Episode 2595 CWSA 09/12/24
An earlier and shorter show today only ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.
Yeah, I'm early. I'm early. I'll tell you about that in a minute. Well, we don't know how many people are going to join us in this new earlier shorter version of the show, but eleven of us so far. You're the ones I call the high achievers. Get in here, will you? Let's figure out how this day is goin…
View segment →s sip habit in you. I feel like I have to deliver every single day. So here I am. And if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that nobody can even understand, well, all you need for that is a cup or mug or glass, a tankard, a chalice, a canteen, a jug or flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill…
View segment →goodness. Well, I've got the swaddling blanket of comfort on me today because it seems to me that the country is in a weird mental state. And what you need is, well, me. You need me. You need me to snap you out of this bad mental state. It looks like there's doom coming from every direction and the…
View segment →announced that they're going to put a limit on junior investment bankers' hours. So if you're a junior investment banker at JP Morgan, they will no longer let you work more than eighty hours per week, no matter how much you want to. What? Who works eighty hours a week unless it's their own company?…
View segment →But even I don't work eighty hours a week. Eighty hours a week. Do you have any idea what that would do to you? I mean, there's a report of somebody dying from overwork, and in Japan you hear about it all the time. But there's no good reason to make somebody work eighty hours a week. There's no way…
View segment →of a more racist organization, like just overtly racist, than MSNBC? Actually I can't think of one. I actually can't think of any. Well, that's weird. It seems like there'd be some competition for the top spot, but there really isn't. Yeah, MSNBC is so blatantly racist that they're going after Laura…
View segment →what's happening. So the Democrats are like, all right, you've got Laura Loomer, ha ha. And then we say, oh yeah, you've got Dick Cheney, ha ha. And then the Democrats say, well, you've got that terrible person Scott Adams. And then I say, oh yeah, you've got Adam Kinzinger. And then they say, we've…
View segment →the evidence that there was something real happening. And maybe there's something real happening, but the odds of it being a secret sonic weapon were really not very high. Now, could I be wrong and someday they'll find a secret sonic weapon? Sure, because unlike the news, I do not declare that some…
View segment →ed to." You know what I mean? We used to have an outdoor cat. It didn't come home. We don't know why, but there are mountain lions and all kinds of dangerous things out there, and outdoor cats disappear a lot. And sometimes they'll be gone for days and come back. Now if you had heard that the immigr…
View segment →oking at or whether it's been edited, whether it's AI. You can't tell. But my best guess is that there's a little bit to it, but the rest might be a mass hysteria. Because then people say, but my cat's missing for two hours. They got my cat. And then they complain about the cat and you hear about i…
View segment →day are dying from fentanyl, but that's the cost of having this control, and that's worth it. I feel like that would explain everything, and it would be consistent with all observations. It's consistent with human behavior. It's consistent with incentives, and it's consistent with history. It might…
View segment →ould completely explain a lot of things if nobody told Trump, which is why he's saying things like we'll bomb the cartels, which will never happen. That would explain everything, wouldn't it? And Mike Benz, you know, is let's say compatible with the idea that we have some cartel-related dealings wi…
View segment →they're watching the debate, if they like what they're hearing, they'll dial it up, and then they'll dial it down if they don't like what they're hearing. So you can see, overlaid when the candidates are talking, you can see the graphs moving. Oh, they like what they're saying right now. Oh, and the…
View segment →right now feels to me like an expression of my mating instinct. I'm literally showing off. That's what I'm doing. Like right now. I mean I do it for other reasons too, but the other reasons are my conscious reasons. My conscious reasons are oh, I enjoy this topic and it's easy and I like dealing wit…
View segment →at nobody can be okay with that. At least half the country, they can't be okay with it. So the IVF thing could be a surprising home run that nobody saw coming just because it's one of the few things that taps into your most basic instinct, which we act on all day long but we're not aware of it. So…
View segment →not really an argument on the other side that you know there was no way to vote without mail-in ballots. So mail-in ballots are a signal of an intention to cheat. What about the use of voting machines which we've been told are totally secure? Well, have you heard of the Secure It Act? So that's a p…
View segment →say Pennsylvania mail-in ballot. I posted the link to the Pennsylvania mail-in ballot because winning Pennsylvania might be the whole game. A lot of people say so. If you wanted to just drill in on the one lever that might move the whole thing, besides IVF which could be surprisingly effective, you…
View segment →is she talking from beyond the grave? She's seventy-eight. But she's a cat lady. She's adopted kids but didn't have her own kids. But she does have a cat. And she said in her message, quote, "Trump hates women, immigrants, and people of color." How do all the batshit crazy women come to that opinion…
View segment →ntlemen, this is my show for the day. I'm not going to talk to the locals people privately today because I got to run. But have a great day, and I will get back to you maybe tonight in the man cave for the locals people, but I'm not sure yet. And I will talk to you soon. Thanks for joining. And I'll…
View segment →Yeah, I'm early. I'm early. I'll tell you about that in a minute. Well, we don't know how many people are going to join us in this new earlier shorter version of the show, but eleven of us so far. You're the ones I call the high achievers. Get in here, will you? Let's figure out how this day is going to go. We're going to have some fun.
All right, I've got a little scheduling overlap today, so I'm doing the show earlier and shorter. But I didn't want to miss out. I didn't want you to wake up and say, "Where's my simultaneous sip?" Which for many of you might be recorded, but I hope you figure it out and come here and make it all work. Because I take some responsibility for having developed a simultaneous sip habit in you. I feel like I have to deliver every single day. So here I am.
And if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that nobody can even understand, well, all you need for that is a cup or mug or glass, a tankard, a chalice, a canteen, a jug or flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. Join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine of the day. The thing that makes everything better is called the simultaneous sip, and it happens now.
Go.
When I say I needed that. Oh my goodness.
Well, I've got the swaddling blanket of comfort on me today because it seems to me that the country is in a weird mental state. And what you need is, well, me. You need me. You need me to snap you out of this bad mental state. It looks like there's doom coming from every direction and the elections look iffy. Yeah, we'll fix all that. I've got an idea to fix all of it actually. Really. So although today's story will be short, you're about to see the best idea ever. Just wait for that.
Well, JP Morgan announced that they're going to put a limit on junior investment bankers' hours. So if you're a junior investment banker at JP Morgan, they will no longer let you work more than eighty hours per week, no matter how much you want to. What? Who works eighty hours a week unless it's their own company? Well, you can make millions as an investment banker if you do everything right, but it looks like there's a lot of competition for those jobs.
And so the question I ask myself is, if I can see a timesheet for that entire eighty hours, how much of that time are you like just really kicking out the work? Because you know, recently I got some attention for having a good work ethic because I like to show up every day and I'm not big on vacations. I like to work every day. But even I don't work eighty hours a week. Eighty hours a week. Do you have any idea what that would do to you? I mean, there's a report of somebody dying from overwork, and in Japan you hear about it all the time. But there's no good reason to make somebody work eighty hours a week. There's no way that that extra ten hours or twenty hours at the end is your good time. You would have to have all kinds of breaks, and I don't know, you're going to have to have an affair with your co-workers to make that all work. So a pretty broken system.
Meanwhile, MSNBC has decided to spend some considerable time telling its audience what a terrible person Laura Loomer is. Now Laura Loomer is, if you've not heard that name, she's associated with the right, and she's, I guess I would say, an independent researcher journalist. And she's broken some good scoops, so she's got some serious credibility in terms of scoops. But she's also controversial, and it's not my job to defend anything that anybody else said. So you should hear this first. I'm not defending anything that anybody else said. But do I need to? Why would that be my job? No, I'm on a pirate ship. All right, I signed up to be on a pirate ship. If they let another pirate on the pirate ship, you know what I'm not going to do? I'd like to examine your past statements for acceptability. No, I'm going to take whatever weapons that pirate has because we need to get a mission done, and I don't give a rat's ass what anybody ever said to offend you.
Do I agree with everything ever said by RFK Jr.? I doubt it. I mean, I can't think of a specific example, but I doubt it. Do I think he shouldn't be on the pirate ship? No, I think he should be very much on the pirate ship. I want to be on the same ship as him. So Laura Loomer is very effective, and they wouldn't be talking about her unless she had made a big dent in the universe. And if you're a pirate who can make a big dent in the universe and you want Trump to win because I think it's vital to the survival of the United States, and that's the kind of pirate I don't mind associating with.
But it's kind of funny because we've entered this weird political mode where we're trying to take people down by who they associate with. And then it's kind of a contest. It's like MSNBC say, all right, all right, we're going to say that Trump is associating with this horrible racist. They would say Laura Loomer. And of course that's weird because MSNBC is the most famously corrupt and racist organization in the public knowledge. That would be an interesting question. Could you think of a more racist organization, like just overtly racist, than MSNBC? Actually I can't think of one. I actually can't think of any. Well, that's weird. It seems like there'd be some competition for the top spot, but there really isn't. Yeah, MSNBC is so blatantly racist that they're going after Laura Loomer now.
Again, I'm not defending Laura Loomer. I know you're going to say the ADL. I thought of the ADL, but they're so special purpose that they seem like a different kind of animal. Yeah, the ADL is not my favorite organization. They defamed me in public because racist. Yeah, you're right. The ADL might be competitive because they went after me because they're racists, I assume. I mean, they made a racist claim about me anyway.
So here's what's happening. So the Democrats are like, all right, you've got Laura Loomer, ha ha. And then we say, oh yeah, you've got Dick Cheney, ha ha. And then the Democrats say, well, you've got that terrible person Scott Adams. And then I say, oh yeah, you've got Adam Kinzinger. And then they say, we've got that terrible person, fill in the blank. I feel like there are enough terrible people according to other people that we could do this all day long.
All right, now here's the funniest story of the day. As I told you, that every meme about Trump is funny, and I don't know how it expands all generations. Whatever it is that's funny about Trump as a personality or a character or a meme or whatever, it works for every generation. And on TikTok today, this is real by the way. This sounds like I'm making it up, but it's real. There's a viral trend going on where the TikTokers, young ones like older teens, are dancing to Trump saying at the debate, "They're eating our dogs. They're eating our pets." And they've turned that into an autotune sort of a line that they dance with. So you can hear Trump's voice: "They're eating our dogs. They're eating our pets." And you see the people dancing: "They're eating our dogs. They're eating our pets." And it's freaking hilarious.
And where does that come from? Like where in the world of all the things that a TikToker could dance to, they pick that? And it works. It works. It's hilarious. And I watched several of them this morning, and I thought, oh, I'm glad I saw those. Those are pretty good. So that never gets old.
Anyway, are they eating our pets? Well, let me tell you how the news determines whether something is true. Would you like to see an example of me doing some investigative journalism? Watch. There's nothing behind that closed door. How do I know? Well, I don't see anything behind it. Well, but that's because the door is closed. So how could you see something behind the door if the door is closed? Well, there's no reports whatsoever of anything from behind the door. I know, but you wouldn't necessarily hear about it unless you talk to the right people, as in opening the door. But there's no indication there's anything behind the door. I know, but you can't know what's behind the door unless you open the door and look. I don't know. You sound like a conspiracy theorist because you're always thinking there's something behind the door when we've proven there's not. No, you didn't prove it. You didn't prove it. You simply stated it without checking. That's the opposite of proving. Proving would be doing something actively. Not doing something is called not proving it.
So yeah, we know that no dogs or cats are being eaten because some of the news people ask the government. They ask the government. Now I would like to put out at least an alternative hypothesis to the eating of the pets. There may have been somebody who tried to kill a goose at the park. I think that's likely. I mean, if you needed food and you're used to killing ducks and geese where you grew up and you saw a goose and it looked like it was free, I could see that happening. The cats and dogs part, especially the cats, seems like it's at least a little bit likely to be a mass hysteria. I know, I know, I'm a broken record. Mass hysterias everywhere. So it could be that I'm just filtered that way, so I see mass hysterias because my brain is kind of tuned to look for them. That's how I knew that there would be no information about a secret sonic weapon at the embassies, because that was really a classic mass hysteria, even with all the evidence that there was something real happening. And maybe there's something real happening, but the odds of it being a secret sonic weapon were really not very high.
Now, could I be wrong and someday they'll find a secret sonic weapon? Sure, because unlike the news, I do not declare that something doesn't exist simply because I haven't seen it. What I did predict is that they wouldn't find it. It would never be confirmed. So think of it as a prediction, not a fact. So far the prediction is holding.
Now let me ask you this. If you went to my neighborhood, my current neighborhood, and you surveyed all of the people here and you said, "Do you have an outdoor cat?" Some of them would say yes. An alarming number of them would say, "We used to." You know what I mean? We used to have an outdoor cat. It didn't come home. We don't know why, but there are mountain lions and all kinds of dangerous things out there, and outdoor cats disappear a lot. And sometimes they'll be gone for days and come back. Now if you had heard that the immigrants in your town were eating cats and then your cat disappeared, what would you tell people? "Uh oh, I think they got my cat. They may have eaten my cat."
Now that's how a mass hysteria starts. Because if you have a natural situation where cats disappear pretty much all the time, I mean outdoor cats, they don't last a long time where I live. So you could imagine that people would start hearing stories of other people losing their cats and presuming it was the immigrants, etc. So here's my best guess of what's really happening. My best guess is that there are a few legitimate claims of an immigrant eating an animal. Might have been a goose. Might even be one example or two where somebody ate an animal like a pet. Maybe. I wouldn't rule it out because I haven't seen it. And you're going to say to me, but Scott, we've seen the videos and the phone calls and stuff. Well, I don't trust anything anymore. I don't trust any videos. You don't know where they came from or what you're really looking at or whether it's been edited, whether it's AI. You can't tell.
But my best guess is that there's a little bit to it, but the rest might be a mass hysteria. Because then people say, but my cat's missing for two hours. They got my cat. And then they complain about the cat and you hear about it, but they don't tell you later the cat came home in two hours. I think it might be that. But again, I'm speculating. So unlike the news, I can't tell you what is a fact without investigating.
All right. In Aurora, the town of Aurora, ten members of that Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua have been arrested. Fox News says they're associated with that alleged building takeover. So the question of whether a building has been taken over or not is still a little bit contentious. I think Aurora is saying no, but there are gang members, and they put out a statement saying that the gangs are not taking over Aurora and they've got things under control. Well, maybe.
According to the Express, there's a big breakthrough in prosthetic hands. So a mechanical hand for somebody who's lost a hand, they figured out how to make it controlled by the brain. So they actually showed a video of somebody with a mechanical hand whose brain was controlling the fingers and the grip. And Daniel, a thirty-four-year-old from Italy, he tested it because he'd lost a hand. And he said, quote, "It feels like I'm moving my own hand." Oh my God. Really? Really? Could that be true? Because the hard part would be the part where you feel like it's your own hand. I don't know how they did that. I mean, I suppose it could be just a psychological phenomenon as much as a physical one. I don't know.
But what if this is true? And by the way, this is a little too good to be true. It falls into the category of maybe the demo worked, but you know, maybe it's not so easy to just slap these on people and say there you go, you got a new hand. But it does raise some questions. If you can get a prosthetic hand that feels just like you're moving your own hand, makes me wonder what other options are available. I'm going to sip a coffee while you fill in the joke. Not even saying the obvious. I'm just letting you fill in your own joke at home. See, it's a prosthetic hand that feels just like your own. But if I were at home and I were writing this joke, I'd say something like this: I wonder if I can get a female hand that doesn't sound like it feels like it's my own. All right, I had to say it.
All right, what else do we got going on? Fentanyl is killing two hundred people a day in the United States and costing 1.5 trillion per year, according to the Times of India. And their headline is "How China is destroying US families with deadly drug fentanyl." Well, yes, it's true that China seems to be the source of the precursors, and they do seem to pretend that they're going to do something about it while clearly not doing anything about it or anything that matters. And then they send that to the cartels in Mexico, and the cartels process it and ship it across the border and kill two hundred people a day in the United States. That would be about one every eight minutes. One every eight minutes.
So we've been on for thirty-three minutes or let's say I've been on for three deaths. So we could change the way we keep time in the United States by having eight-minute increments. That's one fentanyl overdose death. So we're three fentanyl ODs into the show. Oh, hold on, hold on. Four. Somebody else just died. Every eight minutes. Every eight minutes somebody's dropping dead from fentanyl. In another eight minutes I might remind you there's another one.
Now here's my current working hypothesis on this. There's no way this could have persisted this long the way it is unless some dark part of the United States government is in on the plot. And we do have at least the suggestion that the countries that are south of our border, our country wants to control their governments in any way that we can because that would have a legitimate value to the country. Making sure it doesn't become an enemy-controlled country, making sure we have access to resources, all that stuff. So we probably can't control a country that's owned by the cartels unless we're working with the cartels. So it seems to me that cartels probably control most of the governments. And therefore if we work with the cartels and let them earn, they will let us have our little geopolitical control. Because the last thing the cartels want is foreign control. The last thing the cartels want is China or Russia, for example, to get real active in their country.
So to me it seems obvious that the US government, at least some portion of it, the security state part of it, probably gives the talk to only Republican leaders, not everybody, because it'd be too sensitive. But I'm sure if you're the Speaker of the House, for example, there's somebody in that dark part of the government who says, look, here's the deal. If we stop the cartels from earning, we're not going to be able to work with them, and we're going to lose control of entire Central and South America, and the entire country could be in trouble. So I know it's terrible, terrible, terrible that two hundred people a day are dying from fentanyl, but that's the cost of having this control, and that's worth it.
I feel like that would explain everything, and it would be consistent with all observations. It's consistent with human behavior. It's consistent with incentives, and it's consistent with history. It might not be true, but it's the only thing that fits the observations. Because if you're telling me that the United States really, really wants to fight this fentanyl and the border is kind of porous, that's no. Sorry. If we're not physically attacking the source of the fentanyl, which we're not going to do by the way, even if Trump wins, there won't be any bombing of the cartels. I think there's no chance of it because I think the people doing the bombing will say no. They'll say you can order us, but we're literally not going to go. Why? Because there's a dark part of the government that has a lot of control over things who would say maybe don't.
I do believe that it's possible Trump does not get the talk. And the reason is if Trump got the talk, he might tell you all. All right, here's the deal. I'm just going to be honest with you. We can't attack them because we're working with the cartels. You know, that would be the nightmare scenario for any alleged deep state hypothetical group that's really controlling things behind the curtain. So and we've seen, you know, that the generals, etc., suggest that Trump should not be told the full truth that the intelligence people know. So it would completely explain a lot of things if nobody told Trump, which is why he's saying things like we'll bomb the cartels, which will never happen. That would explain everything, wouldn't it?
And Mike Benz, you know, is let's say compatible with the idea that we have some cartel-related dealings with the government south of us. The details could be wildly different than what I'm speculating, but it does seem like we may have a cozy relationship in some way that's not completely public.
All right. According to Project Veritas, they're still in operation even though they lost O'Keefe. There's this Department of Justice immigration attorney that says they got him undercover saying that Biden has the authority to end illegal immigration but he doesn't because Democrat mega donors control the border. The Gateway Pundit is reporting that. Does that sound right to you? Now just because it's a DOJ immigration attorney, that doesn't necessarily mean he knows what's happening. He might be talking as just a citizen who's speculating like the rest of us. Because if you asked me what's going on, I'd say well, somebody's controlling that border. I think the DOJ person legitimately believes that the mega donors are controlling the border. But I don't think he understands that the mega donors are in turn owned by whatever that deep entity is that's running things behind the scenes.
So if this DOJ's belief is that let's say Soros is the funder who's keeping the border open, does he go further and say is Soros his own man? Soros is now elder and younger. Are they their own men or are they influenced by somebody? Let me give you the most obvious interpretation: they're not independent. The most obvious, I mean let's be honest. Alex Soros is getting married to Huma Abedin. Does that look organic to you? To me that reminds me of the old kings and queens in Europe. You know, you'd have to marry your German cousin or something to make sure that everybody's not going to sell you out. Keep it in the family. So to me it looks like a keep-it-in-the-family move. And that the Soros money, it's just what it looks like. Do I have any proof? Nah, no. I'm saying that if you're trying to understand the world, the world in which he's just donating because he thinks it's good for the immigrants is kind of absurd. It is good for the immigrants, but it's absurd to imagine that's why they're doing it. The why of it is clearly something that we're not being told. So what would that be? It all comes back to basically the same answers for everything. The people behind the curtain.
All right. Did you know Ryan Setera was reporting on this? That when there's a debate, there's always somebody who hooks it up to a dial test. Now a dial test is where you get what you hope is a mixed group of people in a room, and they literally have a little dial where they're sitting, each of them. And as they're watching the debate, if they like what they're hearing, they'll dial it up, and then they'll dial it down if they don't like what they're hearing. So you can see, overlaid when the candidates are talking, you can see the graphs moving. Oh, they like what they're saying right now. Oh, and then they're divided by independents, Democrats, and Republicans.
Now you would not be surprised that whenever Kamala Harris talks, the Democrat line goes way up to the top. Whenever Trump talks, it goes way down to the bottom. And vice versa. Republicans up when Trump is talking. Republicans all the way at the bottom when Kamala is talking. But here's the interesting thing. Where do you think the independents are? Your common sense would say somewhere in the middle, right? Somewhere in the middle. Well, it didn't work out that way apparently. When Trump was talking about the economy, the independents tracked the Republican line perfectly. Perfectly. They didn't even basically, you could barely see any difference. So the independents are economics voters. What do you think of that?
So that's my statement of the day. I don't know if it's true. I'll just put it out there as you can test this against what you see in here. I say the independent voters are the ones who are not caring about the eating of cats and dogs. They're not caring about who got accused of saying the thing that made somebody mad. They're not caring so much about the mean tweets. They're not caring so much about anything except the economy. So maybe we're making a big mistake to call them independents. Maybe all they are is people who prioritize the economy above other things. And they say the rest is garbage. Everything else is garbage. Just give us an economy. Maybe stay out of some wars. We'll be good.
So that's interesting. So that would be a suggestion that Trump would win. Because if he's, and there is some evidence that in Michigan for example the New York Post is reporting that Trump's IVF proposal, where the government would pay for your scientific IVF, in vitro fertilization, so you could have more babies, and also some kind of support for people with major newborn expenses. So Trump would help having babies, according to a new poll. That made independents swing pretty hard to his side. So that would be a second indication that there's another thing that could move independents, which is can you directly help me have a baby?
Now the number of people who are either using IVF or have a close family member or friend who is using IVF is really high now, isn't it? Let me ask you in the comments, have you used IVF or do you know somebody who's close to you who has? So just say yes if you've heard it, if you've used it yourself, planning to use it, or does it have a connection to your life at all? Because I feel like it might. I feel like a lot of people would have some connection to that topic anyway.
You could argue that that has some, it's an economic thing, but I think it's more. It could be, and I wouldn't take too much away from this one poll and this one state over this one issue. I'm looking at a lot of yeses coming in, some nos as well. Yeah, so if you look at the wall of yeses coming in to people who have some direct or indirect connection to IVF, that tells you it's at least a real topic.
But secondly, here's my interesting question. The news has to fill up the twenty-four hours, so we end up getting excited about things that we all know are not important because we're trying to fill up the thing. It's about memes and who did who shook hands right and you know who tripped on the stairs and you know all that stuff. But what is more core to your human existence than reproduction? Mating. Mating is the core human value. So it could be that the person who sort of accidentally stumbles onto that wins in the landslide and nobody knows why.
You know I've told you a number of times in the past that all of our behaviors, all of them, are an expression of our mating instinct. Because it's the only thing we're optimized for by evolution. If you get mating right, then you get to survive as a species. Everything else doesn't matter so much. You just got to be able to mate, period. Just make more of you and everything will be fine. So we evolved so that any suggestion of anything that's in the domain of sex or reproduction just automatically goes to the top of all of our lists, even if we don't know it. Even if you're completely oblivious to it, it goes to the top of your list.
So even what I'm doing right now feels to me like an expression of my mating instinct. I'm literally showing off. That's what I'm doing. Like right now. I mean I do it for other reasons too, but the other reasons are my conscious reasons. My conscious reasons are oh, I enjoy this topic and it's easy and I like dealing with all of you and you know I like the experience. Everything. That's my conscious reasons. Do you know what my real reason is? I'm showing off. I'm displaying. I'm just showing you my feathers. And will that increase my mating options? Well, if I were in the mating mood it would. And I don't think the fact that I'm not logically or rationally in a mating mode allows me to turn off the instinct. I think the instinct remains. It's just too embedded in my entire being.
So if Trump comes up with something that's pro extra babies, that might be different than the question of abortion. Because the abortion question gets, I think you know I'm not a woman so I can't judge this. I feel like that's just too much government control on your body and that nobody can be okay with that. At least half the country, they can't be okay with it. So the IVF thing could be a surprising home run that nobody saw coming just because it's one of the few things that taps into your most basic instinct, which we act on all day long but we're not aware of it.
So this would be the thing I'm trying to add to the conversation is that your rational brain and IVF don't have any connection. I mean there's a rational, you know, we save money, etc. That's rational. But the real draw of it, if it really is moving independents in a big way like this one unconfirmed poll is saying, this could be important. It could actually move the election. Anyway, I wouldn't say that's confirmed yet, but it's sort of suggesting that.
So you know that Taylor Swift endorsed Kamala Harris, and she did in a very public way right after the debate. So she got maximum attention. And she was clever, and she was holding her cat and saying that she's a childless cat lady, making fun of JD Vance. And Mike Benz points us to NATO's YouTube channel. So I didn't even know NATO had a YouTube channel. But on the NATO channel, where nobody's hiding it because again it's NATO's own channel, this isn't somebody talking about NATO, this is NATO's own channel. And there's a screenshot that Mike Benz shows that says, quote, "Goal: identify key actors to train and spread desired messaging. Example: encourage opinion leaders to share counter IO." I don't know what IO is, but content. What is IO in that context of NATO? Interoperability? Intelligence? Opinion? I don't know, but sounds something NATO related.
All right, so yeah, the goal is to identify key actors to train and spread desired messaging. And then there was a photo on that same slide right next to "identify key actors to train and spread desired messaging," and it was a photo of Taylor Swift. It's actually Taylor Swift's photo right next to NATO saying that they're going to try to bring in these personalities to help them with their messaging. Oh man.
So my take on this is we've entered the don't-even-need-to-hide-it phase. It seems like the people running the real country are not trying to hide it. And the reason is they don't need to. And here there are two reasons they don't need to. One is the news is so saturated with complicated stories that you and I have too much to worry about. I can't pick one of them out. You could easily imagine that this alone, the Taylor Swift thing, would be the number one headline story in the country. Oh my God, NATO is weaponizing our celebrities against us. Can't you imagine that would be a headline story that people would talk about for a month? Do you know why it's not a headline story and we don't talk about it for a month? Because the things that become headlines are not organic. There are a few entities which have close intelligence connections which decide what the headlines will be for all the other news. If the New York Times says this is our big story and they hit it a few times, the other news just picks it up. Washington Post, same thing. CNN, maybe.
So the point is if the news can tell you what is news, they control the narrative. And everything is so complicated that you can't do much with it yourself. You know, you've seen me. I follow the news maybe because I do it literally every day. Top two percent. Is that fair? Of people who are aware of and capable of following some of the details of the news, would I be in the top one percent? Only because I do it every day, not because of my magical abilities. Maybe top one percent. I don't understand the lawfare stories. I just get them all confused. There's too many of them. And there's so many stories like that where the details of them are so confusing that how could anybody understand it?
So as long as whoever controls the media decides which stories to focus on and then they keep everything else complicated, the public is completely neutered. Do you know why there's not a big protest about the use of electronic voting machines? Do you know why there's not protests in the streets? Well, first of all we're divided, so maybe one side doesn't mind it so much. The other is it's complicated and they'll just tell you no, the machines are fine. Well, but I think they're not. We had an expert look at them. They're fine. Everything's too hard to understand.
Yeah, take Ukraine. If your story of Ukraine is Putin's a monster and he's invading countries because he's basically Hitler, if that was your view, you're missing out on a lot of details about why the United States may have always wanted to control Ukraine and NATO's growth and the security state and the military industrial complex and the Maidan overthrow in Victoria Nuland. I mean to actually understand Ukraine is incredibly complicated. So at this point the bad guys can show their work right in front of us and we'll just go, ah, I have so many other things to complain about like the national debt. It just seems more important. I'll let that one go. So we let it go. They can do stuff right in front of us.
Now let me give you another example where they can do it right in front of you. Daniel Dale, I talked about this. He still has a job. He ranked the lies and the fact check for the debate thirty-three to one, with Trump lying thirty-three times and Harris only once. Now this is an example of where there isn't, in my opinion, the slightest chance that he thought that was real. Do you disagree? See, I don't think there's the slightest chance that Daniel Dale is the fact checker on CNN and doesn't know what the facts are. But he scored it thirty-three to one. What's that tell you? Well, it tells me that something's happening right in front of you. Right in front of you. They're doing it right in front of you. There's no way that was organic. I don't know where it comes from. I don't know what forces caused it. And I'm not saying somebody talked to him because we don't need to do that. Everybody knows what they need to do. You don't have to have a conversation about it. Everybody knows. So if Daniel Dale still has a job, then they can do anything they want right in front of you. It doesn't have any consequences at all.
All right, so let's look at how secure our elections are now that we have a few data points. We know that the Democrats are massively using lawfare against Trump and that the Department of Justice is corrupt in a really deep way. So could you say that the election is unrigged if one team has been essentially illegitimately lawfaring one candidate out of office for over a year? I would say that that would be enough to say the election's rigged if nothing else happened, just by that.
How about Dr. Robert Epstein's work in which he claimed that Google is so obviously biased and fixed it can completely move the election dial one direction or another, and it always moves it toward Democrats? Do you think that he's got a handle on that? Well, we don't know because I have trouble trusting any data or any expert at this point. But I haven't seen him be debunked. Haven't seen the debunk. We did hear that his wife was killed in a suspicious car accident right after people warned him that he might get killed in a suspicious accident. So everything about that screams that he's on to something. But you know I'm not the one who can confirm that.
Of course we have mail-in votes, massive mail-in votes. That suggests that the intention is to cheat because there's not really an argument on the other side that you know there was no way to vote without mail-in ballots. So mail-in ballots are a signal of an intention to cheat.
What about the use of voting machines which we've been told are totally secure? Well, have you heard of the Secure It Act? So that's a proposed legislation that would close the election machine vulnerabilities. What? The election machine vulnerabilities? What? Well now I'm all confused. So the elections were secure and we know it, but there are so many vulnerabilities in the machines that we need legislation and major work and a huge budget to fix the vulnerabilities that we've been told don't exist or at least have not been exploited. How would anybody know that it wasn't exploited?
Here's my second question that the news will never answer. You ready for this? I'll make you a bet the news will never answer this question. It's a very simple question. Are all of the vulnerabilities that we're talking about, and it's stuff like shared passwords across states, some password credentials are in the code so anybody who knew what to look for could have found it. Some of them you could connect to the internet when you shouldn't. Some of them have old software and they think the new software would fix some bugs in the old software that could have caused a vulnerability. So there are a whole host of things. But are those things the types of things that you could always catch it if it happened? There's the key question.
Are these vulnerabilities, which I think there's general agreement there's lots of them because even if you think the machines are great, you're probably still looking to upgrade them because software gets upgraded. So how do we know? Do you ever remember the news telling you, well it is true that there are potential vulnerabilities in the voting machines, but even if somebody tried to exploit them they would get caught. Now we don't want to be in that situation. Of course we'd rather they don't even have anything to exploit. But if they did exploit them in any prior year, well we caught them because we've got a check and a balance. To which I say wait a minute. If you could catch a problem on a voting machine, what are you looking at to catch it? Does that mean there's some parallel system where you can look at it and say well your voting machine total didn't match this total? Because if there's an alternate system that's more reliable and you can use it to test whether the voting machines have the right total, shouldn't you just use that other thing as your source? If there's some other thing that tells you that the vote was right, use the other thing. Otherwise I would be assuming that there's no way to know if the machine got the right answer or not.
So there's the key question. If we all know, and I believe this is now established, it's now established that the voting machines have vulnerabilities that at least potentially could be used by bad people, are they the type that if they existed in past elections and they got exploited that we definitely would have caught them? And what does that look like? How exactly would you catch them? I guess it depends on the type of exploit. But they're really telling us two opposites. One, there are lots of things that need to be fixed in terms of current vulnerabilities. Two, the election was secure and we know it. Can those both be true? To me those seem like opposites. If these vulnerabilities are the kind that you have to fix, it's sort of suggesting by nobody saying it that somebody could have exploited them and gotten away with it.
So this again is the news saying well we haven't looked behind the closed door but we can guarantee there's nothing back there. How? Well nobody said there's anything back there. I know, but you never looked. Right? Do you see how obvious this is? Just think about the fact that you've been watching shows and news and reports about this topic, election integrity, for years. And today is the first time anybody said the only question that mattered. If somebody had already used any of these vulnerabilities, did you definitely catch it because the system catches that kind of stuff? If you've never heard the answer to that question, let me tell you the answer to that question. We would have no idea if they were exploited. That is the answer. It's the most important question and most important answer, and the news on the left and the right doesn't even ask it. What's up with that? Why is this the first time you've even heard the question? Am I right? How many of you, your brains are exploding right now when you say my God, that is the only important question. Since we've confirmed lots of vulnerabilities in lots of different ways, if somebody had used those vulnerabilities which we've confirmed to exist, would they definitely have been caught? How? It's not much of a vulnerability if you get caught every time you use it. Now I suppose there'd be a different kind of vulnerability where it just takes the machine down and you know let's say they take the machine down in Trump territory. So that would be maybe harder to spot.
All right, so we got that. So we got the lawfare against Trump. We've got Google who is rigged. We've got mail-in voting which only has one purpose for rigging. We've got the use of voting machines that have lots of vulnerabilities. We know that and we wouldn't know if they had ever been used before for rigging and we won't know in the future because that's how they're designed. Let's see, what else we got? We've got the media, total media control. The Democrats rigged the primary, replacing Biden and keeping Kamala Harris from our view. And then of course the immigrants shipped in. So that's the bad news.
Let me get to the good news. The reason I was wearing my swaddling blanket today is because you guys need some good news. Here's some good news. Voter enthusiasm is probably all that makes a difference in this race. So the smart people, the ones I agree with, say that getting your base, more of them to show up, is going to be way more likely to work than getting people to change their minds because there's not so much mind changing going on. But you might be able to get more people to show up.
Now I don't think it's hard to get people to show up in person because it's hard to get somebody's ass off the couch if they don't want to do it. But it might not be impossible to get people to vote by mail. So here's what I'd do from this day on. Every time there's another Trump meme, I would put a QR code on it. And the QR code should take you to the Pennsylvania page where you can request a mail-in ballot. And you should know that's what the QR code is for. And it should say Pennsylvania mail-in ballot. I posted the link to the Pennsylvania mail-in ballot because winning Pennsylvania might be the whole game. A lot of people say so. If you wanted to just drill in on the one lever that might move the whole thing, besides IVF which could be surprisingly effective, you put a QR code on your memes. Ideally you'd want somebody like you know Laura Trump or Scott Presler. Maybe Scott Presler should do this because he's doing signups in Pennsylvania. Come up with one QR code so everybody isn't using one. And you just say put this on your memes. And then everybody is, what's that QR code for? But it maybe label it, you know, Pennsylvania mail-in ballot, something like that.
Yeah, there's another. Okay, so that is my suggestion. Put a QR code that takes you to the link for Pennsylvania mail-in votes and just put that in the corner of every Trump meme. And you're going to get a lot of people getting a mail-in vote. How hard is it to get somebody to fill out their mail-in vote? Well I'll tell you. I think the podcasters who are pro-Trump should stop their programs and say, hey, if you're watching right now from Pennsylvania, let's fill these out together. So you know, take a moment. I'll give you a minute. Just go find your mail-in ballot. Just find it right now and then fill it out. Vote for Trump. Drop it in the mail. And then put it in the comments. Tell me in the comments you just filled it out. So you need to make it a group social situation. And that could work.
Linda Ronstadt complained about Trump going to, I guess he's going to Tucson, and he's going to be in a stadium or a facility that has her name on it. And she didn't like that because she doesn't like Trump. The surprising story about this story is that Linda Ronstadt is still alive. How many of you thought Linda Ronstadt had already passed? I did. I saw the story. I was like, how is she talking from beyond the grave? She's seventy-eight. But she's a cat lady. She's adopted kids but didn't have her own kids. But she does have a cat. And she said in her message, quote, "Trump hates women, immigrants, and people of color." How do all the batshit crazy women come to that opinion?
Now I get that Trump has different views on let's say abortion than some of the country. But where in the world do you get that he hates any women, immigrants, or people of color? There's not ever been even a scintilla of evidence of that. He's only ever talked about policies which are unambiguously good for the United States, such as closing the border. And that he just has a normal protect-every-life opinion whether they're male or female fetuses. Somebody who wants to save every single female fetus isn't exactly a woman hater. If he said oh, we only want to abort the female fetuses, then that would be a woman hater right there. That would be a woman hater. But no, he wants to save all the babies. You know that would be his view. He wants to do IVF. Why? Because he hates women? No. Oh my God, how do you even come up with that?
All right, ladies and gentlemen, this is my show for the day. I'm not going to talk to the locals people privately today because I got to run. But have a great day, and I will get back to you maybe tonight in the man cave for the locals people, but I'm not sure yet. And I will talk to you soon. Thanks for joining. And I'll have one final sip before we go. Oh, that was good. Bye for now.
yeah I'm early I'm early I'll tell you about that in a minute well we don't know how many people are going to join us in this new earlier shorter version of the show but 11 of us so far you're the ones I call the high Achievers get in here will you let's figure out how this day is going to go we're going to have some fun all right I've got a little uh scheduling uh overlap today so I'm doing the show earlier and shorter but I didn't want to miss out I didn't want you to wake up and say where's my simultaneous sip which for many of you might be recorded but I hope you uh figure it out and come here and make it all work cuz I take some responsibility for having developed a simultaneous sip Habit in you I feel like I have to deliver every single day so here I am and if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that nobody can even understand well all you need for that is a cuper muger glass a tankered chin a canteen Jugger flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid I like coffee join me now for the unparallel pleasure of the dopamine of the day thing makes everything better it's called the simultaneous zp and it happens now go when I say I needed that oh my goodness well I've got the uh the swaddling blanket of comfort on me today because it seems to me that the country is in a a weird mental state and what you need is well me you need me you need me to snap you out of this bad mental state it looks like there's Doom coming from every direction and the elections look iffy yeah we'll fix all that I've got an idea to fix all of it actually really so although today's story will be short you're about to see the best idea ever just wait for that well JP Morgan announced that they're going to put a limit on Junior investment bankers hours so if you're a junior investment banker at JP Morgan they will no longer let you work more than 80 hours per week no matter how much you want to what who works 80 hours a week unless it's their own company well you can make a Millions as an investment banker if you do everything right but looks like there's a lot of competition for those jobs and so the question I ask myself is if I can see a time sheet for that entire 80 hours how much of that time are you like just really kicking out the work because you know recently I got some attention for uh having a good work ethic because I like to show up every day and I'm not big on vacations I like to work every day but even I don't work 80 hours a week 80 hours a week do you have any idea what that would do to you I mean there's a report of somebody dying from overwork and in Japan you hear about it all the time but there's no good reason to make somebody work 80 hours a week There's no way that that extra 10 hours or 20 hours at the end is your good time you would have to have all kinds of breaks and I don't know you're going to have to have an affair with your co-workers to make that all work so a pretty broken system meanwhile uh MSNBC has decided to spend some considerable time uh telling his audience what a terrible person Laura lumer is now Laura lumer is a if you've not heard that name she's associated with the right and she's I guess I would say an independent researcher journalist and she's broken some good Scoops so she's she's got some serious credibility in terms of scoops Hoops uh but she's also controversial and it's not my job to defend anything that anybody else said so you should hear this first I'm not defending anything that anybody else said but do I need to why would why would that be my job no I'm on a pirate ship all right I signed up to be on a pirate ship if they let another pirate on the pirate ship you know what I'm not going to do um I'd like to examine your past statements for acceptability no I'm going to take whatever weapons that pirate has CU we need to get a mission done and I don't give a rat's ass what what anybody ever said to offend you do I agree with everything ever said by RFK Jr.
I doubt it I mean I can't think of a specific example but I doubt it do do I think he shouldn't be on the pirate ship no I think he should be very much on the pirate ship I want to be on the same ship as him so Laura lomer is very effective and they wouldn't be talking about her unless she had made a big dent in universe and if you're a pirate who can make a big dent in universe and you want Trump to win because I think is vital to the survival of the United States and that's the kind of pirate I don't mind associating with but it's kind of funny because we've entered this weird political mode where we're trying to take people down by who they associate with and then it's kind of a contest it's like MSNBC say all right all right we're g to say that Trump is associating with this this horrible racist they would say Lura lumer and of course that's weird because MSNBC is the most famously corrupt and racist organization in the public knowledge that that would be an interesting question could you think of a more racist organization like just overtly racist than MSNBC actually I can't think of one I actually can't think of any well that's weird it seems like there be some competition for the top spot but there really isn't yeah MSNBC is so blatantly racist that they're they're going after Laura L now again I'm not defending Laura lomer I know you're going to say the ADL I thought of the ADL but they're so special purpose that they seem like a different kind of animal yeah the ADL is uh not my favorite organization they they defamed me in public because racist yeah you're right the ADL might be competitive because they went after me because they're racists I assume I mean they made a racist Claim about me anyway um so here's what's happening so the so the Democrats are like all right you've got Laura lummer haaha and then we say oh yeah you've got dick Janie haaha and then the Democrats say well you've got that terrible person Scott Adams and then I say oh yeah you've got Adam kiner and then they say we''ve got that terrible person fill in the blank I I feel like there are enough terrible people according to other people that we could do this all day long all right now here's the funniest story of the day as I told you that every meme about uh Trump is funny and I don't know how it expands all generations whatever it is that's funny about Trump as a personality or a character or a meme or whatever if works for every generation and on Tik Tok today this is real by the way this sounds like I'm making it up but it's real there's a viral uh Trend going on where the ticktockers young ones like you know older teens are dancing to Trump saying at the uh at the debate they're eating their they're eating our dogs they're eating our pets and they've turned that into a autotune um sort sort of a line that they dance with so you can hear Trump's voice they're eating our they're eating our dogs they're eating our pets and you see the people dancing they're eating our dogs they're eating our pets and it's freaking hilarious and where does that come from like where in the world of all the things that a Tik tocker could dance to they pick that and it works it works it's like it's hilarious and I watched several of them this morning and I thought oh I'm glad I saw those are pretty good so that never gets old anyway are they eating our pets well let me tell you how the news uh determines whether something is true would you like to see an example of me doing some investigative journalism watch there's nothing behind that closed door how do I know well I don't see anything behind it well but that's because the door is closed so well how could you see something behind the door if the door is closed well there's no reports whatsoever of anything from behind the door I know but you wouldn't necessarily hear about it unless you talk to the right people as in opening the door but there's no indication there's there's anything behind the door I know but you can't know what's behind the door unless you open the door and look H I don't know you found you sound like a conspiracy theorist because you're always thinking there's something behind the door when we've proven there's not no you didn't prove it you didn't prove it you simply stated it without checking that's the opposite of proving proving would be doing something actively not doing something is called not proving it so yeah we know that no dogs or cats are being eaten because some of the news people ask the government they ask the government now I would like to put out at least an alternative hypothesis to the eating of the pets there may have been somebody who tried to kill a goose at the park I think that's likely I mean if you needed food and you're used to killing ducks and geese where you grew up and you saw a geese and it looked like it was free I could see that happening the cats and dogs part especially the cats seems like it's at least a little bit likely to be a mass hysteria I know I know I'm a broken record Mass hisy areas everywhere so it could be that I'm just filtered that way so I see Mist areas because my brain is kind of tuned to look for them that's how I knew that there would be no information about a secret Sonic weapon at the embassies because that was really a classic Mass hysteria even with all the evidence that there was something real happening and maybe there's something real happening but the odds of it being a secret Sonic weapon were really not very high now could I be wrong and someday they'll find a secret Sonic weapon sure because unlike the news I do not declare that something doesn't exist simply because I haven't seen it what I did predict is that they wouldn't find it it would never be confirmed so think of it as a prediction not a fact so far the prediction is holding now let me ask you this if you went to my neighborhood my current neighborhood and you surveyed all of the people here and you said do you have an outdoor cat some of them would say yes an alarming number of them would say we used to you know what I mean we used to have an outdoor cat it didn't come home we don't know why but there are mountain lions and all kinds of dangerous things out there and uh outdoor cats disappear a lot and sometimes they'll be gone for days and come back now if you had heard that the uh the immigrants in your town were eating cats and then your cat disappeared what would you tell people uhoh I think they got my cat they may have eaten my cat now that's how a mass hysteria starts because if you have a natural situation where cats disappear pretty much all the time I mean outdoor cats they don't last a long time where I live so you you could imagine that people would start hearing stories of other people losing their cats and presuming it was the immigrants Etc so here's my best guess of what's really happening my best guess is that there are a few legitimate claims of an immigrant eating an animal might have been a goose might even be one example or two where somebody ate an animal like a pet maybe I wouldn't rule it out because I haven't seen it and you're going to say to me but Scott we've seen the videos and the phone calls and stuff well I don't trust anything anymore I don't trust any videos you don't know where they came from or what you're really looking at or whether it's been edited whether it's AI you can't tell but my best guess is that there's a little bit to it but the rest might be a Massy areia because then people say but my cat's missing for two hours they got my cat and then they complain about the cat and you hear about it but they don't tell you later the cat came home in two hours I think it might be that but again I'm speculating so unlike the news I can't tell you what is a fact without investigating all right in aora the town of Aurora 10 members of that Venezuelan gang Treno arago have been arrested Fox News say they're associated with that alleged building takeover so the question of whether a building has been taken over or not is still a little bit contentious U I think Aurora is saying no but there are gang members and they're put down a uh they put out a uh a statement saying that uh the the gangs are not taking over Aurora and they're they got things under control well maybe according to the express there's a big breakthrough in prosthetic hands so a mechanical hand for somebody who's uh lost a hand they figured out how to make it controlled by the brain so they actually showed a video of somebody with a mechanical hand whose brain was controlling the fingers and the grip and uh Daniel 34 year old from Italy uh he tested it because he'd lost a hand and he said uh quote it feels like I'm moving my own hand oh my God really really could that be true because the hard part would make it would be the part where you feel like it's your own hand I don't know how they did that I mean I I suppose it's could be just a psychological phenomenon as much as a physical one I don't know but what if this is true and by the way this is a little this a little too good to be true falls into the category of maybe the demo worked but you know maybe it's not so easy to just slap these on people and say there you go you got a new hand but uh it does raise some questions if you can get a prosthetic hand that feels just like you're moving your own hand makes me wonder what other options are available I'm going to sip a coffee while you fill in the joke not even saying the obvious I'm just letting you fill in your own joke at home this see it's a prosthetic hand that feels just like your own but if I were at home and I were writing this joke I'd say something like this I wonder if I can get a female hand that doesn't sound like feel like it's my own all right I had to say it all right what else do we got going on uh fentanyl is killing uh 200 people A Day in the United States and costing 1.5 trillion per year according to the times of India and their headline is how China is destroying us families with deadly drug fentol well yes it's true that China seems to be the source of the precursors and they do seem to pretend that they're going to do something about it while clearly not doing anything about it or anything that matters and then they send that to the cartels in Mexico and the cartels pressed into and ship it across the border and kill 200 people A Day in the United States that would be about one every 8 minutes one every eight minutes so we've been on for 33 minutes or let's say I've been on for three deaths so we could change the way we keep time in the United States by having 8 minute increments that's one fentel overdose death so we're uh we're three fentel in to the uh three fenel ODS into the show oh hold on hold on four somebody else just died every eight minutes every eight minutes somebody's dropping dead from fenel in another s minutes I might remind you there's another one now here's my current working hypothesis on this there's no way this could have persisted this long the way it is unless some dark part of the United States government is in on the plot and we do have at least the suggestion that the the countries that are south of our border our country wants to control their governments in any way that we can because that that would have a legitimate value to the country making sure it doesn't become you know an enemy controlled country making sure we have access to resources all that stuff so we probably can't control a country that's owned by the cartels unless we're working with the cartels so it seems to me that cartels probably control most of the governments and therefore if we work with the cartels and let them earn they will let us have our little geopolitical control because the last thing the cartels want is what's the last thing that the cartels want foreign control the last thing the can the the cartels want is China or Russia for example to get real active in their country so I don't I to me it seems obvious that the US government at least some portion of it the security State part of it uh probably gives the talk to only Republican leaders not not everybody because it'd be too sensitive but I'm sure if you're the Speaker of the House for example there's somebody in that dark part of the government says look here's the deal if we stop the cartels from earning we're not going to be able to work with them and we're going to lose control of entire Central South America and the entire country could be in trouble so I know it's terrible terrible terrible that 200 people a day are dying from fentanyl but that's the cost of having this control and that's worth it I feel like that would explain everything and it would be consistent with all observations it's consistent with human behavior it's consistent with incentives and it's consistent with history it might not be true but it's the only thing that fits the observations because if you're telling me that the United States really really wants to fight this Fentanyl and the bord is kind of porous that's no sorry if we're not physically attacking the source of the fenel which we're not going to do by the way even if Trump wins there won't be any bombing of the cartels I think there's no chance of it because I think the people doing the bombing will say no they'll say you can order us but we're literally not going to go why because there's a dark part of the government that has a lot of control over things who would say maybe don't I do believe that it's possible Trump does not get the talk and the reason is if Trump got the talk he might tell you all right here's the deal I'm just going to be honest with you we can't attack them because we're working with the cartels you know that would be the nightmare scenario for any alleged deep State hypothetical group that's really controlling things behind the curtain so and we've we've seen you know that the generals Etc suggest that Trump should not be told the full truth that the intelligence people know so it would completely explain a lot of things if no but he told Trump which is why he's saying things like we'll bomb the cartels which will never happen um that would explain everything wouldn't it and Mike Ben you know is uh let's say compatible with the idea that we have some cartel related uh dealings with the the government south of us the details could be you know wildly different than what I'm speculating but it does seem like we may have a cozy relationship in some way that's not completely public all right according to project Veritas uh they're still in operation even though they lost um o'keef um there's this Department of Justice immigration attorney that says they got him undercover saying that Biden has the authority to end illegal immigration but he doesn't because Democrat Mega donors control the Border the gayway punted is reporting that um does that sound right to you now just because it's a doj immigration attorney that doesn't necessarily mean he knows what's happening I he might be talking as just a citizen who's speculating like the rest of us because if you asked me what's going on I'd say well somebody's controlling that border I think the doj person legitimately believes that the mega donors are controlling the B border um but I don't think he understands that the mega donors are in turn owned by whatever that deep entity is that's running things behind the scenes so if this doj's belief is that let's say Soros is the funer who's keeping the Border open does he go further and say is Soros his own man two Soros is now Elder and and younger are they their own men or are they influenced by somebody let me give you the most obvious interpretation is they're not independent the most obvious I mean I mean let let's be honest Alex Soros is getting married to uh Huma abedine does that look organic to you to me that reminds me of you know the old kings and queens in Europe you know you'd have to marry your your German cousin or something to make make sure that make sure that everybody's you know not going to sell you out keep it in the family so to me it looks like I keep it in the family move and that the Soros money it's just what it looks like do I have any proof nah no I'm saying that if you're trying to understand the world the the world in which he's just donating because he thinks it's you know good for the immigrants is kind of absurd it is good for the immigrants but it's absurd to imagine that's why they're doing it the the why of it is clearly something that we not being told so what would that be it all comes back to basically the same answers for everything the people behind the curtain all right um did you know Ryan sedra was reporting on this that when there's a debate there's always somebody who hooks it up to a dial test now a dial test is where you get what you hope is a mixed group of people in a room and they literally have a little dial where they're sitting each of them and as they're watching the debate if they like what they're hearing they'll dial it up and then they'll dial it down if they don't like what they're hearing so you can see uh overlaid when the candidates are talking you can see the graphs moving oh they like what they're saying right now oh and then they're divided by Independence Democrats and Republicans now you would not be surprised that whenever K Harris talks the the Democrat line goes sh way up to the top whenever Trump talks way it goes way down to the bottom and vice versa Republicans up when Trump is talking Republicans all the way at the bottom when Kam is talking but here's the interesting thing where do you think The Independents are your common sense would say somewhere in the middle right somewhere in the middle well didn't work out that way apparently when Trump was talking about the economy The Independents tracked the Republican line perfectly perfectly they they didn't even basically you could barely see any difference so The Independents are economics voters what do you think of that so that that's my that's my statement of the day I don't know if it's true I'll just put it out there as you can you can test this against what you see in here I say the independent voters are the ones who are not caring about the eating of cats and dogs they're not caring about who got accused of saying the thing that made somebody mad they're not caring so much about the Mean Tweets they're not caring so much about anything except the economy so maybe we're making a big mistake to call them Independents maybe all they are is people who prioritize the economy above other things and they say the rest is garbage everything else is garbage just give us an economy maybe stay out of some Wars we'll be good so so that's interesting so that would be a suggestion that um Trump would win because if he's and and there is some evidence that in Michigan for example the New York Post is reporting that Trump IVF proposal where where the government would pay for your scientific IVF in vitro fertilization so you could have more babies and also some kind of uh support for people with major newborn expenses so Trump would help having babies uh according to a new poll uh that made Independence swing pretty hard to his side so that would be a second indication that there's another thing that could move Independence which is can you directly help me have a baby now the number of people who are either using IVF or have a close family member or friend who is using IVF is really high now isn't it let let me ask you in the comments have you used IVF or do you know somebody who's close to you who has so just say yes if you've heard it if you've used it yourself planning to use it or does it have a connection to your life at all because I feel like it might I feel like a lot of people would have some connection to that topic anyway uh you could argue that that has some e it's an economic thing but I think it's more it could be and I wouldn't take too much away from this one this one poll and this one state over this one issue I'm looking at a lot of yeses coming in some NOS as well yeah so if you look at the wall of yeses coming in to people who have some direct or indirect connection to IVF that tells you it's at least you know a real topic but secondly here's my here's my interesting question you the news has to fill up the 24 hours so we end up getting excited about things that we all know are not important because we're trying to fill up the thing it's about memes and who did who shook hands right and you know who tripped on the stairs and you know all that stuff but what is what is more core to your human existence than reproduction mating mating is the core human value so it could be that the person who sort of accidentally stumbles onto that wins in the landslide and nobody knows why you know I've told you a number of times in the past that all of our behaviors all all of them are an expression of our mating Instinct because it's the only thing we're optimized for by Evolution if you get mating right then you get to survive as a species everything else doesn't matter so much you just got to be able to mate period just make more of you and everything will be fine so we we evolved so that any suggestion of anything that's in the domain of sex or reproduction is just automatically goes to the top of all of our lists even if we don't know it like e even if you're completely oblivious to it it goes to the top of your list so even what I'm doing right now feels to me like an expression of my mating Instinct I'm literally showing off that's what I'm doing like like right now I mean I do it for other reasons too but the other reasons are my conscious reasons my conscious reasons are oh I enjoy this topic and it's easy and I like dealing with all of you and you know I like the experience everything that's my conscious reasons do you know what my real reason is I'm showing off I'm I'm displaying I'm just showing you my feathers and will that increase my mating options well if I were in The Mating mood it would and I don't think the fact that I'm not logically or rationally in a mating mode allows me to turn off the Instinct I think the Instinct remains it's just too embedded in my entire being so if Trump comes up with something that's uh Pro extra babies that might be different than the question of abortion because the abortion question gets I think you know I'm not a woman so I can't judge this I feel like that's just too much government control on your body and that nobody can Ser nobody can be okay with that at least half the country they can't be okay with it so the F thing could be a surprising home run that nobody saw coming just because it's one of the few things that Taps into your most Basic Instinct which we act on all day long but we're not aware of it so this this would be the thing I'm trying to add to the conversation is that your rational brain and IVF don't have any connection I mean there's a rational you know we save money Etc that's rational but that the real draw of it if if it really is moving Independence in a big way like this one you know unconfirmed poll is saying this could be important it could actually move the election anyway I wouldn't say that's confirmed yet but it's sort of suggesting that um so you know that Taylor Swift uh endorsed kamla Harris and she did in a very public way right after the debate so she got maximum attention and she was clever and she was holding her cat and saying that she's a childless cat lady making fun of JD Vance and uh Mike Benz points us to NATO's You.
Tube channel so I didn't even know NATO had a You.
Tube channel but on on the NATO Channel where nobody's hiding it because again it's NATO's own channel this this isn't somebody talking about NATO this is NATO's own channel and there's a screenshot that Mike Ben shows that says quote goal identify key actors to train and spread desired me messaging uh example encourage opinion leaders to share counter IO I don't know what IO is but content what is IO in that context of NATO interoperability intelligence opinion I don't know but sounds something NATO related all right so yeah the goal is to identify key actors to train and spread desired messaging and then there was a uh photo on that same slide right next to identify key actors to train and spread desired messaging and it was a photo of Taylor Swift it's actually Taylor Swift's photo right right next to Nato saying that they're that they're going to try to bring in these personalities to help them with their messaging oh man so my take on this is we've entered the don't even need to hide it facee it seems like the people running the real country are not trying to hide it and the reason is they don't need to and here there are two reasons they don't need to one is the news is so sat ated with complicated stories that you and I have too much to worry about I can't pick one of them out you could easily imagine that this alone the Taylor Swift thing would be the number one headline story in the country oh my God NATO is is weaponizing our celebrities against us that would can't you imagine that would be a headline story that people would talk about for a month do you know why it's not a headline story and we don't talk about it for a month because the things that become headlines are not organic there are a few entities which have close intelligence connections which decide what the headlines will be for all the other news if the New York Times says this is our big story and they hit it a few times the other news just picks it up Washington Post same thing CNN maybe so the the point is if the news can tell you what is news they control the narrative and everything is so complicated that you can't do much with it yourself you know you've seen me I follow the news maybe because I do it literally every day top 2% would is that fair of people who are aware of and capable of following some of the details of the news would I be in the top 1% only because I do it every day not because of my magical abilities maybe top 1% I don't understand the lawfare stories I I just get them all confused there's too many of them and there's so many stories like that where the details of them are are so confusing that how could anybody understand it so as long as the as long as whoever controls the media decides which stories to focus on and then they keep everything else complicated the public is completely neuter do you know why there's not a big protest about the use of uh of of electronic voting machines do you know why there's not uh protests in the streets well first of all we're divided so maybe one side doesn't mind it so much the other is it's complicated and they'll just tell you no the machines are fine well but I think they're not H we had an expert look at them they're fine everything's too hard to understand yeah take Ukraine if your story of Ukraine is uh Putin's a monster and he's invading countries because he's basically Hiller if that was your view you're you're missing out on a lot of details about why the United States may have always wanted to control Ukraine and NATO's growth and the security State and the military industrial complex and the Maiden uh overthrow in Victoria Newland I mean to actually understand Ukraine is incredibly complicated so at this point the bad guys can show their work right in front of us and we'll just go ah I have so many other things to complain about like the national dat it just seems more important I'll let that one go so we let it go they can do stuff right in front of us now let me give you another example where they can do it right in front of you Daniel Dale I talked about this he still has a job he he ranked the the lies and the fact check for the debate 33 to1 with Trump lying 33 times and Harris only once now this is an example of where there isn't in my opinion the slightest chance that he thought that was real do you disagree see I I don't think there's the slightest chance that Daniel Dale is the fact checker on CNN and doesn't know what the facts are but he scored It 33 to1 what's that tell you well it tells me that something's happening right in front of you right in front of you they're doing it right in front of you there's no way that was organic I don't know where it comes from I don't I don't know what forces caused it and I'm not saying somebody talk to him because we don't need to do that everybody knows what they need to do you don't have to have a conversation about it everybody knows so if Daniel Dale still has a job then they can do anything they want right in front of you doesn't have any consequences at all all right so let's look at uh how secure our elections are now that we have a few data points we know that uh the Democrats are massively using lawfare against Trump and that the Department of Justice is corrupt um in a really deep way so could you say that the election is unrigged if one team has been essentially illegitimately law faring one candidate out of office for over a year I would say that that would be enough to say the election's rigged if nothing else happened just by that how about Dr.
Epstein's work in which he is he claimed that Google is so obviously biased and fixed it can completely move the election dial one One Direction or another and it always moves it toward Democrats do you think that he's he's got a handle on that well we don't know because I have trouble trusting any data or any expert at this point but I haven't seen him be debunked haven't seen the debunk we did hear that his wife was killed in a suspicious car accident right after people warned him that he might get killed in a suspicious accident so everything about that screams that he's on to something but you know I'm not the one who can confirm that of course we have mailin votes massive mailin votes that suggests that the intention is to cheat because there's not really an argument on the other side that you know there was no way to vote without mail and ballots so mail and ballots are a signal of an intention to cheat what about the use of voting machines which we've been told are Totally Secure well um have you heard of the secure it act so that's a proposed legislation that would uh close the election machine vulner what the election machine vulnerabilities what huh well now I'm all confused so the elections were secure and we know it but there are so many vulnerabilities in the machines that we need legislation and major work and a huge budget to fix the vulnerabilities that we've been told don't exist or at least have not been exploited how would anybody know that it wasn't exploited here's my second question that the news will never answer you ready for this uh I'll make you a bet the news will never answer this question it's a very simple question are all of the vulnerabilities that we're talking about and it's stuff like uh shared passwords across States um some password credentials are in the code so anybody who knew what to look for could have found it some of them you could connect to the internet when you shouldn't some of them have uh old software and they think the new software would fix some bugs in the old software that could have caused a vulnerability so there a whole host of things but are those things the types of things that you could always catch it if it happened there's the key question are these vulnerabilities which I think there's General agreement there's lots of them because even if you think the machines are great you're probably still looking to upgrade them because software gets upgraded so how do we know do you do you ever remember the news telling you well it is true that there are um potential vulnerabilities in the voting machines but even if somebody tried to exploit them they would get caught now we don't want to be in that situation of course we'd rather they don't even have anything to exploit but if they did exploit them in any prior year Well we caught them because we've got a we've got a check in the balance to which I say wait a minute if you could catch a problem on a voting machine what are you looking at to catch it does that mean there's some parallel system where you can look at it and say well your voting machine total didn't match this total because if there's an alternate system that's more reliable and you can use it to test whether the voting machines have the right total shouldn't you just use that other thing as your Source if there's some other thing that tells you that the vote was right use the other thing otherwise I would be assuming that there's no way to know if the machine got the right answer or not so there's the key question if we all know and I believe this is now established it's now established uh that the voting machines have vulnerabilities that at least potentially could be used by bad people are they the type that if they existed in past elections and they got exploited that we definitely would have caught them and what does that look like how exactly would you catch them I guess it depends on the type of exploit but they're really telling us two opposites one there are lots of things that need to be fixed in terms of current vulnerabilities two the election was Secure and we know it can those both be true to me those seem like opposites if if these vulnerabilities are the kind that you have to fix it's sort of suggesting by by nobody saying it that somebody could have exploited them and gotten away with it so this again is the news saying well we haven't looked behind the closed door but we can guarantee there's nothing back there how well nobody said there's anything back there I know but you never looked right do do you see how obvious this is just think about the fact that you've been watching shows and news and reports about this topic election Integrity for years and and today is the first time anybody said the only question that mattered if somebody had already used any of these vulnerabilities did you definitely catch it because the system catches that kind of stuff if you've never heard the answer to that question let me tell you the answer to that question we would have no idea if they were exploited that is the answer it's the most important question and most important answer and the news on the left and the right doesn't even ask it what's up with that why is this the first time you've even heard the question am I right how many of you your brains are exploding right now when you say my God that is the only important question since we've confirmed lots of vulnerabilities in lots of different ways if somebody had use those vulnerabilities which we've confirmed to exist would they definitely have been caught how it's not much of a vulnerability if you get caught every time you use it now I suppose there' be a different kind of vulnerability where it just takes the machine down and you know let's say they take the machine down in Trump territory so that that would be maybe harder spots all right so we got that so we got uh let's see um the lawfare against Trump we've got Google who is rigged we've got mailin voting which only has one purpose for rigging we've got the use of voting machines that have lots of vulnerabilities but they can't tell us if they've been exploited in the past um and uh let's see oh Montgomery County in Texas just halted their voting machine upgrade according to John Becker now why would you halt a software upgrade or an improvement in your election machines because they're they're there to fix a a problem I mean that's the whole point of a software upgrade there's either a vulnerability or something and uh they've decided not to and I think the reason is that they can't be sure that the upgrade will be secure that's a good point how much time does it take to check every upgrade to know that it's secure and how can you know that a new software is better than the old software I'll bet the people who do the upgrade can't tell now let me inject what Dr insensitive jerk on X says good account to follow by the way Dr insensitive jerk um he has lots of good statements even though his name doesn't sound he sounds like a troll but his trolling is always data related you know sort of logical data related stuff so he's good he says the following it's funny that anyone believes a voting machine could be secure against the men who designed the hardware or wrote the software how do you make it secure against the people who designed it that's not a thing it's definitely not a thing you can't be secure against the people who made it so and how would you know that the people who made it are all on your side no way you can't possibly know it gets better uh Dr incens of jerk points out that even reading the code won't help because hiding exploits an innocent looking code is literally a sport now when he says it's literally a sport to hide the real meaning of you code in the code I mean he doesn't really mean that right it's not like it's an actual International contest where experts see if they can be the best to hide some code and some code it is it's an international contest in which they see who can do the best of hiding malicious or just hiding code in other code it's literally a contest it's the international OB obfuscated code contest now look at Elon Musk when he took over Twitter he had access to the code did he not and when he had access the code he was like oh I found some problems here we corrected them and then what happened oh uh well looks like we didn't know it but there's some other problems but we corrected them and then what happened okay there's some other problems but we got them and then what happened okay we found some other problems but we corrected them I think it took him a year just to pour through the the code and find all the things that were rigging the results probably a year and and the we're talking about the best Engineers who are experts on the system do you think the election people are the best Engineers you think there are a lot of Elon Musk who said oh I could build a rocket to space and make a car company or I could work 8 to5 on that election uh machine upgrade stuff no you can't tell by looking at the code all right let's see uh we got the total media control working on one side as we on the debate we saw the Democrats uh game the primary so that the voters weren't uh involved really we saw that Biden was replaced and we see the immigrants are being shipped in and every attempt to make them voters to rig the system so let's uh let's go through the full list now so is this election going to be fair well we see law fair before and we'll probably see law fair after even if Trump were to win he would be lawfare at out of office or or at least they would try very hard so that's rigged uh Dr.
Epstein's Google research if that's true that's rigged the mail in votes there's really no reason for that other than rigging the use of voting machines they're full of vulnerabilities we know that and we wouldn't know if they had ever been used before for rigging and we won't know in the future because that's how they're designed um let's see what else we got uh we got the media total media control the Democrats rigged the primary uh replacing Biden and keeping comell Harris from our view and then of course the Immigrant shipped in so that's the bad news let me get to the good news the reason I was wearing my swaddling blanket today is because you guys need some good news here's some good news voter enthusiasm is probably all that makes a difference in this race so the the smart people the ones I agree with um say that getting your base more of them to show up is going to be way more likely to work than getting people to change their minds because there's not so much mind changing going on but you might be able to get more people to show up now I don't think you it's hard to get people to show up in person because it's hard to get somebody's you know ass off the couch if they don't want to do it but it might not be impossible to get people to mail by to vote by mail so here's what I'd do from this day on every every time there's another Trump meme I would put a QR code on it and the QR code should take you to the Pennsylvania page where you can request a mail-in ballot and you should know that's what the QR code is for and it should say Pennsylvania mail and ballot I I posted the link to the Pennsylvania mail and ballot because winning Pennsylvania might be the whole game a lot of people say so if you wanted to just drill in on the one lever that might move the whole thing besides IVF which could be surprisingly effective you put a QR code on your memes ideally you'd want somebody like you know Laura Trump or Scott presler maybe Scott presler should do this because he's doing H signups in Pennsylvania come up with one QR code so everybody isn't using one and you just say put this on your memes and then everybody is what's that QR code for but it maybe label it you know P Pennsylvania mail and ballot something like that uh yeah there's another okay so that is my suggestion put a QR code that takes you to the link for Pennsylvania Pennsylvania mailin votes and just put that in the corner of every Trump Meme and you're gonna get a lot of people getting a mail and vote how hard is it to give somebody to fill out their mail and vote well I'll tell you I think the podcasters who are pro Trump should stop their Pro uh should stop their programs and say hey if you're watching right now from Pennsylvania let's fill these out together so you know take a moment I'll give you a minute just go find go find your mail and ballot just find it right now and then fill it out vote for Trump drop it in the mail and then put it in the comments tell me in the comments you just filled it out so you need to make it a group social situation U and that could work Linda ronat complained about Trump going to uh I guess he's going to Tucson and he's going to be in a stadium or a facility that has her name on it and she didn't like that because she doesn't like Trump the surprising story about this story is that Linda ronat still alive how many of you thought Linda ronat had already passed I did I saw the story I like how is she talking from Beyond the Grave she's 78 but she's a uh she's a cat lady uh she's she had adopted kids but didn't have her own kids but she does have a cat and she said in her message quote Trump hates women immigrants and people of color how do all the bat sh crazy women come to that opinion now I get that Trump has different views on let's say abortion than some of the country but where in the world do you get that he hates any women immigrants or people of color that there's not ever been even a cintilla of evidence of that he's only ever talked about policies which are unambiguously good for the United States such as closing the border and that he just has a normal protect every life opinion whether they're male or female fetuses somebody who wants to save every single female fetus isn't exactly a woman hater if he said oh we only want to abort the female fetuses then that would be a woman hater right there that would be a woman hater but no he wants to save all the babies you know that would be his view he wants to do IVF why because he hates women no oh my God how do you even come up with that all right ladies and gentlemen this is my show for the day uh I'm not going to talk to the uh to the locals people privately today because I got to run but have a great day and I will get back to you maybe tonight in the man cave for the locals people but I'm not sure yet and I will talk to you soon thanks for joining and I'll have one final sip before we go oh that was good bye for now for
yeah I'm early I'm early I'll tell you
about that in a
minute well we don't know how many
people are going to join us in this new
earlier shorter version of the
show but 11 of us so
far you're the ones I call the high
Achievers get in here will
you let's figure out how this day is
going to go
we're going to have some
fun all right I've got a little uh
scheduling uh overlap today so I'm doing
the show earlier and shorter but I
didn't want to miss out I didn't want
you to wake up and say where's my
simultaneous sip which for many of you
might be
recorded but I hope you uh figure it out
and come here and make it all work cuz I
take some responsibility for having
developed a simultaneous sip Habit in
you I feel like I have to deliver every
single day so here I
am and if you'd like to take this
experience up to levels that nobody can
even understand well all you need for
that is a cuper muger glass a tankered
chin a canteen Jugger flask a vessel of
any kind fill it with your favorite
liquid I like coffee join me now for the
unparallel pleasure of the dopamine of
the day
thing makes everything better it's
called the simultaneous zp and it
happens now
go when I say I needed that oh my
goodness well I've got the uh the
swaddling blanket of comfort on me
today because it seems to me that the
country is in a a weird mental state and
what you need is well me you need me you
need me to snap you out of this bad
mental state it looks like there's Doom
coming from every direction and the
elections look iffy yeah we'll fix all
that I've got an idea to fix all of it
actually
really so although today's story will be
short you're about to see the best idea
ever just wait for
that well JP Morgan announced that
they're going to put a limit on Junior
investment bankers hours so if you're a
junior investment banker at JP Morgan
they will no longer let you work more
than 80 hours per week no matter how
much you want
to what who works 80 hours a week unless
it's their own company well you can make
a Millions as an investment banker if
you do everything right but looks like
there's a lot of competition for those
jobs and so the question I ask myself is
if I can see a time sheet for that
entire 80
hours how much of that time are you like
just really kicking out the
work because you know recently I got
some attention for uh having a good work
ethic because I like to show up every
day and I'm not big on vacations I like
to work every day but even I don't work
80 hours a week 80 hours a week do you
have any idea what that would do to you
I mean there's a report of somebody
dying from overwork and in Japan you
hear about it all the time but there's
no good reason to make somebody work 80
hours a week There's no way that that
extra 10 hours or 20 hours at the end is
your good
time you would have to have all kinds of
breaks and I don't know you're going to
have to have an affair with your
co-workers to make that all work so a
pretty broken
system meanwhile uh MSNBC has decided to
spend some considerable time uh telling
his audience what a terrible person
Laura lumer is now Laura lumer is a if
you've not heard that name she's
associated with the right and she's I
guess I would say an independent
researcher journalist and she's broken
some good Scoops so she's she's got some
serious credibility in terms of scoops
Hoops uh but she's also controversial
and it's not my job to defend anything
that anybody else said so you should
hear this first I'm not defending
anything that anybody else said but do I
need to why would why would that be my
job no I'm on a pirate ship all right I
signed up to be on a pirate ship if they
let another pirate on the pirate ship
you know what I'm not going to do um I'd
like to examine your past statements for
acceptability no I'm going to take
whatever weapons that pirate has CU we
need to get a mission done and I don't
give a rat's ass what what anybody ever
said to offend you do I agree with
everything ever said by RFK Jr I doubt
it I mean I can't think of a specific
example but I doubt it do do I think he
shouldn't be on the pirate ship no I
think he should be very much on the
pirate ship I want to be on the same
ship as him so Laura lomer is very
effective and they wouldn't be talking
about her unless she had made a big dent
in universe and if you're a pirate who
can make a big dent in universe and you
want Trump to win because I think is
vital to the survival of the United
States and that's the kind of pirate I
don't mind associating with but it's
kind of funny
because we've entered this weird
political mode
where we're trying to take people down
by who they associate with and then it's
kind of a contest it's like MSNBC say
all right all right we're g to say that
Trump is associating with this this
horrible racist they would say Lura
lumer and of course that's weird because
MSNBC is the most famously corrupt and
racist
organization in the public
knowledge that that would be an
interesting question could you think of
a more racist
organization like just overtly racist
than
MSNBC actually I can't think of
one I actually can't think of
any well that's weird it seems like
there be some competition for the top
spot but there really isn't yeah MSNBC
is
so blatantly racist that they're they're
going after Laura L now again I'm not
defending Laura
lomer I know you're going to say the ADL
I thought of the ADL but they're so
special
purpose that they seem like a different
kind of animal yeah the ADL is uh not my
favorite organization they they defamed
me in public because racist yeah you're
right the ADL might be
competitive because they went after me
because they're
racists I assume I mean they made a
racist Claim about me
anyway
um so here's what's happening so the so
the Democrats are like all right you've
got Laura lummer haaha and then we say
oh yeah you've got dick Janie
haaha and then the Democrats say well
you've got that terrible person Scott
Adams and then I say oh yeah you've got
Adam
kiner and then they say we''ve got that
terrible person fill in the
blank I I feel like there are enough
terrible people according to other
people that we could do this all day
long all right now here's the funniest
story of the day as I told you that
every meme about uh Trump is funny and I
don't know how it expands all
generations whatever it is that's funny
about Trump as a personality or a
character or a meme or whatever if works
for every generation and on Tik Tok
today this is real by the way this
sounds like I'm making it up but it's
real there's a viral uh Trend going on
where the ticktockers young ones like
you know older teens are dancing to
Trump saying at the uh at the debate
they're eating their they're eating our
dogs they're eating our
pets and they've turned that into a
autotune um sort sort of a line that
they dance with so you can hear Trump's
voice they're eating our they're eating
our dogs they're eating our pets and you
see the people dancing they're eating
our dogs they're eating our pets and
it's freaking hilarious and where does
that come from like where in the world
of all the things that a Tik tocker
could dance to they pick that and it
works it works it's like it's hilarious
and I watched several of them this
morning and I thought oh I'm glad I saw
those are pretty
good so that never gets
old anyway are they eating our pets
well let me tell you how the news uh
determines whether something is
true would you like to see an example of
me doing some investigative
journalism
watch there's nothing behind that closed
door
how do I
know well I don't see anything behind
it well but that's because the door is
closed so well how could you see
something behind the door if the door is
closed well there's no reports
whatsoever of anything from behind the
door I know but you wouldn't necessarily
hear about it unless you talk to the
right people as in opening the
door but there's no indication there's
there's anything behind the door I know
but you can't know what's behind the
door unless you open the door and look H
I don't know you found you sound like a
conspiracy theorist because you're
always thinking there's something behind
the door when we've proven there's not
no you didn't prove it you didn't prove
it you simply stated it without checking
that's the opposite of proving proving
would be doing something actively not
doing
something is called not proving it
so yeah we know that no dogs or cats are
being eaten because some of the news
people ask the
government they ask the government now I
would like to put out at least an
alternative hypothesis to the eating of
the
pets there may have been somebody
who tried to kill a goose at the park I
think that's likely I mean if you needed
food and you're used to killing ducks
and geese where you grew up and you saw
a geese and it looked like it was free I
could see that happening the cats and
dogs part especially the
cats seems like it's at least a little
bit likely to be a mass
hysteria I know I know I'm a broken
record Mass hisy areas everywhere so it
could be that I'm just filtered that way
so I see Mist areas because my brain is
kind of tuned to look for them that's
how I knew that there would be no
information about a secret Sonic weapon
at the embassies because that was really
a classic Mass hysteria even with all
the evidence that there was something
real happening and maybe there's
something real happening but the odds of
it being a secret Sonic weapon were
really not very high now could I be
wrong and someday they'll find a secret
Sonic weapon sure because unlike the
news I do not declare that something
doesn't exist simply because I haven't
seen it what I did predict is that they
wouldn't find it it would never be
confirmed so think of it as a prediction
not a fact so far the prediction is
holding now let me ask you this if you
went to my neighborhood my current
neighborhood and you surveyed all of the
people here and you said do you have an
outdoor
cat some of them would say yes an
alarming number of them would say we
used to you know what I mean we used to
have an outdoor cat it didn't come home
we don't know why but there are mountain
lions and all kinds of dangerous things
out there and uh outdoor cats disappear
a lot and sometimes they'll be gone for
days and come
back now
if you had heard that the uh the
immigrants in your town were eating cats
and then your cat
disappeared what would you tell people
uhoh I think they got my cat they may
have eaten my cat now that's how a mass
hysteria starts because if you have a
natural situation where cats disappear
pretty much all the time I mean outdoor
cats they don't last a long time where I
live
so you you could imagine that people
would start hearing stories of other
people losing their cats and presuming
it was the immigrants Etc
so here's my best guess of what's really
happening my best guess is that there
are a few legitimate claims of an
immigrant eating an animal might have
been a goose might even be one example
or two where somebody ate an animal like
a pet maybe I wouldn't rule it out
because I haven't seen it
and you're going to say to me but Scott
we've seen the videos and the phone
calls and stuff well I don't trust
anything anymore I don't trust any
videos you don't know where they came
from or what you're really looking at or
whether it's been edited whether it's AI
you can't tell but my best guess is that
there's a little bit to it but the rest
might be a Massy areia because then
people say but my cat's missing for two
hours they got my cat and then they
complain about the cat and you hear
about it but they don't tell you later
the cat came home in two hours I think
it might be that but again I'm
speculating so unlike the news I can't
tell you what is a fact without
investigating all
right in aora the town of Aurora 10
members of that Venezuelan gang Treno
arago have been arrested Fox News say
they're associated with that alleged
building takeover so the question of
whether a building has been taken over
or not is still a little bit
contentious U I think Aurora is saying
no but there are gang members and
they're put down a uh they put out a uh
a statement saying that uh the the gangs
are not taking over Aurora and they're
they got things under control well maybe
according to the
express there's a big breakthrough in
prosthetic hands so a mechanical hand
for somebody who's uh lost a hand they
figured out how to make it controlled by
the
brain so they actually showed a video of
somebody with a mechanical hand whose
brain was controlling the fingers and
the
grip and uh Daniel 34 year old from
Italy uh he tested it because he'd lost
a hand and he said uh quote it feels
like I'm moving my own
hand oh my God
really
really could that be true because the
hard part would make it would be the
part where you feel like it's your own
hand I don't know how they did
that I mean I I suppose it's could be
just a psychological phenomenon as much
as a physical one I don't know but what
if this is true and by the way this is a
little this a little too good to be true
falls into the category of maybe the
demo
worked but you know maybe it's not so
easy to just slap these on people and
say there you go you got a new hand but
uh it does raise some
questions if you can get a prosthetic
hand that feels just like you're moving
your own
hand makes me wonder what other options
are available I'm going to sip a coffee
while you fill in the
joke not even saying the obvious I'm
just letting you fill in your own joke
at home this see it's a prosthetic hand
that feels just like your
own but if I were at home and I were
writing this joke I'd say something like
this I wonder if I can get a female hand
that doesn't sound like feel like it's
my
own all right I had to say
it all right what else do we got going
on uh fentanyl is killing uh 200 people
A Day in the United States and costing
1.5 trillion per year according to the
times of India and their headline is how
China is destroying us families with
deadly drug
fentol well yes it's true that China
seems to be the source of the precursors
and they do seem to pretend that they're
going to do something about it while
clearly not doing anything about
it or anything that matters and then
they send that to the cartels in Mexico
and the cartels pressed into and ship it
across the border and
kill 200 people A Day in the United
States that would be about one every 8
minutes one every eight minutes so we've
been on for 33 minutes or let's say I've
been on for three
deaths so we could change the way we
keep time in the United States by having
8 minute increments that's one fentel
overdose
death so we're uh we're three fentel in
to the uh three fenel ODS into the
show oh hold on hold
on four somebody else just died every
eight
minutes every eight minutes somebody's
dropping dead from fenel in another s
minutes I might remind you there's
another one now here's my current
working hypothesis on this there's no
way this could have persisted this long
the way it is unless some dark part of
the United States government is in on
the plot and we do have at least the
suggestion that the the countries that
are south of our border our country
wants to control their governments in
any way that we can because that that
would have a legitimate value to the
country making sure it doesn't become
you know an enemy controlled country
making sure we have access to resources
all that stuff so
we probably can't control a country
that's owned by the cartels unless we're
working with the
cartels so it seems to me that cartels
probably control most of the governments
and therefore if we work with the
cartels and let them earn they will let
us have our little geopolitical control
because the last thing the cartels want
is what's the last thing that the
cartels
want foreign
control the last thing the can the the
cartels want is China or Russia for
example to get real active in their
country
so I don't I to me it seems obvious that
the US government at least some portion
of it the security State part of it uh
probably gives the talk to only
Republican leaders not not everybody
because it'd be too sensitive but I'm
sure if you're the Speaker of the House
for example there's somebody in that
dark part of the government says look
here's the deal if we stop the cartels
from earning we're not going to be able
to work with them and we're going to
lose control of entire Central South
America and the entire country could be
in trouble so I know it's terrible
terrible terrible that 200 people a day
are dying from fentanyl but that's the
cost of having this control and that's
worth
it I feel
like that would explain everything and
it would be consistent with all
observations it's consistent with human
behavior it's consistent with incentives
and it's consistent with history it
might not be true but it's the only
thing that fits the observations because
if you're telling me that the United
States really really wants to fight this
Fentanyl and the bord is kind of porous
that's no sorry if we're not physically
attacking the source of the fenel which
we're not going to do by the way even if
Trump wins there won't be any bombing of
the cartels I think there's no chance of
it because I think the people doing the
bombing will say no they'll say you can
order us but we're literally not going
to
go why because there's a dark part of
the government that has a lot of control
over things who would say maybe
don't I do believe that it's possible
Trump does not get the talk and the
reason is if Trump got the talk he might
tell you all right here's the deal I'm
just going to be honest with you we
can't attack them because we're working
with the cartels you know that would be
the nightmare scenario for any alleged
deep State hypothetical group that's
really controlling things behind the
curtain so and we've we've seen you know
that the generals Etc suggest that Trump
should not be told the full truth that
the intelligence people know so it would
completely explain a lot of things if no
but he told Trump which is why he's
saying things like we'll bomb the
cartels which will never happen um that
would explain
everything wouldn't it and Mike Ben you
know is uh let's say compatible with the
idea that we have some cartel related uh
dealings with the the government south
of
us the details could be you know wildly
different than what I'm speculating but
it does seem like we may have a cozy
relationship in some way that's not
completely
public all
right according to project
Veritas uh they're still in operation
even though they lost um
o'keef um there's this Department of
Justice immigration attorney that says
they got him undercover saying that
Biden has the authority to end illegal
immigration but he doesn't because
Democrat Mega donors control the Border
the gayway punted is reporting that um
does that sound right to you now just
because it's a doj immigration attorney
that doesn't necessarily mean he knows
what's happening I he might be talking
as just a citizen who's speculating like
the rest of us because if you asked me
what's going on I'd say well somebody's
controlling that border I think the doj
person legitimately believes that the
mega donors are controlling the B
border um but I don't think he
understands that the mega donors are in
turn owned by whatever that deep entity
is that's running things behind the
scenes so if this doj's belief is that
let's say Soros is the funer who's
keeping the Border open does he go
further and say is Soros his own
man two Soros is now Elder and and
younger are they their own men
or are they influenced by somebody let
me give you the most obvious
interpretation is they're not
independent the most obvious I mean I
mean let let's be honest Alex Soros is
getting married to uh Huma abedine does
that look organic to
you to me that reminds me of you know
the old kings and queens in Europe you
know you'd have to marry your your
German cousin or something to make make
sure that make sure that everybody's you
know not going to sell you out keep it
in the
family so to me it looks like I keep it
in the family move and that the Soros
money it's just what it looks like do I
have any proof nah no I'm saying that if
you're trying to understand the
world the the world in which he's just
donating because he thinks it's you know
good for the immigrants is kind of
absurd it is good for the immigrants but
it's absurd to imagine that's why
they're doing
it the the why of it is clearly
something that we not being told so what
would that be it all comes back to
basically the same answers for
everything the people behind the
curtain all
right um did you know Ryan sedra was
reporting on this that when there's a
debate there's always somebody who hooks
it up to a dial test now a dial test is
where you get what you hope is a mixed
group of people in a room and they
literally have a little dial where
they're sitting each of them and as
they're watching the debate if they like
what they're hearing they'll dial it up
and then they'll dial it down if they
don't like what they're hearing so you
can see uh overlaid when the candidates
are talking you can see the graphs
moving oh they like what they're saying
right now oh and then they're divided by
Independence Democrats and Republicans
now you would not be surprised that
whenever K Harris talks the the Democrat
line goes sh way up to the top whenever
Trump talks way it goes way down to the
bottom and vice versa Republicans up
when Trump is talking Republicans all
the way at the bottom when Kam is
talking but here's the interesting thing
where do you think The Independents are
your common sense would say somewhere in
the middle right somewhere in the middle
well didn't work out that way apparently
when Trump was talking about the economy
The Independents tracked the Republican
line
perfectly perfectly they they didn't
even basically you could barely see any
difference so The
Independents are economics
voters what do you think of that so that
that's my that's my statement of the day
I don't know if it's true I'll just put
it out there as you can you can test
this against what you see in here I say
the independent voters are the ones who
are not caring about the eating of cats
and dogs they're not caring about who
got accused of saying the thing that
made somebody mad they're not caring so
much about the Mean Tweets they're not
caring so much about anything except the
economy so maybe we're making a big
mistake to call them
Independents maybe all they are is
people who prioritize the economy above
other things and they say the rest is
garbage everything else is garbage just
give us an economy maybe stay out of
some Wars we'll be
good
so so that's interesting so that would
be a suggestion that um Trump would win
because if he's and and there is some
evidence that in Michigan for example
the New York Post is reporting that
Trump IVF proposal where where the
government would pay for your scientific
IVF in vitro fertilization so you could
have more babies and also some kind of
uh support for people with major newborn
expenses so Trump would help having
babies uh according to a new
poll uh that made Independence swing
pretty hard to his side so that would be
a second indication that there's another
thing that could move
Independence which
is can you directly help me have a baby
now the number of people who are either
using IVF or have a close family member
or friend who is using IVF is really
high now isn't it let let me ask you in
the
comments have you used IVF or do you
know somebody who's close to you who
has so just say yes if you've heard it
if you've used it yourself
planning to use it or does it have a
connection to your life at all because I
feel like it might I feel like a lot of
people would have some connection to
that
topic anyway uh you could argue that
that has some e it's an economic thing
but I think it's more it could be and I
wouldn't take too much away from this
one this one poll and this one state
over this one
issue I'm looking at a lot of yeses
coming in some NOS as well yeah so if
you look at the wall of yeses coming in
to people who have some direct or
indirect connection to IVF that tells
you it's at least you know a real topic
but secondly here's my here's my
interesting
question you the news has to fill up the
24 hours so we end up getting excited
about things that we all know are not
important because we're trying to fill
up the thing it's about memes and who
did who shook hands right and you know
who tripped on the stairs and you know
all that stuff but what is what is more
core to your human
existence than
reproduction mating mating is the core
human value so it could be that the
person who sort of accidentally stumbles
onto that wins in the landslide and
nobody knows why you know I've told you
a number of times in the past that all
of our behaviors all all of them are an
expression of our mating Instinct
because it's the only thing we're
optimized for by
Evolution if you get mating right then
you get to survive as a species
everything else doesn't matter so much
you just got to be able to mate period
just make more of you and everything
will be fine so we we evolved so that
any suggestion of anything that's in the
domain of sex or reproduction is just
automatically goes to the top of all of
our lists even if we don't know it like
e even if you're completely oblivious to
it it goes to the top of your list so
even what I'm doing right now feels to
me like an expression of my mating
Instinct I'm literally showing
off that's what I'm doing like like
right now I mean I do it for other
reasons too but the other reasons are my
conscious
reasons my conscious reasons are oh I
enjoy this topic and it's easy and I
like dealing with all of you and you
know I like the experience everything
that's my conscious reasons do you know
what my real reason is I'm showing off
I'm I'm displaying I'm just showing you
my feathers and will that increase my
mating options well if I were in The
Mating mood it would and I don't think
the fact that I'm not logically or
rationally in a mating mode allows me to
turn off the Instinct I think the
Instinct remains it's just too embedded
in my entire being
so if Trump comes up with something
that's
uh Pro extra babies that might be
different than the question of abortion
because the abortion question gets I
think you know I'm not a woman so I
can't judge this I feel like that's just
too much government control on your body
and that nobody can Ser nobody can be
okay with that at least half the country
they can't be okay with it so the F
thing could be a surprising home run
that nobody saw coming just because it's
one of the few things that Taps into
your most Basic Instinct which we act on
all day long but we're not aware of it
so this this would be the thing I'm
trying to add to the conversation is
that your rational brain and IVF don't
have any connection I mean there's a
rational you know we save money Etc
that's rational but that the real draw
of it
if if it really is moving Independence
in a big way like this one you know
unconfirmed poll is
saying this could be important it could
actually move the
election anyway I wouldn't say that's
confirmed yet but it's sort of
suggesting
that um so you know that Taylor Swift uh
endorsed kamla Harris and she did in a
very public way right after the debate
so she got maximum attention and she was
clever and she was holding her cat and
saying that she's a childless cat lady
making fun of JD Vance and uh Mike Benz
points us to NATO's YouTube channel so I
didn't even know NATO had a YouTube
channel but on on the NATO Channel where
nobody's hiding it because again it's
NATO's own
channel this this isn't somebody talking
about NATO
this is NATO's own channel and there's a
screenshot that Mike Ben shows that says
quote goal identify key actors to train
and spread desired me
messaging uh example encourage opinion
leaders to share counter IO I don't know
what IO is but content what is IO in
that context of NATO
interoperability intelligence opinion
I don't know but sounds something NATO
related all right so yeah the goal is to
identify key actors to train and spread
desired
messaging and then there was a uh photo
on that same slide right next to
identify key actors to train and spread
desired messaging and it was a photo
of Taylor
Swift it's actually Taylor Swift's photo
right right next to Nato saying that
they're that they're going to try to
bring in these personalities to help
them with their
messaging oh man
so my take on this is we've entered the
don't even need to hide it
facee it seems like the people running
the real country are not trying to hide
it and the reason is they don't need to
and here there are two reasons they
don't need to one is the news is so sat
ated with complicated stories that you
and
I have too much to worry about I can't
pick one of them out you could easily
imagine that this alone the Taylor Swift
thing would be the number one headline
story in the country oh my God NATO is
is weaponizing our celebrities against
us that would can't you imagine that
would be a headline story that people
would talk about for a month do you know
why it's not a headline story and we
don't talk about it for a month
because the things that become headlines
are not organic there are a few entities
which have close intelligence
connections which decide what the
headlines will be for all the other news
if the New York Times says this is our
big story and they hit it a few times
the other news just picks it up
Washington Post same
thing CNN maybe so the the point is if
the news can tell you what is news they
control the narrative
and everything is so complicated that
you can't do much with it yourself you
know you've seen me I follow the news
maybe because I do it literally every
day top
2% would is that fair of people who are
aware of and capable of following some
of the details of the news would I be in
the top
1% only because I do it every day not
because of my magical abilities maybe
top 1%
I don't understand the lawfare
stories I I just get them all confused
there's too many of them and there's so
many stories like that where the details
of them are are so confusing that how
could anybody understand it so as long
as the as long as whoever controls the
media decides which stories to focus on
and then they keep everything else
complicated the public is completely
neuter
do you know why there's not a big
protest about the use of uh of
of electronic voting machines do you
know why there's not uh protests in the
streets well first of all we're divided
so maybe one side doesn't mind it so
much the other is it's complicated and
they'll just tell you no the machines
are
fine well but I think they're not H we
had an expert look at them they're fine
everything's too hard to
understand yeah take
Ukraine if your story of Ukraine is uh
Putin's a monster and he's invading
countries because he's basically
Hiller if that was your view you're
you're missing out on a lot of details
about why the United States may have
always wanted to control Ukraine and
NATO's growth and the security State and
the military industrial complex and the
Maiden uh overthrow in Victoria Newland
I mean to actually
understand
Ukraine is incredibly
complicated so at this point the bad
guys can show their work right in front
of us and we'll just go ah I have so
many other things to complain about like
the national dat it just seems more
important I'll let that one go so we let
it go they can do stuff right in front
of us
now let me give you another example
where they can do it right in front of
you Daniel Dale I talked about this he
still has a
job he he ranked the the lies and the
fact check for the debate 33 to1 with
Trump lying 33 times and Harris only
once now this is an example of where
there isn't in my opinion the slightest
chance that he thought that was
real do you
disagree see I I don't think there's the
slightest chance that Daniel Dale is the
fact checker on CNN and doesn't know
what the facts
are but he scored It 33 to1 what's that
tell you well it tells me that
something's happening right in front of
you right in front of you they're doing
it right in front of you there's no way
that was organic I don't know where it
comes from I don't I don't know what
forces caused it and I'm not saying
somebody talk to him because we don't
need to do that everybody knows what
they need to do
you don't have to have a conversation
about it everybody knows so if Daniel
Dale still has a
job then they can do anything they want
right in front of you doesn't have any
consequences at
all all right so let's look at uh how
secure our elections are now that we
have a few data points we know that uh
the Democrats are massively using
lawfare against Trump and that the
Department of Justice is
corrupt um in a really deep way so could
you say that the election is
unrigged if one team has been
essentially illegitimately law faring
one candidate out of office for over a
year I would say that that would be
enough to say the election's rigged if
nothing else happened just by
that how about Dr Epstein's work in
which he is he claimed that Google is so
obviously biased and fixed it can
completely move the election dial one
One Direction or another and it always
moves it toward Democrats do you think
that he's he's got a handle on that well
we don't know because I have trouble
trusting any data or any expert at this
point but I haven't seen him be
debunked haven't seen the debunk we did
hear that his wife was killed in a
suspicious car accident right after
people warned him that he might get
killed in a suspicious
accident so everything about that
screams that he's on to something but
you know I'm not the one who can confirm
that of course we have mailin votes
massive mailin votes that suggests that
the intention is to
cheat because there's not really an
argument on the other side that you know
there was no way to vote without mail
and ballots so mail and ballots are a
signal of an intention to cheat what
about the use of voting machines which
we've been told are Totally
Secure
well um have you heard of the secure it
act so that's a proposed legislation
that would uh close the election machine
vulner what the election machine
vulnerabilities
what huh well now I'm all
confused so the elections were secure
and we know
it but there are so many vulnerabilities
in the
machines that we need legislation and
major work and a huge
budget to fix the
vulnerabilities that we've been told
don't exist or at least have not been
exploited how would anybody know that it
wasn't
exploited here's my second question that
the news will never answer you ready for
this uh I'll make you a bet the news
will never answer this question it's a
very simple question are all of the
vulnerabilities that we're talking about
and it's stuff like uh shared passwords
across
States um some password credentials are
in the code so anybody who knew what to
look for could have found it some of
them you could connect to the internet
when you shouldn't some of them have uh
old software and they think the new
software would fix some bugs in the old
software that could have caused a
vulnerability so there a whole host of
[Music]
things but are those things the types of
[Music]
things that you could always catch it if
it happened there's the key question are
these vulnerabilities which I think
there's General agreement there's lots
of them because even if you think the
machines are great you're probably still
looking to upgrade them because software
gets upgraded so
how do we know do you do you ever
remember the news telling you well it is
true that there are um potential
vulnerabilities in the voting machines
but even if somebody tried to exploit
them they would get caught now we don't
want to be in that situation of course
we'd rather they don't even have
anything to exploit but if they did
exploit them in any prior year Well we
caught them because we've got a we've
got a check in the balance to which I
say wait a minute if you could catch a
problem on a voting machine what are you
looking at to catch it does that mean
there's some parallel system where you
can look at it and say well your voting
machine total didn't match this total
because if there's an alternate system
that's more reliable and you can use it
to test whether the voting machines have
the right total shouldn't you just use
that other thing as your Source if
there's some other thing that tells you
that the vote was right use the other
thing
otherwise I would be assuming that
there's no way to know if the machine
got the right answer or
not so there's the key question if we
all know and I believe this is now
established it's now
established uh that the voting machines
have vulnerabilities that at least
potentially could be used by bad
people are they the type that if they
existed in past
elections and they got
exploited that we definitely would have
caught them and what does that look like
how exactly would you catch them I guess
it depends on the type of
exploit but they're really telling us
two opposites one there are lots of
things that need to be fixed in terms of
current vulnerabilities two the election
was Secure and we know
it can those both be true
to me those seem like
opposites if if these vulnerabilities
are the kind that you have to fix it's
sort of suggesting by by nobody saying
it that somebody could have exploited
them and gotten away with it so this
again is the news saying well we haven't
looked behind the closed door but we can
guarantee there's nothing back there how
well nobody said there's anything back
there I know but you never looked
right do do you see how obvious this
is just think about the fact that you've
been watching shows and news and reports
about this topic election Integrity for
years and and today is the first time
anybody said the only question that
mattered if somebody had already used
any of these
vulnerabilities did you definitely catch
it because the system catches that kind
of stuff
if you've never heard the answer to that
question let me tell you the answer to
that question we would have no idea if
they were exploited that is the answer
it's the most important question and
most important answer and the news on
the left and the right doesn't even ask
it what's up with
that why is this the first time you've
even heard the question am I right how
many of you your brains are exploding
right now when you say my God that is
the only important
question since we've confirmed lots of
vulnerabilities in lots of different
ways if somebody had use those
vulnerabilities which we've confirmed to
exist would they definitely have been
caught
how it's not much of a vulnerability if
you get caught every time you use it now
I suppose there' be a different kind of
vulnerability where it just takes the
machine down and you know let's say they
take the machine down in Trump territory
so that that would be maybe harder
spots all right so we got that so we got
uh let's
see um the lawfare against Trump we've
got Google who is rigged we've got
mailin voting which only has one purpose
for rigging we've got the use of voting
machines that have lots of
vulnerabilities but they can't tell us
if they've been exploited in the past
um and uh let's see oh Montgomery County
in Texas just halted their voting
machine upgrade according to John
Becker now why would you halt a software
upgrade or an improvement in your
election machines because they're
they're there to fix a a problem I mean
that's the whole point of a software
upgrade there's either a vulnerability
or something and uh they've decided not
to and I think the reason is that they
can't be sure that the upgrade will be
secure that's a good point how much time
does it take to check every upgrade to
know that it's secure and how can you
know that a new software is better than
the old software I'll bet the people who
do the upgrade can't
tell now let me inject what Dr
insensitive jerk on X says good account
to follow by the way Dr insensitive
jerk um he has lots of good statements
even though his name doesn't sound he
sounds like a troll but his trolling is
always data related you know sort of
logical data related stuff so he's
good he says the following it's funny
that anyone believes a voting machine
could be secure against the men who
designed the hardware or wrote the
software how do you make it secure
against the people who designed it
that's not a
thing it's definitely not a thing you
can't be secure against the people who
made it so and how would you know that
the people who made it are all on your
side no way you can't possibly know it
gets better uh Dr incens of jerk points
out that even reading the code won't
help because hiding exploits an innocent
looking code is literally a sport now
when he says it's literally a sport to
hide the real meaning of you code in the
code I mean he doesn't really mean that
right it's not like it's an actual
International contest where experts see
if they can be the best to hide some
code and some
code it is it's an international contest
in which they see who can do the best of
hiding malicious or just hiding code in
other
code it's literally a
contest it's the international OB
obfuscated code
contest now look at Elon Musk when he
took over
Twitter he had access to the code did he
not and when he had access the code he
was like oh I found some problems here
we corrected them and then what happened
oh uh well looks like we didn't know it
but there's some other problems but we
corrected them and then what
happened okay there's some other
problems but we got them and then what
happened okay we found some other
problems but we corrected them I think
it took him a
year just to pour through the the code
and find all the things that were
rigging the results probably a year and
and the we're talking about the best
Engineers who are experts on the
system do you think the election people
are the best
Engineers you think there are a lot of
Elon Musk who said oh I could build a
rocket to space and make a car company
or I could work 8 to5 on that election
uh machine upgrade
stuff no you can't tell by looking at
the
code all right let's see uh we got the
total media control working on one side
as we on the debate we saw the Democrats
uh game the primary so that the voters
weren't uh involved really we saw that
Biden was replaced and we see the
immigrants are being shipped in and
every attempt to make them voters to rig
the system so let's uh let's go through
the full list now so is this election
going to be fair well we see law fair
before and we'll probably see law fair
after even if Trump were to win he would
be lawfare at out of office or or at
least they would try very hard so that's
rigged uh Dr Epstein's Google research
if that's true that's rigged the mail in
votes there's really no reason for that
other than rigging the use of voting
machines they're full of vulnerabilities
we know that and we wouldn't know if
they had ever been used before for
rigging and we won't know in the future
because that's how they're
designed um let's see what else we got
uh we got the media total media control
the Democrats rigged the primary uh
replacing Biden and keeping comell
Harris from our view and then of course
the Immigrant shipped
in so that's the bad news let me get to
the good news the reason I was wearing
my swaddling blanket today is because
you guys need some good news here's some
good
news voter enthusiasm is probably all
that makes a difference in this race so
the the smart people the ones I agree
with um say that getting your base more
of them to show up is going to be way
more likely to work than getting people
to change their
minds because there's not so much mind
changing going on but you might be able
to get more people to show up now I
don't think you it's hard to get people
to show up in person because it's hard
to get somebody's you know ass off
the couch if they don't want to do it
but it might not be impossible to get
people to mail by to vote by mail so
here's what I'd do from this day on
every every time there's another Trump
meme I would put a QR code on
it and the QR
code should take you to the Pennsylvania
page where you can request a mail-in
ballot and you should know that's what
the QR code is for and it should say
Pennsylvania mail and ballot I I posted
the link to the Pennsylvania mail and
ballot because winning Pennsylvania
might be the whole game a lot of people
say
so if you wanted to just drill in on the
one lever that might move the whole
thing besides IVF which could be
surprisingly effective you put a QR code
on your memes ideally you'd want
somebody like you know Laura Trump or
Scott presler maybe Scott presler should
do this because he's doing H signups in
Pennsylvania come up with one QR code so
everybody isn't using one and you just
say put this on your
memes and then everybody is what's that
QR code for but it maybe label it you
know P Pennsylvania mail and ballot
something like
that
uh yeah there's
another
okay so that is my suggestion put a QR
code that takes you to the link for
Pennsylvania Pennsylvania mailin votes
and just put that in the corner of every
Trump Meme and you're gonna get a lot of
people getting a mail and vote how hard
is it to give somebody to fill out their
mail and vote well I'll tell you I think
the podcasters who are pro Trump should
stop their Pro uh should stop their
programs and say hey if you're watching
right now from
Pennsylvania let's fill these out
together so you know take a moment I'll
give you a minute just go find go find
your mail and ballot just find it right
now and then fill it out vote for Trump
drop it in the mail and then put it in
the comments tell me in the comments you
just filled it out so you need to make
it a group social
situation U and that could
work Linda ronat complained about Trump
going to uh I guess he's going to Tucson
and he's going to be in a stadium or a
facility that has her name on it and she
didn't like that because she doesn't
like Trump the surprising story about
this story is that Linda ronat still
alive how many of you thought Linda
ronat had already
passed I did I saw the story I like how
is she talking from Beyond the Grave
she's 78 but she's a uh she's a cat lady
uh she's she had adopted kids but didn't
have her own kids but she does have a
cat and she said in her message quote
Trump hates women immigrants and people
of
color how do all the bat sh crazy women
come to that
opinion now I
get that Trump has different views on
let's say abortion than some of the
country but where in the world do you
get that he hates any women immigrants
or people of
color that there's not ever been even a
cintilla of evidence of that he's only
ever talked about policies which are
unambiguously good for the United States
such as closing the
border and that he just has a normal
protect every life opinion whether
they're male or female fetuses somebody
who wants to save every single female
fetus isn't exactly a woman hater if he
said oh we only want to abort the female
fetuses then that would be a woman hater
right there that would be a woman
hater but no he wants to save all the
babies you know that would be his
view he wants to do IVF why because he
hates women
no oh my God how do you even come up
with that all right ladies and gentlemen
this is my show for the day uh I'm not
going to talk to the uh to the locals
people privately today because I got to
run but have a great day and I will get
back to you maybe tonight in the man
cave for the locals people but I'm not
sure yet and I will talk to you soon
thanks for
joining and I'll have one final sip
before we go
oh that was good bye for
now for