Back to episode — Episode 2611 CWSA 09/28/24
Context —
coming in. And at the same time Harris has called for a pathway to citizenship for millions of the migrants she led into the country. I don't know how you could be worse to create the biggest blunder in American history and then to top it by saying let's give them citizenship so they can also vote. The level of incompetence is way beyond anything I could call accidental. It doesn't look accidental…
← Previous segment →e of the Democrats making, effectively, legal, not technically legal in every case but effectively legalizing crime across a whole broad range of important topics. What did that do? It made the entire country unsafe and inner cities extra, extra unsafe. But at the same time that they were making criminals legal, they were making the people whose job it is to fight crime, they turned them into criminals.
So they turn the criminals into legal things like, oh yeah you could just say asylum and you could come in. Ah you could take up to $950, still technically illegal but we're not going to do much about it, right? So they legalized crime across a whole broad array of categories and then they took the people who were supposed to fight that crime and they literally turned them into criminals. Because the lawfare against Trump in my opinion is purely criminal. The J6, the degree to which they were overcharged in my opinion is just purely criminal. And they've canceled a lot of people for supporting Trump in the media and supporters and they've gone after his supporters, are trying to take him down.
And if you put all this together it looks like a plan to destroy America. It looks intentional. Now I usually avoid any kind of conspiracy theory that deep. I try to because when you just look at a bunch of patterns it's easy to convince yourself that the patterns mean more than they do. But holy hell that's a lot of pattern.
Let me give you... yeah and apparently ICE has known, which means the administration has known, they let in 663,000 people with criminal histories. 13,000 were convicted of homicide. Convicted. And they let them into the country. 16,000 for sexual assaults and 1,845 facing homicide charges.
Now speaking of Shawn Ryan, in his podcast I'm going to ask you for a favor. I watched a clip in which he had an author on just recently. Shawn Ryan did. And I didn't catch the author's name or the name of his book. So if you saw it and you probably did or maybe you could Google it for me, could you put in the comments the name of the author? Once I tell you what the topic was you'll recognize it. Suddenly he gets his due credit because the author was very, very convincing.
And here's a story that I heard from the author on Shawn Ryan's podcast. And I'm interested if you've ever heard of this before. So Obama wanted DEI and how it happened that it was everywhere in the country was somewhat clever and I'd never heard this before. So you got a president who wants DEI to be a big thing and he worked with John Brennan and also with the various government entities. And the idea was if you could get the government to push DEI and to really embrace it and also hire a lot of people for those agencies that are under the DEI umbrella, that further will make DEI a big thing.
But here's the part I didn't realize before. That if you make the government entities and agencies all DEI advocates, they're going to force companies to be DEI because those companies need approvals and need to work productively with entities within the government. So all you have to do is get the government to push DEI and then the government will push each of the agencies and people who have some control over individuals and companies can then push it themselves.
And apparently John Brennan has said it's one of his greatest accomplishments or the greatest accomplishment of his career was bringing DEI to the CIA when he was in charge of it. And I believe that over 50% of the CIA now is women and that was part of his accomplishments he says.
So when I look at DEI, which is literally illegal, that is tearing the country apart and has created a system which guarantees incompetence. Not because of the individuals, not because of anybody's genes or culture or chromosomes or DNA or anything like that. That's a separate, that's not in the conversation. It's just that the pool of applicants to fulfill DEI is smallish and if you have to do it you're going to just hire less qualified people.
And what we should see under a DEI environment within one decade, you should see every major institution crumble. That would be the prediction that you could predict on paper. And again not because of anybody's DNA, not because of anybody's race or culture, nothing to do with that. It's just that if you force a constraint on a thing that's barely working in the first place, which is the economy, the economy is always delicately between working great and failing. There's always that small difference between huge economic success and well that didn't work. And DEI is by far enough to move you from the great economic success to everything fell apart and we're not sure why. Just everything we tried to do didn't work. You made a phone call to tech support, they couldn't help you. You know, basically nothing works.
So we are in that phase. We are in the predictable stage of everything up because we have too many incompetent people in every organization and it was intentional. Now if you ask them they'd say we're trying to make the organizations look like America, make sure everybody has opportunity. I like all of that on paper. I like it all. It's just if the only way you can implement it is a bunch of managers saying I'm going to get fired unless I hire somebody who's a DEI person and even if I can't find a good one I'm gonna have to take a chance until everything falls apart. And that's where we are. Everything's falling apart and honestly it's mostly a DEI problem more than anything. It's DEI.
Now on top of that everything's more complicated every year. So in theory an average person who could do a reasonable job at something no longer can. So the complexity of everything makes it so if you're not in the top 20% of capability you're not going to be able to do anything. Everything's just too hard. You know back when you just had to milk a cow, oh almost everybody could do it. All you had to do is shoot an animal and skin it. Well most people could do it with a little bit of practice. But most people can't do most jobs now. They're just too complicated anyway.
Frank Luntz says that for the first time in a long time there are more people registered as Republicans than Democrats in the entire country. Did you see that coming? I did not see that coming. I have to admit that one snuck up on me. Because you know what it is about Republicans that really stands out and I've always loved this about conservatives and Republicans. They're really about just getting the work done. They're not so much about making sure that everybody knows it. So there's something about this number that says to me that Republicans just got to work and said we can't give up the country. If there are more Democrats than there are Republicans we're all dead. And so since the obvious solution to having more Democrats than Republicans is you register more Republicans, they did.
Now again Scott Presler gets a huge bit of credit for what he did especially in Pennsylvania but there must be a lot more people working on this. I don't know, is this the Lara Trump part of the world? I'm not sure if what she's doing is directly or indirectly related to this. Now some of this might be that the Democrats did such a bad job that people are hiding as independents because I think that happens. If Biden is just embarrassing, people will say I'm an independent. Yeah, not my fault. Sure I voted for him but now I'm independent. Now I'm independent. So some of it is fake. People just hiding because they don't want to take the heat. But it's never been this way before and it's not even that close. There's 48% Republican and 45% Democrat now.
There's still so many... wait a minute this can't be right. How's that? No that's not right. These numbers can't be right because that would mean that the independents are... no this can't be right. I thought independents were about a third of voters. Am I wrong about that? The last time I saw these numbers the independents, Democrats and Republicans were roughly about the same number and this would suggest that there are very few independents. So that can't be right.
All right I'm going to pivot. My pivot is there's something wrong wit
Context —
h these numbers. It could be that they're only comparing people who are registered one way or the other which you know I would need more detail to know if that's what's happening. But let's say that the numbers are true. What would that suggest would be the likely vote? If there really are more Republicans registered than Democrats, who would win the not the electoral vote but the overall national…
Next segment → →