

And Mike Benz, you know, is let's say compatible with the idea that we have some cartel-related dealings with the government south of us. The details could be wildly different than what I'm speculating, but it does seem like we may have a cozy relationship in some way that's not completely public.

All right. According to Project Veritas, they're still in operation even though they lost O'Keefe. There's this Department of Justice immigration attorney that says they got him undercover saying that Biden has the authority to end illegal immigration but he doesn't because Democrat mega donors control the border. The Gateway Pundit is reporting that. Does that sound right to you? Now just because it's a DOJ immigration attorney, that doesn't necessarily mean he knows what's happening. He might be talking as just a citizen who's speculating like the rest of us. Because if you asked me what's going on, I'd say well, somebody's controlling that border. I think the DOJ person legitimately believes that the mega donors are controlling the border. But I don't think he understands that the mega donors are in turn owned by whatever that deep entity is that's running things behind the scenes.

So if this DOJ's belief is that let's say Soros is the funder who's keeping the border open, does he go further and say is Soros his own man? Soros is now elder and younger. Are they their own men or are they influenced by somebody? Let me give you the most obvious interpretation: they're not independent. The most obvious, I mean let's be honest. Alex Soros is getting married to Huma Abedin. Does that look organic to you? To me that reminds me of the old kings and queens in Europe. You know, you'd have to marry your German cousin or something to make sure that everybody's not going to sell you out. Keep it in the family. So to me it looks like a keep-it-in-the-family move. And that the Soros money, it's just what it looks like. Do I have any proof? Nah, no. I'm saying that if you're trying to understand the world, the world in which he's just donating because he thinks it's good for the immigrants is kind of absurd. It is good for the immigrants, but it's absurd to imagine that's why they're doing it. The why of it is clearly something that we're not being told. So what would that be? It all comes back to basically the same answers for everything. The people behind the curtain.

All right. Did you know Ryan Setera was reporting on this? That when there's a debate, there's always somebody who hooks it up to a dial test. Now a dial test is where you get what you hope is a mixed group of people in a room, and they literally have a little dial where they're sitting, each of them. And as they're watching the debate, if they like what they're hearing, they'll dial it up, and then they'll dial it down if they don't like what they're hearing. So you can see, overlaid when the candidates are talking, you can see the graphs moving. Oh, they like what they're saying right now. Oh, and then they're divided by independents, Democrats, and Republicans.

Now you would not be surprised that whenever Kamala Harris talks, the Democrat line goes way up to the top. Whenever Trump talks, it goes way down to the bottom. And vice versa. Republicans up when Trump is talking. Republicans all the way at the bottom when Kamala is talking. But here's the interesting thing. Where do you think the independents are? Your common sense would say somewhere in the middle, right? Somewhere in the middle. Well, it didn't work out that way apparently. When Trump was talking about the economy, the independents tracked the Republican line perfectly. Perfectly. They didn't even basically, you could barely see any difference. So the independents are economics voters. What do you think of that?

So that's my statement of the day. I don't know if it's true. I'll just put it out there as you can test this against what you see in here. I say the independent voters are the ones who are not caring about the eating of cats and dogs. They're not caring about who got accused of saying the thing that made somebody mad. They're not caring so much about the mean tweets. They're not caring so much about anything except the economy. So maybe we're making a big mistake to call them independents. Maybe all they are is people who prioritize the economy above other things. And they say the rest is garbage. Everything else is garbage. Just give us an economy. Maybe stay out of some wars. We'll be good.

So that's interesting. So that would be a suggestion that Trump would win. Because if he's, and there is some evidence that in Michigan for example the New York Post is reporting that Trump's IVF proposal, where the government would pay for your scientific IVF, in vitro fertilization, so you could have more babies, and also some kind of support for people with major newborn expenses. So Trump would help having babies, according to a new poll. That made independents swing pretty hard to his side. So that would be a second indication that there's another thing that could move independents, which is can you directly help me have a baby?

Now the number of people who are either using IVF or have a close family member or friend who is using IVF is really high now, isn't it? Let me ask you in the comments, have you used IVF or do you know somebody who's close to you who has? So just say yes if you've heard it, if you've used it yourself, planning to use it, or does it have a connection to your life at all? Because I feel like it might. I feel like a lot of people would have some connection to that topic anyway.

You could argue that that has some, it's an economic thing, but I think it's more. It could be, and I wouldn't take too much away from this one poll and this one state over this one issue. I'm looking at a lot of yeses coming in, some nos as well. Yeah, so if you look at the wall of yeses coming in to people who have some direct or indirect connection to IVF, that tells you it's at least a real topic.

But secondly, here's my interesting question. The news has to fill up the twenty-four hours, so we end up getting excited about things that we all know are not important because we're trying to fill up the thing. It's about memes and who did who shook hands right and you know who tripped on the stairs and you know all that stuff. But what is more core to your human existence than reproduction? Mating. Mating is the core human value. So it could be that the person who sort of accidentally stumbles onto that wins in the landslide and nobody knows why.

You know I've told you a number of times in the past that all of our behaviors, all of them, are an expression of our mating instinct. Because it's the only thing we're optimized for by evolution. If you get mating right, then you get to survive as a species. Everything else doesn't matter so much. You just got to be able to mate, period. Just make more of you and everything will be fine. So we evolved so that any suggestion of anything that's in the domain of sex or reproduction just automatically goes to the top of all of our lists, even if we don't know it. Even if you're completely oblivious to it, it goes to the top of your list.

So even what I'm doing right now feels to me like an expression of my mating instinct. I'm literally showing off. That's what I'm doing. Like right now. I mean I do it for other reasons too, but the other reasons are my conscious reasons. My conscious reasons are oh, I enjoy this topic and it's easy and I like dealing with all of you and you know I like the experience. Everything. That's my conscious reasons. Do you know what my real reason is? I'm showing off. I'm displaying. I'm just showing you my feathers. And will that increase my mating options? Well, if I were in the mating mood it would. And I don't think the fact that I'm not logically or rationally in a mating mode allows me to turn off the instinct. I think the instinct remains. It's just too embedded in my entire being.

So if Trump comes up with something that's pro extra babies, that might be different than the question of abortion. Because the abortion question gets, I think you know I'm not a woman so I can't judge this. I feel like that's just too much government control on your body and that nobody can be okay with that. At least half the country, they can't be okay with it. So the IVF thing could be a surprising home run that nobody saw coming just because it's one of the few things that taps into your most basic instinct, which we act on all day long but we're not aware of it.

So this would be the thing I'm trying to add to the conversation is that your rational brain and IVF don't have any connection. I mean there's a rational, you know, we save money, etc. That's rational. But the real draw of it, if it really is moving independents in a big way like this one unconfirmed poll is saying, this could be important. It could actually move the election. Anyway, I wouldn't say that's confirmed yet, but it's sort of suggesting that.

So you know that Taylor Swift endorsed Kamala Harris, and she did in a very public way right after the debate. So she got maximum attention. And she was clever, and she was holding her cat and saying that she's a childless cat lady, making fun of JD Vance. And Mike Benz points us to NATO's YouTube channel. So I didn't even know NATO had a YouTube channel. But on the NATO channel, where nobody's hiding it because again it's NATO's own channel, this isn't somebody talking about NATO, this is NATO's own channel. And there's a screenshot that Mike Benz shows that says, quote, "Goal: identify key actors to train and spread desired messaging. Example: encourage opinion leaders to share counter IO." I don't know what IO is, but content. What is IO in that context of NATO? Interoperability? Intelligence? Opinion? I don't know, but sounds something NATO related.

All right, so yeah, the goal is to identify key actors to train and spread desired messaging. And then there was a photo on that same slide right next to "identify key actors to train and spread desired messaging," and it was a photo of Taylor Swift. It's actually Taylor Swift's photo right next to NATO saying that they're going to try to bring in these personalities to help them with their messaging. Oh man.

So my take on this is we've entered the don't-even-need-to-hide-it phase. It seems like the people running the real country are not trying to hide it. And the reason is they don't need to. And here there are two reasons they don't need to. One is the news is so saturated with complicated stories that you and I have too much to worry about. I can't pick one of them out. You could easily imagine that this alone, the Taylor Swift thing, would be the number one headline story in the country. Oh my God, NATO is weaponizing our celebrities against us. Can't you imagine that would be a headline story that people would talk about for a month? Do you know why it's not a headline story and we don't talk about it for a month? Because the things that become headlines are not organic. There are a few entities which have close intelligence connections which decide what the headlines will be for all the other news. If the New York Times says this is our big story and they hit it a few times, the other news just picks it up. Washington Post, same thing. CNN, maybe.

So the point is if the news can tell you what is news, they control the narrative. And everything is so complicated that you can't do much with it yourself. You know, you've seen me. I follow the news maybe because I do it literally every day. Top two percent. Is that fair? Of people who are aware of and capable of following some of the details of the news, would I be in the top one percent? Only because I do it every day, not because of my magical abilities. Maybe top one percent. I don't understand the lawfare stories. I just get them all confused. There's too many of them. And there's so many stories like that where the details of them are so confusing that how could anybody understand it?

So as long as whoever controls the media decides which stories to focus on and then they keep everything else complicated, the public is completely neutered. Do you know why there's not a big protest about the use of electronic voting machines? Do you know why there's not protests in the streets? Well, first of all we're divided, so maybe one side doesn't mind it so much. The other is it's complicated and they'll just tell you no, the machines are fine. Well, but I think they're not. We had an expert look at them. They're fine. Everything's too hard to understand.

Yeah, take Ukraine. If your story of Ukraine is Putin's a monster and he's invading countries because he's basically Hitler, if that was your view, you're missing out on a lot of details about why the United States may have always wanted to control Ukraine and NATO's growth and the security state and the military industrial complex and the Maidan overthrow in Victoria Nuland. I mean to actually understand Ukraine is incredibly complicated. So at this point the bad guys can show their work right in front of us and we'll just go, ah, I have so many other things to complain about like the national debt. It just seems more important. I'll let that one go. So we let it go. They can do stuff right in front of us.

Now let me give you another example where they can do it right in front of you. Daniel Dale, I talked about this. He still has a job. He ranked the lies and the fact check for the debate thirty-three to one, with Trump lying thirty-three times and Harris only once. Now this is an example of where there isn't, in my opinion, the slightest chance that he thought that was real. Do you disagree? See, I don't think there's the slightest chance that Daniel Dale is the fact checker on CNN and doesn't know what the facts are. But he scored it thirty-three to one. What's that tell you? Well, it tells me that something's happening right in front of you. Right in front of you. They're doing it right in front of you. There's no way that was organic. I don't know where it comes from. I don't know what forces caused it. And I'm not saying somebody talked to him because we don't need to do that. Everybody knows what they need to do. You don't have to have a conversation about it. Everybody knows. So if Daniel Dale still has a job, then they can do anything they want right in front of you. It doesn't have any consequences at all.

All right, so let's look at how secure our elections are now that we have a few data points. We know that the Democrats are massively using lawfare against Trump and that the Department of Justice is corrupt in a really deep way. So could you say that the election is unrigged if one team has been essentially illegitimately lawfaring one candidate out of office for over a year? I would say that that would be enough to say the election's rigged if nothing else happened, just by that.

How about Dr. Robert Epstein's work in which he claimed that Google is so obviously biased and fixed it can completely move the election dial one direction or another, and it always moves it toward Democrats? Do you think that he's got a handle on that? Well, we don't know because I have trouble trusting any data or any expert at this point. But I haven't seen him be debunked. Haven't seen the debunk. We did hear that his wife was killed in a suspicious car accident right after people warned him that he might get killed in a suspicious accident. So everything about that screams that he's on to something. But you know I'm not the one who can confirm that.

Of course we have mail-in votes, massive mail-in votes. That suggests that the intention is to cheat because there's not really an argument on the other side that you know there was no way to vote without mail-in ballots. So mail-in ballots are a signal of an intention to cheat.

What about the use of voting machines which we've been told are totally secure? Well, have you heard of the Secure It Act? So that's a proposed legislation that would close the election machine vulnerabilities. What? The election machine vulnerabilities? What? Well now I'm all confused. So the elections were secure and we know it, but there are so many vulnerabilities in the machines that we need legislation and major work and a huge budget to fix the vulnerabilities that we've been told don't exist or at least have not been exploited. How would anybody know that it wasn't exploited?

Here's my second question that the news will never answer. You ready for this? I'll make you a bet the news will never answer this question. It's a very simple question. Are all of the vulnerabilities that we're talking about, and it's stuff like shared passwords across states, some password credentials are in the code so anybody who knew what to look for could have found it. Some of them you could connect to the internet when you shouldn't. Some of them have old software and they think the new software would fix some bugs in the old software that could have caused a vulnerability. So there are a whole host of things. But are those things the types of things that you could always catch it if it happened? There's the key question.

Are these vulnerabilities, which I think there's general agreement there's lots of them because even if you think the machines are great, you're probably still looking to upgrade them because software gets upgraded. So how do we know? Do you ever remember the news telling you, well it is true that there are potential vulnerabilities in the voting machines, but even if somebody tried to exploit them they would get caught. Now we don't want to be in that situation. Of course we'd rather they don't even have anything to exploit. But if they did exploit them in any prior year, well we caught them because we've got a check and a balance. To which I say wait a minute. If you could catch a problem on a voting machine, what are you looking at to catch it? Does that mean there's some parallel system where you can look at it and say well your voting machine total didn't match this total? Because if there's an alternate system that's more reliable and you can use it to test whether the voting machines have the right total, shouldn't you just use that other thing as your source? If there's some other thing that tells you that the vote was right, use the other thing. Otherwise I would be assuming that there's no way to know if the machine got the right answer or not.

So there's the key question. If we all know, and I believe this is now established, it's now established that the voting machines have vulnerabilities that at least potentially could be used by bad people, are they the type that if they existed in past elections and they got exploited that we definitely would have caught them? And what does that look like? How exactly would you catch them? I guess it depends on the type of exploit. But they're really telling us two opposites. One, there are lots of things that need to be fixed in terms of current vulnerabilities. Two, the election was secure and we know it. Can those both be true? To me those seem like opposites. If these vulnerabilities are the kind that you have to fix, it's sort of suggesting by nobody saying it that somebody could have exploited them and gotten away with it.

So this again is the news saying well we haven't looked behind the closed door but we can guarantee there's nothing back there. How? Well nobody said there's anything back there. I know, but you never looked. Right? Do you see how obvious this is? Just think about the fact that you've been watching shows and news and reports about this topic, election integrity, for years. And today is the first time anybody said the only question that mattered. If somebody had already used any of these vulnerabilities, did you definitely catch it because the system catches that kind of stuff? If you've never heard the answer to that question, let me tell you the answer to that question. We would have no idea if they were exploited. That is the answer. It's the most important question and most important answer, and the news on the left and the right doesn't even ask it. What's up with that? Why is this the first time you've even heard the question? Am I right? How many of you, your brains are exploding right now when you say my God, that is the only important question. Since we've confirmed lots of vulnerabilities in lots of different ways, if somebody had used those vulnerabilities which we've confirmed to exist, would they definitely have been caught? How? It's not much of a vulnerability if you get caught every time you use it. Now I suppose there'd be a different kind of vulnerability where it just takes the machine down and you know let's say they take the machine down in Trump territory. So that would be maybe harder to spot.

All right, so we got that. So we got the lawfare against Trump. We've got Google who is rigged. We've got mail-in voting which only has one purpose for rigging. We've got the use of voting machines that have lots of vulnerabilities. We know that and we wouldn't know if they had ever been used before for rigging and we won't know in the future because that's how they're designed. Let's see, what else we got? We've got the media, total media control. The Democrats rigged the primary, replacing Biden and keeping Kamala Harris from our view. And then of course the immigrants shipped in. So that's the bad news.

Let me get to the good news. The reason I was wearing my swaddling blanket today is because you guys need some good news. Here's some good news. Voter enthusiasm is probably all that makes a difference in this race. So the smart people, the ones I agree with, say that getting your base, more of them to show up, is going to be way more likely to work than getting people to change their minds because there's not so much mind changing going on. But you might be able to get more people to show up.

Now I don't think it's hard to get people to show up in person because it's hard to get somebody's ass off the couch if they don't want to do it. But it might not be impossible to get people to vote by mail. So here's what I'd do from this day on. Every time there's another Trump meme, I would put a QR code on it. And the QR code should take you to the Pennsylvania page where you can request a mail-in ballot. And you should know that's what the QR code is for. And it should say Pennsylvania mail-in ballot. I posted the link to the Pennsylvania mail-in ballot because winning Pennsylvania might be the whole game. A lot of people say so. If you wanted to just drill in on the one lever that might move the whole thing, besides IVF which could be surprisingly effective, you put a QR code on your memes. Ideally you'd want somebody like you know Laura Trump or Scott Presler. Maybe Scott Presler should do this because he's doing signups in Pennsylvania. Come up with one QR code so everybody isn't using one. And you just say put this on your memes. And then everybody is, what's that QR code for? But it maybe label it, you know, Pennsylvania mail-in ballot, something like that.

Yeah, there's another. Okay, so that is my suggestion. Put a QR code that takes you to the link for Pennsylvania mail-in votes and just put that in the corner of every Trump meme. And you're going to get a lot of people getting a mail-in vote. How hard is it to get somebody to fill out their mail-in vote? Well I'll tell you. I think the podcasters who are pro-Trump should stop their programs and say, hey, if you're watching right now from Pennsylvania, let's fill these out together. So you know, take a moment. I'll give you a minute. Just go find your mail-in ballot. Just find it right now and then fill it out. Vote for Trump. Drop it in the mail. And then put it in the comments. Tell me in the comments you just filled it out. So you need to make it a group social situation. And that could work.

Linda Ronstadt complained about Trump going to, I guess he's going to Tucson, and he's going to be in a stadium or a facility that has her name on it. And she didn't like that because she doesn't like Trump. The surprising story about this story is that Linda Ronstadt is still alive. How many of you thought Linda Ronstadt had already passed? I did. I saw the story. I was like, how is she talking from beyond the grave? She's seventy-eight. But she's a cat lady. She's adopted kids but didn't have her own kids. But she does have a cat. And she said in her message, quote, "Trump hates women, immigrants, and people of color." How do all the batshit crazy women come to that opinion?

Now I get that Trump has different views on let's say abortion than some of the country. But where in the world do you get that he hates any women, immigrants, or people of color? There's not ever been even a scintilla of evidence of that. He's only ever talked about policies which are unambiguously good for the United States, such as closing the border. And that he just has a normal protect-every-life opinion whether they're male or female fetuses. Somebody who wants to save every single female fetus isn't exactly a woman hater. If he said oh, we only want to abort the female fetuses, then that would be a woman hater right there. That would be a woman hater. But no, he wants to save all the babies. You know that would be his view. He wants to do IVF. Why? Because he hates women? No. Oh my God, how do you even come up with that?

All right, ladies and gentlemen, this is my show for the day. I'm not going to talk to the locals people privately today because I got to run. But have a great day, and I will get back to you maybe tonight in the man cave for the locals people, but I'm not sure yet. And I will talk to you soon. Thanks for joining. And I'll have one final sip before we go. Oh, that was good. Bye for now.

yeah I'm early I'm early I'll tell you about that in a minute well we don't know how many people are going to join us in this new earlier shorter version of the show but 11 of us so far you're the ones I call the high Achievers get in here will you let's figure out how this day is going to go we're going to have some fun all right I've got a little uh scheduling uh overlap today so I'm doing the show earlier and shorter but I didn't want to miss out I didn't want you to wake up and say where's my simultaneous sip which for many of you might be recorded but I hope you uh figure it out and come here and make it all work cuz I take some responsibility for having developed a simultaneous sip Habit in you I feel like I have to deliver every single day so here I am and if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that nobody can even understand well all you need for that is a cuper muger glass a tankered chin a canteen Jugger flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid I like coffee join me now for the unparallel pleasure of the dopamine of the day thing makes everything better it's called the simultaneous zp and it happens now go when I say I needed that oh my goodness well I've got the uh the swaddling blanket of comfort on me today because it seems to me that the country is in a a weird mental state and what you need is well me you need me you need me to snap you out of this bad mental state it looks like there's Doom coming from every direction and the elections look iffy yeah we'll fix all that I've got an idea to fix all of it actually really so although today's story will be short you're about to see the best idea ever just wait for that well JP Morgan announced that they're going to put a limit on Junior investment bankers hours so if you're a junior investment banker at JP Morgan they will no longer let you work more than 80 hours per week no matter how much you want to what who works 80 hours a week unless it's their own company well you can make a Millions as an investment banker if you do everything right but looks like there's a lot of competition for those jobs and so the question I ask myself is if I can see a time sheet for that entire 80 hours how much of that time are you like just really kicking out the work because you know recently I got some attention for uh having a good work ethic because I like to show up every day and I'm not big on vacations I like to work every day but even I don't work 80 hours a week 80 hours a week do you have any idea what that would do to you I mean there's a report of somebody dying from overwork and in Japan you hear about it all the time but there's no good reason to make somebody work 80 hours a week There's no way that that extra 10 hours or 20 hours at the end is your good time you would have to have all kinds of breaks and I don't know you're going to have to have an affair with your co-workers to make that all work so a pretty broken system meanwhile uh MSNBC has decided to spend some considerable time uh telling his audience what a terrible person Laura lumer is now Laura lumer is a if you've not heard that name she's associated with the right and she's I guess I would say an independent researcher journalist and she's broken some good Scoops so she's she's got some serious credibility in terms of scoops Hoops uh but she's also controversial and it's not my job to defend anything that anybody else said so you should hear this first I'm not defending anything that anybody else said but do I need to why would why would that be my job no I'm on a pirate ship all right I signed up to be on a pirate ship if they let another pirate on the pirate ship you know what I'm not going to do um I'd like to examine your past statements for acceptability no I'm going to take whatever weapons that pirate has CU we need to get a mission done and I don't give a rat's ass what what anybody ever said to offend you do I agree with everything ever said by RFK Jr.

I doubt it I mean I can't think of a specific example but I doubt it do do I think he shouldn't be on the pirate ship no I think he should be very much on the pirate ship I want to be on the same ship as him so Laura lomer is very effective and they wouldn't be talking about her unless she had made a big dent in universe and if you're a pirate who can make a big dent in universe and you want Trump to win because I think is vital to the survival of the United States and that's the kind of pirate I don't mind associating with but it's kind of funny because we've entered this weird political mode where we're trying to take people down by who they associate with and then it's kind of a contest it's like MSNBC say all right all right we're g to say that Trump is associating with this this horrible racist they would say Lura lumer and of course that's weird because MSNBC is the most famously corrupt and racist organization in the public knowledge that that would be an interesting question could you think of a more racist organization like just overtly racist than MSNBC actually I can't think of one I actually can't think of any well that's weird it seems like there be some competition for the top spot but there really isn't yeah MSNBC is so blatantly racist that they're they're going after Laura L now again I'm not defending Laura lomer I know you're going to say the ADL I thought of the ADL but they're so special purpose that they seem like a different kind of animal yeah the ADL is uh not my favorite organization they they defamed me in public because racist yeah you're right the ADL might be competitive because they went after me because they're racists I assume I mean they made a racist Claim about me anyway um so here's what's happening so the so the Democrats are like all right you've got Laura lummer haaha and then we say oh yeah you've got dick Janie haaha and then the Democrats say well you've got that terrible person Scott Adams and then I say oh yeah you've got Adam kiner and then they say we''ve got that terrible person fill in the blank I I feel like there are enough terrible people according to other people that we could do this all day long all right now here's the funniest story of the day as I told you that every meme about uh Trump is funny and I don't know how it expands all generations whatever it is that's funny about Trump as a personality or a character or a meme or whatever if works for every generation and on Tik Tok today this is real by the way this sounds like I'm making it up but it's real there's a viral uh Trend going on where the ticktockers young ones like you know older teens are dancing to Trump saying at the uh at the debate they're eating their they're eating our dogs they're eating our pets and they've turned that into a autotune um sort sort of a line that they dance with so you can hear Trump's voice they're eating our they're eating our dogs they're eating our pets and you see the people dancing they're eating our dogs they're eating our pets and it's freaking hilarious and where does that come from like where in the world of all the things that a Tik tocker could dance to they pick that and it works it works it's like it's hilarious and I watched several of them this morning and I thought oh I'm glad I saw those are pretty good so that never gets old anyway are they eating our pets well let me tell you how the news uh determines whether something is true would you like to see an example of me doing some investigative journalism watch there's nothing behind that closed door how do I know well I don't see anything behind it well but that's because the door is closed so well how could you see something behind the door if the door is closed well there's no reports whatsoever of anything from behind the door I know but you wouldn't necessarily hear about it unless you talk to the right people as in opening the door but there's no indication there's there's anything behind the door I know but you can't know what's behind the door unless you open the door and look H I don't know you found you sound like a conspiracy theorist because you're always thinking there's something behind the door when we've proven there's not no you didn't prove it you didn't prove it you simply stated it without checking that's the opposite of proving proving would be doing something actively not doing something is called not proving it so yeah we know that no dogs or cats are being eaten because some of the news people ask the government they ask the government now I would like to put out at least an alternative hypothesis to the eating of the pets there may have been somebody who tried to kill a goose at the park I think that's likely I mean if you needed food and you're used to killing ducks and geese where you grew up and you saw a geese and it looked like it was free I could see that happening the cats and dogs part especially the cats seems like it's at least a little bit likely to be a mass hysteria I know I know I'm a broken record Mass hisy areas everywhere so it could be that I'm just filtered that way so I see Mist areas because my brain is kind of tuned to look for them that's how I knew that there would be no information about a secret Sonic weapon at the embassies because that was really a classic Mass hysteria even with all the evidence that there was something real happening and maybe there's something real happening but the odds of it being a secret Sonic weapon were really not very high now could I be wrong and someday they'll find a secret Sonic weapon sure because unlike the news I do not declare that something doesn't exist simply because I haven't seen it what I did predict is that they wouldn't find it it would never be confirmed so think of it as a prediction not a fact so far the prediction is holding now let me ask you this if you went to my neighborhood my current neighborhood and you surveyed all of the people here and you said do you have an outdoor cat some of them would say yes an alarming number of them would say we used to you know what I mean we used to have an outdoor cat it didn't come home we don't know why but there are mountain lions and all kinds of dangerous things out there and uh outdoor cats disappear a lot and sometimes they'll be gone for days and come back now if you had heard that the uh the immigrants in your town were eating cats and then your cat disappeared what would you tell people uhoh I think they got my cat they may have eaten my cat now that's how a mass hysteria starts because if you have a natural situation where cats disappear pretty much all the time I mean outdoor cats they don't last a long time where I live so you you could imagine that people would start hearing stories of other people losing their cats and presuming it was the immigrants Etc so here's my best guess of what's really happening my best guess is that there are a few legitimate claims of an immigrant eating an animal might have been a goose might even be one example or two where somebody ate an animal like a pet maybe I wouldn't rule it out because I haven't seen it and you're going to say to me but Scott we've seen the videos and the phone calls and stuff well I don't trust anything anymore I don't trust any videos you don't know where they came from or what you're really looking at or whether it's been edited whether it's AI you can't tell but my best guess is that there's a little bit to it but the rest might be a Massy areia because then people say but my cat's missing for two hours they got my cat and then they complain about the cat and you hear about it but they don't tell you later the cat came home in two hours I think it might be that but again I'm speculating so unlike the news I can't tell you what is a fact without investigating all right in aora the town of Aurora 10 members of that Venezuelan gang Treno arago have been arrested Fox News say they're associated with that alleged building takeover so the question of whether a building has been taken over or not is still a little bit contentious U I think Aurora is saying no but there are gang members and they're put down a uh they put out a uh a statement saying that uh the the gangs are not taking over Aurora and they're they got things under control well maybe according to the express there's a big breakthrough in prosthetic hands so a mechanical hand for somebody who's uh lost a hand they figured out how to make it controlled by the brain so they actually showed a video of somebody with a mechanical hand whose brain was controlling the fingers and the grip and uh Daniel 34 year old from Italy uh he tested it because he'd lost a hand and he said uh quote it feels like I'm moving my own hand oh my God really really could that be true because the hard part would make it would be the part where you feel like it's your own hand I don't know how they did that I mean I I suppose it's could be just a psychological phenomenon as much as a physical one I don't know but what if this is true and by the way this is a little this a little too good to be true falls into the category of maybe the demo worked but you know maybe it's not so easy to just slap these on people and say there you go you got a new hand but uh it does raise some questions if you can get a prosthetic hand that feels just like you're moving your own hand makes me wonder what other options are available I'm going to sip a coffee while you fill in the joke not even saying the obvious I'm just letting you fill in your own joke at home this see it's a prosthetic hand that feels just like your own but if I were at home and I were writing this joke I'd say something like this I wonder if I can get a female hand that doesn't sound like feel like it's my own all right I had to say it all right what else do we got going on uh fentanyl is killing uh 200 people A Day in the United States and costing 1.5 trillion per year according to the times of India and their headline is how China is destroying us families with deadly drug fentol well yes it's true that China seems to be the source of the precursors and they do seem to pretend that they're going to do something about it while clearly not doing anything about it or anything that matters and then they send that to the cartels in Mexico and the cartels pressed into and ship it across the border and kill 200 people A Day in the United States that would be about one every 8 minutes one every eight minutes so we've been on for 33 minutes or let's say I've been on for three deaths so we could change the way we keep time in the United States by having 8 minute increments that's one fentel overdose death so we're uh we're three fentel in to the uh three fenel ODS into the show oh hold on hold on four somebody else just died every eight minutes every eight minutes somebody's dropping dead from fenel in another s minutes I might remind you there's another one now here's my current working hypothesis on this there's no way this could have persisted this long the way it is unless some dark part of the United States government is in on the plot and we do have at least the suggestion that the the countries that are south of our border our country wants to control their governments in any way that we can because that that would have a legitimate value to the country making sure it doesn't become you know an enemy controlled country making sure we have access to resources all that stuff so we probably can't control a country that's owned by the cartels unless we're working with the cartels so it seems to me that cartels probably control most of the governments and therefore if we work with the cartels and let them earn they will let us have our little geopolitical control because the last thing the cartels want is what's the last thing that the cartels want foreign control the last thing the can the the cartels want is China or Russia for example to get real active in their country so I don't I to me it seems obvious that the US government at least some portion of it the security State part of it uh probably gives the talk to only Republican leaders not not everybody because it'd be too sensitive but I'm sure if you're the Speaker of the House for example there's somebody in that dark part of the government says look here's the deal if we stop the cartels from earning we're not going to be able to work with them and we're going to lose control of entire Central South America and the entire country could be in trouble so I know it's terrible terrible terrible that 200 people a day are dying from fentanyl but that's the cost of having this control and that's worth it I feel like that would explain everything and it would be consistent with all observations it's consistent with human behavior it's consistent with incentives and it's consistent with history it might not be true but it's the only thing that fits the observations because if you're telling me that the United States really really wants to fight this Fentanyl and the bord is kind of porous that's no sorry if we're not physically attacking the source of the fenel which we're not going to do by the way even if Trump wins there won't be any bombing of the cartels I think there's no chance of it because I think the people doing the bombing will say no they'll say you can order us but we're literally not going to go why because there's a dark part of the government that has a lot of control over things who would say maybe don't I do believe that it's possible Trump does not get the talk and the reason is if Trump got the talk he might tell you all right here's the deal I'm just going to be honest with you we can't attack them because we're working with the cartels you know that would be the nightmare scenario for any alleged deep State hypothetical group that's really controlling things behind the curtain so and we've we've seen you know that the generals Etc suggest that Trump should not be told the full truth that the intelligence people know so it would completely explain a lot of things if no but he told Trump which is why he's saying things like we'll bomb the cartels which will never happen um that would explain everything wouldn't it and Mike Ben you know is uh let's say compatible with the idea that we have some cartel related uh dealings with the the government south of us the details could be you know wildly different than what I'm speculating but it does seem like we may have a cozy relationship in some way that's not completely public all right according to project Veritas uh they're still in operation even though they lost um o'keef um there's this Department of Justice immigration attorney that says they got him undercover saying that Biden has the authority to end illegal immigration but he doesn't because Democrat Mega donors control the Border the gayway punted is reporting that um does that sound right to you now just because it's a doj immigration attorney that doesn't necessarily mean he knows what's happening I he might be talking as just a citizen who's speculating like the rest of us because if you asked me what's going on I'd say well somebody's controlling that border I think the doj person legitimately believes that the mega donors are controlling the B border um but I don't think he understands that the mega donors are in turn owned by whatever that deep entity is that's running things behind the scenes so if this doj's belief is that let's say Soros is the funer who's keeping the Border open does he go further and say is Soros his own man two Soros is now Elder and and younger are they their own men or are they influenced by somebody let me give you the most obvious interpretation is they're not independent the most obvious I mean I mean let let's be honest Alex Soros is getting married to uh Huma abedine does that look organic to you to me that reminds me of you know the old kings and queens in Europe you know you'd have to marry your your German cousin or something to make make sure that make sure that everybody's you know not going to sell you out keep it in the family so to me it looks like I keep it in the family move and that the Soros money it's just what it looks like do I have any proof nah no I'm saying that if you're trying to understand the world the the world in which he's just donating because he thinks it's you know good for the immigrants is kind of absurd it is good for the immigrants but it's absurd to imagine that's why they're doing it the the why of it is clearly something that we not being told so what would that be it all comes back to basically the same answers for everything the people behind the curtain all right um did you know Ryan sedra was reporting on this that when there's a debate there's always somebody who hooks it up to a dial test now a dial test is where you get what you hope is a mixed group of people in a room and they literally have a little dial where they're sitting each of them and as they're watching the debate if they like what they're hearing they'll dial it up and then they'll dial it down if they don't like what they're hearing so you can see uh overlaid when the candidates are talking you can see the graphs moving oh they like what they're saying right now oh and then they're divided by Independence Democrats and Republicans now you would not be surprised that whenever K Harris talks the the Democrat line goes sh way up to the top whenever Trump talks way it goes way down to the bottom and vice versa Republicans up when Trump is talking Republicans all the way at the bottom when Kam is talking but here's the interesting thing where do you think The Independents are your common sense would say somewhere in the middle right somewhere in the middle well didn't work out that way apparently when Trump was talking about the economy The Independents tracked the Republican line perfectly perfectly they they didn't even basically you could barely see any difference so The Independents are economics voters what do you think of that so that that's my that's my statement of the day I don't know if it's true I'll just put it out there as you can you can test this against what you see in here I say the independent voters are the ones who are not caring about the eating of cats and dogs they're not caring about who got accused of saying the thing that made somebody mad they're not caring so much about the Mean Tweets they're not caring so much about anything except the economy so maybe we're making a big mistake to call them Independents maybe all they are is people who prioritize the economy above other things and they say the rest is garbage everything else is garbage just give us an economy maybe stay out of some Wars we'll be good so so that's interesting so that would be a suggestion that um Trump would win because if he's and and there is some evidence that in Michigan for example the New York Post is reporting that Trump IVF proposal where where the government would pay for your scientific IVF in vitro fertilization so you could have more babies and also some kind of uh support for people with major newborn expenses so Trump would help having babies uh according to a new poll uh that made Independence swing pretty hard to his side so that would be a second indication that there's another thing that could move Independence which is can you directly help me have a baby now the number of people who are either using IVF or have a close family member or friend who is using IVF is really high now isn't it let let me ask you in the comments have you used IVF or do you know somebody who's close to you who has so just say yes if you've heard it if you've used it yourself planning to use it or does it have a connection to your life at all because I feel like it might I feel like a lot of people would have some connection to that topic anyway uh you could argue that that has some e it's an economic thing but I think it's more it could be and I wouldn't take too much away from this one this one poll and this one state over this one issue I'm looking at a lot of yeses coming in some NOS as well yeah so if you look at the wall of yeses coming in to people who have some direct or indirect connection to IVF that tells you it's at least you know a real topic but secondly here's my here's my interesting question you the news has to fill up the 24 hours so we end up getting excited about things that we all know are not important because we're trying to fill up the thing it's about memes and who did who shook hands right and you know who tripped on the stairs and you know all that stuff but what is what is more core to your human existence than reproduction mating mating is the core human value so it could be that the person who sort of accidentally stumbles onto that wins in the landslide and nobody knows why you know I've told you a number of times in the past that all of our behaviors all all of them are an expression of our mating Instinct because it's the only thing we're optimized for by Evolution if you get mating right then you get to survive as a species everything else doesn't matter so much you just got to be able to mate period just make more of you and everything will be fine so we we evolved so that any suggestion of anything that's in the domain of sex or reproduction is just automatically goes to the top of all of our lists even if we don't know it like e even if you're completely oblivious to it it goes to the top of your list so even what I'm doing right now feels to me like an expression of my mating Instinct I'm literally showing off that's what I'm doing like like right now I mean I do it for other reasons too but the other reasons are my conscious reasons my conscious reasons are oh I enjoy this topic and it's easy and I like dealing with all of you and you know I like the experience everything that's my conscious reasons do you know what my real reason is I'm showing off I'm I'm displaying I'm just showing you my feathers and will that increase my mating options well if I were in The Mating mood it would and I don't think the fact that I'm not logically or rationally in a mating mode allows me to turn off the Instinct I think the Instinct remains it's just too embedded in my entire being so if Trump comes up with something that's uh Pro extra babies that might be different than the question of abortion because the abortion question gets I think you know I'm not a woman so I can't judge this I feel like that's just too much government control on your body and that nobody can Ser nobody can be okay with that at least half the country they can't be okay with it so the F thing could be a surprising home run that nobody saw coming just because it's one of the few things that Taps into your most Basic Instinct which we act on all day long but we're not aware of it so this this would be the thing I'm trying to add to the conversation is that your rational brain and IVF don't have any connection I mean there's a rational you know we save money Etc that's rational but that the real draw of it if if it really is moving Independence in a big way like this one you know unconfirmed poll is saying this could be important it could actually move the election anyway I wouldn't say that's confirmed yet but it's sort of suggesting that um so you know that Taylor Swift uh endorsed kamla Harris and she did in a very public way right after the debate so she got maximum attention and she was clever and she was holding her cat and saying that she's a childless cat lady making fun of JD Vance and uh Mike Benz points us to NATO's You.

Tube channel so I didn't even know NATO had a You.

Tube channel but on on the NATO Channel where nobody's hiding it because again it's NATO's own channel this this isn't somebody talking about NATO this is NATO's own channel and there's a screenshot that Mike Ben shows that says quote goal identify key actors to train and spread desired me messaging uh example encourage opinion leaders to share counter IO I don't know what IO is but content what is IO in that context of NATO interoperability intelligence opinion I don't know but sounds something NATO related all right so yeah the goal is to identify key actors to train and spread desired messaging and then there was a uh photo on that same slide right next to identify key actors to train and spread desired messaging and it was a photo of Taylor Swift it's actually Taylor Swift's photo right right next to Nato saying that they're that they're going to try to bring in these personalities to help them with their messaging oh man so my take on this is we've entered the don't even need to hide it facee it seems like the people running the real country are not trying to hide it and the reason is they don't need to and here there are two reasons they don't need to one is the news is so sat ated with complicated stories that you and I have too much to worry about I can't pick one of them out you could easily imagine that this alone the Taylor Swift thing would be the number one headline story in the country oh my God NATO is is weaponizing our celebrities against us that would can't you imagine that would be a headline story that people would talk about for a month do you know why it's not a headline story and we don't talk about it for a month because the things that become headlines are not organic there are a few entities which have close intelligence connections which decide what the headlines will be for all the other news if the New York Times says this is our big story and they hit it a few times the other news just picks it up Washington Post same thing CNN maybe so the the point is if the news can tell you what is news they control the narrative and everything is so complicated that you can't do much with it yourself you know you've seen me I follow the news maybe because I do it literally every day top 2% would is that fair of people who are aware of and capable of following some of the details of the news would I be in the top 1% only because I do it every day not because of my magical abilities maybe top 1% I don't understand the lawfare stories I I just get them all confused there's too many of them and there's so many stories like that where the details of them are are so confusing that how could anybody understand it so as long as the as long as whoever controls the media decides which stories to focus on and then they keep everything else complicated the public is completely neuter do you know why there's not a big protest about the use of uh of of electronic voting machines do you know why there's not uh protests in the streets well first of all we're divided so maybe one side doesn't mind it so much the other is it's complicated and they'll just tell you no the machines are fine well but I think they're not H we had an expert look at them they're fine everything's too hard to understand yeah take Ukraine if your story of Ukraine is uh Putin's a monster and he's invading countries because he's basically Hiller if that was your view you're you're missing out on a lot of details about why the United States may have always wanted to control Ukraine and NATO's growth and the security State and the military industrial complex and the Maiden uh overthrow in Victoria Newland I mean to actually understand Ukraine is incredibly complicated so at this point the bad guys can show their work right in front of us and we'll just go ah I have so many other things to complain about like the national dat it just seems more important I'll let that one go so we let it go they can do stuff right in front of us now let me give you another example where they can do it right in front of you Daniel Dale I talked about this he still has a job he he ranked the the lies and the fact check for the debate 33 to1 with Trump lying 33 times and Harris only once now this is an example of where there isn't in my opinion the slightest chance that he thought that was real do you disagree see I I don't think there's the slightest chance that Daniel Dale is the fact checker on CNN and doesn't know what the facts are but he scored It 33 to1 what's that tell you well it tells me that something's happening right in front of you right in front of you they're doing it right in front of you there's no way that was organic I don't know where it comes from I don't I don't know what forces caused it and I'm not saying somebody talk to him because we don't need to do that everybody knows what they need to do you don't have to have a conversation about it everybody knows so if Daniel Dale still has a job then they can do anything they want right in front of you doesn't have any consequences at all all right so let's look at uh how secure our elections are now that we have a few data points we know that uh the Democrats are massively using lawfare against Trump and that the Department of Justice is corrupt um in a really deep way so could you say that the election is unrigged if one team has been essentially illegitimately law faring one candidate out of office for over a year I would say that that would be enough to say the election's rigged if nothing else happened just by that how about Dr.

Epstein's work in which he is he claimed that Google is so obviously biased and fixed it can completely move the election dial one One Direction or another and it always moves it toward Democrats do you think that he's he's got a handle on that well we don't know because I have trouble trusting any data or any expert at this point but I haven't seen him be debunked haven't seen the debunk we did hear that his wife was killed in a suspicious car accident right after people warned him that he might get killed in a suspicious accident so everything about that screams that he's on to something but you know I'm not the one who can confirm that of course we have mailin votes massive mailin votes that suggests that the intention is to cheat because there's not really an argument on the other side that you know there was no way to vote without mail and ballots so mail and ballots are a signal of an intention to cheat what about the use of voting machines which we've been told are Totally Secure well um have you heard of the secure it act so that's a proposed legislation that would uh close the election machine vulner what the election machine vulnerabilities what huh well now I'm all confused so the elections were secure and we know it but there are so many vulnerabilities in the machines that we need legislation and major work and a huge budget to fix the vulnerabilities that we've been told don't exist or at least have not been exploited how would anybody know that it wasn't exploited here's my second question that the news will never answer you ready for this uh I'll make you a bet the news will never answer this question it's a very simple question are all of the vulnerabilities that we're talking about and it's stuff like uh shared passwords across States um some password credentials are in the code so anybody who knew what to look for could have found it some of them you could connect to the internet when you shouldn't some of them have uh old software and they think the new software would fix some bugs in the old software that could have caused a vulnerability so there a whole host of things but are those things the types of things that you could always catch it if it happened there's the key question are these vulnerabilities which I think there's General agreement there's lots of them because even if you think the machines are great you're probably still looking to upgrade them because software gets upgraded so how do we know do you do you ever remember the news telling you well it is true that there are um potential vulnerabilities in the voting machines but even if somebody tried to exploit them they would get caught now we don't want to be in that situation of course we'd rather they don't even have anything to exploit but if they did exploit them in any prior year Well we caught them because we've got a we've got a check in the balance to which I say wait a minute if you could catch a problem on a voting machine what are you looking at to catch it does that mean there's some parallel system where you can look at it and say well your voting machine total didn't match this total because if there's an alternate system that's more reliable and you can use it to test whether the voting machines have the right total shouldn't you just use that other thing as your Source if there's some other thing that tells you that the vote was right use the other thing otherwise I would be assuming that there's no way to know if the machine got the right answer or not so there's the key question if we all know and I believe this is now established it's now established uh that the voting machines have vulnerabilities that at least potentially could be used by bad people are they the type that if they existed in past elections and they got exploited that we definitely would have caught them and what does that look like how exactly would you catch them I guess it depends on the type of exploit but they're really telling us two opposites one there are lots of things that need to be fixed in terms of current vulnerabilities two the election was Secure and we know it can those both be true to me those seem like opposites if if these vulnerabilities are the kind that you have to fix it's sort of suggesting by by nobody saying it that somebody could have exploited them and gotten away with it so this again is the news saying well we haven't looked behind the closed door but we can guarantee there's nothing back there how well nobody said there's anything back there I know but you never looked right do do you see how obvious this is just think about the fact that you've been watching shows and news and reports about this topic election Integrity for years and and today is the first time anybody said the only question that mattered if somebody had already used any of these vulnerabilities did you definitely catch it because the system catches that kind of stuff if you've never heard the answer to that question let me tell you the answer to that question we would have no idea if they were exploited that is the answer it's the most important question and most important answer and the news on the left and the right doesn't even ask it what's up with that why is this the first time you've even heard the question am I right how many of you your brains are exploding right now when you say my God that is the only important question since we've confirmed lots of vulnerabilities in lots of different ways if somebody had use those vulnerabilities which we've confirmed to exist would they definitely have been caught how it's not much of a vulnerability if you get caught every time you use it now I suppose there' be a different kind of vulnerability where it just takes the machine down and you know let's say they take the machine down in Trump territory so that that would be maybe harder spots all right so we got that so we got uh let's see um the lawfare against Trump we've got Google who is rigged we've got mailin voting which only has one purpose for rigging we've got the use of voting machines that have lots of vulnerabilities but they can't tell us if they've been exploited in the past um and uh let's see oh Montgomery County in Texas just halted their voting machine upgrade according to John Becker now why would you halt a software upgrade or an improvement in your election machines because they're they're there to fix a a problem I mean that's the whole point of a software upgrade there's either a vulnerability or something and uh they've decided not to and I think the reason is that they can't be sure that the upgrade will be secure that's a good point how much time does it take to check every upgrade to know that it's secure and how can you know that a new software is better than the old software I'll bet the people who do the upgrade can't tell now let me inject what Dr insensitive jerk on X says good account to follow by the way Dr insensitive jerk um he has lots of good statements even though his name doesn't sound he sounds like a troll but his trolling is always data related you know sort of logical data related stuff so he's good he says the following it's funny that anyone believes a voting machine could be secure against the men who designed the hardware or wrote the software how do you make it secure against the people who designed it that's not a thing it's definitely not a thing you can't be secure against the people who made it so and how would you know that the people who made it are all on your side no way you can't possibly know it gets better uh Dr incens of jerk points out that even reading the code won't help because hiding exploits an innocent looking code is literally a sport now when he says it's literally a sport to hide the real meaning of you code in the code I mean he doesn't really mean that right it's not like it's an actual International contest where experts see if they can be the best to hide some code and some code it is it's an international contest in which they see who can do the best of hiding malicious or just hiding code in other code it's literally a contest it's the international OB obfuscated code contest now look at Elon Musk when he took over Twitter he had access to the code did he not and when he had access the code he was like oh I found some problems here we corrected them and then what happened oh uh well looks like we didn't know it but there's some other problems but we corrected them and then what happened okay there's some other problems but we got them and then what happened okay we found some other problems but we corrected them I think it took him a year just to pour through the the code and find all the things that were rigging the results probably a year and and the we're talking about the best Engineers who are experts on the system do you think the election people are the best Engineers you think there are a lot of Elon Musk who said oh I could build a rocket to space and make a car company or I could work 8 to5 on that election uh machine upgrade stuff no you can't tell by looking at the code all right let's see uh we got the total media control working on one side as we on the debate we saw the Democrats uh game the primary so that the voters weren't uh involved really we saw that Biden was replaced and we see the immigrants are being shipped in and every attempt to make them voters to rig the system so let's uh let's go through the full list now so is this election going to be fair well we see law fair before and we'll probably see law fair after even if Trump were to win he would be lawfare at out of office or or at least they would try very hard so that's rigged uh Dr.

Epstein's Google research if that's true that's rigged the mail in votes there's really no reason for that other than rigging the use of voting machines they're full of vulnerabilities we know that and we wouldn't know if they had ever been used before for rigging and we won't know in the future because that's how they're designed um let's see what else we got uh we got the media total media control the Democrats rigged the primary uh replacing Biden and keeping comell Harris from our view and then of course the Immigrant shipped in so that's the bad news let me get to the good news the reason I was wearing my swaddling blanket today is because you guys need some good news here's some good news voter enthusiasm is probably all that makes a difference in this race so the the smart people the ones I agree with um say that getting your base more of them to show up is going to be way more likely to work than getting people to change their minds because there's not so much mind changing going on but you might be able to get more people to show up now I don't think you it's hard to get people to show up in person because it's hard to get somebody's you know ass off the couch if they don't want to do it but it might not be impossible to get people to mail by to vote by mail so here's what I'd do from this day on every every time there's another Trump meme I would put a QR code on it and the QR code should take you to the Pennsylvania page where you can request a mail-in ballot and you should know that's what the QR code is for and it should say Pennsylvania mail and ballot I I posted the link to the Pennsylvania mail and ballot because winning Pennsylvania might be the whole game a lot of people say so if you wanted to just drill in on the one lever that might move the whole thing besides IVF which could be surprisingly effective you put a QR code on your memes ideally you'd want somebody like you know Laura Trump or Scott presler maybe Scott presler should do this because he's doing H signups in Pennsylvania come up with one QR code so everybody isn't using one and you just say put this on your memes and then everybody is what's that QR code for but it maybe label it you know P Pennsylvania mail and ballot something like that uh yeah there's another okay so that is my suggestion put a QR code that takes you to the link for Pennsylvania Pennsylvania mailin votes and just put that in the corner of every Trump Meme and you're gonna get a lot of people getting a mail and vote how hard is it to give somebody to fill out their mail and vote well I'll tell you I think the podcasters who are pro Trump should stop their Pro uh should stop their programs and say hey if you're watching right now from Pennsylvania let's fill these out together so you know take a moment I'll give you a minute just go find go find your mail and ballot just find it right now and then fill it out vote for Trump drop it in the mail and then put it in the comments tell me in the comments you just filled it out so you need to make it a group social situation U and that could work Linda ronat complained about Trump going to uh I guess he's going to Tucson and he's going to be in a stadium or a facility that has her name on it and she didn't like that because she doesn't like Trump the surprising story about this story is that Linda ronat still alive how many of you thought Linda ronat had already passed I did I saw the story I like how is she talking from Beyond the Grave she's 78 but she's a uh she's a cat lady uh she's she had adopted kids but didn't have her own kids but she does have a cat and she said in her message quote Trump hates women immigrants and people of color how do all the bat sh crazy women come to that opinion now I get that Trump has different views on let's say abortion than some of the country but where in the world do you get that he hates any women immigrants or people of color that there's not ever been even a cintilla of evidence of that he's only ever talked about policies which are unambiguously good for the United States such as closing the border and that he just has a normal protect every life opinion whether they're male or female fetuses somebody who wants to save every single female fetus isn't exactly a woman hater if he said oh we only want to abort the female fetuses then that would be a woman hater right there that would be a woman hater but no he wants to save all the babies you know that would be his view he wants to do IVF why because he hates women no oh my God how do you even come up with that all right ladies and gentlemen this is my show for the day uh I'm not going to talk to the uh to the locals people privately today because I got to run but have a great day and I will get back to you maybe tonight in the man cave for the locals people but I'm not sure yet and I will talk to you soon thanks for joining and I'll have one final sip before we go oh that was good bye for now for

yeah I'm early I'm early I'll tell you

about that in a

minute well we don't know how many

people are going to join us in this new

earlier shorter version of the

show but 11 of us so

far you're the ones I call the high

Achievers get in here will

you let's figure out how this day is

going to go

we're going to have some

fun all right I've got a little uh

scheduling uh overlap today so I'm doing

the show earlier and shorter but I

didn't want to miss out I didn't want

you to wake up and say where's my

simultaneous sip which for many of you

might be

recorded but I hope you uh figure it out

and come here and make it all work cuz I

take some responsibility for having

developed a simultaneous sip Habit in

you I feel like I have to deliver every

single day so here I

am and if you'd like to take this

experience up to levels that nobody can

even understand well all you need for

that is a cuper muger glass a tankered

chin a canteen Jugger flask a vessel of

any kind fill it with your favorite

liquid I like coffee join me now for the

unparallel pleasure of the dopamine of

the day

thing makes everything better it's

called the simultaneous zp and it

happens now

go when I say I needed that oh my

goodness well I've got the uh the

swaddling blanket of comfort on me

today because it seems to me that the

country is in a a weird mental state and

what you need is well me you need me you

need me to snap you out of this bad

mental state it looks like there's Doom

coming from every direction and the

elections look iffy yeah we'll fix all

that I've got an idea to fix all of it

actually

really so although today's story will be

short you're about to see the best idea

ever just wait for

that well JP Morgan announced that

they're going to put a limit on Junior

investment bankers hours so if you're a

junior investment banker at JP Morgan

they will no longer let you work more

than 80 hours per week no matter how

much you want

to what who works 80 hours a week unless

it's their own company well you can make

a Millions as an investment banker if

you do everything right but looks like

there's a lot of competition for those

jobs and so the question I ask myself is

if I can see a time sheet for that

entire 80

hours how much of that time are you like

just really kicking out the

work because you know recently I got

some attention for uh having a good work

ethic because I like to show up every

day and I'm not big on vacations I like

to work every day but even I don't work

80 hours a week 80 hours a week do you

have any idea what that would do to you

I mean there's a report of somebody

dying from overwork and in Japan you

hear about it all the time but there's

no good reason to make somebody work 80

hours a week There's no way that that

extra 10 hours or 20 hours at the end is

your good

time you would have to have all kinds of

breaks and I don't know you're going to

have to have an affair with your

co-workers to make that all work so a

pretty broken

system meanwhile uh MSNBC has decided to

spend some considerable time uh telling

his audience what a terrible person

Laura lumer is now Laura lumer is a if

you've not heard that name she's

associated with the right and she's I

guess I would say an independent

researcher journalist and she's broken

some good Scoops so she's she's got some

serious credibility in terms of scoops

Hoops uh but she's also controversial

and it's not my job to defend anything

that anybody else said so you should

hear this first I'm not defending

anything that anybody else said but do I

need to why would why would that be my

job no I'm on a pirate ship all right I

signed up to be on a pirate ship if they

let another pirate on the pirate ship

you know what I'm not going to do um I'd

like to examine your past statements for

acceptability no I'm going to take

whatever weapons that pirate has CU we

need to get a mission done and I don't

give a rat's ass what what anybody ever

said to offend you do I agree with

everything ever said by RFK Jr I doubt

it I mean I can't think of a specific

example but I doubt it do do I think he

shouldn't be on the pirate ship no I

think he should be very much on the

pirate ship I want to be on the same

ship as him so Laura lomer is very

effective and they wouldn't be talking

about her unless she had made a big dent

in universe and if you're a pirate who

can make a big dent in universe and you

want Trump to win because I think is

vital to the survival of the United

States and that's the kind of pirate I

don't mind associating with but it's

kind of funny

because we've entered this weird

political mode

where we're trying to take people down

by who they associate with and then it's

kind of a contest it's like MSNBC say

all right all right we're g to say that

Trump is associating with this this

horrible racist they would say Lura

lumer and of course that's weird because

MSNBC is the most famously corrupt and

racist

organization in the public

knowledge that that would be an

interesting question could you think of

a more racist

organization like just overtly racist

than

MSNBC actually I can't think of

one I actually can't think of

any well that's weird it seems like

there be some competition for the top

spot but there really isn't yeah MSNBC

is

so blatantly racist that they're they're

going after Laura L now again I'm not

defending Laura

lomer I know you're going to say the ADL

I thought of the ADL but they're so

special

purpose that they seem like a different

kind of animal yeah the ADL is uh not my

favorite organization they they defamed

me in public because racist yeah you're

right the ADL might be

competitive because they went after me

because they're

racists I assume I mean they made a

racist Claim about me

anyway

um so here's what's happening so the so

the Democrats are like all right you've

got Laura lummer haaha and then we say

oh yeah you've got dick Janie

haaha and then the Democrats say well

you've got that terrible person Scott

Adams and then I say oh yeah you've got

Adam

kiner and then they say we''ve got that

terrible person fill in the

blank I I feel like there are enough

terrible people according to other

people that we could do this all day

long all right now here's the funniest

story of the day as I told you that

every meme about uh Trump is funny and I

don't know how it expands all

generations whatever it is that's funny

about Trump as a personality or a

character or a meme or whatever if works

for every generation and on Tik Tok

today this is real by the way this

sounds like I'm making it up but it's

real there's a viral uh Trend going on

where the ticktockers young ones like

you know older teens are dancing to

Trump saying at the uh at the debate

they're eating their they're eating our

dogs they're eating our

pets and they've turned that into a

autotune um sort sort of a line that

they dance with so you can hear Trump's

voice they're eating our they're eating

our dogs they're eating our pets and you

see the people dancing they're eating

our dogs they're eating our pets and

it's freaking hilarious and where does

that come from like where in the world

of all the things that a Tik tocker

could dance to they pick that and it

works it works it's like it's hilarious

and I watched several of them this

morning and I thought oh I'm glad I saw

those are pretty

good so that never gets

old anyway are they eating our pets

well let me tell you how the news uh

determines whether something is

true would you like to see an example of

me doing some investigative

journalism

watch there's nothing behind that closed

door

how do I

know well I don't see anything behind

it well but that's because the door is

closed so well how could you see

something behind the door if the door is

closed well there's no reports

whatsoever of anything from behind the

door I know but you wouldn't necessarily

hear about it unless you talk to the

right people as in opening the

door but there's no indication there's

there's anything behind the door I know

but you can't know what's behind the

door unless you open the door and look H

I don't know you found you sound like a

conspiracy theorist because you're

always thinking there's something behind

the door when we've proven there's not

no you didn't prove it you didn't prove

it you simply stated it without checking

that's the opposite of proving proving

would be doing something actively not

doing

something is called not proving it

so yeah we know that no dogs or cats are

being eaten because some of the news

people ask the

government they ask the government now I

would like to put out at least an

alternative hypothesis to the eating of

the

pets there may have been somebody

who tried to kill a goose at the park I

think that's likely I mean if you needed

food and you're used to killing ducks

and geese where you grew up and you saw

a geese and it looked like it was free I

could see that happening the cats and

dogs part especially the

cats seems like it's at least a little

bit likely to be a mass

hysteria I know I know I'm a broken

record Mass hisy areas everywhere so it

could be that I'm just filtered that way

so I see Mist areas because my brain is

kind of tuned to look for them that's

how I knew that there would be no

information about a secret Sonic weapon

at the embassies because that was really

a classic Mass hysteria even with all

the evidence that there was something

real happening and maybe there's

something real happening but the odds of

it being a secret Sonic weapon were

really not very high now could I be

wrong and someday they'll find a secret

Sonic weapon sure because unlike the

news I do not declare that something

doesn't exist simply because I haven't

seen it what I did predict is that they

wouldn't find it it would never be

confirmed so think of it as a prediction

not a fact so far the prediction is

holding now let me ask you this if you

went to my neighborhood my current

neighborhood and you surveyed all of the

people here and you said do you have an

outdoor

cat some of them would say yes an

alarming number of them would say we

used to you know what I mean we used to

have an outdoor cat it didn't come home

we don't know why but there are mountain

lions and all kinds of dangerous things

out there and uh outdoor cats disappear

a lot and sometimes they'll be gone for

days and come

back now

if you had heard that the uh the

immigrants in your town were eating cats

and then your cat

disappeared what would you tell people

uhoh I think they got my cat they may

have eaten my cat now that's how a mass

hysteria starts because if you have a

natural situation where cats disappear

pretty much all the time I mean outdoor

cats they don't last a long time where I

live

so you you could imagine that people

would start hearing stories of other

people losing their cats and presuming

it was the immigrants Etc

so here's my best guess of what's really

happening my best guess is that there

are a few legitimate claims of an

immigrant eating an animal might have

been a goose might even be one example

or two where somebody ate an animal like

a pet maybe I wouldn't rule it out

because I haven't seen it

and you're going to say to me but Scott

we've seen the videos and the phone

calls and stuff well I don't trust

anything anymore I don't trust any

videos you don't know where they came

from or what you're really looking at or

whether it's been edited whether it's AI

you can't tell but my best guess is that

there's a little bit to it but the rest

might be a Massy areia because then

people say but my cat's missing for two

hours they got my cat and then they

complain about the cat and you hear

about it but they don't tell you later

the cat came home in two hours I think

it might be that but again I'm

speculating so unlike the news I can't

tell you what is a fact without

investigating all

right in aora the town of Aurora 10

members of that Venezuelan gang Treno

arago have been arrested Fox News say

they're associated with that alleged

building takeover so the question of

whether a building has been taken over

or not is still a little bit

contentious U I think Aurora is saying

no but there are gang members and

they're put down a uh they put out a uh

a statement saying that uh the the gangs

are not taking over Aurora and they're

they got things under control well maybe

according to the

express there's a big breakthrough in

prosthetic hands so a mechanical hand

for somebody who's uh lost a hand they

figured out how to make it controlled by

the

brain so they actually showed a video of

somebody with a mechanical hand whose

brain was controlling the fingers and

the

grip and uh Daniel 34 year old from

Italy uh he tested it because he'd lost

a hand and he said uh quote it feels

like I'm moving my own

hand oh my God

really

really could that be true because the

hard part would make it would be the

part where you feel like it's your own

hand I don't know how they did

that I mean I I suppose it's could be

just a psychological phenomenon as much

as a physical one I don't know but what

if this is true and by the way this is a

little this a little too good to be true

falls into the category of maybe the

demo

worked but you know maybe it's not so

easy to just slap these on people and

say there you go you got a new hand but

uh it does raise some

questions if you can get a prosthetic

hand that feels just like you're moving

your own

hand makes me wonder what other options

are available I'm going to sip a coffee

while you fill in the

joke not even saying the obvious I'm

just letting you fill in your own joke

at home this see it's a prosthetic hand

that feels just like your

own but if I were at home and I were

writing this joke I'd say something like

this I wonder if I can get a female hand

that doesn't sound like feel like it's

my

own all right I had to say

it all right what else do we got going

on uh fentanyl is killing uh 200 people

A Day in the United States and costing

1.5 trillion per year according to the

times of India and their headline is how

China is destroying us families with

deadly drug

fentol well yes it's true that China

seems to be the source of the precursors

and they do seem to pretend that they're

going to do something about it while

clearly not doing anything about

it or anything that matters and then

they send that to the cartels in Mexico

and the cartels pressed into and ship it

across the border and

kill 200 people A Day in the United

States that would be about one every 8

minutes one every eight minutes so we've

been on for 33 minutes or let's say I've

been on for three

deaths so we could change the way we

keep time in the United States by having

8 minute increments that's one fentel

overdose

death so we're uh we're three fentel in

to the uh three fenel ODS into the

show oh hold on hold

on four somebody else just died every

eight

minutes every eight minutes somebody's

dropping dead from fenel in another s

minutes I might remind you there's

another one now here's my current

working hypothesis on this there's no

way this could have persisted this long

the way it is unless some dark part of

the United States government is in on

the plot and we do have at least the

suggestion that the the countries that

are south of our border our country

wants to control their governments in

any way that we can because that that

would have a legitimate value to the

country making sure it doesn't become

you know an enemy controlled country

making sure we have access to resources

all that stuff so

we probably can't control a country

that's owned by the cartels unless we're

working with the

cartels so it seems to me that cartels

probably control most of the governments

and therefore if we work with the

cartels and let them earn they will let

us have our little geopolitical control

because the last thing the cartels want

is what's the last thing that the

cartels

want foreign

control the last thing the can the the

cartels want is China or Russia for

example to get real active in their

country

so I don't I to me it seems obvious that

the US government at least some portion

of it the security State part of it uh

probably gives the talk to only

Republican leaders not not everybody

because it'd be too sensitive but I'm

sure if you're the Speaker of the House

for example there's somebody in that

dark part of the government says look

here's the deal if we stop the cartels

from earning we're not going to be able

to work with them and we're going to

lose control of entire Central South

America and the entire country could be

in trouble so I know it's terrible

terrible terrible that 200 people a day

are dying from fentanyl but that's the

cost of having this control and that's

worth

it I feel

like that would explain everything and

it would be consistent with all

observations it's consistent with human

behavior it's consistent with incentives

and it's consistent with history it

might not be true but it's the only

thing that fits the observations because

if you're telling me that the United

States really really wants to fight this

Fentanyl and the bord is kind of porous

that's no sorry if we're not physically

attacking the source of the fenel which

we're not going to do by the way even if

Trump wins there won't be any bombing of

the cartels I think there's no chance of

it because I think the people doing the

bombing will say no they'll say you can

order us but we're literally not going

to

go why because there's a dark part of

the government that has a lot of control

over things who would say maybe

don't I do believe that it's possible

Trump does not get the talk and the

reason is if Trump got the talk he might

tell you all right here's the deal I'm

just going to be honest with you we

can't attack them because we're working

with the cartels you know that would be

the nightmare scenario for any alleged

deep State hypothetical group that's

really controlling things behind the

curtain so and we've we've seen you know

that the generals Etc suggest that Trump

should not be told the full truth that

the intelligence people know so it would

completely explain a lot of things if no

but he told Trump which is why he's

saying things like we'll bomb the

cartels which will never happen um that

would explain

everything wouldn't it and Mike Ben you

know is uh let's say compatible with the

idea that we have some cartel related uh

dealings with the the government south

of

us the details could be you know wildly

different than what I'm speculating but

it does seem like we may have a cozy

relationship in some way that's not

completely

public all

right according to project

Veritas uh they're still in operation

even though they lost um

o'keef um there's this Department of

Justice immigration attorney that says

they got him undercover saying that

Biden has the authority to end illegal

immigration but he doesn't because

Democrat Mega donors control the Border

the gayway punted is reporting that um

does that sound right to you now just

because it's a doj immigration attorney

that doesn't necessarily mean he knows

what's happening I he might be talking

as just a citizen who's speculating like

the rest of us because if you asked me

what's going on I'd say well somebody's

controlling that border I think the doj

person legitimately believes that the

mega donors are controlling the B

border um but I don't think he

understands that the mega donors are in

turn owned by whatever that deep entity

is that's running things behind the

scenes so if this doj's belief is that

let's say Soros is the funer who's

keeping the Border open does he go

further and say is Soros his own

man two Soros is now Elder and and

younger are they their own men

or are they influenced by somebody let

me give you the most obvious

interpretation is they're not

independent the most obvious I mean I

mean let let's be honest Alex Soros is

getting married to uh Huma abedine does

that look organic to

you to me that reminds me of you know

the old kings and queens in Europe you

know you'd have to marry your your

German cousin or something to make make

sure that make sure that everybody's you

know not going to sell you out keep it

in the

family so to me it looks like I keep it

in the family move and that the Soros

money it's just what it looks like do I

have any proof nah no I'm saying that if

you're trying to understand the

world the the world in which he's just

donating because he thinks it's you know

good for the immigrants is kind of

absurd it is good for the immigrants but

it's absurd to imagine that's why

they're doing

it the the why of it is clearly

something that we not being told so what

would that be it all comes back to

basically the same answers for

everything the people behind the

curtain all

right um did you know Ryan sedra was

reporting on this that when there's a

debate there's always somebody who hooks

it up to a dial test now a dial test is

where you get what you hope is a mixed

group of people in a room and they

literally have a little dial where

they're sitting each of them and as

they're watching the debate if they like

what they're hearing they'll dial it up

and then they'll dial it down if they

don't like what they're hearing so you

can see uh overlaid when the candidates

are talking you can see the graphs

moving oh they like what they're saying

right now oh and then they're divided by

Independence Democrats and Republicans

now you would not be surprised that

whenever K Harris talks the the Democrat

line goes sh way up to the top whenever

Trump talks way it goes way down to the

bottom and vice versa Republicans up

when Trump is talking Republicans all

the way at the bottom when Kam is

talking but here's the interesting thing

where do you think The Independents are

your common sense would say somewhere in

the middle right somewhere in the middle

well didn't work out that way apparently

when Trump was talking about the economy

The Independents tracked the Republican

line

perfectly perfectly they they didn't

even basically you could barely see any

difference so The

Independents are economics

voters what do you think of that so that

that's my that's my statement of the day

I don't know if it's true I'll just put

it out there as you can you can test

this against what you see in here I say

the independent voters are the ones who

are not caring about the eating of cats

and dogs they're not caring about who

got accused of saying the thing that

made somebody mad they're not caring so

much about the Mean Tweets they're not

caring so much about anything except the

economy so maybe we're making a big

mistake to call them

Independents maybe all they are is

people who prioritize the economy above

other things and they say the rest is

garbage everything else is garbage just

give us an economy maybe stay out of

some Wars we'll be

good

so so that's interesting so that would

be a suggestion that um Trump would win

because if he's and and there is some

evidence that in Michigan for example

the New York Post is reporting that

Trump IVF proposal where where the

government would pay for your scientific

IVF in vitro fertilization so you could

have more babies and also some kind of

uh support for people with major newborn

expenses so Trump would help having

babies uh according to a new

poll uh that made Independence swing

pretty hard to his side so that would be

a second indication that there's another

thing that could move

Independence which

is can you directly help me have a baby

now the number of people who are either

using IVF or have a close family member

or friend who is using IVF is really

high now isn't it let let me ask you in

the

comments have you used IVF or do you

know somebody who's close to you who

has so just say yes if you've heard it

if you've used it yourself

planning to use it or does it have a

connection to your life at all because I

feel like it might I feel like a lot of

people would have some connection to

that

topic anyway uh you could argue that

that has some e it's an economic thing

but I think it's more it could be and I

wouldn't take too much away from this

one this one poll and this one state

over this one

issue I'm looking at a lot of yeses

coming in some NOS as well yeah so if

you look at the wall of yeses coming in

to people who have some direct or

indirect connection to IVF that tells

you it's at least you know a real topic

but secondly here's my here's my

interesting

question you the news has to fill up the

24 hours so we end up getting excited

about things that we all know are not

important because we're trying to fill

up the thing it's about memes and who

did who shook hands right and you know

who tripped on the stairs and you know

all that stuff but what is what is more

core to your human

existence than

reproduction mating mating is the core

human value so it could be that the

person who sort of accidentally stumbles

onto that wins in the landslide and

nobody knows why you know I've told you

a number of times in the past that all

of our behaviors all all of them are an

expression of our mating Instinct

because it's the only thing we're

optimized for by

Evolution if you get mating right then

you get to survive as a species

everything else doesn't matter so much

you just got to be able to mate period

just make more of you and everything

will be fine so we we evolved so that

any suggestion of anything that's in the

domain of sex or reproduction is just

automatically goes to the top of all of

our lists even if we don't know it like

e even if you're completely oblivious to

it it goes to the top of your list so

even what I'm doing right now feels to

me like an expression of my mating

Instinct I'm literally showing

off that's what I'm doing like like

right now I mean I do it for other

reasons too but the other reasons are my

conscious

reasons my conscious reasons are oh I

enjoy this topic and it's easy and I

like dealing with all of you and you

know I like the experience everything

that's my conscious reasons do you know

what my real reason is I'm showing off

I'm I'm displaying I'm just showing you

my feathers and will that increase my

mating options well if I were in The

Mating mood it would and I don't think

the fact that I'm not logically or

rationally in a mating mode allows me to

turn off the Instinct I think the

Instinct remains it's just too embedded

in my entire being

so if Trump comes up with something

that's

uh Pro extra babies that might be

different than the question of abortion

because the abortion question gets I

think you know I'm not a woman so I

can't judge this I feel like that's just

too much government control on your body

and that nobody can Ser nobody can be

okay with that at least half the country

they can't be okay with it so the F

thing could be a surprising home run

that nobody saw coming just because it's

one of the few things that Taps into

your most Basic Instinct which we act on

all day long but we're not aware of it

so this this would be the thing I'm

trying to add to the conversation is

that your rational brain and IVF don't

have any connection I mean there's a

rational you know we save money Etc

that's rational but that the real draw

of it

if if it really is moving Independence

in a big way like this one you know

unconfirmed poll is

saying this could be important it could

actually move the

election anyway I wouldn't say that's

confirmed yet but it's sort of

suggesting

that um so you know that Taylor Swift uh

endorsed kamla Harris and she did in a

very public way right after the debate

so she got maximum attention and she was

clever and she was holding her cat and

saying that she's a childless cat lady

making fun of JD Vance and uh Mike Benz

points us to NATO's YouTube channel so I

didn't even know NATO had a YouTube

channel but on on the NATO Channel where

nobody's hiding it because again it's

NATO's own

channel this this isn't somebody talking

about NATO

this is NATO's own channel and there's a

screenshot that Mike Ben shows that says

quote goal identify key actors to train

and spread desired me

messaging uh example encourage opinion

leaders to share counter IO I don't know

what IO is but content what is IO in

that context of NATO

interoperability intelligence opinion

I don't know but sounds something NATO

related all right so yeah the goal is to

identify key actors to train and spread

desired

messaging and then there was a uh photo

on that same slide right next to

identify key actors to train and spread

desired messaging and it was a photo

of Taylor

Swift it's actually Taylor Swift's photo

right right next to Nato saying that

they're that they're going to try to

bring in these personalities to help

them with their

messaging oh man

so my take on this is we've entered the

don't even need to hide it

facee it seems like the people running

the real country are not trying to hide

it and the reason is they don't need to

and here there are two reasons they

don't need to one is the news is so sat

ated with complicated stories that you

and

I have too much to worry about I can't

pick one of them out you could easily

imagine that this alone the Taylor Swift

thing would be the number one headline

story in the country oh my God NATO is

is weaponizing our celebrities against

us that would can't you imagine that

would be a headline story that people

would talk about for a month do you know

why it's not a headline story and we

don't talk about it for a month

because the things that become headlines

are not organic there are a few entities

which have close intelligence

connections which decide what the

headlines will be for all the other news

if the New York Times says this is our

big story and they hit it a few times

the other news just picks it up

Washington Post same

thing CNN maybe so the the point is if

the news can tell you what is news they

control the narrative

and everything is so complicated that

you can't do much with it yourself you

know you've seen me I follow the news

maybe because I do it literally every

day top

2% would is that fair of people who are

aware of and capable of following some

of the details of the news would I be in

the top

1% only because I do it every day not

because of my magical abilities maybe

top 1%

I don't understand the lawfare

stories I I just get them all confused

there's too many of them and there's so

many stories like that where the details

of them are are so confusing that how

could anybody understand it so as long

as the as long as whoever controls the

media decides which stories to focus on

and then they keep everything else

complicated the public is completely

neuter

do you know why there's not a big

protest about the use of uh of

of electronic voting machines do you

know why there's not uh protests in the

streets well first of all we're divided

so maybe one side doesn't mind it so

much the other is it's complicated and

they'll just tell you no the machines

are

fine well but I think they're not H we

had an expert look at them they're fine

everything's too hard to

understand yeah take

Ukraine if your story of Ukraine is uh

Putin's a monster and he's invading

countries because he's basically

Hiller if that was your view you're

you're missing out on a lot of details

about why the United States may have

always wanted to control Ukraine and

NATO's growth and the security State and

the military industrial complex and the

Maiden uh overthrow in Victoria Newland

I mean to actually

understand

Ukraine is incredibly

complicated so at this point the bad

guys can show their work right in front

of us and we'll just go ah I have so

many other things to complain about like

the national dat it just seems more

important I'll let that one go so we let

it go they can do stuff right in front

of us

now let me give you another example

where they can do it right in front of

you Daniel Dale I talked about this he

still has a

job he he ranked the the lies and the

fact check for the debate 33 to1 with

Trump lying 33 times and Harris only

once now this is an example of where

there isn't in my opinion the slightest

chance that he thought that was

real do you

disagree see I I don't think there's the

slightest chance that Daniel Dale is the

fact checker on CNN and doesn't know

what the facts

are but he scored It 33 to1 what's that

tell you well it tells me that

something's happening right in front of

you right in front of you they're doing

it right in front of you there's no way

that was organic I don't know where it

comes from I don't I don't know what

forces caused it and I'm not saying

somebody talk to him because we don't

need to do that everybody knows what

they need to do

you don't have to have a conversation

about it everybody knows so if Daniel

Dale still has a

job then they can do anything they want

right in front of you doesn't have any

consequences at

all all right so let's look at uh how

secure our elections are now that we

have a few data points we know that uh

the Democrats are massively using

lawfare against Trump and that the

Department of Justice is

corrupt um in a really deep way so could

you say that the election is

unrigged if one team has been

essentially illegitimately law faring

one candidate out of office for over a

year I would say that that would be

enough to say the election's rigged if

nothing else happened just by

that how about Dr Epstein's work in

which he is he claimed that Google is so

obviously biased and fixed it can

completely move the election dial one

One Direction or another and it always

moves it toward Democrats do you think

that he's he's got a handle on that well

we don't know because I have trouble

trusting any data or any expert at this

point but I haven't seen him be

debunked haven't seen the debunk we did

hear that his wife was killed in a

suspicious car accident right after

people warned him that he might get

killed in a suspicious

accident so everything about that

screams that he's on to something but

you know I'm not the one who can confirm

that of course we have mailin votes

massive mailin votes that suggests that

the intention is to

cheat because there's not really an

argument on the other side that you know

there was no way to vote without mail

and ballots so mail and ballots are a

signal of an intention to cheat what

about the use of voting machines which

we've been told are Totally

Secure

well um have you heard of the secure it

act so that's a proposed legislation

that would uh close the election machine

vulner what the election machine

vulnerabilities

what huh well now I'm all

confused so the elections were secure

and we know

it but there are so many vulnerabilities

in the

machines that we need legislation and

major work and a huge

budget to fix the

vulnerabilities that we've been told

don't exist or at least have not been

exploited how would anybody know that it

wasn't

exploited here's my second question that

the news will never answer you ready for

this uh I'll make you a bet the news

will never answer this question it's a

very simple question are all of the

vulnerabilities that we're talking about

and it's stuff like uh shared passwords

across

States um some password credentials are

in the code so anybody who knew what to

look for could have found it some of

them you could connect to the internet

when you shouldn't some of them have uh

old software and they think the new

software would fix some bugs in the old

software that could have caused a

vulnerability so there a whole host of

[Music]

things but are those things the types of

[Music]

things that you could always catch it if

it happened there's the key question are

these vulnerabilities which I think

there's General agreement there's lots

of them because even if you think the

machines are great you're probably still

looking to upgrade them because software

gets upgraded so

how do we know do you do you ever

remember the news telling you well it is

true that there are um potential

vulnerabilities in the voting machines

but even if somebody tried to exploit

them they would get caught now we don't

want to be in that situation of course

we'd rather they don't even have

anything to exploit but if they did

exploit them in any prior year Well we

caught them because we've got a we've

got a check in the balance to which I

say wait a minute if you could catch a

problem on a voting machine what are you

looking at to catch it does that mean

there's some parallel system where you

can look at it and say well your voting

machine total didn't match this total

because if there's an alternate system

that's more reliable and you can use it

to test whether the voting machines have

the right total shouldn't you just use

that other thing as your Source if

there's some other thing that tells you

that the vote was right use the other

thing

otherwise I would be assuming that

there's no way to know if the machine

got the right answer or

not so there's the key question if we

all know and I believe this is now

established it's now

established uh that the voting machines

have vulnerabilities that at least

potentially could be used by bad

people are they the type that if they

existed in past

elections and they got

exploited that we definitely would have

caught them and what does that look like

how exactly would you catch them I guess

it depends on the type of

exploit but they're really telling us

two opposites one there are lots of

things that need to be fixed in terms of

current vulnerabilities two the election

was Secure and we know

it can those both be true

to me those seem like

opposites if if these vulnerabilities

are the kind that you have to fix it's

sort of suggesting by by nobody saying

it that somebody could have exploited

them and gotten away with it so this

again is the news saying well we haven't

looked behind the closed door but we can

guarantee there's nothing back there how

well nobody said there's anything back

there I know but you never looked

right do do you see how obvious this

is just think about the fact that you've

been watching shows and news and reports

about this topic election Integrity for

years and and today is the first time

anybody said the only question that

mattered if somebody had already used

any of these

vulnerabilities did you definitely catch

it because the system catches that kind

of stuff

if you've never heard the answer to that

question let me tell you the answer to

that question we would have no idea if

they were exploited that is the answer

it's the most important question and

most important answer and the news on

the left and the right doesn't even ask

it what's up with

that why is this the first time you've

even heard the question am I right how

many of you your brains are exploding

right now when you say my God that is

the only important

question since we've confirmed lots of

vulnerabilities in lots of different

ways if somebody had use those

vulnerabilities which we've confirmed to

exist would they definitely have been

caught

how it's not much of a vulnerability if

you get caught every time you use it now

I suppose there' be a different kind of

vulnerability where it just takes the

machine down and you know let's say they

take the machine down in Trump territory

so that that would be maybe harder

spots all right so we got that so we got

uh let's

see um the lawfare against Trump we've

got Google who is rigged we've got

mailin voting which only has one purpose

for rigging we've got the use of voting

machines that have lots of

vulnerabilities but they can't tell us

if they've been exploited in the past

um and uh let's see oh Montgomery County

in Texas just halted their voting

machine upgrade according to John

Becker now why would you halt a software

upgrade or an improvement in your

election machines because they're

they're there to fix a a problem I mean

that's the whole point of a software

upgrade there's either a vulnerability

or something and uh they've decided not

to and I think the reason is that they

can't be sure that the upgrade will be

secure that's a good point how much time

does it take to check every upgrade to

know that it's secure and how can you

know that a new software is better than

the old software I'll bet the people who

do the upgrade can't

tell now let me inject what Dr

insensitive jerk on X says good account

to follow by the way Dr insensitive

jerk um he has lots of good statements

even though his name doesn't sound he

sounds like a troll but his trolling is

always data related you know sort of

logical data related stuff so he's

good he says the following it's funny

that anyone believes a voting machine

could be secure against the men who

designed the hardware or wrote the

software how do you make it secure

against the people who designed it

that's not a

thing it's definitely not a thing you

can't be secure against the people who

made it so and how would you know that

the people who made it are all on your

side no way you can't possibly know it

gets better uh Dr incens of jerk points

out that even reading the code won't

help because hiding exploits an innocent

looking code is literally a sport now

when he says it's literally a sport to

hide the real meaning of you code in the

code I mean he doesn't really mean that

right it's not like it's an actual

International contest where experts see

if they can be the best to hide some

code and some

code it is it's an international contest

in which they see who can do the best of

hiding malicious or just hiding code in

other

code it's literally a

contest it's the international OB

obfuscated code

contest now look at Elon Musk when he

took over

Twitter he had access to the code did he

not and when he had access the code he

was like oh I found some problems here

we corrected them and then what happened

oh uh well looks like we didn't know it

but there's some other problems but we

corrected them and then what

happened okay there's some other

problems but we got them and then what

happened okay we found some other

problems but we corrected them I think

it took him a

year just to pour through the the code

and find all the things that were

rigging the results probably a year and

and the we're talking about the best

Engineers who are experts on the

system do you think the election people

are the best

Engineers you think there are a lot of

Elon Musk who said oh I could build a

rocket to space and make a car company

or I could work 8 to5 on that election

uh machine upgrade

stuff no you can't tell by looking at

the

code all right let's see uh we got the

total media control working on one side

as we on the debate we saw the Democrats

uh game the primary so that the voters

weren't uh involved really we saw that

Biden was replaced and we see the

immigrants are being shipped in and

every attempt to make them voters to rig

the system so let's uh let's go through

the full list now so is this election

going to be fair well we see law fair

before and we'll probably see law fair

after even if Trump were to win he would

be lawfare at out of office or or at

least they would try very hard so that's

rigged uh Dr Epstein's Google research

if that's true that's rigged the mail in

votes there's really no reason for that

other than rigging the use of voting

machines they're full of vulnerabilities

we know that and we wouldn't know if

they had ever been used before for

rigging and we won't know in the future

because that's how they're

designed um let's see what else we got

uh we got the media total media control

the Democrats rigged the primary uh

replacing Biden and keeping comell

Harris from our view and then of course

the Immigrant shipped

in so that's the bad news let me get to

the good news the reason I was wearing

my swaddling blanket today is because

you guys need some good news here's some

good

news voter enthusiasm is probably all

that makes a difference in this race so

the the smart people the ones I agree

with um say that getting your base more

of them to show up is going to be way

more likely to work than getting people

to change their

minds because there's not so much mind

changing going on but you might be able

to get more people to show up now I

don't think you it's hard to get people

to show up in person because it's hard

to get somebody's you know ass off

the couch if they don't want to do it

but it might not be impossible to get

people to mail by to vote by mail so

here's what I'd do from this day on

every every time there's another Trump

meme I would put a QR code on

it and the QR

code should take you to the Pennsylvania

page where you can request a mail-in

ballot and you should know that's what

the QR code is for and it should say

Pennsylvania mail and ballot I I posted

the link to the Pennsylvania mail and

ballot because winning Pennsylvania

might be the whole game a lot of people

say

so if you wanted to just drill in on the

one lever that might move the whole

thing besides IVF which could be

surprisingly effective you put a QR code

on your memes ideally you'd want

somebody like you know Laura Trump or

Scott presler maybe Scott presler should

do this because he's doing H signups in

Pennsylvania come up with one QR code so

everybody isn't using one and you just

say put this on your

memes and then everybody is what's that

QR code for but it maybe label it you

know P Pennsylvania mail and ballot

something like

that

uh yeah there's

another

okay so that is my suggestion put a QR

code that takes you to the link for

Pennsylvania Pennsylvania mailin votes

and just put that in the corner of every

Trump Meme and you're gonna get a lot of

people getting a mail and vote how hard

is it to give somebody to fill out their

mail and vote well I'll tell you I think

the podcasters who are pro Trump should

stop their Pro uh should stop their

programs and say hey if you're watching

right now from

Pennsylvania let's fill these out

together so you know take a moment I'll

give you a minute just go find go find

your mail and ballot just find it right

now and then fill it out vote for Trump

drop it in the mail and then put it in

the comments tell me in the comments you

just filled it out so you need to make

it a group social

situation U and that could

work Linda ronat complained about Trump

going to uh I guess he's going to Tucson

and he's going to be in a stadium or a

facility that has her name on it and she

didn't like that because she doesn't

like Trump the surprising story about

this story is that Linda ronat still

alive how many of you thought Linda

ronat had already

passed I did I saw the story I like how

is she talking from Beyond the Grave

she's 78 but she's a uh she's a cat lady

uh she's she had adopted kids but didn't

have her own kids but she does have a

cat and she said in her message quote

Trump hates women immigrants and people

of

color how do all the bat sh crazy women

come to that

opinion now I

get that Trump has different views on

let's say abortion than some of the

country but where in the world do you

get that he hates any women immigrants

or people of

color that there's not ever been even a

cintilla of evidence of that he's only

ever talked about policies which are

unambiguously good for the United States

such as closing the

border and that he just has a normal

protect every life opinion whether

they're male or female fetuses somebody

who wants to save every single female

fetus isn't exactly a woman hater if he

said oh we only want to abort the female

fetuses then that would be a woman hater

right there that would be a woman

hater but no he wants to save all the

babies you know that would be his

view he wants to do IVF why because he

hates women

no oh my God how do you even come up

with that all right ladies and gentlemen

this is my show for the day uh I'm not

going to talk to the uh to the locals

people privately today because I got to

run but have a great day and I will get

back to you maybe tonight in the man

cave for the locals people but I'm not

sure yet and I will talk to you soon

thanks for

joining and I'll have one final sip

before we go

oh that was good bye for

now for